CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC (CNP)
SIC breadcrumb: Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services > Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services > SIC 4911 Electric Services
SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1130310. Latest filing source: 0001130310-26-000008.
Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.
Selected Fundamentals
| Metric | Value | Unit | FY | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 9,357,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
| Net income | 1,052,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
| Assets | 46,534,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
Financials
Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-19. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001130310.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 7,528,000,000 | 9,614,000,000 | 6,277,000,000 | 7,564,000,000 | 7,418,000,000 | 8,352,000,000 | 9,321,000,000 | 8,696,000,000 | 8,643,000,000 | 9,357,000,000 |
| Net income | 432,000,000 | 1,792,000,000 | 368,000,000 | 791,000,000 | -773,000,000 | 1,486,000,000 | 1,057,000,000 | 917,000,000 | 1,019,000,000 | 1,052,000,000 |
| Operating income | 1,023,000,000 | 1,136,000,000 | 868,000,000 | 1,071,000,000 | 1,039,000,000 | 1,363,000,000 | 1,566,000,000 | 1,760,000,000 | 1,990,000,000 | 2,110,000,000 |
| Diluted EPS | 1.00 | 4.13 | 0.74 | 1.33 | -1.79 | 2.28 | 1.59 | 1.37 | 1.58 | 1.60 |
| Operating cash flow | 1,923,000,000 | 1,417,000,000 | 2,136,000,000 | 1,638,000,000 | 1,995,000,000 | 22,000,000 | 1,810,000,000 | 3,877,000,000 | 2,139,000,000 | 2,486,000,000 |
| Capital expenditures | 4,401,000,000 | 4,513,000,000 | 4,870,000,000 | |||||||
| Dividends paid | 443,000,000 | 461,000,000 | 499,000,000 | 577,000,000 | 392,000,000 | 385,000,000 | 440,000,000 | 485,000,000 | 522,000,000 | 574,000,000 |
| Assets | 21,829,000,000 | 22,736,000,000 | 27,093,000,000 | 35,529,000,000 | 33,471,000,000 | 37,679,000,000 | 38,546,000,000 | 39,715,000,000 | 43,768,000,000 | 46,534,000,000 |
| Stockholders' equity | 3,460,000,000 | 4,688,000,000 | 8,058,000,000 | 8,359,000,000 | 8,348,000,000 | 9,415,000,000 | 10,042,000,000 | 9,667,000,000 | 10,666,000,000 | 11,153,000,000 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 341,000,000 | 260,000,000 | 4,231,000,000 | 241,000,000 | 147,000,000 | 230,000,000 | 74,000,000 | 90,000,000 | 24,000,000 | 38,000,000 |
| Free cash flow | -524,000,000 | -2,374,000,000 | -2,384,000,000 |
Ratios
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 5.74% | 18.64% | 5.86% | 10.46% | -10.42% | 17.79% | 11.34% | 10.55% | 11.79% | 11.24% |
| Operating margin | 13.59% | 11.82% | 13.83% | 14.16% | 14.01% | 16.32% | 16.80% | 20.24% | 23.02% | 22.55% |
| Return on equity | 12.49% | 38.23% | 4.57% | 9.46% | -9.26% | 15.78% | 10.53% | 9.49% | 9.55% | 9.43% |
| Return on assets | 1.98% | 7.88% | 1.36% | 2.23% | -2.31% | 3.94% | 2.74% | 2.31% | 2.33% | 2.26% |
| Current ratio | 0.95 | 1.11 | 2.13 | 0.99 | 0.61 | 1.72 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 1.08 | 0.91 |
Financial Charts
Quarterly
Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-04-23. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001130310.json.
| Quarter | End Date | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-Q2 | 2022-06-30 | 0.28 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2022-Q3 | 2022-09-30 | 0.30 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q1 | 2023-03-31 | 0.49 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q2 | 2023-06-30 | 1,875,000,000 | 118,000,000 | 0.17 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q3 | 2023-09-30 | 1,860,000,000 | 282,000,000 | 0.40 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q4 | 2023-12-31 | 2,182,000,000 | 192,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2024-Q1 | 2024-03-31 | 2,620,000,000 | 350,000,000 | 0.55 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q2 | 2024-06-30 | 1,905,000,000 | 228,000,000 | 0.36 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-09-30 | 1,856,000,000 | 193,000,000 | 0.30 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q4 | 2024-12-31 | 2,262,000,000 | 248,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2025-Q1 | 2025-03-31 | 2,920,000,000 | 297,000,000 | 0.45 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q2 | 2025-06-30 | 1,944,000,000 | 198,000,000 | 0.30 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q3 | 2025-09-30 | 1,988,000,000 | 293,000,000 | 0.45 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-12-31 | 2,505,000,000 | 264,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2026-Q1 | 2026-03-31 | 2,975,000,000 | 316,000,000 | 0.48 | reported discrete quarter |
Quarterly Charts
Macro Cross-References
- CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
- UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
- FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
- CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
- DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
- DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
- DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
- DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
- T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
- CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
- CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
- CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
- CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
- PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
- PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
- PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
- T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
- U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
- PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
- CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
- EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
- UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
- CE16OV - Employment Level
- ICSA - Initial Claims
- JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
- JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
- GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
- A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
- INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
- TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
- HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
- PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
- RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
- PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
- PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
- M2SL - M2
- BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
- MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
- HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
- RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
- TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
- RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
- TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
- GDP - Gross Domestic Product
- GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
- GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
- PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
- GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
- GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
- FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
- FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
- FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
- MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
- USCONS - All Employees, Construction
- USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
- USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
- USGOVT - All Employees, Government
- AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
- DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
- NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
- BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
- EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
- IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
- IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
- PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand
Latest quarter (10-Q)
Latest 10-Q source: 0001130310-26-000028.
Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following combined discussion and analysis should be read in combination with the Interim Condensed Financial Statements contained in Item 1 herein and the Registrants’ combined 2025 Form 10-K. The discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated financial information includes the results of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., which, along with CenterPoint Energy, Inc. are collectively referred to as the Registrants. Where appropriate, information relating to a specific Registrant has been segregated and labeled as such. Unless the context indicates otherwise, specific references to Houston Electric and CERC also pertain to CenterPoint Energy. In this combined Form 10-Q, the terms “our,” “we” and “us” are used as abbreviated references to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including Houston Electric and CERC, unless otherwise stated. No Registrant makes any representation as to the information relating to the other Registrants or the subsidiaries of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. other than itself or its subsidiaries.
RECENT EVENTS
CenterPoint Energy Appointment of Chief Accounting Officer. On February 23, 2026, CenterPoint Energy announced the appointment of Russell K. Wright to the position of Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of CenterPoint Energy, effective March 2, 2026.
Updated 10-Year Capital Plan. On February 19, 2026, CenterPoint Energy announced an increase in the 10-year capital plan of $500 million to reflect total capital expenditures of approximately $65.5 billion through 2035.The plan is expected to advance economic growth, enhance the experience of the Registrants’ customers and deliver consistent value for stakeholders across the Registrants’ jurisdictions.
Treasury Notice 2026-7. On February 18, 2026, Treasury Notice 2026-7 was issued. This notice allows an election to modify the computation of AFSI by including an adjustment to deduct certain repair and maintenance costs that are capitalized in the applicable financial statement.
TEEEF. In June 2025, Houston Electric entered into the ERCOT Transaction, subject to PUCT approval, to release its 15 large (27 MW to 32 MW) TEEEF units to ERCOT at CPS Energy facilities to serve the greater San Antonio region until March 2027 unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions of the ERCOT Transaction, reduce its TEEEF fleet capacity and reduce its rates to reflect removal of the large TEEEF units from its fleet. Following the completion of service in the San Antonio area, Houston Electric anticipates that it would complete one or more future transactions involving its large TEEEF units. As the large TEEEF units would not be available to serve Houston Electric customers during such time, Houston Electric plans to continue to not charge customers for these units for any future periods. In November 2025, Houston Electric proposed to remove its five medium (5.7 MW) TEEEF units and to remove the associated lease costs from its rates effective January 1, 2026. On April 10, 2026, Houston Electric requested continued abatement until April 24, 2026 due to continued settlement discussions. For additional information, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Regulatory Proceedings. For further information, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements. For information related to our pending and completed regulatory proceedings to date in 2026, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
Debt Transactions. For information about debt transactions to date in 2026, see Note 9 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
42
Table of Contents
CENTERPOINT ENERGY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2025 Form 10-K.
Net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 140 | $ | 108 | $ | 32 | |||||
| Natural Gas | 250 | 228 | 22 | ||||||||
| Corporate and Other (1) | (74) | (39) | (35) | ||||||||
| Total CenterPoint Energy | $ | 316 | $ | 297 | $ | 19 |
(1)Includes unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense and intercompany eliminations.
Three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to three months ended March 31, 2025
Net income increased $19 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in net income of $32 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in net income of $22 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
•an increase in net loss of $35 million for the Corporate and Other reportable segment, primarily due to the impact of accrued income tax expense offset in other segments.
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 10 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
43
Table of Contents
CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT
CenterPoint Energy’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for the reportable segments. Segment results include inter-segment interest income and expense, which may result in inter-segment profit and loss.
The following discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations is further separated into two reportable segments, Electric and Natural Gas.
Electric (CenterPoint Energy)
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2025 Form 10-K.
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | Favorable (Unfavorable) | ||||||||
| (in millions, except operating statistics) | ||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 1,209 | $ | 1,066 | $ | 143 | ||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 81 | 74 | (7) | |||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 513 | 484 | (29) | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 269 | 210 | (59) | |||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 85 | 78 | (7) | |||||||
| Total expenses | 948 | 846 | (102) | |||||||
| Operating Income | 261 | 220 | 41 | |||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (131) | (101) | (30) | |||||||
| Other income, net | 26 | 14 | 12 | |||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 156 | 133 | 23 | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 16 | 25 | 9 | |||||||
| Net Income | $ | 140 | $ | 108 | $ | 32 | ||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||
| Residential | 6,398 | 6,643 | (4) | % | ||||||
| Total | 24,957 | 24,749 | 1 | % | ||||||
| Weather (percentage of normal weather for service area): | ||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 219 | % | 138 | % | 81 | % | ||||
| Heating degree days | 91 | % | 105 | % | (14) | % | ||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||
| Residential | 2,688,307 | 2,651,381 | 1 | % | ||||||
| Total | 3,023,460 | 2,983,906 | 1 | % |
44
Table of Contents
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 by major income statement caption for CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||
| Revenues | |||
| Customer rates and the impact of the change in rate design | $ | 49 | |
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 53 | ||
| Customer growth | 5 | ||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 1 | ||
| Pass-through revenues, offset in operation and maintenance below | 5 | ||
| Miscellaneous revenues, including service connections and off-system sales | 14 | ||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items below | 25 | ||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts | (12) | ||
| Cost of fuel and purchased power, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | 3 | ||
| Total | $ | 143 | |
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||
| Cost of purchased power, offset in revenues above | $ | 24 | |
| Cost of fuel, including coal, natural gas, and fuel oil, offset in revenues above | (31) | ||
| Total | $ | (7) | |
| Operation and maintenance | |||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (28) | |
| Contract services | (8) | ||
| Energy efficiency, and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | (2) | ||
| Corporate support services | (5) | ||
| Labor and benefits | 6 | ||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | 8 | ||
| Total | $ | (29) | |
| Depreciation and amortization | |||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (29) | |
| Amortization of regulatory assets | 9 | ||
| Lease expense associated with TEEEF units no longer eligible for regulatory deferral | (24) | ||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items | (15) | ||
| Total | $ | (59) | |
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of updated property tax rates | $ | (7) | |
| Total | $ | (7) | |
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (17) | |
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items above | (10) | ||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | (3) | ||
| Total | $ | (30) | |
| Other income, net | |||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | $ | 12 | |
| Total | $ | 12 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 10 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
45
Table of Contents
Natural Gas (CenterPoint Energy)
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Natural Gas,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2025 Form 10-K.
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
[[GREPCENT_TABLE]]
[["","Three Months Ended March 31,"],["","2026","","2025","","Favorable (Unfavorable)"],["","(in millions, except operating statistics)"],["Revenues","$","1,765","","","$","1,853","","","$","(88)"],["Expenses:"],["Utility natural gas and fuel","890","","","933","","","43"],["Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas","1","","","1","","","\u2014"],["Operation and maintenance","258","","","265","","","7"],["Depreciation and amortization","148","","","147","","","(1)"],["Taxes other than income taxes","71","","","74","","","3"],["Total expenses","1,
[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]
Latest 10-K MD&A
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following combined discussion and analysis should be read in combination with the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 herein. The discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated financial information includes the results of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., which, along with CenterPoint Energy, Inc., are collectively referred to as the Registrants. Where appropriate, information relating to a specific Registrant has been segregated and labeled as such. Unless the context indicates otherwise, specific references to Houston Electric and CERC also pertain to CenterPoint Energy. In this combined Form 10-K, the terms “our,” “we” and “us” are used as abbreviated references to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including Houston Electric and CERC, unless otherwise stated. No Registrant makes any representation as to the information relating to the other Registrants or the subsidiaries of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. other than itself or its subsidiaries.
OVERVIEW
Background
CenterPoint Energy is a public utility holding company. CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries own and operate electric transmission, distribution and generation facilities and natural gas distribution systems. For a detailed description of CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Houston Electric is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, which provides electric transmission service to transmission service customers in the ERCOT region and distribution service to REPs serving the Texas Gulf Coast area that includes the city of Houston.
50
CERC Corp. is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, which (i) directly owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Minnesota and Texas, (ii) indirectly, through Indiana Gas and CEOH, owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Indiana and Ohio, respectively, and (iii) owns and operates permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP.
On October 20, 2025, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the Ohio Securities Purchase Agreement to sell all of the issued and outstanding equity interests in CEOH. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Reportable Segments
We discuss our operating results on a consolidated basis and individually for each of our reportable segments. We are first and foremost an energy delivery company and it is our intention to remain focused on these regulated segments. The results of our business operations are significantly impacted by weather, customer growth, economic conditions, cost management, competition, rate proceedings before regulatory agencies and other actions of the various regulatory agencies to whose jurisdiction we are subject, among other factors.
Below is a summary of CenterPoint Energy’s reportable segments as of December 31, 2025. For a detailed description of each reportable segment, as well as the assets included in each reportable segment, see Part I, Item 1. Business and Item 2. Properties.
•The Electric reportable segment consisted of electric transmission and distribution services in the Texas Gulf Coast area in the ERCOT region and electric transmission and distribution services primarily to southwestern Indiana and includes power generation and wholesale power operations in the MISO region.
•The Natural Gas reportable segment consisted of (i) intrastate natural gas sales to, and natural gas transportation and distribution for, residential, commercial and industrial customers in Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio and Texas; (ii) permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP; (iii) residential appliance repair and maintenance services along with HVAC equipment sales to customers in Minnesota; and (iv) home repair protection plans to natural gas customers in Indiana, Ohio and Texas through a third party. The Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses were included in the Natural Gas reportable segment through March 31, 2025. See Note 4 for additional detail.
•The Corporate and Other reportable segment consisted of (i) energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services by Energy Systems Group through June 30, 2023, the date of the sale of Energy Systems Group; (ii) corporate support operations that support all of CenterPoint Energy’s business operations; and (iii) office buildings and other real estate used for business operations.
Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We expect our businesses to continue to be affected by the key factors and trends discussed below. Our expectations are based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from our expected results.
Factors Influencing Our Businesses and Industry Trends
We are an energy delivery company with electric transmission, distribution and generation operations and natural gas distribution operations that serve more than seven million metered customers across four states. The majority of our revenues are generated from the transmission and delivery of electricity and the sale of natural gas by our subsidiaries.
We continue to execute on our strategic goals for our businesses that were set in September 2025. Pursuant to this business strategy and in light of the nature of our businesses, significant capital investments are reflected in our new 10-year capital plan. In September 2025, we announced our new 10-year capital plan to invest $65 billion from 2026 through 2035, inclusive of a $2 billion increase in previously planned capital expenditures through 2030, and in February 2026, we announced an additional increase to reflect total expenditures of approximately $65.5 billion. Our 10-year capital plan is intended to advance economic
51
growth, improve the experience of our customers through enhancing the safety, reliability and resiliency of our systems and deliver consistent value for stakeholders across the jurisdictions in which we operate. These investments are not only intended to meet our customers’ current needs, but are also in anticipation of future organic growth from a diverse set of economic drivers. This organic growth is anticipated to result in rapid load growth in our service territories (as further discussed below). To fund these capital investments, we rely on internally-generated cash, borrowings under our credit facilities, proceeds from commercial paper, cash proceeds from strategic transactions (such as our Energy Systems Group divestiture in 2023, the sale of our Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses in 2025 and the announced sale of our Ohio natural gas LDC business, which is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026) and issuances of equity and debt securities in the capital markets, including the issuance of non-recourse system restoration bonds at Houston Electric to recover costs incurred primarily during the year ended December 31, 2024 due to the May 2024 Storm Events, as well as Hurricane Beryl and other significant storms.
We strive to maintain investment grade ratings for our debt securities to access the capital markets on terms we consider reasonable. A reduction in our ratings generally would result in an increase in our borrowing costs for new issuances of debt, as well as borrowing costs under our existing revolving credit facilities, and may prevent us from accessing the commercial paper markets. Disruptions in the financial markets along with high or rising interest rates can also affect the availability of external financing on terms we consider attractive. In those circumstances, we may not be able to obtain certain types of external financing or may be required to accept terms less favorable than we would otherwise accept which, among other things, would negatively impact our ability to finance our capital plan. For that reason, we seek to maintain adequate liquidity for our businesses through existing credit facilities and prudent refinancing of existing debt.
Approximately 85% of our rate base has been subject to a rate case since the beginning of 2023, which supports clarity and stability through 2029 with final orders improving enterprise weighted average returns on equity. Additionally, approximately 85% of CenterPoint Energy’s projected consolidated investments are expected to be recovered through interim capital recovery trackers or rate cases based on a forward test year. For additional detail, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
To assess our financial performance, our management primarily monitors the recovery of costs and return on investments by evaluating net income and capital expenditures, among other metrics, from our regulated service territories within our reportable segments. Within these broader financial measures, we monitor margins, natural gas and fuel costs, interest expense, capital spend, working capital requirements and operation and maintenance expense, among other significant metrics. In addition to these financial measures, we also monitor a number of variables that management considers important to gauge the performance of our reportable segments, including the number of customers, throughput, commodity prices, heating and cooling degree days, safety factors, system reliability and customer satisfaction.
CenterPoint Energy and CERC have weather normalization or other rate mechanisms that largely mitigate the impact of weather on their natural gas distribution businesses in Indiana, Minnesota and Ohio, as applicable. CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s natural gas distribution businesses in Texas and CenterPoint Energy’s electric operations in Texas and Indiana do not have such mechanisms. As a result, fluctuations from normal weather may have a positive or negative effect on CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s natural gas distribution business’ results in Texas and on CenterPoint Energy’s electric operations’ results in its Texas and Indiana service territories.
Management anticipates significant growth in electric demand over the next decade, especially in our Houston Electric territory where we forecast a nearly 50% increase in peak electric load demand to over 30 GW by 2029 and the demand nearly doubling by the mid 2030s, as compared to 2024. It is expected that the significant forecasted growth in this service territory will be driven by a diverse set of economic drivers, including data centers, energy refining and exports, advanced manufacturing and logistics. Management additionally believes that there are increased electric demand opportunities in our Indiana Electric jurisdiction; accordingly, Indiana Electric’s 2025 IRP included a large load scenario with a corresponding alternative preferred portfolio. Additionally, management expects residential meter growth for Houston Electric to remain in line with long-term trends at approximately 2% annually. As discussed above, a significant portion of the planned investments in our new 10-year capital plan are intended to support this growth. There is significant uncertainty with respect to the forecasted load growth and our ability to capitalize on the opportunities presented by these developments. For more information regarding such risks, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — General and Other Risks — We are exposed to risks related to changes in demand and energy consumption...” Typical customer growth in the jurisdictions served by the Natural Gas reportable segment is approximately 1% annually. Management expects residential meter growth for CERC to remain in line with long-term trends at approximately 1% annually. Nevertheless, this expected growth may be partially offset by adverse economic conditions, coupled with concerns for protecting the environment and increased availability of alternate energy sources, which may cause consumers to use less energy or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities. Long-term national trends indicate residential customers have reduced their energy consumption, which could adversely affect
52
our results. To the extent population growth is affected by lower energy prices and there is financial pressure on some of our customers who operate within the energy industry, there may be an impact on the growth rate of our customer base and overall demand for our services.
Macroeconomic and geopolitical developments, including high rates of inflation, supply chain disruptions, labor market constraints, tariffs, high interest rates, general economic slowdown and escalating global conflicts can impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow, including adversely impacting our ability to execute on our 10-year capital plan. Inflation and high interest rates have contributed, and may continue to contribute, to increased prices for materials and services experienced by us and other companies in our industry. Further, the global supply chain has experienced and may continue to experience significant disruptions due to a multitude of factors, such as geopolitical and economic uncertainty, regulatory and policy instability, tariffs and other changes in U.S. and foreign trade policy, changes in laws (including tax laws), executive orders, labor shortages, resource availability, long lead times, manufacturer production limitations, delivery delays, inflation, severe weather events and disruptions to internal or international shipping, including as a result of armed conflicts. We have also faced, and may continue to face, a shortage of experienced and qualified personnel in certain positions, which has resulted in increased competition for skilled labor and wage inflation. Additionally, increased demand for materials necessary for our business has resulted, and may continue to result, in greater competition for and scarcity of such materials. In 2025 and 2026, the U.S. government threatened, announced and, in certain cases, rescinded, tariffs on several foreign jurisdictions and imports (including steel) into the United States, which led, and may continue to lead, to the imposition of retaliatory tariffs and other measures taken by foreign jurisdictions. There is significant uncertainty as to the scope and durability of existing and future tariff measures, as well as the ultimate effects of the tariffs on economic conditions. These macroeconomic and geopolitical developments have adversely impacted the utility industry, and like many of our peers, we have experienced disruptions to our supply chain, as well as increased prices and scarcity of resources and labor, and we may continue to experience this in the future. These developments have impacted our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2025. We have taken actions across multiple vectors to reduce the impact of such developments on our results of operations, but if such conditions continue, they could negatively impact our ability to procure materials, supplies (such as natural gas) or services necessary for our business and 10-year capital plan at a reasonable cost in a timely manner, result in project cancellations or scope changes, delays, cost overruns, and under-recovery of costs and challenges to our ability to remain in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For more information regarding such risk, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks — Disruptions to the global supply chain...” and “— Changes in U.S. or foreign trade policies.”
The utility industry has experienced a period of rising costs and investments and an upward trend in spending, especially with respect to infrastructure investments. As noted above, we are making, and plan to continue to make, significant capital investments in our service territories under our 10-year capital plan to help operate and maintain safer, more reliable and growing electric and natural gas systems and support the electric demand growth that management is forecasting over the next decade. Rising costs and investments and the upward trend in spending are likely to continue in the foreseeable future and could result in more frequent rate cases and requests for, and the continuation of, cost recovery mechanisms. Increased rates and impacts on customer bills or the perceived potential for such impacts, particularly in the current economic environment, has caused and could continue to cause customer affordability concerns, resistance from customers and other stakeholders and increased political, regulatory, community and other scrutiny and pressures. For example, in consideration of customer affordability concerns, Indiana Electric cancelled nearly $1 billion in renewable energy generation projects in 2025. These matters could impact our ability to execute our 10-year capital plan, result in adverse ratemaking and cost recovery determinations, increased financing needs and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For more information regarding such risk, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
Significant Events
Updated 10-Year Capital Plan. On September 29, 2025, CenterPoint Energy announced a new 10-year capital plan to invest $65 billion from 2026 through 2035, inclusive of a $2 billion increase in previously planned capital expenditures through 2030. On February 19, 2026, CenterPoint Energy announced an additional increase of $500 million to reflect total capital expenditures of approximately $65.5 billion through 2035. The plan is expected to advance economic growth, enhance the experience of the Registrants’ customers and deliver consistent value for stakeholders across the Registrants’ jurisdictions.
Treasury Notice 2026-7. On February 18, 2026, Treasury Notice 2026-7 was issued. This notice clarifies the computation of AFSI by including an adjustment to deduct certain repair and maintenance costs that are capitalized in the applicable financial statement. While CenterPoint Energy is still evaluating this guidance, it expects a prospective reduction to its annual CAMT liability. Additionally, CenterPoint Energy expects to be able to amend prior year tax returns to claim a refund of CAMT paid.
53
TEEEF. In June 2025, Houston Electric entered into the ERCOT Transaction, subject to PUCT approval, to release its 15 large (27 MW to 32 MW) TEEEF units to ERCOT at CPS Energy facilities to serve the greater San Antonio region until March 2027 unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions of the ERCOT Transaction, reduce its TEEEF fleet capacity and reduce its rates to reflect removal of the large TEEEF units from its fleet. Following the completion of service in the San Antonio area, Houston Electric anticipates that it would complete one or more future transactions involving its large TEEEF units. As the large TEEEF units would not be available to serve Houston Electric customers during such time, Houston Electric plans to continue to not charge customers for these units for any future periods. In November 2025, Houston Electric proposed to release its five medium (5.7 MW) TEEEF units and to remove the associated lease costs from its rates effective January 1, 2026. On February 13, 2026, Houston Electric requested continued abatement until February 27, 2026 due to continued settlement discussions. For additional information, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Debt Transactions. In 2025, CenterPoint Energy issued or borrowed a combined $3.7 billion of new debt, including: (i) SIGECO’s issuance of $515 million aggregate principal amount of its first mortgage bonds; (ii) Houston Electric’s issuance of $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of its general mortgage bonds; (iii) Restoration Bond Company II’s issuance of approximately $401.5 million aggregate principal amount of its securitization bonds; (iv) CenterPoint Energy’s issuance of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of its convertible senior notes due 2028; and (v) CenterPoint Energy’s issuance of $700 million aggregate principal amount of its junior subordinated notes. During 2025, CenterPoint Energy repaid or redeemed a combined $61 million of outstanding debt, including $41 million of SIGECO’s first mortgage bonds and $20 million of Indiana Gas’s senior notes. In addition, CenterPoint Energy repurchased a combined of approximately $1.5 billion of outstanding debt in connection with settlement of its tender offers, including: (i) approximately $963 million of its senior notes; (ii) approximately $415 million of CERC’s senior notes; and (iii) approximately $234 million of Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds. For further information about debt transactions in 2025, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. In January 2026, CERC Corp. entered into a delayed draw term loan agreement pursuant to which the banks party thereto have committed to provide term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $800 million by March 30, 2026 in up to three separate borrowings, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain customary conditions. If not fully utilized, the term loan commitments expire on March 31, 2026. CERC Corp. borrowed $500 million on January 20, 2026, and expects to borrow the remaining $300 million during the first quarter of 2026. For further information, see Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
Assets Held for Sale. On October 20, 2025, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the Ohio Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which CERC Corp. has agreed to sell all of the issued and outstanding equity interests in CEOH. The purchase price is $2.62 billion, which is comprised of the following: (i) $1.42 billion in cash payable to CERC Corp. upon closing of the transaction, subject to adjustments as set forth in the Ohio Securities Purchase Agreement, including adjustments based on net working capital, regulatory assets and liabilities and capital expenditures at closing of the transaction; and (ii) a 364-day seller promissory note, in the original principal amount of $1.2 billion, to be issued by NFGC at the closing of the transaction and payable to CERC Corp. as provided by the terms and conditions of the Seller Note Agreement. The transaction is not subject to a financing condition and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions. As of December 31, 2025, the assets included approximately 6,000 miles of transmission and distribution pipeline in Ohio serving approximately 337,000 metered customers. CEOH is reflected in CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment and CERC’s single reportable segment, as applicable. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
CenterPoint Energy Board Leadership Structure Changes. On October 8, 2025, the Board unanimously appointed Jason P. Wells, Chief Executive Officer and President of CenterPoint Energy, to serve as Chair of the Board, effective immediately. Mr. Wells has served as a director on the Board since January 5, 2024. In addition, the Board approved the creation of a Lead Independent Director of the Board position and the independent directors of the Board unanimously appointed independent director Christopher H. Franklin to serve as the Lead Independent Director of the Board, effective immediately.
CenterPoint Energy Appointment of Chief Operating Officer. On July 21, 2025, CenterPoint Energy announced the appointment of Jesus Soto, Jr. to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of CenterPoint Energy, effective August 11, 2025.
OBBBA and Executive Order 14315. On July 4, 2025, the OBBBA was signed into law. The OBBBA includes significant provisions, such as the permanent extension of certain expiring provisions of the TCJA and numerous changes to the energy tax credits initially introduced and expanded under the IRA. The legislation has multiple effective dates, with certain provisions effective in 2025 and others implemented through 2027. Additionally, on July 7, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14315, which relates to the implementation of such changes to energy tax credits. The Registrants have assessed the potential effects of the OBBBA and Executive Order 14315 and concluded that neither is expected to have a material impact on their
54
future financial results because the Registrants have limited generation activities qualifying for tax credits under the IRA. The Registrants will consider the impacts of the OBBBA and Executive Order 14315, as well as related guidance, on any future generation projects, including any BTAs or PPAs, as applicable.
Equity Transactions. In April 2025, Centerpoint Energy entered into forward sales agreements pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreement with certain of the ATM Forward Purchasers. In May 2025, CenterPoint Energy entered into separate forward sale agreements with certain financial institutions. For further information about forward sales in 2025, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Regulatory Proceedings. In 2024, Houston Electric filed an Application for Determination of System Restoration Costs and a Financing Order with the PUCT for the May 2024 Storm Events, which were settled in 2025. In 2025, Houston Electric filed an Application for Determination of System Restoration Costs and a Financing Order with the PUCT for Hurricane Beryl and subsequent storm events, which were settled in 2025. For further information, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. For information related to our pending and completed regulatory proceedings in 2025 and to date in 2026, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
Our past earnings and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future earnings and results of operations. The magnitude of our future earnings and results of our operations will depend on or be affected by numerous factors that apply to all Registrants unless otherwise indicated including:
•The business strategies and strategic initiatives, restructurings, joint ventures and acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses involving us or our industry, including the ability to successfully complete such strategies, initiatives, transactions or plans on the timelines we expect or at all, such as the announced sale of our Ohio natural gas LDC business, which we cannot assure will have the anticipated benefits to us;
•industrial, commercial and residential growth in our service territories and changes in market demand and energy consumption, including in relation to the expansion of data centers (associated with, among other things, increasing demand for AI), energy refining and exports, advanced manufacturing and logistics, as well as the effects of energy efficiency measures, technological advances and demographic patterns, and our ability to appropriately estimate/forecast and effectively manage such demand and the business opportunities relating to such matters;
•our ability to fund and invest planned capital and the timely recovery of our investments, including the timing of and amounts sought for those related to our 10-year capital plan;
•our ability to execute and complete our planned capital projects and programs, including those within our 10-year capital plan, in a timely and cost-effective manner and within budget, obtain the anticipated benefits of such projects, and manage costs and impacts of such projects on customer affordability;
•our ability to successfully construct, operate, repair, maintain, replace and restart electric generating facilities, natural gas facilities, TEEEF and electric transmission facilities, as applicable, including in the event of an outage and in relation to complying with applicable environmental, reliability and safety standards;
•timely and appropriate rate actions that allow and authorize timely recovery of costs and a reasonable return on investment, including the timing of and amounts sought for recovery of Houston Electric’s applicable TEEEF leases and restoration costs relating to, among other things, Hurricane Beryl, and requested or favorable adjustments to rates and approval of other requested items as part of base rate proceedings or interim rate mechanisms;
•the timing and success of, and our ability to obtain approval for matters relating to, Houston Electric’s release of its large TEEEF units to the San Antonio area, proposed release of its medium TEEEF units, reduction of its TEEEF fleet capacity and reduction of rates to reflect the removal of the large and medium TEEEF units from Houston Electric’s TEEEF fleet, as well as Houston Electric’s ability to complete one or more other future transactions involving the large and medium TEEEF units on acceptable terms and conditions within the anticipated timeframe;
•economic conditions in regional and national markets, including economic uncertainty and volatility, potential for recession, changes to and increases in inflation and interest rates, and their effect on sales, prices and costs;
•severe weather events, natural disasters and other climate-related impacts, including the impact of severe weather events on operations, capital, legislation and/or regulations, such as seen in connection with the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl;
•volatility in the markets for natural gas as a result of, among other factors, inflation, adverse weather conditions, supply and demand changes, availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources, political and geopolitical instability, commodity production levels and storage capacity, energy and environmental legislation and regulation and economic and financial market conditions;
55
•non-payment for our services due to financial distress of our customers and the ability of our customers, including REPs, to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC, and the negative impact on such ability related to adverse economic conditions and severe weather events;
•public health threats, and their effect on our operations, business and financial condition, our industries and the communities we serve, U.S. and world financial markets and supply chains, potential regulatory actions and changes in customer and stakeholder behavior relating thereto;
•federal, state and local legislative, executive and regulatory actions or developments affecting various aspects of our businesses, including, among others, any actions resulting from Hurricane Beryl, energy deregulation or re-regulation, pipeline integrity and safety, actions relating to our facilities and changes in regulation, legislation and governmental action pertaining to the utility model, trade (including tariffs, bans, retaliatory trade measures taken against the United States or related governmental action), the implementation of budget and spending cuts to federal government agencies and programs, effects of government shutdowns, policies incentivizing or disincentivizing the development or utilization of alternative sources of generation (including distributed generation), health care, finance and actions regarding the rates charged by our regulated businesses;
•disruptions to the global supply chain, inflation, labor shortages and scarcity of certain materials, including as a result of changes in U.S. and foreign trade policy, geopolitical and economic uncertainty, regulatory and policy instability, severe weather and other catastrophic events, changes in laws, executive orders, legislation and other governmental action, increased competition for skilled labor and increases in demand for electricity, that could prevent CenterPoint Energy from securing the resources and labor needed to, among other things, fully execute on its strategy and 10-year capital plan, and otherwise impact the affordability of our rates for our customers;
•operations and maintenance costs, our ability to control such costs and cost-related impacts on the affordability of our rates for our customers;
•our ability to timely obtain and maintain necessary licenses, permits, easements and approvals from local, federal and other regulatory authorities on acceptable terms and resolve third-party challenges to such licenses, permits or approvals as applicable;
•direct or indirect effects on our facilities, resources, operations, reputation and financial condition resulting from terrorism, vandalism, cyberattacks or intrusions, data security breaches or other security incidents, threats or attempts to disrupt our businesses or the businesses of supply chain stakeholders (including by foreign actors), or other catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, leaks, floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, derecho events, ice storms and other severe weather events, wildfires, pandemic health events, geopolitical conflict, civil unrest or other occurrences;
•the impact of negative opinions of us or our utility services that our customers, investors, legislators, regulators, creditors, rating agencies or other stakeholders may have or develop, which could result from a variety of factors, including actual or perceived failures in system reliability and safety, the speed of our response to service interruptions, rates and customer affordability, our ability to successfully execute our capital plan, media coverage and actions by third parties;
•damages to our network, facilities and systems, including as a result of wildfires, as well as to third-party property resulting in outages or shortages in our service territories, and losses in excess of insurance liability coverage;
•tax legislation and guidance and any changes in tax laws under the current or future administrations, including any further changes to or clarification of the IRA or the OBBBA, and any potential changes to tax rates, CAMT imposed, tax credits and/or interest deductibility, as well as uncertainties involving state commissions’ and local municipalities’ regulatory requirements and determinations regarding the treatment of EDIT and our rates;
•our ability to mitigate weather impacts through normalization or rate mechanisms, and the effectiveness of such mechanisms;
•actions by credit rating agencies, including any potential downgrades to credit ratings;
•local, state and federal legislative, executive and regulatory actions or developments relating to the environment, including, among others, those related to global climate risk, air emissions, GHG emissions, carbon emissions, wastewater discharges and the handling and disposal of CCR that could impact operations, cost recovery of generation plant costs and related assets, and CenterPoint Energy’s energy transition goals;
•the impact of unplanned facility outages or other closures;
•the sufficiency of our insurance coverage, including availability, cost, coverage and terms and ability to recover claims;
•impacts from CenterPoint Energy’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, such as the investment performance and increases to net periodic costs as a result of plan settlements and changes in assumptions, including discount rates;
•changes in interest rates and their impact on costs of borrowing and the valuation of CenterPoint Energy’s pension benefit obligation;
56
•commercial bank and financial market conditions, including disruptions in the banking industry, our access to capital, the cost of such capital, the results of our financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in the capital markets, and impacts on our vendors, customers and suppliers;
•inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations to us;
•the extent and effectiveness of our risk management activities;
•timely and appropriate regulatory actions, which include actions allowing requested securitization for any hurricanes or other severe weather events, such as Hurricane Beryl, or natural disasters or other amounts sought for recovery of costs, including stranded coal-fired generation asset costs;
•our ability to attract, effectively transition, motivate and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, identify and develop top talent to succeed management and maintain good labor relations;
•changes in technology, including with respect to efficient battery storage or the emergence or growth of new, developing or alternative sources of generation, and their adoption by consumers, and our ability to anticipate, adapt to and implement technological changes;
•advances in AI and our success in timely adopting, developing and deploying AI;
•the timing and outcome of any audits, disputes and other proceedings related to taxes;
•the recording of impairment charges;
•political and economic developments and actions, including energy and environmental policies under the current administration;
•CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its strategy, initiatives, targets and goals, including energy transition goals and operations and maintenance expenditure goals;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event and Hurricane Beryl;
•the effect of changes in and application of accounting standards and pronouncements; and
•other factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report and in other reports that the Registrants file from time to time with the SEC.
57
CENTERPOINT ENERGY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity and natural gas. CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates its subsidiaries charge, debt service costs, income tax expense, its subsidiaries ability to collect receivables from REPs and customers and its ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders was as follows for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 705 | $ | 671 | $ | 654 | $ | 34 | $ | 17 | |||||||||
| Natural Gas (1) | 570 | 566 | 533 | 4 | 33 | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate & Other (2) | (223) | (218) | (320) | (5) | 102 | ||||||||||||||
| Total CenterPoint Energy | $ | 1,052 | $ | 1,019 | $ | 867 | $ | 33 | $ | 152 |
(1)Includes results of operations from Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses through the date of the sale on March 31, 2025.
(2)Includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services through Energy Systems Group through the date of sale on June 30, 2023, unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense, intercompany eliminations and the reduction of income allocated to preferred shareholders through September 1, 2023, the date of the redemption of all of the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock.
2025 Compared to 2024
Net income available to common shareholders increased $33 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $34 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $4 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
•a decrease in income available to common shareholders of $5 million for the Corporate and Other reportable segment, primarily due to increased borrowing costs of approximately $37 million, offset by a $21 million gain on early extinguishment of debt using proceeds from the divestiture of the Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs, and a $20 million gain on early extinguishment of debt associated with the October 2025 tender offer, which is further discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. The remaining variance is primarily driven by an increase in other corporate expenses, including expenses associated with proposed divestitures.
2024 Compared to 2023
Net income available to common shareholders increased $152 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $17 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $33 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $102 million for the Corporate and Other reportable segment, primarily due to $50 million of income allocated to holders of Series A Preferred Stock in 2023 prior to the redemption of all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock in September 2023 as discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, a loss on sale of $13 million and current tax expense of $32 million related to the divestiture of Energy Systems Group recorded in 2023 further discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, $19 million due to remeasurement of deferred income tax balances recorded during 2023, as well as $8 million due to lower state income taxes. The remaining variance is due largely to an increase in borrowing costs.
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
58
CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT
CenterPoint Energy’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for the reportable segments. Segment results include inter-segment interest income and expense, which may result in inter-segment profit and loss.
The following discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations is separated into two reportable segments, Electric and Natural Gas.
Electric (CenterPoint Energy)
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,866 | $ | 4,590 | $ | 4,290 | $ | 276 | $ | 300 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 270 | 198 | 176 | (72) | (22) | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 2,084 | 2,072 | 1,880 | (12) | (192) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 946 | 877 | 872 | (69) | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 321 | 304 | 272 | (17) | (32) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,621 | 3,451 | 3,200 | (170) | (251) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 1,245 | 1,139 | 1,090 | 106 | 49 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (445) | (372) | (303) | (73) | (69) | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 77 | 61 | 56 | 16 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 877 | 828 | 843 | 49 | (15) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 172 | 157 | 189 | (15) | 32 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 705 | $ | 671 | $ | 654 | $ | 34 | $ | 17 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 35,547 | 34,190 | 35,166 | 4 | % | (3) | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 116,076 | 110,831 | 108,766 | 5 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of normal weather for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 112 | % | 115 | % | 114 | % | (3) | % | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 98 | % | 76 | % | 90 | % | 22 | % | (14) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,679,575 | 2,640,150 | 2,588,510 | 1 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 3,013,715 | 2,971,730 | 2,916,028 | 1 | % | 2 | % |
59
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Electric reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | $ | 109 | $ | 143 | |||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 88 | 217 | |||||
| Customer growth | 26 | 26 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 29 | 5 | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | (18) | (20) | |||||
| Pass-through revenues, offset in operation and maintenance below | 3 | (5) | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues, including service connections and off-system sales | (11) | 1 | |||||
| Lost revenues as a result of outages associated with Hurricane Beryl in 2024 | 10 | (10) | |||||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items below | (62) | (70) | |||||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts | 40 | (9) | |||||
| Cost of fuel and purchased power, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | 62 | 22 | |||||
| Total | $ | 276 | $ | 300 | |||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||||||
| Cost of purchased power, offset in revenues above | $ | (53) | $ | (87) | |||
| Cost of fuel, including coal, natural gas, and fuel oil, offset in revenues above | (19) | 65 | |||||
| Total | $ | (72) | $ | (22) | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (40) | $ | (124) | |||
| Incremental storm expenses, including storm hardening expenses incurred in connection with accelerated operational activities after Hurricane Beryl in 2024 | 112 | (112) | |||||
| Contract services | (34) | 16 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | (3) | (1) | |||||
| Corporate support services | (28) | — | |||||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items | 3 | — | |||||
| Labor and benefits | (9) | 4 | |||||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | (13) | 25 | |||||
| Total | $ | (12) | $ | (192) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (74) | $ | (79) | |||
| Lease expense associated with TEEEF units no longer eligible for regulatory deferral | (59) | — | |||||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items | 64 | 74 | |||||
| Total | $ | (69) | $ | (5) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of updated property tax rates | $ | (17) | $ | (26) | |||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | — | (6) | |||||
| Total | $ | (17) | $ | (32) | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (90) | $ | (63) | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items above | (2) | (4) | |||||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 19 | (2) | |||||
| Total | $ | (73) | $ | (69) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | $ | 19 | $ | 5 | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items above | (3) | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 16 | $ | 5 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
60
Natural Gas (CenterPoint Energy)
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,486 | $ | 4,050 | $ | 4,279 | $ | 436 | $ | (229) | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas and fuel | 1,846 | 1,520 | 1,888 | (326) | 368 | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 4 | 3 | 3 | (1) | — | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 931 | 881 | 949 | (50) | 68 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 563 | 542 | 513 | (21) | (29) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 245 | 237 | 245 | (8) | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,589 | 3,183 | 3,598 | (406) | 415 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 897 | 867 | 681 | 30 | 186 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss on sale | (49) | — | — | (49) | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (208) | (207) | (188) | (1) | (19) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 27 | 14 | 15 | 13 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 667 | 674 | 508 | (7) | 166 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 97 | 108 | (25) | 11 | (133) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 570 | $ | 566 | $ | 533 | $ | 4 | $ | 33 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in Bcf): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 220 | 189 | 199 | 16 | % | (5) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 423 | 426 | 418 | (1) | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 643 | 615 | 617 | 5 | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 96 | % | 78 | % | 86 | % | 18 | % | (8) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 3,739,919 | 4,063,928 | 4,010,113 | (8) | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 289,166 | 304,606 | 303,841 | (5) | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Total (1) | 4,029,085 | 4,368,534 | 4,313,954 | (8) | % | 1 | % |
(1) Decrease in number of metered customers from 2024 to 2025 is primarily attributable to customer accounts associated with the divestiture of the Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs in March 2025. See Note 4 for additional detail.
61
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas and fuel below | $ | 384 | $ | (368) | |||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | 14 | 1 | |||||
| Weather and usage | 12 | (11) | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue | 10 | (5) | |||||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in operation and maintenance below | 40 | (20) | |||||
| Non-utility revenues | 2 | 15 | |||||
| Customer growth | 14 | 14 | |||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | 142 | 145 | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | (182) | $ | — | ||||
| Total | $ | 436 | $ | (229) | |||
| Utility natural gas and fuel | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | $ | (384) | $ | 368 | |||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 58 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (326) | $ | 368 | |||
| Non-utility costs of revenues, including natural gas | |||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | $ | (1) | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | (1) | $ | — | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| All other operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | $ | (15) | $ | 23 | |||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | (40) | 20 | |||||
| Contract services | (10) | (6) | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 53 | — | |||||
| Labor and benefits | (25) | 8 | |||||
| Corporate support services | (13) | 23 | |||||
| Total | $ | (50) | $ | 68 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (60) | $ | (29) | |||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 39 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (21) | $ | (29) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues above | $ | (14) | $ | (1) | |||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 15 | — | |||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of updated property tax rates | (9) | 9 | |||||
| Total | $ | (8) | $ | 8 | |||
| Loss on Sale | |||||||
| Loss on sale of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses | $ | (49) | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | (49) | $ | — | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (6) | $ | (12) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | (5) | (7) | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 10 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (1) | $ | (19) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Changes to non-service benefit cost | $ | 4 | $ | 3 | |||
| Other income, including interest income from affiliated companies and AFUDC - Equity | 10 | (4) | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | (1) | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 13 | $ | (1) |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
62
HOUSTON ELECTRIC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Houston Electric’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. Houston Electric consists of a single reportable segment. Houston Electric’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Houston Electric’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates Houston Electric charges, debt service costs, income tax expense, Houston Electric’s ability to collect receivables from REPs and Houston Electric’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of Houston Electric’s consolidated operations, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
The following table provides summary data of Houston Electric’s single reportable segment for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
| TDU | $ | 4,067 | $ | 3,862 | $ | 3,514 | $ | 205 | $ | 348 | ||||||||
| Bond Companies | 17 | 77 | 163 | (60) | (86) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 4,084 | 3,939 | 3,677 | 145 | 262 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | 1,913 | 1,923 | 1,669 | 10 | (254) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | 795 | 688 | 593 | (107) | (95) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 312 | 295 | 262 | (17) | (33) | |||||||||||||
| Bond Companies | 12 | 78 | 159 | 66 | 81 | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,032 | 2,984 | 2,683 | (48) | (301) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 1,052 | 955 | 994 | 97 | (39) | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (369) | (311) | (259) | (58) | (52) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | (6) | (3) | (8) | (3) | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 48 | 43 | 34 | 5 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 725 | 684 | 761 | 41 | (77) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 147 | 138 | 168 | (9) | 30 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 578 | $ | 546 | $ | 593 | $ | 32 | $ | (47) | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 34,101 | 32,769 | 33,830 | 4 | % | (3) | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 111,083 | 106,014 | 103,862 | 5 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 114 | % | 115 | % | 114 | % | (1) | % | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 94 | % | 92 | % | 92 | % | 2 | % | — | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,544,880 | 2,506,284 | 2,455,309 | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,859,313 | 2,818,343 | 2,763,535 | 1 | % | 2 | % |
63
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for Houston Electric:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | $ | 34 | $ | 153 | |||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 88 | 217 | |||||
| Customer growth | 22 | 25 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 29 | 5 | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues | 13 | 1 | |||||
| Lost revenues as a result of outages associated with Hurricane Beryl in 2024 | 10 | (10) | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | (18) | (19) | |||||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts | 27 | (24) | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items below | (60) | (86) | |||||
| Total | $ | 145 | $ | 262 | |||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (40) | $ | (124) | |||
| Incremental storm expenses, including storm hardening expenses incurred in connection with accelerated operational activities after Hurricane Beryl in 2024 | 112 | (112) | |||||
| Contract services | (29) | 7 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues above | (3) | (6) | |||||
| Corporate support services | (23) | (2) | |||||
| Labor and benefits | (8) | 1 | |||||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | 1 | (18) | |||||
| Total | $ | 10 | $ | (254) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (47) | $ | (95) | |||
| Lease expense associated with TEEEF units no longer eligible for regulatory deferral | (60) | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (107) | $ | (95) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of changes to tax rates | $ | (17) | $ | (26) | |||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | — | (7) | |||||
| Total | $ | (17) | $ | (33) | |||
| Bond Companies | |||||||
| Operations and maintenance and depreciation expense, offset in revenues above | $ | 66 | $ | 81 | |||
| Total | $ | 66 | $ | 81 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (75) | $ | (55) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 17 | 3 | |||||
| Total | $ | (58) | $ | (52) | |||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | |||||||
| Change in outstanding principal balance, offset in revenues above | $ | (3) | $ | 5 | |||
| Total | $ | (3) | $ | 5 | |||
| Other income, net | |||||||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | $ | 7 | $ | 9 | |||
| Bond Companies interest income, offset in other line items | (2) | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 5 | $ | 9 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
64
CERC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CERC’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. CERC consists of a single reportable segment. CERC’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for natural gas. CERC’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various federal, state and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates CERC charges, debt service costs and income tax expense, CERC’s ability to collect receivables from customers and CERC’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of CERC’s consolidated operations, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
The following table provides summary data of CERC’s single reportable segment for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,344 | $ | 3,925 | $ | 4,149 | $ | 419 | $ | (224) | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas | 1,803 | 1,489 | 1,856 | (314) | 367 | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 4 | 3 | 3 | (1) | — | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 895 | 848 | 904 | (47) | 56 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 541 | 522 | 493 | (19) | (29) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 242 | 234 | 243 | (8) | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,485 | 3,096 | 3,499 | (389) | 403 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 859 | 829 | 650 | 30 | 179 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | 46 | — | — | 46 | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (194) | (197) | (178) | 3 | (19) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 25 | 12 | 14 | 13 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 736 | 644 | 486 | 92 | 158 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 97 | 104 | (26) | 7 | (130) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 639 | $ | 540 | $ | 512 | $ | 99 | $ | 28 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in BCF): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 214 | 184 | 194 | 16 | % | (5) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and Industrial | 379 | 390 | 386 | (3) | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 593 | 574 | 580 | 3 | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 96 | % | 78 | % | 86 | % | 18 | % | (8) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 3,634,422 | 3,958,584 | 3,905,388 | (8) | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and Industrial | 278,500 | 293,959 | 293,235 | (5) | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Total (1) | 3,912,922 | 4,252,543 | 4,198,623 | (8) | % | 1 | % |
(1) Decrease in number of metered customers is primarily attributable to customer accounts associated with the divestiture of the Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs in March 2025. See Note 4 for additional detail.
65
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for CERC:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 to 2024 | 2024 to 2023 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | $ | 372 | $ | (367) | |||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | 14 | 1 | |||||
| Weather and usage | 12 | (9) | |||||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in operation and maintenance below | 39 | (10) | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue | 11 | (6) | |||||
| Non-utility revenues | 2 | 15 | |||||
| Customer growth | 14 | 13 | |||||
| Customer rates | 137 | 139 | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | (182) | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 419 | $ | (224) | |||
| Utility natural gas | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | $ | (372) | $ | 367 | |||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 58 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (314) | $ | 367 | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| All other operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | $ | (12) | $ | 21 | |||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | (39) | 10 | |||||
| Contract services | (12) | (6) | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 53 | — | |||||
| Labor and benefits | (25) | 8 | |||||
| Corporate support services | (12) | 23 | |||||
| Total | $ | (47) | $ | 56 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (58) | $ | (29) | |||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 39 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (19) | $ | (29) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues above | $ | (14) | $ | (1) | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of updated property tax rates | (9) | 10 | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | 15 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (8) | $ | 9 | |||
| Gain on sale | |||||||
| Gain on sale of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses | $ | 46 | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | 46 | $ | — | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (3) | $ | (11) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | (4) | (8) | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | $ | 10 | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | 3 | $ | (19) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Changes to non-service benefit cost | $ | 4 | $ | 3 | |||
| Other income, including interest income from affiliated companies and AFUDC - Equity | 10 | (5) | |||||
| Impact of divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDCs on March 31, 2025 | $ | (1) | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | 13 | $ | (2) |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
66
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ cash flows by category for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 2,486 | $ | 1,177 | $ | 1,262 | $ | 2,139 | $ | 960 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 3,877 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 2,312 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (4,016) | (2,349) | (361) | (4,489) | (2,767) | (1,419) | (4,233) | (2,503) | (1,643) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing activities | 1,549 | 1,187 | (903) | 2,271 | 1,732 | 352 | 374 | 1,103 | (668) |
Operating Activities. The following items contributed to increased (decreased) net cash provided by operating activities:
| 2025 compared to 2024 | 2024 compared to 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in net income after adjusting for non-cash items | $ | 76 | $ | 97 | $ | 25 | $ | 315 | $ | (132) | $ | 153 | ||||||||||
| Changes in working capital (1) | (231) | (275) | 48 | (1,372) | 191 | (1,266) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 511 | 370 | 274 | (580) | (500) | (135) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | 189 | 52 | (142) | (57) | (15) | 49 | ||||||||||||||||
| Higher pension contribution | (100) | — | — | 2 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (98) | (27) | (11) | (46) | 15 | (45) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 347 | $ | 217 | $ | 194 | $ | (1,738) | $ | (441) | $ | (1,244) |
(1)This change is primarily related to the receipt of proceeds at CenterPoint Energy and CERC from the issuance of customer rate relief bonds Texas by the Natural Gas Securitization Finance Corporation in 2023. For further details, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Investing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in investing activities:
| 2025 compared to 2024 | 2024 compared to 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment for asset acquisition | $ | (357) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Net change in capital expenditures | (357) | (189) | (88) | $ | (112) | $ | (363) | $ | 180 | |||||||||||||
| Net change in notes receivable from affiliated companies | — | 498 | (1) | — | 108 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from divestitures | 1,219 | — | 1,219 | (144) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (32) | 109 | (72) | — | (9) | 42 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 473 | $ | 418 | $ | 1,058 | $ | (256) | $ | (264) | $ | 224 |
67
Financing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash provided by (used in) financing activities:
| 2025 compared to 2024 | 2024 compared to 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in commercial paper outstanding | $ | 537 | $ | — | $ | (155) | $ | 516 | $ | — | $ | 436 | ||||||||||
| Net changes in proceeds from issuance of Common Stock | (494) | — | — | 494 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in long-term debt and term loans outstanding, excluding commercial paper | (770) | 63 | (819) | 51 | (6) | 725 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in debt and equity issuance costs | (11) | (10) | 3 | 20 | 5 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in short-term borrowings | 1 | — | 1 | 6 | — | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of Series A Preferred Stock | — | — | — | 800 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Increased payment of Common Stock dividends | (52) | — | — | (37) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Decreased payment of preferred stock dividends | — | — | — | 50 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes payable from affiliated companies | — | 54 | 291 | — | 642 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in dividend to parent | — | 41 | (288) | — | 28 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in contribution from parent | — | (750) | (290) | — | (41) | (210) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 67 | 57 | 2 | (3) | 1 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (722) | $ | (545) | $ | (1,255) | $ | 1,897 | $ | 629 | $ | 1,020 |
Future Sources and Uses of Cash
Material Current and Long-term Cash Requirements. The liquidity and capital requirements of the Registrants are affected primarily by results of operations, capital expenditures, storm restoration costs, debt service requirements, tax payments, working capital needs and various regulatory actions. Future capital expenditures are expected to primarily relate to investments in infrastructure. These capital expenditures are anticipated to enhance the safety, reliability and resiliency of our systems and deliver consistent value for stakeholders across the Registrants’ jurisdictions. In addition to dividend payments on CenterPoint Energy’s Common Stock and interest payments on debt, the Registrants’ principal anticipated cash requirements for 2026 include the following:
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||
| Estimated capital expenditures | $ | 6,695 | $ | 4,031 | $ | 2,198 | |||||
| Scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds | 40 | 27 | — | ||||||||
| Scheduled principal payments on debt instruments, excluding Securitization Bonds | 2,377 | 800 | 60 | ||||||||
| Expected contributions to pension plans and other postretirement plans | 86 | — | 5 |
The Registrants expect that anticipated cash needs for 2026 will be met with available cash flows from operations, proceeds from the sale of our Ohio natural gas LDC business, as well as cash flows from financing (such as issuances of debt securities and equity securities upon physical settlement of outstanding forward sale agreements and borrowings under credit facilities, commercial paper issuances or other sources). The issuances of securities in the capital markets and borrowings under additional credit facilities and term loans may not, however, be available on acceptable terms. The Registrants may, from time to time, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire their outstanding debt securities through open market purchases, tender offers or pursuant to the terms of such securities.
68
The following table sets forth the Registrants’ estimates of the Registrants’ capital expenditures currently planned for projects for the periods presented. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for CenterPoint Energy’s actual capital expenditures by reportable segment for 2025.
| 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 4,388 | $ | 4,736 | $ | 4,936 | $ | 3,777 | $ | 4,358 | ||||||||||
| Natural Gas | 2,288 | 2,163 | 2,122 | 1,924 | 2,024 | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 6,695 | $ | 6,919 | $ | 7,078 | $ | 5,721 | $ | 6,402 | ||||||||||
| Houston Electric (1) | $ | 4,031 | $ | 4,326 | $ | 4,474 | $ | 3,440 | $ | 4,076 | ||||||||||
| CERC (1) | $ | 2,198 | $ | 2,047 | $ | 1,994 | $ | 1,826 | $ | 1,899 |
(1)Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ material current and long-term cash requirements as of December 31, 2025:
| 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | $ | 500 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 500 | ||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds (1) | 40 | 37 | 39 | 41 | 43 | 514 | 714 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) (2) | 1,877 | 326 | 3,941 | 870 | 1,469 | 13,470 | 21,953 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (3) | 38 | 32 | 30 | 28 | 26 | 134 | 288 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (3) | 1,024 | 956 | 914 | 749 | 3,170 | 8,223 | 15,036 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (4) | 978 | 946 | 781 | 630 | 681 | 2,919 | 6,935 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 4,457 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 5,705 | $ | 2,318 | $ | 5,389 | $ | 25,260 | $ | 45,426 | ||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | $ | 500 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 500 | ||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds (1) | 27 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 277 | 402 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) | 300 | 300 | 500 | — | 500 | 7,679 | 9,279 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (3) | 22 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 13 | 62 | 144 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (3) | 401 | 383 | 379 | 353 | 2,659 | 3,466 | 7,641 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 1,250 | $ | 723 | $ | 919 | $ | 392 | $ | 3,198 | $ | 11,484 | $ | 17,966 | ||||||||||||
| CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt (1) | $ | 60 | $ | 26 | $ | 1,779 | $ | 30 | $ | 500 | $ | 2,345 | $ | 4,740 | ||||||||||||
| Interest payments — long-term debt (3) | 227 | 224 | 191 | 136 | 133 | 799 | 1,710 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (4) | 684 | 587 | 542 | 522 | 480 | 1,322 | 4,137 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 971 | $ | 837 | $ | 2,512 | $ | 688 | $ | 1,113 | $ | 4,466 | $ | 10,587 |
(1)Balances reflect aggregate principal amounts outstanding and do not include unamortized discounts, premiums or issuance costs. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
(2)ZENS obligations are included in the 2029 column at their contingent principal amount of less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2025. These obligations are exchangeable for cash at any time at the option of the holders for 95% of the current value of the reference shares attributable to each ZENS ($507 million as of December 31, 2025), as discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
(3)The Registrants calculated estimated interest payments for long-term debt as follows: for fixed-rate debt and term debt, the Registrants calculated interest based on the applicable rates and payment dates; for variable-rate debt and/or non-term debt, the Registrants used interest rates in place as of December 31, 2025. The Registrants typically expect to settle such interest payments with cash flows from operations and short-term borrowings.
(4)For a discussion of commodity and other commitments, see Note 14(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
The table above does not include the following:
•estimated future payments for expected future AROs primarily estimated to be incurred after 2030. See Note 3(c) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
69
•expected contributions to pension plans and other postretirement plans in 2026 and expected benefit payments to be paid by the pension and postretirement benefit plans. See Note 8(g) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•operating leases. See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for tax-exempt long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy as discussed in Note 12 and guarantees as discussed in Note 14(b) to the consolidated financial statements and short-term leases, the Registrants have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
70
Regulatory Matters
TEEEF (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
For information about TEEEF, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Hurricane Beryl (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
For information about Hurricane Beryl, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
May 2024 Storm Events (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
For information about May 2024 Storm Events, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
February 2021 Winter Storm Event (CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC)
For information about the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Indiana Electric Securitization of Generation Retirements (CenterPoint Energy)
For further information about the issuance of SIGECO Securitization Bonds, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Indiana Electric CPCN (CenterPoint Energy)
BTAs
Indiana Electric pursued PTCs for solar projects following the passage of the IRA. On February 7, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to approve an amended BTA to purchase the 191 MW Posey Solar project. Indiana Electric requested that project costs, net of PTCs, be recovered in rate base rather than a levelized rate, through base rates or the CECA mechanism, depending on which provides more timely recovery. On September 6, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN. On March 7, 2025, SIGECO completed the acquisition of Posey Solar from Arevon for a purchase price of approximately $357 million. The Posey Solar project was placed in service in the second quarter of 2025 and is currently being recovered through base rates. In the applicable rate case, the IURC approved Indiana Electric’s request to convey PTCs to customers through the new tax adjustment rider. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
On January 10, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to acquire a wind energy generating facility located in the central region of MISO through a BTA, and on June 6, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, thereby authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the wind generating facility. In August 2025, due to changing project considerations and concerns about customer affordability, Indiana Electric exited negotiations relating to this wind energy generating facility. On December 4, 2025, Indiana Electric filed a Notice of Termination in this proceeding.
PPAs
Indiana Electric sought approval in February 2021 for a 100 MW solar PPA with Clenera LLC in Warrick County, Indiana. The request accounted for increased cost of debt related to this PPA, which would provide equivalent equity return to offset imputed debt during the 25-year life of the PPA. In October 2021, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar PPA but denied the request to preemptively offset imputed debt in the PPA cost. Due to rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Clenera LLC and Indiana Electric renegotiated the terms of the agreement to increase the PPA price and Indiana Electric subsequently filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with certain modifications. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays and estimated interconnection cost increases, on April 24, 2025, Indiana Electric provided notice that it was exercising its right to terminate the PPA, which terminated all further obligations of Indiana Electric with respect to the project.
On August 25, 2021, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 185 MW of solar power, under a 15-year PPA, from Oriden, which is developing a solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, and 150 MW of solar power, under a 20-year PPA, from Origis, which is developing a solar project in Knox County, Indiana. On May 4, 2022, the IURC issued an order approving Indiana Electric to enter into both PPAs. In March 2022, when the results of the MISO
71
interconnection study were completed, Origis advised Indiana Electric that the costs to construct the solar project in Knox County, Indiana had increased largely due to escalating commodity and supply chain costs impacting manufacturers worldwide. In August 2022, Indiana Electric and Origis entered into an amended PPA, which reiterated the terms contained in the 2021 PPA with certain modifications. On February 22, 2023, the IURC approved the Knox County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection delays, the project in-service date has been delayed from 2024 to 2026. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with Oriden with certain modifications. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Vermillion County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date would be delayed to 2028. On May 9, 2025, Indiana Electric and Oriden terminated the PPA.
On May 1, 2024, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 147 MW of wind power under a 25-year PPA with an affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc., which is developing a wind project in Knox County, Illinois. On November 6, 2024, the IURC approved the Knox County wind PPA, which provided for the recovery of the purchase power costs through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the PPA. The facility is targeted to be in operation in late 2026.
On April 14, 2025, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 170 MW of wind power under a 25-year PPA with an affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc., which is developing a wind project in Tama County, Iowa. On June 3, 2025, an amendment to the PPA was filed with the IURC requesting an extension of the PPA’s term from 25 to 27 years. Indiana Electric received a final order from the IURC on November 5, 2025. The facility became operational on December 9, 2025. The power purchase costs will be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the PPA.
Indiana Electric 2025 IRP (CenterPoint Energy)
On December 5, 2025, Indiana Electric submitted its 2025 IRP with the IURC pursuant to applicable Indiana law requiring electric utilities to develop and submit to the IURC every three years (unless extended) an IRP that uses economic modeling to consider the costs and risks associated with available generation resource options to provide reliable, cost effective electric service for the next 20-year period. Indiana Electric’s 2025 IRP was developed following a series of public meetings and stakeholder discussions occurring in 2025 and identified both a preferred portfolio, which assumes the status quo for Indiana Electric’s service territory, and an alternative preferred portfolio, which includes a potential large load addition. Due to the phasing out of IRA renewable energy tax incentives pursuant to the OBBBA, declining accreditation from MISO for renewable energy and increased price pressure on resources due to, among other things, tariffs and ongoing supply chain issues, the 2025 IRP extends the timing for Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan. Accordingly, both the preferred portfolio and the alternative portfolio call for using the interconnection at F.B. Culley unit 2 for a 90 MW battery storage unit by 2028 and the conversion of the A.B. Brown units 5 and 6 gas turbines to a combined cycle gas turbine unit in the near- to mid-term, depending on load conditions. Decisions around F.B. Culley 3 will be reevaluated in the next IRP in 2028. The 2025 IRP includes the cancellation of nearly $1 billion in non-economical renewable projects. For more information regarding the risks associated with Indiana Electric’s execution of its generation transition plan and its IRP, see “Risk Factors - Risk Factors Affecting Operations - Indiana Electric’s execution of its generation transition plan...”
