grepcent public filings, reorganized for comparison

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (BWIN) FY 2022 MD&A

Verbatim Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis from Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s 10-K for fiscal year 2022. Filing date: 2023-02-28. Report date: 2022-12-31. Accession: 0001781755-23-000006.

This page reproduces the company's own Item 7 MD&A text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high.

Company profile: BWIN · All MD&A years: index · Previous year: FY 2021 · Next year: FY 2023

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors and included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF 2022 FINANCIAL RESULTS

We are a rapidly growing independent insurance distribution firm delivering solutions that give our Clients the peace of mind to pursue their purpose, passion and dreams. The following is a summary of our 2022 financial results:

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $980.7 million, an increase of $413.4 million, or 73%, year over year. This increase was related to amounts attributable to Partners acquired during 2021 and 2022 prior to their having reached the twelve-month owned mark (such amounts, the “Partnership Contribution”) and organic growth. The Partnership Contribution accounted for $280.7 million of the increase to revenues and organic growth accounted for $132.6 million.

Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $1.0 billion, an increase of $412.9 million, or 69%, year over year. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to commissions, employee compensation and benefits, which grew in conjunction with our revenues and due to hiring to support our growth. We also had increases in other operating expenses, related to our continued investments in new product development and ongoing Partnership integration, and amortization costs, related to our Partnerships.

Interest expense, net, for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $71.1 million, an increase of $44.2 million, or 164%, year over year. Interest expense, net, increased as a result of the higher interest rate environment during 2022 in addition to higher average borrowings outstanding under the JPM Credit Agreement.

Other income, net, for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $26.1 million, an increase of $25.7 million year over year. Other income, net, increased as a result of a gain on interest rate caps recorded in connection with rising interest rates and market estimates for future rate increases.

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $76.7 million, an increase of $18.6 million as compared to net loss of $58.1 million in the same period of 2021.

Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $196.5 million, an increase of $83.6 million year over year. Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 20% for each of 2022 and 2021.

Organic Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $700.1 million as compared to $295.0 million for the same period of 2021. Organic Revenue Growth was $132.6 million, or 23%, for 2022 and $54.0 million, or 22%, for 2021. Refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below for reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Organic Revenue and Organic Revenue Growth to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

PARTNERSHIPS

During 2022, we completed three Partnerships for an aggregate purchase price of $413.8 million. We amended our JPM Credit Agreement to upsize the aggregate principal amount of the Revolving Facility thereunder from $475.0 million to $600.0 million to assist with funding our 2022 Partnerships. Partnerships completed during 2022 added $4.4 million of premiums, commissions and fees receivable, $223.7 million of intangible assets and $187.8 million of goodwill to the consolidated balance sheet. During 2021, we completed 16 Partnerships for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 billion. We completed a follow-on public offering for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $269.4 million and borrowed an additional $450.0 million under the Term Loan B to assist with funding our 2021 Partnerships.

Refer to Note 3 to BRP Group’s consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on the Partnerships that we have completed during 2022.

46

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 AND 2021

For a discussion of our 2020 financial results and a comparison of financial results for the years ended December 31, 2021 to 2020, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2022.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results and timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The following is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

For the Years Ended December 31,Variance
(in thousands, except percentages)20222021Amount%
Revenues:
Commissions and fees$980,720$567,290$413,43073%
Operating expenses:
Commissions, employee compensation and benefits719,445400,050319,39580%
Other operating expenses173,708102,16271,54670%
Amortization expense81,73848,72033,01868%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration32,30745,196(12,889)(29)%
Depreciation expense4,6202,7881,83266%
Total operating expenses1,011,818598,916412,90269%
Operating loss(31,098)(31,626)528(2)%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net(71,072)(26,899)(44,173)164%
Other income, net26,13742425,713n/m
Total other expense(44,935)(26,475)(18,460)
Loss before income taxes(76,033)(58,101)(17,932)31%
Income tax expense71519696n/m
Net loss(76,748)(58,120)(18,628)32%
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(34,976)(27,474)(7,502)
Net loss attributable to BRP Group$(41,772)$(30,646)$(11,126)

__________

n/m    not meaningful

Seasonality

The insurance brokerage market is seasonal and our results of operations are somewhat affected by seasonal trends. Our Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margins are typically highest in the first quarter and lowest in the fourth quarter. This variation is primarily due to fluctuations in our revenues, while overhead remains consistent throughout the year. Our revenues are generally highest in the first quarter due to a higher degree of first quarter policy commencements and renewals in Medicare and certain Middle Market lines of business such as employee benefits and commercial. In addition, a higher proportion of our first quarter revenue is derived from our highest margin businesses.

47

Partnerships can significantly impact Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margins in a given year and may increase the amount of seasonality within the business, especially results attributable to Partnerships that have not been fully integrated into our business or owned by us for a full year.

Commissions and Fees

We earn commissions and fees by facilitating the arrangement between Insurance Company Partners and individuals or businesses for the carrier to provide insurance to the insured party. Our commissions and fees are usually a percentage of the premium paid by the insured and generally depends on the type of insurance, the particular Insurance Company Partner and the nature of the services provided. Under certain arrangements with Clients, we earn pre-negotiated service fees in lieu of commissions. Additionally, we earn policy fees for acting in the capacity of an MGA and fulfilling certain administrative functions on behalf of Insurance Company Partners. We may also receive profit-sharing commissions, or straight overrides, which represent forms of variable consideration from Insurance Company Partners associated with the placement of coverage based primarily on underwriting results, but may also contain considerations for volume, growth or retention.

Commissions and fees increased by $413.4 million year over year. The increase relates to the Partnership Contribution of $280.7 million and organic growth of $132.6 million.

Major Sources of Commissions and Fees

The following table sets forth our commissions and fees by major source by amount for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:

For the Years Ended December 31,Variance
(in thousands, except percentages)20222021Amount%
Commission revenue$786,794$472,495$314,29967%
Profit-sharing revenue66,09137,39228,69977%
Consulting and service fee revenue61,24430,18231,062103%
Policy fee and installment fee revenue55,36219,90335,459178%
Other income11,2297,3183,91153%
Total commissions and fees$980,720$567,290$413,430

Commission revenue primarily represents commission revenue earned by providing insurance placement services to Clients. Commission revenue increased by $314.3 million year over year as a result of the Partnership Contribution of $237.2 million and organic growth of $77.1 million.

Profit-sharing revenue represents bonus-type revenue that is earned by us as a sales incentive provided by certain Insurance Company Partners. Profit-sharing revenue increased by $28.7 million year over year as a result of Partnership Contribution of $17.8 million and organic growth of $10.9 million.

Consulting and service fee revenue represents fees received in lieu of a commission and specialty insurance consulting revenue. Consulting and service fee revenue increased $31.1 million year over year as a result of the Partnership Contribution of $21.8 million and organic growth of $9.2 million.

Policy fee and installment fee revenue represents revenue earned by our Specialty Operating Group for acting in the capacity of an MGA and providing payment processing and services and other administrative functions on behalf of Insurance Company Partners. Policy fee and installment fee revenue increased $35.5 million year over year primarily due to organic growth.

