grepcent public filings, reorganized for comparison

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN (WFC) FY 2025 MD&A

Verbatim Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis from WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN's 10-K for fiscal year 2025. Filing date: 2026-02-24. Report date: 2025-12-31. Accession: 0000072971-26-000133.

This page reproduces the company's own Item 7 MD&A text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.

Extracted from a substantive MD&A body after the formal Item 7 span was a TOC or reference stub. Source document followed from filing index: wfc-20251231.htm. Confidence: high.

Company profile: WFC · All MD&A years: index · Previous year: FY 2024

Overview

Wells Fargo & Company is a leading financial services company that has approximately $2.1 trillion in assets. We provide a diversified set of banking, investment and mortgage products and services, as well as consumer and commercial finance, through our four reportable operating segments: Consumer Banking and Lending, Commercial Banking, Corporate and Investment Banking, and Wealth and Investment Management. Wells Fargo ranked No. 33 on Fortune’s 2025 rankings of America’s largest corporations. We ranked fourth in assets and third in the market value of our common stock among all U.S. banks at December 31, 2025.

Financial Performance

In 2025, we generated $21.3 billion of net income and diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $6.26, compared with $19.7 billion of net income and diluted EPS of $5.37 in 2024. Financial performance for 2025, compared with 2024, included the following:

•total revenue increased due to higher noninterest income, partially offset by lower net interest income;

•noninterest expense increased due to higher technology, telecommunications and equipment expense and personnel expense, partially offset by lower operating losses;

•average loans increased due to growth in our commercial and industrial portfolio, partially offset by declines in our commercial real estate and residential mortgage portfolios; and

•average deposits increased driven by growth in noninterest-bearing deposits, partially offset by a decline in interest-bearing deposits.

Capital and Liquidity

We maintained a strong capital and liquidity position in 2025, which included the following:

•our Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio was 10.61% under the Standardized Approach (our binding framework), which continued to exceed the regulatory minimum and buffers of 8.50%;

•our total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets was 23.22%, compared with the regulatory minimum of 21.50%; and

•our liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) was 119%, which continued to exceed the regulatory minimum of 100%.

See the “Capital Management” and the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Liquidity Risk and Funding” sections in this Report for additional information regarding our capital and liquidity, including the calculation of our regulatory capital and liquidity amounts.

Credit Quality

Credit quality reflected the following:

•The allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans of $14.3 billion at December 31, 2025, decreased $299 million from December 31, 2024.

•Our provision for credit losses for loans was $3.7 billion in 2025, compared with $4.3 billion in 2024, reflecting a decrease in net loan charge-offs due to lower losses in our commercial real estate portfolio driven by the office property type and lower losses in our auto and other consumer portfolios.

•The allowance coverage for total loans was 1.45% at December 31, 2025, compared with 1.60% at December 31, 2024, reflecting a decrease in the allowance for our commercial real estate portfolio driven by improved credit performance.

•Commercial portfolio net loan charge-offs were $1.0 billion, or 19 basis points of average commercial loans, in 2025, compared with net loan charge-offs of $1.5 billion, or 29 basis points, in 2024, due to lower losses in our commercial real estate portfolio driven by the office property type.

•Consumer portfolio net loan charge-offs were $3.0 billion, or 79 basis points of average consumer loans, in 2025, compared with net loan charge-offs of $3.2 billion, or 85 basis points, in 2024, due to lower losses in our auto and other consumer portfolios.

•Nonperforming assets (NPAs) of $8.5 billion at December 31, 2025, increased $567 million from December 31, 2024, driven by higher commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans. NPAs represented 0.86% of total loans at December 31, 2025.

Column 1Column 2
2Wells Fargo & Company

Table 1 presents a three-year summary of selected financial data and Table 2 presents selected ratios and per common share data.

Table 1: Summary of Selected Financial Data

Year ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Income statement
Net interest income$47,48447,676(192)%$52,375(4,699)(9)%
Noninterest income36,21534,6201,595530,2224,39815
Total revenue83,69982,2961,403282,597(301)
Net charge-offs3,9904,759(769)(16)3,4501,30938
Change in the allowance for credit losses(332)(425)93221,949(2,374)NM
Provision for credit losses (1)3,6584,334(676)(16)5,399(1,065)(20)
Noninterest expense54,84254,59824455,562(964)(2)
Income tax expense3,8413,399442132,60779230
Wells Fargo net income21,33819,7221,616819,1425803
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock20,28518,6061,679917,9826243
Earnings per common share6.345.430.91174.880.5511
Diluted earnings per common share6.265.370.89174.830.5411
Dividends declared per common share1.701.500.20131.300.2015
Balance sheet (period-end)
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities421,596397,92623,6706393,1564,7701
Loans986,167912,74573,4228936,682(23,937)(3)
Allowance for credit losses for loans14,33714,636(299)(2)15,088(452)(3)
Assets2,148,6311,929,845218,786111,932,468(2,623)
Deposits1,426,2071,371,80454,40341,358,17313,6311
Common stockholders’ equity164,651160,6563,9952166,444(5,788)(3)
Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity181,117179,1201,9971185,735(6,615)(4)
Total equity183,038181,0661,9721187,443(6,377)(3)

NM – Not meaningful

(1)Includes provision for credit losses for loans, debt securities, and other financial assets.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company3

Overview (continued)

Table 2: Ratios and Per Common Share Data

Year ended December 31,
202520242023
Performance ratios
Return on average assets (ROA) (1)1.07%1.031.02
Return on average equity (ROE) (2)12.411.411.0
Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) (3)14.613.413.1
Efficiency ratio (4)666667
Capital and other metrics (5)
Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity to assets7.668.328.61
Total equity to assets8.529.389.70
Risk-based capital ratios and components:
Standardized Approach:
Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1)10.6111.0711.43
Tier 1 capital11.8612.5712.98
Total capital14.2715.1815.67
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (in billions)$1,294.61,216.11,231.7
Advanced Approach:
Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1)12.35%12.4012.63
Tier 1 capital13.8014.0914.34
Total capital15.7016.0816.40
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (in billions)$1,112.51,085.01,114.3
Tier 1 leverage ratio7.48%8.088.50
Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR)6.236.747.09
Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Ratio (6)23.2224.8325.05
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) (7)119125125
Average balances:
Average Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity to average assets8.278.548.67
Average total equity to average assets9.249.599.80
Per common share data
Dividend payout ratio (8)27.227.926.9
Book value (9)$53.2448.8546.25

(1)Represents Wells Fargo net income divided by average assets.

(2)Represents Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock divided by average common stockholders’ equity.

(3)Tangible common equity and return on average tangible common equity are non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information, including a corresponding reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) financial measures, see the “Capital Management – Tangible Common Equity” section in this Report.

(4)The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).

(5)For additional information, see the “Capital Management” section and Note 25 (Regulatory Capital Requirements and Other Restrictions) to Financial Statements in this Report.

(6)Represents TLAC divided by risk-weighted assets (RWAs), which is our binding TLAC ratio, determined by using the greater of RWAs under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.

(7)Represents average high-quality liquid assets divided by average projected net cash outflows, as each is defined under the LCR rule.

(8)Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared per common share as a percentage of diluted earnings per common share.

(9)Book value per common share is common stockholders’ equity divided by common shares outstanding.

Column 1Column 2
4Wells Fargo & Company

Earnings Performance

Wells Fargo net income for 2025 was $21.3 billion ($6.26 diluted EPS), compared with $19.7 billion ($5.37 diluted EPS) in 2024. Net income increased in 2025, compared with 2024, predominantly due to a $1.6 billion increase in noninterest income and a $676 million decrease in provision for credit losses, partially offset by a $442 million increase in income tax expense and a $244 million increase in noninterest expense.

For a discussion of our 2024 financial results, compared with 2023, see the “Earnings Performance” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the interest earned on interest-earning assets, such as trading assets, debt securities, and loans (including yield-related loan fees) minus the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits, securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, and long-term debt. The net interest margin is the average yield on earning assets minus the average interest rate paid for deposits and our other sources of funding.

Net interest income and the net interest margin in any one period can be significantly affected by a variety of factors including the mix and overall size of our earning assets portfolio and the cost of funding those assets. In addition, variable sources of interest income, such as loan fees, periodic dividends, and

collection of interest on nonaccrual loans, can fluctuate from period to period.

Net interest income decreased in 2025, compared with 2024, driven by the impact of lower interest rates on floating rate assets and deposit mix, partially offset by higher debt securities and loan balances, lower deposit costs, fixed rate asset repricing, and improved results in our Corporate and Investment Banking Markets (Markets) business.

Net interest margin decreased in 2025, compared with 2024, driven by growth in our Markets business.

We also evaluate the Company’s net interest income excluding the net interest income of our Markets business. Markets net interest income includes interest income earned on the assets and interest expense paid on the liabilities of the line of business, as well as funding charges and credits using our funds transfer pricing methodology. Net interest income excluding Markets is a non-GAAP financial measure that management believes is useful because it enables management, investors, and others to assess the net interest income from the Company’s lending, investing, and deposit-raising activities without the volatility that may be associated with Markets activities. Table 3 provides a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to a GAAP financial measure.

Table 3: Net Interest Income excluding Markets

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)202520242023
Net interest income$47,48447,67652,375
Markets net interest income7373961,068
Net interest income excluding Markets$46,74747,28051,307
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company5

Earnings Performance (continued)

Table 4 presents the individual components of net interest income and net interest margin. Net interest income and net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis in

Table 4 to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt assets. The calculation for taxable-equivalent basis was based on a federal statutory tax rate of 21%.

Table 4: Average Balances, Yields and Rates Paid (Taxable-Equivalent Basis) (1)

Year ended December 31,
202520242023
($ in millions)Average balanceInterest income/ expenseAverage interest ratesAverage balanceInterest income/ expenseAverage interest ratesAverage balanceInterest income/ expenseAverage interest rates
Assets
Interest-earning deposits with banks$147,7935,7573.90%$189,2619,1824.85%$149,4016,9734.67%
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements122,1135,0464.1379,1284,0215.0869,8783,3744.83
Trading assets (2)167,6476,7104.00138,4465,5524.01120,0244,2463.54
Available-for-sale debt securities194,0538,9104.59154,8666,5924.26142,7435,3653.76
Held-to-maturity debt securities224,0545,2432.34254,0486,6232.61275,4417,2462.63
Loans:
Commercial and industrial – U.S.335,40520,8866.23307,90921,7427.06307,95320,9416.80
Commercial and industrial – Non-U.S.66,8994,0536.0664,8034,6307.1474,4105,0436.78
Commercial real estate132,7508,1176.11144,7639,8796.82153,76110,2106.64
Lease financing15,6099065.8116,4289145.5615,3867494.87
Total commercial loans550,66333,9626.17533,90337,1656.96551,51036,9436.70
Residential mortgage245,6469,1033.71255,0279,3163.65264,9319,3133.51
Credit card56,2627,08112.5953,6656,85812.7848,2026,24612.96
Auto44,1062,4395.5344,5352,2915.1451,1162,4154.72
Other consumer30,8142,2657.3528,2462,3798.4228,1572,3498.34
Total consumer loans376,82820,8885.54381,47320,8445.46392,40620,3235.18
Total loans927,49154,8505.91915,37658,0096.34943,91657,2666.07
Equity securities (2)12,0722912.4111,9863863.2212,0593422.83
Other interest-earning assets (2)16,8088104.8113,0847515.7113,8257265.17
Total interest-earning assets$1,812,03187,6174.84%$1,756,19591,1165.19%$1,727,28785,5384.95%
Cash and due from banks28,48328,19327,463
Goodwill25,08225,17225,173
Other noninterest-earning assets120,662107,137105,552
Total noninterest-earning assets$174,227160,502158,188
Total assets$1,986,25887,6171,916,69791,1161,885,47585,538
Liabilities
Deposits:
Demand deposits$489,56410,5322.15%$448,68910,2582.29%$418,5426,9471.66%
Savings deposits350,6044,0871.17353,9164,5271.28376,2332,7230.72
Time deposits139,1155,6284.05171,6228,7585.10132,4926,2154.69
Deposits in non-U.S. offices7,9152022.5519,3097393.8319,2786183.21
Total interest-bearing deposits987,19820,4492.07993,53624,2822.44946,54516,5031.74
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase161,4336,9074.2891,3634,7665.2265,6963,3135.04
Short-term borrowings (2)9,4764484.733,4582156.224,2622425.68
Trading liabilities (2)32,5871,0423.2026,7298203.0723,6256432.72
Long-term debt175,36610,2685.85184,55112,4636.75180,46411,5726.41
Other interest-bearing liabilities (2)19,7457163.6318,2705543.0620,4004702.32
Total interest-bearing liabilities$1,385,80539,8302.87%$1,317,90743,1003.27%$1,240,99232,7432.64%
Noninterest-bearing deposits360,047352,379399,737
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities56,93062,53259,886
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities$416,977414,911459,623
Total liabilities$1,802,78239,8301,732,81843,1001,700,61532,743
Total equity183,476183,879184,860
Total liabilities and equity$1,986,25839,8301,916,69743,1001,885,47532,743
Interest rate spread on a taxable-equivalent basis (3)1.97%1.92%2.31%
Net interest margin and net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis (3)$47,7872.64%$48,0162.73%$52,7953.06%

(1)The average balance amounts represent amortized costs, except for certain held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities, which exclude unamortized basis adjustments related to the transfer of those securities from available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities. Amortized cost amounts exclude any valuation allowances and unrealized gains or losses, which are included in other noninterest-earning assets and other noninterest-bearing liabilities. Nonaccrual loans and any related income are included in their respective loan categories. The average interest rates are based on interest income or expense amounts for the period and are annualized. Interest rates and amounts include the effects of hedge and risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(2)In fourth quarter 2025, we changed the presentation of certain items on our consolidated balance sheet, including trading assets and liabilities and short-term borrowings, with corresponding changes to our consolidated statement of income. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

(3)Includes taxable-equivalent adjustments of $303 million, $340 million, and $420 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively, predominantly related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and securities.

Column 1Column 2
6Wells Fargo & Company

Table 5 allocates the changes in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis to changes in either average balances or average rates for both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Because of the numerous simultaneous volume and rate changes during any period, it is not possible to precisely

allocate such changes between volume and rate. For this table, changes that are not solely due to either volume or rate are allocated to these categories on a pro-rata basis based on the absolute value of the change due to average volume and average rate.

Table 5: Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income

Year ended December 31,
2025 vs. 20242024 vs. 2023
(in millions)VolumeRateTotalVolumeRateTotal
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
Interest-earning deposits with banks$(1,808)(1,617)(3,425)1,9302792,209
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements1,881(856)1,025465182647
Trading assets (1)1,172(14)1,1587006061,306
Available-for-sale debt securities1,7755432,3184787491,227
Held-to-maturity debt securities(736)(644)(1,380)(568)(55)(623)
Loans:
Commercial and industrial – U.S.1,837(2,693)(856)(3)804801
Commercial and industrial – Non-U.S.145(722)(577)(672)259(413)
Commercial real estate(781)(981)(1,762)(605)274(331)
Lease financing(48)40(8)54111165
Total commercial loans1,153(4,356)(3,203)(1,226)1,448222
Residential mortgage(359)146(213)(358)3613
Credit card327(104)223700(88)612
Auto(22)170148(328)204(124)
Other consumer204(318)(114)72330
Total consumer loans150(106)4421500521
Total loans1,303(4,462)(3,159)(1,205)1,948743
Equity securities (1)3(98)(95)(2)4644
Other interest-earning assets (1)190(131)59(42)6725
Total increase (decrease) in interest income$3,780(7,279)(3,499)1,7563,8225,578
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
Deposits:
Demand deposits$916(642)2745282,7833,311
Savings deposits(43)(397)(440)(171)1,9751,804
Time deposits(1,500)(1,630)(3,130)1,9625812,543
Deposits in non-U.S. offices(343)(194)(537)1120121
Total interest-bearing deposits(970)(2,863)(3,833)2,3205,4597,779
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase3,125(984)2,1411,3321211,453
Short-term borrowings (1)296(63)233(49)22(27)
Trading liabilities (1)186362228988177
Long-term debt(597)(1,598)(2,195)266625891
Other interest-bearing liabilities (1)49113162(53)13784
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense2,089(5,359)(3,270)3,9056,45210,357
Increase (decrease) in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis$1,691(1,920)(229)(2,149)(2,630)(4,779)

(1)In fourth quarter 2025, we changed the presentation of certain items on our consolidated balance sheet, including trading assets and liabilities and short-term borrowings, with corresponding changes to our consolidated statement of income. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company7

Earnings Performance (continued)

Noninterest Income

Table 6: Noninterest Income

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Deposit-related fees$5,0995,015842%$4,6943217%
Lending-related fees1,5141,5001411,446544
Investment advisory and other asset-based fees10,4989,77572378,6701,10513
Commissions and brokerage services fees2,5562,5213512,3751466
Investment banking fees3,0272,665362141,6491,01662
Card fees4,5894,34224764,256862
Mortgage banking1,1521,0471051082921826
Net gains from trading activities (1)5,1475,366(219)(4)4,87948710
Net gains (losses) from debt securities(144)(920)7768410(930)NM
Net gains (losses) from equity securities2441,070(826)(77)(441)1,511343
Other (1)(2)2,5332,239294131,85538421
Total$36,21534,6201,5955$30,2224,39815

NM – Not meaningful

(1)In fourth quarter 2025, we changed the presentation of certain items on our consolidated balance sheet, including trading assets and liabilities. In connection with these changes, we reclassified the gains (losses) related to our physical commodities inventory, including the related hedging impacts, from other noninterest income to net gains from trading activities. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

(2)In fourth quarter 2025, we reclassified lease income into other noninterest income. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Deposit-related fees increased reflecting higher treasury management fees on commercial accounts driven by lower earnings credits due to a decrease in interest rates, as well as higher transaction volumes and repricing, partially offset by lower overdraft fees.

Investment advisory and other asset-based fees increased driven by higher asset-based fees reflecting higher market valuations.

Fees from the majority of Wealth and Investment Management (WIM) advisory assets are based on a percentage of the market value of the assets at the beginning of the quarter. For additional information on certain client investment assets, see the “Earnings Performance – Operating Segment Results – Wealth and Investment Management – WIM Advisory Assets” section in this Report.

Investment banking fees increased due to higher debt underwriting fees.

Card fees increased driven by higher revenue following our merchant services joint venture acquisition in 2025, as well as increased consumer credit card activity. Following the acquisition, the revenue from the merchant services business has been included in card fees. Prior to the acquisition, our share of the net earnings of the joint venture was included in other noninterest income.

Mortgage banking increased driven by valuation adjustments associated with sales of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), partially offset by lower net servicing fees resulting from portfolio run-off and servicing sales, including the sale of the non-agency portion of our commercial mortgage third-party servicing business in 2025.

Net gains from trading activities decreased driven by lower revenue from mortgage trading, partially offset by higher revenue in commodities products.

Net losses from debt securities decreased driven by higher net losses related to a repositioning of our investment securities portfolio in 2024.

Net gains from equity securities decreased driven by lower realized and unrealized gains from our venture capital investments, partially offset by lower impairment losses.

Other income increased driven by:

•a $263 million gain on the sale of the non-agency portion of our commercial mortgage third-party servicing business in 2025; and

•a $253 million gain associated with our merchant services joint venture acquisition in 2025;

partially offset by:

•lower lease income driven by a gain associated with the resolution of a legacy lease transaction in 2024.

Column 1Column 2
8Wells Fargo & Company

Noninterest Expense

Table 7: Noninterest Expense

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Personnel$36,28135,7295522%$35,829(100)%
Technology, telecommunications and equipment5,2034,583620143,92066317
Occupancy3,1513,0529932,8841686
Professional and outside services4,5404,607(67)(1)5,085(478)(9)
Advertising and promotion1,09486922526812577
Other (1)4,5735,758(1,185)(21)7,032(1,274)(18)
Total$54,84254,598244$55,562(964)(2)

(1)In fourth quarter 2025, we reclassified operating losses and lease expense into other noninterest expense. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Personnel expense increased due to:

•higher revenue-related compensation expense driven by higher fees in our Wealth and Investment Management business;

•higher severance expense; and

•expense for a special award to employees related to the removal of our asset cap in 2025;

partially offset by:

•the impact of efficiency initiatives.

For additional information on personnel expense, see Note 20 (Revenue and Expenses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Technology, telecommunications and equipment expense increased due to higher expense for the amortization of internally developed software, higher software maintenance and licenses expense, and higher hardware depreciation expense.

Advertising and promotion expense increased reflecting higher marketing campaign volume.

Other expense decreased reflecting lower expense for customer remediation activities and lower regulatory charges and assessments expense driven by updates to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) special assessment to recover losses to the FDIC deposit insurance fund as a result of bank failures in the first half of 2023.

For additional information on other expense, see Note 20 (Revenue and Expenses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Income Tax Expense

Table 8: Income Tax Expense

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Income before income tax expense$25,19923,3641,8358%$21,6361,7288%
Income tax expense3,8413,399442132,60779230
Effective income tax rate15.2%14.712.0%

The increase in the effective income tax rate for 2025, compared with 2024, was driven by higher pre-tax income and lower discrete tax benefits.

