ARGAN INC (AGX) FY 2025 MD&A

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This section of our 2025 Annual Report may include projections, assumptions and beliefs that are intended to be “forward-looking statements.” They should be read in light of our cautionary statement regarding “forward-looking statements” presented at the beginning of this 2025 Annual Report. The following discussion summarizes the financial position of Argan, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of January 31, 2025, and the results of their operations for Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in Item 8 of this 2025 Annual Report.

Please see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2024, that was filed with the SEC on April 11, 2024, for a discussion of financial trends, variance drivers and other significant matters for Fiscal 2024 as compared with Fiscal 2023.

Overview

The Company is primarily a construction firm that conducts operations through its wholly owned subsidiaries, GPS, APC, TRC and SMC across three distinct reportable business segments.

Power Industry Services: Through GPS and APC, we provide a full range of engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, maintenance, project development and technical consulting services to the power generation market, including the renewable energy sector, for a wide range of customers, including independent power project owners, public utilities, power plant heavy equipment suppliers and other commercial firms with significant power requirements. Projects are located in the U.S., Ireland and the U.K.

Industrial Construction Services: Through TRC, we provide primarily field services that support new plant construction and additions, maintenance turnarounds, shutdowns and emergency mobilizations for industrial plants primarily located in the Southeast region of the U.S. and that may include the fabrication, delivery and installation of steel components such as piping systems and pressure vessels.

Telecommunications Infrastructure Services: Through SMC, which conducts business as SMC Infrastructure Solutions, we provide project management, construction, installation and maintenance services to commercial, local government and federal government customers primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S.

Project Backlog

At January 31, 2025 and 2024, our consolidated project backlog amount of $1.4 billion and $0.8 billion, respectively, consisted substantially of projects within our power industry services reporting segment.

Our reported amount of project backlog at a point in time represents the total value of projects awarded to us that we consider to be firm as of that date less the amounts of revenues recognized to date on the corresponding projects. Typically, we include the total value of EPC services and other major construction contracts in project backlog upon receiving a notice to proceed from the project owner. When provided with an LNTP, we usually record only the value of the contract related to the LNTP initially. Nevertheless, the inclusion of contract values in project backlog may require management judgment based on the facts and circumstances. It is important to note that the start of new projects is primarily controlled by project owners and that delays may occur that are beyond our control.

We are committed to the construction of state-of-the-art, natural gas-fired power plants, as important elements of our country’s electricity-generation mix now and in the future. We target natural gas-fired power plant, renewable energy plant and industrial construction opportunities in the U.S., Ireland and the U.K. Our vision is to safely contribute to the construction of the energy infrastructure and state-of-the-art industrial facilities that are essential to future economic prosperity in the areas where we operate. We intend to realize this vision with motivated, creative, high-energy and customer-driven teams that are committed to delivering the best possible project results each and every time.

- 29 -

Table of Contents

Tarbert Next Generation Power Station

In January 2025, APC entered into an EPC services contract for an approximately 300 MW biofuel power plant located in County Kerry, Ireland. The Tarbert Next Generation Power Station will consist of Ansaldo Energia’s AE94.3A turbine that will run on 100% sustainable biofuels, specifically hydrotreated vegetable oil, with the potential to convert to hydrogen. The flexible power generated at the Tarbert Next Generation Power Station will help to support Ireland’s energy security while delivering a renewables-led system. Enabling works are now underway ahead of full construction commencing Fiscal 2026 with planned completion towards the end of calendar year 2027.

700 MW Combined-Cycle Project

In December 2024, GPS entered into an EPC services contract and received the corresponding FNTP with a customer for an approximately 700 MW combined-cycle natural gas-fired power plant located in the United States. Project activity commenced in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2025.

405 MW Midwest Solar Project

In April 2024, GPS executed an LNTP with a customer to construct a utility-scale solar field in Illinois with the capacity to provide 405 MW of electrical power (the “405 MW Midwest Solar Project”). In August 2024, GPS received a full release for the activities on the EPC contract. The unique, multi-phased project includes solar-tracking panels that can be stowed by remote command for expected adverse weather events and will use pre-existing transmission and utility infrastructure from a nearby retired coal power plant. Project completion is scheduled for the first half of the fiscal year ending January 31, 2027 (“Fiscal 2027”).

Trumbull Energy Center

In October 2022, GPS added to project backlog the EPC services contract value of the Trumbull Energy Center, a 950 MW natural gas-fired power plant now under construction in Lordstown, Ohio (the “Trumbull Energy Center”). We received the FNTP from the project owner, Clean Energy Future-Trumbull, LLC, in November 2022. This combined cycle power station will consist of two Siemens Energy SGT6-8000H gas-fired, high efficiency, combustion turbines with two heat recovery steam generators and a single steam turbine. Project completion is scheduled for the first quarter of Fiscal 2027.

Midwest Solar and Battery Projects

In August 2023, GPS executed LNTPs for three solar and battery projects in Illinois (the “Midwest Solar and Battery Projects”). Under the LNTPs, GPS commenced early engineering and design activities as well as procurement of major equipment for construction of state-of-the-art solar energy and battery energy storage facilities. Between January and early May 2024, GPS received FNTPs on all three of the solar and battery projects. The three projects will cumulatively represent 160 MW of electrical power and 22 MW of energy storage. Two of these projects were completed in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2025. Completion of the final project is expected in Fiscal 2026.

Louisiana LNG Facility

In June 2024, GPS entered into a subcontract and received FNTP for the installation of five 90 MW gas turbines for the dedicated supply of power to a liquified natural gas (“LNG”) facility in Louisiana. This project, led by GPS, is a collaboration with TRC and APC. Project completion is scheduled for the first half of Fiscal 2026.

Shannonbridge Power Project

APC entered into an EPC services contract with GE Vernova for the construction and commissioning of an open-cycle thermal power facility in County Offaly, Ireland, that has the capacity to generate approximately 264 MW of temporary emergency electrical power (the “Shannonbridge Power Project”). In August 2023, APC received the FNTP on this project. Substantial completion of this project, that is defined in the corresponding contract as system turnover for commissioning, occurred in March 2024, and as of January 31, 2025, no amounts related to this project remained in project backlog.