Other income consists of other fee income and premium financing income generated across all Operating Groups as well as Medicare marketing income that is based on agreed-upon cost reimbursement for fulfilling specific targeted marketing campaigns. Other income increased $3.9 million year over year primarily due to the Partnership Contribution.

48

Commissions, Employee Compensation and Benefits

Commissions, employee compensation and benefits is our largest expense. It consists of (a) base compensation comprising salary, bonuses and benefits paid and payable to Colleagues, commissions paid to Colleagues and outside commissions paid to others; and (b) equity-based compensation associated with the grants of restricted and unrestricted stock awards to senior management, Colleagues, Risk Advisors and directors. We expect to continue to experience a general rise in commissions, employee compensation and benefits expense commensurate with expected growth in our revenue and headcount. We operate in competitive markets for human capital and need to maintain competitive compensation levels as we expand geographically and create new products and services. Our Colleague-related costs have risen as a result of the increasingly competitive market and the inflationary environment. In addition, our compensation arrangements with our Colleagues contain significant bonus or commission components driven by the results of our operations. Therefore, as we grow commissions and fees, we expect compensation costs to rise.

Commissions, employee compensation and benefits expenses increased by $319.4 million year over year. The Partnership Contribution accounted for $154.1 million of the increase to commissions, employee compensation and benefits. Share-based compensation expense increased $28.2 million as a result of equity grants awarded to all newly hired Colleagues, including those who joined us through Partnerships, and grants to reward Colleagues, including members of senior management (which also includes executive leaders, who will each be paid their entire annual bonuses for the year ended December 31, 2022 in the form of fully-vested shares of Class A common stock in April of 2023). The remaining increase in commissions, employee compensation and benefits expense can be attributed to higher commissions expense relating to our organic growth, higher compensation and benefits related to hiring to support our growth, and the inflationary environment, which has resulted in significant increases in the cost of human capital.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses include travel, accounting, legal and other professional fees, placement fees, rent, office expenses and other costs associated with our operations. Our occupancy-related costs and professional services expenses, in particular, generally increase or decrease in relative proportion to the number of our Colleagues and the overall size and scale of our business operations.

Other operating expenses increased by $71.5 million year over year related to increases in dues and subscriptions of $22.4 million from integration costs and investment in technology to support our growth, travel and entertainment of $12.6 million relating to integration of our 2021 Partnerships and our leadership and advisor conference, advertising and marketing of $9.5 million, rent expense of $8.5 million relating to expansion of our operating locations, Colleague education and welfare of $5.0 million relating to investments in our Colleagues, licenses and taxes of $4.2 million, repair and maintenance of $3.2 million, and recruiting expense of $2.2 million relating to the increased cost of human capital.

Amortization Expense

Amortization expense increased by $33.0 million year over year driven by amortization of intangible assets recorded in connection with Partnerships during 2021 and 2022.

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration

Change in fair value of contingent consideration was a $32.3 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to a $45.2 million loss for the same period of 2021. The fair value loss related to contingent consideration for 2022 was impacted by changes in growth trends of certain partners, offset in part by high market volatility and rising interest rates, which resulted in an overall higher contingent earnout liability value.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net, increased by $44.2 million year over year resulting from the high interest rate environment in addition to higher average borrowings outstanding under our JPM Credit Agreement. We expect interest expense to continue to increase during 2023 as a result of recent unprecedented interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve, which directly affect our variable rate debt.

Refer to Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk for further discussion of the impact of rising interest rates on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

49

Other Income, Net

Other income, net, increased by $25.7 million year over year, primarily as a result of a current year gain on interest rate caps of $26.2 million recorded in connection with rising interest rates and market estimates for future rate increases. The current year gain on interest rate caps includes $13.5 million realized in connection with the sale of three interest rate caps and $2.2 million realized from cash settlements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION—COMPARISON OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AT DECEMBER 31, 2022 TO DECEMBER 31, 2021.

Our total assets and total liabilities increased $585.9 million and $633.4 million, respectively, year over year. The most significant changes in assets and liabilities are described below.

Premiums, commissions and fees receivable, net increased $191.2 million as a result of revenue growth and the changes in revenue seasonality of our business given the underlying revenue streams of Partnerships.

Intangible assets, net increased $155.5 million primarily as a result of our 2022 Partnerships, which contributed $223.7 million to gross intangible assets during 2022, and software development costs of $10.1 million for infrastructure to support our business. These additions were offset in part by $81.7 million of amortization during the year.

Goodwill increased $193.3 million as a result of our 2022 Partnerships and measurement period adjustments for certain Partnerships formed in 2021.

Premiums payable to insurance companies increased $155.4 million as a result of revenue growth.

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities increased $33.5 million as a result of higher accrued compensation and benefits relating to revenue growth and an increase in the number of Colleagues, as well as higher contract liabilities relating to our revenue growth.

Related party notes payable decreased $60.0 million as a result of the payment of $61.5 million of these notes during the second quarter of 2022.

The revolving line of credit increased $470.0 million as a result of borrowings on our Revolving Facility for funding our 2022 Partnerships and general working capital purposes in 2022.

Contingent earnout liabilities increased $8.3 million resulting from an increase of $32.3 million related to fair value adjustments from Partnerships that have outperformed on our platform since the date of Partnership and issuances of $14.9 million at fair value related to our 2022 Partnerships. These increases were offset in part by $38.9 million of settlements, of which $2.1 million were noncash.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Organic Revenue, Organic Revenue Growth, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (“EPS”), are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered substitutes for GAAP measures, including commissions and fees (for Organic Revenue and Organic Revenue Growth), net income (loss) (for Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin), net income (loss) attributable to BRP Group (for Adjusted Net Income) or diluted earnings (loss) per share (for Adjusted Diluted EPS), which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP measures. These non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools, and when assessing our operating performance, you should not consider these non-GAAP financial measures in isolation or as substitutes for commissions and fees, net income (loss), net income (loss) attributable to BRP Group, diluted earnings (loss) per share or other consolidated income statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies in our industry may define or calculate these non-GAAP financial measures differently than we do, and accordingly, these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, change in fair value of contingent consideration and certain items of income and expense, including share-based compensation expense, transaction-related Partnership and integration expenses, severance, and certain non-recurring items, including those related to raising capital. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is an appropriate measure of operating performance because it eliminates the impact of income and expenses that do not relate to business performance, and that the presentation of this measure enhances an investor’s understanding of our financial performance.

50

Adjusted EBITDA Margin is Adjusted EBITDA divided by commissions and fees. Adjusted EBITDA Margin is a key metric used by management and our board of directors to assess our financial performance. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA Margin is an appropriate measure of operating performance because it eliminates the impact of income and expenses that do not relate to business performance, and that the presentation of this measure enhances an investor’s understanding of our financial performance. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA Margin is helpful in measuring profitability of operations on a consolidated level.

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin have important limitations as analytical tools. For example, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin:

•do not reflect any cash capital expenditure requirements for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future;

•do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

•do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations;

•do not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt;

•do not reflect share-based compensation expense and other non-cash charges; and

•exclude certain tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us.