For additional information on income taxes, see Note 22 (Income Taxes) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company9

Earnings Performance (continued)

Operating Segment Results

Our management reporting is organized into four reportable operating segments: Consumer Banking and Lending; Commercial Banking; Corporate and Investment Banking; and Wealth and Investment Management. All other business activities that are not included in the reportable operating segments have been included in Corporate. We define our reportable operating segments based on the product or service provided and the type of customer served, and their results are based on our management reporting process. The management reporting process measures the performance of the reportable operating segments based on the Company’s management structure, and the results are regularly reviewed with our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and relevant senior management. The management reporting process is based on U.S. GAAP and includes specific adjustments, such as funds transfer pricing for asset/liability management, shared revenue and expenses, and taxable-equivalent adjustments to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt sources, which allows management to assess performance consistently across the operating segments.

Funds Transfer Pricing. Corporate treasury manages a funds transfer pricing methodology that considers interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and other product characteristics. Operating segments pay a funding charge for their assets and receive a funding credit for their deposits, both of which are included in net interest income. The net impact of the funding charges or credits is recognized in corporate treasury.

Revenue Sharing and Expense Allocations. When lines of business jointly serve customers, the line of business that is responsible for providing the product or service recognizes revenue or expense with a referral fee paid or an allocation of cost to the other line of business based on established internal revenue-sharing agreements.

When a line of business uses a service provided by another line of business, expense is generally allocated based on the cost and use of the service provided. Enterprise functions, such as operations, technology, and risk management, are included in Corporate with an allocation of their applicable costs to the reportable operating segments based on the level of support provided by the enterprise function. We periodically assess and update our revenue sharing and expense allocation methodologies.

Taxable-Equivalent Adjustments. Taxable-equivalent adjustments related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and debt securities are included in net interest income, while taxable-equivalent adjustments related to income tax credits for affordable housing and renewable energy investments are included in noninterest income, in each case with corresponding impacts to income tax expense (benefit). Adjustments are included in Corporate, Commercial Banking, and Corporate and Investment Banking and are eliminated to reconcile to the Company’s consolidated financial results.

Allocated Capital. Reportable operating segments are allocated capital under a risk-sensitive framework that is primarily based on aspects of our regulatory capital requirements, and the assumptions and methodologies used to allocate capital are periodically assessed and updated. Management believes that return on allocated capital is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess a reportable operating segment’s use of capital.

Selected Metrics. We present certain financial and nonfinancial metrics that management uses when evaluating reportable operating segment results. Management believes that these metrics are useful to investors and others to assess the performance, customer growth, and trends of reportable operating segments or lines of business.

Column 1Column 2
10Wells Fargo & Company

Table 9 and the following discussion present our results by reportable operating segment. For additional information, see Note 19 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Table 9: Operating Segment Results – Highlights

(in millions)Consumer Banking and LendingCommercial BankingCorporate and Investment BankingWealth and Investment ManagementCorporate (1)Reconciling Items (2)Consolidated Company
Year ended December 31, 2025
Net interest income$29,1837,9027,5573,684(539)(303)47,484
Noninterest income8,1794,07611,67512,6441,286(1,645)36,215
Total revenue37,36211,97819,23216,328747(1,948)83,699
Provision for credit losses3,36228874(66)3,658
Noninterest expense23,5156,0779,43613,5182,29654,842
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)10,4855,6139,7222,810(1,483)(1,948)25,199
Income tax expense (benefit)2,6201,4212,439691(1,382)(1,948)3,841
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests7,8654,1927,2832,119(101)21,358
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests81220
Net income (loss)$7,8654,1847,2832,119(113)21,338
Year ended December 31, 2024
Net interest income$28,3039,0967,9353,473(791)(340)47,676
Noninterest income7,8983,68211,40911,9631,129(1,461)34,620
Total revenue36,20112,77819,34415,436338(1,801)82,296
Provision for credit losses3,561290521(22)(16)4,334
Noninterest expense23,2746,1909,02912,8843,22154,598
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)9,3666,2989,7942,574(2,867)(1,801)23,364
Income tax expense (benefit)2,3571,5992,456672(1,884)(1,801)3,399
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests7,0094,6997,3381,902(983)19,965
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests10233243
Net income (loss)$7,0094,6897,3381,902(1,216)19,722
Year ended December 31, 2023
Net interest income$30,18510,0349,4983,966(888)(420)52,375
Noninterest income7,7343,4159,69310,725431(1,776)30,222
Total revenue37,91913,44919,19114,691(457)(2,196)82,597
Provision for credit losses3,299752,0076125,399
Noninterest expense24,0246,5558,61812,0644,30155,562
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)10,5966,8198,5662,621(4,770)(2,196)21,636
Income tax expense (benefit)2,6571,7042,140657(2,355)(2,196)2,607
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests7,9395,1156,4261,964(2,415)19,029
Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrollinginterests11(124)(113)
Net income (loss)$7,9395,1046,4261,964(2,291)19,142

(1)All other business activities that are not included in the reportable operating segments have been included in Corporate. For additional information, see the “Corporate” section below.

(2)Taxable-equivalent adjustments related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and debt securities are included in net interest income, while taxable-equivalent adjustments related to income tax credits for affordable housing and renewable energy investments are included in noninterest income, in each case with corresponding impacts to income tax expense (benefit). Adjustments are included in Corporate, Commercial Banking, and Corporate and Investment Banking and are eliminated to reconcile to the Company’s consolidated financial results.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company11

Earnings Performance (continued)

Consumer Banking and Lending offers diversified financial products and services for consumers and small businesses. These financial products and services include checking and savings accounts, credit and debit cards, as well as home, auto, personal, and small business lending.

Table 9a and Table 9b provide additional information for Consumer Banking and Lending.

Table 9a: Consumer Banking and Lending – Income Statement and Selected Metrics

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions, unless otherwise noted)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Income Statement
Net interest income$29,18328,3038803%$30,185(1,882)(6)%
Noninterest income:
Deposit-related fees2,6942,734(40)(1)2,702321
Card fees (1)4,3374,07626163,9671093
Mortgage banking7696501191851213827
Other379438(59)(13)553(115)(21)
Total noninterest income8,1797,89828147,7341642
Total revenue37,36236,2011,161337,919(1,718)(5)
Net charge-offs3,2363,546(310)(9)2,78476227
Change in the allowance for credit losses12615111740515(500)(97)
Provision for credit losses3,3623,561(199)(6)3,2992628
Noninterest expense23,51523,274241124,024(750)(3)
Income before income tax expense10,4859,3661,1191210,596(1,230)(12)
Income tax expense2,6202,357263112,657(300)(11)
Net income$7,8657,00985612$7,939(930)(12)
Revenue by Line of Business
Consumer, Small and Business Banking$25,42724,5109174$25,922(1,412)(5)
Consumer Lending:
Home Lending3,3643,383(19)(1)3,389(6)
Credit Card6,3755,90846785,809992
Auto1,0161,118(102)(9)1,464(346)(24)
Personal Lending1,1801,282(102)(8)1,335(53)(4)
Total revenue$37,36236,2011,1613$37,919(1,718)(5)
Selected Metrics
Consumer Banking and Lending:
Return on allocated capital (2)16.7%14.817.5%
Efficiency ratio (3)636463
Retail bank branches (#, period-end)4,0904,177(2)4,311(3)
Digital active customers (# in millions, period-end) (4)37.236.0334.83
Mobile active customers (# in millions, period-end) (4)32.831.4429.95
Consumer, Small and Business Banking:
Deposit spread (5)2.58%2.502.61%
Debit card purchase volume ($ in billions) (6)$530.5507.523.05$492.814.73
Debit card purchase transactions (# in millions) (6)10,51110,230310,0002

(continued on following page)

Column 1Column 2
12Wells Fargo & Company

(continued from previous page)

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions, unless otherwise noted)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Home Lending:
Mortgage banking:
Net servicing income$61942219747%$30012241%
Net gains on mortgage loan originations/sales150228(78)(34)212168
Total mortgage banking$76965011918$51213827
Mortgage loan originations ($ in billions)$26.320.26.130$24.2(4.0)(17)
% of originations held for sale (HFS)30.4%40.644.6%
Third-party mortgage loans serviced ($ in billions, period-end) (7)$397.0486.9(89.9)(18)$559.7(72.8)(13)
Mortgage servicing rights (MSR) carrying value (period-end)5,6966,844(1,148)(17)7,468(624)(8)
Home lending loans 30+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (8)(9)(10)0.31%0.290.32
Credit Card (6):
Credit card purchase volume ($ in billions)$186.0170.515.59$153.117.411
Credit card new accounts (# in thousands)2,9302,429212,566(5)
Credit card loans 30+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (9)(10)2.80%2.912.80
Credit card loans 90+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (9)(10)1.431.511.41
Auto:
Auto loan originations ($ in billions)$30.516.913.680$17.2(0.3)(2)
Auto loans 30+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (9)(10)1.52%2.312.80%

(1)In April 2025, we completed our acquisition of the remaining interest in our merchant services joint venture. Following the acquisition, the revenue from this business has been included in card fees. Prior to the acquisition, our share of the net earnings of the joint venture was included in other noninterest income.

(2)Return on allocated capital is segment net income (loss) applicable to common stock divided by segment average allocated capital. Segment net income (loss) applicable to common stock is segment net income (loss) less allocated preferred stock dividends.

(3)Efficiency ratio is segment noninterest expense divided by segment total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).

(4)Digital and mobile active customers is based on the number of consumer and small business customers who have logged on via a digital or mobile device, respectively, in the prior 90 days. Digital active customers includes both online and mobile customers.

(5)Deposit spread is (i) the internal funds transfer pricing credit on segment deposits minus interest paid to customers for segment deposits, divided by (ii) average segment deposits.

(6)Reflects combined activity for consumer and small business customers.

(7)Excludes residential mortgage loans subserviced for others.

(8)Excludes residential mortgage loans that are insured or guaranteed by U.S government agencies.

(9)Excludes loans held for sale.

(10)Delinquency balances exclude nonaccrual loans.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Revenue increased driven by:

•higher net interest income reflecting lower deposit pricing and higher deposit balances due to the impact of the transfer of certain business customers from the Commercial Banking operating segment in 2025;

•higher card fees driven by higher revenue following our merchant services joint venture acquisition, as well as increased consumer credit card activity; and

•higher mortgage banking income driven by valuation adjustments associated with MSR sales, partially offset by lower net servicing fees resulting from portfolio run-off and servicing sales.

Provision for credit losses decreased reflecting lower net charge-offs, partially offset by a higher change in allowance for auto loans driven by higher loan balances.

Noninterest expense increased driven by:

•higher advertising expense;

•higher branch personnel expense; and

•the impact of the transfer of certain business customers from the Commercial Banking operating segment in 2025;

partially offset by:

•lower operating losses; and

•the impact of efficiency initiatives.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company13

Earnings Performance (continued)

Table 9b: Consumer Banking and Lending – Balance Sheet

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Selected Balance Sheet Data (average)
Loans by Line of Business:
Consumer, Small and Business Banking (1)$9,8156,2923,52356%$6,740(448)(7)%
Consumer Lending:
Home Lending202,756210,972(8,216)(4)219,601(8,629)(4)
Credit Card51,02748,3222,705642,8945,42813
Auto44,60245,048(446)(1)51,689(6,641)(13)
Personal Lending13,85214,529(677)(5)14,996(467)(3)
Total loans$322,052325,163(3,111)(1)$335,920(10,757)(3)
Total deposits (1)779,994774,6605,3341811,091(36,431)(4)
Allocated capital45,50045,50044,0001,5003
Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end)
Loans by Line of Business:
Consumer, Small and Business Banking (1)$13,6746,2567,418119$6,735(479)(7)
Consumer Lending:
Home Lending199,742207,022(7,280)(4)215,823(8,801)(4)
Credit Card54,05950,9923,067646,7354,2579
Auto50,95442,9148,0401948,283(5,369)(11)
Personal Lending14,05214,246(194)(1)15,291(1,045)(7)
Total loans$332,481321,43011,0513$332,867(11,437)(3)
Total deposits (1)790,962783,4907,4721782,3091,181

(1)In third quarter 2025, we prospectively transferred approximately $8 billion of loans and approximately $6 billion of deposits related to certain business customers from the Commercial Banking operating segment to Consumer, Small and Business Banking in the Consumer Banking and Lending operating segment.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Total loans (period-end) increased due to:

•the impact of the transfer of certain business customers from the Commercial Banking operating segment in 2025;

•an increase in loan balances in our Auto business driven by higher origination volumes reflecting growth across the portfolio, including the impact of a new financing partnership; and

•an increase in loan balances in our Credit Card business due to higher purchase volume and the impact of new account growth;

partially offset by:

•a decline in loan balances in our Home Lending business reflecting paydowns of legacy residential mortgage loans.

Total deposits (average and period-end) increased driven by the impact of the transfer of certain business customers from the Commercial Banking operating segment in 2025.

Column 1Column 2
14Wells Fargo & Company

Commercial Banking provides financial solutions to private, family owned and certain public companies. Products and services include banking and credit products across multiple industry sectors and municipalities, secured lending and lease products, and treasury management.

Table 9c and Table 9d provide additional information for Commercial Banking.

Table 9c: Commercial Banking – Income Statement and Selected Metrics

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Income Statement
Net interest income$7,9029,096(1,194)(13)%$10,034(938)(9)%
Noninterest income:
Deposit-related fees1,2901,180110999818218
Lending-related fees565555102531245
Lease income473532(59)(11)644(112)(17)
Other1,7481,415333241,24217314
Total noninterest income4,0763,682394113,4152678
Total revenue11,97812,778(800)(6)13,449(671)(5)
Net charge-offs318333(15)(5)96237247
Change in the allowance for credit losses(30)(43)1330(21)(22)NM
Provision for credit losses288290(2)(1)75215287
Noninterest expense6,0776,190(113)(2)6,555(365)(6)
Income before income tax expense5,6136,298(685)(11)6,819(521)(8)
Income tax expense1,4211,599(178)(11)1,704(105)(6)
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests810(2)(20)11(1)(9)
Net income$4,1844,689(505)(11)$5,104(415)(8)
Revenue by Product
Lending and leasing$5,0345,201(167)(3)$5,314(113)(2)
Treasury management and payments5,0005,690(690)(12)6,214(524)(8)
Other1,9441,8875731,921(34)(2)
Total revenue$11,97812,778(800)(6)$13,449(671)(5)
Selected Metrics
Return on allocated capital15.1%17.119.1%
Efficiency ratio514849

NM – Not meaningful

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Revenue decreased driven by:

•lower net interest income reflecting the impact of lower interest rates and the impact of the transfer of certain business customers to the Consumer Banking and Lending operating segment in 2025, partially offset by lower deposit pricing and higher deposit balances;

partially offset by:

•higher other noninterest income related to equity securities, including tax credit investments; and

•higher deposit-related fees reflecting higher treasury

management fees on commercial accounts driven by lower

earnings credits due to a decrease in interest rates.

Noninterest expense decreased driven by the impact of the transfer of certain business customers to the Consumer Banking and Lending operating segment in 2025, as well as the impact of efficiency initiatives.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company15

Earnings Performance (continued)

Table 9d: Commercial Banking – Balance Sheet

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Selected Balance Sheet Data (average)
Loans:
Commercial and industrial$167,207162,8274,3803%$164,062(1,235)(1)%
Commercial real estate41,21844,898(3,680)(8)45,705(807)(2)
Lease financing and other14,97415,332(358)(2)14,3359977
Total loans (1)$223,399223,057342$224,102(1,045)
Total deposits (1)178,432172,1296,3034165,2356,8944
Allocated capital26,00026,00025,5005002
Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end)
Loans:
Commercial and industrial$173,931163,46410,4676$163,797(333)
Commercial real estate39,22744,506(5,279)(12)45,534(1,028)(2)
Lease financing and other15,46915,348121115,443(95)(1)
Total loans (1)$228,627223,3185,3092$224,774(1,456)(1)
Total deposits (1)190,004188,6501,3541162,52626,12416

(1)In third quarter 2025, we prospectively transferred approximately $8 billion of loans and approximately $6 billion of deposits related to certain business customers from the Commercial Banking operating segment to Consumer, Small and Business Banking in the Consumer Banking and Lending operating segment.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Total loans (average and period-end) increased driven by higher client activity, partially offset by the impact of the transfer of certain business customers to the Consumer Banking and Lending operating segment in 2025.

Total deposits (average and period-end) increased driven by additions of deposits from new and existing customers, partially offset by the impact of the transfer of certain business customers to the Consumer Banking and Lending operating segment in 2025.

Column 1Column 2
16Wells Fargo & Company

Corporate and Investment Banking delivers a suite of capital markets, banking, and financial products and services to corporate, commercial real estate, government and institutional clients globally. Products and services include corporate banking, investment banking, treasury management, commercial real

estate lending and capital markets, equity and fixed income solutions as well as sales, trading, and research capabilities.

Table 9e and Table 9f provide additional information for Corporate and Investment Banking.

Table 9e: Corporate and Investment Banking – Income Statement and Selected Metrics

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Income Statement
Net interest income$7,5577,935(378)(5)%$9,498(1,563)(16)%
Noninterest income:
Deposit-related fees1,0861,0731319769710
Lending-related fees8448422790527
Investment banking fees2,9852,675310121,73893754
Net gains from trading activities (1)4,9875,173(186)(4)4,63354012
Other (1)1,7731,64612781,556906
Total noninterest income11,67511,40926629,6931,71618
Total revenue19,23219,344(112)(1)19,1911531
Net charge-offs450909(459)(50)58132856
Change in the allowance for credit losses(376)(388)1231,426(1,814)NM
Provision for credit losses74521(447)(86)2,007(1,486)(74)
Noninterest expense9,4369,02940758,6184115
Income before income tax expense9,7229,794(72)(1)8,5661,22814
Income tax expense2,4392,456(17)(1)2,14031615
Net income$7,2837,338(55)(1)$6,42691214
Revenue by Line of Business
Banking:
Lending$2,5222,758(236)(9)$2,872(114)(4)
Treasury Management and Payments2,5072,712(205)(8)3,036(324)(11)
Investment Banking2,0081,814194111,40441029
Total Banking7,0377,284(247)(3)7,312(28)
Commercial Real Estate5,0835,144(61)(1)5,311(167)(3)
Markets:
Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities (FICC)5,2925,09319944,6884059
Equities1,7381,789(51)(3)1,809(20)(1)
Credit Adjustment (CVA/DVA/FVA) and Other (2)31(14)4532165(79)NM
Total Markets7,0616,86819336,5623065
Other514836642700
Total revenue$19,23219,344(112)(1)$19,1911531
Selected Metrics
Return on allocated capital15.6%15.713.8%
Efficiency ratio494745

NM – Not meaningful

(1)In fourth quarter 2025, we changed the presentation of certain items on our consolidated balance sheet, including trading assets and liabilities. In connection with these changes, we reclassified the gains (losses) related to our physical commodities inventory, including the related hedging impacts, from other noninterest income to net gains from trading activities. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

(2)In fourth quarter 2024, we implemented a change to incorporate funding valuation adjustments (FVA) for our derivatives, which resulted in a loss of $85 million.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Revenue decreased driven by:

•lower net interest income driven by lower interest rates, partially offset by lower deposit pricing and higher deposit and loan balances; and

•lower gains from trading activities driven by lower revenue from mortgage trading, partially offset by higher revenue in commodities products;

partially offset by:

•higher investment banking fees due to higher debt underwriting fees; and

•a $263 million gain on the sale of the non-agency portion of our commercial mortgage third-party servicing business in 2025.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company17

Earnings Performance (continued)

Provision for credit losses decreased reflecting lower net charge-offs on commercial real estate loans.

Noninterest expense increased driven by higher operating costs and higher professional and outside services expense, partially offset by the impact of efficiency initiatives.

Table 9f: Corporate and Investment Banking – Balance Sheet

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Selected Balance Sheet Data (average)
Loans:
Commercial and industrial$210,955183,79227,16315%$191,602(7,810)(4)%
Commercial real estate82,13493,247(11,113)(12)100,373(7,126)(7)
Total loans$293,089277,03916,0506$291,975(14,936)(5)
Loans by Line of Business:
Banking$92,35887,3185,0406$95,783(8,465)(9)
Commercial Real Estate117,232125,799(8,567)(7)135,702(9,903)(7)
Markets83,49963,92219,5773160,4903,4326
Total loans$293,089277,03916,0506$291,975(14,936)(5)
Trading-related assets:
Trading assets, excluding derivative assets (1)$173,358138,76434,59425$120,04518,71916
Derivative assets22,05118,8833,1681718,6362471
Resale agreements/securities borrowed114,87572,37442,5015961,51010,86418
Total trading-related assets (1)$310,284230,02180,26335$200,19129,83015
Total assets667,299568,03599,26417553,72214,3133
Total deposits206,251192,59213,6597162,06230,53019
Allocated capital44,00044,00044,000
Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end)
Loans:
Commercial and industrial$253,004192,57360,43131$189,3793,1942
Commercial real estate80,50586,107(5,602)(7)98,053(11,946)(12)
Total loans$333,509278,68054,82920$287,432(8,752)(3)
Loans by Line of Business:
Banking$111,26086,32824,93229$93,987(7,659)(8)
Commercial Real Estate118,516117,2131,3031131,968(14,755)(11)
Markets103,73375,13928,5943861,47713,66222
Total loans$333,509278,68054,82920$287,432(8,752)(3)
Trading-related assets:
Trading assets, excluding derivative assets (1)$205,356147,51457,84239$117,82429,69025
Derivative assets22,47421,3321,142518,0233,30918
Resale agreements/securities borrowed170,66196,47074,1917763,61432,85652
Total trading-related assets (1)$398,491265,316133,17550$199,46165,85533
Total assets787,751597,278190,47332547,20350,0759
Total deposits224,146212,94811,1985185,14227,80615

(1)In fourth quarter 2025, we changed the presentation of certain items on our consolidated balance sheet, including trading assets. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Total loans (average and period-end) increased driven by commercial and industrial loan originations and draws on existing loan accounts exceeding loan payoffs.

