BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ (BAC)
SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > Depository Institutions > SIC 6021 National Commercial Banks
SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=70858. Latest filing source: 0000070858-26-000157.
Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.
Selected Fundamentals
| Metric | Value | Unit | FY | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 113,097,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-25 |
| Net income | 30,509,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-25 |
| Assets | 3,411,738,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-25 |
Financials
Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-25. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000070858.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 83,701,000,000 | 87,126,000,000 | 91,020,000,000 | 91,244,000,000 | 85,528,000,000 | 89,113,000,000 | 94,950,000,000 | 102,769,000,000 | 105,856,000,000 | 113,097,000,000 |
| Net income | 17,822,000,000 | 18,232,000,000 | 28,147,000,000 | 27,430,000,000 | 17,894,000,000 | 31,978,000,000 | 27,528,000,000 | 26,305,000,000 | 26,973,000,000 | 30,509,000,000 |
| Diluted EPS | 1.49 | 1.56 | 2.61 | 2.75 | 1.87 | 3.57 | 3.19 | 3.05 | 3.19 | 3.81 |
| Operating cash flow | 17,277,000,000 | 9,864,000,000 | 39,520,000,000 | 61,777,000,000 | 37,993,000,000 | -7,193,000,000 | -6,327,000,000 | 44,982,000,000 | -8,805,000,000 | 12,613,000,000 |
| Share buybacks | 5,112,000,000 | 12,814,000,000 | 20,094,000,000 | 28,144,000,000 | 7,025,000,000 | 25,126,000,000 | 5,073,000,000 | 4,576,000,000 | 13,104,000,000 | 21,433,000,000 |
| Assets | 2,188,067,000,000 | 2,281,234,000,000 | 2,354,507,000,000 | 2,434,079,000,000 | 2,819,627,000,000 | 3,169,495,000,000 | 3,051,375,000,000 | 3,180,151,000,000 | 3,261,299,000,000 | 3,411,738,000,000 |
| Liabilities | 1,921,872,000,000 | 2,014,088,000,000 | 2,089,182,000,000 | 2,169,269,000,000 | 2,546,703,000,000 | 2,899,429,000,000 | 2,778,178,000,000 | 2,888,505,000,000 | 2,967,336,000,000 | 3,108,495,000,000 |
| Stockholders' equity | 266,195,000,000 | 267,146,000,000 | 265,325,000,000 | 264,810,000,000 | 272,924,000,000 | 270,066,000,000 | 273,197,000,000 | 290,209,000,000 | 293,963,000,000 | 303,243,000,000 |
Ratios
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 21.29% | 20.93% | 30.92% | 30.06% | 20.92% | 35.88% | 28.99% | 25.60% | 25.48% | 26.98% |
| Return on equity | 6.70% | 6.82% | 10.61% | 10.36% | 6.56% | 11.84% | 10.08% | 9.06% | 9.18% | 10.06% |
| Return on assets | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.20% | 1.13% | 0.63% | 1.01% | 0.90% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.89% |
| Liabilities / equity | 7.22 | 7.54 | 7.87 | 8.19 | 9.33 | 10.74 | 10.17 | 9.95 | 10.09 | 10.25 |
Financial Charts
Quarterly
Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-05-01. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000070858.json.
| Quarter | End Date | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-Q2 | 2022-06-30 | 0.73 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2022-Q3 | 2022-09-30 | 0.81 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q1 | 2023-03-31 | 0.94 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q2 | 2023-06-30 | 25,197,000,000 | 7,408,000,000 | 0.88 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q3 | 2023-09-30 | 25,167,000,000 | 7,802,000,000 | 0.90 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q4 | 2023-12-31 | 21,959,000,000 | 3,144,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2024-Q1 | 2024-03-31 | 25,818,000,000 | 6,674,000,000 | 0.76 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q2 | 2024-06-30 | 25,377,000,000 | 6,897,000,000 | 0.83 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-09-30 | 25,345,000,000 | 6,896,000,000 | 0.81 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q4 | 2024-12-31 | 25,347,000,000 | 6,665,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2025-Q1 | 2025-03-31 | 27,366,000,000 | 7,396,000,000 | 0.90 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q2 | 2025-06-30 | 26,463,000,000 | 7,116,000,000 | 0.89 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q3 | 2025-09-30 | 28,088,000,000 | 8,469,000,000 | 1.06 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-12-31 | 31,180,000,000 | 7,528,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2026-Q1 | 2026-03-31 | 30,272,000,000 | 8,584,000,000 | 1.11 | reported discrete quarter |
Quarterly Charts
Macro Cross-References
- CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
- UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
- FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
- CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
- DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
- DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
- DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
- DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
- T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
- CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
- CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
- CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
- CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
- PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
- PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
- PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
- T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
- U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
- PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
- CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
- EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
- UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
- CE16OV - Employment Level
- ICSA - Initial Claims
- JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
- JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
- GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
- A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
- INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
- TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
- HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
- PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
- RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
- PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
- PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
- M2SL - M2
- BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
- MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
- HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
- RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
- TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
- RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
- TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
- GDP - Gross Domestic Product
- GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
- GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
- PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
- GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
- GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
- FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
- FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
- FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
- MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
- USCONS - All Employees, Construction
- USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
- USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
- USGOVT - All Employees, Government
- AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
- DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
- NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
- BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
- EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
- IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
- IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
- PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand
Latest quarter (10-Q)
Latest 10-Q source: 0000070858-26-000249.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Bank of America Corporation (the Corporation) and its management may make certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipates,” “targets,” “expects,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “outlook,” “believes,” “continue” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements represent the Corporation’s current expectations, plans or forecasts of its or its business segments’ future results, which may include, among other measures, revenue, liquidity, net interest income, other income, provision for credit losses, expenses, operating leverage, effective tax rate, efficiency ratio, capital measures, deposits and assets, as well as strategy, future business and economic conditions more generally, and other future matters. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the following uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Corporation’s 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Corporation’s subsequent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings: the Corporation’s potential judgments, orders, settlements, penalties, fines and reputational damage, which are inherently difficult to predict, resulting from pending, threatened or future litigation and regulatory inquiries, demands, requests, investigations, proceedings and enforcement actions, which the Corporation is subject to in the ordinary course of business, including matters related to our processing of unemployment benefits for California and certain other states, the features of our automatic credit card payment service, the adequacy of the Corporation’s anti-money laundering and economic sanctions programs and the processing of electronic payments, including through the Zelle network, and related fraud, which are in various stages; in connection with ongoing litigation, the impact of certain changes to Visa’s and Mastercard’s respective card payment network rules and reductions in interchange fees for U.S.-based merchants; the possibility that the Corporation’s future liabilities may be in excess of its recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation, and regulatory and government actions; the impact of U.S. and global interest rates (including the potential for ongoing fluctuations in interest rates), inflation, currency exchange rates, economic conditions, trade policies and tensions, including changes in, or the imposition of, tariffs and/or trade barriers and the economic impacts, volatility and uncertainty resulting therefrom, which may have varying effects across
industries and geographies, and geopolitical instability; uncertainties about the financial stability and growth rates of non-U.S. jurisdictions, the risk that those jurisdictions may face difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, and related stresses on financial markets, currencies and trade, and the Corporation’s exposures to such risks, including direct, indirect and operational; the impact of the interest rate, inflationary, macroeconomic, banking and regulatory environment on the Corporation’s assets, business, financial condition and results of operations; the impact of adverse developments affecting the U.S. or global banking industry, including a deterioration in private credit markets, bank failures and liquidity concerns, resulting in worsening economic and market volatility, and regulatory responses thereto; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected, including due to changes in economic assumptions, which may include unemployment rates, real estate prices, gross domestic product levels and corporate bond spreads, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions and other uncertainties, such as the impact of trade policies, supply chain disruptions, commodity prices, inflationary pressures and labor shortages on economic conditions and our business; potential losses related to the Corporation's concentration of credit risk; the Corporation’s ability to achieve its expense targets (including noninterest expense) and expectations regarding revenue, net interest income, operating leverage, other income, provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, effective tax rate, loan or deposit growth or other projections and targets; variances to the underlying assumptions and judgments used in estimating banking book net interest income sensitivity; adverse changes to the Corporation’s credit ratings from the major credit rating agencies; an inability to access capital markets or maintain deposits or borrowing costs; estimates of the fair value and other accounting values, subject to impairment assessments, of certain of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities; the estimated or actual impact of changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying those standards; uncertainty regarding the content, timing and impact of regulatory capital and liquidity requirements; the impact of adverse changes to total loss-absorbing capacity requirements, stress capital buffer requirements and/or global systemically important bank surcharges; the potential impact of actions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the Corporation’s capital plans; the effect of changes in or interpretations of income tax laws and regulations, including impacts from the 2025 Budget Reconciliation Act; the impact of implementation and compliance with U.S. and international laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including recovery and resolution planning requirements, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, fiduciary standards, derivatives regulations and potential changes to loss allocations between financial institutions and customers, including for losses incurred from the use of our products and services, including electronic payments and payment of checks, that were authorized by the customer but induced by fraud; the impact of failures or
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 2 |
disruptions in or breaches of the Corporation’s operations or information systems, or those of various third parties, including regulators and federal and state governments, such as from cybersecurity incidents; the risks related to the development, implementation, use and management of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and the ability to achieve potential benefits, such as increased productivity and cost savings; the risks related to the transition and physical impacts of climate change; our ability to achieve environmental goals or the impact of any changes in the Corporation’s sustainability or human capital management strategy or goals; the impact of uncertain or changing political conditions, federal government shutdowns, including partial shutdowns, and uncertainty regarding the federal government’s debt limit or changes in fiscal, monetary, trade or regulatory policy; the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics; the impact of natural disasters, extreme weather events, military conflicts (including the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the conflicts in the Middle East, the possible expansion of such conflicts and potential geopolitical and economic consequences), civil unrest, terrorism or other geopolitical events; and other matters.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Throughout the MD&A, the Corporation uses certain acronyms and abbreviations that are defined in the Glossary.
Executive Summary
Business Overview
The Corporation is a Delaware corporation, a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company. When used in this report, “Bank of America,” “the Corporation,” “we,” “us” and “our” may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation’s subsidiaries or affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Through our various bank and nonbank subsidiaries throughout the U.S. and in international markets, we provide a diversified range of banking and nonbank financial services and products through four business segments: Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We operate our banking activities primarily under the Bank of America, National Association (Bank of America, N.A. or BANA) charter. At March 31, 2026, the Corporation had $3.5 trillion in assets and a headcount of approximately 212,000 employees. As of March 31, 2026, we served clients through operations across the U.S., its territories and more than 35 countries and/or jurisdictions. Our retail banking footprint covers all major markets in the U.S., and we serve approximately 69 million consumer and small business clients with approximately 3,500 retail financial centers, approximately 15,000 automated teller machines (ATMs), and leading digital banking platforms (www.bankofamerica.com) with approximately 50 million active users, including approximately 42 million active mobile users. We offer industry-leading support to approximately four million small business households. Our GWIM businesses, with client balances of $4.6 trillion, provide tailored solutions to meet client needs through a full set of
investment management, brokerage, banking, trust and retirement products. We are a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading across a broad range of asset classes serving corporations, governments, institutions and individuals around the world.
The Corporation’s website is www.bankofamerica.com, and the Investor Relations portion of our website is https://investor.bankofamerica.com. We use our website to distribute company information, including as a means of disclosing material, non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. We routinely post and make accessible financial and other information regarding the Corporation on our website. Investors should monitor our website, including the Investor Relations portion, in addition to our press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls and webcasts. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the information contained on our website as referenced in this paragraph is not incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Recent Developments
Capital Management
On April 23, 2026, the Corporation’s Board of Directors (Board) declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.28 per share, payable on June 26, 2026 to shareholders of record as of June 5, 2026.
For more information on our capital resour
[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]
Latest 10-K MD&A
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Bank of America Corporation (the Corporation) and its management may make certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipates,” “targets,” “expects,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “outlook,” “believes,” “continue” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements represent the Corporation’s current expectations, plans or forecasts of its or its lines of business future results, which may include, among other measures, revenue, liquidity, net interest income, other income, provision for credit losses, expenses, operating leverage, effective tax rate, efficiency ratio, capital measures, deposits and assets, as well as strategy, future business and economic conditions more generally, and other future matters. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the following uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: and in any of the Corporation’s subsequent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings: the Corporation’s potential judgments, orders, settlements, penalties, fines and reputational damage, which are inherently difficult to predict, resulting from pending, threatened or future litigation and regulatory inquiries, demands, requests, investigations, proceedings and enforcement actions, which the Corporation is subject to in the ordinary course of business, including matters related to our processing of unemployment benefits for California and certain other states, the features of our automatic credit card payment service, the adequacy of the Corporation’s anti-money laundering and economic sanctions programs and the processing of electronic payments, including through the Zelle network, and related fraud, which are in various stages; in connection with ongoing litigation, the impact of certain changes to Visa’s and Mastercard’s respective card payment network rules and reductions in interchange fees for U.S.-based merchants; the possibility that the Corporation’s future liabilities may be in excess of its recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation, and regulatory and government actions; the impact of U.S. and global interest rates (including the potential for ongoing fluctuations in interest rates), inflation, currency exchange rates, economic conditions, trade policies and tensions, including changes in, or the imposition of, tariffs and/or trade barriers and the economic impacts, volatility and uncertainty resulting therefrom, which may have varying effects across industries and geographies, and geopolitical instability; uncertainties about the financial stability and growth rates of non-U.S. jurisdictions, the risk that those jurisdictions may face difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, and related stresses on financial markets, currencies and trade, and the Corporation’s exposures to such risks, including direct, indirect and operational; the impact of the interest rate, inflationary, macroeconomic, banking and regulatory environment on the Corporation’s assets, business, financial condition and results of operations; the impact of adverse developments
affecting the U.S. or global banking industry, including bank failures and liquidity concerns, resulting in worsening economic and market volatility, and regulatory responses thereto; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected, including due to changes in economic assumptions, which may include unemployment rates, real estate prices, gross domestic product levels and corporate bond spreads, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions and other uncertainties, such as the impact of trade policies, supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures and labor shortages on economic conditions and our business; potential losses related to the Corporation's concentration of credit risk; the Corporation’s ability to achieve its expense targets (including noninterest expense) and expectations regarding revenue, net interest income, operating leverage, other income, provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, effective tax rate, loan or deposit growth or other projections and targets; variances to the underlying assumptions and judgments used in estimating banking book net interest income sensitivity; adverse changes to the Corporation’s credit ratings from the major credit rating agencies; an inability to access capital markets or maintain deposits or borrowing costs; estimates of the fair value and other accounting values, subject to impairment assessments, of certain of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities; the estimated or actual impact of changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying those standards; uncertainty regarding the content, timing and impact of regulatory capital and liquidity requirements; the impact of adverse changes to total loss-absorbing capacity requirements, stress capital buffer requirements and/or global systemically important bank surcharges; the potential impact of actions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the Corporation’s capital plans; the effect of changes in or interpretations of income tax laws and regulations, including impacts from the 2025 Budget Reconciliation Act; the impact of implementation and compliance with U.S. and international laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including recovery and resolution planning requirements, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Volcker Rule, fiduciary standards, derivatives regulations and potential changes to loss allocations between financial institutions and customers, including for losses incurred from the use of our products and services, including electronic payments and payment of checks, that were authorized by the customer but induced by fraud; the impact of failures or disruptions in or breaches of the Corporation’s operations or information systems, or those of various third parties, including regulators and federal and state governments, such as from cybersecurity incidents; the risks related to the development, implementation, use and management of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence; the risks related to the transition and physical impacts of climate change; our ability to achieve environmental goals or the impact of any changes in the Corporation’s sustainability or human capital management strategy or goals; the impact of uncertain or changing political conditions, federal government shutdowns and uncertainty regarding the federal government’s debt limit or changes in fiscal, monetary, trade or regulatory policy; the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics; the impact of natural disasters, extreme weather events, military conflicts (including the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the conflicts in the Middle East, the possible expansion of such conflicts and potential geopolitical consequences), civil unrest, terrorism or other geopolitical events; and other matters.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 26 |
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-year presentation. Throughout the MD&A, the Corporation uses certain acronyms and abbreviations that are defined in the Glossary.
Executive Summary
Business Overview
The Corporation is a Delaware corporation, a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company. When used in this report, “Bank of America,” “the Corporation,” “we,” “us” and “our” may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation’s subsidiaries or affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Through our various bank and nonbank subsidiaries throughout the U.S. and in international markets, we provide a diversified range of banking and nonbank financial services and products through four business segments: Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We operate our banking activities primarily under the Bank of America, National Association (Bank of America, N.A. or BANA) charter. At December 31, 2025, the Corporation had $3.4 trillion in assets and a headcount of approximately 213,000 employees. As of December 31, 2025, we served clients through operations across the U.S., its territories and more than 35 countries and/or jurisdictions. Our retail banking footprint covers all major markets in the U.S., and we serve approximately 69 million consumer and small business clients with approximately 3,600 retail financial centers, approximately 15,000 automated teller machines (ATMs), and leading digital banking platforms (www.bankofamerica.com) with approximately 49 million active users, including approximately 41 million active mobile users. We offer industry-leading support to approximately four million small business households. Our GWIM businesses, with client balances of $4.8 trillion, provide tailored solutions to meet client needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking, trust and retirement products. We are a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading across a broad range of asset classes serving corporations, governments, institutions and individuals around the world.
Recent Developments
Capital Management
On February 3, 2026, the Board of Directors (Board) declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.28 per share, payable on March 27, 2026 to shareholders of record as of March 6, 2026.
For more information on our capital resources and regulatory developments, see Capital Management beginning on page 48.
Financial Highlights
Effective in the fourth quarter of 2025, the Corporation elected to change accounting methods for its tax-related affordable housing, eligible wind renewable energy and solar renewable energy equity investments, which were applied on a retrospective basis. The Corporation determined that the new accounting methods are preferable, as they better align the financial statement presentation with the economic impact of these equity investments. The primary impact of the accounting changes is a reclassification between income statement line items that nets income tax credits and benefits against the investment expense. Certain prior-period information presented herein has been revised to reflect the accounting method changes. For more information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Exhibit 18 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| Table 1 | Summary Income Statement and Selected Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions, except per share information) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 60,096 | $ | 56,060 | ||||||
| Noninterest income | 53,001 | 49,796 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 113,097 | 105,856 | ||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 5,675 | 5,821 | ||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 69,727 | 66,812 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 37,695 | 33,223 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | 7,186 | 6,250 | ||||||||
| Net income | 30,509 | 26,973 | ||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends and other | 1,454 | 1,629 | ||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | $ | 29,055 | $ | 25,344 | ||||||
| Per common share information | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.86 | $ | 3.23 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.81 | 3.19 | ||||||||
| Dividends paid | 1.08 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.89 | % | 0.82 | % | ||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.59 | 9.53 | ||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2) | 14.22 | 12.94 | ||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (1) | 61.65 | 63.12 | ||||||||
| Balance sheet at year end | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,185,700 | $ | 1,095,835 | ||||||
| Total assets | 3,411,738 | 3,261,299 | ||||||||
| Total deposits | 2,018,729 | 1,965,467 | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | 3,108,495 | 2,967,336 | ||||||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | 277,251 | 270,804 | ||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 303,243 | 293,963 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 172.
(2)Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information and a corresponding reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measures defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 86.
Net income was $30.5 billion, or $3.81 per diluted share, in 2025 compared to $27.0 billion, or $3.19 per diluted share, in 2024. The increase in net income was due to higher net interest income and noninterest income, and lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
For discussion and analysis of our consolidated and business segment results of operations for 2024 compared to 2023, see the Financial Highlights and Business Segment Operations sections in the MD&A of the Corporation’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
27 Bank of America
Net Interest Income
Net interest income increased $4.0 billion to $60.1 billion in 2025 compared to 2024. Net interest yield on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis increased six basis points (bps) to 2.01 percent for 2025. The increases were primarily driven by higher net interest income related to Global Markets activity, fixed-asset repricing, and deposit and loan growth, partially offset by the impact of lower interest rates and one less day of interest accrual. For more information on net interest yield and FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31, and for more information on interest rate risk management, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
Noninterest Income
| Table 2 | Noninterest Income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Fees and commissions: | ||||||||||
| Card income | $ | 6,359 | $ | 6,284 | ||||||
| Service charges | 6,457 | 6,055 | ||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 19,956 | 17,766 | ||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 6,630 | 6,186 | ||||||||
| Total fees and commissions | 39,402 | 36,291 | ||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 12,014 | 12,967 | ||||||||
| Other income (loss) | 1,585 | 538 | ||||||||
| Total noninterest income | $ | 53,001 | $ | 49,796 |
Noninterest income increased $3.2 billion to $53.0 billion in 2025 compared to 2024. The following highlights the significant changes.
● Service charges increased $402 million primarily due to higher treasury service charges.
● Investment and brokerage services increased $2.2 billion primarily driven by higher asset management fees reflecting higher market valuations and the impact of positive assets under management (AUM) flows, as well as higher brokerage fees due to increased client activity.
● Investment banking fees increased $444 million driven by higher debt issuance and advisory fees, partially offset by lower equity issuance fees.
● Market making and similar activities decreased $953 million primarily driven by lower trading revenue from credit products in Fixed Income, Currencies and Commodities (FICC) and lower income from derivatives used in foreign currency risk management activities.
● Other income increased $1.0 billion primarily due to gains on leveraged finance positions.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses decreased $146 million to $5.7 billion for 2025 compared to 2024. For more information on the provision for credit losses, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
Noninterest Expense
| Table 3 | Noninterest Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 42,346 | $ | 40,182 | ||||||
| Information processing and communications | 7,453 | 7,231 | ||||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 7,448 | 7,289 | ||||||||
| Product delivery and transaction related | 3,924 | 3,494 | ||||||||
| Professional fees | 2,580 | 2,669 | ||||||||
| Marketing | 2,204 | 1,956 | ||||||||
| Other general operating | 3,772 | 3,991 | ||||||||
| Total noninterest expense | $ | 69,727 | $ | 66,812 |
Noninterest expense increased $2.9 billion to $69.7 billion in 2025 compared to 2024. The increase was primarily driven by continued investments in the business, including people, technology and marketing, as well as higher revenue-related expenses, partially offset by a reduction in the Corporation’s accrual in 2025 for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) special assessment compared to an increase in the accrual in 2024.
Income Tax Expense
| Table 4 | Income Tax Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 37,695 | $ | 33,223 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | 7,186 | 6,250 | ||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 19.1 | % | 18.8 | % |
The effective tax rates (ETR) for 2025 and 2024 were driven by pretax income and changes in the mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal and state and local taxes, as well as our recurring tax preference benefits, which mainly consisted of tax credits from investments in affordable housing and renewable energy. For more information, see Note 19 – Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 28 |
Balance Sheet Overview
| Table 5 | Selected Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 231,845 | $ | 290,114 | $ | (58,269) | (20) | % | ||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 316,578 | 274,709 | 41,869 | 15 | ||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 366,954 | 314,460 | 52,494 | 17 | ||||||||||
| Debt securities | 925,635 | 917,284 | 8,351 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases | 1,185,700 | 1,095,835 | 89,865 | 8 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | (13,203) | (13,240) | 37 | — | ||||||||||
| All other assets | 398,229 | 382,137 | 16,092 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,411,738 | $ | 3,261,299 | $ | 150,439 | 5 | |||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 2,018,729 | $ | 1,965,467 | $ | 53,262 | 3 | |||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 344,716 | 331,758 | 12,958 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 105,996 | 92,543 | 13,453 | 15 | ||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 48,088 | 43,391 | 4,697 | 11 | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 317,816 | 283,279 | 34,537 | 12 | ||||||||||
| All other liabilities | 273,150 | 250,898 | 22,252 | 9 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 3,108,495 | 2,967,336 | 141,159 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 303,243 | 293,963 | 9,280 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,411,738 | $ | 3,261,299 | $ | 150,439 | 5 |
Assets
At December 31, 2025, total assets were approximately $3.4 trillion, up $150.4 billion from December 31, 2024. The increase in assets was primarily due to higher loans and leases, trading account assets, and federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell, partially offset by lower cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $58.3 billion primarily driven by loan growth and activity within Global Markets.
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Borrowed or Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Federal funds transactions involve lending reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are collateralized lending transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads, and obtain securities for settlement and for collateral. Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell increased $41.9 billion primarily due to activity within Global Markets.
Trading Account Assets
Trading account assets consist primarily of long positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. government and agency securities, corporate securities and non-U.S. sovereign debt. Trading account assets increased $52.5 billion primarily due to activity within Global Markets.
Debt Securities
Debt securities primarily include U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (MBS), principally agency MBS, non-U.S. bonds, corporate bonds and municipal debt. We reinvest cash in the debt securities portfolio primarily to manage interest rate and liquidity risk. Debt securities increased $8.4 billion primarily due to investment of excess cash from higher deposits and long-term debt. For more information on debt securities, see Note 4 – Securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans and Leases
Loans and leases increased $89.9 billion primarily driven by growth in commercial loans and a residential mortgage loan portfolio acquisition in the first quarter of 2025. For more information on the loan portfolio, see Credit Risk Management on page 59.
29 Bank of America
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $37 million primarily due to reserve releases in credit card and commercial real estate as asset quality improved. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
All Other Assets
All other assets increased $16.1 billion primarily driven by activity within Global Markets.
Liabilities
At December 31, 2025, total liabilities were approximately $3.1 trillion, up $141.2 billion from December 31, 2024, primarily due to higher deposits, long-term debt, all other liabilities, trading account liabilities and federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase.
Deposits
Deposits increased $53.3 billion primarily driven by growth in commercial client balances.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Loaned or Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Federal funds transactions involve borrowing reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are collateralized borrowing transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and finance assets on the balance sheet. Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase increased $13.0 billion primarily driven by activity within Global Markets.
Trading Account Liabilities
Trading account liabilities consist primarily of short positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. Treasury and agency securities, non-U.S. sovereign debt and corporate securities. Trading account liabilities increased $13.5 billion primarily due to activity within Global Markets.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings provide an additional funding source and primarily consist of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) short-term borrowings, commercial paper, notes payable and various other borrowings that generally have maturities of one year or less. Short-term borrowings increased $4.7 billion primarily due to higher unsecured borrowings to manage liquidity needs. For more information on short-term borrowings, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt increased $34.5 billion primarily due to debt issuances and valuation adjustments, partially offset by maturities and redemptions. For more information on long-term debt, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
All Other Liabilities
All other liabilities increased $22.3 billion primarily driven by activity within Global Markets.
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity increased $9.3 billion primarily due to net income, preferred stock issuances and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI), partially offset by returns of capital to shareholders through common stock repurchases and common and preferred stock dividends, as well as preferred stock redemptions.
Cash Flows Overview
The Corporation’s operating assets and liabilities support our global markets and lending activities. We believe that cash flows from operations, available cash balances and our ability to generate cash through short- and long-term debt are sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs. Our investing activities primarily include the debt securities portfolio and loans and leases. Our financing activities reflect cash flows primarily related to customer deposits, securities financing agreements, long-term debt and common and preferred stock.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 30 |
Supplemental Financial Data
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this Form 10-K, we present certain non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items or otherwise include components that differ from the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures are provided as additional useful information to assess our financial condition, results of operations (including period-to-period operating performance) or compliance with prospective regulatory requirements. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended as a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may not be defined or calculated the same way as non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.
When presented on a consolidated basis, we view net interest income on an FTE basis as a non-GAAP financial measure. To derive the FTE basis, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before-tax basis with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. For purposes of this calculation, we use the federal statutory tax rate of 21 percent and a representative state tax rate. Net interest yield, which measures the basis points we earn over the cost of funds, utilizes net interest income on an FTE basis. We believe that presentation of these items on an FTE basis allows for comparison of amounts from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practices.
We may present certain key performance indicators and ratios excluding certain items (e.g., debit valuation adjustment (DVA) gains (losses)), which result in non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that the presentation of measures that exclude these items is useful because such measures provide additional information to assess the underlying operational performance and trends of our businesses and to allow better comparison of period-to-period operating performance.
We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible equity, a non-GAAP financial measure. Tangible equity represents shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)), net of related deferred tax liabilities (“adjusted” shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity). These measures are used to evaluate our use of equity. In addition, profitability, relationship and investment models use both return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity and return on average tangible
shareholders’ equity as key measures to support our overall growth objectives. These ratios are:
● Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity measures our net income applicable to common shareholders as a percentage of adjusted average common shareholders’ equity. The tangible common equity ratio represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity measures our net income as a percentage of adjusted average total shareholders’ equity. The tangible equity ratio represents adjusted ending shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Tangible book value per common share represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by ending common shares outstanding.
We believe ratios utilizing tangible equity provide additional useful information because they present measures of those assets that can generate income. Tangible book value per common share provides additional useful information about the level of tangible assets in relation to outstanding shares of common stock.
The aforementioned supplemental data and performance measures are presented in Table 6 on page 32 and Table 7 on page 33.
For more information on the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 86.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators (key performance indicators) that management uses when assessing our consolidated and/or segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our underlying operational performance and trends. These key performance indicators (KPIs) may not be defined or calculated in the same way as similar KPIs used by other companies. For information on how these metrics are defined, see Key Metrics on page 172.
Our consolidated key performance indicators, which include various equity and credit metrics, are presented in Table 1 on page 27, Table 6 on page 32 and Table 7 on page 33.
For information on key segment performance metrics, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
31 Bank of America
| Table 6 | Selected Annual Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions, except per share information) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 60,096 | $ | 56,060 | $ | 56,931 | ||||
| Noninterest income | 53,001 | 49,796 | 45,838 | |||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 113,097 | 105,856 | 102,769 | |||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 5,675 | 5,821 | 4,394 | |||||||
| Noninterest expense | 69,727 | 66,812 | 65,845 | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | 37,695 | 33,223 | 32,530 | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 7,186 | 6,250 | 6,225 | |||||||
| Net income | 30,509 | 26,973 | 26,305 | |||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 29,055 | 25,344 | 24,656 | |||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 7,521.9 | 7,855.5 | 8,028.6 | |||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 7,680.9 | 7,935.8 | 8,080.5 | |||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.89 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.83 | % | ||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.59 | 9.53 | 9.73 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2) | 14.22 | 12.94 | 13.45 | |||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.22 | 9.22 | 9.33 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (2) | 13.36 | 12.13 | 12.43 | |||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 8.89 | 9.01 | 9.12 | |||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.13 | 8.30 | 8.23 | |||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.75 | 8.91 | 8.94 | |||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 27.82 | 30.86 | 29.90 | |||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.86 | $ | 3.23 | $ | 3.07 | ||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.81 | 3.19 | 3.05 | |||||||
| Dividends paid | 1.08 | 1.00 | 0.92 | |||||||
| Book value (1) | 38.44 | 35.58 | 33.16 | |||||||
| Tangible book value (2) | 28.73 | 26.37 | 24.28 | |||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 396,686 | $ | 334,497 | $ | 265,840 | ||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,136,787 | $ | 1,060,081 | $ | 1,046,256 | ||||
| Total assets | 3,410,412 | 3,282,045 | 3,152,461 | |||||||
| Total deposits | 1,984,182 | 1,924,106 | 1,887,541 | |||||||
| Long-term debt | 245,775 | 246,081 | 248,853 | |||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 274,435 | 265,980 | 253,464 | |||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 298,474 | 292,467 | 281,861 | |||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (3) | $ | 14,380 | $ | 14,336 | $ | 14,551 | ||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 5,905 | 6,120 | 5,630 | |||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (4) | 1.12 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.27 | % | ||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (4) | 228 | 222 | 243 | |||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 5,631 | $ | 6,031 | $ | 3,799 | ||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (4) | 0.50 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.36 | % | ||||
| Capital ratios at year end (5) | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.4 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 12.8 | 13.2 | 13.5 | |||||||
| Total capital | 14.7 | 15.1 | 15.2 | |||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 6.8 | 6.9 | 7.1 | |||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.7 | 5.9 | 6.1 | |||||||
| Tangible equity (2) | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.1 | |||||||
| Tangible common equity (2) | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.2 |
(1)For definition, see Key Metrics on page 172.
(2)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 86.
(3)Includes the allowance for loan and leases losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(4)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 63 and corresponding Table 28 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 67 and corresponding Table 34.
(5)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 48.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 32 |
| Table 7 | Selected Quarterly Financial Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Quarters | 2024 Quarters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share information) | Fourth | Third | Second | First | Fourth | Third | Second | First | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 15,750 | $ | 15,233 | $ | 14,670 | $ | 14,443 | $ | 14,359 | $ | 13,967 | $ | 13,702 | $ | 14,032 | ||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 12,617 | 13,807 | 12,773 | 13,804 | 12,116 | 12,246 | 12,603 | 12,831 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 28,367 | 29,040 | 27,443 | 28,247 | 26,475 | 26,213 | 26,305 | 26,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 1,308 | 1,295 | 1,592 | 1,480 | 1,452 | 1,542 | 1,508 | 1,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 17,437 | 17,337 | 17,183 | 17,770 | 16,787 | 16,479 | 16,309 | 17,237 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 9,622 | 10,408 | 8,668 | 8,997 | 8,236 | 8,192 | 8,488 | 8,307 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,975 | 2,076 | 1,498 | 1,637 | 1,430 | 1,481 | 1,685 | 1,654 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 7,647 | 8,332 | 7,170 | 7,360 | 6,806 | 6,711 | 6,803 | 6,653 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 7,319 | 7,903 | 6,879 | 6,954 | 6,540 | 6,195 | 6,488 | 6,121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 7,364.9 | 7,466.0 | 7,581.2 | 7,677.9 | 7,738.4 | 7,818.0 | 7,897.9 | 7,968.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 7,546.9 | 7,627.1 | 7,651.6 | 7,770.8 | 7,843.7 | 7,902.1 | 7,960.9 | 8,031.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.89 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.82 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Four-quarter trailing return on average assets (2) | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.45 | 11.40 | 10.12 | 10.37 | 9.64 | 9.22 | 9.89 | 9.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (3) | 13.97 | 15.29 | 13.61 | 13.97 | 13.02 | 12.49 | 13.47 | 12.79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.98 | 11.01 | 9.74 | 10.15 | 9.23 | 9.10 | 9.37 | 9.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (3) | 12.97 | 14.35 | 12.77 | 13.32 | 12.12 | 11.96 | 12.34 | 12.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 8.89 | 8.89 | 8.66 | 8.78 | 9.01 | 8.87 | 8.97 | 8.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.13 | 8.12 | 7.98 | 8.17 | 8.30 | 8.13 | 8.16 | 8.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.86 | 8.75 | 8.61 | 8.78 | 8.85 | 8.91 | 8.92 | 8.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 28.02 | 26.31 | 28.48 | 28.65 | 30.62 | 32.65 | 29.08 | 31.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 0.99 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.79 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings | 0.98 | 1.04 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book value (1) | 38.44 | 37.72 | 36.92 | 36.17 | 35.58 | 35.14 | 34.19 | 33.52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible book value (3) | 28.73 | 28.16 | 27.49 | 26.90 | 26.37 | 26.03 | 25.17 | 24.61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 396,686 | $ | 378,125 | $ | 351,904 | $ | 315,482 | $ | 334,497 | $ | 305,090 | $ | 309,202 | $ | 298,312 | ||||||||||||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,170,895 | $ | 1,153,035 | $ | 1,128,453 | $ | 1,093,738 | $ | 1,081,009 | $ | 1,059,728 | $ | 1,051,472 | $ | 1,047,890 | ||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 3,427,791 | 3,433,447 | 3,430,280 | 3,349,011 | 3,315,578 | 3,293,900 | 3,272,956 | 3,245,247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 2,012,523 | 1,991,434 | 1,973,761 | 1,958,332 | 1,957,950 | 1,920,748 | 1,909,925 | 1,907,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 245,470 | 247,425 | 249,104 | 241,036 | 238,988 | 247,338 | 243,689 | 254,782 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 277,881 | 275,149 | 272,756 | 271,880 | 269,905 | 267,447 | 263,830 | 262,677 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 303,873 | 300,381 | 295,329 | 294,187 | 293,398 | 293,431 | 291,943 | 291,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (4) | $ | 14,380 | $ | 14,361 | $ | 14,434 | $ | 14,366 | $ | 14,336 | $ | 14,351 | $ | 14,342 | $ | 14,371 | ||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (5) | 5,905 | 5,470 | 6,104 | 6,201 | 6,120 | 5,824 | 5,691 | 6,034 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (5) | 1.12 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.26 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (5) | 228 | 248 | 222 | 218 | 222 | 235 | 242 | 225 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 1,287 | $ | 1,367 | $ | 1,525 | $ | 1,452 | $ | 1,466 | $ | 1,534 | $ | 1,533 | $ | 1,498 | ||||||||||||||
| Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (5) | 0.44 | % | 0.47 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.58 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Capital ratios at period end (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.4 | % | 11.6 | % | 11.5 | % | 11.8 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.8 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 12.8 | 13.1 | 12.9 | 13.0 | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.5 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital | 14.7 | 15.0 | 14.8 | 15.0 | 15.1 | 14.9 | 15.1 | 15.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 7.0 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible equity (3) | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 6.9 | 7.0 | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common equity (3) | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity and long-term debt metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to risk-weighted assets | 26.3 | % | 27.0 | % | 27.1 | % | 27.4 | % | 27.1 | % | 27.4 | % | 28.2 | % | 28.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to supplementary leverage exposure | 11.7 | 11.9 | 12.0 | 12.1 | 12.0 | 12.2 | 12.5 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to risk-weighted assets | 12.7 | 13.1 | 13.5 | 13.6 | 13.0 | 13.3 | 13.7 | 14.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to supplementary leverage exposure | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.3 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 172.
(2)Calculated as total net income for four consecutive quarters divided by annualized average assets for four consecutive quarters.
(3)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 86.
(4)Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(5)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 63 and corresponding Table 28 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 68 and corresponding Table 34.
(6)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 48.
33 Bank of America
| Table 8 | Average Balances and Interest Rates - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | 260,543 | $ | 10,493 | 4.03 | % | $ | 332,897 | $ | 16,806 | 5.05 | % | $ | 324,389 | $ | 15,965 | 4.92 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 9,902 | 354 | 3.58 | 10,105 | 459 | 4.54 | 9,704 | 465 | 4.79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 328,423 | 15,433 | 4.70 | 310,626 | 19,911 | 6.41 | 291,669 | 18,679 | 6.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 235,772 | 12,346 | 5.24 | 207,557 | 10,476 | 5.05 | 189,263 | 8,849 | 4.68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 930,634 | 27,466 | 2.94 | 868,709 | 26,107 | 2.99 | 794,192 | 20,332 | 2.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 233,745 | 8,093 | 3.46 | 227,777 | 7,391 | 3.24 | 229,001 | 6,923 | 3.02 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 26,315 | 1,512 | 5.75 | 25,621 | 1,607 | 6.27 | 25,969 | 1,471 | 5.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 101,043 | 11,518 | 11.40 | 99,914 | 11,438 | 11.45 | 96,190 | 10,436 | 10.85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 109,701 | 5,960 | 5.43 | 104,548 | 5,829 | 5.58 | 104,571 | 5,200 | 4.97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 470,804 | 27,083 | 5.75 | 457,860 | 26,265 | 5.74 | 455,731 | 24,030 | 5.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 434,652 | 23,023 | 5.30 | 390,574 | 21,402 | 5.48 | 378,212 | 19,494 | 5.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 148,871 | 8,233 | 5.53 | 126,596 | 8,749 | 6.91 | 125,486 | 8,023 | 6.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate (3) | 66,356 | 4,092 | 6.17 | 69,940 | 5,000 | 7.15 | 72,981 | 5,162 | 7.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 16,104 | 870 | 5.40 | 15,111 | 806 | 5.33 | 13,846 | 646 | 4.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 665,983 | 36,218 | 5.44 | 602,221 | 35,957 | 5.97 | 590,525 | 33,325 | 5.64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 1,136,787 | 63,301 | 5.57 | 1,060,081 | 62,222 | 5.87 | 1,046,256 | 57,355 | 5.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 122,211 | 9,782 | 8.00 | 108,893 | 11,245 | 10.33 | 98,127 | 9,184 | 9.36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 3,024,272 | 139,175 | 4.60 | 2,898,868 | 147,226 | 5.08 | 2,753,600 | 130,829 | 4.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 24,784 | 24,045 | 26,076 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets, less allowance for loan and lease losses | 361,356 | 359,132 | 372,785 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,410,412 | $ | 3,282,045 | $ | 3,152,461 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposits | $ | 1,087,871 | $ | 22,836 | 2.10 | % | $ | 1,050,904 | $ | 25,177 | 2.40 | % | $ | 1,038,681 | $ | 19,081 | 1.84 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 258,373 | 7,904 | 3.06 | 250,591 | 8,848 | 3.53 | 168,531 | 3,812 | 2.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 1,346,244 | 30,740 | 2.28 | 1,301,495 | 34,025 | 2.61 | 1,207,212 | 22,893 | 1.90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 123,461 | 3,773 | 3.06 | 109,246 | 4,417 | 4.04 | 96,845 | 3,270 | 3.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 1,469,705 | 34,513 | 2.35 | 1,410,741 | 38,442 | 2.72 | 1,304,057 | 26,163 | 2.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased, securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 385,966 | 18,572 | 4.81 | 367,192 | 23,777 | 6.48 | 301,015 | 20,583 | 6.84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities | 175,902 | 9,470 | 5.38 | 149,355 | 10,761 | 7.21 | 152,548 | 9,970 | 6.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 51,758 | 2,657 | 5.13 | 52,371 | 2,191 | 4.18 | 46,083 | 2,043 | 4.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 245,775 | 13,258 | 5.39 | 246,081 | 15,376 | 6.25 | 248,853 | 14,572 | 5.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 2,329,106 | 78,470 | 3.37 | 2,225,740 | 90,547 | 4.07 | 2,052,556 | 73,331 | 3.57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing deposits | 514,477 | 513,365 | 583,484 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities (4) | 268,355 | 250,473 | 234,560 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 298,474 | 292,467 | 281,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,410,412 | $ | 3,282,045 | $ | 3,152,461 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest spread | 1.23 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact of noninterest-bearing sources | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income/yield on earning assets (5) | $ | 60,705 | 2.01 | % | $ | 56,679 | 1.95 | % | $ | 57,498 | 2.08 | % |
(1)Includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
(2)Nonperforming loans are included in the respective average loan balances. Income on these nonperforming loans is generally recognized on a cost recovery basis.
(3)Includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $60.4 billion, $63.8 billion and $67.2 billion, and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $5.9 billion, $6.1 billion and $5.8 billion for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(4)Includes $62.9 billion, $48.4 billion and $40.2 billion of structured notes and liabilities for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(5)Net interest income includes FTE adjustments of $609 million, $619 million and $567 million for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 34 |
| Table 9 | Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Volume | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | From 2024 to 2025 | From 2023 to 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | (3,649) | $ | (2,664) | $ | (6,313) | $ | 414 | $ | 427 | $ | 841 | ||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | (9) | (96) | (105) | 19 | (25) | (6) | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 1,141 | (5,619) | (4,478) | 1,201 | 31 | 1,232 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 1,430 | 440 | 1,870 | 865 | 762 | 1,627 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 1,719 | (360) | 1,359 | 1,820 | 3,955 | 5,775 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 182 | 520 | 702 | (44) | 512 | 468 | ||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 43 | (138) | (95) | (18) | 154 | 136 | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 131 | (51) | 80 | 405 | 597 | 1,002 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 292 | (161) | 131 | (4) | 633 | 629 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 818 | 2,235 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 2,417 | (796) | 1,621 | 621 | 1,287 | 1,908 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 1,538 | (2,054) | (516) | 66 | 660 | 726 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (256) | (652) | (908) | (217) | 55 | (162) | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 52 | 12 | 64 | 60 | 100 | 160 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 261 | 2,632 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 1,079 | 4,867 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 1,379 | (2,842) | (1,463) | 1,008 | 1,053 | 2,061 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in interest income | $ | (8,051) | $ | 16,397 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposit accounts | $ | 932 | $ | (3,273) | $ | (2,341) | $ | 256 | $ | 5,840 | $ | 6,096 | ||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 273 | (1,217) | (944) | 1,851 | 3,185 | 5,036 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | (3,285) | 11,132 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 571 | (1,215) | (644) | 423 | 724 | 1,147 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | (3,929) | 12,279 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 1,234 | (6,439) | (5,205) | 4,533 | (1,339) | 3,194 | ||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities | 1,922 | (3,213) | (1,291) | (202) | 993 | 791 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | (28) | 494 | 466 | 277 | (129) | 148 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | (15) | (2,103) | (2,118) | (152) | 956 | 804 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in interest expense | (12,077) | 17,216 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net interest income (2) | $ | 4,026 | $ | (819) |
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and expense are divided between the portion of change attributable to the variance in volume and the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate for that category. The unallocated change in rate or volume variance is allocated between the rate and volume variances.
(2)Includes changes in FTE basis adjustments of a $10 million decrease from 2024 to 2025 and a $52 million increase from 2023 to 2024.
35 Bank of America
Business Segment Operations
Segment Description and Basis of Presentation
We report our results of operations through the following four business segments: Consumer Banking, GWIM, Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We manage our segments and report their results on an FTE basis. The primary activities, products and businesses of the business segments and All Other are shown below.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. We utilize a methodology that considers the effect of regulatory capital requirements in addition to internal risk-based capital models. Our internal risk-based capital models use a risk-adjusted methodology incorporating each segment’s credit, market, interest rate, business and operational risk components. For more information on the nature of these risks, see Managing Risk on page 45. The capital allocated to the business segments is referred to as allocated capital.
For more information on our presentation of financial information on an FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31, and for reconciliations to consolidated total revenue, net income and year--end total assets, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators that management uses when evaluating segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our segments’ operational performance, client trends and business growth. These KPIs may not be defined or calculated in the same way as similar KPIs used by other companies.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 36 |
Consumer Banking
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 35,309 | $ | 33,078 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Card income | 5,456 | 5,432 | — | |||||||||||||
| Service charges | 2,528 | 2,445 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 380 | 481 | (21) | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 8,364 | 8,358 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 43,673 | 41,436 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 4,649 | 4,987 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 22,697 | 22,104 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 16,327 | 14,345 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 4,082 | 3,586 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 12,245 | $ | 10,759 | 14 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 25.0 | % | 25.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 3.56 | 3.34 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 51.97 | 53.35 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 28 | 25 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 319,312 | $ | 313,792 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 992,579 | 988,950 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 1,030,094 | 1,026,310 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 948,078 | 945,549 | — | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 44,000 | 43,250 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Year End | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 325,871 | $ | 318,754 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 998,969 | 995,369 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 1,039,346 | 1,034,370 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 956,265 | 952,311 | — |
Consumer Banking offers a diversified range of lending, deposit and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses. Consumer Banking includes the net impact of migrating customers and their related deposit, brokerage asset and loan balances between Consumer Banking and GWIM, as well as other client-managed businesses. Our customers and clients have access to a coast-to-coast network, including financial centers in 38 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 2025, our network includes approximately 3,600 financial centers, approximately 15,000 ATMs, nationwide call centers and leading digital banking platforms with approximately 49 million active users, including approximately 41 million active mobile users.
Consumer Banking Results
Net income for Consumer Banking increased $1.5 billion to $12.2 billion primarily due to higher revenue and lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $2.2 billion to $35.3 billion primarily driven by higher deposit spreads, as well as loan and deposit balances. Noninterest income was $8.4 billion, relatively unchanged from the same period a year ago.
The provision for credit losses decreased $338 million to $4.6 billion primarily due to improved asset quality in credit card. Noninterest expense increased $593 million to $22.7 billion primarily driven by investments in the business, including people and marketing.
The return on average allocated capital was 28 percent, up from 25 percent, due to higher net income, partially offset by an increase in allocated capital. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
Average loans and leases increased $5.5 billion to $319.3 billion due to growth across all products.
Average deposits increased $2.5 billion to $948.1 billion primarily due to growth in time deposits of $16.5 billion and net inflows of $7.2 billion in checking, partially offset by net outflows of $21.1 billion in money market and other savings.
Consumer investment assets increased $81.3 billion to $599.1 billion driven by higher market valuations and positive net client flows.
Key Statistics
The following table provides key performance indicators for deposit spreads, other period-end information, credit and debit card and loan production activities.
37 Bank of America
| Key Statistics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Deposit Spreads | ||||||||||
| Total deposit spreads (excludes noninterest costs) | 2.92% | 2.77% | ||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||
| Consumer investment assets (in millions) (1) | $ | 599,110 | $ | 517,835 | ||||||
| Active digital banking users (in thousands) (2) | 49,323 | 48,150 | ||||||||
| Active mobile banking users (in thousands) (3) | 41,427 | 39,958 | ||||||||
| Financial centers | 3,628 | 3,700 | ||||||||
| ATMs | 14,909 | 14,893 | ||||||||
| Credit and Debit Card | ||||||||||
| Total credit card (4) | ||||||||||
| Gross interest yield (5) | 12.02 | % | 12.30 | % | ||||||
| Risk-adjusted margin (6) | 7.06 | 6.98 | ||||||||
| New accounts (in thousands) | 3,531 | 3,820 | ||||||||
| Purchase volumes | $ | 377,760 | $ | 368,861 | ||||||
| Debit card purchase volumes | 594,603 | 557,000 | ||||||||
| Loan Production (7) | ||||||||||
| Consumer Banking: | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 12,137 | $ | 10,252 | ||||||
| Home equity | 8,560 | 7,450 | ||||||||
| Total (8): | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 26,326 | $ | 21,104 | ||||||
| Home equity | 10,400 | 8,884 |
(1)Includes client brokerage assets, deposit sweep balances, brokered CDs and AUM in Consumer Banking.
(2)Represents mobile and/or online active users over the past 90 days.
(3)Represents mobile active users over the past 90 days.
(4)Includes consumer credit card portfolios in Consumer Banking and GWIM.
(5)Calculated as the effective annual percentage rate divided by average loans.
(6)Calculated as the difference between total revenue, net of interest expense, and net charge-offs divided by average loans.
(7)The loan production amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of loans and, in the case of home equity, the principal amount of the total line of credit.
(8)In addition to loan production in Consumer Banking, there is also first mortgage and home equity loan production in GWIM.
Active mobile banking users increased by more than one million, reflecting client growth and continuing changes in our clients’ banking preferences. We had a net decrease of 72 financial centers and an increase of 16 ATMs as we continued to optimize our consumer banking network.
During 2025, the total risk-adjusted margin increased eight bps primarily driven by higher net interest margin and lower net charge-offs, partially offset by lower fee income. Total credit card purchase volumes increased $8.9 billion, and debit card purchase volumes increased $37.6 billion, reflecting higher levels of consumer spending.
During 2025, first mortgage loan originations for Consumer Banking increased $1.9 billion, and first mortgage loan originations for the total Corporation increased $5.2 billion, primarily driven by higher demand.
During 2025, home equity production in Consumer Banking increased $1.1 billion, and home equity production for the total Corporation increased $1.5 billion, primarily driven by higher demand.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 38 |
Global Wealth & Investment Management
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 7,197 | $ | 6,969 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 17,019 | 15,238 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 667 | 722 | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 17,686 | 15,960 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 24,883 | 22,929 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 35 | 4 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 18,621 | 17,241 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 6,227 | 5,684 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,557 | 1,421 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,670 | $ | 4,263 | 10 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 25.0 | % | 25.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.32 | 2.20 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 74.84 | 75.19 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 24 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 243,123 | $ | 223,899 | 9 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 309,890 | 317,283 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 323,914 | 331,014 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 279,776 | 287,491 | (3) | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 19,750 | 18,500 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 261,303 | $ | 231,981 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 320,899 | 323,496 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 335,495 | 338,367 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 289,854 | 292,278 | (1) |
n/m = not meaningful
GWIM consists of two primary businesses: Merrill Wealth Management and Bank of America Private Bank.
Merrill Wealth Management’s advisory business provides a high-touch client experience through a network of financial advisors focused on clients with over $250,000 in total investable assets. Merrill Wealth Management provides tailored solutions to meet clients’ needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking and retirement products.
Bank of America Private Bank, together with Merrill Wealth Management’s Private Wealth Management business, provides comprehensive wealth management solutions targeted to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, as well as customized solutions to meet clients’ wealth structuring, investment management, trust and banking needs, including specialty asset management services.
Net income for GWIM increased $407 million to $4.7 billion primarily due to higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. The operating margin was 25 percent in both 2025 and 2024.
Net interest income increased $228 million to $7.2 billion primarily driven by loan growth.
Noninterest income, which primarily includes investment and brokerage services income, increased $1.7 billion to $17.7 billion. The increase was primarily driven by higher asset management fees, which increased 12 percent to $15.4 billion, reflecting higher market valuations and the impact of positive AUM flows as well as higher brokerage fees due to increased transactional volume, partially offset by the impact of lower AUM pricing.
Noninterest expense increased $1.4 billion to $18.6 billion primarily due to higher revenue-related incentives and investments in the business, including people and technology.
The return on average allocated capital was 24 percent, up from 23 percent, due to higher net income, partially offset by an increase in allocated capital. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
Average loans and leases increased $19.2 billion to $243.1 billion primarily driven by custom lending, securities-based lending and residential mortgage. Average deposits decreased $7.7 billion to $279.8 billion primarily driven by clients moving deposits to higher yielding investment cash alternatives, including offerings on our investment and brokerage platforms, as well as a higher level of client tax payments.
Merrill Wealth Management revenue of $20.7 billion increased nine percent primarily driven by higher asset management fees reflecting higher market valuations and the impact of positive AUM flows, as well as higher brokerage fees due to increased transactional volume.
Bank of America Private Bank revenue of $4.2 billion increased eight percent primarily driven by higher net interest income from loan and deposit growth, as well as higher asset management fees reflecting higher market valuations and the impact of positive AUM flows.
39 Bank of America
| Key Indicators and Metrics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Revenue by Business | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 20,716 | $ | 19,066 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 4,167 | 3,863 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 24,883 | $ | 22,929 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Business, at year end | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 3,992,312 | $ | 3,578,513 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 759,082 | 673,593 | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 4,751,394 | $ | 4,252,106 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Type, at year end | ||||||||||
| Assets under management | $ | 2,177,708 | $ | 1,882,211 | ||||||
| Brokerage and other assets | 2,067,937 | 1,888,334 | ||||||||
| Deposits | 289,854 | 292,278 | ||||||||
| Loans and leases (1) | 263,819 | 234,208 | ||||||||
| Less: Managed deposits in assets under management | (47,924) | (44,925) | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 4,751,394 | $ | 4,252,106 | ||||||
| Assets Under Management Rollforward | ||||||||||
| Assets under management, beginning of year | $ | 1,882,211 | $ | 1,617,740 | ||||||
| Net client flows | 81,997 | 79,227 | ||||||||
| Market valuation/other | 213,500 | 185,244 | ||||||||
| Total assets under management, end of year | $ | 2,177,708 | $ | 1,882,211 |
(1)Includes margin receivables, which are classified in customer and other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Client Balances
Client balances managed under advisory and/or discretion of GWIM are AUM and are typically held in diversified portfolios. Fees earned on AUM are calculated as a percentage of clients’ AUM balances. The asset management fees charged to clients per year depend on various factors but are commonly driven by the breadth of the client’s relationship. The net client AUM flows
represent the net change in clients’ AUM balances over a specified period of time, excluding market appreciation/depreciation and other adjustments.
Client balances increased $499.3 billion, or 12 percent, to $4.8 trillion at December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024. The increase in client balances was driven by higher market valuations and positive net client flows.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 40 |
Global Banking
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 12,611 | $ | 13,235 | (5) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 3,438 | 3,135 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 3,742 | 3,453 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 4,317 | 3,925 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 11,497 | 10,513 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 24,108 | 23,748 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 943 | 883 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 12,416 | 11,853 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 10,749 | 11,012 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,956 | 3,028 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,793 | $ | 7,984 | (2) | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 27.5 | % | 27.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 1.94 | 2.29 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 51.51 | 49.91 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 15 | 16 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 385,379 | $ | 373,227 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 650,829 | 577,481 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 715,866 | 643,337 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 616,831 | 545,769 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 50,750 | 49,250 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 388,998 | $ | 379,473 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 671,354 | 605,499 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 734,710 | 670,505 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 641,211 | 578,159 | 11 |
Global Banking, which includes Global Corporate Banking, Global Commercial Banking, Business Banking and Global Investment Banking, provides a wide range of lending-related products and services, integrated working capital management and treasury solutions, and underwriting and advisory services through our network of global offices and client relationship teams. Our lending products and services include commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, commercial real estate lending and asset-based lending. Our treasury solutions business includes deposits, treasury management, corporate credit card, merchant services, foreign exchange and short-term investment products. We also provide investment banking services to our clients such as debt and equity underwriting and distribution, and merger-related and other advisory services. Underwriting debt and equity issuances, fixed-income and equity research, and certain market-based activities are executed through our global broker-dealer affiliates, which are our primary dealers in several countries. Within Global Banking, Global Corporate Banking clients generally include large global corporations, financial institutions and leasing clients. Global Commercial Banking clients generally include middle-market companies, commercial real estate firms and not-for-profit companies. Business Banking clients include mid-sized U.S.-based businesses requiring customized and integrated financial advice and solutions.
Net income for Global Banking decreased $191 million to $7.8 billion driven by higher noninterest expense and provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher revenue.
Net interest income decreased $624 million to $12.6 billion primarily due to the impact of lower interest rates, partially offset by the benefit of higher average deposit and loan balances.
Noninterest income increased $984 million to $11.5 billion primarily due to sales of certain leveraged finance positions, higher investment banking fees and higher treasury service charges.
The provision for credit losses increased $60 million to $943 million driven by the commercial and industrial portfolio, partially offset by improvement within the commercial real estate portfolio.
Noninterest expense increased $563 million to $12.4 billion primarily due to continued investments in the business, including people, technology and operations, as well as higher regulatory costs.
The return on average allocated capital was 15 percent, down from 16 percent, due to lower net income and an increase in allocated capital. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
41 Bank of America
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking each include Business Lending and Global Transaction Services activities. Business Lending includes various lending-related products and services, and related hedging activities, including commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance,
commercial real estate lending and asset-based lending. Global Transaction Services includes deposits, treasury management, corporate credit card, merchant services, foreign exchange and short-term investment products. The table below and discussion present a summary of the results, which exclude certain investment banking and other activities in Global Banking.
| Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Corporate Banking | Global Commercial Banking | Business Banking | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Business Lending | $ | 4,031 | $ | 4,339 | $ | 4,566 | $ | 4,941 | $ | 216 | $ | 231 | $ | 8,813 | $ | 9,511 | ||||||||||||||
| Global Transaction Services | 5,299 | 5,125 | 4,224 | 3,906 | 1,488 | 1,474 | 11,011 | 10,505 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 9,330 | $ | 9,464 | $ | 8,790 | $ | 8,847 | $ | 1,704 | $ | 1,705 | $ | 19,824 | $ | 20,016 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 174,993 | $ | 164,179 | $ | 198,414 | $ | 196,650 | $ | 11,913 | $ | 12,272 | $ | 385,320 | $ | 373,101 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 347,396 | 300,154 | 215,160 | 193,533 | 54,275 | 52,081 | 616,831 | 545,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 179,314 | $ | 173,013 | $ | 197,313 | $ | 194,529 | $ | 12,358 | $ | 11,791 | $ | 388,985 | $ | 379,333 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 348,798 | 316,214 | 234,887 | 209,792 | 57,523 | 52,152 | 641,208 | 578,158 |
Business Lending revenue decreased $698 million in 2025 compared to 2024 primarily driven by lower net interest income.
Global Transaction Services revenue increased $506 million in 2025 compared to 2024 primarily driven by the benefit of higher average deposit balances and higher treasury service charges, partially offset by the impact of lower interest rates.
Average loans and leases of $385.3 billion increased three percent in 2025 compared to 2024 due to client demand. Average deposits of $616.8 billion increased 13 percent in 2025 compared to 2024 due to growth in deposit balances from existing clients and the addition of new clients.
Global Investment Banking
Client teams and product specialists underwrite and distribute debt, equity and loan products, and provide advisory services and tailored risk management solutions. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Banking and Global Markets under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. To provide a complete discussion of our
consolidated investment banking fees, the table below presents total Corporation investment banking fees and the portion attributable to Global Banking.
| Investment Banking Fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Banking | Total Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Products | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advisory | $ | 1,707 | $ | 1,504 | $ | 1,890 | $ | 1,690 | ||||||||||||||
| Debt issuance | 1,548 | 1,398 | 3,698 | 3,310 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity issuance | 487 | 551 | 1,259 | 1,354 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross investment banking fees | 3,742 | 3,453 | 6,847 | 6,354 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Self-led deals | (69) | (32) | (217) | (168) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment banking fees | $ | 3,673 | $ | 3,421 | $ | 6,630 | $ | 6,186 |
Total Corporation investment banking fees, which exclude self-led deals and are primarily included within Global Banking and Global Markets, increased seven percent to $6.6 billion compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to higher debt issuance and advisory fees, partially offset by lower equity issuance fees.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 42 |
Global Markets
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 5,690 | $ | 3,375 | 69 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 2,511 | 2,128 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 2,837 | 2,655 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 12,064 | 12,778 | (6) | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 994 | 876 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 18,406 | 18,437 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 24,096 | 21,812 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 71 | (32) | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 15,418 | 13,926 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 8,607 | 7,918 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,496 | 2,296 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 6,111 | $ | 5,622 | 9 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 29.0 | % | 29.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 63.99 | 63.85 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 13 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 352,548 | $ | 324,065 | 9 | % | ||||||||||
| Reverse repurchases | 145,925 | 137,052 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Securities borrowed | 138,791 | 135,108 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 40,699 | 37,795 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | 677,963 | 634,020 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 181,334 | 140,557 | 29 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 806,901 | 710,604 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 1,010,898 | 911,657 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 38,074 | 34,120 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 49,000 | 45,500 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 670,949 | $ | 580,557 | 16 | % | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 202,733 | 157,450 | 29 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 814,196 | 687,678 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 1,032,858 | 876,548 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 40,614 | 38,848 | 5 |
n/m = not meaningful
Global Markets offers sales and trading services and research services to institutional clients across fixed-income, credit, currency, commodity and equity businesses. Global Markets product coverage includes securities and derivative products in both the primary and secondary markets. Global Markets provides market-making, financing, securities clearing, settlement and custody services globally to our institutional investor clients in support of their investing and trading activities. We also work with our commercial and corporate clients to provide risk management products using interest rate, equity, credit, currency and commodity derivatives, foreign exchange, fixed-income and mortgage-related products. As a result of our market-making activities in these products, we may be required to manage risk in a broad range of financial products including government securities, equity and equity-linked securities, high-grade and high-yield corporate debt securities, syndicated loans, MBS, commodities and asset-backed securities. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Markets and Global Banking under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. For information on
investment banking fees on a consolidated basis, see page 42.
The following explanations for year-over-year changes in results for Global Markets, including those disclosed under Sales and Trading Revenue, are the same for amounts including and excluding net DVA. Amounts excluding net DVA are a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31.
Net income for Global Markets increased $489 million to $6.1 billion. Net DVA losses were $35 million compared to $113 million in 2024. Excluding net DVA, net income increased $430 million to $6.1 billion. These increases were primarily driven by higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
Revenue increased $2.3 billion to $24.1 billion primarily due to higher sales and trading revenue, sales of certain leveraged finance positions and higher investment banking fees. Sales and trading revenue increased $2.1 billion, and excluding net DVA, increased $2.0 billion. These increases were driven by higher revenue in Equities and FICC. Noninterest expense increased $1.5 billion to $15.4 billion primarily driven by higher revenue-related expenses and continued investments in the business, including people and technology.
43 Bank of America
Average total assets increased $99.2 billion to $1.0 trillion, driven by loan growth, higher levels of inventory and increased financing activity. Year-end total assets increased $156.3 billion to $1.0 trillion driven by the same factors as average total assets.
The return on average allocated capital was 13 percent, up from 12 percent, due to an increase in net income, partially offset by higher allocated capital. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
Sales and Trading Revenue
Sales and trading revenue includes unrealized and realized gains and losses on trading and other assets that are included in market making and similar activities, net interest income, and fees primarily from commissions on equity securities. Sales and trading revenue is segregated into fixed-income (government debt obligations, investment and non-investment grade corporate debt obligations, commercial MBS, residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, interest rate and credit derivative contracts), currencies (interest rate and foreign exchange contracts), commodities (primarily futures, forwards, swaps and options) and equities (equity-linked derivatives and cash equity activity). The following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue, substantially all of which is in Global Markets, with the remainder in Global Banking. In addition, the following table and related discussion also present sales and trading revenue,
excluding net DVA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31.
| Sales and Trading Revenue (1, 2, 3) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Sales and trading revenue (2) | ||||||||||
| Fixed-income, currencies and commodities | $ | 12,267 | $ | 11,371 | ||||||
| Equities | 8,604 | 7,436 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue | $ | 20,871 | $ | 18,807 | ||||||
| Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA (4) | ||||||||||
| Fixed-income, currencies and commodities | $ | 12,308 | $ | 11,468 | ||||||
| Equities | 8,598 | 7,452 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA | $ | 20,906 | $ | 18,920 |
(1)For more information on sales and trading revenue, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes FTE adjustments of $708 million and $890 million for 2025 and 2024.
(3)Includes Global Banking sales and trading revenue of $530 million and $677 million for 2025 and 2024.
(4)FICC and Equities sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, is a non-GAAP financial measure. FICC net DVA losses were $41 million and $97 million for 2025 and 2024. Equities net DVA gains (losses) were $6 million and $(16) million for 2025 and 2024.
Including and excluding net DVA, FICC revenue increased $896 million and $840 million driven by improved trading performance in macro products. Including and excluding net DVA, Equities revenue increased $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion driven by increased client activity.
All Other
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | (102) | $ | 22 | n/m | |||||||||||
| Noninterest income (loss) | (2,952) | (3,472) | (15) | % | ||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | (3,054) | (3,450) | (11) | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (23) | (21) | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 575 | 1,688 | (66) | |||||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (3,606) | (5,117) | (30) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit | (3,296) | (3,462) | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (310) | $ | (1,655) | (81) | |||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 7,639 | $ | 8,606 | (11) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 329,640 | 369,727 | (11) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 101,423 | 111,177 | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 6,795 | $ | 8,177 | (17) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 269,329 | 341,509 | (21) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 90,785 | 103,871 | (13) |
(1)In segments where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, which are generally deposit-taking segments, we allocate assets from All Other to those segments to match liabilities (i.e., deposits) and allocated shareholders’ equity. Average allocated assets were $990.6 billion and $956.5 billion for 2025 and 2024 and year-end allocated assets were $1.0 trillion and $980.4 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
n/m = not meaningful
All Other primarily consists of asset and liability management (ALM) activities, liquidating businesses and certain expenses not otherwise allocated to a business segment, and adjustments to allocate income tax benefits from tax-related equity investments to noninterest income to present Global Banking and Global Markets on an FTE basis. For more information, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net loss in All Other decreased $1.3 billion to $310 million primarily due to lower noninterest expense and a lower loss in noninterest income, partially offset by a lower income tax benefit.
The loss in noninterest income decreased $520 million primarily due to a reduction in the volume of tax-related equity investments and lower valuation losses on certain derivatives.
Noninterest expense decreased $1.1 billion to $575 million primarily due to a reduction in the Corporation’s accrual in 2025 for the FDIC special assessment compared to an increase in the accrual in 2024, and lower expenses related to a liquidating business activity.
The income tax benefit decreased $166 million primarily due to a lower pretax loss.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 44 |
Managing Risk
Risk is inherent in all our business activities. Sound risk management enables us to serve our customers and deliver for our shareholders. If not managed well, risk can result in financial loss, regulatory sanctions and penalties, litigation, and damage to our reputation, each of which may adversely impact our ability to execute our business strategies. We take a comprehensive approach to risk management with a defined Risk Framework and an articulated Risk Appetite Statement, which are approved annually by the Board’s Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC) and the Board.
The seven key types of risk faced by the Corporation are strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational.
● Strategic risk is the risk to current or projected financial condition arising from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate.
● Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations.
● Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities or otherwise negatively impact earnings. Market risk is composed of price risk and interest rate risk.
● Liquidity risk is the risk of the inability to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral needs while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions.
● Compliance risk is the risk of legal action or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules and regulations (LRRs) and our internal policies and procedures.
● Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, people or external events.
● Reputational risk is the risk that negative perception of the Corporation may materially impact its financial condition.
The following sections address in more detail the specific procedures, measures and analyses of the major categories of risk.
As set forth in our Risk Framework, a culture of managing risk well is fundamental to our values and our purpose, and how we drive Responsible Growth. It requires us to focus on risk in all activities and encourages the necessary mindset and behavior to enable effective risk management and promote sound risk-taking within our risk appetite. Sustaining a culture of managing risk well throughout the organization is critical to the success of the Corporation and is a clear expectation of our executive management team and the Board.
Our Risk Framework serves as the foundation for the consistent and effective management of risks facing the Corporation. The Risk Framework sets forth roles and responsibilities for the management of risk and provides a blueprint for how the Board, through delegation of authority to committees and executive officers, establishes risk appetite and associated limits for our activities.
Executive management assesses, with Board oversight, the risk-adjusted returns of each business. Management reviews and approves the strategic and financial operating plans, as well as the capital plan and Risk Appetite Statement, and recommends them annually to the Board for approval. Our strategic plan takes into consideration return objectives and financial resources, which must align with risk capacity and risk appetite. Management sets financial objectives for each business by allocating capital and setting a target for return on capital for each business. Capital allocations are regularly evaluated as part of our overall governance processes as the businesses and the economic environment in which we operate continue to evolve. For more information regarding capital allocations, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
The Corporation’s risk appetite indicates the amount of capital, earnings or liquidity we are willing to put at risk to achieve our strategic objectives and business plans, consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. It also provides a common framework that includes a set of measures to assist senior management and the Board in assessing the Corporation’s risk profile across all risk types against our risk appetite and risk capacity. Our risk appetite is formally articulated in the Risk Appetite Statement, which includes both qualitative statements and quantitative limits.
Our overall capacity to take risk is limited. Accordingly, we prioritize the risks we take in order to maintain a strong and flexible financial position so we can weather challenging economic times and take advantage of organic growth opportunities while complying with all applicable regulatory requirements. Therefore, we set objectives and targets for capital and liquidity that permit us to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner at all times, including during periods of stress. We also maintain strong operational risk management and operational resiliency capabilities so we can meet the expectations of our customers and clients through a range of operating conditions.
Our lines of business operate with risk limits that align with the Corporation’s risk appetite. Management is responsible for tracking and reporting performance measurements as well as any breaches or exceptions to risk appetite limits. The Board, and its committees when appropriate, oversee financial performance, execution of the strategic and financial operating plans, adherence to risk appetite limits and the adequacy of internal controls.
For a more detailed discussion of our risk management activities, see the discussion below and pages 48 through 83.
Risk Management Governance
The Risk Framework describes delegations of authority whereby the Board and its committees may delegate authority to management-level committees or executive officers. Such delegations may authorize certain decision-making and approval functions, which may be evidenced in documents such as committee charters, job descriptions, meeting minutes and resolutions.
The chart below illustrates the interrelationship among the Board, Board committees and management committees that have the majority of risk oversight responsibilities for the Corporation.
45 Bank of America
Board of Directors and Board Committees
The Board is composed of 14 directors, all but one of whom are independent. The Board oversees management’s establishment of an effective Risk Framework and oversees compliance with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, the Board and its committees make inquiries of, and receive reports from senior management on, risk-related matters to assess scope or resource limitations that could impede the ability of Global Risk Management (GRM) and/or Corporate Audit to execute their responsibilities. The Audit and Enterprise Risk Committees discussed below have the principal responsibility for enterprise-wide oversight of our risk management activities. Through these responsibilities, the Board and applicable committees are provided with information on our risk profile and oversee senior management addressing key risks we face. Other Board committees, as described below, provide additional oversight of specific risks.
The Audit and Enterprise Risk Committees regularly report to the Board on risk-related matters within the committees’ responsibilities, which are intended to collectively provide the Board with integrated insight about the Corporation’s risk profile and our management of enterprise-wide risks.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee provides risk assessment and management oversight for compliance risk pursuant to New York Stock Exchange listing standards and regularly receives updates from management on compliance risk-related matters. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees the qualifications, performance and independence of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the performance of our Corporate Audit function, the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and makes inquiries of the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) or other senior management to determine whether there are scope or resource limitations that impede the ability of Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities.
Enterprise Risk Committee
The ERC oversees the Corporation’s Risk Framework, risk appetite and senior management’s identification, measurement, monitoring and control of key risks facing the Corporation. The
ERC regularly receives risk management updates from management on key risks and selected risk topics, including emerging risks. The ERC also periodically reviews the adequacy of the resources of the Corporation’s independent GRM function. The ERC may consult with other Board committees on risk-related matters such as the Audit Committee for compliance risks.
Other Board Committees
Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees corporate governance matters, including periodically reviewing and making recommendations to the Board on Board succession planning and composition matters, conducting an annual review of the Board’s performance and leading itself and the Board’s other committees in an annual assessment of their performance. The committee also oversees sustainability matters (other than human capital matters), including the Corporation’s public policy engagement, sustainability initiatives, charitable contributions, and community reinvestment activities and performance.
Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee oversees establishing, maintaining and administering our compensation programs and employee benefit plans, including approving and recommending our Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO) compensation to our Board for further approval by all independent directors; reviewing and approving our executive officers’ compensation, as well as compensation for non-management directors; and reviewing certain other human capital management topics.
Management Committees
Management committees receive their authority from the Board, a Board committee, or another management committee. Our primary management risk committee is the MRC. Subject to Board oversight, the MRC is responsible for management oversight of key risks facing the Corporation, including an integrated evaluation of risk, earnings, capital and liquidity.
Executive Officers
Executive officers lead various functions representing the functional roles. Authority for functional roles may be delegated to executive officers from the Board, Board committees or management-level committees. Executive officers, in turn, may further delegate responsibilities, as appropriate, to management-level committees, management routines or
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 46 |
individuals. Executive officers review our activities for consistency with our Risk Framework, risk appetite, and applicable strategic, capital and financial operating plans, as well as applicable policies and standards. Executive officers and other employees make decisions individually on a day-to-day basis, consistent with the authority they have been delegated. Executive officers and other employees may also serve on committees and participate in committee decisions.
Lines of Defense
We have clear ownership and accountability for managing risk across three lines of defense: Front Line Units (FLUs), GRM and Corporate Audit. We also have control functions outside of FLUs and GRM (e.g., Legal and Public Policy, and Chief People Organization). The three lines of defense are integrated into our management-level governance structure. Each of these functional roles is further described in this section.
Front Line Units and Control Functions
FLUs, which include the business segments and underlying businesses, as well as the organizations that support technology and operations for the Corporation, are responsible for appropriately assessing and effectively managing all of the risks associated with their activities. Control functions provide guidance and subject matter expertise on day-to-day activities affecting the Corporation, as well as by overseeing and managing risks that emanate from their own respective activities.
Global Risk Management
GRM is part of our control functions and operates as our independent risk management function. GRM, led by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), is responsible for independently assessing and overseeing risks within FLUs and other control functions. GRM establishes written enterprise policies and procedures outlining how aggregate risks are identified, measured, monitored and controlled.
The CRO has the stature, authority and independence needed to develop and implement a meaningful risk management framework and practices to guide the Corporation in managing risk. The CRO has unrestricted access to the Board and reports directly to both the ERC and the CEO. GRM is organized into horizontal risk teams that cover a specific risk area and vertical CRO teams that cover a particular FLU or control function. These teams work collaboratively in executing their respective duties.
Corporate Audit
Corporate Audit and the CAE maintain their independence from the FLUs, GRM and other control functions by reporting directly to the Audit Committee. The CAE administratively reports to the CEO. Corporate Audit provides independent assessment and validation through testing of key processes and controls across the Corporation. Corporate Audit includes Credit Review, which provides an independent assessment of credit lending decisions and the effectiveness of credit processes across the Corporation’s credit platform through examinations and monitoring.
Risk Management Processes
The Risk Framework requires that strong risk management practices are integrated in key strategic, capital and financial planning processes and in day-to-day business processes across the Corporation, thereby ensuring risks are appropriately considered, evaluated and responded to in a timely manner. We employ an effective risk management process, referred to as
Identify, Measure, Monitor and Control, as part of our daily activities.
Identify – To be effectively managed, risks must be proactively identified and well understood. Proper risk identification focuses on recognizing and understanding key risks inherent in our business activities or key risks that may arise from external factors. Each employee is expected to identify and escalate risks promptly. Risk identification is an ongoing process that incorporates input from FLUs and control functions. It is designed to be forward-looking and to capture relevant risk factors across all of our lines of business.
Measure – Once a risk is identified, it must be prioritized and accurately measured through a systematic process including qualitative statements and quantitative limits. Risk is measured at various levels, including, but not limited to, risk type, FLU and legal entity, and also on an aggregate basis. This risk measurement process helps to capture changes in our risk profile due to changes in strategic direction, concentrations, portfolio quality and the overall economic environment. Senior management considers how risk exposures might evolve under a variety of stress scenarios.
Monitor – We monitor risk levels regularly to track adherence to risk appetite, policies and standards. We also regularly update risk assessments and review risk exposures. Through our monitoring, we know our level of risk relative to limits and can take action in a timely manner. We also know when risk limits are breached and have processes to appropriately report and escalate exceptions. This includes timely requests for approval to managers and alerts to executive management, management-level committees or the Board (directly or through an appropriate committee).
Control – We establish and communicate risk limits and controls through policies, standards, procedures and processes. The limits and controls can be adjusted by senior management or the Board when conditions or risk tolerances warrant. These limits may be absolute (e.g., loan amount, trading volume, operational loss) or relative (e.g., percentage of loan book in higher-risk categories). Our FLUs are held accountable for performing within the established limits.
The formal processes used to manage risk represent a part of our overall risk management process. We instill a strong and comprehensive culture of managing risk well through communications, training, policies, procedures and organizational roles and responsibilities. Establishing a culture reflective of our purpose to help make our customers’ financial lives better and delivering on Responsible Growth is also critical to effective risk management. We are committed to the highest principles of ethical and professional conduct. Conduct risk is the risk of improper actions, behaviors or practices by the Corporation, its employees or representatives that are illegal, unethical and/or contrary to our core values that could result in harm to the Corporation, our shareholders or our customers, damage the integrity of the financial markets, or negatively impact our reputation. We have established protocols and structures so that conduct risk is governed and reported across the Corporation appropriately. All employees are held accountable for adhering to the Code of Conduct, operating within our risk appetite and managing risk in their daily business activities. In addition, our performance management and compensation practices encourage responsible risk-taking that is consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite.
47 Bank of America
Corporation-wide Stress Testing
Integral to our Capital Planning, Financial Planning and Strategic Planning processes, we conduct capital scenario management and stress forecasting on a regular basis to better understand balance sheet, earnings and capital sensitivities to a wide range of economic and business scenarios, including economic and market conditions that are more severe than anticipated. These stress forecasts provide an understanding of the potential impacts from our risk profile on the balance sheet, earnings and capital, and serve as a key component of our capital and risk management practices. The intent of stress testing is to develop a comprehensive understanding of potential impacts of on- and off-balance sheet risks at the Corporation and certain subsidiaries and how they impact financial resiliency, which provides confidence to management, regulators and our investors.
Contingency Planning
We have developed and maintain comprehensive contingency plans that are designed to prepare us in advance to respond in the event of potential adverse economic, operational, financial or market stress conditions. These contingency plans include our Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan, which provides monitoring, escalation, actions and routines designed to enable us to increase capital and/or liquidity, access funding sources and reduce risk through consideration of potential options that include asset sales, business sales, capital or debt issuances, and other risk reducing strategies at various levels of capital or liquidity depletion during a period of stress. We also maintain a Resolution Plan to limit adverse systemic impacts that could be associated with a potential resolution of Bank of America.
Strategic Risk Management
Strategic risk is embedded in every business and is one of the major risk categories along with credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. This risk results from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution, or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate (e.g., competitor actions, changing customer preferences, product obsolescence and technology developments).
An aspect of strategic risk is the risk that the Corporation’s capital levels are not adequate to meet minimum regulatory requirements and support execution of business activities or absorb losses from risks during normal or adverse economic and market conditions. As such, capital risk is managed in parallel to strategic risk.
We manage strategic risk through the Strategic Risk Enterprise Policy and integration into the strategic planning process, among other activities. Our strategic plan is consistent with our risk appetite, capital plan and liquidity requirements, and specifically addresses strategic risks impacting each business.
On an annual basis, the Board reviews and approves the strategic plan, capital plan, financial operating plan and Risk Appetite Statement. With oversight by the Board, senior management directs the lines of business to execute our strategic plan consistent with our core operating principles and risk appetite. The executive management team monitors business performance throughout the year and provides the Board with regular progress reports on whether strategic objectives and timelines are being met, including reports on strategic risks and if additional or alternative actions need to be
considered or implemented. The regular executive reviews focus on assessing forecasted earnings and returns on capital, the current risk profile, current capital and liquidity positions and related requirements, staffing levels and changes required to support the strategic plan, stress testing results, and other qualitative factors such as market growth rates and peer analysis.
Significant strategic actions, such as capital actions, material acquisitions or divestitures, and resolution plans are reviewed and approved by the Board or delegate. At the business level, processes are in place to discuss the strategic risk implications of new, expanded or modified businesses, products or services, regulatory change and other strategic initiatives, and to provide formal review and approval where required. With oversight by the Board and the ERC, executive management performs similar analyses throughout the year, and evaluates changes to the financial forecast or the risk, capital or liquidity positions as deemed appropriate to balance and optimize achieving the targeted risk appetite, shareholder returns and maintaining the targeted financial strength. Proprietary models are used to measure the capital requirements for credit, country, market, operational and strategic risks. The allocated capital assigned to each business is based on its unique risk profile. With oversight by the Board, executive management assesses the risk-adjusted returns of each business in approving strategic and financial operating plans. The businesses use allocated capital to define business strategies, and price products and transactions.
Capital Management
The Corporation manages its capital position so that its capital is more than adequate to support its business activities and aligns with risk, risk appetite and strategic planning. Additionally, we seek to maintain safety and soundness at all times, even under adverse scenarios, take advantage of organic growth opportunities, meet obligations to creditors and counterparties, maintain ready access to financial markets, continue to serve as a credit intermediary, remain a source of strength for our subsidiaries, and satisfy current and future regulatory capital requirements. Capital management is integrated into our risk and governance processes, as capital is a key consideration in the development of our strategic plan, risk appetite and risk limits.
We conduct an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) on a periodic basis. The ICAAP is a forward-looking assessment of our projected capital needs and resources, incorporating earnings, balance sheet and risk forecasts under baseline and adverse economic and market conditions. We utilize periodic stress tests to assess the potential impacts to our balance sheet, earnings, regulatory capital and liquidity under a variety of stress scenarios. We perform qualitative risk assessments to identify and assess material risks not fully captured in our forecasts or stress tests. We assess the potential capital impacts of proposed changes to regulatory capital requirements. Management assesses ICAAP results and provides documented quarterly assessments of the adequacy of our capital guidelines and capital position to the Board or its committees.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. For more information, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 48 |
CCAR and Capital Planning
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) requires large BHCs to submit a capital plan and planned capital actions on an annual basis, consistent with the rules governing capital planning and the stress capital buffer (SCB) requirement, which include supervisory stress testing by the Federal Reserve. Based on the results of our 2025 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) stress test under the current regulatory framework, our SCB is 2.5 percent, resulting in a Common equity tier 1 (CET1) minimum requirement of 10.0 percent, effective October 1, 2025. At December 31, 2025, the Corporation’s CET1 capital ratio was 11.4 percent under the Standardized approach. As part of the Federal Reserve’s release of 2026 hypothetical stress test scenarios, the Federal Reserve announced the Corporation’s SCB will remain 2.5 percent through September 30, 2027. For more information, see Regulatory Developments in this section.
On July 24, 2024, the Corporation announced the Board’s authorization of a $25 billion common stock repurchase program, effective August 1, 2024 (2024 Repurchase Program), which replaced the Corporation’s previous repurchase program that expired on August 1, 2024. In addition, on July 23, 2025, the Corporation announced the Board’s authorization of a $40 billion common stock repurchase program, effective August 1, 2025, which replaced the 2024 Repurchase Program that expired on the same date. Pursuant to these Board-authorized repurchase programs, during 2025, the Corporation repurchased $21.4 billion of common stock. For more information, see Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on page 24.
The timing and amount of common stock repurchases are subject to various factors, including the Corporation’s capital position, liquidity, financial performance and alternative uses of capital, stock trading price, regulatory requirements and general market conditions, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Such repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including repurchase plans that satisfy the conditions of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).
Further, as part of our planned capital actions, during 2025, the Corporation paid common stock dividends of $8.1 billion.
Regulatory Capital
As a BHC, we are subject to regulatory capital rules, including Basel 3, issued by U.S. banking regulators. Basel 3 established minimum capital ratios and buffer requirements and outlined two methods of calculating risk-weighted assets (RWA), the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches. The Standardized approach relies primarily on supervisory risk weights based on exposure type, and the Advanced approaches determine risk weights based on internal models.
The Corporation's depository institution subsidiaries are also subject to the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. The Corporation and its primary affiliated banking entity, BANA, are Advanced approaches institutions under Basel 3 and are required to report regulatory risk-based capital ratios and RWA under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. The lower of the capital ratios under Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements is used to assess capital adequacy, including under the PCA framework. As of December 31, 2025, the Corporation’s binding ratio was the Total capital ratio under the Standardized approach.
Minimum Capital Requirements
In order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, the Corporation must meet risk-based capital ratio requirements that include a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent (under the Advanced approaches only), an SCB (under the Standardized approach only), plus any applicable countercyclical capital buffer and a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) surcharge. The buffers and surcharge must be comprised solely of CET1 capital. For the period from October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025, the Corporation’s minimum CET1 ratio requirements were 10.7 percent under the Standardized approach and 10.0 percent under the Advanced approaches. Effective October 1, 2025, the Corporation’s minimum CET1 requirement was 10.0 percent under both the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches.
The Corporation is required to calculate its G-SIB surcharge on an annual basis under two methods and is subject to the higher of the resulting two surcharges. Method 1 is consistent with the approach prescribed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s assessment methodology and is calculated using specified indicators of systemic importance. Method 2 modifies the Method 1 approach for various factors. The Corporation’s Method 1 G-SIB surcharge is 1.5 percent, and its Method 2 G-SIB surcharge is 3.0 percent. On January 1, 2027, the Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge will increase by 50 bps to 2.0 percent under Method 1 and to 3.5 percent under Method 2, which will increase the Corporation’s minimum capital ratio requirements. At December 31, 2025, the Corporation’s CET1 capital ratio of 11.4 percent under the Standardized approach exceeded its minimum CET1 capital ratio requirement of 10.0 percent.
At December 31, 2025, the Corporation was also required to maintain a minimum supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) of 3.0 percent plus a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. Our insured depository institution subsidiaries were required to maintain a minimum SLR of 6.0 percent to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework. At December 31, 2025, both the Corporation and its insured depository institution subsidiaries exceeded their minimum supplementary leverage requirements. Effective January 1, 2026, the minimum SLR requirement for the Corporation and its insured depository institutions is 3.75 percent. For more information, see Regulatory Developments in this section. The numerator of the SLR is quarter-end Basel 3 Tier 1 capital. The denominator is total leverage exposure based on the daily average of the sum of on-balance sheet exposures less permitted deductions and the simple average of certain off-balance sheet exposures, as of the end of each month in a quarter.
Capital Composition and Ratios
Effective in the fourth quarter of 2025, the Corporation elected to change its accounting methods related to certain tax-related equity investments and applied those changes retrospectively through a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. For more information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Under applicable bank regulatory rules, the Corporation is not required to, and accordingly, did not revise regulatory capital information as of December 31, 2024.
49 Bank of America
Table 10 presents Bank of America Corporation’s capital ratios and related information in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2025 and 2024. For the periods presented herein, the Corporation met the definition of well capitalized under current regulatory requirements.
| Table 10 | Bank of America Corporation Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1, 2) | Advanced Approaches (1, 2) | Regulatory Minimum (3) | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2025 | |||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 201,410 | $ | 201,410 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 227,382 | 227,382 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (4) | 261,232 | 250,347 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,773 | 1,570 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.4 | % | 12.8 | % | 10.0 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 12.8 | 14.5 | 11.5 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.7 | 15.9 | 13.5 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (5) | $ | 3,348 | $ | 3,348 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 6.8 | % | 6.8 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,986 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.7 | % | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 201,083 | $ | 201,083 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 223,458 | 223,458 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (4) | 255,363 | 244,809 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,696 | 1,490 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.9 | % | 13.5 | % | 10.7 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.2 | 15.0 | 12.2 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 15.1 | 16.4 | 14.2 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (5) | $ | 3,240 | $ | 3,240 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 6.9 | % | 6.9 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,818 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | % | 5.0 |
(1)As of January 1, 2025, current expected credit losses (CECL) transition provision’s impact was fully phased-in. Capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 were calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allowed a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)Effective in the fourth quarter of 2025, the Corporation elected to change its accounting methods for certain tax-related equity investments and applied those changes retrospectively through cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. Under applicable bank regulatory rules, the Corporation is not required to revise previously-filed regulatory capital ratios and, accordingly, did not revise regulatory capital information as of December 31, 2024.
(3)The CET1 capital regulatory minimum is the sum of the CET1 capital ratio minimum of 4.5 percent, our G-SIB surcharge of 3.0 percent, and SCB (under the Standardized approach) of 2.5 percent at December 31, 2025 and 3.2 percent at December 31, 2024. The countercyclical capital buffer was zero for both periods. The SLR regulatory minimum includes a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent.
(4)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(5)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
At December 31, 2025, CET1 capital was $201.4 billion, an increase of $327 million from December 31, 2024, primarily due to earnings, largely offset by capital distributions and, to a lesser extent, the impact of the tax-related equity investments accounting changes. Tier 1 capital increased $3.9 billion driven by the same factors as CET1 capital as well as preferred stock issuances. Total capital under the Standardized approach increased $5.9 billion driven by the same factors as Tier 1
capital, as well as subordinated debt issuances and an increase in the adjusted allowance for credit losses included in Tier 2 capital. RWA under the Standardized approach, which drove the lower CET1 capital ratio at December 31, 2025, increased $77.2 billion during 2025 to $1,773 billion primarily driven by lending activity in GWIM, Global Banking and Global Markets. Supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2025 increased $167.7 billion primarily driven by increased activity in Global Markets.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 50 |
Table 11 shows the capital composition at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 11 | Capital Composition under Basel 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | $ | 277,251 | $ | 270,804 | ||
| Impact of change in accounting method (1) | — | 1,596 | ||||
| CECL transitional amount (2) | — | 627 | ||||
| Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (68,651) | (68,649) | ||||
| Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | (8,761) | (8,097) | ||||
| Intangibles, other than mortgage servicing rights, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (1,386) | (1,440) | ||||
| Defined benefit pension plan net assets | (868) | (786) | ||||
| Cumulative unrealized net (gain) loss related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net-of-tax | 1,825 | 1,491 | ||||
| Accumulated net (gain) loss on certain cash flow hedges (3) | 2,020 | 5,629 | ||||
| Other | (20) | (92) | ||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 201,410 | 201,083 | ||||
| Qualifying preferred stock, net of issuance cost | 25,991 | 22,391 | ||||
| Other | (19) | (16) | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 227,382 | 223,458 | ||||
| Tier 2 capital instruments | 19,627 | 18,592 | ||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (2) | 14,431 | 13,558 | ||||
| Other | (208) | (245) | ||||
| Total capital under the Standardized approach | 261,232 | 255,363 | ||||
| Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses under the Advanced approaches (2) | (10,885) | (10,554) | ||||
| Total capital under the Advanced approaches | $ | 250,347 | $ | 244,809 |
(1)Represents the decrease in retained earnings due to the Corporation’s election to change its accounting methods for certain tax-related equity investments in the fourth quarter of 2025. Under applicable bank regulatory rules, the Corporation is not required to revise previously-filed regulatory capital ratios and, accordingly, did not revise regulatory capital information as of December 31, 2024.
(2)The qualifying allowance for credit losses under the Standardized approach and under the Advanced approaches include the impact of transition provisions related to the CECL accounting standard. As of January 1, 2025, CECL transition provision’s impact was fully phased-in. December 31, 2024 includes 25 percent of the CECL transition provision’s impact as of December 31, 2021.
(3)Includes amounts in accumulated OCI related to the hedging of items that are not recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Table 12 shows the components of RWA as measured under Basel 3 at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 12 | Risk-weighted Assets under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | |||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Credit risk | $ | 1,694 | $ | 1,087 | $ | 1,623 | $ | 1,015 | ||||||
| Market risk | 79 | 79 | 73 | 73 | ||||||||||
| Operational risk | n/a | 357 | n/a | 359 | ||||||||||
| Risks related to credit valuation adjustments | n/a | 47 | n/a | 43 | ||||||||||
| Total risk-weighted assets (1) | $ | 1,773 | $ | 1,570 | $ | 1,696 | $ | 1,490 |
(1)Effective October 1, 2025, the Corporation elected to change its accounting methods for certain tax-related equity investments and applied those changes retrospectively. Under applicable bank regulatory rules, the Corporation is not required to revise previously-filed regulatory capital ratios and, accordingly, did not revise regulatory capital information as of December 31, 2024.
n/a = not applicable
51 Bank of America
Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital
Table 13 presents regulatory capital information for BANA in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2025 and 2024. BANA met the definition of well capitalized under the PCA framework for both periods.
| Table 13 | Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1, 2) | Advanced Approaches (1, 2) | Regulatory Minimum (3) | ||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2025 | |||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 190,831 | $ | 190,831 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 190,831 | 190,831 | ||||||||
| Total capital (4) | 206,640 | 196,006 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,530 | 1,227 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 12.5 | % | 15.6 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 12.5 | 15.6 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 13.5 | 16.0 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (5) | $ | 2,592 | $ | 2,592 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.4 | % | 7.4 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,101 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.2 | % | 6.0 | |||||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 194,341 | $ | 194,341 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 194,341 | 194,341 | ||||||||
| Total capital (4) | 209,256 | 198,923 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,444 | 1,151 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | % | 16.9 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 16.9 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.5 | 17.3 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (5) | $ | 2,546 | $ | 2,546 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.6 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,015 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.4 | % | 6.0 |
(1)As of January 1, 2025, CECL transition provision’s impact was fully phased-in. Capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 were calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allowed a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)Effective in the fourth quarter of 2025, the Corporation elected to change its accounting methods for certain tax-related equity investments and applied those changes retrospectively through cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. Under applicable bank regulatory rules, the Corporation is not required to revise previously-filed regulatory capital ratios and, accordingly, did not revise regulatory capital information as of December 31, 2024.
(3)Risk-based capital regulatory minimums at both December 31, 2025 and 2024 are the minimum ratios under Basel 3 including a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent. The regulatory minimums for the leverage ratios as of both period ends are the percent required to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework.
(4)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(5)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements
Total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) consists of the Corporation’s Tier 1 capital and eligible long-term debt issued directly by the Corporation. Eligible long-term debt for TLAC ratios is comprised of unsecured debt that has a remaining maturity of at least one year and satisfies additional requirements as prescribed in the TLAC final rule. As with the
risk-based capital ratios and SLR, the Corporation is required to maintain TLAC ratios in excess of minimum requirements plus applicable buffers to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. Table 14 presents the Corporation's TLAC and long-term debt ratios and related information as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 52 |
| Table 14 | Bank of America Corporation Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLAC (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | Long-term Debt | Regulatory Minimum (3) | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 466,728 | $ | 225,518 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 26.3 | % | 22.0 | % | 12.7 | % | 9.0 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 11.7 | 9.5 | 5.7 | 4.5 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 459,857 | $ | 220,666 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 27.1 | % | 22.0 | % | 13.0 | % | 9.0 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 12.0 | 9.5 | 5.8 | 4.5 |
(1)As of January 1, 2025, CECL transition provision’s impact was fully phased-in. TLAC ratios as of December 31, 2024 were calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allowed a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)The TLAC RWA regulatory minimum consists of 18.0 percent plus a TLAC RWA buffer comprised of 2.5 percent plus the Method 1 G-SIB surcharge of 1.5 percent. The countercyclical buffer is zero for both periods. The TLAC supplementary leverage exposure regulatory minimum consists of 7.5 percent plus a 2.0 percent TLAC leverage buffer. The TLAC RWA and leverage buffers must be comprised solely of CET1 capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively.
(3)The long-term debt RWA regulatory minimum is comprised of 6.0 percent plus the Corporation’s Method 2 G-SIB surcharge of 3.0 percent. The long-term debt leverage exposure regulatory minimum is 4.5 percent.
(4)The approach that yields the higher RWA is used to calculate TLAC and long-term debt ratios, which was the Standardized approach as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Regulatory Developments
On November 25, 2025, the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and FDIC issued a final rule that modified enhanced SLR requirements for bank holding companies and their insured depository institution subsidiaries, with corresponding revisions to TLAC and long-term debt requirements. Under the final rule, static buffer requirements have been replaced with a dynamic buffer requirement equal to 50 percent of the G-SIB’s Method 1 surcharge, with the buffer capped at one percent for insured depository institutions. The Corporation elected to early adopt the final rule as of January 1, 2026, which decreased the regulatory minimum SLR requirement to 3.75 percent from 5.0 percent for the Corporation, and to 3.75 percent from 6.0 percent for BANA as of the same date. For more information on the Corporation’s Method 1 and Method 2 G-SIB surcharge, see Minimum Capital Requirements in this section.
On October 24, 2025, the Federal Reserve issued two notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRs) related to its annual stress test. The first NPR requested comment on the hypothetical scenarios that will be used in the 2026 supervisory stress test. The Federal Reserve released these scenarios on February 4, 2026. The second NPR requests comment on the models the Federal Reserve uses to conduct the supervisory stress test. This NPR also outlines proposed changes to the broader stress testing framework and codifies an enhanced disclosure process under which the Federal Reserve would annually publish and invite public comment on stress test scenarios, models and material changes to those models.
On April 17, 2025, the Federal Reserve issued an NPR to modify the capital plan rule and SCB requirements. Under this NPR, results from the two most recent annual supervisory stress tests would be averaged to determine the Corporation’s SCB requirement. In addition, the annual effective date of the SCB requirement would change from October 1st of the current year to January 1st of the following year, providing banks with additional time to comply with their new capital requirements.
Regulatory Capital and Securities Regulation
The Corporation’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS) and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S). The Corporation's principal European subsidiaries undertaking broker-dealer activities are Merrill Lynch International (MLI) and BofA Securities Europe SA (BofASE).
The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act. BofAS computes its capital requirements as an alternative net capital broker-dealer under Rule 15c3-1(a)(7) and Rule 15c3-1e, which permit the use of SEC-approved models, and MLPF&S computes its capital requirements in accordance with the alternative standard under Rule 15c3-1. BofAS is registered as a futures commission merchant and is subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Regulation 1.17. The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are also registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA). Pursuant to FINRA Rule 4110, FINRA may impose higher net capital requirements than Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to each of the broker-dealers.
BofAS provides institutional services, and in accordance with the alternative net capital requirements, is required to regularly maintain tentative net capital in excess of $5.0 billion and net capital in excess of the greater of $1.0 billion or a certain percentage of its reserve requirement in addition to a certain percentage of securities-based swap risk margin. BofAS must also notify the SEC in the event its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. BofAS is also required to hold a certain percentage of its customers' and affiliates' risk-based margin in order to meet its CFTC minimum net capital requirement. At December 31, 2025, BofAS had tentative net capital of $28.2 billion. BofAS also had regulatory net capital of $23.0 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $5.1 billion.
MLPF&S provides retail services and is required to maintain net capital that is the greater of $250,000 or two percent of a certain component of its reserve calculation. At December 31, 2025, MLPF&S' regulatory net capital was $8.1 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $175 million.
Our European broker-dealers are subject to requirements from U.S. and non-U.S. regulators. MLI, a U.K. investment firm, is regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority and is subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2025, MLI’s capital resources were $33.4 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $13.2 billion.
BofASE, an authorized credit institution with its head office located in France, is regulated by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, and supervised under the Single Supervisory Mechanism by the European Central Bank. At December 31, 2025, BofASE's capital resources were $11.8 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $4.0 billion.
53 Bank of America
In addition, MLI and BofASE remained conditionally registered with the SEC as security-based swap dealers, and maintained net liquid assets at December 31, 2025 that exceeded the applicable minimum requirements under the Exchange Act. The entities are also registered as swap dealers with the CFTC and met applicable capital requirements at December 31, 2025.
Liquidity Risk
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity risk management objective is to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral requirements, including payments under long-term debt agreements, commitments to extend credit and customer deposit withdrawals, while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions. To achieve that objective, we analyze and monitor our liquidity risk under expected and stressed conditions, maintain liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, including our stable deposit base, and seek to align liquidity-related incentives and risks. These liquidity risk management practices have allowed us to effectively manage market fluctuations from the elevated interest rate environment, inflationary pressures and changes in the macroeconomic environment.
We define liquidity as readily available assets, limited to cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities that we can use to meet our contractual and contingent financial obligations as they arise. We manage our liquidity position through line of business and ALM activities, as well as through our legal entity funding strategy, on both a forward and current (including intraday) basis under both expected and stressed conditions. We believe that a centralized approach to funding and liquidity management enhances our ability to monitor liquidity requirements, maximizes access to funding sources, minimizes borrowing costs and facilitates timely responses to liquidity events.
We provide centralized funding and liquidity management through a variety of activities, including monitoring of established limits, assessing exposures under both normal and stressed conditions and reviewing liquidity risk management processes and controls. GRM provides oversight of liquidity management across the Corporation, including FLUs and legal entities. GRM oversees the liquidity risk management governance structure, establishes liquidity risk policies, and provides independent review and challenge of the Corporation's liquidity risk management processes.
The Board, its risk committee and various management committees oversee the Corporation’s liquidity activities and risk governance. The Board and/or ERC approve our liquidity risk policy, Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan and liquidity risk appetite limits. Management committees responsible for liquidity governance include the Corporation’s Management Risk Committee, Asset and Liability Governance Committee, Liquidity Risk Committee and Asset and Liability Management Investment Committee. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 88. Under this governance framework, we developed certain funding and liquidity risk management practices which include: maintaining liquidity at Bank of America Corporation (Parent) and selected subsidiaries, including our bank subsidiaries and
other regulated entities; determining what amounts of liquidity are appropriate for these entities based on analysis of debt maturities and other potential cash outflows, including those that we may experience during stressed market conditions; diversifying funding sources, considering our asset profile and legal entity structure; and performing contingency planning.
NB Holdings Corporation
Bank of America Corporation, as the parent company (the Parent), which is a separate and distinct legal entity from our bank and nonbank subsidiaries, has an intercompany arrangement with our wholly-owned holding company subsidiary, NB Holdings Corporation (NB Holdings). We have transferred, and agreed to transfer, additional Parent assets not required to satisfy anticipated near-term expenditures to NB Holdings. The Parent is expected to continue to have access to the same flow of dividends, interest and other amounts of cash necessary to service its debt, pay dividends and perform other obligations as it would have had it not entered into these arrangements and transferred any assets. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In consideration for the transfer of assets, NB Holdings issued a subordinated note to the Parent in a principal amount equal to the value of the transferred assets. The aggregate principal amount of the note will increase by the amount of any future asset transfers. NB Holdings also provided the Parent with a committed line of credit that allows the Parent to draw funds necessary to service near-term cash needs. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These arrangements include provisions to terminate the line of credit, forgive the subordinated note and require the Parent to transfer its remaining financial assets to NB Holdings if our projected liquidity resources deteriorate so severely that resolution of the Parent becomes imminent.
Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets
We maintain liquidity available to the Corporation, including the Parent and selected subsidiaries, in the form of cash and high- quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Our liquidity buffer, referred to as Global Liquidity Sources (GLS), is comprised of assets that are readily available to the Parent and selected subsidiaries, including holding company, bank and broker-dealer subsidiaries, even during stressed market conditions. Our cash is primarily on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank and, to a lesser extent, central banks outside of the U.S. We limit the composition of high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities to U.S. government securities, U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities and other investment-grade securities, and a select group of non-U.S. government securities. We can obtain cash for these securities, even in stressed conditions, through repurchase agreements or outright sales. We hold our GLS in legal entities that allow us to meet the liquidity requirements of our global businesses, and we consider the impact of potential regulatory, tax, legal and other restrictions that could limit the transferability of funds among entities.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 54 |
Table 15 presents average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 15 | Average Global Liquidity Sources | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months EndedDecember 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | December 31 2025 | December 31 2024 | ||||
| Bank entities | $ | 789 | $ | 777 | ||
| Nonbank and other entities (1) | 186 | 176 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 975 | $ | 953 |
(1) Nonbank includes Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities.
Our bank subsidiaries’ liquidity is primarily driven by deposit and lending activity, as well as securities valuation and net debt activity. Bank subsidiaries can also generate incremental liquidity by pledging a range of unencumbered loans and securities to certain FHLBs and the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The cash we could have obtained by borrowing against this pool of specifically-identified eligible assets was $343 billion and $328 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024. We have established operational procedures to enable us to borrow against these assets, including regularly monitoring our total pool of eligible loans and securities collateral. Eligibility is defined in guidelines from the FHLBs and the Federal Reserve and is subject to change at their discretion. Due to regulatory restrictions, liquidity generated by the bank subsidiaries can generally be used only to fund obligations within the bank subsidiaries, and transfers to the Parent or nonbank subsidiaries may be subject to prior regulatory approval.
Liquidity is also held in nonbank entities, including the Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities. The Parent and NB Holdings liquidity is typically in the form of cash deposited at BANA, which is excluded from the liquidity at bank subsidiaries, and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Liquidity held in other regulated entities, comprised primarily of broker-dealer subsidiaries, is primarily available to meet the obligations of that entity, and transfers to the Parent or to any other subsidiary may be subject to prior regulatory approval due to regulatory restrictions and minimum requirements. Our other regulated entities also hold unencumbered investment-grade securities and equities that we believe could be used to generate additional liquidity.
Table 16 presents the composition of average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 16 | Average Global Liquidity Sources Composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months EndedDecember 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | December 31 2025 | December 31 2024 | ||||
| Cash on deposit | $ | 227 | $ | 315 | ||
| U.S. Treasury securities | 371 | 313 | ||||
| U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities | 336 | 296 | ||||
| Non-U.S. government securities | 41 | 29 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 975 | $ | 953 |
Our GLS are substantially the same in composition to what qualifies as High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) under the final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) rules. However, HQLA for purposes of calculating LCR is not reported at market value, but
at a lower value that incorporates regulatory deductions and the exclusion of excess liquidity held at certain subsidiaries. The LCR is calculated as the amount of a financial institution’s unencumbered HQLA relative to the estimated net cash outflows the institution could encounter over a 30-day period of significant liquidity stress, expressed as a percentage. Our average consolidated HQLA, on a net basis, was $667 billion and $623 billion for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. For the same periods, the average consolidated LCR was 112 percent and 113 percent. Our LCR fluctuates due to normal business flows from customer activity.
Liquidity Stress Analysis
We utilize liquidity stress analysis to assist us in determining the appropriate amounts of liquidity to maintain at the Parent and our subsidiaries to meet contractual and contingent cash outflows under a range of scenarios. The scenarios we consider and utilize incorporate market-wide and Corporation-specific events, including potential credit rating downgrades for the Parent and our subsidiaries, and more severe events including potential resolution scenarios. The scenarios are based on our historical experience, experience of distressed and failed financial institutions, regulatory guidance, and both expected and unexpected future events.
The types of potential contractual and contingent cash outflows we consider in our scenarios may include, but are not limited to, upcoming contractual maturities of unsecured debt and reductions in new debt issuances; diminished access to secured financing markets; potential deposit withdrawals; increased draws on loan commitments, liquidity facilities and letters of credit; additional collateral that counterparties could call if our credit ratings were downgraded; collateral and margin requirements arising from market value changes; and potential liquidity required to maintain businesses and finance customer activities. Changes in certain market factors, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades, could negatively impact potential contractual and contingent outflows and the related financial instruments, and in some cases these impacts could be material to our financial results.
We consider all sources of funds that we could access during each stress scenario and focus particularly on matching available sources with corresponding liquidity requirements by legal entity. We also use the stress modeling results to manage our asset and liability profile and establish limits and guidelines on certain funding sources and businesses.
Net Stable Funding Ratio
The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a liquidity requirement for large banks to maintain a minimum level of stable funding over a one-year period. The requirement is intended to support the ability of banks to lend to households and businesses in both normal and adverse economic conditions and is complementary to the LCR, which focuses on short-term liquidity risks. The U.S. NSFR applies to the Corporation on a consolidated basis and to our insured depository institutions. For both the three months ended September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2025, the average consolidated NSFR was 120 percent.
Diversified Funding Sources
We fund our assets primarily with a mix of deposits, and secured and unsecured liabilities through a centralized, globally coordinated funding approach diversified across products, programs, markets, currencies and investor groups.
55 Bank of America
The primary benefits of our centralized funding approach include greater control, reduced funding costs, wider name recognition by investors and greater flexibility to meet the variable funding requirements of subsidiaries. Where regulations, time zone differences or other business considerations make Parent funding impractical, certain other subsidiaries may issue their own debt.
We fund a substantial portion of our lending activities through our deposits, which were $2.02 trillion and $1.97 trillion at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Deposits are primarily generated by our Consumer Banking, GWIM and Global Banking segments. These deposits are diversified by clients, product type and geography, and the majority of our U.S. deposits are insured by the FDIC.
At December 31, 2025, 47 percent of our deposits were in Consumer Banking, 14 percent in GWIM and 32 percent in Global Banking. As of the same period, approximately 70 percent of consumer and small business deposits and 81 percent of U.S. deposits in Global Banking were held by clients who have had accounts with us for 10 or more years. In addition, at December 31, 2025 and 2024, 26 percent and 27 percent of our deposits were noninterest bearing and included operating accounts of our consumer and commercial clients. During the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, rates paid on deposits were 55 bps and 64 bps in Consumer Banking, 221 bps and 275 bps in GWIM, and 252 bps and 297 bps in Global Banking. For information on annual rates paid on consolidated deposit balances, see Table 6 on page 34.
We consider a substantial portion of our deposit base to be a stable, low-cost and consistent source of funding. We believe this deposit funding is generally less sensitive to interest rate
changes, market volatility or changes in our credit ratings than wholesale funding sources. Our lending activities may also be financed through secured borrowings, including credit card securitizations and securitizations with government-sponsored enterprises (GSE), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and private-label investors, as well as FHLB loans.
Our trading activities in other regulated entities are primarily funded on a secured basis through securities lending and repurchase agreements, and these amounts will vary based on customer activity and market conditions. We believe funding these activities in the secured financing markets is more cost-efficient and less sensitive to changes in our credit ratings than unsecured financing. Repurchase agreements are generally short-term and often overnight. Disruptions in secured financing markets for financial institutions have occurred in prior market cycles, which resulted in adverse changes in terms or significant reductions in the availability of such financing. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate. For more information on secured financing agreements, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-term Debt
The Corporation’s long-term debt largely consists of senior, senior structured, subordinated and junior subordinated notes issued by the Parent and/or BANA. The following table provides the carrying value of long-term debt at December 31, 2025.
| Table 17 | Long-term Debt | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2025 | |||||
| Bank of America Corporation | ||||||
| Senior notes | $ | 187,569 | ||||
| Senior structured notes | 20,369 | |||||
| Subordinated notes | 25,428 | |||||
| Junior subordinated notes | 750 | |||||
| Total Bank of America Corporation (1) | 234,116 | |||||
| Bank of America, N.A. | ||||||
| Senior notes (1) | 16,872 | |||||
| Subordinated notes (1) | 1,403 | |||||
| Advances from Federal Home Loan Banks | 4,175 | |||||
| Securitizations and other bank VIEs (2) | 6,442 | |||||
| Other | 600 | |||||
| Total Bank of America, N.A. | 29,492 | |||||
| Other debt | ||||||
| Structured liabilities | 53,803 | |||||
| Nonbank VIEs (2) | 405 | |||||
| Total other debt | 54,208 | |||||
| Total | $ | 317,816 |
(1)As of December 31, 2025, the par values of Bank of America’s senior notes, senior structured notes, subordinated notes and junior subordinated notes were $201.5 billion, $23.5 billion, $25.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, the par values of BANA’s senior notes and subordinated notes were $16.9 billion and $1.2 billion. The par value of long-term debt is the nominal or face value of each instrument as of December 31, 2025, and except for senior structured notes, represents the amount owed at the maturity date. The senior structured notes include zero coupon notes, whose par value increases through maturity and have a current par of $10.0 billion, compared to $28.1 billion owed at maturity. The par value of long-term debt is used by regulators and rating agencies to calculate certain resolution metrics.
(2)Represents liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) included in long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Total long-term debt increased $34.5 billion to $317.8 billion during 2025 primarily due to debt issuances and valuation adjustments, partially offset by maturities and redemptions. We may, from time to time, purchase outstanding debt instruments in various transactions, depending on market conditions, liquidity and other factors. Our other regulated entities may also make markets in our debt instruments to provide liquidity for investors.
At December 31, 2025, Bank of America Corporation's senior notes of $187.6 billion included $177.8 billion of outstanding notes, substantially all of which are both TLAC eligible and callable at least one year before their stated maturities. Of these senior notes, $24.5 billion will be callable and become TLAC ineligible during 2026, and $27.4 billion, $28.1 billion, $8.4 billion and $21.7 billion will do so during each of 2027 through 2030, respectively, and $67.7 billion thereafter.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 56 |
We issue long-term unsecured debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. While the cost and availability of unsecured funding may be negatively impacted by general market conditions or by matters specific to the financial services industry or the Corporation, we seek to mitigate refinancing risk by actively managing the amount of our borrowings that we anticipate will mature within any month or quarter. We may issue unsecured debt in the form of structured notes for client purposes, certain of which qualify as TLAC-eligible debt. During 2025, we issued $44.4 billion of structured notes, which are debt obligations that pay investors returns linked to other debt or equity securities, indices, currencies or commodities. We typically hedge the returns we are obligated to pay on these liabilities with derivatives and/or investments in the underlying instruments, so that from a funding perspective, the cost is similar to our other unsecured long-term debt. We could be required to settle certain structured note obligations for cash or other securities prior to maturity under certain circumstances, which we consider for liquidity planning purposes. We believe, however, that a portion of such borrowings will remain outstanding beyond the earliest put or redemption date.
Substantially all of our senior and subordinated debt obligations contain no provisions that could trigger a requirement for an early repayment, require additional collateral support, result in changes to terms, accelerate maturity or create additional financial obligations upon an adverse change in our credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows or stock price. For more information on long-term debt funding, including issuances and maturities and redemptions, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We use derivative transactions to manage the duration, interest rate and currency risks of our borrowings, considering the characteristics of the assets they are funding. For more information on our ALM activities, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 121.
Uninsured Deposits
The FDIC insures the Corporation’s U.S. deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank for each account ownership category, and various country-specific funds insure non-U.S. deposits up to specified limits. Deposits that exceed insurance limits are uninsured. At December 31, 2025, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $2.02 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $723.0 billion and $134.9 billion. At December 31, 2024, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $1.97 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $646.2 billion and $124.9 billion. Deposit balances exclude $11.9 billion and $16.9 billion of collateral received on certain derivative contracts that are netted against the derivative asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Estimated uninsured deposits presented in this section reflect amounts disclosed in our regulatory reports, adjusted to exclude related accrued interest and intercompany deposit balances.
The Corporation’s estimated uninsured deposits include time deposits. At December 31, 2025, the Corporation’s time deposits totaled $212.5 billion, of which estimated uninsured time deposits totaled $47.1 billion. Table 18 presents the Corporation’s estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. time deposits by remaining maturity. For more information on our liquidity sources, see Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets, and for more information on deposits,
see Diversified Funding Sources in this section. For more information on contractual time deposit maturities, see Note 9 – Deposits to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Table 18 | Uninsured Time Deposits (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | U.S. | Non-U.S. | Total | |||||||
| Uninsured time deposits with a maturity of: | ||||||||||
| 3 months or less | $ | 14,364 | $ | 10,960 | $ | 25,324 | ||||
| Over 3 months through 6 months | 8,243 | 499 | 8,742 | |||||||
| Over 6 months through 12 months | 7,937 | 1,005 | 8,942 | |||||||
| Over 12 months | 272 | 3,771 | 4,043 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 30,816 | $ | 16,235 | $ | 47,051 |
(1)Amounts are estimated based on the regulatory methodologies defined by each local jurisdiction.
Contingency Planning
We maintain contingency funding plans that outline our potential responses to liquidity stress events at various levels of severity. These policies and plans are based on stress scenarios and include potential funding strategies and communication and notification procedures that we would implement in the event we experienced stressed liquidity conditions. We periodically review and test the contingency funding plans to validate efficacy and assess readiness.
Our U.S. bank subsidiaries can access contingency funding through the Federal Reserve Discount Window. Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries have access to central bank facilities in the jurisdictions in which they operate. While we do not rely on these sources in our liquidity modeling, we maintain the policies, procedures and governance processes that would enable us to access these sources if necessary.
Credit Ratings
Our borrowing costs and ability to raise funds are impacted by our credit ratings. In addition, credit ratings may be important to customers or counterparties when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to engage in certain transactions, including over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. Thus, it is our objective to maintain high-quality credit ratings, and management maintains an active dialogue with the major rating agencies.
Credit ratings and outlooks are opinions expressed by rating agencies on our creditworthiness and that of our obligations or securities, including long-term debt, short-term borrowings, preferred stock and other securities, including asset securitizations. Our credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by the rating agencies, and they consider a number of factors, including our own financial strength, performance, prospects and operations as well as factors not under our control. The rating agencies could make adjustments to our ratings at any time, and they provide no assurances that they will maintain our ratings at current levels.
Other factors that influence our credit ratings include changes to the rating agencies’ methodologies for our industry or certain security types; the rating agencies’ assessment of the general operating environment for financial services companies; our relative positions in the markets in which we compete; our various risk exposures and risk management policies and activities; pending litigation and other contingencies or potential tail risks; our reputation; our liquidity position, diversity of funding sources and funding costs; the current and expected level and volatility of our earnings; our capital position and capital management practices; our corporate governance; the
57 Bank of America
sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government; current or future regulatory and legislative initiatives; and the agencies’ views on whether the U.S. government would provide meaningful support to the Corporation or its subsidiaries in a crisis.
The ratings and outlooks from Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings for the Corporation did not change in 2025. On May 19, 2025, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded its rating for the long-term senior
debt of BANA to Aa2 from Aa1, removing one notch of rating uplift for government support as a consequence of the agency’s downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt. The ratings and outlooks from Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings for the Corporation’s rated subsidiaries did not change in 2025.
Table 19 presents the Corporation’s current long-term/short-term senior debt ratings and outlooks expressed by the rating agencies.
| Table 19 | Senior Debt Ratings | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moody’s Investors Service | Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings | Fitch Ratings | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | |||||||||
| Bank of America Corporation | A1 | P-1 | Stable | A- | A-2 | Stable | AA- | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America, N.A. | Aa2 | P-1 | Stable | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities, Inc. | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch International | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities Europe SA | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable |
NR = not rated
A reduction in certain of our credit ratings or the ratings of certain asset-backed securitizations may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, potential loss of access to credit markets, the related cost of funds, our businesses and on certain revenues, particularly in those businesses where counterparty creditworthiness is critical. In addition, under the terms of certain OTC derivative contracts and other trading agreements, in the event of downgrades of our or our rated subsidiaries’ credit ratings, the counterparties to those agreements may require us to provide additional collateral, or to terminate these contracts or agreements, which could cause us to sustain losses and/or adversely impact our liquidity. If the short-term credit ratings of our Parent, bank or broker-dealer subsidiaries were downgraded by one or more levels, the potential loss of access to short-term funding sources such as repo financing and the effect on our incremental cost of funds could be material.
While certain potential impacts are contractual and quantifiable, the full scope of the consequences of a credit rating downgrade to a financial institution is inherently uncertain, as it depends upon numerous dynamic, complex and inter-related factors and assumptions, including whether any downgrade of a company’s long-term credit ratings precipitates downgrades to its short-term credit ratings, and assumptions about the potential behaviors of various customers, investors and counterparties. For more information on potential impacts of credit rating downgrades, see Liquidity Risk – Liquidity Stress Analysis on page 55.
For more information on additional collateral and termination payments that could be required in connection with certain over-the-counter derivative contracts and other trading agreements in the event of a credit rating downgrade, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Common Stock Dividends
For a summary of our declared quarterly cash dividends on common stock during 2025 and through February 25, 2026, see Note 13 – Shareholders’ Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Finance Subsidiary Issuers and Parent Guarantor
BofA Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (BofA Finance), is a consolidated finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold, and is expected to continue to issue and sell, its senior unsecured debt securities (Guaranteed Notes) that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The Corporation guarantees the due and punctual payment, on demand, of amounts payable on the Guaranteed Notes if not paid by BofA Finance. In addition, each of BAC Capital Trust XIII, BAC Capital Trust XIV and BAC Capital Trust XV, Delaware statutory trusts (collectively, the Trusts) is a 100 percent owned finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold trust preferred securities (the Trust Preferred Securities) or capital securities (the Capital Securities and, together with the Guaranteed Notes and the Trust Preferred Securities, the Guaranteed Securities), as applicable, that remained outstanding at December 31, 2025. The Corporation guarantees the payment of amounts and distributions with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities if not paid by the Trusts, to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. This guarantee, together with the Corporation’s other obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities, effectively constitutes a full and unconditional guarantee of the Trusts’ payment obligations on the Trust Preferred Securities or Capital Securities, as applicable. No other subsidiary of the Corporation guarantees the Guaranteed Securities.
BofA Finance and each of the Trusts are finance subsidiaries, have no independent assets, revenues or operations and are dependent upon the Corporation and/or the Corporation’s other subsidiaries to meet their respective obligations under the Guaranteed Securities in the ordinary course. If holders of the Guaranteed Securities make claims on their Guaranteed Securities in a bankruptcy, resolution or similar proceeding, any recoveries on those claims will be limited to those available under the applicable guarantee by the Corporation, as described above.
The Corporation is a holding company and depends upon its subsidiaries for liquidity. Applicable laws and regulations and intercompany arrangements entered into in connection with the Corporation’s resolution plan could restrict the availability of funds from subsidiaries to the Corporation, which could
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 58 |
adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to make payments under its guarantees. In addition, the obligations of the Corporation under the guarantees of the Guaranteed Securities will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of its subsidiaries, and claimants should look only to assets of the Corporation for payments. If the Corporation, as guarantor of the Guaranteed Notes, transfers all or substantially all of its assets to one or more direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiaries, under the indenture governing the Guaranteed Notes, the subsidiary or subsidiaries will not be required to assume the Corporation’s obligations under its guarantee of the Guaranteed Notes.
For more information on factors that may affect payments to holders of the Guaranteed Securities, see Liquidity Risk – NB Holdings Corporation in this section, Item 1. Business – Insolvency and the Orderly Liquidation Authority on page 6 and Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity on page 6.
Representations and Warranties Obligations
For information on representations and warranties obligations in connection with the sale of mortgage loans, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations. Credit risk can also arise from operational failures that result in an erroneous advance, commitment or investment of funds. We define the credit exposure to a borrower or counterparty as the loss potential arising from all product classifications including loans and leases, deposit overdrafts, derivatives, assets held-for-sale and unfunded lending commitments, which include loan commitments, letters of credit and financial guarantees. Derivative positions are recorded at fair value, and assets held-for-sale are recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. Certain loans and unfunded commitments are accounted for under the fair value option. Credit risk for categories of assets carried at fair value is not accounted for as part of the allowance for credit losses but as part of the fair value adjustments recorded in earnings. For derivative positions, our credit risk is measured as the net cost in the event the counterparties with contracts in which we are in a gain position fail to perform under the terms of those contracts. We use the current fair value to represent credit exposure without giving consideration to future mark-to-market changes. The credit risk amounts take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral. Our consumer and commercial credit extension and review procedures encompass funded and unfunded credit exposures. For more information on derivatives and credit extension commitments, see Note 3 – Derivatives and Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We manage credit risk based on the risk profile of the borrower or counterparty, repayment sources, the nature of underlying collateral and other support given current events, conditions and expectations. We classify our portfolios as either consumer or commercial and monitor credit risk in each as discussed below.
We refine our underwriting and credit risk management practices as well as credit standards to meet the changing economic environment. To mitigate losses and enhance customer support in our consumer businesses, we have in place collection programs and loan modification and customer
assistance infrastructures. We utilize a number of actions to mitigate losses in the commercial businesses including increasing the frequency and intensity of portfolio monitoring, hedging activity and our practice of transferring management of deteriorating commercial exposures to independent special asset officers as credits enter criticized categories.