We calculate Organic Revenue based on commissions and fees for the relevant period by excluding the first twelve months of commissions and fees generated from new Partners. Organic Revenue Growth is the change in Organic Revenue period-to-period, with prior period results adjusted to include commissions and fees that were excluded in the prior period because the relevant Partners had not yet reached the twelve-month owned mark, but which have reached the twelve-month owned mark in the current period. For example, revenues from a Partner acquired on June 1, 2021 are excluded from Organic Revenue for 2021. However, after June 1, 2022, results from June 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 for such Partners are compared to results from June 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 for purposes of calculating Organic Revenue Growth in 2022. Organic Revenue Growth is a key metric used by management and our board of directors to assess our financial performance. We believe that Organic Revenue and Organic Revenue Growth are appropriate measures of operating performance as they allow investors to measure, analyze and compare growth in a meaningful and consistent manner.

Adjusted Net Income is presented for the purpose of calculating Adjusted Diluted EPS. We define Adjusted Net Income as net income (loss) attributable to BRP Group adjusted for depreciation, amortization, change in fair value of contingent consideration and certain items of income and expense, including share-based compensation expense, transaction-related Partnership and integration expenses, severance, and certain non-recurring costs that, in the opinion of management, significantly affect the period-over-period assessment of operating results, and the related tax effect of those adjustments. We believe that Adjusted Net Income is an appropriate measure of operating performance because it eliminates the impact of expenses that do not relate to business performance.

Adjusted Diluted EPS measures our per share earnings excluding certain expenses as discussed above and assuming all shares of Class B common stock were exchanged for Class A common stock. Adjusted Diluted EPS is calculated as Adjusted Net Income divided by adjusted dilutive weighted-average shares outstanding. We believe Adjusted Diluted EPS is useful to investors because it enables them to better evaluate per share operating performance across reporting periods.

51

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin

The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin to net loss, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:

For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except percentages)20222021
Commissions and fees$980,720$567,290
Net loss$(76,748)$(58,120)
Adjustments to net loss:
Amortization expense81,73848,720
Interest expense, net71,07226,899
Share-based compensation47,38919,193
Transaction-related Partnership and integration expenses34,58819,182
Change in fair value of contingent consideration32,30745,196
(Gain) loss on interest rate caps(26,220)123
Depreciation expense4,6202,788
Severance1,255871
Income tax provision71519
Other(1)25,7748,038
Adjusted EBITDA$196,490$112,909
Adjusted EBITDA Margin20%20%

__________

(1)    Other addbacks to Adjusted EBITDA include certain expenses that are considered to be non-recurring or non-operational, including certain recruiting costs, remediation efforts, professional fees, litigation costs and bonuses.

Organic Revenue and Organic Revenue Growth

The following table reconciles Organic Revenue and Organic Revenue Growth to commissions and fees, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:

For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except percentages)20222021
Commissions and fees$980,720$567,290
Partnership commissions and fees(1)(280,660)(272,272)
Organic Revenue$700,060$295,018
Organic Revenue Growth(2)$132,610$54,004
Organic Revenue Growth %(2)23%22%

__________

(1)    Includes the first twelve months of such commissions and fees generated from newly acquired Partners.

(2)    Organic Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 used to calculate Organic Revenue Growth for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $567.5 million, which is adjusted to reflect revenues from Partnerships that reached the twelve-month owned mark during the year ended December 31, 2022.

52

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted EPS

The following table reconciles Adjusted Net Income to net loss attributable to BRP Group and reconciles Adjusted Diluted EPS to diluted loss per share, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures:

For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)20222021
Net loss attributable to BRP Group$(41,772)$(30,646)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(34,976)(27,474)
Amortization expense81,73848,720
Share-based compensation47,38919,193
Transaction-related Partnership and integration expenses34,58819,182
Change in fair value of contingent consideration32,30745,196
(Gain) loss on interest rate caps, net of cash settlements(24,012)123
Amortization of deferred financing costs5,1203,506
Depreciation4,6202,788
Severance1,255871
Other(1)25,7748,038
Adjusted pre-tax income132,03189,497
Adjusted income taxes(2)13,0718,860
Adjusted Net Income$118,960$80,637
Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding - diluted56,82547,588
Dilutive effect of non-vested restricted shares of Class A common stock3,5261,982
Exchange of Class B common stock(3)55,45051,811
Adjusted dilutive weighted-average shares outstanding115,801101,381
Adjusted Diluted EPS$1.03$0.80
Diluted loss per share$(0.74)$(0.64)
Effect of exchange of Class B common stock and net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests per share0.080.07
Other adjustments to loss per share1.801.46
Adjusted income taxes per share(0.11)(0.09)
Adjusted Diluted EPS$1.03$0.80

___________

(1)    Other addbacks to Adjusted Net Income include certain expenses that are considered to be non-recurring or non-operational, including certain recruiting costs, remediation efforts, professional fees, litigation costs and bonuses.

(2)    Represents corporate income taxes at assumed effective tax rate of 9.9% applied to adjusted pre-tax income.

(3)    Assumes the full exchange of Class B common stock for Class A common stock pursuant to the Amended LLC Agreement.

OPERATING GROUP RESULTS

Commissions and Fees

In the Middle Market, MainStreet and Specialty Operating Groups, the Company generates commissions and fees from insurance placement under both agency bill and direct bill arrangements. In addition, we generate profit-sharing income in each of those segments based on either the underlying book of business or performance, such as loss ratios. In the Middle Market and Specialty Operating Groups, we generate fees from service fee and consulting arrangements. Service fee arrangements are in place with certain customers in lieu of commission arrangements.

53

In the Specialty Operating Group, we generate policy fee and installment fee revenue for acting in the capacity of an MGA and fulfilling certain services on behalf of Insurance Company Partners.

In the Medicare Operating Group, we generate commissions and fees in the form of direct bill insurance placement and marketing income. Marketing income is earned through co-branded marketing campaigns with our Insurance Company Partners.

The following table sets forth our commissions and fees by Operating Group and for Corporate and Other by amount and as a percentage of our commissions and fees:

Commissions and Fees by Operating Group (in thousands, except percentages)
For the Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Percent of BusinessPercent of BusinessVariance
Operating GroupAmountAmountAmount%
Middle Market$558,77657%$363,82264%$194,95454%
Specialty307,74831%144,45525%163,293113%
MainStreet118,58112%34,3446%84,237245%
Medicare38,4574%27,3925%11,06540%
Corporate and Other(42,842)(4)%(2,723)%(40,119)n/m
$980,720$567,290$413,430

__________

n/m    not meaningful

Commissions and fees for our Middle Market Operating Group increased $195.0 million year over year as a result of the Partnership Contribution of $142.7 million and organic growth of $52.1 million. Organic growth included $43.7 million related to core commissions and fees and $8.4 million related to contingent and other revenue.

Commissions and fees for our Specialty Operating Group increased $163.3 million year over year as a result of the Partnership Contribution of $91.9 million and organic growth of $67.8 million. Organic growth included $63.9 million attributable to our renters and homeowners insurance products, of which $27.1 million is related to the QBE Program Administrator Agreement, and $3.9 million related to contingent and other revenue.