Total trading-related assets (average and period-end) increased reflecting:

•an increased volume of resale agreements; and

•higher trading assets driven by growth across all asset classes.

Total deposits (average and period-end) increased driven by additions of deposits from new and existing customers.

Column 1Column 2
18Wells Fargo & Company

Wealth and Investment Management provides personalized wealth management, brokerage, financial planning, lending, private banking, trust and fiduciary products and services to affluent, high-net worth and ultra-high-net worth clients. We operate through financial advisors in our brokerage and wealth

offices, consumer bank branches, independent offices, and digitally through WellsTrade® and Intuitive Investor®.

Table 9g and Table 9h provide additional information for Wealth and Investment Management (WIM).

Table 9g: Wealth and Investment Management

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions, unless otherwise noted)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Income Statement
Net interest income$3,6843,4732116%$3,966(493)(12)%
Noninterest income:
Investment advisory and other asset-based fees10,2599,53472588,4461,08813
Commissions and brokerage services fees2,1622,15392,058955
Other223276(53)(19)2215525
Total noninterest income12,64411,963681610,7251,23812
Total revenue16,32815,436892614,6917455
Net charge-offs(1)(2)150(1)(1)(100)
Change in the allowance for credit losses1(20)211057(27)NM
Provision for credit losses(22)221006(28)NM
Noninterest expense13,51812,884634512,0648207
Income before income tax expense2,8102,57423692,621(47)(2)
Income tax expense691672193657152
Net income$2,1191,90221711$1,964(62)(3)
Selected Metrics
Return on allocated capital31.7%28.330.7%
Efficiency ratio838382
Client assets ($ in billions, period-end):
Advisory assets$1,12799812913$89110712
Other brokerage assets and deposits1,3821,2958771,1931029
Total client assets$2,5092,2932169$2,08420910
Selected Balance Sheet Data (average)
Total loans$86,01983,0053,0144$82,755250
Total deposits127,257107,68919,56818112,069(4,380)(4)
Allocated capital6,5006,5006,2502504
Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end)
Total loans$90,63584,3406,2957$82,5551,7852
Total deposits147,616127,00820,60816103,90223,10622

NM – Not meaningful

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Revenue increased driven by:

•higher investment advisory and other asset-based fees driven by higher asset-based fees reflecting higher market valuations; and

•higher net interest income driven by lower deposit pricing and higher deposit and loan balances.

Noninterest expense increased reflecting higher personnel expense driven by higher revenue-related compensation expense, partially offset by the impact of efficiency initiatives.

Total loans (average and period-end) increased driven by higher securities-based lending.

Total deposits (average and period-end) increased driven by higher brokerage deposit balances.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company19

Earnings Performance (continued)

WIM Advisory Assets. In addition to transactional accounts, WIM offers advisory account relationships to brokerage customers. Fees from advisory accounts are based on a percentage of the market value of the assets as of the beginning of the quarter, which vary across the account types based on the distinct services provided, and are affected by investment performance as well as asset inflows and outflows. Advisory accounts include assets that are financial advisor-directed and separately managed by third-party managers as well as certain client-directed brokerage assets where we earn a fee for advisory and other services, but do not have investment discretion.

WIM also manages personal trust and other assets for high net worth clients, with fee income earned based on a percentage of the market value of these assets.

Table 9h presents advisory assets activity by WIM line of business. Management believes that advisory assets is a useful metric because it allows management, investors, and others to assess how changes in asset amounts may impact the generation of certain asset-based fees. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the average fee rate by account type ranged from 50 to 120 basis points.

Table 9h: WIM Advisory Assets

Year ended
(in billions)Balance, beginningof periodInflows (outflows), net (1)Marketimpact (2)Balance, end of period
December 31, 2025
Client-directed (3)$205.7(3.8)19.5221.4
Financial advisor-directed (4)309.26.548.0363.7
Separate accounts (5)225.710.733.7270.1
Mutual fund advisory (6)85.7(5.0)11.091.7
Total Wells Fargo Advisors$826.38.4112.2946.9
The Private Bank (7)171.4(8.6)17.4180.2
Total WIM advisory assets$997.7(0.2)129.61,127.1
December 31, 2024
Client-directed (3)$185.3(2.5)22.9205.7
Financial advisor-directed (4)264.61.443.2309.2
Separate accounts (5)198.42.624.7225.7
Mutual fund advisory (6)83.3(5.3)7.785.7
Total Wells Fargo Advisors$731.6(3.8)98.5826.3
The Private Bank (7)159.5(2.8)14.7171.4
Total WIM advisory assets$891.1(6.6)113.2997.7
December 31, 2023
Client-directed (3)$165.2(1.7)21.8185.3
Financial advisor-directed (4)222.92.039.7264.6
Separate accounts (5)176.5(2.4)24.3198.4
Mutual fund advisory (6)78.6(5.4)10.183.3
Total Wells Fargo Advisors$643.2(7.5)95.9731.6
The Private Bank (7)153.6(9.5)15.4159.5
Total WIM advisory assets$796.8(17.0)111.3891.1

(1)Inflows include new advisory account assets, contributions, dividends, and interest. Outflows include closed advisory account assets, withdrawals, and client management fees.

(2)Market impact reflects gains and losses on portfolio investments.

(3)Investment advice and other services are provided to the client, but decisions are made by the client and the fees earned are based on a percentage of the advisory account assets, not the number and size of transactions executed by the client.

(4)Professionally managed portfolios with fees earned based on respective strategies and as a percentage of certain client assets.

(5)Professional advisory portfolios managed by third-party asset managers. Fees are earned based on a percentage of certain client assets.

(6)Program with portfolios constructed of load-waived, no-load, and institutional share class mutual funds. Fees are earned based on a percentage of certain client assets.

(7)Discretionary and non-discretionary portfolios held in personal trusts, investment agency, or custody accounts with fees earned based on a percentage of client assets.

Column 1Column 2
20Wells Fargo & Company

Corporate includes corporate treasury and enterprise functions, net of expense allocations, in support of the reportable operating segments (including funds transfer pricing, capital, and liquidity), as well as our investment portfolio and venture capital and private equity investments. Corporate also includes certain lines of business that management has determined are no longer consistent with the long-term strategic goals of the Company as well as results for previously divested businesses.

In May 2025, the Company announced it had entered into an agreement to sell the assets of its rail car leasing business. This sale closed on January 1, 2026, which reduced other assets on our consolidated balance sheet by $5.3 billion, consisting of $1.0 billion of finance leases held for sale and $4.3 billion of operating lease assets held for sale. We expect lower noninterest expense of approximately $400 million on an annual basis, offset by a similar reduction in noninterest income, as a result of this sale.

Table 9i and Table 9j provide additional information for Corporate.

Table 9i: Corporate – Income Statement

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Income Statement
Net interest income$(539)(791)25232%$(888)9711%
Noninterest income1,2861,12915714431698162
Total revenue747338409121(457)795174
Net charge-offs(13)(27)1452(10)(17)NM
Change in the allowance for credit losses(53)11(64)NM22(11)(50)
Provision for credit losses(66)(16)(50)NM12(28)NM
Noninterest expense2,2963,221(925)(29)4,301(1,080)(25)
Loss before income tax benefit(1,483)(2,867)1,38448(4,770)1,90340
Income tax benefit(1,382)(1,884)50227(2,355)47120
Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests (1)12233(221)(95)(124)357288
Net loss$(113)(1,216)1,10391$(2,291)1,07547

NM – Not meaningful

(1)Reflects results attributable to noncontrolling interests associated with our venture capital investments.

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Revenue increased driven by:

•lower net losses from debt securities driven by the impact of a repositioning of our investment securities portfolio in 2024;

•a $253 million gain associated with our merchant services

joint venture acquisition; and

•higher net interest income driven by lower funding credits to the operating segments due to the impact of lower interest rates;

partially offset by:

•lower net gains from equity securities reflecting lower

realized and unrealized gains from our venture capital

investments, partially offset by lower impairment losses.

Noninterest expense decreased reflecting:

•lower FDIC assessment expense driven by a higher FDIC

special assessment in 2024;

•lower operating losses due to lower expense for customer

remediation activities; and

•lower personnel expense due to the impact of efficiency initiatives.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company21

Earnings Performance (continued)

Table 9j: Corporate – Balance Sheet

Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)20252024$ Change 2025/ 2024% Change 2025/ 20242023$ Change 2024/ 2023% Change 2024/ 2023
Selected Balance Sheet Data (average)
Available-for-sale debt securities$181,536138,98342,55331%$123,54215,44112%
Held-to-maturity debt securities216,958246,577(29,619)(12)267,672(21,095)(8)
Equity securities15,85415,441413315,635(194)(1)
Total assets623,701652,024(28,323)(4)619,00233,0225
Total deposits55,31198,845(43,534)(44)95,8253,0203
Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end)
Available-for-sale debt securities$205,670154,39751,27333$118,92335,47430
Held-to-maturity debt securities204,811231,892(27,081)(12)259,748(27,856)(11)
Equity securities16,45115,4371,014715,810(373)(2)
Total assets638,664633,7994,8651674,075(40,276)(6)
Total deposits73,47959,70813,77123124,294(64,586)(52)

Full year 2025 vs. full year 2024

Total assets (average) decreased reflecting a decrease in interest-earning deposits with banks that are managed by corporate treasury, partially offset by purchases of available-for-sale debt securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies.

Total assets (period-end) increased reflecting purchases of available-for-sale debt securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies and an increased volume of resale agreements, partially offset by a decrease in interest-earning deposits with banks that are managed by corporate treasury.

Total deposits (average) decreased driven by maturities of certificates of deposit (CDs) issued by corporate treasury.

Total deposits (period-end) increased driven by issuances of CDs by corporate treasury.

Column 1Column 2
22Wells Fargo & Company

Balance Sheet Analysis

At December 31, 2025, our assets totaled $2.1 trillion, up $218.8 billion from December 31, 2024.

The following discussion provides additional information about the major components of our consolidated balance sheet. See the “Capital Management” section in this Report for information on changes in our equity.

Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities

Table 10: Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities

December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
($ in millions)Amortized cost, net (1)Net unrealized gains (losses)Fair valueWeighted average expected maturity (yrs)Amortized cost, net (1)Net unrealized gains (losses)Fair valueWeighted average expected maturity (yrs)
Available-for-sale (2)$215,775(2,202)213,5737.2$170,607(7,629)162,9787.2
Held-to-maturity (3)208,023(32,226)175,79710.2234,948(41,169)193,7798.3
Total$423,798(34,428)389,370n/a$405,555(48,798)356,757n/a

(1)Represents amortized cost of the securities, net of the allowance for credit losses of $23 million and $34 million related to available-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $95 million related to held-to-maturity debt securities at both December 31, 2025 and 2024.

(2)Available-for-sale debt securities are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value.

(3)Held-to-maturity debt securities are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.

Table 10 presents a summary of our portfolio of investments in available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities. See Note 2 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on AFS and HTM debt securities, including a summary of debt securities by security type, contractual maturities and weighted average yields. The size and composition of our AFS and HTM debt securities portfolio is dependent upon the Company’s liquidity and interest rate risk management objectives. The AFS debt securities portfolio can be used to meet funding needs that arise in the normal course of business or due to market stress. Changes in our interest rate risk profile may occur due to changes in overall economic or market conditions, which could influence loan origination demand, prepayment rates, or deposit balances and mix. In response, the AFS debt securities portfolio can be rebalanced to meet the Company’s interest rate risk management objectives. In addition to meeting liquidity and interest rate risk management objectives, the AFS and HTM debt securities portfolios may provide yield enhancement over other short-term assets. See the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management” section in this Report for additional information on liquidity and interest rate risk.

The AFS and HTM debt securities portfolios predominantly consist of liquid, high-quality U.S. Treasury and federal agency debt, and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The portfolios also include securities issued by U.S. states and political subdivisions and highly rated collateralized loan obligations (CLOs). Debt securities are classified as HTM at the time of purchase or when transferred from the AFS debt securities portfolio. Our intent is to hold these securities to maturity and collect the contractual cash flows.

The amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses, of the total AFS and HTM debt securities portfolio increased from December 31, 2024. Purchases of AFS debt securities were partially offset by paydowns and maturities of AFS and HTM debt securities, as well as sales of AFS debt securities. The total net unrealized losses on AFS and HTM debt securities decreased from December 31, 2024, due to changes in interest rates.

At December 31, 2025, 99% of the combined AFS and HTM debt securities portfolio was rated AA- or above. Ratings are based on external ratings where available and, where not available, based on internal credit grades.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company23

Balance Sheet Analysis (continued)

Loan Portfolios

Table 11 provides a summary of total outstanding loans by portfolio segment. Commercial loans increased from December 31, 2024, driven by an increase in commercial and industrial loans as a result of increased originations and loan

draws, partially offset by paydowns. Consumer loans increased from December 31, 2024, driven by increases in the auto, securities-based loan, and credit card portfolios, partially offset by a decrease in the residential mortgage portfolio.

Table 11: Loan Portfolios

($ in millions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024$ Change% Change
Commercial$599,895534,15965,73612%
Consumer386,272378,5867,6862
Total loans$986,167912,74573,4228

Average loan balances and a comparative detail of average loan balances is included in Table 4 under “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report. Additional information on total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable is included in the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management” section in this Report. Period-end balances and other loan related information are in Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Table 12 shows loan maturities based on contractually scheduled repayment timing and the distribution by changes in interest rates for loans with a contractual maturity greater than one year. Nonaccrual loans and loans with indeterminate maturities have been classified as maturing within one year.

Table 12: Loan Maturities

December 31, 2025
Loan maturitiesLoans maturing after one year
(in millions)Within one yearAfter one year through five yearsAfter five years through fifteen yearsAfter fifteen yearsTotalFixed interest ratesFloating/variable interest rates
Commercial and industrial$162,370255,43132,8041,463452,06828,110261,588
Commercial real estate59,61659,74311,4551,470132,28415,75356,915
Lease financing3,33210,8831,319915,54312,056155
Total commercial225,318326,05745,5782,942599,89555,919318,658
Residential mortgage9,79029,52285,819117,059242,190159,37573,025
Credit card59,54059,540
Auto12,28334,3753,82950,48738,204
Other consumer27,9516,023641734,0555,884220
Total consumer109,56469,92089,712117,076386,272203,46373,245
Total loans$334,882395,977135,290120,018986,167259,382391,903
Column 1Column 2
24Wells Fargo & Company

Deposits

Deposits increased from December 31, 2024, reflecting:

•growth in consumer deposits driven by higher brokerage deposits in WIM;

•growth in commercial deposits driven by additions of deposits from new and existing customers; and

•higher time deposits due to issuances of CDs by corporate treasury.

Table 13 provides additional information regarding deposit balances. Information regarding the impact of deposits on net interest income and a comparison of average deposit balances is provided in the “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” section and Table 4 earlier in this Report. Our average deposit cost in fourth quarter 2025 decreased to 1.44%, compared with 1.73% in fourth quarter 2024.

Table 13: Deposits

($ in millions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024$ Change% Change
Noninterest-bearing deposits$365,368383,616(18,248)(5)%
Interest-bearing deposits1,060,839988,18872,6517
Total deposits$1,426,2071,371,80454,4034

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, total deposits that exceed FDIC insurance limits, or are otherwise uninsured, were estimated to be $600 billion and $550 billion, respectively. Estimated uninsured domestic deposits reflect amounts disclosed in the U.S. regulatory reports of our subsidiary banks, with adjustments for amounts related to consolidated

subsidiaries. All non-U.S. deposits are treated for these purposes as uninsured.

Table 14 presents the contractual maturities of estimated time deposits that exceed FDIC insurance limits, or are otherwise uninsured. All non-U.S. time deposits are uninsured.

Table 14: Uninsured Time Deposits by Maturity

(in millions)Three months or lessAfter three months through six monthsAfter six months through twelve monthsAfter twelve monthsTotal
December 31, 2025
Domestic time deposits$12,4697,6295,18146525,744
Non-U.S. time deposits1,5341,1095043,147
Total$14,0038,7385,68546528,891
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company25

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, we engage in financial transactions that are not recognized on our consolidated balance sheet or may be recognized on our consolidated balance sheet in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. Our off-balance sheet arrangements include unfunded credit commitments, derivatives, transactions with unconsolidated entities, guarantees, and other commitments. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage our credit, market or liquidity risks, and/or (3) diversify our funding sources.

Unfunded Credit Commitments

Unfunded credit commitments are legally binding agreements to lend to customers with terms covering usage of funds, contractual interest rates, expiration dates, and any required collateral. The maximum credit risk for these commitments will generally be lower than the contractual amount because these commitments may expire without being used or may be cancelled at the customer’s request. Our credit risk monitoring activities include managing the amount of commitments, both to individual customers and in total, and the size and maturity structure of these commitments. For additional information, see Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Derivatives

We use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, including interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk, and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. Derivatives are recognized on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and volume can be measured in terms of the notional amount, which is generally not exchanged, but is used only as the basis on which interest and other payments are determined. The notional amount is not recognized on our consolidated balance sheet and is not, when viewed in isolation, a meaningful measure of the risk profile of the instruments. For additional information, see Note 13 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Transactions with Unconsolidated Entities

In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts, limited liability companies or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Generally, SPEs are formed in connection with securitization transactions and are considered variable interest entities (VIEs). For additional information, see Note 15 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Guarantees and Other Commitments

Guarantees are contracts that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on an event or a change in an underlying asset, liability, rate or index. Guarantees are generally in the form of standby and direct pay letters of credit, written options, recourse obligations, exchange and clearing house guarantees, indemnifications, and other types of similar arrangements. We also enter into other commitments such as commitments to purchase securities under resale agreements. For additional information, see Note 16 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Column 1Column 2
26Wells Fargo & Company

Risk Management

Wells Fargo manages a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance and our ability to meet the expectations of our customers, shareholders, regulators and other stakeholders.

Risk is Part of our Business Model. Risk is the possibility of an event occurring that could adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its strategic and business objectives. The Company routinely takes risks to achieve its business goals and to serve its customers. These risks include financial risks, such as credit and interest rate risks, and non-financial risks, such as operational and strategic risks.

Risk Profile. The Company’s risk profile is an assessment of the aggregate risks associated with the Company’s exposures and business activities after taking into consideration risk management effectiveness. The Company monitors its risk profile, and the Board reviews risk profile reports and analysis.

Risk Capacity. Risk capacity is the maximum level of risk that the Company could assume given its current level of resources before triggering regulatory and other constraints on its capital and liquidity needs.

Risk Appetite. Risk appetite is the nature and level of risk the Company is willing to take, within its risk capacity, while pursuing its strategic and business objectives. Risk appetite is articulated in our Statement of Risk Appetite, which establishes acceptable risks and at what level and includes risk appetite principles. The Company’s Statement of Risk Appetite is defined by senior management, approved at least annually by the Board, and helps guide the Company’s business and risk leaders. The Company continuously monitors its risk appetite, and the Board reviews reports which include risk appetite information and analysis.

Risk and Strategy. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) drives the Company’s strategic planning process, which identifies the Company’s most significant opportunities and challenges, develops plans to address them, evaluates the risks of those plans, and articulates the resulting decisions in the form of a company-wide strategic plan. The Company’s risk profile, risk capacity, risk appetite, and risk management effectiveness are considered in the strategic planning process, which is linked with the Company’s capital planning process. The Company’s Independent Risk Management (IRM) organization participates in strategic planning, providing challenge to and independent assessment of the risks associated with strategic initiatives. IRM also independently assesses and challenges the impact of the strategic plan on risk capacity, risk appetite, and risk management effectiveness at the principal lines of business, enterprise functions, and aggregate Company levels. The strategic plan is presented to the Board each year with IRM’s evaluation.

Risk is Managed by Everyone. Every employee, in the course of their daily activities, creates risk and is responsible for managing risk. Every employee has a role to play in risk management, including establishing and maintaining the Company’s risk and control environment. Every employee must comply with applicable laws, regulations, and Company policies.

Risk and Culture. Senior management sets the tone at the top by supporting a strong culture, defined by the Company’s expectations and Code of Conduct, that guides how employees conduct themselves and make decisions. The Board is responsible for holding senior management accountable for establishing and maintaining this culture and effectively managing risk. Senior management expects employees to speak up when they see something that could cause harm to the Company’s customers, communities, employees, shareholders,

or reputation. Because risk management is everyone’s responsibility, all employees are empowered to and expected to challenge risk decisions when appropriate and to escalate their concerns when they have not been addressed. The Company’s performance management and incentive compensation programs are designed to establish a balanced framework for risk and reward under core principles that employees are expected to know and practice. The Board, through its Human Resources Committee, plays an important role in overseeing the Company’s performance management and incentive compensation programs. Effective risk management is a central component of employee performance evaluations.

Risk Management Framework. The Company’s risk management framework sets forth the Company’s core principles for managing and governing its risk. It is approved by the Board’s Risk Committee and reviewed and updated annually. Many other documents and policies flow from its core principles.

Risk Governance

Role of the Board. The Board oversees the Company’s business, including its risk management. It designates and delegates authority to executive officers, assesses senior management’s performance and holds senior management accountable for maintaining and adhering to an effective risk management program.