As part of our credit risk management, we also monitor and assess transverse risks such as climate risk, which includes physical risk and transition risk. Physical risks related to severe weather events can increase credit risk, including by diminishing borrowers’ repayment capacity or collateral values. Transition risks related to transitioning to a lower carbon economy can amplify credit risks through the financial impacts of changes in policy, technology or the market on our counterparties. For more information on the Corporation’s climate-related risks, see the Credit and Other sections within Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For information on our credit risk management activities, see the following: Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 59, Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 64, Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 70, Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73, Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For information on the Corporation’s loan modification programs, see Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more information on the Corporation’s credit risks, see the Credit section within Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During 2025, our net charge-off ratio decreased seven bps compared to the same period in 2024 primarily driven by lower commercial real estate office charge-offs. Commercial reservable criticized exposure decreased $1.7 billion, and nonperforming loans decreased $171 million compared to December 31, 2024 driven by the commercial real estate portfolio. Ongoing uncertainty surrounding international trade policies, persistent inflationary pressures, interest rates and ongoing geopolitical tensions continue to weigh on the broader economic outlook. These factors have been assessed for any impacts to the portfolio and may contribute to future deterioration in credit quality metrics as they evolve. For more information on risks related to macroeconomic conditions and political activity, see Item 1A. Risk Factors beginning on page 8.
Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the consumer portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout a borrower’s credit cycle. Statistical techniques in conjunction with experiential judgment are used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing, risk appetite, setting credit limits, and establishing operating processes and metrics to quantify and balance risks and returns. Statistical models are built using detailed behavioral information from external sources, such as credit bureaus, and/or internal historical experience and are a component of our consumer credit risk management process. These models are used in part to assist in making both new and ongoing credit decisions as well as portfolio management strategies, including authorizations and line management, collection practices and strategies, and determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and allocated capital for credit risk.
Consumer Credit Portfolio
During 2025, the U.S. unemployment rate and home prices remained relatively stable. Net charge-offs decreased $90
59 Bank of America
million to $4.1 billion in 2025, primarily driven by the other consumer and credit card portfolios.
The consumer allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $190 million to $8.4 billion from 2024. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status, charge-offs and loan
modifications for the consumer portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 20 presents our outstanding consumer loans and leases, consumer nonperforming loans and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more.
| Table 20 | Consumer Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1) | $ | 236,302 | $ | 228,199 | $ | 2,008 | $ | 2,052 | $ | 207 | $ | 229 | ||||||||||
| Home equity | 26,823 | 25,737 | 392 | 409 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 106,027 | 103,566 | n/a | n/a | 1,351 | 1,401 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer (2) | 114,130 | 107,122 | 176 | 186 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 144 | 151 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 483,426 | $ | 464,775 | $ | 2,576 | $ | 2,647 | $ | 1,563 | $ | 1,631 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (3) | 165 | 221 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans and leases | $ | 483,591 | $ | 464,996 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.53 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.35 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases, excluding fully-insured loan portfolios (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
(1)Residential mortgage loans accruing past due 90 days or more are fully-insured loans. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, residential mortgage included $104 million and $119 million of loans on which interest had been curtailed by the FHA, and therefore were no longer accruing interest, although principal was still insured, and $103 million and $110 million of loans on which interest was still accruing.
(2)Outstandings primarily includes auto and specialty lending loans and leases of $55.3 billion and $54.9 billion, U.S. securities-based lending loans of $55.0 billion and $48.7 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, and non-U.S. consumer loans of $3.0 billion and $2.8 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(3)For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)Excludes consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, loans accounted for under the fair value option that were past due 90 days or more and not accruing interest were insignificant.
n/a = not applicable
Table 21 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for consumer loans and leases.
| Table 21 | Consumer Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs (1) | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | (1) | $ | — | — | % | — | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | (41) | (41) | (0.16) | (0.16) | |||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 3,717 | 3,745 | 3.68 | 3.75 | |||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 235 | 239 | 0.21 | 0.23 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 238 | 295 | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,148 | $ | 4,238 | 0.88 | 0.93 |
(1)Negative numbers represent net recoveries. Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
n/m = not meaningful
We believe that the presentation of information adjusted to exclude the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option is more representative of the ongoing operations and credit quality of the business. As a result, in the following tables and discussions of the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios, we exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option and provide information that excludes the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio in certain credit quality statistics.
Residential Mortgage
The residential mortgage portfolio made up the largest percentage of our consumer loan portfolio at 49 percent of consumer loans and leases in 2025. Approximately 49 percent of the residential mortgage portfolio was in Consumer Banking, 47 percent was in GWIM and the remaining portion was in Global Markets and All Other.
Outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio increased $8.1 billion in 2025 primarily due to a loan portfolio acquisition in the first quarter of 2025.
At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the residential mortgage portfolio included $9.1 billion and $9.9 billion of outstanding fully-insured loans, of which $1.9 billion and $2.0 billion had FHA insurance, with the remainder protected by Fannie Mae long-term standby agreements.
Table 22 presents certain residential mortgage key credit statistics on both a reported basis and excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio. The following discussion presents the residential mortgage portfolio excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 60 |
| Table 22 | Residential Mortgage – Key Credit Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported Basis (1) | Excluding Fully-insured Loans (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 236,302 | $ | 228,199 | $ | 227,227 | $ | 218,287 | |||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 1,609 | 1,494 | 1,159 | 1,007 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 90 days or more | 207 | 229 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 2,008 | 2,052 | 2,008 | 2,052 | |||||||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 100 | 1 | — | 1 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a modification.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio decreased $44 million to $2.0 billion in 2025. Of the nonperforming residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2025, $1.2 billion, or 60 percent, were current on contractual payments. Excluding fully-insured loans, loans accruing past due 30 days or more increased $152 million to $1.2 billion in 2025.
Of the $227.2 billion in total residential mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2025, $65.5 billion, or 29 percent, of loans were originated as interest-only. The outstanding balance of interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period was $3.6 billion, or six percent, at December 31, 2025. Residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period generally experience a higher rate of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status compared to the residential mortgage portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2025, $43 million, or one percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgages that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more compared to $1.2 billion, or less than one percent, for the
entire residential mortgage portfolio. In addition, at December 31, 2025, $150 million, or four percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period were nonperforming, of which $48 million were contractually current. Loans that have yet to enter the amortization period in our interest-only residential mortgage portfolio are primarily well-collateralized loans to our wealth management clients and have an interest-only period of three years to 10 years. Substantially all of these loans that have yet to enter the amortization period will not be required to make a fully-amortizing payment until 2027 or later.
Table 23 presents outstandings, nonperforming loans and net charge-offs by certain state concentrations for the residential mortgage portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) made up 15 percent of outstandings at both December 31, 2025 and 2024. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California represented 14 percent of outstandings at both December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 23 | Residential Mortgage State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 82,719 | $ | 81,729 | $ | 601 | $ | 602 | $ | (5) | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| New York | 25,927 | 25,827 | 277 | 318 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 16,696 | 15,715 | 139 | 142 | — | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Massachusetts | 9,674 | 7,926 | 51 | 43 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 9,474 | 8,568 | 83 | 88 | — | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 82,737 | 78,522 | 857 | 859 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans | $ | 227,227 | $ | 218,287 | $ | 2,008 | $ | 2,052 | $ | (1) | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
| Fully-insured loan portfolio | 9,075 | 9,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total residential mortgage loan portfolio | $ | 236,302 | $ | 228,199 |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Negative numbers represent net recoveries
Home Equity
At December 31, 2025, the home equity portfolio made up six percent of the consumer portfolio and was comprised of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), home equity loans and reverse mortgages. HELOCs generally have an initial draw period of 10 years, and after the initial draw period ends, the loans generally convert to 15- or 20-year amortizing loans. We no longer originate home equity loans or reverse mortgages.
At December 31, 2025, 85 percent of the home equity portfolio was in Consumer Banking, 11 percent was in GWIM and the remainder of the portfolio was in All Other. Outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio increased $1.1 billion in
2025 primarily due to draws on existing lines and new originations outpacing paydowns. Of the total home equity portfolio at December 31, 2025 and 2024, $8.9 billion and $9.2 billion, or 33 percent and 36 percent, were in first-lien positions. At December 31, 2025, outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio that were in a second-lien or more junior-lien position and where we also held the first-lien loan totaled $4.8 billion, or 18 percent, of our total home equity portfolio.
Unused HELOCs totaled $43.1 billion and $44.3 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024. The HELOC utilization rate was 38 percent and 36 percent at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
61 Bank of America
Table 24 presents certain home equity portfolio key credit statistics.
| Table 24 | Home Equity – Key Credit Statistics (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 26,823 | $ | 25,737 | ||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 87 | 84 | ||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 392 | 409 | ||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | ||||||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 100 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 3 | 2 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of the portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a modification.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $17 million to $392 million at December 31, 2025. Of the nonperforming home equity loans at December 31, 2025, $238 million, or 61 percent, were current on contractual payments. In addition, $82 million, or 21 percent, were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell. Accruing loans that were 30 days or more past due remained relatively unchanged in 2025 compared to 2024.
Of the $26.8 billion in total home equity portfolio outstandings at December 31, 2025, as shown in Table 24, eight percent require interest-only payments. The outstanding balance of HELOCs that had reached the end of their draw period and entered the amortization period was $3.1 billion at December 31, 2025. The HELOCs that have entered the amortization period have experienced a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status when compared to the HELOC portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2025, $26 million, or one percent, of outstanding HELOCs that
had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more. In addition, at December 31, 2025, $217 million, or seven percent, were nonperforming.
For our interest-only HELOC portfolio, we do not actively track how many of our home equity customers pay only the minimum amount due on their home equity loans and lines; however, we can infer some of this information through a review of our HELOC portfolio that we service and is still in its revolving period. During 2025, 13 percent of these customers with an outstanding balance did not pay any principal on their HELOCs.
Table 25 presents outstandings, nonperforming balances and net recoveries by certain state concentrations for the home equity portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 10 percent and 11 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2025 and 2024. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California made up 10 percent and 11 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 25 | Home Equity State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 7,219 | $ | 7,038 | $ | 108 | $ | 102 | $ | (8) | $ | (8) | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 2,588 | 2,542 | 43 | 47 | (4) | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 1,871 | 1,817 | 27 | 34 | (4) | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 1,674 | 1,521 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 1,421 | 1,447 | 55 | 62 | (6) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 12,050 | 11,372 | 142 | 147 | (20) | (18) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total home equity loan portfolio | $ | 26,823 | $ | 25,737 | $ | 392 | $ | 409 | $ | (41) | $ | (41) |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Negative numbers represent net recoveries
Credit Card
At December 31, 2025, 96 percent of the credit card portfolio was managed in Consumer Banking with the remainder in GWIM. Outstandings in the credit card portfolio increased $2.5 billion during 2025 to $106.0 billion driven by purchase volume growth and card transfer demand. Net charge-offs remained relatively unchanged in 2025 at $3.7 billion. Credit card loans 30 days or
more past due decreased $34 million, and 90 days or more past due decreased $50 million at December 31, 2025.
Unused lines of credit for credit card increased to $417.6 billion at December 31, 2025 from $398.7 billion at December 31, 2024.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 62 |
Table 26 presents certain state concentrations for the credit card portfolio.
| Table 26 | Credit Card State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Past Due 90 Days or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 17,664 | $ | 17,289 | $ | 241 | $ | 253 | $ | 709 | $ | 694 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 11,169 | 10,794 | 192 | 199 | 516 | 518 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,403 | 9,121 | 142 | 142 | 367 | 369 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington | 5,853 | 5,586 | 47 | 46 | 123 | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 5,822 | 5,765 | 80 | 84 | 223 | 238 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 56,116 | 55,011 | 649 | 677 | 1,779 | 1,805 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total credit card portfolio | $ | 106,027 | $ | 103,566 | $ | 1,351 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 3,717 | $ | 3,745 |
Direct/Indirect Consumer
At December 31, 2025, 49 percent of the direct/indirect portfolio was included in Consumer Banking (consumer auto and recreational vehicle lending) and 51 percent was included in GWIM (principally securities-based lending loans). Outstandings
in the direct/indirect portfolio increased $7.0 billion in 2025 to $114.1 billion driven by increases in securities-based lending.
Table 27 presents certain state concentrations for the direct/indirect consumer loan portfolio.
| Table 27 | Direct/Indirect State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 17,247 | $ | 16,017 | $ | 44 | $ | 38 | $ | 64 | $ | 58 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 15,127 | 14,573 | 20 | 23 | 28 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 11,051 | 10,164 | 17 | 18 | 28 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 8,019 | 7,820 | 10 | 15 | 13 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 4,740 | 4,429 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 57,946 | 54,119 | 79 | 85 | 97 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total direct/indirect loan portfolio | $ | 114,130 | $ | 107,122 | $ | 176 | $ | 186 | $ | 235 | $ | 239 |
Other Consumer
Other consumer primarily consists of deposit overdraft balances. Net charge-offs decreased $57 million in 2025 to $238 million, primarily driven by lower overdraft losses.
Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 28 presents nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2025 and 2024. During 2025, nonperforming consumer loans of $2.6 billion decreased $71 million.
At December 31, 2025, $450 million, or 17 percent, of nonperforming loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to their estimated property value less costs to sell. In addition, at December 31, 2025, $1.5 billion, or 58 percent, of nonperforming consumer loans were current and classified as nonperforming loans in accordance with applicable policies.
Foreclosed properties was $90 million in 2025, relatively unchanged from 2024.
| Table 28 | Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 2,647 | $ | 2,712 | ||||||
| Additions | 1,053 | 969 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns and payoffs | (483) | (479) | ||||||||
| Sales | (3) | (5) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (1) | (578) | (489) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (33) | (32) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | (27) | (29) | ||||||||
| Total net reductions to nonperforming loans and leases | (71) | (65) | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 2,576 | 2,647 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 90 | 89 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 (2) | $ | 2,666 | $ | 2,736 | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (3) | 0.53 | % | 0.58 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties (3) | 0.55 | 0.60 |
(1)Consumer loans may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection.
(2)Includes repossessed non-real estate assets of $31 million and $29 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(3)Outstanding consumer loans and leases exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
63 Bank of America
Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the commercial portfolio begins with an assessment of the credit risk profile of the borrower or counterparty based on an analysis of its financial position. As part of the overall credit risk assessment, our commercial credit exposures are assigned a risk rating and are subject to approval based on defined credit approval standards. Subsequent to loan origination, risk ratings are monitored on an ongoing basis, and if necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in the financial condition, cash flow, risk profile or outlook of a borrower or counterparty. In making credit decisions, we consider risk rating, collateral, country, industry and single-name concentration limits while also balancing these considerations with the total borrower or counterparty relationship. We use a variety of tools to continuously monitor the ability of a borrower or counterparty to perform under its obligations. We use risk rating aggregations to measure and evaluate concentrations within portfolios. In addition, risk ratings are a factor in determining the level of allocated capital and the allowance for credit losses.
As part of our ongoing risk mitigation initiatives, we attempt to work with clients experiencing financial difficulty to modify their loans to terms that better align with their current ability to pay. For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status and net charge-offs for the commercial portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management of Commercial Credit Risk Concentrations
Commercial credit risk is evaluated and managed with the goal that concentrations of credit exposure continue to be aligned with our risk appetite. We review, measure and manage concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product, geography, customer relationship and loan size. We also review, measure and manage commercial real estate loans by geographic location and property type. In addition, within our non-U.S. portfolio, we evaluate exposures by region and by country. Tables 33, 35 and 38 summarize our concentrations. We also utilize syndications of exposure to third parties, loan sales, hedging and other risk mitigation techniques to manage the size and risk profile of the commercial credit portfolio. For more information on our industry concentrations, see Table 35 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Industry Concentrations on page 68.
We account for certain large corporate loans and loan commitments, including issued but unfunded letters of credit which are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes, that exceed our single-name credit risk concentration guidelines under the fair value option. Lending commitments, both funded and unfunded, are actively managed and monitored, and as appropriate, credit risk for these lending relationships may be mitigated through the use of credit derivatives, with our credit view and market perspectives determining the size and timing of the hedging activity. In addition, we purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain other credit exposures. To lessen the cost of obtaining our desired credit
protection levels, credit exposure may be added within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection. These credit derivatives do not meet the requirements for treatment as accounting hedges. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other income.
In addition, we are a member of various securities and derivative exchanges and clearinghouses, both in the U.S. and other countries. As a member, we may be required to pay a pro-rata share of the losses incurred by some of these organizations as a result of another member default and under other loss scenarios. For more information, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commercial Credit Portfolio
Outstanding commercial loans and leases increased $71.3 billion during 2025 due to growth in U.S. and Non-U.S. commercial, primarily in Global Markets and GWIM. During 2025, commercial credit quality improved, as the reservable criticized utilized exposure rate improved to 3.37 percent as of December 31, 2025 from 4.01 percent as of December 31, 2024. Nonperforming commercial loans decreased $100 million during 2025 primarily due to commercial real estate. Commercial net charge-offs decreased $310 million to $1.5 billion during 2025 primarily due to lower charge-offs in the commercial real estate office portfolio.
With the exception of the office property type, which is further discussed in the Commercial Real Estate section herein, credit quality of commercial borrowers has remained relatively stable since December 31, 2024; however, we are closely monitoring emerging trends, including ongoing negotiations and developments regarding tariffs and international trade policies, as well as borrower performance in the current environment. Recent demand for office space continues to be stagnant, and future demand for office space continues to be uncertain as companies evaluate space needs with employment models that utilize a mix of remote and conventional office use.
The commercial allowance for loan and lease losses increased $153 million during 2025 to $4.8 billion. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
Total commercial utilized credit exposure increased $68.9 billion during 2025 to $808.4 billion primarily driven by higher loans and leases. The utilization rate for loans and leases, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and financial guarantees, and commercial letters of credit, in the aggregate, was 55 percent at both December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Table 29 presents commercial credit exposure by type for utilized, unfunded and total binding committed credit exposure. Commercial utilized credit exposure includes SBLCs and financial guarantees and commercial letters of credit that have been issued and for which we are legally bound to advance funds under prescribed conditions during a specified time period, and excludes exposure related to trading account assets. Although funds have not yet been advanced, these exposure types are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 64 |
| Table 29 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Type | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized (1) | Commercial Unfunded (2, 3, 4) | Total Commercial Committed | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | $ | 702,109 | $ | 630,839 | $ | 596,676 | $ | 535,675 | $ | 1,298,785 | $ | 1,166,514 | ||||||||||
| Derivative assets (5) | 40,881 | 40,948 | — | — | 40,881 | 40,948 | ||||||||||||||||
| Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees | 35,048 | 33,147 | 2,081 | 1,889 | 37,129 | 35,036 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities and other investments | 19,155 | 19,133 | 3,391 | 4,407 | 22,546 | 23,540 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans held-for-sale | 3,450 | 7,985 | 17,151 | 5,003 | 20,601 | 12,988 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | 5,686 | 5,608 | — | — | 5,686 | 5,608 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial letters of credit | 748 | 839 | — | 111 | 748 | 950 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,312 | 1,004 | — | — | 1,312 | 1,004 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 808,389 | $ | 739,503 | $ | 619,299 | $ | 547,085 | $ | 1,427,688 | $ | 1,286,588 |
(1)Commercial utilized exposure includes loans of $3.3 billion and $4.0 billion accounted for under the fair value option at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(2)Commercial unfunded exposure includes commitments accounted for under the fair value option with a notional amount of $2.3 billion and $2.2 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(3)Excludes unused business card lines, which are not legally binding.
(4)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.6 billion and $10.4 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(5)Derivative assets are carried at fair value, reflect the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and have been reduced by cash collateral of $27.2 billion and $30.1 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Not reflected in utilized and committed exposure is additional non-cash derivative collateral held of $71.4 billion and $59.7 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024, which consists primarily of other marketable securities.
Nonperforming commercial loans decreased $100 million during 2025, driven by commercial real estate. Table 30 presents our commercial loans and leases portfolio and related credit quality information at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 30 | Commercial Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31 2025 | December 31 2024 | December 31 2025 | December 31 2024 | December 31 2025 | December 31 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 436,242 | $ | 386,990 | $ | 1,404 | $ | 1,204 | $ | 302 | $ | 90 | ||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 155,045 | 137,518 | 80 | 8 | 9 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 591,287 | 524,508 | 1,484 | 1,212 | 311 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 68,748 | 65,730 | 1,596 | 2,068 | 10 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 16,241 | 15,708 | 97 | 20 | 33 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| 676,276 | 605,946 | 3,177 | 3,300 | 354 | 103 | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial (1) | 22,500 | 20,865 | 51 | 28 | 204 | 197 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 698,776 | $ | 626,811 | $ | 3,228 | $ | 3,328 | $ | 558 | $ | 300 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (2) | 3,333 | 4,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans and leases | $ | 702,109 | $ | 630,839 |
(1)Includes card-related products.
(2)Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option includes U.S. commercial of $2.1 billion and $2.8 billion and non-U.S. commercial of $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024 For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 31 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for our commercial loans and leases for 2025 and 2024.
| Table 31 | Commercial Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31 2025 | December 31 2024 | December 31 2025 | December 31 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 426 | $ | 388 | 0.10 | % | 0.11 | % | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 31 | 67 | 0.02 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 457 | 455 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 491 | 864 | 0.74 | 1.24 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 4 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||||
| 952 | 1,320 | 0.15 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 531 | 473 | 2.44 | 2.34 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | $ | 1,483 | $ | 1,793 | 0.22 | 0.30 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Table 32 presents commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure by loan type. Criticized exposure corresponds to the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful asset categories as defined by regulatory authorities. Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure of $24.7 billion decreased $1.7
billion, or seven percent, during 2025 primarily driven by commercial real estate and U.S. commercial. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, 87 percent and 91 percent of commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure was secured.
65 Bank of America
| Table 32 | Commercial Reservable Criticized Utilized Exposure (1, 2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 12,239 | 2.63 | % | $ | 13,387 | 3.23 | % | |||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 2,803 | 1.74 | 1,955 | 1.37 | |||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 15,042 | 2.40 | 15,342 | 2.75 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 8,356 | 11.91 | 10,168 | 15.17 | |||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 471 | 2.90 | 291 | 1.85 | |||||||||
| 23,869 | 3.35 | 25,801 | 4.03 | ||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 879 | 3.91 | 694 | 3.33 | |||||||||
| Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure | $ | 24,748 | 3.37 | $ | 26,495 | 4.01 |
(1)Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure includes loans and leases of $23.9 billion and $25.5 billion and commercial letters of credit of $869 million and $977 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(2)Percentages are calculated as commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure divided by total commercial reservable utilized exposure for each exposure category.
Commercial and Industrial
Commercial and industrial loans include U.S. commercial and non-U.S. commercial portfolios.
U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2025, 55 percent of the U.S. commercial loan portfolio, excluding small business, was managed in Global Banking, 26 percent in Global Markets, 17 percent in GWIM (loans that provide financing for asset purchases, business investments and other liquidity needs for high net worth clients) and the remainder primarily in Consumer Banking. U.S. commercial loans increased $49.3 billion, or 13 percent, during 2025 primarily driven by Global Markets and GWIM. Reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $1.1 billion, or nine percent, driven by a broad range of industries.
Non-U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2025, 51 percent of the non-U.S. commercial loan portfolio was managed in Global Banking and 48 percent in Global Markets. Non-U.S. commercial loans increased $17.5 billion, or 13 percent, during 2025 primarily driven by Global Markets. Reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $848 million, or 43 percent. For more information on the non-U.S. commercial portfolio, see Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 70.
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial real estate primarily includes commercial loans secured by non-owner-occupied real estate and is dependent on the sale or lease of the real estate as the primary source of
repayment. Outstanding loans increased $3.0 billion or five percent during 2025. The commercial real estate portfolio is primarily managed in Global Banking and consists of loans made primarily to public and private developers, and commercial real estate firms. The portfolio remains diversified across property types and geographic regions. California represented the largest state concentration at 20 percent and 21 percent of commercial real estate at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Industrial/Warehouse loans represented the largest property type concentration at 19 percent and 20 percent of commercial real estate at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Office loans decreased $2.6 billion, or 17 percent, during 2025 and represented approximately one percent of total loans for the Corporation.
Reservable criticized utilized exposure for commercial real estate decreased $1.8 billion, or 18 percent, during 2025. Reservable criticized exposure for the office property type was $3.5 billion at December 31, 2025, representing a decrease of $1.6 billion, or 32 percent, from December 31, 2024. Approximately $5.2 billion of office loans are scheduled to mature by the end of 2026.
During 2025, net charge-offs decreased $373 million to $491 million driven by office loans. We use a number of proactive risk mitigation initiatives designed to reduce adversely rated exposure in the commercial real estate portfolio, including transfers of deteriorating exposures for management by independent special asset officers and the pursuit of loan restructurings or asset sales to achieve the best results for our customers and the Corporation.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 66 |
Table 33 presents outstanding commercial real estate loans by geographic region, based on the geographic location of the collateral, and by property type.
| Table 33 | Outstanding Commercial Real Estate Loans | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
| By Geographic Region | ||||||
| Northeast | $ | 17,044 | $ | 14,708 | ||
| California | 13,916 | 13,712 | ||||
| Southwest | 8,412 | 7,719 | ||||
| Southeast | 6,958 | 6,914 | ||||
| Florida | 5,167 | 4,410 | ||||
| Midsouth | 2,962 | 2,487 | ||||
| Midwest | 2,862 | 2,468 | ||||
| Illinois | 2,513 | 2,996 | ||||
| Northwest | 1,451 | 1,979 | ||||
| Non-U.S. | 6,021 | 6,109 | ||||
| Other | 1,442 | 2,228 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 68,748 | $ | 65,730 | ||
| By Property Type | ||||||
| Non-residential | ||||||
| Industrial / Warehouse | $ | 13,031 | $ | 13,166 | ||
| Office | 12,447 | 15,061 | ||||
| Multi-family rental | 10,986 | 11,022 | ||||
| Shopping centers / Retail | 6,947 | 5,603 | ||||
| Hotel / Motels | 4,629 | 4,680 | ||||
| Multi-use | 2,509 | 2,162 | ||||
| Other | 17,295 | 13,179 | ||||
| Total non-residential | 67,844 | 64,873 | ||||
| Residential | 904 | 857 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 68,748 | $ | 65,730 |
U.S. Small Business Commercial
The U.S. small business commercial loan portfolio is comprised of small business card loans and small business loans primarily managed in Consumer Banking. Credit card-related products were 51 percent and 53 percent of the U.S. small business commercial portfolio at December 31, 2025 and 2024 and represented 98 percent and 99 percent of net charge-offs for 2025 and 2024. Accruing loans that were past due 90 days or more remained relatively unchanged during 2025.
Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 34 presents the nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2025 and 2024. Nonperforming loans do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. During 2025, nonperforming commercial loans and leases decreased $100 million to $3.2 billion. At December 31, 2025, 98 percent of commercial nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties were secured, and 48 percent were contractually current. Commercial nonperforming loans were carried at 81 percent of their unpaid principal balance, as the carrying value of these loans has been reduced to the estimated collateral value less costs to sell.
67 Bank of America
| Table 34 | Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity (1, 2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, beginning of period | $ | 3,328 | $ | 2,773 | ||||||
| Additions | 3,182 | 3,914 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns | (1,852) | (1,669) | ||||||||
| Sales | (156) | (32) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (3) | (245) | (182) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (1,029) | (1,361) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | — | (115) | ||||||||
| Total net (reductions) additions to nonperforming loans and leases | (100) | 555 | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 3,228 | 3,328 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 11 | 56 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 | $ | 3,239 | $ | 3,384 | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans and leases (4) | 0.46 | % | 0.53 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 0.46 | 0.54 |
(1)Balances do not include nonperforming loans held-for-sale of $517 million and $731 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial activity. Small business card loans are excluded as they are not classified as nonperforming.
(3)Commercial loans and leases may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection, or when a modified loan demonstrates a sustained period of payment performance.
(4)Outstanding commercial loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Industry Concentrations
Table 35 presents commercial committed and utilized credit exposure by industry. For information on net notional credit protection purchased to hedge funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Risk Mitigation.
Commercial credit exposure is diversified across a broad range of industries. Total commercial committed exposure increased $141.1 billion during 2025 to $1.4 trillion. The increase in commercial committed exposure was concentrated in Asset managers and funds, Finance companies and Media.
Industry limits are used internally to manage industry concentrations and are based on committed exposure that is determined on an industry-by-industry basis. A risk management framework is in place to set and approve industry limits as well as to provide ongoing monitoring.
Asset managers and funds, our largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $234.3 billion, increased $40.4 billion, or 21 percent, during 2025, which was primarily driven by investment-grade exposures.
Finance companies, our second largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $129.7 billion, increased $27.8 billion, or 27 percent, during 2025. The increase in committed exposure was primarily driven by increases in Consumer finance, Thrifts and mortgage finance and Diversified financials.
Capital goods, our third largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $108.7 billion, increased $9.9 billion, or ten percent, during 2025. The increase in committed exposure was driven by increases in Trading companies and distributors, Machinery, and Construction and engineering.
Various macroeconomic challenges, including geopolitical tensions, higher costs associated with inflationary pressures experienced over the past several years, interest rates and ongoing negotiations and developments regarding international trade policies have led to uncertainty in the U.S. and global economies and have adversely impacted, and may continue to adversely impact, a number of industries. We continue to monitor these risks.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 68 |
| Table 35 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Industry (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized | Total Commercial Committed (2) | |||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
| Asset managers and funds | $ | 149,178 | $ | 118,123 | $ | 234,323 | $ | 193,947 | ||||||
| Finance companies | 94,444 | 74,975 | 129,652 | 101,828 | ||||||||||
| Capital goods | 54,293 | 51,367 | 108,722 | 98,780 | ||||||||||
| Real estate (3) | 69,939 | 69,841 | 99,454 | 95,981 | ||||||||||
| Healthcare equipment and services | 35,417 | 35,964 | 71,944 | 65,819 | ||||||||||
| Materials | 29,094 | 26,797 | 61,872 | 58,128 | ||||||||||
| Individuals and trusts | 43,556 | 35,457 | 59,713 | 50,353 | ||||||||||
| Retailing | 25,648 | 24,449 | 55,313 | 53,471 | ||||||||||
| Consumer services | 29,757 | 28,391 | 55,291 | 53,054 | ||||||||||
| Food, beverage and tobacco | 25,561 | 25,763 | 51,016 | 54,370 | ||||||||||
| Government and public education | 33,874 | 32,682 | 50,898 | 48,204 | ||||||||||
| Commercial services and supplies | 24,680 | 24,409 | 46,058 | 43,451 | ||||||||||
| Media | 11,324 | 12,130 | 43,691 | 24,023 | ||||||||||
| Utilities | 18,670 | 18,186 | 43,554 | 42,107 | ||||||||||
| Energy | 13,199 | 13,857 | 39,122 | 35,510 | ||||||||||
| Transportation | 24,772 | 24,135 | 37,707 | 35,743 | ||||||||||
| Software and services | 15,317 | 11,158 | 32,070 | 27,383 | ||||||||||
| Technology hardware and equipment | 11,488 | 11,526 | 30,519 | 30,093 | ||||||||||
| Global commercial banks | 22,377 | 22,641 | 25,327 | 25,220 | ||||||||||
| Vehicle dealers | 19,222 | 18,194 | 24,669 | 23,855 | ||||||||||
| Insurance | 11,443 | 12,640 | 23,762 | 23,445 | ||||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology | 7,166 | 7,378 | 23,325 | 21,717 | ||||||||||
| Consumer durables and apparel | 9,612 | 8,987 | 23,299 | 21,823 | ||||||||||
| Automobiles and components | 8,129 | 8,172 | 17,284 | 16,268 | ||||||||||
| Telecommunication services | 6,525 | 8,571 | 15,686 | 18,759 | ||||||||||
| Food and staples retailing | 5,313 | 7,206 | 10,836 | 12,777 | ||||||||||
| Financial markets infrastructure (clearinghouses) | 6,101 | 4,219 | 8,336 | 6,413 | ||||||||||
| Religious and social organizations | 2,290 | 2,285 | 4,245 | 4,066 | ||||||||||
| Total commercial credit exposure by industry | $ | 808,389 | $ | 739,503 | $ | 1,427,688 | $ | 1,286,588 |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial exposure.
(2)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.6 billion and $10.4 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(3)Industries are viewed from a variety of perspectives to best isolate the perceived risks. For purposes of this table, the real estate industry is defined based on the primary business activity of the borrowers or counterparties using operating cash flows and primary source of repayment as key factors.
Risk Mitigation
We purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain credit exposures. To lower the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, we may add credit exposure within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection.
At December 31, 2025 and 2024, net notional credit default protection purchased in our credit derivatives portfolio to hedge our funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, was $14.5 billion and $10.4 billion. We recorded net losses of $100 million in 2025 compared to net losses of $87 million in 2024. The gains and losses on these instruments were largely offset by gains and losses on the related exposures. The Value-at-Risk (VaR) results for these exposures are included in the fair value option portfolio information in Table 42. For more information, see Trading Risk Management on page 76.
Tables 36 and 37 present the maturity profiles and the credit exposure debt ratings of the net credit default protection portfolio at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 36 | Net Credit Default Protection by Maturity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||
| Less than or equal to one year | 37 | % | 24 | % | |
| Greater than one year and less than or equal to five years | 61 | 76 | |||
| Greater than five years | 2 | — | |||
| Total net credit default protection | 100 | % | 100 | % |
69 Bank of America
| Table 37 | Net Credit Default Protection by Credit Exposure Debt Rating | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | ||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
| Ratings (2, 3) | |||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | (145) | 1.0 | % | $ | (120) | 1.1 | % | |||||
| AA | (1,968) | 13.5 | (960) | 9.2 | |||||||||
| A | (6,348) | 43.7 | (4,978) | 47.7 | |||||||||
| BBB | (4,639) | 31.9 | (3,385) | 32.4 | |||||||||
| BB | (697) | 4.8 | (526) | 5.0 | |||||||||
| B | (441) | 3.0 | (385) | 3.7 | |||||||||
| CCC and below | (17) | 0.1 | (82) | 0.8 | |||||||||
| NR (4) | (270) | 2.0 | — | 0.1 | |||||||||
| Total net credit default protection | $ | (14,525) | 100.0 | % | $ | (10,436) | 100.0 | % |
(1)Represents net credit default protection purchased.
(2)Ratings are refreshed on a quarterly basis.
(3)Ratings of BBB- or higher are considered to meet the definition of investment grade.
(4)NR is comprised of index positions held and any names that have not been rated.
In addition to our net notional credit default protection purchased to cover the funded and unfunded portion of certain credit exposures, credit derivatives are used for market-making activities for clients and establishing positions intended to profit from directional or relative value changes. We execute the majority of our credit derivative trades in the OTC market with large, multinational financial institutions, including broker-dealers and, to a lesser degree, with a variety of other investors. Because these transactions are executed in the OTC market, we are subject to settlement risk. We are also subject to credit risk in the event that these counterparties fail to perform under the terms of these contracts. In order to properly reflect counterparty credit risk, we record counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments on certain derivative assets, including our purchased credit default protection. In most cases, credit derivative transactions are executed on a daily margin basis. Therefore, events such as a credit downgrade, depending on the ultimate rating level, or a breach of credit covenants would typically require an increase in the amount of collateral required by the counterparty, where applicable, and/or allow us to take additional protective measures such as early termination of all trades. For more information on credit derivatives and counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-U.S. Portfolio
Our non-U.S. credit and trading portfolios are subject to country risk. We define country risk as the risk of loss from unfavorable economic and political conditions, currency fluctuations, social instability and changes in government policies. A risk management framework is in place to measure, monitor and manage non-U.S. risk and exposures. In addition to the direct risk of doing business in a country, we also are exposed to indirect country risks (e.g., related to the collateral received on secured financing transactions or related to client clearing activities). These indirect exposures are managed in the normal course of business through credit, market and operational risk governance rather than through country risk governance.
Table 38 presents our 20 largest non-U.S. country exposures at December 31, 2025. These exposures accounted for 88 percent of our total non-U.S. exposure at December 31, 2025 and 89 percent at December 31, 2024. Net country exposure for these 20 countries increased $32.9 billion from December 31, 2024 primarily driven by increases in Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Non-U.S. exposure is presented on an internal risk management basis and includes sovereign and non-sovereign credit exposure, securities and other investments issued by or domiciled in countries other than the U.S.
Funded loans and loan equivalents include loans, leases, and other extensions of credit and funds, including letters of credit and due from placements. Unfunded commitments are the undrawn portion of legally binding commitments related to loans and loan equivalents. Net counterparty exposure includes the fair value of derivatives, including the counterparty risk associated with credit default swaps (CDS), and secured financing transactions. Securities and other investments are carried at fair value, and long securities exposures are netted against short exposures with the same underlying issuer to, but not below, zero. Net country exposure represents country exposure less hedges and credit default protection purchased, net of credit default protection sold.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 70 |
| Table 38 | Top 20 Non-U.S. Countries Exposure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | Funded Loans and Loan Equivalents | Unfunded Loan Commitments | Net Counterparty Exposure | Securities/ Other Investments | Country Exposure at December 31 2025 | Hedges and Credit Default Protection | Net Country Exposure at December 31 2025 | Increase (Decrease) from December 31 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Kingdom | $ | 35,666 | $ | 17,879 | $ | 4,682 | $ | 8,637 | $ | 66,864 | $ | (2,249) | $ | 64,615 | $ | 2,570 | ||||||||||||||
| Germany | 24,262 | 12,686 | 3,504 | 2,252 | 42,704 | (3,596) | 39,108 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Australia | 23,570 | 6,313 | 540 | 2,861 | 33,284 | (412) | 32,872 | 10,736 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 15,356 | 11,449 | 1,866 | 3,700 | 32,371 | (608) | 31,763 | 291 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| France | 14,617 | 11,869 | 1,633 | 2,044 | 30,163 | (2,601) | 27,562 | 1,408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Japan | 10,882 | 1,593 | 3,074 | 4,033 | 19,582 | (603) | 18,979 | (262) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | 11,105 | 1,382 | 953 | 4,679 | 18,119 | (125) | 17,994 | 1,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Switzerland | 5,372 | 6,447 | 832 | 278 | 12,929 | (250) | 12,679 | 2,078 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | 6,925 | 4,504 | 661 | 1,193 | 13,283 | (624) | 12,659 | 4,530 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| India | 6,406 | 246 | 636 | 4,118 | 11,406 | (30) | 11,376 | (2,410) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Singapore | 4,991 | 686 | 242 | 5,599 | 11,518 | (145) | 11,373 | 1,486 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| China | 4,636 | 591 | 915 | 5,088 | 11,230 | (297) | 10,933 | 1,711 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ireland | 8,159 | 1,994 | 338 | 392 | 10,883 | (263) | 10,620 | 2,359 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | 5,512 | 2,192 | 610 | 1,662 | 9,976 | (217) | 9,759 | 1,717 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Korea | 4,516 | 1,320 | 607 | 3,359 | 9,802 | (269) | 9,533 | 1,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Italy | 5,741 | 3,019 | 212 | 698 | 9,670 | (812) | 8,858 | 969 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Spain | 3,235 | 2,555 | 99 | 1,248 | 7,137 | (373) | 6,764 | 661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | 2,856 | 540 | 997 | 1,322 | 5,715 | (35) | 5,680 | 590 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sweden | 1,628 | 1,897 | 177 | 263 | 3,965 | (497) | 3,468 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Belgium | 1,060 | 1,359 | 656 | 407 | 3,482 | (121) | 3,361 | (14) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total top 20 non-U.S. countries exposure | $ | 196,495 | $ | 90,521 | $ | 23,234 | $ | 53,833 | $ | 364,083 | $ | (14,127) | $ | 349,956 | $ | 32,854 |
Our largest non-U.S. country exposure at December 31, 2025 was the United Kingdom with net exposure of $64.6 billion, which increased $2.6 billion from December 31, 2024 primarily due to increased exposure to financial institutions. Our second largest non-U.S. country exposure was Germany with net exposure of $39.1 billion at December 31, 2025, which increased $2.1 billion from December 31, 2024 primarily due to increased exposure to financial institutions.
71 Bank of America
Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities
Table 39 disaggregates total outstanding loans and leases by remaining scheduled principal due dates and interest rates. The amounts provided do not reflect prepayment assumptions or hedging activities related to the loan portfolio. For information on the asset sensitivity of our total banking book balance sheet, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
| Table 39 | Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Due in One Year or Less | Due After One Year Through Five Years | Due After Five Years Through 15 Years | Due After 15 Years | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 6,043 | $ | 36,432 | $ | 101,819 | $ | 92,066 | $ | 236,360 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 574 | 627 | 1,822 | 23,907 | 26,930 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 106,027 | — | — | — | 106,027 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 72,094 | 36,728 | 4,668 | 640 | 114,130 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 144 | — | — | — | 144 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 184,882 | 73,787 | 108,309 | 116,613 | 483,591 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 133,448 | 286,555 | 16,082 | 2,303 | 438,388 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 51,894 | 64,501 | 35,703 | 4,134 | 156,232 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 27,454 | 39,702 | 1,573 | 19 | 68,748 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 3,970 | 10,002 | 1,283 | 986 | 16,241 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 13,067 | 5,286 | 4,014 | 133 | 22,500 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 229,833 | 406,046 | 58,655 | 7,575 | 702,109 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 414,715 | $ | 479,833 | $ | 166,964 | $ | 124,188 | $ | 1,185,700 | ||||||||
| Amount due in one year or less at: | Amount due after one year at: | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 1,247 | $ | 4,796 | $ | 91,627 | $ | 138,690 | $ | 236,360 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 98 | 476 | 24,083 | 2,273 | 26,930 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 100,130 | 5,897 | — | — | 106,027 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 53,104 | 18,990 | 2,889 | 39,147 | 114,130 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 25 | 119 | — | — | 144 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 154,604 | 30,278 | 118,599 | 180,110 | 483,591 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 104,248 | 29,200 | 251,959 | 52,981 | 438,388 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 40,483 | 11,411 | 98,512 | 5,826 | 156,232 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 25,065 | 2,389 | 39,859 | 1,435 | 68,748 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 243 | 3,727 | 2,586 | 9,685 | 16,241 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 7,911 | 5,156 | 131 | 9,302 | 22,500 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 177,950 | 51,883 | 393,047 | 79,229 | 702,109 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 332,554 | $ | 82,161 | $ | 511,646 | $ | 259,339 | $ | 1,185,700 |
(1)Includes loans accounted for under the fair value option.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 72 |
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses increased $44 million from December 31, 2024 to $14.4 billion at December 31, 2025, which included a $185 million reserve decrease and
$229 million reserve increase related to the consumer and commercial portfolios, respectively.
Table 40 presents an allocation of the allowance for credit losses by product type at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 40 | Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses by Product Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 294 | 2.23 | % | 0.12 | % | $ | 264 | 1.99 | % | 0.12 | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | 122 | 0.92 | 0.46 | 29 | 0.22 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 7,197 | 54.51 | 6.79 | 7,515 | 56.76 | 7.26 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 713 | 5.40 | 0.63 | 700 | 5.29 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 54 | 0.41 | n/m | 62 | 0.47 | n/m | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 8,380 | 63.47 | 1.73 | 8,570 | 64.73 | 1.84 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 2,967 | 22.47 | 0.65 | 2,637 | 19.91 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 801 | 6.07 | 0.52 | 778 | 5.88 | 0.57 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 1,007 | 7.63 | 1.46 | 1,219 | 9.21 | 1.85 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 48 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 36 | 0.27 | 0.23 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 4,823 | 36.53 | 0.69 | 4,670 | 35.27 | 0.75 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | 13,203 | 100.00 | % | 1.12 | 13,240 | 100.00 | % | 1.21 | |||||||||||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments | 1,177 | 1,096 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 14,380 | $ | 14,336 |
(1)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes allowance for loan and lease losses for U.S. small business commercial loans of $1.4 billion and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
n/m = not meaningful
Net charge-offs for 2025 were $5.6 billion compared to $6.0 billion in 2024 driven by asset quality improvement in commercial real estate office. The provision for credit losses decreased $146 million to $5.7 billion during 2025 compared to 2024. The provision for credit losses in 2025 was impacted by improved asset quality in credit card and commercial real estate, partially offset by loan growth. The provision for credit losses for the consumer portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, decreased $299 million to $4.0 billion during 2025 compared to 2024. The provision for credit losses for the commercial portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments,
increased $153 million to $1.7 billion during 2025 compared to 2024.
Table 41 presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses, including certain loan and allowance ratios for 2025 and 2024. For more information on the Corporation’s credit loss accounting policies and activity related to the allowance for credit losses, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
73 Bank of America
| Table 41 | Allowance for Credit Losses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, January 1 | $ | 13,240 | $ | 13,342 | ||||||
| Loans and leases charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (24) | (21) | ||||||||
| Home equity | (16) | (21) | ||||||||
| Credit card | (4,498) | (4,365) | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | (373) | (399) | ||||||||
| Other consumer | (256) | (313) | ||||||||
| Total consumer charge-offs | (5,167) | (5,119) | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (1) | (1,123) | (958) | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | (33) | (81) | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (520) | (894) | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | (8) | (2) | ||||||||
| Total commercial charge-offs | (1,684) | (1,935) | ||||||||
| Total loans and leases charged off | (6,851) | (7,054) | ||||||||
| Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 25 | 21 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 57 | 62 | ||||||||
| Credit card | 781 | 620 | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 138 | 160 | ||||||||
| Other consumer | 18 | 18 | ||||||||
| Total consumer recoveries | 1,019 | 881 | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 166 | 97 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 2 | 14 | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 29 | 30 | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 4 | 1 | ||||||||
| Total commercial recoveries | 201 | 142 | ||||||||
| Total recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | 1,220 | 1,023 | ||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (5,631) | (6,031) | ||||||||
| Provision for loan and lease losses | 5,595 | 5,935 | ||||||||
| Other | (1) | (6) | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, December 31 | 13,203 | 13,240 | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, January 1 | 1,096 | 1,209 | ||||||||
| Provision for unfunded lending commitments | 80 | (114) | ||||||||
| Other | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, December 31 | 1,177 | 1,096 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses, December 31 | $ | 14,380 | $ | 14,336 | ||||||
| Loan and allowance ratios (3): | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | $ | 1,182,202 | $ | 1,091,586 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.12 | % | 1.21 | % | ||||||
| Consumer allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total consumer loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.73 | 1.84 | ||||||||
| Commercial allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total commercial loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 0.69 | 0.75 | ||||||||
| Average loans and leases outstanding | $ | 1,130,593 | $ | 1,056,507 | ||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding | 0.50 | % | 0.57 | % | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 | 228 | 222 | ||||||||
| Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31 to net charge-offs | 2.34 | 2.20 | ||||||||
| Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | $ | 8,473 | $ | 8,689 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | 82 | % | 76 | % |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial charge-offs of $587 million in 2025 compared to $519 million in 2024.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial recoveries of $56 million in 2025 compared to $46 million in 2024.
(3)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(4)Primarily includes amounts related to credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 74 |
Market Risk Management
Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions may adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities, or otherwise negatively impact earnings. This risk is inherent in the financial instruments associated with our operations, primarily within our Global Markets segment. We are also exposed to these risks in other areas of the Corporation (e.g., our ALM activities). In the event of market stress, these risks could have a material impact on our results. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
Our traditional banking loan and deposit products are non-trading positions and are generally reported at amortized cost for assets or the amount owed for liabilities (historical cost). However, these positions are still subject to changes in economic value based on varying market conditions, with one of the primary risks being changes in the levels of interest rates. The risk of adverse changes in the economic value of our non-trading positions arising from changes in interest rates is managed through our ALM activities. We have elected to account for certain assets and liabilities under the fair value option.
Our trading positions are reported at fair value with changes reflected in income. Trading positions are subject to various changes in market-based risk factors. The majority of this risk is generated by our activities in the interest rate, foreign exchange, credit, equity and commodities markets. In addition, the values of assets and liabilities could change due to market liquidity, correlations across markets and expectations of market volatility. We seek to manage these risk exposures by using a variety of techniques that encompass a broad range of financial instruments. The key risk management techniques are discussed in more detail in the Trading Risk Management section.
GRM is responsible for providing senior management with a clear and comprehensive understanding of the trading risks to which we are exposed. These responsibilities include ownership of market risk policy, developing and maintaining quantitative risk models, calculating aggregated risk measures, establishing and monitoring position limits consistent with risk appetite, conducting daily reviews and analysis of trading inventory, approving material risk exposures and fulfilling regulatory requirements. Market risks that impact businesses outside of Global Markets are monitored and governed by their respective governance functions.
Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. Given that models are used across the Corporation, model risk impacts all risk types including credit, market and operational risks. The Enterprise Model Risk Policy defines model risk standards, consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite, prevailing regulatory guidance and industry best practice. All models, including risk management, valuation and regulatory capital models, must meet certain validation criteria, including effective challenge of the conceptual soundness of the model, independent model testing and ongoing monitoring through outcomes analysis and benchmarking. The Enterprise Model Risk Committee, a subcommittee of the MRC, oversees that model standards are consistent with model risk requirements and monitors the effective challenge in the model validation process across the Corporation.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents exposures to instruments whose values vary with the level or volatility of interest rates. These instruments include, but are not limited to, loans, debt securities, certain trading-related assets and liabilities, deposits, borrowings and derivatives. Hedging instruments used to mitigate these risks include derivatives such as options, futures, forwards and swaps.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange risk represents exposures to changes in the values of current holdings and future cash flows denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The types of instruments exposed to this risk include investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign currency-denominated loans and securities, future cash flows in foreign currencies arising from foreign exchange transactions, foreign currency-denominated debt and various foreign exchange derivatives whose values fluctuate with changes in the level or volatility of currency exchange rates or non-U.S. interest rates. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include foreign exchange options, currency swaps, futures, forwards, and foreign currency-denominated debt and deposits.
Mortgage Risk
Mortgage risk represents exposures to changes in the values of mortgage-related instruments. The values of these instruments are sensitive to prepayment rates, mortgage rates, agency debt ratings, default, market liquidity, government participation and interest rate volatility. Our exposure to these instruments takes several forms. For example, we trade and engage in market-making activities in a variety of mortgage securities including whole loans, pass-through certificates, commercial mortgages and collateralized mortgage obligations, including collateralized debt obligations using mortgages as underlying collateral. In addition, we originate a variety of MBS, which involves the accumulation of mortgage-related loans in anticipation of eventual securitization, and we may hold positions in mortgage securities and residential mortgage loans as part of the ALM portfolio. We also record MSRs as part of our mortgage origination activities. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include derivatives such as options, swaps, futures and forwards, as well as securities including MBS and U.S. Treasury securities. For more information, see Mortgage Banking Risk Management on page 81.
Equity Market Risk
Equity market risk represents exposures to securities that represent an ownership interest in a corporation in the form of domestic and foreign common stock or other equity-linked instruments. Instruments that would lead to this exposure include, but are not limited to, the following: common stock, exchange-traded funds, American Depositary Receipts, convertible bonds, listed equity options (puts and calls), OTC equity options, equity total return swaps, equity index futures and other equity derivative products. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include options, futures, swaps, convertible bonds and cash positions.
Commodity Risk
Commodity risk represents exposures to instruments traded in the petroleum, natural gas, power and metals markets. These instruments consist primarily of futures, forwards, swaps and options. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include
75 Bank of America
options, futures and swaps in the same or similar commodity product, as well as cash positions.
Issuer Credit Risk
Issuer credit risk represents exposures to changes in the creditworthiness of individual issuers or groups of issuers. Our portfolio is exposed to issuer credit risk where the value of an asset may be adversely impacted by changes in the levels of credit spreads, by credit migration or by defaults. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include bonds, CDS and other credit fixed-income instruments.
Market Liquidity Risk
Market liquidity risk represents the risk that the level of expected market activity changes dramatically and, in certain cases, may even cease. This exposes us to the risk that we will not be able to transact business and execute trades in an orderly manner, which may impact our results. This impact could be further exacerbated if expected hedging or pricing correlations are compromised by disproportionate demand or lack of demand for certain instruments. We utilize various risk mitigating techniques as discussed in more detail in Trading Risk Management.
Trading Risk Management
To evaluate risks in our trading activities, we focus on the actual and potential volatility of revenues generated by individual positions as well as portfolios of positions. Various techniques and procedures are utilized to enable the most complete understanding of these risks. Quantitative measures of market risk are evaluated on a daily basis from a single position to the portfolio of the Corporation. These measures include sensitivities of positions to various market risk factors, such as the potential impact on revenue from a one basis point change in interest rates, and statistical measures utilizing both actual and hypothetical market moves, such as VaR and stress testing. Periods of extreme market stress influence the reliability of these techniques to varying degrees. Qualitative evaluations of market risk utilize the suite of quantitative risk measures while understanding each of their respective limitations. Additionally, risk managers independently evaluate the risk of the portfolios under the current market environment and potential future environments.
VaR is a common statistic used to measure market risk as it allows the aggregation of market risk factors, including the effects of portfolio diversification. A VaR model simulates the value of a portfolio under a range of scenarios in order to generate a distribution of potential gains and losses. VaR represents the loss a portfolio is not expected to exceed more than a certain number of times per period, based on a specified holding period, confidence level and window of historical data. We use one VaR model consistently across the trading portfolios, and it uses a historical simulation approach based on a three-year window of historical data. Our primary VaR statistic is equivalent to a 99 percent confidence level, which means that for a VaR with a one-day holding period, there should not be losses in excess of VaR, on average, 99 out of 100 trading days.
Within any VaR model, there are significant and numerous assumptions that will differ from company to company. The accuracy of a VaR model depends on the availability and quality of historical data for each of the risk factors in the portfolio. A VaR model may require additional modeling assumptions for new products that do not have the necessary historical market data or for less liquid positions for which accurate daily prices
are not consistently available. For positions with insufficient historical data for the VaR calculation, the process for establishing an appropriate proxy is based on fundamental and statistical analysis of the new product or less liquid position. This analysis identifies reasonable alternatives that replicate both the expected volatility and correlation to other market risk factors that the missing data would be expected to experience.
VaR may not be indicative of realized revenue volatility, as changes in market conditions or in the composition of the portfolio can have a material impact on the results. In particular, the historical data used for the VaR calculation might indicate higher or lower levels of portfolio diversification than will be experienced. In order for the VaR model to reflect current market conditions, we update the historical data underlying our VaR model on a weekly basis, or more frequently during periods of market stress, and regularly review the assumptions underlying the model. A minor portion of risks related to our trading positions is not included in VaR. These risks are reviewed as part of our ICAAP. For more information regarding ICAAP, see Capital Management on page 48.
GRM continually reviews, evaluates and enhances our VaR model so that it reflects the material risks in our trading portfolio. Changes to the VaR model are reviewed and approved prior to implementation, and any material changes are reported to management through the appropriate management committees.
Trading limits on quantitative risk measures, including VaR, are independently set by Global Markets Risk Management and reviewed on a regular basis so that trading limits remain relevant and within our overall risk appetite for market risks. Trading limits are reviewed in the context of market liquidity, volatility and strategic business priorities. Trading limits are set at both a granular level to allow for extensive coverage of risks as well as at aggregated portfolios to account for correlations among risk factors. All trading limits are approved at least annually. Approved trading limits are stored and tracked in a centralized limits management system. Trading limit excesses are communicated to management for review. Certain quantitative market risk measures and corresponding limits have been identified as critical in the Corporation’s Risk Appetite Statement. These risk appetite limits are reported on a daily basis and are approved at least annually by the ERC and the Board.
In periods of market stress, Global Markets senior leadership communicates daily to discuss losses, key risk positions and any limit excesses. As a result of this process, the businesses may selectively reduce risk.
Table 42 presents the total market-based portfolio VaR, which is the combination of the total trading positions portfolio and the fair value option portfolio. Prior to the first quarter of 2025, the Corporation presented its VaR using a total market-based portfolio VaR, which was primarily a combination of our total covered positions and certain less liquid trading positions. An insignificant amount of banking book positions was included in these portfolios. Beginning in the first quarter of 2025, the VaR amounts for all periods presented in Table 42 and Table 43 exclude those banking book positions and include only the financial instruments used in the Corporation’s market risk management of its trading portfolios.
In addition, Table 42 presents our fair value option portfolio, which includes substantially all of the funded and unfunded exposures for which we elect the fair value option, and their corresponding hedges. Additionally, market risk VaR for trading activities, as presented in Table 42, differs from VaR used for regulatory capital calculations due to the holding period used.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 76 |
The holding period for VaR used for regulatory capital calculations is 10 days, while for the market risk VaR presented below, it is one day. Both measures utilize the same process and methodology.
The total market-based portfolio VaR results in Table 42 include market risk to which we are exposed from all business segments’ trading activities, which exclude credit valuation
adjustment (CVA), DVA and related hedges. The majority of this portfolio is within the Global Markets segment.
Table 42 presents year-end, average, high and low daily trading VaR for 2025 and 2024 using a 99 percent confidence level. The annual average of total trading positions portfolio VaR marginally increased for 2025 compared to 2024, with modest changes across asset classes.
| Table 42 | Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 14 | $ | 16 | $ | 36 | $ | 9 | $ | 24 | 15 | $ | 27 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate | 37 | 52 | 90 | 29 | 65 | 58 | 94 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | 34 | 46 | 67 | 32 | 56 | 51 | 60 | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage | 26 | 32 | 43 | 26 | 27 | 36 | 51 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 20 | 24 | 63 | 13 | 20 | 21 | 34 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 10 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (97) | (107) | n/a | n/a | (114) | (124) | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total trading positions portfolio VaR | 44 | 72 | 119 | 42 | 87 | 67 | 89 | 53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 17 | 20 | 35 | 12 | 31 | 19 | 45 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 7 | 13 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 10 | 26 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (10) | (20) | n/a | n/a | (34) | (16) | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 14 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 19 | 13 | 24 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (9) | (7) | n/a | n/a | (8) | (7) | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 49 | $ | 78 | 127 | 46 | $ | 98 | $ | 73 | 100 | 59 |
(1)The high and low for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the high and low for the components. Therefore, the amount of portfolio diversification, which is the difference between the total portfolio and the sum of the individual components, is not relevant.
n/a = not applicable
The following graph presents the trading positions portfolio VaR for 2025, corresponding to the data in Table 42.
77 Bank of America
Additional VaR statistics produced within our single VaR model are provided in Table 43 at the same level of detail as in Table 42. Evaluating VaR with additional statistics allows for an increased understanding of the risks in the portfolio, as the historical market data used in the VaR calculation does not necessarily follow a predefined statistical distribution. Table 43 presents average trading VaR statistics at 99 percent and 95 percent confidence levels for 2025 and 2024.
| Table 43 | Average Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities – 99 percent and 95 percent VaR Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 99 percent | 95 percent | 99 percent | 95 percent | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 16 | $ | 8 | $ | 15 | $ | 7 | |||||||||||
| Interest rate | 52 | 27 | 58 | 32 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit | 46 | 20 | 51 | 27 | |||||||||||||||
| Mortgage | 32 | 17 | 36 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity | 24 | 12 | 21 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 9 | 6 | 10 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (107) | (58) | (124) | (68) | |||||||||||||||
| Total trading positions portfolio VaR | 72 | 32 | 67 | 34 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 20 | 11 | 19 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 13 | 7 | 10 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (20) | (11) | (16) | (10) | |||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 13 | 7 | 13 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (7) | (5) | (7) | (3) | |||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 78 | $ | 34 | $ | 73 | $ | 38 |
Backtesting
The accuracy of the VaR methodology is evaluated by backtesting, which compares the daily VaR results, utilizing a one-day holding period, against a comparable subset of trading revenue. A backtesting excess occurs when a trading loss exceeds the VaR for the corresponding day. These excesses are evaluated to understand the positions and market moves that produced the trading loss with a goal to help confirm that the VaR methodology accurately represents those losses. We expect the frequency of trading losses in excess of VaR to be in line with the confidence level of the VaR statistic being tested. For example, with a 99 percent confidence level, we expect one trading loss in excess of VaR every 100 days or between two to three trading losses in excess of VaR over the course of a year. The number of backtesting excesses observed can differ from the statistically expected number of excesses if the current level of market volatility is materially different than the level of market volatility that existed during the three years of historical data used in the VaR calculation.
The trading revenue used for backtesting is defined by regulatory agencies in order to most closely align with the VaR component of the regulatory capital calculation. This revenue differs from total trading-related revenue in that it excludes revenue from trading activities that either do not generate market risk or for which the market risk cannot be included in VaR. Some examples of the types of revenue excluded for backtesting are fees, commissions, reserves, net interest income and intra-day trading revenues.
We conduct daily backtesting on the VaR results used for regulatory capital calculations as well as at the level of key legal entities. These results are reported to senior management, who regularly review and evaluate the results of these tests.
During 2025, there were no days where this subset of trading revenue had losses that exceeded our total covered portfolio VaR, utilizing a one-day holding period.
Total Trading-related Revenue
Total trading-related revenue, excluding brokerage fees, and CVA, DVA and funding valuation adjustment gains (losses), represents the total amount earned from trading positions, including net interest income associated with Global Markets trading activities, which are taken in a diverse range of financial instruments and markets. For more information on fair value, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Trading-related revenue can be volatile and is largely driven by general market conditions and customer demand. Also, trading-related revenue is dependent on the volume and type of transactions, the level of risk assumed, and the volatility of price and rate movements at any given time within the ever-changing market environment. Significant daily revenue by business is monitored and the primary drivers of these are reviewed.
The following histogram is a graphic depiction of trading volatility and illustrates the daily level of trading-related revenue for 2025 and 2024. During 2025, positive trading-related revenue was recorded for more than 99 percent of the trading days, of which 95 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $2 million. This compares to 2024 where positive trading-related revenue was recorded for more than 99 percent of the trading days, of which 94 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $12 million.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 78 |
Trading Portfolio Stress Testing
Because the very nature of a VaR model suggests results can exceed our estimates and it is dependent on a limited historical window, we also stress test our portfolio using scenario analysis. This analysis estimates the change in the value of our trading portfolio that may result from abnormal market movements.
A set of scenarios, categorized as either historical or hypothetical, are computed daily for the overall trading portfolio and individual businesses. These scenarios include shocks to underlying market risk factors that may be well beyond the shocks found in the historical data used to calculate VaR. Historical scenarios simulate the impact of the market moves that occurred during a period of extended historical market stress. Generally, a multi-week period representing the most severe point during a crisis is selected for each historical scenario. Hypothetical scenarios provide estimated portfolio impacts from potential future market stress events. Scenarios are reviewed and updated in response to changing positions and new economic or political information. In addition, new or ad hoc scenarios are developed to address specific potential market events or particular vulnerabilities in the portfolio. The stress tests are reviewed on a regular basis and the results are presented to senior management.
Stress testing for the trading portfolio is integrated with enterprise-wide stress testing and incorporated into the limits framework. The macroeconomic scenarios used for enterprise-wide stress testing purposes differ from the typical trading portfolio scenarios in that they have a longer time horizon and the results are forecasted over multiple periods for use in consolidated capital and liquidity planning. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 88.
Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book
The following discussion presents net interest income for banking book activities.
Interest rate risk represents the most significant market risk exposure to our banking book balance sheet. Interest rate risk is measured as the potential change in net interest income caused by movements in market interest rates. Client-facing
activities, primarily lending and deposit-taking, create interest rate sensitive positions on our balance sheet.
We prepare forward-looking forecasts of net interest income. The baseline forecast takes into consideration expected future business growth, ALM positioning and the future direction of interest rate movements as implied by market-based forward curves.
We then measure and evaluate the impact that alternative interest rate scenarios have on the baseline forecast in order to assess interest rate sensitivity under varied conditions. The net interest income forecast is frequently updated for changing assumptions and differing outlooks based on economic trends, market conditions and business strategies. Thus, we continually monitor our banking book balance sheet position in order to maintain an acceptable level of exposure to interest rate changes.
The interest rate scenarios that we analyze incorporate balance sheet assumptions such as loan and deposit growth and pricing, changes in funding mix, product repricing, maturity characteristics and investment securities premium amortization. Our overall goal is to manage interest rate risk so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect earnings and capital.
Table 44 presents the spot and 12-month forward rates used in developing the forward curve used in our baseline forecasts at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Table 44 | Forward Rates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | ||||||||
| Federal Funds | SOFR | 10-Year SOFR | ||||||
| Spot rates | 3.75 | % | 3.87 | % | 3.80 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 3.25 | 3.11 | 3.89 | |||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Spot rates | 4.50 | % | 4.49 | % | 4.07 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 4.00 | 3.94 | 4.07 |
Table 45 shows the potential pretax impact to forecasted net interest income over the next 12 months from December 31, 2025 and 2024 resulting from instantaneous parallel and non-parallel shocks to the market-based forward curve.
79 Bank of America
Periodically, we evaluate the scenarios presented so that they are meaningful in the context of the current rate environment. Amounts presented reflect dynamic deposit sensitivities, which
incorporate behavioral customer deposit balance changes that could occur under various scenarios.
| Table 45 | Estimated Banking Book Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Curve Changes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short Rate (bps) | Long Rate (bps) | |||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
| Parallel Shifts | ||||||||||
| +100 bps instantaneous shift | +100 | +100 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 1.1 | ||||
| -100 bps instantaneous shift | -100 | -100 | (2.0) | (2.3) | ||||||
| +200 bps instantaneous shift | +200 | +200 | 0.8 | 2.0 | ||||||
| -200 bps instantaneous shift | -200 | -200 | (4.9) | (5.4) | ||||||
| Flatteners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | +100 | — | 0.5 | 1.1 | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | -100 | (0.3) | (0.1) | ||||||
| Steepeners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | -100 | — | (1.7) | (2.1) | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | +100 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
We continue to be asset sensitive to a parallel move in interest rates, with the majority of that impact coming from the short end of the yield curve. Additionally, higher interest rates negatively impact the fair value of our debt securities classified as available for sale and adversely affect accumulated OCI, and thus capital levels under the Basel 3 capital rules. Under instantaneous upward parallel shifts, the near-term adverse impact to Basel 3 capital would be reduced over time by offsetting positive impacts to net interest income generated from banking book activities. For more information on Basel 3, see Capital Management – Regulatory Capital on page 49.
As part of our ALM activities, we use securities, certain residential mortgages, and interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives in managing interest rate sensitivity. The sensitivity analysis in Table 45 assumes that we take no action in response to these rate shocks and does not assume any change in other macroeconomic variables normally correlated with changes in interest rates. In higher rate scenarios, the analysis assumes that a portion of low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits are replaced with higher yielding deposits or market-based funding. Conversely, in lower rate scenarios, the analysis assumes that a portion of higher yielding deposits or market-based funding are replaced with low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits.
For larger interest rate shift scenarios, the interest rate sensitivity may behave in a non-linear manner as there are numerous estimates and assumptions, which require a high degree of judgment and are often interrelated, that could impact the outcome. Pertaining to the mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage portfolio, if long-end interest rates were to significantly decrease over the next twelve months, for example over 200 bps, there would generally be an increase in customer prepayment behaviors with an incremental reduction to net interest income, noting that the extent of changes in customer prepayment activity can be impacted by multiple factors and is not necessarily limited to long-end interest rates. Conversely, if long-end interest rates were to significantly increase over the next twelve months, for example, over 200 bps, customer prepayments would likely modestly decrease and result in an incremental increase to net interest income. In addition, deposit pricing is rate sensitive in nature. This sensitivity is assumed to have non-linear impacts to larger short-end rate movements. In decreasing interest rate scenarios, and particularly where interest rates have decreased to small amounts, the ability to further reduce rates paid is reduced as customer rates near zero. In higher short-end rate scenarios, deposit pricing will
likely increase at a faster rate, leading to incremental interest expense and reducing asset sensitivity. While the impact related to the above assumptions used in the asset sensitivity analysis can provide directional analysis on how net interest income will be impacted in changing environments, the ultimate impact is dependent upon the interrelationship of the assumptions and factors, which vary in different macroeconomic scenarios.
Economic Value of Equity
In addition to interest rate sensitivity described above, the Corporation’s management of its interest rate exposures in the banking book also considers a long-term view of interest rate sensitivity through the measurement of Economic Value of Equity (EVE). EVE captures changes in the net present value of banking book assets and liabilities under various interest rate scenarios and its impact to Tier 1 capital. Similar to net interest income, the Corporation establishes limits for EVE. EVE is largely driven by the Corporation’s longer duration fixed-rate products, such as investment securities, residential mortgages and deposits. For assets or liabilities that have no stated maturity, such as deposits, the Corporation estimates the duration for measurement purposes.
Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Derivative Contracts
We use interest rate and foreign exchange derivative contracts in our ALM activities to manage our interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Specifically, we use those derivatives to manage both the variability in cash flows and changes in fair value of various assets and liabilities arising from those risks. Our interest rate derivative contracts are generally non-leveraged swaps tied to various benchmark interest rates and foreign exchange basis swaps, options, futures and forwards, and our foreign exchange contracts include cross-currency interest rate swaps, foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency forward contracts and options.
The derivatives used in our ALM activities can be split into two broad categories: designated accounting hedges and other risk management derivatives. Designated accounting hedges are primarily used to manage our exposure to interest rates as described in the Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book section and are included in the sensitivities presented in Table 45. The Corporation also uses foreign currency derivatives in accounting hedges to manage substantially all of the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations. By hedging the foreign
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 80 |
exchange risk of our foreign operations, the Corporation's market risk exposure in this area is not significant.
Risk management derivatives are predominantly used to hedge foreign exchange risks related to various foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities and eliminate substantially all foreign currency exposures in the cash flows of the Corporation’s non-trading foreign currency-denominated financial instruments. These foreign exchange derivatives are sensitive to other market risk exposures such as cross-currency basis spreads and interest rate risk. However, as these features are not a significant component of these foreign exchange derivatives, the market risk related to this exposure is not significant. For more information on the accounting for derivatives, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mortgage Banking Risk Management
We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subject us to credit, liquidity and interest rate risks, among others. We determine whether loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment and manage credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing a portion of the loans we originate.
Interest rate risk and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Changes in interest rates and other market factors impact the volume of mortgage originations. Changes in interest rates also impact the value of interest rate lock commitments and the related residential first mortgage loans held-for-sale, as well as the value of the MSRs. An increase in mortgage interest rates typically leads to a decrease in the value of these instruments. Conversely, when there is an increase in interest rates, the value of the MSRs will increase driven by lower prepayment expectations. Because the interest rate risks of these hedged items offset, we combine them into one overall hedged item with one combined economic hedge portfolio consisting of derivative contracts and securities.
Compliance and Operational Risk Management
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable LRRs and our internal policies and procedures (collectively, applicable LRRs). We are subject to comprehensive and evolving regulation under federal and state laws, rules and regulations in the U.S. and the laws of the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those related to financial crimes and anti-money laundering, market conduct, trading activities, fair lending, privacy, data protection, development and use of AI, and unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, people or external events, and includes legal risk. Operational risk may occur anywhere in the Corporation, including third-party business processes, and is not limited to operations functions. The Corporation faces a number of key operational risks including third-party risk, model risk, conduct risk, technology risk, information security risk and data risk. The pace of technological change, including in the field of AI, may heighten risks in those areas. Operational risk can result in financial losses and reputational impacts and is a component in the calculation of total RWA used in the Basel 3 capital calculation. For more information on Basel 3 calculations, see Capital Management on page 48.
FLUs and control functions are first and foremost responsible for managing all aspects of their businesses, including their compliance and operational risk. FLUs and control functions are required to understand their business processes and related risks and controls, including third-party dependencies and the related regulatory requirements, and monitor and report on the effectiveness of the control environment. In order to actively monitor and assess the performance of their processes and controls, they must conduct comprehensive quality assurance activities and identify issues and risks to remediate control gaps and weaknesses. FLUs and control functions must also adhere to compliance and operational risk appetite limits to meet strategic, capital and financial planning objectives. Finally, FLUs and control functions are responsible for the proactive identification, management and escalation of compliance and operational risks across the Corporation. Collectively, these efforts are important to strengthen their compliance and operational resiliency, which is the ability to deliver critical operations through disruption. To address AI-related risks, we have implemented internal processes and governance frameworks. These measures help with regulatory compliance and responsible use of AI across our operations.
Global Compliance and Operational Risk teams independently assess compliance and operational risk, monitor business activities and processes and evaluate FLUs and control functions for adherence to applicable LRRs, including identifying issues and risks, and reporting on the state of the control environment. Corporate Audit provides an independent assessment and validation through testing of key compliance and operational risk processes and controls across the Corporation.
The Corporation's Global Compliance – Enterprise Policy and Operational Risk Management – Enterprise Policy set the requirements for reporting compliance and operational risk information to executive management as well as the Board or appropriate Board-level committees and reflect Global Compliance and Operational Risk’s responsibilities for conducting independent oversight of the Corporation’s compliance and operational risk management activities. The Board provides oversight of compliance risk through its Audit Committee and the ERC, and operational risk through its ERC.
MD&A history
Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.
FY 2024 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000070858-25-000139.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Bank of America Corporation (the Corporation) and its management may make certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipates,” “targets,” “expects,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “believes,” “continue” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements represent the Corporation’s current expectations, plans or forecasts of its future results, revenues, liquidity, net interest income, provision for credit losses, expenses, efficiency ratio, capital measures, strategy, deposits, assets, and future business and economic conditions more generally, and other future matters. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the following uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: and in any of the Corporation’s subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission filings: the Corporation’s potential judgments, orders, settlements, penalties, fines and reputational damage, which are inherently difficult to predict, resulting from pending, threatened or future litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings and enforcement actions, which the Corporation is subject to in the ordinary course of business, including matters related to our processing of unemployment benefits for California and certain other states, the features of our automatic credit card payment service, the adequacy of the Corporation’s anti-money laundering and economic sanctions programs and the processing of electronic payments, including through the Zelle network, and related fraud, which are in various stages; the possibility that the Corporation’s future liabilities may be in excess of its recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation, and regulatory and government actions; the Corporation’s ability to resolve representations and warranties repurchase and related claims; the risks related to the discontinuation of reference rates, including increased expenses and litigation and the effectiveness of hedging strategies; uncertainties about the financial stability and growth rates of non-U.S. jurisdictions, the risk that those jurisdictions may face difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, and related stresses on financial markets, currencies and trade, and the Corporation’s exposures to such risks, including direct, indirect and operational; the impact of U.S. and global interest rates (including the potential for ongoing adjustments in interest rates), inflation, currency exchange rates, economic conditions, trade policies and tensions, including increased tariffs, and geopolitical instability; the impact of the interest rate, inflationary, macroeconomic, banking and regulatory environment on the Corporation’s assets, business, financial condition and results of operations; the impact of adverse developments affecting the U.S. or global banking industry, including bank failures and liquidity concerns, resulting in worsening economic and market volatility, and regulatory responses thereto; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic
assumptions, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions and other uncertainties, including the impact of supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures and labor shortages on economic conditions and our business; potential losses related to the Corporation's concentration of credit risk; the Corporation’s ability to achieve its expense targets and expectations regarding revenue, net interest income, provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, effective tax rate, loan growth or other projections; variances to the underlying assumptions and judgments used in estimating banking book net interest income sensitivity; adverse changes to the Corporation’s credit ratings from the major credit rating agencies; an inability to access capital markets or maintain deposits or borrowing costs; estimates of the fair value and other accounting values, subject to impairment assessments, of certain of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities; the estimated or actual impact of changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying those standards; uncertainty regarding the content, timing and impact of regulatory capital and liquidity requirements; the impact of adverse changes to total loss-absorbing capacity requirements, stress capital buffer requirements and/or global systemically important bank surcharges; the potential impact of actions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the Corporation’s capital plans; the effect of changes in or interpretations of income tax laws and regulations; the impact of implementation and compliance with U.S. and international laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including recovery and resolution planning requirements, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Volcker Rule, fiduciary standards, derivatives regulations and potential changes to loss allocations between financial institutions and customers, including for losses incurred from the use of our products and services, including electronic payments and payment of checks, that were authorized by the customer but induced by fraud; the impact of failures or disruptions in or breaches of the Corporation’s operations or information systems, or those of third parties, including as a result of cybersecurity incidents; the risks related to the development, implementation, use and management of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and machine learning; the risks related to the transition and physical impacts of climate change; our ability to achieve environmental goals and targets or the impact of any changes in the Corporation’s sustainability strategy, goals or targets; the impact of uncertain or changing political conditions or any future federal government shutdown and uncertainty regarding the federal government’s debt limit or changes in fiscal, monetary or regulatory policy; the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics; the impact of natural disasters, extreme weather events, military conflicts (including the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the conflicts in the Middle East, the possible expansion of such conflicts and potential geopolitical consequences), terrorism or other geopolitical events; and other matters.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-year presentation. Throughout
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 26 |
the MD&A, the Corporation uses certain acronyms and abbreviations which are defined in the Glossary.
Executive Summary
Business Overview
The Corporation is a Delaware corporation, a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company. When used in this report, “Bank of America,” “the Corporation,” “we,” “us” and “our” may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation’s subsidiaries or affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Through our various bank and nonbank subsidiaries throughout the U.S. and in international markets, we provide a diversified range of banking and nonbank financial services and products through four business segments: Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We operate our banking activities primarily under the Bank of America, National Association (Bank of America, N.A. or BANA) charter. At December 31, 2024, the Corporation had $3.3 trillion in assets and a headcount of approximately 213,000 employees.
As of December 31, 2024, we served clients through operations across the U.S., its territories and more than 35 countries. Our retail banking footprint covers all major markets in the U.S., and we serve approximately 69 million consumer and small business clients with approximately 3,700 retail financial centers, approximately 15,000 ATMs, and leading digital banking platforms (www.bankofamerica.com) with approximately 48 million active users, including approximately 40 million active mobile users. We offer industry-leading support to approximately four million small business households. Our GWIM businesses, with client balances of $4.3 trillion, provide tailored solutions to meet client needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking, trust and retirement products. We are a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading across a broad range of asset classes serving corporations, governments, institutions and individuals around the world.
Recent Developments
Natural Disasters
Certain Bank of America communities, clients and teammates were significantly impacted by recent wildfires in California and by hurricanes in the southeastern U.S. during the second half of 2024. In response, Bank of America activated client assistance programs, donated to disaster relief efforts and provided additional support to teammates in the affected areas. The Corporation continues to evaluate the effects of the wildfires and hurricanes on its clients and communities and does not expect these natural disasters to have a material impact on its businesses, results of operations or financial condition.
Capital Management
On January 29, 2025, the Corporation’s Board of Directors (the Board) declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.26 per share, payable on March 28, 2025 to shareholders of record as of March 7, 2025.
For more information on our capital resources, see Capital Management beginning on page 48.
Financial Highlights
| Table 1 | Summary Income Statement and Selected Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions, except per share information) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 56,060 | $ | 56,931 | ||||||
| Noninterest income | 45,827 | 41,650 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 101,887 | 98,581 | ||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 5,821 | 4,394 | ||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 66,812 | 65,845 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 29,254 | 28,342 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,122 | 1,827 | ||||||||
| Net income | 27,132 | 26,515 | ||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 1,629 | 1,649 | ||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | $ | 25,503 | $ | 24,866 | ||||||
| Per common share information | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.25 | $ | 3.10 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.21 | 3.08 | ||||||||
| Dividends paid | 1.00 | 0.92 | ||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.83 | % | 0.84 | % | ||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.53 | 9.75 | ||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2) | 12.92 | 13.46 | ||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (1) | 65.57 | 66.79 | ||||||||
| Balance sheet at year end | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,095,835 | $ | 1,053,732 | ||||||
| Total assets | 3,261,519 | 3,180,151 | ||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,965,467 | 1,923,827 | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,965,960 | 2,888,505 | ||||||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | 272,400 | 263,249 | ||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 295,559 | 291,646 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 170.
(2)Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information and a corresponding reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measures defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
Net income was $27.1 billion, or $3.21 per diluted share in 2024 compared to $26.5 billion, or $3.08 per diluted share in 2023. The increase in net income was due to higher noninterest income, partially offset by higher provision for credit losses, higher noninterest expense and lower net interest income.
For discussion and analysis of our consolidated and business segment results of operations for 2023 compared to 2022, see Financial Highlights and Business Segment Operations sections in the MD&A of the Corporation’s 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
27 Bank of America
Net Interest Income
Net interest income decreased $871 million to $56.1 billion in 2024 compared to 2023. Net interest yield on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis decreased 13 basis points (bps) to 1.95 percent for 2024. The decreases were primarily driven by higher deposit costs, partially offset by higher asset yields and higher net interest income related to Global Markets activity. For more information on net interest yield and FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 30, and for more information on interest rate risk management, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 78.
Noninterest Income
| Table 2 | Noninterest Income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Fees and commissions: | ||||||||||
| Card income | $ | 6,284 | $ | 6,054 | ||||||
| Service charges | 6,055 | 5,684 | ||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 17,766 | 15,563 | ||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 6,186 | 4,708 | ||||||||
| Total fees and commissions | 36,291 | 32,009 | ||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 12,967 | 12,732 | ||||||||
| Other income | (3,431) | (3,091) | ||||||||
| Total noninterest income | $ | 45,827 | $ | 41,650 |
Noninterest income increased $4.2 billion to $45.8 billion in 2024 compared to 2023. The following highlights the significant changes.
● Card income increased $230 million primarily due to higher late fees, annual fees and card transfer fees.
● Service charges increased $371 million primarily due to higher treasury service charges.
● Investment and brokerage services increased $2.2 billion primarily driven by higher asset management fees due to higher average equity market valuations and positive assets under management (AUM) flows, as well as higher brokerage fees due to increased transactional volume, partially offset by the impact of lower AUM pricing.
● Investment banking fees increased $1.5 billion primarily due to higher debt and equity issuance fees and higher advisory fees.
● Market making and similar activities increased $235 million primarily driven by the net $1.6 billion charge resulting from the Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield Index’s (BSBY) cessation announced in 2023, partially offset by lower trading revenue from macro products in Fixed Income, Currencies and Commodities (FICC), and lower income from foreign currency risk management activities.
● Other income decreased $340 million primarily due to higher partnership losses on tax credit investments, a charge related to Visa Inc.’s (Visa) increase in its litigation escrow account, and certain negative valuation adjustments, partially offset by lower losses on sales of available-for-sale debt securities and gains on sales of equity investments.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses increased $1.4 billion to $5.8 billion for 2024 compared to 2023. The provision for credit losses for 2024 was primarily driven by credit card as well as small business loan growth, and asset quality deterioration in the commercial real estate office and credit card portfolios. For the prior year, the provision for credit losses was primarily driven by credit card loan growth and asset quality deterioration, partially offset by improved macroeconomic conditions that primarily benefited the commercial portfolio. For more information on the provision for credit losses, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 72.
Noninterest Expense
| Table 3 | Noninterest Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 40,182 | $ | 38,330 | ||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 7,289 | 7,164 | ||||||||
| Information processing and communications | 7,231 | 6,707 | ||||||||
| Product delivery and transaction related | 3,494 | 3,608 | ||||||||
| Professional fees | 2,669 | 2,159 | ||||||||
| Marketing | 1,956 | 1,927 | ||||||||
| Other general operating | 3,991 | 5,950 | ||||||||
| Total noninterest expense | $ | 66,812 | $ | 65,845 |
Noninterest expense increased $967 million to $66.8 billion in 2024 compared to 2023. The increase was primarily driven by higher revenue-related expenses as well as investments in people, operations and technology, partially offset by higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) expense in 2023, including $2.1 billion for the estimated special assessment amount arising from the closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, and lower expenses related to a liquidating business activity.
Income Tax Expense
| Table 4 | Income Tax Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 29,254 | $ | 28,342 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,122 | 1,827 | ||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 7.3 | % | 6.4 | % |
The effective tax rates for 2024 and 2023 were primarily driven by our recurring tax preference benefits, which primarily consisted of tax credits from investments in affordable housing and renewable energy. Also included in the effective tax rate for 2023 were tax impacts related to the FDIC special assessment and BSBY’s cessation announced in 2023. For more information on our recurring tax preference benefits, see Note 19 – Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Absent the tax credits and discrete tax benefits, the effective tax rates would have been approximately 25 percent for both periods.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 28 |
Balance Sheet Overview
| Table 5 | Selected Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 290,114 | $ | 333,073 | $ | (42,959) | (13) | % | ||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 274,709 | 280,624 | (5,915) | (2) | ||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 314,460 | 277,354 | 37,106 | 13 | ||||||||||
| Debt securities | 917,284 | 871,407 | 45,877 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases | 1,095,835 | 1,053,732 | 42,103 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | (13,240) | (13,342) | 102 | (1) | ||||||||||
| All other assets | 382,357 | 377,303 | 5,054 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,261,519 | $ | 3,180,151 | $ | 81,368 | 3 | |||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 1,965,467 | $ | 1,923,827 | $ | 41,640 | 2 | |||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 331,758 | 283,887 | 47,871 | 17 | ||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 92,543 | 95,530 | (2,987) | (3) | ||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 43,391 | 32,098 | 11,293 | 35 | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 283,279 | 302,204 | (18,925) | (6) | ||||||||||
| All other liabilities | 249,522 | 250,959 | (1,437) | (1) | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,965,960 | 2,888,505 | 77,455 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 295,559 | 291,646 | 3,913 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,261,519 | $ | 3,180,151 | $ | 81,368 | 3 |
Assets
At December 31, 2024, total assets were approximately $3.3 trillion, up $81.4 billion from December 31, 2023. The increase in assets was primarily due to higher debt securities, loans and leases, and trading account assets, partially offset by lower cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $43.0 billion primarily driven by reinvestment of cash into debt securities.
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Borrowed or Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Federal funds transactions involve lending reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are collateralized lending transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and obtain securities for settlement and for collateral. Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell decreased $5.9 billion primarily due to increased investments in debt securities for balance sheet and liquidity positioning purposes.
Trading Account Assets
Trading account assets consist primarily of long positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. government and agency securities, corporate securities and non-U.S. sovereign debt. Trading account assets increased $37.1 billion primarily due to client activity within Global Markets.
Debt Securities
Debt securities primarily include U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (MBS), principally agency MBS, non-U.S. bonds, corporate bonds and municipal debt. We reinvest cash in the debt securities portfolio primarily to manage interest rate and liquidity risk. Debt securities increased $45.9 billion primarily due to investment of excess cash from higher deposits. For more information on debt securities, see Note 4 – Securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans and Leases
Loans and leases increased $42.1 billion primarily driven by growth in commercial loans. For more information on the loan portfolio, see Credit Risk Management on page 58.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $102 million primarily due to a reserve release in our commercial portfolio due to a favorable macroeconomic environment and reduced exposure in our commercial real estate portfolio. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 72.
All Other Assets
All other assets increased $5.1 billion primarily driven by activity within Global Markets.
Liabilities
At December 31, 2024, total liabilities were approximately $3.0 trillion, up $77.5 billion from December 31, 2023, primarily due to higher federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, deposits, and short-term borrowings, partially offset by lower long-term debt.
Deposits
Deposits increased $41.6 billion primarily driven by growth in commercial client balances and time deposits.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Loaned or Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Federal funds transactions involve borrowing reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are collateralized borrowing transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and finance assets on the balance sheet. Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase increased $47.9 billion primarily driven by client activity within Global Markets.
29 Bank of America
Trading Account Liabilities
Trading account liabilities consist primarily of short positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. Treasury and agency securities, non-U.S. sovereign debt and corporate securities. Trading account liabilities decreased $3.0 billion primarily due to lower levels of short positions within Global Markets.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings provide an additional funding source and primarily consist of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) short-term borrowings, notes payable and various other borrowings that generally have maturities of one year or less. Short-term borrowings increased $11.3 billion primarily due to higher unsecured borrowings to manage liquidity needs. For more information on short-term borrowings, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt decreased $18.9 billion primarily due to maturities and redemptions, partially offset by debt issuances and valuation adjustments. For more information on long-term debt, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity increased $3.9 billion primarily due to net income and market value increases on derivatives, partially offset by returns of capital to shareholders through common stock repurchases and common and preferred stock dividends, as well as preferred stock redemptions.
Cash Flows Overview
The Corporation’s operating assets and liabilities support our global markets and lending activities. We believe that cash flows from operations, available cash balances and our ability to generate cash through short- and long-term debt are sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs. Our investing activities primarily include the debt securities portfolio and loans and leases. Our financing activities reflect cash flows primarily related to customer deposits, securities financing agreements, long-term debt and common and preferred stock.
Supplemental Financial Data
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this Form 10-K, we present certain non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items or otherwise include components that differ from the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures are provided as additional useful information to assess our financial condition, results of operations (including period-to-period operating performance) or compliance with prospective regulatory requirements. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended as a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may not be defined or calculated the same way as non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.
When presented on a consolidated basis, we view net interest income on an FTE basis as a non-GAAP financial measure. To derive the FTE basis, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before-tax basis with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. For purposes of this calculation, we use the federal statutory tax rate of 21 percent and a representative state tax rate. Net interest yield, which measures the basis points we earn over the cost of funds, utilizes net interest income on an FTE basis. We believe that presentation of these items on an FTE basis allows for comparison of amounts from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practices.
We may present certain key performance indicators and ratios excluding certain items (e.g., debit valuation adjustment (DVA) gains (losses)), which result in non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that the presentation of measures that exclude these items is useful because such measures provide additional information to assess the underlying operational performance and trends of our businesses and to allow better comparison of period-to-period operating performance.
We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible equity, a non-GAAP financial measure. Tangible equity represents shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)), net of related deferred tax liabilities (“adjusted” shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity). These measures are used to evaluate our use of equity. In addition, profitability, relationship and investment models use both return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity and return on average tangible shareholders’ equity as key measures to support our overall growth objectives. These ratios are:
● Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity measures our net income applicable to common shareholders as a percentage of adjusted average common shareholders’ equity. The tangible common equity ratio represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity measures our net income as a percentage of adjusted average total shareholders’ equity. The tangible equity ratio represents adjusted ending shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Tangible book value per common share represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by ending common shares outstanding.
We believe ratios utilizing tangible equity provide additional useful information because they present measures of those assets that can generate income. Tangible book value per common share provides additional useful information about the level of tangible assets in relation to outstanding shares of common stock.
The aforementioned supplemental data and performance measures are presented in Tables 6 and 7.
For more information on the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 30 |
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators (key performance indicators) that management uses when assessing our consolidated and/or segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our underlying operational performance and trends. These key performance indicators (KPIs) may not be defined or calculated in the same way as
similar KPIs used by other companies. For information on how these metrics are defined, see Key Metrics on page 170.
Our consolidated key performance indicators, which include various equity and credit metrics, are presented in Table 1 on page 27, Table 6 on page 31 and Table 7 on page 32.
For information on key segment performance metrics, see Business Segment Operations on page 35.
| Table 6 | Selected Annual Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions, except per share information) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 56,060 | $ | 56,931 | $ | 52,462 | ||||
| Noninterest income | 45,827 | 41,650 | 42,488 | |||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 101,887 | 98,581 | 94,950 | |||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 5,821 | 4,394 | 2,543 | |||||||
| Noninterest expense | 66,812 | 65,845 | 61,438 | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | 29,254 | 28,342 | 30,969 | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,122 | 1,827 | 3,441 | |||||||
| Net income | 27,132 | 26,515 | 27,528 | |||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 25,503 | 24,866 | 26,015 | |||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 7,855.5 | 8,028.6 | 8,113.7 | |||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 7,935.8 | 8,080.5 | 8,167.5 | |||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.83 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.88 | % | ||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.53 | 9.75 | 10.75 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 12.92 | 13.46 | 15.15 | |||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.23 | 9.36 | 10.18 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 12.12 | 12.44 | 13.76 | |||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 9.06 | 9.17 | 8.95 | |||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.35 | 8.28 | 8.02 | |||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.95 | 8.99 | 8.62 | |||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 30.67 | 29.65 | 26.77 | |||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.25 | $ | 3.10 | $ | 3.21 | ||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.21 | 3.08 | 3.19 | |||||||
| Dividends paid | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.86 | |||||||
| Book value (1) | 35.79 | 33.34 | 30.61 | |||||||
| Tangible book value (2) | 26.58 | 24.46 | 21.83 | |||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 334,497 | $ | 265,840 | $ | 264,853 | ||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,060,081 | $ | 1,046,256 | $ | 1,016,782 | ||||
| Total assets | 3,284,228 | 3,153,513 | 3,135,894 | |||||||
| Total deposits | 1,924,106 | 1,887,541 | 1,986,158 | |||||||
| Long-term debt | 246,081 | 248,853 | 246,479 | |||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 267,527 | 254,956 | 241,981 | |||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 294,014 | 283,353 | 270,299 | |||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (3) | $ | 14,336 | $ | 14,551 | $ | 14,222 | ||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 6,120 | 5,630 | 3,978 | |||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (4) | 1.21 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (4) | 222 | 243 | 333 | |||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 6,031 | $ | 3,799 | $ | 2,172 | ||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (4) | 0.57 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||
| Capital ratios at year end (5) | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.9 | % | 11.8 | % | 11.2 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 13.2 | 13.5 | 13.0 | |||||||
| Total capital | 15.1 | 15.2 | 14.9 | |||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.0 | |||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | 6.1 | 5.9 | |||||||
| Tangible equity (2) | 7.1 | 7.1 | 6.8 | |||||||
| Tangible common equity (2) | 6.3 | 6.2 | 5.9 |
(1)For definition, see Key Metrics on page 170.
(2)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 30 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(3)Includes the allowance for loan and leases losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(4)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 62 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 66 and corresponding Table 33.
(5)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 48.
31 Bank of America
| Table 7 | Selected Quarterly Financial Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Quarters | 2023 Quarters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share information) | Fourth | Third | Second | First | Fourth | Third | Second | First | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 14,359 | $ | 13,967 | $ | 13,702 | $ | 14,032 | $ | 13,946 | $ | 14,379 | $ | 14,158 | $ | 14,448 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 10,988 | 11,378 | 11,675 | 11,786 | 8,013 | 10,788 | 11,039 | 11,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 25,347 | 25,345 | 25,377 | 25,818 | 21,959 | 25,167 | 25,197 | 26,258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 1,452 | 1,542 | 1,508 | 1,319 | 1,104 | 1,234 | 1,125 | 931 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 16,787 | 16,479 | 16,309 | 17,237 | 17,731 | 15,838 | 16,038 | 16,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 7,108 | 7,324 | 7,560 | 7,262 | 3,124 | 8,095 | 8,034 | 9,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 443 | 428 | 663 | 588 | (20) | 293 | 626 | 928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 6,665 | 6,896 | 6,897 | 6,674 | 3,144 | 7,802 | 7,408 | 8,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 6,399 | 6,380 | 6,582 | 6,142 | 2,838 | 7,270 | 7,102 | 7,656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 7,738.4 | 7,818.0 | 7,897.9 | 7,968.2 | 7,990.9 | 8,017.1 | 8,040.9 | 8,065.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 7,843.7 | 7,902.1 | 7,960.9 | 8,031.4 | 8,062.5 | 8,075.9 | 8,080.7 | 8,182.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.80 | % | 0.83 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.83 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.94 | % | 1.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Four-quarter trailing return on average assets (2) | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.37 | 9.44 | 9.98 | 9.35 | 4.33 | 11.24 | 11.21 | 12.48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (3) | 12.63 | 12.76 | 13.57 | 12.73 | 5.92 | 15.47 | 15.49 | 17.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 8.98 | 9.30 | 9.45 | 9.18 | 4.32 | 10.86 | 10.52 | 11.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (3) | 11.78 | 12.20 | 12.42 | 12.07 | 5.71 | 14.41 | 14.00 | 15.98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 9.06 | 8.92 | 9.02 | 8.97 | 9.17 | 9.10 | 9.07 | 8.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.35 | 8.18 | 8.21 | 8.10 | 8.28 | 8.20 | 8.16 | 7.88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.89 | 8.95 | 8.96 | 9.01 | 8.98 | 9.11 | 8.89 | 8.95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 31.29 | 31.70 | 28.66 | 31.11 | 67.42 | 26.39 | 24.88 | 23.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.35 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book value (1) | 35.79 | 35.37 | 34.39 | 33.71 | 33.34 | 32.65 | 32.05 | 31.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible book value (3) | 26.58 | 26.25 | 25.37 | 24.79 | 24.46 | 23.79 | 23.23 | 22.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 334,497 | $ | 305,090 | $ | 309,202 | $ | 298,312 | $ | 265,840 | $ | 216,942 | $ | 228,188 | $ | 228,012 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,081,009 | $ | 1,059,728 | $ | 1,051,472 | $ | 1,047,890 | $ | 1,050,705 | $ | 1,046,254 | $ | 1,046,608 | $ | 1,041,352 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 3,318,094 | 3,296,171 | 3,274,988 | 3,247,159 | 3,213,159 | 3,128,466 | 3,175,358 | 3,096,058 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,957,950 | 1,920,748 | 1,909,925 | 1,907,462 | 1,905,011 | 1,876,153 | 1,875,353 | 1,893,649 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 238,988 | 247,338 | 243,689 | 254,782 | 256,262 | 245,819 | 248,480 | 244,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 271,641 | 269,001 | 265,290 | 264,114 | 260,221 | 256,578 | 254,028 | 248,855 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 295,134 | 294,985 | 293,403 | 292,511 | 288,618 | 284,975 | 282,425 | 277,252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (4) | $ | 14,336 | $ | 14,351 | $ | 14,342 | $ | 14,371 | $ | 14,551 | $ | 14,640 | $ | 14,338 | $ | 13,951 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (5) | 6,120 | 5,824 | 5,691 | 6,034 | 5,630 | 4,993 | 4,274 | 4,083 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (5) | 1.21 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (5) | 222 | 235 | 242 | 225 | 243 | 275 | 314 | 319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 1,466 | $ | 1,534 | $ | 1,533 | $ | 1,498 | $ | 1,192 | $ | 931 | $ | 869 | $ | 807 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (5) | 0.54 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Capital ratios at period end (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.9 | % | 11.8 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.8 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.6 | % | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.5 | 13.6 | 13.5 | 13.6 | 13.3 | 13.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital | 15.1 | 14.9 | 15.1 | 15.2 | 15.2 | 15.4 | 15.1 | 15.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 6.9 | 6.9 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible equity (3) | 7.1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common equity (3) | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 5.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity and long-term debt metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to risk-weighted assets | 27.1 | % | 27.4 | % | 28.2 | % | 28.7 | % | 29.0 | % | 29.3 | % | 28.8 | % | 28.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to supplementary leverage exposure | 12.0 | 12.2 | 12.5 | 12.8 | 13.0 | 13.3 | 13.0 | 13.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to risk-weighted assets | 13.0 | 13.3 | 13.7 | 14.2 | 14.5 | 14.8 | 14.6 | 14.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to supplementary leverage exposure | 5.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.7 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 170.
(2)Calculated as total net income for four consecutive quarters divided by annualized average assets for four consecutive quarters.
(3)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 30 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(4)Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(5)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 63 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 67 and corresponding Table 33.
(6)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 48.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 32 |
| Table 8 | Average Balances and Interest Rates - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | 332,897 | $ | 16,806 | 5.05 | % | $ | 324,389 | $ | 15,965 | 4.92 | % | $ | 195,564 | $ | 2,591 | 1.32 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 10,105 | 459 | 4.54 | 9,704 | 465 | 4.79 | 9,209 | 132 | 1.44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 310,626 | 19,911 | 6.41 | 291,669 | 18,679 | 6.40 | 292,799 | 4,560 | 1.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 207,557 | 10,476 | 5.05 | 189,263 | 8,849 | 4.68 | 158,102 | 5,586 | 3.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 868,709 | 26,107 | 2.99 | 794,192 | 20,332 | 2.55 | 922,730 | 17,207 | 1.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 227,777 | 7,391 | 3.24 | 229,001 | 6,923 | 3.02 | 227,604 | 6,375 | 2.80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 25,621 | 1,607 | 6.27 | 25,969 | 1,471 | 5.67 | 27,364 | 959 | 3.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 99,914 | 11,438 | 11.45 | 96,190 | 10,436 | 10.85 | 83,539 | 8,408 | 10.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 104,548 | 5,829 | 5.58 | 104,571 | 5,200 | 4.97 | 107,050 | 3,317 | 3.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 457,860 | 26,265 | 5.74 | 455,731 | 24,030 | 5.27 | 445,557 | 19,059 | 4.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 390,574 | 21,402 | 5.48 | 378,212 | 19,494 | 5.15 | 366,748 | 12,251 | 3.34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 126,596 | 8,749 | 6.91 | 125,486 | 8,023 | 6.39 | 125,222 | 3,702 | 2.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate (3) | 69,940 | 5,000 | 7.15 | 72,981 | 5,162 | 7.07 | 65,421 | 2,595 | 3.97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 15,111 | 806 | 5.33 | 13,846 | 646 | 4.67 | 13,834 | 473 | 3.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 602,221 | 35,957 | 5.97 | 590,525 | 33,325 | 5.64 | 571,225 | 19,021 | 3.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 1,060,081 | 62,222 | 5.87 | 1,046,256 | 57,355 | 5.48 | 1,016,782 | 38,080 | 3.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 108,893 | 11,245 | 10.33 | 98,127 | 9,184 | 9.36 | 105,674 | 4,847 | 4.59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 2,898,868 | 147,226 | 5.08 | 2,753,600 | 130,829 | 4.75 | 2,700,860 | 73,003 | 2.70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 24,045 | 26,076 | 28,029 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets, less allowance for loan and lease losses | 361,315 | 373,837 | 407,005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,284,228 | $ | 3,153,513 | $ | 3,135,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposits | $ | 951,314 | $ | 20,877 | 2.19 | % | $ | 952,736 | $ | 15,527 | 1.63 | % | $ | 987,247 | $ | 3,145 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 350,181 | 13,148 | 3.76 | 254,476 | 7,366 | 2.89 | 166,490 | 818 | 0.49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 1,301,495 | 34,025 | 2.61 | 1,207,212 | 22,893 | 1.90 | 1,153,737 | 3,963 | 0.34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 109,246 | 4,417 | 4.04 | 96,845 | 3,270 | 3.38 | 80,951 | 755 | 0.93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 1,410,741 | 38,442 | 2.72 | 1,304,057 | 26,163 | 2.01 | 1,234,688 | 4,718 | 0.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased, securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 367,192 | 23,777 | 6.48 | 301,015 | 20,583 | 6.84 | 214,369 | 4,117 | 1.92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities | 149,355 | 10,761 | 7.21 | 152,548 | 9,970 | 6.54 | 137,277 | 2,861 | 2.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 52,371 | 2,191 | 4.18 | 46,083 | 2,043 | 4.43 | 51,208 | 1,538 | 3.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 246,081 | 15,376 | 6.25 | 248,853 | 14,572 | 5.86 | 246,479 | 6,869 | 2.79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 2,225,740 | 90,547 | 4.07 | 2,052,556 | 73,331 | 3.57 | 1,884,021 | 20,103 | 1.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing deposits | 513,365 | 583,484 | 751,470 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities (4) | 251,109 | 234,120 | 230,104 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 294,014 | 283,353 | 270,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,284,228 | $ | 3,153,513 | $ | 3,135,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest spread | 1.01 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact of noninterest-bearing sources | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income/yield on earning assets (5) | $ | 56,679 | 1.95 | % | $ | 57,498 | 2.08 | % | $ | 52,900 | 1.96 | % |
(1)Includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 78.
(2)Nonperforming loans are included in the respective average loan balances. Income on these nonperforming loans is generally recognized on a cost recovery basis.
(3)Includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $63.8 billion, $67.2 billion and $61.1 billion, and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $6.1 billion, $5.8 billion and $4.3 billion for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(4)Includes $48.4 billion, $40.2 billion and $30.7 billion of structured notes and liabilities for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(5)Net interest income includes FTE adjustments of $619 million, $567 million and $438 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
33 Bank of America
| Table 9 | Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Volume | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | From 2023 to 2024 | From 2022 to 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | 414 | $ | 427 | $ | 841 | $ | 1,691 | $ | 11,683 | $ | 13,374 | ||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 19 | (25) | (6) | 8 | 325 | 333 | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 1,201 | 31 | 1,232 | (10) | 14,129 | 14,119 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 865 | 762 | 1,627 | 1,095 | 2,168 | 3,263 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 1,820 | 3,955 | 5,775 | (2,435) | 5,560 | 3,125 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (44) | 512 | 468 | 37 | 511 | 548 | ||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | (18) | 154 | 136 | (50) | 562 | 512 | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 405 | 597 | 1,002 | 1,269 | 759 | 2,028 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | (4) | 633 | 629 | (75) | 1,958 | 1,883 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 2,235 | 4,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 621 | 1,287 | 1,908 | 381 | 6,862 | 7,243 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 66 | 660 | 726 | 12 | 4,309 | 4,321 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (217) | 55 | (162) | 302 | 2,265 | 2,567 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 60 | 100 | 160 | 1 | 172 | 173 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 2,632 | 14,304 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 4,867 | 19,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 1,008 | 1,053 | 2,061 | (343) | 4,680 | 4,337 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase in interest income | $ | 16,397 | $ | 57,826 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposit accounts | $ | (21) | $ | 5,371 | $ | 5,350 | $ | (96) | $ | 12,478 | $ | 12,382 | ||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 2,754 | 3,028 | 5,782 | 429 | 6,119 | 6,548 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 11,132 | 18,930 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 423 | 724 | 1,147 | 146 | 2,369 | 2,515 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 12,279 | 21,445 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased, securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 4,533 | (1,339) | 3,194 | 1,662 | 14,804 | 16,466 | ||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities | (202) | 993 | 791 | 312 | 6,797 | 7,109 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 277 | (129) | 148 | (156) | 661 | 505 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | (152) | 956 | 804 | 74 | 7,629 | 7,703 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase in interest expense | 17,216 | 53,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net interest income (2) | $ | (819) | $ | 4,598 |
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and expense are divided between the portion of change attributable to the variance in volume and the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate for that category. The unallocated change in rate or volume variance is allocated between the rate and volume variances.
(2)Includes an increase in FTE basis adjustments of $52 million from 2023 to 2024 and $129 million from 2022 to 2023.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 34 |
Business Segment Operations
Segment Description and Basis of Presentation
We report our results of operations through the following four business segments: Consumer Banking, GWIM, Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We manage our segments and report their results on an FTE basis. The primary activities, products and businesses of the business segments and All Other are shown below.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. We utilize a methodology that considers the effect of regulatory capital requirements in addition to internal risk-based capital models. Our internal risk-based capital models use a risk-adjusted methodology incorporating each segment’s credit, market, interest rate, business and operational risk components. For more information on the nature of these risks, see Managing Risk on page 45. The capital allocated to the business segments is referred to as allocated capital. Allocated equity in the reporting units is comprised of allocated capital plus capital for the portion of goodwill and intangibles specifically assigned to the reporting unit. For more information, including the definition of a reporting unit, see Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For more information on our presentation of financial information on an FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 30, and for reconciliations to consolidated total revenue, net income and year-end total assets, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators that management uses when evaluating segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our segments’ operational performance, client trends and business growth.
35 Bank of America
Consumer Banking
| Deposits | Consumer Lending | Total Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 21,217 | $ | 22,545 | $ | 11,861 | $ | 11,144 | $ | 33,078 | $ | 33,689 | (2) | % | |||||||||
| Noninterest income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card income | (41) | (40) | 5,473 | 5,304 | 5,432 | 5,264 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 2,443 | 2,314 | 2 | 3 | 2,445 | 2,317 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| All other income | 410 | 607 | 71 | 154 | 481 | 761 | (37) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 2,812 | 2,881 | 5,546 | 5,461 | 8,358 | 8,342 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 24,029 | 25,426 | 17,407 | 16,605 | 41,436 | 42,031 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 303 | 491 | 4,684 | 4,667 | 4,987 | 5,158 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 13,707 | 13,358 | 8,397 | 8,058 | 22,104 | 21,416 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 10,019 | 11,577 | 4,326 | 3,880 | 14,345 | 15,457 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,504 | 2,894 | 1,082 | 970 | 3,586 | 3,864 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,515 | $ | 8,683 | $ | 3,244 | $ | 2,910 | $ | 10,759 | $ | 11,593 | (7) | ||||||||||
| Effective tax rate (1) | 25.0 | % | 25.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.25 | % | 2.28 | % | 3.83 | % | 3.66 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.26 | % | |||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 55 | 63 | 11 | 10 | 25 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 57.04 | 52.54 | 48.24 | 48.52 | 53.35 | 50.95 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,342 | $ | 4,129 | $ | 309,450 | $ | 304,561 | $ | 313,792 | $ | 308,690 | 2 | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 943,170 | 989,000 | 309,624 | 304,838 | 988,950 | 1,032,525 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 975,704 | 1,022,361 | 314,450 | 310,805 | 1,026,310 | 1,071,853 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 940,662 | 987,675 | 4,887 | 5,075 | 945,549 | 992,750 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 13,700 | 13,700 | 29,550 | 28,300 | 43,250 | 42,000 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Year End | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,510 | $ | 4,218 | $ | 314,244 | $ | 310,901 | $ | 318,754 | $ | 315,119 | 1 | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 949,523 | 965,088 | 314,527 | 311,008 | 995,369 | 1,009,360 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 983,518 | 999,372 | 319,533 | 317,194 | 1,034,370 | 1,049,830 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 947,837 | 964,136 | 4,474 | 5,436 | 952,311 | 969,572 | (2) |
(1) Estimated at the segment level only.
(2) In segments and businesses where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, we allocate assets from All Other to match the segments’ and businesses’ liabilities and allocated shareholders’ equity. As a result, total earning assets and total assets of the businesses may not equal total Consumer Banking.
Consumer Banking, comprised of Deposits and Consumer Lending, offers a diversified range of credit, banking and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses. Deposits and Consumer Lending include the net impact of migrating customers and their related deposit, brokerage asset and loan balances between Deposits, Consumer Lending and GWIM, as well as other client-managed businesses. Our customers and clients have access to a coast-to-coast network including financial centers in 39 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 2024, our network includes approximately 3,700 financial centers, approximately 15,000 ATMs, nationwide call centers and leading digital banking platforms with approximately 48 million active users, including approximately 40 million active mobile users.
Consumer Banking Results
Net income for Consumer Banking decreased $834 million to $10.8 billion primarily due to higher noninterest expense and lower revenue, partially offset by lower provision for credit losses. Net interest income decreased $611 million to $33.1 billion primarily driven by lower deposit balances, partially offset by higher loan balances. Noninterest income increased $16 million to $8.4 billion, relatively unchanged from the same period a year ago.
The provision for credit losses decreased $171 million to $5.0 billion primarily driven by lower overdraft losses from fraud activity. Noninterest expense increased $688 million to $22.1 billion primarily driven by investments in the business, including
operations, technology and people.
The return on average allocated capital was 25 percent, down from 28 percent, due to an increase in allocated capital and lower net income. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 35.
Deposits
Deposits includes the results of consumer deposit activities that consist of a comprehensive range of products provided to consumers and small businesses. Our deposit products include noninterest- and interest-bearing checking accounts, money market savings accounts, traditional savings accounts, CDs and IRAs, as well as investment accounts and products. Net interest income is allocated to deposit products using our funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics. Deposits generates fees such as account service fees, non-sufficient funds fees, overdraft charges and ATM fees, as well as investment and brokerage fees from Consumer Investment accounts. Consumer Investments serves investment client relationships through the Merrill Edge integrated investing and banking service platform, providing investment advice and guidance, client brokerage asset services, self-directed online investing and key banking capabilities including access to the Corporation’s network of financial centers and ATMs.
Net income for Deposits decreased $1.2 billion to $7.5 billion primarily due to lower revenue and higher noninterest
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 36 |
expense, partially offset by lower provision for credit losses. Net interest income decreased $1.3 billion to $21.2 billion primarily driven by lower deposit balances. Noninterest income was $2.8 billion, relatively unchanged from the same period a year ago.
The provision for credit losses decreased $188 million to $303 million primarily driven by lower overdraft losses from fraud activity. Noninterest expense increased $349 million to $13.7 billion primarily driven by investments in the business, including people, technology and operations.
Average deposits decreased $47.0 billion to $940.7 billion primarily due to net outflows of $54.6 billion in money market savings and $20.6 billion in checking, partially offset by growth in time deposits of $37.2 billion.
The table below provides key performance indicators for Deposits. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information to evaluate our deposit profitability and digital/mobile trends.
| Key Statistics – Deposits | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Total deposit spreads (excludes noninterest costs) (1) | 2.77% | 2.70% | |||||||
| Year end | |||||||||
| Consumer investment assets (in millions) (2) | $ | 517,835 | $ | 424,410 | |||||
| Active digital banking users (in thousands) (3) | 48,150 | 46,265 | |||||||
| Active mobile banking users (in thousands) (4) | 39,958 | 37,927 | |||||||
| Financial centers | 3,700 | 3,845 | |||||||
| ATMs | 14,893 | 15,168 |
(1)Includes deposits held in Consumer Lending.
(2)Includes client brokerage assets, deposit sweep balances, Bank of America, N.A. brokered CDs and AUM in Consumer Banking.
(3)Represents mobile and/or online active users over the past 90 days.
(4)Represents mobile active users over the past 90 days.
Consumer investment assets increased $93.4 billion to $517.8 billion driven by market performance and positive net client flows. Active mobile banking users increased approximately two million, reflecting client growth and continuing changes in our clients’ banking preferences. We had a net decrease of 145 financial centers and 275 ATMs as we continued to optimize our consumer banking network.
Consumer Lending
Consumer Lending offers products to consumers and small businesses across the U.S. The products offered include debit and credit cards, residential mortgages and home equity loans, and direct and indirect loans such as automotive, recreational vehicle and consumer personal loans. In addition to earning net interest spread revenue on its lending activities, Consumer Lending generates interchange revenue from debit and credit card transactions, late fees, cash advance fees, annual credit card fees, mortgage banking fee income and other miscellaneous fees. Consumer Lending products are available to our customers through our retail network, direct telephone, and online and mobile channels. Consumer Lending results also include the impact of servicing residential mortgages and home equity loans, including loans held on the balance sheet of Consumer Lending and loans serviced for others.
Net income for Consumer Lending increased $334 million to $3.2 billion primarily driven by higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $717 million to $11.9 billion primarily due to the impact of higher loan balances. Noninterest income increased $85 million to $5.5 billion, primarily driven by higher card income.
The provision for credit losses was $4.7 billion, relatively unchanged from the same period a year ago. Noninterest expense increased $339 million to $8.4 billion primarily driven by investments in the business, including operations, technology and people.
Average loans increased $4.9 billion to $309.5 billion primarily driven by increases in credit card, small business and consumer vehicle loans.
The following table provides key performance indicators for Consumer Lending. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about loan growth and profitability.
| Key Statistics – Consumer Lending | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Total credit card (1) | ||||||||||
| Gross interest yield (2) | 12.30 | % | 11.88 | % | ||||||
| Risk-adjusted margin (3) | 6.98 | 7.83 | ||||||||
| New accounts (in thousands) | 3,820 | 4,275 | ||||||||
| Purchase volumes | $ | 368,861 | $ | 363,117 | ||||||
| Debit card purchase volumes | $ | 557,000 | $ | 527,074 |
(1)Includes GWIM's credit card portfolio.
(2)Calculated as the effective annual percentage rate divided by average loans.
(3)Calculated as the difference between total revenue, net of interest expense, and net credit losses divided by average loans.
Total risk-adjusted margin decreased 85 bps primarily driven by higher net credit losses, partially offset by higher net interest margin and higher net fee income. Total credit card purchase volumes increased $5.7 billion to $368.9 billion, and debit card purchase volumes increased $29.9 billion to $557.0 billion, reflecting higher levels of consumer spending.
| Key Statistics – Loan Production (1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Consumer Banking: | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 10,252 | $ | 9,145 | ||||||
| Home equity | 7,450 | 8,328 | ||||||||
| Total (2): | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 21,104 | $ | 19,405 | ||||||
| Home equity | 8,884 | 9,814 |
(1)The loan production amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of loans and, in the case of home equity, the principal amount of the total line of credit.
(2)In addition to loan production in Consumer Banking, there is also first mortgage and home equity loan production in GWIM.
First mortgage loan originations for Consumer Banking and the total Corporation increased $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion primarily driven by higher demand.
Home equity production in Consumer Banking and the total Corporation decreased $878 million and $930 million primarily driven by lower demand.
37 Bank of America
Global Wealth & Investment Management
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 6,969 | $ | 7,147 | (2) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 15,238 | 13,213 | 15 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 722 | 745 | (3) | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 15,960 | 13,958 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 22,929 | 21,105 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 4 | 6 | (33) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 17,241 | 15,836 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 5,684 | 5,263 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,421 | 1,316 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,263 | $ | 3,947 | 8 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 25.0 | % | 25.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.20 | 2.17 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 23 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 75.19 | 75.04 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 223,899 | $ | 219,503 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 317,283 | 329,493 | (4) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 331,014 | 342,531 | (3) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 287,491 | 298,335 | (4) | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 18,500 | 18,500 | — | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 231,981 | $ | 219,657 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 323,496 | 330,653 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 338,367 | 344,626 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 292,278 | 299,657 | (2) |
GWIM consists of two primary businesses: Merrill Wealth Management and Bank of America Private Bank.
Merrill Wealth Management’s advisory business provides a high-touch client experience through a network of financial advisors focused on clients with over $250,000 in total investable assets. Merrill Wealth Management provides tailored solutions to meet clients’ needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking and retirement products.
Bank of America Private Bank, together with Merrill Wealth Management’s Private Wealth Management business, provides comprehensive wealth management solutions targeted to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, as well as customized solutions to meet clients’ wealth structuring, investment management, trust and banking needs, including specialty asset management services.
Net income for GWIM increased $316 million to $4.3 billion primarily due to higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. The operating margin was 25 percent, unchanged from the same period a year ago.
Net interest income decreased $178 million to $7.0 billion primarily driven by lower average deposit balances.
Noninterest income, which primarily includes investment and brokerage services income, increased $2.0 billion to $16.0 billion. The increase was primarily driven by higher asset management fees due to higher average equity market
valuations and positive AUM flows, as well as higher brokerage fees due to increased transactional volume, partially offset by the impact of lower AUM pricing.
Noninterest expense increased $1.4 billion to $17.2 billion primarily due to higher revenue-related incentives.
The return on average allocated capital was 23 percent, up from 21 percent, due to higher net income. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 35.
Average loans increased $4.4 billion to $223.9 billion, primarily driven by custom lending and residential mortgage loans. Average deposits decreased $10.8 billion to $287.5 billion primarily driven by clients moving deposits to higher yielding investment cash alternatives, including offerings on our investment and brokerage platforms.
Merrill Wealth Management revenue of $19.1 billion increased nine percent primarily driven by higher asset management fees due to the impact of higher average equity market valuations and positive AUM flows, as well as higher brokerage fees due to increased transactional volume.
Bank of America Private Bank revenue of $3.9 billion increased six percent primarily driven by higher asset management fees due to the impact of higher average equity market valuations and client flows.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 38 |
| Key Indicators and Metrics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Revenue by Business | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 19,066 | $ | 17,461 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 3,863 | 3,644 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 22,929 | $ | 21,105 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Business, at year end | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 3,578,513 | $ | 3,182,735 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 673,593 | 606,639 | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 4,252,106 | $ | 3,789,374 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Type, at year end | ||||||||||
| Assets under management | $ | 1,882,211 | $ | 1,617,740 | ||||||
| Brokerage and other assets | 1,888,334 | 1,688,923 | ||||||||
| Deposits | 292,278 | 299,657 | ||||||||
| Loans and leases (1) | 234,208 | 222,287 | ||||||||
| Less: Managed deposits in assets under management | (44,925) | (39,233) | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 4,252,106 | $ | 3,789,374 | ||||||
| Assets Under Management Rollforward | ||||||||||
| Assets under management, beginning of year | $ | 1,617,740 | $ | 1,401,474 | ||||||
| Net client flows | 79,227 | 52,227 | ||||||||
| Market valuation/other | 185,244 | 164,039 | ||||||||
| Total assets under management, end of year | $ | 1,882,211 | $ | 1,617,740 |
(1)Includes margin receivables, which are classified in customer and other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Client Balances
Client balances managed under advisory and/or discretion of GWIM are AUM and are typically held in diversified portfolios. Fees earned on AUM are calculated as a percentage of clients’ AUM balances. The asset management fees charged to clients per year depend on various factors but are commonly driven by the breadth of the client’s relationship. The net client AUM flows
represent the net change in clients’ AUM balances over a specified period of time, excluding market appreciation/depreciation and other adjustments.
Client balances increased $462.7 billion, or 12 percent, to $4.3 trillion at December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023. The increase in client balances was primarily due to the impact of higher market valuations and positive net client flows.
39 Bank of America
Global Banking
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 13,235 | $ | 14,645 | (10) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 3,135 | 2,952 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 3,453 | 2,819 | 22 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 4,135 | 4,380 | (6) | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 10,723 | 10,151 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 23,958 | 24,796 | (3) | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 883 | (586) | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 11,853 | 11,344 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 11,222 | 14,038 | (20) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,086 | 3,790 | (19) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 8,136 | $ | 10,248 | (21) | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 27.5 | % | 27.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.30 | 2.73 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 17 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 49.47 | 45.75 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 373,227 | $ | 378,762 | (1) | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 575,594 | 535,500 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 643,614 | 602,579 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 545,769 | 505,627 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 49,250 | 49,250 | — | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 379,473 | $ | 373,891 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 603,481 | 552,453 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 670,905 | 621,751 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 578,159 | 527,060 | 10 |
n/m = not meaningful
Global Banking, which includes Global Corporate Banking, Global Commercial Banking, Business Banking and Global Investment Banking, provides a wide range of lending-related products and services, integrated working capital management and treasury solutions, and underwriting and advisory services through our network of offices and client relationship teams. Our lending products and services include commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, commercial real estate lending and asset-based lending. Our treasury solutions business includes treasury management, foreign exchange, short-term investing options and merchant services. We also provide investment banking services to our clients such as debt and equity underwriting and distribution, and merger-related and other advisory services. Underwriting debt and equity issuances, fixed-income and equity research, and certain market-based activities are executed through our global broker-dealer affiliates, which are our primary dealers in several countries. Within Global Banking, Global Corporate Banking clients generally include large global corporations, financial institutions and leasing clients. Global Commercial Banking clients generally include middle-market companies, commercial real estate firms and not-for-profit companies. Business Banking clients include
mid-sized U.S.-based businesses requiring customized and integrated financial advice and solutions.
Net income for Global Banking decreased $2.1 billion to $8.1 billion driven by higher provision for credit losses, lower revenue and higher noninterest expense.
Net interest income decreased $1.4 billion to $13.2 billion primarily due to higher deposit costs and lower average loan balances, partially offset by the benefit of higher average deposit balances.
Noninterest income increased $572 million to $10.7 billion due to higher investment banking fees and treasury service charges, partially offset by lower leasing-related revenue.
The provision for credit losses increased $1.5 billion to $883 million primarily driven by the commercial real estate office portfolio compared to a benefit in the prior year due to certain improved macroeconomic conditions.
Noninterest expense increased $509 million to $11.9 billion primarily due to continued investments in the business, including people, technology and operations.
The return on average allocated capital was 17 percent, down from 21 percent, due to lower net income. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 35.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 40 |
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking each include Business Lending and Global Transaction Services activities. Business Lending includes various lending-related products and services, and related hedging activities, including commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance,
real estate lending and asset-based lending. Global Transaction Services includes deposits, treasury management, credit card, foreign exchange and short-term investment products. The following table and discussion present a summary of the results, which exclude certain investment banking and other activities in Global Banking.
| Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Corporate Banking | Global Commercial Banking | Business Banking | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Business Lending | $ | 4,463 | $ | 4,928 | $ | 5,027 | $ | 5,016 | $ | 231 | $ | 253 | $ | 9,721 | $ | 10,197 | ||||||||||||||
| Global Transaction Services | 5,125 | 5,746 | 3,906 | 4,139 | 1,474 | 1,531 | 10,505 | 11,416 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 9,588 | $ | 10,674 | $ | 8,933 | $ | 9,155 | $ | 1,705 | $ | 1,784 | $ | 20,226 | $ | 21,613 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 164,179 | $ | 171,554 | $ | 196,650 | $ | 194,725 | $ | 12,272 | $ | 12,285 | $ | 373,101 | $ | 378,564 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 300,154 | 272,964 | 193,533 | 181,905 | 52,081 | 50,759 | 545,768 | 505,628 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 173,013 | $ | 167,055 | $ | 194,529 | $ | 194,565 | $ | 11,791 | $ | 12,129 | $ | 379,333 | $ | 373,749 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 316,214 | 289,961 | 209,792 | 188,141 | 52,152 | 48,951 | 578,158 | 527,053 |
Business lending revenue decreased $476 million in 2024 compared to 2023 primarily driven by lower net interest income and lower leasing-related revenue, partially offset by higher tax credit activity in affordable housing.
Global Transaction Services revenue decreased $911 million in 2024 compared to 2023 primarily driven by higher deposit costs, partially offset by the benefit of higher average deposit balances and treasury service charges.