Commissions and fees for our MainStreet Operating Group increased $84.2 million year over year as a result of the Partnership Contribution of $40.8 million, intercompany revenue of $35.6 million and organic growth of $7.9 million, primarily related to base commissions and fees. Organic growth included $6.1 million related to core commissions and fees and $1.8 million related to contingent and other revenue.

Commissions and fees for our Medicare Operating Group increased $11.1 million year over year as a result of the Partnership Contribution of $5.5 million and organic growth of $4.8 million, the majority of which was related to core commissions.

The amount reported for Corporate and Other relates to the elimination of intercompany revenue. During 2022, the Middle Market Operating Group recorded intercompany commissions and fees revenue from activity with the Specialty Operating Group of $1.7 million; the Specialty Operating Group recorded intercompany commissions and fees from activity with itself of $3.7 million; the MainStreet Operating Group recorded intercompany commissions and fees from activity with the Middle Market and Specialty Operating Groups of $36.1 million; and the Medicare Operating Group recorded intercompany commissions and fees revenue from activity with itself of $1.3 million. These amounts were eliminated through Corporate and Other.

The substantial increase in intercompany commissions and fees is related to the QBE Program Administrator Agreement. A portion of the revenue recognized by the Specialty Operating Group related to this agreement is passed through to the MainStreet Operating Group, who serves as the retail agent. We expect that revenue relating to this agreement will continue to grow as we serve as the MGA on more intersegment revenue such as homeowners insurance sold through the MainStreet Operating Group.

54

Commissions, Employee Compensation and Benefits

The following table sets forth our commissions, employee compensation and benefits by Operating Group and for Corporate and Other by amount and as a percentage of our commissions, employee compensation and benefits:

Commissions, Employee Compensation and Benefits by Operating Group (in thousands, except percentages)
For the Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Percent of BusinessPercent of BusinessVariance
Operating GroupAmountAmountAmount%
Middle Market$385,49254%$234,65258%$150,84064%
Specialty218,85931%102,82426%116,035113%
MainStreet72,76310%22,8846%49,879218%
Medicare24,9693%16,3094%8,66053%
Corporate and Other17,3622%23,3816%(6,019)(26)%
$719,445$400,050$319,395

Commissions, employee compensation and benefits expenses increased across all Operating Groups year over year. The Partnership Contribution accounted for $82.0 million, $30.2 million, $37.9 million, and $3.9 million of the increase to commissions, employee compensation and benefits expenses in the Middle Market, Specialty, MainStreet and Medicare Operating Groups, respectively. The remaining increase in commissions, employee compensation and benefits expenses across all Operating Groups can be attributed to higher commissions expense relating to our organic growth, higher compensation and benefits related to continued investments in our Growth Services team to support our growth, which costs are primarily allocated among the Operating Groups. In addition, there have been significant increases in the cost of human capital in the current year as a result of the increasingly competitive market and the inflationary environment, which has impacted employee compensation and benefits costs.

Commissions, employee compensation and benefits expenses for Corporate and Other decreased year over year primarily as a result of an increase of $40.1 million in the elimination of intercompany expense, offset in part by $28.2 million of additional share-based compensation expense.

The substantial increase in intercompany commissions, employee compensation and benefits expense for 2022 is related to the QBE Program Administrator Agreement. We expect that commissions, employee compensation and benefits expense relating to this agreement will continue to grow as we serve as the MGA on more intersegment revenue such as homeowners insurance sold through the MainStreet Operating Group.

Other Operating Expenses

The following table sets forth our other operating expenses by Operating Group and for Corporate and Other by amount and as a percentage of our other operating expenses:

Other Operating Expenses by Operating Group (in thousands, except percentages)
For the Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Percent of BusinessPercent of BusinessVariance
Operating GroupAmountAmountAmount%
Middle Market$73,63842%$50,03749%$23,60147%
Specialty31,31318%13,71613%17,597128%
MainStreet17,73610%4,9705%12,766257%
Medicare7,9665%5,2895%2,67751%
Corporate and Other43,05525%28,15028%14,90553%
$173,708$102,162$71,546

55

Other operating expenses for our Middle Market Operating Group increased $23.6 million year over year, driven by higher costs for dues and subscriptions of $9.4 million from Partnership integration costs and our investment in technology to support our growth, rent expense of $5.8 million relating to expansion of our operating locations, travel and entertainment of $5.5 million relating to integration of our Partnerships, settlement expense of $2.0 million, licenses and taxes and Colleague education and welfare relating to investments in our Colleagues of $1.7 million each, and advertising and marketing of $1.3 million. These increases were partially offset by lower costs for professional fees of $2.3 million.

Other operating expenses for our Specialty Operating Group increased $17.6 million year over year, driven by higher costs for dues and subscriptions of $8.3 million from Partnership integration costs, primarily associated with the QBE Program Administrator Agreement, and investment in technology to support our growth, travel and entertainment of $2.5 million relating to integration of our Partnerships, bank charges and rent expense of $0.9 million each, bad debt expense of $0.8 million, consulting fees of $0.7 million, and licenses and taxes and Colleague education and welfare relating to investments in our Colleagues of $0.6 million each.

Other operating expenses for our MainStreet Operating Group increased $12.8 million year over year, driven by higher costs for advertising and marketing of $4.1 million, rent expense of $2.6 million relating to expansion of our operating locations, professional fees of $1.7 million, dues and subscriptions of $1.5 million from our investment in technology to support our growth, and recruiting expense of $0.7 million relating to the increased cost of human capital.

Other operating expenses for our Medicare Operating Group increased $2.7 million year over year, driven by higher costs for advertising and marketing of $1.9 million and dues and subscriptions of $0.6 million.

Other operating expenses in Corporate and Other increased $14.9 million year over year due to higher costs for travel and entertainment of $3.8 million, dues and subscriptions of $2.7 million relating to our investment in technology to support our growth, Colleague education and welfare of $2.4 million relating to investments in our Colleagues, repairs and maintenance of $2.2 million, advertising and marketing of $1.7 million and licenses and taxes of $1.5 million.

Amortization Expense

The following table sets forth our amortization by Operating Group and for Corporate and Other by amount and as a percentage of our amortization:

Amortization Expense by Operating Group (in thousands, except percentages)
For the Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Percent of BusinessPercent of BusinessVariance
Operating GroupAmountAmountAmount%
Middle Market$50,20961%$34,05670%$16,15347%
Specialty16,94621%11,32623%5,62050%
MainStreet12,80916%1,6173%11,192n/m
Medicare1,7692%1,7164%533%
Corporate and Other5%5%%
$81,738$48,720$33,018

__________

n/m    not meaningful

Amortization expense increased across our Middle Market, Specialty and MainStreet Operating Groups year over year, driven by amortization of intangible assets recorded in connection with Partnerships during 2021 and 2022. Amortization for the Medicare Operating Group was relatively flat.