F.B. Culley Unit 2 (CenterPoint Energy)
While Indiana Electric’s 2025 IRP (similar to previous IRPs) preferred portfolios included the retirement of F.B. Culley Unit 2, a coal-fired generation unit, by the end of 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy issued an emergency 202(c) order in December 2025 directing Indiana Electric to continue operating the unit through March 23, 2026. Indiana Electric has filed a complaint with the FERC to request creation of a cost recovery/cost allocation mechanism. If created, a separate filing will be made at a later date with the FERC to seek recovery of all costs incurred to comply with the U.S. Department of Energy’s emergency 202(c) order. Indiana Electric has also filed an application with the IURC in Cause No. 46350 to recover any compliance costs associated with the emergency 202(c) order that are not recovered through the FERC proceedings.
Natural Gas Combustion Turbines (CenterPoint Energy)
On June 17, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to construct two natural gas combustion turbines to replace portions of its existing coal-fired generation fleet. On June 28, 2022, the IURC approved the CPCN. The $287 million turbine facility was constructed at the previous site of the A.B. Brown power plant in Posey County, Indiana. Indiana Electric received approval for depreciation expense and post in-service carrying costs to be deferred in a regulatory asset until the date Indiana Electric’s base rates include a return on and recovery of depreciation expense on the facility. A new approximately 23.5-mile pipeline was constructed and is operated by Texas Gas Transmission, LLC to supply natural gas to the turbine facility. FERC granted a certificate to construct the pipeline on October 20, 2022. On January 7, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed FERC’s order granting the certificate. Indiana Electric granted its contractor a full notice to proceed to construct the turbines on December 9, 2022. In the second quarter of 2025, 230 MW of the facility was
72
placed in service, and, due to a transformer manufacturing issue, the remaining 230 MW of the facility was placed in service in the third quarter of 2025. Indiana Electric received approval from the IURC on February 3, 2025, to recover for each combustion turbine by adjusting base rates as they are placed in service. The first turbine and second turbine are currently being recovered in base rates that were updated on June 17, 2025 and October 1, 2025, respectively.
Stewart-West Bay Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On April 30, 2025, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to replace a portion of a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Galveston County, Texas that connects Houston Electric’s Stewart and West Bay substations. On June 27, 2025, an order was issued dismissing all opposing parties from the proceeding. On August 11, 2025, a notice of approval of Houston Electric’s application was issued. The project is estimated to cost approximately $105 million, but the actual capital cost of the project will depend on construction costs and other factors. Completion of construction and energization of the line is anticipated to occur in the third quarter of 2027.
Space City Solar Transmission Interconnection Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On December 17, 2020, Houston Electric filed a CCN with the PUCT for approval to build a 345 kV transmission line in Wharton County, Texas connecting the Hillje substation on Houston Electric’s transmission system to the planned 610 MW Space City Solar Generation facility being developed by third-party developer, EDF Renewables. In November 2021, the PUCT approved a route that was estimated to cost $25 million and issued a final order on January 12, 2022. There have been project delays due to supply chain constraints in the developer acquiring solar panels. Houston Electric substantially completed construction in the fall of 2023, and the transmission line is expected to be energized shortly after the generation facility is complete, which is anticipated to occur in the first quarter of 2027.
Kilgore Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On August 30, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Chambers County, Texas that will loop the existing 138 kV Chevron to Langston circuit number 86 on Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Kilgore substation. On March 7, 2024, the PUCT issued a final order approving a route that was estimated to cost $60 million, including substation costs. The actual capital costs of the project, including the transmission line and the planned Kilgore substation, will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors. Completion of construction and energization of the line and substation is anticipated to occur in the fourth quarter of 2026.
Mill Creek Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On November 17, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Harris and Montgomery Counties, Texas that will connect Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Mill Creek substation. On November 21, 2024, the PUCT issued a final order approving a route estimated to cost $68 million. The actual capital costs of the project will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors. Completion of construction and energization of the line and substation is anticipated to occur in the second quarter of 2027.
Indiana Legislation (CenterPoint Energy)
Indiana Electric is evaluating legislation filed in Indiana’s 124th General Assembly, including House Bill 1002, a multi-faceted bill aimed at improving the affordability of electric rates. House Bill 1002 would do the following:
•beginning in 2026, require an electric utility to file a multi-year rate plan according to a prescribed schedule;
•apply a customer affordability performance metric and a service restoration performance metric to each year of the multi-year rate plan and use such metric to provide financial rewards or penalties based on the electricity supplier’s measured performance of the metric;
•require an electric utility to offer a low income customer assistance program by July 1, 2026 to be funded by at least 0.2% of jurisdictional revenues for residential customers and allow the utility to seek recovery of eligible program costs;
•prohibit an electric utility from terminating service to any customer on a day forecasted by the National Weather Service to have a heat index of at least 95 degrees Fahrenheit;
•modify the IURC’s authority related to use of emergency powers;
73
•apply a levelized billing plan to residential customers who are eligible and have applied for the Low Income Housing Energy Assistance Program; and
•require an electric utility to report certain residential customer data to the Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor on a quarterly basis.
There are other bills moving through the 124th General Assembly, including legislation regarding surplus interconnection service, nuclear facility permits, and a bill on land use and developments that includes siting of battery energy storage systems.
Texas Legislation (CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC)
The Registrants are evaluating the effects of certain legislation passed in 2025 and associated PUCT rulemaking projects, including the following pieces of legislation that became law during the 89th Texas Legislature:
•House Bill 4384, effective June 20, 2025, allows LDCs to recover post in-service carrying costs (PISCC) in GRIP filings. This allows LDCs to defer for future recovery as a regulatory asset PISCC, depreciation expense and ad valorem taxes associated with unrecovered gross plant.
•Senate Bill 231, effective June 20, 2025, provides that, on or after the effective date, TDUs may only enter into, renew or extend leases for TEEEF units with a maximum generation capacity 5 or fewer MW and that are rapidly deployable, and that they may enter into leases without prior PUCT preapproval (as required by the TEEEF Rule) in the case of an emergency or if the lease includes a provision allowing for the alteration of the lease based on applicable PUCT orders or rules.
•Senate Bill 1963, effective September 1, 2025, allows ERCOT utilities to securitize system restoration costs using a third-party government agency, which may allow for the debt to be off balance sheet and an abbreviated proceeding timeline. This bill also lowered the system restoration costs threshold from $100 million to $50 million, provided the effectiveness tests are met.
•Senate Bill 482, effective September 1, 2025, results in increased penalties for assaulting a utility worker to a third-degree felony, equal to assaulting a first responder, and for harassing a utility worker to a Class A misdemeanor.
Transmission and Distribution System Resiliency Plans (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Following feedback from customers, external experts and other stakeholders, including elected officials and local agencies, Houston Electric filed a revised SRP with the PUCT on January 31, 2025 for review and approval. The filed SRP proposed to invest approximately $5.75 billion over a three-year period from 2026 to 2028 for transmission and distribution infrastructure, information technology and cybersecurity assets and event response capability. This plan proposed 39 resiliency-enhancing measures and a microgrid pilot program to be implemented over the three-year period. The SRP as filed had an estimated capital cost of approximately $5.54 billion and an estimated operations and maintenance expense of approximately $211 million. Approximately $2.17 billion of such cost was for transmission-related investments, and approximately $3.58 billion was for distribution-related investments. Intervenor testimony was filed on April 8, 2025, and PUCT staff testimony was filed on April 15, 2025. On June 12, 2025, Houston Electric announced that it had reached a settlement agreement with parties to its SRP, which provides for approximately $3.18 billion in distribution-related investments. The proposed transmission investments were removed from the SRP and Houston Electric intends to implement such investments, as appropriate, outside of the SRP process. The agreement also includes the deferral of more than $240 million of the approximate $3.18 billion in SRP costs until the second half of 2029, which is intended to help reduce the bill impact for customers by spreading costs over a four-year period instead of three years. Once approved, and while some cost recovery would be deferred into 2029, it is expected that all SRP work agreed upon in the settlement agreement will be completed in the proposed 2025 to 2028 timeframe. At its November 14, 2025 open meeting, the PUCT approved the SRP. The final order issued on November 19, 2025 includes twenty-seven resiliency measures totaling approximately $2.68 billion in capital investments and an estimated $185 million in operations and maintenance expense. The approved SRP also includes the deferral of $217 million of the approximate $2.87 billion in SRP costs until the second half of 2029.
Rate Change Applications
The Registrants are routinely involved in rate change applications before state regulatory authorities. Those applications include general rate cases, where the entire cost of service of the utility is assessed and reset. In addition, the Registrants are periodically involved in proceedings to adjust their capital tracking mechanisms (e.g., CSIA, DCRF, DRR, GRIP, TCOS, ECA, CECA and TDSIC), their decoupling mechanisms (e.g., decoupling and SRC), and their energy efficiency cost trackers (e.g., CIP, DSMA, EECRF, EEFC and EEFR).
Minnesota Gas Rate Case. On November 1, 2023, CERC filed an application with the MPUC requesting an adjustment to delivery charges in 2024 and 2025 for the natural gas business in Minnesota. The requested increase was for approximately
74
6.5% or $85 million for 2024 and an additional approximately 3.7% or $52 million for 2025. The need for a rate change was primarily driven by continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system, including new Intelis natural gas meters that feature an integrated safety shutoff valve, changes to depreciation rates that better reflect the actual life and salvage characteristics of assets and changes in other costs to serve customers. The request reflected a proposed 10.3% ROE on a 52.5% equity ratio. Interim rates for 2024 of $69 million, subject to refund, were implemented as of January 1, 2024. A request for interim rates of $33 million for 2025 was filed on September 30, 2024, approved at the December 3, 2024 hearing and approved by an order issued December 20, 2024. A unanimous settlement agreement was filed on November 25, 2024 and provided for an increase of $60.8 million for 2024 and an additional $42.7 million for 2025. The parties agreed to an overall cost of capital of 7.07% for 2024 and 2025. The ALJ filed a report on February 13, 2025 recommending that the MPUC approve the settlement agreement. As required by the December 20, 2024 order, the difference between 2024 interim rates and the settled amount of $60.8 million was refunded to customers in March 2025. Exceptions to the ALJ report were filed on April 18, 2025. On May 29, 2025, the MPUC approved the settlement agreement. A final order approving the settlement agreement was issued by the MPUC on June 27, 2025 and final rates were implemented on September 1, 2025.
Indiana Electric Rate Case. On December 5, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a petition with the IURC for authority to modify its rates and charges for electric utility service through a phase-in of rates. The requested increase was approximately 16% or $119 million based on a forward looking 2025 test year. The need for a rate increase was primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the system and normal increases in operating expenses. The initial filing of the rate case reflected a proposed 10.4% ROE on a forecasted 55% equity ratio. Indiana Electric reached a settlement agreement with less than all parties and submitted the agreement to the IURC on May 20, 2024. The settlement reflected a proposed 9.8% ROE on a forecasted 55% equity ratio. The requested increase was lowered to $80 million, an 11% increase. Indiana Electric received a final order on February 3, 2025 approving the settlement with one modification that effectively capped the residential increase to 1.15% of the total increase, allocating the difference to other commercial and industrial customers. The final order approved the 9.8% ROE on a forecasted 55% equity ratio and increases revenues by $80 million.
Houston Electric Rate Case. On March 6, 2024, Houston Electric filed an application with the PUCT requesting authority to change rates and charges for electric transmission and distribution service. The requested increase was approximately $17 million (1%) for retail customers and $43 million (6.6%) for wholesale transmission service, excluding TCRF and rate case expenses. The need for a rate increase was primarily driven by continuing investment that has been made to support customer growth and to bolster the safety and reliability of Houston Electric’s transmission and distribution system. The request reflected a proposed 10.4% ROE and a 45% equity ratio. Errata testimony was filed to correct minor errors included in the initial filing, which reduced the requested increase to $56 million compared to then-current rates. Houston Electric reached a settlement agreement with certain parties and submitted the agreement to the PUCT on January 29, 2025. The settlement reflected a $47 million reduction in annual revenues and a 9.65% ROE and a weighted average cost of capital of 6.606% based upon an as-filed 4.29% cost of debt, an agreed ROE of 9.65% and an agreed regulatory capital structure of 56.75% long-term debt and 43.25% equity. A final order approving the settlement agreement was issued by the PUCT on March 13, 2025. Final retail delivery rates were implemented on April 28, 2025. Final wholesale transmission rates were superseded by interim TCOS rates that went into effect on the same date.
Ohio Gas Rate Case. CEOH filed its Application and Standard Filing Requirement in October 2024 and the related testimony in November 2024. The filing seeks a revenue requirement increase of approximately $100 million based on a requested ROE of 10.4% and an equity percentage of 54.13%. The need for a rate increase was primarily driven by continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system. On May 16, 2025, the PUCO staff filed its staff report recommending a revenue requirement range of $340.8 million to $350.3 million and a net increase of $25.1 million to $34.6 million based on an ROE range from 9.05% to 10.07% with a capitalization ratio of 52.3% common equity and 47.7% long-term debt. The PUCO staff recommendation includes amortization over 49 years and 65 years for CEP and DRR regulatory assets, respectively, compared to CEOH’s proposal to amortize over seven years. On June 16, 2025, CEOH filed objections to the PUCO staff report and supplemental testimony. On July 11, 2025, CEOH filed a stipulation and recommendation that outlined the agreed upon terms between CEOH, the Federal Executive Agencies, Ohio Energy Group, the City of Dayton, the Retail Energy Supply Association, Interstate Gas Supply, LLC and the PUCO staff. One intervening party to the case, Spire Marketing, Inc., is a non-opposing party, while another intervening party to the case, the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, filed its testimony in opposition to the stipulation and recommendation on July 29, 2025. The stipulation and recommendation included a revenue requirement of $371.3 million, which would result in a revenue requirement increase of $59.6 million based on a rate of return of 7.1% comprised of a ROE of 9.85% with a capitalization ratio of 52.9% common equity, 47.1% long-term debt at a cost of debt of 4.02%. The stipulation and recommendation amortization periods for CEP and DRR regulatory assets within base rates and within the rider mechanisms is 15 years. The stipulation and recommendation included an extension of the CEP rider and DRR through 2029 investment with revised residential caps for dollars per month per customer ranging from $2.75 for 2025 investment to $9.95 for 2029 investment for the CEP rider, and from $2.56 for 2025 investment to $7.69 for 2029 investment for DRR. The evidentiary hearing commenced on July 21, 2025. The stipulating parties were crossed by the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel on July 28 and August 4, 2025, and the Office of the Ohio
75
Consumers’ Counsel was crossed by the stipulating parties on July 29 and August 5, 2025. On July 29, 2025, a PUCO local public hearing was conducted. The parties filed initial briefs on August 26, 2025, and reply briefs on September 9, 2025. On November 21, 2025, CEOH filed a late filed exhibit to the stipulation and recommendation to include actual rate case expenses, which resulted in a revised revenue requirement increase of $59.7 million. The PUCO order was issued on January 7, 2026, modifying and adopting the stipulation and resolving all issues related to the case. The PUCO order modifications include: (1) extending the 15-year amortization periods for the CEP and DRR deferral balances to 25 years, which had a $7.9 million negative impact on the revenue requirement, and (2) a ROE of 9.79%, resulting in a rate of return of 7.07%, which had a $0.6 million negative impact on the revenue requirement. These two modifications result in a revised revenue requirement increase of $51.3 million and a total revenue requirement of $363 million. Revised rates became effective on a services rendered basis effective January 12, 2026.
The table below reflects significant applications pending or completed since the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC through the date of the filing of this Form 10-K:
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1) (in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric (PUCT) | ||||||||||||
| Rate Case | $ | (47) | March 2024 | April 2025 | March 2025 | See discussion above under Houston Electric Rate Case. | ||||||
| TCOS | $ | 64 | February 2025 | April 2025 | April 2025 | Based on the net change in invested capital since its last base rate proceeding of approximately $614 million for the period January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. | ||||||
| DCRF | $ | 123 | February 2025 | July 2025 | June 2025 | Based on the net change in distribution invested capital since its last base rate proceeding of approximately $1 billion for the period January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024, for an incremental revenue increase of $123 million adjusted for load growth. | ||||||
| TEEEF | $ | (24) | April 2025 | TBD | TBD | Seeks approval of: (1) the release of Houston Electric’s 15 large 32 MW TEEEF units to ERCOT at CPS Energy facilities to serve the greater San Antonio region until March 2027 unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions of the ERCOT Transaction; (2) a corresponding reduction to the capacity of the Houston Electric TEEEF fleet; and (3) a reduction and update to Houston Electric’s rider TEEEF rate to reflect the removal of the 15 large 32 MW TEEEF units from Houston Electric’s TEEEF fleet. Houston Electric will make no revenue or profit from ERCOT for the time period when the 15 large 32 MW TEEEF units are in the San Antonio area being dispatched by ERCOT. In November 2025, Houston Electric also proposed to release the five medium 5.7 MW TEEEF units from its TEEEF fleet and remove the associated lease costs effective January 1, 2026. On February 13, 2026, Houston Electric filed a letter requesting continued abatement until February 27, 2026 due to continued settlement discussions. | ||||||
| TEEEF | N/A | May 2025 | TBD | TBD | Seeks authorization to lease small, 200 kW to 1,250 kW TEEEF units for 36 months in accordance with the TEEEF Rule. Among other things, the TEEEF Rule generally requires that a utility obtain preapproval prior to renewing or entering into a new lease of TEEEF units, with exceptions for emergency situations or if the lease includes a provision allowing for the alteration of the lease based on applicable PUCT orders or rules. Approval of Houston Electric’s request in this filing will have no cost impact on customers at this time, as cost determination will occur in a future proceeding. On January 6, 2026, Houston Electric provided the PUCT with a proposed order. | |||||||
| EECRF | $ | 40 | May 2025 | March 2026 | December 2025 | Requests $96 million, which is comprised primarily of the following: 2026 program costs of $50 million; $5 million related to the under-recovery of 2024 program costs; the 2024 earned bonus of $40 million; and 2026 projected evaluation, measurement and verification costs of $0.6 million. On September 8, 2025, the Sierra Club filed direct testimony. On September 19, 2025, the PUCT staff filed its recommendation requesting that SOAH approve the application as filed. On October 3, 2024, the PUCT staff petitioned (Docket No. 57172) to establish a secondary cap on utilities’ 2024 Program Year (PY) earned performance bonuses equal to 25% of utilities’ total expenditures for PY 2024, and on August 13, 2025, the PUCT issued a final order denying the PUCT staff’s petition. On October 7, 2025, Houston Electric filed an unanimous stipulation and settlement agreement for the full amount requested. On October 10, 2025, SOAH remanded this proceeding to the PUCT. A final order approving the settlement agreement was issued on December 12, 2025. | ||||||
| TCOS | $ | 15 | August 2025 | October 2025 | October 2025 | Based on the net change in invested capital since its last TCOS proceeding of approximately $112 million for the period January 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025. | ||||||
| DCRF | $ | 55 | August 2025 | December 2025 | October 2025 | Based on the net change in distribution invested capital since its last base rate proceeding of approximately $1.5 billion for the period January 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 for an incremental revenue increase of $55 million adjusted for load growth. |
76
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1) (in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCOS | $ | 36 | February 2026 | TBD | TBD | Based on the net change in invested capital since its last TCOS proceeding of approximately $212 million for the period of July 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025, along with the inclusion of regulatory assets of approximately $10 million comprising certain system restoration operations and maintenance expenses and carrying costs associated with the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl. | ||||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Beaumont/East Texas, South Texas, Houston and Texas Coast (Railroad Commission) | ||||||||||||
| Tax Act Rider | $ | 15 | August 2024 | June 2025 | May 2025 | Resulting from the Texas Gas Rate Case, the first Tax Act Rider Calculation was filed on August 1, 2024 pursuant to Docket No. OS-23-00015513 to recover the effects of the IRA and certain other tax-related costs for rates that became effective January 1, 2025. These effects include the return on the CAMT deferred tax asset (“DTA”) resulting from the IRA, income tax credits resulting from the IRA and the return on the increment or decrement in the net operating loss DTA included in the rate base and in the standard service base revenue requirement approved in the Texas Gas Rate Case. CERC believes its filing is consistent with the Tax Act Rider tariff approved in Docket No. OS-23-00015513. On October 1, 2024, certain parties filed comments disputing the application. Briefings were filed with an ALJ in November 2024. A hearing on the merits was held on February 21, 2025 and continued on March 21, 2025. On March 21, 2025, a unanimous settlement agreement was filed. On April 11, 2025, a PFD was issued. On May 13, 2025, the Railroad Commission considered the PFD at an open meeting and issued a Final Order approving the settlement agreement. | ||||||
| Tax Act Rider | $ | 22 | August 2025 | January 2026 | October 2025 | The second Tax Act Rider was initially filed on August 1, 2025, and a revised filing was made on September 24, 2025, to recover the effects of the IRA and certain other tax-related costs for rates that would be effective for bills calculated on or after January 1, 2026. These effects include the return on the CAMT DTA resulting from the IRA, income tax credits resulting from the IRA and the return on the increment or decrement in the net operating loss DTA included in the rate base and in the standard service base revenue requirement approved in the Texas Gas Rate Case Docket No. OS-23-00015513. No comments from the parties were filed prior to the October 1, 2025 deadline for comments. The Railroad Commission accepted the Tax Act Rider filing on October 16, 2025. | ||||||
| GRIP | $ | 70 | February 2025 | June 2025 | May 2025 | Based on net change in invested capital of $445 million. | ||||||
| GRIP | $ | 62 | February 2026 | TBD | TBD | Based on net change in invested capital of $394 million. | ||||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Minnesota (MPUC) | ||||||||||||
| Rate Case | $ | 104 | November 2023 | September 2025 | July 2025 | See discussion above under Minnesota Gas Rate Case. | ||||||
| CIP Financial Incentive | $ | 8 | May 2025 | December 2025 | November 2025 | CIP Financial Incentive based on 2024 CIP program activity. | ||||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana South - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||||
| CSIA | $ | 2 | April 2025 | August 2025 | July 2025 | Requested an increase of $11.6 million to rate base, which reflects an approximately $1.5 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under recovery variance of $1.9 million. The OUCC filed testimony on June 3, 2025, recommending minor changes. Indiana South filed a rebuttal on June 17, 2025, adopting the changes. The evidentiary hearing was held on June 30, 2025. A final order was issued on July 30, 2025, with rates effective August 1, 2025. | ||||||
| CSIA | $ | 1 | October 2025 | February 2026 | January 2026 | Requested an increase of $13.0 million to rate base, which reflects an approximately $1.2 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under recovery variance of $(2.1) million. The OUCC filed testimony on December 2, 2025, recommending minor changes, and Indiana South filed rebuttal on December 16, 2025. An evidentiary hearing was held January 6, 2026. A final order was issued on January 28, 2026 with rates effective on February 1, 2026. | ||||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Indiana North - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||||
| CSIA | $ | 9 | April 2025 | August 2025 | July 2025 | Requested an increase of $94.9 million to rate base, which reflects an approximately $8.6 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under recovery variance of $5 million. The OUCC filed testimony on June 3, 2025. Indiana North filed rebuttal testimony on June 17, 2025. The evidentiary hearing was held on June 30, 2025. A final order was issued on July 30, 2025, with rates effective August 1, 2025. |
77
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1) (in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSIA | $ | 8 | October 2025 | February 2026 | January 2026 | Requested an increase of $90.8 million to rate base, which reflects an approximately $7.6 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under recovery variance of $(6.8) million. The OUCC filed testimony on December 2, 2025, recommending minor changes, and Indiana North filed rebuttal on December 16, 2025. An evidentiary hearing was held January 6, 2026. A final order was issued on January 28, 2026, with rates effective on February 1, 2026. On February 17, 2026, the OUCC filed a motion for rehearing and reconsideration requesting the commission to reconsider its decision approving the recovery of soil remediation costs from ratepayers and reconsider the threshold for a best estimate for a TDSIC plan and the specific justification the commission will require to increase an approved best estimate. | ||||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Ohio - Gas (PUCO) | ||||||||||||
| DRR | $ | 6 | May 2025 | September 2025 | August 2025 | Requested an increase of $54 million to rate base for investments made in 2024, which reflects a $6 million annual increase in current revenues. A change in (over)/under-recovery variance of ($0.03) million annually is also included in rates. PUCO staff and intervenor (Ohio Consumers’ Counsel) filed comments June 27, 2025. PUCO staff recommended approval. Ohio Consumers’ Counsel commented on affordability and provided potential solutions including stretching out the replacement program over a longer period of time, phasing in the annual increase, shifting from fixed charges to volumetric charges, and increasing funding for its bill assistance programs. A statement informing the PUCO of whether the issues raised in comments have been resolved was filed on July 11, 2025. Supplemental Testimony from CEOH and the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel was filed on July 22, 2025. A hearing was scheduled for July 29, 2025, with all parties waiving motions to strike, objections, and cross examination. A final PUCO opinion and order was issued on August 20, 2025, finding that the updated DRR rates are just and reasonable and stating that the correct forum for the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel’s arguments was the 2018 Rate Case, the 2022 Extension, or the 2024 Rate Case. Revised rates became effective on September 1, 2025. | ||||||
| Rate Case | $ | 51 | October 2024 | January 2026 | January 2026 | See discussion above under Ohio Gas Rate Case. |
(1)Represents proposed increases (decreases) when effective date and/or approval date is not yet determined. Approved rates could differ materially from proposed rates.
GHG Emissions and Climate-Related Regulation and Compliance (CenterPoint Energy)
The issue of climate change has received focus at the state, federal and international level, and there are trends and uncertainties relating to GHG emissions and climate-related regulations and compliance that affect the Registrants. Compliance costs and other effects associated with climate change, reductions in GHG emissions and obtaining renewable energy sources remain uncertain; nevertheless, any new regulation or legislation relating to climate change will likely result in an increase in compliance costs. CenterPoint Energy will continue to monitor regulatory activity regarding GHG emission standards that may affect its business. Currently, CenterPoint Energy does not purchase carbon credits. In connection with its energy transition goals, CenterPoint Energy is expected to purchase carbon credits in the future; however, CenterPoint Energy does not currently expect the number of credits, or cost for those credits, to be material. For more information on GHG emissions and climate-change regulation and compliance, see “Business—Environmental Matters” in Item 1 of Part I of this report. For more information on GHG emissions and climate-related risk trends and uncertainties, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
Climate Risk Trends and Uncertainties
There are climate risk trends and uncertainties that affect the Registrants. Changes in the U.S. presidential administration and significant expected increases in electric demand, as announced by organizations such as ERCOT and MISO, have shifted the energy landscape in the United States. This shift in federal domestic energy policy has resulted in uncertainty with respect to the scope and speed of future renewable generation infrastructure development and the role that existing renewable generation will play in support of the U.S. energy grid. The long-term impacts of this domestic energy policy shift are also uncertain, including with respect to impacts on the development of, and consequently the availability of, alternative energy sources (such as solar energy, including private solar, wind energy, microturbines, fuel cells, energy-efficient buildings and energy storage devices). Additionally, it is unclear whether, and if so how, the new domestic energy policy, including the potential suspension, revision or rescission of regulations restricting emissions (including methane emissions) and the repeal of the Endangerment Finding, will affect consumers’ and companies’ energy use, adoption of alternative energy sources or decisions to expand their facilities, including natural gas facilities. For more information on climate risk trends and uncertainties, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
78
79
Other Matters
Credit Facilities
The Registrants may draw on their respective revolving credit facilities from time to time to provide funds used for general corporate and limited liability company purposes, including to backstop CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s commercial paper programs. The facilities may also be utilized to obtain letters of credit. For further details related to the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Based on the consolidated debt to capitalization covenant in the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, the Registrants would have been permitted to utilize the full capacity of such revolving credit facilities, which aggregated approximately $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2025. As of February 13, 2026, the Registrants had the following revolving credit facilities and utilization of such facilities:
| Amount Utilized as of February 13, 2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Size of Facility | Loans | Letters of Credit | Commercial Paper | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Termination Date | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | $ | 2,400 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 665 | 3.75% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy (1) | 250 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | 300 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||||||
| CERC | 1,050 | — | — | 340 | 3.75% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,005 |
(1)This credit facility was issued by SIGECO.
Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to customary terms and conditions. However, there is no requirement that the borrower makes representations prior to borrowing as to the absence of material adverse changes or litigation that could be expected to have a material adverse effect. Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of events of default that we consider customary. The revolving credit facilities also provide for customary fees, including commitment fees, administrative agent fees, fees in respect of letters of credit and other fees. In each of the revolving credit facilities, the spread to SOFR and the commitment fees fluctuate based on the borrower’s credit rating. Each of the Registrant’s credit facilities provide for a mechanism to replace SOFR with possible alternative benchmarks upon certain benchmark replacement events. The Registrants and SIGECO are currently in compliance with the various business and financial covenants in the four revolving credit facilities.
Debt Transactions
For detailed information about the Registrants’ debt transactions in 2025, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. For detailed information about the delay draw term loan agreement executed by CERC Corp. in 2026, see Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
Securities Registered with the SEC
On May 17, 2023, the Registrants filed a joint shelf registration statement with the SEC registering indeterminate principal amounts of Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds, CERC Corp.’s senior debt securities and CenterPoint Energy’s senior debt securities and junior subordinated debt securities and an indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock, shares of preferred stock, depositary shares, as well as stock purchase contracts and equity units. The joint shelf registration statement will expire on May 17, 2026. For information related to the Registrants’ debt issuances in 2025, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
For information related to shares of Common Stock sold pursuant to the forward sale agreements and the Equity Distribution Agreement in 2025, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Money Pool
The Registrants participate in a money pool through which they and certain of their subsidiaries can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net
80
funding requirements of the CenterPoint Energy money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper. The net funding requirements of the CERC money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CERC’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CERC’s commercial paper. The money pool may not provide sufficient funds to meet the Registrants’ cash needs.
The table below summarizes CenterPoint Energy money pool activity by Registrant as of February 13, 2026:
| Weighted Average Interest Rate | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||
| Money pool borrowings | 3.80% | $ | 463 | $ | — |
Impact on Liquidity of a Downgrade in Credit Ratings
The interest rate on borrowings under the Registrants’ credit facilities is based on their respective credit ratings. As of February 13, 2026, Moody’s, S&P and Fitch had assigned the following credit ratings to the borrowers:
| Moody’s | S&P | Fitch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Borrower/Instrument | Rating | Outlook (1) | Rating | Outlook (2) | Rating | Outlook (3) | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | CenterPoint Energy Senior Unsecured Debt | Baa2 | Negative | BBB | Stable | BBB | Stable | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Vectren Corp. Issuer Rating | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | SIGECO Senior Secured Debt | A1 | Stable | A | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| Houston Electric | Houston Electric Senior Secured Debt | A2 | Negative | A | Stable | A | Stable | |||||||
| CERC | CERC Corp. Senior Unsecured Debt | A3 | Stable | BBB+ | Stable | A- | Stable | |||||||
| CERC | Indiana Gas Senior Unsecured Debt | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a |
(1)A Moody’s rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an issuer’s rating over the medium term.
(2)An S&P outlook assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate to longer term.
(3)A Fitch rating outlook indicates the direction a rating is likely to move over a one- to two-year period.
The Registrants cannot assure that the ratings set forth above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. The Registrants note that these credit ratings are included for informational purposes and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Registrants’ securities and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of the Registrants’ credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants’ ability to obtain short- and long-term financing, the cost of such financings and the execution of the Registrants’ commercial strategies.
A decline in credit ratings could increase borrowing costs under the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities. If the Registrants’ credit ratings had been downgraded one notch by S&P and Moody’s from the ratings that existed as of December 31, 2025, the impact on the borrowing costs under the four revolving credit facilities would have been insignificant. A decline in credit ratings would also increase the interest rate on long-term debt to be issued in the capital markets and could negatively impact the Registrants’ ability to complete capital market transactions and to access the commercial paper market. Additionally, a decline in credit ratings could increase cash collateral requirements and reduce earnings of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segments.
Pipeline tariffs and contracts typically provide that if the credit ratings of a shipper or the shipper’s guarantor drop below a threshold level, which is generally investment grade ratings from both Moody’s and S&P, cash or other collateral may be demanded from the shipper in an amount equal to the sum of three months’ charges for pipeline services plus the unrecouped cost of any lateral built for such shipper. If the credit ratings of CERC Corp. decline below the applicable threshold levels, CERC might need to provide cash or other collateral of up to $311 million as of December 31, 2025. The amount of collateral will depend on seasonal variations in transportation levels.
ZENS and Securities Related to ZENS (CenterPoint Energy)
If CenterPoint Energy’s creditworthiness were to drop such that ZENS holders thought CenterPoint Energy’s liquidity was adversely affected or the market for the ZENS were to become illiquid, some ZENS holders might decide to exchange their ZENS for cash. Funds for the payment of cash upon exchange could be obtained from the sale of the shares of ZENS-Related Securities that CenterPoint Energy owns or from other sources. CenterPoint Energy owns shares of ZENS-Related Securities
81
equal to approximately 100% of the reference shares used to calculate its obligation to the holders of the ZENS. ZENS exchanges result in a cash outflow because tax deferrals related to the ZENS and shares of ZENS-Related Securities would typically be reversed when ZENS are exchanged or otherwise retired and shares of ZENS-Related Securities are sold. The ultimate tax liability related to the ZENS and ZENS-Related Securities continues to increase by the amount of the tax benefit realized each year, and there could be a significant cash outflow when the taxes are paid as a result of the retirement or exchange of the ZENS. If all ZENS had been exchanged for cash on December 31, 2025, deferred taxes of approximately $897 million would have been payable in 2025, subject to reduction on account of any available net operating loss carryforwards or CAMT carryforwards. If all the ZENS-Related Securities had been sold on December 31, 2025, capital gains taxes of approximately $72 million would have been payable in 2025 based on 2025 tax rates in effect and subject to reduction on account of any available net operating loss carryforwards or CAMT carryforwards. As of December 31, 2025, CenterPoint Energy had both net operating loss and CAMT carryforwards available from its filed 2024 federal income tax return that can be applied to largely offset the cash outflow that would result from a retirement or exchange of the ZENS. For additional information about ZENS, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
Cross Defaults
Under the Registrants’ respective revolving credit facilities, a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specified types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $125 million by the borrower or any of their respective significant subsidiaries will cause a default under such borrower’s respective credit facility or term loan agreement. Under SIGECO’s revolving credit facility, a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specific types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $75 million by SIGECO or any of its significant subsidiaries will cause a default under SIGECO’s credit facility. A default by CenterPoint Energy would not trigger a default under its subsidiaries’ debt instruments or revolving credit facilities.
Possible Acquisitions, Divestitures and Joint Ventures
From time to time, the Registrants consider the acquisition or the disposition of assets or businesses or possible joint ventures, strategic initiatives or other joint ownership arrangements with respect to assets or businesses. Any determination to take action in this regard will be based on market conditions and opportunities existing at the time, and accordingly, the timing, size or success of any efforts and the associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable. The Registrants may seek to fund all or part of any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or equity issuances. Debt or equity financing may not, however, be available to the Registrants at that time due to a variety of events, including, among others, maintenance of our credit ratings, industry conditions, general economic conditions, market conditions and market perceptions. As announced in September 2025 and February 2026, CenterPoint Energy has increased its planned capital expenditures in its Electric and Natural Gas businesses pursuant to its new 10-year capital plan, which calls for investment of at least $65.5 billion through 2035, and CenterPoint Energy may continue to increase such planned capital investments in the future. The Registrants may continue to explore asset sales, in addition to the completed sale of CERC Corp.’s Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses, as a means to efficiently finance a portion of their increased capital expenditures in the future, subject to the considerations listed above. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
On October 20, 2025, CenterPoint Energy, through CERC Corp., entered into the Ohio Securities Purchase Agreement to sell all of the issued and outstanding equity interests in CEOH for total consideration of approximately $2.62 billion, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Ohio Securities Purchase Agreement. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Collection of Receivables from REPs (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Houston Electric’s receivables from the distribution of electricity are collected from REPs that supply the electricity Houston Electric distributes to their customers. Before conducting business, a REP must register with the PUCT and must meet certain financial qualifications. Nevertheless, adverse economic conditions, weather events, such as the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, structural problems in the market served by ERCOT or financial difficulties of one or more REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for Houston Electric’s services or could cause them to delay such payments. Houston Electric depends on these REPs to remit payments on a timely basis, and any delay or default in payment by REPs could adversely affect Houston Electric’s cash flows. In the event of a REP’s default, Houston Electric’s tariff provides a number of remedies, including the option for Houston Electric to request that the PUCT suspend or revoke the certification of the REP. Applicable regulatory provisions require that customers be shifted to another REP or a provider of last resort if a REP cannot make timely
82
payments. However, Houston Electric remains at risk for payments related to services provided prior to the shift to the replacement REP or the provider of last resort. If a REP were unable to meet its obligations, it could consider, among various options, restructuring under the bankruptcy laws, in which event such REP might seek to avoid honoring its obligations and claims might be made against Houston Electric involving payments it had received from such REP. If a REP were to file for bankruptcy, Houston Electric may not be successful in recovering accrued receivables owed by such REP that are unpaid as of the date the REP filed for bankruptcy. However, PUCT regulations authorize utilities, such as Houston Electric, to defer bad debts resulting from defaults by REPs for recovery in future rate cases, subject to a review of reasonableness and necessity.
Other Factors that Could Affect Cash Requirements
In addition to the above factors, the Registrants’ liquidity and capital resources could also be negatively affected by:
•cash collateral requirements that could exist in connection with certain contracts, including weather hedging arrangements, and natural gas purchases, natural gas price and natural gas storage activities of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segment;
•acceleration of payment dates on certain gas supply contracts, under certain circumstances, as a result of increased natural gas prices, and concentration of natural gas suppliers (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increased costs related to the acquisition of natural gas (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increased costs of certain goods, materials or services due to, among other things, supply chain disruptions, inflation, labor shortages, scarcity of materials and changes in U.S. or foreign trade policy (including tariffs or other trade actions);
•increases in interest expense in connection with debt refinancings and borrowings under credit facilities or term loans or the use of alternative sources of financings, including financings due to the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl;
•various legislative, executive or regulatory actions at the federal, state and local levels, including actions in response to Hurricane Beryl and actions pertaining to U.S. or foreign trade policy (including tariffs or other trade actions) or other geopolitical matters;
•incremental collateral, if any, that may be required due to regulation of derivatives (CenterPoint Energy);
•the timing and outcome of rate actions regarding our recovery of costs and ability to make a reasonable return on investment;
•the ability of REPs, including REP affiliates of NRG and Vistra Energy Corp., to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric;
•slower customer payments and increased write-offs of receivables due to higher natural gas prices, changing economic conditions, public health threats or severe weather events, such as the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl;
•the satisfaction of any obligations pursuant to guarantees;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event and Hurricane Beryl;
•contributions to pension and postretirement benefit plans;
•recovery of any losses under applicable insurance policies;
•restoration costs and revenue losses resulting from future natural disasters such as hurricanes or other severe weather events and the timing of and amounts sought for recovery of such restoration costs; and
•various other risks identified in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Certain Contractual Limits on Our Ability to Issue Securities and Borrow Money
Certain provisions in certain note purchase agreements relating to debt issued by CERC have the effect of restricting the amount of secured debt issued by CERC and debt issued by subsidiaries of CERC Corp. Additionally, Houston Electric and SIGECO are limited in the amount of mortgage bonds they can issue by the General Mortgage and SIGECO’s mortgage indenture, respectively. For information about the total debt to capitalization financial covenants in the Registrants’ and SIGECO’s revolving credit facilities, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of the Registrants’ financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that can have a significant effect on the Registrants’ financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The circumstances that make these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex have to do with the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty. The Registrants base their estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments. These estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired,
83
as additional information is obtained and as the Registrants’ operating environment changes. Our management believes the following accounting policies involve the application of critical accounting estimates. Accordingly, these accounting estimates have been reviewed and discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board. For a complete discussion of the Registrants’ significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Rate Regulation
Accounting guidance for regulated operations provides that rate-regulated entities account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the recovery of those incurred costs in rates if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and if the competitive environment makes it probable that such rates can be charged and collected. CenterPoint Energy, for its Electric and Natural Gas reportable segments, Houston Electric and CERC apply this accounting guidance. Certain expenses and revenues subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the balance sheet as regulatory assets or liabilities and are recognized in income as the related amounts are included in service rates and recovered from or refunded to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are recorded when it is probable that these items will be recovered or reflected in future rates. Determining probability requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals. If events were to occur that would make the recovery of these assets and liabilities no longer probable, the Registrants would be required to write off or write down these regulatory assets and liabilities. For further detail on the Registrants’ regulatory assets and liabilities, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill
The Registrants review the carrying value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable, and at least annually, goodwill is tested for impairment as required by accounting guidance for goodwill. Unforeseen events, changes in market conditions, and probable regulatory disallowances, where applicable, could have a material effect on the value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, future cash flows, interest rate, and regulatory matters, and could result in an impairment charge. The Registrants recorded no impairments to long-lived assets, including goodwill during 2025, 2024 and 2023.
Fair value is the amount at which an asset, liability or business could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices or valuations by third parties, present value techniques based on estimates of cash flows, or multiples of earnings or revenue performance measures. The fair value could be different using different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques.
Fair value measurements require significant judgment and unobservable inputs, including (i) projected timing and amount of future cash flows, which factor in planned growth initiatives, (ii) the regulatory environment, as applicable, and (iii) discount rates reflecting risk inherent in the future market prices. Determining the discount rates for the businesses that are not rate-regulated, such as for Energy Systems Group prior to the sale in June 2023, requires the estimation of the appropriate company-specific risk premiums for such businesses based on evaluation of industry and entity-specific risks, which includes expectations about future market or economic conditions existing on the date of the impairment test. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on results of the impairment tests.
Annual Goodwill Impairment Test
CenterPoint Energy and CERC completed their 2025 annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 2025 and determined, based on a qualitative assessment, that no goodwill impairment charge was required for any reporting unit. No qualitative factors were present that indicated impairment of CenterPoint Energy or CERC reporting units.
Although no goodwill impairment resulted from the 2025 annual test, an interim goodwill impairment test could be triggered by the following: actual earnings results that are materially lower than expected, significant adverse changes in the operating environment, an increase in the discount rate, changes in other key assumptions which require judgment and are forward looking in nature, if CenterPoint Energy’s market capitalization falls below book value for an extended period of time, or events affecting a reporting unit such as a contemplated disposal of all or part of a reporting unit.
Assets Held for Sale
Generally, a long-lived asset to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which management, with approval from the Board, as applicable, commits to a plan to sell, and a sale is expected to be completed within one year. The Registrants
84
record assets and liabilities held for sale, or the disposal group, at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value less cost to sell. If the disposal group reflects a component of a reporting unit and meets the definition of a business, the goodwill within that reporting unit is allocated to the disposal group based on the relative fair value of the components representing a business that will be retained and disposed. Goodwill is not allocated to a portion of a reporting unit that does not meet the definition of a business.
As of December 31, 2025, certain assets and liabilities of the Ohio natural gas LDC business met the held for sale criteria and the goodwill attributable to these businesses was $393 million and $219 million for CenterPoint Energy and CERC, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, certain assets and liabilities of the Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses met the held for sale criteria and the goodwill attributable to these businesses was $217 million and $122 million for CenterPoint Energy and CERC, respectively. See Note 4 for additional detail.
Accounting for Securitizations
Accounting guidance for rate regulated long-lived asset abandonment requires that the carrying value of an operating asset or an asset under construction is removed from property, plant and equipment when it becomes probable that the asset will be abandoned. The Registrants recognize a loss on abandonment when they conclude it is probable the cost will not be recovered in future rates. When the Registrants conclude it is probable that costs will be recovered in future rates, a regulatory asset is recognized. The portion of property, plant and equipment that will remain used and useful until abandonment and recovered through depreciation expense in rates will continue to be classified as property, plant and equipment until the asset is abandoned. The Registrants evaluate if an adjustment to the estimated life of the asset and, accordingly, the rate of depreciation, is required to recover the asset while it is still providing service. Determining probability of abandonment or probability of recovery requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals.
In connection with the securitization of transition property or system restoration property or to facilitate the securitization financing of qualified costs, CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and SIGECO evaluate the wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote, special purpose entities, which are VIEs, for possible consolidation, including review of qualitative factors such as the power to direct the activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE. CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and SIGECO have the power to direct the significant activities of their respective VIEs and are most closely associated with their respective VIEs as compared to other interests held by the holders of the relevant Securitization Bonds. CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and SIGECO are, therefore, considered the respective primary beneficiary and consolidate these VIEs.
Unbilled Revenues
Revenues related to electricity delivery and natural gas sales and services are generally recognized upon delivery to customers. However, the determination of deliveries to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month either electronically through AMS meter communications or manual readings. At the end of each month, deliveries to non-AMS customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is estimated. Information regarding deliveries to AMS customers after the last billing is obtained from actual AMS meter usage data. Unbilled electricity delivery revenue is estimated each month based on actual AMS meter data, daily supply volumes and applicable rates. Unbilled natural gas sales are estimated based on estimated purchased gas volumes, estimated lost and unaccounted for gas and tariffed rates in effect. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates.
Employee Benefit Plans
CenterPoint Energy sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering all employees who meet eligibility requirements. CenterPoint Energy uses several statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events in calculating the expense and liability related to its plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as estimated by management, within certain guidelines. In addition, CenterPoint Energy’s actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the
85
amount of pension and other retirement plans expense recorded. Read “— Other Significant Matters — Pension Plans” for further discussion.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2(p) to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements that affect the Registrants.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT MATTERS
Pension Plans (CenterPoint Energy). As discussed in Note 8(b) to the consolidated financial statements, CenterPoint Energy maintains non-contributory qualified defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees. Employer contributions for the qualified plans are based on actuarial computations that establish the minimum contribution required under ERISA and the maximum deductible contribution for income tax purposes.
Under the terms of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans, it reserves the right to change, modify or terminate the plan. CenterPoint Energy’s funding policy is to review amounts annually and contribute an amount at least equal to the minimum contribution required under ERISA.
Additionally, CenterPoint Energy maintains unfunded non-qualified benefit restoration plans which allow participants to receive the benefits to which they would have been entitled under the non-contributory qualified pension plan except for federally mandated limits on qualified plan benefits or on the level of compensation on which qualified plan benefits may be calculated.
CenterPoint Energy’s funding requirements and employer contributions were as follows for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||
| Minimum funding requirements for qualified pension plans | $ | 35 | $ | 23 | $ | — | ||||
| Employer contributions to the qualified pension plans | 110 | 23 | 24 | |||||||
| Employer contributions to the non-qualified pension plans | 7 | 7 | 8 |
CenterPoint Energy expects to make contributions of approximately $71 million and $6 million to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans in 2026, respectively.
Changes in pension obligations and plan assets may not be immediately recognized as pension expense in CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income, but generally are recognized in future years over the remaining average service period of plan participants. As such, significant portions of pension expense recorded in any period may not reflect the actual level of benefit payments provided to plan participants.
As the sponsor of a plan, CenterPoint Energy is required to (a) recognize on its Consolidated Balance Sheet an asset for the plan’s over-funded status or a liability for the plan’s under-funded status, (b) measure a plan’s assets and obligations as of the end of the fiscal year and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of the plans in the year that changes occur through adjustments to other comprehensive income and, when related to its rate-regulated utilities with recoverability of cost, to regulatory assets.
The projected benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The projected benefit obligation remained generally consistent from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 as impacts resulting from the decrease in discount rates were offset by actual return on plan assets exceeding expected return on plan assets.
As of December 31, 2025, the projected benefit obligation exceeded the market value of plan assets of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans by $272 million. Changes in interest rates or the market values of the securities held by the plan during a year could materially, positively or negatively, change the funded status and affect the level of pension expense and required contributions at the next remeasurement.
86
Houston Electric and CERC participate in CenterPoint Energy’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans covering substantially all employees. Pension cost by Registrant was as follows for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension cost | $ | 49 | $ | 24 | $ | 15 | $ | 51 | $ | 23 | $ | 18 | $ | 53 | $ | 27 | $ | 19 |
The calculation of pension cost and related liabilities requires the use of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. Two of the most critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate.
As of December 31, 2025, CenterPoint Energy’s qualified pension plans had an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.00%, which is the same as the 7.00% rate assumed as of December 31, 2024. The expected rate of return assumption was developed using the targeted asset allocation of our plans and the expected return for each asset class. CenterPoint Energy regularly reviews its actual asset allocation and periodically rebalances plan assets to reduce volatility and better match plan assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2025, the projected benefit obligation was calculated assuming a discount rate of 5.35%, which is 25 basis points lower than the 5.60% discount rate assumed as of December 31, 2024 attributed primarily to rising interest rates. The discount rate was determined by reviewing yields on high-quality bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency and the expected duration of pension obligations specific to the characteristics of CenterPoint Energy’s plans.
CenterPoint Energy’s actuarially determined pension and other postemployment cost for 2025 and 2024 that is greater or less than the amounts being recovered through rates in the majority of Texas jurisdictions is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. Pension cost for 2026, including the non-qualified benefit restoration plan, is estimated to be $49 million before applicable regulatory deferrals and capitalization, based on an expected return on plan assets of 7.00% and a discount rate of 5.35% as of December 31, 2025. If the expected return assumption were lowered by 50 basis points from 7.00% to 6.50%, the 2026 pension cost would increase by approximately $6 million.
As of December 31, 2025, the pension plans projected benefit obligation, including the unfunded non-qualified pension plans, exceeded plan assets by $272 million. If the discount rate were lowered by 50 basis points from 5.35% to 4.85%, CenterPoint Energy’s projected benefit obligation would increase by approximately $62 million and its 2026 pension cost would decrease by approximately $1 million. The expected reduction in pension cost due to the decrease in discount rate is a result of the expected correlation between the reduced interest rate and appreciation of fixed income assets in pension plans with significantly more fixed income instruments than equity instruments. In addition, the assumption change would impact CenterPoint Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets by increasing the regulatory asset recorded as of December 31, 2025 by $55 million and would result in an incremental charge to comprehensive income in 2025 of $6 million, net of tax of $1 million, due to the increase in the projected benefit obligation.
Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the pension plans will impact CenterPoint Energy’s future pension expense and liabilities. CenterPoint Energy cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
MD&A history
Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.
FY 2024 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001130310-25-000040.
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following combined discussion and analysis should be read in combination with the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 herein. The discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated financial information includes the results of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., which, along with CenterPoint Energy, Inc., are collectively referred to as the Registrants. Where appropriate, information relating to a specific registrant has been segregated and labeled as such. Unless the context indicates otherwise, specific references to Houston Electric and CERC also pertain to CenterPoint Energy. In this combined Form 10-K, the terms “our,” “we” and “us” are used as abbreviated references to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including Houston Electric and CERC, unless stated otherwise. No registrant makes any representations as to the information related solely to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. or the subsidiaries of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. other than itself.
OVERVIEW
Background
CenterPoint Energy is a public utility holding company. CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries own and operate electric transmission, distribution and generation facilities and natural gas distribution systems. For a detailed description of CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Houston Electric is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, which provides electric transmission service to transmission service customers in the ERCOT region and distribution service to REPs serving the Texas Gulf Coast area that includes the city of Houston.
CERC Corp. is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, which (i) directly owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi and Texas, (ii) indirectly, through Indiana Gas and CEOH, owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Indiana and Ohio, respectively, and (iii) owns and operates permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP.
On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Reportable Segments
We discuss our operating results on a consolidated basis and individually for each of our reportable segments. We are first and foremost an energy delivery company and it is our intention to remain focused on these regulated segments. The results of our business operations are significantly impacted by weather, customer growth, economic conditions, cost management, competition, rate proceedings before regulatory agencies and other actions of the various regulatory agencies to whose jurisdiction we are subject, among other factors.
Below is a summary of CenterPoint Energy’s reportable segments as of December 31, 2024. For a detailed description of the assets included in each reporting segment, see Part I, Item 1. Business.
•The Electric reportable segment includes electric transmission and distribution services that are subject to rate regulation in Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s service territories, as well as the impacts of generation-related stranded costs and other true-up balances recoverable by the regulated electric utility and energy delivery services to electric customers and electric generation assets to serve electric customers and optimize those assets in the wholesale power market in Indiana Electric’s service territory.
•The Natural Gas reportable segment includes (i) intrastate natural gas sales to, and natural gas transportation and distribution for residential, commercial and industrial customers in Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas; (ii) permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP; and (iii) home appliance maintenance and repair services to customers in Minnesota and home repair protection plans to natural gas customers in Indiana, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas through a third party.
49
•The Corporate and Other reportable segment includes (i) energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services by Energy Systems Group through June 30, 2023, the date of the sale of Energy Systems Group; (ii) corporate operations that support the business operations of CenterPoint Energy; and (iii) office buildings and other real estate used for business operations.
Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We expect our businesses to continue to be affected by the key factors and trends discussed below. Our expectations are based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from our expected results.
Factors Influencing Our Businesses and Industry Trends
We are an energy delivery company with electric transmission and distribution, power generation, and natural gas distribution operations that serve more than seven million metered customers across six jurisdictions. The majority of our revenues are generated from the transmission and delivery of electricity and the sale of natural gas by our subsidiaries.
We continue to execute on our strategic goals for our businesses which were set in 2021. These include our ten-year capital plan from 2021 through 2030, a focus on targeting controllable operations and maintenance savings for the benefit of our customers, prudent capital funding including divestitures of non-core assets, and net zero and GHG emissions reduction goals. Our focus continues to be on the growth of our regulated utility businesses including our electric and gas utility operations, which comprise over 95% of our earnings for the year ended December 31, 2024. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
Pursuant to this business strategy and in light of the nature of our businesses, significant amounts of capital investment are reflected in our current 10-year capital plan, which has increased to nearly $47.5 billion through 2030. These investments include a focus on additional system resiliency, reliability, and grid modernization. These investments are not only intended to meet our customers’ current needs, but are also in anticipation for further organic growth and load growth from increased electrification in our service territories. To fund these capital investments, we rely on internally-generated cash, borrowings under our credit facilities, proceeds from commercial paper, cash proceeds from strategic transactions (such as the divestitures of our Arkansas and Oklahoma LDC businesses in 2022, our Energy Systems Group divestiture in 2023 and the proposed sale of our Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025), and issuances of equity and debt in the capital markets, including the issuance of non-recourse securitization bonds at Houston Electric related to costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2024 due to the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl.
We strive to maintain investment grade ratings for our securities to access the capital markets on terms we consider reasonable. A reduction in our ratings generally would increase our borrowing costs for new issuances of debt, as well as borrowing costs under our existing revolving credit facilities, and may prevent us from accessing the commercial paper markets. Disruptions in the financial markets along with high or rising interest rates can also affect the availability of new capital on terms we consider attractive. In those circumstances, we may not be able to obtain certain types of external financing or may be required to accept terms less favorable than we would otherwise accept which, among other things, would negatively impact our ability to finance our capital plan. For that reason, we seek to maintain adequate liquidity for our businesses through existing credit facilities and prudent refinancing of existing debt.
The regulation of electric transmission, distribution and generation facilities as well as natural gas pipelines and related facilities by federal and state regulatory agencies affects our businesses. In accordance with applicable regulations, we are making, and will continue to make, significant capital investments in our service territories under our capital plan to help operate and maintain safer, more reliable and growing electric and natural gas systems. The current economic environment (e.g., sustained higher interest rates and higher relative levels of inflation in the United States) discussed further below could result in heightened regulatory scrutiny as these regulatory agencies seek to reduce the financial impact of utility bills on customers.
While greater than 80% of CenterPoint Energy’s projected consolidated investments are expected to be recovered through interim capital recovery trackers or rate cases based on a forward test year, the balance is expected to be recovered through base rate cases. Indiana Electric filed a rate case during 2023, and Houston Electric and CERC’s Ohio jurisdiction filed rate cases in 2024. The outcome of these base rate proceedings will determine, among other things, the ability to recover certain capital
50
investments within those jurisdictions. The outcome of these base rate proceedings is uncertain and may be impacted by the current economic environment. CERC’s Texas and Minnesota gas jurisdictions filed rate cases in 2023, which were settled in 2024. For additional detail, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
To assess our financial performance, our management primarily monitors the recovery of costs and return on investments by the evaluation of net income and capital expenditures, among other things, from our regulated service territories within our reportable segments. Within these broader financial measures, we monitor margins, natural gas and fuel costs, interest expense, capital spend, working capital requirements, and operation and maintenance expense. In addition to these financial measures, we also monitor a number of variables that management considers important to gauge the performance of our reportable segments, including the number of customers, throughput, commodity prices, heating and cooling degree days, environmental impacts, safety factors, system reliability and customer satisfaction.
CenterPoint Energy and CERC have weather normalization or other rate mechanisms that largely mitigate the impact of weather on Natural Gas in Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Minnesota and Ohio, as applicable. CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas in Texas and CenterPoint Energy’s electric operations in Texas and Indiana do not have such mechanisms, although fixed customer charges are historically higher in Texas for Natural Gas compared to its other jurisdictions. As a result, fluctuations from normal weather may have a positive or negative effect on CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas’ results in Texas and on CenterPoint Energy’s electric operations’ results in its Texas and Indiana service territories.
Each state has a unique economy and is driven by different industrial sectors. Our largest customers reflect the diversity in industries in the states across our footprint. For example, Houston Electric is largely concentrated in Houston, a diverse economy where a higher percentage of employment is tied to the energy sector relative to other regions of the country. Although the Houston area represents a large part of our customer base, we have a diverse customer base throughout the various states our utility businesses serve. In Minnesota, for instance, education and health services are the state’s largest sectors. Indiana and Ohio are impacted by changes in the Midwest economy in general and changes in particular industries concentrated in the Midwest such as automotive, feed and grain processing. Some industries are driven by population growth like education and health care, while others may be influenced by strength in the national or international economy. Adverse economic conditions, coupled with concerns for protecting the environment and increased availability of alternate energy sources, may cause consumers to use less energy or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for our services. Long-term national trends indicate residential customers have reduced their energy consumption, which could adversely affect our results. To the extent population growth is affected by lower energy prices and there is financial pressure on some of our customers who operate within the energy industry, there may be an impact on the growth rate of our customer base and overall demand. Management expects residential meter growth for Houston Electric to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 2%. Management additionally anticipates significant increased electric load growth demand in our Houston Electric service territory, including in relation to the expected expansion of data centers, energy export facilities, including hydrogen facilities, electrification of industrial processes and transport and logistics. Typical customer growth in the jurisdictions served by the Natural Gas reportable segment is approximately 1%. Management expects residential meter growth for CERC to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 1%.
Inflation and high interest rates and a recessionary environment could potentially adversely impact CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its 10-year capital plan. The inability to execute on our capital plan may result in lost future revenues for CenterPoint Energy. Additionally, these economic conditions may affect customers’ ability to pay their utility bills which may preclude our ability to collect balances due from such customers.
Further, the global supply chain has experienced significant disruptions due to a multitude of factors, such as geopolitical and economic uncertainty, regulatory and political instability, import tariffs and trade agreements, labor shortages, resource availability, long lead times, manufacturer production limitations, delivery delays, inflation and severe weather events. These disruptions have adversely impacted the utility industry. Like many of our peers, we have experienced disruptions to our supply chain, as well as increased prices, and may continue to experience such disruptions in the future. For example, President Trump has expressed a desire to impose substantial new or increased tariffs, and in February 2025, imposed tariffs on several countries and certain imports into the United States. These tariffs, as well as any new legislation, tariffs, bans, potential retaliatory trade measures taken against the United States or related governmental action, could increase or cause volatility in the cost of and negatively impact our ability to procure materials, supplies (such as natural gas) or services necessary for our business and capital plan, lead to scarcity of resources and labor necessary for our business and capital plan, further extend lead time or otherwise negatively impact the supply chain and our ability to timely execute our capital plan. To the extent adverse economic conditions, including supply chain disruptions, affect our suppliers and customers as well as our ability to meet our capital plan and generation transition plan, including with respect to developing and constructing new generation facilities at the cost and scale and on the timelines that we anticipate, results from our energy delivery businesses may suffer. For more information, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
51
Further, in response to concerns for protecting the environment, we have strived to take a leading stance in the transition to safer and cleaner energy by being the first combined electric and natural gas utility with regulated generation assets to adopt net zero for its Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 emissions by 2035 goals. In addition, we set a Scope 3 emission reduction goal across our multi-state footprint by committing to help our residential and commercial customers reduce GHG emissions attributable to their end use of natural gas by 20% to 30% by 2035 from a 2021 baseline. Our capital plan supports these goals. For more information regarding CenterPoint Energy’s net zero and GHG emissions reduction goals and the risks associated with them, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks — CenterPoint Energy is subject to operational and financial risks...”
Significant Events
May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl. Houston Electric’s service territory experienced sudden and destructive severe weather events in May 2024 that included hurricane-like winds and tornadoes. Subsequently, on July 8, 2024, Hurricane Beryl made landfall in Texas, bringing sustained winds, storm surges and torrential rain into Houston Electric’s service territory. The May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl caused significant damage to Houston Electric’s electric delivery system and resulted in electric service interruptions peaking at an estimated 922,000 customers and more than 2.1 million customers, respectively.
Various federal, state and local governmental and regulatory agencies and other entities, such as the Texas Governor’s office, the Texas legislature and the PUCT, have called for or are conducting inquiries and investigations into Hurricane Beryl, the efforts made by Houston Electric to prepare for, and respond to, this event, including the electric service outage issues, and the procurement of TEEEF. Moreover, additional governmental and regulatory agencies and other entities may conduct such inquiries and investigations, as well. On August 12, 2024, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton opened an investigation to evaluate CenterPoint Energy’s conduct during Hurricane Beryl. Texas Lieutenant Governor Patrick has publicly urged the PUCT to hold Houston Electric, rather than ratepayers, responsible for paying $800 million, which was the amount the PUCT had previously approved Houston Electric to recover from ratepayers pursuant to Texas legislation passed after the 2021 Winter Storm Event relating to emergency responsiveness and the leasing of temporary generation units. Additionally, legislation has been proposed in Texas to, among other things, require the PUCT to review TEEEF leased by TDUs, disallow any leases that do not conform to the terms of the proposed legislation (which include, among other things, requirements relating to the speed with which TEEEF may be deployed), disallow recovery of costs associated with such disallowed leases, and implement a process to refund ratepayers the charges paid for the leasing of certain TEEEF. There are significant uncertainties around these inquiries and investigations and potential results and consequences, including with respect to our recovery of costs incurred as a result of Hurricane Beryl and whether any financial penalties will be assessed or changes to Houston Electric’s system, service territories, operations and/or regulatory treatment will result therefrom. Further, on January 22, 2025, a putative shareholder of CenterPoint Energy, Donel Davidson, filed a derivative petition in Harris County District Court, Texas, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment on behalf of CenterPoint Energy against certain of its current and former directors and officers citing, in part, the topics of these inquiries and investigations. The action seeks to recover damages and other relief from the defendants on behalf of CenterPoint Energy. Additionally, on February 12, 2025, a second putative shareholder of CenterPoint Energy made a demand on the Board to investigate the same basic allegations raised in the derivative petition filed by Donel Davidson.
Houston Electric announced an initial hurricane preparedness and response action plan to the PUCT on July 25, 2024 to enhance the resiliency of the electric system through various investments. Following a meeting with Texas Governor Abbott on August 1, 2024, Houston Electric publicly committed to accelerating its previously announced initial hurricane preparedness and response action plan. Accordingly, Houston Electric announced that it was withdrawing its application for approval of its transmission and distribution system resiliency plan with the PUCT in order to focus on addressing the impacts of Hurricane Beryl in its service territory and accelerating preparedness and resiliency efforts for the remaining storm season, and the withdrawal granted by the PUCT. On August 5, 2024, Houston Electric announced the launch of its GHRI. Subsequently, Houston Electric announced the completion of core resiliency actions as part of the first phase of its GHRI, which included certain vegetation management and pole installation goals. In September 2024, Houston Electric announced the launch of the second phase of its GHRI, which included a series of resiliency plans to install new poles, manage higher-risk vegetation and install certain automated devices prior to the start of the 2025 hurricane season as part of its efforts to strengthen grid resiliency, improve public and customer communications and strengthen local, community and emergency partnerships. Following feedback from customers, external experts and other stakeholders, including elected officials and local agencies, Houston Electric filed the SRP with the PUCT on January 31, 2025, which proposes investing approximately $5.75 billion over a three-year period for transmission and distribution infrastructure, information technology and cybersecurity assets, and event response capability.
52
Houston Electric announced on August 28, 2024 its proposal to forego approximately $110 million of profit related to its storm hardening and TEEEF efforts, which would be represented by (1) Houston Electric not seeking to recover approximately $70 million in incremental storm hardening costs incurred in connection with accelerated operational activities after Hurricane Beryl; and (2) Houston Electric not filing, beginning in 2028, for approximately $40 million in anticipated equity profit associated with load-shed orientated TEEEF leased by Houston Electric through the remaining regulatory life of the leases in 2032 as new dispatchable generation is likely to come online in the state of Texas as a result of the Texas Energy Fund. Additionally, on December 19, 2024, Houston Electric announced a proposal to release Houston Electric’s 15 large 27 MW to 32 MW TEEEF units to the San Antonio area prior to the summer of 2025 in an effort to help ERCOT address a potential energy shortfall and Load Shed risk and to provide additional electric generation capacity to support growing energy demand in the greater San Antonio region. Under the proposal, Houston Electric would not receive revenue or profit from ERCOT and would also not charge Houston-area customers for these TEEEF units for the period when they are in San Antonio serving ERCOT, which is currently expected to be for a period of up to two years. Houston Electric would anticipate receiving revenues from one or more future transactions after the period the units are utilized to temporarily serve an energy need in the San Antonio area, and would therefore plan to continue to not charge customers for these units for any future periods. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, Houston Electric estimates that the value of the TEEEF units to be removed from the rate base as a result of the aforementioned proposal will be approximately $375 million. The proposal has not been finalized and is subject to the negotiation of definitive documentation among the relevant parties, as well as being subject to the approval of ERCOT and other stakeholders. It is not certain that mutually agreeable definitive documentation will be entered into at all or that all approvals will be obtained.