Board Committee Structure. The Board carries out its risk oversight responsibilities directly and through its committees. The Risk Committee reviews and approves the Company’s risk management framework and oversees management’s implementation of the framework, including how the Company manages and governs risk. The Risk Committee also oversees the Company’s adherence to its risk appetite. In addition, the Risk Committee supports the stature, authority and independence of IRM and oversees and receives reports on its operation. The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) reports functionally to the Risk Committee and administratively to the CEO.

Management Committee Structure. The Company has established management committees, including those focused on risk, that support management in carrying out its governance and risk management responsibilities. One type of management committee is a governance committee, which is a decision-making body that operates for a particular purpose and may report to a Board committee.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company27

Risk Management (continued)

Each management governance committee, in accordance with its charter, is expected to discuss, document, and make decisions regarding high priority and significant risks, emerging risks, risk acceptances, and risks and issues escalated to it; review and monitor progress related to critical and high-risk issues and remediation efforts, including lessons learned; and report key

challenges, decisions, escalations, other actions, and open issues as appropriate.

Table 15 presents the structure of the Company’s Board committees and escalation paths of relevant management governance committees reporting to a Board committee.

Table 15: Board and Relevant Management-level Governance Committee Structure

Wells Fargo & Company
Audit Committee (1)Finance CommitteeRiskCommitteeGovernance & Nominating CommitteeHuman Resources Committee
Management Governance Committees
Disclosure CommitteeCapital Management CommitteeAllowance for Credit Losses Approval Governance CommitteeEnterprise Risk & Control CommitteeIncentive Compensation & Performance Management Committee
Regulatory Reporting Oversight CommitteeCorporate Asset/Liability CommitteeRisk & Control Committees
Recovery & Resolution CommitteeRisk Type Committees
Risk Topic Committees

(1)The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s financial statements and disclosures to shareholders and bank regulatory agencies; oversees the internal audit function and external auditor qualifications, independence, activities, and performance; and assists the Board and the Risk Committee in the oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Management Governance Committees Reporting to the Risk Committee of the Board. The Enterprise Risk & Control Committee (ERCC) is a decision-making and escalation body that governs the management of all risk types. The ERCC receives information about risk and control issues, addresses escalated risks and issues, and actively oversees risk controls. The ERCC also makes decisions related to significant risks and changes to the Company’s risk appetite. The Risk Committee receives regular updates from the ERCC chairs and senior management regarding current and emerging risks and senior management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management program.

The ERCC is co-chaired by the CEO and CRO, with membership comprising the heads of principal lines of business and certain enterprise functions. The Chief Auditor or a designee attends all meetings of the ERCC. The ERCC has a direct escalation path to the Risk Committee. The ERCC also has an escalation path for certain human capital risks and issues to the Human Resources Committee. In addition, the CRO may escalate directly to the Board. Risks and issues are escalated to the ERCC in accordance with the Company’s escalation management policy.

Each principal line of business and enterprise function has a risk and control committee, which is a management governance committee with a mandate that aligns with the ERCC but with its scope limited to the respective principal line of business or enterprise function. These committees focus on and consider risks that the respective principal line of business or enterprise

function generate and manage, and the controls the principal line of business or enterprise function are expected to have in place.

As a complement to these risk and control committees, management governance committees dedicated to specific risk types and risk topics also report to the ERCC to enable more comprehensive governance of risks.

Risk Operating Model – Roles and Responsibilities

The Company has three lines of defense for managing risk: the Front Line, Independent Risk Management, and Internal Audit.

•Front Line. The Front Line, which comprises principal line of business and certain enterprise function activities, is the first line of defense. The Front Line is responsible for understanding the risks generated by its activities, applying adequate controls, and managing risk in the course of its business activities. The Front Line identifies, measures and assesses, controls, monitors, and reports on risk generated by or associated with its business activities and balances risk and reward in decision making while operating within the Company’s risk appetite.

•Independent Risk Management. IRM is the second line of defense. It establishes and maintains the Company’s risk management program and provides oversight, including challenge to and independent assessment and monitoring, of the Front Line’s execution of its risk management responsibilities.

Column 1Column 2
28Wells Fargo & Company

•Internal Audit. Internal Audit is the third line of defense. It is responsible for acting as an independent assurance function.

Risk Type Classifications

The Company uses common classifications, hierarchies, and ratings to enable consistency across risk management programs and aggregation of information. Risk type classifications permit the Company to identify and prioritize its risk exposures, including emerging risk exposures.

Operational Risk Management

Operational risk, which in addition to those discussed in this section, includes compliance risk and model risk, is the risk resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.

The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for operational risk, including significant supporting programs and/or policies regarding the Company’s business resiliency and disaster recovery, change management, data management, information security, technology, and third-party risk management. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee reviews and approves significant operational risk policies and oversees the Company’s operational risk management program.

At the management level, Operational Risk Management and Technology Risk Management, both part of IRM, have oversight responsibility for operational risk. Operational Risk Management and Technology Risk Management report to the CRO and provide periodic reports related to operational risk to the Board’s Risk Committee. Operational Risk Management’s oversight responsibilities include change management risk, fraud risk, human capital risk, information management risk, and third-party risk. Technology Risk Management has oversight responsibility for data management risk, technology risk, and information security risk.

Information Security Risk Management. Information security risk, which includes cybersecurity risk, is a significant operational risk for financial institutions such as Wells Fargo and includes the risk arising from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information or information systems.

The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for information security risk and approves the Company’s information security program, which includes information protection and cyber resiliency. The Risk Committee receives regular reports from the Company’s Head of Technology and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), as well as from Technology Risk Management representatives, on information security risks and significant information security developments, including certain incidents involving third parties.

As described above, at the management level, Technology Risk Management has oversight responsibility for information security risk. As a second line of defense, Technology Risk Management reviews and provides guidance to the Front Line technology team, including with respect to the development and maintenance of risk management policies, governance documents, processes, and controls, and oversees and challenges the Front Line technology team’s risk assessment activities.

The Company’s cybersecurity team, which is part of the broader technology team, provides Front Line information security risk assessment and management and is responsible for protecting the Company’s information systems, networks, and data, including customer and employee data, through the design, execution, and oversight of our information security program.

The technology team is led by the Company’s Head of Technology, who reports to the CEO and leads our efforts to manage information security and related risks across the enterprise, including overseeing the Company’s CISO. Our Head of Technology has over 30 years of technology and information security risk management experience in the financial services industry.

The Company has processes designed to defend against, detect, mitigate, escalate, and remediate cybersecurity incidents, including monitoring of the Company’s networks for actual or potential attacks or breaches. The Company’s incident response program includes notification, escalation, and remediation protocols for cybersecurity incidents, including to our Head of Technology and CISO as appropriate. In addition, to help monitor and assess our exposure to ongoing and evolving risks in these areas, the Company has a cyber and information security focused risk committee led by the CISO and a technology risk committee led by the Head of Technology.

Additional components of the Company’s information security program include: (i) enhancing and strengthening of our practices, policies, and procedures in response to the evolving information security landscape; (ii) designing our information security program to align with regulatory and industry standards; (iii) investing in emerging technologies to proactively monitor new vulnerabilities and reduce risk; (iv) conducting periodic internal and third-party assessments to test our information security systems and controls; (v) leveraging third-party specialists and advisors to review and strengthen our information security program; (vi) evaluating and updating our incident response planning and protocols; and (vii) requiring employees and third-party service providers who have access to our systems to complete annual information security training modules designed to provide guidance for identifying and avoiding information security risks.

In addition, Operational Risk Management oversees the Company’s third-party risk management program, which, among other things, is designed to identify and address information security risks arising from third-party service providers. Components of this program include incorporating information security and cybersecurity incident notification requirements into contracts with third-party service providers, requiring third parties to adhere to defined information security and control standards, and performing periodic third-party risk assessments.

Wells Fargo and other financial institutions, as well as our third-party service providers, continue to be the target of various evolving and adaptive information security threats, including cyberattacks, malware, ransomware, other malicious software intended to exploit hardware or software vulnerabilities, phishing, social engineering attacks, credential validation, and distributed denial-of-service, in an effort to disrupt the operations of financial institutions, test their cybersecurity capabilities, commit fraud, or obtain confidential, proprietary or other information. Cyberattacks have also focused on targeting online applications and services, such as online banking, as well as

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company29

Risk Management (continued)

cloud-based and other products and services provided by third parties, and have targeted the infrastructure of the internet causing the widespread unavailability of websites and degrading website performance. As a result, information security and the continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes and systems designed to protect our networks, computers, software and data from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a priority for Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo is also involved in industry cybersecurity efforts and working with other parties, including our third-party service providers and governmental agencies, to continue to enhance defenses and improve resiliency to information security threats. See the “Risk Factors” section in this Report for additional information regarding the risks and potential impacts associated with a failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, including as a result of cyberattacks or other information security incidents.

Compliance Risk Management

Compliance risk (a type of operational risk) is the risk resulting from the failure to comply with laws (legislation, regulations and rules) and regulatory guidance, and the failure to appropriately address associated impact, including to customers. Compliance risk encompasses violations of applicable internal policies, program requirements, procedures, and standards related to ethical principles applicable to the Company.

The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for all aspects of compliance risk, including financial crimes risk. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee reviews and approves significant supporting compliance risk and financial crimes risk policies and programs and oversees the Company’s compliance risk management and financial crimes risk management programs.

Conduct risk, a sub-category of compliance risk, is the risk that the behavior of an employee or third party acting on behalf of the Company involves, or a business practice produces, conduct that is unlawful, unethical, or conflicts with the Company’s expectations for lawful and ethical behavior outlined in its Code of Conduct, which has the potential to adversely affect customers, employees, the Company, or its stakeholders. The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for conduct risk and risk management components of the Company’s culture, while the responsibilities of the Board’s Human Resources Committee include oversight of the Company’s culture, Code of Conduct, human capital management (including talent management and succession planning), performance management program, and incentive compensation risk management program.

At the management level, the Compliance function, which is part of IRM, monitors the implementation of the Company’s compliance and conduct risk programs. The Compliance function reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to compliance risk to the Board’s Risk Committee. Financial Crimes Risk Management, also part of IRM, oversees and monitors financial crimes risk, a sub-category of compliance risk. Financial Crimes Risk Management reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to financial crimes risk to the Board’s Risk Committee.

Model Risk Management

Model risk (a type of operational risk) is the risk arising from the potential for adverse consequences of decisions made based on model output that may be incorrect or used inappropriately.

The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for model risk. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee oversees the Company’s model risk management policy, model governance, model performance, model issue remediation status, and adherence to model risk appetite metrics.

At the management level, the Model Risk function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for model risk and is responsible for governance, validation and monitoring of model risk across the Company. The Model Risk function reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to model risk to the Board’s Risk Committee.

Strategic Risk Management

Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, or liquidity arising from adverse business decisions, improper implementation of strategic initiatives, or inadequate responses to changes in the external operating environment.

The Board has primary oversight responsibility for strategic planning and oversees management’s development and implementation of and approves the Company’s strategic plan, and considers whether it is aligned with the Company’s risk appetite and risk management effectiveness. Management develops, executes and recommends significant strategic corporate transactions and the Board evaluates management’s proposals, including their impact on the Company’s risk profile and financial position. The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for the Company’s strategic risk and the adequacy of the Company’s strategic risk management program, including associated risk management practices, processes and controls.

At the management level, the Strategic Risk Oversight function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for strategic risk. The Strategic Risk Oversight function reports into the CRO and supports periodic reports related to strategic risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee.

Credit Risk Management

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a borrower or counterparty default (failure to meet obligations in accordance with agreed upon terms). Credit risk exists with many of the Company’s assets and exposures such as debt security holdings, certain derivatives, and loans.

The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for credit risk. At the management level, Corporate Credit Risk, which is part of IRM, and the chief risk officers aligned with each principal line of business, have oversight responsibility for credit risk. Corporate Credit Risk and the business-aligned chief risk officers report to the CRO and support periodic reports related to credit risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee.

Column 1Column 2
30Wells Fargo & Company

Loan Portfolio. Our loan portfolios represent the largest component of assets on our consolidated balance sheet for which we have credit risk. Table 16 presents our total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable.

Table 16: Total Loans Outstanding by Portfolio Segment and Class of Financing Receivable

(in millions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024
Commercial and industrial$452,068381,241
Commercial real estate132,284136,505
Lease financing15,54316,413
Total commercial599,895534,159
Residential mortgage242,190250,269
Credit card59,54056,542
Auto50,48742,367
Other consumer34,05529,408
Total consumer386,272378,586
Total loans$986,167912,745

We manage our credit risk by establishing what we believe are sound credit policies for underwriting new business, while monitoring and reviewing the performance of our existing loan portfolios. We employ various credit risk management and monitoring activities to mitigate risks, including those related to:

•Loan concentrations;

•Borrower or counterparty performance and related credit risk;

•Economic and market conditions;

•Changes in interest rates; and

•Legislative or regulatory mandates.

Our credit risk management oversight process is governed centrally, but provides for direct management and accountability by our lines of business. Our overall credit process includes comprehensive credit policies, disciplined credit underwriting, frequent and detailed risk measurement and modeling, extensive credit training programs, and a continual loan review and audit process.

A key to our credit risk management is adherence to a well-controlled underwriting process, which we believe is appropriate for the needs of our customers as well as investors who purchase the loans or securities collateralized by the loans.

Credit Quality Overview.  Table 17 provides credit quality trends.

Table 17: Credit Quality Overview

($ in millions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial loans$5,2664,618
Consumer loans2,9353,112
Total nonaccrual loans$8,2017,730
Nonaccrual loans as a % of total loans0.83%0.85
Allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans$14,33714,636
ACL for loans as a % of total loans1.45%1.60
Net loan charge-offs as a % of:
Average commercial loans0.19%0.29
Average consumer loans0.790.85

The following discussion provides additional information and analysis of our loan portfolios. See Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for more analysis and credit information.

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS AND LEASE FINANCING.  For purposes of portfolio risk management, we aggregate commercial and industrial loans and lease financing according to market segmentation and standard industry codes. We generally subject commercial and industrial loans and lease financing to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. Our ratings are aligned to regulatory definitions of pass and criticized categories with criticized segmented among special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss categories.

Generally, the primary source of repayment for our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio is the operating cash flows of customers, with the collateral securing this portfolio representing a secondary source of repayment. The majority of this portfolio is secured by short-term assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory, and debt securities, as well as long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets.

Loans to our largest industry category, financials except banks, are generally secured and have features to help manage credit risk, such as structural credit enhancements, collateral eligibility requirements, contractual re-margining of collateral supporting the loans, and loan amounts limited to a percentage of the value of the underlying assets considering underlying credit risk, asset duration, and ongoing performance.

We had $15.9 billion of the commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio classified as criticized in accordance with regulatory guidance at December 31, 2025, compared with $16.5 billion at December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily driven by the retail and technology, telecom and media industries.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company31

Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)

The portfolio increase at December 31, 2025, compared with December 31, 2024, was a result of increased originations and loan draws, partially offset by paydowns, and was primarily driven by the financials except banks industry.

Table 18 provides our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing by industry using the North American Industry Classification System.

Table 18: Commercial and Industrial Loans and Lease Financing by Industry

December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
($ in millions)Nonaccrual loansLoans outstanding balance% of total loansTotal commitments (1)(2)Nonaccrual loansLoans outstanding balance% of total loansTotal commitments (1)(2)
Financials except banks
Asset managers and funds (3)$184,8549%$141,129159,8476%$106,926
Commercial finance (4)10860,955697,757251,786684,652
Consumer finance (5)12927,794345,321520,840234,669
Real estate finance (6)734,514339,0431624,358329,329
Total financials except banks245208,11721323,25024156,83117255,576
Technology, telecom and media4926,552378,92210623,590361,813
Real estate and construction6629,321360,9009224,839352,741
Equipment, machinery and parts manufacturing3325,985354,0783525,135351,150
Retail20819,644242,8659117,709243,374
Materials and commodities10013,609135,73110013,624137,365
Food and beverage manufacturing28617,838233,951916,665235,079
Auto related716,984232,169816,507230,537
Oil, gas and pipelines310,237131,738310,503130,486
Health care and pharmaceuticals2213,513131,5522713,620130,726
Diversified or miscellaneous5811,905129,90899,115*22,847
Utilities188,232*28,1876,641*24,735
Commercial services6511,481127,5637811,152126,968
Entertainment and recreation1713,208120,8415312,672119,691
Insurance and fiduciaries16,128*19,22324,368*15,753
Transportation services1568,237*16,7371549,560116,477
Other (7)5326,620345,9065625,123344,324
Total$1,387467,61147%$913,521847397,65444%$799,642

*Less than 1%.

(1)Total commitments consist of loans outstanding plus unfunded credit commitments, excluding issued letters of credit and discretionary amounts where our approval or consent is required prior to any loan funding or commitment increase. For additional information on issued letters of credit, see Note 16 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.

(2)We use credit derivatives, which had notional amounts of $8.2 billion and $1.7 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, to hedge certain loan exposures. These amounts are not shown as reductions to total commitments. For additional information on credit derivatives, see Note 13 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report.

(3)Includes loans for subscription or capital calls and loans to prime brokerage customers and securities firms.

(4)Includes asset-based lending and leasing, including loans to special purpose entities, loans to commercial leasing entities, and structured lending facilities to commercial loan managers.

(5)Includes originators or servicers of financial assets collateralized by consumer loans such as auto loans and leases, and credit cards.

(6)Includes originators or servicers of financial assets collateralized by commercial or residential real estate loans.

(7)No other single industry had total loans in excess of $8.4 billion and $7.8 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio included non-U.S. loans of $81.0 billion and $62.6 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Significant industry concentrations of non-U.S. loans at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, included:

•$51.8 billion and $36.3 billion in the financials except banks industry;

•$8.2 billion and $7.4 billion in the banks industry; and

•$1.8 billion and $2.3 billion in the oil, gas and pipelines industry.

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (CRE).  Our CRE loan portfolio is composed of CRE mortgage and CRE construction loans. The total CRE loan portfolio decreased $4.2 billion from December 31, 2024, as paydowns exceeded originations and advances. Unfunded credit commitments at December 31, 2025 and 2024, were $6.2 billion and $5.4 billion, respectively, for CRE mortgage loans and $9.2 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively, for CRE construction loans.

The portfolio is diversified both geographically and by property type. At December 31, 2025, the five states with the largest

geographic concentrations of CRE loans, as shown in Table 19, represented a combined 52% of the total CRE portfolio. The largest property type concentrations were apartments at 28% and industrial/warehouse at 20% of the portfolio at December 31, 2025. With respect to the office property type, loans in California and New York represented approximately 40% of this property type at both December 31, 2025 and 2024. We continue to closely monitor the credit quality of the office property type given weakened demand for office space.

We generally subject CRE loans to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. We had $13.4 billion of CRE mortgage loans classified as criticized in accordance with regulatory guidance at December 31, 2025, compared with $17.8 billion at December 31, 2024. We had $1.7 billion of CRE construction loans classified as criticized in accordance with regulatory guidance at December 31, 2025, compared with $1.5 billion at December 31, 2024. The decrease in criticized CRE mortgage loans was primarily driven by the apartments, office, and hotel/motel property types.

Column 1Column 2
32Wells Fargo & Company

Table 19 provides our CRE loans by state and property type.

Table 19: CRE Loans by State and Property Type

December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
Real estate mortgageReal estate constructionTotal commercial real estateTotal commercial real estate
($ in millions)Nonaccrual loansLoans outstanding balanceNonaccrual loansLoans outstanding balanceNonaccrual loansLoans outstanding balanceLoans as % of total loansTotal commitments (1)Loans outstanding balanceTotal commitments (1)
By state:
California$83623,8372,37183626,2083%$28,91827,99930,802
New York40313,1212,76940315,890217,18215,48116,225
Texas3288,896771,31040510,206113,01810,96711,808
Florida2798,9171,75427910,671111,41311,07812,081
Arizona904,945419905,364*6,0455,3236,129
Other (2)1,66856,9721986,9731,86663,945671,07765,65771,965
Total$3,604116,68827515,5963,879132,28413%$147,653136,505149,010
By property type:
Apartments$36727,989198,98538636,9744%$41,55439,75844,783
Industrial/warehouse4224,2851,6744225,959331,37724,03826,178
Office2,20620,1612551,7972,46121,958223,36027,38028,768
Hotel/motel71912,03972571912,764113,15411,50612,015
Retail (excl shopping center)4210,44411244310,568111,47611,34511,951
Shopping center539,215138539,353*9,8008,1138,571
Institutional114,736666115,402*5,8525,1865,524
Other1647,8191,4871649,306*11,0809,17911,220
Total$3,604116,68827515,5963,879132,28413%$147,653136,505149,010

*    Less than 1%.

(1)Total commitments consist of loans outstanding plus unfunded credit commitments, excluding issued letters of credit. For additional information on issued letters of credit, see Note 16 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.

(2)Includes 45 states and non-U.S. loans. No state in Other had loans in excess of $4.8 billion and $5.9 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Non-U.S. loans were $5.7 billion and $5.1 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

COMMERCIAL CREDIT RISK MITIGATION. Risk mitigation actions, including the restructuring of repayment terms, securing collateral or guarantees, and entering into extensions, are based on a re-underwriting of the loan and our assessment of the borrower’s ability to perform under the agreed-upon terms. Extension terms generally range from six to 36 months and may require that the borrower provide additional economic support, such as partial repayment, or additional collateral or guarantees. In cases where the value of collateral or financial condition of the borrower is insufficient to repay our loan, we may rely upon the support of an outside repayment guarantee in providing the extension.