56

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration

The following table sets forth our change in fair value of contingent consideration by Operating Group by amount and as a percentage of our change in fair value of contingent consideration:

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration by Operating Group (in thousands, except percentages)
For the Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Percent of BusinessPercent of BusinessVariance
Operating GroupAmountAmountAmount%
Middle Market$26,42982%$32,73573%$(6,306)(19)%
Specialty5,35416%11,88126%(6,527)(55)%
MainStreet2531%9262%(673)(73)%
Medicare2711%(346)(1)%617(178)%
$32,307$45,196$(12,889)

The change in fair value of contingent consideration for 2022 was impacted by changes in growth trends of certain partners, offset in part by high market volatility and rising interest rates, which resulted in an overall higher contingent earnout liability value.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary liquidity needs for the foreseeable future will include cash to (i) provide capital to facilitate the organic growth of our business and to fund future Partnerships, (ii) pay operating expenses, including cash compensation to our employees and expenses related to being a public company, (iii) make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, (iv) pay interest and principal due on borrowings under the JPM Credit Agreement, (v) pay contingent earnout liabilities, (vi) pay income taxes, and (vii) fund potential investments in third party businesses that support the growth of our business, which may include the sponsorship of, and a minority, non-controlling interest in, an investment fund, the purpose of which may include facilitating the establishment of additional and alternative capacity that supports the growth of our MGA of the Future business. We have historically financed our operations and funded our debt service through the sale of our insurance products and services, and we have financed significant cash needs to fund growth through the acquisition of Partners through debt and equity financing.

As of December 31, 2022, our cash and cash equivalents were $118.1 million and we had $95.0 million of available borrowing capacity on the Revolving Facility under the JPM Credit Agreement. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations and available borrowings will be sufficient to fund our working capital and meet our commitments for the next twelve months and beyond. In connection with our continuous exploration of Partnership opportunities, we will consider raising additional debt or equity financing if and as necessary to support our growth.

See Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business—Partnerships have been, and may in the future continue to be, important to our growth. We may not be able to successfully identify and acquire Partners or integrate Partners into our company, and we may become subject to certain liabilities assumed or incurred in connection with our Partnerships that could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.”

JPM Credit Agreement

As of December 31, 2021, our JPM Credit Agreement provided for senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of $1.325 billion, which consisted of (i) a term loan facility in the principal amount of $850.0 million maturing in October 2027 (the “Term Loan B”) and (ii) a revolving credit facility with commitments in an aggregate principal amount of $475.0 million maturing in 2025 (the “Revolving Facility”).

On March 28, 2022, BRP entered into Amendment No. 5 to the JPM Credit Agreement, under which (i) the aggregate principal commitment amount of the Revolving Facility was increased from $475.0 million to $600.0 million and (ii) the interest rate on the Revolving Facility changed to the SOFR, plus a credit spread adjustment of 10 bps, plus an amount between 200 bps and 300 bps based on the total net leverage ratio, (iii) the total net leverage ratio covenant increased to 7.0x consolidated EBITDA and (iv) the maturity of the Revolving Facility was extended to April 1, 2027. The other terms of the Revolving Facility and the terms of the Term Loan B remained unchanged. Amendment No. 5 to the JPM Credit Agreement provided us incremental capacity to assist in funding our Partnership pipeline during 2022 with a reduction in our cost of capital.

57

The Term Loan B bears interest at LIBOR plus 350 bps with a LIBOR floor of 50 bps. The applicable interest rate on the Term Loan B at December 31, 2022 was 7.79%. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility accrue interest at SOFR plus 210 bps to SOFR plus 310 bps based on total net leverage ratio. BRP will pay a letter of credit fee equal to the margin then in effect with respect to SOFR loans under the Revolving Facility multiplied by the daily amount available to be drawn under any letter of credit, a fronting fee and any customary documentary and processing charges for any letter of credit issued under the JPM Credit Agreement. The outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Facility of $505.0 million had an applicable interest rate of 7.41% at December 31, 2022. The Revolving Facility is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.40% on the unused capacity at December 31, 2022.

We have entered into interest rate cap agreements to limit the potential impact of interest rate changes on cash flows. The interest rate caps limit the variability of the base rate to the amount of the cap. The interest rate cap agreements in place at December 31, 2022 mitigate the interest rate volatility on $300.0 million to a maximum base rate of 1.50% and mitigate the interest rate volatility on $1.2 billion of debt to a maximum base rate of 7.00%.

The outstanding principal balance on the Term Loan B of $838.1 million at December 31, 2022 is required to be repaid in equal quarterly installments equal to approximately 0.2506% of the original principal amount of the Term Loan B, the balance of which is due at maturity. Outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility are not subject to amortization.

The Revolving Facility and the New Term Loans are collateralized by a first priority lien on substantially all the assets of BRP, including a pledge of all equity securities of certain of its subsidiaries. The JPM Credit Agreement contains covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to make certain restricted payments, incur additional debt, engage in certain asset sales, mergers, acquisitions or similar transactions, create liens on assets, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, change our business, make certain investments or restrict BRP’s ability to make dividends or other distributions to BRP Group. In addition, the JPM Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring us to maintain our Total First Lien Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the JPM Credit Agreement) at or below 7.00 to 1.00.

Sources and Uses of Cash

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated:

For the Years Ended December 31,Variance
(in thousands)20222021
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$(2,462)$40,129$(42,591)
Net cash used in investing activities(414,357)(678,473)264,116
Net cash provided by financing activities419,553724,059(304,506)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash2,73485,715(82,981)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year227,737142,02285,715
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$230,471$227,737$2,734

Operating Activities

The primary sources and uses of cash for operating activities are net income (loss) adjusted for non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities, or operating working capital, and payment of contingent earnout consideration. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $42.6 million year over year driven by an increase in cash payments for contingent earnout consideration in excess of the liability recognized at the acquisition date of $45.1 million from Partnerships that have outperformed on our platform since the date of Partnership. An increase in premiums, commissions and fees receivable of $118.5 million also reduces cash as a result of revenue growth and the changes in revenue seasonality of our business given the underlying revenue streams of Partnerships. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in cash from a higher balance in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $118.2 million related, in part, to the aforementioned revenue growth and changes in seasonality of our business.

Investing Activities

The primary sources and uses of cash for investing activities relate to cash consideration paid to fund Partnerships and other investments to grow our business. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $264.1 million year over year driven by a decrease in cash consideration paid for Partnership activity of $280.0 million due to fewer Partnerships completed during 2022, offset in part by an increase in capital expenditures of $16.7 million as a result of software development projects for infrastructure to support our business, including key customer relationship management software, and other purchases to support our growth.