For more information, see Note 7, 12 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
Equity Transactions. On August 9, 2024, CenterPoint Energy issued 9,754,194 shares of Common Stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $25.36 per share, for net proceeds of $247 million after deducting issuance costs. For further information, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
On January 10, 2024, CenterPoint Energy entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with certain financial institutions with respect to the offering and sale from time to time of shares of Common Stock, having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $500 million. Sales of Common Stock may be made by any method permitted by applicable law and deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. CenterPoint Energy may also enter into one or more forward sales agreements pursuant to master forward confirmations. During the year ended December 31, 2024, CenterPoint Energy issued 8,790,848 shares of Common Stock through the ATM Managers under the Equity Distribution Agreement, representing aggregate cash proceeds of $247 million, which was net of compensation paid by CenterPoint Energy to the ATM Managers of $2 million. As of December 31, 2024, CenterPoint Energy had not entered into any forward sale agreements under the at-the-market program. Additionally, as of December 31, 2024, CenterPoint Energy had $250 million of remaining capacity available under the program. For further information, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Assets Held for Sale. On February 19, 2024, CERC Corp. entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses. The purchase price for the Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses is $1.2 billion and subject to adjustment as set forth in the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement, including adjustments based on net working capital, regulatory assets and liabilities and capital expenditures at closing. The transaction is not subject to a financing condition and is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of 2025, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions. The businesses include approximately 12,000 miles of main pipeline in Louisiana and Mississippi serving more than 300,000 customers. The Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses are reflected in CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment and CERC’s single reportable segment, as applicable. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Regulatory Proceedings. For further information, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. For information related to our pending and completed regulatory proceedings to date in 2024 and to date in 2025, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
Debt Transactions. In 2024, CenterPoint Energy issued or borrowed a combined $4.0 billion in new debt, including Houston Electric’s issuance of $900 million aggregate principal amount of general mortgage bonds and a $500 million term loan, CERC’s issuance of $400 million principal amount of senior notes, SIGECO’s issuance of $160 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds, and CenterPoint Energy’s issuance of $700 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes and $1.3 billion aggregate principal amount of junior subordinated notes. During 2024, CenterPoint Energy repaid or redeemed a combined $0.9 billion of debt, including $500 million of its senior notes, $350 million of its floating rate senior notes and $22 million of SIGECO’s first mortgage bonds. For further information about debt transactions in 2024, see Note 12
53
to the consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events. On January 29, 2025, CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric, CERC and SIGECO each entered into Extension Agreements to, among other things, extend the maturity date of the lenders’ commitments under each of their respective Credit Agreements by one year, from December 6, 2027 to December 6, 2028.
Additionally, on January 31, 2025, SIGECO issued $165 million aggregate principal amount of 5.69% First Mortgage Bonds, Series 2025A, Tranche A due 2055. Total net proceeds from SIGECO’s January 2025 issuance of first mortgage bonds, net of transaction expenses and fees, were approximately $164 million, which will be used for the acquisition of Posey Solar.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
Our past earnings and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future earnings and results of operations. The magnitude of our future earnings and results of our operations will depend on or be affected by numerous factors that apply to all Registrants unless otherwise indicated including:
•The business strategies and strategic initiatives, restructurings, joint ventures and acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses involving us or our industry, including the ability to successfully complete such strategies, initiatives, transactions or plans on the timelines we expect or at all, such as the announced sale of our Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses, which we cannot assure will have the anticipated benefits to us;
•industrial, commercial and residential growth in our service territories and changes in market demand, including in relation to the expansion of data centers, energy export facilities, including hydrogen facilities, electrification of industrial processes and transport and logistics, as well as the effects of energy efficiency measures and demographic patterns;
•our ability to fund and invest planned capital and the timely recovery of our investments, including the timing of and amounts sought for those related to Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan as part of its IRPs and Houston Electric’s GHRI and SRP;
•our ability to successfully construct, operate, repair and maintain electric generating facilities, natural gas facilities, TEEEF and electric transmission facilities, including complying with applicable environmental standards and the implementation of a well-balanced energy and resource mix, as appropriate;
•timely and appropriate rate actions that allow and authorize timely recovery of costs and a reasonable return on investment, including the timing of and amounts sought for recovery of Houston Electric’s TEEEF leases and restoration costs relating to the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl, and requested or favorable adjustments to rates and approval of other requested items as part of base rate proceedings;
•our ability to finalize Houston Electric’s proposal to release its 15 large 27 MW to 32 MW TEEEF units to the San Antonio area and complete one or more other future transactions involving the units on acceptable terms and conditions within the anticipated timeframe;
•economic conditions in regional and national markets, including changes to inflation and interest rates, and their effect on sales, prices and costs;
•weather variations and other natural phenomena, including the impact of severe weather events on operations, capital, legislation and/or regulations, such as in connection with the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl;
•volatility in the markets for natural gas as a result of, among other factors, tariffs, legislation, bans, potential retaliatory trade measures taken against the United States or related governmental action, as well as armed conflicts, including the conflict in the Middle East and any broader related conflict, and the conflict in Ukraine, and the related sanctions on certain Russian entities;
•disruptions to the global supply chain, including as a result of volatility in commodity prices, trade agreements, geopolitical and economic uncertainty, regulatory and policy instability, severe weather events, tariffs, bans, retaliatory trade measures, legislation and governmental action impacting the supply chain, that could prevent CenterPoint Energy from securing the resources needed to, among other things, fully execute on its 10-year capital plan or achieve its net zero and GHG emissions reduction goals;
•non-payment for our services due to financial distress of our customers and the ability of our customers, including REPs, to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC, and the negative impact on such ability related to adverse economic conditions and severe weather events;
•public health threats, and their effect on our operations, business and financial condition, our industries and the communities we serve, U.S. and world financial markets and supply chains, potential regulatory actions and changes in customer and stakeholder behavior relating thereto;
•state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments affecting various aspects of our businesses, including, among others, any actions resulting from the May 2024 Storm Events and/or Hurricane Beryl, energy
54
deregulation or re-regulation, pipeline integrity and safety and changes in regulation and legislation pertaining to trade, health care, finance and actions regarding the rates charged by our regulated businesses;
•our ability to execute Houston Electric’s GHRI and SRP;
•direct or indirect effects on our facilities, resources, operations, reputation and financial condition resulting from terrorism, cyberattacks or intrusions, data security breaches or other attempts to disrupt our businesses or the businesses of third parties, or other catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, leaks, floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, derecho events, ice storms and other severe weather events, terrorism, wildfires, pandemic health events, geopolitical conflict or other occurrences;
•risks relating to potential wildfires, including damages to our network and losses in excess of insurance liability coverage;
•tax legislation, including the effects of or changes to or the repeal of the IRA (which includes but is not limited to any potential changes to tax rates, CAMT imposed, tax credits and/or interest deductibility), as well as any changes in tax laws under the current or future administrations, and uncertainties involving state commissions’ and local municipalities’ regulatory requirements and determinations regarding the treatment of EDIT and our rates;
•our ability to mitigate weather impacts through normalization or rate mechanisms, and the effectiveness of such mechanisms;
•actions by credit rating agencies, including any potential downgrades to credit ratings;
•matters affecting regulatory approval, legislative actions, construction, implementation of necessary technology or other issues with respect to major capital projects that result in delays or cancellation or in costs that cannot be recouped in rates;
•local, state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments relating to the environment, including, among others, those related to global climate change, air emissions, GHG emissions, carbon emissions, wastewater discharges and the handling and disposal of CCR that could impact operations, cost recovery of generation plant costs and related assets, and CenterPoint Energy’s net zero and GHG emissions reduction goals;
•the impact of unplanned facility outages or other closures;
•the sufficiency of our insurance coverage, including availability, cost, coverage and terms and ability to recover claims;
•the availability and prices of raw materials and services and changes in labor for current and future construction projects and operations and maintenance costs, including our ability to control such costs;
•impacts from CenterPoint Energy’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, such as the investment performance and increases to net periodic costs as a result of plan settlements and changes in assumptions, including discount rates;
•changes in interest rates and their impact on costs of borrowing and the valuation of CenterPoint Energy’s pension benefit obligation;
•commercial bank and financial market conditions, including disruptions in the banking industry, our access to capital, the cost of such capital, the results of our financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in the debt capital markets, and impacts on our vendors, customers and suppliers;
•inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations to us;
•the extent and effectiveness of our risk management activities;
•timely and appropriate regulatory actions, which include actions allowing requested securitization for any hurricanes or other severe weather events, such as the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl, or natural disasters or other amounts sought for recovery of costs, including stranded coal-fired generation asset costs;
•our ability to attract, effectively transition, motivate and retain management and key employees and maintain good labor relations;
•changes in technology, particularly with respect to efficient battery storage or the emergence or growth of new, developing or alternative sources of generation, and their adoption by consumers, and our ability to anticipate and adapt to technological changes;
•our success in adopting, developing and deploying AI;
•the impact of climate change and alternate energy sources on the demand for natural gas and electricity generated or transmitted by us;
•the timing and outcome of any audits, disputes and other proceedings related to taxes;
•the recording of impairment charges;
•political and economic developments and actions, including energy and environmental policies under the new presidential administration;
•CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its strategy, initiatives, targets and goals, including its net zero and GHG emissions reduction goals and its operations and maintenance expenditure goals;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event and Hurricane Beryl;
•the effect of changes in and application of accounting standards and pronouncements; and
•other factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report and in other reports that the Registrants file from time to time with the SEC.
55
56
CENTERPOINT ENERGY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity and natural gas. CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates its subsidiaries charge, debt service costs, income tax expense, its subsidiaries ability to collect receivables from REPs and customers and its ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, read “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Income available to common shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 671 | $ | 654 | $ | 603 | $ | 17 | $ | 51 | |||||||||
| Natural Gas | 564 | 533 | 492 | 31 | 41 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Utility Operations | 1,235 | 1,187 | 1,095 | 48 | 92 | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate & Other (1) | (216) | (320) | (87) | 104 | (233) | ||||||||||||||
| Total CenterPoint Energy | $ | 1,019 | $ | 867 | $ | 1,008 | $ | 152 | $ | (141) |
(1)Includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services through Energy Systems Group through the date of sale on June 30, 2023, unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense, intercompany eliminations and the reduction of income allocated to preferred shareholders through September 1, 2023, the date of the redemption of all of the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock.
2024 Compared to 2023
CenterPoint Energy reported income available to common shareholders of $1,019 million for 2024 compared to income available to common shareholders of $867 million for 2023.
Income available to common shareholders increased $152 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $17 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $31 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $104 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to $50 million of income allocated to holders of Series A Preferred Stock in 2023 prior to the redemption of all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock in September 2023 as discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, a loss on sale of $13 million and current tax expense of $32 million related to the divestiture of Energy Systems Group recorded in 2023 further discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, $19 million due to remeasurement of deferred income tax balances recorded during 2023, as well as $8 million due to lower state income taxes. The remaining variance is due largely to an increase in borrowing costs.
2023 Compared to 2022
CenterPoint Energy reported income available to common shareholders of $867 million for 2023 compared to income available to common shareholders of $1,008 million for 2022.
Income available to common shareholders decreased $141 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $51 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $41 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
•a decrease in income available to common shareholders of $233 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to a pre-tax net gain of $86 million on the sale of Energy Transfer equity securities in 2022 further discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, partially offset by $45 million of costs associated with early redemption of long-term debt in first quarter 2022. The decrease is also due to a loss on sale of $13 million and current tax expense of
57
$32 million related to the divestiture of Energy Systems Group further discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, as well as $19 million due to remeasurement of deferred income tax balances. The remaining variance is due largely to an increase in borrowing costs.
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
58
CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT
CenterPoint Energy’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for the reportable segments. Segment results include inter-segment interest income and expense, which may result in inter-segment profit and loss.
The following discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations is separated into two reportable segments, Electric and Natural Gas.
Electric (CenterPoint Energy)
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,590 | $ | 4,290 | $ | 4,108 | $ | 300 | $ | 182 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 198 | 176 | 222 | (22) | 46 | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 2,072 | 1,880 | 1,864 | (192) | (16) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 877 | 872 | 793 | (5) | (79) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 304 | 272 | 275 | (32) | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,451 | 3,200 | 3,154 | (251) | (46) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 1,139 | 1,090 | 954 | 49 | 136 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (372) | (303) | (235) | (69) | (68) | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 61 | 56 | 31 | 5 | 25 | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 828 | 843 | 750 | (15) | 93 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 157 | 189 | 147 | 32 | (42) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 671 | $ | 654 | $ | 603 | $ | 17 | $ | 51 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 34,190 | 35,166 | 35,074 | (3) | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 110,831 | 108,766 | 105,541 | 2 | % | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of normal weather for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 115 | % | 114 | % | 110 | % | 1 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 76 | % | 90 | % | 121 | % | (14) | % | (31) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,640,150 | 2,588,510 | 2,534,730 | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,971,730 | 2,916,028 | 2,858,203 | 2 | % | 2 | % |
59
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Electric reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | $ | 143 | $ | 167 | |||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 217 | 122 | |||||
| Customer growth | 26 | 26 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in operation and maintenance below | 5 | — | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | (20) | (5) | |||||
| Pass-through revenues, offset in operation and maintenance below | (5) | (13) | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues, including service connections and off-system sales | 1 | (14) | |||||
| Lost revenues as a result of outages associated with Hurricane Beryl | (10) | — | |||||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items below | (70) | (27) | |||||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts | (9) | (28) | |||||
| Cost of fuel and purchased power, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | 22 | (46) | |||||
| Total | $ | 300 | $ | 182 | |||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||||||
| Cost of purchased power, offset in revenues above | $ | (87) | $ | 30 | |||
| Cost of fuel, including coal, natural gas, and fuel oil, offset in revenues above | 65 | 16 | |||||
| Total | $ | (22) | $ | 46 | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (124) | $ | (26) | |||
| Incremental storm expenses, including storm hardening expenses incurred in connection with accelerated operational activities after Hurricane Beryl | (112) | — | |||||
| Contract services | 16 | (21) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | (1) | 3 | |||||
| Corporate support services | — | (8) | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 4 | 7 | |||||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | 25 | 29 | |||||
| Total | $ | (192) | $ | (16) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (79) | $ | (106) | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items | 74 | 27 | |||||
| Total | $ | (5) | $ | (79) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of updated property tax rates | $ | (26) | $ | 2 | |||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | (6) | 1 | |||||
| Total | $ | (32) | $ | 3 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (63) | $ | (76) | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items above | (4) | (4) | |||||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | (2) | 12 | |||||
| Total | $ | (69) | $ | (68) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | $ | 5 | $ | 21 | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items above | — | 4 | |||||
| Total | $ | 5 | $ | 25 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
60
Natural Gas (CenterPoint Energy)
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,048 | $ | 4,279 | $ | 4,946 | $ | (231) | $ | (667) | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas and fuel | 1,520 | 1,888 | 2,665 | 368 | 777 | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 3 | 3 | 4 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 881 | 949 | 919 | 68 | (30) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 542 | 513 | 466 | (29) | (47) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 237 | 245 | 261 | 8 | 16 | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,183 | 3,598 | 4,315 | 415 | 717 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 865 | 681 | 631 | 184 | 50 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | — | — | 303 | — | (303) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (207) | (188) | (137) | (19) | (51) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 14 | 15 | (62) | (1) | 77 | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 672 | 508 | 735 | 164 | (227) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 108 | (25) | 243 | (133) | 268 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 564 | $ | 533 | $ | 492 | $ | 31 | $ | 41 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in Bcf): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 189 | 199 | 240 | (5) | % | (17) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 426 | 418 | 424 | 2 | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 615 | 617 | 664 | — | % | (7) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 78 | % | 86 | % | 106 | % | (8) | % | (20) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 4,063,928 | 4,010,113 | 3,964,221 | 1 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 304,606 | 303,841 | 301,834 | — | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 4,368,534 | 4,313,954 | 4,266,055 | 1 | % | 1 | % |
61
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas and fuel below | $ | (368) | $ | (754) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | (38) | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | 1 | (17) | |||||
| Weather and usage | (11) | (7) | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue | (7) | 14 | |||||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in operation and maintenance below | (20) | 17 | |||||
| Non-utility revenues | 15 | 18 | |||||
| Customer growth | 14 | 20 | |||||
| Customer rates | 145 | 80 | |||||
| Total | $ | (231) | $ | (667) | |||
| Utility natural gas and fuel | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | $ | 368 | $ | 754 | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 23 | |||||
| Total | $ | 368 | $ | 777 | |||
| Non-utility costs of revenues, including natural gas | |||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | $ | — | $ | 1 | |||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 1 | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| All other operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | $ | 23 | $ | (36) | |||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | 20 | (17) | |||||
| Contract services | (6) | (3) | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 3 | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 8 | 11 | |||||
| Corporate support services | 23 | 12 | |||||
| Total | $ | 68 | $ | (30) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (29) | $ | (49) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 2 | |||||
| Total | $ | (29) | $ | (47) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues above | $ | (1) | $ | 17 | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 1 | |||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of updated property tax rates | 9 | (2) | |||||
| Total | $ | 8 | $ | 16 | |||
| Gain on Sale | |||||||
| Gain on Sale of Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses in 2022 | $ | — | $ | (303) | |||
| Total | $ | — | $ | (303) | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (12) | $ | (59) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | (7) | 8 | |||||
| Total | $ | (19) | $ | (51) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Changes to non-service benefit cost, primarily settlement cost incurred in 2022 | $ | 3 | $ | 60 | |||
| Other income, including AFUDC - Equity | 3 | 10 | |||||
| Other | (7) | 7 | |||||
| Total | $ | (1) | $ | 77 |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
62
HOUSTON ELECTRIC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Houston Electric’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. Houston Electric consists of a single reportable segment. Houston Electric’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Houston Electric’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates Houston Electric charges, debt service costs, income tax expense, Houston Electric’s ability to collect receivables from REPs and Houston Electric’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of Houston Electric’s consolidated operations, read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
The following table provides summary data of Houston Electric’s single reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
| TDU | $ | 3,862 | $ | 3,514 | $ | 3,205 | $ | 348 | $ | 309 | ||||||||
| Bond Companies | 77 | 163 | 207 | (86) | (44) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 3,939 | 3,677 | 3,412 | 262 | 265 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | 1,923 | 1,669 | 1,647 | (254) | (22) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | 688 | 593 | 479 | (95) | (114) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 295 | 262 | 261 | (33) | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Bond Companies | 78 | 159 | 194 | 81 | 35 | |||||||||||||
| Total | 2,984 | 2,683 | 2,581 | (301) | (102) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 955 | 994 | 831 | (39) | 163 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (311) | (259) | (202) | (52) | (57) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | (3) | (8) | (13) | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 43 | 34 | 19 | 9 | 15 | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 684 | 761 | 635 | (77) | 126 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 138 | 168 | 125 | 30 | (43) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 546 | $ | 593 | $ | 510 | $ | (47) | $ | 83 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 32,769 | 33,830 | 33,676 | (3) | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 106,014 | 103,862 | 100,062 | 2 | % | 4 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 115 | % | 114 | % | 110 | % | 1 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 92 | % | 92 | % | 120 | % | — | % | (28) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,506,284 | 2,455,309 | 2,402,329 | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,818,343 | 2,763,535 | 2,706,598 | 2 | % | 2 | % |
63
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for Houston Electric:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | $ | 153 | $ | 187 | |||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 217 | 120 | |||||
| Customer growth | 25 | 25 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 5 | 1 | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues | 1 | (4) | |||||
| Lost revenues as a result of outages associated with Hurricane Beryl | (10) | — | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | (19) | (5) | |||||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts | (24) | (15) | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items below | (86) | (44) | |||||
| Total | $ | 262 | $ | 265 | |||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (124) | $ | (26) | |||
| Incremental storm expenses, including storm hardening expenses incurred in connection with accelerated operational activities after Hurricane Beryl | (112) | — | |||||
| Contract services | 7 | (23) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues above | (6) | (8) | |||||
| Corporate support services | (2) | (6) | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 1 | 3 | |||||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | (18) | 38 | |||||
| Total | $ | (254) | $ | (22) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (95) | $ | (114) | |||
| Total | $ | (95) | $ | (114) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | $ | (7) | $ | (2) | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of changes to tax rates | (26) | 1 | |||||
| Total | $ | (33) | $ | (1) | |||
| Bond Companies expense | |||||||
| Operations and maintenance and depreciation expense, offset in revenues above | $ | 81 | $ | 35 | |||
| Total | $ | 81 | $ | 35 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (55) | $ | (64) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 3 | 7 | |||||
| Total | $ | (52) | $ | (57) | |||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | |||||||
| Lower outstanding principal balance, offset in revenues above | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | |||
| Total | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | |||
| Other income, net | |||||||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | $ | 9 | $ | 11 | |||
| Bond Companies | — | 4 | |||||
| Total | $ | 9 | $ | 15 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
64
CERC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CERC’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. CERC consists of a single reportable segment. CERC’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for natural gas. CERC’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various federal, state and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates CERC charges, debt service costs and income tax expense, CERC’s ability to collect receivables from customers and CERC’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of CERC’s consolidated operations, read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
The following table provides summary data of CERC’s single reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 3,925 | $ | 4,149 | $ | 4,800 | $ | (224) | $ | (651) | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas | 1,489 | 1,856 | 2,607 | 367 | 751 | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 3 | 3 | 4 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 848 | 904 | 886 | 56 | (18) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 522 | 493 | 448 | (29) | (45) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 234 | 243 | 257 | 9 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,096 | 3,499 | 4,202 | 403 | 703 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 829 | 650 | 598 | 179 | 52 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | — | — | 557 | — | (557) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (197) | (178) | (130) | (19) | (48) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 12 | 14 | (64) | (2) | 78 | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 644 | 486 | 961 | 158 | (475) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 104 | (26) | 236 | (130) | 262 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 540 | $ | 512 | $ | 725 | $ | 28 | $ | (213) | ||||||||
| Throughput (in BCF): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 184 | 194 | 233 | (5) | % | (17) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and Industrial | 390 | 386 | 389 | 1 | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 574 | 580 | 622 | (1) | % | (7) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 78 | % | 86 | % | 106 | % | (8) | % | (20) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 3,958,584 | 3,905,388 | 3,859,726 | 1 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and Industrial | 293,959 | 293,235 | 291,184 | — | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 4,252,543 | 4,198,623 | 4,150,910 | 1 | % | 1 | % |
65
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for CERC:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 to 2023 | 2023 to 2022 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | $ | (367) | $ | (728) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | (38) | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | 1 | (15) | |||||
| Weather and usage | (9) | (7) | |||||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in operation and maintenance below | (10) | 8 | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue | (6) | 13 | |||||
| Non-utility revenues | 15 | 18 | |||||
| Customer growth | 13 | 20 | |||||
| Customer rates | 139 | 78 | |||||
| Total | $ | (224) | $ | (651) | |||
| Utility natural gas | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | $ | 367 | $ | 728 | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 23 | |||||
| Total | $ | 367 | $ | 751 | |||
| Non-utility costs of revenues, including natural gas | |||||||
| Other, primarily non-utility cost of revenues | $ | — | $ | 1 | |||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 1 | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| All other operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | $ | 21 | $ | (36) | |||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | 10 | (8) | |||||
| Contract services | (6) | — | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 3 | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 8 | 11 | |||||
| Corporate support services | 23 | 12 | |||||
| Total | $ | 56 | $ | (18) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (29) | $ | (47) | |||
| Indiana lower depreciation rates from recent rate order | — | — | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 2 | |||||
| Total | $ | (29) | $ | (45) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues above | $ | (1) | $ | 15 | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 1 | |||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of updated property tax rates | 10 | (2) | |||||
| Total | $ | 9 | $ | 14 | |||
| Gain on sale | |||||||
| Net gain on sale of Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses | $ | — | $ | (557) | |||
| Total | $ | — | $ | (557) | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (11) | $ | (56) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | (8) | 8 | |||||
| Total | $ | (19) | $ | (48) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Changes to non-service benefit cost, primarily settlement cost incurred in 2022 | $ | 3 | $ | 60 | |||
| Other income, including AFUDC - Equity | 3 | 9 | |||||
| Other | (8) | 9 | |||||
| Total | $ | (2) | $ | 78 |
66
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ cash flows by category for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 2,139 | $ | 960 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 3,877 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 2,312 | $ | 1,810 | $ | 966 | $ | 856 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (4,489) | (2,767) | (1,419) | (4,233) | (2,503) | (1,643) | (1,628) | (2,435) | 406 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing activities | 2,271 | 1,732 | 352 | 374 | 1,103 | (668) | (345) | 1,324 | (1,277) |
Operating Activities. The following items contributed to increased (decreased) net cash provided by operating activities:
| 2024 compared to 2023 | 2023 compared to 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in net income after adjusting for non-cash items | $ | 315 | $ | (132) | $ | 153 | $ | 394 | $ | 235 | $ | 170 | ||||||||||
| Changes in working capital | (134) | 195 | (83) | 917 | 229 | 358 | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes in current regulatory assets and liabilities (1) | (1,238) | (4) | (1,183) | 1,085 | 26 | 986 | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes in non-current regulatory assets and liabilities | (535) | (472) | (85) | (276) | (115) | (78) | ||||||||||||||||
| Lower pension contribution | 2 | — | — | 3 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (148) | (28) | (46) | (56) | 60 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (1,738) | $ | (441) | $ | (1,244) | $ | 2,067 | $ | 435 | $ | 1,456 |
(1)This change is primarily related to the receipt of proceeds at CenterPoint Energy and CERC from the issuance of customer rate relief bonds Texas by the Natural Gas Securitization Finance Corporation in 2023. For further details, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Investing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in investing activities:
| 2024 compared to 2023 | 2023 compared to 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of equity securities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (702) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Net change in capital expenditures | (112) | (363) | 180 | 18 | 157 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes receivable from affiliated companies | — | 108 | 2 | — | (238) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from divestitures | (144) | — | — | (1,931) | — | (2,075) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | (9) | 42 | 10 | 13 | (15) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (256) | $ | (264) | $ | 224 | $ | (2,605) | $ | (68) | $ | (2,049) |
67
Financing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash provided by (used in) financing activities:
| 2024 compared to 2023 | 2023 compared to 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in commercial paper outstanding | $ | 516 | $ | — | $ | 436 | $ | (981) | $ | — | $ | (227) | ||||||||||
| Net changes in proceeds from issuance of Common Stock | 494 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in long-term debt and term loans outstanding, excluding commercial paper | 51 | (6) | 725 | 2,560 | 373 | (778) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in debt and equity issuance costs | 20 | 5 | 11 | (19) | 4 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in short-term borrowings | 6 | — | 6 | (462) | — | (462) | ||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of Series A Preferred Stock | 800 | — | — | (800) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Increased payment of Common Stock dividends | (37) | — | — | (45) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Decreased (increased) payment of preferred stock dividends | 50 | — | — | (1) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Payment of obligation for finance lease | — | — | — | 485 | 485 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes payable from affiliated companies | — | 642 | — | — | (772) | 1,517 | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in contribution from parent | — | (41) | (210) | — | (258) | 211 | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in dividend to parent | — | 28 | 54 | — | (51) | 348 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (3) | 1 | (2) | (18) | (2) | — | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 1,897 | $ | 629 | $ | 1,020 | $ | 719 | $ | (221) | $ | 609 |
Future Sources and Uses of Cash
Material Current and Long-term Cash Requirements. The liquidity and capital requirements of the Registrants are affected primarily by results of operations, capital expenditures, storm restoration costs, debt service requirements, tax payments, working capital needs and various regulatory actions. Capital expenditures (other than expenditures associated with the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl) are expected to be used for investment in infrastructure. These capital expenditures are anticipated to enhance reliability and safety, increase resiliency and expand our systems through value-added projects. Substantial capital expenditures are also expected for restoration costs associated with Hurricane Beryl, as further described below. In addition to dividend payments on CenterPoint Energy’s Common Stock and interest payments on debt, the Registrants’ principal anticipated cash requirements for 2025 include the following:
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||
| Estimated capital expenditures (1) | $ | 4,802 | $ | 2,560 | $ | 1,391 | |||||
| Estimated restoration costs associated with May 2024 Storm Events (2) | 34 | 34 | — | ||||||||
| Estimated restoration costs associated with Hurricane Beryl (2) | 102 | 102 | — | ||||||||
| Scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds | 13 | — | — | ||||||||
| Expected contributions to pension plans and other postretirement plans | 120 | 1 | 5 |
(1)Excludes expenditures for the restoration costs associated with the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl.
(2)Represents cash requirements associated with estimated storm restoration costs for 2025.
The Registrants expect that anticipated cash needs for 2025 will be met with borrowings under their credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, including the issuance of non-recourse securitization bonds at Houston Electric related to costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2024 due to the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl, anticipated cash flows from operations, and, with respect to CenterPoint Energy and CERC, proceeds from commercial paper and the sale of the Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses, if and when completed (the transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025). Issuances of debt securities in the capital markets, funds raised in the commercial paper markets, term loans and additional credit facilities may not, however, be available on acceptable terms. The Registrants may, from time to time, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire their outstanding debt securities through open market purchases, tender offers or pursuant to the terms of such securities.
For more information regarding the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl, see Notes 7, 12 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements as well as “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
68
The following table sets forth the Registrants’ estimates of the Registrants’ capital expenditures currently planned for projects for 2025 through 2029. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for CenterPoint Energy’s actual capital expenditures by reportable segment for 2024.
| 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 3,306 | $ | 4,358 | $ | 4,266 | $ | 4,106 | $ | 2,728 | ||||||||||
| Natural Gas | 1,465 | 1,604 | 1,469 | 1,344 | 1,327 | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 31 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,802 | $ | 5,982 | $ | 5,755 | $ | 5,470 | $ | 4,075 | ||||||||||
| Houston Electric (1) | $ | 2,560 | $ | 3,432 | $ | 4,008 | $ | 3,904 | $ | 2,546 | ||||||||||
| CERC (1) | $ | 1,391 | $ | 1,486 | $ | 1,391 | $ | 1,271 | $ | 1,254 |
(1)Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
Capital Expenditures for Climate-Related Projects. As part of its approximately $47.5 billion 10-year capital expenditure plan, which concludes in 2030, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in lower-emissions energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation.
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ material current and long-term cash requirements as of December 31, 2024:
| 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds (1) | $ | 13 | $ | 14 | $ | 14 | $ | 15 | $ | 16 | $ | 252 | $ | 324 | ||||||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) (2) | 51 | 2,260 | 1,306 | 2,048 | 919 | 13,738 | 20,322 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (3) | 16 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 85 | 159 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (3) | 967 | 937 | 852 | 771 | 671 | 7,596 | 11,794 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 500 | — | — | — | — | — | 500 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (4) | 805 | 822 | 664 | 578 | 555 | 3,059 | 6,483 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 2,352 | $ | 4,049 | $ | 2,851 | $ | 3,426 | $ | 2,174 | $ | 24,730 | $ | 39,582 | ||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) | $ | — | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 500 | $ | — | $ | 7,313 | $ | 8,413 | |||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (3) | 378 | 351 | 339 | 335 | 309 | 3,809 | 5,521 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 500 | — | — | — | — | — | 500 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 878 | $ | 651 | $ | 639 | $ | 835 | $ | 309 | $ | 11,122 | $ | 14,434 | ||||||||||||
| CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt (1) | $ | 10 | $ | 60 | $ | 625 | $ | 1,230 | $ | 30 | $ | 3,260 | $ | 5,215 | ||||||||||||
| Interest payments — long-term debt (3) | 251 | 250 | 246 | 188 | 156 | 1,071 | 2,162 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (4) | 631 | 597 | 513 | 470 | 456 | 1,544 | 4,211 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 892 | $ | 907 | $ | 1,384 | $ | 1,888 | $ | 642 | $ | 5,875 | $ | 11,588 |
(1)Balances reflect aggregate principal amounts outstanding and do not include unamortized discounts, premiums or issuance costs. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
(2)ZENS obligations are included in the 2029 column at their contingent principal amount of $9 million as of December 31, 2024. These obligations are exchangeable for cash at any time at the option of the holders for 95% of the current value of the reference shares attributable to each ZENS ($558 million as of December 31, 2024), as discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
(3)The Registrants calculated estimated interest payments for long-term debt as follows: for fixed-rate debt and term debt, the Registrants calculated interest based on the applicable rates and payment dates; for variable-rate debt and/or non-term debt, the Registrants used interest rates in place as of December 31, 2024. The Registrants typically expect to settle such interest payments with cash flows from operations and short-term borrowings.
(4)For a discussion of commodity and other commitments, see Note 14(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
The table above does not include the following:
69
•estimated future payments for expected future AROs primarily estimated to be incurred after 2029. See Note 3(c) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•expected contributions to pension plans and other postretirement plans in 2025. See Note 8(g) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•operating leases. See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for tax-exempt long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy as discussed in Note 12 and guarantees as discussed in Note 14(c) to the consolidated financial statements) and short-term leases, the Registrants have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Regulatory Matters
Houston Electric TEEEF
For information about Houston Electric’s TEEEF, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Hurricane Beryl
For information about Hurricane Beryl, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
May 2024 Storm Events
For information about May 2024 Storm Events, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
February 2021 Winter Storm Event
For information about the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Indiana Electric Securitization of Generation Retirements (CenterPoint Energy)
For further information about the issuance of SIGECO Securitization Bonds, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Indiana Electric CPCN (CenterPoint Energy)
BTAs
On February 23, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to purchase the Posey Solar project. On October 27, 2021, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the Posey Solar project through a BTA to acquire its solar array assets for a fixed purchase price and approved recovery of costs via a levelized rate over the anticipated 35-year life. Due to community feedback and rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Indiana Electric, along with Arevon, the developer, announced plans in January 2022 to downsize the Posey Solar project to 191 MW. Indiana Electric collaboratively agreed to the scope change, and on February 1, 2023, Indiana Electric entered into an amended and restated BTA that was contingent on further IURC review and approval. On February 7, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to approve the amended BTA. With the passage of the IRA, Indiana Electric can now pursue PTCs for solar projects. Indiana Electric requested that project costs, net of PTCs, be recovered in rate base rather than a levelized rate, through base rates or the CECA mechanism, depending on which provides more timely recovery. On September 6, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN. The Posey Solar project is expected to be placed in service in the second quarter of 2025 and recovered through base rates.
On July 5, 2022, Indiana Electric entered into a BTA to acquire a 130 MW solar array in Pike County, Indiana through a special purpose entity for a capped purchase price. A CPCN for the project was filed with the IURC on July 29, 2022. On September 21, 2022, an agreement in principle was reached resolving all the issues between Indiana Electric and OUCC. The Stipulation and Settlement agreement was filed on October 6, 2022 and a settlement hearing was held on November 1, 2022. On January 11, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the settlement agreement authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase and acquire the Pike County Solar project through a BTA and approved the estimated cost. The IURC also designated the
70
project as a clean energy project under applicable Indiana regulations, approved the proposed levelized rate and associated ratemaking and accounting treatment. Due to inflationary pressures, the developer disclosed that costs exceeded the agreed upon levels in the BTA. After negotiations, Indiana Electric and the developer were not able to agree upon updated pricing. As a result, on March 15, 2024, Indiana Electric provided notice to the IURC that it was exercising its right to terminate the BTA, which terminated all further obligations of Indiana Electric with respect to the project.
On January 10, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to acquire a wind energy generating facility with installed capacity of 200 MWs through a BTA, consistent with its 2019/2020 IRP that calls for up to 300 MWs of wind generation. The wind project is located in MISO’s Central Region. Indiana Electric received approval from the IURC to recover the costs of the wind facility via the CECA mechanism, which the developer believes can be placed in service by the end of 2026. On June 6, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, thereby authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the wind generating facility. However, as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, Indiana Electric has not entered into any definitive agreement relating to this wind energy generating facility, and it is not certain that a definitive agreement will be entered into at all.
PPAs
Indiana Electric also sought approval in February 2021 for a 100 MW solar PPA with Clenera, LLC in Warrick County, Indiana. The request accounted for increased cost of debt related to this PPA, which provides equivalent equity return to offset imputed debt during the 25-year life of the PPA. In October 2021, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar PPA but denied the request to preemptively offset imputed debt in the PPA cost. Due to rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Clenera, LLC and Indiana Electric were compelled to renegotiate terms of the agreement to increase the PPA price. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs are requested to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date would be delayed to 2026.
On August 25, 2021, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 185 MW of solar power, under a 15-year PPA, from Oriden, which is developing a solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, and 150 MW of solar power, under a 20-year PPA, from Origis, which is developing a solar project in Knox County, Indiana. On May 4, 2022, the IURC issued an order approving Indiana Electric to enter into both PPAs. In March 2022, when the results of the MISO interconnection study were completed, Origis advised Indiana Electric that the costs to construct the solar project in Knox County, Indiana had increased. The increase was largely driven by escalating commodity and supply chain costs impacting manufacturers worldwide. In August 2022, Indiana Electric and Origis entered into an amended PPA, which reiterated the terms contained in the previously approved Knox County solar PPA with certain modifications. On February 22, 2023, the IURC approved the Knox County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection delays, the project in-service date will be delayed to 2026. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved Vermillion County solar PPA with Oriden with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs were approved to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA with Oriden. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Vermillion County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date would be delayed to 2026.
On May 1, 2024, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 147 MW of wind power under a 25-year PPA with an affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc., which is developing a wind project in Knox County, Illinois. On November 6, 2024, the IURC approved the Knox County wind PPA, which provided for the recovery of the purchase power costs through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the PPA. The facility is targeted to be in operation in early 2026.
Natural Gas Combustion Turbines
On June 17, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to construct two natural gas combustion turbines to replace portions of its existing coal-fired generation fleet. On June 28, 2022, the IURC approved the CPCN. The estimated $334 million turbine facility is being constructed at the previous site of the A.B. Brown power plant in Posey County, Indiana and is expected to provide a combined output of 460 MW. Indiana Electric received approval for depreciation expense and post in-service carrying costs to be deferred in a regulatory asset until the date Indiana Electric’s base rates include a return on and recovery of depreciation expense on the facility. A new approximately 23.5 mile pipeline will be constructed and operated by Texas Gas Transmission, LLC to supply natural gas to the turbine facility. FERC granted a certificate to construct the pipeline on October 20, 2022. On January 7, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the
71
FERC’s order granting the certificate. Indiana Electric granted its contractor a full notice to proceed to construct the turbines on December 9, 2022. The facility is targeted to be operational by mid-year 2025. On February 6, 2025, the EPC contractor for Indiana Electric’s proposed natural gas combustion turbines provided a notice to Indiana Electric that the EPC contractor was identifying the impacts of the proposed tariffs on the project and intended to seek an equitable adjustment to the contract price for the project. Recovery of the proposed natural gas combustion turbines and regulatory asset was included in the forecasted test year in the Indiana Electric rate case, which was filed with the IURC on December 5, 2023. For more information on the Indiana Electric rate case, see “— Rate Change Applications” below.
For more information regarding uncertainties related to our solar projects, see Part I, Item 1A of this combined Form 10-K and “ —Solar Panel Issues” below.
Culley Unit 3 Operations
In June 2022, F.B. Culley Unit 3, an Indiana Electric coal-fired electric generation unit with an installed generating capacity of 270 MW, experienced an operating issue relating to its boiler feed pump turbine. The unit returned to service in March 2023. In testimony filed September 13, 2023, the OUCC and an intervenor that represents industrial customers filed testimony with the IURC alleging that Indiana Electric did not act prudently which led to the unplanned outage and recommended disallowances between $21 million to $27 million. On July 3, 2024, the IURC issued an order finding Indiana Electric acted reasonably and prudently with respect to the events that gave rise to the Culley Unit 3 outage and, in addition, did not approve the intervenors proposed disallowance. The order is now final and non-appealable.
Space City Solar Transmission Interconnection Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On December 17, 2020, Houston Electric filed a CCN with the PUCT for approval to build a 345 kV transmission line in Wharton County, Texas connecting the Hillje substation on Houston Electric’s transmission system to the planned 610 MW Space City Solar Generation facility being developed by third-party developer EDF Renewables. In November 2021, the PUCT approved a route that was estimated to cost $25 million and issued a final order on January 12, 2022. There have been project delays due to supply chain constraints in the developer acquiring solar panels. Houston Electric substantially completed construction in the fall of 2023, and the transmission line is expected to be energized shortly after the generation facility is complete, which is anticipated to occur in the first half of 2026.
Kilgore Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On August 30, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Chambers County, Texas that will loop the existing 138 kV Chevron to Langston circuit number 86 on Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Kilgore substation. On March 7, the PUCT issued a final order approving a route that was estimated to cost $60 million, including substation costs. The actual capital costs of the project, including the transmission line and the planned Kilgore substation, will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors. Completion of construction and energization of the line and substation is anticipated to occur in the second quarter of 2026.
Mill Creek Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On November 17, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Harris and Montgomery Counties, Texas that will connect Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Mill Creek substation. On November 21, 2024, the PUCT issued a final order approving a route estimated to cost $68 million. The actual capital costs of the project will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors. Completion of construction and energization of the line and substation is anticipated to occur in the first half of 2027.
Texas Legislation (CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC)
Houston Electric and CERC were affected by legislation passed in 2023 and associated PUCT rulemaking projects, including the following pieces of legislation that became law during the 88th Texas Legislature, including:
•House Bill 1500 became effective on September 1, 2023 and continues the functions of the PUCT, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and ERCOT through 2029. This bill also includes an amendment that clarifies the use cases under which TDUs may lease and operate temporary generation during “significant” power outages;
72
•House Bill 2263 became effective on June 12, 2023 and authorizes LDCs to offer programs to promote energy conservation and to recover costs prudently incurred to implement such programs under Railroad Commission authority;
•House Bill 2555 became effective on June 13, 2023 and allows an electric utility to file a transmission and distribution system resiliency plan with the PUCT and associated cost recovery to enhance its system through hardening, modernization, undergrounding certain lines, lightning mitigation measures, flood mitigation measures, information technology, cybersecurity, physical security, vegetation management and wildfire mitigation. On January 18, 2024, the PUCT issued an Order adopting its Resiliency Plan Rule (16 Tex. Admin. Code § 25.62);
•Senate Bill 947 became effective on September 1, 2023 and creates severe criminal offenses for intentional damage to critical infrastructure facilities that create extended power outages;
•Senate Bill 1015 became effective on June 18, 2023 and allows utilities to file the DCRF twice a year, on any day the PUCT is open (at least 185 days after filing a full base rate proceeding) and setting an administrative approval timeline of 60 days;
•Senate Bill 1016 became effective on May 5, 2023 and requires the PUCT to presume that all employee compensation and benefits are reasonable and necessary when establishing a utility’s rates if based upon market compensation studies issued within the last three years; it includes exceptions for utility officer incentives that are based on financial metrics. Certain incentive compensation that is in-line with market studies will be presumed reasonable and recoverable; and
•Senate Bill 1076 became effective on June 2, 2023 and moves the timeline for the PUCT to approve CCN for transmission projects to 180 days after the date of filing, rather than the first anniversary of the day it was filed.
The Registrants will monitor the 89th Texas Legislature for legislation that may impact their businesses.
Minnesota Legislation (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
The Natural Gas Innovation Act was passed by the Minnesota legislature in June 2021 with bipartisan support. This law establishes a regulatory framework to enable the state’s investor-owned natural gas utilities to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions and advancing the state’s clean energy future. The maximum allowable cost for an innovation plan will start at 1.75% of the utility's revenue in the state and could increase to 4% by 2033, subject to review and approval by the MPUC. Specifically, the Natural Gas Innovation Act allows a natural gas utility to submit an innovation plan for approval by the MPUC that can propose the use of renewable energy resources and innovative technologies such as:
•renewable natural gas (produces energy from organic materials such as wastewater, agricultural manure, food waste, agricultural or forest waste);
•renewable hydrogen gas (produces energy from water through electrolysis with renewable electricity such as solar);
•energy efficiency measures (avoids energy consumption in excess of the utility’s existing conservation programs); and
•innovative technologies (reduces or avoids GHG emissions using technologies such as carbon capture).
On June 28, 2023, CERC submitted its first innovation plan to the MPUC; the five-year plan includes 18 pilot projects and seven smaller research-and-development projects. These projects will deploy and evaluate a broad array of innovative resources including made-in-Minnesota alternative gases such as renewable natural gas and green hydrogen, as well as pioneering technologies such as a networked geothermal district energy system and end-use carbon capture. The proposed plan requires approval from the MPUC through a review process that is expected to take about one year. The MPUC requested comments by September 15, 2023 if parties believe that the filing is incomplete based on the reporting requirements or if parties do not believe that that the MPUC’s standard informal proceeding process is appropriate. No parties filed comments regarding completeness or raising concerns that the MPUC’s standard informal procedural process is inappropriate. The initial comment period closed on January 15, 2024, the reply comment period closed on March 15, 2024 and the supplemental comment period closed on May 15, 2024. On July 25, 2024, the MPUC voted to approve the plan with some minor modifications during its agenda meeting and a formal order was issued on October 9, 2024.
Solar Panel Issues (CenterPoint Energy)
CenterPoint Energy’s current and future solar projects have been impacted by delays and/or increased costs. The potential delays and inflationary cost pressures communicated from the developers of our solar projects have been primarily due to (i) unavailability of solar panels and other uncertainties related to DOC antidumping and countervailing duties investigation(s), (ii) the December 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act on solar modules and other products manufactured in China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and (iii) persistent general global supply chain and labor availability issues. On May 15, 2024, based on a petition filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, the DOC announced the
73
initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of silicon photovoltaic cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. On October 1, 2024, the DOC’s preliminary countervailing duty determination affirmed the petition and established preliminary duty rates. A final determination is expected in the first quarter of 2025. On November 29, 2024, the DOC announced its preliminary affirmative determination in the antidumping investigation and established preliminary dumping rates. A final determination is expected in the second quarter of 2025. These impacts could result in cost increases for certain projects, and such impacts may require that we seek additional regulatory review and approvals. Additionally, significant changes to project costs and schedules as a result of these factors could impact the viability of the projects. For more information regarding potential delays, cancellations and supply chain disruptions, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors— Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution — Increases in the cost or...” in this report.
TDSIC 2.0 (CenterPoint Energy)
On May 24, 2023, Indiana Electric filed its petition and case-in-chief with the IURC requesting, among other things, approval of its five-year plan for transmission, distribution, and storage improvements (TDSIC Plan) and an order approving the TDSIC Plan was issued on December 27, 2023. The approved five-year TDSIC Plan, covering the period January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2028, consists of approximately $454 million in proposed investments across seven different programs: (1) Distribution 12kV Circuit Rebuild, (2) Distribution Underground Rebuild, (3) Distribution Automation, (4) Wood Pole Replacement, (5) Transmission Line Rebuild, (6) Substation Rebuild, and (7) Substation Physical Security.
Transmission and Distribution System Resiliency Plans (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
House Bill 2555, codified as Tex. Util. Code § 38.078, was passed by the 88th Texas Legislature in 2023 and allows an electric utility to file a transmission and distribution system resiliency plan with the PUCT to enhance the resiliency of the utility’s transmission system through at least one or more of the following measures: hardening, modernization, undergrounding certain lines, lightning mitigation measures, flood mitigation measures, information technology, cybersecurity measures, physical security measures, vegetation management, and wildfire mitigation and response. House Bill 2555 also allows an electric utility to establish a regulatory asset for distribution-related costs, including depreciation expense and carrying costs at the electric utility’s weighted average cost of capital, relating to the implementation of a transmission and distribution system resiliency plan.
On April 29, 2024, Houston Electric filed its first transmission and distribution system resiliency plan with the PUCT, which proposed to implement 25 resiliency measures over a three-year period. On August 1, 2024, Houston Electric announced that it was withdrawing its application for approval of its transmission and distribution system resiliency plan in order to focus on addressing the impacts of Hurricane Beryl and accelerating preparedness and resiliency efforts for the remaining storm season. The ALJ granted Houston Electric’s request for withdrawal of the transmission and distribution system resiliency plan on August 16, 2024. Following feedback from customers, external experts and other stakeholders, including elected officials and local agencies, Houston Electric filed the SRP with the PUCT on January 31, 2025 for review and approval. Anticipated to benefit Houston Electric customers by saving approximately 1.3 billion customer minutes of interruption, the SRP proposes to invest approximately $5.75 billion over a three-year period from 2026 to 2028 for transmission and distribution infrastructure, information technology and cybersecurity assets and event response capability. This plan proposes 39 resiliency-enhancing measures and a microgrid pilot program to be implemented over the three-year period. The SRP has an estimated capital cost of approximately $5.54 billion and an estimated operations and maintenance expense of approximately $211 million. Approximately $2.17 billion of such cost is for transmission-related investments, and approximately $3.58 billion is for distribution-related investments.
Rate Change Applications
The Registrants are routinely involved in rate change applications before state regulatory authorities. Those applications include general rate cases, where the entire cost of service of the utility is assessed and reset. In addition, the Registrants are periodically involved in proceedings to adjust their capital tracking mechanisms (e.g., CSIA, DCRF, DRR, GRIP, TCOS, ECA, CECA and TDSIC), their cost of service adjustments (e.g., RSP and RRA), their decoupling mechanism (e.g., decoupling and SRC), and their energy efficiency cost trackers (e.g., CIP, DSMA, EECR, EECRF, EEFC and EEFR).
74
Texas Gas Rate Case. On October 30, 2023, CERC filed an application with the Railroad Commission and municipal regulatory authorities to set new natural gas base rates that would be applied consistently across the approximately 1.9 million customers. The need for a rate change was primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system, including new Intelis natural gas meters that feature an integrated safety shutoff valve, changes to depreciation rates that better reflect the actual life and salvage characteristics of assets, and changes in other costs to serve customers. A settlement agreement was filed on April 23, 2024. The settlement agreement was approved by the Railroad Commission on June 25, 2024 and provides for a $5 million annual increase in current revenues and establishes a 9.80% ROE and a 60.61% equity ratio for future GRIP filings. New rates became effective in December 2024.
Minnesota Gas Rate Case. On November 1, 2023, CERC filed an application with the MPUC requesting an adjustment to delivery charges in 2024 and 2025 for the natural gas business in Minnesota. The requested increase is approximately 6.5% or $85 million for 2024 and an additional approximately 3.7% or $52 million for 2025. The need for a rate change is primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system, including new Intelis natural gas meters that feature an integrated safety shutoff valve, changes to depreciation rates that better reflect the actual life and salvage characteristics of assets, and changes in other costs to serve customers. The request reflects a proposed 10.3% ROE on a 52.5% equity ratio. Interim rates for 2024 of $69 million, subject to refund, were implemented as of January 1, 2024. A request for interim rates of $33 million for 2025 was filed on September 30, 2024, approved at the December 3, 2024 hearing and approved by an order issued December 20, 2024. A unanimous settlement agreement was filed on November 25, 2024. The settlement provided for an increase of $60.8 million for 2024 and an additional $42.7 million for 2025. The parties agreed to an overall cost of capital of 7.07% for 2024 and 2025. The Administrative Law Judge filed a report on February 13, 2025 recommending the Commission approve the settlement agreement. The anticipated decision date of the rate case is July 1, 2025.
Indiana Electric Rate Case. On December 5, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a petition with the IURC for authority to modify its rates and charges for electric utility service through a phase-in of rates. The requested increase is approximately 16% or $119 million based on a forward looking 2025 test year. The need for a rate increase is primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the system and normal increases in operating expenses. The initial filing of the rate case reflected a proposed 10.4% ROE on a forecasted 55% equity ratio. Indiana Electric reached a settlement agreement with less than all parties and submitted the agreement to the IURC on May 20, 2024. The settlement reflects a proposed 9.8% ROE on a forecasted 55% equity ratio. The requested increase was lowered to $80 million, an 11% increase. Indiana Electric received a final order on February 3, 2025 approving the settlement with one modification that effectively capped the residential increase to 1.15% of the total increase, allocating the difference to other commercial and industrial customers. The final order approves the 9.8% ROE on a forecasted 55% equity ratio and increases revenues by $80 million.
Houston Electric Rate Case. On March 6, 2024, Houston Electric filed an application with the PUCT requesting authority to change rates and charges for electric transmission and distribution service. The requested increase is approximately $17 million (1%) for retail customers and $43 million (6.6%) for wholesale transmission service, excluding TCRF and rate case expenses. The need for a rate increase is primarily driven by the continuing investment that has been made to support customer growth and to bolster the safety and reliability of Houston Electric’s transmission and distribution system. The request reflects a proposed 10.4% ROE and a 45% equity ratio. Errata testimony was filed to correct minor errors included in the initial filing which reduced the requested increase to $56 million compared to current rates. On January 15, 2025, Houston Electric filed a letter indicating that an agreement in principle had been reached with certain parties and that complete settlement documents would be filed as soon as possible. On January 29, 2025, Houston Electric announced that a settlement agreement was reached with certain parties to the rate case filed on March 6, 2024, including the City of Houston and other regional municipalities. Subject to PUCT review and approval, the settlement is expected to result in approximately $50 million less annual revenue and an average decrease of approximately $1 a month for residential customers based on average usage of 1,000 kWh per month. A proposed order was issued on February 10, 2025. The parties must file corrections or exceptions to the proposed order by February 24, 2025.
Ohio Capital Expenditure Program (CEP). On March 1, 2024, CEOH filed an application with the PUCO for authority to modify its CEP rates and charges. The requested increase is approximately $3 million resulting in a proposed CEP rate for residential customers of $1.54 per month. Per the PUCO’s Opinion and Order in the 2018 general rate case, the CEP rate is capped at $1.50 per month for residential customers. CEOH requested deferral of the 2023 CEP revenue requirement above the CEP rate cap of approximately $155,000. CEOH filed a statement of resolution on July 30, 2024, indicating CEOH and PUCO staff agree to certain statements including: CEOH’s existing deferral authority has not expired and will continue uninterrupted, provided CEOH files its notice of intent for its base rate case prior to the new CEP Rider charges taking effect. PUCO issued a Finding & Order on August 21, 2024, finding that the parties’ resolution of the rate cap and deferral authority issues were reasonable. As discussed below, notice of intent for a base rate case was filed the following week.
75
Ohio Gas Rate Case. On August 27, 2024, CEOH filed a Notice of Intent with PUCO to begin the process of requesting an adjustment in natural gas base rates. CEOH filed its Application and Standard Filing Requirement in October 2024 and the related testimony in November 2024. The filing seeks a revenue requirement increase of approximately $100 million based on a requested return on equity of 10.4% and equity percentage of 45.87%. The need for a rate increase is primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system. A final order is expected no sooner than the first quarter of 2026.
The table below reflects significant applications pending or completed since the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC through the date of the filing of this Form 10-K:
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric (PUCT) | ||||||||||
| DCRF | 73 | December 2023 | April 2024 | March 2024 | Based on the net change in distribution invested capital since its last base rate proceeding of approximately $2.5 billion for the period January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2023, of which $672 million is incremental to the previous DCRF filing, for an incremental revenue increase of $86 million, adjusted for load growth. On February 5, 2024, Houston Electric notified the ALJ that the parties reached an agreement in principle on all issues in this proceeding and filed an agreed expedited motion for interim rates. On February 13, 2024, interim rates designed to collect $220 million ($73 million incremental) were approved by the ALJ, to be effective April 2024. A final order was issued by the PUCT March 7, 2024. | |||||
| Rate Case | 56 | March 2024 | TBD | TBD | See discussion above under Houston Electric Rate Case. | |||||
| EECRF | 15 | May 2024 | March 2025 | December 2024 | The requested $65 million is comprised primarily of the following: 2025 program costs of $50 million; a credit of $0.5 million related to the over-recovery of 2023 program costs; the 2023 earned bonus of $15 million; and 2025 projected evaluation, measurement and verification costs of $0.5 million. On October 17, 2024, a unanimous settlement was filed for an adjusted total of $63 million, keeping the 2023 earned bonus of $15 million. A final order approving the settlement was issued on December 12, 2024. | |||||
| TCOS | 63 | November 2024 | January 2025 | January 2025 | Based on net change in invested capital of $517 million for the period July 2023 through September 2024. Notice of Approval was issued by PUCT January 13, 2025. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Beaumont/East Texas, South Texas, Houston and Texas Coast (Railroad Commission) | ||||||||||
| Rate Case | 5 | October 2023 | December 2024 | June 2024 | See discussion above under Texas Gas Rate Case. | |||||
| Tax Act Rider | 20 | August 2024 | TBD | TBD | Resulting from the Texas Gas Rate Case, the first Tax Act Rider Calculation was filed on August 1, 2024 pursuant to Docket No. OS-23-00015513 to recover the effects of the Inflation Reduction Act (“Tax Act 2022”) and certain other tax-related costs for rates to become effective January 1, 2025. These effects include the return on the CAMT deferred tax asset (“DTA”) resulting from the Tax Act 2022, income tax credits resulting from the Tax Act 2022, and the return on the increment or decrement in the NOL DTA included in rate base and in the standard service base revenue requirement approved in the Texas Gas Rate Case. CERC believes its filing is consistent with the Tax Act Rider tariff approved in Docket No. OS-23-00015513. On October 1, 2024, certain parties filed comments disputing the application. Briefings were filed with an ALJ in November 2024. A hearing on the merits will be held on February 21, 2025. | |||||
| GRIP | 71 | February 2025 | TBD | TBD | Based on net change in invested capital of $446 million. |
76
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Minnesota (MPUC) | ||||||||||
| CIP Financial Incentive | 8 | May 2024 | December 2024 | November 2024 | CIP Financial Incentive based on 2023 CIP program activity. | |||||
| Rate Case | 136 | November 2023 | TBD | TBD | See discussion above under Minnesota Gas Rate Case. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Louisiana (LPSC) | ||||||||||
| RSP | 12 | September/October 2023 | June 2024 | April 2024 | Based on ROE of 9.95% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. The North Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band and completion of COVID-19 asset recovery, is $8 million based on a test year ended June 2023 and adjusted ROE of 3.67%. The South Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band and completion of COVID-19 asset recovery, is $5 million based on a test year ended June 2023 and adjusted ROE of 5.47%. The TCJA refund impact to North Louisiana and South Louisiana was $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively. South Louisiana interim rates were implemented on December 28, 2023, subject to refund. North Louisiana interim rates were implemented on January 29, 2024. Staff reports issued on January 31, 2024 recommended disallowances of $0.3 million and $0.2 million in North and South Louisiana, respectively. LPSC voted to approve the January 2024 staff reports on April 19, 2024. Implementation occurred in June 2024. | |||||
| RSP | 13 | October 2024 | TBD | TBD | Based on ROE of 9.95% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. The North Louisiana increase, inclusive of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band, is $7 million based on a test year ended June 2024 and adjusted ROE of 5.56%. The South Louisiana increase, inclusive of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band, is $6 million based on a test year ended June 2024 and adjusted ROE of 5.96%. Interim rates, subject to refund, were implemented December 19, 2024. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Mississippi (MPSC) | ||||||||||
| RRA | 9 | May 2024 | September 2024 | September 2024 | Based on ROE of 10.263% with 100 basis points (+/-) earnings band. Revenue increase of approximately $11 million based on 2023 test year adjusted earned ROE of 5.11%. Interim increase of approximately $1.3 million implemented May 31, 2024. On September 5, 2024, MPSC approved a settlement revenue adjustment of $9.4 million. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana South - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | 4 | April 2024 | August2024 | July2024 | Requested an increase of $35 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $3.6 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $0.03 million annually. The final IURC order was issued July 31, 2024, approving CSIA rates as proposed effective August 1, 2024. | |||||
| CSIA | 2 | October 2024 | February 2025 | January 2025 | Requested an increase of $18 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $2.4 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $(1.0) million annually. The final IURC order was issued January 29, 2025 approving rates as filed with the correction filing effective February 1, 2025. |
77
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Indiana North - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | 9 | April 2024 | August 2024 | July 2024 | Requested an increase of $97 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $9.4 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $1 million annually. The final IURC Order was issued July 31, 2024, approving CSIA rates as proposed effective August 1, 2024. | |||||
| CSIA | 11 | October 2024 | February 2025 | January 2025 | Requested an increase of $84 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $11.0 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $(3.0) million annually. The final IURC order was issued January 29, 2025, approving rates as filed with the correction filing effective February 1, 2025. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Ohio - Gas (PUCO) | ||||||||||
| CEP | 3 | March2024 | September2024 | August 2024 | See discussion above under Ohio Capital Expenditure Program. | |||||
| DRR | 12 | May 2024 | September 2024 | August 2024 | Requested an increase of $77 million to rate base for investments made in 2023, which reflects a $12 million annual increase in current revenues. A change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $0.8 million annually is also included in rates. PUCO Opinion & Order was issued August 21, 2024, approving DRR rates as proposed. Revised rates became effective September 1, 2024. | |||||
| Rate Case | 100 | October 2024 | TBD | TBD | See discussion above under Ohio Gas Rate Case. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana Electric (IURC) | ||||||||||
| Rate Case | 80 | December 2023 | February 2025 | February 2025 | See discussion above under Indiana Electric Rate Case. | |||||
| TDSIC | 5 | February 2024 | May 2024 | May 2024 | Requested an increase of $36 million to rate base, which reflects a $5 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until next rate case. An order approving the request was issued on May 17, 2024 and was effective May 16, 2024. | |||||
| CECA | — | February 2024 | May 2024 | June2024 | Requested a decrease of $1 million to rate base, which reflects no change in current revenues. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $0.1 million. The final order was issued May 29, 2024, approving rates effective June 1, 2024. | |||||
| ECA | 6 | May 2024 | August 2024 | August 2024 | Requested an increase of $48 million to rate base, which reflects a $6 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a reduction in the under-recovery variance of $1 million. The OUCC filed testimony on July 1, 2024 recommending approval. A final order approving the request was issued on August 28, 2024. | |||||
| TDSIC | 5 | August 2024 | November 2024 | November 2024 | Requested an increase of $30 million to rate base, which reflects a $5 million annual increase in current revenues, of which 80% is included in the mechanism and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The final order was issued on November 27, 2024 approving rates effective November 28, 2024. |
(1)Represents proposed increases when effective date and/or approval date is not yet determined. Approved rates could differ materially from proposed rates.
78
Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)
On August 16, 2022, the IRA was signed into law. The law extends or creates tax-related energy incentives for solar, wind and alternative clean energy sources, implements, subject to certain exceptions, a 1% tax on share repurchases after December 31, 2022, and implements a 15% CAMT based on the adjusted financial statement income of certain large corporations. Corporations are entitled to a CAMT credit to the extent CAMT liability exceeds regular tax liability, which can be carried forward indefinitely and used in future years when regular tax exceeds the CAMT. The Registrants will owe CAMT in excess of their regular tax liability beginning in 2024. As a result, the Registrants may experience a temporary increase in federal cash tax liability due to this provision beginning in 2024. On September 12, 2024, the IRS issued proposed regulations addressing the application of the CAMT. The proposed regulations offer guidance for computing an entity’s adjusted financial statement income, in addition to addressing other provisions of the CAMT. At this time, the Company does not anticipate changes to the applicability of CAMT to the Registrants as a result of the proposed regulations. For more information regarding changes in federal income tax laws and regulations and our related risks, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks — We may be significantly affected by changes in federal income tax laws and regulations...”
Greenhouse Gas Regulation and Compliance (CenterPoint Energy)
CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s revenues, operating costs and capital requirements could be adversely affected as a result of any regulatory action that would require installation of new control technologies or a modification of their operations or would have the effect of reducing the consumption of natural gas. Additionally, the Methane Emissions Reduction Program established by the IRA and the new regulations published by the EPA on March 8, 2024 targeting reductions in methane emissions, may increase costs related to production, transmission and storage of natural gas. Houston Electric, in contrast to some electric utilities including Indiana Electric, does not generate electricity, other than TEEEF, and thus is not directly exposed to the risk of high capital costs and regulatory uncertainties that face electric utilities that burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. Nevertheless, Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s revenues could be adversely affected to the extent any resulting regulatory action has the effect of reducing consumption of electricity by ultimate consumers within their respective service territories. Likewise, incentives to conserve energy or to use energy sources other than natural gas could result in a decrease in demand for the Registrants’ services. Further, requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by certain specified dates in the Registrants’ respective service areas could have a significant impact on CenterPoint Energy and its operations. Further, our third-party suppliers, vendors and partners may also be impacted by climate change laws and regulations, which could impact CenterPoint Energy’s business by, among other things, causing permitting and construction delays, project cancellations or increased project costs passed on to CenterPoint Energy. Conversely, regulatory actions that effectively promote the consumption of natural gas because of its lower emissions characteristics would be expected to benefit CenterPoint Energy and CERC and their natural gas-related businesses. At this time, however, we cannot quantify the magnitude of the impacts from possible new regulatory actions related to GHG emissions, either positive or negative, on the Registrants’ businesses. Additionally, the Registrants continue to evaluate the impact of the final rules adopted by the SEC on March 6, 2024 regarding disclosure of certain climate-related information in registration statements and annual reports, for which implementation is subject to ongoing voluntary delay by the SEC, on their respective consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Compliance costs and other effects associated with climate change, reductions in GHG emissions and obtaining renewable energy sources remain uncertain; nevertheless, any new regulation or legislation relating to climate change will likely result in an increase in compliance costs. CenterPoint Energy will continue to monitor regulatory activity regarding GHG emission standards that may affect its business. Currently, CenterPoint Energy does not purchase carbon credits. In connection with its net zero emissions goals, CenterPoint Energy is expected to purchase carbon credits in the future; however, CenterPoint Energy does not currently expect the number of credits, or cost for those credits, to be material. For more information on greenhouse gas and climate-change regulation and compliance, see “Business—Environmental Matters” in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Climate Change Trends and Uncertainties
As a result of increased attention regarding climate change, coupled with adverse economic conditions, availability of alternative energy sources, including private solar, microturbines, fuel cells, energy-efficient buildings and energy storage devices, and new regulations restricting emissions, including potential regulations of methane emissions, some consumers and companies may use less energy, meet their own energy needs through alternative energy sources or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for the Registrants’ services. As these technologies likely become more cost-competitive option over time, whether through cost effectiveness or government incentives and subsidies, certain customers may choose to meet their own energy needs and subsequently decrease usage of the Registrants’ systems and
79
services, which may result in, among other things, Indiana Electric’s generating facilities becoming less competitive and economical. Further, evolving investor sentiment related to the use of fossil fuels and initiatives to restrict continued production of fossil fuels have had significant impacts on CenterPoint Energy’s electric generation and natural gas businesses. For example, because Indiana Electric currently relies on coal for a portion of its generation capacity, certain financial institutions choose not to participate in CenterPoint Energy’s financing arrangements. Conversely, demand for the Registrants’ services may increase as a result of customer changes in response to climate change. For example, the expected expansion of energy export facilities, including hydrogen facilities, and electrification of industrial processes and transport and logistics, among others, in our service territories could lead to an increase in demand for electricity, resulting in increased usage of CenterPoint Energy’s systems and services. Any negative opinions with respect to CenterPoint Energy’s environmental practices or its ability to meet the challenges posed by climate change formed by regulators, customers, investors, legislators or other stakeholders could harm its reputation.