Our ability to seek performance under a guarantee is directly related to the guarantor’s creditworthiness, capacity and willingness to perform, which is evaluated on an annual basis, or more frequently as warranted. Our evaluation is based on the most current financial information available and is focused on various key financial metrics, including net worth, leverage, and current and future liquidity. We consider the guarantor’s creditworthiness and willingness to work with us based on our analysis, as well as other lenders’ experience with the guarantor. Our assessment of the guarantor’s credit strength is reflected in our loan risk ratings for such loans. The loan risk rating and accruing status are important factors in our allowance for credit losses methodology.

In considering the accrual status of the loan, we evaluate

the collateral and future cash flows, as well as the anticipated support of any repayment guarantor. In many cases, the

strength of the guarantor provides sufficient assurance that full repayment of the loan is expected. When full and timely collection of the loan becomes uncertain, including the performance of the guarantor, we place the loan on nonaccrual status. As appropriate, we also charge the loan down in accordance with our charge-off policies, generally to the net realizable value of the collateral securing the loan, if any.

NON-U.S. LOANS. Our classification of non-U.S. loans is based on whether the borrower’s primary address is outside of the United States. At December 31, 2025, non-U.S. loans totaled $86.7 billion, representing approximately 9% of our total consolidated loans outstanding, compared with $67.9 billion, or approximately 7% of our total consolidated loans outstanding, at December 31, 2024. Non-U.S. loans were approximately 4% of our total consolidated assets at both December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company33

Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)

COUNTRY RISK EXPOSURE. Our country risk monitoring process incorporates centralized monitoring of economic, political, social, legal, and transfer risks in countries where we do or plan to do business, along with frequent dialogue with our customers, counterparties and regulatory agencies. We establish exposure limits for each country through a centralized oversight process based on customer needs, and through consideration of the relevant and distinct risk of each country. We monitor exposures closely and adjust our country limits in response to changing conditions. We evaluate our individual country risk exposure based on our assessment of a borrower’s ability to repay,

which gives consideration for allowable transfers of risk, such as guarantees and collateral, and may be different from the reporting based on a borrower’s primary address.

Our largest single country exposure outside the U.S. at December 31, 2025, was the United Kingdom, which totaled $33.2 billion, or approximately 2% of our total assets, of which $3.1 billion were sovereign exposures and included deposits we have placed with the Bank of England pursuant to regulatory requirements in support of our London branch.

Table 20 provides information regarding our top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.), based on our assessment of risk, which gives consideration to the country of any guarantors and/or underlying collateral. With respect to Table 20:

•Lending exposure consists of loans outstanding plus unfunded credit commitments (excluding discretionary amounts where our approval or consent is required prior to any loan funding or commitment increase) and is presented prior to the deduction of the allowance for credit losses or collateral received under the terms of the credit agreements, if any.

•Securities exposure represents debt and equity securities of non-U.S. issuers. If applicable, long and short positions are netted.

•Derivatives and other exposure represents foreign exchange contracts, derivative contracts, securities resale agreements, and securities lending agreements.

Table 20: Top 20 Country Exposures (1)

December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
(in millions)Deposits with banks (2)LendingSecuritiesDerivatives and otherTotal (3)Total (4)
United Kingdom$3,47526,882(160)3,03633,23328,079
Canada96013,5893,6331,36619,54816,971
Japan15,65449893720717,29616,027
Luxembourg9010,2221654410,8728,456
Cayman Islands9,1986809,8788,011
Ireland235,5301425276,2225,597
Guernsey5,8352295,8662,855
France193,9352342524,4404,183
Germany2643,685471634,1593,337
Bermuda3,62937683,7343,730
Netherlands3,3581041443,6062,465
South Korea122,200(9)222,2251,502
Switzerland591,448406032,1501,842
Spain11,630582941,983868
Chile11,12937921,5111,372
Australia313871160881,4321,191
Jersey1,012852241,321925
China153555493811,2821,682
Hong Kong3931981181,1771,226
Brazil909492960887
Total$21,06396,4347,0588,340132,895111,206

(1)Top 20 country exposures reflected 90% of our total non-U.S. exposure at both December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024.

(2)Predominantly deposited with central banks.

(3)Top 20 country exposures to central banks and financial institutions was $79.7 billion.

(4)The 2024 exposures correspond to the ranking of the top 20 country exposures at December 31, 2025, and do not necessarily reflect our top 20 country exposures at December 31, 2024.

Column 1Column 2
34Wells Fargo & Company

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS. Our residential mortgage loan portfolio is composed of 1–4 family first and junior lien mortgage loans. Junior lien mortgage loans consist of residential mortgage lines of credit and loans that are subordinate in rights to an existing lien on the same property. Residential mortgage – first lien loans represented 97% of the total residential mortgage loan portfolio at December 31, 2025, compared with 96% at December 31, 2024.

The residential mortgage loan portfolio includes loans with adjustable-rate features. We monitor the risk of default as a result of interest rate increases on adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans, which may be mitigated by product features that limit the amount of the increase in the contractual interest rate. The default risk of these loans is considered in our ACL for loans. ARM loans were $70.8 billion, or 7% of total loans, at December 31, 2025, compared with $66.3 billion, or 7% of total loans, at December 31, 2024, with an initial reset date in 2027 or later for the majority of this portfolio at December 31, 2025. We do not offer option ARM products or loans with negative amortization features.

The outstanding balance of residential mortgage lines of credit (both first and junior lien) was $10.3 billion at December 31, 2025, compared with $12.4 billion at December 31, 2024. The unfunded credit commitments for these lines of credit totaled $15.2 billion at December 31, 2025, compared with $22.5 billion at December 31, 2024. Our residential mortgage lines of credit generally have draw periods of 10 years followed by an amortizing repayment period. The lines that enter their repayment period may experience higher delinquencies and higher loss rates than the ones in their draw period. We have considered this increased risk in our ACL for loans estimate. Interest-only lines and loans were $17.6 billion, or 2% of total

loans, at December 31, 2025, compared with $18.7 billion, or 2% of total loans, at December 31, 2024.

We monitor changes in real estate values and underlying economic or market conditions for the geographic areas of our residential mortgage loan portfolio as part of our credit risk management process. Our periodic review of this portfolio includes estimating property values using home valuation models and indices. We have risk management guidelines that address the usage of these models, including periodic validation. For additional information about our monitoring of property values, see Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Part of our credit monitoring includes tracking delinquency, current Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) credit scores, and loan to collateral values (LTV) on the entire residential mortgage loan portfolio. For junior lien mortgages, LTV uses the total combined loan balance of first and junior lien mortgages, including unused line of credit amounts. For additional information regarding credit quality indicators, see Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Borrowers experiencing financial difficulties may seek additional assistance through a loan modification. For additional information on loan modifications, see Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Our residential mortgage loan portfolio decreased $8.1 billion from December 31, 2024, due to loan paydowns, partially offset by originations. Table 21 shows the outstanding balances of our first and junior lien mortgage loan portfolios.

Table 21: Residential Mortgage Loans

December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
($ in millions)Outstanding balance% of total loansOutstanding balance% of total loans
California (1)$108,08011%$108,00012%
New York30,128330,7773
Washington10,727110,6211
New Jersey9,48119,8411
Florida8,92219,3681
Other (2)61,580665,3367
Government insured/guaranteed loans (3)5,56917,0971
Total first lien mortgage portfolio234,48724241,04026
Total junior lien mortgage portfolio (4)7,70319,2291
Total residential mortgage loan portfolio$242,19025%$250,26927%

(1)Our first lien mortgage loans to borrowers in California are located predominantly within the larger metropolitan areas, with no single California metropolitan area consisting of more than 4% of total loans.

(2)Consists of 45 states; no state in Other had loans in excess of $6.4 billion and $6.9 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

(3)Represents loans, substantially all of which were purchased from Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) loan securitization pools, where the repayment of the loans is insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, such as the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). For additional information on GNMA loan securitization pools, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Mortgage Banking Activities” section in this Report.

(4)Includes loans of $2.4 billion and $2.7 billion in California, and no other state had loans in excess of $730 million and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company35

Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)

CREDIT CARD, AUTO, AND OTHER CONSUMER LOANS. Table 22 shows the outstanding balance of our credit card, auto, and other consumer loan portfolios. For information regarding credit

quality indicators for these portfolios, see Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Table 22: Credit Card, Auto, and Other Consumer Loans

December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
($ in millions)Outstanding balance% of total loansOutstanding balance% of total loans
Credit card$59,5406%$56,5426%
Auto50,487542,3675
Other consumer:
Securities-based26,206321,4482
Other7,84917,9601
Total other consumer34,055429,4083
Total$144,08215%$128,31714%

Credit Card.  The increase in the outstanding balance at December 31, 2025, compared with December 31, 2024, was due to higher purchase volume and the impact of new account growth.

Auto.  The increase in the outstanding balance at December 31, 2025, compared with December 31, 2024, was due to loan originations exceeding paydowns.

Other Consumer.  The increase in the outstanding balance at December 31, 2025, compared with December 31, 2024, was due to an increase in securities-based lending in our WIM operating segment.

Securities-based loans, such as margin loans, originated by the WIM operating segment are collateralized by assets in customer brokerage accounts. These loans have provisions that allow us to require additional collateral if the fair value of the existing collateral declines. Accordingly, these loans generally do not have an allowance for credit losses given their minimal expected credit risk.

Column 1Column 2
36Wells Fargo & Company

NONPERFORMING ASSETS (NONACCRUAL LOANS AND FORECLOSED ASSETS). We generally place loans on nonaccrual status when:

•the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain (generally based on an assessment of the borrower’s financial condition and the adequacy of collateral, if any), such as in bankruptcy or other circumstances;

•they are 90 days (120 days with respect to residential mortgage loans) past due for interest or principal, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection;

•part of the principal balance has been charged off; or

•for junior lien mortgage loans, we have evidence that the related first lien mortgage may be 120 days past due or in the process of foreclosure regardless of the junior lien delinquency status.

Certain nonaccrual loans may be returned to accrual status after they perform for a period of time. Credit card loans are not placed on nonaccrual status, but are generally fully charged off when the loan reaches 180 days past due.

Table 23 summarizes nonperforming assets.

Table 23: Nonperforming Assets (Nonaccrual Loans and Foreclosed Assets)

($ in millions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial and industrial$1,312763
Commercial real estate3,8793,771
Lease financing7584
Total commercial5,2664,618
Residential mortgage (1)2,8382,991
Auto7089
Other consumer2732
Total consumer2,9353,112
Total nonaccrual loans$8,2017,730
As a percentage of total loans0.83%0.85
Foreclosed assets:
Government insured/guaranteed (2)$83
Commercial262169
Consumer3234
Total foreclosed assets302206
Total nonperforming assets$8,5037,936
As a percentage of total loans0.86%0.87

(1)Residential mortgage loans are not placed on nonaccrual status when they are insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, such as the FHA or the VA.

(2)Consistent with regulatory reporting requirements, foreclosed real estate resulting from government insured/guaranteed loans are classified as nonperforming. Both principal and interest related to these foreclosed real estate assets are collectible because the loans were insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Receivables related to the foreclosure of certain government guaranteed real estate mortgage loans are excluded from this table and included in accounts receivable in other assets. For additional information on the classification of certain government-guaranteed mortgage loans upon foreclosure, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Total nonaccrual loans increased $471 million from December 31, 2024, driven by higher commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans.

For additional information on commercial nonaccrual loans, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Commercial and Industrial Loans and Lease Financing” and “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Commercial Real Estate” sections in this Report.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company37

Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)

Table 24 provides an analysis of the changes in nonaccrual loans. Typically, changes to nonaccrual loans period-over-period represent inflows for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status in accordance with our policies, offset by reductions for loans

that are paid down, charged off, sold, foreclosed, or are no longer classified as nonaccrual as a result of continued performance and an improvement in the borrower’s financial condition and loan repayment capabilities.

Table 24: Analysis of Changes in Nonaccrual Loans

Year ended December 31,
(in millions)20252024
Commercial nonaccrual loans
Balance, beginning of period$4,6184,914
Inflows6,2374,613
Outflows:
Returned to accruing(790)(966)
Foreclosures(95)(58)
Charge-offs(1,180)(1,635)
Payments, sales and other(3,524)(2,250)
Total outflows(5,589)(4,909)
Balance, end of period5,2664,618
Consumer nonaccrual loans
Balance, beginning of period3,1123,342
Inflows1,2341,283
Outflows:
Returned to accruing(512)(571)
Foreclosures(76)(88)
Charge-offs(84)(85)
Payments, sales and other(739)(769)
Total outflows(1,411)(1,513)
Balance, end of period2,9353,112
Total nonaccrual loans$8,2017,730

We considered the risk of losses on nonaccrual loans in developing our allowance for loan losses. We believe exposure to losses on nonaccrual loans is mitigated by the following factors at December 31, 2025:

•98% of total commercial nonaccrual loans were secured, predominantly by real estate.

•74% of total commercial nonaccrual loans were current on interest and 63% of commercial nonaccrual loans were current on both principal and interest, but were on nonaccrual status because the full or timely collection of interest or principal had become uncertain.

•99% of total consumer nonaccrual loans were secured, of which 97% were secured by real estate and 98% had an LTV ratio of 80% or less.

•$378 million of the $461 million of consumer loans in bankruptcy or discharged in bankruptcy, and classified as nonaccrual, were current.

Column 1Column 2
38Wells Fargo & Company

NET CHARGE-OFFS. Table 25 presents net loan charge-offs.

Table 25: Net Loan Charge-offs

Quarter ended December 31,Year ended December 31,
2025202420252024
($ in millions)Net loan charge- offs% ofaverageloans (1)Net loan charge- offs% of average loans (1)Net loan charge- offs% of average loansNet loan charge- offs% of average loans
Commercial and industrial$1570.15%$1320.14%$5750.14%$5970.16%
Commercial real estate1580.482610.744210.329030.62
Lease financing100.26100.23370.24350.20
Total commercial3250.224030.301,0330.191,5350.29
Residential mortgage(13)(0.02)(14)(0.02)(53)(0.02)(69)(0.03)
Credit card5833.976284.492,4264.312,4554.58
Auto600.49820.772040.463560.80
Other consumer911.091121.563841.254951.75
Total consumer7210.758080.852,9610.793,2370.85
Total$1,0460.43%$1,2110.53%$3,9940.43%$4,7720.52%

(1)Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average loans are annualized.

The decrease in commercial net loan charge-offs in 2025, compared with 2024, was due to lower losses in our commercial real estate portfolio driven by the office property type.

The decrease in consumer net loan charge-offs in 2025, compared with 2024, was due to lower losses in our auto and other consumer portfolios.

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES.  We maintain an allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans, which is management’s estimate of the expected lifetime credit losses in the loan portfolio and unfunded credit commitments, at the balance sheet date, excluding loans and unfunded credit commitments carried at fair value or held for sale. Additionally, we maintain an ACL for debt securities classified as either AFS or HTM, other financial assets measured at amortized cost, including deposits with banks, net investments in leases, and other off-balance sheet credit exposures.

The process for establishing the ACL for loans takes into consideration many factors, including historical and forecasted loss trends, loan-level credit quality ratings and loan grade-specific characteristics. The process involves subjective and complex judgments. In addition, we review a variety of credit metrics and trends. These credit metrics and trends, however, do not solely determine the amount of the allowance as we use several analytical tools. For additional information on our ACL, see the “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report. For additional information on our ACL for loans, see Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report, and for additional information on our ACL for debt securities, see Note 2 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company39

Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)

Table 26 presents the allocation of the ACL for loans by loan portfolio segment and class.

Table 26: Allocation of the ACL for Loans

Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024
($ in millions)ACLACL as % of loan classLoans as % of total loansACLACL as % of loan classLoans as % of total loans
Commercial and industrial$4,5101.00%46$4,1511.09%42
Commercial real estate2,7372.07133,5832.6215
Lease financing2101.3512121.292
Total commercial7,4571.24607,9461.4959
Residential mortgage (1)5550.23255410.2227
Credit card4,9568.3264,8698.616
Auto8171.6256361.505
Other consumer5521.6246442.193
Total consumer6,8801.78406,6901.7741
Total$14,3371.45%100$14,6361.60%100
Components:
Allowance for loan losses$13,79714,183
Allowance for unfunded credit commitments540453
Allowance for credit losses$14,33714,636
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total net loan charge-offs3.45x2.97
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total nonaccrual loans1.681.83
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans1.40%1.55

(1)Includes negative allowance for expected recoveries of amounts previously charged off.

The ratios for the allowance for loan losses and the ACL for loans presented in Table 26 may fluctuate from period to period due to such factors as the mix of loan types in the portfolio, borrower credit strength, and the value and marketability of collateral.

The ACL for loans decreased $299 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2024, reflecting improved credit performance for commercial real estate loans, partially offset by a higher allowance for commercial and industrial and auto loans due to portfolio growth. The detail of the changes in the ACL for loans by portfolio segment (including charge-offs and recoveries by loan class) is included in Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

We consider multiple economic scenarios to develop our estimate of the ACL for loans, which generally include a base scenario, along with an optimistic (upside) and one or more pessimistic (downside) scenarios. We weighted the base scenario and the downside scenarios in our estimate of the ACL for loans at December 31, 2025. The base scenario assumed uncertainty related to trade policies, increased inflation along with slowing economic growth, increased unemployment rates, and a decline in commercial real estate prices. The downside scenarios assumed a more substantial economic contraction due to lower business and consumer confidence, declining property values, and uncertainty related to trade policies.

Additionally, we consider qualitative factors that represent management’s judgment of risks related to our processes and assumptions used in establishing the ACL such as economic environmental factors, modeling assumptions and performance, process risk, and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.

The forecasted key economic variables used in our estimate of the ACL for loans at December 31 and September 30, 2025, are presented in Table 27.

Table 27: Forecasted Key Economic Variables

2Q 20264Q 20262Q 2027
Weighted blend of economic scenarios:
U.S. unemployment rate (1):
December 31, 20254.7%5.35.8
September 30, 20254.95.65.9
U.S. real GDP (2):
December 31, 2025(0.8)(0.5)1.0
September 30, 2025(1.3)0.31.7
Home price index (3):
December 31, 2025(2.3)(5.2)(5.5)
September 30, 2025(4.7)(6.0)(5.1)
Commercial real estate asset prices (3):
December 31, 2025(6.9)(9.0)(6.9)
September 30, 2025(9.6)(9.4)(6.0)

(1)Quarterly average.

(2)Percent change from the preceding period, seasonally adjusted annualized rate.

(3)Percent change year over year of national average; outlook differs by geography and property type.

Future amounts of the ACL for loans will be based on a variety of factors, including loan balance changes, portfolio credit quality and mix changes, and changes in general economic conditions and expectations (including for unemployment and real GDP), among other factors.

Column 1Column 2
40Wells Fargo & Company

We believe the ACL for loans of $14.3 billion at December 31, 2025, was appropriate to cover expected credit losses, including unfunded credit commitments, at that date. The entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses from the total loan portfolio. The ACL for loans is subject to change and reflects existing factors as of the date of determination, including economic or market conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes. Due to the sensitivity of the ACL for loans to changes in the economic and business environment, it is possible that we will incur incremental credit losses not anticipated as of the balance sheet date. Our process for determining the ACL is discussed in the “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES.  We sell residential and commercial mortgage loans to various parties, including (1) government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), who include the mortgage loans in GSE-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, (2) SPEs that issue private label MBS, and (3) other financial institutions that purchase mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. In addition, we may pool FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed residential mortgage loans that are then used to back securities guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). We may be required to repurchase these mortgage loans, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losses incurred on loans (collectively, repurchase) in the event of a breach of contractual representations or warranties that is not remedied within a period (usually 90 days or less) after we receive notice of the breach.

In connection with our sales and securitization of residential mortgage loans, we have established a mortgage repurchase liability, initially at fair value, related to various representations and warranties that reflect management’s estimate of losses for loans for which we could have a repurchase obligation, whether or not we currently service those loans, based on a combination of factors. See Note 15 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our liability for mortgage loan repurchase losses.

We provide recourse to GSEs for commercial mortgage loans sold under various programs and arrangements. The terms of certain programs require that we incur a pro-rata share of actual losses in the event of borrower default. See Note 16 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our exposure to loss related to these programs.

In addition to servicing loans in our portfolio, we may also service residential and commercial mortgage loans included in GSE mortgage securitizations, GNMA-guaranteed mortgage securitizations of FHA-insured/VA-guaranteed mortgages and private label mortgage securitizations, as well as for unsecuritized loans owned by institutional investors.

The loans we service were originated by us or by other mortgage loan originators. As servicer, our primary duties are typically to (1) collect payments due from borrowers, (2) advance certain delinquent payments of principal and interest on the mortgage loans, (3) maintain and administer any hazard, title or primary mortgage insurance policies relating to the mortgage loans, (4) maintain any required escrow accounts for payment of taxes and insurance and administer escrow payments, and (5) foreclose on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent consistent with the related servicing agreement, consider alternatives to foreclosure, such as loan modifications or short sales, and for certain investors, manage the foreclosed property through liquidation. The amount and timing of reimbursement for advances of delinquent payments vary by investor and the applicable servicing agreements. See Note 6 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights, servicer advances and servicing fees.