- 30 -

Table of Contents

ESB FlexGen Peaker Plants

In May 2022, APC entered into engineering and construction services contracts with the ESB to construct three 65 MW aero-derivative gas turbine flexible generation power plants in and around the city of Dublin, Ireland (“ESB FlexGen Peaker Plants”). Two of the power plants, the Poolbeg and Ringsend FlexGen Power Plants, are located on the Poolbeg Peninsula, and the Corduff FlexGen Power Plant is located in nearby Goddamendy. Substantial completion of each power facility occurred during the third quarter of Fiscal 2025, and as of January 31, 2024, no amounts related to these projects remained in project backlog.

TRC Project Backlog

As of January 31, 2025, TRC’s project backlog was approximately $53.2 million as compared to $127.5 million on January 31, 2024. For Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, TRC generated $167.6 million and $142.8 million in revenues, respectively. The increase in revenues for the current year from the comparative prior period highlights the results of our successful business development efforts in recent years with both new and recurring clients, particularly in securing larger industrial field service construction projects. Despite the decrease in the amount of TRC’s project backlog during the current year, we are encouraged by the number and size of opportunities in our project pipeline, and we expect the TRC project backlog will grow in Fiscal 2026.

Other Activity Subsequent to Year-end

In February 2025, an EPC services contract was awarded to GPS by Sandow Lakes Energy Company, LLC for a 1.2 GW ultra-efficient natural gas-fired power plant in Lee County, Texas. This project will be added to backlog upon receipt of a FNTP. Construction of this plant, which will be powered by two gas-fired turbines supplied by Siemens Energy, is scheduled to commence later this year and the project owner expects to commence power generation in 2028.

Contract Termination

In October 2021, APC UK was contracted to construct a 2 x 330 MW natural gas-fired power plant in Carrickfergus that is near Belfast, Northern Ireland, in an existing structure that was initially designed to enclose coal-fired power plant units. As previously disclosed, there were a number of challenges related to the Kilroot Project that adversely impacted our ability to execute as expected, including supply chain delays, material changes to the project, the COVID-19 omicron outbreak, the war in Ukraine and extreme weather. Unresolved variations and claims disrupted the execution and harmed the cash flow of this project.

APC UK provided 14 days’ notice to terminate as a result of project owner breaches of the contract. Those breaches were not resolved during that 14-day period, as a result of which the contract terminated on May 3, 2024. Subsequently, the project owner made a draw for the full amount of a $9.2 million irrevocable letter of credit, or on-demand performance bond, issued by the Company’s bank. This amount is now part of the open and disputed claims related to this project because APC UK and the Company believe the project owner initiated the draw without cause and, therefore, the amount should be refunded. This amount is included in accounts receivable as of January 31, 2025.

We have recognized an estimated contract loss related to the Kilroot Project in the amount of approximately $13.4 million, of which $3.4 million was recorded during Fiscal 2025 and the remainder was recorded in the prior fiscal year. APC UK has significant billable receivables, unresolved contract variations and claims for extensions of time, among other issues, related to the Kilroot Project. The project owner has asserted counterclaims that APC UK disputes. APC UK will continue to pursue all of its rights under the contract (see Note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements).

Market Outlook

Growing Power Demand

Since 2007, total annual U.S. electricity demand has fluctuated, where eight of the years during that period experienced year-over-year decreases in energy consumption. However, U.S. electricity demand has since reached its highest level in two decades, reflecting a surge in consumption driven by emerging technologies and economic shifts. One prominent driver of this surge in energy demand is the rapid increase in the number of data centers, which are expanding to support the growing adoption of AI technologies. These facilities require substantial amounts of electricity to power advanced computing infrastructure, positioning them as a major contributor to future electricity demand. Technology companies

- 31 -

Table of Contents

with AI ambitions have begun exploring deals to bring more power to the grid in order to secure long-term power contracts to address their significant electricity demand. However, advancements in AI efficiency—as highlighted by DeepSeek, a generative AI model—could reduce the power required per computation, potentially moderating the overall anticipated surge in electricity demand. If these efficiency gains outpace current expectations, the anticipated expansion of data center power needs might be significantly lower than forecasted.

Other factors contributing to the projected growth of electricity demand in the U.S. are the accelerating shift toward electric vehicles (“EVs”) and the trend of onshoring manufacturing facilities. As more drivers transition to EVs, the need for electricity to power charging networks will grow significantly, further straining grid capacity. Meanwhile, companies relocating production to the U.S. to enhance supply chain resilience are increasing the energy requirements of industrial operations. Combined, these factors underscore a growing imperative for the U.S. energy sector to adapt to rising electricity demands in the coming decades.

Keeping up with growing energy demand is further challenged by the aging fleet of traditional power facilities that are at or nearing the end of their operational life. Throughout the U.S., the risk of electricity shortages grows as the retirement of traditional power plants outpaces their replacement. While renewable energy sources like solar and wind are expanding, they often cannot provide the same level of consistent, around-the-clock power generation as the retiring fossil-fuel plants. Electric-grid operators are warning that power-generating capacity is struggling to keep up with demand, a gap that could lead to additional rolling blackouts during heat waves or other peak power periods. As demand for electricity continues to surge—driven by factors such as an increase in data center development, industrial expansion, and the increasing electrification of transportation—these closures could place even greater strain on an already burdened grid, heightening reliability concerns across multiple regions.

Natural Gas Power

The overall growth of our power business has been substantially based on the number of combined cycle and simple cycle gas-fired power plants built by us, as many coal-fired plants have been shut down in the U.S. In 2010, coal-fired power plants accounted for about 45% of net electricity generation in the U.S. For 2024, coal fueled approximately 16% of net electricity generation. It has been reported that the average age of the active plants in the coal-fired fleet approximates 45 years old with an average life span of 50 years; the last coal-fired power plant built in the U.S. was constructed in 2015. On the other hand, natural-gas fired power plants provided approximately 42% of the electricity generated by utility-scale power plants in the U.S. in 2024, representing an increase of 70% in the amount of electrical power generated by natural gas-fired power plants since 2010. Natural gas-fired power plants provided approximately 24% of net electricity generation in 2010.