To address these developments, CenterPoint Energy announced its net zero emission goals for Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 emissions by 2035 and a 20-30% reduction in certain Scope 3 emissions by 2035 as compared to 2021 levels. Indiana Electric’s 2019/2020 IRP identified a preferred portfolio that retires 730 MW of coal-fired generation facilities and replaces these resources with a mix of generating resources composed primarily of renewables, including solar, wind, and solar with storage, supported by dispatchable natural gas combustion turbines including a pipeline to serve such natural gas generation. Indiana Electric continues to execute on its 2019/2020 IRP and has received initial approvals for 626 MWs of the 700-1,000 MWs of solar generation and 200 MWs of the 300 MWs of wind generation identified within Indiana Electric’s 2019/2020 IRP through a combination of BTAs and PPAs. Additionally, as reflected in its 10-year capital plan announced in September 2021, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in cleaner energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation. CenterPoint Energy believes its planned investments in renewable energy generation and corresponding planned reduction in its Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 emissions as part of its net zero emissions goals, as well as its planned reduction in Scope 3 emissions by 20-30% by 2035 as compared to 2021 levels, support global efforts to reduce the impacts of climate change. Indiana Electric has conducted a new IRP, which was submitted to the IURC in May 2023, to identify an appropriate generation resource portfolio to satisfy the needs of its customers and comply with environmental regulations. The proposed preferred portfolio is the second evolution to the generation transition plan to move away from coal-fired generation to a more sustainable portfolio of resources. Under the proposed preferred portfolio, Indiana Electric plans to convert its last remaining coal unit to natural gas and to add a significant amount of additional renewable resources through 2033. Indiana Electric has since received approval for 147 MWs of wind generation facilities identified within Indiana Electric’s 2022/2023 IRP through a PPA. For more information regarding CenterPoint Energy’s net zero and GHG emissions reduction goals and the risks associated with them, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks — CenterPoint Energy is subject to operational and financial risks...” For more information on Indiana Electric’s IRP and associated risks, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks — Indiana Electric’s execution of its generation transition plan...”
To the extent climate changes result in warmer temperatures in the Registrants’ service territories, financial results from the Registrants’ businesses could be adversely impacted. For example, CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas could be adversely affected through lower natural gas sales. On the other hand, warmer temperatures in CenterPoint Energy’s and Houston Electric’s electric service territory may increase revenues from transmission and distribution and generation through increased demand for electricity used for cooling. Another possible result of climate change is more frequent and more severe weather events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, microbursts, severe winter weather conditions, including ice storms, wildfires, thunderstorms, high winds, hail, derecho events, or extreme temperatures, including such storms as the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl. Since many of the Registrants’ facilities are located along or near the Texas Gulf Coast, increased or more severe weather events could increase costs to repair damaged facilities and restore service to customers. CenterPoint Energy’s current 10-year capital plan includes capital expenditures to maintain reliability and safety and increase resiliency of its systems as climate change may result in more frequent significant weather events. Houston Electric does not own or operate any electric generation facilities other than, since September 2021, its operation of TEEEF. Houston Electric transmits and distributes to customers of REPs electric power that the REPs obtain from power generation facilities owned by third parties. To the extent adverse weather conditions affect the Registrants’ suppliers, results from their energy delivery businesses may suffer. For example, in Texas, the February 2021 Winter Storm Event caused an electricity generation shortage that was severely disruptive to Houston Electric’s service territory and the wholesale generation market and also caused a reduction in available natural gas capacity. Additionally, the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl caused significant damage to Houston Electric’s electric delivery system and resulted in electric service interruptions peaking at an estimated 922,000 customers and more than 2.1 million customers, respectively. When the Registrants cannot deliver electricity or natural gas to customers, or customers cannot receive services, the Registrants’ financial results can be impacted by lost revenues, and they generally must seek approval from regulators to recover restoration costs. To the extent the Registrants are unable to recover those costs, or if higher rates resulting from recovery of such costs result in reduced demand for services, the Registrants’ future financial results may be adversely impacted. Further, as the
80
intensity and frequency of significant weather events continues, it may impact our ability to secure cost-efficient insurance. For more information regarding risks relating to climate change and other weather and natural disaster impacts, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks — Climate change and other weather and natural disaster impacts could...”
Other Matters
Credit Facilities
The Registrants may draw on their respective revolving credit facilities from time to time to provide funds used for general corporate and limited liability company purposes, including to backstop CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s commercial paper programs. The facilities may also be utilized to obtain letters of credit. For further details related to the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Based on the consolidated debt to capitalization covenant in the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, the Registrants would have been permitted to utilize the full capacity of such revolving credit facilities, which aggregated approximately $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2024.
As of February 10, 2025, the Registrants had the following revolving credit facilities and utilization of such facilities:
| Amount Utilized as of February 10, 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Size of Facility | Loans | Letters of Credit | Commercial Paper | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Termination Date | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | $ | 2,400 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 737 | 4.50% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy (1) | 250 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | 300 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||||||
| CERC | 1,050 | — | — | 497 | 4.51% | December 6, 2028 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,234 |
(1)This credit facility was issued by SIGECO.
Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to customary terms and conditions. However, there is no requirement that the borrower makes representations prior to borrowing as to the absence of material adverse changes or litigation that could be expected to have a material adverse effect. Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of events of default that we consider customary. The revolving credit facilities also provide for customary fees, including commitment fees, administrative agent fees, fees in respect of letters of credit and other fees. In each of the revolving credit facilities, the spread to SOFR and the commitment fees fluctuate based on the borrower’s credit rating. Each of the Registrant’s credit facilities provide for a mechanism to replace SOFR with possible alternative benchmarks upon certain benchmark replacement events. The borrowers are currently in compliance with the various business and financial covenants in the four revolving credit facilities.
Debt Transactions
For detailed information about the Registrants’ debt transactions in 2024, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Securities Registered with the SEC
On May 17, 2023, the Registrants filed a joint shelf registration statement with the SEC registering indeterminate principal amounts of Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds, CERC Corp.’s senior debt securities and CenterPoint Energy’s senior debt securities and junior subordinated debt securities and an indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock, shares of preferred stock, depositary shares, as well as stock purchase contracts and equity units. The joint shelf registration statement will expire on May 17, 2026. For information related to the Registrants’ debt issuances in 2024, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
81
Temporary Investments
As of February 10, 2025, the Registrants had no temporary investments.
Money Pool
The Registrants participate in a money pool through which they and certain of their subsidiaries can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net funding requirements of the CenterPoint Energy money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper. The net funding requirements of the CERC money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CERC’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CERC’s commercial paper. The money pool may not provide sufficient funds to meet the Registrants’ cash needs.
The table below summarizes CenterPoint Energy money pool activity by Registrant as of February 10, 2025:
| Weighted Average Interest Rate | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||
| Money pool borrowings | 4.56% | $ | 58 | $ | — |
Impact on Liquidity of a Downgrade in Credit Ratings
The interest rate on borrowings under the Registrants’ credit facilities is based on their respective credit ratings. As of February 10, 2025, Moody’s, S&P and Fitch had assigned the following credit ratings to the borrowers:
| Moody’s | S&P | Fitch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Borrower/Instrument | Rating | Outlook (1) | Rating | Outlook (2) | Rating | Outlook (3) | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | CenterPoint Energy Senior Unsecured Debt | Baa2 | Negative | BBB | Negative | BBB | Negative | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Vectren Corp. Issuer Rating | n/a | Negative | BBB+ | Negative | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | SIGECO Senior Secured Debt | A1 | Stable | A | Negative | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| Houston Electric | Houston Electric Senior Secured Debt | A2 | Negative | A | Negative | A | Negative | |||||||
| CERC | CERC Corp. Senior Unsecured Debt | A3 | Stable | BBB+ | Negative | A- | Negative | |||||||
| CERC | Indiana Gas Senior Unsecured Debt | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Negative | n/a | n/a |
(1)A Moody’s rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an issuer’s rating over the medium term.
(2)An S&P outlook assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate to longer term.
(3)A Fitch rating outlook indicates the direction a rating is likely to move over a one- to two-year period.
The Registrants cannot assure that the ratings set forth above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. The Registrants note that these credit ratings are included for informational purposes and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Registrants’ securities and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of the Registrants’ credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants’ ability to obtain short- and long-term financing, the cost of such financings and the execution of the Registrants’ commercial strategies.
A decline in credit ratings could increase borrowing costs under the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities. If the Registrants’ credit ratings had been downgraded one notch by S&P and Moody’s from the ratings that existed as of December 31, 2024, the impact on the borrowing costs under the four revolving credit facilities would have been insignificant. A decline in credit ratings would also increase the interest rate on long-term debt to be issued in the capital markets and could negatively impact the Registrants’ ability to complete capital market transactions and to access the commercial paper market. Additionally, a decline in credit ratings could increase cash collateral requirements and reduce earnings of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segments.
Pipeline tariffs and contracts typically provide that if the credit ratings of a shipper or the shipper’s guarantor drop below a threshold level, which is generally investment grade ratings from both Moody’s and S&P, cash or other collateral may be demanded from the shipper in an amount equal to the sum of three months’ charges for pipeline services plus the unrecouped cost of any lateral built for such shipper. If the credit ratings of CERC Corp. decline below the applicable threshold levels,
82
CERC might need to provide cash or other collateral of as much as $159 million as of December 31, 2024. The amount of collateral will depend on seasonal variations in transportation levels.
ZENS and Securities Related to ZENS (CenterPoint Energy)
If CenterPoint Energy’s creditworthiness were to drop such that ZENS holders thought CenterPoint Energy’s liquidity was adversely affected or the market for the ZENS were to become illiquid, some ZENS holders might decide to exchange their ZENS for cash. Funds for the payment of cash upon exchange could be obtained from the sale of the shares of ZENS-Related Securities that CenterPoint Energy owns or from other sources. CenterPoint Energy owns shares of ZENS-Related Securities equal to approximately 100% of the reference shares used to calculate its obligation to the holders of the ZENS. ZENS exchanges result in a cash outflow because tax deferrals related to the ZENS and shares of ZENS-Related Securities would typically cease when ZENS are exchanged or otherwise retired and shares of ZENS-Related Securities are sold. The ultimate tax liability related to the ZENS and ZENS-Related Securities continues to increase by the amount of the tax benefit realized each year, and there could be a significant cash outflow when the taxes are paid as a result of the retirement or exchange of the ZENS. If all ZENS had been exchanged for cash on December 31, 2024, deferred taxes of approximately $802 million would have been payable in 2024. If all the ZENS-Related Securities had been sold on December 31, 2024, capital gains taxes of approximately $84 million would have been payable in 2024 based on 2024 tax rates in effect. For additional information about ZENS, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
Cross Defaults
Under the Registrants’ respective revolving credit facilities and any term loan agreements (in each case, other than SIGECO), a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specified types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $125 million by the borrower or any of their respective significant subsidiaries will cause a default under such borrower’s respective credit facility or term loan agreement. Under SIGECO’s revolving credit facility, a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specific types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $75 million by SIGECO or any of its significant subsidiaries will cause a default under SIGECO’s credit facility. A default by CenterPoint Energy would not trigger a default under its subsidiaries’ debt instruments or revolving credit facilities.
Possible Acquisitions, Divestitures and Joint Ventures
From time to time, the Registrants consider the acquisition or the disposition of assets or businesses or possible joint ventures, strategic initiatives or other joint ownership arrangements with respect to assets or businesses. Any determination to take action in this regard will be based on market conditions and opportunities existing at the time, and accordingly, the timing, size or success of any efforts and the associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable. The Registrants may seek to fund all or part of any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or equity issuances. Debt or equity financing may not, however, be available to the Registrants at that time due to a variety of events, including, among others, maintenance of our credit ratings, industry conditions, general economic conditions, market conditions and market perceptions. CenterPoint Energy has increased its planned capital expenditures in its Electric and Natural Gas businesses multiple times over the recent years to support rate base growth and may continue to do so in the future. The Registrants may continue to explore asset sales as a means to efficiently finance a portion of their increased capital expenditures in the future, subject to the considerations listed above. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Collection of Receivables from REPs (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Houston Electric’s receivables from the distribution of electricity are collected from REPs that supply the electricity Houston Electric distributes to their customers. Before conducting business, a REP must register with the PUCT and must meet certain financial qualifications. Nevertheless, adverse economic conditions, weather events, such as the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, structural problems in the market served by ERCOT or financial difficulties of one or more REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for Houston Electric’s services or could cause them to delay such payments. Houston Electric depends on these REPs to remit payments on a timely basis, and any delay or default in payment by REPs could adversely affect Houston Electric’s cash flows. In the event of a REP’s default, Houston Electric’s tariff provides a number of remedies,
83
including the option for Houston Electric to request that the PUCT suspend or revoke the certification of the REP. Applicable regulatory provisions require that customers be shifted to another REP or a provider of last resort if a REP cannot make timely payments. However, Houston Electric remains at risk for payments related to services provided prior to the shift to the replacement REP or the provider of last resort. If a REP were unable to meet its obligations, it could consider, among various options, restructuring under the bankruptcy laws, in which event such REP might seek to avoid honoring its obligations and claims might be made against Houston Electric involving payments it had received from such REP. If a REP were to file for bankruptcy, Houston Electric may not be successful in recovering accrued receivables owed by such REP that are unpaid as of the date the REP filed for bankruptcy. However, PUCT regulations authorize utilities, such as Houston Electric, to defer bad debts resulting from defaults by REPs for recovery in future rate cases, subject to a review of reasonableness and necessity.
Other Factors that Could Affect Cash Requirements
In addition to the above factors, the Registrants’ liquidity and capital resources could also be negatively affected by:
•cash collateral requirements that could exist in connection with certain contracts, including weather hedging arrangements, and natural gas purchases, natural gas price and natural gas storage activities of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segment;
•acceleration of payment dates on certain gas supply contracts, under certain circumstances, as a result of increased natural gas prices, and concentration of natural gas suppliers (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increased costs related to the acquisition of natural gas (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increases in interest expense in connection with debt refinancings and borrowings under credit facilities or term loans or the use of alternative sources of financings, including financings due to the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl;
•various legislative or regulatory actions, including such actions in response to the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl;
•incremental collateral, if any, that may be required due to regulation of derivatives (CenterPoint Energy);
•the ability of REPs, including REP affiliates of NRG and Vistra Energy Corp., to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric;
•slower customer payments and increased write-offs of receivables due to higher natural gas prices, changing economic conditions, public health threats or severe weather events, such as the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•the satisfaction of any obligations pursuant to guarantees;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event and Hurricane Beryl;
•contributions to pension and postretirement benefit plans;
•recovery of any losses under applicable insurance policies;
•restoration costs and revenue losses resulting from future natural disasters such as hurricanes or other severe weather events and the timing of and amounts sought for recovery of such restoration costs; and
•various other risks identified in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Certain Contractual Limits on Our Ability to Issue Securities and Borrow Money
Certain provisions in certain note purchase agreements relating to debt issued by CERC have the effect of restricting the amount of secured debt issued by CERC and debt issued by subsidiaries of CERC Corp. Additionally, Houston Electric and SIGECO are limited in the amount of mortgage bonds they can issue by the General Mortgage and SIGECO’s mortgage indenture, respectively. For information about the total debt to capitalization financial covenants in the Registrants’ and SIGECO’s revolving credit facilities, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of the Registrants’ financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that can have a significant effect on the Registrants’ financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The circumstances that make these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex have to do with the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty. The Registrants base their estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments. These estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Registrants’ operating environment changes. Our management believes the following accounting policies involve the application of critical accounting estimates. Accordingly, these accounting estimates
84
have been reviewed and discussed with the Audit Committee of CenterPoint Energy’s Board of Directors. For a complete discussion of the Registrants’ significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Rate Regulation
Accounting guidance for regulated operations provides that rate-regulated entities account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the recovery of those incurred costs in rates if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and if the competitive environment makes it probable that such rates can be charged and collected. CenterPoint Energy, for its Electric and Natural Gas reportable segments, Houston Electric and CERC apply this accounting guidance. Certain expenses and revenues subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the balance sheet as regulatory assets or liabilities and are recognized in income as the related amounts are included in service rates and recovered from or refunded to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are recorded when it is probable that these items will be recovered or reflected in future rates. Determining probability requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals. If events were to occur that would make the recovery of these assets and liabilities no longer probable, the Registrants would be required to write off or write down these regulatory assets and liabilities. For further detail on the Registrants’ regulatory assets and liabilities, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill
The Registrants review the carrying value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable, and at least annually, goodwill is tested for impairment as required by accounting guidance for goodwill. Unforeseen events, changes in market conditions, and probable regulatory disallowances, where applicable, could have a material effect on the value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, future cash flows, interest rate, and regulatory matters, and could result in an impairment charge. The Registrants recorded no impairments to long-lived assets, including goodwill during 2024, 2023 and 2022.
Fair value is the amount at which an asset, liability or business could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices or valuations by third parties, present value techniques based on estimates of cash flows, or multiples of earnings or revenue performance measures. The fair value could be different using different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques.
Fair value measurements require significant judgment and unobservable inputs, including (i) projected timing and amount of future cash flows, which factor in planned growth initiatives, (ii) the regulatory environment, as applicable, and (iii) discount rates reflecting risk inherent in the future market prices. Determining the discount rates for the businesses that are not rate-regulated, such as for Energy Systems Group prior to the sale in June 2023, requires the estimation of the appropriate company-specific risk premiums for such businesses based on evaluation of industry and entity-specific risks, which includes expectations about future market or economic conditions existing on the date of the impairment test. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on results of the impairment tests.
Annual Goodwill Impairment Test
CenterPoint Energy and CERC completed their 2024 annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 2024 and determined, based on a qualitative assessment, that no goodwill impairment charge was required for any reporting unit. No qualitative factors were present that indicated impairment of CenterPoint Energy or CERC reporting units.
Although no goodwill impairment resulted from the 2024 annual test, an interim goodwill impairment test could be triggered by the following: actual earnings results that are materially lower than expected, significant adverse changes in the operating environment, an increase in the discount rate, changes in other key assumptions which require judgment and are forward looking in nature, if CenterPoint Energy’s market capitalization falls below book value for an extended period of time, or events affecting a reporting unit such as a contemplated disposal of all or part of a reporting unit.
Assets Held for Sale
Generally, a long-lived asset to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which management, with approval from the Board of Directors, as applicable, commits to a plan to sell, and a sale is expected to be completed within one year. The Registrants record assets and liabilities held for sale, or the disposal group, at the lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value less cost to sell. If the disposal group reflects a component of a reporting unit and meets the definition of a business,
85
the goodwill within that reporting unit is allocated to the disposal group based on the relative fair value of the components representing a business that will be retained and disposed. Goodwill is not allocated to a portion of a reporting unit that does not meet the definition of a business.
As described further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, certain assets and liabilities of the Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses met the held for sale criteria and the goodwill attributable to these businesses as of December 31, 2024 was $217 million and $122 million for CenterPoint Energy and CERC, respectively.
Accounting for Securitization of Coal Generation Facility Retirements
Accounting guidance for rate regulated long-lived asset abandonment requires that the carrying value of an operating asset or an asset under construction is removed from property, plant and equipment when it becomes probable that the asset will be abandoned. The Registrants recognize a loss on abandonment when they conclude it is probable the cost will not be recovered in future rates. When the Registrants conclude it is probable that costs will be recovered in future rates, a regulatory asset is recognized. The portion of property, plant and equipment that will remain used and useful until abandonment and recovered through depreciation expense in rates will continue to be classified as property, plant and equipment until the asset is abandoned. The Registrants evaluate if an adjustment to the estimated life of the asset and, accordingly, the rate of depreciation, is required to recover the asset while it is still providing service. Determining probability of abandonment or probability of recovery requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals.
In connection with the securitization financing of qualified costs in the second quarter of 2023 associated with the completed retirement of SIGECO’s A.B. Brown coal generation facilities, CenterPoint Energy evaluated the VIE consisting of the SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote, special purpose entity, for possible consolidation, including review of qualitative factors such as the power to direct the activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE. CenterPoint Energy has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE and is most closely associated with the VIE as compared to other interests held by the holders of the SIGECO Securitization Bonds. CenterPoint Energy is, therefore, considered the primary beneficiary and consolidated the VIE.
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Registrants consider cash equivalents to be short-term, highly-liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents held by the SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary solely to support servicing the SIGECO Securitization Bonds as of December 31, 2024 are reflected on CenterPoint Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In connection with the issuance of the SIGECO Securitization Bonds, CenterPoint Energy was required to establish a restricted cash account to collateralize the SIGECO Securitization Bonds that were issued in the financing transaction. The restricted cash account is not available for withdrawal until the maturity of the SIGECO Securitization Bonds and is not included in cash and cash equivalents.
Unbilled Revenues
Revenues related to electricity delivery and natural gas sales and services are generally recognized upon delivery to customers. However, the determination of deliveries to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month either electronically through AMS meter communications or manual readings. At the end of each month, deliveries to non-AMS customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is estimated. Information regarding deliveries to AMS customers after the last billing is obtained from actual AMS meter usage data. Unbilled electricity delivery revenue is estimated each month based on actual AMS meter data, daily supply volumes and applicable rates. Unbilled natural gas sales are estimated based on estimated purchased gas volumes, estimated lost and unaccounted for gas and tariffed rates in effect. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates.
Employee Benefit Plans
CenterPoint Energy sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering all employees who meet eligibility requirements. CenterPoint Energy uses several statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events in calculating the expense and liability related to its plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected
86
return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as estimated by management, within certain guidelines. In addition, CenterPoint Energy’s actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension and other retirement plans expense recorded. Read “— Other Significant Matters — Pension Plans” for further discussion.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2(q) to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements that affect the Registrants.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT MATTERS
Pension Plans (CenterPoint Energy). As discussed in Note 8(b) to the consolidated financial statements, CenterPoint Energy maintains non-contributory qualified defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees. Employer contributions for the qualified plans are based on actuarial computations that establish the minimum contribution required under ERISA and the maximum deductible contribution for income tax purposes.
Under the terms of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans, it reserves the right to change, modify or terminate the plan. CenterPoint Energy’s funding policy is to review amounts annually and contribute an amount at least equal to the minimum contribution required under ERISA.
Additionally, CenterPoint Energy maintains unfunded non-qualified benefit restoration plans which allow participants to receive the benefits to which they would have been entitled under the non-contributory qualified pension plan except for federally mandated limits on qualified plan benefits or on the level of compensation on which qualified plan benefits may be calculated.
CenterPoint Energy’s funding requirements and employer contributions for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||
| Minimum funding requirements for qualified pension plans | $ | 23 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
| Employer contributions to the qualified pension plans | 23 | 24 | 27 | |||||||
| Employer contributions to the non-qualified pension plans | 7 | 8 | 8 |
CenterPoint Energy expects to make contributions of approximately $105 million and $7 million to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans in 2025, respectively.
Changes in pension obligations and plan assets may not be immediately recognized as pension expense in CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income, but generally are recognized in future years over the remaining average service period of plan participants. As such, significant portions of pension expense recorded in any period may not reflect the actual level of benefit payments provided to plan participants.
As the sponsor of a plan, CenterPoint Energy is required to (a) recognize on its Consolidated Balance Sheet an asset for the plan’s over-funded status or a liability for the plan’s under-funded status, (b) measure a plan’s assets and obligations as of the end of the fiscal year and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of the plans in the year that changes occur through adjustments to other comprehensive income and, when related to its rate-regulated utilities with recoverability of cost, to regulatory assets.
The projected benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The impacts resulting from increases in discount rates were offset by the changes in demographic and expected versus actual returns on assets.
As of December 31, 2024, the projected benefit obligation exceeded the market value of plan assets of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans by $345 million. Changes in interest rates or the market values of the securities held by the plan during
87
a year could materially, positively or negatively, change the funded status and affect the level of pension expense and required contributions at the next remeasurement.
Houston Electric and CERC participate in CenterPoint Energy’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans covering substantially all employees. Pension cost by Registrant was as follows for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension cost | $ | 51 | $ | 23 | $ | 18 | $ | 53 | $ | 27 | $ | 19 | $ | 172 | $ | 59 | $ | 88 |
The calculation of pension cost and related liabilities requires the use of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. Two of the most critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate.
As of December 31, 2024, CenterPoint Energy’s qualified pension plans had an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.00%, which is 50 basis points higher than the 6.50% rate assumed as of December 31, 2023. The expected rate of return assumption was developed using the targeted asset allocation of our plans and the expected return for each asset class. CenterPoint Energy regularly reviews its actual asset allocation and periodically rebalances plan assets to reduce volatility and better match plan assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2024, the projected benefit obligation was calculated assuming a discount rate of 5.60%, which is 65 basis points higher than the 4.95% discount rate assumed as of December 31, 2023 attributed primarily to rising interest rates. The discount rate was determined by reviewing yields on high-quality bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency and the expected duration of pension obligations specific to the characteristics of CenterPoint Energy’s plans.
CenterPoint Energy’s actuarially determined pension and other postemployment cost for 2024 and 2023 that is greater or less than the amounts being recovered through rates in the majority of Texas jurisdictions is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. Pension cost for 2025, including the non-qualified benefit restoration plan, is estimated to be $49 million before applicable regulatory deferrals and capitalization, based on an expected return on plan assets of 7.00% and a discount rate of 5.60% as of December 31, 2024. If the expected return assumption were lowered by 50 basis points from 7.00% to 6.50%, the 2025 pension cost would increase by approximately $6 million.
As of December 31, 2024, the pension plans projected benefit obligation, including the unfunded non-qualified pension plans, exceeded plan assets by $345 million. If the discount rate were lowered by 50 basis points from 5.60% to 5.10%, CenterPoint Energy’s projected benefit obligation would increase by approximately $60 million and its 2025 pension cost would decrease by approximately $2 million. The expected reduction in pension cost due to the decrease in discount rate is a result of the expected correlation between the reduced interest rate and appreciation of fixed income assets in pension plans with significantly more fixed income instruments than equity instruments. In addition, the assumption change would impact CenterPoint Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets by increasing the regulatory asset recorded as of December 31, 2024 by $54 million and would result in an incremental charge to comprehensive income in 2024 of $5 million, net of tax of $1 million, due to the increase in the projected benefit obligation.
Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the pension plans will impact CenterPoint Energy’s future pension expense and liabilities. CenterPoint Energy cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
FY 2023 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001130310-24-000010.
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
No Registrant makes any representations as to the information related solely to CenterPoint Energy or the subsidiaries of CenterPoint Energy other than itself.
The following combined discussion and analysis should be read in combination with the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 herein. When discussing CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated financial information, it includes the results of Houston Electric and CERC, which, along with CenterPoint Energy, are collectively referred to as the Registrants. Where appropriate, information relating to a specific registrant has been segregated and labeled as such. Unless the context indicates otherwise, specific references to Houston Electric and CERC also pertain to CenterPoint Energy. In this combined Form 10-K, the terms “our,” “we” and “us” are used as abbreviated references to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including Houston Electric and CERC, unless stated otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Background
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. is a public utility holding company. CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries own and operate electric transmission, distribution and generation and natural gas distribution facilities. For a detailed description of CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries, please read Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Houston Electric is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy that provides electric transmission service to transmission service customers in the ERCOT region and distribution service to REPs serving the Texas gulf coast area that includes the city of Houston.
CERC Corp. is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy that (i) directly owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi and Texas, (ii) indirectly, through Indiana Gas and VEDO, owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Indiana and Ohio, respectively, and (iii) owns and operates permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP.
Reportable Segments
In this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we discuss our results from continuing operations on a consolidated basis and individually for each of our reportable segments, which are listed below. We also discuss our liquidity, capital resources and critical accounting policies. We are first and foremost an energy delivery company and it is our intention to remain focused on these regulated segments. The results of our business operations are significantly impacted by weather, customer growth, economic conditions, cost management, competition, rate proceedings before regulatory agencies and other actions of the various regulatory agencies to whose jurisdiction we are subject, among other factors.
44
As of December 31, 2023, CenterPoint Energy’s reportable segments were Electric, Natural Gas, and Corporate and Other.
•The Electric reportable segment includes electric transmission and distribution services that are subject to rate regulation in Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s service territories, as well as the impacts of generation-related stranded costs and other true-up balances recoverable by the regulated electric utility and energy delivery services to electric customers and electric generation assets to serve electric customers and optimize those assets in the wholesale power market in Indiana Electric’s service territory. For further information about the Electric reportable segment, see “Business — Our Business — Electric” in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
•The Natural Gas reportable segment includes (i) intrastate natural gas sales to, and natural gas transportation and distribution for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional customers in Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas; (ii) permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP; and (iii) home appliance maintenance and repair services to customers in Minnesota and home repair protection plans to natural gas customers in Indiana, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas through a third party. For further information about the Natural Gas reportable segment, see “Business — Our Business — Natural Gas” in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
•The Corporate and Other reportable segment includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services by Energy Systems Group through June 30, 2023, the date of the sale of Energy Systems Group, and corporate support operations that support CenterPoint Energy’s business operations. CenterPoint Energy’s Corporate and Other also includes office buildings and other real estate used for business operations.
Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
Subsequent Events. On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We expect our businesses to continue to be affected by the key factors and trends discussed below. Our expectations are based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from our expected results.
Factors Influencing Our Businesses and Industry Trends
We are an energy delivery company with electric transmission and distribution, power generation, and natural gas distribution operations that serve more than seven million metered customers across six jurisdictions. The majority of our revenues are generated from the transmission and delivery of electricity and the sale of natural gas by our subsidiaries.
We continue to execute on our strategic goals for our businesses which were set in 2021. These include our ten-year capital plan from 2021 through 2030, a focus on targeting controllable operations and maintenance savings for the benefit of our customers, prudent capital funding including divestitures of non-core assets, and net zero and carbon emission reduction goals. Our focus continues to be on the growth of our regulated utility businesses including our electric and gas utility operations, which comprise over 95% of our earnings for the year ended December 31, 2023. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
Pursuant to this business strategy and in light of the nature of our businesses, significant amounts of capital investment are reflected in our current capital plan, which has increased to nearly $44 billion through 2030, a nearly 10% increase from the original 10-year plan. These investments include a focus on additional system resiliency, reliability, and grid modernization. These investments are not only intended to meet our customers’ current needs, but are also in anticipation for further organic growth and load growth from increased electrification in our service territories. To fund these capital investments, we rely on internally generated cash, borrowings under our credit facilities, proceeds from commercial paper, cash proceeds from strategic transactions (such as the sale of our Arkansas and Oklahoma LDC businesses in 2022 and our Energy Systems Group divestiture in 2023), and issuances of equity and debt in the capital markets to satisfy these capital needs.
We strive to maintain investment grade ratings for our securities to access the capital markets on terms we consider reasonable. A reduction in our ratings generally would increase our borrowing costs for new issuances of debt, as well as
45
borrowing costs under our existing revolving credit facilities, and may prevent us from accessing the commercial paper markets. Disruptions in the financial markets along with high or rising interest rates can also affect the availability of new capital on terms we consider attractive. In those circumstances, we may not be able to obtain certain types of external financing or may be required to accept terms less favorable than they would otherwise accept. For that reason, we seek to maintain adequate liquidity for our businesses through existing credit facilities and prudent refinancing of existing debt.
The regulation of electric transmission, distribution and generation facilities as well as natural gas pipelines and related facilities by federal and state regulatory agencies affects CenterPoint Energy’s, Houston Electric’s and CERC’s businesses. In accordance with applicable regulations, CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC are making, and will continue to make, significant capital investments in their service territories under our capital plan to help operate and maintain safer, more reliable and growing electric and natural gas systems. The current economic environment (e.g., sustained higher interest rates and higher relative levels of inflation in the United States) discussed further below could result in heightened regulatory scrutiny as these regulatory agencies seek to reduce the financial impact of utility bills on customers.
While greater than 80% of CenterPoint Energy’s projected consolidated investments are expected to be recovered through interim capital recovery trackers or rate cases based on a forward test year, the balance is expected to be recovered through base rate cases. CERC’s Texas and Minnesota gas jurisdictions along with Indiana Electric have filed rates cases during 2023, and Houston Electric intends to file a rate case in early 2024 and CERC’s Ohio jurisdiction intends to file a rate case in the second half of 2024. The outcome of these base rate proceedings will determine, among other things, the ability to recover certain capital investments within those jurisdictions. The outcome of these base rate proceedings is uncertain and may be impacted by the current economic environment.
To assess our financial performance, our management primarily monitors the recovery of costs and return on investments by the evaluation of net income and capital expenditures, among other things, from our regulated service territories within our reportable segments. Within these broader financial measures, we monitor margins, natural gas and fuel costs, interest expense, capital spend, working capital requirements, and operation and maintenance expense. In addition to these financial measures, we also monitor a number of variables that management considers important to gauge the performance of our reportable segments, including the number of customers, throughput, use per customer, commodity prices, heating and cooling degree days, environmental impacts, safety factors, system reliability and customer satisfaction.
CenterPoint Energy and CERC have weather normalization or other rate mechanisms that largely mitigate the impact of weather on Natural Gas in Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Minnesota and Ohio, as applicable. CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas in Texas and CenterPoint Energy’s electric operations in Texas and Indiana do not have such mechanisms, although fixed customer charges are historically higher in Texas for Natural Gas compared to its other jurisdictions. As a result, fluctuations from normal weather may have a positive or negative effect on CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas’ results in Texas and on CenterPoint Energy’s electric operations’ results in its Texas and Indiana service territories.
Each state has a unique economy and is driven by different industrial sectors. Our largest customers reflect the diversity in industries in the states across our footprint. For example, Houston Electric is largely concentrated in Houston, a diverse economy where a higher percentage of employment is tied to the energy sector relative to other regions of the country. Although the Houston area represents a large part of our customer base, we have a diverse customer base throughout the various states our utility businesses serve. In Minnesota, for instance, education and health services are the state’s largest sectors. Indiana and Ohio are impacted by changes in the Midwest economy in general and changes in particular industries concentrated in the Midwest such as automotive, feed and grain processing. Some industries are driven by population growth like education and health care, while others may be influenced by strength in the national or international economy. Adverse economic conditions, coupled with concerns for protecting the environment and increased availability of alternate energy sources, may cause consumers to use less energy or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for our services. Long-term national trends indicate customers have reduced their energy consumption, which could adversely affect our results. To the extent population growth is affected by lower energy prices and there is financial pressure on some of our customers who operate within the energy industry, there may be an impact on the growth rate of our customer base and overall demand. Management expects residential meter growth for Houston Electric to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 2%. Typical customer growth in the jurisdictions served by the Natural Gas reportable segment is approximately 1%. Management expects residential meter growth for CERC to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 1%.
Rising inflation and sustained high interest rates and a recessionary environment could potentially adversely impact CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its 10-year capital plan. The inability to execute on our capital plan may result in lost
46
future revenues for CenterPoint Energy. Additionally, these economic conditions may affect customers’ ability to pay their utility bills which may preclude our ability to collect balances due from such customers.
Further, the global supply chain has experienced significant disruptions due to a multitude of factors, such as labor shortages, resource availability, long lead times, inflation and weather. These disruptions have adversely impacted the utility industry. Like many of our peers, we have experienced disruptions to our supply chain and may continue to experience such disruptions in the future. To the extent adverse economic conditions, including supply chain disruptions, affect our suppliers and customers as well as our ability to meet our capital plan and generation transition plan, results from our energy delivery businesses may suffer. For more information, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
Further, in response to concerns for protecting the environment, we have strived to take a leading stance in the transition to safer and cleaner energy by being the first combined electric and natural gas utility with regulated generation assets to adopt net zero for its Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 GHG emissions by 2035 goals. In addition, we set a Scope 3 GHG emission reduction goal across our multi-state footprint by committing to help our residential and commercial customers reduce GHG emissions attributable to their end use of natural gas by 20% to 30% by 2035 from a 2021 baseline. Our capital plan supports these goals.
Significant Events
Series A Preferred Stock Redemption. On September 1, 2023, CenterPoint Energy redeemed all of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock for cash of $800 million at a redemption price of $1,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date. For further information, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Divestiture of Energy Systems Group. On May 21, 2023, Vectren Energy Services entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement to sell all of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Energy Systems Group to ESG Holdings Group, for a purchase price of $157 million, subject to customary adjustments set forth in the Equity Purchase Agreement, including adjustments based on Energy Systems Group’s net working capital at closing, indebtedness, cash and cash equivalents and transaction expenses. The transaction closed on June 30, 2023 for $154 million in cash, subject to finalization of the purchase price adjustment. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Regulatory Proceedings. On March 23, 2023, CenterPoint Energy and CERC, collectively, received approximately $1.1 billion in proceeds from the customer rate relief bonds issued by the Texas Public Financing Authority related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event.
On April 5, 2023, a final order was issued approving the $39 million revenue requirement from Houston Electric’s 2021 investment in TEEEF. On April 5, 2023, Houston Electric filed its second TEEEF filing requesting a TEEEF revenue requirement of $188 million or a net increase in TEEEF revenues of approximately $149 million. On August 28, 2023 the State Office of Administrative Hearings issued an Order setting interim rates to collect an annual revenue requirement at the filed amount. On September 26, 2023, intervenors filed testimony with various recommendations including extending the amortization period. A settlement was reached with parties that incorporated an 8 1/2 year amortization period and a TEEEF revenue requirement of $153 million based on the December 31, 2022 balance with interim rates effective December 15, 2023. The State Office of Administrative Hearings ALJ approved the revised interim rates and the settlement was approved by the PUCT in its order issued on February 1, 2024.
On June 29, 2023, Indiana Electric received the net securitization proceeds of $337 million from the issuance and sale of the SIGECO Securitization Bonds to reimburse or pay for qualified costs approved by the IURC related to the completed retirement of its A.B. Brown coal-fired generation facilities.
For further information, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. For information related to our pending and completed regulatory proceedings to date in 2023 and to date in 2024, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
Debt Transactions. In 2023, CenterPoint Energy issued or borrowed a combined $6.0 billion in new debt, including Houston Electric’s issuance of $1.4 billion aggregate principal amount of general mortgage bonds, CERC’s issuance of $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes and a $500 million term loan, SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary’s issuance of $341 million aggregate principal amount of SIGECO Securitization Bonds, SIGECO’s issuance of $650 million aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds, and CenterPoint Energy’s issuance of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes, $400 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes and a $250 million term loan. During 2023, CenterPoint Energy repaid or redeemed a combined $3.0 billion of debt, including CERC’s repayment of $1.0 billion of term loans and $1.332 billion of senior notes maturing in 2023, CenterPoint Energy’s repayment of its
47
$250 million term loan and $350 million of its floating rate senior notes and SIGECO’s early redemption of $91 million of first mortgage bonds, excluding scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds. For information about debt transactions in 2023, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
CenterPoint Energy Leadership Transition. On March 15, 2023, CenterPoint Energy announced the appointment of Christopher A. Foster to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective May 5, 2023. On September 27, 2023, CenterPoint Energy appointed Kristie L. Colvin to the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of CenterPoint Energy and its affiliated subsidiaries, effective October 5, 2023. On October 26, 2023, CenterPoint Energy announced the retirement of Dave Lesar and appointment of Jason Wells to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 5, 2024.
Subsequent Events. On January 10, 2024, CenterPoint Energy entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with certain financial institutions with respect to the offering and sale from time to time of shares of Common Stock, having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $500 million. Sales of Common Stock may be made by any method permitted by applicable law and deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933. CenterPoint Energy may also enter into one or more forward sales agreements pursuant to master forward confirmations. The offer and sale of Common Stock under the Equity Distribution Agreement will terminate upon the earliest of (1) the sale of all Common Stock subject to the Equity Distribution Agreement, (2) termination of the Equity Distribution Agreement, or (3) May 17, 2026. As of February 20, 2024, CenterPoint Energy has not issued any shares of Common Stock under the Equity Distribution Agreement and has not entered into any forward sale agreements.
Additionally, on February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
Our past earnings and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future earnings and results of operations. The magnitude of our future earnings and results of our operations will depend on or be affected by numerous factors that apply to all Registrants unless otherwise indicated including:
•CenterPoint Energy’s business strategies and strategic initiatives, restructurings, including the completed Restructuring, joint ventures and acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the proposed sale of our Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses, and the completed sale of Energy Systems Group, which we cannot assure will have the anticipated benefits to us;
•industrial, commercial and residential growth in our service territories and changes in market demand, including the effects of energy efficiency measures and demographic patterns;
•our ability to fund and invest planned capital and the timely recovery of our investments, including those related to Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan as part of its IRPs;
•our ability to successfully construct, operate, repair and maintain electric generating facilities, natural gas facilities, TEEEF and electric transmission facilities, including complying with applicable environmental standards and the implementation of a well-balanced energy and resource mix, as appropriate;
•timely and appropriate rate actions that allow and authorize requested and timely recovery of costs and a reasonable return on investment, including the timing and amount of recovery of Houston Electric’s TEEEF leases, and requested or favorable adjustments to rates and approval of other requested items as part of base rate proceedings;
•economic conditions in regional and national markets, including changes to inflation and interest rates, and instability of banking institutions, and their effect on sales, prices and costs;
•weather variations and other natural phenomena, including the impact of severe weather events on operations, capital and legislation such as in connection with the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•volatility in the markets for natural gas as a result of, among other factors, armed conflicts, including the conflict in the Middle East and any broader related conflict, and the conflict in Ukraine, and the related sanctions on certain Russian entities;
•disruptions to the global supply chain, including volatility in commodity prices, and tariffs and other legislation impacting the supply chain, that could prevent CenterPoint Energy from securing the resources needed to, among other things, fully execute on its 10-year capital plan or achieve its net zero and carbon emissions reduction goals;
•non-payment for our services due to financial distress of our customers and the ability of our customers, including REPs, to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC, and the negative impact on such ability related to adverse economic conditions and severe weather events;
48
•public health threats, such as COVID-19, and their effect on our operations, business and financial condition, our industries and the communities we serve, U.S. and world financial markets and supply chains, potential regulatory actions and changes in customer and stakeholder behavior relating thereto;
•state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments affecting various aspects of our businesses, including, among others, energy deregulation or re-regulation, pipeline integrity and safety and changes in regulation and legislation pertaining to trade, health care, finance and actions regarding the rates charged by our regulated businesses;
•direct or indirect effects on our facilities, resources, operations and financial condition resulting from terrorism, cyberattacks or intrusions, data security breaches or other attempts to disrupt our businesses or the businesses of third parties, or other catastrophic events such as fires, ice, earthquakes, explosions, leaks, floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes and other severe weather events, pandemic health events or other occurrences;
•tax legislation, including the effects of the IRA (which includes but is not limited to any potential changes to tax rates, CAMT imposed, tax credits and/or interest deductibility), as well as any changes in tax laws under the current or future administrations, and uncertainties involving state commissions’ and local municipalities’ regulatory requirements and determinations regarding the treatment of EDIT and our rates;
•our ability to mitigate weather impacts through normalization or rate mechanisms, and the effectiveness of such mechanisms;
•actions by credit rating agencies, including any potential downgrades to credit ratings;
•matters affecting regulatory approval, legislative actions, construction, implementation of necessary technology or other issues with respect to major capital projects that result in delays or cancellation or in costs that cannot be recouped in rates;
•local, state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments relating to the environment, including, among others, those related to global climate change, air emissions, carbon, waste water discharges and the handling and disposal of CCR that could impact operations, cost recovery of generation plant costs and related assets, and CenterPoint Energy’s net zero and carbon emissions reduction goals;
•the impact of unplanned facility outages or other closures;
•the sufficiency of our insurance coverage, including availability, cost, coverage and terms and ability to recover claims;
•the availability and prices of raw materials and services and changes in labor for current and future construction projects and operations and maintenance costs, including our ability to control such costs;
•impacts from CenterPoint Energy’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, such as the investment performance and increases to net periodic costs as a result of plan settlements and changes in assumptions, including discount rates;
•changes in interest rates and their impact on costs of borrowing and the valuation of CenterPoint Energy’s pension benefit obligation;
•commercial bank and financial market conditions, including disruptions in the banking industry, our access to capital, the cost of such capital, and the results of our financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in the debt capital markets;
•inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations to us;
•the extent and effectiveness of our risk management activities;
•timely and appropriate regulatory actions, which include actions allowing securitization for any hurricanes or other severe weather events, or natural disasters or other recovery of costs, including stranded coal-fired generation asset costs;
•acquisition and merger or divestiture activities involving us or our industry, including the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition and divestiture plans such as the proposed sale of our Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses;
•our ability to attract, effectively transition, motivate and retain management and key employees and maintain good labor relations;
•changes in technology, particularly with respect to efficient battery storage or the emergence or growth of new, developing or alternative sources of generation, and their adoption by consumers;
•the impact of climate change and alternate energy sources on the demand for natural gas and electricity generated or transmitted by us;
•the timing and outcome of any audits, disputes and other proceedings related to taxes;
•the recording of impairment charges;
•political and economic developments, including energy and environmental policies under the current administration;
•CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its strategy, initiatives, targets and goals, including its net zero and carbon emissions reduction goals and its operations and maintenance expenditure goals;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•the effect of changes in and application of accounting standards and pronouncements; and
49
•other factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report and in other reports that the Registrants file from time to time with the SEC.
CENTERPOINT ENERGY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity and natural gas. CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates its subsidiaries charge, debt service costs, income tax expense, its subsidiaries ability to collect receivables from REPs and customers and its ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
Income available to common shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 654 | $ | 603 | $ | 475 | $ | 51 | $ | 128 | |||||||||
| Natural Gas | 533 | 492 | 403 | 41 | 89 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Utility Operations | 1,187 | 1,095 | 878 | 92 | 217 | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate & Other (1) | (320) | (87) | (305) | (233) | 218 | ||||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations | — | — | 818 | — | (818) | ||||||||||||||
| Total CenterPoint Energy | $ | 867 | $ | 1,008 | $ | 1,391 | $ | (141) | $ | (383) |
(1)Includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services through Energy Systems Group through the date of sale on June 30, 2023, unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense, intercompany eliminations and the reduction of income allocated to preferred shareholders.
2023 Compared to 2022
Net Income. CenterPoint Energy reported income available to common shareholders of $867 million for 2023 compared to income available to common shareholders of $1,008 million for 2022.
Income available to common shareholders decreased $141 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in net income of $51 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in net income of $41 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
•a decrease in income available to common shareholders of $233 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to a pre-tax net gain of $86 million on the sale of Energy Transfer equity securities in 2022 further discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, partially offset by $45 million of costs associated with early redemption of long-term debt in first quarter 2022. The decrease is also due to a loss on sale of $13 million and current tax expense of $32 million related to the divestiture of Energy Systems Group further discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, as well as $19 million due to remeasurement of deferred income tax balances. The remaining variance is due largely to an increase in borrowing costs.
2022 Compared to 2021
Net Income. CenterPoint Energy reported income available to common shareholders of $1,008 million for 2022 compared to income available to common shareholders of $1,391 million for 2021.
Income available to common shareholders decreased $383 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in net income of $128 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in net income of $89 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $218 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to a $28 million pre-tax payment related to the impact of Board-implemented governance changes announced in July 2021, the net gain of $86 million in 2022 and a net loss of $122 million in December 2021 on the sale of Energy Transfer equity securities discussed further in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, partially offset by a $34 million loss in Enable Series A Preferred Unit distributions in 2021 discussed in Note 4, and a decrease in income allocated to
50
preferred shareholders of $46 million, primarily due to the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock to Common Stock during 2021; and
•a decrease in income of $818 million from discontinued operations, discussed further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events. On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
51
CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT
CenterPoint Energy’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for the reportable segments. Segment results include inter-segment interest income and expense, which may result in inter-segment profit and loss.
The following discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations is separated into two reportable segments, Electric and Natural Gas.
ELECTRIC
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,290 | $ | 4,108 | $ | 3,763 | $ | 182 | $ | 345 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 176 | 222 | 186 | 46 | (36) | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 1,880 | 1,864 | 1,761 | (16) | (103) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 872 | 793 | 775 | (79) | (18) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 272 | 275 | 268 | 3 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,200 | 3,154 | 2,990 | (46) | (164) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 1,090 | 954 | 773 | 136 | 181 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (303) | (235) | (226) | (68) | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 56 | 31 | 23 | 25 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 843 | 750 | 570 | 93 | 180 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 189 | 147 | 95 | (42) | (52) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 654 | $ | 603 | $ | 475 | $ | 51 | $ | 128 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 35,166 | 35,074 | 32,067 | — | % | 9 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 108,766 | 105,541 | 103,000 | 3 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of normal weather for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 114 | % | 110 | % | 108 | % | 4 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 90 | % | 121 | % | 82 | % | (31) | % | 39 | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,588,510 | 2,534,730 | 2,493,832 | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,916,028 | 2,858,203 | 2,814,859 | 2 | % | 2 | % |
52
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Electric reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | $ | 167 | $ | 38 | |||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF and impact of the change in rate design, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 122 | 157 | |||||
| Customer growth | 26 | 28 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | — | 32 | |||||
| Impacts from increased peak demand in the prior year, collected in rates in the current year | — | 2 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | — | (3) | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | (5) | 2 | |||||
| Pass-through revenues, offset in operation and maintenance below | (13) | 21 | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues, primarily related to service connections and off-system sales | (14) | 11 | |||||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items below | (27) | (33) | |||||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts | (28) | 54 | |||||
| Cost of fuel and purchased power, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | (46) | 36 | |||||
| Total | $ | 182 | $ | 345 | |||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||||||
| Cost of purchased power, offset in revenues above | $ | 30 | $ | 12 | |||
| Cost of fuel, including coal, natural gas, and fuel oil, offset in revenues above | 16 | (48) | |||||
| $ | 46 | $ | (36) | ||||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (26) | $ | (77) | |||
| Contract services | (21) | (2) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues above | (8) | 4 | |||||
| Support services | (8) | 20 | |||||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items | — | 3 | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 7 | 7 | |||||
| Pass through expenses, offset in revenues above | 11 | (19) | |||||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | 29 | (39) | |||||
| Total | $ | (16) | $ | (103) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (106) | $ | (40) | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items | 27 | 22 | |||||
| Total | $ | (79) | $ | (18) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of changes to tax rates | $ | 2 | $ | (14) | |||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | 1 | 7 | |||||
| Total | $ | 3 | $ | (7) | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (76) | $ | (32) | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items above | (4) | 8 | |||||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 12 | 15 | |||||
| Total | $ | (68) | $ | (9) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | $ | 21 | $ | 8 | |||
| Bond Companies and SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, offset in other line items above | 4 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 25 | $ | 8 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
53
NATURAL GAS
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,279 | $ | 4,946 | $ | 4,336 | $ | (667) | $ | 610 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 1,888 | 2,665 | 1,941 | 777 | (724) | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 3 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 14 | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 949 | 919 | 979 | (30) | 60 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 513 | 466 | 527 | (47) | 61 | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 245 | 261 | 253 | 16 | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,598 | 4,315 | 3,718 | 717 | (597) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 681 | 631 | 618 | 50 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | — | 303 | 8 | (303) | 295 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (188) | (137) | (141) | (51) | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 15 | (62) | (2) | 77 | (60) | |||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | 508 | 735 | 483 | (227) | 252 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | (25) | 243 | 80 | 268 | (163) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 533 | $ | 492 | $ | 403 | $ | 41 | $ | 89 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in Bcf): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 199 | 240 | 241 | (17) | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 418 | 424 | 428 | (1) | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 617 | 664 | 669 | (7) | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 86 | % | 106 | % | 91 | % | (20) | % | 15 | % | ||||||||
| Number of customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 4,010,113 | 3,964,221 | 4,372,428 | 1 | % | (9) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 303,841 | 301,834 | 354,602 | 1 | % | (15) | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 4,313,954 | 4,266,055 | 4,727,030 | 1 | % | (10) | % |
54
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | $ | (754) | $ | 923 | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | (38) | (457) | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | (17) | 19 | |||||
| Weather and usage | (7) | 22 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | 3 | 6 | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue | 14 | 26 | |||||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in operation and maintenance below | 17 | 3 | |||||
| Non-utility revenues, including impacts of MES disposal | 18 | (17) | |||||
| Customer growth | 20 | 16 | |||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design, exclusive of the TCJA impact below | 77 | 69 | |||||
| Total | $ | (667) | $ | 610 | |||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | $ | 754 | $ | (923) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 23 | 199 | |||||
| $ | 777 | $ | (724) | ||||
| Non-utility costs of revenues, including natural gas | |||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | $ | 1 | $ | 14 | |||
| $ | 1 | $ | 14 | ||||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Miscellaneous operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | $ | (36) | $ | (21) | |||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | (17) | (3) | |||||
| Contract services | (3) | (14) | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 3 | 125 | |||||
| Labor and benefits, primarily due to headcount | 11 | (5) | |||||
| Corporate support services | 12 | (22) | |||||
| Total | $ | (30) | $ | 60 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | $ | (49) | $ | (23) | |||
| Lower depreciation rates in Indiana from 2021 rate order | — | 18 | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 2 | 66 | |||||
| Total | $ | (47) | $ | 61 | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues above | $ | 17 | $ | (19) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 1 | 23 | |||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (2) | (12) | |||||
| Total | $ | 16 | $ | (8) | |||
| Gain on Sale | |||||||
| Gain on Sale of Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses in 2022 | $ | (303) | $ | 295 | |||
| Total | $ | (303) | $ | 295 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (59) | $ | (11) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 8 | 15 | |||||
| Total | $ | (51) | $ | 4 | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Changes to non-service benefit cost, primarily settlement cost incurred in 2022 | $ | 60 | $ | (66) | |||
| AFUDC - Equity, primarily from increased capital spend | 10 | 3 | |||||
| Other miscellaneous non-operating income (expenses) | 7 | 3 | |||||
| Total | $ | 77 | $ | (60) |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
55
Subsequent Events. On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
HOUSTON ELECTRIC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Houston Electric’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. Houston Electric consists of a single reportable segment. Houston Electric’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Houston Electric’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates Houston Electric charges, debt service costs, income tax expense, Houston Electric’s ability to collect receivables from REPs and Houston Electric’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of Houston Electric’s consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
| TDU | $ | 3,514 | $ | 3,205 | $ | 2,894 | $ | 309 | $ | 311 | ||||||||
| Bond Companies | 163 | 207 | 240 | (44) | (33) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 3,677 | 3,412 | 3,134 | 265 | 278 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | 1,669 | 1,647 | 1,591 | (22) | (56) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | 593 | 479 | 429 | (114) | (50) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 262 | 261 | 251 | (1) | (10) | |||||||||||||
| Bond Companies | 159 | 194 | 219 | 35 | 25 | |||||||||||||
| Total | 2,683 | 2,581 | 2,490 | (102) | (91) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 994 | 831 | 644 | 163 | 187 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (259) | (202) | (183) | (57) | (19) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | (8) | (13) | (21) | 5 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 34 | 19 | 17 | 15 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 761 | 635 | 457 | 126 | 178 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 168 | 125 | 76 | (43) | (49) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 593 | $ | 510 | $ | 381 | $ | 83 | $ | 129 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 33,830 | 33,676 | 30,650 | — | % | 10 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 103,862 | 100,062 | 96,898 | 4 | % | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 114 | % | 110 | % | 109 | % | 4 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 92 | % | 120 | % | 80 | % | (28) | % | 40 | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,455,309 | 2,402,329 | 2,359,168 | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,763,535 | 2,706,598 | 2,660,938 | 2 | % | 2 | % |
56
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for Houston Electric:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | $ | 187 | $ | 30 | |||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF and impact of the change in rate design, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers | 120 | 157 | |||||
| Customer growth | 25 | 27 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 1 | (3) | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | — | 32 | |||||
| Impacts from increased peak demand in the prior year, collected in rates in the current year | — | 2 | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues | (4) | 5 | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | (5) | 1 | |||||
| Weather impacts and other usage | (15) | 60 | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items below | (44) | (33) | |||||
| Total | $ | 265 | $ | 278 | |||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (26) | $ | (77) | |||
| Contract services | (23) | 3 | |||||
| Energy efficiency program costs, offset in revenues above | (8) | 3 | |||||
| Support services | (6) | 24 | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 3 | 12 | |||||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | 38 | (21) | |||||
| Total | $ | (22) | $ | (56) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (114) | $ | (50) | |||
| Total | $ | (114) | $ | (50) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | $ | (2) | $ | 4 | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service, and the impact of changes to tax rates | 1 | (14) | |||||
| Total | $ | (1) | $ | (10) | |||
| Bond Companies expense | |||||||
| Operations and maintenance and depreciation expense, offset by revenues above | $ | 35 | $ | 25 | |||
| Total | $ | 35 | $ | 25 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (64) | $ | (32) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 7 | 13 | |||||
| Total | $ | (57) | $ | (19) | |||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | |||||||
| Lower outstanding principal balance, offset by revenues above | $ | 5 | $ | 8 | |||
| Total | $ | 5 | $ | 8 | |||
| Other income, net | |||||||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | $ | 11 | $ | 2 | |||
| Bond Companies | 4 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 15 | $ | 2 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
57
CERC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CERC’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. CERC consists of a single reportable segment. CERC’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for natural gas. CERC’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various federal, state and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates CERC charges, debt service costs and income tax expense, CERC’s ability to collect receivables from customers and CERC’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of CERC’s consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | 4,149 | 4,800 | 4,200 | (651) | 600 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas | 1,856 | 2,607 | 1,885 | 751 | (722) | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 3 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 904 | 886 | 973 | (18) | 87 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 493 | 448 | 483 | (45) | 35 | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 243 | 257 | 249 | 14 | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,499 | 4,202 | 3,607 | 703 | (595) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 650 | 598 | 593 | 52 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | — | 557 | 11 | (557) | 546 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (178) | (130) | (134) | (48) | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 14 | (64) | (4) | 78 | (60) | |||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | 486 | 961 | 466 | (475) | 495 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | (26) | 236 | 76 | 262 | (160) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 512 | $ | 725 | $ | 390 | $ | (213) | $ | 335 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in BCF): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 194 | 233 | 235 | (17) | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 386 | 389 | 396 | (1) | % | (2) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 580 | 622 | 631 | (7) | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 86 | % | 106 | % | 91 | % | (20) | % | 15 | % | ||||||||
| Number of customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 3,905,388 | 3,859,726 | 4,268,385 | 1 | % | (10) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 293,235 | 291,184 | 336,828 | 1 | % | (14) | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 4,198,623 | 4,150,910 | 4,605,213 | 1 | % | (10) | % |
58
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for CERC:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 to 2022 | 2022 to 2021 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | $ | (728) | $ | 921 | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | (38) | (457) | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes | (15) | 19 | |||||
| Weather and usage | (7) | 22 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | 3 | 6 | |||||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in operation and maintenance | 8 | 8 | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue | 13 | 26 | |||||
| Non-utility revenues, including impacts of MES disposal | 18 | (17) | |||||
| Customer growth | 20 | 16 | |||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design, exclusive of the TCJA impact | 75 | 56 | |||||
| Total | $ | (651) | $ | 600 | |||
| Utility natural gas | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | $ | 728 | $ | (921) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 23 | 199 | |||||
| Total | $ | 751 | $ | (722) | |||
| Non-utility costs of revenues, including natural gas | |||||||
| Other, primarily non-utility cost of revenues | $ | 1 | $ | 13 | |||
| Total | $ | 1 | $ | 13 | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Miscellaneous operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | $ | (36) | $ | (20) | |||
| Energy efficiency and other pass-through, offset in revenues above | (8) | (8) | |||||
| Contract services | — | (8) | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 3 | 125 | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 11 | (4) | |||||
| Corporate Support Services | 12 | 2 | |||||
| Total | $ | (18) | $ | 87 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | ||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | $ | (47) | $ | (44) | |||
| Indiana lower depreciation rates from recent rate order | — | 13 | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 2 | 66 | |||||
| Total | $ | (45) | $ | 35 | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues | $ | 15 | $ | (19) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 1 | 23 | |||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (2) | (12) | |||||
| Total | 14 | (8) | |||||
| Gain on sale | |||||||
| Net gain on sale of Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses | $ | (557) | $ | 546 | |||
| Total | $ | (557) | $ | 546 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (56) | $ | (11) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 8 | 15 | |||||
| Total | $ | (48) | $ | 4 | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Changes to non-service benefit cost, primarily settlement cost incurred in 2022 | $ | 60 | $ | (65) | |||
| Increase in Equity AFUDC | 9 | 2 | |||||
| Other miscellaneous non-operating income (expenses) | 9 | — | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | — | 3 | |||||
| Total | $ | 78 | $ | (60) |
59
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events. On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Historical Cash Flows
The net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for 2023, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 3,877 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 2,312 | $ | 1,810 | $ | 966 | $ | 856 | $ | 22 | $ | 770 | $ | (1,219) | ||||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (4,233) | (2,503) | (1,643) | (1,628) | (2,435) | 406 | (1,851) | (1,617) | (1,287) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing activities | 374 | 1,103 | (668) | (345) | 1,324 | (1,277) | 1,916 | 926 | 2,515 |
Operating Activities. The following items contributed to increased (decreased) net cash provided by operating activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 compared to 2022 | 2022 compared to 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in net income after adjusting for non-cash items | $ | 394 | $ | 235 | $ | 170 | $ | (492) | $ | 211 | $ | (169) | ||||||||||
| Changes in working capital | 917 | 229 | 358 | (615) | (177) | (107) | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes in net regulatory assets and liabilities (1) | 809 | (89) | 908 | 2,529 | 196 | 2,339 | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (2) | — | — | — | 339 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes in distributions from unconsolidated affiliates (2) | — | — | — | (155) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Lower pension contribution | 3 | — | — | 26 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (56) | 60 | 20 | 156 | (34) | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,067 | $ | 435 | $ | 1,456 | $ | 1,788 | $ | 196 | $ | 2,075 |
(1)The change in net regulatory assets and liabilities at CenterPoint Energy and CERC is primarily due to securitization of the incurred natural gas costs associated with the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the February 2021 Winter Storm Event.
(2)In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s equity investment in Enable met the held for sale criteria and is reflected as discontinued operations on CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
60
Investing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in investing activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 compared to 2022 | 2022 compared to 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of equity securities | $ | (702) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (618) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Net change in capital expenditures | 18 | 157 | 42 | (1,255) | (817) | (337) | ||||||||||||||||
| Transaction costs related to the Enable Merger | — | — | — | 49 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash received related to Enable Merger | — | — | — | (5) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes receivable from unconsolidated affiliates | — | (238) | (1) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from divestitures | (1,931) | — | (2,075) | 2,053 | — | 2,053 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 10 | 13 | (15) | (1) | (1) | (23) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (2,605) | $ | (68) | $ | (2,049) | $ | 223 | $ | (818) | $ | 1,693 |
Financing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in financing activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 compared to 2022 | 2022 compared to 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in commercial paper outstanding | $ | (981) | $ | — | $ | (227) | $ | (1,206) | $ | — | $ | (646) | ||||||||||
| Net changes in long-term debt outstanding, excluding commercial paper | 2,560 | 373 | (778) | (1,231) | 386 | (936) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in debt and equity issuance costs | (19) | 4 | — | 2 | (5) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in short-term borrowings | (462) | — | (462) | 479 | — | 479 | ||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of Series A Preferred Stock | (800) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Increased payment of Common Stock dividends | (45) | — | — | (55) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Decreased (increased) payment of Preferred Stock dividends | (1) | — | — | 58 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Payment of obligation for finance lease | 485 | 485 | — | (306) | (306) | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes payable from affiliated companies | — | (772) | 1,517 | — | (374) | (2,007) | ||||||||||||||||
| Contribution from parent | — | (258) | 211 | — | 1,013 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to parent | — | (51) | 348 | — | (316) | (827) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (18) | (2) | — | (2) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 719 | $ | (221) | $ | 609 | $ | (2,261) | $ | 398 | $ | (3,792) |
Future Sources and Uses of Cash
The Registrants expect that anticipated 2024 cash needs will be met with borrowings under their credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, proceeds from sales of Common Stock under the Equity Distribution Agreement further described in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements, anticipated cash flows from operations, and with respect to CenterPoint Energy and CERC, proceeds from commercial paper. Discretionary financing or refinancing may result in the issuance of equity securities of CenterPoint Energy or debt securities of the Registrants in the capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit facilities or term bank loans. Issuances of equity or debt in the capital markets, funds raised in the commercial paper markets and additional credit facilities may not, however, be available on acceptable terms.