58

Financing Activities

The primary sources and uses of cash for financing activities relate to the issuance of our Class A common stock; debt servicing costs in connection with the JPM Credit Agreement, as well as purchases, sales and settlements of interest rate caps to mitigate interest rate volatility on that debt; payment of contingent earnout consideration; and other equity transactions. Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $304.5 million year over year driven by a decrease in net proceeds of $268.3 million from an equity raise completed during 2021, an increase in payments of contingent earnout consideration up to the amount of purchase price accrual of $40.6 million and a decrease in net borrowings on our credit facilities of $9.3 million. This activity was partially offset by an increase in cash from interest rate cap activity of $23.9 million.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table represents our contractual obligations and commitments, aggregated by type, at December 31, 2022:

Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)TotalLess than 1 year1-3 years3-5 yearsMore than 5 years
Operating leases(1)$120,222$18,776$37,945$33,250$30,251
Debt obligations payable(2)1,806,995110,891219,7931,476,311
Maximum future acquisition contingency payments(3)954,264132,513811,75110,000
USF Grant4,7405401,7041,696800
Total$2,886,221$262,720$1,071,193$1,521,257$31,051

__________

(1)    Represents noncancelable operating leases for our facilities. Operating lease expense was $19.9 million and $13.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(2)    Represents scheduled debt obligation and interest payments under the JPM Credit Agreement.

(3)    Includes $266.9 million of current and non-current estimated contingent earnout liabilities at December 31, 2022.

Our contractual obligations and commitments are comprised of operating lease obligations, principal and interest payments on our borrowings under the JPM Credit Agreement, potential payments of contingent earnout liabilities and our commitment to the University of South Florida (“USF”).

Our operating lease obligations represent noncancelable agreements for our corporate headquarters and office space for our insurance brokerage business. Our operating lease agreements expire through December 2030. These obligations do not include leases with an initial term of 12 months or less, which are expensed as incurred. We may extend, terminate or otherwise modify or sub-lease facilities as needed to best suit the needs of our business. The lease term is the non-cancelable period of the lease and includes options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that an option will be exercised.

Borrowings under our JPM Credit Agreement include $838.1 million under the Term Loan B and $505.0 million on the Revolving Facility. Interest payable on outstanding borrowings on the Term Loan B and Revolving Facility in the table above was calculated based on applicable interest rates at December 31, 2022 of 7.79% and 7.41%, respectively, through their respective expiration dates of October 2027 and April 2027.

Substantially all of our Partnerships and certain acquisitions of select books of business that do not constitute a complete business enterprise include contractual earnout provisions. We record an estimation of the fair value of the contingent earnout obligations at the Partnership date as a component of the consideration paid. Our contingent earnout obligations are measured at fair value at each reporting period based on the present value of the expected future payments to be made to Partners in accordance with the provisions outlined in the respective purchase agreements. The recorded obligations are based on estimates of the Partners' future performance using financial projections for the earnout period. The maximum future contingent payment obligation at December 31, 2022 was $954.3 million, of which $63.1 million must be settled in cash and the remaining $891.2 million can be settled in cash or stock at our option. The aggregate estimated contingent earnout liabilities included on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2022 was $266.9 million, of which $23.9 million must be settled in cash and the remaining $243.0 million can be settled in cash or stock at our option.

As of December 31, 2022, we have a commitment to USF to donate an aggregate $4.7 million through October 2028. The gift will provide support for the School of Risk Management and Insurance in the USF Muma College of Business. It is currently anticipated that Lowry Baldwin, our Board Chair, will fund half of this commitment.

59

Effects of Inflation

Certain of our lease agreements feature annual rent escalations either fixed or based on a consumer price index or other index, which, historically, have not had a material impact on our results of operations, including our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Given the recent rise in inflation, we anticipate the inflation rate increase for the upcoming year to be higher than those of past years. Despite this anticipated increase, we do not anticipate the inflation rate increase for 2023 to have a material impact on our results of operations. We have monitored and will continue to monitor the components of compensation costs and operating expenses for the potential impact of inflation.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not invest in any off-balance sheet vehicles that provide liquidity, capital resources, market or credit risk support, or engage in any activities that expose us to any liability that is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements except for those described under this Liquidity and Capital Resources section.

Dividend Policy

Assuming BRP makes distributions to its members in any given year, the determination to pay dividends, if any, to our Class A common stockholders out of the portion, if any, of such distributions remaining after our payment of taxes, Tax Receivable Agreement payments and expenses (any such portion, an “excess distribution”) will be made at the sole discretion of our board of directors. Our board of directors may change our dividend policy at any time. See Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Dividend Policy.

Tax Receivable Agreement

On October 28, 2019, BRP Group entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with BRP’s LLC Members that provides for the payment by BRP Group to BRP’s LLC Members of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that BRP Group actually realizes as a result of (i) any increase in tax basis in BRP assets resulting from (a) previous acquisitions by BRP Group of BRP’s LLC Units from BRP’s LLC Members, (b) the acquisition of LLC Units from BRP’s LLC Members using the net proceeds from any future offering, (c) redemptions or exchanges by BRP’s LLC Members of LLC Units and the corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock for shares of Class A common stock or cash or (d) payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and (ii) tax benefits related to imputed interest resulting from payments made under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

Holders of BRP’s LLC Units (other than BRP Group) may, subject to certain conditions and transfer restrictions described above, redeem or exchange their LLC Units for shares of Class A common stock of BRP Group on a one-for-one basis. BRP intends to make an election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder (the “Code”) effective for each taxable year in which a redemption or exchange of LLC Units for shares of Class A common stock occurs, which is expected to result in increases to the tax basis of the assets of BRP at the time of a redemption or exchange of LLC Units. The redemptions or exchanges are expected to result in increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of BRP. These increases in tax basis may reduce the amount of tax that BRP Group would otherwise be required to pay in the future. We have entered into a Tax Receivable Agreement with BRP’s LLC Members that provides for the payment by us to BRP’s LLC Members of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we actually realize as a result of (i) any increase in tax basis in BRP Group’s assets resulting from (a) the purchase of LLC Units from any of BRP’s LLC Members using the net proceeds from any future offering, (b) redemptions or exchanges by BRP’s LLC Members of LLC Units for shares of our Class A common stock or (c) payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and (ii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed arising as a result of payments made under the Tax Receivable Agreement. This payment obligation is an obligation of BRP Group and not of BRP. For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, the cash tax savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the actual income tax liability of BRP Group (calculated with certain assumptions) to the amount of such taxes that BRP Group would have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of BRP as a result of the redemptions or exchanges and had BRP Group not entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement. Estimating the amount of payments that may be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement is by its nature imprecise, insofar as the calculation of amounts payable depends on a variety of factors. While the actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of redemptions or exchanges, the price of shares of our Class A common stock at the time of the redemption or exchange, the extent to which such redemptions or exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of our income, the tax rates then applicable and the portion of our payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement constituting imputed interest. We account for the effects of these increases in tax basis and associated payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement arising from future redemptions or exchanges as follows:

60

•we record an increase in deferred tax assets for the estimated income tax effects of the increases in tax basis based on enacted federal and state tax rates at the date of the redemption or exchange;

•to the extent we estimate that we will not realize the full benefit represented by the deferred tax asset, based on an analysis that will consider, among other things, our expectation of future earnings, we reduce the deferred tax asset with a valuation allowance; and

•we record 85% of the estimated realizable tax benefit (which is the recorded deferred tax asset less any recorded valuation allowance) as an increase to the liability due under the Tax Receivable Agreement and the remaining 15% of the estimated realizable tax benefit as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

All of the effects of changes in any of our estimates after the date of the redemption or exchange will be included in net income. Similarly, the effect of subsequent changes in the enacted tax rates will be included in net income.