There exist certain headwinds confronting a significant resurgence in the pace of planning new developments of gas-fired power plants. Persistent supply chain constraints, which delay critical equipment delivery, and interconnect challenges that complicate grid integration delay project timelines and strain the availability of project financing. In addition, various cities, counties and states have adopted clean energy and carbon-free goals or objectives with achievement expected by a certain future date, typically 10 to 30 years out.

However, there appears to be a growing realization that such carbon-free goals present risks to the reliability of the electricity grids. For example, in November 2023, Texas voters approved the $10 billion Texas Energy Fund (“TEF”), thereby establishing a pool of funds intended to provide financing to projects that will enhance grid reliability and incentivize new dispatchable power generation projects, with a significant focus on natural gas-fired power plants. Shortly thereafter, the Public Utility Commission of Texas selected 17 natural gas-fired generation projects, totaling nearly 10 GW, to advance through a due diligence review, representing $5.4 billion in potential state-backed loans. Initial disbursements for the projects are expected to begin in late 2025, with construction on several sites already underway.

Solar, Wind, and Battery Power

The net amount of electricity generation in the U.S. provided by utility-scale solar photovoltaic and wind facilities continues to rise. Together, such power facilities provided approximately 16%, 15% and 13% of the net amount of electricity generated by utility-scale power facilities in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The EIA projected that new renewable power capacity will continue to be added to the utility-scale power fleet in the U.S. at a brisk pace, attributable to declines in costs of components for renewable power plants and power storage, an increase in the scale of energy storage capacity (i.e., battery farms and other energy storage technologies), and the availability of valuable tax credits.

- 32 -

Table of Contents

Battery storage has become a critical component in integrating renewable energy into the grid, addressing the intermittency of solar and wind power. In 2024, U.S. battery storage capacity nearly doubled, with developers adding 14.3 GW to the existing 15.5 GW. This rapid expansion enhances grid reliability and flexibility, allowing excess energy generated during peak production periods to be stored and used when demand is high or production is low. The integration of battery storage systems not only supports the stability of the power grid but also contributes to the economic viability of renewable energy projects.

Declining capital costs for solar panels, wind turbines and battery storage, as well as government subsidies like those included in the IRA, were projected to result in renewables becoming increasingly cost effective compared with the alternatives when the costs of building new power capacity were considered. The EIA indicated that for 2024, of the approximately 62.8 gigawatts of new utility-scale electric-generating capacity that was planned to be added to U.S. power grids, approximately 58% was expected to come from solar facilities, and 23% from battery storage.

Nuclear Power

Over the last several decades, the number of operating nuclear reactors has declined, with only four reactors entering commercial operation in the past 30 years—the most recent being Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in Georgia, which became operational in July 2023 and April 2024, respectively. These projects faced significant cost overruns—more than twice their initial estimates—and substantial delays, prompting the industry to shift its focus toward smaller, more economical designs such as small modular reactors. There is growing interest in expanding nuclear power production due to its minimal carbon footprint, but the limited industry activity over the past three decades has created challenges in ramping up development. As a result, it is widely expected that it could take up to a decade before the nuclear sector begins actively adding new plants to the power grid at scale.

The Regulatory Landscape

President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement in January 2025 has significantly influenced the nation's energy production landscape. This move, coupled with a series of executive orders, has shifted federal policies to favor fossil fuel industries, impacting both renewable energy initiatives and the broader energy market. On his first day in office, President Trump declared a national energy emergency, aiming to boost domestic oil and gas production. This declaration has led to the suspension of certain environmental regulations, expedited approvals for fossil fuel projects, and the lifting of moratoriums on offshore drilling. The administration also established the National Energy Dominance Council to further streamline energy infrastructure projects and reduce regulatory barriers. These actions are intended to enhance energy independence and stimulate economic growth within traditional energy sectors. However, regulatory changes under the current administration are occurring at a rapid pace, which poses risks that the industry is unable to adapt in a timely manner.

In August 2022, President Biden signed the IRA, a bill that funds hundreds of billions of dollars in tax subsidies intended to combat climate change among other measures, with the receipt of the majority of the tax subsidies conditioned on the extent that taxpayers “buy American” and/or pay prevailing wages, among other requirements. Existing supply chains and skilled labor pools could lack the capacity to meet the demand that the incentives were intended to create. Therefore, the subsidies may not have provided the economic incentives to renewable and other energy project owners to the extent that was expected. Upon taking office in January 2025, President Trump initiated a 90-day review of aspects of the IRA and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. This action has paused disbursements of certain funds, including grants and loans, pending a review to ensure alignment with the new administration’s energy policies. This pause introduces additional uncertainty for ongoing and planned projects that rely on IRA incentives.

In May 2023, the Biden administration proposed new rules for the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) that were intended to drastically reduce greenhouse gases from coal- and gas-fired power plants that officials admit will cost such plants billions of dollars to comply fully by 2042. In April 2024, the EPA issued final rules that require coal-fired power plants that are expected to operate beyond 2039 to reduce their carbon emissions by 90% prior to 2032. For new gas-fired power plants, the rules require a sliding scale of carbon capture up to 90% based on the operational load of the individual power plant. Rules for existing natural gas power plants have been delayed until 2025 in response to concern that such rules could affect grid reliability. President Trump has expressed strong opposition to the EPA’s emissions-regulating rules and has pledged to abolish them.

- 33 -

Table of Contents

In June 2023, President Biden signed a bill that included reforms for certain elements of the permitting process for energy projects. Following the 2024 presidential election, President Trump has taken more significant steps to modify the permitting process. In January 2025, he signed executive orders prioritizing oil, gas, nuclear, coal, hydropower, biofuel, and critical mineral projects, while notably excluding wind and solar initiatives. These orders aim to expedite permitting for specific energy sectors by proposing changes to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) to facilitate faster approvals.

In May 2024, the Biden administration launched the Federal-State Modern Grid Deployment Initiative, a collaborative measure between the federal government and twenty-one states intended to prioritize efforts that support the adoption of modern grid solutions to expand grid capacity and build modern grid capabilities for both new and existing transmission and distribution lines.