Material Current and Long-term Cash Requirements. The liquidity and capital requirements of the Registrants are affected primarily by results of operations, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, tax payments, working capital needs and various regulatory actions. Capital expenditures are expected to be used for investment in infrastructure for electric and natural gas distribution operations. These capital expenditures are anticipated to maintain reliability and safety, increase resiliency and
61
expand our systems through value-added projects. In addition to dividend payments on CenterPoint Energy’s Common Stock and interest payments on debt, the Registrants’ principal anticipated cash requirements for 2024 include the following:
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||
| Estimated capital expenditures | $ | 3,669 | $ | 1,895 | $ | 1,385 | |||||
| Maturing CenterPoint Energy senior notes | 850 | — | — | ||||||||
| Scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds | 178 | 161 | — | ||||||||
| Maturing SIGECO first mortgage bonds | 22 | — | — | ||||||||
| Minimum contributions to pension plans and other post-retirement plans | 17 | 1 | 4 |
The following table sets forth the Registrants’ estimates of the Registrants’ capital expenditures currently planned for projects for 2024 through 2028. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for CenterPoint Energy’s actual capital expenditures by reportable segment for 2023.
| 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 2,205 | $ | 3,341 | $ | 3,589 | $ | 3,080 | $ | 3,018 | ||||||||||
| Natural Gas | 1,450 | 1,432 | 1,604 | 1,469 | 1,344 | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 14 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,669 | $ | 4,793 | $ | 5,213 | $ | 4,569 | $ | 4,382 | ||||||||||
| Houston Electric (1) | $ | 1,895 | $ | 2,598 | $ | 2,663 | $ | 2,822 | $ | 2,816 | ||||||||||
| CERC (1) | $ | 1,385 | $ | 1,370 | $ | 1,486 | $ | 1,391 | $ | 1,271 |
(1)Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
Capital Expenditures for Climate-Related Projects. As part of its approximately $44.5 billion 10-year capital expenditure plan, which concludes in 2030, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in cleaner energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation and electric vehicle expansion.
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ material current and long-term cash requirements as of December 31, 2023.
| Total | 2024 | 2025-2026 | 2027-2028 | 2029 and thereafter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | |||||||||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds (1) | $ | 502 | $ | 178 | $ | 27 | $ | 29 | $ | 268 | |||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) (2) | 18,282 | 872 | 2,311 | 3,894 | 11,205 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (3) | 187 | 27 | 32 | 29 | 99 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (3) | 9,238 | 835 | 1,652 | 1,317 | 5,434 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (4) | 6,749 | 993 | 2,002 | 982 | 2,772 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 34,962 | $ | 2,909 | $ | 6,024 | $ | 6,251 | $ | 19,778 | |||||||||
| Houston Electric | |||||||||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds (1) | $ | 161 | 161 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) | 7,513 | — | 300 | 800 | 6,413 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (3) | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (3) | 5,340 | 306 | 610 | 583 | 3,841 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 13,018 | $ | 471 | $ | 910 | $ | 1,383 | $ | 10,254 |
62
| Total | 2024 | 2025-2026 | 2027-2028 | 2029 and thereafter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| CERC | |||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | $ | 4,700 | $ | — | $ | 70 | $ | 1,740 | $ | 2,890 | |||||||||
| Interest payments — long-term debt (3) | 2,213 | 240 | 478 | 398 | 1,097 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (4) | 4,245 | 679 | 1,083 | 799 | 1,684 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 11,162 | $ | 923 | $ | 1,631 | $ | 2,937 | $ | 5,671 |
(1)Balances reflect aggregate principal amounts outstanding and do not include unamortized discounts, premiums or issuance costs. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
(2)ZENS obligations are included in the 2029 and thereafter column at their contingent principal amount of $18 million as of December 31, 2023. These obligations are exchangeable for cash at any time at the option of the holders for 95% of the current value of the reference shares attributable to each ZENS ($538 million as of December 31, 2023), as discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(3)The Registrants calculated estimated interest payments for long-term debt as follows: for fixed-rate debt and term debt, the Registrants calculated interest based on the applicable rates and payment dates; for variable-rate debt and/or non-term debt, the Registrants used interest rates in place as of December 31, 2023. The Registrants typically expect to settle such interest payments with cash flows from operations and short-term borrowings.
(4)For a discussion of commodity and other commitments, see Note 15(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
The table above does not include the following:
•estimated future payments for expected future AROs primarily estimated to be incurred after 2026. See Note 3(c) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•expected contributions to pension plans and other postretirement plans in 2024. See Note 8(g) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•operating leases. See Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. Other than Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for tax-exempt long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy (see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements) and short-term leases, the Registrants have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Regulatory Matters
February 2021 Winter Storm Event
For information about the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Indiana Electric Securitization of Generation Retirements (CenterPoint Energy)
For further information about the issuance of SIGECO Securitization Bonds, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Indiana Electric CPCN (CenterPoint Energy)
BTAs
On February 23, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to purchase the Posey solar project. On October 27, 2021, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the Posey solar project through a BTA to acquire its solar array assets for a fixed purchase price and approved recovery of costs via a levelized rate over the anticipated 35-year life. Due to community feedback and rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Indiana Electric, along with Arevon, the developer, announced plans in January 2022 to downsize the Posey solar project to 191 MW. Indiana Electric collaboratively agreed to the scope change, and on February 1, 2023, Indiana Electric entered into an amended and restated BTA that is contingent on further IURC review and approval. On February 7, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to approve the amended BTA. With the passage of the IRA,
63
Indiana Electric can now pursue PTCs for solar projects. Indiana Electric requested that project costs, net of PTCs, be recovered in rate base rather than a levelized rate, through base rates or the CECA mechanism, depending on which provides more timely recovery. On September 6, 2023 the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN. The Posey solar project is expected to be placed in service in 2025 and recovered through base rates.
On July 5, 2022, Indiana Electric entered into a BTA to acquire a 130 MW solar array in Pike County, Indiana through a special purpose entity for a capped purchase price. A CPCN for the project was filed with the IURC on July 29, 2022. On September 21, 2022, an agreement in principle was reached resolving all the issues between Indiana Electric and OUCC. The Stipulation and Settlement agreement was filed on October 6, 2022 and a settlement hearing was held on November 1, 2022. On January 11, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the settlement agreement authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase and acquire the Pike County solar project through a BTA and approved the estimated cost. The IURC also designated the project as a clean energy project under Ind. Code Ch. 8-1-8.8, approved the proposed levelized rate and associated ratemaking and accounting treatment. Due to inflationary pressures, the developer disclosed that costs have exceeded the agreed upon levels in the BTA. Once pricing is updated and parties determine whether to continue with the project, Indiana Electric may have to refile for approval of the project with the IURC, which could delay the in-service date from 2025 to 2026. If Indiana Electric is not able to reach a mutually acceptable solution with the developers of the Pike County Solar project, Indiana Electric may seek to terminate the project.
On January 10, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to acquire a wind energy generating facility with installed capacity of 200 MWs through a BTA, consistent with its 2019/2020 IRP that calls for up to 300 MWs of wind generation. The wind project is located in MISO’s Central Region. Indiana Electric has approval to recover the costs of the wind facility via the CECA mechanism, which is expected to be placed in service by the end of 2026. On June 6, 2023 the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, and thereby authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the wind generating facility. However, as of the date of this Form 10-K, Indiana Electric has not entered into any definitive agreement relating to this wind energy generating facility, and it is not certain that a definitive agreement will be entered into at all.
PPAs
Indiana Electric also sought approval in February 2021 for a 100 MW solar PPA with Clenera LLC in Warrick County, Indiana. The request accounted for increased cost of debt related to this PPA, which provides equivalent equity return to offset imputed debt during the 25 year life of the PPA. In October 2021, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar PPA but denied the request to preemptively offset imputed debt in the PPA cost. Due to rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Clenera LLC and Indiana Electric were compelled to renegotiate terms of the agreement to increase the PPA price. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs are requested to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date could be delayed from 2025 to 2026.
On August 25, 2021, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 185 MW of solar power, under a 15-year PPA, from Oriden, which is developing a solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, and 150 MW of solar power, under a 20-year PPA, from Origis, which is developing a solar project in Knox County, Indiana. On May 4, 2022, the IURC issued an order approving Indiana Electric to enter into both PPAs. In March 2022, when the results of the MISO interconnection study were completed, Origis advised Indiana Electric that the costs to construct the solar project in Knox County, Indiana had increased. The increase was largely driven by escalating commodity and supply chain costs impacting manufacturers worldwide. In August 2022, Indiana Electric and Origis entered into an amended PPA, which reiterated the terms contained in the 2021 PPA with certain modifications. On February 22, 2023 the IURC approved the Knox County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection delays, the project in-service date could be delayed from 2024 to 2025. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with Oriden with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs were approved to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA with Oriden. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Vermillion County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date could be delayed from 2025 to 2026.
Natural Gas Combustion Turbines
On June 17, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to construct two natural gas combustion turbines to replace portions of its existing coal-fired generation fleet. On June 28, 2022, the IURC approved the CPCN. The
64
estimated $334 million turbine facility is being constructed at the previous site of the A.B. Brown power plant in Posey County, Indiana and will provide a combined output of 460 MW. Indiana Electric received approval for depreciation expense and post in-service carrying costs to be deferred in a regulatory asset until the date Indiana Electric’s base rates include a return on and recovery of depreciation expense on the facility. A new approximately 23.5 mile pipeline will be constructed and operated by Texas Gas Transmission, LLC to supply natural gas to the turbine facility. FERC granted a certificate to construct the pipeline on October 20, 2022. The period to challenge FERC’s certificate in a federal district court expired on February 20, 2023. Indiana Electric granted its contractor a full notice to proceed to construct the turbines on December 9, 2022. The facility is targeted to be operational by mid year 2025. Recovery of the proposed natural gas combustion turbines and regulatory asset is included in the forecasted test year in the Indiana Electric rate case, which was filed with the IURC on December 5, 2023.
For more information regarding uncertainties related to our solar projects, see Item 1A of Part I of this combined Form 10-K and “ —Solar Panel Issues” below.
Culley Unit 3 Operations
In June 2022, F.B. Culley Unit 3, an Indiana Electric coal-fired electric generation unit with an installed generating capacity of 270 MW, experienced an operating issue relating to its boiler feed pump turbine. The unit returned to service in March 2023. In testimony filed September 13, 2023, the OUCC and an intervenor that represents industrial customers filed testimony with the IURC alleging that Indiana Electric did not act prudently which led to the unplanned outage and recommended disallowances between $21 million to $27 million. On October 23, 2023, Indiana Electric filed rebuttal testimony with the IURC and an evidentiary hearing was held on November 2, 2023. Indiana Electric expects a decision from the IURC in the first half of 2024.
Space City Solar Transmission Interconnection Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On December 17, 2020, Houston Electric filed a CPCN with the PUCT for approval to build a 345 kV transmission line in Wharton County, Texas connecting the Hillje substation on Houston Electric’s transmission system to the planned 610 MW Space City Solar Generation facility being developed by third-party developer EDF Renewables. In November 2021, the PUCT approved a route that was estimated to cost $25 million and issued a final order on January 12, 2022. There have been project delays due to supply chain constraints in the developer acquiring solar panels. Houston Electric substantially completed construction in the fall of 2023, and the transmission line is expected to be energized shortly after the generation facility is complete, which is anticipated to occur in the first quarter of 2025.
Kilgore Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On August 30, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Chambers County, Texas that will loop the existing 138 kV Chevron to Langston circuit number 86 on Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Kilgore substation. The actual capital costs of the project, including the transmission line and the planned Kilgore substation, will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors and have been estimated to be $60 million to $99 million. A decision on the approval of the project in the PUCT proceeding is expected in the first quarter of 2024.
Mill Creek Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On November 17, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Harris and Montgomery Counties, Texas that will connect Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Mill Creek substation. The actual capital costs of the project, including the transmission line and the planned Kilgore substation, will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors and have been estimated to be $61 million to $90 million. A decision on the approval of the project in the PUCT proceeding is expected in the second or third quarter of 2024.
Texas Legislation (CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC)
Houston Electric and CERC are reviewing legislation passed in 2023 and associated PUCT rulemaking projects, including the following pieces of legislation that became law during the 88th Texas Legislature, including:
65
•House Bill 1500 is effective September 1, 2023 and continues the functions of the PUCT, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and ERCOT through 2029. This bill also includes an amendment that clarifies the use cases under which TDUs may lease and operate temporary generation during “significant” power outages;
•House Bill 2263 is effective June 12, 2023 and authorizes local distribution companies to offer programs to promote energy conservation and to recover costs prudently incurred to implement such programs under Railroad Commission authority;
•House Bill 2555 is effective June 13, 2023 and allows an electric utility to create a transmission and distribution system resiliency plan with the PUCT and associated cost recovery to enhance its system through hardening, undergrounding certain lines, flood mitigation measures, and vegetation management. On January 18, 2024 the PUCT issued an Order adopting its Resiliency Plan Rule (16 TAC 25.62);
•Senate Bill 947 is effective September 1, 2023 and creates severe criminal offenses for intentional damage to critical infrastructure facilities that create extended power outages;
•Senate Bill 1015 is effective June 18, 2023 and allows utilities to file the DCRF twice a year, on any day the PUCT is open (at least 185 days after filing a full base rate proceeding) and setting an administrative approval timeline of 60 days;
•Senate Bill 1016 is effective May 5, 2023 and requires the PUCT to presume that all employee compensation and benefits are reasonable and necessary when establishing a utility’s rates if based upon market compensation studies issued within the last three years; it includes exceptions for utility officer incentives that are based on financial metrics. Certain incentive compensation that is in-line with market studies will be presumed reasonable and recoverable; and
•Senate Bill 1076 is effective June 2, 2023 and moves the timeline for the PUCT to approve CCN for transmission projects to 180 days after the date of filing, rather than the first anniversary of the day it was filed.
Minnesota Legislation (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
The Natural Gas Innovation Act was passed by the Minnesota legislature in June 2021 with bipartisan support. This law establishes a regulatory framework to enable the state’s investor-owned natural gas utilities to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions and advancing the state’s clean energy future. The maximum allowable cost for an innovation plan will start at 1.75% of the utility's revenue in the state and could increase to 4% by 2033, subject to review and approval by the MPUC. Specifically, the Natural Gas Innovation Act allows a natural gas utility to submit an innovation plan for approval by the MPUC which could propose the use of renewable energy resources and innovative technologies such as:
•renewable natural gas (produces energy from organic materials such as wastewater, agricultural manure, food waste, agricultural or forest waste);
•renewable hydrogen gas (produces energy from water through electrolysis with renewable electricity such as solar);
•energy efficiency measures (avoids energy consumption in excess of the utility’s existing conservation programs); and
•innovative technologies (reduces or avoids greenhouse gas emissions using technologies such as carbon capture).
On June 28, 2023, CERC submitted its first innovation plan to the MPUC; the five-year plan includes 18 pilot projects and seven smaller research-and-development projects. These projects will deploy and evaluate a broad array of innovative resources including made-in-Minnesota alternative gases such as renewable natural gas and green hydrogen as well as pioneering technologies such as a networked geothermal district energy system and end-use carbon capture. The proposed plan requires approval from the MPUC through a review process that is expected to take about one year. The MPUC requested comments by September 15, 2023 if parties believe that the filing is incomplete based on the reporting requirements or if parties do not believe that that the MPUC’s standard informal proceeding process is appropriate. No parties filed comments regarding completeness or raising concerns that the MPUC’s standard informal procedural process is inappropriate. The initial comment period closed January 15, 2024, reply comments are due March 15, 2024 and supplemental comments are due May 15, 2024; CERC anticipates the MPUC will hear this matter after the final comments are received.
Solar Panel Issues (CenterPoint Energy)
CenterPoint Energy’s current and future solar projects have been impacted by delays and/or increased costs. The potential delays and inflationary cost pressures communicated from the developers of our solar projects have been primarily due to (i) unavailability of solar panels and other uncertainties related to a DOC investigation on anti-dumping and countervailing duties petition filed by a domestic solar manufacturer, (ii) the December 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act on solar modules and other products manufactured in China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and (iii) persistent general global supply chain and labor availability issues. On December 2, 2022, the DOC issued its preliminary determination, finding four of the eight companies being investigated are attempting to bypass U.S. duties. On August 18, 2023, the DOC announced its final determination and found that five of the eight companies investigated are attempting to bypass U.S. duties by doing minor
66
processing in one of the Southeast Asian countries before shipment to the United States. Pursuant to President Biden’s executive order issued in June 2022, duties will not be collected on any solar module and cell imports from these Southeast Asian countries until June 2024, as long as the imports are consumed in the U.S. market within six months of the termination of the executive order. The executive order could be subject to legal challenges and its effects remain uncertain. The resolution of these issues will determine what additional costs or delays our solar projects will be subject to. These impacts have resulted in cost increases for certain projects, and may result in cost increases in other projects, and such impacts have resulted in, or are expected to result in, the need for us to seek additional regulatory review and approvals. Additionally, significant changes to project costs and schedules as a result of these factors could impact the viability of the projects. For more information regarding potential delays, cancellations and supply chain disruptions, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors— Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution — Increases in the cost or...” in this report.
TDSIC 2.0 (CenterPoint Energy)
On May 24, 2023, Indiana Electric filed its petition and case-in-chief with the IURC requesting, among other things, approval of its five-year plan for transmission, distribution, and storage improvements pursuant to Ind. Code ch. 8-1-39 (TDSIC Plan). Intervenors filed their case in chief on August 16, 2023 and Indiana Electric filed rebuttal on August 29, 2023. A hearing was held on September 13, 2023 and an order approving the TDSIC Plan was issued on December 27, 2023. The approved five-year TDSIC Plan, covering the period January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2028, consists of approximately $454 million in proposed investments across seven different programs: (1) Distribution 12kV Circuit Rebuild, (2) Distribution Underground Rebuild, (3) Distribution Automation, (4) Wood pole replacement, (5) Transmission Line Rebuild, (6) Substation Rebuild, and (7) Substation Physical Security.
Rate Change Applications
The Registrants are routinely involved in rate change applications before state regulatory authorities. Those applications include general rate cases, where the entire cost of service of the utility is assessed and reset. In addition, Registrants are periodically involved in proceedings to adjust its capital tracking mechanisms (e.g., CSIA, DCRF, DRR, GRIP, TCOS, ECA, CECA and TDSIC), its cost of service adjustments (e.g., RSP and RRA), its decoupling mechanism (e.g., Decoupling and SRC), and its energy efficiency cost trackers (e.g., CIP, DSMA, EECR, EECRF, EEFC and EEFR).
Houston Electric Rate Case. Texas law mandates that electric utilities file a base rate proceeding no later than every four years from the date of their last base rate proceeding final order. Houston Electric’s most recent base rate proceeding order was approved by the PUCT on March 9, 2020, in Docket No. 49421. Therefore, Houston Electric is required to file its next base rate proceeding no later than March 9, 2024.
Texas Gas Rate Case. On October 30, 2023 CERC filed an application with the Railroad Commission and municipal regulatory authorities to set new natural gas base rates that would be applied consistently across the approximately 1.9 million customers. The requested increase is approximately 3.1% or $37 million based on an historical test year ending June 30, 2023. The need for a rate change is primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system, including new Intelis natural gas meters that feature an integrated safety shutoff valve, changes to depreciation rates that better reflect the actual life and salvage characteristics of assets, and changes in other costs to serve customers. The request reflects a proposed 10.50% ROE on a 60.61% equity ratio. Intervenor testimony is due in early March 2024, followed by staff testimony. Rebuttal testimony is due in late March 2024 and a hearing on the merits is scheduled for mid-April 2024. A final order is expected in Q2 2024.
Minnesota Rate Case. On November 1, 2023, CERC filed an application with the MPUC requesting an adjustment to delivery charges in 2024 and 2025 for the natural gas business in Minnesota. The requested increase is approximately 6.5% or $85 million for 2024 and an additional approximately 3.7% or $52 million for 2025. The need for a rate change is primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system, including new Intelis natural gas meters that feature an integrated safety shutoff valve, changes to depreciation rates that better reflect the actual life and salvage characteristics of assets, and changes in other costs to serve customers. The request reflects a proposed 10.3% ROE on a 52.5% equity ratio. Interim rates of $69 million were implemented as of January 1, 2024. A decision on 2025 interim rates was delayed until the fourth quarter of 2024. The anticipated decision date of the rate case is July 1, 2025.
Indiana Electric Rate Case. On December 5, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a petition with the IURC for authority to modify its rates and charges for electric utility service through a phase-in of rates. The requested increase is approximately 16% or $119 million based on a forward looking 2025 test year. The need for a rate increase is primarily driven by the continuing investment that is being made to ensure the safety and reliability of the system and normal increases in operating expenses. The rate case
67
reflects a proposed 10.4% ROE on a 55% equity ratio. A hearing is scheduled for late-April through mid-May 2024. A final order is expected in the fourth quarter of 2024.
The table below reflects significant applications pending or completed since the Registrants’ combined 2022 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC through February 20, 2024.
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric (PUCT) | ||||||||||
| DCRF (1) | 86 | December 2023 | TBD | TBD | Based on the net change in distribution invested capital since its last base rate proceeding of approximately $2.5 billion for the period January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2023 for a revenue increase of $86 million, adjusted for load growth. This is the second DCRF filing made in 2023; filing two DCRFs in a year was authorized in 2023 legislative session. A request for interim rates to be implemented on February 12, 2024 was also made on December 14, 2023; the interim rate request was denied on January 9, 2024. On December 28, 2023, an intervenor requested a good cause extension, on January 5, 2024, certain parties supported it, and it was granted on January 9, 2024. On January 24, 2024, certain intervenors requested an evidentiary hearing, and the request was denied on January 25, 2024. On February 5, 2024, Houston Electric notified the ALJ that the parties have reached an agreement in principle on all issues in this proceeding, and filed an agreed expedited motion for interim rates. On February 6, 2024, the PUCT ALJ issued an order denying to abate the proceeding and retaining the procedural schedule already established. On February 7, 2024, Houston Electric on behalf of itself and all parties responded to the February 6, 2024 order to clarify that the abatement request was not intended to alter the statutory timeframe for a decision. On February 9, 2024, the PUCT ALJ issued an order setting filing deadlines and requesting briefing on interim rates. On February 13, 2024, interim rates designed to collect $220 million ($73 million incremental) were approved, to be effective April 2024. | |||||
| TCOS | 44 | August 2023 | October 2023 | October 2023 | Based on net change in invested capital of $405 million for the period February 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023. Notice of Approval issued October 6, 2023. | |||||
| EECRF (1) | 16 | June 2023 | March 2024 | November 2023 | The requested $53 million is comprised primarily of the following: 2024 program costs of $38 million; a credit of $2 million related to the over-recovery of 2022 program costs; the 2022 earned bonus of $16 million; and 2024 projected evaluation, measurement and verification costs of $1 million. An order approving performance bonus and rates was issued November 3, 2023. | |||||
| DCRF | 70 | April 2023 | September 2023 | September 2023 | The net change in distribution invested capital since its last base rate proceeding of approximately $1.9 billion for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2022 for a revenue increase of $85 million, adjusted for load growth. On July 14, 2023 a settlement was filed that results in a revenue increase of $70 million adjusted for load growth. Order approving the rates included in the settlement was issued September 14, 2023. | |||||
| TEEEF (1) | 114 | April 2023 | December 2023 | February 2024 | A total Rider TEEEF revenue requirement of $188 million for cost incurred through December 31, 2022. The revenue change between the rates resulting from the 2022 TEEEF and this application is $149 million. Interim rates effective September 1, 2023. Settlement in principle announced and motion to abate filed October 12, 2023 and updated interim rates were effective December 15, 2023. The settlement incorporates an 8 1/2 year amortization period. The PUCT approved the settlement in its order that was issued February 1, 2024. | |||||
| TCOS | 40 | March 2023 | May 2023 | May 2023 | Based on net change in invested capital of $367 million for the period August 1, 2022 through January 31, 2023. | |||||
| DCRF and TEEEF | 117 | April 2022 | April 2023 | April 2023 | Original filing included both capital that has traditionally been recovered under DCRF and TEEEF capital; the filing was separated into traditional DCRF and TEEEF in June 2022. The traditional DCRF portion revenue requirement of $78 million was approved and was implemented September 1, 2022. A final order was issued on April 5, 2023 approving a TEEEF revenue requirement of $39 million with rates effective April 15, 2023. On April 28, 2023 and May 1, 2023 certain intervenors filed motions for rehearing of the PUCT’s April 5, 2023 order. On May 25, 2023 the PUCT issued its order on rehearing which clarified some of the findings, but did not change the approval of TEEEF cost recovery. On June 19, 2023 certain intervenors filed motions for rehearing of the May 25, 2023 order on rehearing. The PUCT denied the motions for rehearing in an order issued on August 3, 2023. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for further information. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Beaumont/East Texas, South Texas, Houston and Texas Coast (Railroad Commission) | ||||||||||
| GRIP | 60 | March 2023 | June 2023 | June 2023 | Based on net change in invested capital for calendar year 2022 of $390 million. | |||||
| Rate Case (1) | 37 | October 2023 | TBD | TBD | See discussion above under Texas Gas Rate Case. |
68
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Louisiana (LPSC) | ||||||||||
| RSP | 6 | September 2022 | May 2023 | April 2023 | Based on ROE of 9.95% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. The North Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band, is $3 million based on a test year ended June 2022 and adjusted ROE of 7.05%. The South Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band, is $5 million based on a test year ended June 2022 and adjusted ROE of 4.19%. The TCJA refund impact to North Louisiana and South Louisiana was $1 million and $1 million, respectively. North Louisiana and South Louisiana also seek to recover regulatory assets due to COVID-19 bad debt expenses in the amounts of $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. On April 5, 2023 the LPSC issued an order approving a joint settlement for $2.7 million in North Louisiana and $4.6 million in South Louisiana in addition to the full impacts of TCJA and COVID-19 recoveries. Implementation occurred in May 2023 upon approval of compliance tariff. | |||||
| RSP(1) | 12 | September/October 2023 | TBD | TBD | Based on ROE of 9.95% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. The North Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band and completion of COVID-19 asset recovery, is $8 million based on a test year ended June 2023 and adjusted ROE of 3.67%. The South Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band and completion of COVID-19 asset recovery, is $5 million based on a test year ended June 2023 and adjusted ROE of 5.47%. The TCJA refund impact to North Louisiana and South Louisiana was $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively. South Louisiana interim rates were implemented on December 28, 2023, subject to refund. North Louisiana interim rates were implemented on January 29, 2024. Staff reports issued on January 31, 2024 recommended disallowances of $0.3 million and $0.2 million in North and South Louisiana, respectively. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Minnesota (MPUC) | ||||||||||
| CIP Financial Incentive | 8 | May 2023 | September 2023 | October 2023 | CIP Financial Incentive based on 2022 CIP program activity. | |||||
| Rate Case (1) | 136 | November 2023 | TBD | TBD | See discussion above under Minnesota Rate Case. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Mississippi | ||||||||||
| RRA | 7 | May 2023 | October 2023 | October 2023 | Based ROE of 10.098% with 100 basis point (+/-) earnings band. Revenue increase of approximately $8 million based on 2022 test year adjusted earned ROE of 5.66%. Interim increase of approximately $1 million implemented May 31, 2023. Settled increase of approximately $7 million approved and implemented October 3, 2023. Order authorized recovery of regulatory assets due to COVID-19 in the amount of $0.3 million over the 2024 calendar year. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana South - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | 3 | April 2023 | July 2023 | July 2023 | Requested an increase of $33 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $1 million annually. Also included are unrecovered deferred operations and maintenance expenses of $9 million. OUCC filed on June 2, 2023, recommending approval of the proposed CSIA rates and updated plan as filed, with non-cost recommendations. Rebuttal testimony filed June 16, 2023. A hearing was held June 28, 2023. The IURC issued an Order approving the CSIA on July 26, 2023. | |||||
| CSIA | 3 | October 2023 | February 2024 | January 2024 | Requested an increase of $31 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $1 million annually. OUCC filed on December 8, 2023, recommending disallowance of two projects for customer-side replacements. Engineering rebuttal testimony was filed December 15, 2023, stating why costs were necessary for safety and integrity of customers and system. Responded to IURC docket entry requesting additional information on January 2, 2024. A hearing was held January 3, 2024. The IURC issued an order on January 31, 2024, approving the CSIA with the exception of the two projects for customer-side replacements which are not authorized for recovery. Indiana South filed revised revenue requirement schedules removing the two project costs with its compliance filing. Revised rates were effective February 1, 2024. |
69
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Indiana North - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | 9 | April 2023 | July 2023 | July 2023 | Requested an increase of $95 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $9 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $5 million annually. Also included are unrecovered deferred operations and maintenance expenses of $20 million. OUCC filed on June 2, 2023, recommending approval of the proposed CSIA rates and updated plan as filed, with non-cost recommendations. Rebuttal testimony was filed on June 16, 2023. A hearing was held June 28, 2023. The IURC issued an Order approving the CSIA on July 26, 2023. | |||||
| CSIA | 9 | October 2023 | January 2024 | January 2024 | Requested an increase of $98 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $9 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $1 million annually. OUCC filed on December 8, 2023, recommending approval as filed. Responded to IURC Docket entry requesting additional information on January 2, 2024. A hearing was held January 3, 2024. The IURC issued an Order approving the CSIA on January 31, 2024 with rates effective January 31, 2024. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Ohio (PUCO) | ||||||||||
| DRR (1) | 6 | May 2023 | September 2023 | August 2023 | Requested an increase of $46 million to rate base for investments made in 2022, which reflects a $6 million annual increase in current revenues. A change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $0.3 million annually is also included in rates. PUCO staff review and recommendation filed June 29, 2023, recommending approval as proposed. VEDO statement of issues resolved in case filed July 14, 2023. PUCO issued a Finding & Order approving the DRR August 23, 2023, and revised rates effective September 1, 2023. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana Electric (IURC) | ||||||||||
| TDSIC | 2 | February 2023 | June 2023 | May 2023 | Requested an increase of $31 million to rate base, which reflects a $5 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance and a tax reform credit for a total of ($1 million). OUCC filed on April 3, 2023, recommending approval of the proposed TDSIC rates and updated plan as filed. A hearing was held on May 3, 2023. On May 30, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the TDSIC rates and updated plan as filed with rates effective June 1, 2023. | |||||
| CECA | — | February 2023 | June 2023 | May 2023 | Requested an increase of less than $1 million to rate base, which reflects an annual increase of less than $1 million in current revenues. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than ($1 million). OUCC filed on March 31, 2023, recommending approval of the proposed CECA cost recovery with a reduction of approximately $0.3 million. Rebuttal testimony was filed on April 6, 2023. A hearing was held on May 3, 2023. On May 30, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the CECA rates with a cost recovery reduction of approximately $0.3 million with rates effective June 6, 2023. | |||||
| ECA (1) | 1 | May 2023 | February 2024 | February 2024 | Requested an increase of $51 million to rate base, which reflects a $1 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million. A hearing was held on October 24, 2023. Indiana Electric filed a proposed order on October 31, 2023. The OUCC filed a proposed order on November 8, 2023. Indiana Electric filed a response to the OUCC proposed order on November 15, 2023. A final order was issued February 7, 2024 with rates effective February 8, 2024. | |||||
| DSMA (1) | 16 | July 2023 | January 2024 | November 2023 | The requested $45 million is comprised primarily of the following: 2024 program costs of $11 million and $26 million of lost revenue, $3 million related to the over-recovery of 2022 program costs and $11 million under-recovery related to a prior period variance adjustment; the requested $45 million is an increase of $16 million compared to the prior DSMA. A settlement between Indiana Electric and the OUCC was reached concerning the $11 million under-recovery which resolves all issues related to the DSMA for January through December 2024 including the $11 million under-recovery. The settlement provides that the IURC should approve the DSMA and that Indiana Electric will arrange for educational training on demand side management offerings. A settlement hearing was held on October 24, 2023. The IURC issued an Order approving the settlement on November 22, 2023, with rates effective January 1, 2024. |
70
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDSIC (1) | 3 | August 2023 | November 2023 | November 2023 | Requested an increase of $27 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance and a tax reform credit for a total of ($0.2 million). OUCC filed on October 2, 2023 recommending approval of the proposed TDSIC rates. A hearing was held on October 31, 2023. The IURC issued an Order approving the TDSIC on November 29, 2023, with rates effective November 30, 2023. | |||||
| Rate Case (1) | 119 | December 2023 | TBD | TBD | See discussion above under Indiana Electric Rate Case. | |||||
| TDSIC(1) | 5 | February 2024 | TBD | TBD | Requested an increase of $36 million to rate base, which reflects a $5 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance and a tax reform credit for a total of ($1 million). OUCC is expected to file testimony on April 2, 2024 and a hearing is scheduled for April 30, 2024. | |||||
| CECA (1) | — | February 2024 | TBD | TBD | Requested a decrease of $1 million to rate base, which reflects no change in current revenues. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $0.1 million. |
(1)Represents proposed increases (decreases) when effective date and/or approval date is not yet determined. Approved rates could differ materially from proposed rates.
Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)
On August 16, 2022, the IRA was signed into law. The new law extends or creates tax-related energy incentives for solar, wind and alternative clean energy sources, implements, subject to certain exceptions, a 1% tax on share repurchases after December 31, 2022, and implements a 15% CAMT based on the adjusted financial statement income of certain large corporations. Corporations are entitled to a CAMT credit to the extent CAMT liability exceeds regular tax liability, which can be carried forward indefinitely and used in future years when regular tax exceeds the CAMT. The IRA did not have a material impact on the Registrants’ 2023 financial results. It is likely that CenterPoint Energy and the Registrant Subsidiaries will owe CAMT in excess of their regular tax liability beginning in 2024. As a result, CenterPoint Energy and the Registrant Subsidiaries expect a temporary increase in federal cash tax payments due to this provision.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation and Compliance (CenterPoint Energy)
On August 3, 2015, the EPA released its CPP rule, which required a 32% reduction in carbon emissions from 2005 levels. The final rule was published in the Federal Register on October 23, 2015, and that action was immediately followed by litigation ultimately resulting in the U.S. Supreme Court staying implementation of the rule. On July 8, 2019, the EPA published the ACE rule, which (i) repealed the CPP rule; (ii) replaced the CPP rule with a program that requires states to implement a program of energy efficiency improvement targets for individual coal-fired electric generating units; and (iii) amended the implementing regulations for Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. On January 19, 2021, the majority of the ACE rule — including the CPP repeal, CPP replacement, and the timing-related portions of the Section 111(d) implementing rule — was struck down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and on October 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider four petitions filed by various coal interests and a coalition of 19 states. On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA exceeded its authority in promulgating the CPP. On May 11, 2023, the EPA announced proposed emission limits and guidelines for carbon dioxide from fossil fuel-fired power plants under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act which, if finalized, apply new GHG performance standards for those existing coal-fired units expected to continue operation beyond December 31, 2029. We will continue to evaluate the applicability of the rule to existing and new gas-fired generating units, but would note that CenterPoint Energy does not currently have plans to operate any of its coal-fired units beyond December 2029.
The Biden administration recommitted the United States to the Paris Agreement, which has driven a renewed regulatory push to require further GHG emission reductions from the energy sector and proceeded to lead negotiations at the global climate conference in Glasgow, Scotland. On April 22, 2021, President Biden announced new goals of 50% reduction of economy-wide GHG emissions, and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035, which formed the basis of the U.S. commitments announced in Glasgow. In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy announced its net zero emissions goals for both Scope 1 emissions and certain Scope 2 emissions by 2035 as well as a goal to reduce certain Scope 3 emissions by 20% to 30% by 2035.
71
Because Texas is an unregulated market, CenterPoint Energy’s Scope 2 estimates do not take into account Texas electric transmission and distribution assets in the line loss calculation and, in addition, exclude emissions related to purchased power in Indiana between 2024 and 2026 as estimated. CenterPoint Energy’s Scope 3 emissions estimates are based on the total natural gas supply delivered to residential and commercial customers as reported in the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-176 reports and do not take into account the emissions of transport customers and emissions related to upstream extraction. These emission goals are expected to be used to position CenterPoint Energy to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements from the current and future administrations to further reduce GHG emissions. CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s revenues, operating costs and capital requirements could be adversely affected as a result of any regulatory action that would require installation of new control technologies or a modification of their operations or would have the effect of reducing the consumption of natural gas. The IRA established the Methane Emissions Reduction Program, which imposes a charge on methane emissions from certain natural gas transmission facilities, and the EPA has proposed new regulations targeting reductions in methane emissions, which if implemented will increase costs related to production, transmission and storage of natural gas. Houston Electric, in contrast to some electric utilities including Indiana Electric, does not generate electricity, other than TEEEF, and thus is not directly exposed to the risk of high capital costs and regulatory uncertainties that face electric utilities that burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. CenterPoint Energy’s net zero emissions goals are aligned with Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan and are expected to position Indiana Electric to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements related to GHG emissions reductions. Nevertheless, Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s revenues could be adversely affected to the extent any resulting regulatory action has the effect of reducing consumption of electricity by ultimate consumers within their respective service territories. Likewise, incentives to conserve energy or to use energy sources other than natural gas could result in a decrease in demand for the Registrants’ services. For example, Minnesota has enacted the Natural Gas Innovation Act that seeks to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions. Further, certain local government bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by certain specified dates. For example, Minneapolis has adopted carbon emission reduction goals in an effort to decrease reliance on fossil natural gas. Additionally, cities in Minnesota within CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas operational footprint are considering initiatives to eliminate natural gas use in buildings and focus on electrification. Also, Minnesota cities may consider seeking legislative authority for the ability to enact voluntary enhanced energy standards for all development projects. These initiatives could have a significant impact on CenterPoint Energy and its operations, and this impact could increase if other cities and jurisdictions in its service area enact similar initiatives. Further, our third-party suppliers, vendors and partners may also be impacted by climate change laws and regulations, which could impact CenterPoint Energy’s business by, among other things, causing permitting and construction delays, project cancellations or increased project costs passed on to CenterPoint Energy. Conversely, regulatory actions that effectively promote the consumption of natural gas because of its lower emissions characteristics would be expected to benefit CenterPoint Energy and CERC and their natural gas-related businesses. At this time, however, we cannot quantify the magnitude of the impacts from possible new regulatory actions related to GHG emissions, either positive or negative, on the Registrants’ businesses.
Compliance costs and other effects associated with climate change, reductions in GHG emissions and obtaining renewable energy sources remain uncertain. Although the amount of compliance costs remains uncertain, any new regulation or legislation relating to climate change will likely result in an increase in compliance costs. While the requirements of a federal or state rule remain uncertain, CenterPoint Energy will continue to monitor regulatory activity regarding GHG emission standards that may affect its business. Currently, CenterPoint Energy does not purchase carbon credits. In connection with its net zero emissions goals, CenterPoint Energy is expected to purchase carbon credits in the future; however, CenterPoint Energy does not currently expect the number of credits, or cost for those credits, to be material.
Climate Change Trends and Uncertainties
As a result of increased awareness regarding climate change, coupled with adverse economic conditions, availability of alternative energy sources, including private solar, microturbines, fuel cells, energy-efficient buildings and energy storage devices, and new regulations restricting emissions, including potential regulations of methane emissions, some consumers and companies may use less energy, meet their own energy needs through alternative energy sources or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for the Registrants’ services. As these technologies become a more cost-competitive option over time, whether through cost effectiveness or government incentives and subsidies, certain customers may choose to meet their own energy needs and subsequently decrease usage of the Registrants’ systems and services, which may result in, among other things, Indiana Electric’s generating facilities becoming less competitive and economical. Further, evolving investor sentiment related to the use of fossil fuels and initiatives to restrict continued production of fossil fuels have had significant impacts on CenterPoint Energy’s electric generation and natural gas businesses. For example, because Indiana Electric’s current generating facilities substantially rely on coal for their operations, certain financial institutions choose not to participate in CenterPoint Energy’s financing arrangements. Conversely, demand for the Registrants’
72
services may increase as a result of customer changes in response to climate change. For example, as the utilization of electric vehicles increases, demand for electricity may increase, resulting in increased usage of CenterPoint Energy’s systems and services. Any negative opinions with respect to CenterPoint Energy’s environmental practices or its ability to meet the challenges posed by climate change formed by regulators, customers, investors, legislators or other stakeholders could harm its reputation.
To address these developments, CenterPoint Energy announced its net zero emissions goals for both Scope 1 emissions and certain Scope 2 emissions by 2035. Indiana Electric’s 2019/2020 IRP identified a preferred portfolio that retires 730 MW of coal-fired generation facilities and replaces these resources with a mix of generating resources composed primarily of renewables, including solar, wind, and solar with storage, supported by dispatchable natural gas combustion turbines including a pipeline to serve such natural gas generation. Indiana Electric continues to execute on its 2019/2020 IRP and has received initial approvals for 756 MWs of the 700-1,000 MWs identified within Indiana Electric’s 2019/2020 IRP. Additionally, as reflected in its 10-year capital plan announced in September 2021, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in cleaner energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation and electric vehicle expansion. CenterPoint Energy believes its planned investments in renewable energy generation and corresponding planned reduction in its GHG emissions as part of its net zero emissions goals support global efforts to reduce the impacts of climate change. Indiana Electric has conducted a new IRP, which was submitted to the IURC in May 2023, to identify an appropriate generation resource portfolio to satisfy the needs of its customers and comply with environmental regulations. The proposed preferred portfolio is the second evolution to the generation transition plan to move away from coal-fired generation to a more sustainable portfolio of resources. Indiana Electric plans to convert its last remaining coal unit to natural gas by 2027 and to add a significant amount of additional renewable resources through 2033. For more information regarding CenterPoint Energy’s net zero emission goals and the risks associated with them, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks — CenterPoint Energy is subject to operational and financial risks...”
To the extent climate changes result in warmer temperatures in the Registrants’ service territories, financial results from the Registrants’ businesses could be adversely impacted. For example, CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas could be adversely affected through lower natural gas sales. On the other hand, warmer temperatures in CenterPoint Energy’s and Houston Electric’s electric service territory may increase revenues from transmission and distribution and generation through increased demand for electricity used for cooling. Another possible result of climate change is more frequent and more severe weather events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes and flooding, including such storms as the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. Since many of the Registrants’ facilities are located along or near the Texas gulf coast, increased or more severe hurricanes or tornadoes could increase costs to repair damaged facilities and restore service to customers. CenterPoint Energy’s current 10-year capital plan includes capital expenditures to maintain reliability and safety and increase resiliency of its systems as climate change may result in more frequent significant weather events. Houston Electric does not own or operate any electric generation facilities other than, since September 2021, its operation of TEEEF. Houston Electric transmits and distributes to customers of REPs electric power that the REPs obtain from power generation facilities owned by third parties. To the extent adverse weather conditions affect the Registrants’ suppliers, results from their energy delivery businesses may suffer. For example, in Texas, the February 2021 Winter Storm Event caused an electricity generation shortage that was severely disruptive to Houston Electric’s service territory and the wholesale generation market and also caused a reduction in available natural gas capacity. When the Registrants cannot deliver electricity or natural gas to customers, or customers cannot receive services, the Registrants’ financial results can be impacted by lost revenues, and they generally must seek approval from regulators to recover restoration costs. To the extent the Registrants are unable to recover those costs, or if higher rates resulting from recovery of such costs result in reduced demand for services, the Registrants’ future financial results may be adversely impacted. Further, as the intensity and frequency of significant weather events continues, it may impact our ability to secure cost-efficient insurance.
Other Matters
Credit Facilities
The Registrants may draw on their respective revolving credit facilities from time to time to provide funds used for general corporate and limited liability company purposes, including to backstop CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s commercial paper programs. The facilities may also be utilized to obtain letters of credit. For further details related to the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, please see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Based on the consolidated debt to capitalization covenant in the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, the Registrants would have been permitted to utilize the full capacity of such revolving credit facilities, which aggregated approximately $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2023.
73
As of February 12, 2024, the Registrants had the following revolving credit facilities and utilization of such facilities:
| Amount Utilized as of February 12, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Size of Facility | Loans | Letters of Credit | Commercial Paper | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Termination Date | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | $ | 2,400 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,272 | 5.51% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy (1) | 250 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | 300 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||||||
| CERC | 1,050 | — | 1 | 359 | 5.49% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,000 | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 1,631 |
(1)This credit facility was issued by SIGECO.
Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to customary terms and conditions. However, there is no requirement that the borrower makes representations prior to borrowing as to the absence of material adverse changes or litigation that could be expected to have a material adverse effect. Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of events of default that we consider customary. The revolving credit facilities also provide for customary fees, including commitment fees, administrative agent fees, fees in respect of letters of credit and other fees. In each of the revolving credit facilities, the spread to SOFR and the commitment fees fluctuate based on the borrower’s credit rating. Each of the Registrant’s credit facilities provide for a mechanism to replace SOFR with possible alternative benchmarks upon certain benchmark replacement events. The borrowers are currently in compliance with the various business and financial covenants in the four revolving credit facilities.
Debt Transactions
For detailed information about the Registrants’ debt transactions in 2023, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Securities Registered with the SEC
On May 17, 2023, the Registrants filed a joint shelf registration statement with the SEC registering indeterminate principal amounts of Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds, CERC Corp.’s senior debt securities and CenterPoint Energy’s senior debt securities and junior subordinated debt securities and an indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock, shares of preferred stock, depositary shares, as well as stock purchase contracts and equity units. The joint shelf registration statement will expire on May 17, 2026. For information related to the Registrants’ debt issuances in 2023, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Temporary Investments
As of February 12, 2024, the Registrants had no temporary investments.
Money Pool
The Registrants participate in a money pool through which they and certain of their subsidiaries can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net funding requirements of the CenterPoint Energy money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper. The net funding requirements of the CERC money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CERC’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CERC’s commercial paper. The money pool may not provide sufficient funds to meet the Registrants’ cash needs.
The table below summarizes CenterPoint Energy money pool activity by Registrant as of February 12, 2024:
| Weighted Average Interest Rate | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||
| Money pool investments | 5.57% | $ | 60 | $ | — |
74
Impact on Liquidity of a Downgrade in Credit Ratings
The interest rate on borrowings under the Registrants’ credit facilities is based on their respective credit ratings. As of February 12, 2024, Moody’s, S&P and Fitch had assigned the following credit ratings to senior debt of the Registrants:
| Moody’s | S&P | Fitch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Borrower/Instrument | Rating | Outlook (1) | Rating | Outlook (2) | Rating | Outlook (3) | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | CenterPoint Energy Senior Unsecured Debt | Baa2 | Stable | BBB | Stable | BBB | Stable | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Vectren Corp. Issuer Rating | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | SIGECO Senior Secured Debt | A1 | Stable | A | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| Houston Electric | Houston Electric Senior Secured Debt | A2 | Stable | A | Stable | A | Stable | |||||||
| CERC | CERC Corp. Senior Unsecured Debt | A3 | Stable | BBB+ | Stable | A- | Stable | |||||||
| CERC | Indiana Gas Senior Unsecured Debt | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a |
(1)A Moody’s rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an issuer’s rating over the medium term.
(2)An S&P outlook assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate to longer term.
(3)A Fitch rating outlook indicates the direction a rating is likely to move over a one- to two-year period.
The Registrants cannot assure that the ratings set forth above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. The Registrants note that these credit ratings are included for informational purposes and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Registrants’ securities and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of the Registrants’ credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants’ ability to obtain short- and long-term financing, the cost of such financings and the execution of the Registrants’ commercial strategies.
A decline in credit ratings could increase borrowing costs under the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities. If the Registrants’ credit ratings had been downgraded one notch by S&P and Moody’s from the ratings that existed as of December 31, 2023, the impact on the borrowing costs under the four revolving credit facilities would have been insignificant. A decline in credit ratings would also increase the interest rate on long-term debt to be issued in the capital markets and could negatively impact the Registrants’ ability to complete capital market transactions and to access the commercial paper market. Additionally, a decline in credit ratings could increase cash collateral requirements and reduce earnings of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segments.
Pipeline tariffs and contracts typically provide that if the credit ratings of a shipper or the shipper’s guarantor drop below a threshold level, which is generally investment grade ratings from both Moody’s and S&P, cash or other collateral may be demanded from the shipper in an amount equal to the sum of three months’ charges for pipeline services plus the unrecouped cost of any lateral built for such shipper. If the credit ratings of CERC Corp. decline below the applicable threshold levels, CERC might need to provide cash or other collateral of as much as $256 million as of December 31, 2023. The amount of collateral will depend on seasonal variations in transportation levels.
ZENS and Securities Related to ZENS (CenterPoint Energy)
If CenterPoint Energy’s creditworthiness were to drop such that ZENS holders thought its liquidity was adversely affected or the market for the ZENS were to become illiquid, some ZENS holders might decide to exchange their ZENS for cash. Funds for the payment of cash upon exchange could be obtained from the sale of the shares of ZENS-Related Securities that CenterPoint Energy owns or from other sources. CenterPoint Energy owns shares of ZENS-Related Securities equal to approximately 100% of the reference shares used to calculate its obligation to the holders of the ZENS. ZENS exchanges result in a cash outflow because tax deferrals related to the ZENS and shares of ZENS-Related Securities would typically cease when ZENS are exchanged or otherwise retired and shares of ZENS-Related Securities are sold. The ultimate tax liability related to the ZENS and ZENS-Related Securities continues to increase by the amount of the tax benefit realized each year, and there could be a significant cash outflow when the taxes are paid as a result of the retirement or exchange of the ZENS. If all ZENS had been exchanged for cash on December 31, 2023, deferred taxes of approximately $728 million would have been payable in 2023. If all the ZENS-Related Securities had been sold on December 31, 2023, capital gains taxes of approximately $81 million
75
would have been payable in 2023 based on 2023 tax rates in effect. For additional information about ZENS, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Cross Defaults
Under each of CenterPoint Energy’s, Houston Electric’s and CERC’s respective revolving credit facilities and CERC’s term loan agreement, a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specified types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $125 million by the borrower or any of their respective significant subsidiaries will cause a default under such borrower’s respective credit facility or term loan agreement. Under SIGECO’s revolving credit facility, a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specific types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $75 million by SIGECO or any of its significant subsidiaries will cause a default under SIGECO’s credit facility. A default by CenterPoint Energy would not trigger a default under its subsidiaries’ debt instruments or revolving credit facilities.
Possible Acquisitions, Divestitures and Joint Ventures
From time to time, the Registrants consider the acquisition or the disposition of assets or businesses or possible joint ventures, strategic initiatives or other joint ownership arrangements with respect to assets or businesses. Any determination to take action in this regard will be based on market conditions and opportunities existing at the time, and accordingly, the timing, size or success of any efforts and the associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable. The Registrants may seek to fund all or part of any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or equity issuances. Debt or equity financing may not, however, be available to the Registrants at that time due to a variety of events, including, among others, maintenance of our credit ratings, industry conditions, general economic conditions, market conditions and market perceptions. CenterPoint Energy has increased its planned capital expenditures in its Electric and Natural Gas businesses multiple times over the recent years to support rate base growth. The Registrants may continue to explore asset sales as a means to efficiently finance a portion of its increased capital expenditures in the future, subject to the conditions listed above. For further information, see Note 4.
On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas local distribution company businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
Hedging of Interest Expense for Future Debt Issuances
From time to time, the Registrants may enter into interest rate agreements to hedge, in part, volatility in the U.S. treasury rates by reducing variability in cash flows related to interest payments. For further information, see Note 9(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
Collection of Receivables from REPs (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Houston Electric’s receivables from the distribution of electricity are collected from REPs that supply the electricity Houston Electric distributes to their customers. Before conducting business, a REP must register with the PUCT and must meet certain financial qualifications. Nevertheless, adverse economic conditions, structural problems in the market served by ERCOT or financial difficulties of one or more REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for Houston Electric’s services or could cause them to delay such payments. Houston Electric depends on these REPs to remit payments on a timely basis, and any delay or default in payment by REPs could adversely affect Houston Electric’s cash flows. In the event of a REP’s default, Houston Electric’s tariff provides a number of remedies, including the option for Houston Electric to request that the PUCT suspend or revoke the certification of the REP. Applicable regulatory provisions require that customers be shifted to another REP or a provider of last resort if a REP cannot make timely payments. However, Houston Electric remains at risk for payments related to services provided prior to the shift to the replacement REP or the provider of last resort. If a REP were unable to meet its obligations, it could consider, among various options, restructuring under the bankruptcy laws, in which event such REP might seek to avoid honoring its obligations and claims might be made against Houston Electric involving payments it had received from such REP. If a REP were to file for bankruptcy, Houston Electric may not be successful in recovering accrued receivables owed by such REP that are unpaid as of the date the REP filed for bankruptcy. However, PUCT regulations authorize utilities, such as Houston Electric, to defer bad debts resulting from defaults by REPs for recovery in future rate cases, subject to a review of reasonableness and necessity.
76
Other Factors that Could Affect Cash Requirements
In addition to the above factors, the Registrants’ liquidity and capital resources could also be negatively affected by:
•cash collateral requirements that could exist in connection with certain contracts, including weather hedging arrangements, and natural gas purchases, natural gas price and natural gas storage activities of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segment;
•acceleration of payment dates on certain gas supply contracts, under certain circumstances, as a result of increased natural gas prices, and concentration of natural gas suppliers (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increased costs related to the acquisition of natural gas (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increases in interest expense in connection with debt refinancings and borrowings under credit facilities or term loans or the use of alternative sources of financings on capital and other financial markets;
•various legislative or regulatory actions;
•incremental collateral, if any, that may be required due to regulation of derivatives (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•the ability of REPs, including REP affiliates of NRG and Vistra Energy Corp., to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric;
•slower customer payments and increased write-offs of receivables due to higher natural gas prices, changing economic conditions, public health threats or severe weather events (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•the satisfaction of any obligations pursuant to guarantees;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•contributions to pension and postretirement benefit plans;
•restoration costs and revenue losses resulting from future natural disasters such as hurricanes and the timing of recovery of such restoration costs; and
•various other risks identified in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
Certain Contractual Limits on Our Ability to Issue Securities and Borrow Money
Certain provisions in certain note purchase agreements relating to debt issued by CERC have the effect of restricting the amount of secured debt issued by CERC and debt issued by subsidiaries of CERC Corp. Additionally, Houston Electric and SIGECO are limited in the amount of mortgage bonds they can issue by the General Mortgage and SIGECO’s mortgage indenture, respectively. For information about the total debt to capitalization financial covenants in the Registrants’ and SIGECO’s revolving credit facilities, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the presentation of the Registrants’ financial condition and results of operations and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex accounting estimates. An accounting estimate is an approximation made by management of a financial statement element, item or account in the financial statements. Accounting estimates in the Registrants’ historical consolidated financial statements measure the effects of past business transactions or events, or the present status of an asset or liability. The accounting estimates described below require the Registrants to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made. Additionally, different estimates that the Registrants could have used or changes in an accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur could have a material impact on the presentation of their financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The circumstances that make these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex have to do with the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty. The Registrants base their estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments. These estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Registrants’ operating environment changes. The Registrants’ significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The Registrants believe the following accounting policies involve the application of critical accounting estimates. Accordingly, these accounting estimates have been reviewed and discussed with the Audit Committee of CenterPoint Energy’s Board of Directors.
Accounting for Rate Regulation
Accounting guidance for regulated operations provides that rate-regulated entities account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the recovery of those incurred costs in rates if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and if the competitive environment makes it probable that such rates can be charged and collected. CenterPoint Energy, for its Electric and Natural Gas reportable segments, Houston Electric and CERC apply this
77
accounting guidance. Certain expenses and revenues subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the balance sheet as regulatory assets or liabilities and are recognized in income as the related amounts are included in service rates and recovered from or refunded to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are recorded when it is probable that these items will be recovered or reflected in future rates. Determining probability requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals. If events were to occur that would make the recovery of these assets and liabilities no longer probable, the Registrants would be required to write off or write down these regulatory assets and liabilities. For further detail on the Registrants’ regulatory assets and liabilities, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill
The Registrants review the carrying value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable, and at least annually, goodwill is tested for impairment as required by accounting guidance for goodwill and other intangible assets. Unforeseen events, changes in market conditions, and probable regulatory disallowances, where applicable, could have a material effect on the value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, future cash flows, interest rate, and regulatory matters, and could result in an impairment charge. The Registrants recorded no impairments to long-lived assets, including goodwill during 2023, 2022 and 2021.
Fair value is the amount at which an asset, liability or business could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices or valuations by third parties, present value techniques based on estimates of cash flows, or multiples of earnings or revenue performance measures. The fair value could be different using different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques.
Fair value measurements require significant judgment and unobservable inputs, including (i) projected timing and amount of future cash flows, which factor in planned growth initiatives, (ii) the regulatory environment, as applicable, and (iii) discount rates reflecting risk inherent in the future market prices. Determining the discount rates for the businesses that are not rate-regulated, such as for Energy Systems Group, requires the estimation of the appropriate company-specific risk premiums for such businesses based on evaluation of industry and entity-specific risks, which includes expectations about future market or economic conditions existing on the date of the impairment test. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on results of the impairment tests.
Annual goodwill impairment test
CenterPoint Energy and CERC completed their 2023 annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 2023 and determined, based on an income approach or a weighted combination of income and market approaches, that no goodwill impairment charge was required for any reporting unit. The fair values of each reporting unit significantly exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit.
Although no goodwill impairment resulted from the 2023 annual test, an interim goodwill impairment test could be triggered by the following: actual earnings results that are materially lower than expected, significant adverse changes in the operating environment, an increase in the discount rate, changes in other key assumptions which require judgment and are forward looking in nature, if CenterPoint Energy’s market capitalization falls below book value for an extended period of time, or events affecting a reporting unit such as a contemplated disposal of all or part of a reporting unit.
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Generally, a long-lived asset to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which management, with approval from the Board of Directors, as applicable, commits to a plan to sell, and a sale is expected to be completed within one year. The Registrants record assets and liabilities held for sale, or the disposal group, at the lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value less cost to sell. If the disposal group reflects a component of a reporting unit and meets the definition of a business, the goodwill within that reporting unit is allocated to the disposal group based on the relative fair value of the components representing a business that will be retained and disposed. Goodwill is not allocated to a portion of a reporting unit that does not meet the definition of a business. A disposal group that meets the held for sale criteria and also represents a strategic shift to the Registrant is also reflected as discontinued operations on the Statements of Consolidated Income, and prior periods are recast to reflect the earnings or losses from such businesses as income from discontinued operations, net of tax.
78
As described further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, certain assets and liabilities of Energy Systems Group representing a business were disposed of on June 30, 2023. As a result of the held for sale criteria being met during the same period as the completion of the sale, goodwill attributable to Energy Systems Group of $134 million was reflected in the pre-tax loss on sale of $13 million based on the actual sale proceeds received at closing on June 30, 2023.
Accounting for Securitization of Coal Generation Facility Retirements
Accounting guidance for rate regulated long-lived asset abandonment requires that the carrying value of an operating asset or an asset under construction is removed from property, plant and equipment when it becomes probable that the asset will be abandoned. The Registrants recognize either a loss on abandonment or regulatory asset when they concluded it is probable the cost will be recovered in future rates. The portion of property, plant and equipment that will remain used and useful until abandonment and recovered through depreciation expense in rates will continue to be classified as property, plant and equipment until the asset is abandoned. The Registrants evaluate if an adjustment to the estimated life of the asset and, accordingly, the rate of depreciation, is required to recover the asset while it is still providing service. Determining probability of abandonment or probability of recovery requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals.
In connection with the securitization financing of qualified costs in the second quarter of 2023 associated with the completed retirement of SIGECO’s A.B. Brown coal generation facilities, CenterPoint Energy evaluated the VIE consisting of the SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary, a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote, special purpose entity, for possible consolidation, including review of qualitative factors such as the power to direct the activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE. CenterPoint Energy has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE and is most closely associated with the VIE as compared to other interests held by the holders of the SIGECO Securitization Bonds. CenterPoint Energy is, therefore, considered the primary beneficiary and consolidated the VIE.
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Registrants consider cash equivalents to be short-term, highly-liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents held by the SIGECO Securitization Subsidiary solely to support servicing the SIGECO Securitization Bonds as of December 31, 2023 are reflected on CenterPoint Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In connection with the issuance of the SIGECO Securitization Bonds, CenterPoint Energy was required to establish a restricted cash account to collateralize the SIGECO Securitization Bonds that were issued in the financing transaction. The restricted cash account is not available for withdrawal until the maturity of the SIGECO Securitization Bonds and is not included in cash and cash equivalents.
Unbilled Revenues
Revenues related to electricity delivery and natural gas sales and services are generally recognized upon delivery to customers. However, the determination of deliveries to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month either electronically through AMS meter communications or manual readings. At the end of each month, deliveries to non-AMS customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is estimated. Information regarding deliveries to AMS customers after the last billing is obtained from actual AMS meter usage data. Unbilled electricity delivery revenue is estimated each month based on actual AMS meter data, daily supply volumes and applicable rates. Unbilled natural gas sales are estimated based on estimated purchased gas volumes, estimated lost and unaccounted for gas and tariffed rates in effect. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Retirement Plans
CenterPoint Energy sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering all employees who meet eligibility requirements. CenterPoint Energy uses several statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events in calculating the expense and liability related to its plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as estimated by management, within certain guidelines. In addition, CenterPoint Energy’s actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the
79
amount of pension and other retirement plans expense recorded. Please read “— Other Significant Matters — Pension Plans” for further discussion.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2(t) to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements that affect the Registrants.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT MATTERS
Pension Plans (CenterPoint Energy). As discussed in Note 8(b) to the consolidated financial statements, CenterPoint Energy maintains non-contributory qualified defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees. Employer contributions for the qualified plans are based on actuarial computations that establish the minimum contribution required under ERISA and the maximum deductible contribution for income tax purposes.
Under the terms of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans, it reserves the right to change, modify or terminate the plan. CenterPoint Energy’s funding policy is to review amounts annually and contribute an amount at least equal to the minimum contribution required under ERISA.
Additionally, CenterPoint Energy maintains unfunded non-qualified benefit restoration plans which allow participants to receive the benefits to which they would have been entitled under the non-contributory qualified pension plan except for federally mandated limits on qualified plan benefits or on the level of compensation on which qualified plan benefits may be calculated.
CenterPoint Energy’s funding requirements and employer contributions for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||
| Minimum funding requirements for qualified pension plans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
| Employer contributions to the qualified pension plans | 24 | 27 | 53 | |||||||
| Employer contributions to the non-qualified benefit restoration plans | 8 | 8 | 8 |
CenterPoint Energy expects to make contributions of approximately $2 million and $7 million to the qualified pension plans and non-qualified benefit restoration plans in 2024, respectively.
Changes in pension obligations and plan assets may not be immediately recognized as pension expense in CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income, but generally are recognized in future years over the remaining average service period of plan participants. As such, significant portions of pension expense recorded in any period may not reflect the actual level of benefit payments provided to plan participants.
As the sponsor of a plan, CenterPoint Energy is required to (a) recognize on its Consolidated Balance Sheet an asset for the plan’s over-funded status or a liability for the plan’s under-funded status, (b) measure a plan’s assets and obligations as of the end of the fiscal year and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of the plans in the year that changes occur through adjustments to other comprehensive income and, when related to its rate-regulated utilities with recoverability of cost, to regulatory assets.
The projected benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1.5 billion and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to increases in discount rates, as well as the impact of lump sum settlement payments.
In December 2022, the CenterPoint Energy pension plan completed an annuity lift-out, a transaction that provided for the purchase of an irrevocable group annuity contract to fund pension plan annuities of retirees from previously divested businesses, as part of a de-risking strategy. This annuity lift-out impacted 1,119 retirees and beneficiaries, as well as reduced $138 million in pension obligations and $136 million in plan assets which were transferred to an insurance company. The transfer of plan assets is considered to be a lump sum settlement payment that reduced CenterPoint Energy pension plan’s projected benefit obligation in 2022.
80
As of December 31, 2023, the projected benefit obligation exceeded the market value of plan assets of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans by $344 million. Changes in interest rates or the market values of the securities held by the plan during a year could materially, positively or negatively, change the funded status and affect the level of pension expense and required contributions at the next remeasurement.
Houston Electric and CERC participate in CenterPoint Energy’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans covering substantially all employees. Pension cost by Registrant were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension cost | $ | 53 | $ | 27 | $ | 19 | $ | 172 | $ | 59 | $ | 88 | $ | 69 | $ | 34 | $ | 24 |
The calculation of pension cost and related liabilities requires the use of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. Two of the most critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate.
As of December 31, 2023, CenterPoint Energy’s qualified pension plans had an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 6.50%, which is the same as the 6.50% rate assumed as of December 31, 2022. The expected rate of return assumption was developed using the targeted asset allocation of our plans and the expected return for each asset class. CenterPoint Energy regularly reviews its actual asset allocation and periodically rebalances plan assets to reduce volatility and better match plan assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2023, the projected benefit obligation was calculated assuming a discount rate of 4.95%, which is 0.2% lower than the 5.15% discount rate assumed as of December 31, 2022 attributed primarily to rising interest rates. The discount rate was determined by reviewing yields on high-quality bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency and the expected duration of pension obligations specific to the characteristics of CenterPoint Energy’s plans.
CenterPoint Energy’s actuarially determined pension and other postemployment cost for 2023 and 2022 that is greater or less than the amounts being recovered through rates in the majority of Texas jurisdictions is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. Pension cost for 2024, including the nonqualified benefit restoration plan, is estimated to be $51 million before applicable regulatory deferrals and capitalization, based on an expected return on plan assets of 6.50% and a discount rate of 4.95% as of December 31, 2023. If the expected return assumption were lowered by 0.50% from 6.50% to 6.00%, 2024 pension cost would increase by approximately $6 million.
As of December 31, 2023, the pension plans projected benefit obligation, including the unfunded nonqualified pension plans, exceeded plan assets by $344 million. If the discount rate were lowered by 0.50% from 4.95% to 4.45%, the assumption change would increase CenterPoint Energy’s projected benefit obligation by approximately $66 million and decrease its 2024 pension cost by approximately $2 million. The expected reduction in pension cost due to the decrease in discount rate is a result of the expected correlation between the reduced interest rate and appreciation of fixed income assets in pension plans with significantly more fixed income instruments than equity instruments. In addition, the assumption change would impact CenterPoint Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets by increasing the regulatory asset recorded as of December 31, 2023 by $57 million and would result in a charge to comprehensive income in 2023 of $7 million, net of tax of $2 million, due to the increase in the projected benefit obligation.
Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the pension plans will impact CenterPoint Energy’s future pension expense and liabilities. CenterPoint Energy cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
81
FY 2022 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001130310-23-000013.
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
No Registrant makes any representations as to the information related solely to CenterPoint Energy or the subsidiaries of CenterPoint Energy other than itself.