In accordance with applicable servicing guidelines, upon transfer as servicer, we may have the option to repurchase loans from certain loan securitizations, which generally becomes exercisable based on delinquency status such as when three scheduled loan payments are past due. When we have the unilateral option to repurchase a loan, we recognize the loan and a corresponding liability on our balance sheet regardless of our intent to repurchase the loan.

Each agreement under which we act as servicer generally specifies a standard of responsibility for actions we take in such capacity. We are required to indemnify the securitization trustee against any failure by us as servicer to perform our servicing obligations. In addition, if we commit a breach of our obligations as servicer, we may be subject to termination if the breach is not cured within a specified period. The standards governing servicing in GSE-guaranteed securitizations, and the possible remedies for violations of such standards, vary, and those standards and remedies are determined by servicing guides maintained by the GSEs, contracts between the GSEs and individual servicers and topical guides published by the GSEs from time to time. Such remedies could include indemnification or repurchase of an affected mortgage loan. In addition, in connection with our servicing activities, we could continue to become subject to consent orders and settlement agreements with federal and state regulators for alleged servicing issues and practices. In general, these can require us to provide customers with loan modification relief, refinancing relief, and foreclosure prevention and assistance, and can result in business restrictions or the imposition of certain monetary penalties on us.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company41

Asset/Liability Management

Asset/liability management involves measuring, monitoring and managing interest rate risk, market risk, liquidity risk and funding. Primary oversight of interest rate risk and market risk resides with the Finance Committee of the Board, while primary oversight of liquidity risk and funding resides with the Risk Committee of the Board. These committees oversee the administration and effectiveness of financial risk management policies and processes used to assess and manage these risks.

At the management level, the Corporate Asset/Liability Committee, which consists of management from finance, risk and business groups, oversees interest rate risk and liquidity risk and funding and supports periodic reports provided to the Board’s Finance Committee and Risk Committee as appropriate. As discussed in more detail for market risk activities below, we employ separate management level oversight specific to market risk.

INTEREST RATE RISK. Interest rate risk is the risk that market fluctuations in interest rates, and/or product spreads, can cause a reduction in the Company’s earnings and capital stemming from mismatches in the Company’s asset and liability cash flows.

We are subject to interest rate risk because:

•assets and liabilities may mature or reprice at different times or at different amounts;

•short-term and long-term market interest rates may change independently or by different magnitudes;

•the remaining maturity for various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change; or

•interest rates may also have a direct or indirect effect on loan demand, collateral values, credit losses, loan origination volume, and the fair value of financial instruments and MSRs.

We measure interest rate risk exposure from lending, investing, and deposit-raising activities, as well as from issuances of long-term debt. Interest rate risk is measured by comparing the earnings outcomes from multiple interest rate scenarios relative to our base scenario. The base scenario is a reference point used by the Company for financial planning purposes. These scenarios may differ in the direction, degree, and speed of interest rate changes over time, and the projected shape of the yield curve. They also require assumptions regarding drivers of earnings and balance sheet composition such as loan originations, prepayment rates on loans and debt securities, deposit flows and mix, as well as pricing strategies. We periodically assess and enhance our scenarios and assumptions.

Table 28 presents the results of the estimated net interest income sensitivity over the next 12 months from the multiple scenarios compared with our base scenario. These hypothetical scenarios include instantaneous movements across the yield curve with both lower and higher interest rates under a parallel shift, as well as steeper and flatter non-parallel changes in the yield curve. Long-term interest rates are defined as all tenors three years and longer, and short-term interest rates are defined as all tenors less than three years. Markets trading net interest income is excluded from the sensitivity analysis since Markets trading net interest income may be offset by trading-related noninterest income. For additional information on the market risk of financial instruments used in our trading activities, which are measured at fair value through earnings, see the “Risk

Management – Asset/Liability Management – Market Risk – Trading Activities” section in this Report.

Our scenario assumptions reflected the following:

•Scenarios are dynamic and reflect anticipated changes to our assets and liabilities over time.

•Mortgage prepayment and origination assumptions vary across scenarios and reflect only the impact of the higher or lower interest rates.

•Other macroeconomic variables that could be correlated with the changes in interest rates are held constant.

•The funding forecast in our base scenario incorporates deposit mix changes and market funding levels consistent with the base interest rate trajectory. Our hypothetical scenarios incorporate deposit mix that is the same as in the base scenario. In higher interest rate scenarios, potential customer deposit activity that shifts balances into higher yielding products and/or requires additional market funding could reduce the expected benefit from higher rates. Conversely, in lower interest rate scenarios, a potential shift to a funding mix with lower yielding deposits and/or less market funding could reduce the impact of lower rates on earning assets in these scenarios.

•The interest rate sensitivity of deposits as market interest rates change, referred to as deposit betas, are informed by historical behavior and expectations for near-term pricing strategies. Our actual experience may differ from expectations due to the lag or acceleration of deposit repricing, changes in consumer behavior, and other factors.

Table 28: Net Interest Income Sensitivity Over the Next 12 Months Using Instantaneous Movements

($ in billions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024
Parallel shift (1):
+100 bps shift in interest rates$1.91.3
-100 bps shift in interest rates(2.3)(2.2)
-200 bps shift in interest rates(5.3)(4.4)
Steeper yield curve (1):
+100 bps shift in long-term interest rates0.50.4
-100 bps shift in short-term interest rates(1.8)(1.8)
Flatter yield curve (1):
+100 bps shift in short-term interest rates1.40.9
-100 bps shift in long-term interest rates(0.4)(0.4)

(1)In first quarter 2025, we made an update to exclude the net interest income sensitivity for trading-related assets and liabilities of our Markets trading business. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

The changes in our interest rate sensitivity from December 31, 2024, to December 31, 2025, reflected updates for our expected balance sheet composition. Our interest rate sensitivity indicates that we would expect to benefit from higher interest rates as our assets would reprice faster and to a greater degree than our liabilities, while in the case of lower interest rates, our assets would reprice downward and to a greater degree than our liabilities resulting in lower net interest income. The realized impact of interest rate changes may vary from our base and hypothetical scenarios for various reasons, including any deposit pricing lags. We use interest rate derivatives and our debt securities portfolio to manage our interest rate exposures.

Column 1Column 2
42Wells Fargo & Company

We use derivatives for asset/liability management to (i) convert cash flows from selected assets and/or liabilities from floating-rate payments to fixed-rate payments, or vice versa, (ii) reduce accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) sensitivity of our AFS debt securities portfolio, and/or (iii) economically hedge our mortgage origination pipeline, funded mortgage loans, and MSRs. Derivatives used to hedge our interest rate risk exposures are presented in Note 13 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report. As interest rates increase, changes in the fair value of AFS debt securities may negatively affect AOCI, which lowers the amount of our regulatory capital. AOCI also includes unrealized gains or losses related to the transfer of debt securities from AFS to HTM, which are subsequently amortized into earnings over the life of the security with no further impact from interest rate changes. See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 2 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on our debt securities portfolio.

In addition to the net interest income sensitivity above, we also measure and evaluate the economic value sensitivity (EVS) of our balance sheet. EVS is the change in the present value of the life-time cash flows of the Company’s assets and liabilities across a range of scenarios. It is based on the existing balance sheet, at a point in time, and helps indicate whether we are exposed to higher or lower interest rates. We manage EVS through a set of limits that are designed to align with our interest rate risk appetite.

Interest rate sensitive noninterest income is impacted by changes in earnings credit for noninterest-bearing deposits that reduce treasury management deposit-related service fees on commercial accounts. Our interest rate sensitive noninterest income is also impacted by mortgage banking activities that may have sensitivity impacts that move in the opposite direction of our net interest income. See the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section in this Report for additional information.

MORTGAGE BANKING INTEREST RATE AND MARKET RISK.  We originate and service mortgage loans, which subjects us to various risks, including market, interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks that can be substantial. Based on market conditions and other factors, we reduce credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing mortgage loans. We determine whether mortgage loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment, but may change our intent to hold loans for investment or sale as part of our corporate asset/liability management activities. We may also retain securities in our investment portfolio at the time we securitize mortgage loans.

Changes in interest rates may impact mortgage banking noninterest income, including origination and servicing fees, and the fair value of our residential MSRs, loans held for sale (LHFS), and derivative loan commitments (interest rate “locks”) extended to mortgage applicants. Interest rate changes will generally impact our mortgage banking noninterest income on a lagging basis due to the time it takes for the market to reflect a shift in customer demand, as well as the time required for processing a new application, providing the commitment, and securitizing and selling the loan. The amount and timing of the impact will depend on the magnitude, speed and duration of the changes in interest rates.

The valuation of our residential MSRs is highly subjective and involves complex judgments by management about matters that are inherently unpredictable. Changes in interest rates influence a variety of significant assumptions captured in the periodic valuation of residential MSRs, including prepayment rates, costs to service, and other servicing valuation elements. See the “Critical Accounting Policies – Fair Value Measurements” section in this Report for additional information on the valuation of our residential MSRs.

An increase in interest rates generally reduces the propensity for refinancing, extends the expected duration of the managed servicing portfolio, and therefore increases the estimated fair value of the MSRs. However, an increase in interest rates can also reduce mortgage loan demand, including refinancing activity, which reduces noninterest income from origination activities. A decline in interest rates would generally have an opposite impact.

To reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates, our residential MSRs are economically hedged with a combination of derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) futures, highly liquid mortgage forward contracts, and interest rate options. Hedging the various sources of interest rate risk in mortgage banking is a complex process that requires sophisticated modeling and constant monitoring. There are several potential risks to earnings from mortgage banking related to origination volumes and mix, valuation of MSRs and associated hedging results, the relationship and degree of volatility between short-term and long-term interest rates, and changes in servicing and foreclosures costs. While we attempt to balance our mortgage banking interest rate and market risks, the financial instruments we use may not perfectly correlate with the values and income being hedged.

The size of the hedge and the particular combination of hedging instruments at any point in time is designed to reduce the volatility of our earnings over various time frames within a range of mortgage interest rates. Market factors, the composition of the managed servicing portfolio, and the relationship between the origination and servicing sides of our mortgage businesses change continually, and therefore the types of instruments used in our hedging are reviewed daily and rebalanced based on our evaluation of current market factors and the interest rate risk inherent in our portfolio. For additional information on mortgage banking, including key assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value of MSRs, see Note 6 (Mortgage Banking Activities) and Note 14 (Fair Value Measurements) to Financial Statements in this Report.

MARKET RISK. Market risk is the risk of possible economic loss from adverse changes in market risk factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and the risk of possible loss due to counterparty exposure. Market risk applies to implied volatility risk, basis risk, and market liquidity risk and includes price risk in the trading book, mortgage servicing rights, the hedge effectiveness risk associated with non-trading portfolios held at fair value, and impairment on private equity investments.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company43

Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)

The Board’s Finance Committee has primary oversight responsibility for market risk and oversees the Company’s market risk exposure and market risk management strategies. In addition, the Board’s Risk Committee has certain oversight responsibilities with respect to market risk, including counterparty risk. The Finance Committee also reports key market risk matters to the Risk Committee.

At the management level, the Market and Counterparty Risk Management function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for market risk across the enterprise. The Market and Counterparty Risk Management function reports into Corporate and Investment Banking Risk and provides periodic reports related to market risk to the Board’s Finance Committee and Risk Committee, as applicable.

MARKET RISK – TRADING ACTIVITIES.  We engage in trading activities to accommodate the investment and risk management activities of our customers and to execute economic hedging to manage certain balance sheet risks. These trading activities predominantly occur within our Markets business. Trading debt and equity securities, trading loans, and trading derivatives are financial instruments used in our trading activities, and are measured at fair value through earnings. Income earned on the financial instruments used in our trading activities include net interest income, changes in fair value, and realized gains and losses. Changes in fair value and realized gains and losses of the financial instruments used in our trading activities are reflected in net gains from trading activities. For additional information on the financial instruments used in our trading activities, see

Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report. For additional information on the income from these trading activities, see Note 20 (Revenue and Expenses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Value-at-risk (VaR) is a statistical risk measure used to estimate the potential loss from adverse moves in the financial markets, and Trading VaR is a measure used to provide insight into the market risk exhibited by the Company’s trading positions on our consolidated balance sheet. The Company uses these VaR metrics complemented with sensitivity analysis and stress testing in measuring and monitoring market risk. The Company calculates Trading VaR for risk management purposes to establish and monitor line of business and Company-wide risk limits.

Our Trading General VaR is calculated using a simulation model based on historical changes in market values, which estimates the potential loss on the portfolio over a one-day time interval at a 99% confidence level. Our historical simulation model is based on equally weighted data from a 12-month historical look-back period. We believe using a 12-month look-back period helps ensure the Company’s VaR is responsive to current market conditions. The 99% confidence level equates to an expectation that the Company would incur single-day trading losses in excess of the VaR estimate on average once every 100 trading days.

Table 29 shows the Company’s Trading General VaR by risk category.

Table 29: Trading 1-Day 99% General VaR by Risk Category

Year ended December 31,
2025 (1)2024
(in millions)AverageLowHighAverageLowHigh
Company Trading General VaR Risk Categories
Credit$191136352358
Interest rate5214321368
Equity211441201527
Commodity3183111
Foreign exchange5191013
Diversification benefit (2)(23)(62)
Company Trading General VaR$3029

(1)In second quarter 2025, we changed our approach for allocating VaR by risk category to align the primary product class of a trading position to a single risk category. Previously, products with multiple risks were allocated across several risk categories. This change did not affect the underlying assumptions, parameters, or the VaR model itself.

(2)The diversification effect arises because the risks are not perfectly correlated causing a portfolio of positions to usually be less risky than the sum of the risks of the positions alone. The diversification benefit is not meaningful for low and high metrics since they may occur on different days.

Sensitivity Analysis. Given the inherent limitations of the VaR models, the Company uses other measures, including sensitivity analysis, to measure and monitor risk. Sensitivity analysis is the measure of exposure to a single risk factor, such as a 0.01% increase in interest rates or a 1% increase in equity prices. We conduct and monitor sensitivity on interest rates, credit spreads, volatility, equity, commodity, and foreign exchange exposure. Sensitivity analysis complements VaR as it provides an indication of risk relative to each factor irrespective of historical market moves.

Stress Testing. While VaR captures the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market data, stress testing is designed to capture the Company’s exposure to extreme, but low probability, market movements. Stress

scenarios estimate the risk of losses based on management’s assumptions of abnormal but severe market movements such as severe credit spread widening or a large decline in equity prices. These scenarios assume that the market moves happen instantaneously and no repositioning or hedging activity takes place to mitigate losses as events unfold (a conservative approach since experience demonstrates otherwise).

An inventory of scenarios is maintained representing both historical and hypothetical stress events that affect a broad range of market risk factors with varying degrees of correlation and differing time horizons. Hypothetical scenarios assess the impact of large movements in financial variables on portfolio values. Typical examples include a 1% (100 basis point) increase across the yield curve or a 10% decline in equity market indexes.

Column 1Column 2
44Wells Fargo & Company

Historical scenarios utilize an event-driven approach: the stress scenarios are based on plausible but rare events, and the analysis addresses how these events might affect the risk factors relevant to a portfolio.

The Company’s stress testing framework is also used in calculating results in support of the Federal Reserve Board’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and internal stress tests. Stress scenarios are regularly reviewed and updated to address potential market events or concerns. For more detail on the CCAR process, see the “Capital Management” section in this Report.

MARKET RISK – EQUITY SECURITIES. We are directly and indirectly affected by changes in the equity markets. We make and manage investments in various businesses, such as start-up companies and emerging growth companies, some of which are made by our venture capital business. We also invest in funds that make similar private equity investments.

Private equity investments are investments in nonmarketable equity securities and are approved by management and/or the Board depending on investment size. Management reviews these investments at least quarterly to assess for impairment and identify observable price changes for investments accounted for using the measurement alternative, both of which may require us to make fair value measurements. Impairment assessments are based on facts and circumstances of each individual investment and the expectations for that investment’s cash flows and capital needs, the viability of its business model, and our exit strategy. We account for private equity investments under the fair value method, the equity method, or the measurement alternative.

Additionally, as part of our business to support our customers, we trade public equities, listed/over-the-counter equity derivatives, and convertible bonds, and we have parameters for the oversight of these activities.

Changes in equity market prices may also indirectly affect our net income by (1) the value of third-party assets under management and, hence, fee income, (2) borrowers whose ability to repay principal and/or interest may be affected by the stock market, or (3) brokerage activity, related commission income and other business activities. Each business line monitors and manages these indirect risks.

For additional information on our equity securities, see Note 4 (Equity Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report.

LIQUIDITY RISK AND FUNDING. Liquidity risk is the risk arising from the inability of the Company to meet obligations when they come due, or roll over funds at a reasonable cost, without incurring heightened costs. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual obligations that may require future cash payments, including funding for customer loan requests, customer deposit maturities and withdrawals, debt service, leases for premises and equipment, and other cash commitments. Liquidity risk also considers the stability of deposits, including the risk of losing uninsured or non-operational deposits. The objective of effective liquidity management is to be able to meet our contractual obligations and other cash commitments efficiently under both normal operating conditions and under periods of Wells Fargo-specific and/or market stress.

For additional information on these obligations, see the following sections and Notes to Financial Statements in this Report:

•“Unfunded Credit Commitments” section within Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses (Note 3)

•Leasing Activity (Note 7)

•Deposits (Note 8)

•Long-Term Debt (Note 9)

•Guarantees and Other Commitments (Note 16)

•Employee Benefits (Note 21)

•Income Taxes (Note 22)

To help achieve this objective, the Board establishes liquidity guidelines that require sufficient liquidity to cover potential funding requirements and to avoid over-dependence on volatile, less reliable funding markets. These guidelines are monitored on a monthly basis by the management-level Corporate Asset/Liability Committee and on a quarterly basis by the Board. These guidelines are established and monitored for both the Company and the Parent on a stand-alone basis so that the Parent is a source of strength for its banking subsidiaries.

Liquidity Stress Tests. Liquidity stress tests are performed to help the Company maintain sufficient liquidity to meet contractual and contingent outflows modeled under a variety of stress scenarios. Our scenarios utilize market-wide and idiosyncratic events, including a range of stress conditions and time horizons. Stress testing results facilitate evaluation of the Company’s projected liquidity position during stress and may inform future needs in the Company’s funding plan.

Contingency Funding Plan. Our contingency funding plan (CFP), which is approved by the Corporate Asset/Liability Committee and the Board’s Risk Committee, sets out the Company’s strategies and action plans to address potential liquidity needs during market-wide or idiosyncratic liquidity events. The CFP establishes measures for monitoring emerging liquidity events and describes the processes for communicating and managing stress events should they occur. The CFP also identifies alternate funding and liquidity strategies available to the Company in a period of stress.

Liquidity Standards. We are subject to a rule issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) that establishes a quantitative minimum liquidity requirement, known as the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR). The rule requires a covered banking organization to hold high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) in an amount equal to or greater than its projected net cash outflows during a 30-day stress period. Our HQLA under the rule mainly consists of central bank deposits, government debt securities, and federal agency mortgage-backed securities. The LCR applies to the Company and to our insured depository institutions (IDIs) with total assets of $10 billion or more. In addition, rules issued by the FRB impose enhanced liquidity risk management standards on large bank holding companies (BHCs), such as Wells Fargo.

We are also subject to a rule issued by the FRB, OCC and FDIC that establishes a stable funding requirement, known as the net stable funding ratio (NSFR). The NSFR requires a covered banking organization, such as Wells Fargo, to maintain a minimum amount of stable funding, including common equity, long-term debt and most types of deposits, in relation to its assets, derivative exposures and commitments over a one-year

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company45

Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)

horizon period. The NSFR applies to the Company and to our IDIs with total assets of $10 billion or more. As of December 31, 2025, we were compliant with the NSFR requirement.

Liquidity Coverage Ratio. As of December 31, 2025, the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo National Bank West exceeded the minimum LCR requirement of 100%. The LCR

represents average HQLA divided by average projected net cash outflows, as each is defined under the LCR rule.

Table 30 presents the Company’s quarterly average values for the daily-calculated LCR and its components calculated pursuant to the LCR rule requirements.

Table 30: Liquidity Coverage Ratio

Average for quarter ended
(in millions, except ratio)Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Dec 31, 2024
HQLA (1):
Eligible cash$139,271153,816164,386
Eligible securities (2)250,520227,259205,715
Total HQLA389,791381,075370,101
Projected net cash outflows (3)327,403315,355295,537
LCR119%121125

(1)HQLA excludes excess HQLA at certain subsidiaries that is not transferable to other Wells Fargo entities.

(2)Net of applicable haircuts required under the LCR rule.

(3)Projected net cash outflows are calculated by applying a standardized set of outflow and inflow assumptions, defined by the LCR rule, to various exposures and liability types, such as deposits and unfunded loan commitments, which are prescribed based on a number of factors, including the type of customer and the nature of the account.

Liquidity Sources. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had approximately $872.2 billion of total available liquidity sources. Table 31 presents the components of our available liquidity sources.

We maintain primary sources of liquidity in the form of central bank deposits and high-quality liquid debt securities, which collectively totaled $499.5 billion as of December 31, 2025. Our high-quality liquid debt securities presented in Table 31 are substantially the same in composition as HQLA eligible securities under the LCR rule; however, they will generally exceed HQLA eligible securities due to the applicable LCR haircuts and the exclusion of LCR adjustments for excess liquidity that is not transferable from certain subsidiaries.

