PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU)

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

As used in this report, the terms “Peabody” or “the Company” refer to Peabody Energy Corporation or its applicable subsidiary or subsidiaries. Unless otherwise noted herein, disclosures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate only to the Company’s continuing operations.

When used in this filing, the term “ton” refers to short or net tons, equal to 2,000 pounds (907.18 kilograms), while “tonne” refers to metric tons, equal to 2,204.62 pounds (1,000 kilograms).

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes statements of the Company’s expectations, intentions, plans and beliefs that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These statements relate to future events or the Company’s future financial performance. The Company uses words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “forecast,” “project,” “should,” “estimate,” “goal,” “plan,” “outlook,” “target,” “likely,” “could,” “will,” “would,” “to be” or other similar words to identify forward-looking statements.

Without limiting the foregoing, all statements relating to the Company’s future operating results, anticipated capital expenditures, future cash flows and borrowings, and sources of funding are forward-looking statements and speak only as of the date of this report. These forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions and expectations that the Company believes in good faith to be reasonable, but are subject to a wide range of uncertainties and business risks, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in these statements. These factors are difficult to accurately predict and may be beyond the Company’s control.

When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements in this document and in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, including, but not limited to, the more detailed discussion of these factors and other factors that could affect its results contained in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” of Part I of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC on February 19, 2026. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements were made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements except as required by federal securities laws.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following discussion of Peabody’s results of operations includes references to and analysis of Adjusted EBITDA and Total Segment Costs, which are financial measures not recognized in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Adjusted EBITDA is used by the chief operating decision maker, defined as Peabody’s President and Chief Executive Officer, as the primary financial metric to measure each segment’s operating performance against expected results and to allocate resources, including capital investment in mining operations and potential expansions. Total Segment Costs is also used by management as a component of a metric to measure each segment’s operating performance.

Also included in the following discussion of Peabody’s results of operations are references to Revenue per Ton, Costs per Ton and Adjusted EBITDA Margin per Ton for each reportable segment. These metrics are used by management to measure each reportable segment’s operating performance. Management believes Costs per Ton and Adjusted EBITDA Margin per Ton best reflect controllable costs and operating results at the reportable segment level. The Company considers all measures reported on a per ton basis to be operating/statistical measures; however, the Company includes reconciliations of the related non-GAAP financial measures (Adjusted EBITDA and Total Segment Costs) in the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section contained within this Item 2.

Peabody believes non-GAAP measures are used by investors to measure its operating performance. These measures are not intended to serve as alternatives to U.S. GAAP measures of performance and may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures presented by other companies. Refer to the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section contained within this Item 2 for definitions and reconciliations to the most comparable measures under U.S. GAAP.

28

Table of Contents

Overview

Peabody is a leading producer of metallurgical and thermal coal. In 2025, Peabody sold 122.0 million tons of coal. The Company owned interests in 17 active coal mining operations located in the United States (U.S.) and Australia at June 30, 2026. Included in that count is Peabody’s 50% equity interest in Middlemount Coal Pty Ltd (Middlemount), which owns the Middlemount Mine in Queensland, Australia.

The Company reports its results of operations primarily through the following reportable segments: Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin and Other U.S. Thermal. Refer to Note 14. “Segment Information” to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding those segments and the components of the Company’s Corporate and Other category.

Pricing during the three months ended June 30, 2026 is set forth in the table below.

(1)    Spot pricing expressed per metric tonne.

(2)    Prompt month pricing expressed per short ton.

The seaborne pricing included in the table above is not necessarily indicative of the pricing the Company realized during the three months ended June 30, 2026 due to quality differentials and a portion of its seaborne sales being executed through annual and multi-year international coal supply agreements that contain provisions requiring both parties to renegotiate pricing periodically, with spot, index and quarterly sales arrangements also utilized. The Company’s typical practice is to negotiate pricing for seaborne metallurgical coal contracts on a quarterly, spot or index basis and seaborne thermal coal contracts on an annual, spot or index basis.

In the U.S., the pricing included in the table above is also not necessarily indicative of the pricing the Company realized during the three months ended June 30, 2026 since the Company generally sells coal under long-term contracts where pricing is determined based on various factors. Such long-term contracts in the U.S. may vary significantly in many respects, including price adjustment features, price reopener terms, coal quality requirements, quantity parameters, permitted sources of supply, treatment of environmental constraints, extension options, force majeure and termination and assignment provisions. Competition from alternative fuels such as natural gas and other fuel sources may also impact the Company’s realized pricing.

Within the global coal industry, supply and demand for its products and the supplies used for mining are being impacted by recent geopolitical events and changes to trade policy, including tariffs and customs regulations. As future developments related to geopolitical events and trade policy, including additional or retaliatory tariffs, delays in implementing previously announced changes or ongoing negotiations between countries, are unknown, the global coal industry data for the six months ended June 30, 2026 presented herein may not be indicative of their ultimate impacts.