During 2022, we exchanged 1,841,134 LLC Units of BRP on a one-for-one basis for shares of BRP Group's Class A common stock and cancelled the corresponding shares of BRP Group's Class B common stock. We receive an increase in our share of the tax basis in the net assets of BRP due to the interests being redeemed. We have assessed the realizability of the net deferred tax assets and in that analysis have considered the relevant positive and negative evidence available to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. We have recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets at BRP Group as of December 31, 2022, which will be maintained until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances.

Deferred Tax Assets

To determine the realizability of our deferred tax assets, we analyzed if the Company was in a cumulative pre-tax income or loss position over a three-year period (2020, 2021 and 2022). Based on the analysis, the Company is in a pre-tax book loss position, and therefore we have determined that its deferred tax assets are not more likely than not to be realized. Accordingly, we maintain a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. As the Company emerges from its cumulative loss position, we will reassess the realizability of our deferred tax assets and the necessity for a full valuation allowance.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Please refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements that may impact us.

61

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on historical experience, known or expected trends, independent valuations and other factors we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Our most critical accounting policies and estimates, as discussed below, govern the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Commission revenue is earned at a point in time upon the effective date of bound insurance coverage, as no performance obligation exists after coverage is bound. The Company makes its best estimate of direct bill commissions at the policy effective date, particularly in employee benefits within the Middle Market Operating Group, which is subject to change based on enrollment and other factors over the policy period.

Commissions revenue is recorded net of an allowance for estimated policy cancellations. The allowance for estimated policy cancellations is determined based on an evaluation of historical and current cancellation data.

We are entitled to commissions each year for multi-year Medicare contracts. We are required to estimate the total expected value of future renewal commissions for all new policies in the year in effect. A risk of significant reversal exists for renewal policies and is influenced by external factors outside of our control including (1) policyholder discretion over plans and Insurance Company Partner relationships, (2) political influence, and (3) a contractual provision, which limits our right to receive renewal commissions to ongoing compliance and regulatory approval of the relevant Insurance Company Partner and compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Profit-sharing commissions represent a form of variable consideration, which includes additional commissions over base commissions received from Insurance Company Partners. A constraint of variable consideration is necessary when commissions and fees are subject to significant reversal. Profit-sharing commissions associated with loss performance are uncertain, and therefore, are subject to significant reversal as loss data remains subject to material change. Management estimates profit-sharing commissions using historical outcomes and known trends impacting premium volume or loss ratios, subject to a constraint. The constraint is relieved when management estimates commissions and fees that are not subject to significant reversal, which often coincides with the earlier of written notification from the Insurance Company Partner that the target has been achieved or cash collection. Year-end amounts incorporate estimates subject to a constraint or where applicable, are based on confirmation from Insurance Company Partners after calculation of premium volume or loss ratios that are impacted by catastrophic losses.

Costs to obtain contracts includes compensation in the form of producer commissions paid on new business. These incremental costs are capitalized as deferred commission expense and amortized over five years, which represents management’s estimate of the average period over which a Client maintains its initial coverage relationship with the original Insurance Company Partner.

The nature of estimates used in recognizing commissions and fees revenue do not involve a significant level of subjectivity, judgment, or estimation uncertainty that could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations.

We have determined that there are significant judgments and uncertainties included in the application of guidance for valuation of acquired relationships; impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill; valuation of contingent consideration; share-based compensation related to performance-based restricted stock unit awards; and valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The nature of the estimates and assumptions used and the impact the estimates and assumptions could have on our actual results are discussed in the tables below.

62

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Valuation of Acquired Relationships
We acquire significant intangible assets in connection with our strategic acquisitions of a business. The valuation of the acquired business includes determining the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date. We anticipate that for most acquisitions, we will exercise significant judgment in estimating the fair value of intangible assets. In a typical acquisition, acquired relationships are our most significant definite-lived intangible asset. In valuing these relationships, we engage a third-party valuation expert to fair value these assets using a version of the income approach known as the “excess earnings method.” The excess earnings method uses a discounted cash flow approach that is derived from historical information, future revenue and operating profit margins, contributory asset charges, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. We consider this approach the most appropriate valuation technique because the inherent value of these assets is their ability to generate current and future income.Future revenue growth, future operating performance margin as a percentage of revenues, attrition rate, and discount rate applied are the significant estimates used in the excess earnings method to determine the fair value of the relationships. These estimates are influenced by many factors, including historical financial information, estimated retention rates, and management's expectations for future growth as a combined company. Another estimate that impacts the valuation is the contributory charge for (i) the acquired workforce, which involves management assumptions based on historical experience, including interview time and new hire productivity, and (ii) the use of trade names or technology, which involves the selection of an appropriate royalty rate for the use of these intangible assets. The estimated life is determined by calculating the number of years necessary to obtain 95% of the value of the discounted cash flows of the relationships and is directly tied to the accuracy of the above assumptions.We have not made any changes in the accounting methodology used to determine the fair value of relationships during the last three years. If the subsequent actual results and updated projections of the underlying business activity change compared with the assumptions and projections used to develop the values of the identifiable intangible assets, then we could record material impairment losses. With all other assumptions held constant, a 10% increase in the calculated fair value of the Westwood acquired relationships would increase our annual amortization expense by $0.7 million in 2022. See the “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” critical accounting estimate for information about impairment evaluations.

63

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate our amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. These events and circumstances include, but are not limited to: higher than expected attrition for relationships; a current expectation that a long-lived asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, such as when we classify a business as held for sale; a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which we use a long-lived asset; or a change in the physical condition of a long-lived asset. Undiscounted cash flow analyses are used to determine if impairment exists; if impairment is determined to exist, the loss is calculated based on estimated fair value.Our impairment evaluations require us to apply judgment in determining whether a triggering event has occurred, including the evaluation of whether it is more-likely-than-not that a long-lived asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. Incorrect estimation of useful lives may result in inaccurate depreciation and amortization charges over future periods leading to future impairment. Our impairment loss calculations contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows.During the last three years, we have not made any changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate the impairment of long-lived assets or to estimate the useful lives of our long-lived assets. At December 31, 2022, we had $1.1 billion of intangible assets, which are included in each of our reporting units at the following amounts: Middle Market—$725.4 million Specialty—$129.3 million MainStreet—$209.8 million Medicare—$32.4 million We performed a qualitative analysis of each of our reporting units as of October 1, 2022 and determined that there were no events or changes in circumstances that had occurred to indicate that the carrying amount of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable. Therefore, we concluded that there were no indicators of impairment.
Impairment of Goodwill
Goodwill is not amortized but rather tested at least annually for impairment, or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more-likely-than-not that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which represents the operating segment. Goodwill is tested for impairment by either performing a qualitative evaluation or a quantitative test. The qualitative evaluation is an assessment of factors to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. We may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment for some or all of our reporting units and instead perform a quantitative impairment test. We estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of the income approach and the market approach. The income approach incorporates the use of a discounted cash flow method in which the estimated future cash flows and terminal value are calculated for each reporting unit and then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate.Our impairment evaluations require us to apply judgment in determining whether a triggering event has occurred. The valuation of our reporting units requires significant judgment in evaluation of recent indicators of market activity and estimated future cash flows, discount rates, and other factors. Our impairment analyses contain inherent uncertainties due to uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact anticipated future economic and operating conditions. In making these estimates, the weighted-average cost of capital is utilized to calculate the present value of future cash flows and terminal value. Many variables go into estimating future cash flows, including estimates of our future revenue growth and operating results. When estimating our projected revenue growth and future operating results, we consider industry trends, economic data, and our competitive advantage. The market approach estimates fair value of a reporting unit by using market comparables for reasonably similar public companies.During the last three years, we have not made any changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of goodwill. At December 31, 2022, we had $1.4 billion of goodwill. Our goodwill is included in each of our Operating Groups at the following amounts: Middle Market — $906.1 million Specialty — $271.4 million MainStreet — $213.6 million Medicare — $30.9 million A quantitative goodwill impairment analysis was performed for each of our reporting units as of October 1, 2022. Based on these studies, the implied fair value of each of our reporting units was substantially in excess of its carrying value. Therefore, we concluded there were no indicators of impairment. A 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of any of our reporting units would not have resulted in a different conclusion.