Average loans and leases of $373.1 billion decreased one percent in 2024 compared to 2023 due to lower client demand. Average deposits of $545.8 billion increased eight percent in 2024 compared to 2023 due to growth in both domestic and international balances.
Global Investment Banking
Client teams and product specialists underwrite and distribute debt, equity and loan products, and provide advisory services and tailored risk management solutions. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Banking and Global Markets under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by
Global Markets. To provide a complete discussion of our consolidated investment banking fees, the table below presents total Corporation investment banking fees and the portion attributable to Global Banking.
| Investment Banking Fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Banking | Total Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Products | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advisory | $ | 1,504 | $ | 1,392 | $ | 1,690 | $ | 1,575 | ||||||||||||||
| Debt issuance | 1,398 | 1,073 | 3,310 | 2,403 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity issuance | 551 | 354 | 1,354 | 886 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross investment banking fees | 3,453 | 2,819 | 6,354 | 4,864 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Self-led deals | (32) | (43) | (168) | (156) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment banking fees | $ | 3,421 | $ | 2,776 | $ | 6,186 | $ | 4,708 |
Total Corporation investment banking fees, which exclude self-led deals and are primarily included within Global Banking and Global Markets, increased 31 percent to $6.2 billion compared to the same period in 2023 primarily due to higher debt and equity issuance fees and higher advisory fees.
41 Bank of America
Global Markets
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 3,375 | $ | 1,678 | 101 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 2,128 | 1,993 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 2,655 | 1,874 | 42 | |||||||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 12,778 | 13,430 | (5) | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 876 | 552 | 59 | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 18,437 | 17,849 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 21,812 | 19,527 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (32) | (131) | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 13,926 | 13,206 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 7,918 | 6,452 | 23 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,296 | 1,774 | 29 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 5,622 | $ | 4,678 | 20 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 29.0 | % | 27.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 12 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 63.84 | 67.63 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 324,065 | $ | 318,443 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| Reverse repurchases | 137,052 | 133,735 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Securities borrowed | 135,108 | 121,547 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 37,795 | 44,303 | (15) | |||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | 634,020 | 618,028 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 140,557 | 129,657 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 710,604 | 652,352 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 911,718 | 869,756 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 34,120 | 33,278 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 45,500 | 45,500 | — | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 580,557 | $ | 542,544 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 157,450 | 136,223 | 16 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 687,678 | 637,955 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 876,605 | 817,588 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 38,848 | 34,833 | 12 |
n/m = not meaningful
Global Markets offers sales and trading services and research services to institutional clients across fixed-income, credit, currency, commodity and equity businesses. Global Markets product coverage includes securities and derivative products in both the primary and secondary markets. Global Markets provides market-making, financing, securities clearing, settlement and custody services globally to our institutional investor clients in support of their investing and trading activities. We also work with our commercial and corporate clients to provide risk management products using interest rate, equity, credit, currency and commodity derivatives, foreign exchange, fixed-income and mortgage-related products. As a result of our market-making activities in these products, we may be required to manage risk in a broad range of financial products including government securities, equity and equity-linked securities, high-grade and high-yield corporate debt securities, syndicated loans, MBS, commodities and asset-backed securities. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Markets and Global Banking under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. For information on investment banking fees on a consolidated basis, see page 41.
The following explanations for year-over-year changes in results for Global Markets, including those disclosed under Sales and Trading Revenue, are the same for amounts including and excluding net DVA. Amounts excluding net DVA are a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 30.
Net income for Global Markets increased $944 million to $5.6 billion. Net DVA losses were $113 million compared to losses of $236 million in 2023. Excluding net DVA, net income increased $851 million to $5.7 billion. These increases were primarily driven by higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
Revenue increased $2.3 billion to $21.8 billion primarily due to higher sales and trading revenue and investment banking fees. Sales and trading revenue increased $1.4 billion, and excluding net DVA, increased $1.3 billion. These increases were driven by higher revenue in both Equities and FICC. Noninterest expense increased $720 million to $13.9 billion, primarily driven by revenue-related expenses and continued investments in the business, including technology.
Average total assets increased $42.0 billion to $911.7 billion, driven by higher levels of inventory, loan growth and increased financing activity. Year-end total assets increased
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 42 |
$59.0 billion to $876.6 billion driven by the same factors as average assets.
The return on average allocated capital was 12 percent, up from 10 percent, reflecting higher net income. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 35.
Sales and Trading Revenue
Sales and trading revenue includes unrealized and realized gains and losses on trading and other assets that are included in market making and similar activities, net interest income, and fees primarily from commissions on equity securities. Sales and trading revenue is segregated into fixed-income (government debt obligations, investment and non-investment grade corporate debt obligations, commercial MBS, residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, interest rate and credit derivative contracts), currencies (interest rate and foreign exchange contracts), commodities (primarily futures, forwards, swaps and options) and equities (equity-linked derivatives and cash equity activity). The following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue, substantially all of which is in Global Markets, with the remainder in Global Banking. In addition, the following table and related discussion also present sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 30.
| Sales and Trading Revenue (1, 2, 3) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Sales and trading revenue (2) | ||||||||||
| Fixed-income, currencies and commodities | $ | 11,371 | $ | 10,896 | ||||||
| Equities | 7,436 | 6,480 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue | $ | 18,807 | $ | 17,376 | ||||||
| Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA (4) | ||||||||||
| Fixed-income, currencies and commodities | $ | 11,468 | $ | 11,122 | ||||||
| Equities | 7,452 | 6,490 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA | $ | 18,920 | $ | 17,612 |
(1)For more information on sales and trading revenue, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes FTE adjustments of $890 million and $546 million for 2024 and 2023.
(3)Includes Global Banking sales and trading revenue of $677 million and $654 million for 2024 and 2023.
(4)FICC and Equities sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, is a non-GAAP financial measure. FICC net DVA losses were $97 million and $226 million for 2024 and 2023. Equities net DVA losses were $16 million and $10 million for 2024 and 2023.
Including and excluding net DVA, FICC revenue increased $475 million and $346 million driven by improved trading performance in mortgages. Including and excluding net DVA, Equities revenue increased $956 million and $962 million driven by increased client activity and improved trading performance in cash and derivatives.
43 Bank of America
All Other
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 22 | $ | 339 | (94) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income (loss) | (7,651) | (8,650) | (12) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | (7,629) | (8,311) | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (21) | (53) | (60) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 1,688 | 4,043 | (58) | |||||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (9,296) | (12,301) | (24) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit | (7,648) | (8,350) | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (1,648) | $ | (3,951) | (58) | |||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 8,606 | $ | 9,644 | (11) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 371,572 | 266,794 | 39 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 111,177 | 57,551 | 93 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 8,177 | $ | 8,842 | (8) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 341,272 | 346,356 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 103,871 | 92,705 | 12 |
(1)In segments where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, which are generally deposit-taking segments, we allocate assets from All Other to those segments to match liabilities (i.e., deposits) and allocated shareholders’ equity. Average allocated assets were $954.6 billion and $975.9 billion for 2024 and 2023 and year-end allocated assets were $978.4 billion and $972.9 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
All Other primarily consists of asset and liability management (ALM) activities, liquidating businesses and certain expenses not otherwise allocated to a business segment. ALM activities encompass interest rate and foreign currency risk management activities for which substantially all of the results are allocated to our business segments. For more information on our ALM activities, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net loss in All Other decreased $2.3 billion to $1.6 billion primarily due to lower noninterest expense and higher revenue.
Noninterest income increased $999 million primarily due to the net $1.6 billion charge recorded in the prior year due to the
announcement of BSBY’s cessation, partially offset by a charge related to Visa’s increase in its litigation escrow account and certain negative valuation adjustments.
Noninterest expense decreased $2.4 billion to $1.7 billion primarily due to the $2.1 billion accrual recorded in the prior year for the FDIC special assessment resulting from the closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, and lower expenses related to a liquidating business activity.
The income tax benefit was $7.6 billion in 2024 compared to $8.4 billion in 2023. The decrease in the income tax benefit was primarily due to the benefits recorded against pretax charges in 2023 for the FDIC special assessment and the impact of BSBY’s cessation.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 44 |
Managing Risk
Risk is inherent in all our business activities. Sound risk management enables us to serve our customers and deliver for our shareholders. If not managed well, risk can result in financial loss, regulatory sanctions and penalties, litigation, and damage to our reputation, each of which may adversely impact our ability to execute our business strategies. We take a comprehensive approach to risk management with a defined Risk Framework and an articulated Risk Appetite Statement, which are approved annually by the Board’s Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC) and the Board.
The seven key types of risk faced by the Corporation are strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational.
● Strategic risk is the risk to current or projected financial condition arising from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate.
● Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations.
● Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities or otherwise negatively impact earnings. Market risk is composed of price risk and interest rate risk.
● Liquidity risk is the risk of the inability to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral needs while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions.
● Compliance risk is the risk of legal action or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules and regulations (LRRs) and our internal policies and procedures.
● Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, people or external events.
● Reputational risk is the risk that negative perception of the Corporation may adversely impact profitability or operations.
The following sections address in more detail the specific procedures, measures and analyses of the major categories of risk.
As set forth in our Risk Framework, a culture of managing risk well is fundamental to our values and our purpose, and how we drive Responsible Growth. It requires us to focus on risk in all activities and encourages the necessary mindset and behavior to enable effective risk management and promote sound risk-taking within our risk appetite. Sustaining a culture of managing risk well throughout the organization is critical to the success of the Corporation and is a clear expectation of our executive management team and the Board.
Our Risk Framework serves as the foundation for the consistent and effective management of risks facing the Corporation. The Risk Framework sets forth roles and responsibilities for the management of risk and provides a blueprint for how the Board, through delegation of authority to committees and executive officers, establishes risk appetite and associated limits for our activities.
Executive management assesses, with Board oversight, the risk-adjusted returns of each business. Management reviews and approves the strategic and financial operating plans, as well as the capital plan and Risk Appetite Statement, and recommends them annually to the Board for approval. Our strategic plan takes into consideration return objectives and financial resources, which must align with risk capacity and risk appetite. Management sets financial objectives for each business by allocating capital and setting a target for return on capital for each business. Capital allocations are regularly evaluated as part of our overall governance processes as the businesses and the economic environment in which we operate continue to evolve. For more information regarding capital allocations, see Business Segment Operations on page 35.
The Corporation’s risk appetite indicates the amount of capital, earnings or liquidity we are willing to put at risk to achieve our strategic objectives and business plans, consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. It also provides a common framework that includes a set of measures to assist senior management and the Board in assessing the Corporation’s risk profile across all risk types against our risk appetite and risk capacity. Our risk appetite is formally articulated in the Risk Appetite Statement, which includes both qualitative statements and quantitative limits.
Our overall capacity to take risk is limited. Accordingly, we prioritize the risks we take in order to maintain a strong and flexible financial position so we can weather challenging economic times and take advantage of organic growth opportunities while complying with all applicable regulatory requirements. Therefore, we set objectives and targets for capital and liquidity that permit us to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner at all times, including during periods of stress. We also maintain strong operational risk management and operational resiliency capabilities so we can meet the expectations of our customers and clients through a range of operating conditions.
Our lines of business operate with risk limits that align with the Corporation’s risk appetite. Management is responsible for tracking and reporting performance measurements as well as any breaches or exceptions to risk appetite limits. The Board, and its committees when appropriate, oversee financial performance, execution of the strategic and financial operating plans, adherence to risk appetite limits and the adequacy of internal controls.
For a more detailed discussion of our risk management activities, see the discussion below and pages 48 through 82.
Risk Management Governance
The Risk Framework describes delegations of authority whereby the Board and its committees may delegate authority to management-level committees or executive officers. Such delegations may authorize certain decision-making and approval functions, which may be evidenced in documents such as committee charters, job descriptions, meeting minutes and resolutions.
The chart below illustrates the interrelationship among the Board, Board committees and management committees that have the majority of risk oversight responsibilities for the Corporation.
45 Bank of America
Board of Directors and Board Committees
The Board is composed of 14 directors, all but one of whom are independent. The Board authorizes management to maintain an effective Risk Framework and oversees compliance with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, the Board or its committees conduct inquiries of, and receive reports from senior management on, risk-related matters to assess scope or resource limitations that could impede the ability of Global Risk Management (GRM) and/or Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Board committees discussed below have the principal responsibility for enterprise-wide oversight of our risk management activities. Through these activities, the Board and applicable committees are provided with information on our risk profile and oversee senior management addressing key risks we face. Other Board committees, as described below, provide additional oversight of specific risks.
Each of the committees shown on the above chart regularly reports to the Board on risk-related matters within the committee’s responsibilities, which is intended to collectively provide the Board with integrated insight about our management of enterprise-wide risks.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the qualifications, performance and independence of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the performance of our corporate audit function, the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and makes inquiries of senior management or the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) to determine whether there are scope or resource limitations that impede the ability of Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing compliance risks pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Enterprise Risk Committee
The ERC oversees the Corporation’s Risk Framework, risk appetite and senior management’s responsibilities for the identification, measurement, monitoring and control of key risks facing the Corporation. The ERC may consult with other Board committees on risk-related matters such as the Audit Committee for compliance risks.
Other Board Committees
Our Corporate Governance, ESG, and Sustainability Committee oversees corporate governance matters, including periodically reviewing and making recommendations to the Board on Board succession planning and composition matters, conducting an annual review of the Board’s performance and leading itself and the Board’s other committees in an annual assessment of their performance. The committee also oversees sustainability matters (other than human capital matters), including the Corporation’s public policy engagement, sustainability initiatives, charitable contributions, and community reinvestment activities and performance.
Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee oversees establishing, maintaining and administering our compensation programs and employee benefit plans, including approving and recommending our Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO) compensation to our Board for further approval by all independent directors; reviewing and approving our executive officers’ compensation, as well as compensation for non-management directors; and reviewing certain other human capital management topics.
Management Committees
Management committees receive their authority from the Board, a Board committee, or another management committee. Our primary management risk committee is the MRC. Subject to Board oversight, the MRC is responsible for management oversight of key risks facing the Corporation, including an integrated evaluation of risk, earnings, capital and liquidity.
Executive Officers
Executive officers lead various functions representing the functional roles. Authority for functional roles may be delegated to executive officers from the Board, Board committees or management-level committees. Executive officers, in turn, may further delegate responsibilities, as appropriate, to management-level committees, management routines or individuals. Executive officers review our activities for consistency with our Risk Framework, risk appetite, and applicable strategic, capital and financial operating plans, as well as applicable policies and standards. Executive officers and other employees make decisions individually on a day-to-day basis, consistent with the authority they have been delegated.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 46 |
Executive officers and other employees may also serve on committees and participate in committee decisions.
Lines of Defense
We have clear ownership and accountability for managing risk across three lines of defense: Front Line Units (FLUs), GRM and Corporate Audit. We also have control functions outside of FLUs and GRM (e.g., Legal and Global Human Resources). The three lines of defense are integrated into our management-level governance structure. Each of these functional roles is further described in this section.
Front Line Units and Control Functions
FLUs, which include the business segments and underlying businesses, as well as the organizations that support technology and operations for the Corporation, are responsible for appropriately assessing and effectively managing all of the risks associated with their activities. Control functions provide guidance and subject matter expertise on day-to-day activities affecting the Corporation, as well as by overseeing and managing risks that emanate from their own respective activities.
Global Risk Management
GRM is part of our control functions and operates as our independent risk management function. GRM, led by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), is responsible for independently assessing and overseeing risks within FLUs and other control functions. GRM establishes written enterprise policies and procedures outlining how aggregate risks are identified, measured, monitored and controlled.
The CRO has the stature, authority and independence needed to develop and implement a meaningful risk management framework and practices to guide the Corporation in managing risk. The CRO has unrestricted access to the Board and reports directly to both the ERC and the CEO. GRM is organized into horizontal risk teams that cover a specific risk area and vertical CRO teams that cover a particular FLU or control function. These teams work collaboratively in executing their respective duties.
Corporate Audit
Corporate Audit and the CAE maintain their independence from the FLUs, GRM and other control functions by reporting directly to the Audit Committee. The CAE administratively reports to the CEO. Corporate Audit provides independent assessment and validation through testing of key processes and controls across the Corporation. Corporate Audit includes Credit Review, which provides an independent assessment of credit lending decisions and the effectiveness of credit processes across the Corporation’s credit platform through examinations and monitoring.
Risk Management Processes
The Risk Framework requires that strong risk management practices are integrated in key strategic, capital and financial planning processes and in day-to-day business processes across the Corporation, thereby ensuring risks are appropriately considered, evaluated and responded to in a timely manner. We employ an effective risk management process, referred to as Identify, Measure, Monitor and Control, as part of our daily activities.
Identify – To be effectively managed, risks must be proactively identified and well understood. Proper risk identification focuses on recognizing and understanding key risks inherent in our business activities or key risks that may arise from
external factors. Each employee is expected to identify and escalate risks promptly. Risk identification is an ongoing process that incorporates input from FLUs and control functions. It is designed to be forward-looking and to capture relevant risk factors across all of our lines of business.
Measure – Once a risk is identified, it must be prioritized and accurately measured through a systematic process including qualitative statements and quantitative limits. Risk is measured at various levels, including, but not limited to, risk type, FLU and legal entity, and also on an aggregate basis. This risk measurement process helps to capture changes in our risk profile due to changes in strategic direction, concentrations, portfolio quality and the overall economic environment. Senior management considers how risk exposures might evolve under a variety of stress scenarios.
Monitor – We monitor risk levels regularly to track adherence to risk appetite, policies and standards. We also regularly update risk assessments and review risk exposures. Through our monitoring, we know our level of risk relative to limits and can take action in a timely manner. We also know when risk limits are breached and have processes to appropriately report and escalate exceptions. This includes timely requests for approval to managers and alerts to executive management, management-level committees or the Board (directly or through an appropriate committee).
Control – We establish and communicate risk limits and controls through policies, standards, procedures and processes. The limits and controls can be adjusted by senior management or the Board when conditions or risk tolerances warrant. These limits may be absolute (e.g., loan amount, trading volume, operational loss) or relative (e.g., percentage of loan book in higher-risk categories). Our FLUs are held accountable for performing within the established limits.
The formal processes used to manage risk represent a part of our overall risk management process. We instill a strong and comprehensive culture of managing risk well through communications, training, policies, procedures and organizational roles and responsibilities. Establishing a culture reflective of our purpose to help make our customers’ financial lives better and delivering on Responsible Growth is also critical to effective risk management. We are committed to the highest principles of ethical and professional conduct. Conduct risk is the risk of improper actions, behaviors or practices by the Corporation, its employees or representatives that are illegal, unethical and/or contrary to our core values that could result in harm to the Corporation, our shareholders or our customers, damage the integrity of the financial markets, or negatively impact our reputation. We have established protocols and structures so that conduct risk is governed and reported across the Corporation appropriately. All employees are held accountable for adhering to the Code of Conduct, operating within our risk appetite and managing risk in their daily business activities. In addition, our performance management and compensation practices encourage responsible risk-taking that is consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite.
Corporation-wide Stress Testing
Integral to our Capital Planning, Financial Planning and Strategic Planning processes, we conduct capital scenario management and stress forecasting on a regular basis to better understand balance sheet, earnings and capital sensitivities to a wide range of economic and business scenarios, including economic and market conditions that are more severe than anticipated. These stress forecasts provide an understanding of the potential
47 Bank of America
impacts from our risk profile on the balance sheet, earnings and capital, and serve as a key component of our capital and risk management practices. The intent of stress testing is to develop a comprehensive understanding of potential impacts of on- and off-balance sheet risks at the Corporation and certain subsidiaries and how they impact financial resiliency, which provides confidence to management, regulators and our investors.
Contingency Planning
We have developed and maintain comprehensive contingency plans that are designed to prepare us in advance to respond in the event of potential adverse economic, operational, financial or market stress conditions. These contingency plans include our Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan, which provides monitoring, escalation, actions and routines designed to enable us to increase capital and/or liquidity, access funding sources and reduce risk through consideration of potential options that include asset sales, business sales, capital or debt issuances, and other risk reducing strategies at various levels of capital or liquidity depletion during a period of stress. We also maintain a Resolution Plan to limit adverse systemic impacts that could be associated with a potential resolution of Bank of America.
Strategic Risk Management
Strategic risk is embedded in every business and is one of the major risk categories along with credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. This risk results from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution, or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate, such as competitor actions, changing customer preferences, product obsolescence and technology developments, including rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI), such as machine learning and generative AI.
An aspect of strategic risk is the risk that the Corporation’s capital levels are not adequate to meet minimum regulatory requirements and support execution of business activities or absorb losses from risks during normal or adverse economic and market conditions. As such, capital risk is managed in parallel to strategic risk.
We manage strategic risk through the Strategic Risk Enterprise Policy and integration into the strategic planning process, among other activities. Our strategic plan is consistent with our risk appetite, capital plan and liquidity requirements, and specifically addresses strategic risks impacting each business.
On an annual basis, the Board reviews and approves the strategic plan, capital plan, financial operating plan and Risk Appetite Statement. With oversight by the Board, senior management directs the lines of business to execute our strategic plan consistent with our core operating principles and risk appetite. The executive management team monitors business performance throughout the year and provides the Board with regular progress reports on whether strategic objectives and timelines are being met, including reports on strategic risks and if additional or alternative actions need to be considered or implemented. The regular executive reviews focus on assessing forecasted earnings and returns on capital, the current risk profile, current capital and liquidity requirements, staffing levels and changes required to support the strategic plan, stress testing results, and other qualitative factors such as market growth rates and peer analysis.
Significant strategic actions, such as capital actions, material acquisitions or divestitures, and resolution plans are reviewed and approved by the Board. At the business level, processes are in place to discuss the strategic risk implications of new, expanded or modified businesses, products or services, regulatory change and other strategic initiatives, and to provide formal review and approval where required. With oversight by the Board and the ERC, executive management performs similar analyses throughout the year, and evaluates changes to the financial forecast or the risk, capital or liquidity positions as deemed appropriate to balance and optimize achieving the targeted risk appetite, shareholder returns and maintaining the targeted financial strength. Proprietary models are used to measure the capital requirements for credit, country, market, operational and strategic risks. The allocated capital assigned to each business is based on its unique risk profile. With oversight by the Board, executive management assesses the risk-adjusted returns of each business in approving strategic and financial operating plans. The businesses use allocated capital to define business strategies, and price products and transactions.
Capital Management
The Corporation manages its capital position so that its capital is more than adequate to support its business activities and aligns with risk, risk appetite and strategic planning. Additionally, we seek to maintain safety and soundness at all times, even under adverse scenarios, take advantage of organic growth opportunities, meet obligations to creditors and counterparties, maintain ready access to financial markets, continue to serve as a credit intermediary, remain a source of strength for our subsidiaries, and satisfy current and future regulatory capital requirements. Capital management is integrated into our risk and governance processes, as capital is a key consideration in the development of our strategic plan, risk appetite and risk limits.
We conduct an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) on a periodic basis. The ICAAP is a forward-looking assessment of our projected capital needs and resources, incorporating earnings, balance sheet and risk forecasts under baseline and adverse economic and market conditions. We utilize periodic stress tests to assess the potential impacts to our balance sheet, earnings, regulatory capital and liquidity under a variety of stress scenarios. We perform qualitative risk assessments to identify and assess material risks not fully captured in our forecasts or stress tests. We assess the potential capital impacts of proposed changes to regulatory capital requirements. Management assesses ICAAP results and provides documented quarterly assessments of the adequacy of our capital guidelines and capital position to the Board or its committees.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. For more information, see Business Segment Operations on page 35.
CCAR and Capital Planning
The Federal Reserve requires BHCs to submit a capital plan and planned capital actions on an annual basis, consistent with the rules governing capital planning and the stress capital buffer (SCB) requirement, which include supervisory stress testing by the Federal Reserve. Based on 2024 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) stress test results, our SCB is 3.2 percent effective from October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 48 |
On July 24, 2024, the Board authorized a $25 billion common stock repurchase program, effective August 1, 2024, which replaced the Corporation’s previous program that was initially authorized by the Board in 2021, modified in 2023 and expired on August 1, 2024.
Pursuant to Board authorizations, during 2024 we repurchased $13.1 billion of common stock. For more information, see Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on page 24.
The timing and amount of common stock repurchases are subject to various factors, including the Corporation’s capital position, liquidity, financial performance and alternative uses of capital, stock trading price, regulatory requirements and general market conditions, and may be suspended at any time. Such repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including repurchase plans that satisfy the conditions of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).
Regulatory Capital
As a BHC, we are subject to regulatory capital rules, including Basel 3, issued by U.S. banking regulators. Basel 3 established minimum capital ratios and buffer requirements and outlined two methods of calculating risk-weighted assets (RWA), the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches. The Standardized approach relies primarily on supervisory risk weights based on exposure type, and the Advanced approaches determine risk weights based on internal models.
The Corporation's depository institution subsidiaries are also subject to the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. The Corporation and its primary affiliated banking entity, BANA, are Advanced approaches institutions under Basel 3 and are required to report regulatory risk-based capital ratios and RWA under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. The lower of the capital ratios under Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements is used to assess capital adequacy, including under the PCA framework. As of December 31, 2024, the Common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital ratios under the Standardized approach were the binding ratios.
Minimum Capital Requirements
In order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, the Corporation must meet risk-based capital ratio requirements that include a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent (under the Advanced approaches only), an SCB (under the Standardized
approach only), plus any applicable countercyclical capital buffer and a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) surcharge. The buffers and surcharge must be comprised solely of CET1 capital. For the period from January 1, 2024 through September 30, 2024, the Corporation's minimum CET1 capital ratio requirements were 10.0 percent under both the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches. Effective October 1, 2024, the Corporation’s minimum CET1 requirements were 10.7 percent under the Standardized approach and 10.0 percent under the Advanced approaches.
The Corporation is required to calculate its G-SIB surcharge on an annual basis under two methods and is subject to the higher of the resulting two surcharges. Method 1 is consistent with the approach prescribed by the Basel Committee’s assessment methodology and is calculated using specified indicators of systemic importance. Method 2 modifies the Method 1 approach by, among other factors, including a measure of the Corporation’s reliance on short-term wholesale funding. The Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge, which is higher under Method 2, is expected to increase to 3.5 percent from 3.0 percent on January 1, 2027, unless its surcharge calculated as of December 31, 2025 is lower than 3.5 percent. At December 31, 2024, the Corporation’s CET1 capital ratio of 11.9 percent under the Standardized approach exceeded its CET1 capital ratio requirement.
The Corporation is also required to maintain a minimum supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) of 3.0 percent plus a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. At December 31, 2024, our insured depository institution subsidiaries exceeded their requirement to maintain a minimum 6.0 percent SLR to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework. The numerator of the SLR is quarter-end Basel 3 Tier 1 capital. The denominator is total leverage exposure based on the daily average of the sum of on-balance sheet exposures less permitted deductions and the simple average of certain off-balance sheet exposures, as of the end of each month in a quarter.
Capital Composition and Ratios
Table 10 presents Bank of America Corporation’s capital ratios and related information in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2024 and 2023. For the periods presented herein, the Corporation met the definition of well capitalized under current regulatory requirements.
49 Bank of America
| Table 10 | Bank of America Corporation Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 201,083 | $ | 201,083 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 223,458 | 223,458 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 255,363 | 244,809 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,696 | 1,490 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.9 | % | 13.5 | % | 10.7 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.2 | 15.0 | 12.2 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 15.1 | 16.4 | 14.2 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 3,240 | $ | 3,240 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 6.9 | % | 6.9 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,818 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | % | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 194,928 | $ | 194,928 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 223,323 | 223,323 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 251,399 | 241,449 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,651 | 1,459 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.8 | % | 13.4 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 15.3 | 11.0 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 15.2 | 16.6 | 13.0 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 3,135 | $ | 3,135 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.1 | % | 7.1 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,676 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.1 | % | 5.0 |
(1)Capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the current expected credit losses (CECL) accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)The CET1 capital regulatory minimum is the sum of the CET1 capital ratio minimum of 4.5 percent, our G-SIB surcharge of 3.0 percent at December 31, 2024 and 2.5 percent at December 31, 2023, and SCB (under the Standardized approach) of 3.2 percent at December 31, 2024 and 2.5 percent at December 31, 2023. The countercyclical capital buffer was zero for both periods. The SLR regulatory minimum includes a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
At December 31, 2024, CET1 capital was $201.1 billion, an increase of $6.2 billion from December 31, 2023, primarily due to earnings, partially offset by capital distributions. Tier 1 capital increased $135 million primarily driven by the increase in CET1 capital, partially offset by preferred stock redemptions. Total capital under the Standardized approach increased $4.0 billion primarily due to an increase in subordinated debt, adjusted allowance for credit losses included in Tier 2 capital, and the
increase in Tier 1 capital. RWA under the Standardized approach, which yielded the lower CET1 capital ratio at December 31, 2024, increased $44.5 billion during 2024 to $1,696 billion primarily driven by client activity in Global Markets and lending activity in GWIM, Global Banking and Consumer Banking. Supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2024 increased $142.0 billion primarily driven by increased activity in Global Markets and ALM activities in All Other.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 50 |
Table 11 shows the capital composition at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Table 11 | Capital Composition under Basel 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | $ | 272,400 | $ | 263,249 | ||
| CECL transitional amount (1) | 627 | 1,254 | ||||
| Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (68,649) | (68,648) | ||||
| Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | (8,097) | (7,912) | ||||
| Intangibles, other than mortgage servicing rights, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (1,440) | (1,496) | ||||
| Defined benefit pension plan net assets | (786) | (764) | ||||
| Cumulative unrealized net (gain) loss related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net-of-tax | 1,491 | 1,342 | ||||
| Accumulated net (gain) loss on certain cash flow hedges (2) | 5,629 | 8,025 | ||||
| Other | (92) | (122) | ||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 201,083 | 194,928 | ||||
| Qualifying preferred stock, net of issuance cost | 22,391 | 28,396 | ||||
| Other | (16) | (1) | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 223,458 | 223,323 | ||||
| Tier 2 capital instruments | 18,592 | 15,340 | ||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (3) | 13,558 | 12,920 | ||||
| Other | (245) | (184) | ||||
| Total capital under the Standardized approach | 255,363 | 251,399 | ||||
| Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses under the Advanced approaches (3) | (10,554) | (9,950) | ||||
| Total capital under the Advanced approaches | $ | 244,809 | $ | 241,449 |
(1)December 31, 2024 and 2023 include 25 percent and 50 percent of the CECL transition provision’s impact as of December 31, 2021.
(2)Includes amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) related to the hedging of items that are not recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(3)Includes the impact of transition provisions related to the CECL accounting standard.
Table 12 shows the components of RWA as measured under Basel 3 at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Table 12 | Risk-weighted Assets under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | |||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Credit risk | $ | 1,623 | $ | 1,015 | $ | 1,580 | $ | 983 | ||||||
| Market risk | 73 | 73 | 71 | 71 | ||||||||||
| Operational risk | n/a | 359 | n/a | 361 | ||||||||||
| Risks related to credit valuation adjustments | n/a | 43 | n/a | 44 | ||||||||||
| Total risk-weighted assets | $ | 1,696 | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,651 | $ | 1,459 |
n/a = not applicable
51 Bank of America
Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital
Table 13 presents regulatory capital information for BANA in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2024 and 2023. BANA met the definition of well capitalized under the PCA framework for both periods.
| Table 13 | Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2024 | |||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 194,341 | $ | 194,341 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 194,341 | 194,341 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 209,256 | 198,923 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,444 | 1,151 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | % | 16.9 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 16.9 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.5 | 17.3 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,546 | $ | 2,546 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.6 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,015 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.4 | % | 6.0 | |||||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 187,621 | $ | 187,621 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 187,621 | 187,621 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 201,932 | 192,175 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,395 | 1,114 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | % | 16.8 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 16.8 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.5 | 17.2 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,471 | $ | 2,471 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.6 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 2,910 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.4 | % | 6.0 |
(1)Capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)Risk-based capital regulatory minimums at both December 31, 2024 and 2023 are the minimum ratios under Basel 3 including a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent. The regulatory minimums for the leverage ratios as of both period ends are the percent required to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements
Total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) consists of the Corporation’s Tier 1 capital and eligible long-term debt issued directly by the Corporation. Eligible long-term debt for TLAC ratios is comprised of unsecured debt that has a remaining maturity of at least one year and satisfies additional requirements as prescribed in the TLAC final rule. As with the
risk-based capital ratios and SLR, the Corporation is required to maintain TLAC ratios in excess of minimum requirements plus applicable buffers to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. Table 14 presents the Corporation's TLAC and long-term debt ratios and related information as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 52 |
| Table 14 | Bank of America Corporation Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLAC (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | Long-term Debt | Regulatory Minimum (3) | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 459,857 | $ | 220,666 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 27.1 | % | 22.0 | % | 13.0 | % | 9.0 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 12.0 | 9.5 | 5.8 | 4.5 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 479,156 | $ | 239,892 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 29.0 | % | 22.0 | % | 14.5 | % | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 13.0 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 4.5 |
(1)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, TLAC ratios are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)The TLAC RWA regulatory minimum consists of 18.0 percent plus a TLAC RWA buffer comprised of 2.5 percent plus the Method 1 G-SIB surcharge of 1.5 percent. The countercyclical buffer is zero for both periods. The TLAC supplementary leverage exposure regulatory minimum consists of 7.5 percent plus a 2.0 percent TLAC leverage buffer. The TLAC RWA and leverage buffers must be comprised solely of CET1 capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively.
(3)The long-term debt RWA regulatory minimum is comprised of 6.0 percent plus the Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge of 3.0 percent at December 31, 2024 and 2.5 percent at December 31, 2023. The long-term debt leverage exposure regulatory minimum is 4.5 percent. Effective January 1, 2024, the Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge, which is higher under Method 2, increased 50 bps, resulting in an increase in our long-term debt RWA regulatory minimum requirement to 9.0 percent from 8.5 percent.
(4)The approach that yields the higher RWA is used to calculate TLAC and long-term debt ratios, which was the Standardized approach as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Regulatory Capital and Securities Regulation
The Corporation’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS) and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S). The Corporation's principal European subsidiaries undertaking broker-dealer activities are Merrill Lynch International (MLI) and BofA Securities Europe SA (BofASE).
The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act. BofAS computes its capital requirements as an alternative net capital broker-dealer under Rule 15c3-1e, and MLPF&S computes its capital requirements in accordance with the alternative standard under Rule 15c3-1. BofAS is registered as a futures commission merchant and is subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Regulation 1.17. The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are also registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA). Pursuant to FINRA Rule 4110, FINRA may impose higher net capital requirements than Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to each of the broker-dealers.
BofAS provides institutional services, and in accordance with the alternative net capital requirements, is required to maintain tentative net capital in excess of $5.0 billion and net capital in excess of the greater of $1.0 billion or a certain percentage of its reserve requirement in addition to a certain percentage of securities-based swap risk margin. BofAS must also notify the SEC in the event its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. BofAS is also required to hold a certain percentage of its customers' and affiliates' risk-based margin in order to meet its CFTC minimum net capital requirement. At December 31, 2024, BofAS had tentative net capital of $23.6 billion. BofAS also had regulatory net capital of $21.0 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $4.5 billion.
MLPF&S provides retail services. At December 31, 2024, MLPF&S' regulatory net capital was $7.2 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $155 million.
Our European broker-dealers are subject to requirements from U.S. and non-U.S. regulators. MLI, a U.K. investment firm, is regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority and is subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2024, MLI’s capital resources were $33.8 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $11.0 billion.
BofASE, an authorized credit institution with its head office located in France, is regulated by the Autorité de Contrôle
Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, and supervised under the Single Supervisory Mechanism by the European Central Bank. At December 31, 2024, BofASE's capital resources were $10.9 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $3.3 billion.
In addition, MLI and BofASE remained conditionally registered with the SEC as security-based swap dealers, and maintained net liquid assets at December 31, 2024 that exceeded the applicable minimum requirements under the Exchange Act. The entities are also registered as swap dealers with the CFTC and met applicable capital requirements at December 31, 2024.
Liquidity Risk
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity risk management objective is to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral requirements, including payments under long-term debt agreements, commitments to extend credit and customer deposit withdrawals, while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions. To achieve that objective, we analyze and monitor our liquidity risk under expected and stressed conditions, maintain liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, including our stable deposit base, and seek to align liquidity-related incentives and risks. These liquidity risk management practices have allowed us to effectively manage market fluctuations from the elevated interest rate environment, inflationary pressures and changes in the macroeconomic environment.
We define liquidity as readily available assets, limited to cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities that we can use to meet our contractual and contingent financial obligations as they arise. We manage our liquidity position through line-of-business and ALM activities, as well as through our legal entity funding strategy, on both a forward and current (including intraday) basis under both expected and stressed conditions. We believe that a centralized approach to funding and liquidity management enhances our ability to monitor liquidity requirements, maximizes access to funding sources, minimizes borrowing costs and facilitates timely responses to liquidity events.
We provide centralized funding and liquidity management through a variety of activities, including monitoring of
53 Bank of America
established limits and liquidity risk appetites, reviews of liquidity risk management controls and production, and reviews of regulatory and internally defined liquidity risk metrics. In addition, GRM provides oversight of centralized liquidity and funding management as well as oversight of liquidity management across FLUs and legal entities. GRM oversees the liquidity risk management governance structure, establishes liquidity risk policies, reports and monitors liquidity risk limits and provides review and challenge of the Corporation's liquidity risk management processes.
The Board, its risk committee and various management committees oversee the Corporation’s liquidity activities and risk governance. The Board and/or ERC approve our liquidity risk policy, Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan and liquidity risk appetite limits. Management committees responsible for liquidity governance include the Corporation’s Management Risk Committee, Asset and Liability Governance Committee, Liquidity Risk Committee and Asset and Liability Management Investment Committee. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 45. Under this governance framework, we developed certain funding and liquidity risk management practices which include: maintaining liquidity at Bank of America Corporation (Parent) and selected subsidiaries, including our bank subsidiaries and other regulated entities; determining what amounts of liquidity are appropriate for these entities based on analysis of debt maturities and other potential cash outflows, including those that we may experience during stressed market conditions; diversifying funding sources, considering our asset profile and legal entity structure; and performing contingency planning.
NB Holdings Corporation
Bank of America Corporation, as the parent company (Parent), which is a separate and distinct legal entity from our bank and nonbank subsidiaries, has an intercompany arrangement with our wholly-owned holding company subsidiary, NB Holdings Corporation (NB Holdings). We have transferred, and agreed to transfer, additional Parent assets not required to satisfy anticipated near-term expenditures to NB Holdings. The Parent is expected to continue to have access to the same flow of dividends, interest and other amounts of cash necessary to service its debt, pay dividends and perform other obligations as it would have had it not entered into these arrangements and transferred any assets. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In consideration for the transfer of assets, NB Holdings issued a subordinated note to the Parent in a principal amount equal to the value of the transferred assets. The aggregate principal amount of the note will increase by the amount of any future asset transfers. NB Holdings also provided the Parent with a committed line of credit that allows the Parent to draw funds necessary to service near-term cash needs. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These arrangements include provisions to terminate the line of credit, forgive the subordinated note and require the Parent to transfer its remaining financial assets to NB Holdings if our projected liquidity resources deteriorate so severely that resolution of the Parent becomes imminent.
Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets
We maintain liquidity available to the Corporation, including the Parent and selected subsidiaries, in the form of cash and high- quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Our liquidity buffer,
referred to as Global Liquidity Sources (GLS), is comprised of assets that are readily available to the Parent and selected subsidiaries, including holding company, bank and broker-dealer subsidiaries, even during stressed market conditions. Our cash is primarily on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank and, to a lesser extent, central banks outside of the U.S. We limit the composition of high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities to U.S. government securities, U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities and other investment-grade securities, and a select group of non-U.S. government securities. We can obtain cash for these securities, even in stressed conditions, through repurchase agreements or outright sales. We hold our GLS in legal entities that allow us to meet the liquidity requirements of our global businesses, and we consider the impact of potential regulatory, tax, legal and other restrictions that could limit the transferability of funds among entities.
Table 15 presents average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Table 15 | Average Global Liquidity Sources | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| Bank entities | $ | 777 | $ | 735 | ||
| Nonbank and other entities (1) | 176 | 162 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 953 | $ | 897 |
(1) Nonbank includes Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities.
Our bank subsidiaries’ liquidity is primarily driven by deposit and lending activity, as well as securities valuation and net debt activity. Bank subsidiaries can also generate incremental liquidity by pledging a range of unencumbered loans and securities to certain FHLBs and the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The cash we could have obtained by borrowing against this pool of specifically-identified eligible assets was $328 billion and $312 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023. We have established operational procedures to enable us to borrow against these assets, including regularly monitoring our total pool of eligible loans and securities collateral. Eligibility is defined in guidelines from the FHLBs and the Federal Reserve and is subject to change at their discretion. Due to regulatory restrictions, liquidity generated by the bank subsidiaries can generally be used only to fund obligations within the bank subsidiaries, and transfers to the Parent or nonbank subsidiaries may be subject to prior regulatory approval.
Liquidity is also held in nonbank entities, including the Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities. The Parent and NB Holdings liquidity is typically in the form of cash deposited at BANA, which is excluded from the liquidity at bank subsidiaries, and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Liquidity held in other regulated entities, comprised primarily of broker-dealer subsidiaries, is primarily available to meet the obligations of that entity, and transfers to the Parent or to any other subsidiary may be subject to prior regulatory approval due to regulatory restrictions and minimum requirements. Our other regulated entities also hold unencumbered investment-grade securities and equities that we believe could be used to generate additional liquidity.
Table 16 presents the composition of average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 54 |
| Table 16 | Average Global Liquidity Sources Composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| Cash on deposit | $ | 315 | $ | 380 | ||
| U.S. Treasury securities | 313 | 197 | ||||
| U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities | 296 | 299 | ||||
| Non-U.S. government securities | 29 | 21 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 953 | $ | 897 |
Our GLS are substantially the same in composition to what qualifies as High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) under the final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) rules. However, HQLA for purposes of calculating LCR is not reported at market value, but at a lower value that incorporates regulatory deductions and the exclusion of excess liquidity held at certain subsidiaries. The LCR is calculated as the amount of a financial institution’s unencumbered HQLA relative to the estimated net cash outflows the institution could encounter over a 30-day period of significant liquidity stress, expressed as a percentage. Our average consolidated HQLA, on a net basis, was $623 billion and $590 billion for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. For the same periods, the average consolidated LCR was 113 percent and 115 percent. Our LCR fluctuates due to normal business flows from customer activity.
Liquidity Stress Analysis
We utilize liquidity stress analysis to assist us in determining the appropriate amounts of liquidity to maintain at the Parent and our subsidiaries to meet contractual and contingent cash outflows under a range of scenarios. The scenarios we consider and utilize incorporate market-wide and Corporation-specific events, including potential credit rating downgrades for the Parent and our subsidiaries, and more severe events including potential resolution scenarios. The scenarios are based on our historical experience, experience of distressed and failed financial institutions, regulatory guidance, and both expected and unexpected future events.
The types of potential contractual and contingent cash outflows we consider in our scenarios may include, but are not limited to, upcoming contractual maturities of unsecured debt and reductions in new debt issuances; diminished access to secured financing markets; potential deposit withdrawals; increased draws on loan commitments, liquidity facilities and letters of credit; additional collateral that counterparties could call if our credit ratings were downgraded; collateral and margin requirements arising from market value changes; and potential liquidity required to maintain businesses and finance customer activities. Changes in certain market factors, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades, could negatively impact potential contractual and contingent outflows and the related financial instruments, and in some cases these impacts could be material to our financial results.
We consider all sources of funds that we could access during each stress scenario and focus particularly on matching available sources with corresponding liquidity requirements by legal entity. We also use the stress modeling results to manage our asset and liability profile and establish limits and guidelines on certain funding sources and businesses.
Net Stable Funding Ratio
The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a liquidity requirement for large banks to maintain a minimum level of stable funding
over a one-year period. The requirement is intended to support the ability of banks to lend to households and businesses in both normal and adverse economic conditions and is complementary to the LCR, which focuses on short-term liquidity risks. The U.S. NSFR applies to the Corporation on a consolidated basis and to our insured depository institutions. For the three months ended September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2024, the average consolidated NSFR was 121 percent and 119 percent.
Diversified Funding Sources
We fund our assets primarily with a mix of deposits, and secured and unsecured liabilities through a centralized, globally coordinated funding approach diversified across products, programs, markets, currencies and investor groups.
The primary benefits of our centralized funding approach include greater control, reduced funding costs, wider name recognition by investors and greater flexibility to meet the variable funding requirements of subsidiaries. Where regulations, time zone differences or other business considerations make Parent funding impractical, certain other subsidiaries may issue their own debt.
We fund a substantial portion of our lending activities through our deposits, which were $1.97 trillion and $1.92 trillion at December 31, 2024 and 2023. Deposits are primarily generated by our Consumer Banking, GWIM and Global Banking segments. These deposits are diversified by clients, product type and geography, and the majority of our U.S. deposits are insured by the FDIC.
At December 31, 2024, 48 percent of our deposits were in Consumer Banking, 15 percent in GWIM and 29 percent in Global Banking. As of the same period, approximately 68 percent of consumer and small business deposits and 79 percent of U.S. deposits in Global Banking were held by clients who have had accounts with us for 10 or more years. In addition, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, 27 percent and 28 percent of our deposits were noninterest bearing and included operating accounts of our consumer and commercial clients. During the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, rates paid on deposits were 64 bps and 47 bps in Consumer Banking, 275 bps and 287 bps in GWIM, and 297 bps and 296 bps in Global Banking. For information on annual rates paid on consolidated deposit balances, see Table 8 on page 33.
We consider a substantial portion of our deposit base to be a stable, low-cost and consistent source of funding. We believe this deposit funding is generally less sensitive to interest rate changes, market volatility or changes in our credit ratings than wholesale funding sources. Our lending activities may also be financed through secured borrowings, including credit card securitizations and securitizations with government-sponsored enterprises (GSE), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and private-label investors, as well as FHLB loans.
Our trading activities in other regulated entities are primarily funded on a secured basis through securities lending and repurchase agreements, and these amounts will vary based on customer activity and market conditions. We believe funding these activities in the secured financing markets is more cost-efficient and less sensitive to changes in our credit ratings than unsecured financing. Repurchase agreements are generally short-term and often overnight. Disruptions in secured financing markets for financial institutions have occurred in prior market cycles which resulted in adverse changes in terms or significant reductions in the availability of such financing. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a
55 Bank of America
range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate. For more information on secured financing agreements, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total long-term debt decreased $18.9 billion to $283.3 billion during 2024, primarily due to maturities and redemptions, partially offset by debt issuances and valuation adjustments. We may, from time to time, purchase outstanding debt instruments in various transactions, depending on market conditions, liquidity and other factors. Our other regulated entities may also make markets in our debt instruments to provide liquidity for investors.
At December 31, 2024, Bank of America Corporation's senior notes of $180.3 billion included $167.5 billion of outstanding notes, substantially all of which are both TLAC eligible and callable at least one year before their stated maturities. Of these senior notes, $22.1 billion will be callable and become TLAC ineligible during 2025, and $21.6 billion, $24.9 billion, $19.5 billion and $8.0 billion will do so during each of 2026 through 2029, respectively, and $71.4 billion thereafter.
We issue long-term unsecured debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. While the cost and availability of unsecured funding may be negatively impacted by general market conditions or by matters specific to the financial services industry or the Corporation, we seek to mitigate refinancing risk by actively managing the amount of our borrowings that we anticipate will mature within any month or quarter. We may issue unsecured debt in the form of structured notes for client purposes, certain of which qualify as TLAC-eligible debt. During 2024, we issued $28.2 billion of structured notes, which are debt obligations that pay investors returns linked to other debt or equity securities, indices, currencies or commodities. We typically hedge the returns we are obligated to pay on these liabilities with derivatives and/or investments in the underlying instruments, so that from a funding perspective, the cost is similar to our other unsecured long-term debt. We could be required to settle certain structured note obligations for cash or other securities prior to maturity under certain circumstances, which we consider for liquidity planning purposes. We believe, however, that a portion of such borrowings will remain outstanding beyond the earliest put or redemption date.
Substantially all of our senior and subordinated debt obligations contain no provisions that could trigger a requirement for an early repayment, require additional collateral support, result in changes to terms, accelerate maturity or create additional financial obligations upon an adverse change in our credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows or stock price. For more information on long-term debt funding, including issuances and maturities and redemptions, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We use derivative transactions to manage the duration, interest rate and currency risks of our borrowings, considering the characteristics of the assets they are funding. For more information on our ALM activities, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 78.
Uninsured Deposits
The FDIC insures the Corporation’s U.S. deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank for each account ownership category, and various country-specific funds insure non-U.S. deposits up to specified limits. Deposits that exceed
insurance limits are uninsured. At December 31, 2024, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $1.97 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $646.2 billion and $124.9 billion. At December 31, 2023, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $1.92 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $606.8 billion and $116.6 billion. Deposit balances exclude $16.9 billion and $14.8 billion of collateral received on certain derivative contracts that are netted against the derivative asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2024 and 2023. Estimated uninsured deposits presented in this section reflect amounts disclosed in our regulatory reports, adjusted to exclude related accrued interest and intercompany deposit balances.
Table 17 presents information about the Corporation’s total estimated uninsured time deposits. For more information on our liquidity sources, see Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets, and for more information on deposits, see Diversified Funding Sources in this section. For more information on contractual time deposit maturities, see Note 9 – Deposits to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Table 17 | Uninsured Time Deposits (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | U.S. | Non-U.S. | Total | |||||||
| Uninsured time deposits with a maturity of: | ||||||||||
| 3 months or less | $ | 11,726 | $ | 7,891 | $ | 19,617 | ||||
| Over 3 months through 6 months | 8,513 | 1,795 | 10,308 | |||||||
| Over 6 months through 12 months | 7,909 | 180 | 8,089 | |||||||
| Over 12 months | 762 | 3,182 | 3,944 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 28,910 | $ | 13,048 | $ | 41,958 |
(1)Amounts are estimated based on the regulatory methodologies defined by each local jurisdiction.
Contingency Planning
We maintain contingency funding plans that outline our potential responses to liquidity stress events at various levels of severity. These policies and plans are based on stress scenarios and include potential funding strategies and communication and notification procedures that we would implement in the event we experienced stressed liquidity conditions. We periodically review and test the contingency funding plans to validate efficacy and assess readiness.
Our U.S. bank subsidiaries can access contingency funding through the Federal Reserve Discount Window. Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries have access to central bank facilities in the jurisdictions in which they operate. While we do not rely on these sources in our liquidity modeling, we maintain the policies, procedures and governance processes that would enable us to access these sources if necessary.
Credit Ratings
Our borrowing costs and ability to raise funds are impacted by our credit ratings. In addition, credit ratings may be important to customers or counterparties when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to engage in certain transactions,
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 56 |
including over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. Thus, it is our objective to maintain high-quality credit ratings, and management maintains an active dialogue with the major rating agencies.
Credit ratings and outlooks are opinions expressed by rating agencies on our creditworthiness and that of our obligations or securities, including long-term debt, short-term borrowings, preferred stock and other securities, including asset securitizations. Our credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by the rating agencies, and they consider a number of factors, including our own financial strength, performance, prospects and operations as well as factors not under our control. The rating agencies could make adjustments to our ratings at any time, and they provide no assurances that they will maintain our ratings at current levels.
Other factors that influence our credit ratings include changes to the rating agencies’ methodologies for our industry or certain security types; the rating agencies’ assessment of the
general operating environment for financial services companies; our relative positions in the markets in which we compete; our various risk exposures and risk management policies and activities; pending litigation and other contingencies or potential tail risks; our reputation; our liquidity position, diversity of funding sources and funding costs; the current and expected level and volatility of our earnings; our capital position and capital management practices; our corporate governance; the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government; current or future regulatory and legislative initiatives; and the agencies’ views on whether the U.S. government would provide meaningful support to the Corporation or its subsidiaries in a crisis.
The ratings and outlooks from Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings for the Corporation and its subsidiaries did not change during 2024.
Table 18 presents the Corporation’s current long-term/short-term senior debt ratings and outlooks expressed by the rating agencies.
| Table 18 | Senior Debt Ratings | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moody’s Investors Service | Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings | Fitch Ratings | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | |||||||||
| Bank of America Corporation | A1 | P-1 | Stable | A- | A-2 | Stable | AA- | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America, N.A. | Aa1 | P-1 | Negative | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities, Inc. | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch International | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities Europe SA | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable |
NR = not rated
A reduction in certain of our credit ratings or the ratings of certain asset-backed securitizations may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, potential loss of access to credit markets, the related cost of funds, our businesses and on certain revenues, particularly in those businesses where counterparty creditworthiness is critical. In addition, under the terms of certain OTC derivative contracts and other trading agreements, in the event of downgrades of our or our rated subsidiaries’ credit ratings, the counterparties to those agreements may require us to provide additional collateral, or to terminate these contracts or agreements, which could cause us to sustain losses and/or adversely impact our liquidity. If the short-term credit ratings of our Parent, bank or broker-dealer subsidiaries were downgraded by one or more levels, the potential loss of access to short-term funding sources such as repo financing and the effect on our incremental cost of funds could be material.
While certain potential impacts are contractual and quantifiable, the full scope of the consequences of a credit rating downgrade to a financial institution is inherently uncertain, as it depends upon numerous dynamic, complex and inter-related factors and assumptions, including whether any downgrade of a company’s long-term credit ratings precipitates downgrades to its short-term credit ratings, and assumptions about the potential behaviors of various customers, investors and counterparties. For more information on potential impacts of credit rating downgrades, see Liquidity Risk – Liquidity Stress Analysis on page 55.
For more information on additional collateral and termination payments that could be required in connection with certain over-
the-counter derivative contracts and other trading agreements in the event of a credit rating downgrade, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Common Stock Dividends
For a summary of our declared quarterly cash dividends on common stock during 2024 and through February 25, 2025, see Note 13 – Shareholders’ Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Finance Subsidiary Issuers and Parent Guarantor
BofA Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (BofA Finance), is a consolidated finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold, and is expected to continue to issue and sell, its senior unsecured debt securities (Guaranteed Notes) that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The Corporation guarantees the due and punctual payment, on demand, of amounts payable on the Guaranteed Notes if not paid by BofA Finance. In addition, each of BAC Capital Trust XIII, BAC Capital Trust XIV and BAC Capital Trust XV, Delaware statutory trusts (collectively, the Trusts) is a 100 percent owned finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold trust preferred securities (the Trust Preferred Securities) or capital securities (the Capital Securities and, together with the Guaranteed Notes and the Trust Preferred Securities, the Guaranteed Securities), as applicable, that remained outstanding at December 31, 2024. The Corporation guarantees the payment of amounts and distributions with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities
57 Bank of America
if not paid by the Trusts, to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. This guarantee, together with the Corporation’s other obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities, effectively constitutes a full and unconditional guarantee of the Trusts’ payment obligations on the Trust Preferred Securities or Capital Securities, as applicable. No other subsidiary of the Corporation guarantees the Guaranteed Securities.
BofA Finance and each of the Trusts are finance subsidiaries, have no independent assets, revenues or operations and are dependent upon the Corporation and/or the Corporation’s other subsidiaries to meet their respective obligations under the Guaranteed Securities in the ordinary course. If holders of the Guaranteed Securities make claims on their Guaranteed Securities in a bankruptcy, resolution or similar proceeding, any recoveries on those claims will be limited to those available under the applicable guarantee by the Corporation, as described above.
The Corporation is a holding company and depends upon its subsidiaries for liquidity. Applicable laws and regulations and intercompany arrangements entered into in connection with the Corporation’s resolution plan could restrict the availability of funds from subsidiaries to the Corporation, which could adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to make payments under its guarantees. In addition, the obligations of the Corporation under the guarantees of the Guaranteed Securities will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of its subsidiaries, and claimants should look only to assets of the Corporation for payments. If the Corporation, as guarantor of the Guaranteed Notes, transfers all or substantially all of its assets to one or more direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiaries, under the indenture governing the Guaranteed Notes, the subsidiary or subsidiaries will not be required to assume the Corporation’s obligations under its guarantee of the Guaranteed Notes.
For more information on factors that may affect payments to holders of the Guaranteed Securities, see Liquidity Risk – NB Holdings Corporation in this section, Item 1. Business – Insolvency and the Orderly Liquidation Authority on page 6 and Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity on page 9.
Representations and Warranties Obligations
For information on representations and warranties obligations in connection with the sale of mortgage loans, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations. Credit risk can also arise from operational failures that result in an erroneous advance, commitment or investment of funds. We define the credit exposure to a borrower or counterparty as the loss potential arising from all product classifications including loans and leases, deposit overdrafts, derivatives, assets held-for-sale and unfunded lending commitments, which include loan commitments, letters of credit and financial guarantees. Derivative positions are recorded at fair value, and assets held-for-sale are recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or
fair value. Certain loans and unfunded commitments are accounted for under the fair value option. Credit risk for categories of assets carried at fair value is not accounted for as part of the allowance for credit losses but as part of the fair value adjustments recorded in earnings. For derivative positions, our credit risk is measured as the net cost in the event the counterparties with contracts in which we are in a gain position fail to perform under the terms of those contracts. We use the current fair value to represent credit exposure without giving consideration to future mark-to-market changes. The credit risk amounts take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral. Our consumer and commercial credit extension and review procedures encompass funded and unfunded credit exposures. For more information on derivatives and credit extension commitments, see Note 3 – Derivatives and Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We manage credit risk based on the risk profile of the borrower or counterparty, repayment sources, the nature of underlying collateral and other support given current events, conditions and expectations. We classify our portfolios as either consumer or commercial and monitor credit risk in each as discussed below.
We refine our underwriting and credit risk management practices as well as credit standards to meet the changing economic environment. To mitigate losses and enhance customer support in our consumer businesses, we have in place collection programs and loan modification and customer assistance infrastructures. We utilize a number of actions to mitigate losses in the commercial businesses including increasing the frequency and intensity of portfolio monitoring, hedging activity and our practice of transferring management of deteriorating commercial exposures to independent special asset officers as credits enter criticized categories.
For information on our credit risk management activities, see the following: Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 59, Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 63, Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 69, Allowance for Credit Losses on page 72 and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For information on the Corporation’s loan modification programs, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more information on the Corporation’s credit risks, see the Credit section within Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During 2024, our net charge-off ratio increased primarily driven by credit card loans and the commercial real estate office portfolio. Commercial reservable criticized exposure increased compared to December 31, 2023 driven by an increase across a broad range of industries. Nonperforming loans also increased compared to December 31, 2023 primarily driven by the U.S. commercial portfolio. Uncertainty remains regarding broader economic impacts due to higher costs associated with inflationary pressures experienced over the past several years, elevated rates as well as the current geopolitical environment, and could lead to adverse impacts to credit quality metrics in future periods.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 58 |
Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the consumer portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout a borrower’s credit cycle. Statistical techniques in conjunction with experiential judgment are used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing, risk appetite, setting credit limits, and establishing operating processes and metrics to quantify and balance risks and returns. Statistical models are built using detailed behavioral information from external sources, such as credit bureaus, and/or internal historical experience and are a component of our consumer credit risk management process. These models are used in part to assist in making both new and ongoing credit decisions as well as portfolio management strategies, including authorizations and line management, collection practices and strategies, and determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and allocated capital for credit risk.
Consumer Credit Portfolio
During 2024, the U.S. unemployment rate remained relatively stable, and home prices increased steadily throughout most of 2024. Net charge-offs increased $1.1 billion to $4.2 billion in 2024 primarily due to higher credit card loan charge-offs.
The consumer allowance for loan and lease losses was $8.6 billion, relatively unchanged from 2023. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 72.
For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status, charge-offs and loan modifications for the consumer portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 19 presents our outstanding consumer loans and leases, consumer nonperforming loans and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more.
| Table 19 | Consumer Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1) | $ | 228,199 | $ | 228,403 | $ | 2,052 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 229 | $ | 252 | ||||||||||
| Home equity | 25,737 | 25,527 | 409 | 450 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 103,566 | 102,200 | n/a | n/a | 1,401 | 1,224 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer (2) | 107,122 | 103,468 | 186 | 148 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 151 | 124 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 464,775 | $ | 459,722 | $ | 2,647 | $ | 2,712 | $ | 1,631 | $ | 1,478 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (3) | 221 | 243 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans and leases | $ | 464,996 | $ | 459,965 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.57 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases, excluding fully-insured loan portfolios (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.27 |
(1)Residential mortgage loans accruing past due 90 days or more are fully-insured loans. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, residential mortgage included $119 million and $156 million of loans on which interest had been curtailed by the FHA, and therefore were no longer accruing interest, although principal was still insured, and $110 million and $96 million of loans on which interest was still accruing.
(2)Outstandings primarily includes auto and specialty lending loans and leases of $54.9 billion and $53.9 billion, U.S. securities-based lending loans of $48.7 billion and $46.0 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and non-U.S. consumer loans of $2.8 billion at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(3)For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)Excludes consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, loans accounted for under the fair value option past due 90 days or more and not accruing interest were insignificant.
n/a= not applicable
Table 20 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for consumer loans and leases.
| Table 20 | Consumer Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | — | $ | 16 | — | % | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | (41) | (59) | (0.16) | (0.23) | |||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 3,745 | 2,561 | 3.75 | 2.66 | |||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 239 | 92 | 0.23 | 0.09 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 295 | 480 | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,238 | $ | 3,090 | 0.93 | 0.68 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
n/m = not meaningful
59 Bank of America
We believe that the presentation of information adjusted to exclude the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option is more representative of the ongoing operations and credit quality of the business. As a result, in the following tables and discussions of the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios, we exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option and provide information that excludes the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio in certain credit quality statistics.
Residential Mortgage
The residential mortgage portfolio made up the largest percentage of our consumer loan portfolio at 49 percent of consumer loans and leases in 2024. Approximately 50 percent of the residential mortgage portfolio was in Consumer Banking, 47 percent was in GWIM and the remaining portion was in All Other.
Outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio decreased $204 million in 2024, as paydowns and payoffs outpaced new originations.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the residential mortgage portfolio included $9.9 billion and $11.0 billion of outstanding fully-insured loans, of which $2.0 billion and $2.2 billion had FHA insurance, with the remainder protected by Fannie Mae long-term standby agreements.
Table 21 presents certain residential mortgage key credit statistics on both a reported basis and excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio. The following discussion presents the residential mortgage portfolio excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio.
| Table 21 | Residential Mortgage – Key Credit Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported Basis (1) | Excluding Fully-insured Loans (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 228,199 | $ | 228,403 | $ | 218,287 | $ | 217,439 | |||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 1,494 | 1,513 | 1,007 | 986 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 90 days or more | 229 | 252 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 2,052 | 2,114 | 2,052 | 2,114 | |||||||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 100 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a modification.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio remained relatively unchanged in 2024. Of the nonperforming residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2024, $1.2 billion, or 61 percent, were current on contractual payments. Excluding fully-insured loans, loans accruing past due 30 days or more of $1.0 billion also remained relatively unchanged.
Of the $218.3 billion in total residential mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2024, $64.0 billion, or 29 percent, of loans were originated as interest-only. The outstanding balance of interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period was $3.6 billion, or six percent, at December 31, 2024. Residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period generally experience a higher rate of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status compared to the residential mortgage portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2024, $65 million, or two percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgages that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more compared to $1.0 billion, or less than one percent, for the
entire residential mortgage portfolio. In addition, at December 31, 2024, $209 million, or six percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period were nonperforming, of which $56 million were contractually current. Loans that have yet to enter the amortization period in our interest-only residential mortgage portfolio are primarily well-collateralized loans to our wealth management clients and have an interest-only period of three years to 10 years. Substantially all of these loans that have yet to enter the amortization period will not be required to make a fully-amortizing payment until 2026 or later.
Table 22 presents outstandings, nonperforming loans and net charge-offs by certain state concentrations for the residential mortgage portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) made up 15 percent of outstandings at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California represented 14 percent of outstandings at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 60 |
| Table 22 | Residential Mortgage State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31 2024 | December 31 2023 | December 31 2024 | December 31 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 81,729 | $ | 81,085 | $ | 602 | $ | 641 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| New York | 25,827 | 25,975 | 318 | 320 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 15,715 | 15,450 | 142 | 131 | (4) | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,369 | 9,361 | 89 | 88 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 8,568 | 8,671 | 88 | 97 | (2) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 77,079 | 76,897 | 813 | 837 | 2 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans | $ | 218,287 | $ | 217,439 | $ | 2,052 | $ | 2,114 | $ | — | $ | 16 | ||||||||||||||
| Fully-insured loan portfolio | 9,912 | 10,964 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total residential mortgage loan portfolio | $ | 228,199 | $ | 228,403 |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Home Equity
At December 31, 2024, the home equity portfolio made up six percent of the consumer portfolio and was comprised of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), home equity loans and reverse mortgages. HELOCs generally have an initial draw period of 10 years, and after the initial draw period ends, the loans generally convert to 15- or 20-year amortizing loans. We no longer originate home equity loans or reverse mortgages.
At December 31, 2024, 85 percent of the home equity portfolio was in Consumer Banking, 10 percent was in GWIM and the remainder of the portfolio was in All Other. Outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio increased $210 million in 2024 primarily due to draws on existing lines and new
originations outpacing paydowns. Of the total home equity portfolio at December 31, 2024 and 2023, $9.2 billion and $10.1 billion, or 36 percent and 39 percent, were in first-lien positions. At December 31, 2024, outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio that were in a second-lien or more junior-lien position and where we also held the first-lien loan totaled $4.5 billion, or 18 percent, of our total home equity portfolio.
Unused HELOCs totaled $44.3 billion and $45.1 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023. The HELOC utilization rate was 36 percent and 35 percent at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Table 23 presents certain home equity portfolio key credit statistics.
| Table 23 | Home Equity – Key Credit Statistics (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 25,737 | $ | 25,527 | ||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 84 | 95 | ||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 409 | 450 | ||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | ||||||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 100 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 2 | 3 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of the portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a modification.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $41 million to $409 million at December 31, 2024, primarily driven by returns to performing status and paydowns and payoffs outpacing new additions. Of the nonperforming home equity loans at December 31, 2024, $246 million, or 60 percent, were current on contractual payments. In addition, $83 million, or 20 percent, were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell. Accruing loans that were 30 days or more past due remained relatively unchanged in 2024 compared to 2023.
Of the $25.7 billion in total home equity portfolio outstandings at December 31, 2024, as shown in Table 23, nine percent require interest-only payments. The outstanding balance of HELOCs that had reached the end of their draw period and entered the amortization period was $3.4 billion at December 31, 2024. The HELOCs that have entered the amortization period have experienced a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status when compared to the HELOC portfolio as a whole. At December 31,
2024, $30 million, or one percent, of outstanding HELOCs that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more. In addition, at December 31, 2024, $244 million, or seven percent, were nonperforming.
For our interest-only HELOC portfolio, we do not actively track how many of our home equity customers pay only the minimum amount due on their home equity loans and lines; however, we can infer some of this information through a review of our HELOC portfolio that we service and is still in its revolving period. During 2024, 15 percent of these customers with an outstanding balance did not pay any principal on their HELOCs.
Table 24 presents outstandings, nonperforming balances and net recoveries by certain state concentrations for the home equity portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 11 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California made up 11 percent and 10 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
61 Bank of America
| Table 24 | Home Equity State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 7,038 | $ | 6,966 | $ | 102 | $ | 109 | $ | (8) | $ | (6) | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 2,542 | 2,576 | 47 | 53 | (7) | (12) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 1,817 | 1,870 | 34 | 46 | (5) | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 1,521 | 1,410 | 17 | 16 | 1 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 1,447 | 1,590 | 62 | 71 | (4) | (10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 11,372 | 11,115 | 147 | 155 | (18) | (26) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total home equity loan portfolio | $ | 25,737 | $ | 25,527 | $ | 409 | $ | 450 | $ | (41) | $ | (59) |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Credit Card
At December 31, 2024, 96 percent of the credit card portfolio was managed in Consumer Banking with the remainder in GWIM. Outstandings in the credit card portfolio increased $1.4 billion during 2024 to $103.6 billion, primarily driven by higher purchase volumes. Net charge-offs increased $1.2 billion to $3.7 billion in 2024 compared to 2023. Credit card loans 30
days or more past due increased $219 million, and 90 days or more past due increased $177 million at December 31, 2024.
Unused lines of credit for credit card increased to $398.7 billion at December 31, 2024 from $390.2 billion at December 31, 2023.
Table 25 presents certain state concentrations for the credit card portfolio.
| Table 25 | Credit Card State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Past Due 90 Days or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 17,289 | $ | 16,952 | $ | 253 | $ | 216 | $ | 694 | $ | 457 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 10,794 | 10,521 | 199 | 168 | 518 | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,121 | 8,978 | 142 | 125 | 369 | 245 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 5,765 | 5,788 | 84 | 84 | 238 | 197 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington | 5,586 | 5,352 | 46 | 41 | 121 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 55,011 | 54,609 | 677 | 590 | 1,805 | 1,242 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total credit card portfolio | $ | 103,566 | $ | 102,200 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 1,224 | $ | 3,745 | $ | 2,561 |
Direct/Indirect Consumer
At December 31, 2024, 51 percent of the direct/indirect portfolio was included in Consumer Banking (consumer auto and recreational vehicle lending) and 49 percent was included in GWIM (principally securities-based lending loans). Outstandings
in the direct/indirect portfolio increased $3.7 billion in 2024 to $107.1 billion driven by increases in securities-based lending and consumer auto.
Table 26 presents certain state concentrations for the direct/indirect consumer loan portfolio.
| Table 26 | Direct/Indirect State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 16,017 | $ | 15,416 | $ | 38 | $ | 27 | $ | 58 | $ | 21 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 14,573 | 13,550 | 23 | 18 | 33 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 10,164 | 9,668 | 18 | 14 | 33 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 7,820 | 7,335 | 15 | 11 | 15 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 4,429 | 4,376 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 54,119 | 53,123 | 85 | 73 | 92 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total direct/indirect loan portfolio | $ | 107,122 | $ | 103,468 | $ | 186 | $ | 148 | $ | 239 | $ | 92 |
Other Consumer
Other consumer primarily consists of deposit overdraft balances. Net charge-offs decreased $185 million to $295 million in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by lower overdraft losses from fraud activity.
Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 27 presents nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2024 and 2023. During 2024, nonperforming consumer loans of $2.6 billion remained relatively unchanged.
At December 31, 2024, $459 million, or 17 percent, of nonperforming loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to their estimated property value less costs to sell. In addition, at December 31, 2024, $1.5 billion, or 58 percent, of nonperforming consumer loans were current and classified as nonperforming loans in accordance with applicable policies.
Foreclosed properties decreased $14 million in 2024 to $89 million.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 62 |
| Table 27 | Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 2,712 | $ | 2,754 | ||||||
| Additions | 969 | 1,055 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns and payoffs | (479) | (480) | ||||||||
| Sales | (5) | (63) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (1) | (489) | (475) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (32) | (53) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | (29) | (26) | ||||||||
| Total net reductions to nonperforming loans and leases | (65) | (42) | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 2,647 | 2,712 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 89 | 103 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 (2) | $ | 2,736 | $ | 2,815 | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (3) | 0.58 | % | 0.59 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties (3) | 0.60 | 0.61 |
(1)Consumer loans may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection.
(2)Includes repossessed non-real estate assets of $29 million and $20 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(3)Outstanding consumer loans and leases exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the commercial portfolio begins with an assessment of the credit risk profile of the borrower or counterparty based on an analysis of its financial position. As part of the overall credit risk assessment, our commercial credit exposures are assigned a risk rating and are subject to approval based on defined credit approval standards. Subsequent to loan origination, risk ratings are monitored on an ongoing basis, and if necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in the financial condition, cash flow, risk profile or outlook of a borrower or counterparty. In making credit decisions, we consider risk rating, collateral, country, industry and single-name concentration limits while also balancing these considerations with the total borrower or counterparty relationship. We use a variety of tools to continuously monitor the ability of a borrower or counterparty to perform under its obligations. We use risk rating aggregations to measure and evaluate concentrations within portfolios. In addition, risk ratings are a factor in determining the level of allocated capital and the allowance for credit losses.
As part of our ongoing risk mitigation initiatives, we attempt to work with clients experiencing financial difficulty to modify their loans to terms that better align with their current ability to pay. For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status and net charge-offs for the commercial portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management of Commercial Credit Risk Concentrations
Commercial credit risk is evaluated and managed with the goal that concentrations of credit exposure continue to be aligned with our risk appetite. We review, measure and manage concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product, geography, customer relationship and loan size. We also review, measure and manage commercial real estate loans by geographic location and property type. In addition, within our non-U.S. portfolio, we evaluate exposures by region and by country. Tables 32, 34 and 37 summarize our concentrations. We also utilize syndications of exposure to third parties, loan sales, hedging and other risk mitigation techniques to manage the size and risk profile of the commercial credit portfolio. For more information on our industry concentrations, see Table 34 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Industry Concentrations on page 67.
We account for certain large corporate loans and loan commitments, including issued but unfunded letters of credit which are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes, that exceed our single-name credit risk concentration guidelines under the fair value option. Lending commitments, both funded and unfunded, are actively managed and monitored, and as appropriate, credit risk for these lending relationships may be mitigated through the use of credit derivatives, with our credit view and market perspectives determining the size and timing of the hedging activity. In addition, we purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain other credit exposures. To lessen the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, credit exposure may be added within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection. These credit derivatives do not meet the requirements for treatment as accounting hedges. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other income.
In addition, we are a member of various securities and derivative exchanges and clearinghouses, both in the U.S. and other countries. As a member, we may be required to pay a pro-rata share of the losses incurred by some of these organizations as a result of another member default and under other loss scenarios. For more information, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commercial Credit Portfolio
Outstanding commercial loans and leases increased $37.1 billion during 2024 due to growth in U.S. and Non-U.S. commercial, primarily in Global Markets and Global Banking. During 2024, commercial credit quality deteriorated as reservable criticized utilized exposure increased across a broad range of industries, and nonperforming commercial loans increased primarily driven by U.S. commercial. Commercial net charge-offs increased $1.1 billion to $1.8 billion during 2024 primarily due to higher losses in the commercial real estate office portfolio and U.S. commercial portfolio.
With the exception of the office property type, which is further discussed in the Commercial Real Estate section herein, credit quality of commercial real estate borrowers has remained relatively stable since December 31, 2023; however, we are closely monitoring emerging trends and borrower performance in a higher interest rate environment. Recent demand for office
63 Bank of America
space continues to be stagnant, and future demand for office space continues to be uncertain as companies evaluate space needs with employment models that utilize a mix of remote and conventional office use.
The commercial allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $152 million during 2024 to $4.7 billion. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 72.
Total commercial utilized credit exposure increased $43.2 billion during 2024 to $739.5 billion primarily driven by higher loans and leases. The utilization rate for loans and leases, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and financial guarantees, and commercial letters of credit, in the aggregate, was 55 percent at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Table 28 presents commercial credit exposure by type for utilized, unfunded and total binding committed credit exposure. Commercial utilized credit exposure includes SBLCs and financial guarantees and commercial letters of credit that have been issued and for which we are legally bound to advance funds under prescribed conditions during a specified time period, and excludes exposure related to trading account assets. Although funds have not yet been advanced, these exposure types are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes.
| Table 28 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Type | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized (1) | Commercial Unfunded (2, 3, 4) | Total Commercial Committed | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | $ | 630,839 | $ | 593,767 | $ | 535,675 | $ | 507,641 | $ | 1,166,514 | $ | 1,101,408 | ||||||||||
| Derivative assets (5) | 40,948 | 39,323 | — | — | 40,948 | 39,323 | ||||||||||||||||
| Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees | 33,147 | 31,348 | 1,889 | 1,953 | 35,036 | 33,301 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities and other investments | 19,133 | 20,422 | 4,407 | 3,083 | 23,540 | 23,505 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans held-for-sale | 7,985 | 4,338 | 5,003 | 4,904 | 12,988 | 9,242 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | 5,608 | 5,312 | — | — | 5,608 | 5,312 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial letters of credit | 839 | 943 | 111 | 232 | 950 | 1,175 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,004 | 846 | — | — | 1,004 | 846 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 739,503 | $ | 696,299 | $ | 547,085 | $ | 517,813 | $ | 1,286,588 | $ | 1,214,112 |
(1)Commercial utilized exposure includes loans of $4.0 billion and $3.3 billion accounted for under the fair value option at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(2)Commercial unfunded exposure includes commitments accounted for under the fair value option with a notional amount of $2.2 billion and $2.6 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(3)Excludes unused business card lines, which are not legally binding.
(4)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.4 billion and $10.3 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(5)Derivative assets are carried at fair value, reflect the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and have been reduced by cash collateral of $30.1 billion and $29.4 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023. Not reflected in utilized and committed exposure is additional non-cash derivative collateral held of $59.7 billion and $56.1 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, which consists primarily of other marketable securities.
Nonperforming commercial loans increased $555 million during 2024, primarily in U.S. commercial. Table 29 presents our commercial loans and leases portfolio and related credit quality information at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Table 29 | Commercial Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 386,990 | $ | 358,931 | $ | 1,204 | $ | 636 | $ | 90 | $ | 51 | ||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 137,518 | 124,581 | 8 | 175 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 524,508 | 483,512 | 1,212 | 811 | 94 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 65,730 | 72,878 | 2,068 | 1,927 | 6 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 15,708 | 14,854 | 20 | 19 | 3 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| 605,946 | 571,244 | 3,300 | 2,757 | 103 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial (1) | 20,865 | 19,197 | 28 | 16 | 197 | 184 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 626,811 | $ | 590,441 | $ | 3,328 | $ | 2,773 | $ | 300 | $ | 278 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (2) | 4,028 | 3,326 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans and leases | $ | 630,839 | $ | 593,767 |
(1)Includes card-related products.
(2)Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option includes U.S. commercial of $2.8 billion and $2.2 billion and non-U.S. commercial of $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023. For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 64 |
Table 30 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for our commercial loans and leases for 2024 and 2023.
| Table 30 | Commercial Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 388 | $ | 124 | 0.11 | % | 0.03 | % | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 67 | 19 | 0.05 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 455 | 143 | 0.09 | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 864 | 245 | 1.24 | 0.34 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 1 | 2 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
| 1,320 | 390 | 0.23 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 473 | 319 | 2.34 | 1.71 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | $ | 1,793 | $ | 709 | 0.30 | 0.12 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as annualized net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Table 31 presents commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure by loan type. Criticized exposure corresponds to the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful asset categories as defined by regulatory authorities. Total commercial reservable
criticized utilized exposure increased $3.2 billion during 2024 primarily driven by commercial real estate and U.S. commercial. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, 91 percent and 89 percent of commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure was secured.
| Table 31 | Commercial Reservable Criticized Utilized Exposure (1, 2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 13,387 | 3.23 | % | $ | 12,006 | 3.12 | % | |||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 1,955 | 1.37 | 1,787 | 1.37 | |||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 15,342 | 2.75 | 13,793 | 2.68 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 10,168 | 15.17 | 8,749 | 11.80 | |||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 291 | 1.85 | 166 | 1.12 | |||||||||
| 25,801 | 4.03 | 22,708 | 3.76 | ||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 694 | 3.33 | 592 | 3.08 | |||||||||
| Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure | $ | 26,495 | 4.01 | $ | 23,300 | 3.74 |
(1)Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure includes loans and leases of $25.5 billion and $22.5 billion and commercial letters of credit of $977 million and $795 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(2)Percentages are calculated as commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure divided by total commercial reservable utilized exposure for each exposure category.
Commercial and Industrial
Commercial and industrial loans include U.S. commercial and non-U.S. commercial portfolios.
U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2024, 60 percent of the U.S. commercial loan portfolio, excluding small business, was managed in Global Banking, 23 percent in Global Markets, 15 percent in GWIM (loans that provide financing for asset purchases, business investments and other liquidity needs for high net worth clients) and the remainder primarily in Consumer Banking. U.S. commercial loans increased $28.1 billion, or eight percent, during 2024 primarily driven by Global Markets and Global Banking. Reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $1.4 billion, or 12 percent, driven by a broad range of industries.
Non-U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2024, 56 percent of the non-U.S. commercial loan portfolio was managed in Global Banking, 43 percent in Global Markets and the remainder primarily in GWIM. Non-U.S. commercial loans increased $12.9 billion, or 10 percent, during 2024 primarily driven by Global Markets. Reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $168 million, or nine percent. For information on the non-U.S. commercial portfolio, see Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 69.
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial real estate primarily includes commercial loans secured by non-owner-occupied real estate and is dependent on the sale or lease of the real estate as the primary source of
repayment. Outstanding loans decreased $7.1 billion, or 10 percent, during 2024 to $65.7 billion driven by multiple property types, including office. The commercial real estate portfolio is primarily managed in Global Banking and consists of loans made primarily to public and private developers, and commercial real estate firms. The portfolio remains diversified across property types and geographic regions. California represented the largest state concentration at 21 percent and 20 percent of commercial real estate at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $1.4 billion, or 16 percent, during 2024 primarily driven by industrial/warehouse and multi-family rental loans. Office loans represented the largest property type concentration at 23 percent of the commercial real estate portfolio at December 31, 2024, and approximately one percent of total loans for the Corporation. This property type is roughly 75 percent Class A and had an origination loan-to-value of approximately 55 percent.
Reservable criticized exposure for the office property type was $5.1 billion at December 31, 2024, representing a decrease of $398 million, or seven percent, from December 31, 2023, with an aggregate loan-to-value of approximately 85 percent based on property appraisals completed in the last twelve months. Approximately $5.1 billion of office loans are scheduled to mature by the end of 2025.
65 Bank of America
During 2024, net charge-offs increased $619 million to $864 million driven by office loans. We use a number of proactive risk mitigation initiatives to reduce adversely rated exposure in the commercial real estate portfolio, including transfers of deteriorating exposures for management by independent special asset officers and the pursuit of loan
restructurings or asset sales to achieve the best results for our customers and the Corporation.
Table 32 presents outstanding commercial real estate loans by geographic region, based on the geographic location of the collateral, and by property type.
| Table 32 | Outstanding Commercial Real Estate Loans | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| By Geographic Region | ||||||
| Northeast | $ | 14,708 | $ | 15,920 | ||
| California | 13,712 | 14,551 | ||||
| Southwest | 7,719 | 9,318 | ||||
| Southeast | 6,914 | 8,368 | ||||
| Florida | 4,410 | 4,986 | ||||
| Illinois | 2,996 | 3,361 | ||||
| Midsouth | 2,487 | 2,785 | ||||
| Midwest | 2,468 | 3,149 | ||||
| Northwest | 1,979 | 2,095 | ||||
| Non-U.S. | 6,109 | 6,052 | ||||
| Other | 2,228 | 2,293 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 65,730 | $ | 72,878 | ||
| By Property Type | ||||||
| Non-residential | ||||||
| Office | $ | 15,061 | $ | 17,976 | ||
| Industrial / Warehouse | 13,166 | 14,746 | ||||
| Multi-family rental | 11,022 | 10,606 | ||||
| Shopping centers / Retail | 5,603 | 5,756 | ||||
| Hotel / Motels | 4,680 | 5,665 | ||||
| Multi-use | 2,162 | 2,681 | ||||
| Other | 13,179 | 14,201 | ||||
| Total non-residential | 64,873 | 71,631 | ||||
| Residential | 857 | 1,247 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 65,730 | $ | 72,878 |
U.S. Small Business Commercial
The U.S. small business commercial loan portfolio is comprised of small business card loans and small business loans primarily managed in Consumer Banking. Credit card-related products were 53 percent and 54 percent of the U.S. small business commercial portfolio at December 31, 2024 and 2023 and represented 99 percent of net charge-offs for both 2024 and 2023. Accruing past due 90 days or more increased $13 million in 2024 to $197 million.
Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 33 presents the nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2024 and 2023. Nonperforming loans do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. During 2024, nonperforming commercial loans and leases increased $555 million to $3.3 billion. At December 31, 2024, nearly 100 percent of commercial nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties were secured, and 41 percent were contractually current. Commercial nonperforming loans were carried at 88 percent of their unpaid principal balance, as the carrying value of these loans has been reduced to the estimated collateral value less costs to sell.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 66 |
| Table 33 | Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity (1, 2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 2,773 | $ | 1,054 | ||||||
| Additions | 3,914 | 2,863 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns | (1,669) | (517) | ||||||||
| Sales | (32) | (4) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (3) | (182) | (106) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (1,361) | (428) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | (115) | (23) | ||||||||
| Transfers to loans held-for-sale | — | (66) | ||||||||
| Total net additions to nonperforming loans and leases | 555 | 1,719 | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 3,328 | 2,773 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 56 | 42 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 | $ | 3,384 | $ | 2,815 | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans and leases (4) | 0.53 | % | 0.47 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 0.54 | 0.48 |
(1)Balances do not include nonperforming loans held-for-sale of $731 million and $161 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial activity. Small business card loans are excluded as they are not classified as nonperforming.
(3)Commercial loans and leases may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection, or when a modified loan demonstrates a sustained period of payment performance.
(4)Outstanding commercial loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Industry Concentrations
Table 34 presents commercial committed and utilized credit exposure by industry. For information on net notional credit protection purchased to hedge funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Risk Mitigation.
Commercial credit exposure is diversified across a broad range of industries. Total commercial committed exposure increased $72.5 billion during 2024 to $1.3 trillion. The increase in commercial committed exposure was concentrated in Asset managers and funds, Finance companies and Individuals and trusts.
Industry limits are used internally to manage industry concentrations and are based on committed exposure that is determined on an industry-by-industry basis. A risk management framework is in place to set and approve industry limits as well as to provide ongoing monitoring.
Asset managers and funds, our largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $193.9 billion, increased $24.6 billion, or 15 percent, during 2024, which was primarily driven by investment-grade exposures.
Finance companies, our second largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $101.8 billion, increased $12.7 billion, or 14 percent, during 2024. The increase in committed exposure was primarily driven by increases in Consumer finance, Thrifts and mortgage finance and Diversified financials.
Capital goods, our third largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $98.8 billion, increased $1.7 billion, or two percent, during 2024. The increase in committed exposure was driven by increases in Trading companies and distributors, Machinery, and Construction and engineering, partially offset by a decrease in Industrial conglomerates.
Various macroeconomic challenges, including geopolitical tensions, higher costs associated with inflationary pressures experienced over the past several years and elevated interest rates, have led to uncertainty in the U.S. and global economies and have adversely impacted, and may continue to adversely impact, a number of industries. We continue to monitor all industries, particularly higher risk industries that are experiencing or could experience a more significant impact to their financial condition.
67 Bank of America
| Table 34 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Industry (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized | Total Commercial Committed (2) | |||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Asset managers and funds | $ | 118,123 | $ | 103,138 | $ | 193,947 | $ | 169,318 | ||||||
| Finance companies | 74,975 | 62,906 | 101,828 | 89,119 | ||||||||||
| Capital goods | 51,367 | 49,698 | 98,780 | 97,044 | ||||||||||
| Real estate (3) | 69,841 | 73,150 | 95,981 | 100,269 | ||||||||||
| Healthcare equipment and services | 35,964 | 35,037 | 65,819 | 61,766 | ||||||||||
| Materials | 26,797 | 25,223 | 58,128 | 55,296 | ||||||||||
| Food, beverage and tobacco | 25,763 | 23,865 | 54,370 | 49,426 | ||||||||||
| Retailing | 24,449 | 24,561 | 53,471 | 54,523 | ||||||||||
| Consumer services | 28,391 | 27,355 | 53,054 | 49,105 | ||||||||||
| Individuals and trusts | 35,457 | 32,481 | 50,353 | 43,938 | ||||||||||
| Government and public education | 32,682 | 31,051 | 48,204 | 45,873 | ||||||||||
| Commercial services and supplies | 24,409 | 22,642 | 43,451 | 41,473 | ||||||||||
| Utilities | 18,186 | 18,610 | 42,107 | 39,481 | ||||||||||
| Transportation | 24,135 | 24,200 | 35,743 | 36,267 | ||||||||||
| Energy | 13,857 | 12,450 | 35,510 | 36,996 | ||||||||||
| Technology hardware and equipment | 11,526 | 11,951 | 30,093 | 29,160 | ||||||||||
| Software and services | 11,158 | 9,830 | 27,383 | 22,381 | ||||||||||
| Global commercial banks | 22,641 | 22,749 | 25,220 | 25,684 | ||||||||||
| Media | 12,130 | 13,033 | 24,023 | 24,908 | ||||||||||
| Vehicle dealers | 18,194 | 16,283 | 23,855 | 22,570 | ||||||||||
| Insurance | 12,640 | 9,371 | 23,445 | 19,322 | ||||||||||
| Consumer durables and apparel | 8,987 | 9,184 | 21,823 | 20,732 | ||||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology | 7,378 | 6,852 | 21,717 | 22,169 | ||||||||||
| Telecommunication services | 8,571 | 9,224 | 18,759 | 17,269 | ||||||||||
| Automobiles and components | 8,172 | 7,049 | 16,268 | 16,459 | ||||||||||
| Food and staples retailing | 7,206 | 7,423 | 12,777 | 12,496 | ||||||||||
| Financial markets infrastructure (clearinghouses) | 4,219 | 4,229 | 6,413 | 6,503 | ||||||||||
| Religious and social organizations | 2,285 | 2,754 | 4,066 | 4,565 | ||||||||||
| Total commercial credit exposure by industry | $ | 739,503 | $ | 696,299 | $ | 1,286,588 | $ | 1,214,112 |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial exposure.
(2)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.4 billion and $10.3 billion at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(3)Industries are viewed from a variety of perspectives to best isolate the perceived risks. For purposes of this table, the real estate industry is defined based on the primary business activity of the borrowers or counterparties using operating cash flows and primary source of repayment as key factors.
Risk Mitigation
We purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain credit exposures. To lower the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, we may add credit exposure within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, net notional credit default protection purchased in our credit derivatives portfolio to hedge our funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, was $10.4 billion and $10.9 billion. We recorded net losses of $87 million in 2024 compared to net losses $185 million in 2023. The gains and losses on these instruments were largely offset by gains and losses on the related exposures. The Value-at-Risk (VaR) results for these exposures are included in the fair value option portfolio information in Table 41. For more information, see Trading Risk Management on page 75.
Tables 35 and 36 present the maturity profiles and the credit exposure debt ratings of the net credit default protection portfolio at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Table 35 | Net Credit Default Protection by Maturity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| Less than or equal to one year | 24 | % | 36 | % | |
| Greater than one year and less than or equal to five years | 76 | 64 | |||
| Total net credit default protection | 100 | % | 100 | % |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 68 |
| Table 36 | Net Credit Default Protection by Credit Exposure Debt Rating | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | ||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||
| Ratings (2, 3) | |||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | (120) | 1.1 | % | $ | (479) | 4.4 | % | |||||
| AA | (960) | 9.2 | (1,080) | 9.9 | |||||||||
| A | (4,978) | 47.7 | (5,237) | 48.2 | |||||||||
| BBB | (3,385) | 32.4 | (2,912) | 26.8 | |||||||||
| BB | (526) | 5.0 | (698) | 6.4 | |||||||||
| B | (385) | 3.7 | (419) | 3.9 | |||||||||
| CCC and below | (82) | 0.8 | (52) | 0.5 | |||||||||
| NR (4) | — | 0.1 | 2 | (0.1) | |||||||||
| Total net credit default protection | $ | (10,436) | 100.0 | % | $ | (10,875) | 100.0 | % |
(1)Represents net credit default protection purchased.
(2)Ratings are refreshed on a quarterly basis.
(3)Ratings of BBB- or higher are considered to meet the definition of investment grade.
(4)NR is comprised of index positions held and any names that have not been rated.
In addition to our net notional credit default protection purchased to cover the funded and unfunded portion of certain credit exposures, credit derivatives are used for market-making activities for clients and establishing positions intended to profit from directional or relative value changes. We execute the majority of our credit derivative trades in the OTC market with large, multinational financial institutions, including broker-dealers and, to a lesser degree, with a variety of other investors. Because these transactions are executed in the OTC market, we are subject to settlement risk. We are also subject to credit risk in the event that these counterparties fail to perform under the terms of these contracts. In order to properly reflect counterparty credit risk, we record counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments on certain derivative assets, including our purchased credit default protection. In most cases, credit derivative transactions are executed on a daily margin basis. Therefore, events such as a credit downgrade, depending on the ultimate rating level, or a breach of credit covenants would typically require an increase in the amount of collateral required by the counterparty, where applicable, and/or allow us to take additional protective measures such as early termination of all
trades. For more information on credit derivatives and counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-U.S. Portfolio
Our non-U.S. credit and trading portfolios are subject to country risk. We define country risk as the risk of loss from unfavorable economic and political conditions, currency fluctuations, social instability and changes in government policies. A risk management framework is in place to measure, monitor and manage non-U.S. risk and exposures. In addition to the direct risk of doing business in a country, we also are exposed to indirect country risks (e.g., related to the collateral received on secured financing transactions or related to client clearing activities). These indirect exposures are managed in the normal course of business through credit, market and operational risk governance rather than through country risk governance.
Table 37 presents our 20 largest non-U.S. country exposures at December 31, 2024. These exposures accounted for 89 percent of our total non-U.S. exposure at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. Net country exposure for these 20 countries increased $21.5 billion in 2024 primarily driven by increases in the United Kingdom and Canada.
Non-U.S. exposure is presented on an internal risk management basis and includes sovereign and non-sovereign credit exposure, securities and other investments issued by or domiciled in countries other than the U.S.
Funded loans and loan equivalents include loans, leases, and other extensions of credit and funds, including letters of credit and due from placements. Unfunded commitments are the undrawn portion of legally binding commitments related to loans and loan equivalents. Net counterparty exposure includes the fair value of derivatives, including the counterparty risk associated with credit default swaps (CDS), and secured financing transactions. Securities and other investments are carried at fair value and long securities exposures are netted against short exposures with the same underlying issuer to, but not below, zero. Net country exposure represents country exposure less hedges and credit default protection purchased, net of credit default protection sold.
69 Bank of America
| Table 37 | Top 20 Non-U.S. Countries Exposure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | Funded Loans and Loan Equivalents | Unfunded Loan Commitments | Net Counterparty Exposure | Securities/ Other Investments | Country Exposure at December 31 2024 | Hedges and Credit Default Protection | Net Country Exposure at December 31 2024 | Increase (Decrease) from December 31 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Kingdom | $ | 35,704 | $ | 18,100 | $ | 3,757 | $ | 5,534 | $ | 63,095 | $ | (1,050) | $ | 62,045 | $ | 6,110 | ||||||||||||||
| Germany | 25,504 | 10,348 | 1,329 | 2,194 | 39,375 | (2,337) | 37,038 | 1,383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 15,522 | 11,672 | 1,475 | 3,209 | 31,878 | (406) | 31,472 | 3,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| France | 14,184 | 8,894 | 1,318 | 2,789 | 27,185 | (1,031) | 26,154 | 1,296 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Australia | 14,587 | 4,357 | 1,381 | 2,207 | 22,532 | (396) | 22,136 | 814 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Japan | 12,063 | 1,852 | 1,460 | 4,361 | 19,736 | (495) | 19,241 | 2,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | 9,753 | 1,367 | 1,022 | 4,666 | 16,808 | (70) | 16,738 | 1,455 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| India | 7,940 | 301 | 567 | 5,038 | 13,846 | (60) | 13,786 | 1,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Switzerland | 5,595 | 4,524 | 160 | 435 | 10,714 | (113) | 10,601 | 1,372 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Singapore | 3,914 | 576 | 290 | 5,134 | 9,914 | (27) | 9,887 | (930) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| China | 4,765 | 310 | 935 | 3,428 | 9,438 | (216) | 9,222 | 710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Korea | 4,628 | 1,304 | 735 | 1,979 | 8,646 | (203) | 8,443 | (17) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ireland | 6,161 | 1,777 | 84 | 398 | 8,420 | (159) | 8,261 | (2,072) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | 3,239 | 3,471 | 485 | 1,232 | 8,427 | (298) | 8,129 | 980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | 4,880 | 2,107 | 454 | 778 | 8,219 | (177) | 8,042 | (877) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Italy | 4,999 | 2,426 | 232 | 604 | 8,261 | (372) | 7,889 | 1,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Spain | 3,364 | 1,903 | 136 | 1,216 | 6,619 | (516) | 6,103 | 507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | 2,785 | 585 | 635 | 1,128 | 5,133 | (43) | 5,090 | (762) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indonesia | 1,051 | — | 77 | 3,322 | 4,450 | (29) | 4,421 | 2,186 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sweden | 1,390 | 1,792 | 103 | 364 | 3,649 | (199) | 3,450 | 436 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total top 20 non-U.S. countries exposure | $ | 182,028 | $ | 77,666 | $ | 16,635 | $ | 50,016 | $ | 326,345 | $ | (8,197) | $ | 318,148 | $ | 21,450 |
Our largest non-U.S. country exposure at December 31, 2024 was the United Kingdom with net exposure of $62.0 billion, which increased $6.1 billion from December 31, 2023 primarily due to higher deposits with the central bank. Our second largest non-U.S. country exposure was Germany with net exposure of $37.0 billion at December 31, 2024, which increased $1.4 billion from December 31, 2023 primarily due to higher deposits with the central bank.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 70 |
Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities
Table 38 disaggregates total outstanding loans and leases by remaining scheduled principal due dates and interest rates. The amounts provided do not reflect prepayment assumptions or hedging activities related to the loan portfolio. For information on the asset sensitivity of our total banking book balance sheet, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 78.
| Table 38 | Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Due in One Year or Less | Due After One Year Through Five Years | Due After Five Years Through 15 Years | Due After 15 Years | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 5,802 | $ | 33,962 | $ | 97,133 | $ | 91,361 | $ | 228,258 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 671 | 454 | 2,925 | 21,849 | 25,899 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 103,566 | — | — | — | 103,566 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 65,115 | 36,376 | 4,837 | 794 | 107,122 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 151 | — | — | — | 151 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 175,305 | 70,792 | 104,895 | 114,004 | 464,996 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 123,161 | 245,135 | 19,112 | 2,352 | 389,760 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 49,233 | 56,511 | 29,282 | 3,750 | 138,776 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 27,212 | 37,097 | 1,415 | 6 | 65,730 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 3,305 | 9,905 | 1,190 | 1,308 | 15,708 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 12,628 | 4,751 | 3,364 | 122 | 20,865 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 215,539 | 353,399 | 54,363 | 7,538 | 630,839 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 390,844 | $ | 424,191 | $ | 159,258 | $ | 121,542 | $ | 1,095,835 | ||||||||
| Amount due in one year or less at: | Amount due after one year at: | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 1,059 | $ | 4,743 | $ | 85,035 | $ | 137,421 | $ | 228,258 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 150 | 521 | 22,666 | 2,562 | 25,899 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 98,168 | 5,398 | — | — | 103,566 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 45,945 | 19,170 | 2,327 | 39,680 | 107,122 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 22 | 129 | — | — | 151 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 145,344 | 29,961 | 110,028 | 179,663 | 464,996 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 95,052 | 28,109 | 217,109 | 49,490 | 389,760 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 37,073 | 12,160 | 85,896 | 3,647 | 138,776 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 24,460 | 2,752 | 37,251 | 1,267 | 65,730 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 320 | 2,985 | 2,201 | 10,202 | 15,708 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 7,684 | 4,944 | 122 | 8,115 | 20,865 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 164,589 | 50,950 | 342,579 | 72,721 | 630,839 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 309,933 | $ | 80,911 | $ | 452,607 | $ | 252,384 | $ | 1,095,835 |
(1)Includes loans accounted for under the fair value option.
71 Bank of America
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses decreased $215 million from December 31, 2023 to $14.3 billion at December 31, 2024, which included a $25 million reserve increase and a
$240 million reserve decrease related to the consumer and commercial portfolios, respectively.
Table 39 presents an allocation of the allowance for credit losses by product type at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Table 39 | Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses by Product Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 264 | 1.99 | % | 0.12 | % | $ | 339 | 2.54 | % | 0.15 | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | 29 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 47 | 0.35 | 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 7,515 | 56.76 | 7.26 | 7,346 | 55.06 | 7.19 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 700 | 5.29 | 0.65 | 715 | 5.36 | 0.69 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 62 | 0.47 | n/m | 73 | 0.55 | n/m | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 8,570 | 64.73 | 1.84 | 8,520 | 63.86 | 1.85 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 2,637 | 19.91 | 0.65 | 2,600 | 19.49 | 0.69 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 778 | 5.88 | 0.57 | 842 | 6.31 | 0.68 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 1,219 | 9.21 | 1.85 | 1,342 | 10.06 | 1.84 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 36 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 38 | 0.28 | 0.26 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 4,670 | 35.27 | 0.75 | 4,822 | 36.14 | 0.82 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | 13,240 | 100.00 | % | 1.21 | 13,342 | 100.00 | % | 1.27 | |||||||||||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments | 1,096 | 1,209 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 14,336 | $ | 14,551 |
(1)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes allowance for loan and lease losses for U.S. small business commercial loans of $1.2 billion and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
n/m = not meaningful
Net charge-offs for 2024 were $6.0 billion compared to $3.8 billion in 2023 primarily due to credit card loans and the commercial real estate office portfolio. The provision for credit losses increased $1.4 billion to $5.8 billion during 2024 compared to 2023. The provision for credit losses in 2024 was primarily driven by credit card as well as small business loan growth, and asset quality deterioration in the commercial real estate office and credit card portfolios. The provision for credit losses for the consumer portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, decreased $267 million to $4.3 billion during 2024 compared to 2023. The provision for credit losses for the
commercial portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, increased $1.7 billion to $1.6 billion during 2024 compared to 2023.
Table 40 presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses, including certain loan and allowance ratios for 2024 and 2023. For more information on the Corporation’s credit loss accounting policies and activity related to the allowance for credit losses, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 72 |
| Table 40 | Allowance for Credit Losses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, December 31 | $ | 13,342 | $ | 12,682 | ||||||
| January 1, 2023 adoption of credit loss standard | n/a | (243) | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, January 1 | $ | 13,342 | $ | 12,439 | ||||||
| Loans and leases charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (21) | (67) | ||||||||
| Home equity | (21) | (36) | ||||||||
| Credit card | (4,365) | (3,133) | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | (399) | (233) | ||||||||
| Other consumer | (313) | (504) | ||||||||
| Total consumer charge-offs | (5,119) | (3,973) | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (1) | (958) | (551) | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | (81) | (37) | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (894) | (254) | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | (2) | (2) | ||||||||
| Total commercial charge-offs | (1,935) | (844) | ||||||||
| Total loans and leases charged off | (7,054) | (4,817) | ||||||||
| Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 21 | 51 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 62 | 95 | ||||||||
| Credit card | 620 | 572 | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 160 | 141 | ||||||||
| Other consumer | 18 | 24 | ||||||||
| Total consumer recoveries | 881 | 883 | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 97 | 108 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 14 | 18 | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 30 | 9 | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 1 | — | ||||||||
| Total commercial recoveries | 142 | 135 | ||||||||
| Total recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | 1,023 | 1,018 | ||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (6,031) | (3,799) | ||||||||
| Provision for loan and lease losses | 5,935 | 4,725 | ||||||||
| Other | (6) | (23) | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, December 31 | 13,240 | 13,342 | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, January 1 | 1,209 | 1,540 | ||||||||
| Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (114) | (331) | ||||||||
| Other | 1 | — | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, December 31 | 1,096 | 1,209 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses, December 31 | $ | 14,336 | $ | 14,551 | ||||||
| Loan and allowance ratios (3): | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | $ | 1,091,586 | $ | 1,050,163 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.21 | % | 1.27 | % | ||||||
| Consumer allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total consumer loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.84 | 1.85 | ||||||||
| Commercial allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total commercial loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 0.75 | 0.82 | ||||||||
| Average loans and leases outstanding | $ | 1,056,507 | $ | 1,041,824 | ||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding | 0.57 | % | 0.36 | % | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 | 222 | 243 | ||||||||
| Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31 to net charge-offs | 2.20 | 3.51 | ||||||||
| Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | $ | 8,689 | $ | 8,357 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | 76 | % | 91 | % |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial charge-offs of $519 million in 2024 compared to $360 million in 2023.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial recoveries of $46 million in 2024 compared to $41 million in 2023.
(3)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(4)Primarily includes amounts related to credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking.
n/a = not applicable
73 Bank of America
Market Risk Management
Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions may adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities, or otherwise negatively impact earnings. This risk is inherent in the financial instruments associated with our operations, primarily within our Global Markets segment. We are also exposed to these risks in other areas of the Corporation (e.g., our ALM activities). In the event of market stress, these risks could have a material impact on our results. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 78.
Our traditional banking loan and deposit products are non-trading positions and are generally reported at amortized cost for assets or the amount owed for liabilities (historical cost). However, these positions are still subject to changes in economic value based on varying market conditions, with one of the primary risks being changes in the levels of interest rates. The risk of adverse changes in the economic value of our non-trading positions arising from changes in interest rates is managed through our ALM activities. We have elected to account for certain assets and liabilities under the fair value option.
Our trading positions are reported at fair value with changes reflected in income. Trading positions are subject to various changes in market-based risk factors. The majority of this risk is generated by our activities in the interest rate, foreign exchange, credit, equity and commodities markets. In addition, the values of assets and liabilities could change due to market liquidity, correlations across markets and expectations of market volatility. We seek to manage these risk exposures by using a variety of techniques that encompass a broad range of financial instruments. The key risk management techniques are discussed in more detail in the Trading Risk Management section.
GRM is responsible for providing senior management with a clear and comprehensive understanding of the trading risks to which we are exposed. These responsibilities include ownership of market risk policy, developing and maintaining quantitative risk models, calculating aggregated risk measures, establishing and monitoring position limits consistent with risk appetite, conducting daily reviews and analysis of trading inventory, approving material risk exposures and fulfilling regulatory requirements. Market risks that impact businesses outside of Global Markets are monitored and governed by their respective governance functions.
Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. Given that models are used across the Corporation, model risk impacts all risk types including credit, market and operational risks. The Enterprise Model Risk Policy defines model risk standards, consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite, prevailing regulatory guidance and industry best practice. All models, including risk management, valuation and regulatory capital models, must meet certain validation criteria, including effective challenge of the conceptual soundness of the model, independent model testing and ongoing monitoring through outcomes analysis and benchmarking. The Enterprise Model Risk Committee, a subcommittee of the MRC, oversees that model standards are consistent with model risk requirements and monitors the effective challenge in the model validation process across the Corporation.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents exposures to instruments whose values vary with the level or volatility of interest rates. These instruments include, but are not limited to, loans, debt securities, certain trading-related assets and liabilities, deposits, borrowings and derivatives. Hedging instruments used to mitigate these risks include derivatives such as options, futures, forwards and swaps.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange risk represents exposures to changes in the values of current holdings and future cash flows denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The types of instruments exposed to this risk include investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign currency-denominated loans and securities, future cash flows in foreign currencies arising from foreign exchange transactions, foreign currency-denominated debt and various foreign exchange derivatives whose values fluctuate with changes in the level or volatility of currency exchange rates or non-U.S. interest rates. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include foreign exchange options, currency swaps, futures, forwards, and foreign currency-denominated debt and deposits.
Mortgage Risk
Mortgage risk represents exposures to changes in the values of mortgage-related instruments. The values of these instruments are sensitive to prepayment rates, mortgage rates, agency debt ratings, default, market liquidity, government participation and interest rate volatility. Our exposure to these instruments takes several forms. For example, we trade and engage in market-making activities in a variety of mortgage securities including whole loans, pass-through certificates, commercial mortgages and collateralized mortgage obligations including collateralized debt obligations using mortgages as underlying collateral. In addition, we originate a variety of MBS, which involves the accumulation of mortgage-related loans in anticipation of eventual securitization, and we may hold positions in mortgage securities and residential mortgage loans as part of the ALM portfolio. We also record MSRs as part of our mortgage origination activities. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include derivatives such as options, swaps, futures and forwards as well as securities including MBS and U.S. Treasury securities. For more information, see Mortgage Banking Risk Management on page 80.
Equity Market Risk
Equity market risk represents exposures to securities that represent an ownership interest in a corporation in the form of domestic and foreign common stock or other equity-linked instruments. Instruments that would lead to this exposure include, but are not limited to, the following: common stock, exchange-traded funds, American Depositary Receipts, convertible bonds, listed equity options (puts and calls), OTC equity options, equity total return swaps, equity index futures and other equity derivative products. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include options, futures, swaps, convertible bonds and cash positions.
Commodity Risk
Commodity risk represents exposures to instruments traded in the petroleum, natural gas, power and metals markets. These instruments consist primarily of futures, forwards, swaps and options. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 74 |
options, futures and swaps in the same or similar commodity product, as well as cash positions.
Issuer Credit Risk
Issuer credit risk represents exposures to changes in the creditworthiness of individual issuers or groups of issuers. Our portfolio is exposed to issuer credit risk where the value of an asset may be adversely impacted by changes in the levels of credit spreads, by credit migration or by defaults. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include bonds, CDS and other credit fixed-income instruments.
Market Liquidity Risk
Market liquidity risk represents the risk that the level of expected market activity changes dramatically and, in certain cases, may even cease. This exposes us to the risk that we will not be able to transact business and execute trades in an orderly manner which may impact our results. This impact could be further exacerbated if expected hedging or pricing correlations are compromised by disproportionate demand or lack of demand for certain instruments. We utilize various risk mitigating techniques as discussed in more detail in Trading Risk Management.
Trading Risk Management
To evaluate risks in our trading activities, we focus on the actual and potential volatility of revenues generated by individual positions as well as portfolios of positions. Various techniques and procedures are utilized to enable the most complete understanding of these risks. Quantitative measures of market risk are evaluated on a daily basis from a single position to the portfolio of the Corporation. These measures include sensitivities of positions to various market risk factors, such as the potential impact on revenue from a one basis point change in interest rates, and statistical measures utilizing both actual and hypothetical market moves, such as VaR and stress testing. Periods of extreme market stress influence the reliability of these techniques to varying degrees. Qualitative evaluations of market risk utilize the suite of quantitative risk measures while understanding each of their respective limitations. Additionally, risk managers independently evaluate the risk of the portfolios under the current market environment and potential future environments.
VaR is a common statistic used to measure market risk as it allows the aggregation of market risk factors, including the effects of portfolio diversification. A VaR model simulates the value of a portfolio under a range of scenarios in order to generate a distribution of potential gains and losses. VaR represents the loss a portfolio is not expected to exceed more than a certain number of times per period, based on a specified holding period, confidence level and window of historical data. We use one VaR model consistently across the trading portfolios and it uses a historical simulation approach based on a three-year window of historical data. Our primary VaR statistic is equivalent to a 99 percent confidence level, which means that for a VaR with a one-day holding period, there should not be losses in excess of VaR, on average, 99 out of 100 trading days.
Within any VaR model, there are significant and numerous assumptions that will differ from company to company. The accuracy of a VaR model depends on the availability and quality of historical data for each of the risk factors in the portfolio. A VaR model may require additional modeling assumptions for new products that do not have the necessary historical market data or for less liquid positions for which accurate daily prices
are not consistently available. For positions with insufficient historical data for the VaR calculation, the process for establishing an appropriate proxy is based on fundamental and statistical analysis of the new product or less liquid position. This analysis identifies reasonable alternatives that replicate both the expected volatility and correlation to other market risk factors that the missing data would be expected to experience.
VaR may not be indicative of realized revenue volatility as changes in market conditions or in the composition of the portfolio can have a material impact on the results. In particular, the historical data used for the VaR calculation might indicate higher or lower levels of portfolio diversification than will be experienced. In order for the VaR model to reflect current market conditions, we update the historical data underlying our VaR model on a weekly basis, or more frequently during periods of market stress, and regularly review the assumptions underlying the model. A minor portion of risks related to our trading positions is not included in VaR. These risks are reviewed as part of our ICAAP. For more information regarding ICAAP, see Capital Management on page 48.
GRM continually reviews, evaluates and enhances our VaR model so that it reflects the material risks in our trading portfolio. Changes to the VaR model are reviewed and approved prior to implementation and any material changes are reported to management through the appropriate management committees.
Trading limits on quantitative risk measures, including VaR, are independently set by Global Markets Risk Management and reviewed on a regular basis so that trading limits remain relevant and within our overall risk appetite for market risks. Trading limits are reviewed in the context of market liquidity, volatility and strategic business priorities. Trading limits are set at both a granular level to allow for extensive coverage of risks as well as at aggregated portfolios to account for correlations among risk factors. All trading limits are approved at least annually. Approved trading limits are stored and tracked in a centralized limits management system. Trading limit excesses are communicated to management for review. Certain quantitative market risk measures and corresponding limits have been identified as critical in the Corporation’s Risk Appetite Statement. These risk appetite limits are reported on a daily basis and are approved at least annually by the ERC and the Board.
In periods of market stress, Global Markets senior leadership communicates daily to discuss losses, key risk positions and any limit excesses. As a result of this process, the businesses may selectively reduce risk.
Table 41 presents the total market-based portfolio VaR, which is the combination of the total covered positions (and less liquid trading positions) portfolio and the fair value option portfolio. Covered positions are defined by regulatory standards as trading assets and liabilities, both on- and off-balance sheet, that meet a defined set of specifications. These specifications identify the most liquid trading positions which are intended to be held for a short-term horizon and where we are able to hedge the material risk elements in a two-way market. Positions in less liquid markets, or where there are restrictions on the ability to trade the positions, typically do not qualify as covered positions. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
In addition, Table 41 presents our fair value option portfolio, which includes substantially all of the funded and unfunded exposures for which we elect the fair value option, and their
75 Bank of America
corresponding hedges. Additionally, market risk VaR for trading activities, as presented in Table 41, differs from VaR used for regulatory capital calculations due to the holding period used. The holding period for VaR used for regulatory capital calculations is 10 days, while for the market risk VaR presented below, it is one day. Both measures utilize the same process and methodology.
The total market-based portfolio VaR results in Table 41 include market risk to which we are exposed from all business segments, excluding credit valuation adjustment (CVA), DVA and related hedges. The majority of this portfolio is within the Global Markets segment.
Table 41 presents year-end, average, high and low daily trading VaR for 2024 and 2023 using a 99 percent confidence level. The amounts disclosed in Table 41 and Table 42 align to the view of covered positions used in the Basel 3 capital calculations. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, regardless of trading or banking treatment for the trade, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
The annual average of total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR marginally decreased for 2024 compared to 2023, with modest changes across asset classes.
| Table 41 | Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 21 | $ | 29 | $ | 42 | $ | 10 | $ | 29 | $ | 29 | $ | 43 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate | 58 | 57 | 91 | 30 | 51 | 48 | 86 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | 53 | 54 | 72 | 42 | 53 | 60 | 108 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 32 | 21 | 34 | 13 | 9 | 18 | 56 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 9 | 9 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 14 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (94) | (100) | n/a | n/a | (90) | (100) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 79 | 70 | 99 | 50 | 61 | 64 | 92 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures (2) | 16 | 11 | n/a | n/a | 12 | 20 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 95 | 81 | 110 | 61 | 73 | 84 | 149 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 31 | 18 | 45 | 11 | 16 | 25 | 49 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 23 | 12 | 27 | 6 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (34) | (16) | n/a | n/a | (12) | (23) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 20 | 14 | 24 | 9 | 15 | 16 | 30 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (10) | (9) | n/a | n/a | (9) | (8) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 105 | $ | 86 | 117 | 65 | $ | 79 | $ | 92 | 173 | 58 |
(1)The high and low for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the high and low for the components. Therefore the impact from less liquid exposures and the amount of portfolio diversification, which is the difference between the total portfolio and the sum of the individual components, is not relevant.
(2)Impact is net of diversification effects between the covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolios.
n/a = not applicable
The following graph presents the daily covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR for 2024, corresponding to the data in Table 41.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 76 |
Additional VaR statistics produced within our single VaR model are provided in Table 42 at the same level of detail as in Table 41. Evaluating VaR with additional statistics allows for an increased understanding of the risks in the portfolio, as the historical market data used in the VaR calculation does not necessarily follow a predefined statistical distribution. Table 42 presents average trading VaR statistics at 99 percent and 95 percent confidence levels for 2024 and 2023.
| Table 42 | Average Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities – 99 percent and 95 percent VaR Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 99 percent | 95 percent | 99 percent | 95 percent | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 29 | $ | 18 | $ | 29 | $ | 19 | |||||||||||
| Interest rate | 57 | 30 | 48 | 26 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit | 54 | 30 | 60 | 30 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity | 21 | 10 | 18 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 9 | 5 | 9 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (100) | (58) | (100) | (54) | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 70 | 35 | 64 | 34 | |||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures | 11 | 7 | 20 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 81 | 42 | 84 | 41 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 18 | 11 | 25 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 12 | 7 | 14 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (16) | (10) | (23) | (13) | |||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 14 | 8 | 16 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (9) | (5) | (8) | (5) | |||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 86 | $ | 45 | $ | 92 | $ | 44 |
Backtesting
The accuracy of the VaR methodology is evaluated by backtesting, which compares the daily VaR results, utilizing a one-day holding period, against a comparable subset of trading revenue. A backtesting excess occurs when a trading loss exceeds the VaR for the corresponding day. These excesses are evaluated to understand the positions and market moves that produced the trading loss with a goal to help confirm that the VaR methodology accurately represents those losses. We expect the frequency of trading losses in excess of VaR to be in line with the confidence level of the VaR statistic being tested. For example, with a 99 percent confidence level, we expect one trading loss in excess of VaR every 100 days or between two to three trading losses in excess of VaR over the course of a year. The number of backtesting excesses observed can differ from the statistically expected number of excesses if the current level of market volatility is materially different than the level of market volatility that existed during the three years of historical data used in the VaR calculation.
The trading revenue used for backtesting is defined by regulatory agencies in order to most closely align with the VaR component of the regulatory capital calculation. This revenue differs from total trading-related revenue in that it excludes revenue from trading activities that either do not generate market risk or for which the market risk cannot be included in VaR. Some examples of the types of revenue excluded for backtesting are fees, commissions, reserves, net interest income and intra-day trading revenues.
We conduct daily backtesting on the VaR results used for regulatory capital calculations as well as at the level of key legal entities. These results are reported to senior management, who regularly review and evaluate the results of these tests.
During 2024, there was one day where this subset of trading revenue had losses that exceeded our total covered portfolio VaR, utilizing a one-day holding period.
Total Trading-related Revenue
Total trading-related revenue, excluding brokerage fees, and CVA, DVA and funding valuation adjustment gains (losses), represents the total amount earned from trading positions, including market-based net interest income, which are taken in a diverse range of financial instruments and markets. For more information on fair value, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Trading-related revenue can be volatile and is largely driven by general market conditions and customer demand. Also, trading-related revenue is dependent on the volume and type of transactions, the level of risk assumed, and the volatility of price and rate movements at any given time within the ever-changing market environment. Significant daily revenue by business is monitored and the primary drivers of these are reviewed.
The following histogram is a graphic depiction of trading volatility and illustrates the daily level of trading-related revenue for 2024 and 2023. During 2024, positive trading-related revenue was recorded for more than 99 percent of the trading days, of which 94 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $12 million. This compares to 2023 where positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 100 percent of the trading days, of which 93 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million.
77 Bank of America
Trading Portfolio Stress Testing
Because the very nature of a VaR model suggests results can exceed our estimates and it is dependent on a limited historical window, we also stress test our portfolio using scenario analysis. This analysis estimates the change in the value of our trading portfolio that may result from abnormal market movements.
A set of scenarios, categorized as either historical or hypothetical, are computed daily for the overall trading portfolio and individual businesses. These scenarios include shocks to underlying market risk factors that may be well beyond the shocks found in the historical data used to calculate VaR. Historical scenarios simulate the impact of the market moves that occurred during a period of extended historical market stress. Generally, a multi-week period representing the most severe point during a crisis is selected for each historical scenario. Hypothetical scenarios provide estimated portfolio impacts from potential future market stress events. Scenarios are reviewed and updated in response to changing positions and new economic or political information. In addition, new or ad hoc scenarios are developed to address specific potential market events or particular vulnerabilities in the portfolio. The stress tests are reviewed on a regular basis and the results are presented to senior management.
Stress testing for the trading portfolio is integrated with enterprise-wide stress testing and incorporated into the limits framework. The macroeconomic scenarios used for enterprise-wide stress testing purposes differ from the typical trading portfolio scenarios in that they have a longer time horizon and the results are forecasted over multiple periods for use in consolidated capital and liquidity planning. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 45.
Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book
The following discussion presents net interest income for banking book activities.
Interest rate risk represents the most significant market risk exposure to our banking book balance sheet. Interest rate risk is measured as the potential change in net interest income caused by movements in market interest rates. Client-facing activities, primarily lending and deposit-taking, create interest rate sensitive positions on our balance sheet.
We prepare forward-looking forecasts of net interest income. The baseline forecast takes into consideration expected future business growth, ALM positioning and the future direction of interest rate movements as implied by market-based forward curves.
We then measure and evaluate the impact that alternative interest rate scenarios have on the baseline forecast in order to assess interest rate sensitivity under varied conditions. The net interest income forecast is frequently updated for changing assumptions and differing outlooks based on economic trends, market conditions and business strategies. Thus, we continually monitor our banking book balance sheet position in order to maintain an acceptable level of exposure to interest rate changes.
The interest rate scenarios that we analyze incorporate balance sheet assumptions such as loan and deposit growth and pricing, changes in funding mix, product repricing, maturity characteristics and investment securities premium amortization. Our overall goal is to manage interest rate risk so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect earnings and capital.
Table 43 presents the spot and 12-month forward rates used in developing the forward curve used in our baseline forecasts at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| Table 43 | Forward Rates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Federal Funds | SOFR | 10-Year SOFR | ||||||
| Spot rates | 4.50 | % | 4.49 | % | 4.07 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 4.00 | 3.94 | 4.07 | |||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||
| Spot rates | 5.50 | % | 5.38 | % | 3.47 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 3.89 | 3.93 | 3.32 |
Table 44 shows the potential pretax impact to forecasted net interest income over the next 12 months from December 31, 2024 and 2023 resulting from instantaneous parallel and non-parallel shocks to the market-based forward curve. Periodically, we evaluate the scenarios presented so that they are meaningful in the context of the current rate environment.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 78 |
| Table 44 | Estimated Banking Book Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Curve Changes | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short Rate (bps) | Long Rate (bps) | |||||||||||||
| Dynamic Deposits (1) | Static Deposits (1) | Static Deposits (1) | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | December 31 2024 | December 31 2024 | December 31 2023 | |||||||||||
| Parallel Shifts | ||||||||||||||
| +100 bps instantaneous shift | +100 | +100 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 3.1 | $ | 3.5 | ||||||
| -100 bps instantaneous shift | -100 | -100 | (2.3) | (3.3) | (3.1) | |||||||||
| +200 bps instantaneous shift | +200 | +200 | 2.0 | 6.2 | n/a | |||||||||
| -200 bps instantaneous shift | -200 | -200 | (5.4) | (6.9) | n/a | |||||||||
| Flatteners | ||||||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | +100 | — | 1.1 | 2.8 | 3.2 | |||||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | -100 | (0.1) | (0.4) | (0.3) | |||||||||
| Steepeners | ||||||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | -100 | — | (2.1) | (2.9) | (2.8) | |||||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | +100 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
(1)Dynamic Deposit sensitivity reflects behavioral customer deposit balance changes that could occur under various scenarios while Static Deposits assumes no deposit balance change.
n/a=not applicable
We continue to be asset sensitive to a parallel upward move in interest rates with the majority of that impact coming from the short end of the yield curve. Additionally, higher interest rates negatively impact the fair value of our debt securities classified as available for sale and adversely affect accumulated OCI and thus capital levels under the Basel 3 capital rules. Under instantaneous upward parallel shifts, the near-term adverse impact to Basel 3 capital would be reduced over time by offsetting positive impacts to net interest income generated from banking book activities. For more information on Basel 3, see Capital Management – Regulatory Capital on page 49.
As part of our ALM activities, we use securities, certain residential mortgages, and interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives in managing interest rate sensitivity. The sensitivity analysis in Table 44 assumes that we take no action in response to these rate shocks and does not assume any change in other macroeconomic variables normally correlated with changes in interest rates. Beginning in the second quarter of 2024, the sensitivity analysis incorporates potential movements in customer behavior that could result in changes in both total customer deposit balances and deposit balance mix, (e.g., interest bearing versus noninterest bearing), under the various interest rate scenarios. In higher rate scenarios, the analysis assumes that a portion of low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits are replaced with higher yielding deposits or market-based funding. Conversely, in lower rate scenarios, the analysis assumes that a portion of higher yielding deposits or market-based funding are replaced with low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits.