Changes in U.S. trade policy, particularly the introduction of higher and fluctuating tariffs, have created economic uncertainty, raising concerns in the construction sector about material price inflation and delivery delays. In January 2025, the U.S. announced new tariffs on imports from several nations, including Mexico, Canada, and China. Some of these tariffs were later postponed or modified. While intended to support broader policy objectives, these tariffs could disrupt supply chains, impact trade agreements, and increase costs while limiting access to materials essential for project execution. As trade negotiations continue and new policies are introduced, the tariff situation remains fluid, adding to the unpredictability of material costs and supply chain stability. The uncertainty surrounding trade policies may deter investment in new power plant or industrial construction projects, as stakeholders assess the financial viability amid fluctuating costs.

Behind-the-Meter Power Generation

The energy sector continues to experience significant shifts driven by evolving regulatory policies, technological advancements, evolving utility rate structures, and increasing customer demand for energy resilience and sustainability. A key trend influencing the market is the growing adoption of behind-the-meter (“BTM”) power generation assets, which allow commercial, industrial, and residential customers to generate electricity on-site rather than relying solely on the traditional grid. As BTM resources increase, grid operators may require more flexible and fast-ramping natural gas plants to balance intermittent generation from solar and other distributed energy resources, creating a role for gas-fired plants as reliability assets.

The adoption of BTM power generation is accelerating among commercial businesses, particularly data centers, seeking greater energy resilience, cost control, and sustainability. Most importantly, BTM power generation enables data centers and other commercial enterprises to connect to power more quickly, bypassing lengthy interconnection processes and delays associated with grid upgrades. Many companies are investing in on-site generation, such as solar-plus-storage and combined heat and power systems, to mitigate grid reliability risks, reduce peak demand charges, and meet corporate sustainability goals. While BTM generation offers businesses greater control over their energy use, it also challenges traditional utilities, requiring adjustments in grid management and revenue models.

Outlook for Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants

We believe that the lower operating costs of natural gas-fired power plants, the higher energy generating efficiencies of modern gas turbines, and the requirements for grid resiliency should sustain the demand for modern combined cycle and simple cycle gas-fired power plants in the future. We believe that the benefits of natural gas as a source of power are compelling, especially as a complement to the deployment of solar and wind-powered energy sources, and that the future long-term prospects for natural gas-fired power plant construction remain favorable as natural gas continues to be the primary source for power generation in our country. The future availability of less carbon-intense, higher efficiency and inexpensive natural gas in the U.S. should be a significant factor in the economic assessment of future power generation capacity additions, although the pace of new opportunities emerging may be restrained and the starts of awarded EPC projects may be delayed or canceled due to the challenges described above.

The current scramble for electricity, regardless of source, may indicate that the 100% transition to renewable energy is in the distant future and has prompted, in part, renewed interest in not only carbon capture techniques, but carbon removal technologies as well. Governments, including the U.S., are taking initial steps to boost this industry. The success of this industry could reduce the climate-change fear associated with natural gas-fired power plants. We intend to execute an “all-

- 34 -

Table of Contents

of-the-above” approach in pursuing the construction of future facilities that support the energy transition, which we see as a continuation of our historical commitment to building cleaner energy plants.

International Power Markets

The foregoing discussion in this “Market Outlook” has focused on the state of the domestic power market as the EPC services business of GPS historically provides the predominant portion of our revenues. However, overseas power markets may continue to provide important new power construction opportunities for APC, especially across Ireland and the U.K.

The Irish government has issued a policy statement on the security of the electricity supply in Ireland which confirms the requirement for the development of new support technologies to deliver on its commitment to have 80% of the country’s electricity generated from renewables by 2030. The report emphasizes that this will require a combination of conventional generation (typically powered by natural gas), interconnection to other jurisdictions, demand flexibility and other technologies such as battery storage and generation from renewable gases.

Whereas in the U.K., prior to the elections in July 2024, the government had expressed support for new gas-fired power plants to offset the retirement of coal-fired plants, the retirement of aging gas plants, and the intermittency of renewable energy plants. However, with the general election in July 2024, the Labour Party, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, has shifted focus toward accelerating the transition to renewable energy while still acknowledging the role of gas as a transitional fuel.

APC is actively pursuing business opportunities for natural gas-fired power generation projects with its existing and new clients. GPS has been providing top management guidance and project management expertise to APC. Currently, APC is undergoing a comprehensive operational review, in collaboration with GPS, to enhance project management processes.

Industrial Construction Services Outlook

Industrial field services typically represent the majority of TRC’s annual revenues with the remaining revenues contributed by projects consisting primarily of metal fabrication. Although TRC has worked on projects throughout the U.S., the primary business footprint for TRC encompasses the Southeast region of the U.S. where there are many local and state governments that welcome industrial production facilities with ideal locations and with serious economic development programs and incentives. The national focus on infrastructure improvements, biotechnology advancements, energy storage and clean water have resulted in firms that are focused on these trends recently choosing TRC to participate in major construction projects in the region. Other important factors and trends include low state corporate tax rates, favorable labor migration patterns, the surface transportation infrastructure and the ready access to modern seaports.

Economic data supports our belief that TRC is ideally located in a leading manufacturing growth area of the U.S., which should continue to provide it with project opportunities going forward that will expand its business and industrial construction capabilities. Despite headwinds such as rising labor costs and skilled labor shortages, it is likely that the near-term will see a boost to construction associated with manufacturing, as well as the transportation and clean energy infrastructures, as funds from three key pieces of national legislation passed in 2021 and 2022 are still expected to flow into the industry. These bills include the Infrastructure and Jobs Act, the IRA and the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors Act, and they appear to be sustaining high construction industry confidence for the near future.

- 35 -

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

We reported net income of $85.5 million, or $6.15 per diluted share, for Fiscal 2025. For the prior fiscal year, we reported net income of $32.4 million, or $2.39 per diluted share.