29

Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, regional divergence in supply and demand fundamentals in the seaborne metallurgical coal market contributed to a 29% increase in the Premium HCC price and a 17% rise in the Premium PCI price. Weather-related interruptions and operational challenges in Australia periodically constrained export availability and provided support to Premium HCC and Premium PCI prices. Seaborne supply remained responsive to periods of price strength, with producer output recovering following disruption events. Robust blast furnace output in China and domestic coal supply constraints following a major mine accident in Shanxi Province which triggered widespread safety inspections and production suspensions, contributed to tighter domestic coking coal availability and increased Chinese imports of seaborne coal. While India remains the largest growth market for steel production, monsoon-related disruptions and softer steel margins contributed to a moderation in metallurgical coal import demand during the period. Continued geopolitical tensions, constrained availability of premium metallurgical coal products and disruptions to global trade routes contributed to ongoing volatility across energy, freight and raw material markets during the first half of 2026. Despite these headwinds, underlying steel production and industrial activity in key consuming markets continues to provide support for seaborne metallurgical coal demand.

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the seaborne thermal coal market remained supported by national government energy security policies. Elevated liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices and continued volatility across global energy markets encouraged utilities in several importing regions to consider greater coal utilization, particularly in import-dependent regions, such as Asia and Europe. Chinese power demand remained resilient, supported by rising industrial activity and seasonal requirements, while domestic coal production growth moderated import demand. In India, high levels of domestic coal output continued to limit seaborne imports, as record high electricity consumption provided underlying support for domestic production. Thermal coal prices are expected to remain sensitive to geopolitical developments affecting energy trade flows, developments in LNG markets, Indonesia’s coal policy reforms, Asian inventory levels and global weather patterns influencing power demand trends. Demand for energy from thermal coal remains an important component of the global power generation mix through the remainder of 2026 as governments and utilities continue to prioritize reliable and affordable energy supply.

In the U.S., overall electricity demand increased just under 1% year-over-year through the six months ended June 30, 2026. Through the first six months of 2026, electricity generation from thermal coal decreased year-over-year, driven by lower natural gas prices, stronger renewable generation and milder spring temperatures in coal-heavy markets in the U.S. Coal’s share of electricity generation decreased to approximately 14% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, while wind and solar’s combined generation share increased to 22% and the share of natural gas generation remained stable at approximate

[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]

Item 7.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The Company’s discussion and analysis of the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 is included herein. For discussion and analysis of the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, please refer to Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Peabody’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was filed with the SEC on February 20, 2025 and is incorporated by reference herein.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following discussion of Peabody’s results of operations includes references to and analysis of Adjusted EBITDA and Total Segment Costs, which are financial measures not recognized in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Adjusted EBITDA is used by the chief operating decision maker, defined as Peabody’s President and Chief Executive Officer, as the primary financial metric to measure each segment’s operating performance against expected results and to allocate resources, including capital investment in mining operations and potential expansions. Total Segment Costs is also used by management as a component of a metric to measure each segment’s operating performance.

Also included in the following discussion of Peabody’s results of operations are references to Revenue per Ton, Costs per Ton and Adjusted EBITDA Margin per Ton for each reportable segment. These metrics are used by management to measure each reportable segment’s operating performance. Management believes Costs per Ton and Adjusted EBITDA Margin per Ton best reflect controllable costs and operating results at the reportable segment level. The Company considers all measures reported on a per ton basis to be operating/statistical measures; however, the Company includes reconciliations of the related non-GAAP financial measures (Adjusted EBITDA and Total Segment Costs) in the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section contained within this Item 7.

Table of Contents

Peabody believes non-GAAP measures are used by investors to measure its operating performance. These measures are not intended to serve as alternatives to U.S. GAAP measures of performance and may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures presented by other companies. Refer to the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section contained within this Item 7 for definitions and reconciliations to the most comparable measures under U.S. GAAP.

Overview

In 2025, Peabody sold 122.0 million tons of coal. As of December 31, 2025, the Company reports its results of operations primarily through the following reportable segments: Seaborne Thermal, Seaborne Metallurgical, Powder River Basin and Other U.S. Thermal.

The Company’s seaborne operating platform is primarily export focused with customers spread across several countries, with a portion of its thermal and metallurgical coal sold within Australia. Generally, revenue from individual countries varies year by year based on electricity and steel demand, the strength of the global economy, governmental policies and several other factors, including those specific to each country. The Company classifies its seaborne mines within the Seaborne Thermal or Seaborne Metallurgical reportable segments based on the primary customer base and coal reserve type of each mining operation. A small portion of the coal mined by the Seaborne Thermal reportable segment is of a metallurgical grade. Similarly, a small portion of the coal mined by the Seaborne Metallurgical reportable segment is of a thermal grade. Additionally, the Company may market some of its metallurgical coal products as a thermal coal product from time to time depending on market conditions. Peabody’s Seaborne Thermal and Seaborne Metallurgical reportable segments contributed approximately 53% of the Company’s total Adjusted EBITDA from its mining operations during the year ended December 31, 2025.

The Company’s Seaborne Thermal operations consist of mines in New South Wales, Australia. The mines in that reportable segment utilize surface extraction processes to mine low-sulfur, high Btu thermal coal. Prior to September 2025, when the Wambo Underground Mine ceased production, the reportable segment also used underground extraction processes.