For larger interest rate scenarios, the interest rate sensitivity may behave in a non-linear manner as there are numerous estimates and assumptions, which require a high degree of judgment and are often interrelated, that could impact the outcome. Pertaining to the mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage portfolio, if long-end interest rates were to significantly decrease over the next twelve months, for example over 200 bps, there would generally be an increase in customer prepayment behaviors with an incremental reduction to net interest income, noting that the extent of changes in customer prepayment activity can be impacted by multiple factors and is not necessarily limited to long-end interest rates. Conversely, if long-end interest rates were to significantly increase over the next twelve months, for example, over 200 bps, customer prepayments would likely modestly decrease and result in an incremental increase to net interest income. In addition, deposit pricing is rate sensitive in nature. This sensitivity is assumed to have non-linear impacts to larger short-end rate movements. In
decreasing interest rate scenarios, and particularly where interest rates have decreased to small amounts, the ability to further reduce rates paid is reduced as customer rates near zero. In higher short-end rate scenarios, deposit pricing will likely increase at a faster rate, leading to incremental interest expense and reducing asset sensitivity. While the impact related to the above assumptions used in the asset sensitivity analysis can provide directional analysis on how net interest income will be impacted in changing environments, the ultimate impact is dependent upon the interrelationship of the assumptions and factors, which vary in different macroeconomic scenarios.
Economic Value of Equity
In addition to interest rate sensitivity described above, the Corporation’s management of its interest rate exposures in the banking book also considers a long-term view of interest rate sensitivity through the measurement of Economic Value of Equity (EVE). EVE captures changes in the net present value of banking book assets and liabilities under various interest rate scenarios and its impact to Tier 1 capital. Similar to net interest income, the Corporation establishes limits for EVE. EVE is largely driven by the Corporation’s longer duration fixed-rate products, such as investment securities, residential mortgages and deposits. For assets or liabilities that have no stated maturity, such as deposits, the Corporation estimates the duration for measurement purposes.
Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Derivative Contracts
We use interest rate and foreign exchange derivative contracts in our ALM activities to manage our interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Specifically, we use those derivatives to manage both the variability in cash flows and changes in fair value of various assets and liabilities arising from those risks. Our interest rate derivative contracts are generally non-leveraged swaps tied to various benchmark interest rates and foreign exchange basis swaps, options, futures and forwards, and our foreign exchange contracts include cross-currency interest rate swaps, foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency forward contracts and options.
The derivatives used in our ALM activities can be split into two broad categories: designated accounting hedges and other risk management derivatives. Designated accounting hedges are primarily used to manage our exposure to interest rates as described in the Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book section and are included in the sensitivities presented in Table 44. The Corporation also uses foreign currency derivatives
79 Bank of America
in accounting hedges to manage substantially all of the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations. By hedging the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations, the Corporation's market risk exposure in this area is not significant.
Risk management derivatives are predominantly used to hedge foreign exchange risks related to various foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities and eliminate substantially all foreign currency exposures in the cash flows of the Corporation’s non-trading foreign currency-denominated financial instruments. These foreign exchange derivatives are sensitive to other market risk exposures such as cross-currency basis spreads and interest rate risk. However, as these features are not a significant component of these foreign exchange derivatives, the market risk related to this exposure is not significant. For more information on the accounting for derivatives, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mortgage Banking Risk Management
We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subject us to credit, liquidity and interest rate risks, among others. We determine whether loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment and manage credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing a portion of the loans we originate.
Interest rate risk and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Changes in interest rates and other market factors impact the volume of mortgage originations. Changes in interest rates also impact the value of interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) and the related residential first mortgage LHFS between the date of the IRLC and the date the loans are sold to the secondary market. An increase in mortgage interest rates typically leads to a decrease in the value of these instruments. Conversely, when there is an increase in interest rates, the value of the MSRs will increase driven by lower prepayment expectations. Because the interest rate risks of these hedged items offset, we combine them into one overall hedged item with one combined economic hedge portfolio consisting of derivative contracts and securities.
Compliance and Operational Risk Management
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable LRRs and our internal policies and procedures (collectively, applicable LRRs). We are subject to comprehensive and evolving regulation under federal and state laws, rules and regulations in the U.S. and the laws of the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those related to financial crimes and anti-money laundering, market conduct, trading activities, fair lending, privacy, data protection, development and use of AI, and unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, people or external events, and includes legal risk. Operational risk may occur anywhere in the Corporation, including third-party business processes, and is not limited to operations functions. The Corporation faces a number of key operational risks including third-party risk, model risk, conduct risk, technology risk, information security risk and data risk. The pace of technological change, including in the field of AI, may heighten risks in those areas. Operational risk can result in financial losses and reputational impacts and is a component in
the calculation of total RWA used in the Basel 3 capital calculation. For more information on Basel 3 calculations, see Capital Management on page 48.
FLUs and control functions are first and foremost responsible for managing all aspects of their businesses, including their compliance and operational risk. FLUs and control functions are required to understand their business processes and related risks and controls, including third-party dependencies and the related regulatory requirements, and monitor and report on the effectiveness of the control environment. In order to actively monitor and assess the performance of their processes and controls, they must conduct comprehensive quality assurance activities and identify issues and risks to remediate control gaps and weaknesses. FLUs and control functions must also adhere to compliance and operational risk appetite limits to meet strategic, capital and financial planning objectives. Finally, FLUs and control functions are responsible for the proactive identification, management and escalation of compliance and operational risks across the Corporation. Collectively, these efforts are important to strengthen their compliance and operational resiliency, which is the ability to deliver critical operations through disruption. To address AI-related risks, we have implemented internal processes and governance frameworks. These measures help with regulatory compliance and responsible use of AI across our operations.
Global Compliance and Operational Risk teams independently assess compliance and operational risk, monitor business activities and processes and evaluate FLUs and control functions for adherence to applicable LRRs, including identifying issues and risks, and reporting on the state of the control environment. Corporate Audit provides an independent assessment and validation through testing of key compliance and operational risk processes and controls across the Corporation.
The Corporation's Global Compliance – Enterprise Policy and Operational Risk Management – Enterprise Policy set the requirements for reporting compliance and operational risk information to executive management as well as the Board or appropriate Board-level committees and reflect Global Compliance and Operational Risk’s responsibilities for conducting independent oversight of the Corporation’s compliance and operational risk management activities. The Board provides oversight of compliance risk through its Audit Committee and the ERC, and operational risk through its ERC.
FY 2023 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000070858-24-000122.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Bank of America Corporation (the Corporation) and its management may make certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipates,” “targets,” “expects,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “believes,” “continue” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements represent the Corporation’s current expectations, plans or forecasts of its future results, revenues, liquidity, net interest income, provision for credit losses, expenses, efficiency ratio, capital measures, strategy, deposits, assets, and future business and economic conditions more generally, and other future matters. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the following uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: and in any of the Corporation’s subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission filings: the Corporation’s potential judgments, orders, settlements, penalties, fines and reputational damage resulting from pending or future litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings and enforcement actions, including as a result of our participation in and execution of government programs related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, such as the processing of unemployment benefits for California and certain other states; the possibility that the Corporation’s future liabilities may be in excess of its recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation, and regulatory and government actions; the possibility that the Corporation could face increased claims from one or more parties involved in mortgage securitizations; the Corporation’s ability to resolve representations and warranties repurchase and related claims; the risks related to the discontinuation of reference rates, including increased expenses and litigation and the effectiveness of hedging strategies; uncertainties about the financial stability and growth rates of non-U.S. jurisdictions, the risk that those jurisdictions may face difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, and related stresses on financial markets, currencies and trade, and the Corporation’s exposures to such risks, including direct, indirect and operational; the impact of U.S. and global interest rates, inflation, currency exchange rates, economic conditions, trade policies and tensions, including tariffs, and potential geopolitical instability; the impact of the interest rate, inflationary, macroeconomic, banking and regulatory environment on the Corporation’s assets, business, financial condition and results of operations; the impact of adverse developments affecting the U.S. or global banking industry, including bank failures and liquidity concerns, resulting in worsening economic and market volatility, and regulatory responses thereto; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions and other uncertainties, including the impact of supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures and
labor shortages on economic conditions and our business; potential losses related to the Corporation's concentration of credit risk; the Corporation’s ability to achieve its expense targets and expectations regarding revenue, net interest income, provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, effective tax rate, loan growth or other projections; adverse changes to the Corporation’s credit ratings from the major credit rating agencies; an inability to access capital markets or maintain deposits or borrowing costs; estimates of the fair value and other accounting values, subject to impairment assessments, of certain of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities; the estimated or actual impact of changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying those standards; uncertainty regarding the content, timing and impact of regulatory capital and liquidity requirements; the impact of adverse changes to total loss-absorbing capacity requirements, stress capital buffer requirements and/or global systemically important bank surcharges; the potential impact of actions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the Corporation’s capital plans; the effect of changes in or interpretations of income tax laws and regulations; the impact of implementation and compliance with U.S. and international laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including, but not limited to, recovery and resolution planning requirements, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Volcker Rule, fiduciary standards, derivatives regulations and potential changes to loss allocations between financial institutions and customers, including for losses incurred from the use of our products and services, including electronic payments and payment of checks, that were authorized by the customer but induced by fraud; the impact of failures or disruptions in or breaches of the Corporation’s operations or information systems or those of third parties, including as a result of cybersecurity incidents; the risks related to the development, implementation, use and management of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and machine learning; the risks related to the transition and physical impacts of climate change; our ability to achieve environmental, social and governance goals and commitments or the impact of any changes in the Corporation’s sustainability strategy or commitments generally; the impact of any future federal government shutdown and uncertainty regarding the federal government’s debt limit or changes in fiscal, monetary or regulatory policy; the emergence or continuation of widespread health emergencies or pandemics; the impact of natural disasters, extreme weather events, military conflicts (including the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the conflict in the Middle East, the possible expansion of such conflicts and potential geopolitical consequences), terrorism or other geopolitical events; and other matters.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-year presentation. Throughout the MD&A, the Corporation uses certain acronyms and abbreviations which are defined in the Glossary.
25 Bank of America
Executive Summary
Business Overview
The Corporation is a Delaware corporation, a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company. When used in this report, “Bank of America,” “the Corporation,” “we,” “us” and “our” may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation’s subsidiaries or affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Through our various bank and nonbank subsidiaries throughout the U.S. and in international markets, we provide a diversified range of banking and nonbank financial services and products through four business segments: Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We operate our banking activities primarily under the Bank of America, National Association (Bank of America, N.A. or BANA) charter. At December 31, 2023, the Corporation had $3.2 trillion in assets and a headcount of approximately 213,000 employees.
As of December 31, 2023, we served clients through operations across the U.S., its territories and more than 35 countries. Our retail banking footprint covers all major markets in the U.S., and we serve approximately 69 million consumer and small business clients with approximately 3,800 retail financial centers, approximately 15,000 ATMs, and leading digital banking platforms (www.bankofamerica.com) with approximately 46 million active users, including approximately 38 million active mobile users. We offer industry-leading support to approximately four million small business households. Our GWIM businesses, with client balances of $3.8 trillion, provide tailored solutions to meet client needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking, trust and retirement products. We are a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading across a broad range of asset classes serving corporations, governments, institutions and individuals around the world.
Recent Developments
Capital Management
On January 31, 2024, the Corporation’s Board of Directors (the Board) declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.24 per share, payable on March 29, 2024 to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2024.
For more information on our capital resources, see Capital Management on page 47.
Impact of BSBY’s Future Cessation
In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Corporation recognized a net non-cash, pretax charge of approximately $1.6 billion in market making and similar activities as a result of the announcement of Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield Index’s (BSBY) future cessation. For more information, see Business Segment Operations – All Other on page 43, Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2024.
FDIC Special Assessment
On November 16, 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued its final rule to impose a special assessment to recover the loss to the Deposit Insurance Fund resulting from the closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2023, the Corporation recorded noninterest expense of $2.1 billion for its estimated assessment amount. For more information, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financial Highlights
| Table 1 | Summary Income Statement and Selected Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions, except per share information) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 56,931 | $ | 52,462 | ||||||
| Noninterest income | 41,650 | 42,488 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 98,581 | 94,950 | ||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 4,394 | 2,543 | ||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 65,845 | 61,438 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 28,342 | 30,969 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,827 | 3,441 | ||||||||
| Net income | 26,515 | 27,528 | ||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends and other | 1,649 | 1,513 | ||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | $ | 24,866 | $ | 26,015 | ||||||
| Per common share information | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.10 | $ | 3.21 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.08 | 3.19 | ||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.92 | 0.86 | ||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.84 | % | 0.88 | % | ||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.75 | 10.75 | ||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2) | 13.46 | 15.15 | ||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (1) | 66.79 | 64.71 | ||||||||
| Balance sheet at year end | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,053,732 | $ | 1,045,747 | ||||||
| Total assets | 3,180,151 | 3,051,375 | ||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,923,827 | 1,930,341 | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,888,505 | 2,778,178 | ||||||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | 263,249 | 244,800 | ||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 291,646 | 273,197 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 170.
(2)Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information and a corresponding reconciliation to the most closely related financial measures defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
Net income was $26.5 billion, or $3.08 per diluted share in 2023 compared to $27.5 billion, or $3.19 per diluted share in 2022. The decrease in net income was primarily due to higher noninterest expense and provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher net interest income.
For discussion and analysis of our consolidated and business segment results of operations for 2022 compared to 2021, see Financial Highlights and Business Segment Operations sections in the MD&A of the Corporation’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 26 |
Net Interest Income
Net interest income increased $4.5 billion to $56.9 billion in 2023 compared to 2022. Net interest yield on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis increased 12 basis points (bps) to 2.08 percent for 2023. The increases were primarily driven by benefits from higher interest rates and loan growth, partially offset by higher funding costs, lower deposits and net interest income related to Global Markets activity. For more information on net interest yield and FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 29, and for more information on interest rate risk management, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 77.
Noninterest Income
| Table 2 | Noninterest Income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Fees and commissions: | ||||||||||
| Card income | $ | 6,054 | $ | 6,083 | ||||||
| Service charges | 5,684 | 6,405 | ||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 15,563 | 15,901 | ||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 4,708 | 4,823 | ||||||||
| Total fees and commissions | 32,009 | 33,212 | ||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 12,732 | 12,075 | ||||||||
| Other income | (3,091) | (2,799) | ||||||||
| Total noninterest income | $ | 41,650 | $ | 42,488 |
Noninterest income decreased $838 million to $41.7 billion in 2023 compared to 2022. The following highlights the significant changes.
● Service charges decreased $721 million primarily driven by the impact of non-sufficient funds and overdraft policy changes, as well as lower treasury service charges.
● Investment and brokerage services decreased $338 million primarily due to lower transactional revenue and asset management fees driven by declines in assets under management (AUM) pricing, as well as lower average market valuations, partially offset by the impact of positive AUM flows.
● Investment banking fees decreased $115 million primarily due to lower advisory and debt issuance fees, partially offset by higher equity issuance fees.
● Market making and similar activities increased $657 million primarily driven by improved trading in mortgage products in Fixed Income, Currencies and Commodities (FICC) and by the impact of higher interest rates on client financing activities in Equities, partially offset by the net $1.6 billion impact of BSBY’s future cessation.
● Other income decreased $292 million primarily due to higher partnership losses on tax-advantaged investments and losses on sales of available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities, partially offset by certain negative valuation adjustments in the prior year.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses increased $1.9 billion to $4.4 billion in 2023 compared to 2022. The provision for credit losses for 2023 was driven by our consumer portfolio primarily due to credit card loan growth and asset quality, partially offset by improved macroeconomic conditions that primarily benefited our commercial portfolio. For the same period in the prior year, the provision for credit losses was primarily driven by loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic outlook, partially offset by a reduction in COVID-19 pandemic uncertainties. For more information on the provision for credit losses, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 71.
Noninterest Expense
| Table 3 | Noninterest Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 38,330 | $ | 36,447 | ||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 7,164 | 7,071 | ||||||||
| Information processing and communications | 6,707 | 6,279 | ||||||||
| Product delivery and transaction related | 3,608 | 3,653 | ||||||||
| Marketing | 1,927 | 1,825 | ||||||||
| Professional fees | 2,159 | 2,142 | ||||||||
| Other general operating | 5,950 | 4,021 | ||||||||
| Total noninterest expense | $ | 65,845 | $ | 61,438 |
Noninterest expense increased $4.4 billion to $65.8 billion in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily due to higher investments in people and technology and higher FDIC expense, including $2.1 billion for the estimated special assessment amount arising from the closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, partially offset by lower litigation expense and revenue-related compensation.
Income Tax Expense
| Table 4 | Income Tax Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 28,342 | $ | 30,969 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,827 | 3,441 | ||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 6.4 | % | 11.1 | % |
Income tax expense was $1.8 billion for 2023 compared to $3.4 billion in 2022, resulting in an effective tax rate of 6.4 percent compared to 11.1 percent.
The effective tax rates for 2023 and 2022 were primarily driven by our recurring tax preference benefits, which primarily consisted of tax credits from investments in affordable housing and renewable energy. Also included in the effective tax rate for 2023 were tax impacts from charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2023 related to the FDIC special assessment and the impact of BSBY’s future cessation. For more information on these charges, see Executive Summary – Recent Developments on page 26. For more information on our recurring tax preference benefits, see Note 19 – Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Absent the tax credits related to tax-advantaged investments and discrete tax benefits, the effective tax rates would have been approximately 25 percent for both periods.
27 Bank of America
Balance Sheet Overview
| Table 5 | Selected Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 333,073 | $ | 230,203 | $ | 102,870 | 45 | % | ||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 280,624 | 267,574 | 13,050 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 277,354 | 296,108 | (18,754) | (6) | ||||||||||
| Debt securities | 871,407 | 862,819 | 8,588 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases | 1,053,732 | 1,045,747 | 7,985 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | (13,342) | (12,682) | (660) | 5 | ||||||||||
| All other assets | 377,303 | 361,606 | 15,697 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,180,151 | $ | 3,051,375 | $ | 128,776 | 4 | |||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 1,923,827 | $ | 1,930,341 | $ | (6,514) | — | |||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 283,887 | 195,635 | 88,252 | 45 | ||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 95,530 | 80,399 | 15,131 | 19 | ||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 32,098 | 26,932 | 5,166 | 19 | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 302,204 | 275,982 | 26,222 | 10 | ||||||||||
| All other liabilities | 250,959 | 268,889 | (17,930) | (7) | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,888,505 | 2,778,178 | 110,327 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 291,646 | 273,197 | 18,449 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,180,151 | $ | 3,051,375 | $ | 128,776 | 4 |
Assets
At December 31, 2023, total assets were approximately $3.2 trillion, up $128.8 billion from December 31, 2022. The increase in assets was primarily due to higher cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents increased $102.9 billion primarily driven by increased funding to support balance sheet and liquidity positioning.
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Borrowed or Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Federal funds transactions involve lending reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are collateralized lending transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and obtain securities for settlement and for collateral. Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell increased $13.1 billion primarily due to the investment of excess cash from higher federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term borrowings and long-term debt, as well as client activity within Global Markets.
Trading Account Assets
Trading account assets consist primarily of long positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. government and agency securities, corporate securities and non-U.S. sovereign debt. Trading account assets decreased $18.8 billion primarily due to a decline in inventory within Global Markets.
Debt Securities
Debt securities primarily include U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (MBS), principally agency MBS, non-U.S. bonds, corporate bonds and municipal debt. We reinvest cash in the debt securities portfolio primarily to manage interest rate and liquidity risk. Debt securities increased $8.6 billion primarily due to investment of excess cash from higher federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term borrowings and long-term
debt. For more information on debt securities, see Note 4 – Securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans and Leases
Loans and leases increased $8.0 billion primarily driven by higher credit card spending and growth in commercial loans. For more information on the loan portfolio, see Credit Risk Management on page 57.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses increased $660 million driven by the Corporation’s consumer portfolio primarily due to credit card loan growth and asset quality, partially offset by a reserve release in the Corporation’s commercial portfolio primarily driven by improved macroeconomic conditions applicable to the commercial portfolio. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 71.
All Other Assets
All other assets increased $15.7 billion primarily driven by Global Markets activity.
Liabilities
At December 31, 2023, total liabilities were approximately $2.9 trillion, up $110.3 billion from December 31, 2022, primarily due to higher federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase and long-term debt.
Deposits
Deposits decreased $6.5 billion primarily due to an increase in customer spending and customers’ movement of balances to higher yielding investment alternatives.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Loaned or Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Federal funds transactions involve borrowing reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are collateralized borrowing transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and finance assets on the balance sheet. Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 28 |
under agreements to repurchase increased $88.3 billion primarily driven by an increase in repurchase agreements to support liquidity.
Trading Account Liabilities
Trading account liabilities consist primarily of short positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. Treasury and agency securities, non-U.S. sovereign debt and corporate securities. Trading account liabilities increased $15.1 billion primarily due to higher levels of short positions within Global Markets.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings provide an additional funding source and primarily consist of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) short-term borrowings, notes payable and various other borrowings that generally have maturities of one year or less. Short-term borrowings increased $5.2 billion primarily due to an increase in FHLB advances and commercial paper to manage liquidity needs. For more information on short-term borrowings, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt increased $26.2 billion primarily due to debt issuances and valuation adjustments, partially offset by debt maturities and redemptions. For more information on long-term debt, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
All Other Liabilities
All other liabilities decreased $17.9 billion primarily driven by Global Markets activity.
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity increased $18.4 billion primarily due to net income and market value increases on derivatives, partially offset by returns of capital to shareholders through common and preferred stock dividends and common stock repurchases.
Cash Flows Overview
The Corporation’s operating assets and liabilities support our global markets and lending activities. We believe that cash flows from operations, available cash balances and our ability to generate cash through short- and long-term debt are sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs. Our investing activities primarily include the debt securities portfolio and loans and leases. Our financing activities reflect cash flows primarily related to customer deposits, securities financing agreements, long-term debt and common and preferred stock. For more information on liquidity, see Liquidity Risk on page 52.
Supplemental Financial Data
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this Form 10-K, we present certain non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items or otherwise include components that differ from the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures are provided as additional useful information to assess our financial condition, results of operations (including period-to-period operating performance) or compliance with prospective regulatory requirements. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended as a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may not be defined or calculated the same way as non-GAAP financial measures used
by other companies.
When presented on a consolidated basis, net interest income on an FTE basis is a non-GAAP financial measure. To derive the FTE basis, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before-tax basis with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. For purposes of this calculation, we use the federal statutory tax rate of 21 percent and a representative state tax rate. Net interest yield, which measures the basis points we earn over the cost of funds, utilizes net interest income on an FTE basis. We believe that presentation of these items on an FTE basis allows for comparison of amounts from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practices.
We may present certain key performance indicators and ratios excluding certain items (e.g., debit valuation adjustment (DVA) gains (losses)), which result in non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that the presentation of measures that exclude these items is useful because such measures provide additional information to assess the underlying operational performance and trends of our businesses and to allow better comparison of period-to-period operating performance.
We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible equity, a non-GAAP financial measure. Tangible equity represents shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)), net of related deferred tax liabilities (“adjusted” shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity). These measures are used to evaluate our use of equity. In addition, profitability, relationship and investment models use both return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity and return on average tangible shareholders’ equity as key measures to support our overall growth objectives. These ratios are:
● Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity measures our net income applicable to common shareholders as a percentage of adjusted average common shareholders’ equity. The tangible common equity ratio represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity measures our net income as a percentage of adjusted average total shareholders’ equity. The tangible equity ratio represents adjusted ending shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Tangible book value per common share represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by ending common shares outstanding.
We believe ratios utilizing tangible equity provide additional useful information because they present measures of those assets that can generate income. Tangible book value per common share provides additional useful information about the level of tangible assets in relation to outstanding shares of common stock.
The aforementioned supplemental data and performance measures are presented in Tables 6 and 7.
For more information on the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators (key performance indicators) that management uses when assessing our consolidated and/or segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our underlying operational
29 Bank of America
performance and trends. These key performance indicators (KPIs) may not be defined or calculated in the same way as similar KPIs used by other companies. For information on how these metrics are defined, see Key Metrics on page 170.
Our consolidated key performance indicators, which include
various equity and credit metrics, are presented in Table 1 on page 26, Table 6 on page 30 and Table 7 on page 31.
For information on key segment performance metrics, see Business Segment Operations on page 34.
| Table 6 | Selected Annual Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions, except per share information) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 56,931 | $ | 52,462 | $ | 42,934 | ||||
| Noninterest income | 41,650 | 42,488 | 46,179 | |||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 98,581 | 94,950 | 89,113 | |||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 4,394 | 2,543 | (4,594) | |||||||
| Noninterest expense | 65,845 | 61,438 | 59,731 | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | 28,342 | 30,969 | 33,976 | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,827 | 3,441 | 1,998 | |||||||
| Net income | 26,515 | 27,528 | 31,978 | |||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 24,866 | 26,015 | 30,557 | |||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 8,028.6 | 8,113.7 | 8,493.3 | |||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 8,080.5 | 8,167.5 | 8,558.4 | |||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.84 | % | 0.88 | % | 1.05 | % | ||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.75 | 10.75 | 12.23 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 13.46 | 15.15 | 17.02 | |||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 9.36 | 10.18 | 11.68 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 12.44 | 13.76 | 15.71 | |||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 9.17 | 8.95 | 8.52 | |||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.28 | 8.02 | 7.74 | |||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.99 | 8.62 | 9.02 | |||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 29.65 | 26.77 | 21.51 | |||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.10 | $ | 3.21 | $ | 3.60 | ||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.08 | 3.19 | 3.57 | |||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.78 | |||||||
| Book value (1) | 33.34 | 30.61 | 30.37 | |||||||
| Tangible book value (2) | 24.46 | 21.83 | 21.68 | |||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 265,840 | $ | 264,853 | $ | 359,383 | ||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,046,256 | $ | 1,016,782 | $ | 920,401 | ||||
| Total assets | 3,153,513 | 3,135,894 | 3,034,623 | |||||||
| Total deposits | 1,887,541 | 1,986,158 | 1,914,286 | |||||||
| Long-term debt | 248,853 | 246,479 | 237,703 | |||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 254,956 | 241,981 | 249,787 | |||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 283,353 | 270,299 | 273,757 | |||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (3) | $ | 14,551 | $ | 14,222 | $ | 13,843 | ||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 5,630 | 3,978 | 4,697 | |||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (4) | 1.27 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.28 | % | ||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (4) | 243 | 333 | 271 | |||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 3,799 | $ | 2,172 | $ | 2,243 | ||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (4) | 0.36 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.25 | % | ||||
| Capital ratios at year end (5) | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.8 | % | 11.2 | % | 10.6 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 13.5 | 13.0 | 12.1 | |||||||
| Total capital | 15.2 | 14.9 | 14.1 | |||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 7.1 | 7.0 | 6.4 | |||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.1 | 5.9 | 5.5 | |||||||
| Tangible equity (2) | 7.1 | 6.8 | 6.4 | |||||||
| Tangible common equity (2) | 6.2 | 5.9 | 5.7 |
(1)For definition, see Key Metrics on page 170.
(2)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 29 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(3)Includes the allowance for loan and leases losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(4)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 62 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 66 and corresponding Table 33.
(5)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 47.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 30 |
| Table 7 | Selected Quarterly Financial Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Quarters | 2022 Quarters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share information) | Fourth | Third | Second | First | Fourth | Third | Second | First | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 13,946 | $ | 14,379 | $ | 14,158 | $ | 14,448 | $ | 14,681 | $ | 13,765 | $ | 12,444 | $ | 11,572 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 8,013 | 10,788 | 11,039 | 11,810 | 9,851 | 10,737 | 10,244 | 11,656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 21,959 | 25,167 | 25,197 | 26,258 | 24,532 | 24,502 | 22,688 | 23,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 1,104 | 1,234 | 1,125 | 931 | 1,092 | 898 | 523 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 17,731 | 15,838 | 16,038 | 16,238 | 15,543 | 15,303 | 15,273 | 15,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 3,124 | 8,095 | 8,034 | 9,089 | 7,897 | 8,301 | 6,892 | 7,879 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | (20) | 293 | 626 | 928 | 765 | 1,219 | 645 | 812 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 3,144 | 7,802 | 7,408 | 8,161 | 7,132 | 7,082 | 6,247 | 7,067 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 2,838 | 7,270 | 7,102 | 7,656 | 6,904 | 6,579 | 5,932 | 6,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 7,990.9 | 8,017.1 | 8,040.9 | 8,065.9 | 8,088.3 | 8,107.7 | 8,121.6 | 8,136.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 8,062.5 | 8,075.9 | 8,080.7 | 8,182.3 | 8,155.7 | 8,160.8 | 8,163.1 | 8,202.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.39 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.94 | % | 1.07 | % | 0.92 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.79 | % | 0.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Four-quarter trailing return on average assets (2) | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 4.33 | 11.24 | 11.21 | 12.48 | 11.24 | 10.79 | 9.93 | 11.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (3) | 5.92 | 15.47 | 15.49 | 17.38 | 15.79 | 15.21 | 14.05 | 15.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 4.32 | 10.86 | 10.52 | 11.94 | 10.38 | 10.37 | 9.34 | 10.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (3) | 5.71 | 14.41 | 14.00 | 15.98 | 13.98 | 13.99 | 12.66 | 14.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 9.17 | 9.10 | 9.07 | 8.77 | 8.95 | 8.77 | 8.65 | 8.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.28 | 8.20 | 8.16 | 7.88 | 8.02 | 7.82 | 7.71 | 7.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.98 | 9.11 | 8.89 | 8.95 | 8.87 | 8.73 | 8.49 | 8.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 67.42 | 26.39 | 24.88 | 23.17 | 25.71 | 27.06 | 28.68 | 25.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings | 0.35 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book value (1) | 33.34 | 32.65 | 32.05 | 31.58 | 30.61 | 29.96 | 29.87 | 29.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible book value (3) | 24.46 | 23.79 | 23.23 | 22.78 | 21.83 | 21.21 | 21.13 | 20.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 265,840 | $ | 216,942 | $ | 228,188 | $ | 228,012 | $ | 264,853 | $ | 242,338 | $ | 250,136 | $ | 332,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,050,705 | $ | 1,046,254 | $ | 1,046,608 | $ | 1,041,352 | $ | 1,039,247 | $ | 1,034,334 | $ | 1,014,886 | $ | 977,793 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 3,213,159 | 3,128,466 | 3,175,358 | 3,096,058 | 3,074,289 | 3,105,546 | 3,157,855 | 3,207,702 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,905,011 | 1,876,153 | 1,875,353 | 1,893,649 | 1,925,544 | 1,962,775 | 2,012,079 | 2,045,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 256,262 | 245,819 | 248,480 | 244,759 | 243,871 | 250,204 | 245,781 | 246,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 260,221 | 256,578 | 254,028 | 248,855 | 243,647 | 241,882 | 239,523 | 242,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 288,618 | 284,975 | 282,425 | 277,252 | 272,629 | 271,017 | 268,197 | 269,309 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (4) | $ | 14,551 | $ | 14,640 | $ | 14,338 | $ | 13,951 | $ | 14,222 | $ | 13,817 | $ | 13,434 | $ | 13,483 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (5) | 5,630 | 4,993 | 4,274 | 4,083 | 3,978 | 4,156 | 4,326 | 4,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (5) | 1.27 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (5) | 243 | 275 | 314 | 319 | 333 | 309 | 288 | 262 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 1,192 | $ | 931 | $ | 869 | $ | 807 | $ | 689 | $ | 520 | $ | 571 | $ | 392 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (5) | 0.45 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Capital ratios at period end (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.8 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.6 | % | 11.4 | % | 11.2 | % | 11.0 | % | 10.5 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 13.5 | 13.6 | 13.3 | 13.1 | 13.0 | 12.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital | 15.2 | 15.4 | 15.1 | 15.0 | 14.9 | 14.7 | 14.2 | 14.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 5.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible equity (3) | 7.1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common equity (3) | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity and long-term debt metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to risk-weighted assets | 29.0 | % | 29.3 | % | 28.8 | % | 28.8 | % | 29.0 | % | 28.9 | % | 27.8 | % | 27.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to supplementary leverage exposure | 13.0 | 13.3 | 13.0 | 13.1 | 13.2 | 13.0 | 12.6 | 12.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to risk-weighted assets | 14.5 | 14.8 | 14.6 | 14.8 | 15.2 | 15.2 | 14.7 | 14.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to supplementary leverage exposure | 6.5 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.5 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 170.
(2)Calculated as total net income for four consecutive quarters divided by annualized average assets for four consecutive quarters.
(3)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 29 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(4)Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(5)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 62 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 66 and corresponding Table 33.
(6)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 47.
31 Bank of America
| Table 8 | Average Balances and Interest Rates - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | InterestIncome/Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | 324,389 | $ | 15,965 | 4.92 | % | $ | 195,564 | $ | 2,591 | 1.32 | % | $ | 255,595 | $ | 172 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 9,704 | 465 | 4.79 | 9,209 | 132 | 1.44 | 7,603 | 15 | 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (2) | 291,669 | 18,679 | 6.40 | 292,799 | 4,560 | 1.56 | 267,257 | (90) | (0.03) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 189,263 | 8,849 | 4.68 | 158,102 | 5,586 | 3.53 | 147,891 | 3,823 | 2.58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 794,192 | 20,332 | 2.55 | 922,730 | 17,207 | 1.86 | 905,169 | 12,433 | 1.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases (3): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 229,001 | 6,923 | 3.02 | 227,604 | 6,375 | 2.80 | 216,983 | 5,995 | 2.76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 25,969 | 1,471 | 5.67 | 27,364 | 959 | 3.50 | 31,014 | 1,066 | 3.44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 96,190 | 10,436 | 10.85 | 83,539 | 8,408 | 10.06 | 75,385 | 7,772 | 10.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 104,571 | 5,200 | 4.97 | 107,050 | 3,317 | 3.10 | 96,472 | 2,276 | 2.36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 455,731 | 24,030 | 5.27 | 445,557 | 19,059 | 4.28 | 419,854 | 17,109 | 4.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 378,212 | 19,494 | 5.15 | 366,748 | 12,251 | 3.34 | 324,795 | 8,606 | 2.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 125,486 | 8,023 | 6.39 | 125,222 | 3,702 | 2.96 | 99,584 | 1,752 | 1.76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate (4) | 72,981 | 5,162 | 7.07 | 65,421 | 2,595 | 3.97 | 60,303 | 1,496 | 2.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 13,846 | 646 | 4.67 | 13,834 | 473 | 3.42 | 15,865 | 462 | 2.91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 590,525 | 33,325 | 5.64 | 571,225 | 19,021 | 3.33 | 500,547 | 12,316 | 2.46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 1,046,256 | 57,355 | 5.48 | 1,016,782 | 38,080 | 3.75 | 920,401 | 29,425 | 3.20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 98,127 | 9,184 | 9.36 | 105,674 | 4,847 | 4.59 | 112,512 | 2,321 | 2.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 2,753,600 | 130,829 | 4.75 | 2,700,860 | 73,003 | 2.70 | 2,616,428 | 48,099 | 1.84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 26,076 | 28,029 | 31,214 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets, less allowance for loan and lease losses | 373,837 | 407,005 | 386,981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,153,513 | $ | 3,135,894 | $ | 3,034,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposits | 952,736 | 15,527 | 1.63 | % | 987,247 | 3,145 | 0.32 | % | 925,970 | 314 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 254,476 | 7,366 | 2.89 | 166,490 | 818 | 0.49 | 161,512 | 170 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 1,207,212 | 22,893 | 1.90 | 1,153,737 | 3,963 | 0.34 | 1,087,482 | 484 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 96,845 | 3,270 | 3.38 | 80,951 | 755 | 0.93 | 82,769 | 53 | 0.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 1,304,057 | 26,163 | 2.01 | 1,234,688 | 4,718 | 0.38 | 1,170,251 | 537 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased, securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 301,015 | 20,583 | 6.84 | 214,369 | 4,117 | 1.92 | 210,848 | 461 | 0.22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities (2) | 152,548 | 9,970 | 6.54 | 137,277 | 2,861 | 2.08 | 106,975 | (819) | (0.77) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 46,083 | 2,043 | 4.43 | 51,208 | 1,538 | 3.00 | 54,107 | 1,128 | 2.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 248,853 | 14,572 | 5.86 | 246,479 | 6,869 | 2.79 | 237,703 | 3,431 | 1.44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 2,052,556 | 73,331 | 3.57 | 1,884,021 | 20,103 | 1.07 | 1,779,884 | 4,738 | 0.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing sources: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing deposits | 583,484 | 751,470 | 744,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities (5) | 234,120 | 230,104 | 236,947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 283,353 | 270,299 | 273,757 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,153,513 | $ | 3,135,894 | $ | 3,034,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest spread | 1.18 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact of noninterest-bearing sources | 0.90 | 0.33 | 0.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income/yield on earning assets (6) | $ | 57,498 | 2.08 | % | $ | 52,900 | 1.96 | % | $ | 43,361 | 1.66 | % |
(1)Includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 77.
(2)For more information on negative interest, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)Nonperforming loans are included in the respective average loan balances. Income on these nonperforming loans is generally recognized on a cost recovery basis.
(4)Includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $67.2 billion, $61.1 billion and $56.5 billion, and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $5.8 billion, $4.3 billion and $3.8 billion for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(5)Includes $40.2 billion, $30.7 billion and $30.4 billion of structured notes and liabilities for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(6)Net interest income includes FTE adjustments of $567 million, $438 million and $427 million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 32 |
| Table 9 | Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Volume | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | From 2022 to 2023 | From 2021 to 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | 1,691 | $ | 11,683 | $ | 13,374 | $ | (35) | $ | 2,454 | $ | 2,419 | ||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 8 | 325 | 333 | 2 | 115 | 117 | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | (10) | 14,129 | 14,119 | 2 | 4,648 | 4,650 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 1,095 | 2,168 | 3,263 | 256 | 1,507 | 1,763 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | (2,435) | 5,560 | 3,125 | 301 | 4,473 | 4,774 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 37 | 511 | 548 | 287 | 93 | 380 | ||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | (50) | 562 | 512 | (125) | 18 | (107) | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 1,269 | 759 | 2,028 | 841 | (205) | 636 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | (75) | 1,958 | 1,883 | 250 | 791 | 1,041 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 4,971 | 1,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 381 | 6,862 | 7,243 | 1,113 | 2,532 | 3,645 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 12 | 4,309 | 4,321 | 452 | 1,498 | 1,950 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 302 | 2,265 | 2,567 | 126 | 973 | 1,099 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 1 | 172 | 173 | (59) | 70 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 14,304 | 6,705 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 19,275 | 8,655 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | (343) | 4,680 | 4,337 | (144) | 2,670 | 2,526 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in interest income | $ | 57,826 | $ | 24,904 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposit accounts | $ | (96) | $ | 12,478 | $ | 12,382 | $ | (18) | $ | 2,849 | $ | 2,831 | ||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 429 | 6,119 | 6,548 | 13 | 635 | 648 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 18,930 | 3,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 146 | 2,369 | 2,515 | (4) | 706 | 702 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 21,445 | 4,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 1,662 | 14,804 | 16,466 | 11 | 3,645 | 3,656 | ||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities | 312 | 6,797 | 7,109 | (238) | 3,918 | 3,680 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | (156) | 661 | 505 | (63) | 473 | 410 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 74 | 7,629 | 7,703 | 118 | 3,320 | 3,438 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in interest expense | 53,228 | 15,365 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net interest income (2) | $ | 4,598 | $ | 9,539 |
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and expense are divided between the portion of change attributable to the variance in volume and the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate for that category. The unallocated change in rate or volume variance is allocated between the rate and volume variances.
(2)Includes an increase in FTE basis adjustments of $129 million from 2022 to 2023 and $11 million from 2021 to 2022.
33 Bank of America
Business Segment Operations
Segment Description and Basis of Presentation
We report our results of operations through the following four business segments: Consumer Banking, GWIM, Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We manage our segments and report their results on an FTE basis. The primary activities, products and businesses of the business segments and All Other are shown below.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. We utilize a methodology that considers the effect of regulatory capital requirements in addition to internal risk-based capital models. Our internal risk-based capital models use a risk-adjusted methodology incorporating each segment’s credit, market, interest rate, business and operational risk components. For more information on the nature of these risks, see Managing Risk on page 44. The capital allocated to the business segments is referred to as allocated capital. Allocated equity in the reporting units is comprised of allocated capital plus capital for the portion of goodwill and intangibles specifically assigned to the reporting unit. For more information, including the definition of a reporting unit, see Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For more information on our presentation of financial information on an FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 29, and for reconciliations to consolidated total revenue, net income and year-end total assets, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators that management uses when evaluating segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our segments’ operational performance, customer trends and business growth.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 34 |
Consumer Banking
| Deposits | Consumer Lending | Total Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 22,545 | $ | 19,254 | $ | 11,144 | $ | 10,791 | $ | 33,689 | $ | 30,045 | 12 | % | |||||||||
| Noninterest income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card income | (40) | (36) | 5,304 | 5,205 | 5,264 | 5,169 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 2,314 | 2,703 | 3 | 3 | 2,317 | 2,706 | (14) | ||||||||||||||||
| All other income | 607 | 478 | 154 | 237 | 761 | 715 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 2,881 | 3,145 | 5,461 | 5,445 | 8,342 | 8,590 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 25,426 | 22,399 | 16,605 | 16,236 | 42,031 | 38,635 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 491 | 564 | 4,667 | 1,416 | 5,158 | 1,980 | n/m | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 13,358 | 12,393 | 8,058 | 7,684 | 21,416 | 20,077 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 11,577 | 9,442 | 3,880 | 7,136 | 15,457 | 16,578 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,894 | 2,314 | 970 | 1,748 | 3,864 | 4,062 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 8,683 | $ | 7,128 | $ | 2,910 | $ | 5,388 | $ | 11,593 | $ | 12,516 | (7) | ||||||||||
| Effective tax rate (1) | 25.0 | % | 24.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.28 | % | 1.82 | % | 3.66 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.26 | % | 2.73 | % | |||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 63 | 55 | 10 | 20 | 28 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 52.54 | 55.33 | 48.52 | 47.32 | 50.95 | 51.96 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,129 | $ | 4,161 | $ | 304,561 | $ | 288,205 | $ | 308,690 | $ | 292,366 | 6 | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 989,000 | 1,057,531 | 304,838 | 289,719 | 1,032,525 | 1,099,410 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 1,022,361 | 1,090,692 | 310,805 | 296,499 | 1,071,853 | 1,139,351 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 987,675 | 1,056,783 | 5,075 | 5,778 | 992,750 | 1,062,561 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 13,700 | 13,000 | 28,300 | 27,000 | 42,000 | 40,000 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Year End | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,218 | $ | 4,148 | $ | 310,901 | $ | 300,613 | $ | 315,119 | $ | 304,761 | 3 | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 965,088 | 1,043,049 | 311,008 | 300,787 | 1,009,360 | 1,085,079 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 999,372 | 1,077,203 | 317,194 | 308,007 | 1,049,830 | 1,126,453 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 964,136 | 1,043,194 | 5,436 | 5,605 | 969,572 | 1,048,799 | (8) |
(1)Estimated at the segment level only.
(2)In segments and businesses where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, we allocate assets from All Other to match the segments’ and businesses’ liabilities and allocated shareholders’ equity. As a result, total earning assets and total assets of the businesses may not equal total Consumer Banking.
n/m = not meaningful
Consumer Banking, comprised of Deposits and Consumer Lending, offers a diversified range of credit, banking and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses. Deposits and Consumer Lending include the net impact of migrating customers and their related deposit, brokerage asset and loan balances between Deposits, Consumer Lending and GWIM, as well as other client-managed businesses. Our customers and clients have access to a coast-to-coast network including financial centers in 39 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 2023, our network includes approximately 3,800 financial centers, approximately 15,000 ATMs, nationwide call centers and leading digital banking platforms with more than 46 million active users, including approximately 38 million active mobile users.
Consumer Banking Results
Net income for Consumer Banking decreased $923 million to $11.6 billion due to an increase in provision for credit losses and higher noninterest expense, partially offset by higher revenue. Net interest income increased $3.6 billion to $33.7 billion primarily driven by higher interest rates and loan balances, partially offset by lower deposit balances. Noninterest income decreased $248 million to $8.3 billion primarily driven by the impact of non-sufficient funds and overdraft policy changes.
The provision for credit losses increased $3.2 billion to $5.2 billion primarily driven by credit card loan growth and asset quality. Noninterest expense increased $1.3 billion to $21.4
billion primarily driven by continued investments in the business, including people and technology, higher litigation expense, including consumer regulatory matters, and higher FDIC expense.
The return on average allocated capital was 28 percent, down from 31 percent, due to an increase in allocated capital and lower net income. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 34.
Deposits
Deposits includes the results of consumer deposit activities that consist of a comprehensive range of products provided to consumers and small businesses. Our deposit products include noninterest- and interest-bearing checking accounts, money market savings accounts, traditional savings accounts, CDs and IRAs, as well as investment accounts and products. Net interest income is allocated to deposit products using our funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics. Deposits generates fees such as account service fees and ATM fees, as well as investment and brokerage fees from Consumer Investment accounts. Consumer Investments serves investment client relationships through the Merrill Edge integrated investing and banking service platform, providing investment advice and guidance, client brokerage asset services, self-directed online investing and key banking capabilities including access to the Corporation’s network of financial centers and ATMs.
35 Bank of America
Net income for Deposits increased $1.6 billion to $8.7 billion primarily due to higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $3.3 billion to $22.5 billion primarily due to higher interest rates, partially offset by lower deposit balances. Noninterest income decreased $264 million to $2.9 billion primarily driven by the impact of non-sufficient funds and overdraft policy changes.
Noninterest expense increased $965 million to $13.4 billion primarily due to continued investments in the business, including people and technology, higher litigation expense, including consumer regulatory matters, and higher FDIC expense.
Average deposits decreased $69.1 billion to $987.7 billion primarily due to net outflows of $51.8 billion in money market savings and $28.6 billion in checking, partially offset by growth in time deposits of $19.9 billion.
The table below provides key performance indicators for Deposits. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information to evaluate our deposit profitability and digital/ mobile trends.
| Key Statistics – Deposits | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Total deposit spreads (excludes noninterest costs) (1) | 2.70% | 1.86% | |||||||
| Year end | |||||||||
| Consumer investment assets (in millions) (2) | $ | 424,410 | $ | 319,648 | |||||
| Active digital banking users (in thousands) (3) | 46,265 | 44,054 | |||||||
| Active mobile banking users (in thousands) (4) | 37,927 | 35,452 | |||||||
| Financial centers | 3,845 | 3,913 | |||||||
| ATMs | 15,168 | 15,528 |
(1)Includes deposits held in Consumer Lending.
(2)Includes client brokerage assets, deposit sweep balances, Bank of America, N.A. brokered CDs and AUM in Consumer Banking.
(3)Represents mobile and/or online active users over the past 90 days.
(4)Represents mobile active users over the past 90 days.
Consumer investment assets increased $104.8 billion to $424.4 billion driven by market performance and client flows. Active mobile banking users increased approximately two million, reflecting continuing changes in our clients’ banking preferences. We had a net decrease of 68 financial centers and 360 ATMs as we continue to optimize our consumer banking network.
Consumer Lending
Consumer Lending offers products to consumers and small businesses across the U.S. The products offered include debit and credit cards, residential mortgages and home equity loans, and direct and indirect loans such as automotive, recreational vehicle and consumer personal loans. In addition to earning net interest spread revenue on its lending activities, Consumer Lending generates interchange revenue from debit and credit card transactions, late fees, cash advance fees, annual credit card fees, mortgage banking fee income and other miscellaneous fees. Consumer Lending products are available to our customers through our retail network, direct telephone, and online and mobile channels. Consumer Lending results also include the impact of servicing residential mortgages and home equity loans, including loans held on the balance sheet of Consumer Lending and loans serviced for others.
Net income for Consumer Lending decreased $2.5 billion to $2.9 billion primarily due to an increase in provision for credit losses. Net interest income increased $353 million to $11.1 billion primarily due to higher loan balances. Noninterest income increased $16 million to $5.5 billion, relatively unchanged from the same period a year ago.
The provision for credit losses increased $3.3 billion to $4.7 billion primarily driven by credit card loan growth and asset quality. Noninterest expense increased $374 million to $8.1 billion primarily driven by continued investments in the business, including people and technology.
Average loans increased $16.4 billion to $304.6 billion primarily driven by an increase in credit card loans.
The table below provides key performance indicators for Consumer Lending. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about loan growth and profitability.
| Key Statistics – Consumer Lending | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Total credit card (1) | ||||||||||
| Gross interest yield (2) | 11.88 | % | 10.42 | % | ||||||
| Risk-adjusted margin (3) | 7.83 | 10.06 | ||||||||
| New accounts (in thousands) | 4,275 | 4,397 | ||||||||
| Purchase volumes | $ | 363,117 | $ | 356,588 | ||||||
| Debit card purchase volumes | $ | 527,074 | $ | 503,583 |
(1)Includes GWIM's credit card portfolio.
(2)Calculated as the effective annual percentage rate divided by average loans.
(3)Calculated as the difference between total revenue, net of interest expense, and net credit losses divided by average loans.
During 2023, the total risk-adjusted margin decreased 223 bps primarily driven by higher net credit losses, lower net fee income and lower interest margin. Total credit card purchase volumes increased $6.5 billion to $363.1 billion and debit card purchase volumes increased $23.5 billion to $527.1 billion, reflecting higher levels of consumer spending.
| Key Statistics – Loan Production (1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Consumer Banking: | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 9,145 | $ | 20,981 | ||||||
| Home equity | 8,328 | 7,988 | ||||||||
| Total (2): | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 19,405 | $ | 44,765 | ||||||
| Home equity | 9,814 | 9,591 |
(1)The loan production amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of loans and, in the case of home equity, the principal amount of the total line of credit.
(2)In addition to loan production in Consumer Banking, there is also first mortgage and home equity loan production in GWIM.
First mortgage loan originations for Consumer Banking and the total Corporation decreased $11.8 billion and $25.4 billion during 2023 primarily driven by higher interest rates, resulting in lower customer demand.
Home equity production in Consumer Banking and the total Corporation increased $340 million and $223 million during 2023 primarily driven by higher demand.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 36 |
Global Wealth & Investment Management
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 7,147 | $ | 7,466 | (4) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 13,213 | 13,561 | (3) | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 745 | 721 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 13,958 | 14,282 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 21,105 | 21,748 | (3) | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 6 | 66 | (91) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 15,836 | 15,490 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 5,263 | 6,192 | (15) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,316 | 1,517 | (13) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 3,947 | $ | 4,675 | (16) | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 25.0 | % | 24.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.17 | 1.95 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 21 | 27 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 75.04 | 71.23 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 219,503 | $ | 219,810 | — | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 329,493 | 383,352 | (14) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 342,531 | 396,167 | (14) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 298,335 | 351,329 | (15) | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 18,500 | 17,500 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 219,657 | $ | 223,910 | (2) | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 330,653 | 355,461 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 344,626 | 368,893 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 299,657 | 323,899 | (7) |
GWIM consists of two primary businesses: Merrill Wealth Management and Bank of America Private Bank.
Merrill Wealth Management’s advisory business provides a high-touch client experience through a network of financial advisors focused on clients with over $250,000 in total investable assets. Merrill Wealth Management provides tailored solutions to meet clients’ needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking and retirement products.
Bank of America Private Bank, together with Merrill Wealth Management’s Private Wealth Management business, provides comprehensive wealth management solutions targeted to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, as well as customized solutions to meet clients’ wealth structuring, investment management, trust and banking needs, including specialty asset management services.
Net income for GWIM decreased $728 million to $3.9 billion primarily due to lower revenue and higher noninterest expense. The operating margin was 25 percent compared to 28 percent a year ago.
Net interest income decreased $319 million to $7.1 billion primarily driven by lower average deposit balances and a portfolio mix shift to higher yielding deposit products.
Noninterest income, which primarily includes investment and brokerage services income, decreased $324 million to $14.0 billion. The decrease was primarily driven by lower transactional revenue and asset management fees driven by declines in AUM
pricing as well as lower average market valuations, partially offset by the impact of positive AUM flows.
Noninterest expense increased $346 million to $15.8 billion primarily due to continued investments in the business, including strategic hiring and technology, as well as higher FDIC expense, partially offset by lower revenue-related incentives.
The return on average allocated capital was 21 percent, down from 27 percent, due to lower net income and, to a lesser extent, a small increase in allocated capital.
Average loans totaled $219.5 billion, relatively unchanged from the same period a year ago. Average deposits decreased $53.0 billion to $298.3 billion primarily driven by clients moving deposits to higher yielding investment cash alternatives, including offerings on our investment and brokerage platforms.
Merrill Wealth Management revenue of $17.5 billion decreased four percent primarily driven by lower net interest income, lower transactional revenue and asset management fees driven by declines in AUM pricing as well as lower average market valuations, partially offset by the impact of positive AUM flows.
Bank of America Private Bank revenue of $3.6 billion increased one percent primarily driven by higher net interest income as well as higher asset management fees driven by the impact of positive AUM flows.
37 Bank of America
| Key Indicators and Metrics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Revenue by Business | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 17,461 | $ | 18,135 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 3,644 | 3,613 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 21,105 | $ | 21,748 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Business, at year end | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 3,182,735 | $ | 2,822,910 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 606,639 | 563,931 | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 3,789,374 | $ | 3,386,841 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Type, at year end | ||||||||||
| Assets under management | $ | 1,617,740 | $ | 1,401,474 | ||||||
| Brokerage and other assets | 1,688,923 | 1,482,025 | ||||||||
| Deposits | 299,657 | 323,899 | ||||||||
| Loans and leases (1) | 222,287 | 226,973 | ||||||||
| Less: Managed deposits in assets under management | (39,233) | (47,530) | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 3,789,374 | $ | 3,386,841 | ||||||
| Assets Under Management Rollforward | ||||||||||
| Assets under management, beginning of year | $ | 1,401,474 | $ | 1,638,782 | ||||||
| Net client flows | 52,227 | 20,785 | ||||||||
| Market valuation/other | 164,039 | (258,093) | ||||||||
| Total assets under management, end of year | $ | 1,617,740 | $ | 1,401,474 | ||||||
| Total wealth advisors, at year end (2) | 18,916 | 19,273 |
(1)Includes margin receivables which are classified in customer and other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2)Includes advisors across all wealth management businesses in GWIM and Consumer Banking.
Client Balances
Client balances managed under advisory and/or discretion of GWIM are AUM and are typically held in diversified portfolios. Fees earned on AUM are calculated as a percentage of clients’ AUM balances. The asset management fees charged to clients per year depend on various factors but are commonly driven by the breadth of the client’s relationship. The net client AUM flows represent the net change in clients’ AUM balances over a
specified period of time, excluding market appreciation/depreciation and other adjustments.
Client balances increased $402.5 billion, or 12 percent, to $3.8 trillion at December 31, 2023 compared to December 31, 2022. The increase in client balances was primarily due to the impact of higher end-of-period market valuations and positive net client flows.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 38 |
Global Banking
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 14,645 | $ | 12,184 | 20 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 2,952 | 3,293 | (10) | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 2,819 | 3,004 | (6) | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 4,380 | 3,748 | 17 | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 10,151 | 10,045 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 24,796 | 22,229 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (586) | 641 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 11,344 | 10,966 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 14,038 | 10,622 | 32 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,790 | 2,815 | 35 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 10,248 | $ | 7,807 | 31 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 27.0 | % | 26.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.73 | 2.26 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 21 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 45.75 | 49.34 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 378,762 | $ | 375,271 | 1 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 535,500 | 539,032 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 602,579 | 603,273 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 505,627 | 511,804 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 49,250 | 44,500 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 373,891 | $ | 379,107 | (1) | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 552,453 | 522,539 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 621,751 | 588,466 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 527,060 | 498,661 | 6 |
n/m = not meaningful
Global Banking, which includes Global Corporate Banking, Global Commercial Banking, Business Banking and Global Investment Banking, provides a wide range of lending-related products and services, integrated working capital management and treasury solutions, and underwriting and advisory services through our network of offices and client relationship teams. Our lending products and services include commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, commercial real estate lending and asset-based lending. Our treasury solutions business includes treasury management, foreign exchange, short-term investing options and merchant services. We also provide investment banking services to our clients such as debt and equity underwriting and distribution, and merger-related and other advisory services. Underwriting debt and equity issuances, fixed-income and equity research, and certain market-based activities are executed through our global broker-dealer affiliates, which are our primary dealers in several countries. Within Global Banking, Global Corporate Banking clients generally include large global corporations, financial institutions and leasing clients. Global Commercial Banking clients generally include middle-market companies, commercial real estate firms and not-for-profit companies. Business Banking clients include mid-sized U.S.-based businesses requiring customized and integrated financial advice and solutions.
Net income for Global Banking increased $2.4 billion to $10.2 billion driven by higher revenue and lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
Net interest income increased $2.5 billion to $14.6 billion primarily due to the benefit of higher interest rates.
Noninterest income increased $106 million to $10.2 billion driven by negative valuation adjustments on leveraged loans in the prior year and higher revenue from tax-advantaged investment activities in the current year, partially offset by lower treasury service charges and lower investment banking fees.
The provision for credit losses improved $1.2 billion to a benefit of $586 million primarily due to an improved macroeconomic outlook.
Noninterest expense increased $378 million to $11.3 billion primarily due to continued investments in the business, including technology and strategic hiring in 2022, and higher FDIC expense, partially offset by expenses recognized for certain regulatory matters in the prior-year period.
The return on average allocated capital was 21 percent, up from 18 percent, due to higher net income, partially offset by higher allocated capital.
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking each include Business Lending and Global Transaction Services activities. Business Lending includes various lending-related products and services, and related hedging activities, including commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, real estate lending and asset-based lending. Global Transaction Services includes deposits, treasury management, credit card, foreign exchange and short-term investment products.
39 Bank of America
The following table and discussion present a summary of the results, which exclude certain investment banking and other activities in Global Banking.
| Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Corporate Banking | Global Commercial Banking | Business Banking | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Business Lending | $ | 4,928 | $ | 4,325 | $ | 5,016 | $ | 4,316 | $ | 253 | $ | 251 | $ | 10,197 | $ | 8,892 | ||||||||||||||
| Global Transaction Services | 5,746 | 5,002 | 4,139 | 4,166 | 1,531 | 1,213 | 11,416 | 10,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 10,674 | $ | 9,327 | $ | 9,155 | $ | 8,482 | $ | 1,784 | $ | 1,464 | $ | 21,613 | $ | 19,273 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 171,554 | $ | 174,052 | $ | 194,725 | $ | 187,597 | $ | 12,285 | $ | 12,743 | $ | 378,564 | $ | 374,392 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 272,964 | 250,648 | 181,905 | 204,893 | 50,759 | 56,263 | 505,628 | 511,804 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 167,055 | $ | 174,905 | $ | 194,565 | $ | 191,051 | $ | 12,129 | $ | 12,683 | $ | 373,749 | $ | 378,639 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 289,961 | 262,033 | 188,141 | 186,112 | 48,951 | 50,516 | 527,053 | 498,661 |
Business Lending revenue increased $1.3 billion in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily driven by higher interest rates, higher revenue from tax-advantaged investment activities and the impact of higher average loan balances.
Global Transaction Services revenue increased $1.0 billion in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily driven by higher interest rates, partially offset by lower treasury service charges and the impact of lower average deposit balances.
Average loans and leases increased one percent in 2023 compared to 2022 due to client demand. Average deposits decreased one percent in 2023 compared to 2022 due to declines in domestic balances.
Global Investment Banking
Client teams and product specialists underwrite and distribute debt, equity and loan products, and provide advisory services and tailored risk management solutions. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Banking and Global Markets under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. To provide a complete discussion of our
consolidated investment banking fees, the table below presents total Corporation investment banking fees and the portion attributable to Global Banking.
| Investment Banking Fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Banking | Total Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Products | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advisory | $ | 1,392 | $ | 1,643 | $ | 1,575 | $ | 1,783 | ||||||||||||||
| Debt issuance | 1,073 | 1,099 | 2,403 | 2,523 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity issuance | 354 | 262 | 886 | 709 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross investment banking fees | 2,819 | 3,004 | 4,864 | 5,015 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Self-led deals | (43) | (78) | (156) | (192) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment banking fees | $ | 2,776 | $ | 2,926 | $ | 4,708 | $ | 4,823 |
Total Corporation investment banking fees, which exclude self-led deals and are primarily included within Global Banking and Global Markets, decreased two percent to $4.7 billion primarily due to lower advisory and debt issuance fees, partially offset by higher equity issuance fees.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 40 |
Global Markets
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 1,678 | $ | 3,088 | (46) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 1,993 | 2,002 | — | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 1,874 | 1,820 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 13,430 | 11,406 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 552 | (178) | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 17,849 | 15,050 | 19 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 19,527 | 18,138 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (131) | 28 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 13,206 | 12,420 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 6,452 | 5,690 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,774 | 1,508 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,678 | $ | 4,182 | 12 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 27.5 | % | 26.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 67.63 | 68.48 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 318,443 | $ | 303,587 | 5 | % | ||||||||||
| Reverse repurchases | 133,735 | 126,324 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Securities borrowed | 121,547 | 116,764 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 44,303 | 54,128 | (18) | |||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | 618,028 | 600,803 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 129,657 | 116,652 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 652,352 | 602,889 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 869,756 | 857,637 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 33,278 | 40,382 | (18) | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 45,500 | 42,500 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 542,544 | $ | 564,769 | (4) | % | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 136,223 | 127,735 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 637,955 | 587,772 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 817,588 | 812,489 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 34,833 | 39,077 | (11) |
n/m = not meaningful
Global Markets offers sales and trading services and research services to institutional clients across fixed-income, credit, currency, commodity and equity businesses. Global Markets product coverage includes securities and derivative products in both the primary and secondary markets. Global Markets provides market-making, financing, securities clearing, settlement and custody services globally to our institutional investor clients in support of their investing and trading activities. We also work with our commercial and corporate clients to provide risk management products using interest rate, equity, credit, currency and commodity derivatives, foreign exchange, fixed-income and mortgage-related products. As a result of our market-making activities in these products, we may be required to manage risk in a broad range of financial products including government securities, equity and equity-linked securities, high-grade and high-yield corporate debt securities, syndicated loans, MBS, commodities and asset-backed securities. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Markets and Global Banking under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. For information on investment banking fees on a consolidated basis, see page 40.
The following explanations for year-over-year changes in results for Global Markets, including those disclosed under Sales and Trading Revenue, are the same for amounts including and excluding net DVA. Amounts excluding net DVA are a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 29.
Net income for Global Markets increased $496 million to $4.7 billion in 2023 compared to 2022. Net DVA losses were $236 million compared to gains of $20 million in 2022. Excluding net DVA, net income increased $690 million to $4.9 billion. These increases were primarily driven by an increase in revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
Revenue increased $1.4 billion to $19.5 billion primarily due to higher sales and trading revenue in the current-year period and negative valuation adjustments on leveraged loans in the prior-year period. Sales and trading revenue increased $887 million, and excluding net DVA, increased $1.1 billion. These increases were primarily driven by higher revenue in FICC. Noninterest expense increased $786 million to $13.2 billion, primarily driven by continued investments in the business, including people and technology, partially offset by expenses recognized for certain regulatory matters in the prior-year period.
Average total assets increased $12.1 billion to $869.8 billion, driven by higher levels of inventory, increased secured
41 Bank of America
financing activity and loan growth in FICC, partially offset by lower levels of inventory in Equities. Year-end total assets increased $5.1 billion to $817.6 billion driven by the same factors as average assets.
The return on average allocated capital was 10 percent, unchanged from the same period a year ago. For information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 34.
Sales and Trading Revenue
Sales and trading revenue includes unrealized and realized gains and losses on trading and other assets which are included in market making and similar activities, net interest income, and fees primarily from commissions on equity securities. Sales and trading revenue is segregated into fixed-income (government debt obligations, investment and non-investment grade corporate debt obligations, commercial MBS, residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, interest rate and credit derivative contracts), currencies (interest rate and foreign exchange contracts), commodities (primarily futures, forwards, swaps and options) and equities (equity-linked derivatives and cash equity activity). The following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue, substantially all of which is in Global Markets, with the remainder in Global Banking. In addition, the following table and related discussion also present sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 29.
| Sales and Trading Revenue (1, 2, 3) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Sales and trading revenue (2) | ||||||||||
| Fixed-income, currencies and commodities | $ | 10,896 | $ | 9,917 | ||||||
| Equities | 6,480 | 6,572 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue | $ | 17,376 | $ | 16,489 | ||||||
| Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA (4) | ||||||||||
| Fixed-income, currencies and commodities | $ | 11,122 | $ | 9,898 | ||||||
| Equities | 6,490 | 6,571 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA | $ | 17,612 | $ | 16,469 |
(1)For more information on sales and trading revenue, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes FTE adjustments of $546 million and $354 million for 2023 and 2022.
(3)Includes Global Banking sales and trading revenue of $654 million and $1.0 billion for 2023 and 2022.
(4)FICC and Equities sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, is a non-GAAP financial measure. FICC net DVA gains (losses) were $(226) million and $19 million for 2023 and 2022. Equities net DVA gains (losses) were $(10) million and $1 million for 2023 and 2022.
Including and excluding net DVA, FICC revenue increased $979 million and $1.2 billion driven by an improved trading environment for credit and mortgage products and an increase in secured financing activity. Including and excluding net DVA, Equities revenue decreased $92 million and $81 million driven by weaker trading performance in derivatives, partially offset by an increase in client financing activities.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 42 |
All Other
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 339 | $ | 117 | n/m | |||||||||||
| Noninterest income (loss) | (8,650) | (5,479) | 58 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | (8,311) | (5,362) | 55 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (53) | (172) | (69) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 4,043 | 2,485 | 63 | |||||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (12,301) | (7,675) | 60 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit | (8,350) | (6,023) | 39 | |||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (3,951) | $ | (1,652) | 139 | |||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 9,644 | $ | 12,683 | (24) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 266,794 | 139,466 | 91 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 57,551 | 20,082 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 8,842 | $ | 10,234 | (14) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 346,356 | 155,074 | 123 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 92,705 | 19,905 | n/m |
(1)In segments where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, which are generally deposit-taking segments, we allocate assets from All Other to those segments to match liabilities (i.e., deposits) and allocated shareholders’ equity. Average allocated assets were $975.9 billion and $1.1 trillion for 2023 and 2022 and year-end allocated assets were $972.9 billion and $1.0 trillion at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
n/m = not meaningful
All Other primarily consists of asset and liability management (ALM) activities, liquidating businesses and certain expenses not otherwise allocated to a business segment. ALM activities encompass interest rate and foreign currency risk management activities for which substantially all of the results are allocated to our business segments. For more information on our ALM activities, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net loss in All Other increased $2.3 billion to $4.0 billion primarily due to lower noninterest income and higher noninterest expense, partially offset by a higher income tax benefit.
Noninterest income decreased $3.2 billion primarily due to a net charge incurred as a result of the impact of BSBY’s future cessation, higher partnership losses for tax-advantaged investments and losses on sales of AFS debt securities. The announcement of BSBY’s future cessation resulted in a $1.6 billion net charge due to the Corporation’s determination that certain forecasted BSBY-indexed interest payments, which had been designated in cash flow hedges, were no longer expected to occur beyond November 15, 2024 as they will transition to a new reference rate. Accordingly, during the fourth quarter of 2023, the Corporation reclassified the fair value of the interest
rate swaps used in the cash flow hedges related to these forecasted transactions from accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) into noninterest income. The Corporation also recognized subsequent fair value changes of the interest rate swaps into noninterest income until they were re-designated into new cash flow hedges.
Noninterest expense increased $1.6 billion primarily due to an accrual of $2.1 billion for the estimated amount of the FDIC special assessment resulting from the closure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, as well as higher costs related to a liquidating business activity in the current year, partially offset by higher litigation expense in the prior year.
The income tax benefit was $8.4 billion in 2023 compared to a benefit of $6.0 billion in 2022. The income tax benefit in All Other resulted from both periods having income tax benefit adjustments to allocate the FTE treatment of certain tax credits to Global Banking and Global Markets. The increase in the income tax benefit in 2023 was primarily due to the benefit recorded against pretax charges for the FDIC special assessment and impact of BSBY’s future cessation, as well as higher income tax credits related to tax-advantaged investment activity.
43 Bank of America
Managing Risk
Risk is inherent in all our business activities. Sound risk management enables us to serve our customers and deliver for our shareholders. If not managed well, risk can result in financial loss, regulatory sanctions and penalties, and damage to our reputation, each of which may adversely impact our ability to execute our business strategies. We take a comprehensive approach to risk management with a defined Risk Framework and an articulated Risk Appetite Statement, which are approved annually by the Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC) and the Board.
The seven key types of risk faced by the Corporation are strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational.
● Strategic risk is the risk to current or projected financial condition arising from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate.
● Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations.
● Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities or otherwise negatively impact earnings. Market risk is composed of price risk and interest rate risk.
● Liquidity risk is the inability to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral needs while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions.
● Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules and regulations and our internal policies and procedures.
● Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, people or external events.
● Reputational risk is the risk that negative perception of the Corporation may adversely impact profitability or operations.
The following sections address in more detail the specific procedures, measures and analyses of the major categories of risk.
As set forth in our Risk Framework, a culture of managing risk well is fundamental to our values and our purpose, and how we drive Responsible Growth. It requires us to focus on risk in all activities and encourages the necessary mindset and behavior to enable effective risk management and promote sound risk-taking within our risk appetite. Sustaining a culture of managing risk well throughout the organization is critical to the success of the Corporation and is a clear expectation of our executive management team and the Board.
Our Risk Framework serves as the foundation for the consistent and effective management of risks facing the Corporation. The Risk Framework sets forth roles and responsibilities for the management of risk and provides a blueprint for how the Board, through delegation of authority to committees and executive officers, establishes risk appetite and associated limits for our activities.
Executive management assesses, with Board oversight, the risk-adjusted returns of each business. Management reviews and approves the strategic and financial operating plans, as well as the capital plan and Risk Appetite Statement, and recommends them annually to the Board for approval. Our strategic plan takes into consideration return objectives and financial resources, which must align with risk capacity and risk appetite. Management sets financial objectives for each business by allocating capital and setting a target for return on capital for each business. Capital allocations are regularly evaluated as part of our overall governance processes as the businesses and the economic environment in which we operate continue to evolve. For more information regarding capital allocations, see Business Segment Operations on page 34.
The Corporation’s risk appetite indicates the amount of capital, earnings or liquidity we are willing to put at risk to achieve our strategic objectives and business plans, consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. Our risk appetite provides a common framework that includes a set of measures to assist senior management and the Board in assessing the Corporation’s risk profile across all risk types against our risk appetite and risk capacity. Our risk appetite is formally articulated in the Risk Appetite Statement, which includes both qualitative statements and quantitative limits.
Our overall capacity to take risk is limited; therefore, we prioritize the risks we take in order to maintain a strong and flexible financial position so we can weather challenging economic times and take advantage of organic growth opportunities. Therefore, we set objectives and targets for capital and liquidity that are intended to permit us to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner at all times, including during periods of stress. We also maintain operational risk management and operational resiliency capabilities designed to permit us to meet the expectations of our customers and clients through a range of operating conditions.
Our lines of business operate with risk limits that align with the Corporation’s risk appetite. Senior management is responsible for tracking and reporting performance measurements as well as any exceptions to risk appetite limits. The Board, and its committees when appropriate, oversee financial performance, execution of the strategic and financial operating plans, adherence to risk appetite limits and the adequacy of internal controls.
For a more detailed discussion of our risk management activities, see the discussion below and pages 47 through 82.
Risk Management Governance
The Risk Framework describes delegations of authority whereby the Board and its committees may delegate authority to management-level committees or executive officers. Such delegations may authorize certain decision-making and approval functions, which may be evidenced in documents such as committee charters, job descriptions, meeting minutes and resolutions.
The chart below illustrates the interrelationship among the Board, Board committees and management committees that have the majority of risk oversight responsibilities for the Corporation.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 44 |
Board of Directors and Board Committees
The Board is composed of 15 directors, all but one of whom are independent. The Board authorizes management to maintain an effective Risk Framework and oversees compliance with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, the Board or its committees conduct inquiries of, and receive reports from senior management on, risk-related matters to assess scope or resource limitations that could impede the ability of Global Risk Management (GRM) and/or Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Board committees discussed below have the principal responsibility for enterprise-wide oversight of our risk management activities. Through these activities, the Board and applicable committees are provided with information on our risk profile and oversee senior management addressing key risks we face. Other Board committees, as described below, provide additional oversight of specific risks.
Each of the committees shown on the above chart regularly reports to the Board on risk-related matters within the committee’s responsibilities, which is intended to collectively provide the Board with integrated insight about our management of enterprise-wide risks.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the qualifications, performance and independence of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the performance of our corporate audit function, the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and makes inquiries of senior management or the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) to determine whether there are scope or resource limitations that impede the ability of Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing compliance risks pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Enterprise Risk Committee
The ERC oversees the Corporation’s Risk Framework, risk appetite and senior management’s responsibilities for the identification, measurement, monitoring and control of key risks facing the Corporation. The ERC may consult with other Board committees on risk-related matters.
Other Board Committees
Our Corporate Governance, ESG, and Sustainability Committee oversees our Board’s governance processes, identifies and reviews the qualifications of potential Board members, leads Board and committee succession planning and their formal self-evaluation, and reviews our ESG activities, shareholder input and shareholder engagement process.
Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee oversees establishing, maintaining and administering our compensation programs and employee benefit plans, including approving and recommending our Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO) compensation to our Board for further approval by all independent directors; reviewing and approving our executive officers’ compensation, as well as compensation for non-management directors; and reviewing certain other human capital management topics, including pay equity.
Management Committees
Management committees receive their authority from the Board, a Board committee, or another management committee. Our primary management risk committee is the MRC. Subject to Board oversight, the MRC is responsible for management oversight of key risks facing the Corporation, including an integrated evaluation of risk, earnings, capital and liquidity.
Lines of Defense
We have clear ownership and accountability for managing risk across three lines of defense: Front Line Units (FLUs), GRM and Corporate Audit. We also have control functions outside of FLUs and GRM (e.g., Legal and Global Human Resources). The three lines of defense are integrated into our management-level governance structure. Each of these functional roles is further described in this section.
Executive Officers
Executive officers lead various functions representing the functional roles. Authority for functional roles may be delegated to executive officers from the Board, Board committees or management-level committees. Executive officers, in turn, may further delegate responsibilities, as appropriate, to management-level committees, management routines or
45 Bank of America
individuals. Executive officers review our activities for consistency with our Risk Framework, risk appetite, and applicable strategic, capital and financial operating plans, as well as applicable policies and standards. Executive officers and other employees make decisions individually on a day-to-day basis, consistent with the authority they have been delegated. Executive officers and other employees may also serve on committees and participate in committee decisions.
Front Line Units
FLUs, which include the lines of business as well as Global Technology and Global Operations, are responsible for appropriately assessing and effectively managing all of the risks associated with their activities.
Three organizational units that include FLU activities and control function activities, but are not part of GRM are (1) the Chief Financial Officer Group; (2) the Chief Administrative Officer Group; and (3) Global Strategy and Enterprise Platforms.
Global Risk Management
GRM is part of our control functions and operates as our independent risk management function. GRM, led by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), is responsible for independently assessing and overseeing risks within FLUs and other control functions. GRM establishes written enterprise policies and procedures outlining how aggregate risks are identified, measured, monitored and controlled.
The CRO has the stature, authority and independence needed to develop and implement a meaningful risk management framework and practices to guide the Corporation in managing risk. The CRO has unrestricted access to the Board and reports directly to both the ERC and the CEO. GRM is organized into horizontal risk teams that cover a specific risk area and vertical CRO teams that cover a particular FLU or control function. These teams work collaboratively in executing their respective duties.
Corporate Audit
Corporate Audit and the CAE maintain their independence from the FLUs, GRM and other control functions by reporting directly to the Audit Committee. The CAE administratively reports to the CEO. Corporate Audit provides independent assessment and validation through testing of key processes and controls across the Corporation. Corporate Audit includes Credit Review, which provides an independent assessment of credit lending decisions and the effectiveness of credit processes across the Corporation’s credit platform through examinations and monitoring.
Risk Management Processes
The Risk Framework requires that strong risk management practices are integrated in key strategic, capital and financial planning processes and in day-to-day business processes across the Corporation, thereby ensuring risks are appropriately considered, evaluated and responded to in a timely manner. We employ an effective risk management process, referred to as Identify, Measure, Monitor and Control, as part of our daily activities.
Identify – To be effectively managed, risks must be proactively identified and well understood. Proper risk identification focuses on recognizing and understanding key risks inherent in our business activities or key risks that may arise from external factors. Each employee is expected to identify and escalate risks promptly. Risk identification is an ongoing process that incorporates input from FLUs and control
functions. It is designed to be forward-looking and to capture relevant risk factors across all of our lines of business.
Measure – Once a risk is identified, it must be prioritized and accurately measured through a systematic process including qualitative statements and quantitative limits. Risk is measured at various levels, including, but not limited to, risk type, FLU and legal entity, and also on an aggregate basis. This risk measurement process helps to capture changes in our risk profile due to changes in strategic direction, concentrations, portfolio quality and the overall economic environment. Senior management considers how risk exposures might evolve under a variety of stress scenarios.
Monitor – We monitor risk levels regularly to track adherence to risk appetite, policies and standards. We also regularly update risk assessments and review risk exposures. Through our monitoring, we know our level of risk relative to limits and can take action in a timely manner. We also know when risk limits are breached and have processes to appropriately report and escalate exceptions. This includes timely requests for approval to managers and alerts to executive management, management-level committees or the Board (directly or through an appropriate committee).
Control – We establish and communicate risk limits and controls through policies, standards, procedures and processes. The limits and controls can be adjusted by senior management or the Board when conditions or risk tolerances warrant. These limits may be absolute (e.g., loan amount, trading volume, operational loss) or relative (e.g., percentage of loan book in higher-risk categories). Our FLUs are held accountable for performing within the established limits.
The formal processes used to manage risk represent a part of our overall risk management process. We instill a strong and comprehensive culture of managing risk well through communications, training, policies, procedures and organizational roles and responsibilities. Establishing a culture reflective of our purpose to help make our customers’ financial lives better and delivering on Responsible Growth is also critical to effective risk management. We are committed to the highest principles of ethical and professional conduct. Conduct risk is the risk of improper actions, behaviors or practices by the Corporation, its employees or representatives that are illegal, unethical and/or contrary to our core values that could result in harm to the Corporation, our shareholders or our customers, damage the integrity of the financial markets, or negatively impact our reputation. We have established protocols and structures so that conduct risk is governed and reported across the Corporation appropriately. All employees are held accountable for adhering to the Code of Conduct, operating within our risk appetite and managing risk in their daily business activities. In addition, our performance management and compensation practices encourage responsible risk-taking that is consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite.
Corporation-wide Stress Testing
Integral to our Capital Planning, Financial Planning and Strategic Planning processes, we conduct capital scenario management and stress forecasting on a regular basis to better understand balance sheet, earnings and capital sensitivities to a wide range of economic and business scenarios, including economic and market conditions that are more severe than anticipated. These stress forecasts provide an understanding of the potential impacts from our risk profile on the balance sheet, earnings and capital, and serve as a key component of our capital and risk management practices. The intent of stress testing is to
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 46 |
develop a comprehensive understanding of potential impacts of on- and off-balance sheet risks at the Corporation and certain subsidiaries and how they impact financial resiliency, which provides confidence to management, regulators and our investors.
Contingency Planning
We have developed and maintain comprehensive contingency plans that are designed to prepare us in advance to respond in the event of potential adverse economic, operational, financial or market stress conditions. These contingency plans include our Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan, which provides monitoring, escalation, actions and routines designed to enable us to increase capital and/or liquidity, access funding sources and reduce risk through consideration of potential options that include asset sales, business sales, capital or debt issuances, and other risk reducing strategies at various levels of capital or liquidity depletion during a period of stress. We also maintain a Resolution Plan to limit adverse systemic impacts that could be associated with a potential resolution of Bank of America.
Strategic Risk Management
Strategic risk is embedded in every business and is one of the major risk categories along with credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. This risk results from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution, or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate, such as competitor actions, changing customer preferences, product obsolescence and technology developments.
An aspect of strategic risk is the risk that the Corporation’s capital levels are not adequate to meet minimum regulatory requirements and support execution of business activities or absorb losses from risks during normal or adverse economic and market conditions. As such, capital risk is managed in parallel to strategic risk.
We manage strategic risk through the Strategic Risk Enterprise Policy and integration into the strategic planning process, among other activities. Our strategic plan is consistent with our risk appetite, capital plan and liquidity requirements, and specifically addresses strategic risks impacting each business.
On an annual basis, the Board reviews and approves the strategic plan, capital plan, financial operating plan and Risk Appetite Statement. With oversight by the Board, senior management directs the lines of business to execute our strategic plan consistent with our core operating principles and risk appetite. The executive management team monitors business performance throughout the year and provides the Board with regular progress reports on whether strategic objectives and timelines are being met, including reports on strategic risks and if additional or alternative actions need to be considered or implemented. The regular executive reviews focus on assessing forecasted earnings and returns on capital, the current risk profile, current capital and liquidity requirements, staffing levels and changes required to support the strategic plan, stress testing results, and other qualitative factors such as market growth rates and peer analysis.
Significant strategic actions, such as capital actions, material acquisitions or divestitures, and resolution plans are reviewed and approved by the Board. At the business level, processes are in place to discuss the strategic risk implications of new, expanded or modified businesses, products or services,
regulatory change and other strategic initiatives, and to provide formal review and approval where required. With oversight by the Board and the ERC, executive management performs similar analyses throughout the year, and evaluates changes to the financial forecast or the risk, capital or liquidity positions as deemed appropriate to balance and optimize achieving the targeted risk appetite, shareholder returns and maintaining the targeted financial strength. Proprietary models are used to measure the capital requirements for credit, country, market, operational and strategic risks. The allocated capital assigned to each business is based on its unique risk profile. With oversight by the Board, executive management assesses the risk-adjusted returns of each business in approving strategic and financial operating plans. The businesses use allocated capital to define business strategies, and price products and transactions.
Capital Management
The Corporation manages its capital position so that its capital is more than adequate to support its business activities and aligns with risk, risk appetite and strategic planning. Additionally, we seek to maintain safety and soundness at all times, even under adverse scenarios, take advantage of organic growth opportunities, meet obligations to creditors and counterparties, maintain ready access to financial markets, continue to serve as a credit intermediary, remain a source of strength for our subsidiaries, and satisfy current and future regulatory capital requirements. Capital management is integrated into our risk and governance processes, as capital is a key consideration in the development of our strategic plan, risk appetite and risk limits.
We conduct an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) on a periodic basis. The ICAAP is a forward-looking assessment of our projected capital needs and resources, incorporating earnings, balance sheet and risk forecasts under baseline and adverse economic and market conditions. We utilize periodic stress tests to assess the potential impacts to our balance sheet, earnings, regulatory capital and liquidity under a variety of stress scenarios. We perform qualitative risk assessments to identify and assess material risks not fully captured in our forecasts or stress tests. We assess the potential capital impacts of proposed changes to regulatory capital requirements. Management assesses ICAAP results and provides documented quarterly assessments of the adequacy of our capital guidelines and capital position to the Board or its committees.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. For more information, see Business Segment Operations on page 34.
CCAR and Capital Planning
The Federal Reserve requires BHCs to submit a capital plan and planned capital actions on an annual basis, consistent with the rules governing the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) capital plan, which includes supervisory stress testing by the Federal Reserve. Based on 2023 stress test results, our stress capital buffer (SCB) is 2.5 percent effective October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024.
In October 2021, the Board authorized the Corporation’s $25 billion common stock repurchase program (October 2021 Authorization). Additionally, the Board authorized common stock repurchases to offset shares awarded under the Corporation’s equity-based compensation plans. In September 2023, the Board modified the October 2021 Authorization, effective
47 Bank of America
October 1, 2023, to include repurchases to offset shares awarded under equity-based compensation plans when determining the remaining repurchase authority. Pursuant to the Board’s authorizations, during 2023, we repurchased $4.6 billion of common stock, including repurchases to offset shares awarded under equity-based compensation plans. As of December 31, 2023, the remaining repurchase authority was approximately $12.7 billion (including repurchases to offset shares awarded under equity-based compensation plans).
The timing and amount of common stock repurchases are subject to various factors, including the Corporation’s capital position, liquidity, financial performance and alternative uses of capital, stock trading price, regulatory requirements and general market conditions, and may be suspended at any time. Such repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including repurchase plans that satisfy the conditions of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).
Regulatory Capital
As a BHC, we are subject to regulatory capital rules, including Basel 3, issued by U.S. banking regulators. Basel 3 established minimum capital ratios and buffer requirements and outlined two methods of calculating risk-weighted assets (RWA), the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches. The Standardized approach relies primarily on supervisory risk weights based on exposure type, and the Advanced approaches determine risk weights based on internal models.
The Corporation's depository institution subsidiaries are also subject to the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. The Corporation and its primary affiliated banking entity, BANA, are Advanced approaches institutions under Basel 3 and are required to report regulatory risk-based capital ratios and RWA under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. The lower of the capital ratios under Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements is used to assess capital adequacy, including under the PCA framework. As of December 31, 2023, the common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital ratios under the Standardized approach were the binding ratios.
Minimum Capital Requirements
In order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, the Corporation must meet risk-based capital ratio requirements that include a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent (under the Advanced approaches only), an SCB (under the Standardized approach only), plus any applicable countercyclical capital buffer
and a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) surcharge. The buffers and surcharge must be comprised solely of CET1 capital. For the period from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023, the Corporation's minimum CET1 capital ratio requirements were 10.4 percent under the Standardized approach and 9.5 percent under the Advanced approaches. Effective October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, our CET1 minimum requirement was 9.5 percent under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches.
The Corporation is required to calculate its G-SIB surcharge on an annual basis under two methods and is subject to the higher of the resulting two surcharges. Method 1 is consistent with the approach prescribed by the Basel Committee’s assessment methodology and is calculated using specified indicators of systemic importance. Method 2 modifies the Method 1 approach by, among other factors, including a measure of the Corporation’s reliance on short-term wholesale funding. Effective January 1, 2024, the Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge, which is higher under Method 2, increased 50 bps, resulting in an increase in our minimum CET1 capital ratio requirement to 10.0 percent from 9.5 percent. At December 31, 2023, the Corporation’s CET1 capital ratio of 11.8 percent under the Standardized approach exceeded its CET1 capital ratio requirement as well as the new minimum requirement in place as of January 1, 2024.
The Corporation is also required to maintain a minimum supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) of 3.0 percent plus a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. At December 31, 2023, our insured depository institution subsidiaries exceeded their requirement to maintain a minimum 6.0 percent SLR to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework. The numerator of the SLR is quarter-end Basel 3 Tier 1 capital. The denominator is total leverage exposure based on the daily average of the sum of on-balance sheet exposures less permitted deductions and the simple average of certain off-balance sheet exposures, as of the end of each month in a quarter.
Capital Composition and Ratios
Table 10 presents Bank of America Corporation’s capital ratios and related information in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2023 and 2022. For the periods presented herein, the Corporation met the definition of well capitalized under current regulatory requirements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 48 |
| Table 10 | Bank of America Corporation Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 194,928 | $ | 194,928 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 223,323 | 223,323 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 251,399 | 241,449 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,651 | 1,459 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.8 | % | 13.4 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 15.3 | 11.0 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 15.2 | 16.6 | 13.0 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 3,135 | $ | 3,135 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.1 | % | 7.1 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,676 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.1 | % | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 180,060 | $ | 180,060 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 208,446 | 208,446 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 238,773 | 230,916 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,605 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.2 | % | 12.8 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.0 | 14.8 | 11.9 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.9 | 16.4 | 13.9 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,997 | $ | 2,997 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,523 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | % | 5.0 |
(1)Capital ratios as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the current expected credit losses (CECL) accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)The CET1 capital regulatory minimum is the sum of the CET1 capital ratio minimum of 4.5 percent, our G-SIB surcharge of 2.5 percent and our capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent (under the Advanced approaches) or the SCB of 2.5 percent at December 31, 2023 and 3.4 percent at December 31, 2022 (under the Standardized approach), as applicable. The countercyclical capital buffer was zero for both periods. The SLR regulatory minimum includes a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
At December 31, 2023, CET1 capital was $194.9 billion, an increase of $14.9 billion from December 31, 2022, primarily due to earnings, partially offset by capital distributions. Tier 1 capital increased $14.9 billion primarily driven by the same factors as CET1 capital. Total capital under the Standardized approach increased $12.6 billion primarily due to the same factors driving the increase in Tier 1 capital and an increase in the adjusted allowance for credit losses included in Tier 2 capital, partially offset by a decrease in subordinated debt. RWA
under the Standardized approach, which yielded the lower CET1 capital ratio at December 31, 2023, increased $46.4 billion during 2023 to $1,651 billion primarily due to higher counterparty and market risk exposures in Global Markets and consumer loan growth. Supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2023 increased $152.9 billion primarily due to higher cash held at central banks, partially offset by lower debt securities balances.
49 Bank of America
Table 11 shows the capital composition at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 11 | Capital Composition under Basel 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | $ | 263,249 | $ | 244,800 | ||
| CECL transitional amount (1) | 1,254 | 1,881 | ||||
| Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (68,648) | (68,644) | ||||
| Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | (7,912) | (7,776) | ||||
| Intangibles, other than mortgage servicing rights, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (1,496) | (1,554) | ||||
| Defined benefit pension plan net assets | (764) | (867) | ||||
| Cumulative unrealized net (gain) loss related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net-of-tax | 1,342 | 496 | ||||
| Accumulated net (gain) loss on certain cash flow hedges (2) | 8,025 | 11,925 | ||||
| Other | (122) | (201) | ||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 194,928 | 180,060 | ||||
| Qualifying preferred stock, net of issuance cost | 28,396 | 28,396 | ||||
| Other | (1) | (10) | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 223,323 | 208,446 | ||||
| Tier 2 capital instruments | 15,340 | 18,751 | ||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (3) | 12,920 | 11,739 | ||||
| Other | (184) | (163) | ||||
| Total capital under the Standardized approach | 251,399 | 238,773 | ||||
| Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses under the Advanced approaches (3) | (9,950) | (7,857) | ||||
| Total capital under the Advanced approaches | $ | 241,449 | $ | 230,916 |
(1)December 31, 2023 and 2022 include 50 percent and 75 percent of the CECL transition provision’s impact as of December 31, 2021.
(2)Includes amounts in accumulated OCI related to the hedging of items that are not recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(3)Includes the impact of transition provisions related to the CECL accounting standard.
Table 12 shows the components of RWA as measured under Basel 3 at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 12 | Risk-weighted Assets under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | |||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Credit risk | $ | 1,580 | $ | 983 | $ | 1,538 | $ | 939 | ||||||
| Market risk | 71 | 71 | 67 | 67 | ||||||||||
| Operational risk | n/a | 361 | n/a | 364 | ||||||||||
| Risks related to credit valuation adjustments | n/a | 44 | n/a | 41 | ||||||||||
| Total risk-weighted assets | $ | 1,651 | $ | 1,459 | $ | 1,605 | $ | 1,411 |
n/a = not applicable
Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital
Table 13 presents regulatory capital information for BANA in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2023 and 2022. BANA met the definition of well capitalized under the PCA framework for both periods.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 50 |
| Table 13 | Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 187,621 | $ | 187,621 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 187,621 | 187,621 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 201,932 | 192,175 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,395 | 1,114 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | % | 16.8 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 16.8 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.5 | 17.2 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,471 | $ | 2,471 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.6 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 2,910 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.4 | % | 6.0 | |||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 181,089 | $ | 181,089 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 181,089 | 181,089 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 194,254 | 186,648 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,386 | 1,087 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.1 | % | 16.7 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.1 | 16.7 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.0 | 17.2 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,358 | $ | 2,358 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.7 | % | 7.7 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 2,785 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.5 | % | 6.0 |
(1)Capital ratios as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)Risk-based capital regulatory minimums at both December 31, 2023 and 2022 are the minimum ratios under Basel 3 including a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent. The regulatory minimums for the leverage ratios as of both period ends are the percent required to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements
Total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) consists of the Corporation’s Tier 1 capital and eligible long-term debt issued directly by the Corporation. Eligible long-term debt for TLAC ratios is comprised of unsecured debt that has a remaining maturity of at least one year and satisfies additional
requirements as prescribed in the TLAC final rule. As with the risk-based capital ratios and SLR, the Corporation is required to maintain TLAC ratios in excess of minimum requirements plus applicable buffers to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. Table 14 presents the Corporation's TLAC and long-term debt ratios and related information as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
51 Bank of America
| Table 14 | Bank of America Corporation Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLAC (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | Long-term Debt | Regulatory Minimum (3) | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 479,156 | $ | 239,892 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 29.0 | % | 22.0 | % | 14.5 | % | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 13.0 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 4.5 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 465,451 | $ | 243,833 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 29.0 | % | 22.0 | % | 15.2 | % | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 13.2 | 9.5 | 6.9 | 4.5 |
(1)As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, TLAC ratios are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)The TLAC RWA regulatory minimum consists of 18.0 percent plus a TLAC RWA buffer comprised of 2.5 percent plus the Method 1 G-SIB surcharge of 1.5 percent. The countercyclical buffer is zero for both periods. The TLAC supplementary leverage exposure regulatory minimum consists of 7.5 percent plus a 2.0 percent TLAC leverage buffer. The TLAC RWA and leverage buffers must be comprised solely of CET1 capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively.
(3)The long-term debt RWA regulatory minimum is comprised of 6.0 percent plus an additional 2.5 percent requirement based on the Corporation’s Method 2 G-SIB surcharge. The long-term debt leverage exposure regulatory minimum is 4.5 percent. Effective January 1, 2024, the Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge, which is higher under Method 2, increased 50 bps, resulting in an increase in our long-term debt RWA regulatory minimum requirement to 9.0 percent from 8.5 percent.
(4)The approach that yields the higher RWA is used to calculate TLAC and long-term debt ratios, which was the Standardized approach as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Regulatory Developments
On July 27, 2023, U.S. banking regulators issued proposed rules that would update future U.S. regulatory capital requirements. Under the capital proposal, the Advanced approaches would be replaced with a new standardized approach, referred to as the expanded risk-based approach, which would be phased in over a three-year period beginning July 1, 2025. U.S. banking regulators also issued proposed rules to revise the risk-based capital surcharge for G-SIBs, which would be effective two calendar quarters after finalization. On August 29, 2023, U.S. banking regulators issued proposed rules that would change the criteria for debt instruments included in the Corporation’s eligible long-term debt and TLAC. Any final rules issued are subject to change from the current proposals. The Corporation is evaluating the potential impact of the proposed rules on its regulatory capital, eligible long-term debt and TLAC requirements.
Regulatory Capital and Securities Regulation
The Corporation’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS) and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S). On August 13, 2023, Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. (MLPCC) merged into its immediate parent, BofAS. Prior to that date, MLPCC was a fully-guaranteed subsidiary of BofAS and provided clearing and settlement services as well as prime brokerage and arranged financing services for institutional clients. Following the merger, client services previously provided by MLPCC are now being provided by or through BofAS.
The Corporation's principal European subsidiaries undertaking broker-dealer activities are Merrill Lynch International (MLI) and BofA Securities Europe SA (BofASE).
The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act. BofAS computes its capital requirements as an alternative net capital broker-dealer under Rule 15c3-1e, and MLPF&S computes its capital requirements in accordance with the alternative standard under Rule 15c3-1. BofAS is registered as a futures commission merchant and is subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Regulation 1.17. The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are also registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA). Pursuant to FINRA Rule 4110, FINRA may impose higher net capital requirements than Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to each of the broker-dealers.
BofAS provides institutional services, and in accordance with the alternative net capital requirements, is required to maintain tentative net capital in excess of $5.0 billion and net capital in excess of the greater of $1.0 billion or a certain percentage of its reserve requirement in addition to a certain percentage of securities-based swap risk margin. BofAS must also notify the SEC in the event its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. BofAS is also required to hold a certain percentage of its customers' and affiliates' risk-based margin in order to meet its CFTC minimum net capital requirement. At December 31, 2023, BofAS had tentative net capital of $21.4 billion. BofAS also had regulatory net capital of $19.4 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $4.6 billion.
MLPF&S provides retail services. At December 31, 2023, MLPF&S' regulatory net capital was $5.8 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $134 million.
Our European broker-dealers are subject to requirements from U.S. and non-U.S. regulators. MLI, a U.K. investment firm, is regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority and is subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2023, MLI’s capital resources were $33.9 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $11.4 billion.
BofASE, an authorized credit institution with its head office located in France, is regulated by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, and supervised under the Single Supervisory Mechanism by the European Central Bank. At December 31, 2023, BofASE's capital resources were $9.6 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $3.6 billion.
In addition, MLI and BofASE became conditionally registered with the SEC as security-based swap dealers in the fourth quarter of 2021, and maintained net liquid assets at December 31, 2023 that exceeded the applicable minimum requirements under the Exchange Act.
Liquidity Risk
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity risk management objective is to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral requirements, including payments under long-term debt agreements, commitments to extend credit and customer deposit withdrawals, while continuing to support our businesses and
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 52 |
customers under a range of economic conditions. To achieve that objective, we analyze and monitor our liquidity risk under expected and stressed conditions, maintain liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, including our stable deposit base, and seek to align liquidity-related incentives and risks. These liquidity risk management practices have allowed us to effectively manage the market stress from increased volatility due to the failure of certain financial institutions in the first half of 2023. Our practices have also allowed us to effectively manage market fluctuations from the rising interest rate environment, inflationary pressures and changes in the macroeconomic environment.
We define liquidity as readily available assets, limited to cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities that we can use to meet our contractual and contingent financial obligations as they arise. We manage our liquidity position through line-of-business and ALM activities, as well as through our legal entity funding strategy, on both a forward and current (including intraday) basis under both expected and stressed conditions. We believe that a centralized approach to funding and liquidity management enhances our ability to monitor liquidity requirements, maximizes access to funding sources, minimizes borrowing costs and facilitates timely responses to liquidity events.
The Board approves our liquidity risk policy and the Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan. The ERC establishes our liquidity risk tolerance levels. The MRC is responsible for overseeing liquidity risks and directing management to maintain exposures within the established tolerance levels. The MRC reviews and monitors our liquidity position and stress testing results, approves certain liquidity risk limits and reviews the impact of strategic decisions on our liquidity. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 44. Under this governance framework, we developed certain funding and liquidity risk management practices which include: maintaining liquidity at Bank of America Corporation (Parent) and selected subsidiaries, including our bank subsidiaries and other regulated entities; determining what amounts of liquidity are appropriate for these entities based on analysis of debt maturities and other potential cash outflows, including those that we may experience during stressed market conditions; diversifying funding sources, considering our asset profile and legal entity structure; and performing contingency planning.
NB Holdings Corporation
The Parent, which is a separate and distinct legal entity from our bank and nonbank subsidiaries, has an intercompany arrangement with our wholly-owned holding company subsidiary, NB Holdings Corporation (NB Holdings). We have transferred, and agreed to transfer, additional Parent assets not required to satisfy anticipated near-term expenditures to NB Holdings. The Parent is expected to continue to have access to the same flow of dividends, interest and other amounts of cash necessary to service its debt, pay dividends and perform other obligations as it would have had it not entered into these arrangements and transferred any assets. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In consideration for the transfer of assets, NB Holdings issued a subordinated note to the Parent in a principal amount equal to the value of the transferred assets. The aggregate principal amount of the note will increase by the amount of any future asset transfers. NB Holdings also provided the Parent with a committed line of credit that allows the Parent to draw
funds necessary to service near-term cash needs. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These arrangements include provisions to terminate the line of credit, forgive the subordinated note and require the Parent to transfer its remaining financial assets to NB Holdings if our projected liquidity resources deteriorate so severely that resolution of the Parent becomes imminent.
Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets
We maintain liquidity available to the Corporation, including the Parent and selected subsidiaries, in the form of cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Our liquidity buffer, referred to as Global Liquidity Sources (GLS), is comprised of assets that are readily available to the Parent and selected subsidiaries, including holding company, bank and broker-dealer subsidiaries, even during stressed market conditions. Our cash is primarily on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank and, to a lesser extent, central banks outside of the U.S. We limit the composition of high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities to U.S. government securities, U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency MBS and other investment-grade securities, and a select group of non-U.S. government securities. We can obtain cash for these securities, even in stressed conditions, through repurchase agreements or outright sales. We hold our GLS in legal entities that allow us to meet the liquidity requirements of our global businesses, and we consider the impact of potential regulatory, tax, legal and other restrictions that could limit the transferability of funds among entities.
Table 15 presents average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 15 | Average Global Liquidity Sources | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||
| Bank entities | $ | 735 | $ | 694 | ||
| Nonbank and other entities (1) | 162 | 174 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 897 | $ | 868 |
(1) Nonbank includes Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities.
Our bank subsidiaries’ liquidity is primarily driven by deposit and lending activity, as well as securities valuation and net debt activity. Bank subsidiaries can also generate incremental liquidity by pledging a range of unencumbered loans and securities to certain FHLBs and the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The cash we could have obtained by borrowing against this pool of specifically-identified eligible assets was $312 billion and $348 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022. We have established operational procedures to enable us to borrow against these assets, including regularly monitoring our total pool of eligible loans and securities collateral. Eligibility is defined in guidelines from the FHLBs and the Federal Reserve and is subject to change at their discretion. Due to regulatory restrictions, liquidity generated by the bank subsidiaries can generally be used only to fund obligations within the bank subsidiaries, and transfers to the Parent or nonbank subsidiaries may be subject to prior regulatory approval.
Liquidity is also held in nonbank entities, including the Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities. The Parent and NB Holdings liquidity is typically in the form of cash deposited at BANA, which is excluded from the liquidity at bank subsidiaries, and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Liquidity held in other regulated entities, comprised primarily of
53 Bank of America
broker-dealer subsidiaries, is primarily available to meet the obligations of that entity, and transfers to the Parent or to any other subsidiary may be subject to prior regulatory approval due to regulatory restrictions and minimum requirements. Our other regulated entities also hold unencumbered investment-grade securities and equities that we believe could be used to generate additional liquidity.
Table 16 presents the composition of average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 16 | Average Global Liquidity Sources Composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||
| Cash on deposit | $ | 380 | $ | 174 | ||
| U.S. Treasury securities | 197 | 252 | ||||
| U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities | 299 | 427 | ||||
| Non-U.S. government securities | 21 | 15 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 897 | $ | 868 |
Our GLS are substantially the same in composition to what qualifies as High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) under the final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) rules. However, HQLA for purposes of calculating LCR is not reported at market value, but at a lower value that incorporates regulatory deductions and the exclusion of excess liquidity held at certain subsidiaries. The LCR is calculated as the amount of a financial institution’s unencumbered HQLA relative to the estimated net cash outflows the institution could encounter over a 30-day period of significant liquidity stress, expressed as a percentage. Our average consolidated HQLA, on a net basis, was $590 billion and $605 billion for the three months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. For the same periods, the average consolidated LCR was 115 percent and 120 percent. Our LCR fluctuates due to normal business flows from customer activity.
Liquidity Stress Analysis
We utilize liquidity stress analysis to assist us in determining the appropriate amounts of liquidity to maintain at the Parent and our subsidiaries to meet contractual and contingent cash outflows under a range of scenarios. The scenarios we consider and utilize incorporate market-wide and Corporation-specific events, including potential credit rating downgrades for the Parent and our subsidiaries, and more severe events including potential resolution scenarios. The scenarios are based on our historical experience, experience of distressed and failed financial institutions, regulatory guidance, and both expected and unexpected future events.
The types of potential contractual and contingent cash outflows we consider in our scenarios may include, but are not limited to, upcoming contractual maturities of unsecured debt and reductions in new debt issuances; diminished access to secured financing markets; potential deposit withdrawals; increased draws on loan commitments, liquidity facilities and letters of credit; additional collateral that counterparties could call if our credit ratings were downgraded; collateral and margin requirements arising from market value changes; and potential liquidity required to maintain businesses and finance customer activities. Changes in certain market factors, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades, could negatively impact potential contractual and contingent outflows and the related financial instruments, and in some cases these impacts could be material to our financial results.
We consider all sources of funds that we could access during each stress scenario and focus particularly on matching available sources with corresponding liquidity requirements by legal entity. We also use the stress modeling results to manage our asset and liability profile and establish limits and guidelines on certain funding sources and businesses.
Net Stable Funding Ratio
The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a liquidity requirement for large banks to maintain a minimum level of stable funding over a one-year period. The requirement is intended to support the ability of banks to lend to households and businesses in both normal and adverse economic conditions and is complementary to the LCR, which focuses on short-term liquidity risks. The U.S. NSFR applies to the Corporation on a consolidated basis and to our insured depository institutions. For the three months ended September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2023, the average consolidated NSFR was 119 percent and 120 percent.
Diversified Funding Sources
We fund our assets primarily with a mix of deposits, and secured and unsecured liabilities through a centralized, globally coordinated funding approach diversified across products, programs, markets, currencies and investor groups.
The primary benefits of our centralized funding approach include greater control, reduced funding costs, wider name recognition by investors and greater flexibility to meet the variable funding requirements of subsidiaries. Where regulations, time zone differences or other business considerations make Parent funding impractical, certain other subsidiaries may issue their own debt.
We fund a substantial portion of our lending activities through our deposits, which were $1.92 trillion and $1.93 trillion at December 31, 2023 and 2022. Deposits are primarily generated by our Consumer Banking, GWIM and Global Banking segments. These deposits are diversified by clients, product type and geography, and the majority of our U.S. deposits are insured by the FDIC.
At December 31, 2023, 50 percent of our deposits were in Consumer Banking, 16 percent in GWIM and 27 percent in Global Banking. As of the same period, approximately 68 percent of consumer and small business deposits and 79 percent of U.S. deposits in Global Banking were held by clients who have had accounts with us for 10 or more years. In addition, at December 31, 2023 and 2022, 28 percent and 34 percent of our deposits were noninterest-bearing and included operating accounts of our consumer and commercial clients.
We consider a substantial portion of our deposits to be a stable, low-cost and consistent source of funding. We believe this deposit funding is generally less sensitive to interest rate changes, market volatility or changes in our credit ratings than wholesale funding sources. Our lending activities may also be financed through secured borrowings, including credit card securitizations and securitizations with government-sponsored enterprises (GSE), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and private-label investors, as well as FHLB loans.
Our trading activities in other regulated entities are primarily funded on a secured basis through securities lending and repurchase agreements, and these amounts will vary based on customer activity and market conditions. We believe funding these activities in the secured financing markets is more cost-efficient and less sensitive to changes in our credit ratings than unsecured financing. Repurchase agreements are generally short-term and often overnight. Disruptions in secured financing
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 54 |
markets for financial institutions have occurred in prior market cycles which resulted in adverse changes in terms or significant reductions in the availability of such financing. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate. For more information on secured financing agreements, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total long-term debt increased $26.2 billion to $302.2 billion during 2023, primarily due to debt issuances and valuation adjustments, partially offset by debt maturities and redemptions. We may, from time to time, purchase outstanding debt instruments in various transactions, depending on market conditions, liquidity and other factors. Our other regulated entities may also make markets in our debt instruments to provide liquidity for investors.
During 2023, we issued $62.0 billion of long-term debt consisting of $24.0 billion of notes issued by Bank of America Corporation, substantially all of which were TLAC compliant, $25.1 billion of notes issued by Bank of America, N.A. and $12.9 billion of other debt. During 2022, we issued $66.0 billion of long-term debt consisting of $44.2 billion of notes issued by Bank of America Corporation, substantially all of which were TLAC compliant, $10.0 billion of notes issued by Bank of America, N.A. and $11.8 billion of other debt.
During 2023, we had total long-term debt maturities and redemptions in the aggregate of $42.7 billion consisting of $25.3 billion for Bank of America Corporation, $10.5 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $6.9 billion of other debt. During 2022, we had total long-term debt maturities and redemptions in the aggregate of $33.3 billion consisting of $19.8 billion for Bank of America Corporation, $9.9 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $3.6 billion of other debt.
At December 31, 2023, Bank of America Corporation's senior notes of $208.4 billion included $187.7 billion of outstanding notes that are both TLAC eligible and callable at least one year before their stated maturities. Of these senior notes, $22.1 billion will be callable and become TLAC ineligible during 2024, and $22.0 billion, $21.4 billion, $25.0 billion and $19.9 billion will do so during each of 2025 through 2028, respectively, and $77.3 billion thereafter.
We issue long-term unsecured debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. While the cost and availability of unsecured funding may be negatively impacted by general market conditions or by matters specific to the financial services industry or the Corporation, we seek to mitigate refinancing risk by actively managing the amount of our borrowings that we anticipate will mature within any month or quarter. We may issue unsecured debt in the form of structured notes for client purposes, certain of which qualify as TLAC-eligible debt. During 2023, we issued $15.7 billion of structured notes, which are debt obligations that pay investors returns linked to other debt or equity securities, indices, currencies or commodities. We typically hedge the returns we are obligated to pay on these liabilities with derivatives and/or investments in the underlying instruments, so that from a funding perspective, the cost is similar to our other unsecured long-term debt. We could be required to settle certain structured note obligations for cash or other securities prior to maturity under certain circumstances, which we consider for liquidity planning purposes. We believe, however, that a portion of such
borrowings will remain outstanding beyond the earliest put or redemption date.
Substantially all of our senior and subordinated debt obligations contain no provisions that could trigger a requirement for an early repayment, require additional collateral support, result in changes to terms, accelerate maturity or create additional financial obligations upon an adverse change in our credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows or stock price. For more information on long-term debt funding, including issuances and maturities and redemptions, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We use derivative transactions to manage the duration, interest rate and currency risks of our borrowings, considering the characteristics of the assets they are funding. For more information on our ALM activities, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 77.
Uninsured Deposits
The FDIC insures the Corporation’s U.S. deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank for each account ownership category, and various country-specific funds insure non-U.S. deposits up to specified limits. Deposits that exceed insurance limits are uninsured. At December 31, 2023, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $1.92 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $606.8 billion and $116.6 billion. At December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $1.93 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $617.6 billion and $102.8 billion. Deposit balances exclude $14.8 billion and $15.2 billion of collateral received on certain derivative contracts that are netted against the derivative asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2023 and 2022. Estimated uninsured deposits presented in this section reflect amounts disclosed in our regulatory reports, adjusted to exclude related accrued interest and intercompany deposit balances.
Table 17 presents information about the Corporation’s total estimated uninsured time deposits. For more information on our liquidity sources, see Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets, and for more information on deposits, see Diversified Funding Sources in this section. For more information on contractual time deposit maturities, see Note 9 – Deposits to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Table 17 | Uninsured Time Deposits (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | U.S. | Non-U.S. | Total | |||||||
| Uninsured time deposits with a maturity of: | ||||||||||
| 3 months or less | $ | 8,797 | $ | 7,744 | $ | 16,541 | ||||
| Over 3 months through 6 months | 6,154 | 1,629 | 7,783 | |||||||
| Over 6 months through 12 months | 7,885 | 280 | 8,165 | |||||||
| Over 12 months | 848 | 2,985 | 3,833 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 23,684 | $ | 12,638 | $ | 36,322 |
(1)Amounts are estimated based on the regulatory methodologies defined by each local jurisdiction.
Contingency Planning
We maintain contingency funding plans that outline our potential responses to liquidity stress events at various levels of severity. These policies and plans are based on stress scenarios and include potential funding strategies and communication and notification procedures that we would implement in the event we experienced stressed liquidity conditions. We periodically review and test the contingency funding plans to validate efficacy and
55 Bank of America
assess readiness.
Our U.S. bank subsidiaries can access contingency funding through the Federal Reserve Discount Window. Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries have access to central bank facilities in the jurisdictions in which they operate. While we do not rely on these sources in our liquidity modeling, we maintain the policies, procedures and governance processes that would enable us to access these sources if necessary.
Credit Ratings
Our borrowing costs and ability to raise funds are impacted by our credit ratings. In addition, credit ratings may be important to customers or counterparties when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to engage in certain transactions, including over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. Thus, it is our objective to maintain high-quality credit ratings, and management maintains an active dialogue with the major rating agencies.
Credit ratings and outlooks are opinions expressed by rating agencies on our creditworthiness and that of our obligations or securities, including long-term debt, short-term borrowings, preferred stock and other securities, including asset securitizations. Our credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by the rating agencies, and they consider a number of factors, including our own financial strength, performance, prospects and operations as well as factors not under our control. The rating agencies could make adjustments to our ratings at any time, and they provide no assurances that they will maintain our ratings at current levels.
Other factors that influence our credit ratings include changes to the rating agencies’ methodologies for our industry or certain security types; the rating agencies’ assessment of the general operating environment for financial services companies; our relative positions in the markets in which we compete; our various risk exposures and risk management policies and activities; pending litigation and other contingencies or potential tail risks; our reputation; our liquidity position, diversity of
funding sources and funding costs; the current and expected level and volatility of our earnings; our capital position and capital management practices; our corporate governance; the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government; current or future regulatory and legislative initiatives; and the agencies’ views on whether the U.S. government would provide meaningful support to the Corporation or its subsidiaries in a crisis.
On May 3, 2023, Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) upgraded its long-term senior debt ratings of the Corporation by one notch to A1 from A2, and also upgraded the long-term senior debt ratings of BANA to Aa1 from Aa2. Moody’s concurrently affirmed its Prime-1 short-term ratings of the Corporation and BANA. Moody’s cited the Corporation’s strengthened capital, improved earnings profile and ongoing commitment to maintaining a restrained risk appetite as rationale for the upgrade. These actions concluded the review for upgrade that Moody’s initiated on January 23, 2023. Separately, on November 13, 2023, Moody’s placed its ratings for BANA on negative outlook, reflecting the agency’s recent move to a negative outlook on its ratings for the government of the United States of America and the potentially weaker capacity for the government to support systemically important U.S. banks. The Corporation’s ratings and stable outlook were not affected by this action.
On March 31, 2023, Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings (S&P) affirmed the current ratings of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, while at the same time revising its rating outlook to Stable from Positive. S&P concurrently changed its outlooks on three other large U.S. bank holding companies to Stable from Positive, noting that the agency has reduced its upside expectations for bank ratings in the near term.
The ratings and outlooks from Fitch Ratings for the Corporation and its subsidiaries have not changed during 2023.
Table 18 presents the Corporation’s current long-term/short-term senior debt ratings and outlooks expressed by the rating agencies.
| Table 18 | Senior Debt Ratings | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moody’s Investors Service | Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings | Fitch Ratings | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | |||||||||
| Bank of America Corporation | A1 | P-1 | Stable | A- | A-2 | Stable | AA- | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America, N.A. | Aa1 | P-1 | Negative | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities, Inc. | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch International | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities Europe SA | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Stable | AA | F1+ | Stable |
NR = not rated
A reduction in certain of our credit ratings or the ratings of certain asset-backed securitizations may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, potential loss of access to credit markets, the related cost of funds, our businesses and on certain revenues, particularly in those businesses where counterparty creditworthiness is critical. In addition, under the terms of certain OTC derivative contracts and other trading agreements, in the event of downgrades of our or our rated subsidiaries’ credit ratings, the counterparties to those agreements may require us to provide additional collateral, or to terminate these contracts or agreements, which could cause us to sustain losses and/or adversely impact our liquidity. If the short-term credit ratings of our Parent, bank or broker-dealer
subsidiaries were downgraded by one or more levels, the potential loss of access to short-term funding sources such as repo financing and the effect on our incremental cost of funds could be material.
While certain potential impacts are contractual and quantifiable, the full scope of the consequences of a credit rating downgrade to a financial institution is inherently uncertain, as it depends upon numerous dynamic, complex and inter-related factors and assumptions, including whether any downgrade of a company’s long-term credit ratings precipitates downgrades to its short-term credit ratings, and assumptions about the potential behaviors of various customers, investors and counterparties. For more information on potential impacts
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 56 |
of credit rating downgrades, see Liquidity Risk – Liquidity Stress Analysis on page 54.
For more information on additional collateral and termination payments that could be required in connection with certain over-the-counter derivative contracts and other trading agreements in the event of a credit rating downgrade, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Common Stock Dividends
For a summary of our declared quarterly cash dividends on common stock during 2023 and through February 20, 2024, see Note 13 – Shareholders’ Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Finance Subsidiary Issuers and Parent Guarantor
BofA Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (BofA Finance), is a consolidated finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold, and is expected to continue to issue and sell, its senior unsecured debt securities (Guaranteed Notes) that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The Corporation guarantees the due and punctual payment, on demand, of amounts payable on the Guaranteed Notes if not paid by BofA Finance. In addition, each of BAC Capital Trust XIII, BAC Capital Trust XIV and BAC Capital Trust XV, Delaware statutory trusts (collectively, the Trusts) is a 100 percent owned finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold trust preferred securities (the Trust Preferred Securities) or capital securities (the Capital Securities and, together with the Guaranteed Notes and the Trust Preferred Securities, the Guaranteed Securities), as applicable, that remained outstanding at December 31, 2023. The Corporation guarantees the payment of amounts and distributions with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities if not paid by the Trusts, to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. This guarantee, together with the Corporation’s other obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities, effectively constitutes a full and unconditional guarantee of the Trusts’ payment obligations on the Trust Preferred Securities or Capital Securities, as applicable. No other subsidiary of the Corporation guarantees the Guaranteed Securities.
BofA Finance and each of the Trusts are finance subsidiaries, have no independent assets, revenues or operations and are dependent upon the Corporation and/or the Corporation’s other subsidiaries to meet their respective obligations under the Guaranteed Securities in the ordinary course. If holders of the Guaranteed Securities make claims on their Guaranteed Securities in a bankruptcy, resolution or similar proceeding, any recoveries on those claims will be limited to those available under the applicable guarantee by the Corporation, as described above.
The Corporation is a holding company and depends upon its subsidiaries for liquidity. Applicable laws and regulations and intercompany arrangements entered into in connection with the Corporation’s resolution plan could restrict the availability of funds from subsidiaries to the Corporation, which could adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to make payments under its guarantees. In addition, the obligations of the Corporation under the guarantees of the Guaranteed Securities will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of its subsidiaries, and claimants should look only to assets of the Corporation for payments. If the Corporation, as guarantor of the Guaranteed Notes, transfers all or substantially all of its assets to one or more direct or indirect majority-owned
subsidiaries, under the indenture governing the Guaranteed Notes, the subsidiary or subsidiaries will not be required to assume the Corporation’s obligations under its guarantee of the Guaranteed Notes.
For more information on factors that may affect payments to holders of the Guaranteed Securities, see Liquidity Risk – NB Holdings Corporation in this section, Item 1. Business – Insolvency and the Orderly Liquidation Authority on page 6 and Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity on page 9.
Representations and Warranties Obligations
For information on representations and warranties obligations in connection with the sale of mortgage loans, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations. Credit risk can also arise from operational failures that result in an erroneous advance, commitment or investment of funds. We define the credit exposure to a borrower or counterparty as the loss potential arising from all product classifications including loans and leases, deposit overdrafts, derivatives, assets held-for-sale and unfunded lending commitments, which include loan commitments, letters of credit and financial guarantees. Derivative positions are recorded at fair value, and assets held-for-sale are recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. Certain loans and unfunded commitments are accounted for under the fair value option. Credit risk for categories of assets carried at fair value is not accounted for as part of the allowance for credit losses but as part of the fair value adjustments recorded in earnings. For derivative positions, our credit risk is measured as the net cost in the event the counterparties with contracts in which we are in a gain position fail to perform under the terms of those contracts. We use the current fair value to represent credit exposure without giving consideration to future mark-to-market changes. The credit risk amounts take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral. Our consumer and commercial credit extension and review procedures encompass funded and unfunded credit exposures. For more information on derivatives and credit extension commitments, see Note 3 – Derivatives and Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We manage credit risk based on the risk profile of the borrower or counterparty, repayment sources, the nature of underlying collateral and other support given current events, conditions and expectations. We classify our portfolios as either consumer or commercial and monitor credit risk in each as discussed below.
We refine our underwriting and credit risk management practices as well as credit standards to meet the changing economic environment. To mitigate losses and enhance customer support in our consumer businesses, we have in place collection programs and loan modification and customer assistance infrastructures. We utilize a number of actions to mitigate losses in the commercial businesses including increasing the frequency and intensity of portfolio monitoring, hedging activity and our practice of transferring management of deteriorating commercial exposures to independent special asset officers as credits enter criticized categories.
For information on our credit risk management activities, see the following: Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management on
57 Bank of America
page 58, Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 62, Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 68, Allowance for Credit Losses on page 71, and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For information on the Corporation’s loan modification programs, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more information on the Corporation’s credit risks, see the Credit section within Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During 2023, our asset quality remained relatively stable. Our net charge-off ratio increased primarily driven by credit card loans, as delinquency trends continued to slowly increase off of historic lows. Nonperforming loans increased compared to 2022 driven by the commercial real estate office property type, while commercial reservable criticized exposure increased driven by both office as well as other industries that have been impacted by the current environment. Uncertainty remains regarding broader economic impacts as a result of inflationary pressures, elevated rates and the current geopolitical environment and could lead to adverse impacts to credit quality metrics in future periods.
Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the consumer portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout a borrower’s credit cycle. Statistical techniques in conjunction with experiential judgment are used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing, risk appetite, setting
credit limits, and establishing operating processes and metrics to quantify and balance risks and returns. Statistical models are built using detailed behavioral information from external sources, such as credit bureaus, and/or internal historical experience and are a component of our consumer credit risk management process. These models are used in part to assist in making both new and ongoing credit decisions as well as portfolio management strategies, including authorizations and line management, collection practices and strategies, and determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and allocated capital for credit risk.
Consumer Credit Portfolio
During 2023, the U.S. unemployment rate remained relatively stable and home prices increased compared to 2022. Net charge-offs increased $1.2 billion to $3.1 billion in 2023 primarily due to late-stage delinquent credit card loans that were charged off.
The consumer allowance for loan and lease losses increased $1.3 billion during 2023 to $8.5 billion. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 71.
For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status, charge-offs and loan modifications for the consumer portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 19 presents our outstanding consumer loans and leases, consumer nonperforming loans and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more.
| Table 19 | Consumer Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1) | $ | 228,403 | $ | 229,670 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 2,167 | $ | 252 | $ | 368 | ||||||||||
| Home equity | 25,527 | 26,563 | 450 | 510 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 102,200 | 93,421 | n/a | n/a | 1,224 | 717 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer (2) | 103,468 | 106,236 | 148 | 77 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 124 | 156 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 459,722 | $ | 456,046 | $ | 2,712 | $ | 2,754 | $ | 1,478 | $ | 1,087 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (3) | 243 | 339 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans and leases | $ | 459,965 | $ | 456,385 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.59 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases, excluding fully-insured loan portfolios (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.27 | 0.16 |
(1)Residential mortgage loans accruing past due 90 days or more are fully-insured loans. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, residential mortgage included $156 million and $260 million of loans on which interest had been curtailed by the FHA, and therefore were no longer accruing interest, although principal was still insured, and $96 million and $108 million of loans on which interest was still accruing.
(2)Outstandings primarily includes auto and specialty lending loans and leases of $53.9 billion and $51.8 billion, U.S. securities-based lending loans of $46.0 billion and $50.4 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and non-U.S. consumer loans of $2.8 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(3)For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)Excludes consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, $4 million and $7 million of loans accounted for under the fair value option were past due 90 days or more and not accruing interest.
n/a = not applicable
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 58 |
Table 20 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for consumer loans and leases.
| Table 20 | Consumer Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 16 | $ | 72 | 0.01 | % | 0.03 | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | (59) | (90) | (0.23) | (0.33) | |||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 2,561 | 1,334 | 2.66 | 1.60 | |||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 92 | 18 | 0.09 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 480 | 521 | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,090 | $ | 1,855 | 0.68 | 0.42 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
n/m = not meaningful
We believe that the presentation of information adjusted to exclude the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option is more representative of the ongoing operations and credit quality of the business. As a result, in the following tables and discussions of the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios, we exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option and provide information that excludes the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio in certain credit quality statistics.
Residential Mortgage
The residential mortgage portfolio made up the largest percentage of our consumer loan portfolio at 50 percent of consumer loans and leases in 2023. Approximately 51 percent of the residential mortgage portfolio was in Consumer Banking, 46 percent was in GWIM and the remaining portion was in All Other.
Outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio decreased $1.3 billion in 2023, as paydowns and payoffs outpaced new originations.
At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the residential mortgage portfolio included $11.0 billion and $11.7 billion of outstanding fully-insured loans, of which $2.2 billion for both periods had FHA insurance, with the remainder protected by Fannie Mae long-term standby agreements.
Table 21 presents certain residential mortgage key credit statistics on both a reported basis and excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio. The following discussion presents the residential mortgage portfolio excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio.
| Table 21 | Residential Mortgage – Key Credit Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported Basis (1) | Excluding Fully-insured Loans (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 228,403 | $ | 229,670 | $ | 217,439 | $ | 217,976 | |||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 1,513 | 1,471 | 986 | 844 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 90 days or more | 252 | 368 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 2,114 | 2,167 | 2,114 | 2,167 | |||||||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 100 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a modification.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio decreased $53 million in 2023 primarily due to payoffs and paydowns, returns to performing and loan sales outpacing new additions. Of the nonperforming residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2023, $1.3 billion, or 62 percent, were current on contractual payments. Excluding fully-insured loans, loans accruing past due 30 days or more increased $142 million.