The following combined discussion and analysis should be read in combination with the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 herein. When discussing CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated financial information, it includes the results of Houston Electric and CERC, which, along with CenterPoint Energy, are collectively referred to as the Registrants. Where appropriate, information relating to a specific registrant has been segregated and labeled as such. Unless the context indicates otherwise, specific references to Houston Electric and CERC also pertain to CenterPoint Energy. In this combined Form 10-K, the terms “our,” “we” and “us” are used as abbreviated references to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including Houston Electric and CERC, unless stated otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Background
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. is a public utility holding company. CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries own and operate electric transmission, distribution and generation and natural gas distribution facilities, and provide energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services. For a detailed description of CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries, please read Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Houston Electric is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy that provides electric transmission service to transmission service customers in the ERCOT region and distribution service to REPs serving the Texas gulf coast area that includes the city of Houston.
CERC Corp. is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy that (i) directly owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi and Texas, (ii) indirectly, through Indiana Gas and VEDO, owns and operates natural gas distribution systems in Indiana and Ohio, respectively, and (iii) owns and operates permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP.
CenterPoint Energy completed the Restructuring on June 30, 2022, whereby the equity interests in Indiana Gas and VEDO, both subsidiaries it acquired in its acquisition of Vectren on February 1, 2019, were transferred from VUH to CERC Corp. As a result, Indiana Gas and VEDO became wholly owned subsidiaries of CERC Corp. to better align CenterPoint Energy’s organizational structure with management and financial reporting and to fund future capital investments more efficiently. The Restructuring was a non-cash common control acquisition by CERC. As a result, CERC acquired these businesses at CenterPoint Energy’s historical basis in these entities and prior year amounts were recast to reflect the Restructuring as if it occurred at the earliest period presented for which CenterPoint Energy had common control. The Restructuring did not impact CenterPoint Energy’s carrying basis in any entity, its allocation of goodwill to its reporting units, or its segment presentation. Neither CenterPoint Energy nor CERC recognized any gains or losses in connection with the Restructuring. SIGECO was not acquired by CERC and remains a subsidiary of VUH.
Reportable Segments
In this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we discuss our results from continuing operations on a consolidated basis and individually for each of our reportable segments, which are listed below. We also discuss our liquidity, capital resources and critical accounting policies. We are first and foremost an energy delivery company and it is our intention to remain focused on these regulated segments. The results of our business operations are significantly impacted by weather, customer growth, economic conditions, cost management, competition, rate proceedings before regulatory agencies and other actions of the various regulatory agencies to whose jurisdiction we are subject, among other factors.
As of December 31, 2022, CenterPoint Energy’s reportable segments were Electric, Natural Gas, and Corporate and Other.
•The Electric reportable segment includes electric transmission and distribution services that are subject to rate regulation in Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s service territories, as well as the impacts of generation-related stranded costs and other true-up balances recoverable by the regulated electric utility and energy delivery services to electric customers and electric generation assets to serve electric customers and optimize those assets in the wholesale power market in Indiana Electric’s service territory. For further information about the Electric reportable segment, see “Business — Our Business — Electric” in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
41
•The Natural Gas reportable segment includes (i) intrastate natural gas sales to, and natural gas transportation and distribution for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional customers in Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas; (ii) permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies through CEIP; and (iii) home appliance maintenance and repair services to customers in Minnesota and home repair protection plans to natural gas customers in Indiana, Mississippi, Ohio and Texas through a third party. For further information about the Natural Gas reportable segment, see “Business — Our Business — Natural Gas” in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
•The Corporate and Other reportable segment includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services and other corporate support operations that support CenterPoint Energy’s business operations. CenterPoint Energy’s Corporate and Other also includes office buildings and other real estate used for business operations.
Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We expect our businesses to continue to be affected by the key factors and trends discussed below. Our expectations are based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from our expected results.
Factors Influencing Our Businesses and Industry Trends
We are an energy delivery company with electric transmission and distribution, power generation, and natural gas distribution operations that serve more than seven million metered customers across six jurisdictions. The majority of our revenues are generated from the transmission and delivery of electricity and the sale of natural gas by our subsidiaries.
In 2021, we announced strategic goals for our businesses, including our ten-year capital plan, and net zero and carbon emission reduction goals. Our focus on the growth of our regulated utility businesses led to the previously announced Enable Merger in December 2021 and CenterPoint Energy’s subsequent complete divestiture of its remaining Energy Transfer Common Units and Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units in February and March 2022. As a result of these transactions, over 95% of our earnings are now derived from regulated utility operations. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
Pursuant to this business strategy and in light of the nature of our businesses, significant amounts of capital investment, as reflected in our current capital plan, which was increased in 2022 to fund additional investments in system resiliency, reliability, and grid modernization, is required. These investments are not only intended to meet our customers’ current needs, but are also in anticipation for further organic growth and load growth from increased electrification in our service territories, including via increased electric vehicle adoption. To fund these capital investments, we rely on internally generated cash, borrowings under our credit facilities, proceeds from commercial paper, cash proceeds from strategic transactions (such as the sale of our Arkansas and Oklahoma LDC businesses), and issuances of debt in the capital markets to satisfy these capital needs. We strive to maintain investment grade ratings for our securities to access the capital markets on terms we consider reasonable. A reduction in our ratings generally would increase our borrowing costs for new issuances of debt, as well as borrowing costs under our existing revolving credit facilities, and may prevent us from accessing the commercial paper markets. Disruptions in the financial markets along with rising interest rates can also affect the availability of new capital on terms we consider attractive. In those circumstances, we may not be able to obtain certain types of external financing or may be required to accept terms less favorable than they would otherwise accept. For that reason, we seek to maintain adequate liquidity for our businesses through existing credit facilities and prudent refinancing of existing debt.
The regulation of electric transmission, distribution and generation facilities as well as natural gas pipelines and related facilities by federal and state regulatory agencies affects CenterPoint Energy’s, Houston Electric’s and CERC’s businesses. In accordance with applicable regulations, CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC are making, and will continue to make, significant capital investments in their service territories under our capital plan to help operate and maintain a safer, more reliable and growing electric and natural gas systems. The current economic environment (e.g., increasing interest rates, higher relative levels of inflation in the United States) discussed further below could result in heightened regulatory scrutiny as these regulatory agencies seek to reduce the financial impact of utility bills on customers. This increased level of scrutiny could result in the disallowance (in part or in whole) of CenterPoint Energy and its subsidiaries from recovering on certain capital investments. CenterPoint Energy’s, Houston Electric’s and CERC’s compliance expenses may also increase as a result of preventative measures required under these regulations. Consequently, new rates in the areas they serve are necessary to recover
42
these increasing costs. Houston Electric, Indiana Electric and CERC plan to file rate cases during 2023. The outcome of these base rate proceedings is uncertain and may be impacted by the current economic environment.
To assess our financial performance, our management primarily monitors the recovery of costs and return on investments by the evaluation of net income and capital expenditures, among other things, from our regulated service territories within our reportable segments. Within these broader financial measures, we monitor margins, natural gas and fuel costs, interest expense, capital spend, working capital requirements, and operation and maintenance expense. In addition to these financial measures, we also monitor a number of variables that management considers important to gauge the performance of our reportable segments, including the number of customers, throughput, use per customer, commodity prices, heating and cooling degree days, environmental impacts, safety factors, system reliability and customer satisfaction.
Each state has a unique economy and is driven by different industrial sectors. Our largest customers reflect the diversity in industries in the states across our footprint. For example, Houston Electric is largely concentrated in Houston, a diverse economy where a higher percentage of employment is tied to the energy sector relative to other regions of the country. Although the Houston area represents a large part of our customer base, we have a diverse customer base throughout the various states our utility businesses serve. In Minnesota, for instance, education and health services are the state’s largest sectors. Indiana and Ohio are impacted by changes in the Midwest economy in general and changes in particular industries concentrated in the Midwest such as automotive, feed and grain processing. Some industries are driven by population growth like education and health care, while others may be influenced by strength in the national or international economy. Adverse economic conditions, coupled with concerns for protecting the environment and increased availability of alternate energy sources, may cause consumers to use less energy or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for our services. Long-term national trends indicate customers have reduced their energy consumption, which could adversely affect our results. To the extent population growth is affected by lower energy prices and there is financial pressure on some of our customers who operate within the energy industry, there may be an impact on the growth rate of our customer base and overall demand. Management expects residential meter growth for Houston Electric to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 2%. Typical customer growth in the jurisdictions served by the Natural Gas reportable segment is approximately 1%. Management expects residential meter growth for CERC to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 1%.
Rising inflation and interest rates and a recessionary environment could potentially adversely impact CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its 10-year capital plan. The inability to execute on our capital plan may result in lost future revenues for CenterPoint Energy. Additionally, these economic conditions may affect customers’ ability to pay their utility bills which may preclude our ability to collect balances due from such customers.
Further, the global supply chain has experienced significant disruptions due to a multitude of factors, such as labor shortages, resource availability, long lead times, inflation and weather. These disruptions have adversely impacted the utility industry. Like many of our peers, we have experienced disruptions to our supply chain and may continue to experience such disruptions in the future. For example, we, along with the developer of the project, announced plans in January 2022 to downsize the solar array to be built in Posey County, Indiana due to supply chain issues experienced in the energy industry, rising cost of commodities and community feedback. To the extent adverse economic conditions, including supply chain disruptions, affect our suppliers and customers as well as our ability to meet our capital plan and generation transition plan, results from our energy delivery businesses may suffer. For more information, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
Further, in response to concerns for protecting the environment, we have strived to take a leading stance in the transition to safer and cleaner energy by being the first combined electric and natural gas utility with regulated generation assets to adopt net zero for its Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 GHG emissions by 2035 goals. In addition, we set a Scope 3 GHG emission reduction goal across our multi-state footprint by committing to help our residential and commercial customers reduce GHG emissions attributable to their end use of natural gas by 20% to 30% by 2035 from a 2021 baseline. Our capital plan supports these goals.
Significant Events
Regulatory Proceedings. The commissioners of the MPUC held deliberations in August 2022 regarding CERC’s natural gas cost prudency review case related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. As a result, the MPUC disallowed recovery of approximately $36 million of jurisdictional gas costs incurred during the event (or about 8.7% of the total of such costs incurred by CERC) and CERC’s regulatory asset balance was reduced to reflect the disallowance. Houston Electric filed its DCRF application with the PUCT on April 5, 2022, and subsequently amended such filing on July 1, 2022 to show mobile generation in a separate Rider TEEEF, seeking recovery of deferred costs and the applicable return as of December 31, 2021 under these lease agreements of approximately $200 million. The annual revenue increase requested for these lease agreements is
43
approximately $57 million. On January 27, 2023, the administrative law judges issued a proposal for decision recommending that the leasing of the TEEEF was not prudent or reasonable and necessary and that the PUCT deny recovery of all of the TEEEF costs. The PUCT is expected to consider the proposal for decision on March 9, 2023. For further information, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. For information related to our pending and completed regulatory proceedings to date in 2022 and to date in 2023, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
Debt Transactions. In 2022, Houston Electric issued $1.6 billion, and CERC issued or borrowed $1.0 billion in new debt, excluding the debt exchanges discussed below. CenterPoint Energy repaid or redeemed a combined $1.53 billion of debt, including CERC’s redemption of $425 million of debt and CEHE’s redemption of $500 million of debt, but excluding scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds. For information about debt transactions in 2022, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Debt Exchange. As a part of the Restructuring, on May 27, 2022, CERC Corp. and VUH completed an exchange with holders of VUH PPNs whereby CERC Corp. issued new senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $302 million in return for all of their outstanding VUH PPNs with an aggregate principal amount of $302 million. On October 5, 2022, in connection with the settlement of an exchange offer, CERC Corp. issued $75 million aggregate principal amount of 6.10% senior notes due 2035 in exchange for all remaining outstanding VUH senior notes. For additional information, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Restructuring. CenterPoint Energy completed the Restructuring on June 30, 2022, whereby the equity interests in Indiana Gas and VEDO, each of which were acquired in its acquisition of Vectren on February 1, 2019, were transferred from VUH to CERC Corp. As a result, Indiana Gas and VEDO became wholly owned subsidiaries of CERC Corp. to better align CenterPoint Energy’s organizational structure with management and financial reporting and to fund future capital investments more efficiently. For additional information, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Credit Facilities. On December 6, 2022, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Houston Electric and CERC, replaced their existing revolving credit facilities with three revolving credit facilities totaling $3.75 billion in aggregate commitments. In addition, SIGECO entered into a new revolving credit facility totaling an additional $250 million in aggregate commitments. The aggregate amount of commitments among the four credit facilities total $4.0 billion. On June 30, 2022, in connection with the Restructuring, VUH repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness and terminated all remaining commitments and other obligations under its $400 million amended and restated credit agreement dated as of February 4, 2021. For additional information, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Sale of Energy Transfer Equity Securities. In 2022, CenterPoint Energy sold its remaining Energy Transfer Common Units and Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units for net proceeds of $702 million. For more information, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Sale of Natural Gas Businesses. On January 10, 2022, CERC Corp. completed the sale of its Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses. For additional information regarding discontinued operations and divestitures, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
Our past earnings and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future earnings and results of operations. The magnitude of our future earnings and results of our operations will depend on or be affected by numerous factors that apply to all Registrants unless otherwise indicated including:
•CenterPoint Energy’s business strategies and strategic initiatives, restructurings, including the Restructuring, joint ventures and acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the completed sale of our Natural Gas businesses in Arkansas and Oklahoma and our exit of the midstream sector, which we cannot assure will have the anticipated benefits to us;
•industrial, commercial and residential growth in our service territories and changes in market demand, including the demand for our non-utility products and services and effects of energy efficiency measures and demographic patterns;
•our ability to fund and invest planned capital and the timely recovery of our investments, including those related to Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan as part of its IRPs;
•our ability to successfully construct, operate, repair and maintain electric generating facilities, natural gas facilities, TEEEF and electric transmission facilities, including complying with applicable environmental standards and the implementation of a well-balanced energy and resource mix, as appropriate;
44
•timely and appropriate rate actions that allow recovery of costs and a reasonable return on investment, including the timing and amount of the recovery of Houston Electric’s TEEEF leases;
•future economic conditions in regional and national markets, including inflation, and their effect on sales, prices and costs;
•weather variations and other natural phenomena, including the impact of severe weather events on operations and capital, such as impacts from the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•increases in commodity prices;
•volatility in the markets for natural gas as a result of, among other factors, armed conflicts, including the conflict in Ukraine and the related sanctions on certain Russian entities;
•changes in rates of inflation;
•continued disruptions to the global supply chain, including tariffs and other legislation impacting the supply chain, that could prevent CenterPoint Energy from securing the resources needed to, among other things, fully execute on its 10-year capital plan or achieve its net zero and carbon emissions reduction goals;
•non-payment for our services due to financial distress of our customers and the ability of REPs to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric, including the negative impact on such ability related to adverse economic conditions and severe weather events;
•public health threats, such as COVID-19, and their effect on our operations, business and financial condition, our industries and the communities we serve, U.S. and world financial markets and supply chains, potential regulatory actions and changes in customer and stakeholder behaviors relating thereto;
•state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments affecting various aspects of our businesses, including, among others, energy deregulation or re-regulation, pipeline integrity and safety and changes in regulation and legislation pertaining to trade, health care, finance and actions regarding the rates charged by our regulated businesses;
•direct or indirect effects on our facilities, resources, operations and financial condition resulting from terrorism, cyber attacks or intrusions, data security breaches or other attempts to disrupt our businesses or the businesses of third parties, or other catastrophic events such as fires, ice, earthquakes, explosions, leaks, floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes and other severe weather events, pandemic health events or other occurrences;
•tax legislation, including the effects of the CARES Act and the IRA (which includes but is not limited to any potential changes to tax rates, tax credits and/or interest deductibility), as well as any changes in tax laws under the current administration, and uncertainties involving state commissions’ and local municipalities’ regulatory requirements and determinations regarding the treatment of EDIT and our rates;
•our ability to mitigate weather impacts through normalization or rate mechanisms, and the effectiveness of such mechanisms;
•actions by credit rating agencies, including any potential downgrades to credit ratings;
•matters affecting regulatory approval, legislative actions, construction, implementation of necessary technology or other issues with respect to major capital projects that result in delays or cancellation or in cost overruns that cannot be recouped in rates;
•local, state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments relating to the environment, including, among others, those related to global climate change, air emissions, carbon, waste water discharges and the handling and disposal of CCR that could impact operations, cost recovery of generation plant costs and related assets, and CenterPoint Energy’s net zero and carbon emissions reduction goals;
•the impact of unplanned facility outages or other closures;
•the sufficiency of our insurance coverage, including availability, cost, coverage and terms and ability to recover claims;
•the availability and prices of raw materials and services and changes in labor for current and future construction projects and operations and maintenance costs, including our ability to control such costs;
•impacts from CenterPoint Energy’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, such as the investment performance and increases to net periodic costs as a result of plan settlements and changes in discount rates;
•changes in interest rates and their impact on costs of borrowing and the valuation of CenterPoint Energy’s pension benefit obligation;
•commercial bank and financial market conditions, our access to capital, the cost of such capital, and the results of our financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in the debt capital markets;
•inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations to us;
•non-payment for our services due to financial distress of our customers;
•the extent and effectiveness of our risk management activities;
•timely and appropriate regulatory actions, which include actions allowing securitization, such as the anticipated issuance of customer rate relief bonds by the Texas Public Financing Authority, for any hurricanes or other severe weather events, or natural disasters or other recovery of costs, including stranded coal generation asset costs;
45
•acquisition and merger or divestiture activities involving us or our industry, including the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition and divestiture plans;
•our ability to recruit, effectively transition and retain management and key employees and maintain good labor relations;
•changes in technology, particularly with respect to efficient battery storage or the emergence or growth of new, developing or alternative sources of generation, and their adoption by consumers;
•the impact of climate change and alternate energy sources on the demand for natural gas and electricity generated or transmitted by us;
•the timing and outcome of any audits, disputes and other proceedings related to taxes;
•the recording of impairment charges;
•political and economic developments, including energy and environmental policies under the current administration;
•the transition to a replacement for the LIBOR benchmark interest rate;
•CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its initiatives, targets and goals, including its net zero and carbon emissions reduction goals and its operations and maintenance expenditure goals;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•the development of new opportunities and the performance of projects undertaken by Energy Systems Group, which are subject to, among other factors, the level of success in bidding contracts and cancellation and/or reductions in the scope of projects by customers, and obligations related to warranties, guarantees and other contractual and legal obligations;
•the effect of changes in and application of accounting standards and pronouncements; and
•other factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report and in other reports that the Registrants file from time to time with the SEC.
CENTERPOINT ENERGY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity and natural gas. CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates its subsidiaries charge, debt service costs, income tax expense, its subsidiaries ability to collect receivables from REPs and customers and its ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
Income (loss) available to common shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 603 | $ | 475 | $ | 230 | $ | 128 | $ | 245 | |||||||||
| Natural Gas | 492 | 403 | 278 | 89 | 125 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Utility Operations | 1,095 | 878 | 508 | 217 | 370 | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate & Other (1) | (87) | (305) | (201) | 218 | (104) | ||||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations | — | 818 | (1,256) | (818) | 2,074 | ||||||||||||||
| Total CenterPoint Energy | $ | 1,008 | $ | 1,391 | $ | (949) | $ | (383) | $ | 2,340 |
(1)Includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services through Energy Systems Group, unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense, intercompany eliminations and the reduction of income allocated to preferred shareholders.
2022 Compared to 2021
Net Income. CenterPoint Energy reported income available to common shareholders of $1,008 million for 2022 compared to income available to common shareholders of $1,391 million for 2021.
Income available to common shareholders decreased $383 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in net income of $128 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in net income of $89 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below;
46
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $218 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to a $28 million pre-tax payment related to the impact of Board-implemented governance changes announced in July 2021, the net gain of $86 million in 2022 and a net loss of $122 million in December 2021 on the sale of Energy Transfer equity securities discussed further in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, partially offset by a $34 million loss in Enable series A preferred unit distributions in 2021 discussed in Note 4, and a decrease in income allocated to preferred shareholders of $46 million, primarily due to the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock to Common Stock during 2021; and
•a decrease in income of $818 million from discontinued operations, discussed further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
2021 Compared to 2020
Net Income. CenterPoint Energy reported income available to common shareholders of $1,391 million for 2021 compared to a loss available to common shareholders of $949 million for 2020.
Income available to common shareholders increased $2,340 million primarily due to the following items:
•an increase in net income of $245 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
•an increase in net income of $125 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
•a decrease in income available to common shareholders of $104 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to net gain of $97 million on Energy Transfer equity securities in 2021 discussed further in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, a $28 million pre-tax payment related to the impact of Board-implemented governance changes announced in July 2021, approximately $51 million unfavorable income tax impact primarily driven by CARES Act benefit in 2020, and approximately $33 million of CenterPoint Energy Inc. debt redemption charges in 2021; partially offset by approximately $15 million of lower interest expense as a result of the debt redemptions and a decrease in income allocated to preferred shareholders of $58 million due to the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock to Common Stock during 2020 and $22 million primarily due to the conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to Common Stock during 2021; and
•an increase in income of $2,074 million from discontinued operations, discussed further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
47
CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT
CenterPoint Energy’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for the reportable segments. Segment results include inter-segment interest income and expense, which may result in inter-segment profit and loss.
The following discussion of CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations is separated into two reportable segments, Electric and Natural Gas.
ELECTRIC
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,108 | $ | 3,763 | $ | 3,470 | $ | 345 | $ | 293 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 222 | 186 | 147 | (36) | (39) | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 1,864 | 1,761 | 1,683 | (103) | (78) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 793 | 775 | 684 | (18) | (91) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 275 | 268 | 268 | (7) | — | |||||||||||||
| Goodwill Impairment (1) | — | — | 185 | — | 185 | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,154 | 2,990 | 2,967 | (164) | (23) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 954 | 773 | 503 | 181 | 270 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest and other finance charges | (235) | (226) | (220) | (9) | (6) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 31 | 23 | 19 | 8 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 750 | 570 | 302 | 180 | 268 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 147 | 95 | 72 | (52) | (23) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 603 | $ | 475 | $ | 230 | $ | 128 | $ | 245 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 35,074 | 32,067 | 32,630 | 9 | % | (2) | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 105,541 | 103,000 | 98,647 | 2 | % | 4 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of normal weather for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 110 | % | 108 | % | 109 | % | 2 | % | (1) | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 121 | % | 82 | % | 76 | % | 39 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,534,730 | 2,493,832 | 2,433,474 | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,858,203 | 2,814,859 | 2,749,116 | 2 | % | 2 | % |
(1)For information related to the 2020 goodwill impairment at the Indiana Electric reporting unit, see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
48
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Electric reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF and impact of the change in rate design, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | $ | 157 | $ | 254 | |||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts, excluding impact of COVID-19 | 54 | (57) | |||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | 38 | (80) | |||||
| Cost of fuel and purchased power, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | 36 | 39 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | 32 | (8) | |||||
| Customer growth | 28 | 32 | |||||
| Pass-through revenues, offset in operation and maintenance below | 21 | 2 | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues, primarily related to service connections and off-system sales | 11 | 4 | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | 2 | 9 | |||||
| Impacts from increased peak demand in the prior year, collected in rates in the current year | 2 | 6 | |||||
| Impacts on usage from COVID-19 | — | 28 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | (3) | 12 | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items below | (33) | 52 | |||||
| Total | $ | 345 | $ | 293 | |||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||||||
| Cost of purchased power, offset in revenues above | 12 | 6 | |||||
| Cost of fuel, including coal, natural gas, and fuel oil, offset in revenues above | (48) | (45) | |||||
| $ | (36) | $ | (39) | ||||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (77) | $ | (90) | |||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | (39) | (8) | |||||
| Pass through expenses, offset in revenues above | (19) | (3) | |||||
| Contract services | (2) | — | |||||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | — | 10 | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items | 3 | (1) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues above | 4 | (1) | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 7 | 9 | |||||
| Support services | 20 | 6 | |||||
| Total | $ | (103) | $ | (78) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items | $ | 22 | $ | (58) | |||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | (40) | (33) | |||||
| Total | $ | (18) | $ | (91) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | $ | (14) | $ | (2) | |||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | 7 | 2 | |||||
| Total | $ | (7) | $ | — | |||
| Goodwill impairment | |||||||
| See Note 6 for further information | $ | — | $ | 185 | |||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 185 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (32) | $ | (19) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 15 | 6 | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items above | 8 | 7 | |||||
| Total | $ | (9) | $ | (6) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Reduction to non-service benefits costs | $ | — | $ | 5 | |||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | 8 | — | |||||
| Investments in CenterPoint Energy Money Pool interest income | — | (1) | |||||
| Total | $ | 8 | $ | 4 |
49
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
NATURAL GAS
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,946 | $ | 4,336 | $ | 3,631 | $ | 610 | $ | 705 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 2,665 | 1,941 | 1,341 | (724) | (600) | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 4 | 18 | 17 | 14 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 919 | 979 | 995 | 60 | 16 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 466 | 527 | 491 | 61 | (36) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 261 | 253 | 237 | (8) | (16) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 4,315 | 3,718 | 3,081 | (597) | (637) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 631 | 618 | 550 | 13 | 68 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | 303 | 8 | — | 295 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (137) | (141) | (153) | 4 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | (62) | (2) | 6 | (60) | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | 735 | 483 | 403 | 252 | 80 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 243 | 80 | 125 | (163) | 45 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 492 | $ | 403 | $ | 278 | $ | 89 | $ | 125 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in Bcf): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 240 | 241 | 237 | — | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 424 | 428 | 439 | (1) | % | (3) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 664 | 669 | 676 | (1) | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 106 | % | 91 | % | 91 | % | 15 | % | — | % | ||||||||
| Number of customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 3,964,221 | 4,372,428 | 4,328,607 | (9) | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 301,834 | 354,602 | 349,725 | (15) | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 4,266,055 | 4,727,030 | 4,678,332 | (10) | % | 1 | % |
50
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | $ | 923 | $ | 600 | |||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design, exclusive of the TCJA impact below | 69 | 65 | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue, excluding impacts from COVID-19 | 26 | (16) | |||||
| Weather and usage, excluding impacts from COVID-19 | 22 | 12 | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | 19 | 13 | |||||
| Customer growth | 16 | 13 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | 6 | (8) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in operation and maintenance below | 3 | (7) | |||||
| Impacts of COVID-19, including usage and other miscellaneous charges | — | 16 | |||||
| Changes in non-utility revenues, including impacts of MES disposal | (17) | 17 | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | (457) | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 610 | $ | 705 | |||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | (923) | $ | (600) | ||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 199 | — | |||||
| $ | (724) | $ | (600) | ||||
| Non-utility costs of revenues, including natural gas | |||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 14 | (1) | |||||
| $ | 14 | $ | (1) | ||||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | $ | 125 | $ | — | |||
| Contract services | (14) | (3) | |||||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | — | 8 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues above | (3) | 7 | |||||
| Corporate support services | (22) | (8) | |||||
| Labor and benefits, primarily due to headcount | (5) | (19) | |||||
| Miscellaneous operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | (21) | 31 | |||||
| Total | $ | 60 | $ | 16 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | $ | 66 | $ | — | |||
| Lower depreciation rates in Indiana from 2021 rate order | 18 | — | |||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (23) | (36) | |||||
| Total | $ | 61 | $ | (36) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues above | $ | (19) | $ | (13) | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (12) | (3) | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 23 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (8) | $ | (16) | |||
| Gain on Sale | |||||||
| Net gain on sale of MES | $ | — | $ | 8 | |||
| Gain on Sale of Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses | 295 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 295 | $ | 8 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (11) | $ | (2) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 15 | 14 | |||||
| Total | $ | 4 | $ | 12 |
51
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Increase to non-service benefit cost, primarily settlement cost incurred in 2022 | $ | (66) | $ | (10) | |||
| AFUDC - Equity, primarily from increased capital spend | 3 | — | |||||
| Money pool investments with CenterPoint Energy interest income | — | 2 | |||||
| Other miscellaneous non-operating income (expenses) | 3 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (60) | $ | (8) |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
HOUSTON ELECTRIC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Houston Electric’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. Houston Electric consists of a single reportable segment. Houston Electric’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Houston Electric’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates Houston Electric charges, debt service costs, income tax expense, Houston Electric’s ability to collect receivables from REPs and Houston Electric’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of Houston Electric’s consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
| TDU | $ | 3,205 | $ | 2,894 | $ | 2,723 | $ | 311 | $ | 171 | ||||||||
| Bond Companies | 207 | 240 | 188 | (33) | 52 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 3,412 | 3,134 | 2,911 | 278 | 223 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | 1,647 | 1,591 | 1,517 | (56) | (74) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | 479 | 429 | 405 | (50) | (24) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 261 | 251 | 252 | (10) | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Bond Companies | 194 | 219 | 161 | 25 | (58) | |||||||||||||
| Total | 2,581 | 2,490 | 2,335 | (91) | (155) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 831 | 644 | 576 | 187 | 68 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (202) | (183) | (171) | (19) | (12) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | (13) | (21) | (28) | 8 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 19 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 635 | 457 | 387 | 178 | 70 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 125 | 76 | 53 | (49) | (23) | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 510 | $ | 381 | $ | 334 | $ | 129 | $ | 47 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 33,676 | 30,650 | 31,244 | 10 | % | (2) | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 100,062 | 96,898 | 93,768 | 3 | % | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 110 | % | 109 | % | 110 | % | 1 | % | (1) | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 120 | % | 80 | % | 72 | % | 40 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,402,329 | 2,359,168 | 2,303,315 | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,706,598 | 2,660,938 | 2,599,827 | 2 | % | 2 | % |
52
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for Houston Electric:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF and impact of the change in rate design, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers | $ | 157 | $ | 254 | |||
| Weather impacts and other usage | 60 | (51) | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | 32 | (8) | |||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | 30 | (100) | |||||
| Customer growth | 27 | 31 | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues | 5 | (1) | |||||
| Impacts from increased peak demand in the prior year, collected in rates in the current year | 2 | 6 | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | 1 | 9 | |||||
| Impacts on usage from COVID-19 | — | 19 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | (3) | 12 | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items below | (33) | 52 | |||||
| Total | $ | 278 | $ | 223 | |||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (77) | $ | (90) | |||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | (21) | (2) | |||||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | — | 9 | |||||
| Contract services | 3 | (3) | |||||
| Energy efficiency program costs, offset in revenues above | 3 | (1) | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 12 | 11 | |||||
| Support services | 24 | 2 | |||||
| Total | $ | (56) | $ | (74) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (50) | $ | (24) | |||
| Total | $ | (50) | $ | (24) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (14) | (3) | |||||
| Total | $ | (10) | $ | 1 | |||
| Bond Companies expense | |||||||
| Operations and maintenance and depreciation expense, offset by revenues above | $ | 25 | $ | (58) | |||
| Total | $ | 25 | $ | (58) | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (32) | $ | (19) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 13 | 7 | |||||
| Total | $ | (19) | $ | (12) | |||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | |||||||
| Lower outstanding principal balance, offset by revenues above | $ | 8 | $ | 7 | |||
| Total | $ | 8 | $ | 7 | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Reduction to non-service benefit cost | $ | — | $ | 8 | |||
| Other income, including AFUDC - equity | 2 | — | |||||
| Investments in CenterPoint Energy Money Pool interest income | — | (1) | |||||
| Total | $ | 2 | $ | 7 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
53
CERC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CERC’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. CERC consists of a single reportable segment. CERC’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for natural gas. CERC’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various federal, state and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates CERC charges, debt service costs and income tax expense, CERC’s ability to collect receivables from customers and CERC’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of CERC’s consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
CenterPoint Energy completed the Restructuring on June 30, 2022, whereby the equity interests in Indiana Gas and VEDO, both subsidiaries it acquired in its acquisition of Vectren on February 1, 2019, were transferred from VUH to CERC Corp. As a result, Indiana Gas and VEDO became wholly owned subsidiaries of CERC Corp. The Restructuring was a non-cash common control acquisition by CERC. As a result, CERC acquired these businesses at CenterPoint Energy’s historical basis in these entities and prior year amounts were recast to reflect the Restructuring as if it occurred at the earliest period presented for which CenterPoint Energy had common control.
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | 4,800 | 4,200 | 3,531 | 600 | 669 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | 2,607 | 1,885 | 1,313 | (722) | (572) | |||||||||||||
| Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas | 4 | 17 | 17 | 13 | — | |||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 886 | 973 | 997 | 87 | 24 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 448 | 483 | 441 | 35 | (42) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 257 | 249 | 234 | (8) | (15) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 4,202 | 3,607 | 3,002 | (595) | (605) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 598 | 593 | 529 | 5 | 64 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | 557 | 11 | — | 546 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (130) | (134) | (143) | 4 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | (64) | (4) | (4) | (60) | — | |||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | 961 | 466 | 382 | 495 | 84 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 236 | 76 | 117 | (160) | 41 | |||||||||||||
| Income From Continuing Operations | 725 | 390 | 265 | 335 | 125 | |||||||||||||
| Loss from Discontinued Operations (net of tax benefit of $—, $—, and $(2), respectively) | — | — | (66) | — | 66 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 725 | $ | 390 | $ | 199 | $ | 335 | $ | 191 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in BCF): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 233 | 235 | 231 | (1) | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 389 | 396 | 410 | (2) | % | (3) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 622 | 631 | 641 | (1) | % | (2) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 106 | % | 91 | % | 91 | % | 15 | % | — | % | ||||||||
| Number of customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 3,859,726 | 4,268,385 | 4,225,047 | (10) | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 291,184 | 336,828 | 332,210 | (14) | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 4,150,910 | 4,605,213 | 4,557,257 | (10) | % | 1 | % |
Discontinued Operations. On February 24, 2020, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the Equity Purchase Agreement to sell the Energy Services Disposal Group. Accordingly, the previously reported Energy Services reportable segment has been eliminated. The transaction closed on June 1, 2020. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
54
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power below | $ | 921 | $ | 572 | |||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design, exclusive of the TCJA impact | 56 | 56 | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue | 26 | (16) | |||||
| Weather and usage | 22 | 11 | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes | 19 | 13 | |||||
| Customer growth | 16 | 12 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in operation and maintenance | 8 | (4) | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | 6 | (8) | |||||
| Impacts of COVID-19 | — | 16 | |||||
| Changes in non-utility revenues, including impacts of MES disposal | (17) | 17 | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | (457) | — | |||||
| Total | $ | 600 | $ | 669 | |||
| Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power | |||||||
| Cost of natural gas, offset in revenues above | $ | (921) | $ | (572) | |||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 199 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (722) | $ | (572) | |||
| Non-utility costs of revenues, including natural gas | |||||||
| Other, primarily non-utility cost of revenues | $ | 13 | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | 13 | $ | — | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | $ | 125 | $ | — | |||
| Contract services | (8) | (2) | |||||
| Labor and benefits | (4) | (18) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues above | (8) | 4 | |||||
| Corporate Support Services | 2 | 5 | |||||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | — | 8 | |||||
| Miscellaneous operations and maintenance expenses, including bad debt expense | (20) | 27 | |||||
| Total | $ | 87 | $ | 24 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | ||||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | $ | 66 | $ | — | |||
| Indiana lower depreciation rates from recent rate order | 13 | — | |||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (44) | (42) | |||||
| Total | $ | 35 | $ | (42) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues | $ | (19) | $ | (13) | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (12) | (2) | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 23 | — | |||||
| Total | (8) | (15) | |||||
| Gain on sale | |||||||
| Net gain on sale of Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses | $ | 546 | $ | — | |||
| Net gain on sale of MES | — | 11 | |||||
| Total | $ | 546 | $ | 11 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Changes in outstanding debt | $ | (11) | $ | (5) | |||
| Other, primarily AFUDC and impacts of regulatory deferrals | 15 | 14 | |||||
| Total | $ | 4 | $ | 9 |
55
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 to 2021 | 2021 to 2020 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Increase to non-service benefit cost | $ | (65) | $ | (10) | |||
| Other miscellaneous non-operating income (expenses) | — | 10 | |||||
| Increase in Equity AFUDC | 2 | — | |||||
| Nine days in January 2022 for Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses due to sale | 3 | — | |||||
| Total | $ | (60) | $ | — |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Historical Cash Flows
The net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for 2022, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 1,810 | $ | 966 | $ | 856 | $ | 22 | $ | 770 | $ | (1,219) | $ | 1,995 | $ | 899 | $ | 990 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (1,628) | (2,435) | 406 | (1,851) | (1,617) | (1,287) | (1,265) | (564) | (770) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing activities | (345) | 1,324 | (1,277) | 1,916 | 926 | 2,515 | (834) | (416) | (223) |
Operating Activities. The following items contributed to increased (decreased) net cash provided by operating activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 compared to 2021 | 2021 compared to 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in net income after adjusting for non-cash items | $ | (492) | $ | 211 | $ | (169) | $ | 2,098 | $ | 203 | $ | 117 | ||||||||||
| Changes in working capital | (615) | (177) | (107) | (155) | (101) | (236) | ||||||||||||||||
| Increase in regulatory assets (1) | 2,529 | 196 | 2,339 | (2,188) | (226) | (2,017) | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | 339 | — | — | (1,767) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in distributions from unconsolidated affiliates (2) (3) | (155) | — | — | 42 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Higher pension contribution | 26 | — | — | 25 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 156 | (34) | 12 | (28) | (5) | (73) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 1,788 | $ | 196 | $ | 2,075 | $ | (1,973) | $ | (129) | $ | (2,209) |
(1)The increase in regulatory assets is primarily due to the incurred natural gas costs associated with the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the February 2021 Winter Storm Event.
(2)In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s equity investment in Enable met the held for sale criteria and is reflected as discontinued operations on CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
(3)This change is partially offset by the change in distributions from Enable in excess of cumulative earnings in investing activities noted in the table below.
56
Investing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in investing activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 compared to 2021 | 2021 compared to 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of equity securities | $ | (618) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,320 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Net change in capital expenditures | (1,255) | (817) | (337) | (568) | (561) | (178) | ||||||||||||||||
| Transaction costs related to the Enable Merger | 49 | — | — | (49) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash received related to Enable Merger | (5) | — | — | 5 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes receivable from unconsolidated affiliates | — | — | — | — | (481) | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in distributions from Enable in excess of cumulative earnings (1) | — | — | — | (80) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from divestitures | 2,053 | — | 2,053 | (1,193) | — | (343) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (1) | (1) | (23) | (21) | (11) | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 223 | $ | (818) | $ | 1,693 | $ | (586) | $ | (1,053) | $ | (517) |
(1)In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s equity investment in Enable met the held for sale criteria and is reflected as discontinued operations on CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Financing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in financing activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 compared to 2021 | 2021 compared to 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in commercial paper outstanding | $ | (1,206) | $ | — | $ | (646) | $ | 1,893 | $ | — | $ | 582 | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuances of preferred stock, net | — | — | — | (723) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock, net | — | — | — | (672) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in long-term debt outstanding, excluding commercial paper | (1,231) | 386 | (936) | 2,450 | 415 | 1,481 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in debt and equity issuance costs | 2 | (5) | (4) | (30) | (9) | (6) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in short-term borrowings | 479 | — | 479 | (27) | — | (27) | ||||||||||||||||
| Decreased payment of Common Stock dividends | (55) | — | — | 7 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Decreased (increased) payment of Preferred Stock dividends | 58 | — | — | 30 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Payment of obligation for finance lease | (306) | (306) | — | (179) | (179) | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes payable from affiliated companies | — | (374) | (2,007) | — | 496 | 508 | ||||||||||||||||
| Contribution from parent | — | 1,013 | 149 | — | 68 | (197) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to parent | — | (316) | (827) | — | 551 | 111 | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital contribution to parent associated with the sale of CES | — | — | — | — | — | 286 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (2) | — | — | 1 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (2,261) | $ | 398 | $ | (3,792) | $ | 2,750 | $ | 1,342 | $ | 2,738 |
Future Sources and Uses of Cash
The Registrants expect that anticipated 2023 cash needs will be met with borrowings under their credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt (including ratepayer-backed securitization bonds), proceeds from the issuance by the Texas Public Financing Authority of customer rate relief bonds (which will not be a debt of CERC or its subsidiaries), term loans or common stock, anticipated cash flows from operations, and with respect to CenterPoint Energy and CERC, proceeds from
57
commercial paper. Discretionary financing or refinancing may result in the issuance of equity securities of CenterPoint Energy or debt securities of the Registrants in the capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit facilities or term bank loans. Issuances of equity or debt in the capital markets, funds raised in the commercial paper markets and additional credit facilities may not, however, be available on acceptable terms.
Material Current and Long-term Cash Requirements. The liquidity and capital requirements of the Registrants are affected primarily by results of operations, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, tax payments, working capital needs and various regulatory actions. Capital expenditures are expected to be used for investment in infrastructure for electric and natural gas distribution operations. These capital expenditures are anticipated to maintain reliability and safety, increase resiliency and expand our systems through value-added projects. In addition to dividend payments on CenterPoint Energy’s Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock, and in addition to interest payments on debt, the Registrants’ principal anticipated cash requirements for 2023 include the following:
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||
| Estimated capital expenditures | $ | 3,639 | $ | 1,815 | $ | 1,427 | |||||
| Scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds | 156 | 156 | — | ||||||||
| Maturing CERC senior notes and term loan | 1,831 | — | 1,831 |
The following table sets forth the Registrants’ estimates of the Registrants’ capital expenditures currently planned for projects for 2023 through 2027. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for CenterPoint Energy’s actual capital expenditures by reportable segment for 2022.
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 2,102 | $ | 3,335 | $ | 2,251 | $ | 2,246 | $ | 2,388 | ||||||||||
| Natural Gas | 1,521 | 1,363 | 1,349 | 1,775 | 1,817 | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 16 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,639 | $ | 4,716 | $ | 3,618 | $ | 4,039 | $ | 4,223 | ||||||||||
| Houston Electric (1) | $ | 1,815 | $ | 1,970 | $ | 1,863 | $ | 2,098 | $ | 2,246 | ||||||||||
| CERC (1) | $ | 1,427 | $ | 1,311 | $ | 1,277 | $ | 1,690 | $ | 1,738 |
(1)Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
Capital Expenditures for Climate-Related Projects. On September 23, 2021, CenterPoint Energy announced a new 10-year capital expenditure plan. As part of its 10-year plan to spend over $40 billion on capital expenditures, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in clean energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation and electric vehicle expansion. CenterPoint Energy announced in November 2022 an increase of $2.3 billion to its 10-year capital plan, concluding in 2030, which now totals nearly $43 billion.
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ material current and long-term cash requirements as of December 31, 2022.
| Total | 2023 | 2024-2025 | 2026-2027 | 2028 and thereafter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | |||||||||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds | $ | 317 | $ | 156 | $ | 161 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) | 16,021 | 1,335 | 1,273 | 3,761 | 9,652 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (2) | 12 | 8 | 4 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (2) | 8,049 | 651 | 1,196 | 1,133 | 5,069 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 511 | 511 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (3) | 7,152 | 1,165 | 2,424 | 1,040 | 2,523 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 32,062 | $ | 3,826 | $ | 5,058 | $ | 5,934 | $ | 17,244 |
58
| Total | 2023 | 2024-2025 | 2026-2027 | 2028 and thereafter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | |||||||||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds | $ | 317 | $ | 156 | $ | 161 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) | 6,036 | — | — | 600 | 5,436 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (2) | 12 | 8 | 4 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (2) | 4,693 | 235 | 467 | 456 | 3,535 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 11,058 | $ | 399 | $ | 632 | $ | 1,056 | $ | 8,971 | |||||||||
| CERC | |||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | $ | 4,826 | $ | 1,331 | $ | 10 | $ | 891 | $ | 2,594 | |||||||||
| Interest payments — long-term debt (2) | 1,897 | 195 | 327 | 313 | 1,062 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 511 | 511 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (3) | 5,096 | 894 | 1,426 | 822 | 1,954 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 12,330 | $ | 2,931 | $ | 1,763 | $ | 2,026 | $ | 5,610 |
(1)ZENS obligations are included in the 2028 and thereafter column at their contingent principal amount of $26 million as of December 31, 2022. These obligations are exchangeable for cash at any time at the option of the holders for 95% of the current value of the reference shares attributable to each ZENS ($507 million as of December 31, 2022), as discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2)The Registrants calculated estimated interest payments for long-term debt as follows: for fixed-rate debt and term debt, the Registrants calculated interest based on the applicable rates and payment dates; for variable-rate debt and/or non-term debt, the Registrants used interest rates in place as of December 31, 2022. The Registrants typically expect to settle such interest payments with cash flows from operations and short-term borrowings.
(3)For a discussion of commodity and other commitments, see Note 15(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
The table above does not include the following:
•estimated future payments for expected future AROs primarily estimated to be incurred after 2026. See Note 3(c) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•expected contributions to pension plans and other postretirement plans in 2023. See Note 8(g) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•operating leases. See Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. Other than Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for tax-exempt long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy (see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements) and short-term leases, the Registrants have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Regulatory Matters
COVID-19 Regulatory Matters
For information about COVID-19 regulatory matters, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
February 2021 Winter Storm Event
For information about the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, and for additional information on the Texas electric market, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Business — In connection with the February...”
59
Indiana Electric CPCN (CenterPoint Energy)
BTAs
On February 23, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to purchase the Posey solar project. On October 27, 2021, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the Posey solar project through a BTA to acquire its solar array assets for a fixed purchase price and approved recovery of costs via a levelized rate over the anticipated 35-year life. Due to community feedback and rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Indiana Electric, along with Arevon, the developer, announced plans in January 2022 to downsize the Posey solar project to 191 MW. Indiana Electric collaboratively agreed to the scope change, and on February 1, 2023, Indiana Electric entered into an amended and restated BTA that is contingent on further IURC review and approval. On February 7, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to approve the amended BTA. With the passage of the IRA, Indiana Electric can now pursue PTCs for solar projects. Indiana Electric will request that project costs, net of PTCs, be recovered in rate base rather than a levelized rate, through base rates or the CECA mechanism, depending on which provides more timely recovery. The Posey solar project is expected to be placed in service in 2025.
On July 5, 2022, Indiana Electric entered into a BTA to acquire a 130 MW solar array in Pike County, Indiana through a special purpose entity for a capped purchase price. A CPCN for the project was filed with the IURC on July 29, 2022. On September 21, 2022, an agreement in principle was reached resolving all the issues between Indiana Electric and OUCC. The Stipulation and Settlement agreement was filed on October 6, 2022 and a settlement hearing was held on November 1, 2022. On January 11, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the settlement agreement granting Indiana Electric to purchase and acquire the Pike County solar project through a BTA and approved the estimated cost. The IURC also designated the project as a clean energy project under Ind. Code Ch. 8-1-8.8, approved the proposed levelized rate and associated ratemaking and accounting treatment. The project is expected to be placed in service by the first quarter of 2025.
On January 10, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to acquire a wind energy generating facility through a BTA, consistent with its 2019/2020 IRP that calls for up to 300 MWs of wind generation. The wind project is located in MISO’s Central Region. The construction phase is expected to commence during the second half of 2023 to achieve commercial operation by January 1, 2025. Indiana Electric has requested recovery via the CECA mechanism or through base rates in the next general rate case, depending on which provides more timely recovery. As of the date of this Form 10-K, Indiana Electric has not entered into any definitive agreement relating to this wind energy generating facility, and it is not certain that a definitive agreement will be entered into at all.
PPAs
Indiana Electric also sought approval in February 2021 for a 100 MW solar PPA with Clenera LLC in Warrick County, Indiana. The request accounted for increased cost of debt related to this PPA, which provides equivalent equity return to offset imputed debt during the 25 year life of the PPA. In October 2021, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar PPA but denied the request to preemptively offset imputed debt in the PPA cost. Due to rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Clenera and Indiana Electric were compelled to renegotiate terms of the agreement to increase the PPA price. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs are requested to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA. The amended PPA will be brought before the IURC in a fully docketed proceeding in the second quarter of 2023. The Clenera solar array is expected to be placed in service in the second quarter of 2025.
On August 25, 2021, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 185 MW of solar power, under a 15-year PPA, from Oriden, which is developing a solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, and 150 MW of solar power, under a 20-year PPA, from Origis, which is developing a solar project in Knox County, Indiana. On May 4, 2022, the IURC issued an order approving Indiana Electric to enter into both PPAs. In March 2022, when the results of the MISO interconnection study were completed, Origis advised Indiana Electric that the costs to construct the solar project in Knox County, Indiana had increased. The increase was largely driven by escalating commodity and supply chain costs impacting manufacturers worldwide. In August 2022, Indiana Electric and Origis entered into an amended PPA, which reiterated the terms contained in the 2021 PPA with certain modifications. On October 19, 2022, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval of the amended PPA with Origis and a hearing was held on January 4, 2023. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with Oriden with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs are requested to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA with Oriden. The amended PPA with Oriden will be brought before the IURC in a fully docketed proceeding in the second quarter of 2023. The Oriden solar array is expected to be placed in service in the second quarter of 2025 and the Origis solar array is expected to be placed in service by the third quarter of 2024.
60
Natural Gas Combustion Turbines
On June 17, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to construct two natural gas combustion turbines to replace portions of its existing coal-fired generation fleet. On June 28, 2022, the IURC approved the CPCN. The estimated $334 million turbine facility is planned to be constructed at the current site of the A.B. Brown power plant in Posey County, Indiana and would provide a combined output of 460 MW. Indiana Electric received approval for depreciation expense and post in-service carrying costs to be deferred in a regulatory asset until the date Indiana South’s base rates include a return on and recovery of depreciation expense on the facility. A new approximately 23.5 mile pipeline will be constructed and operated by Texas Gas Transmission, LLC to supply natural gas to the turbine facility. FERC granted a certificate to construct the pipeline on October 20, 2022. The period to challenge FERC’s certificate in a federal district court expires on February 20, 2023. Indiana Electric granted its contractor a full notice to proceed to construct the turbines on December 9, 2022. The facility is targeted to be operational by year end 2025. Recovery of the proposed natural gas combustion turbines and regulatory asset will be requested in the next Indiana Electric rate case expected in 2023.
For more information regarding uncertainties related to our solar projects, see Item 1A of Part I of this combined Form 10-K and “ —Solar Panel Issues” below.
Culley Unit 3 Operations
In June 2022, F.B. Culley Unit 3, an Indiana Electric coal-fired electric generation unit with an installed generating capacity of 270 MW, experienced an operating issue relating to its boiler feed pump turbine, and it remains out of service. The current estimate of the costs to repair F.B. Culley Unit 3 is approximately $6 million to $7 million, which will largely be capital expenditures. CenterPoint Energy has located a replacement boiler feed pump turbine which is currently being refurbished by the original equipment manufacturer to ensure it is in good working order. Currently, F.B. Culley Unit 3 is expected to return to service in the first half of 2023 depending on the time it takes to refurbish, install and test operation of the replacement turbine and related materials. CenterPoint Energy is evaluating the applicability of insurance coverages. For the duration of the unplanned outage, CenterPoint Energy expects to meet its generation capacity needs from its other generation units and power purchase agreements.
Indiana Electric Securitization of Planned Generation Retirements (CenterPoint Energy)
The State of Indiana has enacted legislation, Senate Bill 386, that would enable CenterPoint Energy to request approval from the IURC to securitize the remaining book value and removal costs associated with certain generating facilities not more than twenty-four months before the unit is retired. The Governor of Indiana signed the legislation on April 19, 2021. On May 10, 2022, CenterPoint Energy (Indiana Electric) filed an application with the IURC to securitize qualified costs associated with its planned retirements of coal generation facilities. Total qualified costs are estimated at $359 million, of which $350 million would be financed and $9 million are estimated total ongoing costs. A hearing was held before the IURC on September 7, 2022 and a final order was received on January 4, 2023 authorizing the issuance of up to $350 million in securitization bonds. Per Senate Bill 386, CenterPoint Energy has 90 days after the 30-day appeal period has expired to issue the securitization bonds, subject to an approved extension.
Subsidiary Restructuring
In July 2021, Indiana North and SIGECO filed petitions with the IURC for the approval of a new financial services agreement and the confirmation of Indiana North’s financing authority, and final orders were issued by the IURC on December 28, 2021. VEDO filed a similar application with the PUCO in September 2021 and the PUCO issued an order on January 26, 2022 adopting recommendations by PUCO staff. Both the IURC and PUCO approved the petitions. The orders allowed the reissuance of existing debt of Indiana Gas and VEDO to CERC, the continued amortization of existing issuance expenses and discounts, and the treatment of any potential exchange fees as discounts to be amortized over the life of the debt. As a part of the Restructuring, on May 27, 2022, CERC Corp. and VUH completed an exchange with holders of VUH PPNs whereby CERC Corp. issued new senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $302 million in return for all of their outstanding VUH PPNs with an aggregate principal amount of $302 million. Additionally, although not necessary to complete the Restructuring or the above mentioned exchange, on October 5, 2022, CERC Corp. closed a separate exchange offer of all outstanding VUH 6.10% senior notes for new notes of CERC Corp. For further information on the debt exchanges, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. CenterPoint Energy completed the transfer of Indiana Gas and VEDO from VUH to CERC on June 30, 2022 to better align its organizational structure with management and financial reporting and to fund future capital investments more efficiently. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
61
Bailey to Jones Creek Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
In April 2017, Houston Electric submitted a proposal to ERCOT requesting its endorsement of the Freeport Area Master Plan, which included the Bailey to Jones Creek Project. On November 21, 2019, the PUCT issued its final approval of Houston Electric’s certificate of convenience and necessity application, based on an unopposed settlement agreement under which Houston Electric would construct the project at an estimated cost of approximately $483 million. Houston Electric commenced pre-construction activities on the project in 2019, began construction in 2021, and completed construction and energized the line ahead of schedule in November 2021. Certain residual clean-up activities were done in 2022 and will continue in 2023.
Space City Solar Transmission Interconnection Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On December 17, 2020, Houston Electric filed a certificate of convenience and necessity application with the PUCT for approval to build a 345 kV transmission line in Wharton County, Texas connecting the Hillje substation on Houston Electric’s transmission system to the planned 610 MW Space City Solar Generation facility being developed by third-party developer EDF Renewables. The actual capital costs of the project will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors. In November 2021, the PUCT approved a route that was estimated to cost $25 million and issued a final order on January 12, 2022. There have been project delays due to supply chain constraints in the developer acquiring solar panels. Houston Electric expects to complete construction and energization of the transmission line by the end of 2023.
Texas Legislation (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Houston Electric continues to review the effects of legislation passed in 2021 and will be reviewing proposed bills that have been or will be submitted during the current 2023 legislative session for similar impacts where applicable. For example, pursuant to legislation passed in 2021, Houston Electric entered into two leases for TEEEF (mobile generation). Houston Electric sought initial recovery of the 2021 lease costs for the TEEEF and the operational costs for transportation, mobilization and demobilization, labor and materials for interconnections, fuel for commissioning, testing and operation, purchase and lease of auxiliary equipment, and labor and materials for operations in its 2022 DCRF application. Additionally, the 2021 legislation allows Houston Electric to seek recovery of transmission and distribution facilities that have a lead time of at least six months and would aid in restoring power to Houston Electric’s distribution customers following a widespread power outage. Houston Electric plans to seek recovery of costs associated with long-lead time facilities in a future DCRF or ratemaking proceeding. For further information regarding Houston Electric’s TEEEF, see Notes 7 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
Minnesota Base Rate Case (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
On November 1, 2021, CERC filed a general rate case with the MPUC seeking approval for a revenue increase of approximately $67 million with a projected test year ended December 31, 2022. On September 23, 2022, the MPUC issued a written order approving the Settlement agreement which provides for a general revenue increase of $48.5 million and overall rate of return of 6.65%. The MPUC approved CERC’s compliance filing on January 17, 2023 and rate implementation began February 1, 2023. CERC plans to implement its Interim Rate Undercollection Plan in the second quarter of 2023 to collect the difference between authorized final rates and interim rates for the time period September 23, 2022 through January 31, 2023.
Minnesota Legislation (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
The Natural Gas Innovation Act was passed by the Minnesota legislature in June 2021 with bipartisan support. This law establishes a regulatory framework to enable the state’s investor-owned natural gas utilities to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and advancing the state’s clean energy future. Specifically, the Natural Gas Innovation Act allows a natural gas utility to submit an innovation plan for approval by the MPUC which could propose the use of renewable energy resources and innovative technologies such as:
•renewable natural gas (produces energy from organic materials such as wastewater, agricultural manure, food waste, agricultural or forest waste);
•renewable hydrogen gas (produces energy from water through electrolysis with renewable electricity such as solar);
•energy efficiency measures (avoids energy consumption in excess of the utility’s existing conservation programs); and
•innovative technologies (reduces or avoids greenhouse gas emissions using technologies such as carbon capture).
CERC expects to submit its first innovation plan to the MPUC in 2023. The maximum allowable cost for an innovation plan will start at 1.75% of the utility's revenue in the state and could increase to 4% by 2033, subject to review and approval by the MPUC.
62
Solar Panel Issues (CenterPoint Energy)
CenterPoint Energy’s current and future solar projects have been impacted by delays and/or increased costs. The potential delays and inflationary cost pressures communicated from the developers of our solar projects are primarily due to (i) unavailability of solar panels and other uncertainties related to the pending DOC investigation on anti-dumping and countervailing duties petition filed by a domestic solar manufacturer, (ii) the December 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act on solar modules and other products manufactured in China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and (iii) persistent general global supply chain and labor availability issues. On December 2, 2022, the DOC issued its preliminary determination, finding four of the eight companies being investigated are attempting to bypass U.S. duties; however, the investigation continues with the DOC’s final determination, which is currently scheduled for May 2023. In June 2022, President Biden authorized an executive order which would suspend anti-circumvention tariffs on solar panels for two years; however, the executive order could be subject to legal challenges and its effects remain uncertain. The resolution of these issues will determine what additional costs or delays our solar projects will be subject to. These impacts have resulted in cost increases for certain projects, and may result in cost increases in other projects, and such impacts have resulted in, or are expected to result in, the need for us to seek additional regulatory review and approvals. Additionally, significant changes to project costs and schedules as a result of these factors could impact the viability of the projects. For more information regarding potential delays, cancellations and supply chain disruptions, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors— Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution — Increases in the cost or...” in this report.
Rate Change Applications
The Registrants are routinely involved in rate change applications before state regulatory authorities. Those applications include general rate cases, where the entire cost of service of the utility is assessed and reset. In addition, Registrants are periodically involved in proceedings to adjust its capital tracking mechanisms (e.g., CSIA, DCRF, DRR, GRIP, TCOS and TDSIC), its cost of service adjustments (e.g., RSP and RRA), its decoupling mechanism (e.g., Decoupling and SRC), and its energy efficiency cost trackers (e.g., CIP, DSMA, EECR, EECRF, EEFC and EEFR). The table below reflects significant applications pending or completed since the Registrants’ combined 2021 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC through February 15, 2023.
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric (PUCT) | ||||||||||
| TCOS | 38 | September 2022 | October 2022 | October 2022 | Based on net change in invested capital of $317 million for the period January 1, 2022 through July 31, 2022. | |||||
| EECRF | 23 | June 2022 | March 2023 | November 2022 | The requested amount is comprised of the following: 2023 Program and Evaluation, Measurement and Verification costs of $38 million, a charge of $3 million related to the under-recovery of 2021 program costs including interest and rate case expenses, 2021 earned bonus of $23 million for a total of $64 million. On August 26, 2022, a unanimous settlement was filed for an adjusted total of $63 million comprised of the following: 2023 Program and Evaluation, Measurement and Verification costs of $37 million, a charge of $3 million related to the under-recovery of 2021 program costs including interest and rate case expenses, and a 2021 earned bonus of $23 million. | |||||
| DCRF (1) | 142 | April 2022 | TBD | TBD | As amended on July 1, 2022, the net change in distribution invested capital since its last base rate proceeding of over $1 billion for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021 for a revenue increase of $86 million, adjusted for load growth. In addition, the request includes approximately $200 million in TEEEF during the calendar year ending December 31, 2021 representing a revenue increase of $57 million. The requested overall revenue increase is $142 million with a proposed effective date of September 1, 2022. On July 11, 2022, a partial settlement was filed resolving the non-TEEEF issues. The settlement provides for a black box reduction to the revenue requirement of $7.8 million for a revenue increase of $78 million and a September 1, 2022 effective date for rates. A hearing on TEEEF issues was held on October 18 through 20, 2022. Briefs were filed on November 16, 2022 and reply briefs were filed on December 2, 2022. On January 27, 2023, the administrative law judges issued a proposal for decision recommending that the leasing of the TEEEF was not prudent or reasonable and necessary and that the PUCT deny recovery of all of the TEEEF costs. The PUCT is expected to consider the proposal for decision on March 9, 2023. | |||||
| TCOS | 64 | February 2022 | April 2022 | April 2022 | Based on net change of invested capital of $574 million. |
63
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Beaumont/East Texas, South Texas, Houston and Texas Coast (Railroad Commission) | ||||||||||
| GRIP | 34 | March 2022 | June 2022 | June 2022 | Based on net change in invested capital for calendar year 2021 of $213 million. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Louisiana (LPSC) | ||||||||||
| RSP (1) | 7 | September 2022 | TBD | TBD | Based on ROE of 9.95% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. The North Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band, is $3 million based on a test year ended June 2022 and adjusted ROE of 7.05%. The South Louisiana increase, net of TCJA effects considered outside of the earnings band, is $5 million based on a test year ended June 2022 and adjusted ROE of 4.19%. The TCJA refund impact to North Louisiana and South Louisiana was $1 million and $1 million, respectively. North Louisiana and South Louisiana also seek to recover regulatory assets due to COVID bad debt expenses in the amounts of $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Interim rates implemented on December 28, 2022, subject to refund. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Minnesota (MPUC) | ||||||||||
| CIP Financial Incentive | 8 | May 2022 | October 2022 | September 2022 | The requested amount is attributed to the CIP Financial Incentive based on 2021 CIP program activity, and the approved Conservation Cost Recovery Adjustment charge is inclusive of the CIP Incentive as well as any over or under collections from CIP to reach a forecasted CIP tracker balance of zero. | |||||
| Rate Case | 49 | November 2021 | Feb 2023 | September 2022 | See discussion above under Minnesota Base Rate Case. | |||||
| Decoupling | N/A | September 2021 | September 2021 | April 2022 | Represents under-recovery of approximately $19 million recorded for and during the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, including an approximately $5 million adjustment related to the implementation of final rates from the general rate case filed in 2019. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Mississippi (MPSC) | ||||||||||
| RRA | 2 | April 2022 | August 2022 | August 2022 | Based on ROE of 9.568% with 100 basis point (+/-) earnings band. Revenue increase of approximately $3 million based on 2021 test year adjusted earned ROE of 7.74%. Interim increase of approximately $1 million implemented May 31, 2022. A joint stipulation was filed on July 29, 2022 resolving all issues and an agreed revenue increase of $2 million based on 2021 test year adjusted earned ROE of 8.27% with rates effective in August 2022. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana South - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | 9 | October 2022 | January 2023 | January 2023 | Requested an increase of $12 million to rate base, which reflects approximately $1 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of ($1 million) annually. Also included are unrecovered deferred O&M expenses of $9 million. OUCC filed on December 2, 2022 recommending approval of revenue requirement as filed, with additional recommendations on disallowing increases on cost estimates for a specific transmission project (no disallowances of actual costs in this filing). Rebuttal testimony was filed on December 9, 2022 responding to OUCC’s recommendations. A hearing was held on December 20, 2022, and an agreed upon joint proposed order was submitted to the judge on January 9, 2023, which the IURC approved on January 25, 2023. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Indiana North - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | 17 | October 2022 | January 2023 | January 2023 | Requested an increase of $38 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of ($5 million) annually. Also included is unrecovered deferred operation and maintenance expenses of $20 million. OUCC filed on December 2, 2022 recommending changes to the Compliance Component Revenue Requirement as a result of recommending disallowance of actual costs for five distribution projects. Also recommended disallowing increases on cost estimates for certain projects. Rebuttal testimony was filed on December 9, 2022 responding to OUCC’s recommendations. A hearing was held on December 20, 2022, and an agreed upon joint proposed order was submitted to the judge on January 9, 2023, which the IURC approved on January 25, 2023. |
64
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Ohio (PUCO) | ||||||||||
| DRR | 9 | April 2022 | September 2022 | August 2022 | Requested an increase of $63 million to rate base for investments made in 2021, which reflects a $9 million annual increase in current revenues. A change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $(4 million) annually is also included in rates. PUCO issued order in August 2022 and rates implemented in September 2022. Filed a separate request on September 14, 2022 to extend the DRR beyond 2023 for investment through December 31, 2026 (no impact to revenues). The Staff report was filed January 11, 2023 with two recommendations: 1) For the extension period, any unrecovered capital investment in excess of the annual rate caps continue to be deferred, however, CERC shall cease accruing additional carrying charges on the amounts in excess of the annual rate cap; 2) Staff agrees with CERC that this program should be completed following this 3-year extension and recommends to the PUCO that this extension be granted contingent upon the DRR program ending and exclusive of any incremental investment following the completion of the mileage, projects and costs CERC outlined in this application. Objections are due by February 10, 2023. After reviewing the Staff Report and any objections filed, the PUCO will determine whether a hearing is necessary. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana Electric (IURC) | ||||||||||
| TDSIC (1) | 2 | February 2023 | TBD | TBD | Requested an increase of $31 million to rate base, which reflects a $5 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance and a tax reform credit for a total of ($1 million). | |||||
| CECA (1) | — | February 2023 | TBD | TBD | Requested an increase of less than $1 million to rate base, which reflects an annual increase of less than $1 million in current revenues. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than ($1 million). | |||||
| TDSIC | 3 | August 2022 | November 2022 | November 2022 | Requested an increase of $43 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than ($1 million). | |||||
| ECA | 6 | May 2022 | August 2022 | August 2022 | Requested an increase of $21 million to rate base, which reflects a $9 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of ($3 million). | |||||
| TDSIC | 3 | February 2022 | May 2022 | May 2022 | Requested an increase of $42 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million. | |||||
| CECA | (2) | February 2022 | June 2022 | May 2022 | Requested a decrease of less than $1 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual decrease in current revenues. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million. This mechanism includes a non-traditional rate making approach related to a 50 MW universal solar array placed in service in January 2021. |
(1)Represents proposed increases (decreases) when effective date and/or approval date is not yet determined. Approved rates could differ materially from proposed rates.
Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)
On August 16, 2022, the IRA was signed into law. The new law extends or creates tax-related energy incentives for solar, wind and alternative clean energy sources, implements, subject to certain exceptions, a 1% tax on share repurchases after December 31, 2022, and implements a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax based on the AFSI of those corporations with an average AFSI of $1 billion over the most recent three-year period. The IRA did not have a material impact on the Registrants’ 2022 financial results and no material impact is expected for 2023 financial results. Further guidance on the tax provisions of the IRA is expected and the Registrants continue to evaluate the IRA provisions for the effect on their future financial results.
65
Greenhouse Gas Regulation and Compliance (CenterPoint Energy)
On August 3, 2015, the EPA released its CPP rule, which required a 32% reduction in carbon emissions from 2005 levels. The final rule was published in the Federal Register on October 23, 2015, and that action was immediately followed by litigation ultimately resulting in the U.S. Supreme Court staying implementation of the rule. On July 8, 2019, the EPA published the ACE rule, which (i) repealed the CPP rule; (ii) replaced the CPP rule with a program that requires states to implement a program of energy efficiency improvement targets for individual coal-fired electric generating units; and (iii) amended the implementing regulations for Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. On January 19, 2021, the majority of the ACE rule — including the CPP repeal, CPP replacement, and the timing-related portions of the Section 111(d) implementing rule — was struck down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and on October 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider four petitions filed by various coal interests and a coalition of 19 states. On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA exceeded its authority in promulgating the CPP. The EPA has announced it plans on issuing new greenhouse gas rules in the future.
The Biden administration recommitted the United States to the Paris Agreement, which can be expected to drive a renewed regulatory push to require further GHG emission reductions from the energy sector and proceeded to lead negotiations at the global climate conference in Glasgow, Scotland. On April 22, 2021, President Biden announced new goals of 50% reduction of economy-wide GHG emissions, and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035, which formed the basis of the U.S. commitments announced in Glasgow. In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy announced its net zero emissions goals for both Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 emissions by 2035 as well as a goal to reduce certain Scope 3 emissions by 20% to 30% by 2035. Because Texas is an unregulated market, CenterPoint Energy’s Scope 2 estimates do not take into account Texas electric transmission and distribution assets in the line loss calculation and, in addition, exclude emissions related to purchased power in Indiana between 2024 and 2026 as estimated. CenterPoint Energy’s Scope 3 estimates are based on the total natural gas supply delivered to residential and commercial customers as reported in the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-176 reports and do not take into account the emissions of transport customers and emissions related to upstream extraction. These emission goals are expected to be used to position CenterPoint Energy to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements from the current and future administrations to further reduce GHG emissions. CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s revenues, operating costs and capital requirements could be adversely affected as a result of any regulatory action that would require installation of new control technologies or a modification of their operations or would have the effect of reducing the consumption of natural gas. The IRA established the Methane Emissions Reduction Program, which imposes a charge on methane emissions from certain natural gas transmission facilities, and the EPA has proposed new regulations targeting reductions in methane emissions, which if implemented will increase costs related to production, transmission and storage of natural gas. Houston Electric, in contrast to some electric utilities including Indiana Electric, does not generate electricity, other than TEEEF, and thus is not directly exposed to the risk of high capital costs and regulatory uncertainties that face electric utilities that burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. CenterPoint Energy’s net zero emissions goals are aligned with Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan and are expected to position Indiana Electric to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements related to GHG emissions reductions. Nevertheless, Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s revenues could be adversely affected to the extent any resulting regulatory action has the effect of reducing consumption of electricity by ultimate consumers within their respective service territories. Likewise, incentives to conserve energy or to use energy sources other than natural gas could result in a decrease in demand for the Registrants’ services. For example, Minnesota has enacted the Natural Gas Innovation Act that seeks to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions. Further, certain local government bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by certain specified dates. For example, Minneapolis has adopted carbon emission reduction goals in an effort to decrease reliance on fossil gas. Additionally, cities in Minnesota within CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas operational footprint are considering initiatives to eliminate natural gas use in buildings and focus on electrification. Also, Minnesota cities may consider seeking legislative authority for the ability to enact voluntary enhanced energy standards for all development projects. These initiatives could have a significant impact on CenterPoint Energy and its operations, and this impact could increase if other cities and jurisdictions in its service area enact similar initiatives. Further, our third party suppliers, vendors and partners may also be impacted by climate change laws and regulations, which could impact CenterPoint Energy’s business by, among other things, causing permitting and construction delays, project cancellations or increased project costs passed on to CenterPoint Energy. Conversely, regulatory actions that effectively promote the consumption of natural gas because of its lower emissions characteristics would be expected to benefit CenterPoint Energy and CERC and their natural gas-related businesses. At this time, however, we cannot quantify the magnitude of the impacts from possible new regulatory actions related to GHG emissions, either positive or negative, on the Registrants’ businesses.
Compliance costs and other effects associated with climate change, reductions in GHG emissions and obtaining renewable energy sources remain uncertain. Although the amount of compliance costs remains uncertain, any new regulation or legislation
66
relating to climate change will likely result in an increase in compliance costs. While the requirements of a federal or state rule remain uncertain, CenterPoint Energy will continue to monitor regulatory activity regarding GHG emission standards that may affect its business. Currently, CenterPoint Energy does not purchase carbon credits. In connection with its net zero emissions goals, CenterPoint Energy is expected to purchase carbon credits in the future; however, CenterPoint Energy does not currently expect the number of credits, or cost for those credits, to be material.
Climate Change Trends and Uncertainties
As a result of increased awareness regarding climate change, coupled with adverse economic conditions, availability of alternative energy sources, including private solar, microturbines, fuel cells, energy-efficient buildings and energy storage devices, and new regulations restricting emissions, including potential regulations of methane emissions, some consumers and companies may use less energy, meet their own energy needs through alternative energy sources or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for the Registrants’ services. As these technologies become a more cost-competitive option over time, whether through cost effectiveness or government incentives and subsidies, certain customers may choose to meet their own energy needs and subsequently decrease usage of the Registrants’ systems and services, which may result in, among other things, Indiana Electric’s generating facilities becoming less competitive and economical. Further, evolving investor sentiment related to the use of fossil fuels and initiatives to restrict continued production of fossil fuels have had significant impacts on CenterPoint Energy’s electric generation and natural gas businesses. For example, because Indiana Electric’s current generating facilities substantially rely on coal for their operations, certain financial institutions choose not to participate in CenterPoint Energy’s financing arrangements. Conversely, demand for the Registrants’ services may increase as a result of customer changes in response to climate change. For example, as the utilization of electric vehicles increases, demand for electricity may increase, resulting in increased usage of CenterPoint Energy’s systems and services. Any negative opinions with respect to CenterPoint Energy’s environmental practices or its ability to meet the challenges posed by climate change formed by regulators, customers, investors, legislators or other stakeholders could harm its reputation.
To address these developments, CenterPoint Energy announced its net zero emissions goals for both Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 emissions by 2035. Indiana Electric’s 2019/2020 IRP identified a preferred portfolio that retires 730 MW of coal-fired generation facilities and replaces these resources with a mix of generating resources composed primarily of renewables, including solar, wind, and solar with storage, supported by dispatchable natural gas combustion turbines including a pipeline to serve such natural gas generation. Indiana Electric continues to execute on its 2019/2020 IRP and has received initial approvals for 756 MWs of the 700-1,000 MWs identified within Indiana Electric’s 2019/2020 IRP. Additionally, as reflected in its 10-year capital plan announced in September 2021, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in clean energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation and electric vehicle expansion. CenterPoint Energy believes its planned investments in renewable energy generation and corresponding planned reduction in its GHG emissions as part of its net zero emissions goals support global efforts to reduce the impacts of climate change. For more information regarding CenterPoint Energy’s net zero emission goals and the risks associated with them, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks — CenterPoint Energy is subject to operational and financial risks...”
To the extent climate changes result in warmer temperatures in the Registrants’ service territories, financial results from the Registrants’ businesses could be adversely impacted. For example, CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas could be adversely affected through lower natural gas sales. On the other hand, warmer temperatures in CenterPoint Energy’s and Houston Electric’s electric service territory may increase revenues from transmission and distribution and generation through increased demand for electricity used for cooling. Another possible result of climate change is more frequent and more severe weather events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes and flooding, including such storms as the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. Since many of the Registrants’ facilities are located along or near the Texas gulf coast, increased or more severe hurricanes or tornadoes could increase costs to repair damaged facilities and restore service to customers. CenterPoint Energy’s current 10-year capital plan includes capital expenditures to maintain reliability and safety and increase resiliency of its systems as climate change may result in more frequent significant weather events. Houston Electric does not own or operate any electric generation facilities other than, since September 2021, its operation of TEEEF. Houston Electric transmits and distributes to customers of REPs electric power that the REPs obtain from power generation facilities owned by third parties. To the extent adverse weather conditions affect the Registrants’ suppliers, results from their energy delivery businesses may suffer. For example, in Texas, the February 2021 Winter Storm Event caused an electricity generation shortage that was severely disruptive to Houston Electric’s service territory and the wholesale generation market and also caused a reduction in available natural gas capacity. When the Registrants cannot deliver electricity or natural gas to customers, or customers cannot receive services, the Registrants’ financial results can be impacted by lost revenues, and they generally must seek approval from regulators to recover restoration costs. To the extent the Registrants are unable to recover those costs, or if higher rates resulting from
67
recovery of such costs result in reduced demand for services, the Registrants’ future financial results may be adversely impacted. Further, as the intensity and frequency of significant weather events continues, it may impact our ability to secure cost-efficient insurance.
Other Matters
Credit Facilities
The Registrants may draw on their respective revolving credit facilities from time to time to provide funds used for general corporate and limited liability company purposes, including to backstop CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s commercial paper programs. The facilities may also be utilized to obtain letters of credit. For further details related to the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, please see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
On June 30, 2022, in connection with the Restructuring, VUH repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness and terminated all remaining commitments and other obligations under its $400 million amended and restated credit agreement dated as of February 4, 2021. VUH did not incur any penalties in connection with the early termination.
On December 6, 2022, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Houston Electric and CERC, replaced their existing revolving credit facilities with three revolving credit facilities totaling $3.75 billion in aggregate commitments. In addition, SIGECO entered into a new revolving credit facility totaling an additional $250 million in aggregate commitments. The aggregate amount of commitments among the four credit facilities total $4.0 billion.
Based on the consolidated debt to capitalization covenant in the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, the Registrants would have been permitted to utilize the full capacity of such revolving credit facilities, which aggregated approximately $4 billion as of December 31, 2022.
As of February 9, 2023, the Registrants had the following revolving credit facilities and utilization of such facilities:
| Amount Utilized as of February 9, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Size of Facility | Loans | Letters of Credit | Commercial Paper | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Termination Date | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | $ | 2,400 | $ | — | $ | 11 | $ | 1,759 | 4.86% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy (1) | 250 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | 300 | — | — | — | —% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||||||
| CERC | 1,050 | — | — | 1,049 | 4.82% | December 6, 2027 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,000 | $ | — | $ | 11 | $ | 2,808 |
(1)This credit facility was issued by SIGECO.
Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to customary terms and conditions. However, there is no requirement that the borrower makes representations prior to borrowing as to the absence of material adverse changes or litigation that could be expected to have a material adverse effect. Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of events of default that we consider customary. The revolving credit facilities also provide for customary fees, including commitment fees, administrative agent fees, fees in respect of letters of credit and other fees. In each of the revolving credit facilities, the spread to SOFR and the commitment fees fluctuate based on the borrower’s credit rating. Each of the Registrant’s credit facilities provide for a mechanism to replace SOFR with possible alternative benchmarks upon certain benchmark replacement events. The borrowers are currently in compliance with the various business and financial covenants in the four revolving credit facilities.
Debt Transactions
For detailed information about the Registrants’ debt issuances in 2022, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
68
Securities Registered with the SEC
On May 29, 2020, the Registrants filed a joint shelf registration statement with the SEC registering indeterminate principal amounts of Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds, CERC Corp.’s senior debt securities and CenterPoint Energy’s senior debt securities and junior subordinated debt securities and an indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock, shares of preferred stock, depositary shares, as well as stock purchase contracts and equity units. The joint shelf registration statement will expire on May 29, 2023. For information related to the Registrants’ debt and equity security issuances in 2022, see Notes 12 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Temporary Investments
As of February 9, 2023, the Registrants had no temporary investments.
Money Pool
The Registrants participate in a money pool through which they and certain of their subsidiaries can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net funding requirements of the CenterPoint Energy money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper. The net funding requirements of the CERC money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CERC’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CERC’s commercial paper. The money pool may not provide sufficient funds to meet the Registrants’ cash needs.
The table below summarizes CenterPoint Energy money pool activity by Registrant as of February 9, 2023:
| Weighted Average Interest Rate | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||
| Money pool borrowings | 4.91% | $ | (292) | $ | (32) |
Impact on Liquidity of a Downgrade in Credit Ratings
The interest rate on borrowings under the Registrants’ credit facilities is based on their respective credit ratings. As of February 9, 2023, Moody’s, S&P and Fitch had assigned the following credit ratings to senior debt of the Registrants:
| Moody’s | S&P | Fitch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Borrower/Instrument | Rating | Outlook (1) | Rating | Outlook (2) | Rating | Outlook (3) | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | CenterPoint Energy Senior Unsecured Debt | Baa2 | Stable | BBB | Stable | BBB | Stable | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Vectren Corp. Issuer Rating | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | SIGECO Senior Secured Debt | A1 | Stable | A | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| Houston Electric | Houston Electric Senior Secured Debt | A2 | Stable | A | Stable | A | Stable | |||||||
| CERC | CERC Corp. Senior Unsecured Debt | A3 | Stable | BBB+ | Stable | A- | Stable | |||||||
| CERC | Indiana Gas Senior Unsecured Debt | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a |
(1)A Moody’s rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an issuer’s rating over the medium term.
(2)An S&P outlook assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate to longer term.
(3)A Fitch rating outlook indicates the direction a rating is likely to move over a one- to two-year period.
The Registrants cannot assure that the ratings set forth above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. The Registrants note that these credit ratings are included for informational purposes and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Registrants’ securities and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of the Registrants’ credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants’ ability to obtain short- and long-term financing, the cost of such financings and the execution of the Registrants’ commercial strategies.
69
A decline in credit ratings could increase borrowing costs under the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities. If the Registrants’ credit ratings had been downgraded one notch by S&P and Moody’s from the ratings that existed as of December 31, 2022, the impact on the borrowing costs under the four revolving credit facilities would have been insignificant. A decline in credit ratings would also increase the interest rate on long-term debt to be issued in the capital markets and could negatively impact the Registrants’ ability to complete capital market transactions and to access the commercial paper market. Additionally, a decline in credit ratings could increase cash collateral requirements and reduce earnings of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segments.
Pipeline tariffs and contracts typically provide that if the credit ratings of a shipper or the shipper’s guarantor drop below a threshold level, which is generally investment grade ratings from both Moody’s and S&P, cash or other collateral may be demanded from the shipper in an amount equal to the sum of three months’ charges for pipeline services plus the unrecouped cost of any lateral built for such shipper. If the credit ratings of CERC Corp. decline below the applicable threshold levels, CERC might need to provide cash or other collateral of as much as $237 million as of December 31, 2022. The amount of collateral will depend on seasonal variations in transportation levels.
ZENS and Securities Related to ZENS (CenterPoint Energy)
If CenterPoint Energy’s creditworthiness were to drop such that ZENS holders thought its liquidity was adversely affected or the market for the ZENS were to become illiquid, some ZENS holders might decide to exchange their ZENS for cash. Funds for the payment of cash upon exchange could be obtained from the sale of the shares of ZENS-Related Securities that CenterPoint Energy owns or from other sources. CenterPoint Energy owns shares of ZENS-Related Securities equal to approximately 100% of the reference shares used to calculate its obligation to the holders of the ZENS. ZENS exchanges result in a cash outflow because tax deferrals related to the ZENS and shares of ZENS-Related Securities would typically cease when ZENS are exchanged or otherwise retired and shares of ZENS-Related Securities are sold. The ultimate tax liability related to the ZENS and ZENS-Related Securities continues to increase by the amount of the tax benefit realized each year, and there could be a significant cash outflow when the taxes are paid as a result of the retirement or exchange of the ZENS. If all ZENS had been exchanged for cash on December 31, 2022, deferred taxes of approximately $665 million would have been payable in 2022. If all the ZENS-Related Securities had been sold on December 31, 2022, capital gains taxes of approximately $80 million would have been payable in 2022 based on 2022 tax rates in effect. For additional information about ZENS, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Cross Defaults
Under each of CenterPoint Energy’s, Houston Electric’s and CERC’s respective revolving credit facilities and CERC’s term loan agreement, a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specified types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $125 million by the borrower or any of their respective significant subsidiaries will cause a default under such borrower’s respective credit facility or term loan agreement. Under SIGECO’s revolving credit facility, a payment default on, or a non-payment default, event or condition that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specific types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $75 million by SIGECO or any of its significant subsidiaries will cause a default under SIGECO’s credit facility. A default by CenterPoint Energy would not trigger a default under its subsidiaries’ debt instruments or revolving credit facilities.
Possible Acquisitions, Divestitures and Joint Ventures
From time to time, the Registrants consider the acquisition or the disposition of assets or businesses or possible joint ventures, strategic initiatives or other joint ownership arrangements with respect to assets or businesses. Any determination to take action in this regard will be based on market conditions and opportunities existing at the time, and accordingly, the timing, size or success of any efforts and the associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable. The Registrants may seek to fund all or part of any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or equity issuances. Debt or equity financing may not, however, be available to the Registrants at that time due to a variety of events, including, among others, maintenance of our credit ratings, industry conditions, general economic conditions, market conditions and market perceptions. As announced in September 2021, and updated in November 2022, CenterPoint Energy has increased its planned capital expenditures in its Electric and Natural Gas businesses to support rate base growth and may explore asset sales, in addition to the completed sale of its Natural Gas businesses located in Arkansas and Oklahoma, as a means to efficiently finance a portion of such increased capital expenditures. For further information, see Note 4.
70
Hedging of Interest Expense for Future Debt Issuances
From time to time, the Registrants may enter into interest rate agreements to hedge, in part, volatility in the U.S. treasury rates by reducing variability in cash flows related to interest payments. For further information, see Note 9(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
Collection of Receivables from REPs (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Houston Electric’s receivables from the distribution of electricity are collected from REPs that supply the electricity Houston Electric distributes to their customers. Before conducting business, a REP must register with the PUCT and must meet certain financial qualifications. Nevertheless, adverse economic conditions, structural problems in the market served by ERCOT or financial difficulties of one or more REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for Houston Electric’s services or could cause them to delay such payments. Houston Electric depends on these REPs to remit payments on a timely basis, and any delay or default in payment by REPs could adversely affect Houston Electric’s cash flows. In the event of a REP’s default, Houston Electric’s tariff provides a number of remedies, including the option for Houston Electric to request that the PUCT suspend or revoke the certification of the REP. Applicable regulatory provisions require that customers be shifted to another REP or a provider of last resort if a REP cannot make timely payments. However, Houston Electric remains at risk for payments related to services provided prior to the shift to the replacement REP or the provider of last resort. If a REP were unable to meet its obligations, it could consider, among various options, restructuring under the bankruptcy laws, in which event such REP might seek to avoid honoring its obligations and claims might be made against Houston Electric involving payments it had received from such REP. If a REP were to file for bankruptcy, Houston Electric may not be successful in recovering accrued receivables owed by such REP that are unpaid as of the date the REP filed for bankruptcy. However, PUCT regulations authorize utilities, such as Houston Electric, to defer bad debts resulting from defaults by REPs for recovery in future rate cases, subject to a review of reasonableness and necessity.
Other Factors that Could Affect Cash Requirements
In addition to the above factors, the Registrants’ liquidity and capital resources could also be negatively affected by:
•cash collateral requirements that could exist in connection with certain contracts, including weather hedging arrangements, and natural gas purchases, natural gas price and natural gas storage activities of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segment;
•acceleration of payment dates on certain gas supply contracts, under certain circumstances, as a result of increased natural gas prices, and concentration of natural gas suppliers (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increased costs related to the acquisition of natural gas (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increases in interest expense in connection with debt refinancings and borrowings under credit facilities or term loans or the use of alternative sources of financings on capital and other financial markets;
•various legislative or regulatory actions;
•incremental collateral, if any, that may be required due to regulation of derivatives (CenterPoint Energy);
•the ability of REPs, including REP affiliates of NRG and Vistra Energy Corp., to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric;
•slower customer payments and increased write-offs of receivables due to higher natural gas prices, changing economic conditions, public health threats or severe weather events (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•the satisfaction of any obligations pursuant to guarantees;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•contributions to pension and postretirement benefit plans;
•restoration costs and revenue losses resulting from future natural disasters such as hurricanes and the timing of recovery of such restoration costs; and
•various other risks identified in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
Certain Contractual Limits on Our Ability to Issue Securities and Borrow Money
Certain provisions in certain note purchase agreements relating to debt issued by CERC have the effect of restricting the amount of secured debt issued by CERC and debt issued by subsidiaries of CERC Corp. Additionally, Houston Electric and SIGECO are limited in the amount of mortgage bonds they can issue by the General Mortgage and SIGECO’s mortgage indenture, respectively. For information about the total debt to capitalization financial covenants in the Registrants’ and SIGECO’s revolving credit facilities, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
71
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the presentation of the Registrants’ financial condition and results of operations and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex accounting estimates. An accounting estimate is an approximation made by management of a financial statement element, item or account in the financial statements. Accounting estimates in the Registrants’ historical consolidated financial statements measure the effects of past business transactions or events, or the present status of an asset or liability. The accounting estimates described below require the Registrants to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made. Additionally, different estimates that the Registrants could have used or changes in an accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur could have a material impact on the presentation of their financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The circumstances that make these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex have to do with the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty. The Registrants base their estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments. These estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Registrants’ operating environment changes. The Registrants’ significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The Registrants believe the following accounting policies involve the application of critical accounting estimates. Accordingly, these accounting estimates have been reviewed and discussed with the Audit Committee of CenterPoint Energy’s Board of Directors.
Accounting for Rate Regulation
Accounting guidance for regulated operations provides that rate-regulated entities account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the recovery of those incurred costs in rates if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and if the competitive environment makes it probable that such rates can be charged and collected. CenterPoint Energy, for its Electric and Natural Gas reportable segments, Houston Electric and CERC apply this accounting guidance. Certain expenses and revenues subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the balance sheet as regulatory assets or liabilities and are recognized in income as the related amounts are included in service rates and recovered from or refunded to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are recorded when it is probable that these items will be recovered or reflected in future rates. Determining probability requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals. If events were to occur that would make the recovery of these assets and liabilities no longer probable, the Registrants would be required to write off or write down these regulatory assets and liabilities. For example, during 2022, the MPUC disallowed recovery of approximately $36 million of jurisdictional gas costs incurred during the February 2021 Winter Storm Event and CERC’s regulatory asset balance was reduced when such amounts were no longer probable of recovery. For further detail on the Registrants’ regulatory assets and liabilities, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Including Identifiable Intangibles and Goodwill
The Registrants review the carrying value of long-lived assets, including identifiable intangibles and goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable, and at least annually, goodwill is tested for impairment as required by accounting guidance for goodwill and other intangible assets. Unforeseen events, changes in market conditions, and probable regulatory disallowances, where applicable, could have a material effect on the value of long-lived assets, including intangibles and goodwill, future cash flows, interest rate, and regulatory matters could result in an impairment charge. The Registrants recorded no impairments to long-lived assets, including intangibles or goodwill during 2022 and 2021. During 2020, CenterPoint Energy recognized goodwill impairment losses as discussed further in Notes 4 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
Fair value is the amount at which an asset, liability or business could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices or valuations by third parties, present value techniques based on estimates of cash flows, or multiples of earnings or revenue performance measures. The fair value could be different using different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques.
Fair value measurements require significant judgment and unobservable inputs, including (i) projected timing and amount of future cash flows, which factor in planned growth initiatives, (ii) the regulatory environment, as applicable, and (iii) discount rates reflecting risk inherent in the future market prices. Determining the discount rates for the non-rate regulated businesses, such as for Energy Systems Group, requires the estimation of the appropriate company specific risk premiums for those non-rate regulated businesses based on evaluation of industry and entity-specific risks, which includes expectations about future
72
market or economic conditions existing on the date of the impairment test. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on results of the impairment tests.
Annual goodwill impairment test
CenterPoint Energy and CERC completed their 2022 annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 2022 and determined, based on an income approach or a weighted combination of income and market approaches, that no goodwill impairment charge was required for any reporting unit. The fair values of each reporting unit significantly exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit.
Although no goodwill impairment resulted from the 2022 annual test, an interim goodwill impairment test could be triggered by the following: actual earnings results that are materially lower than expected, significant adverse changes in the operating environment, an increase in the discount rate, changes in other key assumptions which require judgment and are forward looking in nature, if CenterPoint Energy’s market capitalization falls below book value for an extended period of time, or events affecting a reporting unit such as a contemplated disposal of all or part of a reporting unit.
Common control transactions (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
When accounting for a transfer of net assets or exchange of equity interests between entities under common control, the entity that receives the net assets or the equity interests shall initially recognize the assets and liabilities transferred at the date of transfer based on the ultimate parent company’s basis, which in the case of the Restructuring is CenterPoint Energy’s basis. CenterPoint Energy’s basis in net assets of an entity may differ from the historical net assets of that entity on a standalone basis, for example, because push-down accounting had not been applied on a standalone basis. Additionally, when the net assets transferred in a common-control transaction meet the definition of a business, the receiving entity will record an allocation of goodwill from the reporting unit based on the relative fair value of the businesses transferred within that reporting unit. As a result, on June 30, 2022, CERC received $972 million of goodwill from CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reporting unit in connection with the Restructuring. CERC recast prior periods to reflect the Restructuring as if it occurred at the earliest period presented for which CenterPoint Energy had common control. The Restructuring did not impact CenterPoint Energy’s basis in any entity, its allocation of goodwill to its reporting units, or its segment presentation. Neither CenterPoint Energy nor CERC recognized any gains or losses in connection with the Restructuring. SIGECO was not acquired by CERC and remains a subsidiary of VUH.
Fair value is the amount at which an asset, liability or business could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices, present value techniques based on estimates of cash flows, or multiples of earnings or revenue performance measures. The fair value could be different if different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques were applied.
Fair value measurements require significant judgment and often depend on unobservable inputs, including (i) projected timing and amounts of future cash flows, which factor in planned growth initiatives, (ii) the regulatory environment, as applicable, and (iii) discount rates reflecting risk inherent in the future market prices. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the resulting fair value or relative fair value.
The fair value of the businesses within the Natural Gas reporting unit was estimated based on a weighted combination of income and market approaches, consistent with the methodology used in the 2021 annual goodwill impairment test (the most recent annual test completed at the time of the transaction).
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Generally, a long-lived asset to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which management, with approval from the Board of Directors, as applicable, commits to a plan to sell, and a sale is expected to be completed within one year. The Registrants record assets and liabilities held for sale, or the disposal group, at the lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value less cost to sell. If a disposal group reflects a component of a reporting unit and meets the definition of a business, the goodwill within that reporting unit is allocated to the disposal group based on the relative fair value of the components representing a business that will be retained and disposed. Goodwill is not allocated to a portion of a reporting unit that does not meet the definition of a business. A disposal group that meets the held for sale criteria and also represents a strategic shift to the Registrant is also reflected as discontinued operations on the Statements of Consolidated Income, and prior periods are recast to reflect the earnings or losses from such businesses as income from discontinued operations, net of tax.
73
For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Unbilled Revenues
Revenues related to electricity delivery and natural gas sales and services are generally recognized upon delivery to customers. However, the determination of deliveries to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month either electronically through AMS meter communications or manual readings. At the end of each month, deliveries to non-AMS customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is estimated. Information regarding deliveries to AMS customers after the last billing is obtained from actual AMS meter usage data. Unbilled electricity delivery revenue is estimated each month based on actual AMS meter data, daily supply volumes and applicable rates. Unbilled natural gas sales are estimated based on estimated purchased gas volumes, estimated lost and unaccounted for gas and tariffed rates in effect. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Retirement Plans
CenterPoint Energy sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering all employees who meet eligibility requirements. CenterPoint Energy uses several statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events in calculating the expense and liability related to its plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as estimated by management, within certain guidelines. In addition, CenterPoint Energy’s actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension and other retirement plans expense recorded. Please read “— Other Significant Matters — Pension Plans” for further discussion.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2(u) to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements that affect the Registrants.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT MATTERS
Pension Plans (CenterPoint Energy). As discussed in Note 8(b) to the consolidated financial statements, CenterPoint Energy maintains non-contributory qualified defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees. Employer contributions for the qualified plans are based on actuarial computations that establish the minimum contribution required under ERISA and the maximum deductible contribution for income tax purposes.
Under the terms of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans, it reserves the right to change, modify or terminate the plan. CenterPoint Energy’s funding policy is to review amounts annually and contribute an amount at least equal to the minimum contribution required under ERISA.
Additionally, CenterPoint Energy maintains unfunded non-qualified benefit restoration plans that allows participants to receive the benefits to which they would have been entitled under the non-contributory qualified pension plan except for the federally mandated limits on qualified plan benefits or on the level of compensation on which qualified plan benefits may be calculated.
CenterPoint Energy’s funding requirements and employer contributions for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||
| Minimum funding requirements for qualified pension plans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 76 | ||||
| Employer contributions to the qualified pension plans | 27 | 53 | 76 | |||||||
| Employer contributions to the non-qualified benefit restoration plans | 8 | 8 | 10 |
74
Although CenterPoint Energy’s minimum contribution requirement to the qualified pension plans in 2023 is zero, it expects to make contributions aggregating up to $50 million. CenterPoint Energy expects to make contributions aggregating approximately $7 million to the non-qualified benefit restoration plans in 2023.
Changes in pension obligations and plan assets may not be immediately recognized as pension expense in CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income, but generally are recognized in future years over the remaining average service period of plan participants. As such, significant portions of pension expense recorded in any period may not reflect the actual level of benefit payments provided to plan participants.
As the sponsor of a plan, CenterPoint Energy is required to (a) recognize on its Consolidated Balance Sheet an asset for the plan’s over-funded status or a liability for the plan’s under-funded status, (b) measure a plan’s assets and obligations as of the end of the fiscal year and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of the plans in the year that changes occur through adjustments to other comprehensive income and, when related to its rate-regulated utilities with recoverability of cost, to regulatory assets.
The projected benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1.6 billion and $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to increases in discount rates, as well as the impact of lump sum settlement payments.
In December 2022, the CenterPoint Energy pension plan completed an annuity lift-out, a transaction that provided for the purchase of an annuity contract to fund pension plan annuities of retirees from previously divested businesses, as part of a de-risking strategy. This annuity lift-out impacted 1,119 retirees and beneficiaries, as well as reduced $138 million in pension obligations and $136 million in plan assets which were transferred to an insurance company. The transfer of plan assets is considered to be a lump sum settlement payment that reduced CenterPoint Energy pension plan’s projected benefit obligation in 2022.
As of December 31, 2022, the projected benefit obligation exceeded the market value of plan assets of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans by $341 million. Changes in interest rates or the market values of the securities held by the plan during a year could materially, positively or negatively, change the funded status and affect the level of pension expense and required contributions at the next remeasurement.
Houston Electric and CERC participate in CenterPoint Energy’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans covering substantially all employees. Pension cost by Registrant were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension cost | $ | 172 | $ | 59 | $ | 88 | $ | 69 | $ | 34 | $ | 24 | $ | 49 | $ | 19 | $ | 19 |
The calculation of pension cost and related liabilities requires the use of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. Two of the most critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate.
As of December 31, 2022, CenterPoint Energy’s qualified pension plans had an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 6.50% rate, which is 1.50% higher than the 5.00% rate assumed as of December 31, 2021. The expected rate of return assumption was developed using the targeted asset allocation of our plans and the expected return for each asset class. CenterPoint Energy regularly reviews its actual asset allocation and periodically rebalances plan assets to reduce volatility and better match plan assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2022, the projected benefit obligation was calculated assuming a discount rate of 5.15%, which is 84% higher than the 2.80% discount rate assumed as of December 31, 2021 attributed primarily to rising interest rates. The discount rate was determined by reviewing yields on high-quality bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency and the expected duration of pension obligations specific to the characteristics of CenterPoint Energy’s plans.
CenterPoint Energy’s actuarially determined pension and other postemployment cost for 2022 and 2021 that is greater or less than the amounts being recovered through rates in the majority of Texas jurisdictions is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. Pension cost for 2023, including the nonqualified benefit restoration plan, is estimated to be $54 million
75
before applicable regulatory deferrals and capitalization, based on an expected return on plan assets of 6.50% and a discount rate of 5.15% as of December 31, 2022. If the expected return assumption were lowered by 0.50% from 6.50% to 6.00%, 2023 pension cost would increase by approximately $6 million.
As of December 31, 2022, the pension plans projected benefit obligation, including the unfunded nonqualified pension plans, exceeded plan assets by $341 million. If the discount rate were lowered by 0.50% from 5.15% to 4.65%, the assumption change would increase CenterPoint Energy’s projected benefit obligation by approximately $68 million and decrease its 2023 pension cost by approximately $2 million. The expected reduction in pension cost due to the decrease in discount rate is a result of the expected correlation between the reduced interest rate and appreciation of fixed income assets in pension plans with significantly more fixed income instruments than equity instruments. In addition, the assumption change would impact CenterPoint Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets by increasing the regulatory asset recorded as of December 31, 2022 by $59 million and would result in a charge to comprehensive income in 2022 of $7 million, net of tax of $2 million, due to the increase in the projected benefit obligation.
Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the pension plans will impact CenterPoint Energy’s future pension expense and liabilities. CenterPoint Energy cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
FY 2021 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001130310-22-000023.
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
No Registrant makes any representations as to the information related solely to CenterPoint Energy or the subsidiaries of CenterPoint Energy other than itself.
The following combined discussion and analysis should be read in combination with the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 herein. When discussing CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated financial information, it includes the results of Houston Electric and CERC, which, along with CenterPoint Energy, are collectively referred to as the Registrants. Where appropriate, information relating to a specific registrant has been segregated and labeled as such. Unless the context indicates otherwise, specific references to Houston Electric and CERC also pertain to CenterPoint Energy. In this combined Form 10-K, the terms “our,” “we” and “us” are used as abbreviated references to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
OVERVIEW
Background
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. is a public utility holding company. CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries own and operate electric transmission, distribution and generation and natural gas distribution facilities, and provide energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services. For a detailed description of CenterPoint Energy’s operating subsidiaries and discontinued operations, please read Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Houston Electric is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy that provides electric transmission service to transmission service customers in the ERCOT region and distribution service to REPs serving the Texas gulf coast area that includes the city of Houston.
CERC Corp. is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy that owns and operates natural gas distribution facilities in several states, with operating subsidiaries that own and operate permanent pipeline connections through interconnects with various interstate and intrastate pipeline companies.
Reportable Segments
In this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we discuss our results from continuing operations on a consolidated basis and individually for each of our reportable segments, which are listed below. We also discuss our liquidity, capital resources and critical accounting policies. We are first and foremost an energy delivery company and it is our intention to remain focused on these segments of the energy business. The results of our business operations are significantly impacted by weather, customer growth, economic conditions, cost management, competition, rate proceedings before regulatory agencies and other actions of the various regulatory agencies to whose jurisdiction we are subject, among other factors.
As of December 31, 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s reportable segments were Electric and Natural Gas.
•The Electric reportable segment includes electric transmission and distribution services that are subject to rate regulation in Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s service territories, as well as the impacts of generation-related stranded costs and other true-up balances recoverable by the regulated electric utility and energy delivery services to electric customers and electric generation assets to serve electric customers and optimize those assets in the wholesale power market in Indiana Electric’s service territory. For further information about the Electric reportable segment, see “Business — Our Business — Electric” in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
•The Natural Gas reportable segment includes natural gas distribution services that are subject to rate regulation in CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s service territories, as well as home appliance maintenance and repair services to customers in Minnesota and home repair protection plans to natural gas customers in Arkansas, Indiana, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas through a third party as of December 31, 2021. For further information about the Natural Gas reportable segment, see “Business — Our Business — Natural Gas” in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
CenterPoint Energy’s Corporate and Other includes office buildings and other real estate used for business operations, energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services and other corporate support operations.
Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment.
40
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We expect our businesses to continue to be affected by the key factors and trends discussed below. Our expectations are based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from our expected results.
Factors Influencing Our Businesses and Industry Trends
We are an energy delivery company. The majority of our revenues are generated from the transmission and delivery of electricity and the sale of natural gas by our subsidiaries.
As announced in December 2020, our business strategy incorporated the Business Review and Evaluation Committee’s recommendations to increase our planned capital expenditures in our electric and natural gas businesses to support rate base growth and sell certain of our Natural Gas businesses located in Arkansas and Oklahoma as a means to efficiently finance a portion of such increased capital expenditures. The sale of our Natural Gas businesses in Arkansas and Oklahoma was completed in January 2022. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
In February 2021, we announced our support for the Enable Merger, which closed in December 2021. At our September 2021 analyst day, we announced our plans to exit the midstream sector by the end of 2022 and become a pure-play utility focusing on growth in our existing service territories. In September 2021, we entered into a Forward Sale Agreement to sell 50 million Energy Transfer Common Units immediately following the closing of the Enable Merger. In December 2021, we completed sales of 150 million Energy Transfer Common Units (inclusive of the Energy Transfer Common Units sold pursuant to the Forward Sale Agreement) and 192,390 Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units for net proceeds of $1,320 million. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.
The regulation of natural gas pipelines and related facilities by federal and state regulatory agencies affects CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s businesses. In accordance with natural gas pipeline safety and integrity regulations, CenterPoint Energy and CERC are making, and will continue to make, significant capital investments in their service territories, which are necessary to help operate and maintain a safe, reliable and growing natural gas system. CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s compliance expenses may also increase as a result of preventative measures required under these regulations. Consequently, new rates in the areas they serve are necessary to recover these increasing costs.
To assess our financial performance, our management primarily monitors recovery of costs and return on investments by the evaluation of net income and cash flows, among other things, from our regulated service territories within our reportable segments. Within these broader financial measures, we monitor margins, natural gas and fuel costs, interest expense, capital spending working capital requirements, and operation and maintenance expense. In addition to these financial measures, we also monitor a number of variables that management considers important to gauge the performance of our reportable segments, including the number of customers, throughput, use per customer, commodity prices, heating and cooling degree days, environmental impacts, safety factors, system reliability and customer satisfaction.
The nature of our businesses requires significant amounts of capital investment, particularly in light of our new 10-year capital plan, and we rely on internally generated cash, borrowings under our credit facilities, proceeds from commercial paper and issuances of debt and equity in the capital markets to satisfy these capital needs. Proceeds from future dispositions of Energy Transfer Common Units or Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units could reduce borrowings or provide additional support for our capital investment needs. With respect to CERC, we intend to use proceeds from the completed dispositions of our Natural Gas businesses in Arkansas and Oklahoma and any potential further asset sales to satisfy a portion of its capital needs. We strive to maintain investment grade ratings for our securities to access the capital markets on terms we consider reasonable. A reduction in our ratings generally would increase our borrowing costs for new issuances of debt, as well as borrowing costs under our existing revolving credit facilities, and may prevent us from accessing the commercial paper markets. Disruptions in the financial markets can also affect the availability of new capital on terms we consider attractive. In those circumstances, we may not be able to obtain certain types of external financing or may be required to accept terms less favorable than they would otherwise accept. For that reason, we seek to maintain adequate liquidity for our businesses through existing credit facilities and prudent refinancing of existing debt.
To the extent adverse economic conditions, including supply chain disruptions, affect our suppliers and customers, results from our energy delivery businesses may suffer. Each state has a unique economy and is driven by different industrial sectors. Our largest customers reflect the diversity in industries in the states across our footprint. For example, Houston Electric is largely concentrated in Houston, Texas, a diverse economy where a higher percentage of employment is tied to the energy sector relative to other regions of the country. Although the Houston area represents a large part of our customer base, we have
41
a diverse customer base throughout the various states our utility businesses serve. In Minnesota, for instance, education and health services are the state’s largest sectors. Indiana and Ohio are impacted by changes in the Midwest economy in general and changes in particular industries concentrated in the Midwest such as automotive, feed and grain processing. Some industries are driven by population growth like education and health care, while others may be influenced by strength in the national or international economy.
Further, the global supply chain has experienced significant disruptions due to a multitude of factors, such as labor shortages, resource availability, long lead times, inflation and weather. These disruptions have adversely impacted the utility industry. Like many of our peers, we have experienced disruptions to our supply chain and may continue to experience such disruptions in the future. For example, we, along with the developer of the project, recently announced plans to downsize the solar array to be built in Posey County, Indiana from 300 MW to 200 MW due to supply chain issues experienced in the energy industry, rising cost of commodities and community feedback. For more information, see Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
Also, adverse economic conditions, coupled with concerns for protecting the environment and increased availability of alternate energy sources, may cause consumers to use less energy or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for our services. Long-term national trends indicate customers have reduced their energy consumption, which could adversely affect our results. However, due to more affordable energy prices and continued economic improvement in the areas we serve, the trend toward lower usage has slowed. To the extent population growth is affected by lower energy prices and there is financial pressure on some of our customers who operate within the energy industry, there may be an impact on the growth rate of our customer base and overall demand. Lower interest rates have helped single family housing starts in the Houston and Minneapolis to exceed growth in previous years. Multifamily residential customer growth is affected by the cyclical nature of apartment construction. A new construction cycle in Houston helped overall residential customer growth to surpass the long-term trend of 2% for the last two years. Management expects residential meter growth for Houston Electric to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 2%. Typical customer growth in the jurisdictions served by the Natural Gas reportable segment is approximately 1%. Management expects residential meter growth for CERC to remain in line with long term trends at approximately 1%.
Significant Events
Sale of Natural Gas Businesses. On April 29, 2021, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses for $2.15 billion in cash, including recovery of approximately $425 million in gas cost, including storm-related incremental natural gas costs incurred in the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement. The sale closed on January 10, 2022. On August 31, 2021, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., completed the sale of MES to Last Mile Energy. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Net Zero Emission Goals. In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy announced new net zero emission goals for both Scope 1 and certain Scope 2 emissions by 2035 as well as a goal to reduce certain Scope 3 emissions by 20% to 30% by 2035. For more information regarding CenterPoint Energy’s new net zero emission goals and the risks associated with them, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Our Businesses — CenterPoint Energy is subject to operational and financial risks...” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Form 10-K.
February 2021 Winter Storm Event. In February 2021, portions of the United States experienced an extreme and unprecedented winter weather event that resulted in corresponding electricity generation shortages, including in Texas, natural gas shortages and increased wholesale prices of natural gas in the United States. Many customers of Houston Electric’s REPs and, to a lesser extent, of CERC, were severely impacted by outages in electricity and natural gas delivery during the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. As a result of this weather event, the governors of Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana declared states of either disaster or emergencies in their respective states. Subsequently, President Biden also approved major disaster declarations for all or parts of Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana.
The February 2021 Winter Storm Event resulted in financial impacts to CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC, including substantial increases in prices for natural gas, decreased revenues at Houston Electric due to ERCOT-mandated outages, additional interest expense related to external financing to pay for natural gas working capital, significant impacts to the REPs, including the REPs’ ability to pay invoices from Houston Electric, increases in bad debt expense, issues with counterparties and customers, litigation and investigations or inquiries from government or regulatory agencies and entities, and other financial impacts. CenterPoint Energy does not, at this time, anticipate long-term financial impacts associated with the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, including changes to its credit profile, credit ratings or liquidity, given the regulatory mechanisms that are in place in our jurisdictions to recover the extraordinary expenses. CenterPoint Energy is, however,
42
continuing to work with individual regulatory agencies to reach a successful final resolution on the recovery of the extraordinary costs. For more information regarding regulatory impacts, debt transactions and litigation, see Notes 7, 14 and 16 to the consolidated financial statements and “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Future Sources and Uses of Cash” and “—Regulatory Matters” below.
Enable Merger Agreement. On February 16, 2021, Enable entered into the Enable Merger Agreement. On December 2, 2021, the Enable Merger closed pursuant to the Enable Merger Agreement. At the closing of the Enable Merger, CenterPoint Energy transferred 100% of the Enable Common Units and Enable Series A Preferred Units it owned in exchange for Energy Transfer Common Units and Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units, respectively. In December 2021, we completed sales of approximately 75% of the acquired Energy Transfer Common Units and 50% of Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units for net proceeds of $1,320 million. For more information, see Notes 4, 11 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Debt Transactions. In 2021, CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric and CERC issued a combined $4.5 billion in new debt and repaid or redeemed a combined $2.7 billion of debt, excluding scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds. Additionally, on January 31, 2022, CERC Corp. redeemed $425 million aggregate principal amount of CERC’s outstanding senior notes due 2023. For further information about debt transactions in 2021 and to date in 2022, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Preferred Stock Conversions. For information regarding preferred stock conversions in 2021, see Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
Regulatory Proceedings. For information related to our pending and completed regulatory proceedings in 2021 and to date in 2022, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Regulatory Matters” below.
Board of Directors Governance Structure. On July 22, 2021, CenterPoint Energy announced the decision of the independent directors of the Board to implement a new independent Board leadership and governance structure and appointed a new independent chair of the Board. To implement this new governance structure, the independent directors of the Board eliminated the Executive Chairman position. For further information, see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
Our past earnings and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future earnings and results of operations. The magnitude of our future earnings and results of our operations will depend on or be affected by numerous factors that apply to all Registrants unless otherwise indicated including:
•CenterPoint Energy’s business strategies and strategic initiatives, restructurings, joint ventures and acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, including the completed sale of our Natural Gas businesses in Arkansas and Oklahoma, which we cannot assure will have the anticipated benefits to us, our planned sales of our remaining Energy Transfer common and preferred equity securities, which we cannot assure will be completed or will have the anticipated benefits to us;
•industrial, commercial and residential growth in our service territories and changes in market demand, including the demand for our non-utility products and services and effects of energy efficiency measures and demographic patterns;
•our ability to fund and invest planned capital and the timely recovery of our investments, including those related to Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan as part of its most recent IRP;
•our ability to successfully construct and operate electric generating facilities, including complying with applicable environmental standards and the implementation of a well-balanced energy and resource mix, as appropriate;
•the development of new opportunities and the performance of projects undertaken by Energy Systems Group, which are subject to, among other factors, the level of success in bidding contracts and cancellation and/or reductions in the scope of projects by customers, and obligations related to warranties, guarantees and other contractual and legal obligations;
•the recording of impairment charges;
•timely and appropriate rate actions that allow recovery of costs and a reasonable return on investment, including the timing and amount of the recovery of Houston Electric’s mobile generation leases;
•future economic conditions in regional and national markets and their effect on sales, prices and costs;
•weather variations and other natural phenomena, including the impact of severe weather events on operations and capital, such as impacts from the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•the ability of REPs, including REP affiliates of NRG and Vistra Energy Corp., to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric, including the negative impact on such ability related to COVID-19;
43
•the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on our operations, business and financial condition, our industries and the communities we serve, U.S. and world financial markets and supply chains, potential regulatory actions and changes in customer and stakeholder behaviors relating thereto;
•volatility in the markets for oil and natural gas as a result of, among other factors, the actions of certain crude-oil exporting countries and the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, increasing exports of LNG to Europe and climate change concerns, including the increasing adoption and use of alternative energy sources;
•state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments affecting various aspects of our businesses, including, among others, energy deregulation or re-regulation, pipeline integrity and safety and changes in regulation and legislation pertaining to trade, health care, finance and actions regarding the rates charged by our regulated businesses;
•direct or indirect effects on our facilities, resources, operations and financial condition resulting from terrorism, cyber attacks or intrusions, data security breaches or other attempts to disrupt our businesses or the businesses of third parties, or other catastrophic events such as fires, ice, earthquakes, explosions, leaks, floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes and other severe weather events, pandemic health events or other occurrences;
•tax legislation, including the effects of the CARES Act and of the TCJA (which includes but is not limited to any potential changes to tax rates, tax credits and/or interest deductibility), as well as any changes in tax laws under the current administration, and uncertainties involving state commissions’ and local municipalities’ regulatory requirements and determinations regarding the treatment of EDIT and our rates;
•our ability to mitigate weather impacts through normalization or rate mechanisms, and the effectiveness of such mechanisms;
•actions by credit rating agencies, including any potential downgrades to credit ratings;
•matters affecting regulatory approval, legislative actions, construction, implementation of necessary technology or other issues with respect to major capital projects that result in delays or cancellation or in cost overruns that cannot be recouped in rates;
•local, state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments relating to the environment, including, among others, those related to global climate change, air emissions, carbon, waste water discharges and the handling and disposal of CCR that could impact operations, cost recovery of generation plant costs and related assets, and CenterPoint Energy’s net zero emission goals;
•the impact of unplanned facility outages or other closures;
•the sufficiency of our insurance coverage, including availability, cost, coverage and terms and ability to recover claims;
•the availability and prices of raw materials and services and changes in labor for current and future construction projects and operations and maintenance costs, including our ability to control such costs;
•the investment performance of CenterPoint Energy’s pension and postretirement benefit plans;
•changes in interest rates and their impact on costs of borrowing and the valuation of CenterPoint Energy’s pension benefit obligation;
•commercial bank and financial market conditions, our access to capital, the cost of such capital, and the results of our financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in the debt capital markets;
•changes in rates of inflation;
•inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations to us;
•non-payment for our services due to financial distress of our customers;
•the extent and effectiveness of our risk management and hedging activities, including, but not limited to financial and weather hedges;
•timely and appropriate regulatory actions, which include actions allowing securitization, for any future hurricanes or other severe weather events, or natural disasters or other recovery of costs;
•acquisition and merger activities involving us or our competitors, including the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition and divestiture plans;
•our ability to recruit, effectively transition and retain management and key employees and maintain good labor relations;
•changes in technology, particularly with respect to efficient battery storage or the emergence or growth of new, developing or alternative sources of generation, and their adoption by consumers;
•the impact of alternate energy sources on the demand for natural gas;
•the timing and outcome of any audits, disputes and other proceedings related to taxes;
•the effective tax rates;
•political and economic developments, including energy and environmental policies under the Biden administration;
•the transition to a replacement for the LIBOR benchmark interest rate;
•CenterPoint Energy’s ability to execute on its initiatives, targets and goals, including its net zero emission goals and its operations and maintenance expenditure goals;
44
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•the effect of changes in and application of accounting standards and pronouncements; and
•other factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report and in other reports that the Registrants file from time to time with the SEC.
CENTERPOINT ENERGY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity and natural gas. CenterPoint Energy’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates its subsidiaries charge, debt service costs, income tax expense, its subsidiaries ability to collect receivables from REPs and customers and its ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
Income (loss) available to common shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 (1) | 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 475 | $ | 230 | $ | 419 | $ | 245 | $ | (189) | |||||||||
| Natural Gas | 403 | 278 | 251 | 125 | 27 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Utility Operations | 878 | 508 | 670 | 370 | (162) | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate & Other (2) | (305) | (201) | (272) | (104) | 71 | ||||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations | 818 | (1,256) | 276 | 2,074 | (1,532) | ||||||||||||||
| Total CenterPoint Energy | $ | 1,391 | $ | (949) | $ | 674 | $ | 2,340 | $ | (1,623) |
(1)Includes only February 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 results of acquired electric and natural gas businesses due to the Merger.
(2)Includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services through Energy Systems Group, unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense, intercompany eliminations and the reduction of income allocated to preferred shareholders.
2021 Compared to 2020
Net Income. CenterPoint Energy reported income available to common shareholders of $1,391 million for 2021 compared to a loss available to common shareholders of $949 million for 2020.
The increase in income available to common shareholders of $2,340 million was primarily due to the following key factors:
•an increase in earnings from discontinued operations primarily related to the Enable Merger discussed further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements and the 2020 impairment in Enable discussed further in Notes 10 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements;
•goodwill impairment at Indiana Electric in 2020;
•the dividend requirement and amortization of beneficial conversion feature associated with Series C Preferred Stock in 2020; and
•favorable income tax impacts in 2021, partially offset by the CARES Act in 2020.
These increases were partially offset by:
•losses on the sale of Energy Transfer Common Units and Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units in 2021;
•make-whole premiums on debt redeemed in 2021; and
•the impact of the Board-implemented governance changes announced in July 2021.
Excluding those items, income available to common shareholders increased $191 million primarily due to the following key factors:
•rate relief, net of increases in depreciation and amortization and taxes other than income taxes;
•reduced impact of COVID-19;
45
•continued customer growth; and
•reduced interest expense.
2020 Compared to 2019
Net Income. CenterPoint Energy reported a loss available to common shareholders of $949 million for 2020 compared to income available to common shareholders of $674 million for 2019.
The decrease in income available to common shareholders of $1,623 million was primarily due to the following key factors:
•a decrease in earnings from discontinued operations as a result of the 2020 impairment in Enable discussed further in Note 10 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements;
•goodwill impairment at Indiana Electric in 2020; and
•the dividend requirement and amortization of beneficial conversion feature associated with Series C Preferred Stock in 2020
These decreases were partially offset by the CARES Act in 2020.
Excluding those items, income available to common shareholders increased $115 million primarily due to the following key factors:
•rate relief, net of increases in depreciation and amortization and taxes other than income taxes;
•continued customer growth;
•operation and maintenance expense discipline; and
•the impact of twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 for businesses acquired in the Merger.
These increases were partially offset by the impact of COVID-19.
Discontinued Operations. In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s equity investment in Enable met the held for sale criteria. On December 2, 2021, Enable completed the previously announced Enable Merger pursuant to the Enable Merger Agreement entered into on February 16, 2021. CenterPoint Energy’s plan to exit its Midstream Investment reportable segment in 2022 represents a strategic shift to CenterPoint Energy. Therefore, the assets and liabilities associated with the equity investment in Enable are reflected as discontinued operations on CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income, and the December 31, 2020 Consolidated Balance Sheet was required to be recast for assets held for sale. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
On February 3, 2020, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary VUSI, entered into the Securities Purchase Agreement to sell the Infrastructure Services Disposal Group. Accordingly, the previously reported Infrastructure Services reportable segment has been eliminated. The transaction closed on April 9, 2020. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, on February 24, 2020, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the Equity Purchase Agreement to sell the Energy Services Disposal Group. Accordingly, the previously reported Energy Services reportable segment has been eliminated. The transaction closed on June 1, 2020. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT
CenterPoint Energy’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for the reportable segments. Segment results include inter-segment interest income and expense, which may result in inter-segment profit and loss.
The following discussion of results of operations by reportable segment concentrates on CenterPoint Energy’s Utility Operations, conducted through two reportable segments, Electric and Natural Gas. CenterPoint Energy’s formerly reported Midstream Investments reportable segment results are now included in discontinued operations. For additional information regarding the Midstream Investments reportable segment, see Notes 4, 10, 11 and 18 to the consolidated financial statements.
46
ELECTRIC
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 (1) | 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 3,763 | $ | 3,470 | $ | 3,519 | $ | 293 | $ | (49) | ||||||||
| Cost of revenues (2) | 186 | 147 | 149 | (39) | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues less cost of revenues | 3,577 | 3,323 | 3,370 | 254 | (47) | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 1,780 | 1,697 | 1,649 | (83) | (48) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 756 | 670 | 746 | (86) | 76 | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 268 | 268 | 261 | — | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Goodwill Impairment (3) | — | 185 | — | 185 | (185) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 2,804 | 2,820 | 2,656 | 16 | (164) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 773 | 503 | 714 | 270 | (211) | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest and other finance charges | (226) | (220) | (225) | (6) | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 23 | 19 | 26 | 4 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 570 | 302 | 515 | 268 | (213) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 95 | 72 | 96 | (23) | 24 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 475 | $ | 230 | $ | 419 | $ | 245 | $ | (189) | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 32,067 | 32,630 | 31,605 | (2) | % | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 103,000 | 98,647 | 96,866 | 4 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of normal weather for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 108 | % | 109 | % | 109 | % | (1) | % | — | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 82 | % | 76 | % | 96 | % | 6 | % | (20) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,493,832 | 2,433,474 | 2,372,135 | 2 | % | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,814,859 | 2,749,116 | 2,682,228 | 2 | % | 2 | % |
(1)Includes only February 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 results of acquired electric businesses due to the Merger.
(2)Includes Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power.
(3)For information related to the 2020 goodwill impairment at the Indiana Electric reporting unit, see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
47
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Electric reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues less Cost of revenues | |||||||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF and impact of the change in rate design, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | $ | 254 | $ | 363 | |||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items below | 52 | (124) | |||||
| Customer growth | 32 | 37 | |||||
| Impacts on usage from COVID-19 | 28 | (40) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 12 | 5 | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | 9 | (14) | |||||
| Impacts from increased peak demand in the prior year, collected in rates in the current year | 6 | 19 | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues, primarily related to service connections and off-system sales | 4 | 11 | |||||
| Pass-through revenues, offset in operation and maintenance below | 2 | 2 | |||||
| AMS, offset in depreciation and amortization below | — | (3) | |||||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 for Indiana Electric due to Merger | — | 34 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | (8) | (31) | |||||
| Weather, efficiency improvements and other usage impacts, excluding impact of COVID-19 | (57) | (17) | |||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | (80) | (289) | |||||
| Total | $ | 254 | $ | (47) | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues less cost of revenues above | $ | (90) | $ | (61) | |||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | (8) | 14 | |||||
| Pass through expenses, offset in revenues less cost of revenues above | (3) | (2) | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items | (1) | 1 | |||||
| Energy efficiency program costs | (1) | — | |||||
| Contract services | — | 12 | |||||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 for Indiana Electric due to Merger | — | (17) | |||||
| Support services | 1 | (13) | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 9 | (2) | |||||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | 10 | 20 | |||||
| Total | $ | (83) | $ | (48) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items | $ | (58) | $ | 116 | |||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | (28) | (31) | |||||
| AMS, offset by revenues less cost of revenues above | — | (1) | |||||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 for Indiana Electric due to Merger | — | (8) | |||||
| Total | $ | (86) | $ | 76 | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | $ | (2) | $ | (4) | |||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 for Indiana Electric | — | (1) | |||||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | 2 | (2) | |||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | (7) | |||
| Goodwill impairment | |||||||
| See Note 6 for further information | $ | 185 | $ | (185) | |||
| Total | $ | 185 | $ | (185) | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Debt to fund incremental capital projects, and refinance maturing debt | $ | (13) | $ | (5) | |||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 for Indiana Electric due to Merger | — | (2) | |||||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items above | 7 | 12 | |||||
| Total | $ | (6) | $ | 5 | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Reduction to non-service benefit cost | $ | 5 | $ | 17 | |||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items above | — | (4) | |||||
| Investments in CenterPoint Energy Money Pool interest income | (1) | (20) | |||||
| Total | $ | 4 | $ | (7) |
48
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
NATURAL GAS
The following table provides summary data of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 (1) | 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,336 | $ | 3,631 | $ | 3,750 | $ | 705 | $ | (119) | ||||||||
| Cost of revenues (2) | 1,959 | 1,358 | 1,652 | (601) | 294 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues less Cost of revenues | 2,377 | 2,273 | 2,098 | 104 | 175 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 1,004 | 1,013 | 1,051 | 9 | 38 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 502 | 473 | 439 | (29) | (34) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 253 | 237 | 206 | (16) | (31) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 1,759 | 1,723 | 1,696 | (36) | (27) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 618 | 550 | 402 | 68 | 148 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (141) | (153) | (144) | 12 | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | (2) | 6 | (5) | (8) | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | 483 | 403 | 253 | 80 | 150 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 80 | 125 | 2 | 45 | (123) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 403 | $ | 278 | $ | 251 | $ | 125 | $ | 27 | ||||||||
| Throughput (in Bcf): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 241 | 237 | 246 | 2 | % | (4) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 428 | 439 | 458 | (3) | % | (4) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 669 | 676 | 704 | (1) | % | (4) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 91 | % | 91 | % | 101 | % | — | % | (10) | % | ||||||||
| Number of customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 4,372,428 | 4,328,607 | 4,252,361 | 1 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 354,602 | 349,725 | 349,749 | 1 | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 4,727,030 | 4,678,332 | 4,602,110 | 1 | % | 2 | % |
(1)Includes only February 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 results of acquired natural gas businesses due to the Merger.
(2)Includes Utility natural gas, fuel and purchased power and Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas.
49
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues less Cost of revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design, exclusive of the TCJA impact below | $ | 65 | $ | 108 | |||
| Impacts of COVID-19, including usage and other miscellaneous charges | 16 | (25) | |||||
| Customer growth | 13 | 20 | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | 13 | (6) | |||||
| Weather and usage, excluding impacts from COVID-19 | 12 | 4 | |||||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 in Indiana and Ohio jurisdictions | — | 65 | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue, excluding impacts from COVID-19 | — | 15 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in operation and maintenance below | (7) | (1) | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | (8) | (5) | |||||
| Total | $ | 104 | $ | 175 | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Support services and miscellaneous operations and maintenance expenses | $ | 16 | $ | (8) | |||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | 8 | 40 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues less cost of revenues above | 7 | 1 | |||||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 in Indiana and Ohio jurisdictions | — | (14) | |||||
| Contract services | (3) | 20 | |||||
| Labor and benefits, primarily due to headcount | (19) | (1) | |||||
| Total | $ | 9 | $ | 38 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | $ | (29) | $ | (23) | |||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 in Indiana and Ohio jurisdictions | — | (11) | |||||
| Total | $ | (29) | $ | (34) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues less cost of revenues above | $ | (13) | $ | 6 | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (3) | (31) | |||||
| Twelve months in 2020 versus eleven months in 2019 in Indiana and Ohio jurisdictions | — | (6) | |||||
| Total | $ | (16) | $ | (31) | |||
| Gain on Sale | |||||||
| Net gain on sale of MES | $ | 8 | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | 8 | $ | — | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Reduced interest rates on outstanding borrowings, partially offset by incremental borrowings for capital expenditures and make-whole premium | $ | 12 | $ | (9) | |||
| Total | $ | 12 | $ | (9) | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Other miscellaneous non-operating expenses, primarily due to non-service benefit cost | $ | (10) | $ | 9 | |||
| Money pool investments with CenterPoint Energy interest income | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Total | (8) | 11 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period by Registrant, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
50
HOUSTON ELECTRIC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Houston Electric’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. Houston Electric consists of a single reportable segment. Houston Electric’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Houston Electric’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates Houston Electric charges, debt service costs, income tax expense, Houston Electric’s ability to collect receivables from REPs and Houston Electric’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of Houston Electric’s consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
| TDU | $ | 2,894 | $ | 2,723 | $ | 2,678 | $ | 171 | $ | 45 | ||||||||
| Bond Companies | 240 | 188 | 312 | 52 | (124) | |||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 3,134 | 2,911 | 2,990 | 223 | (79) | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | 1,591 | 1,517 | 1,470 | (74) | (47) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | 429 | 405 | 377 | (24) | (28) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 251 | 252 | 247 | 1 | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Bond Companies | 219 | 161 | 278 | (58) | 117 | |||||||||||||
| Total | 2,490 | 2,335 | 2,372 | (155) | 37 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 644 | 576 | 618 | 68 | (42) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (183) | (171) | (164) | (12) | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | (21) | (28) | (39) | 7 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 17 | 10 | 21 | 7 | (11) | |||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 457 | 387 | 436 | 70 | (49) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 76 | 53 | 80 | (23) | 27 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 381 | $ | 334 | $ | 356 | $ | 47 | $ | (22) | ||||||||
| Throughput (in GWh): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 30,650 | 31,244 | 30,334 | (2) | % | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 96,898 | 93,768 | 92,180 | 3 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cooling degree days | 109 | % | 110 | % | 106 | % | (1) | % | 4 | % | ||||||||
| Heating degree days | 80 | % | 72 | % | 96 | % | 8 | % | (24) | % | ||||||||
| Number of metered customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 2,359,168 | 2,303,315 | 2,243,188 | 2 | % | 3 | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 2,660,938 | 2,599,827 | 2,534,286 | 2 | % | 3 | % |
51
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for the Houston Electric T&D reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Transmission Revenues, including TCOS and TCRF and impact of the change in rate design, inclusive of costs billed by transmission providers | $ | 254 | $ | 364 | |||
| Bond Companies, offset in other line items below | 52 | (124) | |||||
| Customer growth | 31 | 35 | |||||
| Impacts on usage from COVID-19 | 19 | (31) | |||||
| Energy efficiency, partially offset in operation and maintenance below | 12 | 5 | |||||
| Equity return, related to the annual true-up of transition charges for amounts over or under collected in prior periods | 9 | (14) | |||||
| Impacts from increased peak demand in the prior year, collected in rates in the current year | 6 | 19 | |||||
| AMS, offset in depreciation and amortization below | — | (3) | |||||
| Miscellaneous revenues | (1) | 7 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | (8) | (32) | |||||
| Weather impacts and other usage | (51) | (7) | |||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design | (100) | (298) | |||||
| Total | $ | 223 | $ | (79) | |||
| Operation and maintenance, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Transmission costs billed by transmission providers, offset in revenues above | $ | (90) | $ | (61) | |||
| Contract services | (3) | 6 | |||||
| All other operation and maintenance expense, including materials and supplies and insurance | (2) | 14 | |||||
| Energy efficiency program costs, offset in revenues above | (1) | — | |||||
| Support services | 2 | (6) | |||||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | 9 | 2 | |||||
| Labor and benefits | 11 | (2) | |||||
| Total | $ | (74) | $ | (47) | |||
| Depreciation and amortization, excluding Bond Companies | |||||||
| Ongoing additions to plant-in-service | $ | (24) | $ | (31) | |||
| AMS, offset by revenues | — | 3 | |||||
| Total | $ | (24) | $ | (28) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Franchise fees and other taxes | $ | 4 | $ | (1) | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | (3) | (4) | |||||
| Total | $ | 1 | $ | (5) | |||
| Bond Companies expense | |||||||
| Operations and maintenance and depreciation expense, offset by revenues above | $ | (58) | $ | 117 | |||
| Total | $ | (58) | $ | 117 | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Debt to fund incremental capital projects, and refinance maturing debt | $ | (12) | $ | (7) | |||
| Total | $ | (12) | $ | (7) | |||
| Interest expense on Securitization Bonds | |||||||
| Lower outstanding principal balance, offset by revenues above | $ | 7 | $ | 11 | |||
| Total | $ | 7 | $ | 11 | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Reduction to non-service benefit cost | $ | 8 | $ | 13 | |||
| Bond Companies, offset by revenues above | — | (4) | |||||
| Investments in CenterPoint Energy Money Pool interest income | (1) | (20) | |||||
| Total | $ | 7 | $ | (11) |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
52
CERC CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CERC’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its reportable segment. CERC consists of a single reportable segment. CERC’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for natural gas. CERC’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various federal, state and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates CERC charges, debt service costs and income tax expense, CERC’s ability to collect receivables from customers and CERC’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of CERC’s consolidated operations, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
| Year Ended December 31, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except throughput, weather and customer data) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 3,248 | $ | 2,763 | $ | 3,018 | $ | 485 | $ | (255) | ||||||||
| Cost of Revenues (1) | 1,532 | 1,117 | 1,430 | (415) | 313 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues less Cost of Revenues | 1,716 | 1,646 | 1,588 | 70 | 58 | |||||||||||||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operation and maintenance | 790 | 798 | 824 | 8 | 26 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 326 | 304 | 293 | (22) | (11) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 193 | 182 | 161 | (11) | (21) | |||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 1,309 | 1,284 | 1,278 | (25) | (6) | |||||||||||||
| Operating Income | 407 | 362 | 310 | 45 | 52 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale | 11 | — | — | 11 | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | (103) | (111) | (116) | 8 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | (10) | (7) | (8) | (3) | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | 305 | 244 | 186 | 61 | 58 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 51 | 97 | (3) | 46 | (100) | |||||||||||||
| Income From Continuing Operations | 254 | 147 | 189 | 107 | (42) | |||||||||||||
| Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of tax expense (benefit) of $—, $(2), and $17, respectively) | — | (66) | 23 | 66 | (89) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 254 | $ | 81 | $ | 212 | $ | 173 | $ | (131) | ||||||||
| Throughput (in BCF): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 173 | 167 | 188 | 4 | % | (11) | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 264 | 260 | 292 | 2 | % | (11) | % | |||||||||||
| Total Throughput | 437 | 427 | 480 | 2 | % | (11) | % | |||||||||||
| Weather (percentage of 10-year average for service area): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Heating degree days | 92 | % | 91 | % | 101 | % | 1 | % | (10) | % | ||||||||
| Number of customers at end of period: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | 3,383,819 | 3,349,828 | 3,287,343 | 1 | % | 2 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | 264,843 | 260,400 | 260,872 | 2 | % | — | % | |||||||||||
| Total | 3,648,662 | 3,610,228 | 3,548,215 | 1 | % | 2 | % |
(1)Includes Utility natural gas and Non-utility cost of revenues, including natural gas.