The Company’s Seaborne Metallurgical operations consist of mines in Queensland, Australia, one in New South Wales, Australia and one in Alabama, USA. The mines in that reportable segment utilize both surface and underground extraction processes to mine various qualities of metallurgical coal. The metallurgical coal qualities include hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal and pulverized coal injection coal.

The Company’s thermal operations in the U.S. are focused on the mining, preparation and sale of thermal coal, sold primarily to electric utilities in the U.S. under long-term contracts, with a relatively small portion sold as international exports as conditions warrant. The Company’s Powder River Basin operations consist of its mines in Wyoming. The mines in that reportable segment are characterized by surface mining extraction processes, coal with a lower sulfur content and Btu and higher customer transportation costs (due to longer shipping distances). The Company’s Other U.S. Thermal operations reflect the aggregation of its Illinois, Indiana, New Mexico and Colorado mining operations. The mines in that reportable segment are characterized by a mix of surface and underground mining extraction processes, coal with a higher sulfur content and Btu and lower customer transportation costs (due to shorter shipping distances). Geologically, the Company’s Powder River Basin operations mine sub-bituminous coal deposits and its Other U.S. Thermal operations mine both bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits. Peabody’s Powder River Basin and Other U.S. Thermal reportable segments contributed approximately 47% of the Company’s total Adjusted EBITDA from its mining operations during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Corporate and Other includes selling and administrative expenses, results from equity method investments, trading and brokerage activities, minimum charges on certain transportation-related contracts, the closure of inactive mining sites, the impact of foreign currency remeasurement and certain commercial matters.

Resource Management. As of December 31, 2025, Peabody controlled approximately 2.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves, 3.5 billion tons of coal resources and approximately 335,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The Company has an ongoing asset optimization program whereby its property management group regularly reviews these coal reserves, coal resources and surface properties for opportunities to generate earnings and cash flow through the sale or exchange of non-strategic coal reserves, coal resources and surface lands. These surface lands include acres where Peabody has completed post-mining reclamation. In addition, the Company generates revenue through royalties from coal reserves and oil and gas rights leased to third parties, farm income from surface lands under third-party contracts and lease income from surface lands under contracts with renewable energy ventures.

Table of Contents

Middlemount Mine. Peabody owns a 50% equity interest in Middlemount, which owns the Middlemount Mine in Queensland, Australia. The mine predominantly produces semi-hard coking coal and low-volatile pulverized coal injection (LV PCI) coal for sale into seaborne coal markets through Abbot Point Coal Terminal, with some capacity also secured at Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal. Mining operations first commenced at the Middlemount Mine in late 2011. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the mine sold 1.5 million and 1.3 million tons of coal, respectively (on a 50% basis).

Summary

Pricing during the year ended December 31, 2025 is set forth in the table below.

(1)    Spot pricing expressed per metric tonne.

(2)    Prompt month pricing expressed per short ton.

The seaborne pricing included in the table above is not necessarily indicative of the pricing the Company realized during the year ended December 31, 2025 due to quality differentials and a portion of its seaborne sales being executed through annual and multi-year international coal supply agreements that contain provisions requiring both parties to renegotiate pricing periodically, with spot, index and quarterly sales arrangements also utilized. The Company’s typical practice is to negotiate pricing for seaborne metallurgical coal contracts on a quarterly, spot or index basis and seaborne thermal coal contracts on an annual, spot or index basis.

In the U.S., the pricing included in the table above is also not necessarily indicative of the pricing the Company realized during the year ended December 31, 2025 since the Company generally sells coal under long-term contracts where pricing is determined based on various factors. Such long-term contracts in the U.S. may vary significantly in many respects, including price adjustment features, price reopener terms, coal quality requirements, quantity parameters, permitted sources of supply, treatment of environmental constraints, extension options, force majeure and termination and assignment provisions. Competition from alternative fuels such as natural gas and other fuel sources may also impact the Company’s realized pricing.

Within the global coal industry, supply and demand for its products and the supplies used for mining are being impacted by recent changes to trade policy, including tariffs and customs regulations. As future developments related to trade policy, including additional or retaliatory tariffs, delays in implementing previously announced changes or ongoing negotiations between countries, are unknown, the global coal industry data for the year ended December 31, 2025 presented herein may not be indicative of their ultimate impacts.

Within the seaborne metallurgical coal market, metallurgical coal prices were mixed during the year ended December 31, 2025. Globally, both steel production and pig iron production (which predominantly utilizes metallurgical coal) declined during the period. In China, lower domestic steel consumption constrained output, while producers in most other countries experienced competitive pressure from increased Chinese steel exports. India was an exception, expanding its steel making capabilities and increasing pig iron output versus the prior year. Metallurgical coal prices were influenced by lower global steel output in 2025, with premium hard coking coal prices averaging lower in 2025 than 2024. However, metallurgical coal supply curtailment events, such as wet

[Excerpt truncated for page length; the complete text is on the linked full-MD&A page.]