The following schedule compares our operating results for Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024 (dollars in thousands):

Revenues

Power Industry Services

The revenues of the power industry services business increased by 66.5%, or $276.8 million, to $693.0 million for Fiscal 2025 compared with revenues of $416.3 million for Fiscal 2024, as the current year construction activities increased for the Midwest Solar and Battery Projects, the Trumbull Energy Center, the 405 MW Midwest Solar Project and the Louisiana LNG Facility. The increase in revenues between years was partially offset by decreased construction activities associated with the Guernsey Power Station project, the ESB FlexGen Peaker Plants, the Shannonbridge Power Project and the Kilroot Project, as those projects have concluded. The revenues of this business represented approximately 79.3% of consolidated revenues for Fiscal 2025 and 72.6% of consolidated revenues for the prior year. The project backlog amounts for the power industry services reportable segment as of January 31, 2025 and 2024 were $1.3 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively.

Industrial Construction Services

The revenues of industrial construction services increased by $24.8 million, or 17.4%, to $167.6 million for Fiscal 2025 compared with revenues of $142.8 million for Fiscal 2024 as the amounts of field services construction activities increased meaningfully between periods, partially offset by decreased supporting vessel fabrication work between periods. The revenues of this business represented approximately 19.2% of consolidated revenues for Fiscal 2025 and 24.9% of consolidated revenues for the prior fiscal year.

Telecommunications Infrastructure Services

The revenues of telecommunications infrastructure services were $13.5 million for Fiscal 2025 compared with revenues of $14.3 million for Fiscal 2024.

- 36 -

Table of Contents

Cost of Revenues

Due primarily to the increase in consolidated revenues for Fiscal 2025 compared with revenues for Fiscal 2024, consolidated cost of revenues also increased. These costs were $733.2 million and $492.5 million for Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, respectively.

Gross Profit

For Fiscal 2025, we reported a consolidated gross profit of approximately $141.0 million, which represented a gross profit percentage of approximately 16.1% of corresponding consolidated revenues. For Fiscal 2024, we reported a consolidated gross profit of approximately $80.8 million, which represented a gross profit percentage of approximately 14.1% of corresponding consolidated revenues. The gross profit percentage increased between periods primarily due to the changing mix of projects and contract types. Additionally, during Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, gross profit was negatively impacted by losses recorded on the Kilroot Project, which reduced margins by approximately $3.4 million and $10.0 million, respectively. The gross profit percentages of corresponding revenues for the power industry services, industrial construction services and telecommunications infrastructure services segments for Fiscal 2025 were 16.7%, 13.3% and 23.8%, respectively.

The gross profit percentages of corresponding revenues for the power industry services, industrial construction services and telecommunications infrastructure services segments for Fiscal 2024 were 14.1%, 12.9% and 26.5%, respectively.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $52.8 million and $44.4 million for Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, respectively, representing 6.0% and 7.7% of consolidated revenues for the corresponding periods, respectively.

Other Income, Net

For Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, the net amounts of other income were $23.0 million and $12.5 million, respectively, which represented an increase of 84.4% between the comparable periods, as the weighted average balances of investments are meaningfully higher this year, and earnings related to cash and cash equivalent balances increased during Fiscal 2025 as well. Earnings on invested funds and interest-bearing cash accounts for Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024 were $21.2 million and $14.1 million, respectively. Offsetting other income in the prior year was the wire-transfer fraud loss of $3.0 million that occurred in the first quarter of Fiscal 2024 (see Note 18 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements).

Income Tax Expense

We recorded income tax expense for Fiscal 2025 in the net amount of approximately $25.7 million primarily due to our reporting pre-tax income for financial reporting purposes in the amount of $111.2 million for the year. Our annual effective income tax rate for Fiscal 2025 was 23.2%. This tax rate differed from the statutory federal tax rate of 21% due to the unfavorable effect of state income taxes and the unfavorable effects of certain nondeductible expense amounts. Partially offsetting these unfavorable effects were the investment tax credit effect recorded in Fiscal 2025 related to our solar fund investments and the windfall benefit from stock-based compensation.

We recorded income tax expense for Fiscal 2024 in the net amount of approximately $16.6 million primarily due to our reporting pre-tax income for financial reporting purposes in the amount of $48.9 million for the year. Our annual effective income tax rate for Fiscal 2024 was 33.9%. This tax rate differed from the statutory federal tax rate of 21% due to the net operating loss of APC’s subsidiary in the U.K. that was not tax effected with benefit. Partially offsetting this unfavorable tax effect were the benefits provided by foreign tax rate differentials.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At January 31, 2025 and 2024, our balances of cash and cash equivalents were $145.3 million and $197.0 million, respectively, which represented a decrease of $51.7 million between years.

The net amount of cash provided by operating activities for Fiscal 2025 was $167.6 million. Our net income for Fiscal 2025, adjusted favorably by the net amount of non-cash income and expense items, represented a source of cash in the total amount of $99.7 million. The temporary increase in contract liabilities of $118.2 million represented a source of cash, primarily due to the net effect of the early phase of construction activities on certain projects. The increase in the combined

- 37 -

Table of Contents

level of accounts payable and accrued expenses in the amount of $66.2 million represented a meaningful source of cash during the period as well. The decrease in contract assets of $19.8 million represented a source of cash, primarily due to the completion of projects during the period. The increase of accounts receivable in the amount of $128.6 million, which represented a use of cash during the period, was due primarily to the increase in revenues during the period and timing of billings, but also related to the Kilroot Project. The increase in other assets of $7.7 million represented a use of cash during the period.

During Fiscal 2025, we used $120.7 million, net of maturities, to invest in available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities consisting primarily of U.S. Treasury notes. We also used $45.0 million, net of maturities, to invest in CDs issued by the Bank. We used $16.3 million to invest in a new solar tax credit entity and fund our remaining capital contribution obligation to a solar energy project we invested in during the prior year. We also used $6.6 million for the purchases of property, plant and equipment.

For Fiscal 2025, we used $26.1 million cash in financing activities, including $18.3 million used for the payment of regular cash dividends and $1.5 million used to repurchase shares of common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. We also used $6.3 million for share-based award settlements, which represented the net of payments of $12.7 million for withholding taxes reimbursed by shares of common stock and $6.5 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options during the period. As of January 31, 2025, there were no restrictions with respect to intercompany payments between the holding company, GPS, TRC, APC and SMC.