Of the $217.4 billion in total residential mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2023, $63.1 billion, or 29 percent, of loans were originated as interest-only. The outstanding balance of interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period was $3.6 billion, or six percent, at December 31, 2023. Residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period generally experience a higher rate of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status compared to the residential mortgage portfolio as a
whole. At December 31, 2023, $80 million, or two percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgages that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more compared to $986 million, or less than one percent, for the entire residential mortgage portfolio. In addition, at December 31, 2023, $180 million, or five percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period were nonperforming, of which $61 million were contractually current. Loans that have yet to enter the amortization period in our interest-only residential mortgage portfolio are primarily well-collateralized loans to our wealth management clients and have an interest-only period of three years to 10 years. Substantially all of these loans that have yet to enter the amortization period will not be required to make a fully-amortizing payment until 2025 or later.
59 Bank of America
Table 22 presents outstandings, nonperforming loans and net charge-offs by certain state concentrations for the residential mortgage portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) made up 15 percent of outstandings at both December 31, 2023 and 2022. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California represented 14 percent of outstandings at both December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 22 | Residential Mortgage State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31 2023 | December 31 2022 | December 31 2023 | December 31 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 81,085 | $ | 80,878 | $ | 641 | $ | 656 | $ | 3 | $ | 37 | ||||||||||||||
| New York | 25,975 | 26,228 | 320 | 328 | 4 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 15,450 | 15,225 | 131 | 145 | (2) | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,361 | 9,399 | 88 | 88 | 1 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 8,671 | 8,810 | 97 | 96 | — | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 76,897 | 77,436 | 837 | 854 | 10 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans | $ | 217,439 | $ | 217,976 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 2,167 | $ | 16 | $ | 72 | ||||||||||||||
| Fully-insured loan portfolio | 10,964 | 11,694 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total residential mortgage loan portfolio | $ | 228,403 | $ | 229,670 |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Home Equity
At December 31, 2023, the home equity portfolio made up six percent of the consumer portfolio and was comprised of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), home equity loans and reverse mortgages. HELOCs generally have an initial draw period of 10 years, and after the initial draw period ends, the loans generally convert to 15- or 20-year amortizing loans. We no longer originate home equity loans or reverse mortgages.
At December 31, 2023, 84 percent of the home equity portfolio was in Consumer Banking, seven percent was in All Other and the remainder of the portfolio was primarily in GWIM. Outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $1.0 billion in 2023 primarily due to paydowns outpacing draws
on existing lines and new originations. Of the total home equity portfolio at December 31, 2023 and 2022, $10.1 billion and $11.1 billion, or 39 percent and 42 percent, were in first-lien positions. At December 31, 2023, outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio that were in a second-lien or more junior-lien position and where we also held the first-lien loan totaled $4.4 billion, or 17 percent, of our total home equity portfolio.
Unused HELOCs totaled $45.1 billion and $42.4 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022. The HELOC utilization rate was 35 percent and 38 percent at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Table 23 presents certain home equity portfolio key credit statistics.
| Table 23 | Home Equity – Key Credit Statistics (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 25,527 | $ | 26,563 | ||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 95 | 96 | ||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 450 | 510 | ||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | ||||||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 100 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 3 | 2 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of the portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a modification.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $60 million to $450 million at December 31, 2023, primarily driven by loan sales, payoffs and returns to performing status outpacing new additions. Of the nonperforming home equity loans at December 31, 2023, $256 million, or 57 percent, were current on contractual payments. In addition, $113 million, or 25 percent, were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell. Accruing loans that were 30 days or more past due remained relatively unchanged in 2023 compared to 2022.
Of the $25.5 billion in total home equity portfolio outstandings at December 31, 2023, as shown in Table 23, 11 percent require interest-only payments. The outstanding balance of HELOCs that had reached the end of their draw period and entered the amortization period was $4.0 billion at
December 31, 2023. The HELOCs that have entered the amortization period have experienced a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status when compared to the HELOC portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2023, $41 million, or one percent, of outstanding HELOCs that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more. In addition, at December 31, 2023, $283 million, or seven percent, were nonperforming.
For our interest-only HELOC portfolio, we do not actively track how many of our home equity customers pay only the minimum amount due on their home equity loans and lines; however, we can infer some of this information through a review of our HELOC portfolio that we service and is still in its revolving period. During 2023, 13 percent of these customers with an outstanding balance did not pay any principal on their HELOCs.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 60 |
Table 24 presents outstandings, nonperforming balances and net recoveries by certain state concentrations for the home equity portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 11 percent and 12 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2023 and 2022. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California made up 10 percent and 11 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 24 | Home Equity State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 6,966 | $ | 7,406 | $ | 109 | $ | 119 | $ | (6) | $ | (20) | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 2,576 | 2,743 | 53 | 63 | (12) | (21) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 1,870 | 2,047 | 46 | 53 | (5) | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 1,590 | 1,806 | 71 | 80 | (10) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 1,410 | 1,284 | 16 | 14 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 11,115 | 11,277 | 155 | 181 | (26) | (42) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total home equity loan portfolio | $ | 25,527 | $ | 26,563 | $ | 450 | $ | 510 | $ | (59) | $ | (90) |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Credit Card
At December 31, 2023, 97 percent of the credit card portfolio was managed in Consumer Banking with the remainder in GWIM. Outstandings in the credit card portfolio increased $8.8 billion during 2023 to $102.2 billion as purchase volume and card transfers more than offset payments. Net charge-offs increased $1.2 billion to $2.6 billion in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to late-stage delinquent credit card loans that were charged off. Credit card loans 30 days or more past due and still
accruing interest increased $914 million, and 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest increased $507 million at December 31, 2023.
Unused lines of credit for credit card increased to $390.2 billion at December 31, 2023 from $370.1 billion at December 31, 2022.
Table 25 presents certain state concentrations for the credit card portfolio.
| Table 25 | Credit Card State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 16,952 | $ | 15,363 | $ | 216 | $ | 126 | $ | 457 | $ | 232 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 10,521 | 9,512 | 168 | 100 | 343 | 183 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 8,978 | 8,125 | 125 | 72 | 245 | 123 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 5,788 | 5,381 | 84 | 56 | 197 | 99 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington | 5,352 | 4,844 | 41 | 21 | 77 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 54,609 | 50,196 | 590 | 342 | 1,242 | 661 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total credit card portfolio | $ | 102,200 | $ | 93,421 | $ | 1,224 | $ | 717 | $ | 2,561 | $ | 1,334 |
Direct/Indirect Consumer
At December 31, 2023, 52 percent of the direct/indirect portfolio was included in Consumer Banking (consumer auto and recreational vehicle lending) and 48 percent was included in GWIM (principally securities-based lending loans). Outstandings in the direct/indirect portfolio decreased $2.8 billion in 2023 to
$103.5 billion driven by declines in securities-based lending stemming from higher paydown activity due to higher interest rates, partially offset by growth in our auto portfolio.
Table 26 presents certain state concentrations for the direct/indirect consumer loan portfolio.
| Table 26 | Direct/Indirect State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 15,416 | $ | 15,516 | $ | 27 | $ | 12 | $ | 21 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 13,550 | 13,783 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,668 | 9,837 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 7,335 | 7,891 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 4,376 | 4,456 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 53,123 | 54,753 | 73 | 38 | 37 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total direct/indirect loan portfolio | $ | 103,468 | $ | 106,236 | $ | 148 | $ | 77 | $ | 92 | $ | 18 |
61 Bank of America
Other Consumer
Other consumer primarily consists of deposit overdraft balances. Net charge-offs decreased $41 million in 2023 to $480 million, primarily driven by lower overdraft losses.
Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 27 presents nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2023 and 2022. During 2023, nonperforming consumer loans decreased $42 million to $2.7 billion.
At December 31, 2023, $531 million, or 20 percent, of nonperforming loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to their estimated property value less costs to sell. In addition, at December 31, 2023, $1.6 billion, or 60 percent, of nonperforming consumer loans were current and classified as nonperforming loans in accordance with applicable policies.
Foreclosed properties decreased $18 million in 2023 to $103 million.
| Table 27 | Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 2,754 | $ | 2,989 | ||||||
| Additions | 1,055 | 1,453 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns and payoffs | (480) | (535) | ||||||||
| Sales | (63) | (402) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (1) | (475) | (661) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (53) | (56) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | (26) | (34) | ||||||||
| Total net reductions to nonperforming loans and leases | (42) | (235) | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 2,712 | 2,754 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 103 | 121 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 (2) | $ | 2,815 | $ | 2,875 | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (3) | 0.59 | % | 0.60 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties (3) | 0.61 | 0.63 |
(1)Consumer loans may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection.
(2)Includes repossessed non-real estate assets of $20 million and $0 at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(3)Outstanding consumer loans and leases exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the commercial portfolio begins with an assessment of the credit risk profile of the borrower or counterparty based on an analysis of its financial position. As part of the overall credit risk assessment, our commercial credit exposures are assigned a risk rating and are subject to approval based on defined credit approval standards. Subsequent to loan origination, risk ratings are monitored on an ongoing basis, and if necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in the financial condition, cash flow, risk profile or outlook of a borrower or counterparty. In making credit decisions, we consider risk rating, collateral, country, industry and single-name concentration limits while also balancing these considerations with the total borrower or counterparty relationship. We use a variety of tools to continuously monitor the ability of a borrower or counterparty to perform under its obligations. We use risk rating aggregations to measure and evaluate concentrations within portfolios. In addition, risk ratings are a factor in determining the level of allocated capital and the allowance for credit losses.
As part of our ongoing risk mitigation initiatives, we attempt to work with clients experiencing financial difficulty to modify their loans to terms that better align with their current ability to pay. For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status and net charge-offs for the commercial portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management of Commercial Credit Risk Concentrations
Commercial credit risk is evaluated and managed with the goal that concentrations of credit exposure continue to be aligned with our risk appetite. We review, measure and manage
concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product, geography, customer relationship and loan size. We also review, measure and manage commercial real estate loans by geographic location and property type. In addition, within our non-U.S. portfolio, we evaluate exposures by region and by country. Tables 32, 34 and 37 summarize our concentrations. We also utilize syndications of exposure to third parties, loan sales, hedging and other risk mitigation techniques to manage the size and risk profile of the commercial credit portfolio. For more information on our industry concentrations, see Table 34 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Industry Concentrations on page 66.
We account for certain large corporate loans and loan commitments, including issued but unfunded letters of credit which are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes, that exceed our single-name credit risk concentration guidelines under the fair value option. Lending commitments, both funded and unfunded, are actively managed and monitored, and as appropriate, credit risk for these lending relationships may be mitigated through the use of credit derivatives, with our credit view and market perspectives determining the size and timing of the hedging activity. In addition, we purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain other credit exposures. To lessen the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, credit exposure may be added within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection. These credit derivatives do not meet the requirements for treatment as accounting hedges. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other income.
In addition, we are a member of various securities and derivative exchanges and clearinghouses, both in the U.S. and
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 62 |
other countries. As a member, we may be required to pay a pro-rata share of the losses incurred by some of these organizations as a result of another member default and under other loss scenarios. For more information, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commercial Credit Portfolio
Outstanding commercial loans and leases increased $4.4 billion during 2023 due to growth in commercial real estate, primarily in Global Banking, and U.S. small business commercial. During 2023, commercial credit quality deteriorated as nonperforming commercial loans and reservable criticized utilized exposure increased primarily driven by the commercial real estate office property type; however, the commercial net charge-off ratio of 0.12 percent during 2023 remained low.
With the exception of the office property type, which is further discussed in the Commercial Real Estate section herein, credit quality of commercial real estate borrowers has remained relatively stable since December 31, 2022; however, we are closely monitoring emerging trends and borrower performance in the increased rate environment and challenging capital markets. Recent demand for office space has been stagnant, and future demand for office space continues to be uncertain as
companies evaluate space needs with employment models that utilize a mix of remote and conventional office use.
The commercial allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $623 million during 2023 to $4.8 billion, primarily driven by improved macroeconomic conditions. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 71.
Total commercial utilized credit exposure decreased $8.6 billion during 2023 to $696.3 billion primarily driven by lower derivative assets. The utilization rate for loans and leases, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and financial guarantees, and commercial letters of credit, in the aggregate, was 55 percent and 56 percent at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Table 28 presents commercial credit exposure by type for utilized, unfunded and total binding committed credit exposure. Commercial utilized credit exposure includes SBLCs and financial guarantees and commercial letters of credit that have been issued and for which we are legally bound to advance funds under prescribed conditions during a specified time period, and excludes exposure related to trading account assets. Although funds have not yet been advanced, these exposure types are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes.
| Table 28 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Type | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized (1) | Commercial Unfunded (2, 3, 4) | Total Commercial Committed | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | $ | 593,767 | $ | 589,362 | $ | 507,641 | $ | 487,772 | $ | 1,101,408 | $ | 1,077,134 | ||||||||||
| Derivative assets (5) | 39,323 | 48,642 | — | — | 39,323 | 48,642 | ||||||||||||||||
| Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees | 31,348 | 33,376 | 1,953 | 1,266 | 33,301 | 34,642 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities and other investments | 20,422 | 20,195 | 3,083 | 2,551 | 23,505 | 22,746 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans held-for-sale | 4,338 | 6,112 | 4,904 | 3,729 | 9,242 | 9,841 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | 5,312 | 5,509 | — | — | 5,312 | 5,509 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial letters of credit | 943 | 973 | 232 | 28 | 1,175 | 1,001 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 846 | 698 | — | — | 846 | 698 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 696,299 | $ | 704,867 | $ | 517,813 | $ | 495,346 | $ | 1,214,112 | $ | 1,200,213 |
(1)Commercial utilized exposure includes loans of $3.3 billion and $5.4 billion accounted for under the fair value option at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(2)Commercial unfunded exposure includes commitments accounted for under the fair value option with a notional amount of $2.6 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(3)Excludes unused business card lines, which are not legally binding.
(4)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.3 billion and $10.4 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(5)Derivative assets are carried at fair value, reflect the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and have been reduced by cash collateral of $29.4 billion and $33.8 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022. Not reflected in utilized and committed exposure is additional non-cash derivative collateral held of $56.1 billion and $51.6 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022, which consists primarily of other marketable securities.
Nonperforming commercial loans increased $1.7 billion during 2023, primarily in commercial real estate. Table 29 presents our commercial loans and leases portfolio and related credit quality information at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
63 Bank of America
| Table 29 | Commercial Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 358,931 | $ | 358,481 | $ | 636 | $ | 553 | $ | 51 | $ | 190 | ||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 124,581 | 124,479 | 175 | 212 | 4 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 483,512 | 482,960 | 811 | 765 | 55 | 215 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 72,878 | 69,766 | 1,927 | 271 | 32 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 14,854 | 13,644 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| 571,244 | 566,370 | 2,757 | 1,040 | 94 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial (1) | 19,197 | 17,560 | 16 | 14 | 184 | 355 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 590,441 | $ | 583,930 | $ | 2,773 | $ | 1,054 | $ | 278 | $ | 624 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (2) | 3,326 | 5,432 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans and leases | $ | 593,767 | $ | 589,362 |
(1)Includes card-related products.
(2)Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option includes U.S. commercial of $2.2 billion and $2.9 billion and non-U.S. commercial of $1.2 billion and $2.5 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022. For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 30 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for our commercial loans and leases for 2023 and 2022.
| Table 30 | Commercial Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 124 | $ | 71 | 0.03 | % | 0.02 | % | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 19 | 21 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 143 | 92 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 245 | 66 | 0.34 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 2 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||||
| 390 | 163 | 0.07 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 319 | 154 | 1.71 | 0.86 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | $ | 709 | $ | 317 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Table 31 presents commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure by loan type. Criticized exposure corresponds to the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful asset categories as defined by regulatory authorities. Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $4.0 billion during 2023
driven by the commercial real estate office property type and U.S. commercial, partially offset by non-U.S. commercial. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, 89 percent and 88 percent of commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure was secured.
| Table 31 | Commercial Reservable Criticized Utilized Exposure (1, 2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 12,006 | 3.12 | % | $ | 10,724 | 2.78 | % | |||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 1,787 | 1.37 | 2,665 | 2.04 | |||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 13,793 | 2.68 | 13,389 | 2.59 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 8,749 | 11.80 | 5,201 | 7.30 | |||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 166 | 1.12 | 240 | 1.76 | |||||||||
| 22,708 | 3.76 | 18,830 | 3.13 | ||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 592 | 3.08 | 444 | 2.53 | |||||||||
| Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure | $ | 23,300 | 3.74 | $ | 19,274 | 3.12 |
(1)Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure includes loans and leases of $22.5 billion and $18.5 billion and commercial letters of credit of $795 million and $817 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(2)Percentages are calculated as commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure divided by total commercial reservable utilized exposure for each exposure category.
Commercial and Industrial
Commercial and industrial loans include U.S. commercial and non-U.S. commercial portfolios.
U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2023, 62 percent of the U.S. commercial loan portfolio, excluding small business, was managed in Global Banking, 22 percent in Global Markets, 14 percent in GWIM
(loans that provide financing for asset purchases, business investments and other liquidity needs for high net worth clients) and the remainder primarily in Consumer Banking. U.S. commercial loans remained largely unchanged during 2023. Reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $1.3 billion, or 12 percent, driven by a broad range of industries.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 64 |
Non-U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2023, 62 percent of the non-U.S. commercial loan portfolio was managed in Global Banking and 38 percent in Global Markets. Non-U.S. commercial loans remained largely unchanged during 2023. Reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $878 million, or 33 percent, due to upgrades and sales of Russian exposure. For information on the non-U.S. commercial portfolio, see Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 68.
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial real estate primarily includes commercial loans secured by non-owner-occupied real estate and is dependent on the sale or lease of the real estate as the primary source of repayment. Outstanding loans increased $3.1 billion, or four percent, during 2023 to $72.9 billion with increases across multiple property types. The commercial real estate portfolio is primarily managed in Global Banking and consists of loans made primarily to public and private developers, and commercial real estate firms. The portfolio remains diversified across property types and geographic regions. California represented the largest state concentration at 20 percent and 19 percent of commercial real estate at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $3.5 billion, or 68 percent, during 2023, primarily driven by office loans.
Office loans represented the largest property type concentration at 25 percent of the commercial real estate portfolio at December 31, 2023, but only represented approximately two percent of total loans for the Corporation. This property type is roughly 75 percent Class A and had an origination loan-to-value of approximately 55 percent. Although we have seen collateral value declines in this property type, the majority of these loans remained adequately secured as of December 31, 2023.
Reservable criticized exposure for the office property type was $5.5 billion at December 31, 2023, and approximately $7.6 billion of office loans are scheduled to mature by the end of 2024.
During 2023 and 2022, we continued to see relatively low default rates. We use a number of proactive risk mitigation initiatives to reduce adversely rated exposure in the commercial real estate portfolio, including transfers of deteriorating exposures for management by independent special asset officers and the pursuit of loan restructurings or asset sales to achieve the best results for our customers and the Corporation.
Table 32 presents outstanding commercial real estate loans by geographic region, based on the geographic location of the collateral, and by property type.
| Table 32 | Outstanding Commercial Real Estate Loans | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||
| By Geographic Region | ||||||
| Northeast | $ | 15,920 | $ | 15,601 | ||
| California | 14,551 | 13,360 | ||||
| Southwest | 9,318 | 8,723 | ||||
| Southeast | 8,368 | 7,713 | ||||
| Florida | 4,986 | 5,374 | ||||
| Illinois | 3,361 | 3,327 | ||||
| Midwest | 3,149 | 3,419 | ||||
| Midsouth | 2,785 | 2,716 | ||||
| Northwest | 2,095 | 1,959 | ||||
| Non-U.S. | 6,052 | 5,518 | ||||
| Other | 2,293 | 2,056 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 72,878 | $ | 69,766 | ||
| By Property Type | ||||||
| Non-residential | ||||||
| Office | $ | 17,976 | $ | 18,230 | ||
| Industrial / Warehouse | 14,746 | 13,775 | ||||
| Multi-family rental | 10,606 | 10,412 | ||||
| Shopping centers / Retail | 5,756 | 5,830 | ||||
| Hotel / Motels | 5,665 | 5,696 | ||||
| Multi-use | 2,681 | 2,403 | ||||
| Other | 14,201 | 12,241 | ||||
| Total non-residential | 71,631 | 68,587 | ||||
| Residential | 1,247 | 1,179 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 72,878 | $ | 69,766 |
65 Bank of America
U.S. Small Business Commercial
The U.S. small business commercial loan portfolio is comprised of small business card loans and small business loans primarily managed in Consumer Banking, and included $329 million and $1.0 billion of Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans outstanding at December 31, 2023 and 2022. PPP loans decreased $679 million primarily due to repayment of the loans by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the terms of the program. Excluding PPP, credit card-related products were 54 percent and 53 percent of the U.S. small business commercial portfolio at December 31, 2023 and 2022 and represented 99 percent of the net charge-offs compared to 100 percent for 2022. Accruing past due 90 days or more decreased $171 million in 2023 driven by the repayment of PPP loans, which are fully guaranteed by the SBA.
Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 33 presents the nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2023 and 2022. Nonperforming loans do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. During 2023, nonperforming commercial loans and leases increased $1.7 billion to $2.8 billion. At December 31, 2023, 96 percent of commercial nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties were secured, and 62 percent were contractually current. Commercial nonperforming loans were carried at 89 percent of their unpaid principal balance, as the carrying value of these loans has been reduced to the estimated collateral value less costs to sell.
| Table 33 | Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity (1, 2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 1,054 | $ | 1,578 | ||||||
| Additions | 2,863 | 952 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns | (517) | (825) | ||||||||
| Sales | (4) | (57) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (3) | (106) | (334) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (428) | (221) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | (23) | — | ||||||||
| Transfers to loans held-for-sale | (66) | (39) | ||||||||
| Total net additions / (reductions) to nonperforming loans and leases | 1,719 | (524) | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 2,773 | 1,054 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 42 | 49 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 | $ | 2,815 | $ | 1,103 | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans and leases (4) | 0.47 | % | 0.18 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 0.48 | 0.19 |
(1)Balances do not include nonperforming loans held-for-sale of $161 million and $219 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial activity. Small business card loans are excluded as they are not classified as nonperforming.
(3)Commercial loans and leases may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection, or when a modified loan demonstrates a sustained period of payment performance.
(4)Outstanding commercial loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Industry Concentrations
Table 34 presents commercial committed and utilized credit exposure by industry. For information on net notional credit protection purchased to hedge funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Risk Mitigation.
Commercial credit exposure is diversified across a broad range of industries. Total commercial committed exposure increased $13.9 billion during 2023 to $1.2 trillion. The increase in commercial committed exposure was concentrated in Capital goods, Finance companies and Asset managers and funds.
Industry limits are used internally to manage industry concentrations and are based on committed exposure that is determined on an industry-by-industry basis. A risk management framework is in place to set and approve industry limits as well as to provide ongoing monitoring.
Asset managers and funds, our largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $169.3 billion, increased $4.2 billion, primarily driven by exposure to the Capital markets industry group during 2023.
Real estate, our second largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $100.3 billion remained relatively unchanged during 2023. For more information on the commercial real estate and related portfolios, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Commercial Real Estate on page 65.
Capital goods, our third largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $97.0 billion, increased $9.7 billion, or 11 percent, during 2023. The increase in committed exposure occurred primarily as a result of increases in Trading companies and distributors as well as Machinery, partially offset by a decrease in Industrial conglomerates.
The impact of various macroeconomic challenges, including geopolitical tensions, inflationary pressures and elevated interest rates, may lead to uncertainty in the U.S. and global economies, and may adversely impact a number of industries. We continue to monitor all industries, particularly higher risk industries that are experiencing or could experience a more significant impact to their financial condition.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 66 |
| Table 34 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Industry (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized | Total Commercial Committed (2) | |||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Asset managers and funds | $ | 103,138 | $ | 106,842 | $ | 169,318 | $ | 165,087 | ||||||
| Real estate (3) | 73,150 | 72,180 | 100,269 | 99,722 | ||||||||||
| Capital goods | 49,698 | 45,580 | 97,044 | 87,314 | ||||||||||
| Finance companies | 62,906 | 55,248 | 89,119 | 79,546 | ||||||||||
| Healthcare equipment and services | 35,037 | 33,554 | 61,766 | 58,761 | ||||||||||
| Materials | 25,223 | 26,304 | 55,296 | 55,589 | ||||||||||
| Retailing | 24,561 | 24,785 | 54,523 | 53,714 | ||||||||||
| Food, beverage and tobacco | 23,865 | 23,232 | 49,426 | 47,486 | ||||||||||
| Consumer services | 27,355 | 26,980 | 49,105 | 47,372 | ||||||||||
| Government and public education | 31,051 | 34,861 | 45,873 | 48,134 | ||||||||||
| Individuals and trusts | 32,481 | 34,897 | 43,938 | 45,572 | ||||||||||
| Commercial services and supplies | 22,642 | 23,628 | 41,473 | 41,596 | ||||||||||
| Utilities | 18,610 | 20,292 | 39,481 | 40,164 | ||||||||||
| Energy | 12,450 | 15,132 | 36,996 | 36,043 | ||||||||||
| Transportation | 24,200 | 22,273 | 36,267 | 33,858 | ||||||||||
| Technology hardware and equipment | 11,951 | 11,441 | 29,160 | 29,825 | ||||||||||
| Global commercial banks | 22,749 | 27,217 | 25,684 | 29,293 | ||||||||||
| Media | 13,033 | 14,781 | 24,908 | 28,216 | ||||||||||
| Vehicle dealers | 16,283 | 12,909 | 22,570 | 20,638 | ||||||||||
| Software and services | 9,830 | 12,961 | 22,381 | 25,633 | ||||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology | 6,852 | 7,547 | 22,169 | 26,208 | ||||||||||
| Consumer durables and apparel | 9,184 | 10,009 | 20,732 | 21,389 | ||||||||||
| Insurance | 9,371 | 10,224 | 19,322 | 19,444 | ||||||||||
| Telecommunication services | 9,224 | 9,679 | 17,269 | 17,349 | ||||||||||
| Automobiles and components | 7,049 | 8,774 | 16,459 | 16,911 | ||||||||||
| Food and staples retailing | 7,423 | 7,157 | 12,496 | 11,908 | ||||||||||
| Financial markets infrastructure (clearinghouses) | 4,229 | 3,913 | 6,503 | 8,752 | ||||||||||
| Religious and social organizations | 2,754 | 2,467 | 4,565 | 4,689 | ||||||||||
| Total commercial credit exposure by industry | $ | 696,299 | $ | 704,867 | $ | 1,214,112 | $ | 1,200,213 |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial exposure.
(2)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.3 billion and $10.4 billion at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
(3)Industries are viewed from a variety of perspectives to best isolate the perceived risks. For purposes of this table, the real estate industry is defined based on the primary business activity of the borrowers or counterparties using operating cash flows and primary source of repayment as key factors.
Risk Mitigation
We purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain credit exposures. To lower the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, we may add credit exposure within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection.
At December 31, 2023 and 2022, net notional credit default protection purchased in our credit derivatives portfolio to hedge our funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, was $10.9 billion and $9.0 billion. We recorded net losses of $185 million in 2023 compared to net losses of $37 million in 2022. The gains and losses on these instruments were largely offset by gains and losses on the related exposures. The Value-at-Risk (VaR) results for these exposures are included in the fair value option portfolio information in Table 41. For more information, see Trading Risk Management on page 74.
Tables 35 and 36 present the maturity profiles and the credit exposure debt ratings of the net credit default protection portfolio at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 35 | Net Credit Default Protection by Maturity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||
| 2023 | 2022 | ||||
| Less than or equal to one year | 36 | % | 14 | % | |
| Greater than one year and less than or equal to five years | 64 | 85 | |||
| Greater than five years | — | 1 | |||
| Total net credit default protection | 100 | % | 100 | % |
67 Bank of America
| Table 36 | Net Credit Default Protection by Credit Exposure Debt Rating | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | ||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||
| Ratings (2, 3) | |||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | (479) | 4.4 | % | $ | (379) | 4.0 | % | |||||
| AA | (1,080) | 9.9 | (867) | 10.0 | |||||||||
| A | (5,237) | 48.2 | (3,257) | 36.0 | |||||||||
| BBB | (2,912) | 26.8 | (2,476) | 28.0 | |||||||||
| BB | (698) | 6.4 | (1,049) | 12.0 | |||||||||
| B | (419) | 3.9 | (676) | 7.0 | |||||||||
| CCC and below | (52) | 0.5 | (93) | 1.0 | |||||||||
| NR (4) | 2 | (0.1) | (182) | 2.0 | |||||||||
| Total net credit default protection | $ | (10,875) | 100.0 | % | $ | (8,979) | 100.0 | % |
(1)Represents net credit default protection purchased.
(2)Ratings are refreshed on a quarterly basis.
(3)Ratings of BBB- or higher are considered to meet the definition of investment grade.
(4)NR is comprised of index positions held and any names that have not been rated.
In addition to our net notional credit default protection purchased to cover the funded and unfunded portion of certain credit exposures, credit derivatives are used for market-making activities for clients and establishing positions intended to profit from directional or relative value changes. We execute the majority of our credit derivative trades in the OTC market with large, multinational financial institutions, including broker-dealers and, to a lesser degree, with a variety of other investors. Because these transactions are executed in the OTC market, we are subject to settlement risk. We are also subject to credit risk in the event that these counterparties fail to perform under the terms of these contracts. In order to properly reflect counterparty credit risk, we record counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments on certain derivative assets, including our purchased credit default protection. In most cases, credit derivative transactions are executed on a daily margin basis. Therefore, events such as a credit downgrade, depending on the ultimate rating level, or a breach of credit covenants would typically require an increase in the amount of collateral required by the counterparty, where applicable, and/or allow us to take additional protective measures such as early termination of all
trades. For more information on credit derivatives and counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-U.S. Portfolio
Our non-U.S. credit and trading portfolios are subject to country risk. We define country risk as the risk of loss from unfavorable economic and political conditions, currency fluctuations, social instability and changes in government policies. A risk management framework is in place to measure, monitor and manage non-U.S. risk and exposures. In addition to the direct risk of doing business in a country, we also are exposed to indirect country risks (e.g., related to the collateral received on secured financing transactions or related to client clearing activities). These indirect exposures are managed in the normal course of business through credit, market and operational risk governance rather than through country risk governance.
Table 37 presents our 20 largest non-U.S. country exposures at December 31, 2023. These exposures accounted for 89 percent of our total non-U.S. exposure at December 31, 2023 and 2022. Net country exposure for these 20 countries decreased $13.1 billion in 2023 primarily driven by decreases in Germany and Japan.
Non-U.S. exposure is presented on an internal risk management basis and includes sovereign and non-sovereign credit exposure, securities and other investments issued by or domiciled in countries other than the U.S.
Funded loans and loan equivalents include loans, leases, and other extensions of credit and funds, including letters of credit and due from placements. Unfunded commitments are the undrawn portion of legally binding commitments related to loans and loan equivalents. Net counterparty exposure includes the fair value of derivatives, including the counterparty risk associated with credit default swaps (CDS), and secured financing transactions. Securities and other investments are carried at fair value and long securities exposures are netted against short exposures with the same underlying issuer to, but not below, zero. Net country exposure represents country exposure less hedges and credit default protection purchased, net of credit default protection sold.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 68 |
| Table 37 | Top 20 Non-U.S. Countries Exposure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | Funded Loans and Loan Equivalents | Unfunded Loan Commitments | Net Counterparty Exposure | Securities/ Other Investments | Country Exposure at December 31 2023 | Hedges and Credit Default Protection | Net Country Exposure at December 31 2023 | Increase (Decrease) from December 31 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Kingdom | $ | 28,805 | $ | 18,276 | $ | 5,416 | $ | 5,080 | $ | 57,577 | $ | (1,642) | $ | 55,935 | $ | 590 | ||||||||||||||
| Germany | 24,051 | 10,098 | 2,105 | 2,013 | 38,267 | (2,612) | 35,655 | (10,071) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 11,653 | 10,079 | 1,280 | 5,490 | 28,502 | (487) | 28,015 | 2,442 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| France | 13,997 | 8,429 | 1,111 | 2,585 | 26,122 | (1,264) | 24,858 | (1,735) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Australia | 14,179 | 4,654 | 383 | 2,358 | 21,574 | (252) | 21,322 | 1,105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Japan | 9,553 | 1,895 | 1,194 | 5,124 | 17,766 | (792) | 16,974 | (6,113) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | 9,252 | 1,329 | 807 | 3,946 | 15,334 | (51) | 15,283 | 2,783 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| India | 6,891 | 231 | 580 | 4,270 | 11,972 | (47) | 11,925 | 1,156 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Singapore | 4,955 | 505 | 125 | 5,303 | 10,888 | (71) | 10,817 | 1,210 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ireland | 8,464 | 1,322 | 133 | 459 | 10,378 | (45) | 10,333 | 1,243 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Switzerland | 4,867 | 3,786 | 294 | 497 | 9,444 | (215) | 9,229 | (1,459) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | 5,499 | 1,652 | 489 | 1,332 | 8,972 | (53) | 8,919 | 1,527 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| China | 5,299 | 334 | 331 | 2,781 | 8,745 | (233) | 8,512 | (2,296) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Korea | 5,404 | 880 | 357 | 1,854 | 8,495 | (35) | 8,460 | (666) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | 3,188 | 3,312 | 735 | 959 | 8,194 | (1,045) | 7,149 | (2,134) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Italy | 4,121 | 2,184 | 200 | 653 | 7,158 | (543) | 6,615 | 947 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | 3,722 | 556 | 464 | 1,137 | 5,879 | (27) | 5,852 | (1,419) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Spain | 2,893 | 2,035 | 163 | 902 | 5,993 | (397) | 5,596 | (245) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Belgium | 1,648 | 1,328 | 205 | 415 | 3,596 | (149) | 3,447 | (416) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sweden | 1,223 | 1,857 | 155 | 152 | 3,387 | (373) | 3,014 | 410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total top 20 non-U.S. countries exposure | $ | 169,664 | $ | 74,742 | $ | 16,527 | $ | 47,310 | $ | 308,243 | $ | (10,333) | $ | 297,910 | $ | (13,141) |
Our largest non-U.S. country exposure at December 31, 2023 was the United Kingdom with net exposure of $55.9 billion, which represents an increase of $590 million from December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by higher corporate exposure. Our second largest non-U.S. country exposure was Germany with net exposure of $35.7 billion at December 31, 2023, a decrease of $10.1 billion from December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily driven by lower deposits with the central bank.
69 Bank of America
Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities
Table 38 disaggregates total outstanding loans and leases by remaining scheduled principal due dates and interest rates. The amounts provided do not reflect prepayment assumptions or hedging activities related to the loan portfolio. For information on the asset sensitivity of our total banking book balance sheet, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 77.
| Table 38 | Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Due in One Year or Less | Due After One Year Through Five Years | Due After Five Years Through 15 Years | Due After 15 Years | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 5,675 | $ | 32,850 | $ | 95,399 | $ | 94,545 | $ | 228,469 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 186 | 1,092 | 4,038 | 20,388 | 25,704 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 102,200 | — | — | — | 102,200 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 61,888 | 35,663 | 4,941 | 976 | 103,468 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 124 | — | — | — | 124 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 170,073 | 69,605 | 104,378 | 115,909 | 459,965 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 105,690 | 233,802 | 19,659 | 1,935 | 361,086 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 44,473 | 55,782 | 24,255 | 1,242 | 125,752 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 29,335 | 41,819 | 864 | 860 | 72,878 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 3,234 | 9,112 | 1,052 | 1,456 | 14,854 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 11,764 | 4,459 | 2,878 | 96 | 19,197 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 194,496 | 344,974 | 48,708 | 5,589 | 593,767 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 364,569 | $ | 414,579 | $ | 153,086 | $ | 121,498 | $ | 1,053,732 | ||||||||
| Amount due in one year or less at: | Amount due after one year at: | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 999 | $ | 4,676 | $ | 84,230 | $ | 138,564 | $ | 228,469 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 161 | 25 | 21,871 | 3,647 | 25,704 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 97,627 | 4,573 | — | — | 102,200 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 42,832 | 19,056 | 2,321 | 39,259 | 103,468 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 2 | 122 | — | — | 124 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 141,621 | 28,452 | 108,422 | 181,470 | 459,965 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 81,546 | 24,144 | 209,912 | 45,484 | 361,086 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 34,632 | 9,841 | 79,019 | 2,260 | 125,752 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 26,836 | 2,499 | 42,226 | 1,317 | 72,878 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 410 | 2,824 | 1,800 | 9,820 | 14,854 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 7,089 | 4,675 | 110 | 7,323 | 19,197 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 150,513 | 43,983 | 333,067 | 66,204 | 593,767 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 292,134 | $ | 72,435 | $ | 441,489 | $ | 247,674 | $ | 1,053,732 |
(1)Includes loans accounted for under the fair value option.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 70 |
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses increased $329 million from December 31, 2022 to $14.6 billion at December 31, 2023, which included a $1.3 billion reserve increase related to the consumer portfolio and a $942 million reserve decrease related to the commercial portfolio. The increase in the allowance reflected a reserve build in our consumer portfolio primarily due to credit card loan growth and asset quality, partially offset by a reserve release in our commercial portfolio primarily driven by improved macroeconomic conditions applicable to the
commercial portfolio. The allowance also includes the impact of the accounting change to remove the recognition and measurement guidance on troubled debt restructurings, which reduced the allowance for credit losses by $243 million on January 1, 2023. For more information on this change in accounting guidance, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 39 presents an allocation of the allowance for credit losses by product type at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 39 | Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses by Product Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2023 | December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 339 | 2.54 | % | 0.15 | % | $ | 328 | 2.59 | % | 0.14 | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | 47 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 92 | 0.73 | 0.35 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 7,346 | 55.06 | 7.19 | 6,136 | 48.38 | 6.57 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 715 | 5.36 | 0.69 | 585 | 4.61 | 0.55 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 73 | 0.55 | n/m | 96 | 0.76 | n/m | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 8,520 | 63.86 | 1.85 | 7,237 | 57.07 | 1.59 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 2,600 | 19.49 | 0.69 | 3,007 | 23.71 | 0.80 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 842 | 6.31 | 0.68 | 1,194 | 9.41 | 0.96 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 1,342 | 10.06 | 1.84 | 1,192 | 9.40 | 1.71 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 38 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 52 | 0.41 | 0.38 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 4,822 | 36.14 | 0.82 | 5,445 | 42.93 | 0.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | 13,342 | 100.00 | % | 1.27 | 12,682 | 100.00 | % | 1.22 | |||||||||||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments | 1,209 | 1,540 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 14,551 | $ | 14,222 |
(1)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes allowance for loan and lease losses for U.S. small business commercial loans of $1.0 billion and $844 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
n/m = not meaningful
Net charge-offs for 2023 were $3.8 billion compared to $2.2 billion in 2022 primarily due to late-stage delinquent credit card loans that were charged off. The provision for credit losses increased $1.9 billion to $4.4 billion during 2023 compared to 2022. The provision for credit losses in 2023 was driven by our consumer portfolio primarily due to credit card loan growth and asset quality, partially offset by improved macroeconomic conditions that primarily benefited our commercial portfolio. The provision for credit losses for the consumer portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, increased $2.5 billion to $4.5 billion during 2023 compared to 2022. The provision for credit losses for the commercial portfolio, including unfunded lending
commitments, decreased $628 million to a $133 million benefit for 2023 compared to 2022. The decline was due primarily to an improved macroeconomic outlook.
Table 40 presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses, including certain loan and allowance ratios for 2023 and 2022. For more information on the Corporation’s credit loss accounting policies and activity related to the allowance for credit losses, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
71 Bank of America
| Table 40 | Allowance for Credit Losses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, December 31 | $ | 12,682 | $ | 12,387 | ||||||
| January 1, 2023 adoption of credit loss standard | (243) | n/a | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, January 1 | $ | 12,439 | $ | 12,387 | ||||||
| Loans and leases charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (67) | (161) | ||||||||
| Home equity | (36) | (45) | ||||||||
| Credit card | (3,133) | (1,985) | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | (233) | (232) | ||||||||
| Other consumer | (504) | (538) | ||||||||
| Total consumer charge-offs | (3,973) | (2,961) | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (1) | (551) | (354) | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | (37) | (41) | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (254) | (75) | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | (2) | (8) | ||||||||
| Total commercial charge-offs | (844) | (478) | ||||||||
| Total loans and leases charged off | (4,817) | (3,439) | ||||||||
| Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 51 | 89 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 95 | 135 | ||||||||
| Credit card | 572 | 651 | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 141 | 214 | ||||||||
| Other consumer | 24 | 17 | ||||||||
| Total consumer recoveries | 883 | 1,106 | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 108 | 129 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 18 | 20 | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 9 | 9 | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | — | 3 | ||||||||
| Total commercial recoveries | 135 | 161 | ||||||||
| Total recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | 1,018 | 1,267 | ||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (3,799) | (2,172) | ||||||||
| Provision for loan and lease losses | 4,725 | 2,460 | ||||||||
| Other | (23) | 7 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, December 31 | 13,342 | 12,682 | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, January 1 | 1,540 | 1,456 | ||||||||
| Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (331) | 83 | ||||||||
| Other | — | 1 | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, December 31 | 1,209 | 1,540 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses, December 31 | $ | 14,551 | $ | 14,222 | ||||||
| Loan and allowance ratios (3) : | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | $ | 1,050,163 | $ | 1,039,976 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.27 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||||
| Consumer allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total consumer loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.85 | 1.59 | ||||||||
| Commercial allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total commercial loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 0.82 | 0.93 | ||||||||
| Average loans and leases outstanding | $ | 1,041,824 | $ | 1,010,799 | ||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding | 0.36 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 | 243 | 333 | ||||||||
| Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31 to net charge-offs | 3.51 | 5.84 | ||||||||
| Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | $ | 8,357 | $ | 6,998 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | 91 | % | 149 | % |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial charge-offs of $360 million in 2023 compared to $203 million in 2022.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial recoveries of $41 million in 2023 compared to $49 million in 2022.
(3)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(4)Primarily includes amounts related to credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 72 |
Market Risk Management
Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions may adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities, or otherwise negatively impact earnings. This risk is inherent in the financial instruments associated with our operations, primarily within our Global Markets segment. We are also exposed to these risks in other areas of the Corporation (e.g., our ALM activities). In the event of market stress, these risks could have a material impact on our results. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 77.
Our traditional banking loan and deposit products are non-trading positions and are generally reported at amortized cost for assets or the amount owed for liabilities (historical cost). However, these positions are still subject to changes in economic value based on varying market conditions, with one of the primary risks being changes in the levels of interest rates. The risk of adverse changes in the economic value of our non-trading positions arising from changes in interest rates is managed through our ALM activities. We have elected to account for certain assets and liabilities under the fair value option.
Our trading positions are reported at fair value with changes reflected in income. Trading positions are subject to various changes in market-based risk factors. The majority of this risk is generated by our activities in the interest rate, foreign exchange, credit, equity and commodities markets. In addition, the values of assets and liabilities could change due to market liquidity, correlations across markets and expectations of market volatility. We seek to manage these risk exposures by using a variety of techniques that encompass a broad range of financial instruments. The key risk management techniques are discussed in more detail in the Trading Risk Management section.
GRM is responsible for providing senior management with a clear and comprehensive understanding of the trading risks to which we are exposed. These responsibilities include ownership of market risk policy, developing and maintaining quantitative risk models, calculating aggregated risk measures, establishing and monitoring position limits consistent with risk appetite, conducting daily reviews and analysis of trading inventory, approving material risk exposures and fulfilling regulatory requirements. Market risks that impact businesses outside of Global Markets are monitored and governed by their respective governance functions.
Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. Given that models are used across the Corporation, model risk impacts all risk types including credit, market and operational risks. The Enterprise Model Risk Policy defines model risk standards, consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite, prevailing regulatory guidance and industry best practice. All models, including risk management, valuation and regulatory capital models, must meet certain validation criteria, including effective challenge of the conceptual soundness of the model, independent model testing and ongoing monitoring through outcomes analysis and benchmarking. The Enterprise Model Risk Committee, a subcommittee of the MRC, oversees that model standards are consistent with model risk requirements and monitors the effective challenge in the model validation process across the Corporation.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents exposures to instruments whose values vary with the level or volatility of interest rates. These instruments include, but are not limited to, loans, debt
securities, certain trading-related assets and liabilities, deposits, borrowings and derivatives. Hedging instruments used to mitigate these risks include derivatives such as options, futures, forwards and swaps.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange risk represents exposures to changes in the values of current holdings and future cash flows denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The types of instruments exposed to this risk include investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign currency-denominated loans and securities, future cash flows in foreign currencies arising from foreign exchange transactions, foreign currency-denominated debt and various foreign exchange derivatives whose values fluctuate with changes in the level or volatility of currency exchange rates or non-U.S. interest rates. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include foreign exchange options, currency swaps, futures, forwards, and foreign currency-denominated debt and deposits.
Mortgage Risk
Mortgage risk represents exposures to changes in the values of mortgage-related instruments. The values of these instruments are sensitive to prepayment rates, mortgage rates, agency debt ratings, default, market liquidity, government participation and interest rate volatility. Our exposure to these instruments takes several forms. For example, we trade and engage in market-making activities in a variety of mortgage securities including whole loans, pass-through certificates, commercial mortgages and collateralized mortgage obligations including collateralized debt obligations using mortgages as underlying collateral. In addition, we originate a variety of MBS, which involves the accumulation of mortgage-related loans in anticipation of eventual securitization, and we may hold positions in mortgage securities and residential mortgage loans as part of the ALM portfolio. We also record MSRs as part of our mortgage origination activities. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include derivatives such as options, swaps, futures and forwards as well as securities including MBS and U.S. Treasury securities. For more information, see Mortgage Banking Risk Management on page 79.
Equity Market Risk
Equity market risk represents exposures to securities that represent an ownership interest in a corporation in the form of domestic and foreign common stock or other equity-linked instruments. Instruments that would lead to this exposure include, but are not limited to, the following: common stock, exchange-traded funds, American Depositary Receipts, convertible bonds, listed equity options (puts and calls), OTC equity options, equity total return swaps, equity index futures and other equity derivative products. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include options, futures, swaps, convertible bonds and cash positions.
Commodity Risk
Commodity risk represents exposures to instruments traded in the petroleum, natural gas, power and metals markets. These instruments consist primarily of futures, forwards, swaps and options. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include options, futures and swaps in the same or similar commodity product, as well as cash positions.
73 Bank of America
Issuer Credit Risk
Issuer credit risk represents exposures to changes in the creditworthiness of individual issuers or groups of issuers. Our portfolio is exposed to issuer credit risk where the value of an asset may be adversely impacted by changes in the levels of credit spreads, by credit migration or by defaults. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include bonds, CDS and other credit fixed-income instruments.
Market Liquidity Risk
Market liquidity risk represents the risk that the level of expected market activity changes dramatically and, in certain cases, may even cease. This exposes us to the risk that we will not be able to transact business and execute trades in an orderly manner which may impact our results. This impact could be further exacerbated if expected hedging or pricing correlations are compromised by disproportionate demand or lack of demand for certain instruments. We utilize various risk mitigating techniques as discussed in more detail in Trading Risk Management.
Trading Risk Management
To evaluate risks in our trading activities, we focus on the actual and potential volatility of revenues generated by individual positions as well as portfolios of positions. Various techniques and procedures are utilized to enable the most complete understanding of these risks. Quantitative measures of market risk are evaluated on a daily basis from a single position to the portfolio of the Corporation. These measures include sensitivities of positions to various market risk factors, such as the potential impact on revenue from a one basis point change in interest rates, and statistical measures utilizing both actual and hypothetical market moves, such as VaR and stress testing. Periods of extreme market stress influence the reliability of these techniques to varying degrees. Qualitative evaluations of market risk utilize the suite of quantitative risk measures while understanding each of their respective limitations. Additionally, risk managers independently evaluate the risk of the portfolios under the current market environment and potential future environments.
VaR is a common statistic used to measure market risk as it allows the aggregation of market risk factors, including the effects of portfolio diversification. A VaR model simulates the value of a portfolio under a range of scenarios in order to generate a distribution of potential gains and losses. VaR represents the loss a portfolio is not expected to exceed more than a certain number of times per period, based on a specified holding period, confidence level and window of historical data. We use one VaR model consistently across the trading portfolios and it uses a historical simulation approach based on a three-year window of historical data. Our primary VaR statistic is equivalent to a 99 percent confidence level, which means that for a VaR with a one-day holding period, there should not be losses in excess of VaR, on average, 99 out of 100 trading days.
Within any VaR model, there are significant and numerous assumptions that will differ from company to company. The accuracy of a VaR model depends on the availability and quality of historical data for each of the risk factors in the portfolio. A VaR model may require additional modeling assumptions for new products that do not have the necessary historical market data or for less liquid positions for which accurate daily prices are not consistently available. For positions with insufficient historical data for the VaR calculation, the process for establishing an appropriate proxy is based on fundamental and
statistical analysis of the new product or less liquid position. This analysis identifies reasonable alternatives that replicate both the expected volatility and correlation to other market risk factors that the missing data would be expected to experience.
VaR may not be indicative of realized revenue volatility as changes in market conditions or in the composition of the portfolio can have a material impact on the results. In particular, the historical data used for the VaR calculation might indicate higher or lower levels of portfolio diversification than will be experienced. In order for the VaR model to reflect current market conditions, we update the historical data underlying our VaR model on a weekly basis, or more frequently during periods of market stress, and regularly review the assumptions underlying the model. A minor portion of risks related to our trading positions is not included in VaR. These risks are reviewed as part of our ICAAP. For more information regarding ICAAP, see Capital Management on page 47.
GRM continually reviews, evaluates and enhances our VaR model so that it reflects the material risks in our trading portfolio. Changes to the VaR model are reviewed and approved prior to implementation and any material changes are reported to management through the appropriate management committees.
Trading limits on quantitative risk measures, including VaR, are independently set by Global Markets Risk Management and reviewed on a regular basis so that trading limits remain relevant and within our overall risk appetite for market risks. Trading limits are reviewed in the context of market liquidity, volatility and strategic business priorities. Trading limits are set at both a granular level to allow for extensive coverage of risks as well as at aggregated portfolios to account for correlations among risk factors. All trading limits are approved at least annually. Approved trading limits are stored and tracked in a centralized limits management system. Trading limit excesses are communicated to management for review. Certain quantitative market risk measures and corresponding limits have been identified as critical in the Corporation’s Risk Appetite Statement. These risk appetite limits are reported on a daily basis and are approved at least annually by the ERC and the Board.
In periods of market stress, Global Markets senior leadership communicates daily to discuss losses, key risk positions and any limit excesses. As a result of this process, the businesses may selectively reduce risk.
Table 41 presents the total market-based portfolio VaR, which is the combination of the total covered positions (and less liquid trading positions) portfolio and the fair value option portfolio. Covered positions are defined by regulatory standards as trading assets and liabilities, both on- and off-balance sheet, that meet a defined set of specifications. These specifications identify the most liquid trading positions which are intended to be held for a short-term horizon and where we are able to hedge the material risk elements in a two-way market. Positions in less liquid markets, or where there are restrictions on the ability to trade the positions, typically do not qualify as covered positions. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
In addition, Table 41 presents the VaR for the fair value option portfolio, which includes substantially all of the funded and unfunded exposures for which we elect the fair value option, and their corresponding hedges. Market risk VaR for trading activities, as presented in Table 41, differs from VaR used for regulatory capital calculations due to the holding period used.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 74 |
The holding period for VaR used for regulatory capital calculations is 10 days, while for the market risk VaR presented below, it is one day. Both measures utilize the same process and methodology.
The total market-based portfolio VaR results in Table 41 include market risk to which we are exposed from all business segments, excluding credit valuation adjustment (CVA), DVA and related hedges. The majority of this portfolio is within the Global Markets segment.
Table 41 presents year-end, average, high and low daily trading VaR for 2023 and 2022 using a 99 percent confidence level. The amounts disclosed in Table 41 and Table 42 align to
the view of covered positions used in the Basel 3 capital calculations. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, regardless of trading or banking treatment for the trade, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
The annual average of total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR for 2023 decreased compared to 2022, primarily due to the roll off of March 2020 market volatility from the window of historical data used in the calibration of the VaR model.
| Table 41 | Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 29 | $ | 29 | $ | 43 | $ | 12 | $ | 38 | $ | 21 | $ | 39 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate | 51 | 48 | 86 | 32 | 36 | 36 | 56 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | 53 | 60 | 108 | 43 | 76 | 71 | 106 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 9 | 18 | 56 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 33 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 9 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 27 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (90) | (100) | n/a | n/a | (81) | (91) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 61 | 64 | 92 | 41 | 95 | 70 | 140 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures (2) | 12 | 20 | n/a | n/a | 35 | 38 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 73 | 84 | 149 | 52 | 130 | 108 | 236 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 16 | 25 | 49 | 14 | 48 | 51 | 65 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 11 | 14 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 24 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (12) | (23) | n/a | n/a | (38) | (36) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 15 | 16 | 30 | 10 | 26 | 32 | 44 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (9) | (8) | n/a | n/a | 9 | (11) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 79 | $ | 92 | 173 | 58 | $ | 165 | $ | 129 | 287 | 70 |
(1)The high and low for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the high and low for the components. Therefore the impact from less liquid exposures and the amount of portfolio diversification, which is the difference between the total portfolio and the sum of the individual components, is not relevant.
(2)Impact is net of diversification effects between the covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolios.
n/a = not applicable
The following graph presents the daily covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR for 2023, corresponding to the data in Table 41.
75 Bank of America
Additional VaR statistics produced within our single VaR model are provided in Table 42 at the same level of detail as in Table 41. Evaluating VaR with additional statistics allows for an increased understanding of the risks in the portfolio, as the historical market data used in the VaR calculation does not necessarily follow a predefined statistical distribution. Table 42 presents average trading VaR statistics at 99 percent and 95 percent confidence levels for 2023 and 2022.
| Table 42 | Average Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities – 99 percent and 95 percent VaR Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2023 | December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 99 percent | 95 percent | 99 percent | 95 percent | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 29 | $ | 19 | $ | 21 | $ | 12 | |||||||||||
| Interest rate | 48 | 26 | 36 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit | 60 | 30 | 71 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity | 18 | 8 | 20 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 9 | 5 | 13 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (100) | (54) | (91) | (46) | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 64 | 34 | 70 | 29 | |||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures | 20 | 7 | 38 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 84 | 41 | 108 | 36 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 25 | 12 | 51 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 14 | 9 | 17 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (23) | (13) | (36) | (13) | |||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 16 | 8 | 32 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (8) | (5) | (11) | (7) | |||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 92 | $ | 44 | $ | 129 | $ | 40 |
Backtesting
The accuracy of the VaR methodology is evaluated by backtesting, which compares the daily VaR results, utilizing a one-day holding period, against a comparable subset of trading revenue. A backtesting excess occurs when a trading loss exceeds the VaR for the corresponding day. These excesses are evaluated to understand the positions and market moves that produced the trading loss with a goal to help confirm that the VaR methodology accurately represents those losses. We expect the frequency of trading losses in excess of VaR to be in line with the confidence level of the VaR statistic being tested. For example, with a 99 percent confidence level, we expect one trading loss in excess of VaR every 100 days or between two to three trading losses in excess of VaR over the course of a year. The number of backtesting excesses observed can differ from the statistically expected number of excesses if the current level of market volatility is materially different than the level of market volatility that existed during the three years of historical data used in the VaR calculation.
The trading revenue used for backtesting is defined by regulatory agencies in order to most closely align with the VaR component of the regulatory capital calculation. This revenue differs from total trading-related revenue in that it excludes revenue from trading activities that either do not generate market risk or the market risk cannot be included in VaR. Some examples of the types of revenue excluded for backtesting are fees, commissions, reserves, net interest income and intra-day trading revenues.
We conduct daily backtesting on the VaR results used for regulatory capital calculations as well as the VaR results for key legal entities, regions and risk factors. These results are
reported to senior market risk management. Senior management regularly reviews and evaluates the results of these tests.
During 2023, there were no days where this subset of trading revenue had losses that exceeded our total covered portfolio VaR, utilizing a one-day holding period.
Total Trading-related Revenue
Total trading-related revenue, excluding brokerage fees, and CVA, DVA and funding valuation adjustment gains (losses), represents the total amount earned from trading positions, including market-based net interest income, which are taken in a diverse range of financial instruments and markets. For more information on fair value, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Trading-related revenue can be volatile and is largely driven by general market conditions and customer demand. Also, trading-related revenue is dependent on the volume and type of transactions, the level of risk assumed, and the volatility of price and rate movements at any given time within the ever-changing market environment. Significant daily revenue by business is monitored and the primary drivers of these are reviewed.
The following histogram is a graphic depiction of trading volatility and illustrates the daily level of trading-related revenue for 2023 and 2022. During 2023, positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 100 percent of the trading days, of which 93 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million. This compares to 2022 where positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 99 percent of the trading days, of which 90 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $9 million.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 76 |
Trading Portfolio Stress Testing
Because the very nature of a VaR model suggests results can exceed our estimates and it is dependent on a limited historical window, we also stress test our portfolio using scenario analysis. This analysis estimates the change in the value of our trading portfolio that may result from abnormal market movements.
A set of scenarios, categorized as either historical or hypothetical, are computed daily for the overall trading portfolio and individual businesses. These scenarios include shocks to underlying market risk factors that may be well beyond the shocks found in the historical data used to calculate VaR. Historical scenarios simulate the impact of the market moves that occurred during a period of extended historical market stress. Generally, a multi-week period representing the most severe point during a crisis is selected for each historical scenario. Hypothetical scenarios provide estimated portfolio impacts from potential future market stress events. Scenarios are reviewed and updated in response to changing positions and new economic or political information. In addition, new or ad hoc scenarios are developed to address specific potential market events or particular vulnerabilities in the portfolio. The stress tests are reviewed on a regular basis and the results are presented to senior management.
Stress testing for the trading portfolio is integrated with enterprise-wide stress testing and incorporated into the limits framework. The macroeconomic scenarios used for enterprise-wide stress testing purposes differ from the typical trading portfolio scenarios in that they have a longer time horizon and the results are forecasted over multiple periods for use in consolidated capital and liquidity planning. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 44.
Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book
The following discussion presents net interest income for banking book activities.
Interest rate risk represents the most significant market risk exposure to our banking book balance sheet. Interest rate risk is measured as the potential change in net interest income caused by movements in market interest rates. Client-facing
activities, primarily lending and deposit-taking, create interest rate sensitive positions on our balance sheet.
We prepare forward-looking forecasts of net interest income. The baseline forecast takes into consideration expected future business growth, ALM positioning and the future direction of interest rate movements as implied by market-based forward curves.
We then measure and evaluate the impact that alternative interest rate scenarios have on the baseline forecast in order to assess interest rate sensitivity under varied conditions. The net interest income forecast is frequently updated for changing assumptions and differing outlooks based on economic trends, market conditions and business strategies. Thus, we continually monitor our banking book balance sheet position in order to maintain an acceptable level of exposure to interest rate changes.
The interest rate scenarios that we analyze incorporate balance sheet assumptions such as loan and deposit growth and pricing, changes in funding mix, product repricing, maturity characteristics and investment securities premium amortization. Our overall goal is to manage interest rate risk so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect earnings and capital.
Table 43 presents the spot and 12-month forward rates used in our baseline forecasts at December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Table 43 | Forward Rates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||
| Federal Funds | SOFR (1) | 10-YearSOFR (1) | ||||||
| Spot rates | 5.50 | % | 5.38 | % | 3.47 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 3.89 | 3.93 | 3.32 | |||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||
| Federal Funds | Three-month LIBOR | 10-Year Swap | ||||||
| Spot rates | 4.50 | % | 4.77 | % | 3.84 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 4.75 | 4.78 | 3.62 |
(1) The Corporation uses SOFR in its baseline forecast as one of the primary alternative reference rates used as a result of the cessation of LIBOR in 2023.
Table 44 shows the pretax impact to forecasted net interest income over the next 12 months from December 31, 2023 and
77 Bank of America
2022 resulting from instantaneous parallel and non-parallel shocks to the market-based forward curve. Periodically, we evaluate the scenarios presented so that they are meaningful in the context of the current rate environment. The interest rate scenarios also assume U.S. dollar interest rates are floored at zero.
During 2023, the overall decrease in asset sensitivity of our balance sheet to higher and lower rate scenarios was primarily due to changes in deposit product mix and ALM portfolio activity. We continue to be asset sensitive to a parallel upward move in interest rates with the majority of that impact coming from the short end of the yield curve. Additionally, higher interest rates negatively impact the fair value of our debt securities classified as available for sale and adversely affect accumulated OCI and thus capital levels under the Basel 3 capital rules. Under instantaneous upward parallel shifts, the near-term adverse impact to Basel 3 capital would be reduced over time by offsetting positive impacts to net interest income generated from the banking book activities. For more information on Basel 3, see Capital Management – Regulatory Capital on page 48.
| Table 44 | Estimated Banking Book Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Curve Changes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short Rate (bps) | Long Rate (bps) | |||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Parallel Shifts | ||||||||||
| +100 bps instantaneous shift | +100 | +100 | $ | 3,476 | $ | 3,829 | ||||
| -100 bps instantaneous shift | -100 | -100 | (3,077) | (4,591) | ||||||
| Flatteners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | +100 | — | 3,242 | 3,698 | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | -100 | (257) | (157) | ||||||
| Steepeners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | -100 | — | (2,773) | (4,420) | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | +100 | 272 | 131 |
The sensitivity analysis in Table 44 assumes that we take no action in response to these rate shocks and does not assume any change in other macroeconomic variables normally correlated with changes in interest rates. As part of our ALM activities, we use securities, certain residential mortgages, and interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives in managing interest rate sensitivity.
The behavior of our deposit portfolio in the baseline forecast and in alternate interest rate scenarios is a key assumption in our projected estimates of net interest income. The sensitivity analysis in Table 44 assumes no change in deposit portfolio size or mix from the baseline forecast in alternate rate environments. In higher rate scenarios, the increase in net interest income would be impacted by any customer activity resulting in the replacement of low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits with higher yielding deposits or market-based funding, as our benefit in those scenarios would be reduced. Conversely, in lower-rate scenarios, any customer activity that results in the replacement of higher yielding deposits or market-based funding with low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits would reduce our exposure in those scenarios.
For interest rate scenarios larger than 100 bps shifts, it is expected that the interest rate sensitivity will illustrate non-linear behaviors as there are numerous estimates and
assumptions, which require a high degree of judgment and are often interrelated, that could impact the outcome. Pertaining to the mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage portfolio, if long-end interest rates were to significantly decrease over the next twelve months, for example over 200 bps, there would generally be an increase in customer prepayment behaviors with an incremental reduction to net interest income, noting that the extent of changes in customer prepayment activity can be impacted by multiple factors and is not necessarily limited to long-end interest rates. Conversely, if long-end interest rates were to significantly increase over the next twelve months, for example, over 200 bps, customer prepayments would likely modestly decrease and result in an incremental increase to net interest income. In addition, deposit pricing will have non-linear impacts to larger short-end rate movements. In decreasing interest rate scenarios, and particularly where interest rates have decreased to small amounts, the ability to further reduce rates paid is reduced as customer rates near zero. In higher short-end rate scenarios, deposit pricing will likely increase at a faster rate, leading to incremental interest expense and reducing asset sensitivity. While the impact related to the above assumptions used in the asset sensitivity analysis can provide directional analysis on how net interest income will be impacted in changing environments, the ultimate impact is dependent upon the interrelationship of the assumptions and factors, which vary in different macroeconomic scenarios.
Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Derivative Contracts
We use interest rate and foreign exchange derivative contracts in our ALM activities to manage our interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Specifically, we use those derivatives to manage both the variability in cash flows and changes in fair value of various assets and liabilities arising from those risks. Our interest rate derivative contracts are generally non-leveraged swaps tied to various benchmark interest rates and foreign exchange basis swaps, options, futures and forwards, and our foreign exchange contracts include cross-currency interest rate swaps, foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency forward contracts and options.
The derivatives used in our ALM activities can be split into two broad categories: designated accounting hedges and other risk management derivatives. Designated accounting hedges are primarily used to manage our exposure to interest rates as described in the Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book section and are included in the sensitivities presented in Table 44. The Corporation also uses foreign currency derivatives in accounting hedges to manage substantially all of the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations. By hedging the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations, the Corporation's market risk exposure in this area is not significant.
Risk management derivatives are predominantly used to hedge foreign exchange risks related to various foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities and eliminate substantially all foreign currency exposures in the cash flows of the Corporation’s non-trading foreign currency-denominated financial instruments. These foreign exchange derivatives are sensitive to other market risk exposures such as cross-currency basis spreads and interest rate risk. However, as these features are not a significant component of these foreign exchange derivatives, the market risk related to this exposure is not significant. For more information on the accounting for derivatives, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 78 |
Mortgage Banking Risk Management
We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subject us to credit, liquidity and interest rate risks, among others. We determine whether loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment and manage credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing a portion of the loans we originate.
Interest rate risk and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Changes in interest rates and other market factors impact the volume of mortgage originations. Changes in interest rates also impact the value of interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) and the related residential first mortgage loans held-for-sale between the date of the IRLC and the date the loans are sold to the secondary market. An increase in mortgage interest rates typically leads to a decrease in the value of these instruments. Conversely, when there is an increase in interest rates, the value of the MSRs will increase driven by lower prepayment expectations. Because the interest rate risks of these hedged items offset, we combine them into one overall hedged item with one combined economic hedge portfolio consisting of derivative contracts and securities.
During 2023, 2022, and 2021 we recorded gains of $127 million, $78 million and $39 million. For more information on MSRs, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Compliance and Operational Risk Management
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules, regulations and our internal policies and procedures (collectively, applicable laws, rules and regulations). We are subject to comprehensive regulation under federal and state laws, rules and regulations in the U.S. and the laws of the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those related to financial crimes and anti-money laundering, market conduct, trading activities, fair lending, privacy, data protection and unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes or systems, people or external events, and includes legal risk. Operational risk may occur anywhere in the Corporation, including third-party business processes, and is not limited to operations functions. The Corporation faces a number of key operational risks including third-party risk, model risk, conduct risk, technology risk, information security risk and data risk. Operational risk can result in financial losses and reputational impacts and is a component in the calculation of total RWA used in the Basel 3 capital calculation. For more information on Basel 3 calculations, see Capital Management on page 47.
FLUs and control functions are first and foremost responsible for managing all aspects of their businesses, including their compliance and operational risk. FLUs and control functions are required to understand their business processes and related risks and controls, including third-party dependencies and the related regulatory requirements, and monitor and report on the effectiveness of the control environment. In order to actively monitor and assess the performance of their processes and controls, they must conduct comprehensive quality assurance activities and identify issues and risks to remediate control gaps and weaknesses. FLUs and control functions must also adhere to compliance and operational risk appetite limits to meet strategic, capital and
financial planning objectives. Finally, FLUs and control functions are responsible for the proactive identification, management and escalation of compliance and operational risks across the Corporation. Collectively, these efforts are important to strengthen their compliance and operational resiliency, which is the ability to deliver critical operations through disruption.
Global Compliance and Operational Risk teams independently assess compliance and operational risk, monitor business activities and processes and evaluate FLUs and control functions for adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations, including identifying issues and risks, and reporting on the state of the control environment. Corporate Audit provides an independent assessment and validation through testing of key compliance and operational risk processes and controls across the Corporation.
The Corporation's Global Compliance – Enterprise Policy and Operational Risk Management – Enterprise Policy set the requirements for reporting compliance and operational risk information to executive management as well as the Board or appropriate Board-level committees and reflect Global Compliance and Operational Risk’s responsibilities for conducting independent oversight of the Corporation’s compliance and operational risk management activities. The Board provides oversight of compliance risk through its Audit Committee and the ERC, and operational risk through its ERC.
FY 2022 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000070858-23-000092.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Bank of America Corporation (the Corporation) and its management may make certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipates,” “targets,” “expects,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “believes,” “continue” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements represent the Corporation’s current expectations, plans or forecasts of its future results, revenues, provision for credit losses, expenses, efficiency ratio, capital measures, strategy and future business and economic conditions more generally, and other future matters. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the following uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: and in any of the Corporation’s subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission filings: the Corporation’s potential judgments, orders, settlements, penalties, fines and reputational damage resulting from pending or future litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings and enforcement actions, including as a result of our participation in and execution of government programs related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, such as the processing of unemployment benefits for California and certain other states; the possibility that the Corporation’s future liabilities may be in excess of its recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation, and regulatory and government actions; the possibility that the Corporation could face increased claims from one or more parties involved in mortgage securitizations; the Corporation’s ability to resolve representations and warranties repurchase and related claims; the risks related to the discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate and other reference rates, including increased expenses and litigation and the effectiveness of hedging strategies; uncertainties about the financial stability and growth rates of non-U.S. jurisdictions, the risk that those jurisdictions may face difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, and related stresses on financial markets, currencies and trade, and the Corporation’s exposures to such risks, including direct, indirect and operational; the impact of U.S. and global interest rates, inflation, currency exchange rates, economic conditions, trade policies and tensions, including tariffs, and potential geopolitical instability; the impact of the interest rate, inflationary and macroeconomic environment on the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions and other uncertainties, including the impact of supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures and labor shortages on economic conditions and our business; potential losses related to the Corporation's concentration of credit risk; the Corporation’s ability to achieve its expense targets and expectations regarding revenue, net interest income, provision for credit losses, net
charge-offs, effective tax rate, loan growth or other projections; adverse changes to the Corporation’s credit ratings from the major credit rating agencies; an inability to access capital markets or maintain deposits or borrowing costs; estimates of the fair value and other accounting values, subject to impairment assessments, of certain of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities; the estimated or actual impact of changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying those standards; uncertainty regarding the content, timing and impact of regulatory capital and liquidity requirements; the impact of adverse changes to total loss-absorbing capacity requirements, stress capital buffer requirements and/or global systemically important bank surcharges; the potential impact of actions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the Corporation’s capital plans; the effect of changes in or interpretations of income tax laws and regulations; the impact of implementation and compliance with U.S. and international laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including, but not limited to, recovery and resolution planning requirements, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Volcker Rule, fiduciary standards, derivatives regulations and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and any similar or related rules and regulations; a failure or disruption in or breach of the Corporation’s operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, including as a result of cyber-attacks or campaigns; the risks related to the transition and physical impacts of climate change; our ability to achieve environmental, social and governance goals and commitments or the impact of any changes in the Corporation’s sustainability strategy or commitments generally; the impact of any future federal government shutdown and uncertainty regarding the federal government’s debt limit or changes in fiscal, monetary or regulatory policy; the emergence or continuation of widespread health emergencies or pandemics, including the magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on U.S. and/or global financial market conditions and our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects; the impact of natural disasters, extreme weather events, military conflict (including the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the possible expansion of such conflict and potential geopolitical consequences), terrorism or other geopolitical events; and other matters.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-year presentation. Throughout the MD&A, the Corporation uses certain acronyms and abbreviations which are defined in the Glossary.
Executive Summary
Business Overview
The Corporation is a Delaware corporation, a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company. When used in this report, “Bank of America,” “the Corporation,” “we,” “us” and “our” may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation’s subsidiaries or affiliates. Our
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 26 |
principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Through our various bank and nonbank subsidiaries throughout the U.S. and in international markets, we provide a diversified range of banking and nonbank financial services and products through four business segments: Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We operate our banking activities primarily under the Bank of America, National Association (Bank of America, N.A. or BANA) charter. At December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $3.1 trillion in assets and a headcount of approximately 217,000 employees.
As of December 31, 2022, we served clients through operations across the U.S., its territories and more than 35 countries. Our retail banking footprint covers all major markets in the U.S., and we serve approximately 67 million consumer and small business clients with approximately 3,900 retail financial centers, approximately 16,000 ATMs, and leading digital banking platforms (www.bankofamerica.com) with approximately 44 million active users, including approximately 35 million active mobile users. We offer industry-leading support to approximately three million small business households. Our GWIM businesses, with client balances of $3.4 trillion, provide tailored solutions to meet client needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking, trust and retirement products. We are a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading across a broad range of asset classes serving corporations, governments, institutions and individuals around the world.
Recent Developments
Capital Management
On February 1, 2023, the Corporation’s Board of Directors (the Board) declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.22 per share, payable on March 31, 2023 to shareholders of record as of March 3, 2023.
For more information on our capital resources, see Capital Management on page 49.
Changes in U.S. Tax Law
On August 16, 2022, the U.S. enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which contained a number of tax-related provisions. The tax changes included the extension and expansion of renewable energy tax credit programs, the establishment of a new 15 percent alternative minimum tax (AMT) on adjusted financial statement income for large corporations and a one percent excise tax on stock repurchases. For more information, see Financial Highlights – Income Tax Expense on page 29.
Russia/Ukraine Conflict
Due to the Russia/Ukraine conflict, there has been significant volatility in financial and commodities markets, and multiple jurisdictions have implemented various economic sanctions. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, our direct net country exposure to Russia was $443 million and $733 million, primarily consisting of outstanding loans and leases totaling $391 million and $686 million, and our net country exposure to Ukraine was not significant. While the Corporation’s direct exposure to Russia is limited, the potential duration, course and impact of the Russia/Ukraine conflict remain uncertain and could adversely affect macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions, which could negatively impact the Corporation's businesses, results of operations and financial position. For more
information on the risks related to the Russia/Ukraine conflict, see the Market, Credit and Geopolitical sections in Item 1A. Risk Factors on page 8.
LIBOR and Other Benchmark Rates
After December 31, 2021, ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA) ceased publishing British Pound Sterling (GBP), Euro, Swiss Franc, and Japanese Yen (JPY) London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) settings and one-week and two-month U.S. dollar (USD) LIBOR settings, subject to the continued publication of certain non-representative LIBOR settings based on a modified calculation (i.e., on a “synthetic” basis). The remaining USD LIBOR settings (i.e., overnight, one month, three month, six month and 12 month) will cease or become non-representative immediately after June 30, 2023, although the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a consultation seeking views on whether to compel publication of the one-month, three-month and six-month USD LIBOR settings on a “synthetic” basis for a short time after June 30, 2023 (i.e., through September 30, 2024). Separately, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued supervisory guidance encouraging banks to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate by December 31, 2021, subject to certain regulatory-approved exceptions (USD LIBOR Guidance).
As a result, a major transition has been and continues to be in progress in the global financial markets with respect to the replacement of Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs). This has been and continues to be a complex process impacting a variety of our businesses and operations. IBORs have historically been used in many of the Corporation’s products and contracts, including derivatives, consumer and commercial loans, mortgages, floating-rate notes and other adjustable-rate products and financial instruments. In response, the Corporation established an enterprise-wide IBOR transition program, with active involvement of senior management and regular reports to the Management Risk Committee (MRC) and Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC). The program continues to drive the Corporation's industry and regulatory engagement, client and financial contract changes, internal and external communications, technology and operations modifications, including updates to its operational models, systems and processes, introduction of new products, migration of existing clients, and program strategy and governance.
As of December 31, 2021, the Corporation transitioned or otherwise addressed IBOR-based products and contracts referencing the rates that ceased or became non-representative after December 31, 2021, including LIBOR-linked commercial loans, LIBOR-based adjustable-rate consumer mortgages, LIBOR-linked derivatives and interdealer trading of certain USD LIBOR and other interest rate swaps, and related hedging arrangements. Additionally, in accordance with the USD LIBOR Guidance, the Corporation has ceased entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate, subject to limited exceptions, including those consistent with supervisory guidance.
The Corporation launched capabilities and services to support the issuance of and trading in products indexed to various alternative reference rates (ARRs) and developed employee training programs as well as other internal and external sources of information on the various challenges and opportunities that the replacement of IBORs has presented and continues to present. The Corporation continues to monitor a variety of market scenarios as part of its transition efforts, including risks associated with insufficient preparation by
27 Bank of America
individual market participants or the overall market ecosystem, ability of market participants to meet regulatory and industry-wide recommended milestones, and access and demand by clients and market participants to liquidity in certain products, including LIBOR products.
With respect to the transition of LIBOR products referencing USD LIBOR settings ceasing or becoming non-representative as of June 30, 2023, a significant majority of the Corporation’s notional contractual exposure to such LIBOR settings, of which the significant majority is derivatives contracts, have been remediated (i.e., updated to include fallback provisions to ARRs based on market-driven protocols, regulatory guidance and industry-recommended fallback provisions and related mechanisms), and the Corporation is continuing to remediate the remaining USD LIBOR exposure. For example, during the first half of 2023, certain central counterparties (CCPs) expect to complete processes to convert outstanding USD LIBOR-cleared derivatives to ARR positions. The remaining exposure, a majority of which is made up of derivatives and commercial loans and which represents a small minority of outstanding USD LIBOR notional contractual exposure of the Corporation, requires active dialogue with clients to modify the contracts. For any residual exposures after June 2023 that continue to have no fallback provisions, the Corporation continues to assess and plans to leverage relevant contractual and statutory solutions, including the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act in the U.S. (as implemented by the Federal Reserve) and “synthetic” USD LIBOR (if the FCA compels such publication), to transition such exposure.
While there remain risks to the Corporation associated with the transition from IBORs (as discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors – Other on page 20), such risks have been monitored and, where applicable, managed through the Corporation’s efforts and dedicated operational resources to date. In the Corporation’s view, the potential likelihood and/or impact of transition-related risks has lessened over time, and the Corporation anticipates it has devoted appropriate resources to remaining transition efforts and will be able to continue to appropriately monitor and manage such risks as the transition process continues. The Corporation expects transition-related risks to further diminish as certain market developments occur prior to June 30, 2023.
The Corporation has implemented regulatory, tax and accounting changes and continues to monitor current and potential impacts of the transition, including Internal Revenue Service tax regulations and guidance and Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance. In addition, the Corporation has engaged impacted clients in connection with the transition by providing education on ARRs and the timing of transition events. The Corporation is also working actively with global regulators, industry working groups and trade associations.
For more information on the expected replacement of LIBOR and other benchmark rates, see Item 1A. Risk Factors – Other on page 20.
Financial Highlights
| Table 1 | Summary Income Statement and Selected Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions, except per share information) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 52,462 | $ | 42,934 | ||||||
| Noninterest income | 42,488 | 46,179 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 94,950 | 89,113 | ||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 2,543 | (4,594) | ||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 61,438 | 59,731 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 30,969 | 33,976 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,441 | 1,998 | ||||||||
| Net income | 27,528 | 31,978 | ||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends and other | 1,513 | 1,421 | ||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | $ | 26,015 | $ | 30,557 | ||||||
| Per common share information | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.21 | $ | 3.60 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.19 | 3.57 | ||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.86 | 0.78 | ||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.88 | % | 1.05 | % | ||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.75 | 12.23 | ||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2) | 15.15 | 17.02 | ||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (1) | 64.71 | 67.03 | ||||||||
| Balance sheet at year end | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,045,747 | $ | 979,124 | ||||||
| Total assets | 3,051,375 | 3,169,495 | ||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,930,341 | 2,064,446 | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,778,178 | 2,899,429 | ||||||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | 244,800 | 245,358 | ||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 273,197 | 270,066 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 167.
(2)Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information and a corresponding reconciliation to the most closely related financial measures defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
Net income was $27.5 billion, or $3.19 per diluted share in 2022 compared to $32.0 billion, or $3.57 per diluted share in 2021. The decrease in net income was primarily due to an increase in provision for credit losses, lower noninterest income and higher noninterest expense, partially offset by higher net interest income.
For discussion and analysis of our consolidated and business segment results of operations for 2021 compared to 2020, see Financial Highlights and Business Segment Operations sections in the MD&A of the Corporation’s 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income increased $9.5 billion to $52.5 billion in 2022 compared to 2021. Net interest yield on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis increased 30 basis points (bps) to 1.96 percent for 2022. The increase was primarily driven by benefits from higher interest rates, including lower premium amortization expense, and loan growth, partially offset by a lower amount of accelerated net capitalized loan fees due to Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan forgiveness, which primarily occurred in 2021. For more information on net interest yield and the FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32, and for
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 28 |
more information on interest rate risk management, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
Noninterest Income
| Table 2 | Noninterest Income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Fees and commissions: | ||||||||||
| Card income | $ | 6,083 | $ | 6,218 | ||||||
| Service charges | 6,405 | 7,504 | ||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 15,901 | 16,690 | ||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 4,823 | 8,887 | ||||||||
| Total fees and commissions | 33,212 | 39,299 | ||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 12,075 | 8,691 | ||||||||
| Other income | (2,799) | (1,811) | ||||||||
| Total noninterest income | $ | 42,488 | $ | 46,179 |
Noninterest income decreased $3.7 billion to $42.5 billion for 2022 compared to 2021. The following highlights the significant changes.
● Service charges decreased $1.1 billion primarily driven by the impact of non-sufficient funds and overdraft policy changes as well as lower treasury service charges.
● Investment and brokerage services decreased $789 million primarily driven by lower market valuations and declines in assets under management (AUM) pricing, partially offset by positive AUM flows.
● Investment banking fees decreased $4.1 billion primarily driven by a decline in demand resulting in lower equity and debt issuance fees and lower advisory fees.
● Market making and similar activities increased $3.4 billion primarily driven by improved performance across macro products in fixed income, currencies and commodities (FICC) and by the impact of higher interest rates on client financing activities in Equities.
● Other income decreased $988 million primarily due to certain valuation adjustments.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses increased $7.1 billion to $2.5 billion for 2022 compared to 2021. The provision for credit losses for 2022 was primarily driven by loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic outlook, partially offset by a reserve release for reduced COVID-19 pandemic (the pandemic) uncertainties. For the same period in the prior year, the benefit in the provision for credit losses was due to an improved macroeconomic outlook. For more information on the provision for credit losses, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
Noninterest Expense
| Table 3 | Noninterest Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 36,447 | $ | 36,140 | ||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 7,071 | 7,138 | ||||||||
| Information processing and communications | 6,279 | 5,769 | ||||||||
| Product delivery and transaction related | 3,653 | 3,881 | ||||||||
| Marketing | 1,825 | 1,939 | ||||||||
| Professional fees | 2,142 | 1,775 | ||||||||
| Other general operating | 4,021 | 3,089 | ||||||||
| Total noninterest expense | $ | 61,438 | $ | 59,731 |
Noninterest expense increased $1.7 billion to $61.4 billion in 2022 compared to 2021. The increase was primarily due to higher investments in people and technology, expense associated with the settlement of the legacy monoline insurance litigation and expense related to certain regulatory matters, partially offset by lower net COVID-19 related costs.
Income Tax Expense
| Table 4 | Income Tax Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 30,969 | $ | 33,976 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,441 | 1,998 | ||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 11.1 | % | 5.9 | % |
Income tax expense was $3.4 billion for 2022 compared to $2.0 billion in 2021 resulting in an effective tax rate of 11.1 percent compared to 5.9 percent.
The effective tax rates for 2022 and 2021 were primarily driven by our recurring preference benefits. Also included in the effective tax rate for 2021 was the impact of the 2021 U.K. tax law change further discussed in this section. For more information on our recurring tax preference benefits, see Note 19 – Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Absent environmental, social and governance (ESG) tax credits and discrete tax benefits, the effective tax rates would have been approximately 25 percent.
On August 16, 2022, the U.S. enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which contained a number of tax-related provisions, including the extension and expansion of renewable energy tax credit programs. In particular, partnerships are no longer solely limited to an Investment Tax Credit, but can now also elect a Production Tax Credit for solar energy production facilities placed in service after December 31, 2021.
Other notable tax law changes include the establishment of a new 15 percent AMT on adjusted financial statement income for large corporations and a one percent excise tax on net stock repurchases, both of which were effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2023. The tax law changes for the new AMT permit business credits, including those from ESG investments in renewable energy and affordable housing, to offset potential AMT liability. The Corporation has assessed the potential impacts of these two U.S. tax law changes and does not expect the changes to have a significant effect on its future effective tax rate.
On June 10, 2021, the U.K. enacted the 2021 Finance Act, which increased the U.K. corporation income tax rate to 25 percent from 19 percent. This change is effective April 1, 2023 and unfavorably affects income tax expense on future U.K. earnings. As a result, during the three months ended June 30, 2021, the Corporation recorded a positive income tax adjustment of approximately $2.0 billion with a corresponding write-up of U.K. net deferred tax assets, which reflected a reversal of previously recorded write-downs of net deferred tax assets for prior changes in the U.K. corporation income tax rate.
29 Bank of America
Balance Sheet Overview
| Table 5 | Selected Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 230,203 | $ | 348,221 | $ | (118,018) | (34) | % | ||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 267,574 | 250,720 | 16,854 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 296,108 | 247,080 | 49,028 | 20 | ||||||||||
| Debt securities | 862,819 | 982,627 | (119,808) | (12) | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases | 1,045,747 | 979,124 | 66,623 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | (12,682) | (12,387) | (295) | 2 | ||||||||||
| All other assets | 361,606 | 374,110 | (12,504) | (3) | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,051,375 | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | (118,120) | (4) | |||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 1,930,341 | $ | 2,064,446 | $ | (134,105) | (6) | |||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 195,635 | 192,329 | 3,306 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 80,399 | 100,690 | (20,291) | (20) | ||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 26,932 | 23,753 | 3,179 | 13 | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 275,982 | 280,117 | (4,135) | (1) | ||||||||||
| All other liabilities | 268,889 | 238,094 | 30,795 | 13 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,778,178 | 2,899,429 | (121,251) | (4) | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 273,197 | 270,066 | 3,131 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,051,375 | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | (118,120) | (4) |
Assets
At December 31, 2022, total assets were approximately $3.1 trillion, down $118.1 billion from December 31, 2021. The decrease in assets was primarily due to lower debt securities and cash and cash equivalents, partially offset by an increase in loans and leases, trading account assets and federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $118.0 billion primarily driven by lower deposits and continued loan growth.
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Borrowed or Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Federal funds transactions involve lending reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are collateralized lending transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and obtain securities for settlement and for collateral. Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or
purchased under agreements to resell increased $16.9 billion primarily due to client activity within Global Markets.
Trading Account Assets
Trading account assets consist primarily of long positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. government and agency securities, corporate securities and non-U.S. sovereign debt. Trading account assets increased $49.0 billion primarily due to client activity within Global Markets.
Debt Securities
Debt securities primarily include U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (MBS), principally agency MBS, non-U.S. bonds, corporate bonds and municipal debt. We use the debt securities portfolio primarily to manage interest rate and liquidity risk and to leverage market conditions that create economically attractive returns on these investments. Debt securities decreased $119.8 billion primarily driven by lower deposits and continued loan growth. For more information on debt securities, see Note 4 – Securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 30 |
Loans and Leases
Loans and leases increased $66.6 billion primarily driven by growth in commercial loans, higher credit card spending and higher residential mortgages due to lower paydowns and continued originations. For more information on the loan portfolio, see Credit Risk Management on page 59.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses increased $295 million primarily driven by loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic outlook, partially offset by a reserve release for reduced pandemic uncertainties. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
All Other Assets
All other assets decreased $12.5 billion primarily driven by a decline in margin loans and loans held-for-sale (LHFS).
Liabilities
At December 31, 2022, total liabilities were approximately $2.8 trillion, down $121.3 billion from December 31, 2021, primarily due to lower deposits.
Deposits
Deposits decreased $134.1 billion primarily due to an increase in customer spending and a shift to higher yielding accounts.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Loaned or Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Federal funds transactions involve borrowing reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are collateralized borrowing transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and finance assets on the balance sheet. Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase increased $3.3 billion primarily driven by an increase in repurchase agreements to support liquidity.
Trading Account Liabilities
Trading account liabilities consist primarily of short positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. Treasury and agency securities, non-U.S. sovereign debt and corporate securities. Trading account liabilities decreased $20.3 billion primarily due to lower levels of short positions within Global Markets.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings provide an additional funding source and primarily consist of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) short-term borrowings, notes payable and various other borrowings that generally have maturities of one year or less. Short-term borrowings increased $3.2 billion primarily due to an increase in FHLB advances and commercial paper to manage liquidity needs. For more information on short-term borrowings, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt decreased $4.1 billion primarily due to maturities, redemptions and valuation adjustments, partially offset by issuances. For more information on long-term debt, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
All Other Liabilities
All other liabilities increased $30.8 billion primarily driven by Global Markets client activity.
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity increased $3.1 billion primarily due to net income and the issuance of preferred stock, partially offset by market value decreases on derivatives and debt securities, and returns of capital to shareholders through common and preferred stock dividends and common stock repurchases.
Cash Flows Overview
The Corporation’s operating assets and liabilities support our global markets and lending activities. We believe that cash flows from operations, available cash balances and our ability to generate cash through short- and long-term debt are sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs. Our investing activities primarily include the debt securities portfolio and loans and leases. Our financing activities reflect cash flows primarily related to customer deposits, securities financing agreements, long-term debt and common and preferred stock. For more information on liquidity, see Liquidity Risk on page 54.
31 Bank of America
Supplemental Financial Data
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this Form 10-K, we present certain non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items or otherwise include components that differ from the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures are provided as additional useful information to assess our financial condition, results of operations (including period-to-period operating performance) or compliance with prospective regulatory requirements. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended as a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may not be defined or calculated the same way as non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.
We view net interest income and related ratios and analyses on an FTE basis, which when presented on a consolidated basis are non-GAAP financial measures. To derive the FTE basis, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before-tax basis with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. For purposes of this calculation, we use the federal statutory tax rate of 21 percent and a representative state tax rate. Net interest yield, which measures the basis points we earn over the cost of funds, utilizes net interest income on an FTE basis. We believe that presentation of these items on an FTE basis allows for comparison of amounts from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practices.
We may present certain key performance indicators and ratios excluding certain items (e.g., debit valuation adjustment (DVA) gains (losses)), which result in non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that the presentation of measures that exclude these items is useful because such measures provide additional information to assess the underlying operational performance and trends of our businesses and to allow better comparison of period-to-period operating performance.
We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible equity, a non-GAAP financial measure. Tangible equity represents shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)), net of related deferred tax liabilities (“adjusted” shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity). These measures are used to evaluate our use of equity. In addition, profitability, relationship and investment models use both return on average tangible
common shareholders’ equity and return on average tangible shareholders’ equity as key measures to support our overall growth objectives. These ratios are:
● Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity measures our net income applicable to common shareholders as a percentage of adjusted average common shareholders’ equity. The tangible common equity ratio represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity measures our net income as a percentage of adjusted average total shareholders’ equity. The tangible equity ratio represents adjusted ending shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Tangible book value per common share represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by ending common shares outstanding.
We believe ratios utilizing tangible equity provide additional useful information because they present measures of those assets that can generate income. Tangible book value per common share provides additional useful information about the level of tangible assets in relation to outstanding shares of common stock.
The aforementioned supplemental data and performance measures are presented in Tables 6 and 7.
For more information on the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators (key performance indicators) that management uses when assessing our consolidated and/or segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our underlying operational performance and trends. These key performance indicators (KPIs) may not be defined or calculated in the same way as similar KPIs used by other companies. For information on how these metrics are defined, see Key Metrics on page 167.
Our consolidated key performance indicators, which include various equity and credit metrics, are presented in Table 1 on page 28, Table 6 on page 33 and Table 7 on page 34.
For information on key segment performance metrics, see Business Segment Operations on page 37.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 32 |
| Table 6 | Selected Annual Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions, except per share information) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 52,462 | $ | 42,934 | $ | 43,360 | ||||
| Noninterest income | 42,488 | 46,179 | 42,168 | |||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 94,950 | 89,113 | 85,528 | |||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 2,543 | (4,594) | 11,320 | |||||||
| Noninterest expense | 61,438 | 59,731 | 55,213 | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | 30,969 | 33,976 | 18,995 | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,441 | 1,998 | 1,101 | |||||||
| Net income | 27,528 | 31,978 | 17,894 | |||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 26,015 | 30,557 | 16,473 | |||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 8,113.7 | 8,493.3 | 8,753.2 | |||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 8,167.5 | 8,558.4 | 8,796.9 | |||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.88 | % | 1.05 | % | 0.67 | % | ||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.75 | 12.23 | 6.76 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 15.15 | 17.02 | 9.48 | |||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.18 | 11.68 | 6.69 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 13.76 | 15.71 | 9.07 | |||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 8.95 | 8.52 | 9.68 | |||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.02 | 7.74 | 8.81 | |||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.62 | 9.02 | 9.96 | |||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 26.77 | 21.51 | 38.18 | |||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.21 | $ | 3.60 | $ | 1.88 | ||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.19 | 3.57 | 1.87 | |||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.72 | |||||||
| Book value (1) | 30.61 | 30.37 | 28.72 | |||||||
| Tangible book value (2) | 21.83 | 21.68 | 20.60 | |||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 264,853 | $ | 359,383 | $ | 262,206 | ||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,016,782 | $ | 920,401 | $ | 982,467 | ||||
| Total assets | 3,135,894 | 3,034,623 | 2,683,122 | |||||||
| Total deposits | 1,986,158 | 1,914,286 | 1,632,998 | |||||||
| Long-term debt | 246,479 | 237,703 | 220,440 | |||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 241,981 | 249,787 | 243,685 | |||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 270,299 | 273,757 | 267,309 | |||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (3) | $ | 14,222 | $ | 13,843 | $ | 20,680 | ||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 3,978 | 4,697 | 5,116 | |||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (4) | 1.22 | % | 1.28 | % | 2.04 | % | ||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (4) | 333 | 271 | 380 | |||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 2,172 | $ | 2,243 | $ | 4,121 | ||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (4) | 0.21 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.42 | % | ||||
| Capital ratios at year end (5) | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.2 | % | 10.6 | % | 11.9 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 13.0 | 12.1 | 13.5 | |||||||
| Total capital | 14.9 | 14.1 | 16.1 | |||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 7.0 | 6.4 | 7.4 | |||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | 5.5 | 7.2 | |||||||
| Tangible equity (2) | 6.8 | 6.4 | 7.4 | |||||||
| Tangible common equity (2) | 5.9 | 5.7 | 6.5 |
(1)For definition, see Key Metrics on page 167.
(2)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(3)Includes the allowance for loan and leases losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(4)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 63 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 68 and corresponding Table 34.
(5)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 49.
33 Bank of America
| Table 7 | Selected Quarterly Financial Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Quarters | 2021 Quarters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share information) | Fourth | Third | Second | First | Fourth | Third | Second | First | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 14,681 | $ | 13,765 | $ | 12,444 | $ | 11,572 | $ | 11,410 | $ | 11,094 | $ | 10,233 | $ | 10,197 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 9,851 | 10,737 | 10,244 | 11,656 | 10,650 | 11,672 | 11,233 | 12,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 24,532 | 24,502 | 22,688 | 23,228 | 22,060 | 22,766 | 21,466 | 22,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 1,092 | 898 | 523 | 30 | (489) | (624) | (1,621) | (1,860) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 15,543 | 15,303 | 15,273 | 15,319 | 14,731 | 14,440 | 15,045 | 15,515 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 7,897 | 8,301 | 6,892 | 7,879 | 7,818 | 8,950 | 8,042 | 9,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 765 | 1,219 | 645 | 812 | 805 | 1,259 | (1,182) | 1,116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 7,132 | 7,082 | 6,247 | 7,067 | 7,013 | 7,691 | 9,224 | 8,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 6,904 | 6,579 | 5,932 | 6,600 | 6,773 | 7,260 | 8,964 | 7,560 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 8,088.3 | 8,107.7 | 8,121.6 | 8,136.8 | 8,226.5 | 8,430.7 | 8,620.8 | 8,700.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 8,155.7 | 8,160.8 | 8,163.1 | 8,202.1 | 8,304.7 | 8,492.8 | 8,735.5 | 8,755.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.92 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.79 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.88 | % | 0.99 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Four-quarter trailing return on average assets (2) | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 1.04 | 0.97 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 11.24 | 10.79 | 9.93 | 11.02 | 10.90 | 11.43 | 14.33 | 12.28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (3) | 15.79 | 15.21 | 14.05 | 15.51 | 15.25 | 15.85 | 19.90 | 17.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.38 | 10.37 | 9.34 | 10.64 | 10.27 | 11.08 | 13.47 | 11.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (3) | 13.98 | 13.99 | 12.66 | 14.40 | 13.87 | 14.87 | 18.11 | 16.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 8.95 | 8.77 | 8.65 | 8.23 | 8.52 | 8.83 | 9.15 | 9.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity ratio (1) | 8.02 | 7.82 | 7.71 | 7.40 | 7.74 | 8.07 | 8.37 | 8.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.87 | 8.73 | 8.49 | 8.40 | 8.56 | 8.95 | 9.11 | 9.52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 25.71 | 27.06 | 28.68 | 25.86 | 25.33 | 24.10 | 17.25 | 20.68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.87 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 1.03 | 0.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book value (1) | 30.61 | 29.96 | 29.87 | 29.70 | 30.37 | 30.22 | 29.89 | 29.07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible book value (3) | 21.83 | 21.21 | 21.13 | 20.99 | 21.68 | 21.69 | 21.61 | 20.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 264,853 | $ | 242,338 | $ | 250,136 | $ | 332,320 | $ | 359,383 | $ | 349,841 | $ | 349,925 | $ | 332,337 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 1,039,247 | $ | 1,034,334 | $ | 1,014,886 | $ | 977,793 | $ | 945,062 | $ | 920,509 | $ | 907,900 | $ | 907,723 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 3,074,289 | 3,105,546 | 3,157,885 | 3,207,702 | 3,164,118 | 3,076,452 | 3,015,113 | 2,879,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,925,544 | 1,962,775 | 2,012,079 | 2,045,811 | 2,017,223 | 1,942,705 | 1,888,834 | 1,805,747 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 243,871 | 250,204 | 245,781 | 246,042 | 248,525 | 248,988 | 232,034 | 220,836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 243,647 | 241,882 | 239,523 | 242,865 | 246,519 | 252,043 | 250,948 | 249,648 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 272,629 | 271,017 | 268,197 | 269,309 | 270,883 | 275,484 | 274,632 | 274,047 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (4) | $ | 14,222 | $ | 13,817 | $ | 13,434 | $ | 13,483 | $ | 13,843 | $ | 14,693 | $ | 15,782 | $ | 17,997 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (5) | 3,978 | 4,156 | 4,326 | 4,778 | 4,697 | 4,831 | 5,031 | 5,299 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (5) | 1.22 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (5) | 333 | 309 | 288 | 262 | 271 | 279 | 287 | 313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 689 | $ | 520 | $ | 571 | $ | 392 | $ | 362 | $ | 463 | $ | 595 | $ | 823 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (5) | 0.26 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Capital ratios at period end (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 11.2 | % | 11.0 | % | 10.5 | % | 10.4 | % | 10.6 | % | 11.1 | % | 11.5 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 13.0 | 12.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 | 12.1 | 12.6 | 13.0 | 13.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital | 14.9 | 14.7 | 14.2 | 14.0 | 14.1 | 14.7 | 15.1 | 15.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 7.0 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.9 | 7.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible equity (3) | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common equity (3) | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity and long-term debt metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to risk-weighted assets | 29.0 | % | 28.9 | % | 27.8 | % | 27.2 | % | 26.9 | % | 27.7 | % | 27.7 | % | 26.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to supplementary leverage exposure | 13.2 | 13.0 | 12.6 | 12.2 | 12.1 | 12.4 | 12.5 | 14.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to risk-weighted assets | 15.2 | 15.2 | 14.7 | 14.4 | 14.1 | 14.4 | 14.1 | 13.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to supplementary leverage exposure | 6.9 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.8 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 167.
(2)Calculated as total net income for four consecutive quarters divided by annualized average assets for four consecutive quarters.
(3)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(4)Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(5)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 64 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 68 and corresponding Table 34.
(6)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 49.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 34 |
| Table 8 | Average Balances and Interest Rates - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non- U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | 195,564 | $ | 2,591 | 1.32 | % | $ | 255,595 | $ | 172 | 0.07 | % | $ | 253,227 | $ | 359 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 9,209 | 132 | 1.44 | 7,603 | 15 | 0.19 | 8,840 | 29 | 0.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (2) | 292,799 | 4,560 | 1.56 | 267,257 | (90) | (0.03) | 309,945 | 903 | 0.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 158,102 | 5,586 | 3.53 | 147,891 | 3,823 | 2.58 | 148,076 | 4,185 | 2.83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 922,730 | 17,207 | 1.86 | 905,169 | 12,433 | 1.38 | 532,266 | 9,868 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 227,604 | 6,375 | 2.80 | 216,983 | 5,995 | 2.76 | 236,719 | 7,338 | 3.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 27,364 | 959 | 3.50 | 31,014 | 1,066 | 3.44 | 38,251 | 1,290 | 3.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 83,539 | 8,408 | 10.06 | 75,385 | 7,772 | 10.31 | 85,017 | 8,759 | 10.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 107,050 | 3,317 | 3.10 | 96,472 | 2,276 | 2.36 | 89,974 | 2,545 | 2.83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 445,557 | 19,059 | 4.28 | 419,854 | 17,109 | 4.08 | 449,961 | 19,932 | 4.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 366,748 | 12,251 | 3.34 | 324,795 | 8,606 | 2.65 | 344,095 | 9,712 | 2.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 125,222 | 3,702 | 2.96 | 99,584 | 1,752 | 1.76 | 106,487 | 2,208 | 2.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate (4) | 65,421 | 2,595 | 3.97 | 60,303 | 1,496 | 2.48 | 63,428 | 1,790 | 2.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 13,834 | 473 | 3.42 | 15,865 | 462 | 2.91 | 18,496 | 559 | 3.02 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 571,225 | 19,021 | 3.33 | 500,547 | 12,316 | 2.46 | 532,506 | 14,269 | 2.68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 1,016,782 | 38,080 | 3.75 | 920,401 | 29,425 | 3.20 | 982,467 | 34,201 | 3.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 105,674 | 4,847 | 4.59 | 112,512 | 2,321 | 2.06 | 83,078 | 2,539 | 3.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 2,700,860 | 73,003 | 2.70 | 2,616,428 | 48,099 | 1.84 | 2,317,899 | 52,084 | 2.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 28,029 | 31,214 | 31,885 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets, less allowance for loan and lease losses | 407,005 | 386,981 | 333,338 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,135,894 | $ | 3,034,623 | $ | 2,683,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposits | $ | 987,247 | $ | 3,145 | 0.32 | % | $ | 925,970 | $ | 314 | 0.03 | % | $ | 829,719 | $ | 977 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 166,490 | 818 | 0.49 | 161,512 | 170 | 0.11 | 170,750 | 734 | 0.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 1,153,737 | 3,963 | 0.34 | 1,087,482 | 484 | 0.04 | 1,000,469 | 1,711 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 80,951 | 755 | 0.93 | 82,769 | 53 | 0.06 | 77,046 | 232 | 0.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 1,234,688 | 4,718 | 0.38 | 1,170,251 | 537 | 0.05 | 1,077,515 | 1,943 | 0.18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 214,369 | 4,117 | 1.92 | 210,848 | 461 | 0.22 | 188,511 | 1,229 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities (2) | 137,277 | 2,861 | 2.08 | 106,975 | (819) | (0.77) | 104,955 | (242) | (0.23) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 51,208 | 1,538 | 3.00 | 54,107 | 1,128 | 2.08 | 41,386 | 974 | 2.35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 246,479 | 6,869 | 2.79 | 237,703 | 3,431 | 1.44 | 220,440 | 4,321 | 1.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 1,884,021 | 20,103 | 1.07 | 1,779,884 | 4,738 | 0.27 | 1,632,807 | 8,225 | 0.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing deposits | 751,470 | 744,035 | 555,483 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities (5) | 230,104 | 236,947 | 227,523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 270,299 | 273,757 | 267,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,135,894 | $ | 3,034,623 | $ | 2,683,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest spread | 1.63 | % | 1.57 | % | 1.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact of noninterest-bearing sources | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income/yield on earning assets (6) | $ | 52,900 | 1.96 | % | $ | 43,361 | 1.66 | % | $ | 43,859 | 1.90 | % |
(1)Includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
(2)For more information on negative interest, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)Nonperforming loans are included in the respective average loan balances. Income on these nonperforming loans is generally recognized on a cost recovery basis.
(4)Includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $61.1 billion, $56.5 billion and $59.8 billion, and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $4.3 billion, $3.8 billion and $3.6 billion for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(5)Includes $30.7 billion, $30.4 billion and $34.3 billion of structured notes and liabilities for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(6)Net interest income includes FTE adjustments of $438 million, $427 million and $499 million for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
35 Bank of America
| Table 9 | Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Volume | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | From 2021 to 2022 | From 2020 to 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | (35) | $ | 2,454 | $ | 2,419 | $ | (1) | $ | (186) | $ | (187) | ||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 2 | 115 | 117 | (4) | (10) | (14) | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 2 | 4,648 | 4,650 | (128) | (865) | (993) | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 256 | 1,507 | 1,763 | — | (362) | (362) | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 301 | 4,473 | 4,774 | 7,059 | (4,494) | 2,565 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 287 | 93 | 380 | (612) | (731) | (1,343) | ||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | (125) | 18 | (107) | (245) | 21 | (224) | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 841 | (205) | 636 | (994) | 7 | (987) | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 250 | 791 | 1,041 | 185 | (454) | (269) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 1,950 | (2,823) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 1,113 | 2,532 | 3,645 | (553) | (553) | (1,106) | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 452 | 1,498 | 1,950 | (147) | (309) | (456) | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 126 | 973 | 1,099 | (89) | (205) | (294) | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | (59) | 70 | 11 | (80) | (17) | (97) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 6,705 | (1,953) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 8,655 | (4,776) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | (144) | 2,670 | 2,526 | 904 | (1,122) | (218) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in interest income | $ | 24,904 | $ | (3,985) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposits | $ | (18) | $ | 2,849 | $ | 2,831 | $ | 134 | $ | (797) | $ | (663) | ||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 13 | 635 | 648 | (39) | (525) | (564) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 3,479 | (1,227) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | (4) | 706 | 702 | 16 | (195) | (179) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 4,181 | (1,406) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 11 | 3,645 | 3,656 | 142 | (910) | (768) | ||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities | (238) | 3,918 | 3,680 | (4) | (573) | (577) | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | (63) | 473 | 410 | 298 | (144) | 154 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 118 | 3,320 | 3,438 | 338 | (1,228) | (890) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in interest expense | 15,365 | (3,487) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net interest income (2) | $ | 9,539 | $ | (498) |
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and expense are divided between the portion of change attributable to the variance in volume and the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate for that category. The unallocated change in rate or volume variance is allocated between the rate and volume variances.
(2)Includes an increase (decrease) in FTE basis adjustments of $11 million from 2021 to 2022 and $(72) million from 2020 to 2021.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 36 |
Business Segment Operations
Segment Description and Basis of Presentation
We report our results of operations through the following four business segments: Consumer Banking, GWIM, Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We manage our segments and report their results on an FTE basis. The primary activities, products and businesses of the business segments and All Other are shown below.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. We utilize a methodology that considers the effect of regulatory capital requirements in addition to internal risk-based capital models. Our internal risk-based capital models use a risk-adjusted methodology incorporating each segment’s credit, market, interest rate, business and operational risk components. For more information on the nature of these risks, see Managing Risk on page 46. The capital allocated to the business segments is referred to as allocated capital. Allocated equity in the reporting units is comprised of allocated capital plus capital for the portion of goodwill and intangibles specifically assigned to the reporting unit. For more information, including the definition of a reporting unit, see Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For more information on our presentation of financial information on an FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32, and for reconciliations to consolidated total revenue, net income and year-end total assets, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators that management uses when evaluating segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our segments’ operational performance, customer trends and business growth.
37 Bank of America
Consumer Banking
| Deposits | Consumer Lending | Total Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 19,254 | $ | 14,358 | $ | 10,791 | $ | 10,571 | $ | 30,045 | $ | 24,929 | 21 | % | |||||||||
| Noninterest income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card income | (36) | (28) | 5,205 | 5,200 | 5,169 | 5,172 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 2,703 | 3,535 | 3 | 3 | 2,706 | 3,538 | (24) | ||||||||||||||||
| All other income | 478 | 223 | 237 | 143 | 715 | 366 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 3,145 | 3,730 | 5,445 | 5,346 | 8,590 | 9,076 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 22,399 | 18,088 | 16,236 | 15,917 | 38,635 | 34,005 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 564 | 240 | 1,416 | (1,275) | 1,980 | (1,035) | n/m | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 12,393 | 11,650 | 7,684 | 7,640 | 20,077 | 19,290 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 9,442 | 6,198 | 7,136 | 9,552 | 16,578 | 15,750 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,314 | 1,519 | 1,748 | 2,340 | 4,062 | 3,859 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,128 | $ | 4,679 | $ | 5,388 | $ | 7,212 | $ | 12,516 | $ | 11,891 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Effective tax rate (1) | 24.5 | % | 24.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 1.82 | % | 1.48 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.77 | % | 2.73 | % | 2.45 | % | |||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 55 | 39 | 20 | 27 | 31 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 55.33 | 64.41 | 47.32 | 48.00 | 51.96 | 56.73 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,161 | $ | 4,431 | $ | 288,205 | $ | 279,630 | $ | 292,366 | $ | 284,061 | 3 | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 1,057,531 | 973,018 | 289,719 | 280,080 | 1,099,410 | 1,016,751 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 1,090,692 | 1,009,387 | 296,499 | 285,532 | 1,139,351 | 1,058,572 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,056,783 | 976,093 | 5,778 | 6,934 | 1,062,561 | 983,027 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 13,000 | 12,000 | 27,000 | 26,500 | 40,000 | 38,500 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Year End | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,148 | $ | 4,206 | $ | 300,613 | $ | 282,305 | $ | 304,761 | $ | 286,511 | 6 | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 1,043,049 | 1,048,009 | 300,787 | 282,850 | 1,085,079 | 1,090,331 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 1,077,203 | 1,082,449 | 308,007 | 289,220 | 1,126,453 | 1,131,142 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,043,194 | 1,049,085 | 5,605 | 5,910 | 1,048,799 | 1,054,995 | (1) |
(1)Estimated at the segment level only.
(2)In segments and businesses where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, we allocate assets from All Other to match the segments’ and businesses’ liabilities and allocated shareholders’ equity. As a result, total earning assets and total assets of the businesses may not equal total Consumer Banking.
n/m = not meaningful
Consumer Banking, comprised of Deposits and Consumer Lending, offers a diversified range of credit, banking and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses. Deposits and Consumer Lending include the net impact of migrating customers and their related deposit, brokerage asset and loan balances between Deposits, Consumer Lending and GWIM, as well as other client-managed businesses. Our customers and clients have access to a coast-to-coast network including financial centers in 38 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 2022, our network includes approximately 3,900 financial centers, approximately 16,000 ATMs, nationwide call centers and leading digital banking platforms with more than 44 million active users, including approximately 35 million active mobile users.
Consumer Banking Results
Net income for Consumer Banking increased $625 million to $12.5 billion due to higher revenue, partially offset by an increase in provision for credit losses and higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $5.1 billion to $30.0 billion primarily driven by higher interest rates and the benefits of higher deposit and loan balances, partially offset by a lower amount of accelerated net capitalized loan fees due to PPP loan forgiveness, which primarily occurred in 2021. Noninterest income decreased $486 million to $8.6 billion primarily driven by the impact of non-sufficient funds and overdraft policy changes, partially offset by a gain on the sale of an affinity card loan portfolio in the fourth quarter of 2022.
The provision for credit losses increased $3.0 billion to $2.0 billion primarily driven by loan growth and a dampened
macroeconomic outlook in 2022, compared to a benefit in 2021 due to an improved macroeconomic outlook. Noninterest expense increased $787 million to $20.1 billion primarily driven by continued investments for business growth, including marketing, technology and people, as well as increased client activity, partially offset by an impairment charge for real estate rationalization and the contribution to the Bank of America Foundation in the prior year.
The return on average allocated capital was 31 percent, unchanged from 2021. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 37.
Deposits
Deposits includes the results of consumer deposit activities that consist of a comprehensive range of products provided to consumers and small businesses. Our deposit products include noninterest- and interest-bearing checking accounts, money market savings accounts, traditional savings accounts, CDs and IRAs, as well as investment accounts and products. Net interest income is allocated to deposit products using our funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics. Deposits generates fees such as account service fees and ATM fees, as well as investment and brokerage fees from Consumer Investment accounts. Consumer Investments serves investment client relationships through the Merrill Edge integrated investing and banking service platform, providing investment advice and guidance, client brokerage asset services, self-directed online investing and key banking capabilities including access to the
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 38 |
Corporation’s network of financial centers and ATMs.
Net income for Deposits increased $2.4 billion to $7.1 billion due to higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense and an increase in provision for credit losses. Net interest income increased $4.9 billion to $19.3 billion primarily due to higher interest rates and the benefit of higher deposit balances. Noninterest income decreased $585 million to $3.1 billion primarily driven by the impact of non-sufficient funds and overdraft policy changes, partially offset by higher other service charges due to increased client activity.
The provision for credit losses increased $324 million to $564 million primarily driven by increased overdraft losses due to higher payment activity related to checking accounts. The benefit in the prior year was due to an improved macroeconomic outlook. Noninterest expense increased $743 million to $12.4 billion primarily driven by continued investments for business growth and increased client activity, partially offset by an impairment charge for real estate rationalization in the prior year.
Average deposits increased $80.7 billion to $1.1 trillion primarily due to net inflows of $46.8 billion in checking and $34.9 billion in money market savings largely driven by strong organic growth.
The table below provides key performance indicators for Deposits. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information to evaluate our deposit profitability and digital/mobile trends.
| Key Statistics – Deposits | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Total deposit spreads (excludes noninterest costs) (1) | 1.86% | 1.69% | |||||||
| Year End | |||||||||
| Consumer investment assets (in millions) (2) | $ | 319,648 | $ | 368,831 | |||||
| Active digital banking users (in thousands) (3) | 44,054 | 41,365 | |||||||
| Active mobile banking users (in thousands) (4) | 35,452 | 32,980 | |||||||
| Financial centers | 3,913 | 4,173 | |||||||
| ATMs | 15,528 | 16,209 |
(1)Includes deposits held in Consumer Lending.
(2)Includes client brokerage assets, deposit sweep balances and AUM in Consumer Banking.
(3)Represents mobile and/or online active users over the past 90 days.
(4)Represents mobile active users over the past 90 days.
Consumer investment assets decreased $49.2 billion to $319.6 billion driven by market performance, partially offset by client flows. Active mobile banking users increased approximately two million, reflecting continuing changes in our clients’ banking preferences. We had a net decrease of 260 financial centers and 681 ATMs as we continue to optimize our consumer banking network.
Consumer Lending
Consumer Lending offers products to consumers and small businesses across the U.S. The products offered include debit and credit cards, residential mortgages and home equity loans, and direct and indirect loans such as automotive, recreational vehicle and consumer personal loans. In addition to earning net interest spread revenue on its lending activities, Consumer Lending generates interchange revenue from debit and credit card transactions, late fees, cash advance fees, annual credit card fees, mortgage banking fee income and other miscellaneous fees. Consumer Lending products are available to our customers through our retail network, direct telephone, and online and mobile channels. Consumer Lending results also include the impact of servicing residential mortgages and home
equity loans, including loans held on the balance sheet of Consumer Lending and loans serviced for others.
Net income for Consumer Lending decreased $1.8 billion to $5.4 billion primarily due to an increase in provision for credit losses. Net interest income increased $220 million to $10.8 billion primarily due to higher interest rates and loan balances, largely offset by a lower amount of accelerated net capitalized loan fees due to PPP loan forgiveness, which primarily occurred in 2021. Noninterest income increased $99 million to $5.4 billion primarily driven by a gain on the sale of an affinity card loan portfolio in the fourth quarter of 2022.
The provision for credit losses increased $2.7 billion to $1.4 billion primarily driven by loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic environment in 2022 compared to a benefit in 2021 due to an improved macroeconomic outlook. Noninterest expense increased $44 million to $7.7 billion largely driven by continued investments for business growth and increased client activity, partially offset by the contribution to the Bank of America Foundation in the prior year.
Average loans increased $8.6 billion to $288.2 billion primarily driven by an increase in credit card loans and first mortgage loans, partially offset by a decline in PPP loans.
The table below provides key performance indicators for Consumer Lending. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about loan growth and profitability.
| Key Statistics – Consumer Lending | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Total credit card (1) | ||||||||||
| Gross interest yield (2) | 10.42 | % | 10.17 | % | ||||||
| Risk-adjusted margin (3) | 10.06 | 10.17 | ||||||||
| New accounts (in thousands) | 4,397 | 3,594 | ||||||||
| Purchase volumes | $ | 356,588 | $ | 311,571 | ||||||
| Debit card purchase volumes | $ | 503,583 | $ | 473,770 |
(1)Includes GWIM's credit card portfolio.
(2)Calculated as the effective annual percentage rate divided by average loans.
(3)Calculated as the difference between total revenue, net of interest expense, and net credit losses divided by average loans.
During 2022, the total risk-adjusted margin decreased 11 bps primarily driven by lower net interest margin and lower fee income, partially offset by lower net credit losses. Total credit card purchase volumes increased $45.0 billion to $356.6 billion and debit card purchase volumes increased $29.8 billion to $503.6 billion, reflecting higher levels of consumer spending.
| Key Statistics – Loan Production (1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Consumer Banking: | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 20,981 | $ | 45,976 | ||||||
| Home equity | 7,988 | 3,996 | ||||||||
| Total (2): | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 44,765 | $ | 79,692 | ||||||
| Home equity | 9,591 | 4,895 |
(1)The loan production amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of loans and, in the case of home equity, the principal amount of the total line of credit.
(2)In addition to loan production in Consumer Banking, there is also first mortgage and home equity loan production in GWIM.
First mortgage loan originations for Consumer Banking and the total Corporation decreased $25.0 billion and $34.9 billion during 2022 primarily driven by changes in demand.
Home equity production in Consumer Banking and the total Corporation increased $4.0 billion and $4.7 billion during 2022 primarily driven by higher demand.
39 Bank of America
Global Wealth & Investment Management
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 7,466 | $ | 5,664 | 32 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 13,561 | 14,312 | (5) | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 721 | 772 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 14,282 | 15,084 | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 21,748 | 20,748 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 66 | (241) | (127) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 15,490 | 15,258 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 6,192 | 5,731 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,517 | 1,404 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,675 | $ | 4,327 | 8 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 24.5 | % | 24.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 1.95 | 1.51 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 27 | 26 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 71.23 | 73.54 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 219,810 | $ | 196,899 | 12 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 383,352 | 374,273 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 396,167 | 386,918 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 351,329 | 340,124 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 17,500 | 16,500 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 223,910 | $ | 208,971 | 7 | |||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 355,461 | 425,112 | (16) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 368,893 | 438,275 | (16) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 323,899 | 390,143 | (17) |
GWIM consists of two primary businesses: Merrill Wealth Management and Bank of America Private Bank.
Merrill Wealth Management’s advisory business provides a high-touch client experience through a network of financial advisors focused on clients with over $250,000 in total investable assets. Merrill Wealth Management provides tailored solutions to meet clients’ needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking and retirement products.
Bank of America Private Bank, together with Merrill Wealth Management’s Private Wealth Management business, provides comprehensive wealth management solutions targeted to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, as well as customized solutions to meet clients’ wealth structuring, investment management, trust and banking needs, including specialty asset management services.
Net income for GWIM increased $348 million to $4.7 billion driven by higher revenue, partially offset by higher provision for credit losses and noninterest expense. The operating margin remained unchanged at 28 percent compared to a year ago.
Net interest income increased $1.8 billion to $7.5 billion due to the impacts of higher interest rates, as well as the benefits of higher loan and deposit balances.
Noninterest income, which primarily includes investment and brokerage services income, decreased $802 million to $14.3 billion primarily due to the impacts of lower market valuations and declines in AUM pricing, partially offset by the impact of positive AUM flows.
The provision for credit losses increased $307 million primarily due to a dampened macroeconomic outlook and loan growth in the current-year period, compared to a benefit in the prior-year period due to an improved macroeconomic outlook. Noninterest expense increased $232 million to $15.5 billion primarily due to continued investments in the business, partially offset by lower revenue-related incentives.
The return on average allocated capital was 27 percent, up from 26 percent, due to higher net income, partially offset by an increase in allocated capital. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 37.
Average loans increased $22.9 billion to $219.8 billion primarily due to residential mortgage, securities-based lending and custom lending. Average deposits increased $11.2 billion to $351.3 billion primarily driven by inflows from new and existing accounts.
Merrill Wealth Management revenue of $18.1 billion increased four percent primarily driven by the benefits of higher interest rates, as well as higher deposit and loan balances, partially offset by the impact of lower market valuations and declines in AUM pricing.
Bank of America Private Bank revenue of $3.6 billion increased nine percent primarily driven by the benefits of higher interest rates, as well as higher deposit and loan balances, partially offset by the impact of lower market valuations.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 40 |
| Key Indicators and Metrics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Revenue by Business | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 18,135 | $ | 17,448 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 3,613 | 3,300 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 21,748 | $ | 20,748 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Business, at year end | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 2,822,910 | $ | 3,214,881 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 563,931 | 625,453 | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 3,386,841 | $ | 3,840,334 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Type, at year end | ||||||||||
| Assets under management | $ | 1,401,474 | $ | 1,638,782 | ||||||
| Brokerage and other assets | 1,482,025 | 1,655,021 | ||||||||
| Deposits | 323,899 | 390,143 | ||||||||
| Loans and leases (1) | 226,973 | 212,251 | ||||||||
| Less: Managed deposits in assets under management | (47,530) | (55,863) | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 3,386,841 | $ | 3,840,334 | ||||||
| Assets Under Management Rollforward | ||||||||||
| Assets under management, beginning of year | $ | 1,638,782 | $ | 1,408,465 | ||||||
| Net client flows | 20,785 | 66,250 | ||||||||
| Market valuation/other | (258,093) | 164,067 | ||||||||
| Total assets under management, end of year | $ | 1,401,474 | $ | 1,638,782 | ||||||
| Total wealth advisors, at year end (2) | 19,273 | 18,846 |
(1)Includes margin receivables which are classified in customer and other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2)Includes advisors across all wealth management businesses in GWIM and Consumer Banking.
Client Balances
Client balances managed under advisory and/or discretion of GWIM are AUM and are typically held in diversified portfolios. Fees earned on AUM are calculated as a percentage of clients’ AUM balances. The asset management fees charged to clients per year depend on various factors but are commonly driven by the breadth of the client’s relationship. The net client AUM flows represent the net change in clients’ AUM balances over a
specified period of time, excluding market appreciation/depreciation and other adjustments.
Client balances decreased $453.5 billion, or 12 percent, to $3.4 trillion at December 31, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021. The decrease in client balances was primarily due to the impact of lower market valuations, partially offset by positive client flows.
41 Bank of America
Global Banking
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 12,184 | $ | 8,511 | 43 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 3,293 | 3,523 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 3,004 | 5,107 | (41) | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 3,748 | 3,734 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 10,045 | 12,364 | (19) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 22,229 | 20,875 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 641 | (3,201) | (120) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 10,966 | 10,632 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 10,622 | 13,444 | (21) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,815 | 3,630 | (22) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,807 | $ | 9,814 | (20) | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 26.5 | % | 27.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 2.26 | 1.55 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 18 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 49.34 | 50.93 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 375,271 | $ | 329,655 | 14 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 539,032 | 549,749 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 603,273 | 611,304 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 511,804 | 522,790 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 44,500 | 42,500 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 379,107 | $ | 352,933 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 522,539 | 574,583 | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 588,466 | 638,131 | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 498,661 | 551,752 | (10) |
Global Banking, which includes Global Corporate Banking, Global Commercial Banking, Business Banking and Global Investment Banking, provides a wide range of lending-related products and services, integrated working capital management and treasury solutions, and underwriting and advisory services through our network of offices and client relationship teams. Our lending products and services include commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, commercial real estate lending and asset-based lending. Our treasury solutions business includes treasury management, foreign exchange, short-term investing options and merchant services. We also provide investment banking services to our clients such as debt and equity underwriting and distribution, and merger-related and other advisory services. Underwriting debt and equity issuances, fixed-income and equity research, and certain market-based activities are executed through our global broker-dealer affiliates, which are our primary dealers in several countries. Within Global Banking, Global Corporate Banking clients generally include large global corporations, financial institutions and leasing clients. Global Commercial Banking clients generally include middle-market companies, commercial real estate firms and not-for-profit companies. Business Banking clients include mid-sized U.S.-based businesses requiring customized and integrated financial advice and solutions.
Net income for Global Banking decreased $2.0 billion to $7.8 billion driven by higher provision for credit losses and noninterest expense, partially offset by higher revenue.