We believe our high-quality liquid debt securities provide reliable sources of liquidity through sales or by pledging to obtain financing, in both normal and stressed market conditions. High-quality liquid debt securities include AFS, HTM, and trading debt securities, as well as debt securities received through securities financing activities.

As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $623.0 billion of borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Discount Window and Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). This borrowing capacity included $250.3 billion related to pledged high-quality liquid debt securities within our primary sources of liquidity and $372.7 billion related to pledged loans and other debt securities within our contingent sources of liquidity.

Table 31: Total Available Liquidity Sources

(in millions)Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Dec 31, 2024
Primary sources of liquidity:
Central bank deposits$130,448134,506162,174
High-quality liquid debt securities (1)369,007372,003368,508
Total499,455506,509530,682
Contingent sources of liquidity (2):
Pledged loans and other372,698359,579361,057
Total available liquidity$872,153866,088891,739

(1)Presented at fair value and includes unencumbered securities.

(2)Presented at borrowing capacity, net of haircuts.

Column 1Column 2
46Wells Fargo & Company

Funding Sources. The Parent acts as a source of funding for the Company through the issuance of long-term debt and equity. WFC Holdings, LLC (the “IHC”) is an intermediate holding company and subsidiary of the Parent, which provides funding support for the ongoing operational requirements of the Parent and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries. For additional information on the IHC, see the “Regulation and Supervision – ‘Living Will’ Requirements and Related Matters” section in our 2025 Form 10-K. Additional subsidiary funding is provided by deposits, short-term funding, and long-term debt.

Deposits have historically provided a sizable source of relatively low-cost funds. Loans were 69% and 67% of total deposits at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Short-term funding, which generally matures in less than 30 days, includes federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements and short-term borrowings. The balances of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase may vary over time due to client activity in our Markets business, our own demand for financing, and our overall mix of liabilities. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased at December 31, 2025, from December 31, 2024, driven by increased client-driven activity in our Markets business. For additional information, see the “Collateralized Financing Activities and Deposits”, “Short-term Borrowings”, and “Long-term Debt” sections of Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

We may pledge financial instruments that we own to collateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings, as well as borrowings from the FHLB. For additional information, see the “Pledged Assets” section of Note 18 (Pledged Assets and Collateral) to Financial Statements in this Report.

We access domestic and international capital markets for long-term funding through issuances of registered debt securities, private placements, securitizations, and asset-backed secured funding. We issue long-term debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. Proceeds from securities issued were used for general corporate purposes unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus or prospectus supplement, and we expect the proceeds from securities issued in the future will be used for the same purposes. Depending on market conditions and our liquidity position, we may redeem or repurchase, and subsequently retire, our outstanding debt securities in privately negotiated or open market transactions,

by tender offer, or otherwise. We issued $9.9 billion of long-term debt during January and February 2026.

Table 32 presents a summary of our long-term debt. For additional information on our long-term debt, including contractual maturities, see Note 9 (Long-Term Debt), and for additional information on the classification of our long-term debt, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Table 32: Long-Term Debt

(in millions)December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
Wells Fargo & Company (Parent Only)$153,748147,100
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and other bank entities (Bank)19,23624,709
Other consolidated subsidiaries1,7281,269
Total$174,712173,078

Credit Ratings. Capital markets investors, as well as other market participants, generally will consider, among other factors, a company’s debt rating in making investment decisions. Rating agencies base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, the level and quality of earnings, and rating agency assumptions regarding the probability and extent of federal financial assistance or support for certain large financial institutions. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a reduction of our credit rating; however, our debt securities do not contain credit rating covenants.

There were no actions undertaken by the ratings agencies with regard to our credit ratings during fourth quarter 2025.

See the “Risk Factors” section in this Report for additional information regarding our credit ratings and the potential impact a credit rating downgrade would have on our liquidity and operations as well as Note 13 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report for information regarding additional collateral and funding obligations required for certain derivative instruments in the event our credit ratings were to fall below investment grade.

The credit ratings of the Parent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as of December 31, 2025, are presented in Table 33.

Table 33: Credit Ratings as of December 31, 2025

Wells Fargo & CompanyWells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Long-termShort-termOutlookLong-termShort-termOutlook
Moody’s Investors ServiceA1P-1StableAa2P-1Stable
S&P Global RatingsBBB+A-2PositiveA+A-1Stable
Fitch RatingsA+F1StableAA-F1+Stable
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company47

Capital Management

We have an active program for managing capital through a comprehensive process for assessing the Company’s overall capital adequacy. Our objective is to maintain capital at an amount commensurate with our risk profile and risk tolerance objectives, and to meet both regulatory and market expectations. We primarily fund our capital needs through the retention of earnings net of both dividends and share repurchases, as well as through the issuance of preferred stock and long- and short-term debt. For additional information about capital planning, see the “Capital Planning and Stress Testing” section below.

Regulatory Capital Requirements

The Company and each of our IDIs are subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. Risk-based capital rules establish risk-adjusted ratios relating regulatory capital to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet exposures as discussed below.

RISK-BASED CAPITAL AND RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS. The Company is subject to rules issued by federal banking regulators to implement Basel III capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations. The rules contain two frameworks for calculating capital requirements, a Standardized Approach and an Advanced Approach applicable to certain institutions, including Wells Fargo, and we must calculate our risk-based capital ratios under both approaches. The Company is required to satisfy the risk-based capital ratio requirements to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.

Table 34 presents the risk-based capital requirements applicable to the Company under the Standardized Approach and Advanced Approach, respectively, as of December 31, 2025.

In addition to the risk-based capital requirements described in Table 34, if the FRB determines that a period of excessive credit growth is contributing to an increase in systemic risk, a countercyclical buffer of up to 2.50% could be added to the risk-based capital ratio requirements under federal banking regulations. The countercyclical buffer in effect at December 31, 2025, was 0.00%.

The capital conservation buffer is applicable to certain institutions, including Wells Fargo, under the Advanced Approach and is intended to absorb losses during times of economic or financial stress.

The stress capital buffer (SCB) is calculated based on the decrease in a BHC’s risk-based capital ratios under the severely adverse scenario in the FRB’s annual supervisory stress test and related Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR), plus four quarters of planned common stock dividends. Because the SCB is calculated annually based on data that can differ over time, our SCB, and thus our risk-based capital ratio requirements under the Standardized Approach, are subject to change in future periods. Our SCB for the period October 1, 2025, through September 30, 2026, is 2.50%. In February 2026, the FRB communicated that the current SCB for BHCs would remain in effect until September 30, 2027, due to proposed updates to enhance the transparency of the stress testing program.

Table 34: Risk-Based Capital Requirements – Standardized and Advanced Approaches

Column 1Column 2
48Wells Fargo & Company

As a global systemically important bank (G-SIB), we are also subject to the FRB’s rule implementing an additional capital surcharge between 1.00-4.50% on the risk-based capital ratio requirements of G-SIBs. Under the rule, we must annually calculate our surcharge under two methods and use the higher of the two surcharges. The first method (method one) considers our size, interconnectedness, cross-jurisdictional activity, substitutability, and complexity, consistent with the methodology developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The second method (method two) uses similar inputs, but replaces substitutability with use of short-term wholesale funding and will generally result in higher surcharges than under method one. Because the G-SIB capital surcharge is calculated annually based on data that can differ over time, the amount of the surcharge is subject to change in future years. If our annual calculation results in a decrease to our G-SIB capital surcharge, the decrease takes effect the next calendar year. If our annual calculation results in an increase to our G-SIB capital surcharge, the increase takes effect in two calendar years. Our G-SIB capital surcharge will continue to be 1.50% in 2026. On July 27, 2023, the FRB issued a

proposed rule that would impact the methodology used to calculate the G-SIB capital surcharge.

Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) include components for credit risk and market risk under both the Standardized and Advanced Approaches. Under the Standardized Approach, credit risk RWAs are determined by applying prescribed risk weights that vary by category of asset, including credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet items. Under the Advanced Approach, credit risk RWAs are calculated using a risk-sensitive methodology, which relies upon the use of our internal credit models based upon our experience with internal rating grades. The Advanced Approach also includes an operational risk component to reflect the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.

The tables that follow provide information about our risk-based capital and related ratios as calculated under Basel III capital rules. Table 35 summarizes our CET1, Tier 1 capital, Total capital, RWAs and capital ratios.

Table 35: Capital Components and Ratios

Standardized ApproachAdvanced Approach
($ in millions)Required Capital Ratios (1)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Required Capital Ratios (1)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024
Common Equity Tier 1(A)$137,346134,588137,346134,588
Tier 1 capital(B)153,567152,866153,567152,866
Total capital(C)184,682184,638174,617174,446
Risk-weighted assets(D)1,294,6091,216,1461,112,5331,085,017
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio(A)/(D)8.50%10.61*11.078.5012.3512.40
Tier 1 capital ratio(B)/(D)10.0011.86*12.5710.0013.8014.09
Total capital ratio(C)/(D)12.0014.27*15.1812.0015.7016.08

*Denotes the binding framework, which is the lower of the Standardized and Advanced Approaches, at December 31, 2025.

(1)Represents the minimum ratios required to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments at December 31, 2025.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company49

Capital Management (continued)

Table 36 provides information regarding the calculation and composition of our risk-based capital under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.

Table 36: Risk-Based Capital Calculation and Components

(in millions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024
Total equity$183,038181,066
Adjustments:
Preferred stock(16,608)(18,608)
Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock141144
Noncontrolling interests(1,920)(1,946)
Total common stockholders’ equity$164,651160,656
Adjustments:
Goodwill(24,967)(25,167)
Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs)(823)(73)
Goodwill and other intangibles on venture capital investments in consolidated portfolio companies (included in other assets)(705)(735)
Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (1)1,063947
Other(1,873)(1,040)
Common Equity Tier 1 under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches$137,346134,588
Preferred stock16,60818,608
Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock(141)(144)
Other(246)(186)
Total Tier 1 capital under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches(A)$153,567152,866
Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 216,73617,644
Qualifying allowance for credit losses (2)14,65914,471
Other(280)(343)
Total Tier 2 capital under the Standardized Approach(B)$31,11531,772
Total qualifying capital under the Standardized Approach(A)+(B)$184,682184,638
Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 216,73617,644
Qualifying allowance for credit losses (2)4,5944,279
Other(280)(343)
Total Tier 2 capital under the Advanced Approach(C)$21,05021,580
Total qualifying capital under the Advanced Approach(A)+(C)$174,617174,446

(1)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period-end.

(2)Differences between the approaches are driven by the qualifying amounts of ACL includable in Tier 2 capital. Under the Advanced Approach, eligible credit reserves represented by the amount of qualifying ACL in excess of expected credit losses (using regulatory definitions) is limited to 0.60% of Advanced credit RWAs, whereas the Standardized Approach includes ACL in Tier 2 capital up to 1.25% of Standardized credit RWAs. Under both approaches, any excess ACL is deducted from the respective total RWAs.

Column 1Column 2
50Wells Fargo & Company

Table 37 provides the composition and net changes in the components of RWAs under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.

Table 37: Risk-Weighted Assets

Standardized ApproachAdvanced Approach
(in millions)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024$ ChangeDec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024$ Change
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs):
Credit risk$1,243,4551,156,57286,883785,554726,85558,699
Market risk51,15459,574(8,420)51,15459,574(8,420)
Operational riskN/AN/AN/A275,825298,588(22,763)
Total RWAs$1,294,6091,216,14678,4631,112,5331,085,01727,516

Table 38 provides an analysis of changes in CET1.

Table 38: Analysis of Changes in Common Equity Tier 1

(in millions)
Common Equity Tier 1 at December 31, 2024$134,588
Net income applicable to common stock20,285
Common stock dividends(5,442)
Common stock issued, repurchased, and stock compensation-related items(16,349)
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)5,503
Goodwill200
Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs)(750)
Goodwill and other intangibles on venture capital investments in consolidated portfolio companies (included in other assets)30
Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (1)116
Other(835)
Change in Common Equity Tier 12,758
Common Equity Tier 1 at December 31, 2025$137,346

(1)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period-end.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company51

Capital Management (continued)

TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY. We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible common equity. Tangible common equity is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents total equity less preferred equity, noncontrolling interests, goodwill, certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) and goodwill and other intangibles on venture capital investments in consolidated portfolio companies, net of applicable deferred taxes. The ratios are (i) tangible book value per common share, which represents tangible common equity divided by common shares outstanding; and (ii) return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE), which represents our

annualized earnings as a percentage of tangible common equity. The methodology of determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. Management believes that tangible book value per common share and return on average tangible common equity, which utilize tangible common equity, are useful financial measures because they enable management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s use of equity.

Table 39 provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.

Table 39: Tangible Common Equity

Balance at period-endAverage balance
Period endedYear ended
(in millions, except ratios)Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Dec 31, 2023Dec 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Dec 31, 2023
Total equity$183,038181,066187,443183,476183,879184,860
Adjustments:
Preferred stock(16,608)(18,608)(19,448)(17,517)(18,581)(19,698)
Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock141144157142147168
Noncontrolling interests(1,920)(1,946)(1,708)(1,860)(1,751)(1,844)
Total common stockholders’ equity(A)164,651160,656166,444164,241163,694163,486
Adjustments:
Goodwill(24,967)(25,167)(25,175)(25,082)(25,172)(25,173)
Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs)(823)(73)(118)(670)(95)(136)
Goodwill and other intangibles on venture capital investments in consolidated portfolio companies (included in other assets)(705)(735)(878)(695)(895)(2,083)
Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (1)1,0639479201,016935906
Tangible common equity(B)$139,219135,628141,193138,810138,467137,000
Common shares outstanding(C)3,092.63,288.93,598.9N/AN/AN/A
Net income applicable to common stock(D)N/AN/AN/A$20,28518,60617,982
Book value per common share(A)/(C)$53.2448.8546.25N/AN/AN/A
Tangible book value per common share(B)/(C)45.0241.2439.23N/AN/AN/A
Return on average common stockholders’ equity (ROE)(D)/(A)N/AN/AN/A12.35%11.3711.00
Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE)(D)/(B)N/AN/AN/A14.6113.4413.13

(1)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period-end.

LEVERAGE REQUIREMENTS. As a BHC, we are required to maintain a supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments and maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio. Table 40 presents the leverage requirements applicable to the Company as of December 31, 2025.

Table 40: Leverage Requirements Applicable to the Company

In addition, our IDIs are required to maintain an SLR of at least 6.00% and a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.00% to be considered well-capitalized under applicable regulatory capital adequacy rules. At December 31, 2025, each of our IDIs exceeded their applicable SLR and Tier 1 leverage requirements.

In November 2025, federal banking regulators issued a rule to modify the leverage requirements. The rule will replace the amount of the supplementary leverage buffer for the Company with an amount equal to half of our G-SIB capital surcharge calculated under method one. Similarly, the rule will replace the amount of the supplementary leverage buffer for our IDIs with an amount equal to half of our G-SIB capital surcharge calculated under method one, with the buffer capped at 1.00%. The rule becomes effective on April 1, 2026, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2026. The Company intends to adopt this rule effective January 1, 2026.

Column 1Column 2
52Wells Fargo & Company

Table 41 presents information regarding the calculation and components of the Company’s SLR and Tier 1 leverage ratio.

Table 41: Leverage Ratios for the Company

($ in millions)Quarter ended December 31, 2025
Tier 1 capital(A)$153,567
Total consolidated assets2,148,631
Adjustments:
Derivatives (1)75,158
Repo-style transactions (2)11,337
Credit equivalent amounts of other off-balance sheet exposures327,081
Other (3)(95,584)
Total adjustments317,992
Total leverage exposure(B)$2,466,623
Supplementary leverage ratio(A)/(B)6.23%
Total adjusted average assets (4)(C)$2,052,117
Tier 1 leverage ratio(A)/(C)7.48%

(1)Adjustment represents derivatives and collateral netting exposures as defined for supplementary leverage ratio determination purposes.

(2)Adjustment represents counterparty credit risk for repo-style transactions where Wells Fargo & Company is the principal counterparty facing the client.

(3)Adjustment represents other permitted Tier 1 capital deductions and certain other adjustments as determined under capital rule requirements.

(4)Represents total average assets less goodwill and other permitted Tier 1 capital deductions.

TOTAL LOSS ABSORBING CAPACITY. As a G-SIB, we are required to have a minimum amount of equity and unsecured long-term debt for purposes of resolvability and resiliency, often referred to as Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC). U.S. G-SIBs are required to have a minimum amount of TLAC (consisting of CET1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital issued directly by the top-tier or covered BHC plus eligible external long-term debt) to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments as well as a minimum amount of eligible unsecured long-term debt. The components used to calculate our minimum TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt requirements as of December 31, 2025, are presented in Table 42.

Table 42: Components Used to Calculate TLAC and Eligible Unsecured Long-Term Debt Requirements

TLAC requirement Greater of:
18.00% of RWAs7.50% of total leverage exposure (the denominator of the SLR calculation)
++
TLAC buffer (equal to 2.50% of RWAs + method one G-SIB capital surcharge + any countercyclical buffer)External TLAC leverage buffer (equal to 2.00% of total leverage exposure)
Minimum amount of eligible unsecured long-term debt Greater of:
6.00% of RWAs4.50% of total leverage exposure
+
Greater of method one and method two G-SIB capital surcharge

In August 2023, the FRB proposed rules that would, among other things, modify the calculation of eligible long-term debt that counts towards the TLAC requirements, which would reduce our TLAC ratios.

In addition, in November 2025, federal banking regulators issued a rule to modify the leverage requirements, which will also impact the TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt requirements. The rule will (i) replace the external TLAC leverage buffer of 2.00% of total leverage exposure with a buffer equal to half of our method one G-SIB capital surcharge, and (ii) replace the minimum leverage-based long-term debt requirement of 4.50% of total leverage exposure with a minimum equal to 2.50% of total leverage exposure plus a buffer equal to half of our method one G-SIB capital surcharge. The rule becomes effective on April 1, 2026, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2026. The Company intends to adopt this rule effective January 1, 2026.

Table 43 provides our TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt and related ratios.

Table 43: TLAC and Eligible Unsecured Long-Term Debt

December 31, 2025
($ in millions)TLACRegulatory Minimum (1)Eligible Unsecured Long-term DebtRegulatory Minimum
Total eligible amount$300,597141,576
Percentage of RWAs (2)23.22%21.5010.947.50
Percentage of total leverage exposure12.199.505.744.50

(1)Represents the minimum required to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.

(2)Our minimum TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt requirements are calculated based on the greater of RWAs determined under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.

OTHER REGULATORY CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY MATTERS. For information regarding the U.S. implementation of the Basel III LCR and NSFR, see the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Liquidity Risk and Funding – Liquidity Standards” section in this Report.

Our principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC, are subject to regulations to maintain minimum net capital requirements. As of December 31, 2025, these broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their respective regulatory minimum net capital requirements.

Capital Planning and Stress Testing

Our planned long-term capital structure is designed to meet regulatory and market expectations. We believe that our long-term targeted capital structure enables us to invest in and grow our business, satisfy our customers’ financial needs in varying environments, access markets, and maintain flexibility to return capital to our shareholders. Our long-term targeted capital structure also considers capital levels sufficient to exceed capital requirements, including the G-SIB capital surcharge and the SCB, as well as potential changes to regulatory requirements for our capital ratios, planned capital actions, changes in our risk profile and other factors. Accordingly, our long-term target capital levels are set above their respective regulatory minimums plus buffers.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company53

Capital Management (continued)

The FRB capital plan rule establishes capital planning and other requirements that govern capital distributions, including dividends and share repurchases, by certain BHCs, including Wells Fargo. The FRB assesses, among other things, the overall financial condition, risk profile, and capital adequacy of BHCs when evaluating their capital plans.

As part of the annual CCAR, the FRB generates a supervisory stress test. The FRB reviews the supervisory stress test results as required under the Dodd-Frank Act using a common set of capital actions for all large BHCs and also reviews the Company’s proposed capital actions.

Federal banking regulators also require large BHCs and banks to conduct their own stress tests to evaluate whether the institution has sufficient capital to continue to operate during periods of adverse economic and financial conditions.

During 2025, we issued $1.1 billion of common stock, substantially all of which was issued in connection with employee compensation and benefits, and we repurchased 221 million shares of common stock at a cost of $17.7 billion. We paid $6.5 billion of common and preferred stock dividends during 2025.

Securities Repurchases

On April 29, 2025, we announced that the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $40 billion of common stock. Unless modified or revoked by the Board, this authorization does not expire. At December 31, 2025, we had remaining Board authority

to repurchase up to approximately $29.8 billion of common stock.

For additional information about share repurchases during fourth quarter 2025, see Part II, Item 5 in our 2025 Form 10-K.

Various factors impact the amount and timing of our share repurchases, including the earnings, cash requirements and financial condition of the Company, the impact to our balance sheet of expected customer activity, our capital requirements and long-term targeted capital structure, the results of supervisory stress tests, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), and regulatory and legal considerations, including regulatory requirements under the FRB’s capital plan rule. Although we announce when the Board authorizes a share repurchase program, we typically do not give any public notice before we repurchase our shares. Due to the various factors that may impact the amount and timing of our share repurchases and the fact that we may be in the market throughout the year, our share repurchases occur at various prices. We may suspend share repurchase activity at any time.

Furthermore, the Company has a variety of benefit plans in which employees may own or obtain shares of our common stock. The Company may buy shares from these plans to accommodate employee preferences and these purchases are subtracted from our repurchase authority.