At January 31, 2025, a portion of our balance of cash and cash equivalents was invested in a money market fund with most of its net assets invested in cash, U.S. Treasury obligations, other obligations issued by U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises, and repurchase agreements secured by U.S. government obligations. The major portion of our domestic operating bank account balances are maintained with the Bank. We do maintain certain Euro-based bank accounts in Ireland and certain pound sterling-based bank accounts in the U.K. in support of the operations of APC.

In order to monitor the actual and necessary levels of liquidity for our business, we focus on working capital, or net liquidity, in addition to our cash balances. Our net liquidity increased by $56.5 million to $301.4 million as of January 31, 2025 from $244.9 million as of January 31, 2024, due primarily to our net income for the fiscal year, partially offset by the payment of cash dividends, common stock repurchases, and net cash paid for withholding taxes due to stock-based award net settlements. As we have no debt service, as our fixed asset acquisitions in a reporting period are typically low, and as our net liquidity includes our short-term investments and AFS investments, our levels of working capital are not subjected to the volatility that affects our levels of cash and cash equivalents.

We believe that cash on hand, our cash equivalents, cash that will be provided from the maturities of short-term investments and other debt securities and cash generated from our future operations, with or without funds available under our New Credit Agreement, will be adequate to meet our general business needs in the foreseeable future. In general, we maintain significant liquid capital in our consolidated balance sheet to ensure the maintenance of our bonding capacity and to provide parent company performance guarantees for EPC and other construction projects.

However, any significant future acquisition, investment or other unplanned cost or cash requirement, may require us to raise additional funds through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Financing Arrangements

On May 24, 2024, we executed with the Bank the New Credit Agreement with an expiration date of May 31, 2027. The New Credit Agreement supersedes the Expired Credit Agreement, reduces the base lending commitment amount from $50.0 million to $35.0 million, increases the letter of credit fees to be consistent with current market conditions, and establishes the interest rate for revolving loans at SOFR plus 1.85%. In addition to the base commitment, the new facility includes an accordion feature that allows for an additional commitment amount of $30.0 million, subject to certain conditions. We may use the borrowing ability to cover other credit instruments issued by the Bank for our use in the ordinary course of business as defined in the New Credit Agreement. Further, on May 31, 2024, we entered into a companion facility, in the amount of $25.0 million, pursuant to which the Company’s Irish subsidiary, APC, may cause the Bank’s European entity to issue letters of credit on its behalf that are secured by a blanket parent company guarantee issued by Argan to the Bank. Despite the reduction in the base amount of the credit commitment provided by the New

- 38 -

Table of Contents

Credit Agreement, the increased accordion amount and the addition of the companion facility provide us with greater flexibility in managing our credit requirements, at a potentially lower cost.

At January 31, 2025 and 2024, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under the New Credit Agreement or the Expired Credit Agreement, respectively. At January 31, 2025, there were no outstanding letters of credit issued under the credit facilities.

We have pledged the majority of the Company’s assets to secure its financing arrangements. The Bank’s consent is not required for acquisitions, divestitures, cash dividends or significant investments as long as certain conditions are met. The New Credit Agreement requires that the we comply with certain financial covenants at its fiscal year-end and at each fiscal quarter-end. The New Credit Agreement includes other terms, covenants and events of default that are customary for a credit facility of its size and nature, including a requirement to achieve positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined, over each rolling twelve-month measurement period. As of January 31, 2025, we were in compliance with the covenants and other requirements of the New Credit Agreement.

Contractual Obligations

During Fiscal 2025, there was no significant change in the nature or amounts of our contractual obligations. We estimate that the balance of such contractual obligations as of January 31, 2025 was less than $20.0 million. The two largest items in this estimate, operating leases and deferred compensation, are amounts included as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. The remainder of such obligations relate primarily to open service arrangements. Outstanding commitments represented by open purchase orders and subcontracts related to our construction contracts have not been included in the estimated amounts of contractual obligations as such amounts are expected to be funded through contract billings to customers. We do not have any significant obligations for materials or subcontracted services beyond those required to complete construction contracts awarded to us.

Performance Bonds and Guarantees

In the normal course of business and for certain major projects, we may be required to obtain surety or performance bonding, to provide parent company guarantees, or to cause the issuance of letters of credit (or some combination thereof) in order to provide performance assurances to clients on behalf of one of our subsidiaries.

If our services under a guaranteed project would not be completed or would be determined to have resulted in a material defect or other material deficiency, then we could be responsible for monetary damages or other legal remedies. As is typically required by any surety bond, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of any surety bond provided on behalf of a subsidiary for any cash payments made thereunder. The commitments under performance bonds generally end concurrently with the expiration of the related contractual obligation. Not all of our projects require bonding.

As of January 31, 2025, the estimated amount of our unsatisfied bonded performance obligations, covering all of our subsidiaries, was approximately $0.7 billion. In addition, as of January 31, 2025, the outstanding amount of bonds covering other risks, including warranty obligations and contract payment retentions related to completed activities, was $25.2 million.

When sufficient information about claims related to performance on projects would be available and monetary damages or other costs or losses would be determined to be probable, we would record such losses. As our subsidiaries are wholly owned, any actual liability related to contract performance is ordinarily reflected in the financial statement account balances determined pursuant to the Company’s accounting for contracts with customers. Any amounts that we may be required to pay in excess of the estimated costs to complete contracts in progress as of January 31, 2025 are not estimable.

Solar Energy Project Investments

We make investments in limited liability companies that make equity investments in solar energy projects that are eligible to receive energy tax credits, for which we have received substantially all of the income tax benefits associated with those investments. During Fiscal 2024, we made an investment of approximately $5.1 million cash in a solar tax credit entity, and during the first quarter of Fiscal 2025, we paid $3.3 million in cash to satisfy our remaining capital contribution obligation.

- 39 -

Table of Contents

Later in Fiscal 2025, we evaluated and entered into an investment opportunity in an additional solar tax credit entity, where we contributed $13.0 million in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2025. As of January 31, 2025, we have $11.5 million remaining of cash investment commitments related to this solar fund, which we expect to fulfill in Fiscal 2026. It is likely that we will evaluate opportunities to make other solar energy investments of this type in the future.