Net interest income increased $3.7 billion to $12.2 billion primarily due to the benefits of higher interest rates and loan balances.
Noninterest income decreased $2.3 billion to $10.0 billion driven by lower investment banking fees and valuation adjustments on leveraged loans, as well as lower treasury service charges.
The provision for credit losses increased $3.8 billion to $641 million primarily driven by a dampened macroeconomic outlook and loan growth, compared to a benefit in the prior year due to an improved macroeconomic outlook.
Noninterest expense increased $334 million to $11.0 billion, primarily due to continued investments in the business, including strategic hiring and technology.
The return on average allocated capital was 18 percent, down from 23 percent, due to lower net income and higher allocated capital. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 37.
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking each include Business Lending and Global Transaction Services activities. Business Lending includes various lending-related products and services, and related hedging activities, including commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, real estate lending and asset-based lending. Global Transaction Services includes deposits, treasury management, credit card, foreign exchange and short-term investment products.
The following table and discussion present a summary of the results, which exclude certain investment banking and PPP activities in Global Banking.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 42 |
| Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Corporate Banking | Global Commercial Banking | Business Banking | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Business Lending | $ | 4,325 | $ | 3,723 | $ | 4,316 | $ | 3,675 | $ | 251 | $ | 224 | $ | 8,892 | $ | 7,622 | ||||||||||||||
| Global Transaction Services (1) | 5,002 | 3,235 | 4,166 | 3,341 | 1,213 | 941 | 10,381 | 7,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 9,327 | $ | 6,958 | $ | 8,482 | $ | 7,016 | $ | 1,464 | $ | 1,165 | $ | 19,273 | $ | 15,139 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 174,052 | $ | 150,159 | $ | 187,597 | $ | 161,012 | $ | 12,743 | $ | 12,763 | $ | 374,392 | $ | 323,934 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits (1) | 250,648 | 252,403 | 204,893 | 213,999 | 56,263 | 56,354 | 511,804 | 522,756 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 174,905 | $ | 163,027 | $ | 191,051 | $ | 175,228 | $ | 12,683 | $ | 12,822 | $ | 378,639 | $ | 351,077 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits (1) | 262,033 | 260,826 | 186,112 | 233,007 | 50,516 | 57,886 | 498,661 | 551,719 |
(1)Prior periods have been revised to conform to current-period presentation.
Business Lending revenue increased $1.3 billion in 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to the benefits of higher interest rates and loan balances.
Global Transaction Services revenue increased $2.9 billion in 2022 compared to 2021 driven by higher interest rates, partially offset by lower treasury service charges.
Average loans and leases increased 16 percent in 2022 compared to 2021 due to higher client demand. Average deposits decreased two percent due to declines in domestic balances.
Global Investment Banking
Client teams and product specialists underwrite and distribute debt, equity and loan products, and provide advisory services and tailored risk management solutions. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Banking and Global Markets under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. To provide a complete discussion of our
consolidated investment banking fees, the table below presents total Corporation investment banking fees and the portion attributable to Global Banking.
| Investment Banking Fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Banking | Total Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Products | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advisory | $ | 1,643 | $ | 2,139 | $ | 1,783 | $ | 2,311 | ||||||||||||||
| Debt issuance | 1,099 | 1,736 | 2,523 | 4,015 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity issuance | 262 | 1,232 | 709 | 2,784 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross investment banking fees | 3,004 | 5,107 | 5,015 | 9,110 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Self-led deals | (78) | (93) | (192) | (223) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment banking fees | $ | 2,926 | $ | 5,014 | $ | 4,823 | $ | 8,887 |
Total Corporation investment banking fees, which exclude self-led deals and are primarily included within Global Banking and Global Markets, decreased 46 percent to $4.8 billion primarily due to lower equity issuance, debt issuance and advisory fees.
43 Bank of America
Global Markets
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 3,088 | $ | 4,011 | (23) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 2,002 | 1,979 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 1,820 | 3,616 | (50) | |||||||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 11,406 | 8,760 | 30 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | (178) | 889 | (120) | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 15,050 | 15,244 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 18,138 | 19,255 | (6) | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 28 | 65 | (57) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 12,420 | 13,032 | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 5,690 | 6,158 | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,508 | 1,601 | (6) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,182 | $ | 4,557 | (8) | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 26.5 | % | 26.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 10 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 68.48 | 67.68 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 303,587 | $ | 291,505 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
| Reverse repurchases | 126,324 | 113,989 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Securities borrowed | 116,764 | 100,292 | 16 | |||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 54,128 | 43,582 | 24 | |||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | 600,803 | 549,368 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 116,652 | 91,339 | 28 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 602,889 | 541,391 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 857,637 | 785,998 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 40,382 | 51,833 | (22) | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 42,500 | 38,000 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 564,769 | $ | 491,160 | 15 | % | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 127,735 | 114,846 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 587,772 | 561,135 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 812,489 | 747,794 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 39,077 | 46,374 | (16) |
Global Markets offers sales and trading services and research services to institutional clients across fixed-income, credit, currency, commodity and equity businesses. Global Markets product coverage includes securities and derivative products in both the primary and secondary markets. Global Markets provides market-making, financing, securities clearing, settlement and custody services globally to our institutional investor clients in support of their investing and trading activities. We also work with our commercial and corporate clients to provide risk management products using interest rate, equity, credit, currency and commodity derivatives, foreign exchange, fixed-income and mortgage-related products. As a result of our market-making activities in these products, we may be required to manage risk in a broad range of financial products including government securities, equity and equity-linked securities, high-grade and high-yield corporate debt securities, syndicated loans, MBS, commodities and asset-backed securities. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Markets and Global Banking under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. For information on investment banking fees on a consolidated basis, see page 43.
The following explanations for year-over-year changes for
Global Markets, including those disclosed under Sales and Trading Revenue, are the same for amounts including and excluding net DVA. Amounts excluding net DVA are a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32.
Net income for Global Markets decreased $375 million to $4.2 billion. Net DVA gains were $20 million compared to losses of $54 million in 2021. Excluding net DVA, net income decreased $431 million to $4.2 billion. These decreases were primarily driven by lower revenue, partially offset by lower noninterest expense.
Revenue decreased $1.1 billion to $18.1 billion primarily due to lower investment banking fees, partially offset by higher sales and trading revenue. Sales and trading revenue increased $1.3 billion, and excluding net DVA, sales and trading revenue increased $1.2 billion. These increases were driven by higher revenue in both FICC and Equities.
Noninterest expense decreased $612 million to $12.4 billion primarily driven by the realignment of a liquidating business activity from Global Markets to All Other in the fourth quarter of 2021 and an acceleration of expenses from incentive compensation award changes in the prior year.
Average total assets increased $71.6 billion to $857.6 billion driven by loan growth and commodities activity in FICC. Period-end total assets increased $64.7 billion to $812.5 billion
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 44 |
driven by loan growth, an increase in commodities activity, and higher derivative balances due to higher interest rates.
The return on average allocated capital was 10 percent, down from 12 percent, reflecting lower net income and an increase in allocated capital. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 37.
Sales and Trading Revenue
Sales and trading revenue includes unrealized and realized gains and losses on trading and other assets which are included in market making and similar activities, net interest income, and fees primarily from commissions on equity securities. Sales and trading revenue is segregated into fixed-income (government debt obligations, investment and non-investment grade corporate debt obligations, commercial MBS, residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, interest rate and credit derivative contracts), currencies (interest rate and foreign exchange contracts), commodities (primarily futures, forwards, swaps and options) and equities (equity-linked derivatives and cash equity activity). The following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue, substantially all of which is in Global Markets, with the remainder in Global Banking. In addition, the following table and related discussion also present sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32.
| Sales and Trading Revenue (1, 2, 3) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Sales and trading revenue | ||||||||||
| Fixed income, currencies and commodities | $ | 9,917 | $ | 8,761 | ||||||
| Equities | 6,572 | 6,428 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue | $ | 16,489 | $ | 15,189 | ||||||
| Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA (4) | ||||||||||
| Fixed income, currencies and commodities | $ | 9,898 | $ | 8,810 | ||||||
| Equities | 6,571 | 6,433 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA | $ | 16,469 | $ | 15,243 |
(1)For more information on sales and trading revenue, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes FTE adjustments of $354 million and $421 million for 2022 and 2021.
(3) Includes Global Banking sales and trading revenue of $1.0 billion and $510 million for 2022 and 2021.
(4) FICC and Equities sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, is a non-GAAP financial measure. FICC net DVA gains (losses) were $19 million and $(49) million for 2022 and 2021. Equities net DVA gains (losses) were $1 million and $(5) million for 2022 and 2021.
Including and excluding net DVA, FICC revenue increased $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion driven by improved trading performance across interest rate and currency products, partially offset by a weaker trading environment for credit products in the current-year period and a gain in commodities from a weather-related event in the prior year. Including and excluding net DVA, Equities revenue increased $144 million and $138 million driven by strong performances in derivatives and client financing activities, partially offset by a weaker performance in cash.
All Other
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 117 | $ | 246 | (52) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income (loss) | (5,479) | (5,589) | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | (5,362) | (5,343) | — | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (172) | (182) | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 2,485 | 1,519 | 64 | |||||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (7,675) | (6,680) | 15 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit | (6,023) | (8,069) | (25) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (1,652) | $ | 1,389 | n/m | |||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | 2022 | 2021 | % Change | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 12,683 | $ | 18,447 | (31) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 139,466 | 191,831 | (27) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 20,082 | 16,512 | 22 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | December 31 2022 | December 31 2021 | % Change | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 10,234 | $ | 15,863 | (35) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 155,074 | 214,153 | (28) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 19,905 | 21,182 | (6) |
(1)In segments where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, which are generally deposit-taking segments, we allocate assets from All Other to those segments to match liabilities (i.e., deposits) and allocated shareholders’ equity. Average allocated assets were $1.1 trillion for both 2022 and 2021, and year-end allocated assets were $1.0 trillion and $1.2 trillion at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
n/m = not meaningful
All Other primarily consists of asset and liability management (ALM) activities, liquidating businesses and certain expenses not otherwise allocated to a business segment. ALM activities encompass interest rate and foreign currency risk management activities for which substantially all of the results are allocated to our business segments. For more information on our ALM activities, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net income decreased $3.0 billion to a loss of $1.7 billion primarily due to a lower income tax benefit and higher noninterest expense.
Noninterest expense increased $966 million primarily driven by the realignment of a liquidating business activity from Global Markets to All Other in the fourth quarter of 2021, expense associated with the settlement of the legacy monoline insurance litigation and expense related to certain regulatory matters, partially offset by decreases in other expenses.
45 Bank of America
The income tax benefit was $6.0 billion in 2022 compared to a benefit of $8.1 billion in 2021. The decrease in the tax benefit was primarily driven by the impact of the U.K. tax law change in 2021. For more information, see Financial Highlights - Income Tax Expense on page 29. Both periods included income tax benefit adjustments to eliminate the FTE treatment of certain tax credits recorded in Global Banking and Global Markets.
Managing Risk
Risk is inherent in all our business activities. Sound risk management enables us to serve our customers and deliver for our shareholders. If not managed well, risk can result in financial loss, regulatory sanctions and penalties, and damage to our reputation, each of which may adversely impact our ability to execute our business strategies. We take a comprehensive approach to risk management with a defined Risk Framework and an articulated Risk Appetite Statement, which are approved annually by the ERC and the Board.
The seven key types of risk faced by the Corporation are strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational.
● Strategic risk is the risk to current or projected financial condition arising from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate.
● Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations.
● Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities or otherwise negatively impact earnings. Market risk is composed of price risk and interest rate risk.
● Liquidity risk is the inability to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral needs while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions.
● Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules and regulations and our internal policies and procedures.
● Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, people or external events.
● Reputational risk is the risk that negative perception of the Corporation may adversely impact profitability or operations.
The following sections address in more detail the specific procedures, measures and analyses of the major categories of risk. This discussion of managing risk focuses on the current Risk Framework that, as part of its annual review process, was approved by the ERC and the Board.
As set forth in our Risk Framework, a culture of managing risk well is fundamental to our values and our purpose, and how we drive Responsible Growth. It requires us to focus on risk in all activities and encourages the necessary mindset and behavior to enable effective risk management and promote sound risk-taking within our risk appetite. Sustaining a culture of managing risk well throughout the organization is critical to the success of the Corporation and is a clear expectation of our executive management team and the Board.
Our Risk Framework serves as the foundation for the consistent and effective management of risks facing the Corporation. The Risk Framework sets forth roles and responsibilities for the management of risk and provides a blueprint for how the Board, through delegation of authority to committees and executive officers, establishes risk appetite and associated limits for our activities.
Executive management assesses, with Board oversight, the risk-adjusted returns of each business. Management reviews and approves the strategic and financial operating plans, as well as the capital plan and Risk Appetite Statement, and recommends them annually to the Board for approval. Our strategic plan takes into consideration return objectives and financial resources, which must align with risk capacity and risk appetite. Management sets financial objectives for each business by allocating capital and setting a target for return on capital for each business. Capital allocations and operating limits are regularly evaluated as part of our overall governance processes as the businesses and the economic environment in which we operate continue to evolve. For more information regarding capital allocations, see Business Segment Operations on page 37.
The Corporation’s risk appetite indicates the amount of capital, earnings or liquidity we are willing to put at risk to achieve our strategic objectives and business plans, consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. Our risk appetite provides a common framework that includes a set of measures to assist senior management and the Board in assessing the Corporation’s risk profile against our risk appetite and risk capacity. Our risk appetite is formally articulated in the Risk Appetite Statement, which includes both qualitative statements and quantitative limits.
Our overall capacity to take risk is limited; therefore, we prioritize the risks we take in order to maintain a strong and flexible financial position so we can withstand challenging economic conditions and take advantage of organic growth opportunities. Therefore, we set objectives and targets for capital and liquidity that are intended to permit us to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner at all times, including during periods of stress.
Our lines of business operate with risk limits that align with the Corporation’s risk appetite. Senior management is responsible for tracking and reporting performance measurements as well as any exceptions to risk appetite limits. The Board, and its committees when appropriate, oversee financial performance, execution of the strategic and financial operating plans, adherence to risk appetite limits and the adequacy of internal controls.
For a more detailed discussion of our risk management activities, see the discussion below and pages 49 through 82.
Risk Management Governance
The Risk Framework describes delegations of authority whereby the Board and its committees may delegate authority to management-level committees or executive officers. Such delegations may authorize certain decision-making and approval functions, which may be evidenced in documents such as committee charters, job descriptions, meeting minutes and resolutions.
The chart below illustrates the interrelationship among the Board, Board committees and management committees that have the majority of risk oversight responsibilities for the Corporation.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 46 |
Board of Directors and Board Committees
The Board is composed of 15 directors, all but one of whom are independent. The Board authorizes management to maintain an effective Risk Framework and oversees compliance with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, the Board or its committees conduct inquiries of, and receive reports from senior management on, risk-related matters to assess scope or resource limitations that could impede the ability of Global Risk Management (GRM) and/or Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Board committees discussed below have the principal responsibility for enterprise-wide oversight of our risk management activities. Through these activities, the Board and applicable committees are provided with information on our risk profile and oversee senior management addressing key risks we face. Other Board committees, as described below, provide additional oversight of specific risks.
Each of the committees shown on the above chart regularly reports to the Board on risk-related matters within the committee’s responsibilities, which is intended to collectively provide the Board with integrated insight about our management of enterprise-wide risks.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the qualifications, performance and independence of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the performance of our corporate audit function, the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and makes inquiries of senior management or the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) to determine whether there are scope or resource limitations that impede the ability of Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing compliance risks pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Enterprise Risk Committee
The ERC oversees the Corporation’s Risk Framework, risk appetite and senior management’s responsibilities for the identification, measurement, monitoring and control of key risks facing the Corporation. The ERC may consult with other Board committees on risk-related matters.
Other Board Committees
Our Corporate Governance, ESG, and Sustainability Committee oversees our Board’s governance processes, identifies and reviews the qualifications of potential Board members, leads
Board and committee succession planning and their formal self-evaluation, and reviews our ESG activities, shareholder input and shareholder engagement process.
Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee oversees establishing, maintaining and administering our compensation programs and employee benefit plans, including approving and recommending our Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO) compensation to our Board for further approval by all independent directors; reviewing and approving our executive officers’ compensation, as well as compensation for non-management directors; and reviewing certain other human capital management topics, including pay equity and diversity and inclusion.
Management Committees
Management committees receive their authority from the Board, a Board committee, or another management committee. Our primary management risk committee is the MRC. Subject to Board oversight, the MRC is responsible for management oversight of key risks facing the Corporation, including an integrated evaluation of risk, earnings, capital and liquidity.
Lines of Defense
We have clear ownership and accountability for managing risk across three lines of defense: Front Line Units (FLUs), GRM and Corporate Audit. We also have control functions outside of FLUs and GRM (e.g., Legal and Global Human Resources). The three lines of defense are integrated into our management-level governance structure. Each of these functional roles is further described in this section.
Executive Officers
Executive officers lead various functions representing the functional roles. Authority for functional roles may be delegated to executive officers from the Board, Board committees or management-level committees. Executive officers, in turn, may further delegate responsibilities, as appropriate, to management-level committees, management routines or individuals. Executive officers review our activities for consistency with our Risk Framework, risk appetite, and applicable strategic, capital and financial operating plans, as well as applicable policies and standards. Executive officers and other employees make decisions individually on a day-to-day basis, consistent with the authority they have been delegated. Executive officers and other employees may also serve on committees and participate in committee decisions.
47 Bank of America
Front Line Units
FLUs, which include the lines of business as well as Global Technology and Global Operations, are responsible for appropriately assessing and effectively managing all of the risks associated with their activities.
Three organizational units that include FLU activities and control function activities, but are not part of GRM are first, the Chief Financial Officer Group; second, the Chief Administrative Officer Group; and third, Global Strategy and Enterprise Platforms.
Global Risk Management
GRM is part of our control functions and operates as our independent risk management function. GRM, led by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), is responsible for independently assessing and overseeing risks within FLUs and other control functions. GRM establishes written enterprise policies and procedures outlining how aggregate risks are identified, measured, monitored and controlled.
The CRO has the stature, authority and independence needed to develop and implement a meaningful risk management framework and practices to guide the Corporation in managing risk. The CRO has unrestricted access to the Board and reports directly to both the ERC and the CEO. GRM is organized into horizontal risk teams that cover a specific risk area and vertical CRO teams that cover a particular FLU or control function. These teams work collaboratively in executing their respective duties.
Corporate Audit
Corporate Audit and the CAE maintain their independence from the FLUs, GRM and other control functions by reporting directly to the Audit Committee. The CAE administratively reports to the CEO. Corporate Audit provides independent assessment and validation through testing of key processes and controls across the Corporation. Corporate Audit includes Credit Review, which provides an independent assessment of credit lending decisions and the effectiveness of credit processes across the Corporation’s credit platform through examinations and monitoring.
Risk Management Processes
The Risk Framework requires that strong risk management practices are integrated in key strategic, capital and financial planning processes and in day-to-day business processes across the Corporation, thereby ensuring risks are appropriately considered, evaluated and responded to in a timely manner. We employ an effective risk management process, referred to as Identify, Measure, Monitor and Control, as part of our daily activities.
Identify – To be effectively managed, risks must be proactively identified and well understood. Proper risk identification focuses on recognizing and understanding key risks inherent in our business activities or key risks that may arise from external factors. Each employee is expected to identify and escalate risks promptly. Risk identification is an ongoing process that incorporates input from FLUs and control functions. It is designed to be forward-looking and to capture relevant risk factors across all of our lines of business.
Measure – Once a risk is identified, it must be prioritized and accurately measured through a systematic process including qualitative statements and quantitative limits. Risk is measured at various levels, including, but not limited to, risk type, FLU and legal entity, and also on an aggregate basis. This risk measurement process helps to capture changes in our risk profile due to changes in strategic direction,
concentrations, portfolio quality and the overall economic environment. Senior management considers how risk exposures might evolve under a variety of stress scenarios.
Monitor – We monitor risk levels regularly to track adherence to risk appetite, policies and standards. We also regularly update risk assessments and review risk exposures. Through our monitoring, we know our level of risk relative to limits and can take action in a timely manner. We also know when risk limits are breached and have processes to appropriately report and escalate exceptions. This includes timely requests for approval to managers and alerts to executive management, management-level committees or the Board (directly or through an appropriate committee).
Control – We establish and communicate risk limits and controls through policies, standards, procedures and processes. The limits and controls can be adjusted by senior management or the Board when conditions or risk tolerances warrant. These limits may be absolute (e.g., loan amount, trading volume, operational loss) or relative (e.g., percentage of loan book in higher-risk categories). Our FLUs are held accountable for performing within the established limits.
The formal processes used to manage risk represent a part of our overall risk management process. We instill a strong and comprehensive culture of managing risk well through communications, training, policies, procedures and organizational roles and responsibilities. Establishing a culture reflective of our purpose to help make our customers’ financial lives better and delivering on Responsible Growth is also critical to effective risk management. We are committed to the highest principles of ethical and professional conduct. Conduct risk is the risk of improper actions, behaviors or practices by the Corporation, its employees or representatives that are illegal, unethical and/or contrary to our core values that could result in harm to the Corporation, our shareholders or our customers, damage the integrity of the financial markets, or negatively impact our reputation. We have established protocols and structures so that conduct risk is governed and reported across the Corporation appropriately. All employees are held accountable for adhering to the Code of Conduct, operating within our risk appetite and managing risk in their daily business activities. In addition, our performance management and compensation practices encourage responsible risk-taking that is consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite.
Corporation-wide Stress Testing
Integral to our Capital Planning, Financial Planning and Strategic Planning processes, we conduct capital scenario management and stress forecasting on a periodic basis to better understand balance sheet, earnings and capital sensitivities to certain economic and business scenarios, including economic and market conditions that are more severe than anticipated. These stress forecasts provide an understanding of the potential impacts from our risk profile on the balance sheet, earnings and capital, and serve as a key component of our capital and risk management practices. The intent of stress testing is to develop a comprehensive understanding of potential impacts of on- and off-balance sheet risks at the Corporation and certain subsidiaries and how they impact financial resiliency, which provides confidence to management, regulators and our investors.
Contingency Planning
We have developed and maintain contingency plans that are designed to prepare us in advance to respond in the event of
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 48 |
potential adverse economic, financial or market stress. These contingency plans include our Capital Contingency Plan and Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan, which provide monitoring, escalation, actions and routines designed to enable us to increase capital, access funding sources and reduce risk through consideration of potential options that include asset sales, business sales, capital or debt issuances, and other de-risking strategies. We also maintain a Resolution Plan to limit adverse systemic impacts that could be associated with a potential resolution of Bank of America.
Strategic Risk Management
Strategic risk is embedded in every business and is one of the major risk categories along with credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. This risk results from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution, or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate, such as competitor actions, changing customer preferences, product obsolescence and technology developments.
An aspect of strategic risk is the risk that the Corporation’s capital levels are not adequate to meet minimum regulatory requirements and support execution of business activities or absorb losses from risks during normal or adverse economic and market conditions. As such, capital risk is managed in parallel to strategic risk.
We manage strategic risk through the Strategic Risk Enterprise Policy and integration into the strategic planning process, among other activities. Our strategic plan is consistent with our risk appetite, capital plan and liquidity requirements, and specifically addresses strategic risks impacting each business.
On an annual basis, the Board reviews and approves the strategic plan, capital plan, financial operating plan and Risk Appetite Statement. With oversight by the Board, senior management directs the lines of business to execute our strategic plan consistent with our core operating principles and risk appetite. The executive management team monitors business performance throughout the year and provides the Board with regular progress reports on whether strategic objectives and timelines are being met, including reports on strategic risks and if additional or alternative actions need to be considered or implemented. The regular executive reviews focus on assessing forecasted earnings and returns on capital, the current risk profile, current capital and liquidity requirements, staffing levels and changes required to support the strategic plan, stress testing results, and other qualitative factors such as market growth rates and peer analysis.
Significant strategic actions, such as capital actions, material acquisitions or divestitures, and resolution plans are reviewed and approved by the Board. At the business level, processes are in place to discuss the strategic risk implications of new, expanded or modified businesses, products or services and other strategic initiatives, and to provide formal review and approval where required. With oversight by the Board and the ERC, executive management performs similar analyses throughout the year, and evaluates changes to the financial forecast or the risk, capital or liquidity positions as deemed appropriate to balance and optimize achieving the targeted risk appetite, shareholder returns and maintaining the targeted financial strength. Proprietary models are used to measure the capital requirements for credit, country, market, operational and strategic risks. The allocated capital assigned to each business
is based on its unique risk profile. With oversight by the Board, executive management assesses the risk-adjusted returns of each business in approving strategic and financial operating plans. The businesses use allocated capital to define business strategies, and price products and transactions.
Capital Management
The Corporation manages its capital position so that its capital is more than adequate to support its business activities and aligns with risk, risk appetite and strategic planning. Additionally, we seek to maintain safety and soundness at all times, even under adverse scenarios, take advantage of organic growth opportunities, meet obligations to creditors and counterparties, maintain ready access to financial markets, continue to serve as a credit intermediary, remain a source of strength for our subsidiaries, and satisfy current and future regulatory capital requirements. Capital management is integrated into our risk and governance processes, as capital is a key consideration in the development of our strategic plan, risk appetite and risk limits.
We conduct an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) on a periodic basis. The ICAAP is a forward-looking assessment of our projected capital needs and resources, incorporating earnings, balance sheet and risk forecasts under baseline and adverse economic and market conditions. We utilize periodic stress tests to assess the potential impacts to our balance sheet, earnings, regulatory capital and liquidity under a variety of stress scenarios. We perform qualitative risk assessments to identify and assess material risks not fully captured in our forecasts or stress tests. We assess the potential capital impacts of proposed changes to regulatory capital requirements. Management assesses ICAAP results and provides documented quarterly assessments of the adequacy of our capital guidelines and capital position to the Board or its committees.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. For more information, see Business Segment Operations on page 37.
CCAR and Capital Planning
The Federal Reserve requires BHCs to submit a capital plan and planned capital actions on an annual basis, consistent with the rules governing the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) capital plan. Based on the results of our 2022 CCAR stress test, our stress capital buffer (SCB) increased to 3.4 percent from 2.5 percent, effective October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023.
In October 2021, the Board authorized the Corporation’s $25 billion common stock repurchase program. Additionally, the Board authorized common stock repurchases to offset shares awarded under the Corporation’s equity-based compensation plans. Pursuant to the Board’s authorizations, during 2022, we repurchased $5.1 billion of common stock, including repurchases to offset shares awarded under equity-based compensation plans.
The timing and amount of common stock repurchases are subject to various factors, including the Corporation’s capital position, liquidity, financial performance and alternative uses of capital, stock trading price, regulatory requirements and general market conditions, and may be suspended at any time. Such repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including repurchase plans that satisfy the conditions of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).
49 Bank of America
Regulatory Capital
As a financial services holding company, we are subject to regulatory capital rules, including Basel 3, issued by U.S. banking regulators. Basel 3 established minimum capital ratios and buffer requirements and outlined two methods of calculating risk-weighted assets (RWA), the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches. The Standardized approach relies primarily on supervisory risk weights based on exposure type, and the Advanced approaches determine risk weights based on internal models.
The Corporation's depository institution subsidiaries are also subject to the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. The Corporation and its primary affiliated banking entity, BANA, are Advanced approaches institutions under Basel 3 and are required to report regulatory risk-based capital ratios and RWA under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. The lower of the capital ratios under Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements are used to assess capital adequacy, including under the PCA framework. As of December 31, 2022, the common equity tier 1 (CET1), Tier 1 capital and Total capital ratios under the Standardized approach were the binding ratios.
Minimum Capital Requirements
In order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments, the Corporation must meet risk-based capital ratio requirements that include a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent (under the Advanced approaches only), an SCB (under the Standardized approach only), plus any applicable countercyclical capital buffer and a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) surcharge. The buffers and surcharge must be comprised solely of CET1 capital. For the period from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022, the Corporation's minimum CET1 capital ratio requirement was 9.5 percent under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. Based on the results of our 2022 CCAR stress test, the Corporation’s SCB increased to 3.4 percent, resulting in a minimum CET1 capital ratio requirement of 10.4 percent under the Standardized approach for the period from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023. Our minimum CET1 capital ratio requirement under the Advanced approaches
remains unchanged at 9.5 percent.
The Corporation is required to calculate its G-SIB surcharge on an annual basis under two methods and is subject to the higher of the resulting two surcharges. Method 1 is consistent with the approach prescribed by the Basel Committee’s assessment methodology and is calculated using specified indicators of systemic importance. Method 2 modifies the Method 1 approach by, among other factors, including a measure of the Corporation’s reliance on short-term wholesale funding. The Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge, which is higher under Method 2, is expected to increase to 3.0 percent from 2.5 percent on January 1, 2024, which will increase our minimum CET1 capital ratio requirement. At December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s CET1 capital ratio of 11.2 percent under the Standardized approach exceeded its current CET1 capital ratio requirement as well as the minimum requirement expected to be in place as of January 1, 2024 due to an anticipated increase in our G-SIB surcharge.
The Corporation is also required to maintain a minimum supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) of 3.0 percent plus a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. Our insured depository institution subsidiaries are required to maintain a minimum 6.0 percent SLR to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework. The numerator of the SLR is quarter-end Basel 3 Tier 1 capital. The denominator is total leverage exposure based on the daily average of the sum of on-balance sheet exposures less permitted deductions, and applicable temporary exclusions, as well as the simple average of certain off-balance sheet exposures, as of the end of each month in a quarter.
Capital Composition and Ratios
Table 10 presents Bank of America Corporation’s capital ratios and related information in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2022 and 2021. For the periods presented herein, the Corporation met the definition of well capitalized under current regulatory requirements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 50 |
| Table 10 | Bank of America Corporation Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 180,060 | $ | 180,060 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 208,446 | 208,446 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 238,773 | 230,916 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,605 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.2 | % | 12.8 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.0 | 14.8 | 11.9 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.9 | 16.4 | 13.9 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,997 | $ | 2,997 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,523 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.9 | % | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 171,759 | $ | 171,759 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 196,465 | 196,465 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 227,592 | 220,616 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,618 | 1,399 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 10.6 | % | 12.3 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 12.1 | 14.0 | 11.0 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.1 | 15.8 | 13.0 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 3,087 | $ | 3,087 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 6.4 | % | 6.4 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 3,604 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.5 | % | 5.0 |
(1)Capital ratios as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the current expected credit losses (CECL) accounting standard on January 1, 2020.
(2)The capital conservation buffer and G-SIB surcharge were 2.5 percent at both December 31, 2022 and 2021. The Corporation's SCB applied in place of the capital conservation buffer under the Standardized approach was 3.4 percent at December 31, 2022 and 2.5 percent at December 31, 2021. The countercyclical capital buffer for both periods was zero. The CET1 capital regulatory minimum is the sum of the CET1 capital ratio minimum of 4.5 percent, our G-SIB surcharge of 2.5 percent and our capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent or the SCB, as applicable, of 3.4 percent at December 31, 2022 and 2.5 percent at December 31, 2021. The SLR regulatory minimum includes a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
At December 31, 2022, CET1 capital was $180.1 billion, an increase of $8.3 billion from December 31, 2021, due to earnings, partially offset by dividends, common stock repurchases and higher net unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI). Tier 1 capital increased $12.0 billion primarily driven by the same factors as CET1 capital as well as non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock issuances. Total capital under the Standardized approach increased $11.2 billion primarily due to the same factors driving the increase in
Tier 1 capital and an increase in the adjusted allowance for credit losses included in Tier 2 capital, partially offset by a decrease in subordinated debt. RWA under the Standardized approach, which yielded the lower CET1 capital ratio at December 31, 2022, decreased $13.0 billion during 2022 to $1,605 billion primarily due to lower counterparty exposures in Global Markets and a decrease in debt securities in the Treasury portfolio, partially offset by loan growth. Supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2022 decreased $80.3 billion primarily due to lower debt securities, driven by lower deposits, partially offset by loan growth.
51 Bank of America
Table 11 shows the capital composition at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 11 | Capital Composition under Basel 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | $ | 244,800 | $ | 245,358 | ||
| CECL transitional amount (1) | 1,881 | 2,508 | ||||
| Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (68,644) | (68,641) | ||||
| Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | (7,776) | (7,743) | ||||
| Intangibles, other than mortgage servicing rights, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (1,554) | (1,605) | ||||
| Defined benefit pension plan net assets | (867) | (1,261) | ||||
| Cumulative unrealized net (gain) loss related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net-of-tax | 496 | 1,400 | ||||
| Accumulated net (gain) loss on certain cash flow hedges (2) | 11,925 | 1,870 | ||||
| Other | (201) | (127) | ||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 180,060 | 171,759 | ||||
| Qualifying preferred stock, net of issuance cost | 28,396 | 24,707 | ||||
| Other | (10) | (1) | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 208,446 | 196,465 | ||||
| Tier 2 capital instruments | 18,751 | 20,750 | ||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (3) | 11,739 | 10,534 | ||||
| Other | (163) | (157) | ||||
| Total capital under the Standardized approach | 238,773 | 227,592 | ||||
| Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses under the Advanced approaches (3) | (7,857) | (6,976) | ||||
| Total capital under the Advanced approaches | $ | 230,916 | $ | 220,616 |
(1)Includes the impact of the Corporation's adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020 and 25 percent of the increase in reserves since the initial adoption.
(2)Includes amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the hedging of items that are not recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(3)Includes the impact of transition provisions related to the CECL accounting standard.
Table 12 shows the components of RWA as measured under Basel 3 at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 12 | Risk-weighted Assets under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | |||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Credit risk | $ | 1,538 | $ | 939 | $ | 1,549 | $ | 913 | ||||||
| Market risk | 67 | 67 | 69 | 69 | ||||||||||
| Operational risk (1) | n/a | 364 | n/a | 378 | ||||||||||
| Risks related to credit valuation adjustments | n/a | 41 | n/a | 39 | ||||||||||
| Total risk-weighted assets | $ | 1,605 | $ | 1,411 | $ | 1,618 | $ | 1,399 |
(1)December 31, 2022 includes the effects of an update made to our operational risk RWA model during the fourth quarter of 2022.
n/a = not applicable
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 52 |
Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital
Table 13 presents regulatory capital information for BANA in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2022 and 2021. BANA met the definition of well capitalized under the PCA framework for both periods.
| Table 13 | Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2022 | |||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 181,089 | $ | 181,089 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 181,089 | 181,089 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 194,254 | 186,648 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,386 | 1,087 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.1 | % | 16.7 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.1 | 16.7 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.0 | 17.2 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,358 | $ | 2,358 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.7 | % | 7.7 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 2,785 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.5 | % | 6.0 | |||||||
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 182,526 | $ | 182,526 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 182,526 | 182,526 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 194,773 | 188,091 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,352 | 1,048 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | % | 17.4 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 17.4 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.4 | 17.9 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,414 | $ | 2,414 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.6 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 2,824 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.5 | % | 6.0 |
(1)Capital ratios as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1,2020 .
(2)Risk-based capital regulatory minimums at both December 31, 2022 and 2021 are the minimum ratios under Basel 3 including a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent. The regulatory minimums for the leverage ratios as of both period ends are the percent required to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements
Total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) consists of the Corporation’s Tier 1 capital and eligible long-term debt issued directly by the Corporation. Eligible long-term debt for TLAC ratios is comprised of unsecured debt that has a remaining maturity of at least one year and satisfies additional requirements as prescribed in the TLAC final rule. As with the
risk-based capital ratios and SLR, the Corporation is required to maintain TLAC ratios in excess of minimum requirements plus applicable buffers to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. Table 14 presents the Corporation's TLAC and long-term debt ratios and related information as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
53 Bank of America
| Table 14 | Bank of America Corporation Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLAC (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | Long-term Debt | Regulatory Minimum (3) | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 465,451 | $ | 243,833 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 29.0 | % | 22.0 | % | 15.2 | % | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 13.2 | 9.5 | 6.9 | 4.5 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 435,904 | $ | 227,714 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 26.9 | % | 22.0 | % | 14.1 | % | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure | 12.1 | 9.5 | 6.3 | 4.5 |
(1)As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, TLAC ratios are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of CECL.
(2)The TLAC RWA regulatory minimum consists of 18.0 percent plus a TLAC RWA buffer comprised of 2.5 percent plus the Method 1 G-SIB surcharge of 1.5 percent. The countercyclical buffer is zero for both periods. The TLAC supplementary leverage exposure regulatory minimum consists of 7.5 percent plus a 2.0 percent TLAC leverage buffer. The TLAC RWA and leverage buffers must be comprised solely of CET1 capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively.
(3)The long-term debt RWA regulatory minimum is comprised of 6.0 percent plus an additional 2.5 percent requirement based on the Corporation’s Method 2 G-SIB surcharge. The long-term debt leverage exposure regulatory minimum is 4.5 percent.
(4)The approach that yields the higher RWA is used to calculate TLAC and long-term debt ratios, which was the Standardized approach as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Regulatory Capital and Securities Regulation
The Corporation’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS), Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. (MLPCC) and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S). The Corporation's principal European broker-dealer subsidiaries are Merrill Lynch International (MLI) and BofA Securities Europe SA (BofASE).
The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act. BofAS computes its minimum capital requirements as an alternative net capital broker-dealer under Rule 15c3-1e, and MLPCC and MLPF&S compute their minimum capital requirements in accordance with the alternative standard under Rule 15c3-1. BofAS and MLPCC are also registered as futures commission merchants and are subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Regulation 1.17. The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are also registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA). Pursuant to FINRA Rule 4110, FINRA may impose higher net capital requirements than Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to each of the broker-dealers.
BofAS provides institutional services, and in accordance with the alternative net capital requirements, is required to maintain tentative net capital in excess of $5.0 billion and net capital in excess of the greater of $1.0 billion or a certain percentage of its reserve requirement in addition to a certain percentage of securities-based swap risk margin. BofAS must also notify the SEC in the event its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. BofAS is also required to hold a certain percentage of its customers' and affiliates' risk-based margin in order to meet its CFTC minimum net capital requirement. At December 31, 2022, BofAS had tentative net capital of $20.9 billion. BofAS also had regulatory net capital of $17.5 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $4.1 billion.
MLPCC is a fully-guaranteed subsidiary of BofAS and provides clearing and settlement services as well as prime brokerage and arranged financing services for institutional clients. At December 31, 2022, MLPCC’s regulatory net capital of $7.5 billion exceeded the minimum requirement of $1.4 billion.
MLPF&S provides retail services. At December 31, 2022, MLPF&S' regulatory net capital was $6.0 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $137 million.
Our European broker-dealers are subject to requirements from U.S. and non-U.S. regulators. MLI, a U.K. investment firm, is regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the
Financial Conduct Authority and is subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2022, MLI’s capital resources were $33.4 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $11.6 billion.
BofASE is an authorized credit institution with its head office located in France. Previously, BofASE had been authorized as an investment firm, but following the European Union’s adoption of the harmonized Investment Firm Directive and Investment Firm Regulation prudential regime, it was required to apply for reauthorization as a credit institution. The application was approved in November 2022 and became effective on December 8, 2022. BofASE is authorized and regulated by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, and supervised under the Single Supervisory Mechanism by the European Central Bank. At December 31, 2022, BofASE's capital resources were $9.0 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $3.0 billion.
In addition, MLI and BofASE became conditionally registered with the SEC as security-based swap dealers in the fourth quarter of 2021, and maintained net liquid assets at December 31, 2022 that exceeded the applicable minimum requirements under the Exchange Act.
Liquidity Risk
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity risk management objective is to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral requirements, including payments under long-term debt agreements, commitments to extend credit and customer deposit withdrawals, while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions. To achieve that objective, we analyze and monitor our liquidity risk under expected and stressed conditions, maintain liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, including our stable deposit base, and seek to align liquidity-related incentives and risks. These liquidity risk management practices have allowed us to effectively manage the market fluctuation from the rising interest rate environment, inflationary pressures and macroeconomic environment.
We define liquidity as readily available assets, limited to cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities that we can use to meet our contractual and contingent financial obligations as they arise. We manage our liquidity position through line-of-business and ALM activities, as well as through our legal entity funding strategy, on both a forward and current
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 54 |
(including intraday) basis under both expected and stressed conditions. We believe that a centralized approach to funding and liquidity management enhances our ability to monitor liquidity requirements, maximizes access to funding sources, minimizes borrowing costs and facilitates timely responses to liquidity events.
The Board approves our liquidity risk policy and the Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan. The ERC establishes our liquidity risk tolerance levels. The MRC is responsible for overseeing liquidity risks and directing management to maintain exposures within the established tolerance levels. The MRC reviews and monitors our liquidity position and stress testing results, approves certain liquidity risk limits and reviews the impact of strategic decisions on our liquidity. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 46. Under this governance framework, we developed certain funding and liquidity risk management practices which include: maintaining liquidity at Bank of America Corporation (Parent) and selected subsidiaries, including our bank subsidiaries and other regulated entities; determining what amounts of liquidity are appropriate for these entities based on analysis of debt maturities and other potential cash outflows, including those that we may experience during stressed market conditions; diversifying funding sources, considering our asset profile and legal entity structure; and performing contingency planning.
NB Holdings Corporation
The Parent, which is a separate and distinct legal entity from our bank and nonbank subsidiaries, has an intercompany arrangement with our wholly-owned holding company subsidiary, NB Holdings Corporation (NB Holdings). We have transferred, and agreed to transfer, additional Parent assets not required to satisfy anticipated near-term expenditures to NB Holdings. The Parent is expected to continue to have access to the same flow of dividends, interest and other amounts of cash necessary to service its debt, pay dividends and perform other obligations as it would have had it not entered into these arrangements and transferred any assets. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In consideration for the transfer of assets, NB Holdings issued a subordinated note to the Parent in a principal amount equal to the value of the transferred assets. The aggregate principal amount of the note will increase by the amount of any future asset transfers. NB Holdings also provided the Parent with a committed line of credit that allows the Parent to draw funds necessary to service near-term cash needs. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the Parent would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These arrangements include provisions to terminate the line of credit, forgive the subordinated note and require the Parent to transfer its remaining financial assets to NB Holdings if our projected liquidity resources deteriorate so severely that resolution of the Parent becomes imminent.
Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets
We maintain liquidity available to the Corporation, including the Parent and selected subsidiaries, in the form of cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Our liquidity buffer, referred to as Global Liquidity Sources (GLS), is comprised of
assets that are readily available to the Parent and selected subsidiaries, including holding company, bank and broker-dealer subsidiaries, even during stressed market conditions. Our cash is primarily on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank and, to a lesser extent, central banks outside of the U.S. We limit the composition of high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities to U.S. government securities, U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency MBS and other investment-grade securities, and a select group of non-U.S. government securities. We can obtain cash for these securities, even in stressed conditions, through repurchase agreements or outright sales. We hold our GLS in legal entities that allow us to meet the liquidity requirements of our global businesses, and we consider the impact of potential regulatory, tax, legal and other restrictions that could limit the transferability of funds among entities.
Table 15 presents average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 15 | Average Global Liquidity Sources | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
| Bank entities | $ | 694 | $ | 1,006 | ||
| Nonbank and other entities (1) | 174 | 152 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 868 | $ | 1,158 |
(1) Nonbank includes Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities.
Our bank subsidiaries’ liquidity is primarily driven by deposit and lending activity, as well as securities valuation and net debt activity. Bank subsidiaries can also generate incremental liquidity by pledging a range of unencumbered loans and securities to certain FHLBs and the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The cash we could have obtained by borrowing against this pool of specifically-identified eligible assets was $348 billion and $322 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021. We have established operational procedures to enable us to borrow against these assets, including regularly monitoring our total pool of eligible loans and securities collateral. Eligibility is defined in guidelines from the FHLBs and the Federal Reserve and is subject to change at their discretion. Due to regulatory restrictions, liquidity generated by the bank subsidiaries can generally be used only to fund obligations within the bank subsidiaries, and transfers to the Parent or nonbank subsidiaries may be subject to prior regulatory approval.
Liquidity is also held in nonbank entities, including the Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities. The Parent and NB Holdings liquidity is typically in the form of cash deposited at BANA, which is excluded from the liquidity at bank subsidiaries, and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Liquidity held in other regulated entities, comprised primarily of broker-dealer subsidiaries, is primarily available to meet the obligations of that entity, and transfers to the Parent or to any other subsidiary may be subject to prior regulatory approval due to regulatory restrictions and minimum requirements. Our other regulated entities also hold unencumbered investment-grade securities and equities that we believe could be used to generate additional liquidity.
Table 16 presents the composition of average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021.
55 Bank of America
| Table 16 | Average Global Liquidity Sources Composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
| Cash on deposit | $ | 174 | $ | 259 | ||
| U.S. Treasury securities | 252 | 278 | ||||
| U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities | 427 | 606 | ||||
| Non-U.S. government securities | 15 | 15 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 868 | $ | 1,158 |
Our GLS are substantially the same in composition to what qualifies as High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) under the final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) rules. However, HQLA for purposes of calculating LCR is not reported at market value, but at a lower value that incorporates regulatory deductions and the exclusion of excess liquidity held at certain subsidiaries. The LCR is calculated as the amount of a financial institution’s unencumbered HQLA relative to the estimated net cash outflows the institution could encounter over a 30-day period of significant liquidity stress, expressed as a percentage. Our average consolidated HQLA, on a net basis, was $605 billion and $617 billion for the three months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. For the same periods, the average consolidated LCR was 120 percent and 115 percent. Our LCR fluctuates due to normal business flows from customer activity.
Liquidity Stress Analysis
We utilize liquidity stress analysis to assist us in determining the appropriate amounts of liquidity to maintain at the Parent and our subsidiaries to meet contractual and contingent cash outflows under a range of scenarios. The scenarios we consider and utilize incorporate market-wide and Corporation-specific events, including potential credit rating downgrades for the Parent and our subsidiaries, and more severe events including potential resolution scenarios. The scenarios are based on our historical experience, experience of distressed and failed financial institutions, regulatory guidance, and both expected and unexpected future events.
The types of potential contractual and contingent cash outflows we consider in our scenarios may include, but are not limited to, upcoming contractual maturities of unsecured debt and reductions in new debt issuances; diminished access to secured financing markets; potential deposit withdrawals; increased draws on loan commitments, liquidity facilities and letters of credit; additional collateral that counterparties could call if our credit ratings were downgraded; collateral and margin requirements arising from market value changes; and potential liquidity required to maintain businesses and finance customer activities. Changes in certain market factors, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades, could negatively impact potential contractual and contingent outflows and the related financial instruments, and in some cases these impacts could be material to our financial results.
We consider all sources of funds that we could access during each stress scenario and focus particularly on matching available sources with corresponding liquidity requirements by legal entity. We also use the stress modeling results to manage our asset and liability profile and establish limits and guidelines on certain funding sources and businesses.
Net Stable Funding Ratio
The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a liquidity requirement for large banks to maintain a minimum level of stable funding over a one-year period. The requirement is intended to support
the ability of banks to lend to households and businesses in both normal and adverse economic conditions and is complementary to the LCR, which focuses on short-term liquidity risks. The U.S. NSFR applies to the Corporation on a consolidated basis and to our insured depository institutions. At December 31, 2022, the Corporation and its insured depository institutions were in compliance with this requirement.
Diversified Funding Sources
We fund our assets primarily with a mix of deposits, and secured and unsecured liabilities through a centralized, globally coordinated funding approach diversified across products, programs, markets, currencies and investor groups.
The primary benefits of our centralized funding approach include greater control, reduced funding costs, wider name recognition by investors and greater flexibility to meet the variable funding requirements of subsidiaries. Where regulations, time zone differences or other business considerations make Parent funding impractical, certain other subsidiaries may issue their own debt.
We fund a substantial portion of our lending activities through our deposits, which were $1.93 trillion and $2.1 trillion at December 31, 2022 and 2021. Deposits are primarily generated by our Consumer Banking, GWIM and Global Banking segments. These deposits are diversified by clients, product type and geography, and the majority of our U.S. deposits are insured by the FDIC. We consider a substantial portion of our deposits to be a stable, low-cost and consistent source of funding. We believe this deposit funding is generally less sensitive to interest rate changes, market volatility or changes in our credit ratings than wholesale funding sources. Our lending activities may also be financed through secured borrowings, including credit card securitizations and securitizations with government-sponsored enterprises (GSE), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and private-label investors, as well as FHLB loans.
Our trading activities in other regulated entities are primarily funded on a secured basis through securities lending and repurchase agreements, and these amounts will vary based on customer activity and market conditions. We believe funding these activities in the secured financing markets is more cost-efficient and less sensitive to changes in our credit ratings than unsecured financing. Repurchase agreements are generally short-term and often overnight. Disruptions in secured financing markets for financial institutions have occurred in prior market cycles which resulted in adverse changes in terms or significant reductions in the availability of such financing. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate. For more information on secured financing agreements, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings, Collateral and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total long-term debt decreased $4.1 billion to $276.0 billion during 2022 primarily due to debt maturities, redemptions and valuation adjustments, partially offset by debt issuances. We may, from time to time, purchase outstanding debt instruments in various transactions, depending on market conditions, liquidity and other factors. Our other regulated entities may also make markets in our debt instruments to provide liquidity for investors.
During 2022, we issued $66.0 billion of long-term debt consisting of $44.2 billion of notes issued by Bank of America Corporation, substantially all of which were TLAC compliant,
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 56 |
$10.0 billion of notes issued by Bank of America, N.A. and $11.8 billion of other debt. During 2021, we issued $76.7 billion of long-term debt consisting of $56.2 billion of notes issued by Bank of America Corporation, substantially all of which were TLAC compliant, $8 billion of notes issued by Bank of America, N.A. and $12.5 billion of other debt.
During 2022, we had total long-term debt maturities and redemptions in the aggregate of $33.3 billion consisting of $19.8 billion for Bank of America Corporation, $9.9 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $3.6 billion of other debt. During 2021, we had total long-term debt maturities and redemptions in the aggregate of $46.4 billion consisting of $24.4 billion for Bank of America Corporation, $10.4 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $11.6 billion of other debt.
At December 31, 2022, Bank of America Corporation's senior notes of $205.9 billion included $179.1 billion of outstanding notes that are both TLAC eligible and callable at least one year before their stated maturities. Of these senior notes, $16.6 billion will be callable and become TLAC ineligible during 2023, and $21.4 billion, $21.3 billion, $16.0 billion and $24.4 billion will do so during each of 2024 through 2027, respectively, and $79.4 billion thereafter.
We issue long-term unsecured debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. While the cost and availability of unsecured funding may be negatively impacted by general market conditions or by matters specific to the financial services industry or the Corporation, we seek to mitigate refinancing risk by actively managing the amount of our borrowings that we anticipate will mature within any month or quarter. We may issue unsecured debt in the form of structured notes for client purposes, certain of which qualify as TLAC-eligible debt. During 2022, we issued $12.5 billion of structured notes, which are debt obligations that pay investors returns linked to other debt or equity securities, indices, currencies or commodities. We typically hedge the returns we are obligated to pay on these liabilities with derivatives and/or investments in the underlying instruments, so that from a funding perspective, the cost is similar to our other unsecured long-term debt. We could be required to settle certain structured note obligations for cash or other securities prior to maturity under certain circumstances, which we consider for liquidity planning purposes. We believe, however, that a portion of such borrowings will remain outstanding beyond the earliest put or redemption date.
Substantially all of our senior and subordinated debt obligations contain no provisions that could trigger a requirement for an early repayment, require additional collateral support, result in changes to terms, accelerate maturity or create additional financial obligations upon an adverse change in our credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows or stock price. For more information on long-term debt funding, including issuances and maturities and redemptions, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We use derivative transactions to manage the duration, interest rate and currency risks of our borrowings, considering the characteristics of the assets they are funding. For more information on our ALM activities, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
Uninsured Deposits
The FDIC insures the Corporation’s U.S. deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank for each account ownership category, and various country-specific funds insure non-U.S. deposits up to specified limits. Deposits that exceed
insurance limits are uninsured. At December 31, 2022, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $1.9 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $617.6 billion and $102.8 billion. At December 31, 2021, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $2.1 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $701.4 billion and $111.9 billion.
Table 17 presents information about the Corporation’s total estimated uninsured time deposits. For more information on our liquidity sources, see Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets, and for more information on deposits, see Diversified Funding Sources in this section. For more information on contractual time deposit maturities, see Note 9 – Deposits to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Table 17 | Uninsured Time Deposits (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | U.S. | Non-U.S. | Total | |||||||
| Uninsured time deposits with a maturity of: | ||||||||||
| 3 months or less | $ | 3,721 | $ | 7,023 | $ | 10,744 | ||||
| Over 3 months through 6 months | 2,230 | 275 | 2,505 | |||||||
| Over 6 months through 12 months | 2,712 | 86 | 2,798 | |||||||
| Over 12 months | 686 | 1,566 | 2,252 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 9,349 | $ | 8,950 | $ | 18,299 |
(1)Amounts are estimated based on the regulatory methodologies defined by each local jurisdiction.
Contingency Planning
We maintain contingency funding plans that outline our potential responses to liquidity stress events at various levels of severity. These policies and plans are based on stress scenarios and include potential funding strategies and communication and notification procedures that we would implement in the event we experienced stressed liquidity conditions. We periodically review and test the contingency funding plans to validate efficacy and assess readiness.
Our U.S. bank subsidiaries can access contingency funding through the Federal Reserve Discount Window. Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries have access to central bank facilities in the jurisdictions in which they operate. While we do not rely on these sources in our liquidity modeling, we maintain the policies, procedures and governance processes that would enable us to access these sources if necessary.
Credit Ratings
Our borrowing costs and ability to raise funds are impacted by our credit ratings. In addition, credit ratings may be important to customers or counterparties when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to engage in certain transactions, including over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. Thus, it is our objective to maintain high-quality credit ratings, and management maintains an active dialogue with the major rating agencies.
Credit ratings and outlooks are opinions expressed by rating agencies on our creditworthiness and that of our obligations or securities, including long-term debt, short-term borrowings, preferred stock and other securities, including asset securitizations. Our credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by the rating agencies, and they consider a number of factors, including our own financial strength, performance, prospects and operations as well as factors not under our control. The rating agencies could make adjustments to our ratings at any
57 Bank of America
time, and they provide no assurances that they will maintain our ratings at current levels.
Other factors that influence our credit ratings include changes to the rating agencies’ methodologies for our industry or certain security types; the rating agencies’ assessment of the general operating environment for financial services companies; our relative positions in the markets in which we compete; our various risk exposures and risk management policies and activities; pending litigation and other contingencies or potential tail risks; our reputation; our liquidity position, diversity of funding sources and funding costs; the current and expected level and volatility of our earnings; our capital position and capital management practices; our corporate governance; the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government; current or future regulatory and legislative initiatives; and the agencies’ views on whether the U.S. government would provide meaningful support to the Corporation or its subsidiaries in a crisis.
On September 19, 2022, Fitch Ratings (Fitch) affirmed the long-term and short-term senior debt ratings of the Corporation. Fitch also affirmed and withdrew the long-term and short-term ratings on certain subsidiaries, as they are no longer considered relevant to the agency’s coverage.
On January 23, 2023, Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) placed the long-term rating of the Corporation as well as the long-term rating of its rated subsidiaries, including BANA, on review for upgrade. The agency cited the Corporation’s strengthened capital ratios, improved earnings profile and continued commitment to maintaining a restrained risk appetite as drivers of the review. A review for upgrade indicates that those ratings are under consideration for a change in the near term and typically concludes within 90 days. Moody’s concurrently affirmed all Prime-1 short-term ratings of the Corporation and rated subsidiaries.
The current ratings and outlooks for the Corporation and its subsidiaries from Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings (S&P) were not the subject of any rating actions during 2022 or through February 22, 2023.
Table 18 presents the Corporation’s current long-term/short-term senior debt ratings and outlooks expressed by the rating agencies.
| Table 18 | Senior Debt Ratings | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moody’s Investors Service | Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings | Fitch Ratings | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | |||||||||
| Bank of America Corporation | A2 | P-1 | Review for Upgrade | A- | A-2 | Positive | AA- | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America, N.A. | Aa2 | P-1 | Review for Upgrade | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities, Inc. | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch International | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities Europe SA | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable |
NR = not rated
A reduction in certain of our credit ratings or the ratings of certain asset-backed securitizations may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, potential loss of access to credit markets, the related cost of funds, our businesses and on certain revenues, particularly in those businesses where counterparty creditworthiness is critical. In addition, under the terms of certain OTC derivative contracts and other trading agreements, in the event of downgrades of our or our rated subsidiaries’ credit ratings, the counterparties to those agreements may require us to provide additional collateral, or to terminate these contracts or agreements, which could cause us to sustain losses and/or adversely impact our liquidity. If the short-term credit ratings of our Parent, bank or broker-dealer subsidiaries were downgraded by one or more levels, the potential loss of access to short-term funding sources such as repo financing and the effect on our incremental cost of funds could be material.
While certain potential impacts are contractual and quantifiable, the full scope of the consequences of a credit rating downgrade to a financial institution is inherently uncertain, as it depends upon numerous dynamic, complex and inter-related factors and assumptions, including whether any downgrade of a company’s long-term credit ratings precipitates downgrades to its short-term credit ratings, and assumptions about the potential behaviors of various customers, investors and counterparties. For more information on potential impacts of credit rating downgrades, see Liquidity Risk – Liquidity Stress
Analysis on page 56.
For more information on additional collateral and termination payments that could be required in connection with certain over-the-counter derivative contracts and other trading agreements in the event of a credit rating downgrade, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements herein and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Common Stock Dividends
For a summary of our declared quarterly cash dividends on common stock during 2022 and through February 22, 2023, see Note 13 – Shareholders’ Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Finance Subsidiary Issuers and Parent Guarantor
BofA Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (BofA Finance), is a consolidated finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold, and is expected to continue to issue and sell, its senior unsecured debt securities (Guaranteed Notes) that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The Corporation guarantees the due and punctual payment, on demand, of amounts payable on the Guaranteed Notes if not paid by BofA Finance. In addition, each of BAC Capital Trust XIII, BAC Capital Trust XIV and BAC Capital Trust XV, Delaware statutory trusts (collectively, the Trusts), is a 100 percent owned finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold trust preferred securities (the Trust Preferred
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 58 |
Securities) or capital securities (the Capital Securities and, together with the Guaranteed Notes and the Trust Preferred Securities, the Guaranteed Securities), as applicable, that remained outstanding at December 31, 2022. The Corporation guarantees the payment of amounts and distributions with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities if not paid by the Trusts, to the extent of funds held by the Trusts, and this guarantee, together with the Corporation’s other obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities, effectively constitutes a full and unconditional guarantee of the Trusts’ payment obligations on the Trust Preferred Securities or Capital Securities, as applicable. No other subsidiary of the Corporation guarantees the Guaranteed Securities.
BofA Finance and each of the Trusts are finance subsidiaries, have no independent assets, revenues or operations and are dependent upon the Corporation and/or the Corporation’s other subsidiaries to meet their respective obligations under the Guaranteed Securities in the ordinary course. If holders of the Guaranteed Securities make claims on their Guaranteed Securities in a bankruptcy, resolution or similar proceeding, any recoveries on those claims will be limited to those available under the applicable guarantee by the Corporation, as described above.
The Corporation is a holding company and depends upon its subsidiaries for liquidity. Applicable laws and regulations and intercompany arrangements entered into in connection with the Corporation’s resolution plan could restrict the availability of funds from subsidiaries to the Corporation, which could adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to make payments under its guarantees. In addition, the obligations of the Corporation under the guarantees of the Guaranteed Securities will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of its subsidiaries, and claimants should look only to assets of the Corporation for payments. If the Corporation, as guarantor of the Guaranteed Notes, transfers all or substantially all of its assets to one or more direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiaries, under the indenture governing the Guaranteed Notes, the subsidiary or subsidiaries will not be required to assume the Corporation’s obligations under its guarantee of the Guaranteed Notes.
For more information on factors that may affect payments to holders of the Guaranteed Securities, see Liquidity Risk – NB Holdings Corporation in this section, Item 1. Business – Insolvency and the Orderly Liquidation Authority on page 6 and Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity on page 9.
Representations and Warranties Obligations
For information on representations and warranties obligations in connection with the sale of mortgage loans, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations. Credit risk can also arise from operational failures that result in an erroneous advance, commitment or investment of funds. We define the credit exposure to a borrower or counterparty as the loss potential arising from all product classifications including loans and leases, deposit overdrafts, derivatives, assets held-for-sale and unfunded lending commitments, which include loan commitments, letters of credit and financial guarantees. Derivative positions are recorded at fair value, and assets held-for-sale are recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or
fair value. Certain loans and unfunded commitments are accounted for under the fair value option. Credit risk for categories of assets carried at fair value is not accounted for as part of the allowance for credit losses but as part of the fair value adjustments recorded in earnings. For derivative positions, our credit risk is measured as the net cost in the event the counterparties with contracts in which we are in a gain position fail to perform under the terms of those contracts. We use the current fair value to represent credit exposure without giving consideration to future mark-to-market changes. The credit risk amounts take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral. Our consumer and commercial credit extension and review procedures encompass funded and unfunded credit exposures. For more information on derivatives and credit extension commitments, see Note 3 – Derivatives and Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We manage credit risk based on the risk profile of the borrower or counterparty, repayment sources, the nature of underlying collateral and other support given current events, conditions and expectations. We classify our portfolios as either consumer or commercial and monitor credit risk in each as discussed below.
We refine our underwriting and credit risk management practices as well as credit standards to meet the changing economic environment. To mitigate losses and enhance customer support in our consumer businesses, we have in place collection programs and loan modification and customer assistance infrastructures. We utilize a number of actions to mitigate losses in the commercial businesses including increasing the frequency and intensity of portfolio monitoring, hedging activity and our practice of transferring management of deteriorating commercial exposures to independent special asset officers as credits enter criticized categories.
During 2022, asset quality generally improved compared to 2021. Our 2022 net charge-off ratio remained near historic lows, and nonperforming loans and commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased compared to 2021, which was partially offset by an increase in reservable criticized exposure associated with our direct exposure to Russia as a result of the Russia/Ukraine conflict. While uncertainty around the pandemic has diminished, uncertainty remains regarding broader economic impacts as a result of inflationary pressures, rising rates and the current geopolitical situation and could lead to adverse impacts to credit quality metrics in future periods.
For information on our credit risk management activities, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management below, Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 64, Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 70, Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73, and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more information on the factors that may expose us to credit risk, see Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the consumer portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout a borrower’s credit cycle. Statistical techniques in conjunction with experiential judgment are used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing, risk appetite, setting credit limits, and establishing operating processes and metrics to quantify and balance risks and returns. Statistical models are built using detailed behavioral information from external
59 Bank of America
sources, such as credit bureaus, and/or internal historical experience and are a component of our consumer credit risk management process. These models are used in part to assist in making both new and ongoing credit decisions as well as portfolio management strategies, including authorizations and line management, collection practices and strategies, and determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and allocated capital for credit risk.
Consumer Credit Portfolio
During 2022, the U.S. unemployment rate continued to decline and home prices increased compared to 2021, although they began to decline in the second half of 2022 as inflationary pressures continued to persist. During 2022, net charge-offs were $1.9 billion, relatively unchanged compared to 2021. During 2022, nonperforming loans declined primarily due to
decreases from consumer real estate loan sales, partially offset by increases from loans whose prior-period deferrals expired and were modified in troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) during the first quarter of 2022.
The consumer allowance for loan and lease losses increased $204 million during 2022 to $7.2 billion. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status, charge-offs and TDRs for the consumer portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 19 presents our outstanding consumer loans and leases, consumer nonperforming loans and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more.
| Table 19 | Consumer Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1) | $ | 229,670 | $ | 221,963 | $ | 2,167 | $ | 2,284 | $ | 368 | $ | 634 | ||||||||||
| Home equity | 26,563 | 27,935 | 510 | 630 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 93,421 | 81,438 | n/a | n/a | 717 | 487 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer (2) | 106,236 | 103,560 | 77 | 75 | 2 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 156 | 190 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 456,046 | $ | 435,086 | $ | 2,754 | $ | 2,989 | $ | 1,087 | $ | 1,132 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (3) | 339 | 618 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans and leases | $ | 456,385 | $ | 435,704 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.60 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases, excluding fully-insured loan portfolios (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.16 | 0.12 |
(1)Residential mortgage loans accruing past due 90 days or more are fully-insured loans. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, residential mortgage included $260 million and $444 million of loans on which interest had been curtailed by the FHA, and therefore were no longer accruing interest, although principal was still insured, and $108 million and $190 million of loans on which interest was still accruing.
(2)Outstandings primarily includes auto and specialty lending loans and leases of $51.8 billion and $48.5 billion, U.S. securities-based lending loans of $50.4 billion and $51.1 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and non-U.S. consumer loans of $3.0 billion as of both period ends.
(3)For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)Excludes consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, $7 million and $21 million of loans accounted for under the fair value option were past due 90 days or more and not accruing interest.
n/a = not applicable
Table 20 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for consumer loans and leases.
| Table 20 | Consumer Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 72 | $ | (28) | 0.03 | % | (0.01) | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | (90) | (119) | (0.33) | (0.39) | |||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 1,334 | 1,723 | 1.60 | 2.29 | |||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 18 | 1 | 0.02 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 521 | 270 | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,855 | $ | 1,847 | 0.42 | 0.44 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
n/m = not meaningful
We believe that the presentation of information adjusted to exclude the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option is more representative of the ongoing operations and credit quality of the business. As a result, in the following tables and discussions of the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios, we exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option and provide information that excludes the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio in certain credit quality statistics.
Residential Mortgage
The residential mortgage portfolio made up the largest percentage of our consumer loan portfolio at 50 percent of consumer loans and leases in 2022. Approximately 51 percent of the residential mortgage portfolio was in Consumer Banking and 45 percent was in GWIM. The remaining portion was in All Other.
Outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio increased $7.7 billion in 2022 as originations were partially offset by paydowns and loan sales.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 60 |
At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the residential mortgage portfolio included $11.7 billion and $12.7 billion of outstanding fully-insured loans, of which both had $2.2 billion of FHA insurance, with the remainder protected by Fannie Mae long-term standby agreements.
Table 21 presents certain residential mortgage key credit
statistics on both a reported basis and excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio. The following discussion presents the residential mortgage portfolio excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio.
| Table 21 | Residential Mortgage – Key Credit Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported Basis (1) | Excluding Fully-insured Loans (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 229,670 | $ | 221,963 | $ | 217,976 | $ | 209,259 | |||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 1,471 | 1,753 | 844 | 866 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 90 days or more | 368 | 634 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 2,167 | 2,284 | 2,167 | 2,284 | |||||||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 100 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current which primarily consist of collateral-dependent TDRs, including those that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy and loans that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a TDR.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio decreased $117 million in 2022 primarily due to decreases from consumer real estate loan sales in the second quarter of 2022, partially offset by increases from loans whose prior-period deferrals expired and were modified in TDRs during the first quarter of 2022. Of the nonperforming residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2022, $1.4 billion, or 63 percent, were current on contractual payments. Loans accruing past due 30 days or more decreased $22 million.
Net charge-offs of $72 million for 2022 increased $100 million compared to 2021 primarily due to loan sales that occurred in the second quarter of 2022.
Of the $218.0 billion in total residential mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2022, 28 percent were originated as interest-only loans. The outstanding balance of interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period was $3.4 billion, or six percent, at December 31, 2022. Residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period generally experience a higher rate of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status compared to the residential mortgage portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2022, $64 million, or two percent, of outstanding interest-only
residential mortgages that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more compared to $844 million, or less than one percent, for the entire residential mortgage portfolio. In addition, at December 31, 2022, $204 million, or six percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period were nonperforming, of which $79 million were contractually current. Loans that have yet to enter the amortization period in our interest-only residential mortgage portfolio are primarily well-collateralized loans to our wealth management clients and have an interest-only period of three to ten years. Approximately 96 percent of these loans that have yet to enter the amortization period will not be required to make a fully-amortizing payment until 2025 or later.
Table 22 presents outstandings, nonperforming loans and net charge-offs by certain state concentrations for the residential mortgage portfolio. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) within California represented 14 percent and 15 percent of outstandings at December 31, 2022 and 2021. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 15 percent of outstandings at both December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 22 | Residential Mortgage State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31 2022 | December 31 2021 | December 31 2022 | December 31 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 80,878 | $ | 77,819 | $ | 656 | $ | 693 | $ | 37 | $ | (14) | ||||||||||||||
| New York | 26,228 | 24,975 | 328 | 358 | 7 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 15,225 | 13,883 | 145 | 158 | (2) | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,399 | 9,002 | 88 | 86 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 8,810 | 8,723 | 96 | 117 | 3 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 77,436 | 74,857 | 854 | 872 | 27 | (9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans | $ | 217,976 | $ | 209,259 | $ | 2,167 | $ | 2,284 | $ | 72 | $ | (28) | ||||||||||||||
| Fully-insured loan portfolio | 11,694 | 12,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total residential mortgage loan portfolio | $ | 229,670 | $ | 221,963 |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Home Equity
At December 31, 2022, the home equity portfolio made up six percent of the consumer portfolio and was comprised of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), home equity loans and reverse mortgages. HELOCs generally have an initial draw period of 10
years, and after the initial draw period ends, the loans generally convert to 15- or 20-year amortizing loans. We no longer originate home equity loans or reverse mortgages.
At December 31, 2022, 82 percent of the home equity portfolio was in Consumer Banking, nine percent was in All Other and the remainder of the portfolio was primarily in GWIM.
61 Bank of America
Outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $1.4 billion in 2022 primarily due to paydowns outpacing draws on existing lines and new originations. Of the total home equity portfolio at December 31, 2022 and 2021, $11.1 billion and $12.2 billion, or 42 percent and 44 percent, were in first-lien positions. At December 31, 2022, outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio that were in a second-lien or more junior-
lien position and where we also held the first-lien loan totaled $4.5 billion, or 17 percent of our total home equity portfolio.
Unused HELOCs totaled $42.4 billion and $40.5 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The HELOC utilization rate was 38 percent and 39 percent at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Table 23 presents certain home equity portfolio key credit statistics.
| Table 23 | Home Equity – Key Credit Statistics (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 26,563 | $ | 27,935 | ||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 96 | 157 | ||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 510 | 630 | ||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | ||||||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 100 | — | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 2 | 3 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of the portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current which primarily consist of collateral-dependent TDRs, including those that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, junior-lien loans where the underlying first lien is 90 days or more past due, as well as loans that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a TDR.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $120 million to $510 million at December 31, 2022, primarily driven by loan sales. Of the nonperforming home equity loans at December 31, 2022, $275 million, or 54 percent, were current on contractual payments. In addition, $167 million, or 33 percent, of nonperforming home equity loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell. Accruing loans that were 30 days or more past due decreased $61 million in 2022.
Net recoveries decreased $29 million to $90 million in 2022 compared to 2021.
Of the $26.6 billion in total home equity portfolio outstandings at December 31, 2022, as shown in Table 23, 13 percent require interest-only payments. The outstanding balance of HELOCs that had reached the end of their draw period and entered the amortization period was $5.2 billion at December 31, 2022. The HELOCs that have entered the amortization period have experienced a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status when compared to the HELOC portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2022, $53 million, or one percent, of outstanding HELOCs that
had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more. In addition, at December 31, 2022, $354 million, or seven percent, were nonperforming.
For our interest-only HELOC portfolio, we do not actively track how many of our home equity customers pay only the minimum amount due on their home equity loans and lines; however, we can infer some of this information through a review of our HELOC portfolio that we service and is still in its revolving period. During 2022, 10 percent of these customers with an outstanding balance did not pay any principal on their HELOCs.
Table 24 presents outstandings, nonperforming balances and net recoveries by certain state concentrations for the home equity portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 12 percent and 13 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California made up 11 percent and 10 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 24 | Home Equity State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 7,406 | $ | 7,600 | $ | 119 | $ | 140 | $ | (20) | $ | (40) | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 2,743 | 2,977 | 63 | 78 | (21) | (21) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 2,047 | 2,259 | 53 | 69 | (3) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 1,806 | 2,072 | 80 | 96 | (4) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Massachusetts | 1,347 | 1,422 | 23 | 32 | (2) | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 11,214 | 11,605 | 172 | 215 | (40) | (50) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total home equity loan portfolio | $ | 26,563 | $ | 27,935 | $ | 510 | $ | 630 | $ | (90) | $ | (119) |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Credit Card
At December 31, 2022, 97 percent of the credit card portfolio was managed in Consumer Banking with the remainder in GWIM. Outstandings in the credit card portfolio increased $12.0 billion during 2022 to $93.4 billion primarily driven by increased purchase volumes, partially offset by the sale of a $1.6 billion affinity card loan portfolio. Net charge-offs decreased $389
million to $1.3 billion in 2022 compared to 2021, as loss rates remained near historic lows. In addition, the prior year included charge-offs associated with deferrals that expired in 2020. Credit card loans 30 days or more past due and still accruing interest increased $508 million, and 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest increased $230 million. Unused lines of credit for credit card increased to $370.1 billion
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 62 |
at December 31, 2022 from $361.2 billion at December 31, 2021.
Table 25 presents certain state concentrations for the credit card portfolio.
| Table 25 | Credit Card State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 15,363 | $ | 13,076 | $ | 126 | $ | 82 | $ | 232 | $ | 322 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 9,512 | 8,046 | 100 | 71 | 183 | 245 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 8,125 | 6,894 | 72 | 47 | 123 | 158 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 5,381 | 4,725 | 56 | 35 | 99 | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington | 4,844 | 4,080 | 21 | 13 | 36 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 50,196 | 44,617 | 342 | 239 | 661 | 824 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total credit card portfolio | $ | 93,421 | $ | 81,438 | $ | 717 | $ | 487 | $ | 1,334 | $ | 1,723 |
Direct/Indirect Consumer
At December 31, 2022, 49 percent of the direct/indirect portfolio was included in Consumer Banking (consumer auto and recreational vehicle lending) and 51 percent was included in GWIM (principally securities-based lending loans). Outstandings
in the direct/indirect portfolio increased $2.7 billion in 2022 to $106.2 billion driven by growth in our auto portfolio.
Table 26 presents certain state concentrations for the direct/indirect consumer loan portfolio.
| Table 26 | Direct/Indirect State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 15,516 | $ | 15,061 | $ | 1 | $ | 2 | $ | 6 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 13,783 | 13,352 | — | 1 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,837 | 9,505 | — | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 7,891 | 7,802 | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 4,456 | 4,228 | — | — | 1 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 54,753 | 53,612 | 1 | 5 | 2 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total direct/indirect loan portfolio | $ | 106,236 | $ | 103,560 | $ | 2 | $ | 11 | $ | 18 | $ | 1 |
Other Consumer
Other consumer primarily consists of deposit overdraft balances. Net charge-offs increased $251 million in 2022 to $521 million, primarily driven by overdraft losses due to higher payment activity related to checking accounts.
Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 27 presents nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2022 and 2021. During 2022, nonperforming consumer loans decreased $235 million to $2.8 billion primarily due to decreases from loan sales, partially offset by increases from loans whose prior-period deferrals expired and were modified in TDRs during the first quarter of 2022.
At December 31, 2022, $605 million, or 22 percent, of nonperforming loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to their estimated property value less costs to sell. In addition, at December 31, 2022, $1.7 billion, or 61 percent, of nonperforming consumer loans were modified and are now current after successful trial periods, or are current loans classified as nonperforming loans in accordance with applicable policies.
Foreclosed properties increased $20 million in 2022 to $121 million. Nonperforming loans also include certain loans that have been modified in TDRs where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.
63 Bank of America
| Table 27 | Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 2,989 | $ | 2,725 | ||||||
| Additions | 1,453 | 2,006 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns and payoffs | (535) | (625) | ||||||||
| Sales | (402) | (4) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (1) | (661) | (1,037) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (56) | (64) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | (34) | (12) | ||||||||
| Total net additions/(reductions) to nonperforming loans and leases | (235) | 264 | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 2,754 | 2,989 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 (2) | 121 | 101 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 | $ | 2,875 | $ | 3,090 | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (3) | 0.60 | % | 0.69 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties (3) | 0.63 | 0.71 |
(1)Consumer loans may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection.
(2)Foreclosed property balances do not include properties insured by certain government-guaranteed loans, principally FHA-insured, of $60 million and $52 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(3)Outstanding consumer loans and leases exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Table 28 presents TDRs for the consumer real estate portfolio. Performing TDR balances are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases in Table 27.
| Table 28 | Consumer Real Estate Troubled Debt Restructurings | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1, 2) | $ | 1,726 | $ | 1,548 | $ | 3,274 | $ | 1,498 | $ | 2,278 | $ | 3,776 | ||||||||||
| Home equity (3) | 324 | 544 | 868 | 254 | 652 | 906 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer real estate troubled debt restructurings | $ | 2,050 | $ | 2,092 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 1,752 | $ | 2,930 | $ | 4,682 |
(1)At December 31, 2022 and 2021, residential mortgage TDRs deemed collateral dependent totaled $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, and included $1.6 billion and $1.4 billion of loans classified as nonperforming and $183 million and $279 million of loans classified as performing.
(2)At December 31, 2022 and 2021, residential mortgage performing TDRs included $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion of loans that were fully-insured.
(3)At December 31, 2022 and 2021, home equity TDRs deemed collateral dependent totaled $411 million and $370 million, and included $293 million and $222 million of loans classified as nonperforming and $118 million and $148 million of loans classified as performing.
In addition to modifying consumer real estate loans, we work with customers who are experiencing financial difficulty by modifying credit card and other consumer loans. Credit card and other consumer loan modifications generally involve a reduction in the customer’s interest rate on the account and placing the customer on a fixed payment plan not exceeding 60 months.
Modifications of credit card and other consumer loans are made through programs utilizing direct customer contact, but may also utilize external programs. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, our credit card and other consumer TDR portfolio was $624 million and $672 million, of which $540 million and $599 million were current or less than 30 days past due under the modified terms.
Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the commercial portfolio begins with an assessment of the credit risk profile of the borrower or counterparty based on an analysis of its financial position. As part of the overall credit risk assessment, our commercial credit exposures are assigned a risk rating and are subject to approval based on defined credit approval standards. Subsequent to loan origination, risk ratings are monitored on an ongoing basis, and if necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in the financial condition, cash flow, risk profile or outlook of a borrower or counterparty. In making credit decisions, we consider risk rating, collateral, country, industry and single-name concentration limits while also balancing these considerations with the total borrower or counterparty relationship. We use a variety of tools to continuously monitor the ability of a borrower or counterparty to perform under its obligations. We use risk rating aggregations
to measure and evaluate concentrations within portfolios. In addition, risk ratings are a factor in determining the level of allocated capital and the allowance for credit losses.
As part of our ongoing risk mitigation initiatives, we attempt to work with clients experiencing financial difficulty to modify their loans to terms that better align with their current ability to pay. In situations where an economic concession has been granted to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, we identify these loans as TDRs. For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status and net charge-offs for the commercial portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management of Commercial Credit Risk Concentrations
Commercial credit risk is evaluated and managed with the goal that concentrations of credit exposure continue to be aligned with our risk appetite. We review, measure and manage concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product, geography, customer relationship and loan size. We also review, measure and manage commercial real estate loans by geographic location and property type. In addition, within our non-U.S. portfolio, we evaluate exposures by region and by country. Tables 33, 36 and 39 summarize our concentrations. We also utilize syndications of exposure to third parties, loan sales, hedging and other risk mitigation techniques to manage the size and risk profile of the commercial credit portfolio. For more information on our industry concentrations, see Table 36
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 64 |
and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Industry Concentrations on page 68.
We account for certain large corporate loans and loan commitments, including issued but unfunded letters of credit which are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes, that exceed our single-name credit risk concentration guidelines under the fair value option. Lending commitments, both funded and unfunded, are actively managed and monitored, and as appropriate, credit risk for these lending relationships may be mitigated through the use of credit derivatives, with our credit view and market perspectives determining the size and timing of the hedging activity. In addition, we purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain other credit exposures. To lessen the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, credit exposure may be added within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection. These credit derivatives do not meet the requirements for treatment as accounting hedges. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other income.
In addition, we are a member of various securities and derivative exchanges and clearinghouses, both in the U.S. and other countries. As a member, we may be required to pay a pro-rata share of the losses incurred by some of these organizations as a result of another member default and under other loss scenarios. For more information, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commercial Credit Portfolio
During 2022, commercial credit quality improved as charge-offs, nonperforming commercial loans and reservable criticized utilized exposure declined. Due to the ongoing Russia/Ukraine conflict, all direct exposure to Russian counterparties was downgraded and reported as reservable criticized exposure, and expected credit losses (ECL) have been incorporated into our estimate of the allowance for credit losses. Outstanding
commercial loans and leases increased $45.9 billion during 2022 due to growth in commercial and industrial, primarily in Global Banking. This increase was partially offset by lower U.S. small business commercial loans due to repayments of PPP loans by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the terms of the program.
Credit quality of commercial real estate borrowers generally improved from 2021 as pandemic-impacted sectors are recovering. However, many commercial real estate markets, while improving, are still experiencing disruptions in demand, supply chain challenges, tenant difficulties and challenging capital markets. Demand for office space continues to be uncertain as companies evaluate space needs with employment models that utilize a mix of remote and conventional office use.
The commercial allowance for loan and lease losses remained relatively unchanged at $5.4 billion at December 31, 2022, as loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic outlook were offset by asset quality improvement and a reserve release for reduced pandemic uncertainties. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
Total commercial utilized credit exposure increased $51.3 billion during 2022 to $704.9 billion primarily driven by higher loans and leases and derivative assets. The utilization rate for loans and leases, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and financial guarantees, and commercial letters of credit, in the aggregate, was 56 percent at both December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Table 29 presents commercial credit exposure by type for utilized, unfunded and total binding committed credit exposure. Commercial utilized credit exposure includes SBLCs and financial guarantees and commercial letters of credit that have been issued and for which we are legally bound to advance funds under prescribed conditions during a specified time period, and excludes exposure related to trading account assets. Although funds have not yet been advanced, these exposure types are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes.
| Table 29 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Type | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized (1) | Commercial Unfunded (2, 3, 4) | Total Commercial Committed | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | $ | 589,362 | $ | 543,420 | $ | 487,772 | $ | 454,256 | $ | 1,077,134 | $ | 997,676 | ||||||||||
| Derivative assets (5) | 48,642 | 35,344 | — | — | 48,642 | 35,344 | ||||||||||||||||
| Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees | 33,376 | 34,389 | 1,266 | 639 | 34,642 | 35,028 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities and other investments | 20,195 | 19,427 | 2,551 | 4,638 | 22,746 | 24,065 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans held-for-sale | 6,112 | 13,185 | 3,729 | 16,581 | 9,841 | 29,766 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | 5,509 | 5,935 | — | — | 5,509 | 5,935 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial letters of credit | 973 | 1,176 | 28 | 247 | 1,001 | 1,423 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 698 | 652 | — | — | 698 | 652 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 704,867 | $ | 653,528 | $ | 495,346 | $ | 476,361 | $ | 1,200,213 | $ | 1,129,889 |
(1)Commercial utilized exposure includes loans of $5.4 billion and $7.2 billion accounted for under the fair value option at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(2)Commercial unfunded exposure includes commitments accounted for under the fair value option with a notional amount of $3.0 billion and $4.8 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(3)Excludes unused business card lines, which are not legally binding.
(4)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.4 billion and $10.7 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(5)Derivative assets are carried at fair value, reflect the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and have been reduced by cash collateral of $33.8 billion and $30.8 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021. Not reflected in utilized and committed exposure is additional non-cash derivative collateral held of $51.6 billion and $44.8 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021, which consists primarily of other marketable securities.
65 Bank of America
Nonperforming commercial loans decreased $524 million across all product types. Table 30 presents our commercial loans and leases portfolio and related credit quality information at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 30 | Commercial Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 358,481 | $ | 325,936 | $ | 553 | $ | 825 | $ | 190 | $ | 171 | ||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 124,479 | 113,266 | 212 | 268 | 25 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 482,960 | 439,202 | 765 | 1,093 | 215 | 190 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 69,766 | 63,009 | 271 | 382 | 46 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 13,644 | 14,825 | 4 | 80 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| 566,370 | 517,036 | 1,040 | 1,555 | 269 | 238 | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial (1) | 17,560 | 19,183 | 14 | 23 | 355 | 87 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 583,930 | $ | 536,219 | $ | 1,054 | $ | 1,578 | $ | 624 | $ | 325 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (2) | 5,432 | 7,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans and leases | $ | 589,362 | $ | 543,420 |
(1)Includes card-related products.
(2)Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option includes U.S. commercial of $2.9 billion and $4.6 billion and non-U.S. commercial of $2.5 billion and $2.6 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021. For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 31 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for our commercial loans and leases for 2022 and 2021.
| Table 31 | Commercial Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 71 | $ | (23) | 0.02 | % | (0.01 | %) | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 21 | 35 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 92 | 12 | 0.02 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 66 | 34 | 0.10 | 0.06 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 5 | (1) | 0.03 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| 163 | 45 | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 154 | 351 | 0.86 | 1.19 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | $ | 317 | $ | 396 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Table 32 presents commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure by loan type. Criticized exposure corresponds to the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful asset categories as defined by regulatory authorities. Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $3.1 billion during 2022, which was broad-based across industries. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, 88 percent and 87 percent of commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure was secured.
| Table 32 | Commercial Reservable Criticized Utilized Exposure (1, 2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 10,724 | 2.78 | % | $ | 11,327 | 3.20 | % | |||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 2,665 | 2.04 | 2,582 | 2.17 | |||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 13,389 | 2.59 | 13,909 | 2.94 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 5,201 | 7.30 | 7,572 | 11.72 | |||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 240 | 1.76 | 387 | 2.61 | |||||||||
| 18,830 | 3.13 | 21,868 | 3.96 | ||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 444 | 2.53 | 513 | 2.67 | |||||||||
| Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure | $ | 19,274 | 3.12 | $ | 22,381 | 3.91 |
(1)Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure includes loans and leases of $18.5 billion and $21.2 billion and commercial letters of credit of $817 million and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(2)Percentages are calculated as commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure divided by total commercial reservable utilized exposure for each exposure category.
Commercial and Industrial
Commercial and industrial loans include U.S. commercial and non-U.S. commercial portfolios.
U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2022, 63 percent of the U.S. commercial loan
portfolio, excluding small business, was managed in Global Banking, 21 percent in Global Markets, 15 percent in GWIM (loans that provide financing for asset purchases, business investments and other liquidity needs for high net worth clients) and the remainder primarily in Consumer Banking. U.S. commercial loans increased $32.5 billion, or 10 percent, during
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 66 |
2022 primarily driven by Global Banking. Reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $603 million, or five percent, driven by decreases across a broad range of industries.
Non-U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2022, 64 percent of the non-U.S. commercial loan portfolio was managed in Global Banking, 35 percent in Global Markets and the remainder in GWIM. Non-U.S. commercial loans increased $11.2 billion, or 10 percent, during 2022 due to loan growth in Global Markets. Reservable criticized utilized exposure increased $83 million, or three percent, due to downgrades for direct exposure to Russian counterparties. For information on the non-U.S. commercial portfolio, see Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 70. For more information on the Russia/Ukraine conflict, see Recent Developments on page 27.
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial real estate primarily includes commercial loans secured by non-owner-occupied real estate and is dependent on the sale or lease of the real estate as the primary source of repayment. Outstanding loans increased $6.8 billion, or 11 percent, during 2022 to $69.8 billion due to new originations outpacing paydowns and increased utilizations under existing
credit facilities. Reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $2.4 billion, or 31 percent, primarily driven by Hotels due to improving vacancy rates and reduced travel restrictions. The portfolio remains diversified across property types and geographic regions. California represented the largest state concentration at 19 percent and 21 percent of the commercial real estate portfolio at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The commercial real estate portfolio is predominantly managed in Global Banking and consists of loans made primarily to public and private developers, and commercial real estate firms.
During 2022, we continued to see low default rates and varying degrees of improvement in certain geographic regions and property types of the portfolio. We use a number of proactive risk mitigation initiatives to reduce adversely rated exposure in the commercial real estate portfolio, including transfers of deteriorating exposures for management by independent special asset officers and the pursuit of loan restructurings or asset sales to achieve the best results for our customers and the Corporation.
Table 33 presents outstanding commercial real estate loans by geographic region, based on the geographic location of the collateral, and by property type.
| Table 33 | Outstanding Commercial Real Estate Loans | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
| By Geographic Region | ||||||
| Northeast | $ | 15,601 | $ | 14,318 | ||
| California | 13,360 | 13,145 | ||||
| Southwest | 8,723 | 7,510 | ||||
| Southeast | 7,713 | 6,758 | ||||
| Florida | 5,374 | 4,367 | ||||
| Midwest | 3,419 | 3,221 | ||||
| Illinois | 3,327 | 2,878 | ||||
| Midsouth | 2,716 | 2,289 | ||||
| Northwest | 1,959 | 1,709 | ||||
| Non-U.S. | 5,518 | 4,760 | ||||
| Other | 2,056 | 2,054 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 69,766 | $ | 63,009 | ||
| By Property Type | ||||||
| Non-residential | ||||||
| Office | $ | 18,230 | $ | 18,309 | ||
| Industrial / Warehouse | 13,775 | 10,749 | ||||
| Multi-family rental | 10,412 | 8,173 | ||||
| Shopping centers /Retail | 5,830 | 6,502 | ||||
| Hotel / Motels | 5,696 | 5,932 | ||||
| Unsecured | 3,195 | 3,178 | ||||
| Multi-use | 2,403 | 1,835 | ||||
| Other | 9,046 | 7,238 | ||||
| Total non-residential | 68,587 | 61,916 | ||||
| Residential | 1,179 | 1,093 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 69,766 | $ | 63,009 |
U.S. Small Business Commercial
The U.S. small business commercial loan portfolio is comprised of small business card loans and small business loans primarily managed in Consumer Banking, and included $1.0 billion and $4.7 billion of PPP loans outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The decline of $3.7 billion in PPP loans during 2022 was primarily due to repayment of the loans by the SBA under
the terms of the program. Excluding PPP, credit card-related products were 53 percent and 50 percent of the U.S. small business commercial portfolio at December 31, 2022 and 2021 and represented all of the net charge-offs in 2022 compared to 95 percent in 2021. The increase of $268 million in accruing past due 90 days or more in 2022 was driven by PPP loans, which are fully guaranteed by the SBA.
67 Bank of America
Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 34 presents the nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2022 and 2021. Nonperforming loans do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. During 2022, nonperforming commercial loans and leases decreased $524 million to $1.1 billion. At
December 31, 2022, 97 percent of commercial nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties were secured, and 65 percent were contractually current. Commercial nonperforming loans were carried at 85 percent of their unpaid principal balance, as the carrying value of these loans has been reduced to the estimated collateral value less costs to sell.
| Table 34 | Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity (1, 2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 1,578 | $ | 2,227 | ||||||
| Additions | 952 | 1,622 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns | (825) | (1,163) | ||||||||
| Sales | (57) | (199) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (3) | (334) | (264) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (221) | (254) | ||||||||
| Transfers to loans held-for-sale | (39) | (391) | ||||||||
| Total net reductions to nonperforming loans and leases | (524) | (649) | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 1,054 | 1,578 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 49 | 29 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 | $ | 1,103 | $ | 1,607 | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans and leases (4) | 0.18 | % | 0.29 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 0.19 | 0.30 |
(1)Balances do not include nonperforming loans held-for-sale of $219 million and $264 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial activity. Small business card loans are excluded as they are not classified as nonperforming.
(3)Commercial loans and leases may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection. TDRs are generally classified as performing after a sustained period of demonstrated payment performance.
(4)Outstanding commercial loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Table 35 presents our commercial TDRs by product type and performing status. U.S. small business commercial TDRs are comprised of renegotiated small business card loans and small business loans. The renegotiated small business card loans are not classified as nonperforming as they are charged off no later
than the end of the month in which the loan becomes 180 days past due. Commercial TDRs increased $957 million, or 50 percent, during 2022 primarily due to commercial real estate loans that were modified as TDRs during the first half of the year.
| Table 35 | Commercial Troubled Debt Restructurings | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 305 | $ | 985 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 359 | $ | 685 | $ | 1,044 | ||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 69 | 238 | 307 | 72 | 8 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 374 | 1,223 | 1,597 | 431 | 693 | 1,124 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 59 | 1,131 | 1,190 | 244 | 437 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 3 | 16 | 19 | 50 | 7 | 57 | ||||||||||||||||
| 436 | 2,370 | 2,806 | 725 | 1,137 | 1,862 | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | — | 51 | 51 | — | 38 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial troubled debt restructurings | $ | 436 | $ | 2,421 | $ | 2,857 | $ | 725 | $ | 1,175 | $ | 1,900 |
Industry Concentrations
Table 36 presents commercial committed and utilized credit exposure by industry. Our commercial credit exposure is diversified across a broad range of industries. Total commercial committed exposure increased $70.3 billion, or six percent, during 2022 to $1.2 trillion. The increase in commercial committed exposure was concentrated in Asset managers and funds, Global commercial banks and Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology.
Industry limits are used internally to manage industry concentrations and are based on committed exposure that is determined on an industry-by-industry basis. A risk management framework is in place to set and approve industry limits as well as to provide ongoing monitoring.
Asset managers and funds, our largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $165.1 billion,
increased $28.2 billion, or 21 percent, during 2022 primarily driven by investment-grade exposures.
Real estate, our second largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $99.7 billion, increased $3.5 billion, or four percent, during 2022. For more information on the commercial real estate and related portfolios, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Commercial Real Estate on page 67.
Capital goods, our third largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $87.3 billion, increased $3.0 billion, or four percent, during 2022. The increase in committed exposure occurred primarily as a result of increases in the Electrical equipment and Trading companies and distributors, partially offset by a decrease in Building products.
While the U.S. and global economies have shown signs of relief from the pandemic, uncertainty remains as a result of
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 68 |
geopolitical and inflationary pressures, and a number of industries will likely continue to be adversely impacted due to these conditions. We continue to monitor all industries,
particularly higher risk industries that are experiencing or could experience a more significant impact to their financial condition.
| Table 36 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Industry (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized | Total Commercial Committed (2) | |||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Asset managers & funds | $ | 106,842 | $ | 89,786 | $ | 165,087 | $ | 136,914 | ||||||
| Real estate (3) | 72,180 | 69,384 | 99,722 | 96,202 | ||||||||||
| Capital goods | 45,580 | 42,784 | 87,314 | 84,293 | ||||||||||
| Finance companies | 55,248 | 59,327 | 79,546 | 86,009 | ||||||||||
| Healthcare equipment and services | 33,554 | 32,003 | 58,761 | 58,195 | ||||||||||
| Materials | 26,304 | 25,133 | 55,589 | 53,652 | ||||||||||
| Retailing | 24,785 | 24,514 | 53,714 | 50,816 | ||||||||||
| Government & public education | 34,861 | 37,597 | 48,134 | 50,066 | ||||||||||
| Food, beverage and tobacco | 23,232 | 21,584 | 47,486 | 45,419 | ||||||||||
| Consumer services | 26,980 | 28,172 | 47,372 | 48,052 | ||||||||||
| Individuals and trusts | 34,897 | 29,752 | 45,572 | 39,869 | ||||||||||
| Commercial services and supplies | 23,628 | 22,390 | 41,596 | 42,451 | ||||||||||
| Utilities | 20,292 | 17,082 | 40,164 | 36,855 | ||||||||||
| Energy | 15,132 | 14,217 | 36,043 | 34,136 | ||||||||||
| Transportation | 22,273 | 21,079 | 33,858 | 32,015 | ||||||||||
| Technology hardware and equipment | 11,441 | 10,159 | 29,825 | 26,910 | ||||||||||
| Global commercial banks | 27,217 | 20,062 | 29,293 | 21,390 | ||||||||||
| Media | 14,781 | 12,495 | 28,216 | 26,318 | ||||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology | 7,547 | 5,608 | 26,208 | 19,439 | ||||||||||
| Software and services | 12,961 | 10,663 | 25,633 | 27,643 | ||||||||||
| Consumer durables and apparel | 10,009 | 9,740 | 21,389 | 21,226 | ||||||||||
| Vehicle dealers | 12,909 | 11,030 | 20,638 | 15,678 | ||||||||||
| Insurance | 10,224 | 5,743 | 19,444 | 14,323 | ||||||||||
| Telecommunication services | 9,679 | 10,056 | 17,349 | 21,270 | ||||||||||
| Automobiles and components | 8,774 | 9,236 | 16,911 | 17,052 | ||||||||||
| Food and staples retailing | 7,157 | 6,902 | 11,908 | 12,226 | ||||||||||
| Financial markets infrastructure (clearinghouses) | 3,913 | 3,876 | 8,752 | 6,076 | ||||||||||
| Religious and social organizations | 2,467 | 3,154 | 4,689 | 5,394 | ||||||||||
| Total commercial credit exposure by industry | $ | 704,867 | $ | 653,528 | $ | 1,200,213 | $ | 1,129,889 |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial exposure.
(2)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments, net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.4 billion and $10.7 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(3)Industries are viewed from a variety of perspectives to best isolate the perceived risks. For purposes of this table, the real estate industry is defined based on the primary business activity of the borrowers or counterparties using operating cash flows and primary source of repayment as key factors.
Risk Mitigation
We purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain credit exposures. To lower the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, we may add credit exposure within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection.
At December 31, 2022 and 2021, net notional credit default protection purchased in our credit derivatives portfolio to hedge our funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, was $9.0 billion and $2.6 billion. We recorded net losses of $37 million in 2022 compared to net losses $91 million in 2021. The gains and losses on these instruments were largely offset by gains and losses on the related exposures. The Value-at-Risk (VaR) results for these exposures are included in the fair value option portfolio information in Table 43. For more information, see Trading Risk Management on page 76.
Tables 37 and 38 present the maturity profiles and the credit exposure debt ratings of the net credit default protection portfolio at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 37 | Net Credit Default Protection by Maturity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||
| Less than or equal to one year | 14 | % | 34 | % | |
| Greater than one year and less than or equal to five years | 85 | 62 | |||
| Greater than five years | 1 | 4 | |||
| Total net credit default protection | 100 | % | 100 | % |
69 Bank of America
| Table 38 | Net Credit Default Protection by Credit Exposure Debt Rating | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | ||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||
| Ratings (2, 3) | |||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | (379) | 4.0 | % | $ | — | — | % | |||||
| AA | (867) | 10.0 | — | — | |||||||||
| A | (3,257) | 36.0 | (350) | 13.4 | |||||||||
| BBB | (2,476) | 28.0 | (710) | 27.1 | |||||||||
| BB | (1,049) | 12.0 | (809) | 30.9 | |||||||||
| B | (676) | 7.0 | (659) | 25.2 | |||||||||
| CCC and below | (93) | 1.0 | (35) | 1.3 | |||||||||
| NR (4) | (182) | 2.0 | (55) | 2.1 | |||||||||
| Total net credit default protection | $ | (8,979) | 100.0 | % | $ | (2,618) | 100.0 | % |
(1)Represents net credit default protection purchased.
(2)Ratings are refreshed on a quarterly basis.
(3)Ratings of BBB- or higher are considered to meet the definition of investment grade.
(4)NR is comprised of index positions held and any names that have not been rated.
In addition to our net notional credit default protection purchased to cover the funded and unfunded portion of certain credit exposures, credit derivatives are used for market-making activities for clients and establishing positions intended to profit from directional or relative value changes. We execute the majority of our credit derivative trades in the OTC market with large, multinational financial institutions, including broker-dealers and, to a lesser degree, with a variety of other investors. Because these transactions are executed in the OTC market, we are subject to settlement risk. We are also subject to credit risk in the event that these counterparties fail to perform under the terms of these contracts. In order to properly reflect counterparty credit risk, we record counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments on certain derivative assets, including our purchased credit default protection. In most cases, credit derivative transactions are executed on a daily margin basis. Therefore, events such as a credit downgrade, depending on the ultimate rating level, or a breach of credit covenants would typically require an increase in the amount of collateral required by the counterparty, where applicable, and/or allow us to take additional protective measures such as early termination of all
trades. For more information on credit derivatives and counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-U.S. Portfolio
Our non-U.S. credit and trading portfolios are subject to country risk. We define country risk as the risk of loss from unfavorable economic and political conditions, currency fluctuations, social instability and changes in government policies. A risk management framework is in place to measure, monitor and manage non-U.S. risk and exposures. In addition to the direct risk of doing business in a country, we also are exposed to indirect country risks (e.g., related to the collateral received on secured financing transactions or related to client clearing activities). These indirect exposures are managed in the normal course of business through credit, market and operational risk governance rather than through country risk governance.
Table 39 presents our 20 largest non-U.S. country exposures at December 31, 2022. These exposures accounted for 89 percent of our total non-U.S. exposure at both December 31, 2022 and 2021. Net country exposure for these 20 countries increased $24.0 billion in 2022 primarily driven by increases in Germany, Japan, Ireland, India and Switzerland, partially offset by decreases in China, Belgium, Australia and Singapore.
Non-U.S. exposure is presented on an internal risk management basis and includes sovereign and non-sovereign credit exposure, securities and other investments issued by or domiciled in countries other than the U.S.
Funded loans and loan equivalents include loans, leases, and other extensions of credit and funds, including letters of credit and due from placements. Unfunded commitments are the undrawn portion of legally binding commitments related to loans and loan equivalents. Net counterparty exposure includes the fair value of derivatives, including the counterparty risk associated with credit default swaps (CDS), and secured financing transactions. Securities and other investments are carried at fair value and long securities exposures are netted against short exposures with the same underlying issuer to, but not below, zero. Net country exposure represents country exposure less hedges and credit default protection purchased, net of credit default protection sold.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 70 |
| Table 39 | Top 20 Non-U.S. Countries Exposure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | Funded Loans and Loan Equivalents | Unfunded Loan Commitments | Net Counterparty Exposure | Securities/ Other Investments | Country Exposure at December 31 2022 | Hedges and Credit Default Protection | Net Country Exposure at December 31 2022 | Increase (Decrease) from December 31 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Kingdom | $ | 29,965 | $ | 16,601 | $ | 7,243 | $ | 2,570 | $ | 56,379 | $ | (1,034) | $ | 55,345 | $ | 376 | ||||||||||||||
| Germany | 32,248 | 9,431 | 2,190 | 2,742 | 46,611 | (885) | 45,726 | 11,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| France | 13,888 | 8,064 | 2,023 | 3,604 | 27,579 | (986) | 26,593 | 1,686 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 10,992 | 10,094 | 1,472 | 3,383 | 25,941 | (368) | 25,573 | (738) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Japan | 19,239 | 1,806 | 1,366 | 1,502 | 23,913 | (826) | 23,087 | 5,825 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Australia | 14,412 | 4,013 | 568 | 1,510 | 20,503 | (286) | 20,217 | (1,087) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | 6,175 | 1,413 | 741 | 4,199 | 12,528 | (28) | 12,500 | (250) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| China | 6,489 | 294 | 1,378 | 2,932 | 11,093 | (285) | 10,808 | (1,774) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| India | 6,805 | 589 | 614 | 2,841 | 10,849 | (80) | 10,769 | 2,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Switzerland | 7,039 | 3,063 | 469 | 438 | 11,009 | (321) | 10,688 | 2,113 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Singapore | 4,017 | 627 | 126 | 4,874 | 9,644 | (37) | 9,607 | (1,058) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | 3,169 | 4,892 | 617 | 1,402 | 10,080 | (797) | 9,283 | (313) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Korea | 6,103 | 927 | 504 | 1,664 | 9,198 | (72) | 9,126 | 974 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ireland | 7,678 | 1,157 | 151 | 230 | 9,216 | (126) | 9,090 | 3,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | 4,444 | 1,753 | 514 | 743 | 7,454 | (62) | 7,392 | 930 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | 5,123 | 523 | 466 | 1,181 | 7,293 | (22) | 7,271 | (56) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Spain | 2,433 | 2,170 | 398 | 1,067 | 6,068 | (227) | 5,841 | (79) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Italy | 3,883 | 1,777 | 184 | 426 | 6,270 | (602) | 5,668 | 464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Saudi Arabia | 2,428 | 1,465 | 219 | 15 | 4,127 | (109) | 4,018 | 545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Belgium | 1,433 | 1,489 | 184 | 910 | 4,016 | (153) | 3,863 | (1,168) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total top 20 non-U.S. countries exposure | $ | 187,963 | $ | 72,148 | $ | 21,427 | $ | 38,233 | $ | 319,771 | $ | (7,306) | $ | 312,465 | $ | 23,980 |
Our largest non-U.S. country exposure at December 31, 2022 was the United Kingdom with net exposure of $55.3 billion, which represents an increase of $376 million from December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily driven by net counterparty exposure with financial institutions, partially offset by a reduction in deposits with the central bank. Our second largest non-U.S. country exposure was Germany with net exposure of $45.7 billion at December 31, 2022, an increase of $11.9 billion from December 31, 2021. The increase was driven by higher deposits with the central bank and increased exposure with financial institutions and corporates.
Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities
Table 40 disaggregates total outstanding loans and leases by remaining scheduled principal due dates and interest rates. The amounts provided do not reflect prepayment assumptions or hedging activities related to the loan portfolio. For information on the asset sensitivity of our total banking book balance sheet, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
71 Bank of America
| Table 40 | Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Due in One Year or Less | Due After One Year Through Five Years | Due After Five Years Through 15 Years | Due After 15 Years | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 5,660 | $ | 32,546 | $ | 94,544 | $ | 96,991 | $ | 229,741 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 251 | 1,195 | 5,076 | 20,309 | 26,831 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 93,421 | — | — | — | 93,421 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 65,877 | 35,066 | 4,464 | 829 | 106,236 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 156 | — | — | — | 156 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 165,365 | 68,807 | 104,084 | 118,129 | 456,385 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 97,153 | 242,313 | 20,343 | 1,584 | 361,393 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 49,662 | 52,826 | 22,436 | 2,075 | 126,999 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 19,199 | 48,051 | 1,650 | 866 | 69,766 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 2,737 | 8,214 | 1,026 | 1,667 | 13,644 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 10,615 | 4,474 | 2,407 | 64 | 17,560 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 179,366 | 355,878 | 47,862 | 6,256 | 589,362 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 344,731 | $ | 424,685 | $ | 151,946 | $ | 124,385 | $ | 1,045,747 | ||||||||
| Amount due in one year or less at: | Amount due after one year at: | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 1,007 | $ | 4,653 | $ | 83,441 | $ | 140,640 | $ | 229,741 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 203 | 48 | 22,438 | 4,142 | 26,831 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 88,113 | 5,308 | — | — | 93,421 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 47,240 | 18,637 | 2,857 | 37,502 | 106,236 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | — | 156 | — | — | 156 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 136,563 | 28,802 | 108,736 | 182,284 | 456,385 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 73,593 | 23,560 | 223,099 | 41,141 | 361,393 | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 42,692 | 6,970 | 75,355 | 1,982 | 126,999 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 18,361 | 838 | 49,247 | 1,320 | 69,766 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 229 | 2,508 | 3,696 | 7,211 | 13,644 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 6,363 | 4,252 | 109 | 6,836 | 17,560 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 141,238 | 38,128 | 351,506 | 58,490 | 589,362 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 277,801 | $ | 66,930 | $ | 460,242 | $ | 240,774 | $ | 1,045,747 |
(1)Includes loans accounted for under the fair value option.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 72 |
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses increased $379 million from December 31, 2021 to $14.2 billion at December 31, 2022, which included a $202 million reserve increase related to the consumer portfolio and a $177 million reserve increase related to the commercial portfolio. The increase in the allowance was
primarily driven by loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic outlook, partially offset by a reserve release for reduced pandemic uncertainties.
Table 41 presents an allocation of the allowance for credit losses by product type at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 41 | Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses by Product Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 328 | 2.59 | % | 0.14 | % | $ | 351 | 2.83 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | 92 | 0.73 | 0.35 | 206 | 1.66 | 0.74 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 6,136 | 48.38 | 6.57 | 5,907 | 47.70 | 7.25 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 585 | 4.61 | 0.55 | 523 | 4.22 | 0.51 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 96 | 0.76 | n/m | 46 | 0.37 | n/m | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 7,237 | 57.07 | 1.59 | 7,033 | 56.78 | 1.62 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 3,007 | 23.71 | 0.80 | 3,019 | 24.37 | 0.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 1,194 | 9.41 | 0.96 | 975 | 7.87 | 0.86 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 1,192 | 9.40 | 1.71 | 1,292 | 10.43 | 2.05 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 52 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 68 | 0.55 | 0.46 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 5,445 | 42.93 | 0.93 | 5,354 | 43.22 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | 12,682 | 100.00 | % | 1.22 | 12,387 | 100.00 | % | 1.28 | |||||||||||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments | 1,540 | 1,456 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 14,222 | $ | 13,843 |
(1)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes allowance for loan and lease losses for U.S. small business commercial loans of $844 million and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
n/m = not meaningful
Net charge-offs for both 2022 and 2021 were $2.2 billion as credit card losses, which remained near historic lows, were partially offset by higher overdrafts charged off in other consumer due to payment activity related to checking accounts. The provision for credit losses increased $7.1 billion to an expense of $2.5 billion during 2022 compared to 2021. The provision for credit losses in 2022 was primarily driven by loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic outlook, partially offset by a reserve release for reduced pandemic uncertainties. The provision for credit losses for the consumer portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, increased $3.2 billion to an expense of $2.0 billion during 2022 compared to 2021. The
provision for credit losses for the commercial portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, increased $3.9 billion to an expense of $495 million for 2022 compared to 2021.
Table 42 presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses, including certain loan and allowance ratios for 2022 and 2021. For more information on the Corporation’s credit loss accounting policies and activity related to the allowance for credit losses, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
73 Bank of America
| Table 42 | Allowance for Credit Losses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, January 1 | $ | 12,387 | $ | 18,802 | ||||||
| Loans and leases charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (161) | (34) | ||||||||
| Home equity | (45) | (44) | ||||||||
| Credit card | (1,985) | (2,411) | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | (232) | (297) | ||||||||
| Other consumer | (538) | (292) | ||||||||
| Total consumer charge-offs | (2,961) | (3,078) | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (1) | (354) | (626) | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | (41) | (47) | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (75) | (46) | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | (8) | — | ||||||||
| Total commercial charge-offs | (478) | (719) | ||||||||
| Total loans and leases charged off | (3,439) | (3,797) | ||||||||
| Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 89 | 62 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 135 | 163 | ||||||||
| Credit card | 651 | 688 | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 214 | 296 | ||||||||
| Other consumer | 17 | 22 | ||||||||
| Total consumer recoveries | 1,106 | 1,231 | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 129 | 298 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 20 | 12 | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 9 | 12 | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 3 | 1 | ||||||||
| Total commercial recoveries | 161 | 323 | ||||||||
| Total recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | 1,267 | 1,554 | ||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (2,172) | (2,243) | ||||||||
| Provision for loan and lease losses | 2,460 | (4,173) | ||||||||
| Other | 7 | 1 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, December 31 | 12,682 | 12,387 | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, January 1 | 1,456 | 1,878 | ||||||||
| Provision for unfunded lending commitments | 83 | (421) | ||||||||
| Other | 1 | (1) | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, December 31 | 1,540 | 1,456 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses, December 31 | $ | 14,222 | $ | 13,843 | ||||||
| Loan and allowance ratios (3) : | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | $ | 1,039,976 | $ | 971,305 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.22 | % | 1.28 | % | ||||||
| Consumer allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total consumer loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.59 | 1.62 | ||||||||
| Commercial allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total commercial loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 0.93 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| Average loans and leases outstanding | $ | 1,010,799 | $ | 913,354 | ||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding | 0.21 | % | 0.25 | % | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 | 333 | 271 | ||||||||
| Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31 to net charge-offs | 5.84 | 5.52 | ||||||||
| Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | $ | 6,998 | $ | 7,027 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | 149 | % | 117 | % |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial charge-offs of $203 million in 2022 compared to $425 million in 2021.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial recoveries of $49 million in 2022 compared to $74 million in 2021.
(3)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(4)Primarily includes amounts related to credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 74 |
Market Risk Management
Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions may adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities, or otherwise negatively impact earnings. This risk is inherent in the financial instruments associated with our operations, primarily within our Global Markets segment. We are also exposed to these risks in other areas of the Corporation (e.g., our ALM activities). In the event of market stress, these risks could have a material impact on our results. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
Our traditional banking loan and deposit products are non-trading positions and are generally reported at amortized cost for assets or the amount owed for liabilities (historical cost). However, these positions are still subject to changes in economic value based on varying market conditions, with one of the primary risks being changes in the levels of interest rates. The risk of adverse changes in the economic value of our non-trading positions arising from changes in interest rates is managed through our ALM activities. We have elected to account for certain assets and liabilities under the fair value option.
Our trading positions are reported at fair value with changes reflected in income. Trading positions are subject to various changes in market-based risk factors. The majority of this risk is generated by our activities in the interest rate, foreign exchange, credit, equity and commodities markets. In addition, the values of assets and liabilities could change due to market liquidity, correlations across markets and expectations of market volatility. We seek to manage these risk exposures by using a variety of techniques that encompass a broad range of financial instruments. The key risk management techniques are discussed in more detail in the Trading Risk Management section.
GRM is responsible for providing senior management with a clear and comprehensive understanding of the trading risks to which we are exposed. These responsibilities include ownership of market risk policy, developing and maintaining quantitative risk models, calculating aggregated risk measures, establishing and monitoring position limits consistent with risk appetite, conducting daily reviews and analysis of trading inventory, approving material risk exposures and fulfilling regulatory requirements. Market risks that impact businesses outside of Global Markets are monitored and governed by their respective governance functions.
Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. Given that models are used across the Corporation, model risk impacts all risk types including credit, market and operational risks. The Enterprise Model Risk Policy defines model risk standards, consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite, prevailing regulatory guidance and industry best practice. All models, including risk management, valuation and regulatory capital models, must meet certain validation criteria, including effective challenge of the conceptual soundness of the model, independent model testing and ongoing monitoring through outcomes analysis and benchmarking. The Enterprise Model Risk Committee, a subcommittee of the MRC, oversees that model standards are consistent with model risk requirements and monitors the effective challenge in the model validation process across the Corporation.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents exposures to instruments whose values vary with the level or volatility of interest rates. These instruments include, but are not limited to, loans, debt
securities, certain trading-related assets and liabilities, deposits, borrowings and derivatives. Hedging instruments used to mitigate these risks include derivatives such as options, futures, forwards and swaps.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange risk represents exposures to changes in the values of current holdings and future cash flows denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The types of instruments exposed to this risk include investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign currency-denominated loans and securities, future cash flows in foreign currencies arising from foreign exchange transactions, foreign currency-denominated debt and various foreign exchange derivatives whose values fluctuate with changes in the level or volatility of currency exchange rates or non-U.S. interest rates. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include foreign exchange options, currency swaps, futures, forwards, and foreign currency-denominated debt and deposits.
Mortgage Risk
Mortgage risk represents exposures to changes in the values of mortgage-related instruments. The values of these instruments are sensitive to prepayment rates, mortgage rates, agency debt ratings, default, market liquidity, government participation and interest rate volatility. Our exposure to these instruments takes several forms. For example, we trade and engage in market-making activities in a variety of mortgage securities including whole loans, pass-through certificates, commercial mortgages and collateralized mortgage obligations including collateralized debt obligations using mortgages as underlying collateral. In addition, we originate a variety of MBS, which involves the accumulation of mortgage-related loans in anticipation of eventual securitization, and we may hold positions in mortgage securities and residential mortgage loans as part of the ALM portfolio. We also record MSRs as part of our mortgage origination activities. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include derivatives such as options, swaps, futures and forwards as well as securities including MBS and U.S. Treasury securities. For more information, see Mortgage Banking Risk Management on page 80.
Equity Market Risk
Equity market risk represents exposures to securities that represent an ownership interest in a corporation in the form of domestic and foreign common stock or other equity-linked instruments. Instruments that would lead to this exposure include, but are not limited to, the following: common stock, exchange-traded funds, American Depositary Receipts, convertible bonds, listed equity options (puts and calls), OTC equity options, equity total return swaps, equity index futures and other equity derivative products. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include options, futures, swaps, convertible bonds and cash positions.
Commodity Risk
Commodity risk represents exposures to instruments traded in the petroleum, natural gas, power and metals markets. These instruments consist primarily of futures, forwards, swaps and options. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include options, futures and swaps in the same or similar commodity product, as well as cash positions.
75 Bank of America
Issuer Credit Risk
Issuer credit risk represents exposures to changes in the creditworthiness of individual issuers or groups of issuers. Our portfolio is exposed to issuer credit risk where the value of an asset may be adversely impacted by changes in the levels of credit spreads, by credit migration or by defaults. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include bonds, CDS and other credit fixed-income instruments.
Market Liquidity Risk
Market liquidity risk represents the risk that the level of expected market activity changes dramatically and, in certain cases, may even cease. This exposes us to the risk that we will not be able to transact business and execute trades in an orderly manner which may impact our results. This impact could be further exacerbated if expected hedging or pricing correlations are compromised by disproportionate demand or lack of demand for certain instruments. We utilize various risk mitigating techniques as discussed in more detail in Trading Risk Management.
Trading Risk Management
To evaluate risks in our trading activities, we focus on the actual and potential volatility of revenues generated by individual positions as well as portfolios of positions. Various techniques and procedures are utilized to enable the most complete understanding of these risks. Quantitative measures of market risk are evaluated on a daily basis from a single position to the portfolio of the Corporation. These measures include sensitivities of positions to various market risk factors, such as the potential impact on revenue from a one basis point change in interest rates, and statistical measures utilizing both actual and hypothetical market moves, such as VaR and stress testing. Periods of extreme market stress influence the reliability of these techniques to varying degrees. Qualitative evaluations of market risk utilize the suite of quantitative risk measures while understanding each of their respective limitations. Additionally, risk managers independently evaluate the risk of the portfolios under the current market environment and potential future environments.
VaR is a common statistic used to measure market risk as it allows the aggregation of market risk factors, including the effects of portfolio diversification. A VaR model simulates the value of a portfolio under a range of scenarios in order to generate a distribution of potential gains and losses. VaR represents the loss a portfolio is not expected to exceed more than a certain number of times per period, based on a specified holding period, confidence level and window of historical data. We use one VaR model consistently across the trading portfolios and it uses a historical simulation approach based on a three-year window of historical data. Our primary VaR statistic is equivalent to a 99 percent confidence level, which means that for a VaR with a one-day holding period, there should not be losses in excess of VaR, on average, 99 out of 100 trading days.
Within any VaR model, there are significant and numerous assumptions that will differ from company to company. The accuracy of a VaR model depends on the availability and quality of historical data for each of the risk factors in the portfolio. A VaR model may require additional modeling assumptions for new products that do not have the necessary historical market data or for less liquid positions for which accurate daily prices are not consistently available. For positions with insufficient historical data for the VaR calculation, the process for establishing an appropriate proxy is based on fundamental and
statistical analysis of the new product or less liquid position. This analysis identifies reasonable alternatives that replicate both the expected volatility and correlation to other market risk factors that the missing data would be expected to experience.
VaR may not be indicative of realized revenue volatility as changes in market conditions or in the composition of the portfolio can have a material impact on the results. In particular, the historical data used for the VaR calculation might indicate higher or lower levels of portfolio diversification than will be experienced. In order for the VaR model to reflect current market conditions, we update the historical data underlying our VaR model on a weekly basis, or more frequently during periods of market stress, and regularly review the assumptions underlying the model. A minor portion of risks related to our trading positions is not included in VaR. These risks are reviewed as part of our ICAAP. For more information regarding ICAAP, see Capital Management on page 49.
GRM continually reviews, evaluates and enhances our VaR model so that it reflects the material risks in our trading portfolio. Changes to the VaR model are reviewed and approved prior to implementation and any material changes are reported to management through the appropriate management committees.
Trading limits on quantitative risk measures, including VaR, are independently set by Global Markets Risk Management and reviewed on a regular basis so that trading limits remain relevant and within our overall risk appetite for market risks. Trading limits are reviewed in the context of market liquidity, volatility and strategic business priorities. Trading limits are set at both a granular level to allow for extensive coverage of risks as well as at aggregated portfolios to account for correlations among risk factors. All trading limits are approved at least annually. Approved trading limits are stored and tracked in a centralized limits management system. Trading limit excesses are communicated to management for review. Certain quantitative market risk measures and corresponding limits have been identified as critical in the Corporation’s Risk Appetite Statement. These risk appetite limits are reported on a daily basis and are approved at least annually by the ERC and the Board.
In periods of market stress, Global Markets senior leadership communicates daily to discuss losses, key risk positions and any limit excesses. As a result of this process, the businesses may selectively reduce risk.
Table 43 presents the total market-based portfolio VaR, which is the combination of the total covered positions (and less liquid trading positions) portfolio and the fair value option portfolio. Covered positions are defined by regulatory standards as trading assets and liabilities, both on- and off-balance sheet, that meet a defined set of specifications. These specifications identify the most liquid trading positions which are intended to be held for a short-term horizon and where we are able to hedge the material risk elements in a two-way market. Positions in less liquid markets, or where there are restrictions on the ability to trade the positions, typically do not qualify as covered positions. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
In addition, Table 43 presents our fair value option portfolio, which includes substantially all of the funded and unfunded exposures for which we elect the fair value option, and their corresponding hedges. Additionally, market risk VaR for trading activities as presented in Table 43 differs from VaR used for regulatory capital calculations due to the holding period being
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 76 |
used. The holding period for VaR used for regulatory capital calculations is 10 days, while for the market risk VaR presented below, it is one day. Both measures utilize the same process and methodology.
The total market-based portfolio VaR results in Table 43 include market risk to which we are exposed from all business segments, excluding credit valuation adjustment (CVA), DVA and related hedges. The majority of this portfolio is within the Global Markets segment.
Table 43 presents year-end, average, high and low daily trading VaR for 2022 and 2021 using a 99 percent confidence
level. The amounts disclosed in Table 43 and Table 44 align to the view of covered positions used in the Basel 3 capital calculations. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, regardless of trading or banking treatment for the trade, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
The annual average of total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR increased for 2022 compared to 2021 driven by heightened market volatility and reduced diversification across asset classes.
| Table 43 | Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 38 | $ | 21 | $ | 39 | $ | 12 | $ | 11 | $ | 12 | $ | 21 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate | 36 | 36 | 56 | 24 | 54 | 40 | 80 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | 76 | 71 | 106 | 52 | 73 | 69 | 84 | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 18 | 20 | 33 | 12 | 21 | 24 | 35 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 8 | 13 | 27 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 28 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (81) | (91) | n/a | n/a | (114) | (100) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 95 | 70 | 140 | 42 | 51 | 53 | 85 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures (2) | 35 | 38 | n/a | n/a | 8 | 20 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 130 | 108 | 236 | 61 | 59 | 73 | 125 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 48 | 51 | 65 | 37 | 51 | 50 | 65 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 16 | 17 | 24 | 13 | 15 | 16 | 20 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (38) | (36) | n/a | n/a | (27) | (32) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 26 | 32 | 44 | 23 | 39 | 34 | 53 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | 9 | (11) | n/a | n/a | (24) | (10) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 165 | $ | 129 | 287 | 70 | $ | 74 | $ | 97 | 169 | 54 |
(1)The high and low for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the high and low for the components. Therefore the impact from less liquid exposures and the amount of portfolio diversification, which is the difference between the total portfolio and the sum of the individual components, is not relevant.
(2)Impact is net of diversification effects between the covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolios.
n/a = not applicable
The following graph presents the daily covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR for 2022, corresponding to the data in Table 43.
Additional VaR statistics produced within our single VaR model are provided in Table 44 at the same level of detail as in Table 43. Evaluating VaR with additional statistics allows for an increased understanding of the risks in the portfolio, as the historical market data used in the VaR calculation does not necessarily follow a predefined statistical distribution. Table 44 presents average trading VaR statistics at 99 percent and 95 percent confidence levels for 2022 and 2021.
77 Bank of America
| Table 44 | Average Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities – 99 percent and 95 percent VaR Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 99 percent | 95 percent | 99 percent | 95 percent | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 21 | $ | 12 | $ | 12 | $ | 8 | |||||||||||
| Interest rate | 36 | 17 | 40 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit | 71 | 28 | 69 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity | 20 | 11 | 24 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 13 | 7 | 8 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (91) | (46) | (100) | (39) | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 70 | 29 | 53 | 26 | |||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures | 38 | 7 | 20 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 108 | 36 | 73 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 51 | 14 | 50 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 17 | 10 | 16 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (36) | (13) | (32) | (9) | |||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 32 | 11 | 34 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (11) | (7) | (10) | (7) | |||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 129 | $ | 40 | $ | 97 | $ | 33 |
Backtesting
The accuracy of the VaR methodology is evaluated by backtesting, which compares the daily VaR results, utilizing a one-day holding period, against a comparable subset of trading revenue. A backtesting excess occurs when a trading loss exceeds the VaR for the corresponding day. These excesses are evaluated to understand the positions and market moves that produced the trading loss with a goal to help confirm that the VaR methodology accurately represents those losses. We expect the frequency of trading losses in excess of VaR to be in line with the confidence level of the VaR statistic being tested. For example, with a 99 percent confidence level, we expect one trading loss in excess of VaR every 100 days or between two to three trading losses in excess of VaR over the course of a year. The number of backtesting excesses observed can differ from the statistically expected number of excesses if the current level of market volatility is materially different than the level of market volatility that existed during the three years of historical data used in the VaR calculation.