64

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Valuation of Contingent Consideration
Substantially all of our Partnerships and certain acquisitions of select books of business that do not constitute a complete business enterprise include contingent consideration arrangements, which are based on the acquired company achieving thresholds related to revenues, total insured value or number of rented units. The structure of these contingent earn-out arrangements can reduce the risk of overpaying for acquisitions if the projected financial results are not achieved. The fair values of these contingent consideration arrangements are included as part of the purchase price of the acquired companies on their respective acquisition dates. For each transaction, we estimate the fair value of contingent earnout payments as part of the initial purchase price and record the estimated fair value of contingent consideration as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of the earnout arrangements are estimated by discounting the expected future contingent payments to present value using a variation of the income approach, specifically using a Monte Carlo Simulation approach. We have 35 acquisitions with a corresponding contingent consideration liability still outstanding.The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangements is estimated by simulating the metrics corresponding to a payment using a Monte Carlo Simulation approach and discounting the expected future contingent payments to present value. The key assumptions used in our valuation were: (i) forecast of revenue, total insured value or number of rented units, (ii) the volatility associated with the revenues, total insured value or number of rented units, (iii) risk-adjusted discount rate applied to forecasted revenues, total insured value or number of rented units, and (iv) the credit-adjusted discount rate related to the payment of the contingent consideration. These estimates are influenced by many factors, including historical financial information, guideline public company data, and management's expectations for future revenue of the acquired businesses, total insured value and number of rented units, as well as market conditions, economic conditions and the company’s performance. Changes in these inputs could have a significant impact on the fair value of the contingent consideration liability.We review and re-assess the estimated fair value of contingent consideration on a quarterly basis, and the updated fair value could be materially different from the initial estimates or prior quarterly amounts. Any changes in the estimated fair value of contingent considerations and adjustments to the estimated fair value related to unobservable inputs will be recognized within change in fair value of contingent consideration in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. We recognized $32.3 million of expense related to the change in fair value of contingent consideration in 2022. At December 31, 2022, we recorded $266.9 million of contingent consideration liabilities related to the 35 contingent consideration arrangements still outstanding and the total potential maximum of the contingent consideration payments is $954.3 million. If all remaining revenue, insured value and rental units targets were achieved, our Partners would be entitled payments of up to $132.5 million in calendar year 2023 for achieving targets through September 30, 2023; $480.4 million in calendar year 2024 for achieving targets through September 30, 2024; $331.4 million in calendar year 2025 for achieving targets through September 30, 2025; and $10.0 million in calendar year 2026 for achieving targets through September 30, 2026. If the actual achievement of contingent considerations payments in 2023 through 2026 was at the maximum target amounts, we would record an additional $687.3 million of expense over the next four years.

65

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Share-Based Compensation Related to Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards (“PSUs”)
We issue PSUs to our executive officers in connection to our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) that is adopted each year. These PSUs have historically been granted with market-based conditions and may include a performance-based condition. The PSUs granted under the LTIP in 2022 were based on two market conditions and a performance condition. Performance is measured over the three-year vesting period and the achievement with respect to each condition contributes a percentage to the overall PSUs earned.The market conditions measure BRP Group's relative total shareholder return, which is determined by comparing BRP Group's total shareholder return to that of two benchmark groups: a peer group and the Russel 3000 Index. Total shareholder return is calculated using the simple average trading price of our common stock for the 30-day trading period prior to the beginning and at the end of the performance period.We engaged a third-party valuation expert to assist in the valuation of relative performance for the determination of the PSUs grant date fair value. The valuation expert used the Monte Carlo analysis, which is used to model all potential outcomes by running multiple iterations of relative shareholder return over the vesting period.Relative performance is subject to varying degrees of expected volatilities, and correlation to a combination of simulated end stock price values. The Monte Carlo method allows for the combination of simulated end stock price values throughout the vesting schedule to estimate relative performance.Significant assumptions utilized in the Monte Carlo analysis include historical stock price data, a range of expected future stock price data, volatility, correlations, risk-free rate and the term of the awards.A statistical sample was selected of 99 publicly-traded companies from within the peer group and the Russel 3000 Index, which made up the benchmark companies. A combined 100,000 iterations of probable outcomes were generated using a range of assumptions for BRP Group and the benchmark companies. Volatility, which is subject to significant judgment, was estimated for BRP Group and each of the benchmark companies using an average of one-year historical stock price data and Bloomberg’s reported implied volatility on the valuation date, as an estimate of future volatility. The volatility effects the range of stock price data utilized in the iterations of the model over the term of the awards. The correlations of the results generated by the model for BRP Group and the benchmark companies result in the valuation of relative performance of the PSUs.We monitor the performance metrics of the awards over the vesting period and adjust compensation expense based on how each performance metric is tracking toward its respective performance goal. We recognized $4.2 million in compensation expense related to our outstanding PSUs during 2022, of which $2.9 million related to the relative performance metrics. We expect to recognize additional compensation expense of $4.9 million for PSUs related to relative performance goals.

66

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets
We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. We compute the provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the currently enacted tax rates in each jurisdiction that applies to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and record a charge to income if it is determined, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.Our evaluation of the realizability of the deferred tax assets contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future net income or net loss before taxes. It also requires management to consider significant, objective evidence that we will more likely than not be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future. Many variables go into estimating future net income or net loss before taxes, including estimates of our future revenue growth and management's expectations of ongoing investments.We review and re-assess our cumulative three-year loss before income taxes on a quarterly basis. During the last three years, we have not made any changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets have been reduced by a full valuation allowance at December 31, 2022 due to a determination that it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized based on the weight of all available evidence.

67

Back to the BWIN company profile or the MD&A index.