Development Financing

We selectively participate in power plant project development and related financing activities 1) to maintain a proprietary pipeline for future EPC services contract opportunities, 2) to secure exclusive rights to EPC contracts, and 3) to generate profits through interest income and project development success fees. As is common in our industry, EPC contractors and third parties periodically form joint ventures, limited partnerships and limited liability companies for purposes of executing a project or program for a project owner. These teaming arrangements are typically dissolved upon completion of the project or program. In addition, we may obtain interests in VIEs formed by its owners for a specific purpose. The evaluation of whether such interests represent our financial control of a VIE requires analysis and judgment.

In Fiscal 2023, we deconsolidated a VIE that had been formed for the purpose of developing a natural gas-fired power plant in Virginia (see Note 15 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). GPS had provided development financing to this special purpose entity pursuant to a promissory note. However, the project owner was unable to obtain the necessary equity financing for the project, and the special purpose entity dissolved.

We have entered into similar support arrangements with other independent parties in the past that resulted in the successful development and our construction of three separate gas-fired power plant projects. We were paid project development fees for each project and our loans to the development entities were repaid in full plus interest. In each of these cases, we deconsolidated the corresponding VIE when we were no longer the primary beneficiary.

In Fiscal 2025, we funded a loan to a special purpose entity in the amount of $5.0 million to support the development phase of a natural gas-fired power plant (see Note 18 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). We may enter into other support arrangements in the future in connection with power plant development opportunities when they arise and when we are confident that providing early financial support for the projects will lead to the award of the corresponding EPC contracts to us.

Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”)

We believe that EBITDA is a meaningful presentation that enables us to assess and compare our operating performance on a consistent basis by removing from our operating results the impacts of our capital structure, the effects of the accounting methods used to compute depreciation and amortization and the effects of operating in different income tax jurisdictions. Further, we believe that EBITDA is widely used by investors and analysts as a measure of performance.

However, as EBITDA is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we do not believe that this measure should be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, the results of our operations presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP that are included in our consolidated financial statements. In addition, our EBITDA does not necessarily represent funds available for discretionary use and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs.

The following table presents the determinations of EBITDA for Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, respectively (amounts in thousands).

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

Our consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2025 includes net deferred tax assets in the amount of approximately $0.6 million. The components of our deferred taxes are presented in Note 12 to the accompanying consolidated financial

- 40 -

Table of Contents

statements. These amounts reflect differences in the periods in which certain transactions are recognized for financial and income tax reporting purposes.

We consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Our ability to realize our deferred tax assets depends primarily upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income to allow for the realization of our deductible temporary differences. If such estimates and assumptions regarding income amounts change in the future, we may be required to record additional valuation allowances against some or all of the deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in our consolidated statement of earnings.

During Fiscal 2020, a valuation allowance in the amount of $7.1 million was established against the deferred tax asset amount created by the NOL of APC UK. During Fiscal 2023, APC UK continued a turnaround of its operating results such that we believed it had a stable earnings history upon which APC UK could reliably forecast future profitable operations. Accordingly, we reversed a portion of the corresponding allowance during Fiscal 2023 in the amount of $2.6 million. However, the unexpected difficulties with one construction project and the loss that was recorded by APC UK related to it caused management to increase the amount of the allowance by $2.1 million in Fiscal 2024. During Fiscal 2025, the valuation allowance was increased by $1.4 million related to additional operating losses incurred by APC UK during the fiscal year. As of January 31, 2025, the potential income tax benefits associated with the NOLs of APC UK are fully offset by a valuation allowance.

A deferred tax asset in the amount of $8.3 million was recorded as of January 31, 2020 associated with the income tax benefit of our domestic NOL for Fiscal 2020 without any corresponding valuation allowance. Among other changes, the CARES Act re-established a carryback period for certain losses to five years. The NOLs eligible for carryback under the CARES Act include our domestic loss for Fiscal 2020, which was approximately $39.5 million. The carryback provided a favorable rate benefit for us as the loss, which was incurred in a year where the statutory federal tax rate was 21%, has been carried back to tax years where the tax rate was higher. The net amount of this additional income tax benefit, which we recorded in Fiscal 2021, was $4.4 million. We have made the appropriate filings with the IRS requesting carryback refunds of income taxes paid in prior years. With the enactment of the CARES Act, the asset amount, which totals $12.7 million, was moved to income taxes receivable. The IRS has not completed the examination of our refund request.

At this time, we believe that the historically strong earnings performance of our power industry services segment will provide sufficient income during the years when most of our other deferred tax assets become deductible in the U.S. in order for us to realize the applicable temporary income tax differences. Accordingly, we believe that it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of significantly all of our net deferred tax assets.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those related to the areas where we have made what we consider to be particularly subjective or complex judgments in arriving at estimates and where these estimates can significantly impact our financial results under different assumptions and conditions.

These estimates, judgments, and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and equity, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities and equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results and outcomes could differ from these estimates and assumptions. We do periodically review these critical accounting policies and estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors.

We consider the accounting policies related to revenue recognition on long-term construction contracts to be most critical to the understanding of our financial position and results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenues are primarily derived from construction contracts that can span several quarters or years. We enter into EPC and other long-term construction contracts principally on the basis of competitive bids or in conjunction with our support of the development of power plant projects. The types of contracts may vary. However, the EPC contracts of our power

- 41 -

Table of Contents

industry services reporting segment, and most other large contracts awarded to our other companies, are fixed-price contracts. Revenues are recognized primarily over time as performance obligations are satisfied due to the continuous transfer of control to the project owner or other customer. The accuracy of our revenues and profit recognition in a given period depends on the accuracy of our estimates of the forecasted contract value, or transaction price, and the cost to complete the work for each project.