The trading revenue used for backtesting is defined by regulatory agencies in order to most closely align with the VaR component of the regulatory capital calculation. This revenue differs from total trading-related revenue in that it excludes revenue from trading activities that either do not generate market risk or the market risk cannot be included in VaR. Some examples of the types of revenue excluded for backtesting are fees, commissions, reserves, net interest income and intra-day trading revenues.
We conduct daily backtesting on the VaR results used for regulatory capital calculations as well as the VaR results for key legal entities, regions and risk factors. These results are reported to senior market risk management. Senior management regularly reviews and evaluates the results of these tests.
During 2022, there was one day where this subset of trading revenue had losses that exceeded our total covered portfolio VaR, utilizing a one-day holding period.
Total Trading-related Revenue
Total trading-related revenue, excluding brokerage fees, and CVA, DVA and funding valuation adjustment gains (losses), represents the total amount earned from trading positions, including market-based net interest income, which are taken in a diverse range of financial instruments and markets. For more information on fair value, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Trading-related revenue can be volatile and is largely driven by general market conditions and customer demand. Also, trading-related revenue is dependent on the volume and type of transactions, the level of risk assumed, and the volatility of price and rate movements at any given time within the ever-changing market environment. Significant daily revenue by business is monitored and the primary drivers of these are reviewed.
The following histogram is a graphic depiction of trading volatility and illustrates the daily level of trading-related revenue for 2022 and 2021. During 2022, positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 99 percent of the trading days, of which 90 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $9 million. This compares to 2021 where positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 97 percent of the trading days, of which 80 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $45 million.
Trading Portfolio Stress Testing
Because the very nature of a VaR model suggests results can exceed our estimates and it is dependent on a limited historical window, we also stress test our portfolio using scenario analysis. This analysis estimates the change in the value of our trading portfolio that may result from abnormal market movements.
A set of scenarios, categorized as either historical or hypothetical, are computed daily for the overall trading portfolio and individual businesses. These scenarios include shocks to underlying market risk factors that may be well beyond the shocks found in the historical data used to calculate VaR.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 78 |
Historical scenarios simulate the impact of the market moves that occurred during a period of extended historical market stress. Generally, a multi-week period representing the most severe point during a crisis is selected for each historical scenario. Hypothetical scenarios provide estimated portfolio impacts from potential future market stress events. Scenarios are reviewed and updated in response to changing positions and new economic or political information. In addition, new or ad hoc scenarios are developed to address specific potential market events or particular vulnerabilities in the portfolio. The stress tests are reviewed on a regular basis and the results are presented to senior management.
Stress testing for the trading portfolio is integrated with enterprise-wide stress testing and incorporated into the limits framework. The macroeconomic scenarios used for enterprise-wide stress testing purposes differ from the typical trading portfolio scenarios in that they have a longer time horizon and the results are forecasted over multiple periods for use in consolidated capital and liquidity planning. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 46.
Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book
The following discussion presents net interest income for banking book activities.
Interest rate risk represents the most significant market risk exposure to our banking book balance sheet. Interest rate risk is measured as the potential change in net interest income caused by movements in market interest rates. Client-facing activities, primarily lending and deposit-taking, create interest rate sensitive positions on our balance sheet.
We prepare forward-looking forecasts of net interest income. The baseline forecast takes into consideration expected future business growth, ALM positioning and the future direction of interest rate movements as implied by market-based forward curves.
We then measure and evaluate the impact that alternative interest rate scenarios have on the baseline forecast in order to assess interest rate sensitivity under varied conditions. The net interest income forecast is frequently updated for changing assumptions and differing outlooks based on economic trends, market conditions and business strategies. Thus, we continually monitor our banking book balance sheet position in order to maintain an acceptable level of exposure to interest rate changes.
The interest rate scenarios that we analyze incorporate balance sheet assumptions such as loan and deposit growth and pricing, changes in funding mix, product repricing, maturity characteristics and investment securities premium amortization. Our overall goal is to manage interest rate risk so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect earnings and capital.
Table 45 presents the spot and 12-month forward rates used in developing the forward curve used in our baseline forecasts at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| Table 45 | Forward Rates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||
| Federal Funds | Three-month LIBOR | 10-Year Swap | ||||||
| Spot rates | 4.50 | % | 4.77 | % | 3.84 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 4.75 | 4.78 | 3.62 | |||||
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||
| Spot rates | 0.25 | % | 0.21 | % | 1.58 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.84 |
Table 46 shows the pretax impact to forecasted net interest income over the next 12 months from December 31, 2022 and 2021 resulting from instantaneous parallel and non-parallel shocks to the market-based forward curve. Periodically, we evaluate the scenarios presented so that they are meaningful in the context of the current rate environment. The interest rate scenarios also assume U.S. dollar interest rates are floored at zero. Depending on the level of interest rates, Down-rate scenarios may not receive the full impact of the rate shock, particularly in low rate environments.
The overall decrease in asset sensitivity, as shown in the following table, to Up-rate scenarios was primarily due to an increase in long-end and short-end rates. We continue to be asset sensitive to a parallel upward move in interest rates with the majority of that impact coming from the short end of the yield curve. Additionally, higher interest rates negatively impact the fair value of our debt securities classified as available for sale and adversely affect accumulated OCI and thus capital levels under the Basel 3 capital rules. Under instantaneous upward parallel shifts, the near-term adverse impact to Basel 3 capital would be reduced over time by offsetting positive impacts to net interest income generated from the banking book activities. For more information on Basel 3, see Capital Management – Regulatory Capital on page 50.
| Table 46 | Estimated Banking Book Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Curve Changes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short Rate (bps) | Long Rate (bps) | |||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Parallel Shifts | ||||||||||
| +100 bps instantaneous shift | +100 | +100 | $ | 3,829 | $ | 6,542 | ||||
| -100 bps instantaneous shift | -100 | -100 | (4,591) | n/m | ||||||
| Flatteners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | +100 | — | 3,698 | 4,982 | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | -100 | (157) | n/m | ||||||
| Steepeners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | -100 | — | (4,420) | n/m | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | +100 | 131 | 1,646 |
n/m = not meaningful
79 Bank of America
The sensitivity analysis in Table 46 assumes that we take no action in response to these rate shocks and does not assume any change in other macroeconomic variables normally correlated with changes in interest rates. As part of our ALM activities, we use securities, certain residential mortgages, and interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives in managing interest rate sensitivity.
The behavior of our deposit portfolio in the baseline forecast and in alternate interest rate scenarios is a key assumption in our projected estimates of net interest income. The sensitivity analysis in Table 46 assumes no change in deposit portfolio size or mix from the baseline forecast in alternate rate environments. In higher rate scenarios, any customer activity resulting in the replacement of low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits with higher yielding deposits or market-based funding would reduce our benefit in those scenarios.
Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Derivative Contracts
We use interest rate and foreign exchange derivative contracts in our ALM activities to manage our interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Specifically, we use those derivatives to manage both the variability in cash flows and changes in fair value of various assets and liabilities arising from those risks. Our interest rate derivative contracts are generally non-leveraged swaps tied to various benchmark interest rates and foreign exchange basis swaps, options, futures and forwards, and our foreign exchange contracts include cross-currency interest rate swaps, foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency forward contracts and options.
The derivatives used in our ALM activities can be split into two broad categories: designated accounting hedges and other risk management derivatives. Designated accounting hedges are primarily used to manage our exposure to interest rates as described in the Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book section and are included in the sensitivities presented in Table 46. The Corporation also uses foreign currency derivatives in accounting hedges to manage substantially all of the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations. By hedging the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations, the Corporation's market risk exposure in this area is not significant.
Risk management derivatives are predominantly used to hedge foreign exchange risks related to various foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities and eliminate substantially all foreign currency exposures in the cash flows of the Corporation’s non-trading foreign currency-denominated financial instruments. These foreign exchange derivatives are sensitive to other market risk exposures such as cross-currency basis spreads and interest rate risk. However, as these features are not a significant component of these foreign exchange derivatives, the market risk related to this exposure is not significant. For more information on the accounting for derivatives, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mortgage Banking Risk Management
We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subject us to credit, liquidity and interest rate risks, among others. We determine whether loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment and manage credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing a portion of the loans we originate.
Interest rate risk and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Changes in interest rates and other market factors impact the volume of mortgage originations. Changes in
interest rates also impact the value of interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) and the related residential first mortgage LHFS between the date of the IRLC and the date the loans are sold to the secondary market. An increase in mortgage interest rates typically leads to a decrease in the value of these instruments. Conversely, when there is an increase in interest rates, the value of the MSRs will increase driven by lower prepayment expectations. Because the interest rate risks of these hedged items offset, we combine them into one overall hedged item with one combined economic hedge portfolio consisting of derivative contracts and securities.
During 2022, 2021 and 2020, we recorded gains of $78 million, $39 million and $321 million. For more information on MSRs, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Compliance and Operational Risk Management
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules, regulations and our internal policies and procedures (collectively, applicable laws, rules and regulations). We are subject to comprehensive regulation under federal and state laws, rules and regulations in the U.S. and the laws of the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those related to financial crimes and anti-money laundering, market conduct, trading activities, fair lending, privacy, data protection and unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes or systems, people or external events, and includes legal risk. Operational risk may occur anywhere in the Corporation, including third-party business processes, and is not limited to operations functions. The Corporation faces a number of key operational risks including third-party risk, model risk, conduct risk, technology risk, information security risk and data risk. Operational risk can result in financial losses and reputational impacts and is a component in the calculation of total RWA used in the Basel 3 capital calculation. For more information on Basel 3 calculations, see Capital Management on page 49.
FLUs and control functions are first and foremost responsible for managing all aspects of their businesses, including their compliance and operational risk. FLUs and control functions are required to understand their business processes and related risks and controls, including third-party dependencies and the related regulatory requirements, and monitor and report on the effectiveness of the control environment. In order to actively monitor and assess the performance of their processes and controls, they must conduct comprehensive quality assurance activities and identify issues and risks to remediate control gaps and weaknesses. FLUs and control functions must also adhere to compliance and operational risk appetite limits to meet strategic, capital and financial planning objectives. Finally, FLUs and control functions are responsible for the proactive identification, management and escalation of compliance and operational risks across the Corporation. Collectively, these efforts are important to strengthen their compliance and operational resiliency, which is the ability to deliver critical operations through disruption.
Global Compliance and Operational Risk teams independently assess compliance and operational risk, monitor business activities and processes and evaluate FLUs and control functions for adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations, including identifying issues and risks, and reporting
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 80 |
on the state of the control environment. Corporate Audit provides an independent assessment and validation through testing of key compliance and operational risk processes and controls across the Corporation.
The Corporation's Global Compliance – Enterprise Policy and Operational Risk Management – Enterprise Policy set the requirements for reporting compliance and operational risk information to executive management as well as the Board or appropriate Board-level committees and reflect Global Compliance and Operational Risk’s responsibilities for conducting independent oversight of the Corporation’s compliance and operational risk management activities. The Board provides oversight of compliance risk through its Audit Committee and the ERC, and operational risk through its ERC.
A key operational risk facing the Corporation is information security, which includes cybersecurity. Cybersecurity risk includes exposure to failures or interruptions of service or security breaches resulting from malicious technological attacks that impact the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our or third parties' operations, systems or data. The Corporation seeks to mitigate information security risk and associated reputational and compliance risk by employing a multi-layered and intelligence-led Global Information Security Program focused on preparing for, preventing, detecting, mitigating, responding to and recovering from cyber threats and incidents and effectively operating the Corporation’s processes. Additionally, our business continuity policy, standards and procedures are designed to maintain the availability of business functions and enable impacted units within the Corporation and third parties to achieve strategic objectives in the event of a cybersecurity incident.
The Global Information Security Program is supported by three lines of defense. The Global Information Security Team within the first line of defense is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Global Information Security Program, which includes defining policies and procedures to safeguard the Corporation’s information systems and data, conducting vulnerability and third-party information security assessments, information security event management (e.g., responding to ransomware and distributed denial of service attacks), evaluation of external cyber intelligence, supporting industry cybersecurity efforts and working with governmental agencies, and developing employee training to support adherence to the Corporation’s policies and procedures. As the second line of defense, Global Compliance and Operational Risk independently assesses, monitors and tests information security risk across the Corporation, as well as the effectiveness of the Global Information Security Program. Corporate Audit serves as the third line of defense, conducting additional independent review and validation of the first-line processes and functions. As part of our Global Information Security Program, we leverage both internal and external assessments and partnerships with industry leaders to help approach information security holistically. Additionally the Corporation maintains a comprehensive enterprise-wide program that defines standards for the planning, sourcing, management, and oversight of third-party relationships and third-party access to its system, facilities, and/or confidential or proprietary data for a business purpose or supervisory function.
Through established governance structures, we have processes to help facilitate appropriate and effective oversight of information security risk. These routines enable our three lines of defense and management to debate information security risks and monitor control performance to allow for further escalation to executive management, management and
Board-level committees or to the Board, as appropriate. The Board is actively engaged in the oversight of Bank of America’s Global Information Security Program and devotes significant time and attention to the oversight of cybersecurity and information security risk. The Board regularly discusses cybersecurity and information security risks with the Chief Technology and Information Officer and the Chief Information Security Officer. Additionally, the ERC receives regular reporting, and reviews and approves the Information Security Program and Policy on an annual basis.
Reputational Risk Management
Reputational risk is the risk that negative perception of the Corporation may adversely impact profitability or operations. Reputational risk may result from many of the Corporation’s activities, including those related to the management of our strategic, operational, compliance and credit risks.
The Corporation manages reputational risk through established policies and controls embedded throughout its business and risk management processes. We proactively monitor and identify potential reputational risk events and have processes established to mitigate reputational risks in a timely manner. If reputational risk events occur, we focus on remediating the underlying issue and taking action to minimize damage to the Corporation’s reputation. The Corporation has processes and procedures in place to respond to events that give rise to reputational risk, including educating individuals and organizations that influence public opinion, implementing external communication strategies to mitigate the risk, and informing key stakeholders of potential reputational risks. The Corporation’s organization and governance structure provides oversight of reputational risks. Reputational risk reporting is provided regularly and directly to senior management and the ERC, which provides primary oversight of reputational risk. In addition, each FLU has a committee, which includes representatives from Legal and Risk, that is responsible for the oversight of reputational risk, including approval for business activities that present elevated levels of reputational risks.
Climate Risk Management
Climate-related risks are divided into two major categories: (1) risks related to the physical impacts of climate change, driven by extreme weather events such as hurricanes and floods, as well as chronic longer-term shifts such as rising average global temperatures and sea levels, and (2) risks related to the transition to a low-carbon economy, which may entail extensive policy, legal, technology and market changes. These changes and events may have broad impacts on operations, supply chains, distribution networks, customers and markets and are otherwise referred to, respectively, as physical risk and transition risk. These risks may impact both financial and nonfinancial risk types. Physical risk may lead to increased credit risk by diminishing borrowers’ repayment capacity or impacting the value of collateral. Physical risk may also increase operational risk by impacting the Corporation’s facilities, employees, customers or vendors. Transition risks may amplify credit risk through the financial impacts of changes in policy, technology or the market on the Corporation or its counterparties. Unanticipated market changes can lead to sudden price adjustments and give rise to heightened market risk. In addition, reputational risk may arise, including from our climate-related practices and disclosures and if we do not meet our climate-related commitments.
Effective management of climate risk requires coordinated governance, clearly defined roles and responsibilities and well-
81 Bank of America
developed processes to identify, measure, monitor and control risks. As climate risk spans all key risk types, we have developed and continue to enhance processes to embed climate risk considerations into our Risk Framework and risk management programs established for strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. Our Environmental and Social Risk Policy Framework aligns with our Risk Framework and provides additional clarity and transparency regarding our approach to environmental and social risks, inclusive of climate risk.
Our governance framework establishes oversight of climate risk practices and strategies by the Board, supported by its ERC, as well as the MRC and the Responsible Growth Committee, both of which are management-level committees comprised of senior leaders across every major FLU and control function. The Responsible Growth Committee is supported by the ESG Disclosure sub-committee, which is responsible for reviewing and providing oversight of the Corporation’s climate and ESG-related public disclosures.
Our climate risk management efforts are overseen by an executive officer who reports to the CRO. The Climate Risk Council, which consists of leaders across risk, FLU and control functions, meets routinely to discuss our approach to managing climate-related risks in line with our Risk Framework.
In 2021, we publicly announced our commitment to achieve net zero emissions in our financing activities, operations, and supply chain before 2050 (Net Zero Goal) and set 2030 emissions targets for our operations and supply chain. In connection with our Net Zero Goal, in 2022, we announced a target to reduce emissions by 2030 associated with our financing activities related to auto manufacturing, energy and power generation (2030 Targets). In our September 2022 Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures Report, we disclosed our 2019 and 2020 financed emissions and emissions intensity metrics for these sectors, with 2019 serving as the baseline for our 2030 Targets.
We plan to disclose the financed emissions for additional portions of our business loan portfolio in 2023, and we plan to set financing activity emission reduction targets for other key sectors by April 2024.
Achieving our climate--related goals and targets, including our Net Zero Goal and 2030 Targets, may require technological advances, clearly defined roadmaps for industry sectors, new standards and public policies, including those that improve the cost of capital for the transition to a low-carbon economy and better emissions data reporting, as well as ongoing, strong and active engagement with customers, suppliers, investors, government officials and other stakeholders.
Given the extended period of these and other climate-related goals we have established, our initiatives have not resulted in a significant effect on our results of operations or financial position in the relevant periods presented herein.
For more information about climate-related matters, including how the Corporation manages climate risk, and the Corporation’s climate-related goals and commitments, including our plans to achieve our Net Zero Goal and 2030 Targets and progress on our sustainable finance goals, see the Corporation’s website, including our 2022 Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures Report and the 2022
Annual Report to shareholders available on the Investor Relations portion of our website in March 2023. The contents of the Corporation’s website and 2022 Annual Report to shareholders are not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For more information on climate-related risks, see Item 1A. Risk Factors on page 8.
The foregoing discussion and our discussion in the 2022 Annual Report to shareholders regarding our goals and commitments with respect to climate risk management, including environmental transition considerations, include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
Complex Accounting Estimates
Our significant accounting principles, as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements, are essential in understanding the MD&A. Many of our significant accounting principles require complex judgments to estimate the values of assets and liabilities. We have procedures and processes in place to facilitate making these judgments.
The more judgmental estimates are summarized in the following discussion. We have identified and described the development of the variables most important in the estimation processes that involve mathematical models to derive the estimates. In many cases, there are numerous alternative judgments that could be used in the process of determining the inputs to the models. Where alternatives exist, we have used the factors that we believe represent the most reasonable value in developing the inputs. Actual performance that differs from our estimates of the key variables could materially impact our results of operations. Separate from the possible future impact to our results of operations from input and model variables, the value of our lending portfolio and market-sensitive assets and liabilities may change subsequent to the balance sheet date, often significantly, due to the nature and magnitude of future credit and market conditions. Such credit and market conditions may change quickly and in unforeseen ways and the resulting volatility could have a significant, negative effect on future operating results. These fluctuations would not be indicative of deficiencies in our models or inputs.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. Our process for determining the allowance for credit losses is discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The determination of the allowance for credit losses is based on numerous estimates and assumptions, which require
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 82 |
a high degree of judgment and are often interrelated. A critical judgment in the process is the weighting of our forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios that are incorporated into our quantitative models. As any one economic outlook is inherently uncertain, the Corporation uses multiple macroeconomic scenarios in its ECL calculation, which have included a baseline scenario derived from consensus estimates, an adverse scenario reflecting an extended moderate recession, a downside scenario reflecting persistent inflation and interest rates above the baseline scenario, a tail risk scenario similar to the severely adverse scenario used in stress testing and an upside scenario that considers the potential for improvement above the baseline scenario. The overall economic outlook is weighted 95 percent towards a recessionary environment in 2023, with continued inflationary pressures leading to lower gross domestic product (GDP) and higher unemployment rate expectations as compared to the prior year. Generally, as the consensus estimates improve or deteriorate, the allowance for credit losses will change in a similar direction. There are multiple variables that drive the macroeconomic scenarios with the key variables including, but not limited to, U.S. GDP and unemployment rates. As of December 31, 2021, the weighted macroeconomic outlook for the U.S. average unemployment rate was forecasted at 5.2 percent, 4.7 percent and 4.3 percent in the fourth quarters of 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively, and the weighted macroeconomic outlook for U.S. GDP was forecasted to grow at 2.1 percent, 1.9 percent and 1.9 percent year-over-year in the fourth quarters of 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, the latest consensus estimates for the U.S. average unemployment rate for the fourth quarter of 2022 was 3.7 percent and U.S. GDP was forecasted to grow 0.4 percent year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2022, reflecting a tighter labor market and depressed growth expectations compared to our macroeconomic outlook as of December 31, 2021, and were factored into our allowance for credit losses estimate as of December 31, 2022. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, the weighted macroeconomic outlook for the U.S. average unemployment rate was forecasted at 5.6 percent and 5.0 percent in the fourth quarters of 2023 and 2024, and the weighted macroeconomic outlook for U.S. GDP was forecasted to contract 0.4 percent and grow 1.2 percent year-over-year in the fourth quarters of 2023 and 2024.
In addition to the above judgments and estimates, the allowance for credit losses can also be impacted by unanticipated changes in asset quality of the portfolio, such as increases or decreases in credit and/or internal risk ratings in our commercial portfolio, improvement or deterioration in borrower delinquencies or credit scores in our credit card portfolio and increases or decreases in home prices, which is a primary driver of LTVs, in our consumer real estate portfolio, all of which have some degree of uncertainty. The allowance for credit losses increased to $14.2 billion from $13.8 billion at December 31, 2021, primarily due to loan growth and a dampened macroeconomic outlook in 2022.
To provide an illustration of the sensitivity of the macroeconomic scenarios and other assumptions on the estimate of our allowance for credit losses, the Corporation compared the December 31, 2022 modeled ECL from the baseline scenario and our adverse scenario. Relative to the baseline scenario, the adverse scenario assumed a peak U.S. unemployment rate of nearly three percentage points higher than the baseline scenario, a decline in U.S. GDP followed by a prolonged recovery and a lower home price outlook with a difference of approximately eight percent at the trough. This
sensitivity analysis resulted in a hypothetical increase in the allowance for credit losses of approximately $4 billion.
While the sensitivity analysis may be useful to understand how changes in macroeconomic assumptions could impact our modeled ECLs, it is not meant to forecast how our allowance for credit losses is expected to change in a different macroeconomic outlook. Importantly, the analysis does not incorporate a variety of factors, including qualitative reserves and the weighting of alternate scenarios, which could have offsetting effects on the estimate. Considering the variety of factors contemplated when developing and weighting macroeconomic outlooks such as recent economic events, leading economic indicators, views of internal and third-party economists and industry trends, in addition to other qualitative factors, the Corporation believes the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2022 is appropriate.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Under applicable accounting standards, we are required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in measuring fair value. We classify fair value measurements of financial instruments and MSRs based on the three-level fair value hierarchy in the accounting standards.
The fair values of assets and liabilities may include adjustments, such as market liquidity and credit quality, where appropriate. Valuations of products using models or other techniques are sensitive to assumptions used for the significant inputs. Where market data is available, the inputs used for valuation reflect that information as of our valuation date. Inputs to valuation models are considered unobservable if they are supported by little or no market activity. In periods of extreme volatility, lessened liquidity or in illiquid markets, there may be more variability in market pricing or a lack of market data to use in the valuation process. In keeping with the prudent application of estimates and management judgment in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, we have in place various processes and controls that include: a model validation policy that requires review and approval of quantitative models used for deal pricing, financial statement fair value determination and risk quantification; a trading product valuation policy that requires verification of all traded product valuations; and a periodic review and substantiation of daily profit and loss reporting for all traded products. Primarily through validation controls, we utilize both broker and pricing service inputs which can and do include both market-observable and internally-modeled values and/or valuation inputs. Our reliance on this information is affected by our understanding of how the broker and/or pricing service develops its data with a higher degree of reliance applied to those that are more directly observable and lesser reliance applied to those developed through their own internal modeling. For example, broker quotes in less active markets may only be indicative and therefore less reliable. These processes and controls are performed independently of the business. For more information, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements and Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities, and MSRs, where values are based on valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and are significant to the overall fair value measurement are classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy established in applicable accounting standards. The fair value of these Level 3 financial assets and liabilities and
83 Bank of America
MSRs is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Level 3 financial instruments may be hedged with derivatives classified as Level 1 or 2; therefore, gains or losses associated with Level 3 financial instruments may be offset by gains or losses associated with financial instruments classified in other levels of the fair value hierarchy. The Level 3 gains and losses recorded in earnings did not have a significant impact on our liquidity or capital. We conduct a review of our fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Transfers into or out of Level 3 are made if the significant inputs used in the financial models measuring the fair values of the assets and liabilities became unobservable or observable, respectively, in the current marketplace. For more information on transfers into and out of Level 3 during 2022, 2021 and 2020, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accrued Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Assets
Accrued income taxes, reported as a component of either other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, represent the net amount of current income taxes we expect to pay to or receive from various taxing jurisdictions attributable to our operations to date. We currently file income tax returns in more than 100 jurisdictions and consider many factors, including statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, in estimating the appropriate accrued income taxes for each jurisdiction.
Net deferred tax assets, reported as a component of other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, represent the net decrease in taxes expected to be paid in the future because of net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards and
because of future reversals of temporary differences in the bases of assets and liabilities as measured by tax laws and their bases as reported in the financial statements. NOL and tax credit carryforwards result in reductions to future tax liabilities, and many of these attributes can expire if not utilized within certain periods. We consider the need for valuation allowances to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amounts that we estimate are more likely than not to be realized.
Consistent with the applicable accounting guidance, we monitor relevant tax authorities and change our estimates of accrued income taxes and/or net deferred tax assets due to changes in income tax laws and their interpretation by the courts and regulatory authorities. These revisions of our estimates, which also may result from our income tax planning and from the resolution of income tax audit matters, may be material to our operating results for any given period.
See Note 19 – Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a table of significant tax attributes and additional information. For more information, see page 17 under Item 1A. Risk Factors – Regulatory, Compliance and Legal.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The nature of and accounting for goodwill and intangible assets are discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles, and Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment test as of June 30, 2022. Based on our assessment, we have concluded that goodwill was not impaired.
Certain Contingent Liabilities
For more information on the complex judgments associated with certain contingent liabilities, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 84 |
Non-GAAP Reconciliations
Tables 47 and 48 provide reconciliations of certain non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.
| Table 47 | Annual Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions, shares in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Reconciliation of average shareholders’ equity to average tangible shareholders’ equity and average tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 270,299 | $ | 273,757 | $ | 267,309 | ||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,005) | (68,951) | |||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,117) | (2,177) | (1,862) | |||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 922 | 916 | 821 | |||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 200,082 | $ | 203,491 | $ | 197,317 | ||||
| Preferred stock | (28,318) | (23,970) | (23,624) | |||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 171,764 | $ | 179,521 | $ | 173,693 | ||||
| Reconciliation of year-end shareholders’ equity to year-end tangible shareholders’ equity and year-end tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 273,197 | $ | 270,066 | $ | 272,924 | ||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,022) | (68,951) | |||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,075) | (2,153) | (2,151) | |||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 899 | 929 | 920 | |||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 202,999 | $ | 199,820 | $ | 202,742 | ||||
| Preferred stock | (28,397) | (24,708) | (24,510) | |||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 174,602 | $ | 175,112 | $ | 178,232 | ||||
| Reconciliation of year-end assets to year-end tangible assets | ||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 3,051,375 | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | 2,819,627 | ||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,022) | (68,951) | |||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,075) | (2,153) | (2,151) | |||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 899 | 929 | 920 | |||||||
| Tangible assets | $ | 2,981,177 | $ | 3,099,249 | $ | 2,749,445 |
(1)Presents reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures. For more information on non-GAAP financial measures and ratios we use in assessing the results of the Corporation, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32.
| Table 48 | Quarterly Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Quarters | 2021 Quarters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Fourth | Third | Second | First | Fourth | Third | Second | First | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of average shareholders’ equity to average tangible shareholders’ equity and average tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 272,629 | $ | 271,017 | $ | 268,197 | $ | 269,309 | $ | 270,883 | $ | 275,484 | $ | 274,632 | $ | 274,047 | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,023) | (69,023) | (68,951) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,088) | (2,107) | (2,127) | (2,146) | (2,166) | (2,185) | (2,212) | (2,146) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 914 | 920 | 926 | 929 | 913 | 915 | 915 | 920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 202,433 | $ | 200,808 | $ | 197,974 | $ | 199,070 | $ | 200,608 | $ | 205,191 | $ | 204,312 | $ | 203,870 | ||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | (28,982) | (29,134) | (28,674) | (26,444) | (24,364) | (23,441) | (23,684) | (24,399) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 173,451 | $ | 171,674 | $ | 169,300 | $ | 172,626 | $ | 176,244 | $ | 181,750 | $ | 180,628 | $ | 179,471 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of period-end shareholders’ equity to period-end tangible shareholders’ equity and period-end tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 273,197 | $ | 269,524 | $ | 269,118 | $ | 266,617 | $ | 270,066 | $ | 272,464 | $ | 277,119 | $ | 274,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,023) | (69,023) | (68,951) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,075) | (2,094) | (2,114) | (2,133) | (2,153) | (2,172) | (2,192) | (2,134) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 899 | 915 | 920 | 926 | 929 | 913 | 915 | 915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 202,999 | $ | 199,323 | $ | 198,902 | $ | 196,388 | $ | 199,820 | $ | 202,182 | $ | 206,819 | $ | 203,830 | ||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | (28,397) | (29,134) | (29,134) | (27,137) | (24,708) | (23,441) | (23,441) | (24,319) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 174,602 | $ | 170,189 | $ | 169,768 | $ | 169,251 | $ | 175,112 | $ | 178,741 | $ | 183,378 | $ | 179,511 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of period-end assets to period-end tangible assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 3,051,375 | $ | 3,072,953 | $ | 3,111,606 | $ | 3,238,223 | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | 3,085,446 | $ | 3,029,894 | $ | 2,969,992 | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,022) | (69,023) | (69,023) | (68,951) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,075) | (2,094) | (2,114) | (2,133) | (2,153) | (2,172) | (2,192) | (2,134) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 899 | 915 | 920 | 926 | 929 | 913 | 915 | 915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible assets | $ | 2,981,177 | $ | 3,002,752 | $ | 3,041,390 | $ | 3,167,994 | $ | 3,099,249 | $ | 3,015,164 | $ | 2,959,594 | $ | 2,899,822 |
(1)Presents reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures. For more information on non-GAAP financial measures and ratios we use in assessing the results of the Corporation, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 32.
85 Bank of America
FY 2021 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000070858-22-000062.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Bank of America Corporation (the “Corporation”) and its management may make certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipates,” “targets,” “expects,” “hopes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “believes,” “continue” and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements represent the Corporation’s current expectations, plans or forecasts of its future results, revenues, provision for credit losses, expenses, efficiency ratio, capital measures, strategy and future business and economic conditions more generally, and other future matters. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the following uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: and in any of the Corporation’s subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission Filings: the Corporation’s potential judgments, orders, settlements, penalties, fines and reputational damage resulting from pending or future litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings and enforcement actions, including as a result of our participation in and execution of government programs related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, such as the processing of unemployment benefits for California and certain other states; the possibility that the Corporation’s future liabilities may be in excess of its recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation, and regulatory and government actions; the possibility that the Corporation could face increased claims from one or more parties involved in mortgage securitizations; the Corporation’s ability to resolve representations and warranties repurchase and related claims; the risks related to the discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate and other reference rates, including increased expenses and litigation and the effectiveness of hedging strategies; uncertainties about the financial stability and growth rates of non-U.S. jurisdictions, the risk that those jurisdictions may face difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, and related stresses on financial markets, currencies and trade, and the Corporation’s exposures to such risks, including direct, indirect and operational; the impact of U.S. and global interest rates, inflation, currency exchange rates, economic conditions, trade policies and tensions, including tariffs, and potential geopolitical instability; the impact of the interest rate and inflationary environment on the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions and other uncertainties, including the impact of supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures and labor shortages on the economic recovery and our business; the Corporation's concentration of credit risk; the Corporation’s ability to achieve its expense targets and expectations regarding revenue, net interest income, provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, effective tax
rate, loan growth or other projections; adverse changes to the Corporation’s credit ratings from the major credit rating agencies; an inability to access capital markets or maintain deposits or borrowing costs; estimates of the fair value and other accounting values, subject to impairment assessments, of certain of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities; the estimated or actual impact of changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying those standards; uncertainty regarding the content, timing and impact of regulatory capital and liquidity requirements; the impact of adverse changes to total loss-absorbing capacity requirements, stress capital buffer requirements and/or global systemically important bank surcharges; the potential impact of actions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the Corporation’s capital plans; the effect of changes in or interpretations of income tax laws and regulations; the impact of implementation and compliance with U.S. and international laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including, but not limited to, recovery and resolution planning requirements, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Volcker Rule, fiduciary standards, derivatives regulations and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and any similar or related rules and regulations; a failure or disruption in or breach of the Corporation’s operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, including as a result of cyberattacks or campaigns; the transition and physical impacts of climate change; our ability to achieve environmental, social and governance goals and commitments or the impact of any changes in the Corporation’s sustainability strategy or commitments generally; the impact of any future federal government shutdown and uncertainty regarding the federal government’s debt limit or changes in fiscal, monetary or regulatory policy; the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics, including the magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the U.S. and/or global, financial market conditions and our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects; the impact of natural disasters, extreme weather events, military conflict, terrorism or other geopolitical events; and other matters.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-year presentation. Throughout the MD&A, the Corporation uses certain acronyms and abbreviations which are defined in the Glossary.
Executive Summary
Business Overview
The Corporation is a Delaware corporation, a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company. When used in this report, “the Corporation,” “we,” “us” and “our” may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation’s subsidiaries or affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Through our various bank and nonbank subsidiaries throughout the U.S. and in international markets, we provide a diversified range of
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 26 |
banking and nonbank financial services and products through four business segments: Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We operate our banking activities primarily under the Bank of America, National Association (Bank of America, N.A. or BANA) charter. At December 31, 2021, the Corporation had $3.2 trillion in assets and a headcount of approximately 208,000 employees.
As of December 31, 2021, we served clients through operations across the U.S., its territories and approximately 35 countries. Our retail banking footprint covers all major markets in the U.S., and we serve approximately 67 million consumer and small business clients with approximately 4,200 retail financial centers, approximately 16,000 ATMs, and leading digital banking platforms (www.bankofamerica.com) with approximately 41 million active users, including approximately 33 million active mobile users. We offer industry-leading support to approximately three million small business households. Our GWIM businesses, with client balances of $3.8 trillion, provide tailored solutions to meet client needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking, trust and retirement products. We are a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading across a broad range of asset classes serving corporations, governments, institutions and individuals around the world.
Recent Developments
Capital Management
On February 2, 2022, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash common stock dividend of $0.21 per share, payable on March 25, 2022 to shareholders of record as of March 4, 2022.
For more information on our capital resources and regulatory developments, see Capital Management on page 49.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (the pandemic) has impacted the Corporation and may continue to do so, as uncertainty remains about the duration of the pandemic and the timing and strength of the global economic recovery. As the pandemic continues to evolve, we regularly evaluate protocols and processes in place to execute our business continuity plans. In conjunction with our efforts to support clients affected by the pandemic, we have cumulatively originated $35.4 billion in loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) with amounts outstanding of $4.7 billion and $22.7 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020. For more information on PPP loans, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The future direct and indirect impact of the pandemic on our businesses, results of operations and financial condition remains uncertain. Should current economic conditions deteriorate or if the pandemic worsens due to various factors,
including through the spread of more easily communicable variants of COVID-19, such conditions could have an adverse effect on our businesses and results of operations and could adversely affect our financial condition.
For more information on how the risks related to the pandemic adversely affect our businesses, results of operations and financial condition, see Part 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors on page 8.
LIBOR and Other Benchmark Rates
Subject to the continued publication of certain non-representative London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark settings based on a modified calculation (i.e., on a “synthetic” basis), British Pound Sterling, Euro, Swiss Franc and Japanese Yen LIBOR settings and one-week and two-month U.S. dollar (USD) LIBOR settings ceased or became no longer representative of the underlying market the rates seek to measure (i.e., non-representative) immediately after December 31, 2021, and the remaining USD LIBOR settings (i.e., overnight, one month, three month, six month and 12 month) will cease or become non-representative immediately after June 30, 2023. Separately, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued supervisory guidance encouraging banks to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate by December 31, 2021 subject to certain regulatory-approved exceptions (USD LIBOR Guidance).
As a result, a major transition has been and continues to be in progress in the global financial markets with respect to the replacement of Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs). This is a complex process impacting a variety of our businesses and operations. IBORs have historically been used in many of the Corporation’s products and contracts, including derivatives, consumer and commercial loans, mortgages, floating-rate notes and other adjustable-rate products and financial instruments. In response, the Corporation established an enterprise-wide IBOR transition program, with active involvement of senior management and regular reports to the Management Risk Committee (MRC) and Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC). The program continues to drive the Corporation's industry and regulatory engagement, client and financial contract changes, internal and external communications, technology and operations modifications, including updates to its operational models, systems and processes, introduction of new products, migration of existing clients, and program strategy and governance.
As of December 31, 2021, the Corporation has transitioned or otherwise addressed IBOR-based products and contracts referencing the rates that ceased or became non-representative after December 31, 2021, including LIBOR-linked commercial loans, LIBOR-based adjustable-rate consumer mortgages, LIBOR-linked derivatives and interdealer trading of certain USD LIBOR and other interest rate swaps, and related hedging
27 Bank of America
arrangements. Additionally, in accordance with the USD LIBOR Guidance, the Corporation has ceased entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate, subject to certain regulatory-approved exceptions.
The Corporation launched capabilities and services to support the issuance and trading in products indexed to various alternative reference rates (ARRs) and developed employee training programs as well as other internal and external sources of information on the various challenges and opportunities that the replacement of IBORs has presented and continues to present. The Corporation continues to monitor a variety of market scenarios as part of its transition efforts, including risks associated with insufficient preparation by individual market participants or the overall market ecosystem, ability of market participants to meet regulatory and industry-wide recommended milestones and access and demand by clients and market participants to liquidity in certain products, including LIBOR products.
With respect to the transition of LIBOR products referencing USD LIBOR settings ceasing or becoming non-representative as of June 30, 2023, a significant majority of the Corporation’s notional contractual exposure to such LIBOR currencies, of which the significant majority is derivatives contracts, have been remediated (i.e., updated to include fallback provisions to ARRs based on market driven protocols, regulatory guidance and industry-recommended fallback provisions and related mechanisms) and the Corporation is continuing to remediate the remaining USD LIBOR exposure. The remaining exposure, a majority of which is made up of derivatives and commercial loans and which represents a small minority of outstanding USD LIBOR notional contractual exposure of the Corporation, will require active dialogue with clients to modify the contracts. For any residual exposures after June 2023 that continue to have no fallback provisions, the Corporation is assessing and planning to leverage relevant contractual and statutory solutions, including relevant state legislation and any future federal legislation, to transition such exposure to ARRs.
The Corporation has implemented regulatory, tax and accounting changes and continues to monitor current and potential impacts of the transition, including Internal Revenue Service tax regulations and guidance and Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance. In addition, the Corporation has engaged impacted clients in connection with the transition by providing ARRs education and the timing of transition events. The Corporation is also working actively with global regulators, industry working groups and trade associations. For more information on the expected replacement of LIBOR and other benchmark rates, see Item 1A. Risk Factors – Other on page 21.
Changes to Overdraft Services
In January 2022, the Corporation announced changes to its overdraft services for consumer and small business clients, which include eliminating non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees beginning in February 2022 and reducing overdraft fees from $35 to $10 beginning in May 2022. Fees from overdraft services were approximately $1 billion in 2021 and recorded in Consumer Banking as service charges in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Due to the policy changes, in 2022 the Corporation expects a significant reduction in NSF and overdraft fees.
Financial Highlights
| Table 1 | Summary Income Statement and Selected Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions, except per share information) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 42,934 | $ | 43,360 | ||||||
| Noninterest income | 46,179 | 42,168 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 89,113 | 85,528 | ||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (4,594) | 11,320 | ||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 59,731 | 55,213 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 33,976 | 18,995 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,998 | 1,101 | ||||||||
| Net income | 31,978 | 17,894 | ||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 1,421 | 1,421 | ||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | $ | 30,557 | $ | 16,473 | ||||||
| Per common share information | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.60 | $ | 1.88 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.57 | 1.87 | ||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.78 | 0.72 | ||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 1.05 | % | 0.67 | % | ||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 12.23 | 6.76 | ||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (2) | 17.02 | 9.48 | ||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (1) | 67.03 | 64.55 | ||||||||
| Balance sheet at year end | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 979,124 | $ | 927,861 | ||||||
| Total assets | 3,169,495 | 2,819,627 | ||||||||
| Total deposits | 2,064,446 | 1,795,480 | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,899,429 | 2,546,703 | ||||||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | 245,358 | 248,414 | ||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 270,066 | 272,924 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 169.
(2)Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information and a corresponding reconciliation to the most closely related financial measures defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
Net income was $32.0 billion or $3.57 per diluted share in 2021 compared to $17.9 billion or $1.87 per diluted share in 2020. The increase in net income was due to improvement in the provision for credit losses and higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
For discussion and analysis of our consolidated and business segment results of operations for 2020 compared to 2019, see the Financial Highlights and Business Segment Operations sections in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income decreased $426 million to $42.9 billion in 2021 compared to 2020. Net interest yield on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis decreased 24 basis points (bps) to 1.66 percent for 2021. The decrease in net interest income was primarily driven by lower interest rates and average loan balances, partially offset by higher average balances of debt securities. For more information on net interest yield and the FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31, and for more information on interest rate risk management, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 28 |
Noninterest Income
| Table 2 | Noninterest Income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Fees and commissions: | ||||||||||
| Card income | $ | 6,218 | $ | 5,656 | ||||||
| Service charges | 7,504 | 7,141 | ||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 16,690 | 14,574 | ||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 8,887 | 7,180 | ||||||||
| Total fees and commissions | 39,299 | 34,551 | ||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 8,691 | 8,355 | ||||||||
| Other income | (1,811) | (738) | ||||||||
| Total noninterest income | $ | 46,179 | $ | 42,168 |
Noninterest income increased $4.0 billion to $46.2 billion in 2021 compared to 2020. The following highlights the significant changes.
● Card income increased $562 million primarily driven by increased client activity and merchant services revenue.
● Service charges increased $363 million primarily due to higher treasury and credit service charges and increased client activity.
● Investment and brokerage services increased $2.1 billion primarily driven by higher market valuations and assets under management (AUM) flows, partially offset by declines in AUM pricing.
● Investment banking fees increased $1.7 billion primarily due to higher advisory fees as well as higher debt and equity issuance fees.
● Market making and similar activities increased $336 million primarily driven by strong sales and trading performance in Equities, partially offset by a weaker performance in Fixed Income, Currencies and Commodities (FICC), which benefited from a more favorable market environment in 2020.
● Other income decreased $1.1 billion primarily due to a $704 million gain on sales of certain mortgage loans in the prior year, as well as higher partnership losses on tax credit investments.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses improved $15.9 billion to a benefit of $4.6 billion in 2021 compared to 2020. The benefit was primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. For more information on the provision for credit losses, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
Noninterest Expense
| Table 3 | Noninterest Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 36,140 | $ | 32,725 | ||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 7,138 | 7,141 | ||||||||
| Information processing and communications | 5,769 | 5,222 | ||||||||
| Product delivery and transaction related | 3,881 | 3,433 | ||||||||
| Marketing | 1,939 | 1,701 | ||||||||
| Professional fees | 1,775 | 1,694 | ||||||||
| Other general operating | 3,089 | 3,297 | ||||||||
| Total noninterest expense | $ | 59,731 | $ | 55,213 |
Noninterest expense increased $4.5 billion to $59.7 billion in 2021 compared to 2020. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation and benefits expense, higher costs associated with processing transactional card claims related to state unemployment benefits, a contribution to the Bank of America Foundation and an impairment charge for real estate rationalization.
Income Tax Expense
| Table 4 | Income Tax Expense | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 33,976 | $ | 18,995 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,998 | 1,101 | ||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 5.9 | % | 5.8 | % |
Income tax expense was $2.0 billion for 2021 compared to $1.1 billion in 2020, resulting in an effective tax rate of 5.9 percent compared to 5.8 percent.
The effective tax rates for 2021 and 2020 were driven by the impact of our recurring tax preference benefits and positive income tax adjustments from the impact of U.K. tax law changes discussed below. Our recurring tax preference benefits primarily consist of tax credits from environmental, social and governance (ESG) investments in affordable housing and renewable energy, aligning with our responsible growth strategy to address global sustainability challenges. Absent these tax credits, the impact of the U.K. tax law changes and other discrete items, the effective tax rates would have been approximately 25 percent and 26 percent for 2021 and 2020.
In June 2021, the U.K. enacted the 2021 Finance Act, which included an increase in the U.K. corporation income tax rate to 25 percent from 19 percent. This change is effective April 1, 2023 and unfavorably affects income tax expense on future U.K. earnings. In addition, in July 2020, the U.K. enacted a repeal of the final two percent of scheduled decreases in the U.K. corporation income tax rate. As a result, in 2021 and 2020, the Corporation recorded write-ups of U.K. net deferred tax assets of approximately $2.0 billion and $700 million, with corresponding positive income tax adjustments. These write-ups were reversals of previously recorded write-downs of net deferred tax assets for prior changes in the U.K. corporation income tax rate.
29 Bank of America
Balance Sheet Overview
| Table 5 | Selected Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 348,221 | $ | 380,463 | $ | (32,242) | (8) | % | ||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 250,720 | 304,058 | (53,338) | (18) | ||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 247,080 | 198,854 | 48,226 | 24 | ||||||||||
| Debt securities | 982,627 | 684,850 | 297,777 | 43 | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases | 979,124 | 927,861 | 51,263 | 6 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | (12,387) | (18,802) | 6,415 | (34) | ||||||||||
| All other assets | 374,110 | 342,343 | 31,767 | 9 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | 2,819,627 | $ | 349,868 | 12 | |||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 2,064,446 | $ | 1,795,480 | $ | 268,966 | 15 | |||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 192,329 | 170,323 | 22,006 | 13 | ||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 100,690 | 71,320 | 29,370 | 41 | ||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 23,753 | 19,321 | 4,432 | 23 | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 280,117 | 262,934 | 17,183 | 7 | ||||||||||
| All other liabilities | 238,094 | 227,325 | 10,769 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 2,899,429 | 2,546,703 | 352,726 | 14 | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 270,066 | 272,924 | (2,858) | (1) | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | 2,819,627 | $ | 349,868 | 12 |
Assets
At December 31, 2021, total assets were approximately $3.2 trillion, up $349.9 billion from December 31, 2020. The increase in assets was primarily due to higher debt securities that were primarily funded by deposit growth, an increase in loans and leases and higher trading account assets, partially offset by lower federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell and cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $32.2 billion primarily driven by higher investments in debt securities.
Federal Funds Sold and Securities Borrowed or Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Federal funds transactions involve lending reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are collateralized lending transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and obtain securities for settlement and for collateral. Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell decreased $53.3 billion primarily due to the investment of excess cash into debt securities.
Trading Account Assets
Trading account assets consist primarily of long positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. government and agency securities, corporate securities and non-U.S. sovereign debt. Trading account assets increased $48.2 billion primarily due to an increase in inventory within Global Markets.
Debt Securities
Debt securities primarily include U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (MBS), principally agency MBS, non-U.S. bonds, corporate bonds and municipal debt. We use the debt securities portfolio primarily to manage interest rate and liquidity risk and to leverage market conditions that create economically attractive returns on these investments. Debt securities increased $297.8 billion primarily driven by the deployment of deposit inflows. For more information on debt
securities, see Note 4 – Securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans and Leases
Loans and leases increased $51.3 billion primarily driven by growth in commercial loans and higher securities-based lending within consumer loans. For more information on the loan portfolio, see Credit Risk Management on page 59.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $6.4 billion primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
All Other Assets
All other assets increased $31.8 billion primarily driven by higher margin loans and loans held-for-sale (LHFS).
Liabilities
At December 31, 2021, total liabilities were approximately $2.9 trillion, up $352.7 billion from December 31, 2020, primarily due to deposit growth.
Deposits
Deposits increased $269.0 billion primarily due to an increase in retail and wholesale deposits.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Loaned or Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Federal funds transactions involve borrowing reserve balances on a short-term basis. Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are collateralized borrowing transactions utilized to accommodate customer transactions, earn interest rate spreads and finance assets on the balance sheet. Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase increased $22.0 billion primarily driven by client activity within Global Markets.
Trading Account Liabilities
Trading account liabilities consist primarily of short positions in equity and fixed-income securities including U.S. Treasury and agency securities, corporate securities and non-U.S. sovereign
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 30 |
debt. Trading account liabilities increased $29.4 billion primarily due to higher levels of short positions within Global Markets.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings provide an additional funding source and primarily consist of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) short-term borrowings, notes payable and various other borrowings that generally have maturities of one year or less. Short-term borrowings increased $4.4 billion primarily due to an increase in short-term commercial paper issuances to manage liquidity needs. For more information on short-term borrowings, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt increased $17.2 billion primarily due to debt issuances, partially offset by maturities, redemptions and valuation adjustments. For more information on long-term debt, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity decreased $2.9 billion primarily due to returns of capital to shareholders through common stock repurchases and common and preferred stock dividends, market value decreases on derivatives and debt securities and the redemption of preferred stock, partially offset by net income.
Cash Flows Overview
The Corporation’s operating assets and liabilities support our global markets and lending activities. We believe that cash flows from operations, available cash balances and our ability to generate cash through short- and long-term debt are sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs. Our investing activities primarily include the debt securities portfolio and loans and leases. Our financing activities reflect cash flows primarily related to customer deposits, securities financing agreements, long-term debt and common and preferred stock. For more information on liquidity, see Liquidity Risk on page 54.
Supplemental Financial Data
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this Form 10-K, we present certain non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items or otherwise include components that differ from the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures are provided as additional useful information to assess our financial condition, results of operations (including period-to-period operating performance) or compliance with prospective regulatory requirements. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended as a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may not be defined or calculated the same way as non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.
We view net interest income and related ratios and analyses on an FTE basis, which when presented on a consolidated basis are non-GAAP financial measures. To derive the FTE basis, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before-tax basis with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. For purposes of this calculation, we use the federal statutory tax rate of 21 percent and a representative state tax rate. Net interest yield, which measures the basis points we earn over the cost of funds, utilizes net interest income on an FTE basis. We believe that presentation of these items on an FTE basis allows for comparison of amounts from
both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practices.
We may present certain key performance indicators and ratios excluding certain items (e.g., debit valuation adjustment (DVA) gains (losses)) which result in non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that the presentation of measures that exclude these items is useful because such measures provide additional information to assess the underlying operational performance and trends of our businesses and to allow better comparison of period-to-period operating performance.
We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible equity, a non-GAAP financial measure. Tangible equity represents shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)), net of related deferred tax liabilities (“adjusted” shareholders’ equity or common shareholders’ equity). These measures are used to evaluate our use of equity. In addition, profitability, relationship and investment models use both return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity and return on average tangible shareholders’ equity as key measures to support our overall growth objectives. These ratios are as follows:
● Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity measures our net income applicable to common shareholders as a percentage of adjusted average common shareholders’ equity. The tangible common equity ratio represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity measures our net income as a percentage of adjusted average total shareholders’ equity. The tangible equity ratio represents adjusted ending shareholders’ equity divided by total tangible assets.
● Tangible book value per common share represents adjusted ending common shareholders’ equity divided by ending common shares outstanding.
We believe ratios utilizing tangible equity provide additional useful information because they present measures of those assets that can generate income. Tangible book value per common share provides additional useful information about the level of tangible assets in relation to outstanding shares of common stock.
The aforementioned supplemental data and performance measures are presented in Tables 6 and 7.
For more information on the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators (key performance indicators) that management uses when assessing our consolidated and/or segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our underlying operational performance and trends. These key performance indicators (KPIs) may not be defined or calculated in the same way as similar KPIs used by other companies. For information on how these metrics are defined, see Key Metrics on page 169.
Our consolidated key performance indicators, which include various equity and credit metrics, are presented in Table 1 on page 28, Table 6 on page 32 and Table 7 on page 33.
For information on key segment performance metrics, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
31 Bank of America
| Table 6 | Selected Annual Financial Data | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions, except per share information) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 42,934 | $ | 43,360 | $ | 48,891 | ||||
| Noninterest income | 46,179 | 42,168 | 42,353 | |||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 89,113 | 85,528 | 91,244 | |||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (4,594) | 11,320 | 3,590 | |||||||
| Noninterest expense | 59,731 | 55,213 | 54,900 | |||||||
| Income before income taxes | 33,976 | 18,995 | 32,754 | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,998 | 1,101 | 5,324 | |||||||
| Net income | 31,978 | 17,894 | 27,430 | |||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 30,557 | 16,473 | 25,998 | |||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 8,493.3 | 8,753.2 | 9,390.5 | |||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 8,558.4 | 8,796.9 | 9,442.9 | |||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 1.05 | % | 0.67 | % | 1.14 | % | ||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 12.23 | 6.76 | 10.62 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 17.02 | 9.48 | 14.86 | |||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 11.68 | 6.69 | 10.24 | |||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (1, 2) | 15.71 | 9.07 | 13.85 | |||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 8.52 | 9.68 | 10.88 | |||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 9.02 | 9.96 | 11.14 | |||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 21.51 | 38.18 | 23.65 | |||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 3.60 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 2.77 | ||||
| Diluted earnings | 3.57 | 1.87 | 2.75 | |||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.66 | |||||||
| Book value (1) | 30.37 | 28.72 | 27.32 | |||||||
| Tangible book value (2) | 21.68 | 20.60 | 19.41 | |||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 359,383 | $ | 262,206 | $ | 311,209 | ||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 920,401 | $ | 982,467 | $ | 958,416 | ||||
| Total assets | 3,034,623 | 2,683,122 | 2,405,830 | |||||||
| Total deposits | 1,914,286 | 1,632,998 | 1,380,326 | |||||||
| Long-term debt | 237,703 | 220,440 | 201,623 | |||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 249,787 | 243,685 | 244,853 | |||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 273,757 | 267,309 | 267,889 | |||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (3) | $ | 13,843 | $ | 20,680 | $ | 10,229 | ||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 4,697 | 5,116 | 3,837 | |||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (4) | 1.28 | % | 2.04 | % | 0.97 | % | ||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (4) | 271 | 380 | 265 | |||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 2,243 | $ | 4,121 | $ | 3,648 | ||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (4) | 0.25 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||
| Capital ratios at year end (5) | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 10.6 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.2 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 12.1 | 13.5 | 12.6 | |||||||
| Total capital | 14.1 | 16.1 | 14.7 | |||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 6.4 | 7.4 | 7.9 | |||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.5 | 7.2 | 6.4 | |||||||
| Tangible equity (2) | 6.4 | 7.4 | 8.2 | |||||||
| Tangible common equity (2) | 5.7 | 6.5 | 7.3 |
(1)For definition, see Key Metrics on page 169.
(2)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(3)Includes the allowance for loan and leases losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(4)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 64 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 68 and corresponding Table 34.
(5)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 49.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 32 |
| Table 7 | Selected Quarterly Financial Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Quarters | 2020 Quarters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share information) | Fourth | Third | Second | First | Fourth | Third | Second | First | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 11,410 | $ | 11,094 | $ | 10,233 | $ | 10,197 | $ | 10,253 | $ | 10,129 | $ | 10,848 | $ | 12,130 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 10,650 | 11,672 | 11,233 | 12,624 | 9,846 | 10,207 | 11,478 | 10,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 22,060 | 22,766 | 21,466 | 22,821 | 20,099 | 20,336 | 22,326 | 22,767 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (489) | (624) | (1,621) | (1,860) | 53 | 1,389 | 5,117 | 4,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 14,731 | 14,440 | 15,045 | 15,515 | 13,927 | 14,401 | 13,410 | 13,475 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 7,818 | 8,950 | 8,042 | 9,166 | 6,119 | 4,546 | 3,799 | 4,531 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 805 | 1,259 | (1,182) | 1,116 | 649 | (335) | 266 | 521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 7,013 | 7,691 | 9,224 | 8,050 | 5,470 | 4,881 | 3,533 | 4,010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common shareholders | 6,773 | 7,260 | 8,964 | 7,560 | 5,208 | 4,440 | 3,284 | 3,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average common shares issued and outstanding | 8,226.5 | 8,430.7 | 8,620.8 | 8,700.1 | 8,724.9 | 8,732.9 | 8,739.9 | 8,815.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | 8,304.7 | 8,492.8 | 8,735.5 | 8,755.6 | 8,785.0 | 8,777.5 | 8,768.1 | 8,862.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average assets (1) | 0.88 | % | 0.99 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.13 | % | 0.78 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.53 | % | 0.65 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Four-quarter trailing return on average assets (2) | 1.05 | 1.04 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average common shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.90 | 11.43 | 14.33 | 12.28 | 8.39 | 7.24 | 5.44 | 5.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity (3) | 15.25 | 15.85 | 19.90 | 17.08 | 11.73 | 10.16 | 7.63 | 8.32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) | 10.27 | 11.08 | 13.47 | 11.91 | 8.03 | 7.26 | 5.34 | 6.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (3) | 13.87 | 14.87 | 18.11 | 16.01 | 10.84 | 9.84 | 7.23 | 8.29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending equity to total ending assets | 8.52 | 8.83 | 9.15 | 9.23 | 9.68 | 9.82 | 9.69 | 10.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total average equity to total average assets | 8.56 | 8.95 | 9.11 | 9.52 | 9.71 | 9.76 | 9.85 | 10.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend payout (1) | 25.33 | 24.10 | 17.25 | 20.68 | 30.11 | 35.36 | 47.87 | 44.57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings | 0.82 | 0.85 | 1.03 | 0.86 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.37 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book value (1) | 30.37 | 30.22 | 29.89 | 29.07 | 28.72 | 28.33 | 27.96 | 27.84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible book value (3) | 21.68 | 21.69 | 21.61 | 20.90 | 20.60 | 20.23 | 19.90 | 19.79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market capitalization | $ | 359,383 | $ | 349,841 | $ | 349,925 | $ | 332,337 | $ | 262,206 | $ | 208,656 | $ | 205,772 | $ | 184,181 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Average balance sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 945,062 | $ | 920,509 | $ | 907,900 | $ | 907.723 | $ | 934,798 | $ | 974,018 | $ | 1,031,387 | $ | 990,283 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 3,164,118 | 3,076,452 | 3,015,113 | 2,879.221 | 2,791,874 | 2,739,684 | 2,704,186 | 2,494,928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 2,017,223 | 1,942,705 | 1,888,834 | 1,805.747 | 1,737,139 | 1,695,488 | 1,658,197 | 1,439,336 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 248,525 | 248,988 | 232,034 | 220.836 | 225,423 | 224,254 | 221,167 | 210,816 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | 246,519 | 252,043 | 250,948 | 249,648 | 246,840 | 243,896 | 242,889 | 241,078 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 270,883 | 275,484 | 274,632 | 274,047 | 271,020 | 267,323 | 266,316 | 264,534 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset quality | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses (4) | $ | 13,843 | $ | 14,693 | $ | 15,782 | $ | 17,997 | $ | 20,680 | $ | 21,506 | $ | 21,091 | $ | 17,126 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties (5) | 4,697 | 4,831 | 5,031 | 5,299 | 5,116 | 4,730 | 4,611 | 4,331 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding (5) | 1.28 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.80 | % | 2.04 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.96 | % | 1.51 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases (5) | 271 | 279 | 287 | 313 | 380 | 431 | 441 | 389 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | $ | 362 | $ | 463 | $ | 595 | $ | 823 | $ | 881 | $ | 972 | $ | 1,146 | $ | 1,122 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (5) | 0.15 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Capital ratios at period end (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 10.6 | % | 11.1 | % | 11.5 | % | 11.8 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.9 | % | 11.4 | % | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 12.1 | 12.6 | 13.0 | 13.3 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 12.9 | 12.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital | 14.1 | 14.7 | 15.1 | 15.6 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 14.8 | 14.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.9 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 7.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 6.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible equity (3) | 6.4 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common equity (3) | 5.7 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity and long-term debt metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to risk-weighted assets | 26.9 | % | 27.7 | % | 27.7 | % | 26.8 | % | 27.4 | % | 26.9 | % | 26.0 | % | 24.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total loss-absorbing capacity to supplementary leverage exposure | 12.1 | 12.4 | 12.5 | 14.1 | 14.5 | 13.7 | 14.2 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to risk-weighted assets | 14.1 | 14.4 | 14.1 | 13.0 | 13.3 | 12.9 | 12.4 | 11.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible long-term debt to supplementary leverage exposure | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.1 |
(1)For definitions, see Key Metrics on page 169.
(2)Calculated as total net income for four consecutive quarters divided by annualized average assets for four consecutive quarters.
(3)Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31 and Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 85.
(4)Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
(5)Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 64 and corresponding Table 27 and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 68 and corresponding Table 34.
(6)For more information, including which approach is used to assess capital adequacy, see Capital Management on page 49.
33 Bank of America
| Table 8 | Average Balances and Interest Rates - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense (1) | Yield/ Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non- U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | 255,595 | $ | 172 | 0.07 | % | $ | 253,227 | $ | 359 | 0.14 | % | $ | 125,555 | $ | 1,823 | 1.45 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | 7,603 | 15 | 0.19 | 8,840 | 29 | 0.33 | 9,427 | 207 | 2.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (2) | 267,257 | (90) | (0.03) | 309,945 | 903 | 0.29 | 279,610 | 4,843 | 1.73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | 147,891 | 3,823 | 2.58 | 148,076 | 4,185 | 2.83 | 148,076 | 5,269 | 3.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 905,169 | 12,433 | 1.38 | 532,266 | 9,868 | 1.87 | 450,090 | 11,917 | 2.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 216,983 | 5,995 | 2.76 | 236,719 | 7,338 | 3.10 | 220,552 | 7,651 | 3.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 31,014 | 1,066 | 3.44 | 38,251 | 1,290 | 3.37 | 44,600 | 2,194 | 4.92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 75,385 | 7,772 | 10.31 | 85,017 | 8,759 | 10.30 | 94,488 | 10,166 | 10.76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 96,472 | 2,276 | 2.36 | 89,974 | 2,545 | 2.83 | 90,656 | 3,261 | 3.60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 419,854 | 17,109 | 4.08 | 449,961 | 19,932 | 4.43 | 450,296 | 23,272 | 5.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | 324,795 | 8,606 | 2.65 | 344,095 | 9,712 | 2.82 | 321,467 | 13,161 | 4.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 99,584 | 1,752 | 1.76 | 106,487 | 2,208 | 2.07 | 103,918 | 3,402 | 3.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate (4) | 60,303 | 1,496 | 2.48 | 63,428 | 1,790 | 2.82 | 62,044 | 2,741 | 4.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 15,865 | 462 | 2.91 | 18,496 | 559 | 3.02 | 20,691 | 718 | 3.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 500,547 | 12,316 | 2.46 | 532,506 | 14,269 | 2.68 | 508,120 | 20,022 | 3.94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 920,401 | 29,425 | 3.20 | 982,467 | 34,201 | 3.48 | 958,416 | 43,294 | 4.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 112,512 | 2,321 | 2.06 | 83,078 | 2,539 | 3.06 | 69,089 | 4,478 | 6.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 2,616,428 | 48,099 | 1.84 | 2,317,899 | 52,084 | 2.25 | 2,040,263 | 71,831 | 3.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 31,214 | 31,885 | 26,193 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets, less allowance for loan and lease losses | 386,981 | 333,338 | 339,374 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 3,034,623 | $ | 2,683,122 | $ | 2,405,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposits | $ | 925,970 | $ | 314 | 0.03 | % | $ | 829,719 | $ | 977 | 0.12 | % | $ | 741,126 | $ | 4,471 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | 161,512 | 170 | 0.11 | 170,750 | 734 | 0.43 | 166,463 | 1,883 | 1.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 1,087,482 | 484 | 0.04 | 1,000,469 | 1,711 | 0.17 | 907,589 | 6,354 | 0.70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 82,769 | 53 | 0.06 | 77,046 | 232 | 0.30 | 71,468 | 834 | 1.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 1,170,251 | 537 | 0.05 | 1,077,515 | 1,943 | 0.18 | 979,057 | 7,188 | 0.73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (5) | 210,848 | 461 | 0.22 | 188,511 | 1,229 | 0.65 | 198,533 | 4,404 | 2.22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities (2,5) | 106,975 | (819) | (0.77) | 104,955 | (242) | (0.23) | 77,899 | 2,804 | 3.60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 54,107 | 1,128 | 2.08 | 41,386 | 974 | 2.35 | 45,449 | 1,249 | 2.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 237,703 | 3,431 | 1.44 | 220,440 | 4,321 | 1.96 | 201,623 | 6,700 | 3.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 1,779,884 | 4,738 | 0.27 | 1,632,807 | 8,225 | 0.50 | 1,502,561 | 22,345 | 1.49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing deposits | 744,035 | 555,483 | 401,269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities (6) | 236,947 | 227,523 | 234,111 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 273,757 | 267,309 | 267,889 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,034,623 | $ | 2,683,122 | $ | 2,405,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest spread | 1.57 | % | 1.75 | % | 2.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact of noninterest-bearing sources | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income/yield on earning assets (7) | $ | 43,361 | 1.66 | % | $ | 43,859 | 1.90 | % | $ | 49,486 | 2.43 | % |
(1)Includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
(2)For more information on negative interest, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)Nonperforming loans are included in the respective average loan balances. Income on these nonperforming loans is generally recognized on a cost recovery basis.
(4)Includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $56.5 billion, $59.8 billion and $57.3 billion, and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $3.8 billion, $3.6 billion and $4.7 billion for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(5)Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
(6)Includes $30.4 billion, $34.3 billion and $35.5 billion of structured notes and liabilities for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(7)Net interest income includes FTE adjustments of $427 million, $499 million and $595 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 34 |
| Table 9 | Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income - FTE Basis | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | Due to Change in (1) | Net Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Volume | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | From 2020 to 2021 | From 2019 to 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks | $ | (1) | $ | (186) | $ | (187) | $ | 1,849 | $ | (3,313) | $ | (1,464) | ||||||||||
| Time deposits placed and other short-term investments | (4) | (10) | (14) | (13) | (165) | (178) | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | (128) | (865) | (993) | 519 | (4,459) | (3,940) | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account assets | — | (362) | (362) | 3 | (1,087) | (1,084) | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 7,059 | (4,494) | 2,565 | 2,188 | (4,237) | (2,049) | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (612) | (731) | (1,343) | 563 | (876) | (313) | ||||||||||||||||
| Home equity | (245) | 21 | (224) | (312) | (592) | (904) | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | (994) | 7 | (987) | (1,018) | (389) | (1,407) | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect and other consumer | 185 | (454) | (269) | (22) | (694) | (716) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | (2,823) | (3,340) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | (553) | (553) | (1,106) | 912 | (4,361) | (3,449) | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | (147) | (309) | (456) | 80 | (1,274) | (1,194) | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (89) | (205) | (294) | 63 | (1,014) | (951) | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | (80) | (17) | (97) | (76) | (83) | (159) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | (1,953) | (5,753) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | (4,776) | (9,093) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other earning assets | 904 | (1,122) | (218) | 905 | (2,844) | (1,939) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net decrease in interest income | $ | (3,985) | $ | (19,747) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. interest-bearing deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand and money market deposit accounts | $ | 134 | $ | (797) | $ | (663) | $ | 507 | $ | (4,001) | $ | (3,494) | ||||||||||
| Time and savings deposits | (39) | (525) | (564) | 46 | (1,195) | (1,149) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits | (1,227) | (4,643) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits | 16 | (195) | (179) | 67 | (669) | (602) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | (1,406) | (5,245) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (2) | 142 | (910) | (768) | (219) | (2,956) | (3,175) | ||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities (2) | (4) | (573) | (577) | 974 | (4,020) | (3,046) | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account liabilities | 298 | (144) | 154 | (111) | (164) | (275) | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 338 | (1,228) | (890) | 619 | (2,998) | (2,379) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net decrease in interest expense | (3,487) | (14,120) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net decrease in net interest income (3) | $ | (498) | $ | (5,627) |
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and expense are divided between the portion of change attributable to the variance in volume and the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate for that category. The unallocated change in rate or volume variance is allocated between the rate and volume variances.
(2)Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-period presentation.
(3)Includes changes in FTE basis adjustments of a $72 million decrease from 2020 to 2021 and a $96 million decrease from 2019 to 2020.
35 Bank of America
Business Segment Operations
Segment Description and Basis of Presentation
We report our results of operations through the following four business segments: Consumer Banking, GWIM, Global Banking and Global Markets, with the remaining operations recorded in All Other. We manage our segments and report their results on an FTE basis. The primary activities, products and businesses of the business segments and All Other are shown below.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. We utilize a methodology that considers the effect of regulatory capital requirements in addition to internal risk-based capital models. Our internal risk-based capital models use a risk-adjusted methodology incorporating each segment’s credit, market, interest rate, business and operational risk components. For more information on the nature of these risks, see Managing Risk on page 46. The capital allocated to the business segments is referred to as allocated capital. Allocated equity in the reporting units is comprised of allocated capital plus capital for the portion of goodwill and intangibles specifically assigned to the reporting unit. For more information, including the definition of a reporting unit, see Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For information on our presentation of financial information on an FTE basis, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31,
and for reconciliations to consolidated total revenue, net income and year-end total assets, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective October 1, 2021, a business activity previously included in Global Markets is being reported as a liquidating business in All Other, consistent with a realignment in performance reporting to senior management. The activity was not material to Global Markets’ results of operations and historical results have not been restated. For more information, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Key Performance Indicators
We present certain key financial and nonfinancial performance indicators that management uses when evaluating segment results. We believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our segments’ operational performance, customer trends and business growth.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 36 |
Consumer Banking
| Deposits | Consumer Lending | Total Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 14,358 | $ | 13,739 | $ | 10,571 | $ | 10,959 | $ | 24,929 | $ | 24,698 | 1 | % | |||||||||
| Noninterest income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card income | (28) | (20) | 5,200 | 4,693 | 5,172 | 4,673 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 3,535 | 3,416 | 3 | 1 | 3,538 | 3,417 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| All other income | 223 | 310 | 143 | 164 | 366 | 474 | (23) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 3,730 | 3,706 | 5,346 | 4,858 | 9,076 | 8,564 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 18,088 | 17,445 | 15,917 | 15,817 | 34,005 | 33,262 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 240 | 379 | (1,275) | 5,386 | (1,035) | 5,765 | (118) | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 11,650 | 11,508 | 7,640 | 7,374 | 19,290 | 18,882 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 6,198 | 5,558 | 9,552 | 3,057 | 15,750 | 8,615 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,519 | 1,362 | 2,340 | 749 | 3,859 | 2,111 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,679 | $ | 4,196 | $ | 7,212 | $ | 2,308 | $ | 11,891 | $ | 6,504 | 83 | ||||||||||
| Effective tax rate (1) | 24.5 | % | 24.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 1.48 | % | 1.69 | % | 3.77 | % | 3.53 | % | 2.45 | 2.88 | |||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 39 | 35 | 27 | 9 | 31 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 64.41 | 65.97 | 48.00 | 46.62 | 56.73 | 56.77 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,431 | $ | 5,144 | $ | 279,630 | $ | 310,436 | $ | 284,061 | $ | 315,580 | (10) | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 973,018 | 813,779 | 280,080 | 310,862 | 1,016,751 | 858,724 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 1,009,387 | 849,924 | 285,532 | 314,599 | 1,058,572 | 898,606 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 976,093 | 816,968 | 6,934 | 6,698 | 983,027 | 823,666 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 12,000 | 12,000 | 26,500 | 26,500 | 38,500 | 38,500 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Year end | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 4,206 | $ | 4,673 | $ | 282,305 | $ | 295,261 | $ | 286,511 | $ | 299,934 | (4) | % | |||||||||
| Total earning assets (2) | 1,048,009 | 899,951 | 282,850 | 295,627 | 1,090,331 | 945,343 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets (2) | 1,082,449 | 939,629 | 289,220 | 299,185 | 1,131,142 | 988,580 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,049,085 | 906,092 | 5,910 | 6,560 | 1,054,995 | 912,652 | 16 |
(1)Estimated at the segment level only.
(2)In segments and businesses where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, we allocate assets from All Other to match the segments’ and businesses’ liabilities and allocated shareholders’ equity. As a result, total earning assets and total assets of the businesses may not equal total Consumer Banking.
Consumer Banking, comprised of Deposits and Consumer Lending, offers a diversified range of credit, banking and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses. Deposits and Consumer Lending include the net impact of migrating customers and their related deposit, brokerage asset and loan balances between Deposits, Consumer Lending and GWIM, as well as other client-managed businesses. Our customers and clients have access to a coast-to-coast network including financial centers in 38 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 2021, our network includes approximately 4,200 financial centers, approximately 16,000 ATMs, nationwide call centers and leading digital banking platforms with more than 41 million active users, including approximately 33 million active mobile users.
Consumer Banking Results
Net income for Consumer Banking increased $5.4 billion to $11.9 billion primarily due to improvement in the provision for credit losses and higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $231 million to $24.9 billion primarily due to the benefit of higher
deposit balances and the acceleration of net capitalized loan fees due to PPP loan forgiveness, partially offset by lower interest rates and loan balances. Noninterest income increased $512 million to $9.1 billion primarily driven by higher card income and service charges due to increased client activity, partially offset by the allocation of asset and liability management (ALM) results.
The provision for credit losses improved $6.8 billion to a benefit of $1.0 billion primarily driven by reserve releases due to improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. Noninterest expense increased $408 million to $19.3 billion primarily driven by an impairment charge for real estate rationalization, the contribution to the Bank of America Foundation, cost of increased client activity and continued investments for business growth, including the merchant services platform, partially offset by lower COVID-19 related costs.
The return on average allocated capital was 31 percent, up from 17 percent, driven by higher net income. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
37 Bank of America
Deposits
Deposits includes the results of consumer deposit activities that consist of a comprehensive range of products provided to consumers and small businesses. Our deposit products include noninterest- and interest-bearing checking accounts, money market savings accounts, traditional savings accounts, CDs and IRAs, as well as investment accounts and products. Net interest income is allocated to the deposit products using our funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics. Deposits generates fees such as account service fees, non-sufficient funds fees, overdraft charges and ATM fees, as well as investment and brokerage fees from Consumer Investment accounts. Consumer Investments serves investment client relationships through the Merrill Edge integrated investing and banking service platform, providing investment advice and guidance, client brokerage asset services, self-directed online investing and key banking capabilities including access to the Corporation’s network of financial centers and ATMs.
Net income for Deposits increased $483 million to $4.7 billion due to higher revenue and lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $619 million to $14.4 billion primarily due to the benefit of higher deposit balances. Noninterest income increased $24 million to $3.7 billion primarily driven by higher service charges and investment and brokerage fees, largely offset by the allocation of ALM results.
The provision for credit losses decreased $139 million to $240 million due to an improved macroeconomic outlook. Noninterest expense increased $142 million to $11.7 billion primarily driven by an impairment charge for real estate rationalization, and the cost of increased client activity and continued investments for business growth, partially offset by lower COVID-19 related costs.
Average deposits increased $159.1 billion to $976.1 billion primarily due to net inflows of $90.4 billion in checking and time deposits and $68.0 billion in traditional savings and money market savings driven by strong organic growth and government stimulus measures.
The table below provides key performance indicators for Deposits. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information to evaluate our deposit profitability and digital/mobile trends.
| Key Statistics – Deposits | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Total deposit spreads (excludes noninterest costs) (1) | 1.69% | 1.94% | |||||||
| Year End | |||||||||
| Consumer investment assets (in millions) (2) | $ | 368,831 | $ | 306,104 | |||||
| Active digital banking users (in thousands) (3) | 41,365 | 39,315 | |||||||
| Active mobile banking users (in thousands) (4) | 32,980 | 30,783 | |||||||
| Financial centers | 4,173 | 4,312 | |||||||
| ATMs | 16,209 | 16,904 |
(1)Includes deposits held in Consumer Lending.
(2)Includes client brokerage assets, deposit sweep balances and AUM in Consumer Banking.
(3)Represents mobile and/or online active users over the past 90 days.
(4)Represents mobile active users over the past 90 days.
Consumer investment assets increased $62.7 billion to $368.8 billion driven by market performance and client flows. Active mobile banking users increased approximately two million, reflecting continuing changes in our customers’ banking preferences. We had a net decrease of 139 financial centers as we continue to optimize our consumer banking network.
Consumer Lending
Consumer Lending offers products to consumers and small businesses across the U.S. The products offered include debit and credit cards, residential mortgages and home equity loans, and direct and indirect loans such as automotive, recreational vehicle and consumer personal loans. In addition to earning net interest spread revenue on its lending activities, Consumer Lending generates interchange revenue from debit and credit card transactions, late fees, cash advance fees, annual credit card fees, mortgage banking fee income and other miscellaneous fees. Consumer Lending products are available to our customers through our retail network, direct telephone, and online and mobile channels. Consumer Lending results also include the impact of servicing residential mortgages and home equity loans, including loans held on the balance sheet of Consumer Lending and loans serviced for others.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 38 |
Net income for Consumer Lending was $7.2 billion, an increase of $4.9 billion, primarily due to improvement in the provision for credit losses. Net interest income declined $388 million to $10.6 billion primarily due to lower interest rates and loan balances. Noninterest income increased $488 million to $5.3 billion primarily driven by higher card income due to increased client activity.
The provision for credit losses improved $6.7 billion to a benefit of $1.3 billion primarily driven by reserve releases due to improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. Noninterest expense increased $266 million to $7.6 billion primarily driven by continued investments for business growth, partially offset by lower COVID-19 related costs.
Average loans decreased $30.8 billion to $279.6 billion primarily driven by a decline in residential mortgage and credit card loans.
The table below provides key performance indicators for Consumer Lending. Management uses these metrics, and we believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about loan growth and profitability.
| Key Statistics – Consumer Lending | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Total credit card (1) | ||||||||||
| Gross interest yield (2) | 10.17 | % | 10.27 | % | ||||||
| Risk-adjusted margin (3) | 10.17 | 9.16 | ||||||||
| New accounts (in thousands) | 3,594 | 2,505 | ||||||||
| Purchase volumes | $ | 311,571 | $ | 251,599 | ||||||
| Debit card purchase volumes | $ | 473,770 | $ | 384,503 |
(1)Includes GWIM's credit card portfolio.
(2)Calculated as the effective annual percentage rate divided by average loans.
(3)Calculated as the difference between total revenue, net of interest expense, and net credit losses divided by average loans.
During 2021, the total risk-adjusted margin increased 101 bps primarily driven by lower net credit losses, higher fee income and higher net interest margin. Total credit card purchase volumes increased $60.0 billion to $311.6 billion as spending continued to recover, with improvements across all categories. Debit card purchase volumes increased $89.3 billion to $473.8 billion due to continued retail growth from the pandemic recovery, as well as the impact of government stimulus measures, and tax refunds.
| Key Statistics – Loan Production (1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Consumer Banking: | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 45,976 | $ | 43,197 | ||||||
| Home equity | 3,996 | 6,930 | ||||||||
| Total (2): | ||||||||||
| First mortgage | $ | 79,692 | $ | 69,086 | ||||||
| Home equity | 4,895 | 8,160 |
(1)The loan production amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of loans and, in the case of home equity, the principal amount of the total line of credit.
(2)In addition to loan production in Consumer Banking, there is also first mortgage and home equity loan production in GWIM.
First mortgage loan originations for Consumer Banking and the total Corporation increased $2.8 billion and $10.6 billion during 2021 primarily driven by higher demand.
Home equity production in Consumer Banking and the total Corporation decreased $2.9 billion and $3.3 billion during 2021 primarily driven by lower demand due to increased borrower liquidity.
39 Bank of America
Global Wealth & Investment Management
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 5,664 | $ | 5,468 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 14,312 | 12,270 | 17 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 772 | 846 | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 15,084 | 13,116 | 15 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 20,748 | 18,584 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (241) | 357 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 15,258 | 14,160 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 5,731 | 4,067 | 41 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,404 | 996 | 41 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,327 | $ | 3,071 | 41 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 24.5 | % | 24.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 1.51 | 1.73 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 26 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 73.54 | 76.19 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 196,899 | $ | 183,402 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 374,273 | 316,008 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 386,918 | 328,384 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 340,124 | 287,123 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 16,500 | 15,000 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 208,971 | $ | 188,562 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 425,112 | 356,873 | 19 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 438,275 | 369,736 | 19 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 390,143 | 322,157 | 21 |
n/m = not meaningful
GWIM consists of two primary businesses: Merrill Wealth Management (MWM) and Bank of America Private Bank.
MWM's advisory business provides a high-touch client experience through a network of financial advisors focused on clients with over $250,000 in total investable assets. MWM provides tailored solutions to meet clients' needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking and retirement products.
Bank of America Private Bank, together with MWM's Private Wealth Management business, provides comprehensive wealth management solutions targeted to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, as well as customized solutions to meet clients' wealth structuring, investment management, trust and banking needs, including specialty asset management services.
Net income for GWIM increased $1.3 billion to $4.3 billion driven by higher revenue and improvement in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. The operating margin was 28 percent compared to 22 percent a year ago.
Net interest income increased $196 million to $5.7 billion due to the benefits of loan and deposit growth, partially offset by lower interest rates.
Noninterest income, which primarily includes investment and brokerage services income, increased $2.0 billion to $15.1
billion primarily due to higher market valuations and positive AUM flows, partially offset by declines in AUM pricing.
The provision for credit losses improved $598 million to a benefit of $241 million primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. Noninterest expense increased $1.1 billion to $15.3 billion primarily driven by higher revenue-related incentives.
The return on average allocated capital was 26 percent, up from 21 percent, due to higher net income, partially offset by an increase in allocated capital. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
Average loans increased $13.5 billion to $196.9 billion primarily driven by securities-based lending, custom lending and residential mortgage. Average deposits increased $53.0 billion to $340.1 billion primarily driven by inflows from new accounts and client responses to market volatility.
MWM revenue of $17.4 billion increased 14 percent primarily driven by the benefits of higher market valuations, positive AUM flows and loan and deposit growth.
Bank of America Private Bank revenue of $3.3 billion remained relatively flat with the benefits of higher market valuations, AUM flows, and loan and deposit growth mostly offset by the realignment of certain business results to MWM.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 40 |
| Key Indicators and Metrics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Revenue by Business | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 17,448 | $ | 15,292 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 3,300 | 3,292 | ||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 20,748 | $ | 18,584 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Business, at period end | ||||||||||
| Merrill Wealth Management | $ | 3,214,881 | $ | 2,808,340 | ||||||
| Bank of America Private Bank | 625,453 | 541,464 | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 3,840,334 | $ | 3,349,804 | ||||||
| Client Balances by Type, at period end | ||||||||||
| Assets under management | $ | 1,638,782 | $ | 1,408,465 | ||||||
| Brokerage and other assets | 1,655,021 | 1,479,614 | ||||||||
| Deposits | 390,143 | 322,157 | ||||||||
| Loans and leases (1) | 212,251 | 191,124 | ||||||||
| Less: Managed deposits in assets under management | (55,863) | (51,556) | ||||||||
| Total client balances | $ | 3,840,334 | $ | 3,349,804 | ||||||
| Assets Under Management Rollforward | ||||||||||
| Assets under management, beginning of period | $ | 1,408,465 | $ | 1,275,555 | ||||||
| Net client flows | 66,250 | 19,596 | ||||||||
| Market valuation/other | 164,067 | 113,314 | ||||||||
| Total assets under management, end of period | $ | 1,638,782 | $ | 1,408,465 | ||||||
| Total wealth advisors, at period end (2) | 18,846 | 20,103 |
(1)Includes margin receivables which are classified in customer and other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2)Includes advisors across all wealth management businesses in GWIM and Consumer Banking. Prior period has been revised to conform to current-period presentation.
Client Balances
Client balances managed under advisory and/or discretion of GWIM are AUM and are typically held in diversified portfolios. Fees earned on AUM are calculated as a percentage of clients’ AUM balances. The asset management fees charged to clients per year depend on various factors, but are commonly driven by the breadth of the client’s relationship. The net client AUM flows
represent the net change in clients’ AUM balances over a specified period of time, excluding market appreciation/depreciation and other adjustments.
Client balances increased $490.5 billion, or 15 percent, to $3.8 trillion at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020. The increase in client balances was primarily due to higher market valuations and positive client flows.
41 Bank of America
Global Banking
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 8,511 | $ | 9,013 | (6) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Service charges | 3,523 | 3,238 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 5,107 | 4,010 | 27 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 3,734 | 2,726 | 37 | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 12,364 | 9,974 | 24 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 20,875 | 18,987 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (3,201) | 4,897 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 10,632 | 9,342 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 13,444 | 4,748 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,630 | 1,282 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 9,814 | $ | 3,466 | n/m | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 27.0 | % | 27.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest yield | 1.55 | 1.86 | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 23 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 50.93 | 49.20 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 329,655 | $ | 382,264 | (14) | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 549,749 | 485,688 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 611,304 | 542,302 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 522,790 | 456,562 | 15 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 42,500 | 42,500 | — | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 352,933 | $ | 339,649 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 574,583 | 522,650 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 638,131 | 580,561 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 551,752 | 493,748 | 12 |
n/m = not meaningful
Global Banking, which includes Global Corporate Banking, Global Commercial Banking, Business Banking and Global Investment Banking, provides a wide range of lending-related products and services, integrated working capital management and treasury solutions, and underwriting and advisory services through our network of offices and client relationship teams. Our lending products and services include commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, commercial real estate lending and asset-based lending. Our treasury solutions business includes treasury management, foreign exchange, short-term investing options and merchant services. We also provide investment banking products to our clients such as debt and equity underwriting and distribution, and merger-related and other advisory services. Underwriting debt and equity issuances, fixed-income and equity research, and certain market-based activities are executed through our global broker-dealer affiliates, which are our primary dealers in several countries. Within Global Banking, Global Corporate Banking clients generally include large global corporations, financial institutions and leasing clients. Global Commercial Banking clients generally include middle-market companies, commercial real estate firms and not-for-profit companies. Business Banking clients include mid-sized U.S.-based businesses requiring customized and integrated financial advice and solutions.
Net income for Global Banking increased $6.3 billion to $9.8 billion driven by improvement in the provision for credit losses and higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
Net interest income decreased $502 million to $8.5 billion
primarily due to the impact of lower average loan balances and deposit spreads, partially offset by the benefits of higher deposit balances and credit spreads.
Noninterest income increased $2.4 billion to $12.4 billion driven by higher investment banking fees, higher valuation-driven adjustments on the fair value loan portfolio, debt securities and leveraged loans, higher income from ESG investment activities, as well as higher treasury and credit service charges.
The provision for credit losses improved $8.1 billion to a benefit of $3.2 billion primarily driven by reserve releases due to improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality.
Noninterest expense increased $1.3 billion to $10.6 billion, primarily due to higher revenue-related incentives and higher operating costs.
The return on average allocated capital was 23 percent, up from eight percent, due to higher net income. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking
Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking each include Business Lending and Global Transaction Services activities. Business Lending includes various lending-related products and services, and related hedging activities, including commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, real estate lending and asset-based lending. Global Transaction Services includes deposits, treasury management, credit card, foreign exchange and short-term investment products.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 42 |
The table below and following discussion present a summary of the results, which exclude certain investment banking, merchant services and PPP activities in Global Banking.
| Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Corporate Banking | Global Commercial Banking | Business Banking | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Business Lending | $ | 3,725 | $ | 3,552 | $ | 3,676 | $ | 3,743 | $ | 225 | $ | 261 | $ | 7,626 | $ | 7,556 | ||||||||||||||
| Global Transaction Services | 3,127 | 2,986 | 3,209 | 3,169 | 889 | 893 | 7,225 | 7,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | $ | 6,852 | $ | 6,538 | $ | 6,885 | $ | 6,912 | $ | 1,114 | $ | 1,154 | $ | 14,851 | $ | 14,604 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 150,159 | $ | 179,393 | $ | 161,012 | $ | 182,212 | $ | 12,763 | $ | 14,410 | $ | 323,934 | $ | 376,015 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 251,303 | 216,371 | 213,708 | 191,813 | 56,321 | 48,214 | 521,332 | 456,398 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 163,027 | $ | 153,126 | $ | 175,228 | $ | 164,641 | $ | 12,822 | $ | 13,242 | $ | 351,077 | $ | 331,009 | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 259,160 | 233,484 | 232,670 | 207,597 | 57,848 | 52,150 | 549,678 | 493,231 |
Business Lending revenue increased $70 million in 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher credit spreads and income from ESG investment activities, partially offset by the impact of lower average loan balances.
Global Transaction Services revenue increased $177 million in 2021 compared to 2020 driven by the benefit of higher deposit balances and treasury service charges, partially offset by lower deposit spreads.
Average loans and leases decreased 14 percent in 2021 compared to 2020 driven by client paydowns and lower demand. Average deposits increased 14 percent primarily driven by elevated balances from prior-year inflows on client responses to market volatility and government stimulus measures.
Global Investment Banking
Client teams and product specialists underwrite and distribute debt, equity and loan products, and provide advisory services and tailored risk management solutions. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Banking and Global Markets under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by
Global Markets. To provide a complete discussion of our consolidated investment banking fees, the following table presents total Corporation investment banking fees and the portion attributable to Global Banking.
| Investment Banking Fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Banking | Total Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Products | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advisory | $ | 2,139 | $ | 1,458 | $ | 2,311 | $ | 1,621 | ||||||||||||||
| Debt issuance | 1,736 | 1,555 | 4,015 | 3,443 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity issuance | 1,232 | 997 | 2,784 | 2,328 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross investment banking fees | 5,107 | 4,010 | 9,110 | 7,392 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Self-led deals | (93) | (93) | (223) | (212) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment banking fees | $ | 5,014 | $ | 3,917 | $ | 8,887 | $ | 7,180 |
Total Corporation investment banking fees, excluding self-led deals, of $8.9 billion, which are primarily included within Global Banking and Global Markets, increased 24 percent primarily driven by higher advisory fees as well as higher debt issuance and equity issuance fees.
43 Bank of America
Global Markets
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 4,011 | $ | 4,646 | (14) | % | ||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment and brokerage services | 1,979 | 1,973 | — | |||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 3,616 | 2,991 | 21 | |||||||||||||
| Market making and similar activities | 8,760 | 8,471 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| All other income | 889 | 684 | 30 | |||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 15,244 | 14,119 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | 19,255 | 18,765 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 65 | 251 | (74) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 13,032 | 11,417 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 6,158 | 7,097 | (13) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,601 | 1,845 | (13) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,557 | $ | 5,252 | (13) | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 26.0 | % | 26.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Return on average allocated capital | 12 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 67.68 | 60.84 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 291,505 | $ | 243,519 | 20 | % | ||||||||||
| Reverse repurchases | 113,989 | 104,697 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Securities borrowed | 100,292 | 87,125 | 15 | |||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 43,582 | 47,655 | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | 549,368 | 482,996 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 91,339 | 73,062 | 25 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 541,391 | 482,171 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 785,998 | 685,047 | 15 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 51,833 | 47,400 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 38,000 | 36,000 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Year end | ||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 491,160 | $ | 421,698 | 16 | % | ||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | 114,846 | 78,415 | 46 | |||||||||||||
| Total earning assets | 561,135 | 447,350 | 25 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets | 747,794 | 616,609 | 21 | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 46,374 | 53,925 | (14) |
Global Markets offers sales and trading services and research services to institutional clients across fixed-income, credit, currency, commodity and equity businesses. Global Markets product coverage includes securities and derivative products in both the primary and secondary markets. Global Markets provides market-making, financing, securities clearing, settlement and custody services globally to our institutional investor clients in support of their investing and trading activities. We also work with our commercial and corporate clients to provide risk management products using interest rate, equity, credit, currency and commodity derivatives, foreign exchange, fixed-income and mortgage-related products. As a result of our market-making activities in these products, we may be required to manage risk in a broad range of financial products including government securities, equity and equity-linked securities, high-grade and high-yield corporate debt securities, syndicated loans, MBS, commodities and asset-backed securities. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Markets and Global Banking under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets. For information on
investment banking fees on a consolidated basis, see page 43.
The following explanations for year-over-year changes for Global Markets, including those disclosed under Sales and Trading Revenue, are the same for amounts including and excluding net DVA. Amounts excluding net DVA are a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31.
Net income for Global Markets decreased $695 million to $4.6 billion. Net DVA losses were $54 million compared to losses of $133 million in 2020. Excluding net DVA, net income decreased $755 million to $4.6 billion. These decreases were primarily driven by higher noninterest expense, partially offset by higher revenue and lower provision for credit losses.
Revenue increased $490 million to $19.3 billion primarily driven by higher investment banking fees and sales and trading revenue. Sales and trading revenue increased $172 million, and excluding net DVA, increased $93 million. These increases were driven by higher revenue in Equities, partially offset by lower revenue in FICC.
The provision for credit losses decreased $186 million primarily due to an improved macroeconomic outlook.
Noninterest expense increased $1.6 billion to $13.0 billion primarily driven by higher revenue-related expenses for sales and trading as well as costs associated with processing
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 44 |
transactional card claims related to state unemployment benefits.
Average total assets increased $101.0 billion to $786.0 billion. Year-end total assets increased $131.2 billion to $747.8 billion. Both increases were primarily due to higher client balances in Equities and higher levels of inventory and loan growth in FICC.
The return on average allocated capital was 12 percent, down from 15 percent, reflecting lower net income and an increase in allocated capital. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
Sales and Trading Revenue
Sales and trading revenue includes unrealized and realized gains and losses on trading and other assets which are included in market making and similar activities, net interest income, and fees primarily from commissions on equity securities. Sales and trading revenue is segregated into fixed-income (government debt obligations, investment and non-investment grade corporate debt obligations, commercial MBS, residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, interest rate and credit derivative contracts), currencies (interest rate and foreign exchange contracts), commodities (primarily futures, forwards, swaps and options) and equities (equity-linked derivatives and cash equity activity). The following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue, substantially all of which is in Global Markets, with the remainder in Global Banking. In addition, the following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue,
excluding net DVA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on net DVA, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31.
| Sales and Trading Revenue (1, 2, 3) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Sales and trading revenue | ||||||||||
| Fixed income, currencies and commodities | $ | 8,761 | $ | 9,595 | ||||||
| Equities | 6,428 | 5,422 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue | $ | 15,189 | $ | 15,017 | ||||||
| Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA (4) | ||||||||||
| Fixed income, currencies and commodities | $ | 8,810 | $ | 9,725 | ||||||
| Equities | 6,433 | 5,425 | ||||||||
| Total sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA | $ | 15,243 | $ | 15,150 |
(1)For more information on sales and trading revenue, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes FTE adjustments of $421 million and $196 million for 2021 and 2020.
(3) Includes Global Banking sales and trading revenue of $510 million and $479 million for 2021 and 2020.
(4) FICC and Equities sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, is a non-GAAP financial measure. FICC net DVA losses were $49 million and $130 million for 2021 and 2020. Equities net DVA losses were $5 million and $3 million for 2021 and 2020.
FICC revenue decreased $915 million driven by reduced activity in macro products, partially offset by stronger performance in credit and municipal products, and gains in commodities (partially offset by related losses in another segment) from market volatility driven by a weather-related event in the first quarter of 2021. Equities revenue increased $1.0 billion driven by growth in client financing activities, a stronger trading performance and increased client activity.
All Other
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | $ | 246 | $ | 34 | n/m | |||||||||||
| Noninterest income (loss) | (5,589) | (3,605) | 55 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total revenue, net of interest expense | (5,343) | (3,571) | 50 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (182) | 50 | n/m | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 1,519 | 1,412 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (6,680) | (5,033) | 33 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit | (8,069) | (4,634) | 74 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,389 | $ | (399) | n/m | |||||||||||
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
| Average | 2021 | 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 18,447 | $ | 28,159 | (34) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 191,831 | 228,783 | (16) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 16,512 | 18,247 | (10) | |||||||||||||
| Year end | December 31 2021 | December 31 2020 | % Change | |||||||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 15,863 | $ | 21,301 | (26) | % | ||||||||||
| Total assets (1) | 214,153 | 264,141 | (19) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 21,182 | 12,998 | 63 |
(1)In segments where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, which are generally deposit-taking segments, we allocate assets from All Other to those segments to match liabilities (i.e., deposits) and allocated shareholders’ equity. Average allocated assets were $1.1 trillion and $763.1 billion for 2021 and 2020, and year-end allocated assets were $1.2 trillion and $977.7 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
n/m = not meaningful
All Other primarily consists of ALM activities, liquidating businesses and certain expenses not otherwise allocated to a business segment. ALM activities encompass interest rate and foreign currency risk management activities for which substantially all of the results are allocated to our business segments. For more information on our ALM activities, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net income increased $1.8 billion to $1.4 billion primarily due to a higher income tax benefit and improvement in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by lower revenue.
Revenue decreased $1.8 billion primarily due to higher partnership losses for ESG investments and a $704 million gain on sales of certain mortgage loans in the prior year.
45 Bank of America
The provision for credit losses improved $232 million to a benefit of $182 million primarily due to an improved macroeconomic outlook.
Noninterest expense increased $107 million primarily due to higher technology costs and the realignment of a liquidating business activity from Global Markets to All Other in the fourth quarter of 2021, partially offset by lower litigation expense. For more information on realignment of the business activity, see Note 23 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The income tax benefit was $8.1 billion in 2021 compared to a benefit of $4.6 billion in 2020. The increase in the tax benefit was primarily driven by the impact of U.K. tax law changes and increased income tax credits in 2021. For more information on U.K. tax law changes, see Financial Highlights – Income Tax Expense on page 29. Both years included income tax benefit adjustments to eliminate the FTE treatment of certain tax credits recorded in Global Banking.
Managing Risk
Risk is inherent in all our business activities. Sound risk management enables us to serve our customers and deliver for our shareholders. If not managed well, risk can result in financial loss, regulatory sanctions and penalties, and damage to our reputation, each of which may adversely impact our ability to execute our business strategies. We take a comprehensive approach to risk management with a defined Risk Framework and an articulated Risk Appetite Statement, which are approved annually by the ERC and the Board.
The seven key types of risk faced by the Corporation are strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational.
● Strategic risk is the risk to current or projected financial condition arising from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate.
● Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations.
● Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities or otherwise negatively impact earnings. Market risk is composed of price risk and interest rate risk.
● Liquidity risk is the inability to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral needs while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions.
● Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules and regulations and our internal policies and procedures.
● Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, people or external events.
● Reputational risk is the risk that negative perception of the Corporation may adversely impact profitability or operations.
The following sections address in more detail the specific procedures, measures and analyses of the major categories of risk. This discussion of managing risk focuses on the current
Risk Framework that, as part of its annual review process, was approved by the ERC and the Board.
As set forth in our Risk Framework, a culture of managing risk well is fundamental to our values and our purpose, and how we drive Responsible Growth. It requires us to focus on risk in all activities and encourages the necessary mindset and behavior to enable effective risk management and promote sound risk-taking within our risk appetite. Sustaining a culture of managing risk well throughout the organization is critical to the success of the Corporation and is a clear expectation of our executive management team and the Board.
Our Risk Framework serves as the foundation for the consistent and effective management of risks facing the Corporation. The Risk Framework sets forth roles and responsibilities for the management of risk and provides a blueprint for how the Board, through delegation of authority to committees and executive officers, establishes risk appetite and associated limits for our activities.
Executive management assesses, with Board oversight, the risk-adjusted returns of each business. Management reviews and approves the strategic and financial operating plans, as well as the capital plan and Risk Appetite Statement, and recommends them annually to the Board for approval. Our strategic plan takes into consideration return objectives and financial resources, which must align with risk capacity and risk appetite. Management sets financial objectives for each business by allocating capital and setting a target for return on capital for each business. Capital allocations and operating limits are regularly evaluated as part of our overall governance processes as the businesses and the economic environment in which we operate continue to evolve. For more information regarding capital allocations, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
The Corporation’s risk appetite indicates the amount of capital, earnings or liquidity we are willing to put at risk to achieve our strategic objectives and business plans, consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. Our risk appetite provides a common set of measures for senior management and the Board to clearly indicate the level of risk we are willing to take in alignment with our strategic and capital plans and ensure that the Corporation’s risk profile remains aligned with our risk appetite. Our risk appetite is formally articulated in the Risk Appetite Statement, which includes both qualitative components and quantitative limits.
Our overall capacity to take risk is limited; therefore, we prioritize the risks we take in order to maintain a strong and flexible financial position so we can withstand challenging economic conditions and take advantage of organic growth opportunities. Therefore, we set objectives and targets for capital and liquidity that are intended to permit us to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner, including during periods of stress.
Our lines of business operate with risk limits (which may include credit, market and/or operational limits, as applicable) that align with the Corporation’s risk appetite. Executive management is responsible for tracking and reporting performance measurements as well as any exceptions to guidelines or limits. The Board, and its committees when appropriate, oversee financial performance, execution of the strategic and financial operating plans, adherence to risk appetite limits and the adequacy of internal controls.
For a more detailed discussion of our risk management activities, see the discussion below and pages 49 through 82.
For more information about the Corporation's risks related to the pandemic, see Item 1A. Risk Factors on page 8. These
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 46 |
COVID-19 related risks are being managed within our Risk Framework and supporting risk management programs.
Risk Management Governance
The Risk Framework describes delegations of authority whereby the Board and its committees may delegate authority to management-level committees or executive officers. Such delegations may authorize certain decision-making and approval
functions, which may be evidenced in documents such as committee charters, job descriptions, meeting minutes and resolutions.
The chart below illustrates the interrelationship among the Board, Board committees and management committees that have the majority of risk oversight responsibilities for the Corporation.
Board of Directors and Board Committees
The Board is composed of 16 directors, all but one of whom are independent. The Board authorizes management to maintain an effective Risk Framework and oversees compliance with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, the Board or its committees conduct inquiries of, and receive reports from management on, risk-related matters to assess scope or resource limitations that could impede the ability of Global Risk Management (GRM) and/or Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Board committees discussed below have the principal responsibility for enterprise-wide oversight of our risk management activities. Through these activities, the Board and applicable committees are provided with information on our risk profile and oversee executive management addressing key risks we face. Other Board committees, as described below, provide additional oversight of specific risks.
Each of the committees shown on the above chart regularly reports to the Board on risk-related matters within the committee’s responsibilities, which is intended to collectively provide the Board with integrated insight about our management of enterprise-wide risks.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the qualifications, performance and independence of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the performance of our corporate audit function, the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and makes inquiries of management or the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) to determine whether there are scope or resource limitations that impede the ability of Corporate Audit to execute its responsibilities. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing compliance risks pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Enterprise Risk Committee
The ERC has primary responsibility for oversight of the Risk Framework and key risks we face and of the Corporation’s
overall risk appetite. It approves the Risk Framework and the Risk Appetite Statement and further recommends these documents to the Board for approval. The ERC oversees senior management’s responsibilities for the identification, measurement, monitoring and control of key risks we face. The ERC may consult with other Board committees on risk-related matters.
Other Board Committees
Our Corporate Governance, ESG, and Sustainability Committee oversees our Board’s governance processes, identifies and reviews the qualifications of potential Board members, recommends nominees for election to our Board, recommends committee appointments for Board approval and reviews our ESG and stockholder engagement activities.
Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee oversees establishing, maintaining and administering our compensation programs and employee benefit plans, including approving and recommending our Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO) compensation to our Board for further approval by all independent directors; reviewing and approving our executive officers’ compensation, as well as compensation for non-management directors; and reviewing certain other human capital management topics.
Management Committees
Management committees receive their authority from the Board, a Board committee, another management committee or from one or more executive officers. Our primary management risk committee is the MRC. Subject to Board oversight, the MRC is responsible for management oversight of key risks facing the Corporation, including an integrated evaluation of risk, earnings, capital and liquidity.
Lines of Defense
We have clear ownership and accountability for managing risk across three lines of defense: Front Line Units (FLUs), GRM and Corporate Audit. We also have control functions outside of FLUs and GRM (e.g., Legal and Global Human Resources). The three
47 Bank of America
lines of defense are integrated into our management-level governance structure. Each of these functional roles is further described in this section.
Executive Officers
Executive officers lead various functions representing the functional roles. Authority for functional roles may be delegated to executive officers from the Board, Board committees or management-level committees. Executive officers, in turn, may further delegate responsibilities, as appropriate, to management-level committees, management routines or individuals. Executive officers review our activities for consistency with our Risk Framework, risk appetite, and applicable strategic, capital and financial operating plans, as well as applicable policies and standards. Executive officers and other employees make decisions individually on a day-to-day basis, consistent with the authority they have been delegated. Executive officers and other employees may also serve on committees and participate in committee decisions.
Front Line Units
FLUs, which include the lines of business as well as Global Technology and Global Operations, are responsible for appropriately assessing and effectively managing all of the risks associated with their activities.
Three organizational units that include FLU activities and control function activities, but are not part of GRM are first, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Group; second, the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) Group; and third, Global Strategy and Enterprise Platforms (GSEP).
Global Risk Management
GRM is part of our control functions and operates as our independent risk management function. GRM, led by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), is responsible for independently assessing and overseeing risks within FLUs and other control functions. GRM establishes written enterprise policies and procedures outlining how aggregate risks are identified, measured, monitored and controlled.
The CRO has the stature, authority and independence needed to develop and implement a meaningful risk management framework and practices to guide the Corporation in managing risk. The CRO has unrestricted access to the Board and reports directly to both the ERC and the CEO. GRM is organized into horizontal risk teams that cover a specific risk area and vertical CRO teams that cover a particular FLU or control function. These teams work collaboratively in executing their respective duties.
Corporate Audit
Corporate Audit and the CAE maintain their independence from the FLUs, GRM and other control functions by reporting directly to the Audit Committee. The CAE administratively reports to the CEO. Corporate Audit provides independent assessment and validation through testing of key processes and controls across the Corporation. Corporate Audit includes Credit Review, which provides an independent assessment of credit lending decisions and the effectiveness of credit processes across the Corporation’s credit platform through examinations and monitoring.
Risk Management Processes
The Risk Framework requires that strong risk management practices are integrated in key strategic, capital and financial planning processes and in day-to-day business processes across the Corporation, thereby ensuring risks are appropriately
considered, evaluated and responded to in a timely manner. We employ an effective risk management process, referred to as Identify, Measure, Monitor and Control, as part of our daily activities.
Identify – To be effectively managed, risks must be proactively identified and well understood. Proper risk identification focuses on recognizing and understanding key risks inherent in our business activities or key risks that may arise from external factors. Each employee is expected to identify and escalate risks promptly. Risk identification is an ongoing process that incorporates input from FLUs and control functions. It is designed to be forward-looking and to capture relevant risk factors across all of our lines of business.
Measure – Once a risk is identified, it must be prioritized and accurately measured through a systematic process including quantitative and qualitative components. Risk is measured at various levels, including, but not limited to, risk type, FLU and legal entity, and also on an aggregate basis. This risk measurement process helps to capture changes in our risk profile due to changes in strategic direction, concentrations, portfolio quality and the overall economic environment. Senior management considers how risk exposures might evolve under a variety of stress scenarios.
Monitor – We monitor risk levels regularly to track adherence to risk appetite, policies and standards. We also regularly update risk assessments and review risk exposures. Through our monitoring, we know our level of risk relative to limits and can take action in a timely manner. We also know when risk limits are breached and have processes to appropriately report and escalate exceptions. This includes timely requests for approval to managers and alerts to executive management, management-level committees or the Board (directly or through an appropriate committee).
Control – We establish and communicate risk limits and controls through policies, standards, procedures and processes. The limits and controls can be adjusted by the Board or management when conditions or risk tolerances warrant. These limits may be absolute (e.g., loan amount, trading volume, operational loss) or relative (e.g., percentage of loan book in higher-risk categories). Our FLUs are held accountable for performing within the established limits.
The formal processes used to manage risk represent a part of our overall risk management process. We instill a strong and comprehensive culture of managing risk well through communications, training, policies, procedures and organizational roles and responsibilities. Establishing a culture reflective of our purpose to help make our customers’ financial lives better and delivering on Responsible Growth is also critical to effective risk management. We are committed to the highest principles of ethical and professional conduct. Conduct risk is the risk of improper actions, behaviors or practices that are illegal, unethical and/or contrary to our core values that could result in harm to the Corporation, our shareholders or our customers, damage the integrity of the financial markets, or negatively impact our reputation. We have established protocols and structures so that conduct risk is governed and reported across the Corporation appropriately. All employees are held accountable for adhering to the Code of Conduct, operating within our risk appetite and managing risk in their daily business activities. In addition, our performance management and compensation practices encourage responsible risk-taking that is consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 48 |
Corporation-wide Stress Testing
Integral to our Capital Planning, Financial Planning and Strategic Planning processes, we conduct capital scenario management and stress forecasting on a periodic basis to better understand balance sheet, earnings and capital sensitivities to certain economic and business scenarios, including economic and market conditions that are more severe than anticipated. These stress forecasts provide an understanding of the potential impacts from our risk profile on the balance sheet, earnings and capital, and serve as a key component of our capital and risk management practices. The intent of stress testing is to develop a comprehensive understanding of potential impacts of on- and off-balance sheet risks at the Corporation and certain subsidiaries and how they impact financial resiliency, which provides confidence to management, regulators and our investors.
Contingency Planning
We have developed and maintain contingency plans that are designed to prepare us in advance to respond in the event of potential adverse economic, financial or market stress. These contingency plans include our Capital Contingency Plan and Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan, which provide monitoring, escalation, actions and routines designed to enable us to increase capital, access funding sources and reduce risk through consideration of potential options that include asset sales, business sales, capital or debt issuances, or other de-risking strategies. We also maintain a Resolution Plan to limit adverse systemic impacts that could be associated with a potential resolution of Bank of America.
Strategic Risk Management
Strategic risk is embedded in every business and is one of the major risk categories along with credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. This risk results from incorrect assumptions about external or internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution, or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic or competitive environments in the geographic locations in which we operate, such as competitor actions, changing customer preferences, product obsolescence and technology developments. Our strategic plan is consistent with our risk appetite, capital plan and liquidity requirements, and specifically addresses strategic risks.
On an annual basis, the Board reviews and approves the strategic plan, capital plan, financial operating plan and Risk Appetite Statement. With oversight by the Board, executive management directs the lines of business to execute our strategic plan consistent with our core operating principles and risk appetite. The executive management team monitors business performance throughout the year and provides the Board with regular progress reports on whether strategic objectives and timelines are being met, including reports on strategic risks and if additional or alternative actions need to be considered or implemented. The regular executive reviews focus on assessing forecasted earnings and returns on capital, the current risk profile, current capital and liquidity requirements, staffing levels and changes required to support the strategic plan, stress testing results, and other qualitative factors such as market growth rates and peer analysis.
Significant strategic actions, such as capital actions, material acquisitions or divestitures, and resolution plans are reviewed and approved by the Board. At the business level, processes are in place to discuss the strategic risk implications of new, expanded or modified businesses, products or services
and other strategic initiatives, and to provide formal review and approval where required. With oversight by the Board and the ERC, executive management performs similar analyses throughout the year, and evaluates changes to the financial forecast or the risk, capital or liquidity positions as deemed appropriate to balance and optimize achieving the targeted risk appetite, shareholder returns and maintaining the targeted financial strength. Proprietary models are used to measure the capital requirements for credit, country, market, operational and strategic risks. The allocated capital assigned to each business is based on its unique risk profile. With oversight by the Board, executive management assesses the risk-adjusted returns of each business in approving strategic and financial operating plans. The businesses use allocated capital to define business strategies, and price products and transactions.
Capital Management
The Corporation manages its capital position so that its capital is more than adequate to support its business activities and aligns with risk, risk appetite and strategic planning. Additionally, we seek to maintain safety and soundness at all times, even under adverse scenarios, take advantage of organic growth opportunities, meet obligations to creditors and counterparties, maintain ready access to financial markets, continue to serve as a credit intermediary, remain a source of strength for our subsidiaries, and satisfy current and future regulatory capital requirements. Capital management is integrated into our risk and governance processes, as capital is a key consideration in the development of our strategic plan, risk appetite and risk limits.
We conduct an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) on a periodic basis. The ICAAP is a forward-looking assessment of our projected capital needs and resources, incorporating earnings, balance sheet and risk forecasts under baseline and adverse economic and market conditions. We utilize periodic stress tests to assess the potential impacts to our balance sheet, earnings, regulatory capital and liquidity under a variety of stress scenarios. We perform qualitative risk assessments to identify and assess material risks not fully captured in our forecasts or stress tests. We assess the potential capital impacts of proposed changes to regulatory capital requirements. Management assesses ICAAP results and provides documented quarterly assessments of the adequacy of our capital guidelines and capital position to the Board or its committees.
We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. For more information, see Business Segment Operations on page 36.
CCAR and Capital Planning
The Federal Reserve requires BHCs to submit a capital plan and planned capital actions on an annual basis, consistent with the rules governing the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) capital plan. Based on the results of our 2021 CCAR capital plan and related supervisory stress tests, we are subject to a 2.5 percent stress capital buffer (SCB), unchanged from the prior level, effective October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022. Our Common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio under the Standardized approach must remain above 9.5 percent during this period in order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.
Due to uncertainty resulting from the pandemic, the Federal Reserve imposed various restrictions on share repurchase programs and dividends during 2020 and the first half of 2021.
49 Bank of America
In conjunction with its release of 2021 CCAR supervisory stress test results, the Federal Reserve announced those restrictions would end as of July 1, 2021 for large banks, including the Corporation, and large banks would be subject to the normal restrictions under the Federal Reserve's SCB framework. On October 20, 2021, we announced that the Board renewed the Corporation’s $25 billion common stock repurchase program previously announced in April 2021. The Board’s authorization replaced the previous program. As with the April authorization, the Board also authorized common stock repurchases to offset shares awarded under the Corporation’s equity-based compensation plans. Pursuant to the Board’s authorization, during 2021 we repurchased $25.1 billion of common stock, including repurchases to offset shares awarded under equity-based compensation plans.
The timing and amount of common stock repurchases made pursuant to our stock repurchase program are subject to various factors, including the Corporation’s capital position, liquidity, financial performance and alternative uses of capital, stock trading price, regulatory requirements and general market conditions, and may be suspended at any time. Such repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including repurchase plans that satisfy the conditions of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).
Regulatory Capital
As a financial services holding company, we are subject to regulatory capital rules, including Basel 3, issued by U.S. banking regulators. Basel 3 established minimum capital ratios and buffer requirements and outlined two methods of calculating risk-weighted assets (RWA), the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches. The Standardized approach relies primarily on supervisory risk weights based on exposure type, and the Advanced approaches determine risk weights based on internal models.
The Corporation's depository institution subsidiaries are also subject to the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. The Corporation and its primary affiliated banking entity, BANA, are Advanced approaches institutions under Basel 3 and are required to report regulatory risk-based capital ratios and RWA under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. The approach that yields the lower ratio is used to assess capital adequacy, including under the PCA framework. As of December 31, 2021, the CET1, Tier 1 capital and Total capital ratios for the Corporation were lower under the Standardized approach.
Minimum Capital Requirements
In order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments, the Corporation must meet risk-based capital ratio requirements that include a capital
conservation buffer of 2.5 percent (under the Advanced approaches only), an SCB (under the Standardized approach only), plus any applicable countercyclical capital buffer and a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) surcharge. Including a regulatory minimum requirement of 4.5 percent, an SCB of 2.5 percent and a G-SIB surcharge of 2.5 percent, the Corporation's CET1 capital ratio must be a minimum of 9.5 percent under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches.
The Corporation is required to calculate its G-SIB surcharge on an annual basis under two methods and is subject to the higher of the resulting two surcharges. Method 1 is consistent with the approach prescribed by the Basel Committee’s assessment methodology and is calculated using specified indicators of systemic importance. Method 2 modifies the Method 1 approach by, among other factors, including a measure of the Corporation’s reliance on short-term wholesale funding. The Corporation’s G-SIB surcharge, which is higher under Method 2, is expected to increase to 3.0 percent on January 1, 2024 unless its surcharge calculated as of December 31, 2022 is lower than 3.0 percent.
The current SCB of 2.5 percent, which remains effective from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022, could change based on results of the 2022 CCAR capital plan and related supervisory stress tests to be submitted in the first half of 2022.
The Corporation is also required to maintain a minimum supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) of 3.0 percent plus a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. Our insured depository institution subsidiaries are required to maintain a minimum 6.0 percent SLR to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework. The numerator of the SLR is quarter-end Basel 3 Tier 1 capital. The denominator is total leverage exposure based on the daily average of the sum of on-balance sheet exposures less permitted deductions, and applicable temporary exclusions, as well as the simple average of certain off-balance sheet exposures, as of the end of each month in a quarter. The temporary exclusions expired after March 31, 2021 and were not applicable for December 31, 2021. For more information, see Capital Management – Regulatory Developments on page 54.
Capital Composition and Ratios
Table 10 presents Bank of America Corporation’s capital ratios and related information in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2021 and 2020. For the periods presented herein, the Corporation met the definition of well capitalized under current regulatory requirements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 50 |
| Table 10 | Bank of America Corporation Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 171,759 | $ | 171,759 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 196,465 | 196,465 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 227,592 | 220,616 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,618 | 1,399 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 10.6 | % | 12.3 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 12.1 | 14.0 | 11.0 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.1 | 15.8 | 13.0 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 3,087 | $ | 3,087 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 6.4 | % | 6.4 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) (5) | $ | 3,604 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 5.5 | % | 5.0 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 176,660 | $ | 176,660 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 200,096 | 200,096 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 237,936 | 227,685 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,480 | 1,371 | ||||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 11.9 | % | 12.9 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 14.6 | 11.0 | |||||||||||
| Total capital ratio | 16.1 | 16.6 | 13.0 | |||||||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,719 | $ | 2,719 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.4 | % | 7.4 | % | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) (5) | $ | 2,786 | ||||||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 7.2 | % | 5.0 |
(1)Capital ratios as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of the current expected credit losses (CECL) accounting standard.
(2)The capital conservation buffer and G-SIB surcharge were 2.5 percent at both December 31, 2021 and 2020. At both December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Corporation's SCB of 2.5 percent was applied in place of the capital conservation buffer under the Standardized approach. The countercyclical capital buffer for both periods was zero. The CET1 capital regulatory minimum is the sum of the CET1 capital ratio minimum of 4.5 percent, our G-SIB surcharge of 2.5 percent and our SCB or the capital conservation buffer, as applicable, of 2.5 percent. The SLR regulatory minimum includes a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
(5)Supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2020 reflects the temporary exclusion of U.S. Treasury securities and deposits at Federal Reserve Banks. The temporary relief expired after March 31, 2021 and is not reflected in supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2021.
At December 31, 2021, CET1 capital was $171.8 billion, a decrease of $4.9 billion from December 31, 2020, driven by common stock repurchases, dividends and decreases in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI), partially offset by earnings. Tier 1 capital decreased $3.6 billion primarily driven by the same factors as CET1 capital, partially offset by non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock issuances. Total capital under the Standardized approach decreased $10.3 billion primarily due to the same factors driving the decrease in CET1 capital, and a decrease in the adjusted allowance for credit losses included in Tier 2 capital. RWA under the
Standardized approach, which yielded the lower CET1 capital
ratio at December 31, 2021, increased $138.1 billion during 2021 to $1,618 billion primarily due to loan growth in Global Banking, strong client activity in Global Markets and an increase in debt securities resulting from the deployment of cash received from deposit inflows. Supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2021 increased $818.1 billion during 2021 primarily due to the expiration of the Federal Reserve’s temporary relief to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and deposits at Federal Reserve Banks and an increase in debt securities resulting from the deployment of cash received from deposit inflows.
51 Bank of America
Table 11 shows the capital composition at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 11 | Capital Composition under Basel 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Total common shareholders’ equity | $ | 245,358 | $ | 248,414 | ||
| CECL transitional amount (1) | 2,508 | 4,213 | ||||
| Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (68,641) | (68,565) | ||||
| Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards | (7,743) | (5,773) | ||||
| Intangibles, other than mortgage servicing rights, net of related deferred tax liabilities | (1,605) | (1,617) | ||||
| Defined benefit pension plan net assets | (1,261) | (1,164) | ||||
| Cumulative unrealized net (gain) loss related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net-of-tax | 1,400 | 1,753 | ||||
| Accumulated net (gain) loss on certain cash flow hedges (2) | 1,870 | (436) | ||||
| Other | (127) | (165) | ||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 171,759 | 176,660 | ||||
| Qualifying preferred stock, net of issuance cost | 24,707 | 23,437 | ||||
| Other | (1) | (1) | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 196,465 | 200,096 | ||||
| Tier 2 capital instruments | 20,750 | 22,213 | ||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (3) | 10,534 | 15,649 | ||||
| Other | (157) | (22) | ||||
| Total capital under the Standardized approach | 227,592 | 237,936 | ||||
| Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses under the Advanced approaches (3) | (6,976) | (10,251) | ||||
| Total capital under the Advanced approaches | $ | 220,616 | $ | 227,685 |
(1)Includes the impact of the Corporation's adoption of the CECL accounting standard on January 1, 2020 and 25 percent of the increase in reserves since the initial adoption.
(2)Includes amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the hedging of items that are not recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(3)Includes the impact of transition provisions related to the CECL accounting standard.
Table 12 shows the components of RWA as measured under Basel 3 at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 12 | Risk-weighted Assets under Basel 3 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | Standardized Approach | Advanced Approaches | |||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
| Credit risk | $ | 1,549 | $ | 913 | $ | 1,420 | $ | 896 | ||||||
| Market risk | 69 | 69 | 60 | 60 | ||||||||||
| Operational risk | n/a | 378 | n/a | 372 | ||||||||||
| Risks related to credit valuation adjustments | n/a | 39 | n/a | 43 | ||||||||||
| Total risk-weighted assets | $ | 1,618 | $ | 1,399 | $ | 1,480 | $ | 1,371 |
n/a = not applicable
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 52 |
Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital
Table 13 presents regulatory capital information for BANA in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at December 31, 2021 and 2020. BANA met the definition of well capitalized under the PCA framework for both periods.
| Table 13 | Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized Approach (1) | Advanced Approaches (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | ||||||||
| (Dollars in millions, except as noted) | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 182,526 | $ | 182,526 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 182,526 | 182,526 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 194,773 | 188,091 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,352 | 1,048 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | % | 17.4 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 17.4 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.4 | 17.9 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,414 | $ | 2,414 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.6 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 2,824 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.5 | % | 6.0 | |||||||
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||
| Risk-based capital metrics: | ||||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital | $ | 164,593 | $ | 164,593 | ||||||
| Tier 1 capital | 164,593 | 164,593 | ||||||||
| Total capital (3) | 181,370 | 170,922 | ||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (in billions) | 1,221 | 1,014 | ||||||||
| Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | % | 16.2 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.5 | 16.2 | 8.5 | |||||||
| Total capital ratio | 14.9 | 16.9 | 10.5 | |||||||
| Leverage-based metrics: | ||||||||||
| Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (4) | $ | 2,143 | $ | 2,143 | ||||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.7 | % | 7.7 | % | 5.0 | |||||
| Supplementary leverage exposure (in billions) | $ | 2,525 | ||||||||
| Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.5 | % | 6.0 |
(1)Capital ratios for both December 31, 2021 and 2020 are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of CECL.
(2)Risk-based capital regulatory minimums at both December 31, 2021 and 2020 are the minimum ratios under Basel 3 including a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent. The regulatory minimums for the leverage ratios as of both period ends are the percent required to be considered well capitalized under the PCA framework.
(3)Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.
(4)Reflects total average assets adjusted for certain Tier 1 capital deductions.
Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements
Total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) consists of the Corporation’s Tier 1 capital and eligible long-term debt issued directly by the Corporation. Eligible long-term debt for TLAC ratios is comprised of unsecured debt that has a remaining maturity of at least one year and satisfies additional requirements as prescribed in the TLAC final rule. As with the
risk-based capital ratios and SLR, the Corporation is required to maintain TLAC ratios in excess of minimum requirements plus applicable buffers to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. Table 14 presents the Corporation's TLAC and long-term debt ratios and related information as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
53 Bank of America
| Table 14 | Bank of America Corporation Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLAC (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | Long-term Debt | Regulatory Minimum (3) | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 435,904 | $ | 227,714 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 26.9 | % | 22.0 | % | 14.1 | % | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure (5) | 12.1 | 9.5 | 6.3 | 4.5 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Total eligible balance | $ | 405,153 | $ | 196,997 | |||||||||
| Percentage of risk-weighted assets (4) | 27.4 | % | 22.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Percentage of supplementary leverage exposure (5) | 14.5 | 9.5 | 7.1 | 4.5 |
(1)As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, TLAC ratios are calculated using the regulatory capital rule that allows a five-year transition period related to the adoption of CECL.
(2)The TLAC RWA regulatory minimum consists of 18.0 percent plus a TLAC RWA buffer comprised of 2.5 percent plus the Method 1 G-SIB surcharge of 1.5 percent. The countercyclical buffer is zero for both periods. The TLAC supplementary leverage exposure regulatory minimum consists of 7.5 percent plus a 2.0 percent TLAC leverage buffer. The TLAC RWA and leverage buffers must be comprised solely of CET1 capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively.
(3)The long-term debt RWA regulatory minimum is comprised of 6.0 percent plus an additional 2.5 percent requirement based on the Corporation’s Method 2 G-SIB surcharge. The long-term debt leverage exposure regulatory minimum is 4.5 percent.
(4)The approach that yields the higher RWA is used to calculate TLAC and long-term debt ratios, which was the Standardized approach as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(5)Supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2020 reflects the temporary exclusion of U.S. Treasury Securities and deposits at Federal Reserve Banks. The temporary relief expired after March 31, 2021 and is not reflected in supplementary leverage exposure at December 31, 2021.
Regulatory Developments
Supplementary Leverage Ratio
On March 19, 2021, U.S. banking regulators announced that temporary changes issued in 2020 for BHCs and depository institutions would expire as scheduled after March 31, 2021. These temporary changes to the SLR allowed the exclusion of on-balance sheet amounts of U.S. Treasury securities and deposits at Federal Reserve Banks from the calculation of supplementary leverage exposure. While the temporary relief automatically applied to the Corporation, the Corporation’s lead depository institution, Bank of America, N.A., did not opt to take advantage of the SLR relief offered by the OCC. At December 31, 2021, the Corporation’s SLR was 5.5 percent, which exceeds the 5.0 percent minimum required by the Federal Reserve.
Regulatory Capital and Securities Regulation
The Corporation’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS), Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. (MLPCC) and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S). The Corporation's principal European broker-dealer subsidiaries are Merrill Lynch International (MLI) and BofA Securities Europe SA (BofASE).
The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act. BofAS computes its minimum capital requirements as an alternative net capital broker-dealer under Rule 15c3-1e, and MLPCC and MLPF&S compute their minimum capital requirements in accordance with the alternative standard under Rule 15c3-1. BofAS and MLPCC are also registered as futures commission merchants and are subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Regulation 1.17. The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are also registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA). Pursuant to FINRA Rule 4110, FINRA may impose higher net capital requirements than Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to each of the broker-dealers.
BofAS provides institutional services, and in accordance with the alternative net capital requirements, is required to maintain tentative net capital in excess of $5.0 billion and net capital in excess of the greater of $1.0 billion or a certain percentage of its reserve requirement in addition to a certain percentage of securities-based swap risk margin. BofAS must also notify the SEC in the event its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. BofAS is also required to hold a certain percentage of its
customers' and affiliates' risk-based margin in order to meet its CFTC minimum net capital requirement. At December 31, 2021, BofAS had tentative net capital of $19.4 billion. BofAS also had regulatory net capital of $16.6 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $3.5 billion.
MLPCC is a fully-guaranteed subsidiary of BofAS and provides clearing and settlement services as well as prime brokerage and arranged financing services for institutional clients. At December 31, 2021, MLPCC’s regulatory net capital of $6.2 billion exceeded the minimum requirement of $1.5 billion.
MLPF&S provides retail services. At December 31, 2021, MLPF&S' regulatory net capital was $5.7 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement of $199 million.
Our European broker-dealers are regulated by non-U.S. regulators. MLI, a U.K. investment firm, is regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority and is subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2021, MLI’s capital resources were $33.6 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $14.0 billion. BofASE, a French investment firm, is regulated by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, and is subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2021, BofASE's capital resources were $7.9 billion, which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $2.8 billion.
Liquidity Risk
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity risk management objective is to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral requirements, including payments under long-term debt agreements, commitments to extend credit and customer deposit withdrawals, while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions. To achieve that objective, we analyze and monitor our liquidity risk under expected and stressed conditions, maintain liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, including our stable deposit base, and seek to align liquidity-related incentives and risks. These liquidity risk management practices have allowed us to effectively manage the market fluctuation from the pandemic. For more information on the risks of the pandemic, see Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors – Coronavirus Disease on page 8 and Executive Summary – Recent Developments – COVID-19
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 54 |
Pandemic on page 27.
We define liquidity as readily available assets, limited to cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities that we can use to meet our contractual and contingent financial obligations as they arise. We manage our liquidity position through line-of-business and ALM activities, as well as through our legal entity funding strategy, on both a forward and current (including intraday) basis under both expected and stressed conditions. We believe that a centralized approach to funding and liquidity management enhances our ability to monitor liquidity requirements, maximizes access to funding sources, minimizes borrowing costs and facilitates timely responses to liquidity events.
The Board approves our liquidity risk policy and the Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan. The ERC establishes our liquidity risk tolerance levels. The MRC is responsible for overseeing liquidity risks and directing management to maintain exposures within the established tolerance levels. The MRC reviews and monitors our liquidity position and stress testing results, approves certain liquidity risk limits and reviews the impact of strategic decisions on our liquidity. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 46. Under this governance framework, we developed certain funding and liquidity risk management practices which include: maintaining liquidity at the parent company and selected subsidiaries, including our bank subsidiaries and other regulated entities; determining what amounts of liquidity are appropriate for these entities based on analysis of debt maturities and other potential cash outflows, including those that we may experience during stressed market conditions; diversifying funding sources, considering our asset profile and legal entity structure; and performing contingency planning.
NB Holdings Corporation
The parent company, which is a separate and distinct legal entity from our bank and nonbank subsidiaries, has an intercompany arrangement with our wholly-owned holding company subsidiary, NB Holdings Corporation (NB Holdings). We have transferred, and agreed to transfer, additional parent company assets not required to satisfy anticipated near-term expenditures to NB Holdings. The parent company is expected to continue to have access to the same flow of dividends, interest and other amounts of cash necessary to service its debt, pay dividends and perform other obligations as it would have had it not entered into these arrangements and transferred any assets. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the parent company would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
In consideration for the transfer of assets, NB Holdings issued a subordinated note to the parent company in a principal amount equal to the value of the transferred assets. The aggregate principal amount of the note will increase by the amount of any future asset transfers. NB Holdings also provided the parent company with a committed line of credit that allows the parent company to draw funds necessary to service near-term cash needs. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the parent company would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These arrangements include provisions to terminate the line of credit, forgive the subordinated note and require the parent company to transfer its remaining financial assets to NB Holdings if our projected liquidity resources deteriorate so severely that resolution of the parent company becomes imminent.
Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets
We maintain liquidity available to the Corporation, including the parent company and selected subsidiaries, in the form of cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Our liquidity buffer, referred to as Global Liquidity Sources (GLS), is comprised of assets that are readily available to the parent company and selected subsidiaries, including holding company, bank and broker-dealer subsidiaries, even during stressed market conditions. Our cash is primarily on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank and, to a lesser extent, central banks outside of the U.S. We limit the composition of high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities to U.S. government securities, U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency MBS and other investment-grade securities, and a select group of non-U.S. government securities. We can obtain cash for these securities, even in stressed conditions, through repurchase agreements or outright sales. We hold our GLS in legal entities that allow us to meet the liquidity requirements of our global businesses, and we consider the impact of potential regulatory, tax, legal and other restrictions that could limit the transferability of funds among entities.
Table 15 presents average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 15 | Average Global Liquidity Sources | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Bank entities | $ | 1,006 | $ | 773 | ||
| Nonbank and other entities (1) | 152 | 170 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 1,158 | $ | 943 |
(1) Nonbank includes Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities.
Our bank subsidiaries’ liquidity is primarily driven by deposit and lending activity, as well as securities valuation and net debt activity. Bank subsidiaries can also generate incremental liquidity by pledging a range of unencumbered loans and securities to certain FHLBs and the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The cash we could have obtained by borrowing against this pool of specifically-identified eligible assets was $322 billion and $306 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020. We have established operational procedures to enable us to borrow against these assets, including regularly monitoring our total pool of eligible loans and securities collateral. Eligibility is defined in guidelines from the FHLBs and the Federal Reserve and is subject to change at their discretion. Due to regulatory restrictions, liquidity generated by the bank subsidiaries can generally be used only to fund obligations within the bank subsidiaries, and transfers to the parent company or nonbank subsidiaries may be subject to prior regulatory approval.
Liquidity is also held in nonbank entities, including the Parent, NB Holdings and other regulated entities. Parent company and NB Holdings liquidity is typically in the form of cash deposited at BANA, which is excluded from the liquidity at bank subsidiaries, and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Liquidity held in other regulated entities, comprised primarily of broker-dealer subsidiaries, is primarily available to meet the obligations of that entity, and transfers to the parent company or to any other subsidiary may be subject to prior regulatory approval due to regulatory restrictions and minimum requirements. Our other regulated entities also hold unencumbered investment-grade securities and equities that we believe could be used to generate additional liquidity.
55 Bank of America
Table 16 presents the composition of average GLS for the three months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 16 | Average Global Liquidity Sources Composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in billions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Cash on deposit | $ | 259 | $ | 322 | ||
| U.S. Treasury securities | 278 | 141 | ||||
| U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities | 606 | 462 | ||||
| Non-U.S. government securities | 15 | 18 | ||||
| Total Average Global Liquidity Sources | $ | 1,158 | $ | 943 |
Our GLS are substantially the same in composition to what qualifies as High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) under the final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) rules. However, HQLA for purposes of calculating LCR is not reported at market value, but at a lower value that incorporates regulatory deductions and the exclusion of excess liquidity held at certain subsidiaries. The LCR is calculated as the amount of a financial institution’s unencumbered HQLA relative to the estimated net cash outflows the institution could encounter over a 30-day period of significant liquidity stress, expressed as a percentage. Our average consolidated HQLA, on a net basis, was $617 billion and $584 billion for the three months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. For the same periods, the average consolidated LCR was 115 percent and 122 percent. Our LCR fluctuates due to normal business flows from customer activity.
Liquidity Stress Analysis
We utilize liquidity stress analysis to assist us in determining the appropriate amounts of liquidity to maintain at the parent company and our subsidiaries to meet contractual and contingent cash outflows under a range of scenarios. The scenarios we consider and utilize incorporate market-wide and Corporation-specific events, including potential credit rating downgrades for the parent company and our subsidiaries, and more severe events including potential resolution scenarios. The scenarios are based on our historical experience, experience of distressed and failed financial institutions, regulatory guidance, and both expected and unexpected future events.
The types of potential contractual and contingent cash outflows we consider in our scenarios may include, but are not limited to, upcoming contractual maturities of unsecured debt and reductions in new debt issuances; diminished access to secured financing markets; potential deposit withdrawals; increased draws on loan commitments, liquidity facilities and letters of credit; additional collateral that counterparties could call if our credit ratings were downgraded; collateral and margin requirements arising from market value changes; and potential liquidity required to maintain businesses and finance customer activities. Changes in certain market factors, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades, could negatively impact potential contractual and contingent outflows and the related financial instruments, and in some cases these impacts could be material to our financial results.
We consider all sources of funds that we could access during each stress scenario and focus particularly on matching available sources with corresponding liquidity requirements by legal entity. We also use the stress modeling results to manage our asset and liability profile and establish limits and guidelines on certain funding sources and businesses.
Net Stable Funding Ratio Final Rule
On October 20, 2020, U.S. banking regulators finalized the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), a rule requiring large banks to maintain a minimum level of stable funding over a one-year period. The final rule is intended to support the ability of banks to lend to households and businesses in both normal and adverse economic conditions and is complementary to the LCR rule, which focuses on short-term liquidity risks. The final rule was effective July 1, 2021, and the Corporation is in compliance. The U.S. NSFR applies to the Corporation on a consolidated basis and to our insured depository institutions. There have not been any significant impacts to the Corporation.
Diversified Funding Sources
We fund our assets primarily with a mix of deposits, and secured and unsecured liabilities through a centralized, globally coordinated funding approach diversified across products, programs, markets, currencies and investor groups.
The primary benefits of our centralized funding approach include greater control, reduced funding costs, wider name recognition by investors and greater flexibility to meet the variable funding requirements of subsidiaries. Where regulations, time zone differences or other business considerations make parent company funding impractical, certain other subsidiaries may issue their own debt.
We fund a substantial portion of our lending activities through our deposits, which were $2.1 trillion and $1.8 trillion at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Deposits are primarily generated by our Consumer Banking, GWIM and Global Banking segments. These deposits are diversified by clients, product type and geography, and the majority of our U.S. deposits are insured by the FDIC. We consider a substantial portion of our deposits to be a stable, low-cost and consistent source of funding. We believe this deposit funding is generally less sensitive to interest rate changes, market volatility or changes in our credit ratings than wholesale funding sources. Our lending activities may also be financed through secured borrowings, including credit card securitizations and securitizations with government-sponsored enterprises (GSE), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and private-label investors, as well as FHLB loans.
Our trading activities in other regulated entities are primarily funded on a secured basis through securities lending and repurchase agreements, and these amounts will vary based on customer activity and market conditions. We believe funding these activities in the secured financing markets is more cost-efficient and less sensitive to changes in our credit ratings than unsecured financing. Repurchase agreements are generally short-term and often overnight. Disruptions in secured financing markets for financial institutions have occurred in prior market cycles which resulted in adverse changes in terms or significant reductions in the availability of such financing. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate. For more information on secured financing agreements, see Note 10 – Securities Financing Agreements, Short-term Borrowings and Restricted Cash to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total long-term debt increased $17.2 billion to $280.1 billion during 2021, primarily due to debt issuances, partially offset by debt maturities, redemptions and valuation adjustments. We may, from time to time, purchase outstanding debt instruments in various transactions, depending on market conditions, liquidity and other factors. Our other regulated
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 56 |
entities may also make markets in our debt instruments to provide liquidity for investors.
During 2021, we issued $76.7 billion of long-term debt consisting of $56.2 billion of notes issued by Bank of America Corporation, substantially all of which were TLAC compliant, $8.0 billion of notes issued by Bank of America, N.A. and $12.5 billion of other debt. During 2020, we issued $56.9 billion of long-term debt consisting of $43.8 billion of notes issued by Bank of America Corporation, substantially all of which were TLAC compliant, $4.8 billion of notes issued by Bank of America, N.A. and $8.3 billion of other debt.
During 2021, we had total long-term debt maturities and redemptions in the aggregate of $46.4 billion consisting of $24.4 billion for Bank of America Corporation, $10.4 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $11.6 billion of other debt. During 2020, we had total long-term debt maturities and redemptions in the aggregate of $47.1 billion consisting of $22.6 billion for Bank of America Corporation, $11.5 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $13.0 billion of other debt.
At December 31, 2021, Bank of America Corporation's senior notes of $212.9 billion included $179.5 billion of outstanding notes that are both TLAC eligible and callable at least one year before their stated maturities. Of these senior notes, $15.0 billion will be callable and become TLAC ineligible during 2022, and $17.0 billion, $17.8 billion, $15.0 billion and $17.7 billion will do so during each of 2023 through 2026, respectively, and $97.0 billion thereafter.
We issue long-term unsecured debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. While the cost and availability of unsecured funding may be negatively impacted by general market conditions or by matters specific to the financial services industry or the Corporation, we seek to mitigate refinancing risk by actively managing the amount of our borrowings that we anticipate will mature within any month or quarter. We may issue unsecured debt in the form of structured notes for client purposes, certain of which qualify as TLAC-eligible debt. During 2021, we issued $7.1 billion of structured notes, which are debt obligations that pay investors returns linked to other debt or equity securities, indices, currencies or commodities. We typically hedge the returns we are obligated to pay on these liabilities with derivatives and/or investments in the underlying instruments, so that from a funding perspective, the cost is similar to our other unsecured long-term debt. We could be required to settle certain structured note obligations for cash or other securities prior to maturity under certain circumstances, which we consider for liquidity planning purposes. We believe, however, that a portion of such borrowings will remain outstanding beyond the earliest put or redemption date.
Substantially all of our senior and subordinated debt obligations contain no provisions that could trigger a requirement for an early repayment, require additional collateral support, result in changes to terms, accelerate maturity or create additional financial obligations upon an adverse change in our credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows or stock price. For more information on long-term debt funding, including issuances and maturities and redemptions, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We use derivative transactions to manage the duration, interest rate and currency risks of our borrowings, considering the characteristics of the assets they are funding. For more information on our ALM activities, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
Uninsured Deposits
The FDIC insures the Corporation’s U.S. deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank for each account ownership category, and various country-specific funds insure non-U.S. deposits up to specified limits. Deposits that exceed insurance limits are uninsured. At December 31, 2021, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $2.1 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $701.4 billion and $111.9 billion. At December 31, 2020, the Corporation’s deposits totaled $1.8 trillion, of which total estimated uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. deposits were $597.7 billion and $104.1 billion.
Table 17 presents information about the Corporation’s total estimated uninsured time deposits. For more information on our liquidity sources, see Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets, and for more information on deposits, see Diversified Funding Sources in this section. For more information on contractual time deposit maturities, see Note 9 – Deposits to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Table 17 | Uninsured Time Deposits (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | U.S. | Non-U.S. | Total | |||||||
| Uninsured time deposits with a maturity of: | ||||||||||
| 3 months or less | $ | 2,337 | $ | 7,274 | $ | 9,611 | ||||
| Over 3 months through 6 months | 1,668 | 1,663 | 3,331 | |||||||
| Over 6 months through 12 months | 1,942 | 239 | 2,181 | |||||||
| Over 12 months | 289 | 1,470 | 1,759 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 6,236 | $ | 10,646 | $ | 16,882 |
(1)Amounts are estimated based on the regulatory methodologies defined by each local jurisdiction.
Contingency Planning
We maintain contingency funding plans that outline our potential responses to liquidity stress events at various levels of severity. These policies and plans are based on stress scenarios and include potential funding strategies and communication and notification procedures that we would implement in the event we experienced stressed liquidity conditions. We periodically review and test the contingency funding plans to validate efficacy and assess readiness.
Our U.S. bank subsidiaries can access contingency funding through the Federal Reserve Discount Window. Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries have access to central bank facilities in the jurisdictions in which they operate. While we do not rely on these sources in our liquidity modeling, we maintain the policies, procedures and governance processes that would enable us to access these sources if necessary.
Credit Ratings
Our borrowing costs and ability to raise funds are impacted by our credit ratings. In addition, credit ratings may be important to customers or counterparties when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to engage in certain transactions, including over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. Thus, it is our objective to maintain high-quality credit ratings, and management maintains an active dialogue with the major rating agencies.
Credit ratings and outlooks are opinions expressed by rating agencies on our creditworthiness and that of our obligations or securities, including long-term debt, short-term borrowings, preferred stock and other securities, including asset securitizations. Our credit ratings are subject to ongoing review
57 Bank of America
by the rating agencies, and they consider a number of factors, including our own financial strength, performance, prospects and operations as well as factors not under our control. The rating agencies could make adjustments to our ratings at any time, and they provide no assurances that they will maintain our ratings at current levels.
Other factors that influence our credit ratings include changes to the rating agencies’ methodologies for our industry or certain security types; the rating agencies’ assessment of the general operating environment for financial services companies; our relative positions in the markets in which we compete; our various risk exposures and risk management policies and activities; pending litigation and other contingencies or potential tail risks; our reputation; our liquidity position, diversity of funding sources and funding costs; the current and expected level and volatility of our earnings; our capital position and capital management practices; our corporate governance; the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government; current or future regulatory and legislative initiatives; and the agencies’ views on whether the U.S. government would provide meaningful support to the Corporation or its subsidiaries in a crisis.
On May 24, 2021, Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings (S&P) affirmed the current ratings of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, while at the same time revising its rating outlook to Positive from Stable.
On June 7, 2021, Fitch Ratings (Fitch) upgraded the long-term senior debt ratings of the Corporation and its rated subsidiaries by one notch, to AA- and AA, respectively. Fitch also upgraded the Corporation’s short-term rating to F1+ which is now aligned with the short-term rating of its subsidiaries, including BANA. Following the upgrade, the rating outlook for the Corporation and its subsidiaries is Stable.
On November 22, 2021, Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) affirmed the current ratings of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, while at the same time revising its rating outlook to Positive from Stable.
Table 18 presents the Corporation’s current long-term/short-term senior debt ratings and outlooks expressed by the rating agencies.
| Table 18 | Senior Debt Ratings | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moody’s Investors Service | Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings | Fitch Ratings | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | |||||||||
| Bank of America Corporation | A2 | P-1 | Positive | A- | A-2 | Positive | AA- | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America, N.A. | Aa2 | P-1 | Positive | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities, Inc. | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| Merrill Lynch International | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable | ||||||||
| BofA Securities Europe SA | NR | NR | NR | A+ | A-1 | Positive | AA | F1+ | Stable |
NR = not rated
A reduction in certain of our credit ratings or the ratings of certain asset-backed securitizations may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, potential loss of access to credit markets, the related cost of funds, our businesses and on certain revenues, particularly in those businesses where counterparty creditworthiness is critical. In addition, under the terms of certain OTC derivative contracts and other trading agreements, in the event of downgrades of our or our rated subsidiaries’ credit ratings, the counterparties to those agreements may require us to provide additional collateral, or to terminate these contracts or agreements, which could cause us to sustain losses and/or adversely impact our liquidity. If the short-term credit ratings of our parent company, bank or broker-dealer subsidiaries were downgraded by one or more levels, the potential loss of access to short-term funding sources such as repo financing and the effect on our incremental cost of funds could be material.
While certain potential impacts are contractual and quantifiable, the full scope of the consequences of a credit rating downgrade to a financial institution is inherently uncertain, as it depends upon numerous dynamic, complex and inter-related factors and assumptions, including whether any downgrade of a company’s long-term credit ratings precipitates downgrades to its short-term credit ratings, and assumptions about the potential behaviors of various customers, investors and counterparties. For more information on potential impacts of credit rating downgrades, see Liquidity Risk – Liquidity Stress Analysis on page 56.
For more information on additional collateral and termination
payments that could be required in connection with certain OTC derivative contracts and other trading agreements as a result of such a credit rating downgrade, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Common Stock Dividends
For a summary of our declared quarterly cash dividends on common stock during 2021 and through February 22, 2022, see Note 13 – Shareholders’ Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Finance Subsidiary Issuers and Parent Guarantor
BofA Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (BofA Finance), is a consolidated finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold, and is expected to continue to issue and sell, its senior unsecured debt securities (Guaranteed Notes) that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The Corporation guarantees the due and punctual payment, on demand, of amounts payable on the Guaranteed Notes if not paid by BofA Finance. In addition, each of BAC Capital Trust XIII, BAC Capital Trust XIV and BAC Capital Trust XV, Delaware statutory trusts (collectively, the Trusts), is a 100 percent owned finance subsidiary of the Corporation that has issued and sold trust preferred securities (the Trust Preferred Securities) or capital securities (the Capital Securities and, together with the Guaranteed Notes and the Trust Preferred Securities, the Guaranteed Securities), as applicable, that remained outstanding at December 31, 2021. The Corporation guarantees the payment of amounts and distributions with
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 58 |
respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities if not paid by the Trusts, to the extent of funds held by the Trusts, and this guarantee, together with the Corporation’s other obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Securities and Capital Securities, effectively constitutes a full and unconditional guarantee of the Trusts’ payment obligations on the Trust Preferred Securities or Capital Securities, as applicable. No other subsidiary of the Corporation guarantees the Guaranteed Securities.
BofA Finance and each of the Trusts are finance subsidiaries, have no independent assets, revenues or operations and are dependent upon the Corporation and/or the Corporation’s other subsidiaries to meet their respective obligations under the Guaranteed Securities in the ordinary course. If holders of the Guaranteed Securities make claims on their Guaranteed Securities in a bankruptcy, resolution or similar proceeding, any recoveries on those claims will be limited to those available under the applicable guarantee by the Corporation, as described above.
The Corporation is a holding company and depends upon its subsidiaries for liquidity. Applicable laws and regulations and intercompany arrangements entered into in connection with the Corporation’s resolution plan could restrict the availability of funds from subsidiaries to the Corporation, which could adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to make payments under its guarantees. In addition, the obligations of the Corporation under the guarantees of the Guaranteed Securities will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities of its subsidiaries, and claimants should look only to assets of the Corporation for payments. If the Corporation, as guarantor of the Guaranteed Notes, transfers all or substantially all of its assets to one or more direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiaries, under the indenture governing the Guaranteed Notes, the subsidiary or subsidiaries will not be required to assume the Corporation’s obligations under its guarantee of the Guaranteed Notes.
For more information on factors that may affect payments to holders of the Guaranteed Securities, see Liquidity Risk – NB Holdings Corporation in this section, Item 1. Business – Insolvency and the Orderly Liquidation Authority on page 5 and Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity on page 10.
Representations and Warranties Obligations
For information on representations and warranties obligations in connection with the sale of mortgage loans, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability or failure of a borrower or counterparty to meet its obligations. Credit risk can also arise from operational failures that result in an erroneous advance, commitment or investment of funds. We define the credit exposure to a borrower or counterparty as the loss potential arising from all product classifications including loans and leases, deposit overdrafts, derivatives, assets held-for-sale and unfunded lending commitments which include loan commitments, letters of credit and financial guarantees. Derivative positions are recorded at fair value and assets held-for-sale are recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. Certain loans and unfunded commitments are accounted for under the fair value option. Credit risk for categories of assets carried at fair value is not accounted for as part of the allowance for credit losses but as part of the fair value adjustments recorded in earnings. For derivative positions,
our credit risk is measured as the net cost in the event the counterparties with contracts in which we are in a gain position fail to perform under the terms of those contracts. We use the current fair value to represent credit exposure without giving consideration to future mark-to-market changes. The credit risk amounts take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral. Our consumer and commercial credit extension and review procedures encompass funded and unfunded credit exposures. For more information on derivatives and credit extension commitments, see Note 3 – Derivatives and Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We manage credit risk based on the risk profile of the borrower or counterparty, repayment sources, the nature of underlying collateral and other support given current events, conditions and expectations. We classify our portfolios as either consumer or commercial and monitor credit risk in each as discussed below.
We refine our underwriting and credit risk management practices as well as credit standards to meet the changing economic environment. To mitigate losses and enhance customer support in our consumer businesses, we have in place collection programs and loan modification and customer assistance infrastructures. We utilize a number of actions to mitigate losses in the commercial businesses including increasing the frequency and intensity of portfolio monitoring, hedging activity and our practice of transferring management of deteriorating commercial exposures to independent special asset officers as credits enter criticized categories.
For information on our credit risk management activities, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management below, Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 65, Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 71, Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73, and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more information on the factors that may expose us to credit risk, see Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors - Credit on page 12.
During 2021, the economy gained momentum as unemployment continued to decline from double-digit highs during 2020 and the economy re-opened as vaccination rates increased and restrictions eased. With the easing of restrictions, we saw increased business openings, a rebound to commercial and consumer spending, higher asset values and increased global GDP, all of which positively impacted our consumer and commercial credit portfolios. Additionally, individuals and businesses in the U.S. benefited from various forms of government support through economic stimulus packages enacted in 2020 and 2021, which contributed to strong asset quality across our credit portfolios.
As a result of the economic recovery experienced in 2021, net charge-offs, nonperforming loans and commercial reservable criticized exposure declined compared to 2020. While there has been significant economic improvement in comparison to 2020, uncertainty remains about the timing and strength of the economy’s recovery, which may also be hampered by supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures and could lead to adverse impacts to credit quality metrics in future periods. The pandemic and its full impact on the global economy continue to be highly uncertain. While COVID-19 cases eased throughout the majority of 2021, they reached new highs by the end of 2021, and the spread of new, more contagious variants could impact the magnitude and duration of this health crisis. However, ongoing virus containment efforts and vaccination progress, could support the macroeconomic recovery.
59 Bank of America
For more information on how the pandemic may affect our operations, see Executive Summary – Recent Developments – COVID-19 Pandemic on page 27 and Item 1A. Risk Factors – Coronavirus Disease on page 7.
Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the consumer portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout a borrower’s credit cycle. Statistical techniques in conjunction with experiential judgment are used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing, risk appetite, setting credit limits, and establishing operating processes and metrics to quantify and balance risks and returns. Statistical models are built using detailed behavioral information from external sources such as credit bureaus and/or internal historical experience and are a component of our consumer credit risk management process. These models are used in part to assist in making both new and ongoing credit decisions, as well as portfolio management strategies, including authorizations and line management, collection practices and strategies, and determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and allocated capital for credit risk.
Consumer Credit Portfolio
The economic environment improved during 2021, with the U.S. unemployment rate continuing to decline and home prices increasing. During 2021, net charge-offs decreased $805 million to $1.8 billion primarily due to lower credit card losses, as the impact of government stimulus measures were partially offset by charge-offs associated with deferrals that expired in 2020. During 2021, nonperforming loans increased due to deferral activity.
The consumer allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $3.0 billion in 2021 to $7.0 billion primarily due to improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status, charge-offs and troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) for the consumer portfolio, as well as interest accrual policies and delinquency status for loan modifications related to the pandemic, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 19 presents our outstanding consumer loans and leases, consumer nonperforming loans and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more.
| Table 19 | Consumer Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1) | $ | 221,963 | $ | 223,555 | $ | 2,284 | $ | 2,005 | $ | 634 | $ | 762 | ||||||||||
| Home equity | 27,935 | 34,311 | 630 | 649 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 81,438 | 78,708 | n/a | n/a | 487 | 903 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer (2) | 103,560 | 91,363 | 75 | 71 | 11 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 190 | 124 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 435,086 | $ | 428,061 | $ | 2,989 | $ | 2,725 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 1,698 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (3) | 618 | 735 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans and leases | $ | 435,704 | $ | 428,796 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.69 | % | 0.64 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.40 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases, excluding fully-insured loan portfolios (4) | n/a | n/a | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.12 | 0.22 |
(1)Residential mortgage loans accruing past due 90 days or more are fully-insured loans. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, residential mortgage includes $444 million and $537 million of loans on which interest had been curtailed by the FHA, and therefore were no longer accruing interest, although principal was still insured, and $190 million and $225 million of loans on which interest was still accruing.
(2)Outstandings primarily include auto and specialty lending loans and leases of $48.5 billion and $46.4 billion, U.S. securities-based lending loans of $51.1 billion and $41.1 billion and non-U.S. consumer loans of $3.0 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(3)For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)Excludes consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, $21 million and $11 million of loans accounted for under the fair value option were past due 90 days or more and not accruing interest.
n/a = not applicable
Table 20 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for consumer loans and leases.
| Table 20 | Consumer Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | (28) | $ | (30) | (0.01) | % | (0.01) | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | (119) | (73) | (0.39) | (0.19) | |||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 1,723 | 2,349 | 2.29 | 2.76 | |||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 1 | 122 | — | 0.14 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 270 | 284 | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,847 | $ | 2,652 | 0.44 | 0.59 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
n/m = not meaningful
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 60 |
We believe that the presentation of information adjusted to exclude the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option is more representative of the ongoing operations and credit quality of the business. As a result, in the following tables and discussions of the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios, we exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option and provide information that excludes the impact of the fully-insured loan portfolio in certain credit quality statistics.
Residential Mortgage
The residential mortgage portfolio made up the largest percentage of our consumer loan portfolio at 51 percent of consumer loans and leases in 2021. Approximately 52 percent of the residential mortgage portfolio was in Consumer Banking
and 43 percent was in GWIM. The remaining portion was in All Other.
Outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio decreased $1.6 billion in 2021 as paydowns were partially offset by originations.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the residential mortgage portfolio included $12.7 billion and $11.8 billion of outstanding fully-insured loans, of which $2.2 billion and $2.8 billion had FHA insurance, with the remainder protected by Fannie Mae long-term standby agreements.
Table 21 presents certain residential mortgage key credit statistics on both a reported basis and excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio. The following discussion presents the residential mortgage portfolio excluding the fully-insured loan portfolio.
| Table 21 | Residential Mortgage – Key Credit Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported Basis (1) | Excluding Fully-insured Loans (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 221,963 | $ | 223,555 | $ | 209,259 | $ | 211,737 | |||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 1,753 | 2,314 | 866 | 1,224 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accruing past due 90 days or more | 634 | 762 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 2,284 | 2,005 | 2,284 | 2,005 | |||||||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | 1 | % | 2 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
| Refreshed LTV greater than 100 | — | 1 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option. For information on our interest accrual policies and delinquency status for loan modifications related to the pandemic, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current which primarily consist of collateral-dependent TDRs, including those that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy and loans that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a TDR.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio increased $279 million in 2021 primarily driven by deferral activity. Of the nonperforming residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2021, $1.2 billion, or 51 percent, were current on contractual payments. Loans accruing past due 30 days or more decreased $358 million driven by continued improvement in credit quality.
Net recoveries of $28 million in 2021 remained relatively unchanged compared to 2020.
Of the $209.3 billion in total residential mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2021, 27 percent were originated as interest-only loans. The outstanding balance of interest-only residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period was $4.8 billion, or eight percent, at December 31, 2021. Residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period generally experienced a higher rate of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status compared to the residential mortgage portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2021, $66 million, or one percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgages that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more compared to $866 million, or less than one percent, for the entire residential
mortgage portfolio. In addition, at December 31, 2021, $275 million, or six percent, of outstanding interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period were nonperforming, of which $83 million were contractually current compared to $2.3 billion, or one percent, for the entire residential mortgage portfolio. Loans that have yet to enter the amortization period in our interest-only residential mortgage portfolio are primarily well-collateralized loans to our wealth management clients and have an interest-only period of three to ten years. Approximately 91 percent of these loans that have yet to enter the amortization period will not be required to make a fully-amortizing payment until 2025 or later.
Table 22 presents outstandings, nonperforming loans and net charge-offs by certain state concentrations for the residential mortgage portfolio. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) within California represented 15 percent and 16 percent of outstandings at December 31, 2021 and 2020. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 15 percent and 14 percent of outstandings at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
61 Bank of America
| Table 22 | Residential Mortgage State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31 2021 | December 31 2020 | December 31 2021 | December 31 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 77,819 | $ | 83,185 | $ | 693 | $ | 570 | $ | (14) | $ | (18) | ||||||||||||||
| New York | 24,975 | 23,832 | 358 | 272 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 13,883 | 13,017 | 158 | 175 | (8) | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,002 | 8,868 | 86 | 78 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 8,723 | 8,806 | 117 | 98 | — | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 74,857 | 74,029 | 872 | 812 | (9) | (9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage loans | $ | 209,259 | $ | 211,737 | $ | 2,284 | $ | 2,005 | $ | (28) | $ | (30) | ||||||||||||||
| Fully-insured loan portfolio | 12,704 | 11,818 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total residential mortgage loan portfolio | $ | 221,963 | $ | 223,555 |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Home Equity
At December 31, 2021, the home equity portfolio made up six percent of the consumer portfolio and was comprised of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), home equity loans and reverse mortgages. HELOCs generally have an initial draw period of 10 years, and after the initial draw period ends, the loans generally convert to 15- or 20-year amortizing loans. We no longer originate home equity loans or reverse mortgages.
At December 31, 2021, 80 percent of the home equity portfolio was in Consumer Banking, 11 percent was in All Other and the remainder of the portfolio was primarily in GWIM. Outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $6.4 billion in 2021 primarily due to paydowns outpacing new
originations and draws on existing lines. Of the total home equity portfolio at December 31, 2021 and 2020, $12.2 billion, or 44 percent, and $13.8 billion, or 40 percent, were in first-lien positions. At December 31, 2021, outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio that were in a second-lien or more junior-lien position and where we also held the first-lien loan totaled $4.6 billion, or 16 percent of our total home equity portfolio.
Unused HELOCs totaled $40.5 billion and $42.3 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The HELOC utilization rate was 39 percent and 43 percent at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 23 presents certain home equity portfolio key credit statistics.
| Table 23 | Home Equity – Key Credit Statistics (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
| Outstandings | $ | 27,935 | $ | 34,311 | ||||||||||
| Accruing past due 30 days or more | 157 | 186 | ||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans (2) | 630 | 649 | ||||||||||||
| Percent of portfolio | ||||||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100 | — | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||
| Refreshed CLTV greater than 100 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Refreshed FICO below 620 | 3 | 3 |
(1)Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of the portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option. For information on our interest accrual policies and delinquency status for loan modifications related to the pandemic, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Includes loans that are contractually current which primarily consist of collateral-dependent TDRs, including those that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, junior-lien loans where the underlying first lien is 90 days or more past due, as well as loans that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a TDR.
Nonperforming outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio remained relatively flat at $630 million at December 31, 2021. Of the nonperforming home equity loans at December 31, 2021, $227 million, or 36 percent, were current on contractual payments. In addition, $273 million, or 43 percent of nonperforming home equity loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell. Accruing loans that were 30 days or more past due decreased $29 million in 2021.
Net recoveries increased $46 million to $119 million in 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. The increase was driven by favorable portfolio trends due in part to improvement in home prices.
Of the $27.9 billion in total home equity portfolio outstandings at December 31, 2021, as shown in Table 23, 14 percent require interest-only payments. The outstanding balance of HELOCs that have reached the end of their draw period and have entered the amortization period was $6.8 billion at December 31, 2021. The HELOCs that have entered the amortization period have experienced a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status when
compared to the HELOC portfolio as a whole. At December 31, 2021, $105 million, or two percent, of outstanding HELOCs that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more. In addition, at December 31, 2021, $455 million, or seven percent, were nonperforming. Loans that have yet to enter the amortization period in our interest-only portfolio are primarily post-2008 vintages and generally have better credit quality than the previous vintages that had entered the amortization period. We communicate to contractually current customers more than a year prior to the end of their draw period to inform them of the potential change to the payment structure before entering the amortization period, and provide payment options to customers prior to the end of the draw period.
Although we do not actively track how many of our home equity customers pay only the minimum amount due on their home equity loans and lines, we can infer some of this information through a review of our HELOC portfolio that we service and that is still in its revolving period. During 2021, nine percent of these customers with an outstanding balance did not pay any principal on their HELOCs.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 62 |
Table 24 presents outstandings, nonperforming balances and net recoveries by certain state concentrations for the home equity portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 13 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at both December 31, 2021
and 2020. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California made up 10 percent and 11 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 24 | Home Equity State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings (1) | Nonperforming (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Recoveries | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 7,600 | $ | 9,488 | $ | 140 | $ | 143 | $ | (40) | $ | (26) | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 2,977 | 3,715 | 78 | 80 | (21) | (11) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 2,259 | 2,749 | 69 | 67 | (4) | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 2,072 | 2,495 | 96 | 103 | (1) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Massachusetts | 1,422 | 1,719 | 32 | 32 | (3) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 11,605 | 14,145 | 215 | 224 | (50) | (31) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total home equity loan portfolio | $ | 27,935 | $ | 34,311 | $ | 630 | $ | 649 | $ | (119) | $ | (73) |
(1)Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Credit Card
At December 31, 2021, 97 percent of the credit card portfolio was managed in Consumer Banking with the remainder in GWIM. Outstandings in the credit card portfolio increased $2.7 billion in 2021 to $81.4 billion due to higher retail spend. Net charge-offs decreased $626 million to $1.7 billion during 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 due to the impact of government stimulus measures, partially offset by charge-offs of certain loans with deferrals that expired in 2020. Credit card
loans 30 days or more past due and still accruing interest decreased $692 million, and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest decreased $416 million primarily due to charge-offs of certain loans with deferrals that expired in 2020 and the impact of government stimulus measures.
Unused lines of credit for credit card increased to $361.2 billion at December 31, 2021 from $342.4 billion at 2020.
Table 25 presents certain state concentrations for the credit card portfolio.
| Table 25 | Credit Card State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Accruing Past Due90 Days or More (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 13,076 | $ | 12,543 | $ | 82 | $ | 166 | $ | 322 | $ | 419 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 8,046 | 7,666 | 71 | 135 | 245 | 306 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 6,894 | 6,499 | 47 | 87 | 158 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 4,725 | 4,654 | 35 | 76 | 135 | 188 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington | 4,080 | 3,685 | 13 | 21 | 39 | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 44,617 | 43,661 | 239 | 418 | 824 | 1,178 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total credit card portfolio | $ | 81,438 | $ | 78,708 | $ | 487 | $ | 903 | $ | 1,723 | $ | 2,349 |
(1)For information on our interest accrual policies and delinquency status for loan modifications related to the pandemic, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Direct/Indirect Consumer
At December 31, 2021, 47 percent of the direct/indirect portfolio was included in Consumer Banking (consumer auto and recreational vehicle lending) and 53 percent was included in
GWIM (principally securities-based lending loans). Outstandings in the direct/indirect portfolio increased by $12.2 billion in 2021 to $103.6 billion driven by client demand for liquidity and high asset values in the securities-based lending portfolio.
63 Bank of America
Table 26 presents certain state concentrations for the direct/indirect consumer loan portfolio.
| Table 26 | Direct/Indirect State Concentrations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | Net Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 15,061 | $ | 12,248 | $ | 2 | $ | 6 | $ | 3 | $ | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 13,352 | 10,891 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | 9,505 | 8,981 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New York | 7,802 | 6,609 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 4,228 | 3,572 | — | — | (3) | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 53,612 | 49,062 | 5 | 15 | (5) | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total direct/indirect loan portfolio | $ | 103,560 | $ | 91,363 | $ | 11 | $ | 33 | $ | 1 | $ | 122 |
(1)For information on our interest accrual policies and delinquency status for loan modifications related to the pandemic, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 27 presents nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2021 and 2020. During 2021, nonperforming consumer loans increased $264 million to $3.0 billion primarily driven by consumer real estate deferral activity.
At December 31, 2021, $888 million, or 30 percent of nonperforming loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to their estimated property value less costs
to sell. In addition, at December 31, 2021, $1.4 billion, or 48 percent of nonperforming consumer loans were modified and are now current after successful trial periods, or are current loans classified as nonperforming loans in accordance with applicable policies.
Foreclosed properties decreased $22 million in 2021 to $101 million. Nonperforming loans also include certain loans that have been modified in TDRs where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.
| Table 27 | Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 2,725 | $ | 2,053 | ||||||
| Additions | 2,006 | 2,278 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns and payoffs | (625) | (440) | ||||||||
| Sales | (4) | (38) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (1) | (1,037) | (1,014) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (64) | (78) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | (12) | (36) | ||||||||
| Total net additions to nonperforming loans and leases | 264 | 672 | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 2,989 | 2,725 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 (2) | 101 | 123 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 | $ | 3,090 | $ | 2,848 | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (3) | 0.69 | % | 0.64 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties (3) | 0.71 | 0.66 |
(1)Consumer loans may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection.
(2)Foreclosed property balances do not include properties insured by certain government-guaranteed loans, principally FHA-insured, of $52 million and $119 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(3)Outstanding consumer loans and leases exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 64 |
Table 28 presents TDRs for the consumer real estate portfolio. Performing TDR balances are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases in Table 27.
| Table 28 | Consumer Real Estate Troubled Debt Restructurings | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1, 2) | $ | 1,498 | $ | 2,278 | $ | 3,776 | $ | 1,195 | $ | 2,899 | $ | 4,094 | ||||||||||
| Home equity (3) | 254 | 652 | 906 | 248 | 836 | 1,084 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer real estate troubled debt restructurings | $ | 1,752 | $ | 2,930 | $ | 4,682 | $ | 1,443 | $ | 3,735 | $ | 5,178 |
(1)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, residential mortgage TDRs deemed collateral dependent totaled $1.6 billion and $1.4 billion, and included $1.4 billion and $1.0 billion of loans classified as nonperforming and $279 million and $361 million of loans classified as performing.
(2)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, residential mortgage performing TDRs include $1.2 billion and $1.5 billion of loans that were fully-insured.
(3)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, home equity TDRs deemed collateral dependent totaled $370 million and $407 million, and include $222 million and $216 million of loans classified as nonperforming and $148 million and $191 million of loans classified as performing.
In addition to modifying consumer real estate loans, we work with customers who are experiencing financial difficulty by modifying credit card and other consumer loans. Credit card and other consumer loan modifications generally involve a reduction in the customer’s interest rate on the account and placing the customer on a fixed payment plan not exceeding 60 months.
Modifications of credit card and other consumer loans are made through programs utilizing direct customer contact, but may also utilize external programs. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, our credit card and other consumer TDR portfolio was $672 million and $701 million, of which $599 million and $614 million were current or less than 30 days past due under the modified terms.
Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management
Credit risk management for the commercial portfolio begins with an assessment of the credit risk profile of the borrower or counterparty based on an analysis of its financial position. As part of the overall credit risk assessment, our commercial credit exposures are assigned a risk rating and are subject to approval based on defined credit approval standards. Subsequent to loan origination, risk ratings are monitored on an ongoing basis, and if necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in the financial condition, cash flow, risk profile or outlook of a borrower or counterparty. In making credit decisions, we consider risk rating, collateral, country, industry and single-name concentration limits while also balancing these considerations with the total borrower or counterparty relationship. We use a variety of tools to continuously monitor the ability of a borrower or counterparty to perform under its obligations. We use risk rating aggregations to measure and evaluate concentrations within portfolios. In addition, risk ratings are a factor in determining the level of allocated capital and the allowance for credit losses.
As part of our ongoing risk mitigation initiatives, we attempt to work with clients experiencing financial difficulty to modify their loans to terms that better align with their current ability to pay. In situations where an economic concession has been granted to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, we identify these loans as TDRs. For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status and net charge-offs for the commercial portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management of Commercial Credit Risk Concentrations
Commercial credit risk is evaluated and managed with the goal that concentrations of credit exposure continue to be aligned with our risk appetite. We review, measure and manage concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product,
geography, customer relationship and loan size. We also review, measure and manage commercial real estate loans by geographic location and property type. In addition, within our non-U.S. portfolio, we evaluate exposures by region and by country. Tables 33, 36 and 39 summarize our concentrations. We also utilize syndications of exposure to third parties, loan sales, hedging and other risk mitigation techniques to manage the size and risk profile of the commercial credit portfolio. For more information on our industry concentrations, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Industry Concentrations on page 69 and Table 36.
We account for certain large corporate loans and loan commitments, including issued but unfunded letters of credit which are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes, that exceed our single-name credit risk concentration guidelines under the fair value option. Lending commitments, both funded and unfunded, are actively managed and monitored, and as appropriate, credit risk for these lending relationships may be mitigated through the use of credit derivatives, with our credit view and market perspectives determining the size and timing of the hedging activity. In addition, we purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain other credit exposures. To lessen the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, credit exposure may be added within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection. These credit derivatives do not meet the requirements for treatment as accounting hedges. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other income.
In addition, we are a member of various securities and derivative exchanges and clearinghouses, both in the U.S. and other countries. As a member, we may be required to pay a pro-rata share of the losses incurred by some of these organizations as a result of another member default and under other loss scenarios. For more information, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commercial Credit Portfolio
During 2021, commercial credit quality improved as the economic recovery gained momentum driven in part by increased consumer spending and COVID-19 vaccination progress. Accordingly, charge-offs, nonperforming commercial loans and reservable criticized utilized exposure declined during this period. Outstanding commercial loans and leases increased $44.4 billion during 2021 due to growth in commercial and industrial, primarily in Global Markets with most of the increase in investment grade exposures. This increase was partially offset by lower U.S. small business commercial loans due to repayments of PPP loans by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the terms of the program. For more information on
65 Bank of America
PPP loans, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit quality of commercial real estate borrowers has begun to stabilize in many sectors as economies have reopened. However, certain sectors, including hospitality, while showing signs of improvement, continue to be negatively impacted due to the pandemic. Moreover, many real estate markets, while improving, are still experiencing some disruptions in demand, supply chain challenges and tenant difficulties. Current and future office demand is uncertain as companies evaluate space needs with employment models that utilize a mix of remote and conventional office use.
The commercial allowance for loan and lease losses decreased $3.4 billion during 2021 to $5.4 billion driven by improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 73.
Total commercial utilized credit exposure increased $33.2 billion during 2021 to $653.5 billion primarily driven by higher loans and leases. The utilization rate for loans and leases, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and financial guarantees, and commercial letters of credit, in the aggregate, was 56 percent at December 31, 2021 and 57 percent at December 31, 2020.
Table 29 presents commercial credit exposure by type for utilized, unfunded and total binding committed credit exposure. Commercial utilized credit exposure includes SBLCs and financial guarantees and commercial letters of credit that have been issued and for which we are legally bound to advance funds under prescribed conditions during a specified time period, and excludes exposure related to trading account assets. Although funds have not yet been advanced, these exposure types are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes.
| Table 29 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Type | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized (1) | Commercial Unfunded (2, 3, 4) | Total Commercial Committed | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans and leases | $ | 543,420 | $ | 499,065 | $ | 454,256 | $ | 404,740 | $ | 997,676 | $ | 903,805 | ||||||||||
| Derivative assets (5) | 35,344 | 47,179 | — | — | 35,344 | 47,179 | ||||||||||||||||
| Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees | 34,389 | 34,616 | 639 | 538 | 35,028 | 35,154 | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities and other investments | 19,427 | 22,618 | 4,638 | 4,827 | 24,065 | 27,445 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans held-for-sale | 13,185 | 8,378 | 16,581 | 9,556 | 29,766 | 17,934 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | 5,935 | 6,424 | — | — | 5,935 | 6,424 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial letters of credit | 1,176 | 855 | 247 | 280 | 1,423 | 1,135 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 652 | 1,168 | — | — | 652 | 1,168 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 653,528 | $ | 620,303 | $ | 476,361 | $ | 419,941 | $ | 1,129,889 | $ | 1,040,244 |
(1)Commercial utilized exposure includes loans of $7.2 billion and $5.9 billion accounted for under the fair value option at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(2)Commercial unfunded exposure includes commitments accounted for under the fair value option with a notional amount of $4.8 billion and $3.9 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(3)Excludes unused business card lines, which are not legally binding.
(4)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.7 billion and $10.5 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(5)Derivative assets are carried at fair value, reflect the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and have been reduced by cash collateral of $30.8 billion and $42.5 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Not reflected in utilized and committed exposure is additional non-cash derivative collateral held of $44.8 billion and $39.3 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, which consists primarily of other marketable securities.
Nonperforming commercial loans decreased $649 million. Table 30 presents our commercial loans and leases portfolio and related credit quality information at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 30 | Commercial Credit Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstandings | Nonperforming | Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 325,936 | $ | 288,728 | $ | 825 | $ | 1,243 | $ | 171 | $ | 228 | ||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 113,266 | 90,460 | 268 | 418 | 19 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 439,202 | 379,188 | 1,093 | 1,661 | 190 | 238 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 63,009 | 60,364 | 382 | 404 | 40 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 14,825 | 17,098 | 80 | 87 | 8 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||
| 517,036 | 456,650 | 1,555 | 2,152 | 238 | 269 | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial (1) | 19,183 | 36,469 | 23 | 75 | 87 | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option | $ | 536,219 | $ | 493,119 | $ | 1,578 | $ | 2,227 | $ | 325 | $ | 384 | ||||||||||
| Loans accounted for under the fair value option (2) | 7,201 | 5,946 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans and leases | $ | 543,420 | $ | 499,065 |
(1)Includes card-related products.
(2)Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option include U.S. commercial of $4.6 billion and $2.9 billion and non-U.S. commercial of $2.6 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020. For more information on the fair value option, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 66 |
Table 31 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for our commercial loans and leases for 2021 and 2020.
| Table 31 | Commercial Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Charge-offs | Net Charge-off Ratios (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | (23) | $ | 718 | (0.01) | % | 0.23 | % | |||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 35 | 155 | 0.04 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 12 | 873 | — | 0.21 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 34 | 270 | 0.06 | 0.43 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | (1) | 59 | — | 0.32 | |||||||||||||||||
| 45 | 1,202 | 0.01 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 351 | 267 | 1.19 | 0.86 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | $ | 396 | $ | 1,469 | 0.08 | 0.28 |
(1)Net charge-off ratios are calculated as net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
Table 32 presents commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure by loan type. Criticized exposure corresponds to the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful asset categories as defined by regulatory authorities. Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $16.3 billion during 2021, which was broad-based across industries. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, 87 percent and 79 percent of commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure was secured.
| Table 32 | Commercial Reservable Criticized Utilized Exposure (1, 2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | |||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 11,327 | 3.20 | % | $ | 21,388 | 6.83 | % | |||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 2,582 | 2.17 | 5,051 | 5.03 | |||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 13,909 | 2.94 | 26,439 | 6.40 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 7,572 | 11.72 | 10,213 | 16.42 | |||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 387 | 2.61 | 714 | 4.18 | |||||||||
| 21,868 | 3.96 | 37,366 | 7.59 | ||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 513 | 2.67 | 1,300 | 3.56 | |||||||||
| Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure | $ | 22,381 | 3.91 | $ | 38,666 | 7.31 |
(1)Total commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure includes loans and leases of $21.2 billion and $36.6 billion and commercial letters of credit of $1.2 billion and $2.1 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(2)Percentages are calculated as commercial reservable criticized utilized exposure divided by total commercial reservable utilized exposure for each exposure category.
Commercial and Industrial
Commercial and industrial loans include U.S. commercial and non-U.S. commercial portfolios.
U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2021, 62 percent of the U.S. commercial loan portfolio, excluding small business, was managed in Global Banking, 22 percent in Global Markets, 15 percent in GWIM (loans that provide financing for asset purchases, business investments and other liquidity needs for high net worth clients) and the remainder primarily in Consumer Banking. U.S. commercial loans increased $37.2 billion, or 13 percent, during 2021 primarily driven by Global Markets and Global Banking. Reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $10.1 billion, driven by decreases across a broad range of industries.
Non-U.S. Commercial
At December 31, 2021, 69 percent of the non-U.S. commercial loan portfolio was managed in Global Banking, 30 percent in Global Markets and the remainder in GWIM. Non-U.S. commercial loans increased $22.8 billion, or 25 percent, during 2021 primarily in Global Markets. Reservable criticized utilized exposure decreased $2.5 billion, which was broad-based across industries. For information on the non-U.S. commercial portfolio, see Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 71.
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial real estate primarily includes commercial loans secured by non-owner-occupied real estate and is dependent on the sale or lease of the real estate as the primary source of repayment. Outstanding loans increased $2.6 billion, or four percent, during 2021 to $63.0 billion due to new originations outpacing paydowns. The portfolio remains diversified across property types and geographic regions. California represented the largest state concentration at 21 percent and 23 percent of the commercial real estate portfolio at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The commercial real estate portfolio is predominantly managed in Global Banking and consists of loans made primarily to public and private developers, and commercial real estate firms.
During 2021, we continued to see low default rates and varying degrees of improvement in certain geographic regions and property types of the portfolio. We use a number of proactive risk mitigation initiatives to reduce adversely rated exposure in the commercial real estate portfolio, including transfers of deteriorating exposures for management by independent special asset officers and the pursuit of loan restructurings or asset sales to achieve the best results for our customers and the Corporation.
Table 33 presents outstanding commercial real estate loans by geographic region, based on the geographic location of the collateral, and by property type.
67 Bank of America
| Table 33 | Outstanding Commercial Real Estate Loans | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | ||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| By Geographic Region | ||||||
| Northeast | $ | 14,318 | $ | 11,628 | ||
| California | 13,145 | 14,028 | ||||
| Southwest | 7,510 | 8,551 | ||||
| Southeast | 6,758 | 6,588 | ||||
| Florida | 4,367 | 4,294 | ||||
| Midwest | 3,221 | 3,483 | ||||
| Illinois | 2,878 | 2,594 | ||||
| Midsouth | 2,289 | 2,370 | ||||
| Northwest | 1,709 | 1,634 | ||||
| Non-U.S. | 4,760 | 3,187 | ||||
| Other | 2,054 | 2,007 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 63,009 | $ | 60,364 | ||
| By Property Type | ||||||
| Non-residential | ||||||
| Office | $ | 18,309 | $ | 17,667 | ||
| Industrial / Warehouse | 10,749 | 8,330 | ||||
| Multi-family rental | 8,173 | 7,051 | ||||
| Shopping centers /Retail | 6,502 | 7,931 | ||||
| Hotel / Motels | 5,932 | 7,226 | ||||
| Unsecured | 3,178 | 2,336 | ||||
| Multi-use | 1,835 | 1,460 | ||||
| Other | 7,238 | 7,146 | ||||
| Total non-residential | 61,916 | 59,147 | ||||
| Residential | 1,093 | 1,217 | ||||
| Total outstanding commercial real estate loans | $ | 63,009 | $ | 60,364 |
U.S. Small Business Commercial
The U.S. small business commercial loan portfolio is comprised of small business card loans and small business loans primarily managed in Consumer Banking, and includes $4.7 billion and $22.7 billion of PPP loans outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The decline of $18.0 billion in PPP loans during 2021 was due to repayment of the loans by the SBA under the terms of the program. Excluding PPP, credit card-related products were 50 percent of the U.S. small business commercial portfolio at both December 31, 2021 and 2020 and represented 95 percent of net charge-offs in 2021 compared to 91 percent in 2020.
Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity
Table 34 presents the nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during 2021 and 2020. Nonperforming loans do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. During 2021, nonperforming commercial loans and leases decreased $649 million to $1.6 billion. At December 31, 2021, 88 percent of commercial nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties were secured and 54 percent were contractually current. Commercial nonperforming loans were carried at 90 percent of their unpaid principal balance, as the carrying value of these loans has been reduced to the estimated collateral value less costs to sell.
| Table 34 | Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity (1, 2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming loans and leases, January 1 | $ | 2,227 | $ | 1,499 | ||||||
| Additions | 1,622 | 3,518 | ||||||||
| Reductions: | ||||||||||
| Paydowns | (1,163) | (1,002) | ||||||||
| Sales | (199) | (350) | ||||||||
| Returns to performing status (3) | (264) | (172) | ||||||||
| Charge-offs | (254) | (1,208) | ||||||||
| Transfers to foreclosed properties | — | (2) | ||||||||
| Transfers to loans held-for-sale | (391) | (56) | ||||||||
| Total net additions (reductions) to nonperforming loans and leases | (649) | 728 | ||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans and leases, December 31 | 1,578 | 2,227 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed properties, December 31 | 29 | 41 | ||||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties, December 31 | $ | 1,607 | $ | 2,268 | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans and leases (4) | 0.29 | % | 0.45 | % | ||||||
| Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties (4) | 0.30 | 0.46 |
(1)Balances do not include nonperforming loans held-for-sale of $264 million and $359 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial activity. Small business card loans are excluded as they are not classified as nonperforming.
(3)Commercial loans and leases may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection. TDRs are generally classified as performing after a sustained period of demonstrated payment performance.
(4)Outstanding commercial loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 68 |
Table 35 presents our commercial TDRs by product type and performing status. U.S. small business commercial TDRs are comprised of renegotiated small business card loans and small business loans. The renegotiated small business card loans are
not classified as nonperforming as they are charged off no later than the end of the month in which the loan becomes 180 days past due.
| Table 35 | Commercial Troubled Debt Restructurings | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | Nonperforming | Performing | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 359 | $ | 685 | $ | 1,044 | $ | 509 | $ | 850 | $ | 1,359 | ||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 72 | 8 | 80 | 49 | 119 | 168 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial and industrial | 431 | 693 | 1,124 | 558 | 969 | 1,527 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 244 | 437 | 681 | 137 | — | 137 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 50 | 7 | 57 | 42 | 2 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||
| 725 | 1,137 | 1,862 | 737 | 971 | 1,708 | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | — | 38 | 38 | — | 29 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial troubled debt restructurings | $ | 725 | $ | 1,175 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 737 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,737 |
Industry Concentrations
Table 36 presents commercial committed and utilized credit exposure by industry. Our commercial credit exposure is diversified across a broad range of industries. Total commercial committed exposure increased $89.6 billion, or nine percent, during 2021 to $1.1 trillion. The increase in commercial committed exposure was concentrated in the Asset managers and funds, Finance companies and Utilities industry sectors. Increases were partially offset by decreased exposure to the Government and public education and Automobiles and components industry sectors.
Industry limits are used internally to manage industry concentrations and are based on committed exposure that is determined on an industry-by-industry basis. A risk management framework is in place to set and approve industry limits as well as to provide ongoing monitoring.
Asset managers and funds, our largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $136.9 billion, increased $36.6 billion, or 37 percent, during 2021, which was primarily driven by secured investment grade exposures.
Real estate, our second largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $96.2 billion, increased $4.5 billion, or five percent, during 2021. For more information on the commercial real estate and related portfolios, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Commercial Real Estate on page 67.
Finance companies, our third largest industry concentration with committed exposure of $86.0 billion, increased $16.0 billion, or 23 percent during 2021, with the growth largely occurring in Consumer Finance, Thrifts and Mortgage Finance and Diversified Financials.
Given the widespread impact of the pandemic on the U.S. and global economy, a number of industries have been and will likely continue to be adversely impacted. We continue to monitor all industries, particularly higher risk industries that are experiencing or could experience a more significant impact to their financial condition.
69 Bank of America
| Table 36 | Commercial Credit Exposure by Industry (1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Utilized | Total Commercial Committed (2) | |||||||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
| Asset managers & funds | $ | 89,786 | $ | 67,360 | $ | 136,914 | $ | 100,296 | ||||||
| Real estate (3) | 69,384 | 68,967 | 96,202 | 91,730 | ||||||||||
| Finance companies | 59,327 | 46,948 | 86,009 | 70,004 | ||||||||||
| Capital goods | 42,784 | 39,807 | 84,293 | 80,815 | ||||||||||
| Healthcare equipment and services | 32,003 | 33,488 | 58,195 | 57,540 | ||||||||||
| Materials | 25,133 | 24,516 | 53,652 | 50,757 | ||||||||||
| Retailing | 24,514 | 23,700 | 50,816 | 48,306 | ||||||||||
| Government & public education | 37,597 | 41,669 | 50,066 | 56,212 | ||||||||||
| Consumer services | 28,172 | 31,993 | 48,052 | 47,997 | ||||||||||
| Food, beverage and tobacco | 21,584 | 22,755 | 45,419 | 44,417 | ||||||||||
| Commercial services and supplies | 22,390 | 21,107 | 42,451 | 38,092 | ||||||||||
| Individuals and trusts | 29,752 | 24,727 | 39,869 | 34,036 | ||||||||||
| Utilities | 17,082 | 12,387 | 36,855 | 29,234 | ||||||||||
| Energy | 14,217 | 13,930 | 34,136 | 32,974 | ||||||||||
| Transportation | 21,079 | 23,126 | 32,015 | 33,082 | ||||||||||
| Software and services | 10,663 | 10,853 | 27,643 | 22,524 | ||||||||||
| Technology hardware and equipment | 10,159 | 9,935 | 26,910 | 24,196 | ||||||||||
| Media | 12,495 | 12,632 | 26,318 | 24,120 | ||||||||||
| Global commercial banks | 20,062 | 20,544 | 21,390 | 22,595 | ||||||||||
| Telecommunication services | 10,056 | 9,411 | 21,270 | 15,605 | ||||||||||
| Consumer durables and apparel | 9,740 | 9,232 | 21,226 | 20,223 | ||||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology | 5,608 | 4,830 | 19,439 | 15,901 | ||||||||||
| Automobiles and components | 9,236 | 10,792 | 17,052 | 20,575 | ||||||||||
| Vehicle dealers | 11,030 | 15,028 | 15,678 | 18,696 | ||||||||||
| Insurance | 5,743 | 5,772 | 14,323 | 13,277 | ||||||||||
| Food and staples retailing | 6,902 | 5,209 | 12,226 | 11,795 | ||||||||||
| Financial markets infrastructure (clearinghouses) | 3,876 | 4,939 | 6,076 | 8,648 | ||||||||||
| Religious and social organizations | 3,154 | 4,646 | 5,394 | 6,597 | ||||||||||
| Total commercial credit exposure by industry | $ | 653,528 | $ | 620,303 | $ | 1,129,889 | $ | 1,040,244 |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial exposure.
(2)Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments net of amounts distributed (i.e., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $10.7 billion and $10.5 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(3)Industries are viewed from a variety of perspectives to best isolate the perceived risks. For purposes of this table, the real estate industry is defined based on the primary business activity of the borrowers or counterparties using operating cash flows and primary source of repayment as key factors.
Risk Mitigation
We purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain credit exposures. To lower the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, we may add credit exposure within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, net notional credit default protection purchased in our credit derivatives portfolio to hedge our funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, was $2.6 billion and $4.2 billion. We recorded net losses of $91 million in 2021 compared to net losses of $240 million in 2020. The gains and losses on these instruments were offset by gains and losses on the related exposures. The Value-at-Risk (VaR) results for these exposures are included in the fair value option portfolio information in Table 43. For more information, see Trading Risk Management on page 76.
Tables 37 and 38 present the maturity profiles and the credit exposure debt ratings of the net credit default protection portfolio at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 37 | Net Credit Default Protection by Maturity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | |||||
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Less than or equal to one year | 34 | % | 65 | % | |
| Greater than one year and less than or equal to five years | 62 | 34 | |||
| Greater than five years | 4 | 1 | |||
| Total net credit default protection | 100 | % | 100 | % |
| Table 38 | Net Credit Default Protection by Credit Exposure Debt Rating | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | Net Notional (1) | Percent of Total | ||||||||||
| December 31 | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||
| Ratings (2, 3) | |||||||||||||
| A | $ | (350) | 13.4 | % | $ | (250) | 6.0 | % | |||||
| BBB | (710) | 27.1 | (1,856) | 44.5 | |||||||||
| BB | (809) | 30.9 | (1,363) | 32.7 | |||||||||
| B | (659) | 25.2 | (465) | 11.2 | |||||||||
| CCC and below | (35) | 1.3 | (182) | 4.4 | |||||||||
| NR (4) | (55) | 2.1 | (54) | 1.2 | |||||||||
| Total net credit default protection | $ | (2,618) | 100.0 | % | $ | (4,170) | 100.0 | % |
(1)Represents net credit default protection purchased.
(2)Ratings are refreshed on a quarterly basis.
(3)Ratings of BBB- or higher are considered to meet the definition of investment grade.
(4)NR is comprised of index positions held and any names that have not been rated.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 70 |
In addition to our net notional credit default protection purchased to cover the funded and unfunded portion of certain credit exposures, credit derivatives are used for market-making activities for clients and establishing positions intended to profit from directional or relative value changes. We execute the majority of our credit derivative trades in the OTC market with large, multinational financial institutions, including broker-dealers and, to a lesser degree, with a variety of other investors. Because these transactions are executed in the OTC market, we are subject to settlement risk. We are also subject to credit risk in the event that these counterparties fail to perform under the terms of these contracts. In order to properly reflect counterparty credit risk, we record counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments on certain derivative assets, including our
purchased credit default protection. In most cases, credit derivative transactions are executed on a daily margin basis. Therefore, events such as a credit downgrade, depending on the ultimate rating level, or a breach of credit covenants would typically require an increase in the amount of collateral required by the counterparty, where applicable, and/or allow us to take additional protective measures such as early termination of all trades. For more information on credit derivatives and counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-U.S. Portfolio
Our non-U.S. credit and trading portfolios are subject to country risk. We define country risk as the risk of loss from unfavorable economic and political conditions, currency fluctuations, social instability and changes in government policies. A risk management framework is in place to measure, monitor and
manage non-U.S. risk and exposures. In addition to the direct risk of doing business in a country, we also are exposed to indirect country risks (e.g., related to the collateral received on secured financing transactions or related to client clearing activities). These indirect exposures are managed in the normal course of business through credit, market and operational risk governance rather than through country risk governance.
Table 39 presents our 20 largest non-U.S. country exposures at December 31, 2021. These exposures accounted for 89 percent and 90 percent of our total non-U.S. exposure at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Net country exposure for these 20 countries increased $10.5 billion in 2021 primarily driven by increases in Australia, Canada and France, partially offset by reductions in Germany and the United Kingdom.
Non-U.S. exposure is presented on an internal risk management basis and includes sovereign and non-sovereign credit exposure, securities and other investments issued by or domiciled in countries other than the U.S.
Funded loans and loan equivalents include loans, leases, and other extensions of credit and funds, including letters of credit and due from placements. Unfunded commitments are the undrawn portion of legally binding commitments related to loans and loan equivalents. Net counterparty exposure includes the fair value of derivatives, including the counterparty risk associated with credit default swaps (CDS), and secured financing transactions. Securities and other investments are carried at fair value and long securities exposures are netted against short exposures with the same underlying issuer to, but not below, zero. Net country exposure represents country exposure less hedges and credit default protection purchased, net of credit default protection sold.
| Table 39 | Top 20 Non-U.S. Countries Exposure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | Funded Loans and Loan Equivalents | Unfunded Loan Commitments | Net Counterparty Exposure | Securities/ Other Investments | Country Exposure at December 31 2021 | Hedges and Credit Default Protection | Net Country Exposure at December 31 2021 | Increase (Decrease) from December 31 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Kingdom | $ | 32,062 | $ | 15,858 | $ | 5,932 | $ | 2,399 | $ | 56,251 | $ | (1,282) | $ | 54,969 | $ | (4,503) | ||||||||||||||
| Germany | 21,397 | 9,790 | 1,794 | 1,807 | 34,788 | (963) | 33,825 | (11,078) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 9,138 | 12,783 | 1,441 | 3,551 | 26,913 | (602) | 26,311 | 5,177 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| France | 12,393 | 8,234 | 1,391 | 3,710 | 25,728 | (821) | 24,907 | 4,116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Australia | 9,194 | 9,078 | 434 | 2,812 | 21,518 | (214) | 21,304 | 8,217 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Japan | 14,812 | 1,528 | 1,308 | 371 | 18,019 | (757) | 17,262 | (234) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | 6,814 | 1,382 | 526 | 4,227 | 12,949 | (199) | 12,750 | 2,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| China | 9,941 | 689 | 894 | 1,370 | 12,894 | (312) | 12,582 | (838) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Singapore | 3,914 | 709 | 249 | 5,850 | 10,722 | (57) | 10,665 | 1,383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | 3,839 | 4,780 | 452 | 950 | 10,021 | (425) | 9,596 | (88) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| India | 6,485 | 388 | 470 | 1,454 | 8,797 | (166) | 8,631 | 820 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Switzerland | 5,072 | 3,125 | 277 | 338 | 8,812 | (237) | 8,575 | 1,680 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Korea | 5,800 | 771 | 545 | 1,191 | 8,307 | (155) | 8,152 | (399) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | 5,523 | 315 | 338 | 1,167 | 7,343 | (16) | 7,327 | 790 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | 4,333 | 1,577 | 136 | 629 | j | 6,675 | (213) | 6,462 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Spain | 2,482 | 2,126 | 473 | 1,198 | 6,279 | (359) | 5,920 | 1,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ireland | 4,037 | 1,019 | 136 | 376 | 5,568 | (29) | 5,539 | 1,374 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Italy | 2,843 | 1,098 | 348 | 1,484 | 5,773 | (569) | 5,204 | (488) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Belgium | 2,548 | 1,516 | 462 | 687 | 5,213 | (182) | 5,031 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Arab Emirates | 2,942 | 329 | 36 | 234 | 3,541 | (47) | 3,494 | 807 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total top 20 non-U.S. countries exposure | $ | 165,569 | $ | 77,095 | $ | 17,642 | $ | 35,805 | $ | 296,111 | $ | (7,605) | $ | 288,506 | $ | 10,536 |
71 Bank of America
Our largest non-U.S. country exposure at December 31, 2021 was the United Kingdom with net exposure of $55.0 billion, which represents a $4.5 billion decrease from December 31, 2020. Our second largest non-U.S. country exposure was Germany with net exposure of $33.8 billion at December 31, 2021, a $11.1 billion decrease from December 31, 2020. The decrease in both of these countries was primarily driven by a reduction in deposits with central banks.
In light of the global pandemic, we are monitoring our non-U.S. exposure closely, particularly in countries where restrictions on certain activities, in an attempt to contain the spread and impact of the virus, have affected and will likely continue to adversely affect economic activity.
The impact of COVID-19 could have an adverse impact on the global economy for a prolonged period of time. For more information on how the pandemic may affect our operations, see Executive Summary – Recent Developments – COVID-19 Pandemic on page 27 and Part 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors on page 7.
Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities
Table 40 disaggregates total outstanding loans and leases by remaining contractual maturities and interest rates. The amounts provided do not reflect prepayment assumptions or hedging activities related to the loan portfolio. For information on the asset sensitivity of our total banking book balance sheet, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
| Table 40 | Loan and Lease Contractual Maturities (1) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Due in One Year or Less | Due After One Year Through Five Years | Due After Five Years Through 15 Years | Due After 15 Years | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 175 | $ | 702 | $ | 48,614 | $ | 172,751 | $ | 222,242 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 1,596 | 92 | 6,159 | 20,427 | 28,274 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 81,438 | — | — | — | 81,438 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 54,080 | 30,940 | 14,535 | 4,005 | 103,560 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 190 | — | — | — | 190 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | $ | 137,479 | $ | 31,734 | $ | 69,308 | $ | 197,183 | $ | 435,704 | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 93,480 | $ | 195,157 | $ | 39,370 | $ | 2,505 | $ | 330,512 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 42,570 | 50,514 | 21,754 | 1,053 | 115,891 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 16,322 | 42,363 | 3,386 | 938 | 63,009 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 1,349 | 8,676 | 3,865 | 935 | 14,825 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 9,428 | 3,895 | 5,656 | 204 | 19,183 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | $ | 163,149 | $ | 300,605 | $ | 74,031 | $ | 5,635 | $ | 543,420 | ||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 300,628 | $ | 332,339 | $ | 143,339 | $ | 202,818 | $ | 979,124 | ||||||||
| Amount due in one year or less at: | Amount due after one year at: | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Variable Interest Rates | Fixed Interest Rates | Total | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 18 | $ | 157 | $ | 80,967 | $ | 141,100 | $ | 222,242 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 98 | 1,498 | 25,982 | 696 | 28,274 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 77,151 | 4,287 | — | — | 81,438 | |||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 48,424 | 5,656 | 2,551 | 46,929 | 103,560 | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | — | 190 | — | — | 190 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | $ | 125,691 | $ | 11,788 | $ | 109,500 | $ | 188,725 | $ | 435,704 | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial | $ | 84,398 | $ | 9,082 | $ | 190,978 | $ | 46,054 | $ | 330,512 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 39,472 | 3,098 | 70,817 | 2,504 | 115,891 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 15,673 | 649 | 44,626 | 2,061 | 63,009 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 187 | 1,162 | 1,560 | 11,916 | 14,825 | |||||||||||||
| U.S. small business commercial | 5,150 | 4,278 | 98 | 9,657 | 19,183 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | $ | 144,880 | $ | 18,269 | $ | 308,079 | $ | 72,192 | $ | 543,420 | ||||||||
| Total loans and leases | $ | 270,571 | $ | 30,057 | $ | 417,579 | $ | 260,917 | $ | 979,124 |
(1)Includes loans accounted for under the fair value option.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 72 |
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses decreased $6.8 billion from December 31, 2020 to $13.8 billion at December 31, 2021, which included a $3.8 billion reserve decrease related to the commercial portfolio and a $3.1 billion reserve decrease related
to the consumer portfolio. The decreases were primarily driven by improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality.
Table 41 presents an allocation of the allowance for credit losses by product type at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 41 | Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses by Product Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | Amount | Percent of Total | Percent of Loans and LeasesOutstanding (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | $ | 351 | 2.83 | % | 0.16 | % | $ | 459 | 2.44 | % | 0.21 | % | |||||||||||||
| Home equity | 206 | 1.66 | 0.74 | 399 | 2.12 | 1.16 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 5,907 | 47.70 | 7.25 | 8,420 | 44.79 | 10.70 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 523 | 4.22 | 0.51 | 752 | 4.00 | 0.82 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 46 | 0.37 | n/m | 41 | 0.22 | n/m | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 7,033 | 56.78 | 1.62 | 10,071 | 53.57 | 2.35 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 3,019 | 24.37 | 0.87 | 5,043 | 26.82 | 1.55 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 975 | 7.87 | 0.86 | 1,241 | 6.60 | 1.37 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 1,292 | 10.43 | 2.05 | 2,285 | 12.15 | 3.79 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 68 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 162 | 0.86 | 0.95 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 5,354 | 43.22 | 1.00 | 8,731 | 46.43 | 1.77 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | 12,387 | 100.00 | % | 1.28 | 18,802 | 100.00 | % | 2.04 | |||||||||||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments | 1,456 | 1,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 13,843 | $ | 20,680 |
(1)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(2)Includes allowance for loan and lease losses for U.S. small business commercial loans of $1.2 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
n/m = not meaningful
Net charge-offs for 2021 were $2.2 billion compared to $4.1 billion in 2020 driven by decreases across most products. The provision for credit losses decreased $15.9 billion to a $4.6 billion benefit during 2021 compared to 2020. The allowance for credit losses had a reserve release of $6.8 billion for 2021, primarily driven by improvements in the macroeconomic outlook and credit quality. The provision for credit losses for the consumer portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, decreased $6.1 billion to a benefit of $1.2 billion during 2021 compared to 2020. The provision for credit losses for the
commercial portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, decreased $9.8 billion to a $3.4 billion benefit for 2021 compared to 2020.
Table 42 presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses, including certain loan and allowance ratios for 2021 and 2020. For more information on the Corporation’s credit loss accounting policies and activity related to the allowance for credit losses, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
73 Bank of America
| Table 42 | Allowance for Credit Losses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, January 1 | $ | 18,802 | $ | 12,358 | ||||||
| Loans and leases charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (34) | (40) | ||||||||
| Home equity | (44) | (58) | ||||||||
| Credit card | (2,411) | (2,967) | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | (297) | (372) | ||||||||
| Other consumer | (292) | (307) | ||||||||
| Total consumer charge-offs | (3,078) | (3,744) | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (1) | (626) | (1,163) | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | (47) | (168) | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (46) | (275) | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | — | (69) | ||||||||
| Total commercial charge-offs | (719) | (1,675) | ||||||||
| Total loans and leases charged off | (3,797) | (5,419) | ||||||||
| Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | ||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 62 | 70 | ||||||||
| Home equity | 163 | 131 | ||||||||
| Credit card | 688 | 618 | ||||||||
| Direct/Indirect consumer | 296 | 250 | ||||||||
| Other consumer | 22 | 23 | ||||||||
| Total consumer recoveries | 1,231 | 1,092 | ||||||||
| U.S. commercial (2) | 298 | 178 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. commercial | 12 | 13 | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 12 | 5 | ||||||||
| Commercial lease financing | 1 | 10 | ||||||||
| Total commercial recoveries | 323 | 206 | ||||||||
| Total recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off | 1,554 | 1,298 | ||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (2,243) | (4,121) | ||||||||
| Provision for loan and lease losses | (4,173) | 10,565 | ||||||||
| Other | 1 | — | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses, December 31 | 12,387 | 18,802 | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, January 1 | 1,878 | 1,123 | ||||||||
| Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (421) | 755 | ||||||||
| Other | (1) | — | ||||||||
| Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, December 31 | 1,456 | 1,878 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses, December 31 | $ | 13,843 | $ | 20,680 | ||||||
| Loan and allowance ratios (3) : | ||||||||||
| Loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | $ | 971,305 | $ | 921,180 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.28 | % | 2.04 | % | ||||||
| Consumer allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total consumer loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.62 | 2.35 | ||||||||
| Commercial allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total commercial loans and leases outstanding at December 31 | 1.00 | 1.77 | ||||||||
| Average loans and leases outstanding | $ | 913,354 | $ | 974,281 | ||||||
| Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding | 0.25 | % | 0.42 | % | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 | 271 | 380 | ||||||||
| Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31 to net charge-offs | 5.52 | 4.56 | ||||||||
| Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | $ | 7,027 | $ | 9,854 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at December 31 (4) | 117 | % | 181 | % |
(1)Includes U.S. small business commercial charge-offs of $425 million in 2021 compared to $321 million in 2020.
(2)Includes U.S. small business commercial recoveries of $74 million for 2021 compared to $54 million in 2020.
(3)Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.
(4)Primarily includes amounts related to credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 74 |
Market Risk Management
Market risk is the risk that changes in market conditions may adversely impact the value of assets or liabilities, or otherwise negatively impact earnings. This risk is inherent in the financial instruments associated with our operations, primarily within our Global Markets segment. We are also exposed to these risks in other areas of the Corporation (e.g., our ALM activities). In the event of market stress, these risks could have a material impact on our results. For more information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 79.
We have been affected, and may continue to be affected, by market stress resulting from the pandemic that began in the first quarter of 2020. For more information, see Part 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors – Coronavirus Disease on page 8.
Our traditional banking loan and deposit products are non-trading positions and are generally reported at amortized cost for assets or the amount owed for liabilities (historical cost). However, these positions are still subject to changes in economic value based on varying market conditions, with one of the primary risks being changes in the levels of interest rates. The risk of adverse changes in the economic value of our non-trading positions arising from changes in interest rates is managed through our ALM activities. We have elected to account for certain assets and liabilities under the fair value option.
Our trading positions are reported at fair value with changes reflected in income. Trading positions are subject to various changes in market-based risk factors. The majority of this risk is generated by our activities in the interest rate, foreign exchange, credit, equity and commodities markets. In addition, the values of assets and liabilities could change due to market liquidity, correlations across markets and expectations of market volatility. We seek to manage these risk exposures by using a variety of techniques that encompass a broad range of financial instruments. The key risk management techniques are discussed in more detail in the Trading Risk Management section.
Global Risk Management is responsible for providing senior management with a clear and comprehensive understanding of the trading risks to which we are exposed. These responsibilities include ownership of market risk policy, developing and maintaining quantitative risk models, calculating aggregated risk measures, establishing and monitoring position limits consistent with risk appetite, conducting daily reviews and analysis of trading inventory, approving material risk exposures and fulfilling regulatory requirements. Market risks that impact businesses outside of Global Markets are monitored and governed by their respective governance functions.
Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. Given that models are used across the Corporation, model risk impacts all risk types including credit, market and operational risks. The Enterprise Model Risk Policy defines model risk standards, consistent with our Risk Framework and risk appetite, prevailing regulatory guidance and industry best practice. All models, including risk management, valuation and regulatory capital models, must meet certain validation criteria, including effective challenge of the conceptual soundness of the model, independent model testing and ongoing monitoring through outcomes analysis and benchmarking. The Enterprise Model Risk Committee (EMRC), a subcommittee of the MRC, oversees that model standards are consistent with model risk requirements and monitors the effective challenge in the model validation process across the Corporation.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents exposures to instruments whose values vary with the level or volatility of interest rates. These instruments include, but are not limited to, loans, debt securities, certain trading-related assets and liabilities, deposits, borrowings and derivatives. Hedging instruments used to mitigate these risks include derivatives such as options, futures, forwards and swaps.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange risk represents exposures to changes in the values of current holdings and future cash flows denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The types of instruments exposed to this risk include investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign currency-denominated loans and securities, future cash flows in foreign currencies arising from foreign exchange transactions, foreign currency-denominated debt and various foreign exchange derivatives whose values fluctuate with changes in the level or volatility of currency exchange rates or non-U.S. interest rates. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include foreign exchange options, currency swaps, futures, forwards, and foreign currency-denominated debt and deposits.
Mortgage Risk
Mortgage risk represents exposures to changes in the values of mortgage-related instruments. The values of these instruments are sensitive to prepayment rates, mortgage rates, agency debt ratings, default, market liquidity, government participation and interest rate volatility. Our exposure to these instruments takes several forms. For example, we trade and engage in market-making activities in a variety of mortgage securities including whole loans, pass-through certificates, commercial mortgages and collateralized mortgage obligations including collateralized debt obligations using mortgages as underlying collateral. In addition, we originate a variety of MBS, which involves the accumulation of mortgage-related loans in anticipation of eventual securitization, and we may hold positions in mortgage securities and residential mortgage loans as part of the ALM portfolio. We also record MSRs as part of our mortgage origination activities. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include derivatives such as options, swaps, futures and forwards as well as securities including MBS and U.S. Treasury securities. For more information, see Mortgage Banking Risk Management on page 80.
Equity Market Risk
Equity market risk represents exposures to securities that represent an ownership interest in a corporation in the form of domestic and foreign common stock or other equity-linked instruments. Instruments that would lead to this exposure include, but are not limited to, the following: common stock, exchange-traded funds, American Depositary Receipts, convertible bonds, listed equity options (puts and calls), OTC equity options, equity total return swaps, equity index futures and other equity derivative products. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include options, futures, swaps, convertible bonds and cash positions.
Commodity Risk
Commodity risk represents exposures to instruments traded in the petroleum, natural gas, power and metals markets. These instruments consist primarily of futures, forwards, swaps and options. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include
75 Bank of America
options, futures and swaps in the same or similar commodity product, as well as cash positions.
Issuer Credit Risk
Issuer credit risk represents exposures to changes in the creditworthiness of individual issuers or groups of issuers. Our portfolio is exposed to issuer credit risk where the value of an asset may be adversely impacted by changes in the levels of credit spreads, by credit migration or by defaults. Hedging instruments used to mitigate this risk include bonds, CDS and other credit fixed-income instruments.
Market Liquidity Risk
Market liquidity risk represents the risk that the level of expected market activity changes dramatically and, in certain cases, may even cease. This exposes us to the risk that we will not be able to transact business and execute trades in an orderly manner which may impact our results. This impact could be further exacerbated if expected hedging or pricing correlations are compromised by disproportionate demand or lack of demand for certain instruments. We utilize various risk mitigating techniques as discussed in more detail in Trading Risk Management.
Trading Risk Management
To evaluate risks in our trading activities, we focus on the actual and potential volatility of revenues generated by individual positions as well as portfolios of positions. Various techniques and procedures are utilized to enable the most complete understanding of these risks. Quantitative measures of market risk are evaluated on a daily basis from a single position to the portfolio of the Corporation. These measures include sensitivities of positions to various market risk factors, such as the potential impact on revenue from a one basis point change in interest rates, and statistical measures utilizing both actual and hypothetical market moves, such as VaR and stress testing. Periods of extreme market stress influence the reliability of these techniques to varying degrees. Qualitative evaluations of market risk utilize the suite of quantitative risk measures while understanding each of their respective limitations. Additionally, risk managers independently evaluate the risk of the portfolios under the current market environment and potential future environments.
VaR is a common statistic used to measure market risk as it allows the aggregation of market risk factors, including the effects of portfolio diversification. A VaR model simulates the value of a portfolio under a range of scenarios in order to generate a distribution of potential gains and losses. VaR represents the loss a portfolio is not expected to exceed more than a certain number of times per period, based on a specified holding period, confidence level and window of historical data. We use one VaR model consistently across the trading portfolios and it uses a historical simulation approach based on a three-year window of historical data. Our primary VaR statistic is equivalent to a 99 percent confidence level, which means that for a VaR with a one-day holding period, there should not be losses in excess of VaR, on average, 99 out of 100 trading days.
Within any VaR model, there are significant and numerous assumptions that will differ from company to company. The accuracy of a VaR model depends on the availability and quality of historical data for each of the risk factors in the portfolio. A VaR model may require additional modeling assumptions for new products that do not have the necessary historical market data or for less liquid positions for which accurate daily prices
are not consistently available. For positions with insufficient historical data for the VaR calculation, the process for establishing an appropriate proxy is based on fundamental and statistical analysis of the new product or less liquid position. This analysis identifies reasonable alternatives that replicate both the expected volatility and correlation to other market risk factors that the missing data would be expected to experience.
VaR may not be indicative of realized revenue volatility as changes in market conditions or in the composition of the portfolio can have a material impact on the results. In particular,
the historical data used for the VaR calculation might indicate higher or lower levels of portfolio diversification than will be experienced. In order for the VaR model to reflect current market conditions, we update the historical data underlying our VaR model on a weekly basis, or more frequently during periods of market stress, and regularly review the assumptions underlying the model. A minor portion of risks related to our trading positions is not included in VaR. These risks are reviewed as part of our ICAAP. For more information regarding ICAAP, see Capital Management on page 49.
Global Risk Management continually reviews, evaluates and enhances our VaR model so that it reflects the material risks in our trading portfolio. Changes to the VaR model are reviewed and approved prior to implementation and any material changes are reported to management through the appropriate management committees.
Trading limits on quantitative risk measures, including VaR, are independently set by Global Markets Risk Management and reviewed on a regular basis so that trading limits remain relevant and within our overall risk appetite for market risks. Trading limits are reviewed in the context of market liquidity, volatility and strategic business priorities. Trading limits are set at both a granular level to allow for extensive coverage of risks as well as at aggregated portfolios to account for correlations among risk factors. All trading limits are approved at least annually. Approved trading limits are stored and tracked in a centralized limits management system. Trading limit excesses are communicated to management for review. Certain quantitative market risk measures and corresponding limits have been identified as critical in the Corporation’s Risk Appetite Statement. These risk appetite limits are reported on a daily basis and are approved at least annually by the ERC and the Board.
In periods of market stress, Global Markets senior leadership communicates daily to discuss losses, key risk positions and any limit excesses. As a result of this process, the businesses may selectively reduce risk.
Table 43 presents the total market-based portfolio VaR, which is the combination of the total covered positions (and less liquid trading positions) portfolio and the fair value option portfolio. Covered positions are defined by regulatory standards as trading assets and liabilities, both on- and off-balance sheet, that meet a defined set of specifications. These specifications identify the most liquid trading positions which are intended to be held for a short-term horizon and where we are able to hedge the material risk elements in a two-way market. Positions in less liquid markets, or where there are restrictions on the ability to trade the positions, typically do not qualify as covered positions. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 76 |
In addition, Table 43 presents our fair value option portfolio, which includes substantially all of the funded and unfunded exposures for which we elect the fair value option, and their corresponding hedges. Additionally, market risk VaR for trading activities as presented in Table 43 differs from VaR used for regulatory capital calculations due to the holding period being used. The holding period for VaR used for regulatory capital calculations is 10 days, while for the market risk VaR presented below, it is one day. Both measures utilize the same process and methodology.
The total market-based portfolio VaR results in Table 43 include market risk to which we are exposed from all business segments, excluding credit valuation adjustment (CVA), DVA and related hedges. The majority of this portfolio is within the Global Markets segment.
Table 43 presents year-end, average, high and low daily trading VaR for 2021 and 2020 using a 99 percent confidence level. The amounts disclosed in Table 43 and Table 44 align to the view of covered positions used in the Basel 3 capital calculations. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, regardless of trading or banking treatment for the trade, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval.
The annual average of total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR decreased for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to an increase in diversification across asset classes.
| Table 43 | Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | Year End | Average | High (1) | Low (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 11 | $ | 12 | $ | 21 | $ | 5 | $ | 8 | $ | 7 | $ | 25 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate | 54 | 40 | 80 | 16 | 30 | 19 | 39 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | 73 | 69 | 84 | 53 | 79 | 58 | 91 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 21 | 24 | 35 | 19 | 20 | 24 | 162 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 6 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (114) | (100) | — | — | (72) | (61) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 51 | 53 | 85 | 34 | 69 | 53 | 171 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures (2) | 8 | 20 | — | — | 52 | 27 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 59 | 73 | 125 | 46 | 121 | 80 | 169 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 51 | 50 | 65 | 31 | 52 | 52 | 84 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 15 | 16 | 20 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (27) | (32) | — | — | (17) | (24) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 39 | 34 | 53 | 23 | 46 | 41 | 86 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (24) | (10) | — | — | (4) | (15) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 74 | $ | 97 | 169 | 54 | $ | 163 | $ | 106 | 171 | 32 |
(1)The high and low for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the high and low for the components. Therefore the impact from less liquid exposures and the amount of portfolio diversification, which is the difference between the total portfolio and the sum of the individual components, is not relevant.
(2)Impact is net of diversification effects between the covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolios.
The graph below presents the daily covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio VaR for 2021, corresponding to the data in Table 43.
77 Bank of America
Additional VaR statistics produced within our single VaR model are provided in Table 44 at the same level of detail as in Table 43. Evaluating VaR with additional statistics allows for an increased understanding of the risks in the portfolio, as the
historical market data used in the VaR calculation does not necessarily follow a predefined statistical distribution. Table 44 presents average trading VaR statistics at 99 percent and 95 percent confidence levels for 2021 and 2020.
| Table 44 | Average Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities – 99 percent and 95 percent VaR Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 99 percent | 95 percent | 99 percent | 95 percent | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | $ | 12 | $ | 8 | $ | 7 | $ | 4 | |||||||||||
| Interest rate | 40 | 20 | 19 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit | 69 | 21 | 58 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity | 24 | 12 | 24 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
| Commodities | 8 | 4 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (100) | (39) | (61) | (26) | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions portfolio | 53 | 26 | 53 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
| Impact from less liquid exposures | 20 | 2 | 27 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Total covered positions and less liquid trading positions portfolio | 73 | 28 | 80 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option loans | 50 | 12 | 52 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option hedges | 16 | 9 | 13 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair value option portfolio diversification | (32) | (9) | (24) | (8) | |||||||||||||||
| Total fair value option portfolio | 34 | 12 | 41 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio diversification | (10) | (7) | (15) | (6) | |||||||||||||||
| Total market-based portfolio | $ | 97 | $ | 33 | $ | 106 | $ | 29 |
Backtesting
The accuracy of the VaR methodology is evaluated by backtesting, which compares the daily VaR results, utilizing a one-day holding period, against a comparable subset of trading revenue. A backtesting excess occurs when a trading loss exceeds the VaR for the corresponding day. These excesses are evaluated to understand the positions and market moves that produced the trading loss with a goal to ensure that the VaR methodology accurately represents those losses. We expect the frequency of trading losses in excess of VaR to be in line with the confidence level of the VaR statistic being tested. For example, with a 99 percent confidence level, we expect one trading loss in excess of VaR every 100 days or between two to three trading losses in excess of VaR over the course of a year. The number of backtesting excesses observed can differ from the statistically expected number of excesses if the current level of market volatility is materially different than the level of market volatility that existed during the three years of historical data used in the VaR calculation.
The trading revenue used for backtesting is defined by regulatory agencies in order to most closely align with the VaR component of the regulatory capital calculation. This revenue differs from total trading-related revenue in that it excludes revenue from trading activities that either do not generate market risk or the market risk cannot be included in VaR. Some examples of the types of revenue excluded for backtesting are fees, commissions, reserves, net interest income and intra-day trading revenues.
We conduct daily backtesting on the VaR results used for regulatory capital calculations as well as the VaR results for key legal entities, regions and risk factors. These results are reported to senior market risk management. Senior management regularly reviews and evaluates the results of these tests.
During 2021, there were two days where this subset of trading revenue had losses that exceeded our total covered portfolio VaR, utilizing a one-day holding period.
Total Trading-related Revenue
Total trading-related revenue, excluding brokerage fees, and CVA, DVA and funding valuation adjustment gains (losses), represents the total amount earned from trading positions, including market-based net interest income, which are taken in a diverse range of financial instruments and markets. For more information on fair value, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Trading-related revenue can be volatile and is largely driven by general market conditions and customer demand. Also, trading-related revenue is dependent on the volume and type of transactions, the level of risk assumed, and the volatility of price and rate movements at any given time within the ever-changing market environment. Significant daily revenue by business is monitored and the primary drivers of these are reviewed.
The following histogram is a graphic depiction of trading volatility and illustrates the daily level of trading-related revenue for 2021 and 2020. During 2021, positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 97 percent of the trading days, of which 80 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $45 million. This compares to 2020 where positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 98 percent of the trading days, of which 87 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million, and the largest loss was $90 million.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 78 |
Trading Portfolio Stress Testing
Because the very nature of a VaR model suggests results can exceed our estimates and it is dependent on a limited historical window, we also stress test our portfolio using scenario analysis. This analysis estimates the change in the value of our trading portfolio that may result from abnormal market movements.
A set of scenarios, categorized as either historical or hypothetical, are computed daily for the overall trading portfolio and individual businesses. These scenarios include shocks to underlying market risk factors that may be well beyond the shocks found in the historical data used to calculate VaR. Historical scenarios simulate the impact of the market moves that occurred during a period of extended historical market stress. Generally, a multi-week period representing the most severe point during a crisis is selected for each historical scenario. Hypothetical scenarios provide estimated portfolio impacts from potential future market stress events. Scenarios are reviewed and updated in response to changing positions and new economic or political information. In addition, new or ad hoc scenarios are developed to address specific potential market events or particular vulnerabilities in the portfolio. The stress tests are reviewed on a regular basis and the results are presented to senior management.
Stress testing for the trading portfolio is integrated with enterprise-wide stress testing and incorporated into the limits framework. The macroeconomic scenarios used for enterprise-wide stress testing purposes differ from the typical trading portfolio scenarios in that they have a longer time horizon and the results are forecasted over multiple periods for use in consolidated capital and liquidity planning. For more information, see Managing Risk on page 46.
Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book
The following discussion presents net interest income for banking book activities.
Interest rate risk represents the most significant market risk exposure to our banking book balance sheet. Interest rate risk is measured as the potential change in net interest income caused by movements in market interest rates. Client-facing activities, primarily lending and deposit-taking, create interest rate sensitive positions on our balance sheet.
We prepare forward-looking forecasts of net interest income. The baseline forecast takes into consideration expected future business growth, ALM positioning -and the direction of interest rate movements as implied by the market-based forward curve.
We then measure and evaluate the impact that alternative interest rate scenarios have on the baseline forecast in order to assess interest rate sensitivity under varied conditions. The net interest income forecast is frequently updated for changing assumptions and differing outlooks based on economic trends, market conditions and business strategies. Thus, we continually monitor our balance sheet position in order to maintain an acceptable level of exposure to interest rate changes.
The interest rate scenarios that we analyze incorporate balance sheet assumptions such as loan and deposit growth and pricing, changes in funding mix, product repricing, maturity characteristics and investment securities premium amortization. Our overall goal is to manage interest rate risk so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect earnings and capital.
Table 45 presents the spot and 12-month forward rates used in our baseline forecasts at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| Table 45 | Forward Rates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||
| Federal Funds | Three-month LIBOR | 10-Year Swap | ||||||
| Spot rates | 0.25 | % | 0.21 | % | 1.58 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.84 | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||
| Spot rates | 0.25 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.93 | % | ||
| 12-month forward rates | 0.25 | 0.19 | 1.06 |
Table 46 shows the pretax impact to forecasted net interest income over the next 12 months from December 31, 2021 and 2020 resulting from instantaneous parallel and non-parallel shocks to the market-based forward curve. Periodically, we evaluate the scenarios presented so that they are meaningful in the context of the current rate environment. The interest rate scenarios also assume U.S. dollar rates are floored at zero.
During 2021, the overall decrease in asset sensitivity of our balance sheet to Up-rate and Down-rate scenarios was primarily due to ALM activity and an increase in long-end rates. We continue to be asset sensitive to a parallel upward move in interest rates with the majority of that impact coming from the short end of the yield curve. Additionally, higher interest rates impact the fair value of debt securities and, accordingly, for debt securities classified as AFS, may adversely affect accumulated OCI and thus capital levels under the Basel 3 capital rules. Under instantaneous upward parallel shifts, the near-term adverse impact to Basel 3 capital is reduced over time by offsetting positive impacts to net interest income. For more information on Basel 3, see Capital Management – Regulatory Capital on page 50.
| Table 46 | Estimated Banking Book Net Interest Income Sensitivity to Curve Changes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short Rate (bps) | Long Rate (bps) | |||||||||
| December 31 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| Parallel Shifts | ||||||||||
| +100 bps instantaneous shift | +100 | +100 | $ | 6,542 | $ | 10,468 | ||||
| -25 bps instantaneous shift | -25 | -25 | (2,092) | (2,766) | ||||||
| Flatteners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | +100 | — | 4,982 | 6,321 | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | -25 | (735) | (1,686) | ||||||
| Steepeners | ||||||||||
| Short-end instantaneous change | -25 | — | (1,344) | (1,084) | ||||||
| Long-end instantaneous change | — | +100 | 1,646 | 4,333 |
The sensitivity analysis in Table 46 assumes that we take no action in response to these rate shocks and does not assume any change in other macroeconomic variables normally correlated with changes in interest rates. As part of our ALM activities, we use securities, certain residential mortgages, and interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives in managing interest rate sensitivity.
The behavior of our deposits portfolio in the baseline forecast and in alternate interest rate scenarios is a key assumption in our projected estimates of net interest income. The sensitivity analysis in Table 46 assumes no change in
79 Bank of America
deposit portfolio size or mix from the baseline forecast in alternate rate environments. In higher rate scenarios, any customer activity resulting in the replacement of low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits with higher yielding deposits or market-based funding would reduce our benefit in those scenarios.
Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Derivative Contracts
We use interest rate and foreign exchange derivative contracts in our ALM activities to manage our interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Specifically, we use those derivatives to manage both the variability in cash flows and changes in fair value of various assets and liabilities arising from those risks. Our interest rate derivative contracts are generally non-leveraged swaps tied to various benchmark interest rates and foreign exchange basis swaps, options, futures and forwards, and our foreign exchange contracts include cross-currency interest rate swaps, foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency forward contracts and options.
The derivatives used in our ALM activities can be split into two broad categories: designated accounting hedges and other risk management derivatives. Designated accounting hedges are primarily used to manage our exposure to interest rates as described in the Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book section and are included in the sensitivities presented in Table 46. The Corporation also uses foreign currency derivatives in accounting hedges to manage substantially all of the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations. By hedging the foreign exchange risk of our foreign operations, the Corporation's market risk exposure in this area is insignificant.
Risk management derivatives are predominantly used to hedge foreign exchange risks related to various foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities and eliminate substantially all foreign currency exposures in the cash flows of the Corporation’s non-trading foreign currency-denominated financial instruments. These foreign exchange derivatives are sensitive to other market risk exposures such as cross-currency basis spreads and interest rate risk. However, as these features are not a significant component of these foreign exchange derivatives, the market risk related to this exposure is insignificant. For more information on the accounting for derivatives, see Note 3 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mortgage Banking Risk Management
We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subject us to credit, liquidity and interest rate risks, among others. We determine whether loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment and manage credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing a portion of the loans we originate.
Interest rate risk and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Changes in interest rates and other market factors impact the volume of mortgage originations. Changes in interest rates also impact the value of interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) and the related residential first mortgage LHFS between the date of the IRLC and the date the loans are
sold to the secondary market. An increase in mortgage interest rates typically leads to a decrease in the value of these instruments. Conversely, when there is an increase in interest rates, the value of the MSRs will increase driven by lower prepayment expectations. Because the interest rate risks of these hedged items offset, we combine them into one overall hedged item with one combined economic hedge portfolio consisting of derivative contracts and securities.
During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recorded gains of $39 million, $321 million and $291 million. For more information on MSRs, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Compliance and Operational Risk Management
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss or damage to the reputation of the Corporation arising from the failure of the Corporation to comply with the requirements of applicable laws, rules, regulations and our internal policies and procedures (collectively, applicable laws, rules and regulations). We are subject to comprehensive regulation under federal and state laws, rules and regulations in the U.S. and the laws of the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those related to financial crimes and anti-money laundering, market conduct, trading activities, fair lending, privacy, data protection and unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes or systems, people or external events, and includes legal risk. Operational risk may occur anywhere in the Corporation, including third-party business processes, and is not limited to operations functions. The Corporation faces a number of key operational risks including third-party risk, model risk, conduct risk, technology risk, information security risk and data risk. Operational risk can result in financial losses and reputational impacts and is a component in the calculation of total RWA used in the Basel 3 capital calculation. For more information on Basel 3 calculations, see Capital Management on page 49.
FLUs and control functions are first and foremost responsible for managing all aspects of their businesses, including their compliance and operational risk. FLUs and control functions are required to understand their business processes and related risks and controls, including third-party dependencies and the related regulatory requirements, and monitor and report on the effectiveness of the control environment. In order to actively monitor and assess the performance of their processes and controls, they must conduct comprehensive quality assurance activities and identify issues and risks to remediate control gaps and weaknesses. FLUs and control functions must also adhere to compliance and operational risk appetite limits to meet strategic, capital and financial planning objectives. Finally, FLUs and control functions are responsible for the proactive identification, management and escalation of compliance and operational risks across the Corporation. Collectively, these efforts are important to strengthen their compliance and operational resiliency, which is the ability to deliver critical operations through disruption.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 80 |
Global Compliance and Operational Risk teams independently assess compliance and operational risk, monitor business activities and processes and evaluate FLUs and control functions for adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations, including identifying issues and risks, determining and developing tests to be conducted by the Enterprise Independent Testing unit and reporting on the state of the control environment. Enterprise Independent Testing, an independent testing function within GRM, works with Global Compliance and Operational Risk, the FLUs and control functions in the identification of testing needs and test design, and is accountable for test execution, reporting and analysis of results. Corporate Audit provides an independent assessment and validation through testing of key compliance and operational risk processes and controls across the Corporation.
The Corporation's Global Compliance Enterprise Policy and Operational Risk Management – Enterprise Policy set the requirements for reporting compliance and operational risk information to executive management as well as the Board or appropriate Board-level committees and reflect Global Compliance and Operational Risk’s responsibilities for conducting independent oversight of the Corporation’s compliance and operational risk management activities. The Board provides oversight of compliance risk through its Audit Committee and the ERC, and operational risk through its ERC.
A key operational risk facing the Corporation is information security, which includes cybersecurity. Cybersecurity risk represents, among other things, exposure to failures or interruptions of service or breaches of security, including as a result of malicious technological attacks, that impact the confidentiality, availability or integrity of our or third parties' operations, systems or data. The Corporation seeks to mitigate information security risk and associated reputational and compliance risk by employing a multi-layered and intelligence-led Global Information Security Program, which is focused on preparing for, preventing, detecting, mitigating, responding to and recovering from cyber threats and incidents and ensuring the Corporation’s processes operate effectively and mitigate the aforementioned risks.
The Global Information Security Program is supported by three lines of defense. The Global Information Security Team within the first line of defense is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Global Information Security Program, which includes defining policies and procedures to safeguard the Corporation’s information systems and data, conducting vulnerability and third-party information security assessments, information security event management (e.g., responding to ransomware and distributed denial of service attacks), evaluation of external cyber intelligence, supporting industry cybersecurity efforts and working with governmental agencies, as well as developing employee training to support adherence to the Corporation’s policies and procedures. As the second line of defense, Global Compliance and Operational Risk independently assesses, monitors and tests information security risk across the Corporation as well as the effectiveness of the Global Information Security Program. Corporate Audit serves as the third line of defense, conducting additional independent review and validation of the first line processes and functions.
Through established governance structures, we have processes to help facilitate appropriate and effective oversight of information security risk. These routines enable our three lines of defense and management to debate information security risks and monitor control performance to allow for further escalation to executive management, management and Board-level committees or to the Board, as appropriate. The Board is actively engaged in the oversight of Bank of America’s Global Information Security Program, primarily through the ERC.
Reputational Risk Management
Reputational risk is the risk that negative perception of the Corporation may adversely impact profitability or operations. Reputational risk may result from many of the Corporation’s activities, including those related to the management of our strategic, operational, compliance and credit risks.
The Corporation manages reputational risk through established policies and controls embedded throughout its business and risk management processes. We proactively monitor and identify potential reputational risk events and have processes established to mitigate reputational risks in a timely manner. If reputational risk events occur, we focus on remediating the underlying issue and taking action to minimize damage to the Corporation’s reputation. The Corporation has processes and procedures in place to respond to events that give rise to reputational risk, including educating individuals and organizations that influence public opinion, implementing external communication strategies to mitigate the risk, and informing key stakeholders of potential reputational risks. The Corporation’s organization and governance structure provides oversight of reputational risks. Reputational risk reporting is provided regularly and directly to management and the ERC, which provides primary oversight of reputational risk. In addition, each FLU has a committee, which includes representatives from Legal and Risk, that is responsible for the oversight of reputational risk, including approval for business activities that present elevated levels of reputational risks.
Climate Risk Management
Climate-related risks are divided into two major categories: (1) risks related to the transition to a low-carbon economy, which may entail extensive policy, legal, technology and market changes, and (2) risks related to the physical impacts of climate change, driven by extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and floods, as well as chronic longer-term shifts, such as rising average global temperatures and sea-level rise. These changes and events can have broad impacts on operations, supply chains, distribution networks, customers and markets and are otherwise referred to, respectively, as transition risk and physical risk. These risks can impact both financial and nonfinancial risk types. The impacts of transition risk can lead to and amplify credit risk or market risk by reducing our customers’ operating income or the value of their assets as well as expose us to reputational and/or litigation risk due to increased regulatory scrutiny or negative public sentiment. Physical risk can lead to increased credit risk by diminishing borrowers’ repayment capacity or impacting the value of collateral. In addition, it could pose increased operational risk to our facilities and people.
81 Bank of America
Effective management of climate risk requires coordinated governance, clearly defined roles and responsibilities and well-developed processes to identify, measure, monitor and control risks. We continue to build out and enhance our climate risk management capabilities. As climate risk is interconnected with all key risk types, we have developed and continue to enhance processes to embed climate risk considerations into our Risk Framework and risk management programs established for strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. Our Environmental and Social Risk Policy Framework (ESRPF) aligns with our Risk Framework and provides additional clarity and transparency regarding our approach to environmental and social risks, inclusive of climate risk.
Our governance framework establishes oversight of climate risk practices and strategies by the Board, supported by its Corporate Governance, ESG, and Sustainability Committee and ERC, as well as the MRC and the Global ESG Committee, both of which are management-level committees comprised of senior leaders across every major FLU and control function.
Our climate risk management efforts are overseen by the Global Climate Risk Executive who reports to the CRO. The Global Climate Risk Executive chairs the Climate Risk Steering Council, which meets monthly and shapes our approach to managing climate-related risks in line with our Risk Framework.
As outlined in our ESRPF, we are focused on supporting and financing areas critical to the transition to a low-carbon economy. Accordingly, we have a goal, publicly announced in early 2021, to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions in our financing activities, operations and supply chain before 2050 (Net Zero Goal). More broadly, achieving this goal will require technological advances, clearly defined roadmaps for industry sectors, public policies, and better emissions data reporting, as well as ongoing, strong and active engagement with clients, suppliers, investors, government officials and other stakeholders.
Our progress towards achieving our Net Zero Goal is based on establishing the baseline for emissions associated with our financing activities often referred to as financed emissions. Currently, we are using the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials methodology to assess our financed emissions. Additionally, given the urgency required to address climate change, we helped to launch the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) in April 2021, which outlines guidelines for banks to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions including requirements for setting interim targets. As a member of NZBA, the Corporation and more than 100 other financial institution members representing more than 40 percent of the world’s banking assets, have committed to set emission reduction targets for 2030. We plan to begin disclosure of financed emissions by 2023, and set 2030 targets for the significant majority of emissions in our portfolio.
In 2021, we also announced a goal to deploy $1 trillion by 2030 to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon, sustainable economy by providing lending, capital raising, advisory and investment services, and by developing other client-driven financial solutions. This commitment anchors a broader $1.5
trillion sustainable finance goal to support both environmental transition and social inclusive development, which spans business activities across the globe. These goals are intended to help drive business opportunities and enhance risk management related to the transition to a low-carbon economy.
For more information about climate risk, see the Bank of America website. For more information about the Corporation’s climate-related goals and commitments, including emissions associated with our operations and supply chain and progress on our sustainable finance goals, see the Corporation’s 2021 Annual Report to shareholders that will be available on the Investor Relations portion of our website in March 2022. The contents of the Corporation’s website and 2021 Annual Report to shareholders are not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The foregoing discussion and our discussion in the 2021 Annual Report to shareholders regarding our goals and commitments with respect to climate risk management, including environmental transition considerations, include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation’s control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.
Complex Accounting Estimates
Our significant accounting principles, as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements, are essential in understanding the MD&A. Many of our significant accounting principles require complex judgments to estimate the values of assets and liabilities. We have procedures and processes in place to facilitate making these judgments.
The more judgmental estimates are summarized in the following discussion. We have identified and described the development of the variables most important in the estimation processes that involve mathematical models to derive the estimates. In many cases, there are numerous alternative judgments that could be used in the process of determining the inputs to the models. Where alternatives exist, we have used the factors that we believe represent the most reasonable value in developing the inputs. Actual performance that differs from our estimates of the key variables could materially impact our results of operations. Separate from the possible future impact to our results of operations from input and model variables, the value of our lending portfolio and market-sensitive assets and liabilities may change subsequent to the balance sheet date, often significantly, due to the nature and magnitude of future credit and market conditions. Such credit and market conditions may change quickly and in unforeseen ways and the resulting volatility could have a significant, negative effect on future operating results. These fluctuations would not be indicative of deficiencies in our models or inputs.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 82 |
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. Our process for determining the allowance for credit losses is discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 5 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The determination of allowance for credit losses is based on numerous estimates and assumptions, which require a high degree of judgment and are often interrelated. A critical judgment in the process is the weighting of our forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios that are incorporated into our quantitative models. As any one economic outlook is inherently uncertain, the Corporation uses multiple macroeconomic scenarios in its expected credit losses (ECL) calculation, which have included a baseline scenario, which is derived from consensus estimates, downside scenarios, a tail risk scenario similar to the severely adverse scenario used in stress testing and an upside scenario. Beginning in 2020, the scenarios incorporated the potential impacts of the pandemic and, beginning in the second quarter in 2021, an additional scenario was added to account for inflationary risk and higher interest rates. Generally, as the consensus estimates improve or deteriorate, the allowance for credit losses will change in a similar direction.
There are multiple variables that drive the macroeconomic scenarios with the key variables including, but not limited to, U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) and unemployment rates. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted macroeconomic outlook for U.S. average unemployment rate was forecasted at 6.6 percent, 5.5 percent and 5.0 percent in the fourth quarters of 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively, and the weighted macroeconomic outlook for U.S. GDP was forecasted to grow at 2.5 percent, 2.4 percent and 2.1 percent year-over-year in the fourth quarters of 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 the latest consensus estimates for the U.S. average unemployment rate for the fourth quarter of 2021 was 4.4 percent and U.S. GDP was forecasted to grow 5.2 percent year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2021, both of which were meaningfully better than our macroeconomic outlook as of December 31, 2020 and were factored into our December 31, 2021 allowance for credit losses estimate. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, the weighted macroeconomic outlook for the U.S. average unemployment rate was forecasted at 5.2 percent and 4.7 percent in the fourth quarters of 2022 and 2023, and the weighted macroeconomic outlook for U.S. GDP was forecasted to grow 2.1 percent and 1.9 percent year-over-year in the fourth quarters of 2022 and 2023.
In addition to the above judgments and estimates, the allowance for credit losses can also be impacted by unanticipated changes in asset quality of the portfolio, such as increases or decreases in credit and/or internal risk ratings in our commercial portfolio, improvement or deterioration in borrower delinquencies or credit scores in our credit card portfolio and increases or decreases in home prices, which is a primary driver of LTVs, in our consumer real estate portfolio, all
of which have some degree of uncertainty. As the macroeconomic outlook improved in 2021, along with improvements in asset quality, the allowance for credit losses decreased to $13.8 billion from $20.7 billion at December 31, 2020.
To provide an illustration of the sensitivity of the macroeconomic scenarios and other assumptions on the estimate of our allowance for credit losses, the Corporation compared the December 31, 2021 modeled ECL from the baseline scenario and our downside scenario. Relative to the baseline scenario, the downside scenario assumed a peak U.S. unemployment rate of approximately three percentage points higher than the consensus outlook, a decline in U.S. GDP followed by a prolonged recovery and a lower home price outlook with a difference of 14 percent at the trough. This sensitivity analysis resulted in a hypothetical increase in the allowance for credit losses of approximately $5 billion.
While the sensitivity analysis may be useful to understand how changes in macroeconomic assumptions could impact our modeled ECLs, it is not meant to forecast how our allowance for credit losses is expected to change in a different macroeconomic outlook. Importantly, the analysis does not incorporate a variety of factors, including qualitative reserves and the weighting of alternate scenarios, which could have offsetting effects on the estimate. Considering the variety of factors contemplated when developing and weighting macroeconomic outlooks such as recent economic events, leading economic indicators, views of internal and third-party economists and industry trends, in addition to other qualitative factors, the Corporation believes the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2021 is appropriate.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Under applicable accounting standards, we are required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in measuring fair value. We classify fair value measurements of financial instruments and MSRs based on the three-level fair value hierarchy in the accounting standards.
The fair values of assets and liabilities may include adjustments, such as market liquidity and credit quality, where appropriate. Valuations of products using models or other techniques are sensitive to assumptions used for the significant inputs. Where market data is available, the inputs used for valuation reflect that information as of our valuation date. Inputs to valuation models are considered unobservable if they are supported by little or no market activity. In periods of extreme volatility, lessened liquidity or in illiquid markets, there may be more variability in market pricing or a lack of market data to use in the valuation process. In keeping with the prudent application of estimates and management judgment in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, we have in place various processes and controls that include: a model validation policy that requires review and approval of quantitative models used for deal pricing, financial statement fair value determination and risk quantification; a trading product valuation policy that requires verification of all traded product valuations; and a periodic review and substantiation of daily profit and loss
83 Bank of America
reporting for all traded products. Primarily through validation controls, we utilize both broker and pricing service inputs which can and do include both market-observable and internally-modeled values and/or valuation inputs. Our reliance on this information is affected by our understanding of how the broker and/or pricing service develops its data with a higher degree of reliance applied to those that are more directly observable and lesser reliance applied to those developed through their own internal modeling. For example, broker quotes in less active markets may only be indicative and therefore less reliable. These processes and controls are performed independently of the business. For more information, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements and Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities, and MSRs, where values are based on valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and are significant to the overall fair value measurement are classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy established in applicable accounting standards. The fair value of these Level 3 financial assets and liabilities and MSRs is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Level 3 financial instruments may be hedged with derivatives classified as Level 1 or 2; therefore, gains or losses associated with Level 3 financial instruments may be offset by gains or losses associated with financial instruments classified in other levels of the fair value hierarchy. The Level 3 gains and losses recorded in earnings did not have a significant impact on our liquidity or capital. We conduct a review of our fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Transfers into or out of Level 3 are made if the significant inputs used in the financial models measuring the fair values of the assets and liabilities became unobservable or observable, respectively, in the current marketplace. For more information on transfers into and out of Level 3 during 2021, 2020 and 2019, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accrued Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Assets
Accrued income taxes, reported as a component of either other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, represent the net amount of current income taxes we expect to pay to or receive from various taxing jurisdictions attributable to our operations to date. We currently file income tax returns in more than 100 jurisdictions and consider many factors, including statutory, judicial and
regulatory guidance, in estimating the appropriate accrued income taxes for each jurisdiction.
Net deferred tax assets, reported as a component of other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, represent the net decrease in taxes expected to be paid in the future because of net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards and because of future reversals of temporary differences in the bases of assets and liabilities as measured by tax laws and their bases as reported in the financial statements. NOL and tax credit carryforwards result in reductions to future tax liabilities, and many of these attributes can expire if not utilized within certain periods. We consider the need for valuation allowances to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amounts that we estimate are more likely than not to be realized.
Consistent with the applicable accounting guidance, we monitor relevant tax authorities and change our estimates of accrued income taxes and/or net deferred tax assets due to changes in income tax laws and their interpretation by the courts and regulatory authorities. These revisions of our estimates, which also may result from our income tax planning and from the resolution of income tax audit matters, may be material to our operating results for any given period.
See Note 19 – Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a table of significant tax attributes and
additional information. For more information, see page 18 under Item 1A. Risk Factors – Regulatory, Compliance and Legal.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The nature of and accounting for goodwill and intangible assets are discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles, and Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment test as of June 30, 2021 by using a qualitative assessment to determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit was less than its respective carrying value. Factors considered in the qualitative assessment included, among other things, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, financial performance of the respective reporting unit and other relevant entity- and reporting-unit specific considerations. Based on our qualitative assessment, we have concluded that it was not “more likely than not” that the reporting units’ fair values were less than their carrying values.
Certain Contingent Liabilities
For more information on the complex judgments associated with certain contingent liabilities, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America 84 |
Non-GAAP Reconciliations
Tables 47 and 48 provide reconciliations of certain non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.
| Table 47 | Annual Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions, shares in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Reconciliation of average shareholders’ equity to average tangible shareholders’ equity and average tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 273,757 | $ | 267,309 | $ | 267,889 | ||||
| Goodwill | (69,005) | (68,951) | (68,951) | |||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,177) | (1,862) | (1,721) | |||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 916 | 821 | 773 | |||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 203,491 | $ | 197,317 | $ | 197,990 | ||||
| Preferred stock | (23,970) | (23,624) | (23,036) | |||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 179,521 | $ | 173,693 | $ | 174,954 | ||||
| Reconciliation of year-end shareholders’ equity to year-end tangible shareholders’ equity and year-end tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 270,066 | $ | 272,924 | $ | 264,810 | ||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (68,951) | (68,951) | |||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,153) | (2,151) | (1,661) | |||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 929 | 920 | 713 | |||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 199,820 | $ | 202,742 | $ | 194,911 | ||||
| Preferred stock | (24,708) | (24,510) | (23,401) | |||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 175,112 | $ | 178,232 | $ | 171,510 | ||||
| Reconciliation of year-end assets to year-end tangible assets | ||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | 2,819,627 | $ | 2,434,079 | ||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (68,951) | (68,951) | |||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,153) | (2,151) | (1,661) | |||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 929 | 920 | 713 | |||||||
| Tangible assets | $ | 3,099,249 | $ | 2,749,445 | $ | 2,364,180 |
(1)Presents reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures. For more information on non-GAAP financial measures and ratios we use in assessing the results of the Corporation, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31.
| Table 48 | Quarterly Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Quarters | 2020 Quarters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | Fourth | Third | Second | First | Fourth | Third | Second | First | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of average shareholders’ equity to average tangible shareholders’ equity and average tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 270,883 | $ | 275,484 | $ | 274,632 | $ | 274,047 | $ | 271,020 | $ | 267,323 | $ | 266,316 | $ | 264,534 | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,023) | (69,023) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,166) | (2,185) | (2,212) | (2,146) | (2,173) | (1,976) | (1,640) | (1,655) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 913 | 915 | 915 | 920 | 910 | 855 | 790 | 728 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 200,608 | $ | 205,191 | $ | 204,312 | $ | 203,870 | $ | 200,806 | $ | 197,251 | $ | 196,515 | $ | 194,656 | ||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | (24,364) | (23,441) | (23,684) | (24,399) | (24,180) | (23,427) | (23,427) | (23,456) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 176,244 | $ | 181,750 | $ | 180,628 | $ | 179,471 | $ | 176,626 | $ | 173,824 | $ | 173,088 | $ | 171,200 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of period-end shareholders’ equity to period-end tangible shareholders’ equity and period-end tangible common shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 270,066 | $ | 272,464 | $ | 277,119 | $ | 274,000 | $ | 272,924 | $ | 268,850 | $ | 265,637 | $ | 264,918 | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,023) | (69,023) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,153) | (2,172) | (2,192) | (2,134) | (2,151) | (2,185) | (1,630) | (1,646) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 929 | 913 | 915 | 915 | 920 | 910 | 789 | 790 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible shareholders’ equity | $ | 199,820 | $ | 202,182 | $ | 206,819 | $ | 203,830 | $ | 202,742 | $ | 198,624 | $ | 195,845 | $ | 195,111 | ||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | (24,708) | (23,441) | (23,441) | (24,319) | (24,510) | (23,427) | (23,427) | (23,427) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible common shareholders’ equity | $ | 175,112 | $ | 178,741 | $ | 183,378 | $ | 179,511 | $ | 178,232 | $ | 175,197 | $ | 172,418 | $ | 171,684 | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of period-end assets to period-end tangible assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 3,169,495 | $ | 3,085,446 | $ | 3,029,894 | $ | 2,969,992 | $ | 2,819,627 | $ | 2,738,452 | $ | 2,741,688 | $ | 2,619,954 | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (69,022) | (69,023) | (69,023) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | (68,951) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | (2,153) | (2,172) | (2,192) | (2,134) | (2,151) | (2,185) | (1,630) | (1,646) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related deferred tax liabilities | 929 | 913 | 915 | 915 | 920 | 910 | 789 | 790 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tangible assets | $ | 3,099,249 | $ | 3,015,164 | $ | 2,959,594 | $ | 2,899,822 | $ | 2,749,445 | $ | 2,668,226 | $ | 2,671,896 | $ | 2,550,147 |
(1)Presents reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures. For more information on non-GAAP financial measures and ratios we use in assessing the results of the Corporation, see Supplemental Financial Data on page 31.
85 Bank of America