Regulation and Supervision

The U.S. financial services industry is subject to significant regulation and regulatory oversight initiatives. This regulation and oversight may continue to impact how U.S. financial services companies conduct business and may continue to result in increased regulatory compliance costs.

For a discussion of significant regulations and regulatory oversight initiatives that have affected or may affect our business, see the “Regulation and Supervision” section in our 2025 Form 10-K and the “Risk Factors” section in this Report.

Column 1Column 2
54Wells Fargo & Company

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies (see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this

Report) are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Five of these policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies govern:

•the allowance for credit losses;

•fair value measurements;

•income taxes;

•liability for legal actions; and

•goodwill impairment.

Management has discussed these critical accounting policies and the related estimates and judgments with the Board’s Audit Committee.

Allowance for Credit Losses

We maintain an allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans, which is management’s estimate of the expected credit losses in the loan portfolio and unfunded credit commitments, at the balance sheet date, excluding loans and unfunded credit commitments carried at fair value or held for sale. Additionally, we maintain an ACL for debt securities classified as either HTM or AFS, other financial assets measured at amortized cost, net investments in leases, and other off-balance sheet credit exposures. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 3 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

For loans and HTM debt securities, the ACL is measured based on the remaining contractual term of the financial asset (including off-balance sheet credit exposures) adjusted, as appropriate, for prepayments and permitted extension options using historical experience, current conditions, and forecasted information. For AFS debt securities, the ACL is measured using a discounted cash flow approach and is limited to the difference between the fair value of the security and its amortized cost.

Changes in the ACL and, therefore, in the related provision for credit losses can materially affect net income. In applying the judgment and review required to determine the ACL, management considerations include the evaluation of past events, historical experience, changes in economic forecasts and conditions, customer behavior, collateral values, the length of the initial loss forecast period, and other influences. From time to time, changes in economic factors or assumptions, business or investment strategy, or products or product mix may result in a corresponding increase or decrease in our ACL. While our methodology attributes portions of the ACL to specific financial asset classes (loan and debt security portfolios) or loan portfolio segments (commercial and consumer), the entire ACL is available to absorb credit losses of the Company.

Judgment is specifically applied in:

•Economic assumptions and the length of the initial loss forecast period. We forecast a wide range of economic variables to estimate expected credit losses. Our key economic variables

include gross domestic product (GDP), unemployment rate, and collateral asset prices. While many of these economic variables are evaluated at the macro-economy level, some economic variables are forecasted at more granular levels, for example, using the metro statistical area (MSA) level for unemployment rates, home prices and commercial real estate prices. At least annually, we assess the length of the initial loss forecast period and have currently set the period to two years. For the initial loss forecast period, we forecast multiple economic scenarios that generally include a base scenario with an optimistic (upside) and one or more pessimistic (downside) scenarios. Management exercises judgment when assigning weight to the economic scenarios that are used to estimate future credit losses.

•Reversion to historical loss expectations. Our long-term average loss expectations are estimated by reverting to the long-term average, on a linear basis, for each of the forecasted economic variables. These long-term averages are based on observations over multiple economic cycles. The reversion period, which may be up to two years, is assessed on a quarterly basis.

•Credit risk ratings applied to individual commercial loans, unfunded credit commitments, and debt securities. Individually assessed credit risk ratings are considered key credit variables in our modeled approaches to help assess probability of default and loss given default. Borrower quality ratings are aligned to the borrower’s financial strength and contribute to forecasted probability of default curves. Collateral quality ratings combined with forecasted collateral prices (as applicable) contribute to the forecasted severity of loss in the event of default. These credit risk ratings are reviewed by experienced senior credit officers and subjected to reviews by an internal team of credit risk specialists.

•Usage of credit loss estimation models. We use internally developed models that incorporate credit attributes and economic variables to generate credit loss estimates. Management uses judgment and quantitative analytics in the determination of segmentation, modeling approach, and variables that are leveraged in the models. These models are independently validated in accordance with the Company’s policies. We routinely assess our model performance and apply adjustments when necessary. We also assess our models for limitations against the company-wide risk inventory to help appropriately capture known and emerging risks in our estimate of expected credit losses and apply overlays as needed.

•Valuation of collateral. The current fair value of collateral is utilized to assess the expected credit losses when a financial asset is considered to be collateral dependent. Judgment is applied when valuing the collateral through appraisals, evaluation of the cash flows of the property, or other quantitative techniques. Decreases in collateral valuations support incremental ACL or charge-downs and increases in collateral valuations support lower ACL or are included in the ACL as a negative allowance when the financial asset has been previously written-down below current recovery value.

•Contractual term considerations. The remaining contractual term of a loan is adjusted for expected prepayments and certain expected extensions, renewals, or modifications. We extend the contractual term when we are not able to unconditionally cancel contractual renewals or extension

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company55

Critical Accounting Policies (continued)

options. Credit card loans have indeterminate maturities, which requires that we determine a contractual life by estimating the application of future payments to the outstanding loan amount.

•Qualitative factors which may not be adequately captured in the loss models. These amounts represent management’s judgment of risks related to the processes and assumptions used in establishing the ACL. We also consider economic environmental factors, modeling assumptions and performance, process risk, and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.

Sensitivity. The ACL for loans is sensitive to changes in key assumptions and requires significant management judgment. Future amounts of the ACL for loans will be based on a variety of factors, including loan balance changes, portfolio credit quality, and general forecasted economic conditions. The forecasted economic variables used could have varying impacts on different financial assets or portfolios. Additionally, throughout numerous credit cycles, there are observed changes in economic variables such as the unemployment rate, GDP and real estate prices which may not move in a correlated manner as variables may move in opposite directions or differ across portfolios or geography.

Our sensitivity analysis does not represent management’s view of expected credit losses at the balance sheet date. We applied a 100% weight to a more severe downside scenario in our sensitivity analysis to reflect the potential for further economic deterioration. The outcome of the scenario was influenced by the duration, severity, and timing of changes in economic variables within the scenario. The sensitivity analysis resulted in a hypothetical increase in the ACL for loans of approximately $5.9 billion at December 31, 2025. The hypothetical increase in our ACL for loans does not incorporate the impact of management judgment for qualitative factors applied in the current ACL for loans, which may have a positive or negative effect on the results. It is possible that others performing similar sensitivity analyses could reach different conclusions or results. Management believes that the estimate for the ACL for loans was appropriate at the balance sheet date.

The sensitivity analysis excludes the ACL for debt securities and other financial assets given its size relative to the overall ACL.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell a financial asset or paid to transfer a financial liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

We use fair value measurements to comply with recognition and disclosure requirements. For example, trading assets and trading liabilities, AFS debt securities, residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), derivatives, and marketable non-trading equity securities are recognized at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet each period. Other assets and liabilities, such as loans held for investment, commercial MSRs and certain nonmarketable equity securities are not recognized at fair value each period but may require nonrecurring fair value adjustments through the write-down of individual assets or the application of accounting methods such as lower of cost or fair value (LOCOM) and the measurement alternative.

Fair value measurements are made using a three-level hierarchy which is based on whether the significant inputs to the valuation

methodology used for measurement are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-derived or market-based information obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or liability.

When developing fair value measurements, we maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When available, we use quoted prices in active markets to measure fair value. Such measurements are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. If quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value measurement is based upon internal models that generally use market-based or independently sourced market parameters, including interest rate yield curves, prepayment rates, option volatilities and currency rates. However, when observable market data is limited or not available, fair value measurement is based upon internal models that use unobservable inputs. These models are independently validated in accordance with the Company’s policies. We also obtain pricing information from third-party vendors to determine fair values and to corroborate internal prices. Validation procedures are performed over the reasonableness of prices received from third parties.

When using internal models that use unobservable inputs, management judgment is necessary as our assumptions reflect those that we believe market participants would use to estimate fair value of the asset or liability. Determination of these assumptions includes consideration of many factors, including market conditions and liquidity levels. Changes in market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value. In such cases, adjustments to available quoted prices or observable market data may be required. For example, we may adjust a price received from a third-party pricing service using internal models based on discounted cash flows when the impact of illiquid markets has not already been incorporated in the fair value measurement.

We continually assess the level and volume of market activity to determine when adjustments, if any, are made to quoted prices. Given market conditions can change over time, our determination of which markets are considered active or inactive can change. If we determine a market to be inactive, the degree to which quoted prices require adjustment may also change.

For assets and liabilities not classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy, significant judgment may be needed to determine the classification as either Level 2 or Level 3. When making this judgment, we consider available information, including observable market data, indications of market liquidity and orderliness of transactions, and our understanding of the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to estimate fair value. The classification as Level 2 or Level 3 is based upon the specific facts and circumstances of each instrument or instrument category and judgments are made regarding the significance of unobservable inputs to each instrument’s fair value measurement in its entirety. If one or more unobservable inputs are considered significant to the fair value measurement, the instrument is classified as Level 3. Significant unobservable inputs used in our Level 3 fair value measurements include discount rates, default rates, comparability adjustments, and prepayment rates.

Column 1Column 2
56Wells Fargo & Company

MSRs are assets that represent the rights to service mortgage loans for others. We generally recognize MSRs when we retain servicing rights in connection with the sale or securitization of loans we originate. We have elected to carry our residential MSRs at fair value with changes recognized in earnings. We use internal models to estimate the fair value of residential MSRs, which represent our most significant Level 3 asset. These models calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income and incorporate our estimates of inputs and assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset. Certain significant inputs and assumptions, such as discount rates, prepayment rates (blend of prepayment speeds and expected defaults), and costs to service residential mortgage loans, are generally not observable in the market and require judgment to determine. Both prepayment rate and discount rate assumptions can, and generally will, change quarterly as market conditions and mortgage interest rates change. We periodically benchmark our residential MSR fair value estimates to independent appraisals.

Table 44 presents our (i) assets and liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis and (ii) Level 3 assets and liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis, both presented as a percentage of our total assets and total liabilities.

Table 44: Fair Value Level 3 Summary

December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
($ in billions)Total balanceLevel 3 (1)Total balanceLevel 3 (1)
Assets recognized at fairvalue on a recurring basis$513.27.0421.78.3
As a percentage oftotal assets23.9%0.321.80.4
Liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis$126.21.9132.05.6
As a percentage of total liabilities6.4%0.17.50.3

(1)Before derivative netting adjustments.

See Note 14 (Fair Value Measurements) to Financial Statements in this Report for a complete discussion on fair value measurements, our related measurement techniques and the impact to our financial statements, including MSRs. See Note 6 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report for key weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation of residential MSRs and sensitivity to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions.

Income Taxes

We file income tax returns in the jurisdictions in which we operate and evaluate income tax expense in two components: current and deferred income tax expense. Current income tax expense represents our estimated taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period and includes income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions and proportional amortization of certain affordable housing and renewable energy investments. Uncertain tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that management believes has a greater than 50% likelihood of realization upon settlement. Tax benefits not meeting our realization criteria represent unrecognized tax benefits.

Deferred income taxes are based on the balance sheet method and deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Under the balance sheet method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in income tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur. Deferred tax assets, including those related to net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards, are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. When necessary, valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the realizable amounts.

The income tax laws of the jurisdictions in which we operate are complex and subject to different interpretations by management and the relevant government taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we make judgments about the application of these tax laws. We also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Our interpretations may be subjected to review during examination by taxing authorities and disputes may arise over the respective tax positions. We attempt to resolve these disputes during the tax examination and audit process and ultimately through the court systems when applicable.

We monitor relevant tax authorities and may update our estimate of accrued income taxes due to changes in income tax laws and their interpretation by the courts and regulatory authorities on a quarterly basis. Updates to our estimate of accrued income taxes also may result from our own income tax planning and from the resolution of income tax controversies. Such updates to our estimates may be material to our operating results for any period.

See Note 22 (Income Taxes) to Financial Statements in this Report for a further description of our provision for income taxes and related income tax assets and liabilities.

Liability for Legal Actions

The Company is involved in a number of judicial, regulatory, governmental, arbitration and other proceedings or investigations that expose the Company to potential financial losses or other adverse consequences. We recognize accruals for legal actions when potential losses associated with the actions become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. For such accruals, we recognize the amount we consider to be the best estimate within a range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable. If we cannot determine a best estimate, we recognize the amount at the low end of the range of those potential losses. The actual costs of resolving legal actions may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those actions.

We apply judgment when recognizing an accrual for potential losses associated with legal actions and in establishing the range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the accrual. Our judgment is influenced by our understanding of information currently available related to the legal evaluation and potential outcome of actions, including input and advice on these matters from our external counsel. These matters may be in various stages of investigation, discovery or proceedings. They may also involve a wide variety of claims across our businesses, legal entities and jurisdictions. The eventual outcome may be a scenario that was not considered or was considered remote in

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company57

Critical Accounting Policies (continued)

anticipated occurrence. Accordingly, our estimate of potential losses will change over time and the actual losses may vary significantly given the inherent and unpredictable nature of legal actions.

See Note 12 (Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.

Goodwill Impairment

We assess goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently depending on macroeconomic and other business factors. These factors may include trends in short-term or long-term interest rates, negative trends from reduced revenue generating activities or increased costs, adverse actions by regulators, or company specific factors such as a decline in market capitalization.

We identify reporting units to be assessed for goodwill impairment at the reportable operating segment level or one level below. Goodwill is allocated to the reporting unit at the time we acquire a business and does not change unless there is goodwill impairment or a significant business reorganization impacting the reporting unit. We determine the reporting unit carrying amounts as the allocated capital plus assigned goodwill and other intangible assets. We allocate capital to the reporting units under a risk-sensitive framework driven by our regulatory capital requirements. We estimate fair value of the reporting units based on a balanced weighting of fair values estimated using both an income approach and a market approach which are intended to reflect Company performance and expectations as well as external market conditions. The methodologies for determining the carrying amounts and estimating the fair values are periodically assessed and updated as necessary.

The income approach is a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, which estimates the present value of future cash flows associated with each reporting unit. A DCF analysis requires significant judgment to estimate financial forecasts for our reporting units, which includes future expectations of economic conditions and balance sheet changes, as well as considerations related to future business activities. The forecasts are reviewed by senior management. For periods after our financial forecasts, we incorporate a terminal value estimate. We discount these forecasted cash flows using a rate derived from the capital asset pricing model that produces an estimated cost of equity for our reporting units, which reflects risks and uncertainties in the financial markets and in our financial forecasts.

The market approach utilizes observable market data from comparable publicly traded companies, such as price-to-earnings or price-to-tangible book value ratios, to estimate a reporting unit’s fair value. We use judgment to select comparable companies for each reporting unit and include those with the most similar business activities.

Our 2025 assessment indicated goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2025, based on the fair value of each reporting unit exceeding its carrying amount by a significant amount. The aggregate fair value of our reporting units exceeded our market capitalization, and we believe factors that contributed to this difference included an overall control premium.

Adverse changes to forecasts or a significant increase in the discount rates may result in an impairment. Additionally, declines in our ability to generate revenue, significant increases in credit losses or other expenses, or adverse actions from regulators are factors that could result in material goodwill impairment of any reporting unit in a future period.

For additional information on goodwill and our reportable operating segments, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), Note 5 (Intangible Assets and Other Assets), and Note 19 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Column 1Column 2
58Wells Fargo & Company

Current Accounting Developments

Table 45 provides significant Accounting Standard Updates (ASU or Update) applicable to us that have been issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) but are not yet effective.

Table 45: Current Accounting Developments – Issued Standards

StandardDescription and Effective DateImpact
ASU 2024-03 – Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses•Effective January 1, 2027; early adoption permitted•Requires tabular disclosure in the notes to the financial statements and disaggregation of certain costs and expenses included within certain captions on the income statement•Requires disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, the definition of selling expensesCurrently evaluating the impact to the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-06 – Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software•Effective January 1, 2028; early adoption permitted •Eliminates the use of “project stages” in determining whether internal‑use software costs should be expensed or capitalized•Requires capitalization once (1) management has authorized and committed funding for the project, and (2) it is probable the project will be completed and used as intendedCurrently evaluating and do not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-07 – Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract•Effective January 1, 2027; early adoption permitted•Introduces a new derivatives scope exception for contracts tied to the operations or activities of a party to the contract (e.g., environmental, social or governance linked financial instruments)•Clarifies the accounting for share‑based noncash customer consideration provided in exchange for goods or servicesCurrently evaluating and do not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-08 – Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans•Effective January 1, 2027; early adoption permitted•Expands the scope of acquired financial assets subject to the gross-up approach to include purchased seasoned loans that are not purchased credit deteriorated loans•Applies when the acquired loan is (a) obtained through a business combination, or (b) acquired outside a business combination or through consolidation of a variable interest entity and the loan was purchased more than 90 days after origination with no involvement by the purchaser in its originationCurrently evaluating and do not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-09 – Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements•Effective January 1, 2027; early adoption permitted•Aligns hedge accounting with entities’ risk management economics, primarily affecting cash flow hedges and certain fair value and net investment hedgesCurrently evaluating and do not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-10 – Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities•Effective January 1, 2029; early adoption permitted•Provides recognition, measurement, and presentation guidance for government grants received by business entities•Requires that a grant not be recognized until (1) it is probable the entity will comply with the grant’s conditions and (2) the grant will be receivedCurrently evaluating and do not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company59

Forward-Looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements. In addition, we may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed or furnished with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and our management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “target,” “projects,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “can” and similar references to future periods. In particular, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make about: (i) the future operating or financial performance of the Company or any of its businesses, including our outlook for future growth; (ii) our expectations regarding noninterest expense and our efficiency ratio; (iii) future credit quality and performance, including our expectations regarding future loan losses, our allowance for credit losses, and the economic scenarios considered to develop the allowance; (iv) our expectations regarding net interest income and net interest margin; (v) loan growth or the reduction or mitigation of risk in our loan portfolios; (vi) future capital or liquidity levels, ratios or targets; (vii) the expected outcome and impact of legal, regulatory and legislative developments, as well as our expectations regarding compliance therewith; (viii) future common stock dividends, common share repurchases and other uses of capital; (ix) our targeted range for return on assets, return on equity, and return on tangible common equity; (x) expectations regarding our effective income tax rate; (xi) the outcome of contingencies, such as legal actions; (xii) sustainability and governance related goals or commitments; and (xiii) the Company’s plans, objectives and strategies.

Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation:

•current and future economic and market conditions, including the effects of declines in housing prices, high unemployment rates, declines in commercial real estate prices, U.S. fiscal debt, budget and tax matters, geopolitical matters, trade policies, and any slowdown in global economic growth;

•our capital and liquidity requirements (including under regulatory capital standards, such as the Basel III capital standards) and our ability to generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;

•current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could have a negative effect on our revenue and businesses, including rules and regulations relating to bank products and financial services;

•our ability to realize any efficiency ratio or expense target as part of our expense management initiatives, including as a result of business and economic cyclicality, seasonality, changes in our business composition and operating environment, growth in our businesses and/or acquisitions, and unexpected expenses relating to, among other things, litigation and regulatory matters;

•the effect of the current interest rate environment or changes in interest rates or in the level or composition of our assets or liabilities on our net interest income and net interest margin;

•significant turbulence or a disruption in the capital or financial markets, which could result in, among other things, a reduction in the availability of funding or increased funding costs, a reduction in our ability to sell or securitize loans, and declines in asset values and/or recognition of impairment of securities held in our debt securities and equity securities portfolios;

•the effect of a fall in stock market prices on our investment banking business and our fee income from our brokerage and wealth management businesses;

•negative effects from instances where customers may have experienced financial harm, including on our legal, operational and compliance costs, our ability to engage in certain business activities or offer certain products or services, our ability to keep and attract customers, our ability to attract and retain qualified employees, and our reputation;

•regulatory matters, including the failure to resolve outstanding matters on a timely basis and the potential impact of new matters, litigation, or other legal actions, which may result in, among other things, additional costs, fines, penalties, restrictions on our business activities, reputational harm, or other adverse consequences;

•a failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of cyberattacks;

•the effect of changes in the level of checking or savings account deposits on our funding costs and net interest margin;

•fiscal and monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board;

•changes to tax laws, regulations, and guidance as well as the effect of discrete items on our effective income tax rate;

•our ability to develop and execute effective business plans and strategies; and

•the other risk factors and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors” in this Report.

In addition to the above factors, we also caution that the amount and timing of any future common stock dividends or repurchases will depend on the earnings, cash requirements and financial condition of the Company, the impact to our balance sheet of expected customer activity, our capital requirements and long-term targeted capital structure, the results of supervisory stress tests, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), regulatory and legal considerations, including regulatory requirements under the Federal Reserve Board’s capital plan rule, and other factors deemed relevant by the Company, and may be subject to regulatory approval or conditions.

Column 1Column 2
60Wells Fargo & Company

For additional information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, refer to our reports filed with the SEC, including the discussion under “Risk Factors” in this Report, as filed with the SEC and available on its website at www.sec.gov.1

Any forward-looking statement made by us speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

1 We do not control this website. Wells Fargo has provided this link for your convenience, but does not endorse and is not responsible for the content, links, privacy policy, or security policy of this website.

Forward-looking Non-GAAP Financial Measures. From time to time we may provide forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures, such as forward-looking estimates or targets for return on average tangible common equity or for net interest income excluding Markets. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures because we are unable to provide, without unreasonable effort, a meaningful or accurate calculation or estimation of amounts that would be necessary for the reconciliation due to the complexity and inherent difficulty in forecasting and quantifying future amounts or when they may occur. Such unavailable information could be significant to future results.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Wells Fargo & Company61

Back to the WFC company profile or the MD&A index.