Central to accounting for revenues from contracts with customers is a five-step revenue recognition model that requires reporting entities to:

The guidance focuses on the transfer of the control of the goods and/or services to the customer, as opposed to the transfer of risk and rewards. Major provisions cover the determination of which goods and services are distinct and represent separate performance obligations, the appropriate treatment of variable consideration, and the evaluation of whether revenues should be recognized at a point in time or over time. In general, application of the rules requires us to make important judgments and meaningful estimates that may have significant impact on the amounts of revenues recognized by us for any reporting period.

Revenues from fixed-price contracts, including portions of estimated gross profit, are recognized as services are provided, based on costs incurred and estimated total contract costs using the cost-to-cost approach. The cost and profit estimates are re-forecasted monthly for all significant contracts pursuant to a detailed determination and review process. The results of the process are subjected to reviews by senior management with the applicable project management personnel at each subsidiary. The depth of the reviews may vary between projects depending on the percentage-of-completion for the projects, among other factors. The cost-to-cost method measures the ratio of costs incurred and accrued to date for each contract to the estimated, or forecasted, total cost for each contract at completion. This requires us to prepare on-going estimates of the forecasted cost to complete each contract as the project progresses. In preparing these estimates, we make significant judgments and assumptions about our significant costs, including materials, labor and equipment, and we evaluate contingencies based on possible schedule variances, major equipment delivery delays, construction delays, weather or other productivity factors.

Actual costs may vary from the costs we estimate. Variations from estimated contract costs, along with other risks inherent in fixed-price contracts, may result in actual revenues and gross profits differing from those we estimate and could result in losses on projects or other significant unfavorable impacts on our operating results for any fiscal quarter or year. If a current estimate of total contract cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full when determined, without regard to the percentage of completion. There are a number of factors that can contribute to changes in estimated contract costs, revenues and profitability. The most significant of these are identified in the first item included in the Risks Related to our Operational Execution section of Part I, Item 1A. of this Annual Report entitled Risk Factors.

Crucial to the compliance with the accounting standard covering the recognition of revenues on contracts with customers is the identification of the promises made to the customer by us that are included in the contract. If a promise is distinct, as that concept is defined in the accounting standard, it represents a separate performance obligation. Contracts may have multiple promises. The amounts of revenue associated with each promise are recognized when, or as, the performance obligations are satisfied. However, complex contracts may include only one performance obligation if the multiple promises are not distinct within the context of the contract. For example, if the promises that could be considered distinct are interrelated or require us to perform integration so that the customer receives a complete product, the contract is considered to include only one performance obligation. Most of our long-term contracts have a single performance obligation as the promises to transfer individual goods or services are not separately identifiable from other promises within the context of the contract. Our EPC contracts require us to deliver a complete and functioning power plant, not just functioning components.

The transaction price of a contract represents the value used to determine the amount of revenues recognized as of the balance sheet date. It may reflect amounts of variable consideration, which could be either increases or decreases to the

- 42 -

Table of Contents

transaction price. These adjustments can be made from time-to-time during the period of contract performance as circumstances evolve related to such items as variations in the scope and price of contracts, claims, incentives and liquidated damages.

We may include an estimated amount of variable consideration in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenues recognized on the particular contract will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. The Company’s determination of the amount of variable consideration to be included in the transaction price of a particular contract is based largely on an assessment of the Company’s anticipated performance and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available. The effect of any revisions to the transaction price on the amount of previously recognized revenues that is due to the addition or reduction of variable consideration is recorded currently as an adjustment to revenues on a cumulative catch-up basis. In the event that any amounts of variable consideration that are reflected in the transaction price of a contract are not resolved in the Company’s favor, there could be reductions in, or reversals of, previously recognized revenues. In most significant instances, modifications to our contracts do not represent the addition of new performance obligations.

Contract results may be impacted by estimates of the amounts of contract variations that we expect to receive. The effects of any resulting revisions to revenues and estimated costs can be determined at any time and they could be material. As of January 31, 2025 and 2024, the aggregate amounts of contract variations reflected in estimated transaction prices that were pending customer approval were $8.0 million and $8.4 million, respectively.

Substantially all of our customer contracts include the right for customers to terminate contracts for convenience as disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The value of future work that companies are contractually obligated to perform pursuant to active customer contracts should not be included in the disclosure of remaining unsatisfied performance obligations (“RUPO”) when the corresponding contracts include termination for convenience clauses without substantial penalties accruing to the customers upon such terminations. In the application of this guidance, we assess whether the nature of the work being performed under contract is largely service-based and repetitive and should be considered a succession of one-month contracts for the duration of the identified term of the contract. Predominantly, our customers contract with us to construct assets, to fabricate materials or to perform emergency maintenance or outage services where we believe a substantial penalty or cost would be incurred upon a termination for convenience. We believe that in substantially all cases, there would be substantial costs incurred by a customer if it terminated a contract with us for convenience including the costs of terminating subcontracts, canceling purchase orders, returning or otherwise disposing of delivered materials and equipment and restarting the effort with another contractor. Further, to the best of management’s knowledge, the Company has never had a customer terminate a material contract with us for convenience. Therefore, our disclosure in Note 2 of the value of RUPO on active customer contracts represents an amount based on contracts or orders received from customers that the Company believes are firm and where the parties are acting in accordance with their respective obligations.

Our long-term contracts typically have schedule dates and other performance obligations that, if not achieved, could subject us to liquidated damages. These contract requirements generally relate to specified activities that must be completed by an established date or by achievement of a specified level of output or efficiency. Each contract defines the conditions under which a project owner may make a claim for liquidated damages. The amounts of liquidated damages owed to a project owner pursuant to the terms of a contract would represent reductions of the transaction price of the corresponding contract.

At the outset of each of the Company’s contracts, the potential amounts of liquidated damages typically are not subtracted, from the transaction price as the Company believes that it has included activities in its contract plan, and has reflected the associated costs in its forecasts of completed contract costs, that will be effective in preventing such damages. Of course, circumstances may change as the Company executes the corresponding contract. The transaction price is reduced by an applicable amount when the Company no longer considers it probable that a future reversal of revenues will not occur when the matter is resolved. In general, we consider potential liquidated damages, the costs of other related items and potential mitigating factors in determining the estimates of forecasted revenues and the adequacy of our estimates of the cost to complete contracts.

- 43 -

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statement for discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.