Discontinued Operations. On February 24, 2020, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the Equity Purchase Agreement to sell the Energy Services Disposal Group. Accordingly, the previously reported Energy Services reportable segment has been eliminated. The transaction closed on June 1, 2020. For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
53
The following table provides variance explanations by major income statement caption for CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
| Favorable (Unfavorable) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 to 2020 | 2020 to 2019 | ||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues less Cost of revenues | |||||||
| Customer rates and impact of the change in rate design, exclusive of the TCJA impact below | $ | 31 | $ | 62 | |||
| Impacts on usage from COVID-19 | 16 | (22) | |||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in taxes other than income taxes below | 13 | (4) | |||||
| Customer growth | 9 | 14 | |||||
| Weather and usage, excluding impacts from COVID-19 | 8 | 2 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in operation and maintenance below | 1 | (8) | |||||
| Non-volumetric and miscellaneous revenue, excluding impacts from COVID-19 | (1) | 18 | |||||
| Refund of protected and unprotected EDIT, offset in income tax expense | (7) | (4) | |||||
| Total | $ | 70 | $ | 58 | |||
| Operation and maintenance | |||||||
| Merger related expenses, primarily severance and technology | $ | 8 | $ | — | |||
| Support services and miscellaneous operations and maintenance expenses | 8 | (2) | |||||
| Contracted services | 1 | 24 | |||||
| Energy efficiency, offset in revenues less cost of revenues above | (1) | 8 | |||||
| Labor and benefits, primarily due to headcount | (8) | (4) | |||||
| Total | $ | 8 | $ | 26 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | $ | (22) | $ | (11) | |||
| Total | $ | (22) | $ | (11) | |||
| Taxes other than income taxes | |||||||
| Gross receipts tax, offset in revenues less cost of revenues above | $ | (13) | $ | 4 | |||
| Incremental capital projects placed in service | 2 | (25) | |||||
| Total | $ | (11) | $ | (21) | |||
| Gain on Sale | |||||||
| Net gain on sale of MES | $ | 11 | $ | — | |||
| Total | $ | 11 | $ | — | |||
| Interest expense and other finance charges | |||||||
| Reduced interest rates on outstanding borrowings, partially offset by incremental borrowings for capital expenditures and make-whole premium | $ | 8 | $ | 5 | |||
| Total | $ | 8 | $ | 5 | |||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||
| Other miscellaneous non-operating expenses, primarily due to non-service benefit cost | $ | (4) | $ | 6 | |||
| Money pool investments with CenterPoint Energy interest income | 1 | (5) | |||||
| Total | $ | (3) | $ | 1 |
Income Tax Expense. For a discussion of effective tax rate per period, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
54
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Historical Cash Flows
The net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for 2021, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 22 | $ | 770 | $ | (1,440) | $ | 1,995 | $ | 899 | $ | 729 | $ | 1,638 | $ | 918 | $ | 466 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investing activities | (1,851) | (1,617) | (859) | (1,265) | (564) | (452) | (8,421) | (1,495) | (662) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing activities | 1,916 | 926 | 2,306 | (834) | (416) | (278) | 2,776 | 442 | 173 |
Operating Activities. The following items contributed to increased (decreased) net cash provided by operating activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 compared to 2020 | 2020 compared to 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in net income after adjusting for non-cash items | $ | 2,098 | $ | 203 | $ | 88 | $ | (1,785) | $ | (128) | $ | 9 | ||||||||||
| Changes in working capital | (155) | (101) | (274) | 811 | 61 | 355 | ||||||||||||||||
| Increase in regulatory assets (1) | (2,188) | (226) | (1,927) | (85) | 37 | (128) | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | (1,767) | — | — | 1,658 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in distributions from unconsolidated affiliates (2) (3) | 42 | — | — | (148) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Higher pension contribution | 25 | — | — | 23 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (28) | (5) | (56) | (117) | 11 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (1,973) | $ | (129) | $ | (2,169) | $ | 357 | $ | (19) | $ | 263 |
(1)The increase in regulatory assets is primarily due to the incurred natural gas costs associated with the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the February 2021 Winter Storm Event.
(2)In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s equity investment in Enable met the held for sale criteria and is reflected as discontinued operations on CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income. For further information, see Notes 4 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(3)This change is partially offset by the change in distributions from Enable in excess of cumulative earnings in investing activities noted in the table below.
55
Investing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in investing activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 compared to 2020 | 2020 compared to 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of equity securities | $ | 1,320 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — | — | — | 5,991 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in capital expenditures | (568) | (561) | (80) | (90) | (33) | (39) | ||||||||||||||||
| Transaction costs related to the Enable Merger | (49) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash received related to Enable Merger | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes receivable from unconsolidated affiliates | — | (481) | 9 | — | 962 | (123) | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in distributions from Enable in excess of cumulative earnings (1) | (80) | — | — | 38 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from divestitures | (1,193) | — | (343) | 1,215 | — | 365 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | (21) | (11) | 7 | 2 | 2 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (586) | $ | (1,053) | $ | (407) | $ | 7,156 | $ | 931 | $ | 210 |
(1)In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s equity investment in Enable met the held for sale criteria and is reflected as discontinued operations on CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income. For further information, see Notes 4 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Financing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in financing activities:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 compared to 2020 | 2020 compared to 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in commercial paper outstanding | $ | 1,893 | $ | — | $ | 582 | $ | (2,652) | $ | — | $ | (197) | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuances of preferred stock, net | (723) | — | — | 723 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock, net | (672) | — | — | 672 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in long-term debt outstanding, excluding commercial paper | 2,450 | 415 | 1,481 | (2,539) | (170) | (93) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in debt and equity issuance costs | (30) | (9) | (6) | 12 | 5 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net changes in short-term borrowings | (27) | — | (27) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Decreased payment of Common Stock dividends | 7 | — | — | 185 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Decreased (increased) payment of Preferred Stock dividends | 30 | — | — | (19) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Payment of obligation for finance lease | (179) | (179) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in notes payable from affiliated companies | — | 496 | 224 | — | 9 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Contribution from parent | — | 68 | (37) | — | (528) | 88 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividend to parent | — | 551 | 80 | — | (175) | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital contribution to parent associated with the sale of CES | — | — | 286 | — | — | (286) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1 | — | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,750 | $ | 1,342 | $ | 2,584 | $ | (3,610) | $ | (858) | $ | (451) |
56
Future Sources and Uses of Cash
The Registrants expect that anticipated 2022 cash needs will be met with borrowings under their credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, term loans or common stock, anticipated cash flows from operations, with respect to CenterPoint Energy and CERC, proceeds from commercial paper, and with respect to CenterPoint Energy, distributions from Energy Transfer or proceeds from future dispositions of Energy Transfer Common Units or Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units, and, with respect to CERC, proceeds from any potential asset sales. Discretionary financing or refinancing may result in the issuance of equity securities of CenterPoint Energy or debt securities of the Registrants in the capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit facilities or term bank loans. Issuances of equity or debt in the capital markets, funds raised in the commercial paper markets and additional credit facilities may not, however, be available on acceptable terms.
Material Current and Long-term Cash Requirements. The liquidity and capital requirements of the Registrants are affected primarily by results of operations, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, tax payments, working capital needs and various regulatory actions. Capital expenditures are expected to be used for investment in infrastructure for electric and natural gas distribution operations. These capital expenditures are anticipated to maintain reliability and safety, increase resiliency and expand our systems through value-added projects. In addition to dividend payments on CenterPoint Energy’s Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock, and in addition to interest payments on debt, the Registrants’ principal anticipated cash requirements for 2022 include the following:
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||
| Estimated capital expenditures | $ | 3,490 | $ | 1,780 | $ | 1,233 | |||||
| Scheduled principal payments on Securitization Bonds | 220 | 220 | — | ||||||||
| Maturing Houston Electric general mortgage bonds | 300 | 300 | — | ||||||||
| Finance lease for mobile generation | 496 | 496 | — |
The following table sets forth the Registrants’ estimates of the Registrants’ capital expenditures currently planned for projects for 2022 through 2026. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for CenterPoint Energy’s actual capital expenditures by reportable segment for 2021.
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric | $ | 2,052 | $ | 2,879 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,724 | $ | 2,683 | ||||||||||
| Natural Gas | 1,427 | 1,804 | 1,439 | 1,490 | 1,887 | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 11 | 31 | 18 | 14 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,490 | $ | 4,714 | $ | 3,738 | $ | 3,228 | $ | 4,584 | ||||||||||
| Houston Electric (1) | $ | 1,780 | $ | 2,172 | $ | 1,479 | $ | 1,429 | $ | 2,205 | ||||||||||
| CERC (1) | $ | 1,233 | $ | 1,725 | $ | 1,360 | $ | 1,422 | $ | 1,807 |
(1)Houston Electric and CERC each consist of a single reportable segment..
Capital Expenditures for Climate-Related Projects. On September 23, 2021, CenterPoint Energy announced a new 10-year capital expenditure plan. As part of its 10-year plan to spend over $40 billion on capital expenditures, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in clean energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation and electric vehicle expansion.
57
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ material current and long-term cash requirements as of December 31, 2021.
| Total | 2022 | 2023-2024 | 2025-2026 | 2027 and thereafter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | |||||||||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds | $ | 537 | $ | 220 | $ | 317 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) | 15,549 | 308 | 6,082 | 911 | 8,248 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (2) | 27 | 15 | 12 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (2) | 6,386 | 445 | 834 | 761 | 4,346 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 7 | 7 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Finance lease for mobile generation | 496 | 496 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (3) | 4,939 | 626 | 1,500 | 631 | 2,182 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 27,941 | $ | 2,117 | $ | 8,745 | $ | 2,303 | $ | 14,776 | |||||||||
| Houston Electric | |||||||||||||||||||
| Securitization Bonds | $ | 537 | $ | 220 | $ | 317 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
| Other long-term debt (1) | 4,958 | 300 | 200 | 300 | 4,158 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — Securitization Bonds (2) | 27 | 15 | 12 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments — other long-term debt (2) | 3,615 | 188 | 351 | 340 | 2,736 | ||||||||||||||
| Finance lease for mobile generation | 496 | 496 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 9,633 | $ | 1,219 | $ | 880 | $ | 640 | $ | 6,894 | |||||||||
| CERC | |||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | $ | 4,380 | $ | — | $ | 2,599 | $ | — | $ | 1,781 | |||||||||
| Interest payments — long-term debt (1) | 1,250 | 91 | 160 | 153 | 846 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 7 | 7 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Commodity and other commitments (3) | 2,486 | 322 | 500 | 382 | 1,282 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cash requirements | $ | 8,123 | $ | 420 | $ | 3,259 | $ | 535 | $ | 3,909 |
(1)ZENS obligations are included in the 2027 and thereafter column at their contingent principal amount of $38 million as of December 31, 2021. These obligations are exchangeable for cash at any time at the option of the holders for 95% of the current value of the reference shares attributable to each ZENS ($820 million as of December 31, 2021), as discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2)The Registrants calculated estimated interest payments for long-term debt as follows: for fixed-rate debt and term debt, the Registrants calculated interest based on the applicable rates and payment dates; for variable-rate debt and/or non-term debt, the Registrants used interest rates in place as of December 31, 2021. The Registrants typically expect to settle such interest payments with cash flows from operations and short-term borrowings.
(3)For a discussion of commodity and other commitments, see Note 16(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
The table above does not include the following:
•estimated future payments for expected future AROs primarily estimated to be incurred after 2026. See Note 3(c) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•expected contributions to pension plans and other postretirement plans in 2022. See Note 8(g) to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
•operating leases. See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
58
February 2021 Winter Storm Event. In February 2021, portions of the United States experienced an extreme and unprecedented winter weather event resulting in corresponding electricity generation shortages, including in Texas, and natural gas shortages and increased prices of natural gas in the United States. Although CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s extraordinary costs from the increase in natural gas prices are subject to available natural gas cost recovery mechanisms in their jurisdictions (although timing of recovery is uncertain), until such amounts are ultimately recovered from customers, CenterPoint Energy and CERC will continue to incur increased finance-related costs, resulting in a significant use of cash. See “— Regulatory Matters — February 2021 Winter Storm Event” below and Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. Other than Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for tax-exempt long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy (see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements) and short-term leases, the Registrants have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Regulatory Matters
COVID-19 Regulatory Matters
For information about COVID-19 regulatory matters, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
February 2021 Winter Storm Event
For information about the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, and for additional information on the Texas electric market, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Business — In connection with the February...”
The table below presents the incremental natural gas costs included in regulatory assets as of December 31, 2021 by state as a result of the February 2021 Winter Storm Event and CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s requested recovery status as of February 2022.
| State | Recovery Status | Legislative Activity | Incremental Gas Cost in Regulatory Assets (in millions) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas and Oklahoma | On January 10, 2022, CERC Corp., completed the sale of its Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses For additional information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements. | $ | 398 | ||||
| Louisiana | Filed application on April 16, 2021 for North Louisiana to recover over a three-year period beginning May 1, 2021. LPSC approved on April 22, 2021. | None. | 67 | ||||
| Minnesota | Filed application on March 15, 2021 requesting to recover over a two-year period beginning May 1, 2021. Modified request and worked with other utilities to propose common definition of extraordinary gas costs to be recovered over a 27-month period starting September 1, 2021 using volumetric, seasonally adjusted, and stepped surcharge rates. MPUC issued order approving modified cost recovery subject to a prudence review. The prudence review schedule has testimonies being filed by parties October 2021 through February 2022, a hearing scheduled in February 2022, an administrative law judge report in May 2022 and MPUC final order issued by August 2022. On December 30, 2021, as part of CERC’s alternative request filed in tandem with its general rate case initial filing, the MPUC ordered the amortization period for extraordinary gas cost recovery be extended from a 27-month period to a 63-month period beginning on January 1, 2022. | None. | 379 | ||||
| Mississippi | Recovery began in September 2021 through normal gas cost recovery. | None. | 2 |
59
| State | Recovery Status | Legislative Activity | Incremental Gas Cost in Regulatory Assets (in millions) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | Securitization application was filed on July 30, 2021. Intervenor and staff testimony was received in September and October and CERC filed rebuttal testimony on October 25, 2021. A joint notice of settlement was filed by the Texas utilities that are requesting securitization, intervenors, and Railroad Commission staff on October 29, 2021. The settlement resolves all contested issues and includes an agreement by all signatories that the costs incurred by the utilities to purchase natural gas volumes during February 2021 are reasonable and necessary and were prudently incurred. As part of the settlement, CERC agreed to limit the interim carrying cost rate to its actual interim financing rate of 0.7%. A merits hearing was held on November 2, 2021. On November 10, 2021, the RRC approved the settlement and the regulatory asset amount to be securitized. On February 8, 2022, the RRC issued a financing order. The Texas Public Finance Authority will have approximately 180 days to issue customer rate relief bonds to recover natural gas costs from the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. | A securitization bill has been signed by the Texas governor which authorizes the Railroad Commission to use securitization financing and issuance of customer rate relief bonds for recovery of extraordinary gas costs. | 1,073 | ||||
| Total CERC | $ | 1,919 | |||||
| Indiana North | IURC issued order August 25, 2021. Recovery began September 2021 with 50% of the February 2021 variance recovered evenly over the 12‐month period September 2021 to August 2022, with the remainder of the variance recovered through a volumetric per‐therm allocation over the same 12-month period. | None. | 63 | ||||
| Indiana South | IURC issued order July 28, 2021. Recovery began August 2021 with 50% of the February 2021 variance recovered evenly over the 12‐month period August 2021 to July 2022, with the remainder of the variance recovered through a volumetric per‐therm allocation over the same 12-month period. | None. | 11 | ||||
| Total CenterPoint Energy | $ | 1,993 |
Indiana Electric CPCN (CenterPoint Energy)
On February 9, 2021, Indiana Electric entered into a BTA with a subsidiary of Capital Dynamics. Under the agreement, Capital Dynamics, with its partner Tenaska, contracted to build a 300 MW solar array in Posey County, Indiana through a special purpose entity, Posey Solar. Upon completion of construction, which is projected to be at the end of 2023. Indiana Electric will acquire Posey Solar and its solar array assets for a fixed purchase price. On February 23, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to purchase the project. Indiana Electric also sought approval for a 100 MW solar PPA with Clenera LLC in Warrick County, Indiana. The request accounted for increased cost of debt related to this PPA, which provides equivalent equity return to offset imputed debt during the 25 year life of the PPA. A hearing was conducted on June 21, 2021. On October 27, 2021, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the Posey solar project through a BTA and approved recovery of costs via a levelized rate over the anticipated 35-year life. The IURC also approved the Warrick County solar PPA but denied the request to preemptively offset imputed debt in the PPA cost. The Posey solar project is expected to be in service by 2023. Due to rising cost for the project, caused in part by supply chain issues in the energy industry and the rising costs of commodities, we, along with Capital Dynamics, recently announced plans to downsize the project to approximately 200 MW. Indiana Electric collaboratively agreed to the scope change and is currently working through contract negotiations, contingent on further IURC review and approval.
On June 17, 2021 Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to construct two natural gas combustion turbines to replace portions of its existing coal-fired generation fleet. Indiana Electric has also requested depreciation expense and post in-service carrying costs to be deferred in a regulatory asset until the date Indiana South’s base rates include a return on and recovery of depreciation expense on the facility. A hearing was conducted on January 26 through 28, 2022. The estimated $334 million turbine facility would be constructed at the current site of the A.B. Brown power plant in Posey County, Indiana and would provide a combined output of 460 MW. Construction of the turbines will begin following receipt of necessary regulatory approvals by the IURC and FERC, which are anticipated in the second half of 2022 and first quarter 2023, respectively. The turbines are targeted to be operational in first quarter of 2025. Subject to IURC approval, recovery of the
60
proposed natural gas combustion turbines and regulatory asset will be requested in the next Indiana Electric rate case expected in 2023.
On August 25, 2021, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 185 MW of solar power, under a 15-year PPA, from Oriden LLC, which is developing a solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, and 150 MW of solar power, under a 20-year PPA, from Origis Energy USA Inc., which is developing a solar project in Knox County, Indiana. Subject to necessary approvals, both solar arrays are expected to be in service by 2023.
Indiana Electric Securitization of Planned Generation Retirements (CenterPoint Energy)
The State of Indiana has enacted legislation, Senate Bill 386, that would enable CenterPoint Energy to request approval from the IURC to securitize the remaining book value and removal costs associated with generating facilities to be retired in the next twenty-four months. The Governor of Indiana signed the legislation on April 19, 2021. CenterPoint Energy intends to seek securitization in the future associated with planned retirements of coal generation facilities in 2022.
Subsidiary Restructuring
In July 2021, Indiana North and SIGECO filed petitions with the IURC for the approval of a new financial services agreement and the confirmation of Indiana North’s financing authority, and final orders were issued by the IURC on December 28, 2021. VEDO filed a similar application with the PUCO in September 2021 and the PUCO issued an order on January 26, 2022 adopting recommendations by PUCO staff. CenterPoint Energy is evaluating the transfer of Indiana North and VEDO from VUHI to CERC in order to better align its organizational structure with management and financial reporting. Both the IURC and PUCO have approved the transaction. As a part of the restructuring, VUHI may approach certain of its debt holders with an offer to exchange existing VUHI debt for CERC debt. The orders allow the reissuance of existing debt of Indiana North and VEDO to CERC, to continue to amortize existing issuance expenses and discounts, and to treat any potential exchange fees as discounts to be amortized over the life of the debt. If CenterPoint Energy moves forward with the restructuring, including any VUHI debt exchanges, it is expected to be completed in 2022.
Indiana South Base Rate Case (CenterPoint Energy)
On October 30, 2020, and as subsequently amended, Indiana South filed its base rate case with the IURC seeking approval for a revenue increase of approximately $29 million. This rate case filing is required under Indiana TDSIC statutory requirements before the completion of Indiana South’s capital expenditure program, approved in 2014 for investments starting in 2014 through 2020. The revenue increase is based upon a requested ROE of 10.15% and an overall after-tax rate of return of 5.99% on total rate base of approximately $469 million. Indiana South has utilized a projected test year, reflecting its 2021 budget as the basis for the revenue increase requested and proposes to implement rates in two phases. On April 23, 2021, a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement was filed resolving all issues in the case. The settlement recommended a revenue increase of $21 million based on a 9.7% ROE and an overall after-tax rate of return of 5.78% on total rate base of approximately $469 million. A settlement hearing was held on June 24, 2021. On October 6, 2021, the IURC issued an order approving the settlement. Phase one rates, reflecting actual plant-in-service and cost of capital through June 2021, became effective in October 2021 and phase two rates, reflecting actual plant-in-service and cost of capital through December 2021 with certain adjustments, will become effective in March 2022.
Indiana North Base Rate Case (CenterPoint Energy)
On December 18, 2020, Indiana North filed its base rate case with the IURC seeking approval for a revenue increase of approximately $21 million. This rate case filing is required under Indiana TDSIC statutory requirements before the completion of Indiana North’s capital expenditure program, approved in 2014 for investments starting in 2014 through 2020. The revenue increase is based upon a requested ROE of 10.15% and an overall after-tax rate of return of 6.32% on total rate base of approximately $1,611 million. Indiana North has utilized a projected test year, reflecting its 2021 budget as the basis for the revenue increase requested and proposes to implement rates in two phases. On June 25, 2021, a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement was filed resolving all issues in the case. The settlement recommended a revenue decrease of $6 million based on a 9.8% ROE and an overall after-tax rate of return of 6.16% on total rate base of approximately $1,611 million. A settlement hearing was held August 6, 2021. On November 17, 2021, the IURC issued an order approving the settlement. Phase one rates, reflecting actual plant-in-service and cost of capital through June 2021, became effective in November 2021 and phase two rates, reflecting actual plant-in-service and cost of capital through December 2021 with certain adjustments, will become effective in March 2022.
61
Bailey to Jones Creek Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
In April 2017, Houston Electric submitted a proposal to ERCOT requesting its endorsement of the Freeport Area Master Plan, which included the Bailey to Jones Creek Project. On November 21, 2019, the PUCT issued its final approval of Houston Electric’s certificate of convenience and necessity application, based on an unopposed settlement agreement under which Houston Electric would construct the project at an estimated cost of approximately $483 million. Houston Electric commenced pre-construction activities on the project in 2019, began construction in 2021, and completed construction and energized the line ahead of schedule in November 2021. Certain residual clean-up activities will continue in 2022.
Space City Solar Transmission Interconnection Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
On December 17, 2020, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 345 kV transmission line in Wharton County, Texas connecting the Hillje substation on Houston Electric’s transmission system to the planned 610 MW Space City Solar Generation facility being developed by third-party developer EDF Renewables. Depending on the route ultimately approved by the PUCT, the estimated capital cost of the transmission line project ranges from approximately $23 million to $71 million. The actual capital costs of the project will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors in addition to route selection. In January 2021, Houston Electric executed a Standard Generation Interconnection Agreement for the Space City Solar Generation facility with EDF Renewables, which also provided security for the transmission line project in the form of a $23 million letter of credit, the amount of which is subject to change depending on the route approved. A hearing at the PUCT was held on June 28, 2021. On September 1, 2021, the administrative law judge issued a proposal for decision recommending a route that costs $25 million. The PUCT approved the proposal for decision at the November 18, 2021 open meeting and issued a final order on January 12, 2022. Houston Electric expects to complete construction and energization of the transmission line by the end of 2022.
Texas Legislation (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
In addition to the legislative activity discussed above, the Texas legislature enacted the following in 2021:
•Senate Bill 2 reforms the ERCOT board to be comprised of a total of eleven directors: three ex officio representatives, and eight members who are unaffiliated with any market participants. The three ex officio directors—the ERCOT CEO, the Public Counsel of the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and the PUCT Chair—serve on the board by virtue of their official position for as long as they hold that position. Two members are non-voting directors: the ERCOT CEO and the PUCT Chair. The other nine members are voting directors. The ERCOT board is currently comprised of the following members: Mr. Paul Foster (Chairman of ERCOT board), Mr. William Flores (Vice Chairman of ERCOT board), Mr. Carlos Aguilar, Mr. Zin Smati, Mr. John Swainson, Mr. Robert Flexon, Ms. Julie England, Ms. Peggy Heeg, Mr. Peter Lake (PUCT Chairman), Mr. Brad Jones (ERCOT Interim President & CEO), and Mr. Chris Ekoh (Public Counsel of the Office of Public Utility Counsel).
•Senate Bill 3 establishes weatherization and other power grid requirements including the design and operation of a load management program for nonresidential customers during an energy emergency activation level 2 or higher event and the ability to recover the reasonable and necessary costs of the program.
•Senate Bill 415 allows a TDU to seek prior PUCT approval to contract with a power generation company for a PUCT assigned proportional share of electric energy storage system at the distribution level and recover certain costs and a reasonable return on contract payments if contract terms satisfy relevant accounting standards for a capital lease or finance lease.
•House Bill 2483 allows a TDU to procure, own and operate, or jointly own with another TDU, transmission and distribution facilities with a lead time of at least six months that would aid in restoring power to the utility's distribution customers following a widespread outage, excluding storage equipment or facilities. Reasonable and necessary costs can be recovered using the rate of return on investment from the most recent base rate proceeding. Recovery of incremental operation and maintenance expenses and any return not recovered in a rate proceeding can be deferred until a future ratemaking proceeding. Additionally, a TDU may lease and operate facilities that provide temporary emergency electric energy to aid in restoring power to the utility’s distribution customers during a widespread power outage. Leasing and operating costs can be recovered using the utility’s rate of return from the most recent base rate proceeding and incremental operation and maintenance expenses can be deferred. The lease must be treated as a capital lease or finance lease for ratemaking purposes.
•Senate Bill 1281 removes the requirement for an electric utility to amend its CCN to construct a transmission line that connects existing transmission facilities to a substation or metering point if certain conditions are met and adds a customer benefit test into consideration. The bill also requires ERCOT to conduct biennial assessments of grid reliability in extreme weather scenarios.
62
Houston Electric continues to review the effects of the legislation and is working with the PUCT regarding proposed rulemakings and pursuing implementation of these items where applicable. For example, in 2021 Houston Electric entered into two leases for mobile generation: (1) a temporary short-term lease initially for 125 MW that expanded to 220 MW by December 31, 2021 and (2) a 7.5 year lease for up to 505 MW of mobile generation of which 125 MW was delivered as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric intends to seek recovery in its DCRF of deferred costs and the applicable return under these lease agreements, approximating $200 million. These mobile generation leases will support resiliency in major weather events and were deployed during the restoration process for Hurricane Nicholas. See Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
In addition to these measures taken by Houston Electric to support system preparedness and reliability, the City of Houston recently launched the first-of-its-kind long-term strategic power resilience initiative called “Resilient Now.” In a joint effort, Houston Electric is working with the City of Houston to develop the Master Energy Plan for the city to help the community thrive through economic changes, digital transformation, and advancing environmental goals for the benefit of its communities. The Master Energy Plan could develop into capital opportunities for Houston Electric, including relating to infrastructure modernization, residential weatherization, and investments around electric vehicles infrastructure.
Minnesota Base Rate Cases (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
On October 28, 2019, CERC filed a general rate case with the MPUC seeking approval for a revenue increase of approximately $62 million with a projected test year ended December 31, 2020. The revenue increase is based upon a requested ROE of 10.15% and an overall after-tax rate of return of 7.41% on a total rate base of approximately $1,307 million. CERC implemented interim rates reflecting $53 million for natural gas used on and after January 1, 2020. In September 2020, a settlement that addressed all issues except the Inclusive Financing/TOB Financing proposal by the City of Minneapolis was signed by a majority of all parties and was filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. A stipulation between the City of Minneapolis and CERC addressing the TOB proposal was filed on September 2, 2020. The settlement reflects a $39 million increase and was based on an overall after-tax rate of return of 6.86% and does not specify individual cost of capital components. On March 1, 2021, the MPUC issued a written final order approving the $39 million increase and rejected the TOB stipulation. The order also required CERC and the City of Minneapolis to submit a future filing to allow for further development of a potential TOB pilot program and additional or expanded low-income conservation improvement programs. A compliance filing was submitted on March 12, 2021 proposing a final rate implementation on June 1, 2021 and the interim refund occurring in June 2021, contingent on final MPUC approval. Pursuant to MPUC approval, final rates were implemented on June 1, 2021 and the interim rate refunds were applied to customer accounts starting on June 12, 2021.
On November 1, 2021, CERC filed a general rate case with the MPUC seeking approval for a revenue increase of approximately $67 million with a projected test year ended December 31, 2022. The revenue increase is based upon a requested ROE of 10.2% and an overall rate of return of 7.06% on a total rate base of approximately $1.8 billion. CERC requested that an interim rate increase of approximately $52 million be implemented January 1, 2022 while the rate case is litigated. An alternative request was also filed on November 1, 2021. The alternative request proposed a final rate increase of $40 million that would be implemented in the rate case on January 1, 2022, and offered: an increase in rates for plant investment only using the overall rate of return approved in the prior rate case, an asymmetrical capital true-up, extension of the recovery of gas costs incurred to serve customers in February 2021 from the then current 27 month mechanism to 63 months, an income tax rider, continuation of the existing property tax rider and continued deferral of COVID-19 incremental costs along with additional adjustments. On December 30, 2021, the MPUC issued a written order denying the alternative request but extended the amortization period for extraordinary gas costs to 63-months beginning on January 1, 2022. The MPUC also issued written orders on the general rate case filing which (1) accepted CERC’s rate-increase application with a time for final determination of September 1, 2022, (2) authorized the implementation of interim rates on January 1, 2022, of $42 million based on an overall rate of return of 6.46%, and (3) referred the case to the Office of Administrative Hearings for a contested case proceeding. A procedural schedule has been set with intervenor testimony that was due on February 7, 2022, rebuttal testimony due on March 7, 2022, surrebuttal testimony due March 30, 2022, a hearing scheduled April 6, 2022 through April 8, 2022, the administrative law judge to issue a report on July 12, 2022 and the MPUC to issue an order in October 2022.
Minnesota Legislation (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
The Natural Gas Innovation Act was passed by the Minnesota legislature in June 2021 with bipartisan support. This law establishes a regulatory framework to enable the state’s investor-owned natural gas utilities to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and advancing the
63
state’s clean energy future. Specifically, the Natural Gas Innovation Act allows a natural gas utility to submit an innovation plan for approval by the MPUC which could propose the use of renewable energy resources and innovative technologies such as:
•renewable natural gas (produces energy from organic materials such as wastewater, agricultural manure, food waste, agricultural or forest waste);
•renewable hydrogen gas (produces energy from water through electrolysis with renewable electricity such as solar);
•energy efficiency measures (avoids energy consumption in excess of the utility’s existing conservation programs); and
•innovative technologies (reduces or avoids greenhouse gas emissions using technologies such as carbon capture).
CERC expects to submit its first innovation plan to the MPUC in 2022. The maximum allowable cost for an innovation plan will start at 1.75% of the utility's revenue in the state and could increase to 4% by 2033, subject to review and approval by the MPUC.
Rate Change Applications
The Registrants are routinely involved in rate change applications before state regulatory authorities. Those applications include general rate cases, where the entire cost of service of the utility is assessed and reset. In addition, Houston Electric is periodically involved in proceedings to adjust its capital tracking mechanisms (TCOS and DCRF) and annually files to adjust its EECRF. CERC is periodically involved in proceedings to adjust its capital tracking mechanisms in Texas (GRIP), its cost of service adjustments in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Oklahoma (FRP, RSP, RRA and PBRC, respectively), its decoupling mechanism in Minnesota, and its energy efficiency cost trackers in Arkansas, Minnesota, Mississippi and Oklahoma (EECR, CIP, EECR and EECR, respectively). CenterPoint Energy is periodically involved in proceedings to adjust its capital tracking mechanisms in Indiana (CSIA for gas and TDSIC for electric) and Ohio (DRR), its decoupling mechanism in Indiana (SRC for gas), and its energy efficiency cost trackers in Indiana (EEFC for gas and DSMA for electric) and Ohio (EEFR). The table below reflects significant applications pending or completed since the Registrants’ combined 2020 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC.
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric (PUCT) | ||||||||||
| TCOS (1) | 64 | February 2022 | TBD | TBD | Based on net change of invested capital of $574 million. | |||||
| TCOS | 19 | August 2021 | October 2021 | October 2021 | Based on net change of invested capital of $166 million. | |||||
| EECRF | 22 | June 2021 | March 2022 | November 2021 | The requested $63 million is comprised of the following: 2022 Program and Evaluation, Measurement and Verification costs of $38 million, 2020 under-recovery of $3 million including interest, and 2020 earned bonus of $22 million. A settlement was filed in September 2021 reducing the amount requested by $315 thousand and recommending 2022 Program and Evaluation, Measurement and Verification costs of $38 million, 2020 under-recovery of $3 million including interest, and 2020 earned bonus of $22 million. | |||||
| TCOS | 9 | March 2021 | April 2021 | April 2021 | Based on net change in invested capital of $80 million. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Arkansas (APSC) | ||||||||||
| FRP | (10) | April 2021 | October 2021 | September 2021 | Based on ROE of 9.50% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. Revenue decrease of $10.4 million based on prior test year true-up earned return on equity of 11.53%. The initial term of Rider FRP was terminated in September 2021. A petition for rehearing was filed on October 8, 2021. On October 14, 2021, as part of the settlement filed in the asset sale docket, CERC filed a motion to hold the petition for rehearing in abeyance pending closing of the asset sale. The APSC issued an order on October 15, 2021 granting the motion. Additionally, a request to extend the Rider FRP term for an additional five years was filed on May 5, 2021. On October 19, 2021, as part of the settlement filed in the asset sale docket, CERC filed a motion to hold this proceeding in abeyance and the APSC granted the motion on October 21, 2021. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Beaumont/East Texas, South Texas, Houston and Texas Coast (Railroad Commission) | ||||||||||
| GRIP | 28 | March 2021 | June 2021 | June 2021 | Based on net change in invested capital of $197 million. |
64
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Louisiana (LPSC) | ||||||||||
| RSP | 7 | September 2021 | December 2021 | December 2021 | Based on authorized ROE of 9.95% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. The North Louisiana decrease, with certain non-recurring true-up adjustments outside the earnings band, is a decrease of $1 million based on a test year ended June 2021 and adjusted earned ROE of 15.17%. The South Louisiana increase, with certain non-recurring true-up adjustments outside the earnings band, is an increase of $8 million based on a test year ended June 2021 and adjusted earned ROE of 1.93%. Per the 2020 RSP order, a request to extend the RSP for an additional three year term was filed in July 2021 and a hearing is scheduled for May 2022. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Minnesota (MPUC) | ||||||||||
| Rate Case (1) | 67 | November 2021 | TBD | TBD | See discussion above under Minnesota Base Rate Case. | |||||
| Decoupling (1) | N/A | September 2021 | September 2021 | TBD | Represents under-recovery of approximately $19 million recorded for and during the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, including an approximately $5 million adjustment related to the implementation of final rates from the general rate case filed in 2019. | |||||
| CIP Financial Incentive | 10 | May 2021 | December 2021 | October 2021 | CIP Financial Incentive based on 2020 activity. | |||||
| Decoupling | N/A | September 2020 | September 2020 | March 2021 | Represents under-recovery of approximately $2 million recorded for and during the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, including approximately $1 million related to the period July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. | |||||
| Rate Case | 39 | October 2019 | June 2021 | March 2021 | See discussion above under Minnesota Base Rate Case. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Mississippi (MPSC) | ||||||||||
| RRA | 3 | April 2021 | September 2021 | September 2021 | Based on ROE of 9.81% with 100 basis point (+/-) earnings band. Revenue increase of approximately $3 million based on 2020 test year adjusted earned ROE of 7.49%. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy and CERC - Oklahoma (OCC) | ||||||||||
| PBRC | (1) | March 2021 | August 2021 | August 2021 | Based on ROE of 10% with 50 basis point (+/-) earnings band. Revenue credit of approximately $1 million based on 2020 test year adjusted earned ROE of 12.42%. A settlement was filed in June 2021 with a hearing held on July 1, 2021. OCC approved revenue credit of approximately $1 million on August 6, 2021. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana South - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | (1) | April 2021 | July 2021 | July 2021 | Requested an increase of $11 million to rate base, which reflects a $(1 million) annual decrease in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes refunds associated with the TCJA, resulting in no change to the previous credit provided, and a change in the total (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million annually. | |||||
| Rate Case | 21 | October 2020 | October 2021 | October 2021 | See discussion above under Indiana South Base Rate Case. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana North - Gas (IURC) | ||||||||||
| CSIA | 5 | April 2021 | July 2021 | July 2021 | Requested an increase of $37 million to rate base, which reflects a $5 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until the next rate case. The mechanism also includes refunds associated with the TCJA, resulting in no change to the previous credit provided, and a change in the total (over)/under-recovery variance of $6 million annually. | |||||
| Rate Case | 21 | December 2020 | November 2021 | November 2021 | See discussion above under Indiana North Base Rate Case. | |||||
| CenterPoint Energy - Ohio (PUCO) | ||||||||||
| DRR | 9 | April 2021 | September 2021 | September 2021 | Requested an increase of $71 million to rate base for investments made in 2020, which reflects a $9 million annual increase in current revenues. A change in (over)/under-recovery variance of $5 million annually is also included in rates. |
65
| Mechanism | Annual Increase (Decrease) (1)(in millions) | Filing Date | Effective Date | Approval Date | Additional Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy - Indiana Electric (IURC) | ||||||||||
| TDSIC (1) | 3 | February 2022 | TBD | TBD | Requested an increase of $42 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million. | |||||
| CECA (1) | (2) | February 2022 | TBD | TBD | Requested a decrease of less than $1 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual decrease in current revenues. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million. This mechanism includes a non-traditional rate making approach related to a 50 MW universal solar array placed in service in January 2021. | |||||
| TDSIC | 3 | August 2021 | November 2021 | November 2021 | Requested an increase of $35 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million. | |||||
| ECA | 2 | May 2021 | September 2021 | September 2021 | Requested an increase of $39 million to rate base, which reflects a $2 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also included a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million annually. | |||||
| TDSIC | 3 | February 2021 | May 2021 | May 2021 | Requested an increase of $28 million to rate base, which reflects a $3 million annual increase in current revenues. 80% of the revenue requirement is included in requested rate increase and 20% is deferred until next rate case. The mechanism also includes a change in (over)/under-recovery variance of less than $1 million. | |||||
| CECA | 8 | February 2021 | June 2021 | May 2021 | Reflects an $8 million annual increase in current revenues through a non-traditional rate making approach related to a 50 MW universal solar array placed in service in January 2021. |
(1)Represents proposed increases (decreases) when effective date and/or approval date is not yet determined. Approved rates could differ materially from proposed rates.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation and Compliance (CenterPoint Energy)
On August 3, 2015, the EPA released its CPP rule, which required a 32% reduction in carbon emissions from 2005 levels. The final rule was published in the Federal Register on October 23, 2015, and that action was immediately followed by litigation ultimately resulting in the U.S. Supreme Court staying implementation of the rule. On July 8, 2019, the EPA published the ACE rule, which (i) repealed the CPP rule; (ii) replaced the CPP rule with a program that requires states to implement a program of energy efficiency improvement targets for individual coal-fired electric generating units; and (iii) amended the implementing regulations for Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. On January 19, 2021, the majority of the ACE rule — including the CPP repeal, CPP replacement, and the timing-related portions of the Section 111(d) implementing rule — was struck down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and on October 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider four petitions filed by various coal interests and a coalition of 19 states that seek review of the lower court’s decision vacating the ACE rule. CenterPoint Energy is currently unable to predict what a replacement rule for either the ACE rule or CPP would require.
The Biden administration recommitted the United States to the Paris Agreement, which can be expected to drive a renewed regulatory push to require further GHG emission reductions from the energy sector and proceeded to lead negotiations at the global climate conference in Glasgow, Scotland. On April 22, 2021, President Biden announced new goals of 50% reduction of economy-wide GHG emissions, and 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035, which formed the basis of the US commitments announced in Glasgow. In September 2021, CenterPoint Energy announced its new net zero emissions goals for both Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2035 as well as a goal to reduce Scope 3 emissions by 20% to 30% by 2035. Because Texas is an unregulated market, CenterPoint Energy’s Scope 2 estimates do not take into account Texas electric transmission and distribution assets in the line loss calculation and exclude emissions related to purchased power in Indiana between 2024 and 2026 as estimated. CenterPoint Energy’s Scope 3 estimates do not take into account the emissions of transport customers and emissions related to upstream extraction. These emission goals are expected to be used to position CenterPoint Energy to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements from the current and future administrations to further reduce GHG
66
emissions. CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s revenues, operating costs and capital requirements could be adversely affected as a result of any regulatory action that would require installation of new control technologies or a modification of their operations or would have the effect of reducing the consumption of natural gas. For more information regarding CenterPoint Energy’s new net zero emission goals and the risks associated with them, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Our Businesses — CenterPoint Energy is subject to operational and financial risks...” In addition, the EPA has indicated that it intends to implement new regulations targeting reductions in methane emissions, which are likely to increase costs related to production, transmission and storage of natural gas. Houston Electric, in contrast to some electric utilities including Indiana Electric, does not generate electricity, other than leasing facilities that provide temporary emergency electric energy to aid in restoring power to distribution customers during certain widespread power outages as allowed by a new law enacted after the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, and thus is not directly exposed to the risk of high capital costs and regulatory uncertainties that face electric utilities that burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. CenterPoint Energy’s new net zero emissions goals are aligned with Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan and are expected to position Indiana Electric to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements related to GHG emissions reductions. Nevertheless, Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s revenues could be adversely affected to the extent any resulting regulatory action has the effect of reducing consumption of electricity by ultimate consumers within their respective service territories. Likewise, incentives to conserve energy or to use energy sources other than natural gas could result in a decrease in demand for the Registrants’ services. For example, Minnesota has enacted the Natural Gas Innovation Act that seeks to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions. Further, certain local government bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by certain specified dates. For example, Minneapolis has adopted carbon emission reduction goals in an effort to decrease reliance on fossil gas. Additionally, cities in Minnesota within CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas operational footprint are considering initiatives to eliminate natural gas use in buildings and focus on electrification. Also, Minnesota cities may consider seeking legislative authority for the ability to enact voluntary enhanced energy standards for all development projects. These initiatives could have a significant impact on CenterPoint Energy and its operations, and this impact could increase if other cities and jurisdictions in its service area enact similar initiatives. Further, our third party suppliers, vendors and partners may also be impacted by climate change laws and regulations, which could impact CenterPoint Energy’s business by, among other things, causing permitting and construction delays, project cancellations or increased project costs passed on to CenterPoint Energy. Conversely, regulatory actions that effectively promote the consumption of natural gas because of its lower emissions characteristics would be expected to benefit CenterPoint Energy and CERC and their natural gas-related businesses. At this time, however, we cannot quantify the magnitude of the impacts from possible new regulatory actions related to GHG emissions, either positive or negative, on the Registrants’ businesses.
Compliance costs and other effects associated with climate change, reductions in GHG emissions and obtaining renewable energy sources remain uncertain. Although the amount of compliance costs remains uncertain, any new regulation or legislation relating to climate change will likely result in an increase in compliance costs. While the requirements of a federal or state rule remain uncertain, CenterPoint Energy will continue to monitor regulatory activity regarding GHG emission standards that may affect its business. Currently, CenterPoint Energy does not purchase carbon credits. In connection with its net zero emissions goals, CenterPoint Energy is expected to purchase carbon credits in the future; however, CenterPoint Energy does not currently expect the number of credits, or cost for those credits, to be material.
Climate Change Trends and Uncertainties
As a result of increased awareness regarding climate change, coupled with adverse economic conditions, availability of alternative energy sources, including private solar, microturbines, fuel cells, energy-efficient buildings and energy storage devices, and new regulations restricting emissions, including potential regulations of methane emissions, some consumers and companies may use less energy, meet their own energy needs through alternative energy sources or avoid expansions of their facilities, including natural gas facilities, resulting in less demand for the Registrants’ services. As these technologies become a more cost-competitive option over time, whether through cost effectiveness or government incentives and subsidies, certain customers may choose to meet their own energy needs and subsequently decrease usage of the Registrants’ systems and services, which may result in, among other things, Indiana Electric’s generating facilities becoming less competitive and economical. Further, evolving investor sentiment related to the use of fossil fuels and initiatives to restrict continued production of fossil fuels have had significant impacts on CenterPoint Energy’s electric generation and natural gas businesses. For example, because Indiana Electric’s current generating facilities substantially rely on coal for their operations, certain financial institutions choose not to participate in CenterPoint Energy’s financing arrangements. Conversely, demand for the Registrants’ services may increase as a result of customer changes in response to climate change. For example, as the utilization of electric vehicles increases, demand for electricity may increase, resulting in increased usage of CenterPoint Energy’s systems and services. Any negative opinions with respect to CenterPoint Energy’s environmental practices or its ability to meet the
67
challenges posed by climate change formed by regulators, customers, investors, legislators or other stakeholders could harm its reputation.
To address these developments, CenterPoint Energy announced its new net zero emissions goals for both Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2035. In June of 2020, Indiana Electric identified a preferred generation resource in its most recent IRP submitted to the IURC that aligns with its new net zero emission goals and includes the replacement of 730 MW of coal-fired generation facilities with a significant portion comprised of renewables, including solar and wind, supported by dispatchable natural gas combustion turbines, including a pipeline to serve such natural gas generation, as well as storage. Additionally, as reflected in its 10-year capital plan announced in September 2021, CenterPoint Energy anticipates spending over $3 billion in clean energy investments and enablement, which may be used to support, among other things, renewable energy generation and electric vehicle expansion. CenterPoint Energy believes its planned investments in renewable energy generation and corresponding planned reduction in its GHG emissions as part of its newly adopted net zero emissions goals support global efforts to reduce the impacts of climate change. For more information regarding CenterPoint Energy’s new net zero emission goals and the risks associated with them, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Our Businesses — CenterPoint Energy is subject to operational and financial risks...”
To the extent climate changes result in warmer temperatures in the Registrants’ service territories, financial results from the Registrants’ businesses could be adversely impacted. For example, CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas could be adversely affected through lower natural gas sales. On the other hand, warmer temperatures in CenterPoint Energy’s and Houston Electric’s electric service territory may increase revenues from transmission and distribution and generation through increased demand for electricity used for cooling. Another possible result of climate change is more frequent and more severe weather events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes and flooding, including such storms as the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. Since many of the Registrants’ facilities are located along or near the Texas gulf coast, increased or more severe hurricanes or tornadoes could increase costs to repair damaged facilities and restore service to customers. CenterPoint Energy’s recently announced 10-year capital plan includes capital expenditures to maintain reliability and safety and increase resiliency of its systems as climate change may result in more frequent significant weather events. Houston Electric does not own or operate any electric generation facilities other than, since September 2021, leasing facilities that provide temporary emergency electric energy to aid in restoring power to distribution customers during certain widespread power outages as allowed by a new law enacted after the February 2021 Winter Storm Event. Houston Electric transmits and distributes to customers of REPs electric power that the REPs obtain from power generation facilities owned by third parties. To the extent adverse weather conditions affect the Registrants’ suppliers, results from their energy delivery businesses may suffer. For example, in Texas, the February 2021 Winter Storm Event caused an electricity generation shortage that was severely disruptive to Houston Electric’s service territory and the wholesale generation market and also caused a reduction in available natural gas capacity. When the Registrants cannot deliver electricity or natural gas to customers, or customers cannot receive services, the Registrants’ financial results can be impacted by lost revenues, and they generally must seek approval from regulators to recover restoration costs. To the extent the Registrants are unable to recover those costs, or if higher rates resulting from recovery of such costs result in reduced demand for services, the Registrants’ future financial results may be adversely impacted. Further, as the intensity and frequency of significant weather events continues, it may impact our ability to secure cost-efficient insurance.
Other Matters
Credit Facilities
The Registrants may draw on their respective revolving credit facilities from time to time to provide funds used for general corporate and limited liability company purposes, including to backstop CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s commercial paper programs. The facilities may also be utilized to obtain letters of credit. For further details related to the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, please see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Based on the consolidated debt to capitalization covenant in the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities, the Registrants would have been permitted to utilize the full capacity of such revolving credit facilities, which aggregated approximately $4 billion as of December 31, 2021.
68
As of February 15, 2022, the Registrants had the following revolving credit facilities and utilization of such facilities:
| Amount Utilized as of February 15, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Size of Facility | Loans | Letters of Credit | Commercial Paper | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Termination Date | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | $ | 2,400 | $ | — | $ | 11 | $ | 710 | 0.23% | February 4, 2024 | ||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy (1) | 400 | — | — | 264 | 0.22% | February 4, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Houston Electric | 300 | — | — | — | —% | February 4, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| CERC | 900 | — | — | 100 | 0.19% | February 4, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,000 | $ | — | $ | 11 | $ | 1,074 |
(1)The credit facility was issued by VUHI and is guaranteed by SIGECO, Indiana Gas and VEDO.
Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to customary terms and conditions. However, there is no requirement that the borrower makes representations prior to borrowing as to the absence of material adverse changes or litigation that could be expected to have a material adverse effect. Borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities are subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of events of default that we consider customary. The revolving credit facilities also provide for customary fees, including commitment fees, administrative agent fees, fees in respect of letters of credit and other fees. In each of the revolving credit facilities, the spread to LIBOR and the commitment fees fluctuate based on the borrower’s credit rating. Each of the Registrant’s credit facilities provide for a mechanism to replace LIBOR with possible alternative benchmarks upon certain benchmark replacement events. The borrowers are currently in compliance with the various business and financial covenants in the four revolving credit facilities.
Long-term Debt
For detailed information about the Registrants’ debt issuances in 2021, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Securities Registered with the SEC
On May 29, 2020, the Registrants filed a joint shelf registration statement with the SEC registering indeterminate principal amounts of Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds, CERC Corp.’s senior debt securities and CenterPoint Energy’s senior debt securities and junior subordinated debt securities and an indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock, shares of preferred stock, depositary shares, as well as stock purchase contracts and equity units. The joint shelf registration statement will expire on May 29, 2023. For information related to the Registrants’ debt and equity security issuances in 2021, see Notes 13 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Temporary Investments
As of February 15, 2022, the Registrants had no temporary investments.
Money Pool
The Registrants participate in a money pool through which they and certain of their subsidiaries can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net funding requirements of the CenterPoint Energy money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper. The net funding requirements of the CERC money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CERC’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CERC’s commercial paper. The money pool may not provide sufficient funds to meet the Registrants’ cash needs.
The table below summarizes CenterPoint Energy money pool activity by Registrant as of February 15, 2022:
| Weighted Average Interest Rate | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||
| Money pool investments | 0.22% | $ | (731) | $ | — |
69
Impact on Liquidity of a Downgrade in Credit Ratings
The interest rate on borrowings under the Registrants’ credit facilities is based on their respective credit ratings. As of February 15, 2022, Moody’s, S&P and Fitch had assigned the following credit ratings to senior debt of the Registrants:
| Moody’s | S&P | Fitch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registrant | Borrower/Instrument | Rating | Outlook (1) | Rating | Outlook (2) | Rating | Outlook (3) | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | CenterPoint Energy Senior Unsecured Debt | Baa2 | Stable | BBB | Stable | BBB | Stable | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Vectren Corp. Issuer Rating | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | VUHI Senior Unsecured Debt | A3 | Stable | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Indiana Gas Senior Unsecured Debt | n/a | n/a | BBB+ | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | SIGECO Senior Secured Debt | A1 | Stable | A | Stable | n/a | n/a | |||||||
| Houston Electric | Houston Electric Senior Secured Debt | A2 | Stable | A | Stable | A | Stable | |||||||
| CERC | CERC Corp. Senior Unsecured Debt | A3 | Stable | BBB+ | Stable | A- | Stable |
(1)A Moody’s rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an issuer’s rating over the medium term.
(2)An S&P outlook assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate to longer term.
(3)A Fitch rating outlook indicates the direction a rating is likely to move over a one- to two-year period.
The Registrants cannot assure that the ratings set forth above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. The Registrants note that these credit ratings are included for informational purposes and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the Registrants’ securities and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of the Registrants’ credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants’ ability to obtain short- and long-term financing, the cost of such financings and the execution of the Registrants’ commercial strategies.
A decline in credit ratings could increase borrowing costs under the Registrants’ revolving credit facilities. If the Registrants’ credit ratings had been downgraded one notch by S&P and Moody’s from the ratings that existed as of December 31, 2021, the impact on the borrowing costs under the four revolving credit facilities would have been insignificant. A decline in credit ratings would also increase the interest rate on long-term debt to be issued in the capital markets and could negatively impact the Registrants’ ability to complete capital market transactions and to access the commercial paper market. Additionally, a decline in credit ratings could increase cash collateral requirements and reduce earnings of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segments.
Pipeline tariffs and contracts typically provide that if the credit ratings of a shipper or the shipper’s guarantor drop below a threshold level, which is generally investment grade ratings from both Moody’s and S&P, cash or other collateral may be demanded from the shipper in an amount equal to the sum of three months’ charges for pipeline services plus the unrecouped cost of any lateral built for such shipper. If the credit ratings of CERC Corp. decline below the applicable threshold levels, CERC might need to provide cash or other collateral of as much as $213 million as of December 31, 2021. The amount of collateral will depend on seasonal variations in transportation levels.
ZENS and Securities Related to ZENS (CenterPoint Energy)
If CenterPoint Energy’s creditworthiness were to drop such that ZENS holders thought its liquidity was adversely affected or the market for the ZENS were to become illiquid, some ZENS holders might decide to exchange their ZENS for cash. Funds for the payment of cash upon exchange could be obtained from the sale of the shares of ZENS-Related Securities that CenterPoint Energy owns or from other sources. CenterPoint Energy owns shares of ZENS-Related Securities equal to approximately 100% of the reference shares used to calculate its obligation to the holders of the ZENS. ZENS exchanges result in a cash outflow because tax deferrals related to the ZENS and shares of ZENS-Related Securities would typically cease when ZENS are exchanged or otherwise retired and shares of ZENS-Related Securities are sold. The ultimate tax liability related to the ZENS and ZENS-Related Securities continues to increase by the amount of the tax benefit realized each year, and there could be a significant cash outflow when the taxes are paid as a result of the retirement or exchange of the ZENS. If all ZENS had been exchanged for cash on December 31, 2021, deferred taxes of approximately $539 million would have been payable in
70
2021. If all the ZENS-Related Securities had been sold on December 31, 2021, capital gains taxes of approximately $146 million would have been payable in 2021. For additional information about ZENS, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Cross Defaults
Under each of CenterPoint Energy’s (including VUHI’s), Houston Electric’s and CERC’s respective revolving credit facilities, a payment default on, or a non-payment default that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness for borrowed money and certain other specified types of obligations (including guarantees) exceeding $125 million by the borrower or any of their respective significant subsidiaries will cause a default under such borrower’s respective credit facility or term loan agreement. A default by CenterPoint Energy would not trigger a default under its subsidiaries’ debt instruments or revolving credit facilities.
Possible Acquisitions, Divestitures and Joint Ventures
From time to time, the Registrants consider the acquisition or the disposition of assets or businesses or possible joint ventures, strategic initiatives or other joint ownership arrangements with respect to assets or businesses. Any determination to take action in this regard will be based on market conditions and opportunities existing at the time, and accordingly, the timing, size or success of any efforts and the associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable. The Registrants may seek to fund all or part of any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or equity issuances. Debt or equity financing may not, however, be available to the Registrants at that time due to a variety of events, including, among others, maintenance of our credit ratings, industry conditions, general economic conditions, market conditions and market perceptions. As announced in September 2021, CenterPoint Energy plans to increase its planned capital expenditures in its Electric and Natural Gas businesses to support rate base growth and may explore asset sales in addition to the recently completed sale of its Natural Gas businesses located in Arkansas and Oklahoma as a means to efficiently finance a portion of such increased capital expenditures. On January 10, 2022, CERC Corp. completed the sale of its Arkansas and Oklahoma regulated natural gas LDC businesses. For further information, see Notes 4 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements.
On December 2, 2021, the Enable Merger closed and, as a result, CenterPoint Energy received Energy Transfer Common Units and Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units. Subsequent to the closing of the Enable Merger, in December 2021, CenterPoint Energy sold 150 million of the Energy Transfer Common Units (inclusive of the Energy Transfer Common Units sold pursuant to the Forward Sale Agreement) and half of the Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units it received in the Enable Merger. CenterPoint Energy has announced plans to dispose of all of its interests in Energy Transfer by the end of 2022. CenterPoint Energy may not realize any or all of the anticipated strategic, financial, operational or other benefits from any disposition or reduction of its investment in Energy Transfer. There can be no assurances that any further disposal of Energy Transfer Common Units or Energy Transfer Series G Preferred Units will be completed. Any disposal of such securities may involve significant costs and expenses, including in connection with any public offering, a significant underwriting discount. For information regarding the Enable Merger, see Notes 4, 11 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
Hedging of Interest Expense for Future Debt Issuances
From time to time, the Registrants may enter into interest rate agreements to hedge, in part, volatility in the U.S. treasury rates by reducing variability in cash flows related to interest payments. For further information, see Note 9(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
Weather Hedge (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)
CenterPoint Energy and CERC have historically entered into partial weather hedges for certain Natural Gas jurisdictions and electric operations’ Texas service territory to mitigate the impact of fluctuations from normal weather. CenterPoint Energy and CERC remain exposed to some weather risk as a result of the partial hedges. CenterPoint Energy and CERC did not enter into any weather hedges during the year ended December 31, 2021. For more information about weather hedges, see Note 9(a) to the consolidated financial statements.
Collection of Receivables from REPs (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Houston Electric’s receivables from the distribution of electricity are collected from REPs that supply the electricity Houston Electric distributes to their customers. Before conducting business, a REP must register with the PUCT and must meet certain financial qualifications. Nevertheless, adverse economic conditions, structural problems in the market served by ERCOT
71
or financial difficulties of one or more REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for Houston Electric’s services or could cause them to delay such payments. Houston Electric depends on these REPs to remit payments on a timely basis, and any delay or default in payment by REPs could adversely affect Houston Electric’s cash flows. In the event of a REP’s default, Houston Electric’s tariff provides a number of remedies, including the option for Houston Electric to request that the PUCT suspend or revoke the certification of the REP. Applicable regulatory provisions require that customers be shifted to another REP or a provider of last resort if a REP cannot make timely payments. However, Houston Electric remains at risk for payments related to services provided prior to the shift to the replacement REP or the provider of last resort. If a REP were unable to meet its obligations, it could consider, among various options, restructuring under the bankruptcy laws, in which event such REP might seek to avoid honoring its obligations and claims might be made against Houston Electric involving payments it had received from such REP. If a REP were to file for bankruptcy, Houston Electric may not be successful in recovering accrued receivables owed by such REP that are unpaid as of the date the REP filed for bankruptcy. However, PUCT regulations authorize utilities, such as Houston Electric, to defer bad debts resulting from defaults by REPs for recovery in future rate cases, subject to a review of reasonableness and necessity.
Other Factors that Could Affect Cash Requirements
In addition to the above factors, the Registrants’ liquidity and capital resources could also be negatively affected by:
•cash collateral requirements that could exist in connection with certain contracts, including weather hedging arrangements, and natural gas purchases, natural gas price and natural gas storage activities of CenterPoint Energy’s and CERC’s Natural Gas reportable segment;
•reductions in the cash distributions we receive from Energy Transfer;
•acceleration of payment dates on certain gas supply contracts, under certain circumstances, as a result of increased natural gas prices, and concentration of natural gas suppliers (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increased costs related to the acquisition of natural gas (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•increases in interest expense in connection with debt refinancings and borrowings under credit facilities or term loans or the use of alternative sources of financings due to the effects of COVID-19 on capital and other financial markets;
•various legislative or regulatory actions;
•incremental collateral, if any, that may be required due to regulation of derivatives (CenterPoint Energy);
•the ability of REPs, including REP affiliates of NRG and Vistra Energy Corp., to satisfy their obligations to CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric, including the negative impact on such ability related to COVID-19 and the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•slower customer payments and increased write-offs of receivables due to higher natural gas prices, changing economic conditions, COVID-19 or the February 2021 Winter Storm Event (CenterPoint Energy and CERC);
•the satisfaction of any obligations pursuant to guarantees;
•the outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the February 2021 Winter Storm Event;
•contributions to pension and postretirement benefit plans;
•restoration costs and revenue losses resulting from future natural disasters such as hurricanes and the timing of recovery of such restoration costs; and
•various other risks identified in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
Certain Contractual Limits on Our Ability to Issue Securities and Borrow Money
Certain provisions in certain note purchase agreements relating to debt issued by VUHI have the effect of restricting the amount of additional first mortgage bonds issued by SIGECO. Additionally, such note purchase agreements would restrict the securitization (as enabled by Senate Bill 386 as enacted by the State of Indiana) that CenterPoint Energy intends to seek in 2022 of remaining book value and removal costs associated with generating facilities to be retired by Indiana Electric. For information about the total debt to capitalization financial covenants in the Registrants’ and certain of CenterPoint Energy’s subsidiaries’ revolving credit facilities, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the presentation of the Registrants’ financial condition and results of operations and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex accounting estimates. An accounting estimate is an approximation made by management of a financial statement element, item or account in the financial statements. Accounting estimates in the Registrants’ historical consolidated financial statements measure the effects of past business transactions or events, or the present status of an asset or liability. The accounting estimates described below require the Registrants to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made. Additionally, different estimates that the Registrants could have used or changes in an accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur could
72
have a material impact on the presentation of their financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The circumstances that make these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex have to do with the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty. The Registrants base their estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments. These estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Registrants’ operating environment changes. The Registrants’ significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The Registrants believe the following accounting policies involve the application of critical accounting estimates. Accordingly, these accounting estimates have been reviewed and discussed with the Audit Committee of CenterPoint Energy’s Board of Directors.
Accounting for Rate Regulation
Accounting guidance for regulated operations provides that rate-regulated entities account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the recovery of those incurred costs in rates if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and if the competitive environment makes it probable that such rates can be charged and collected. CenterPoint Energy, for its Electric and Natural Gas reportable segments, Houston Electric and CERC apply this accounting guidance. Certain expenses and revenues subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the balance sheet as regulatory assets or liabilities and are recognized in income as the related amounts are included in service rates and recovered from or refunded to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are recorded when it is probable that these items will be recovered or reflected in future rates. Determining probability requires significant judgment on the part of management and includes, but is not limited to, consideration of testimony presented in regulatory hearings, proposed regulatory decisions, final regulatory orders and the strength or status of applications for rehearing or state court appeals. If events were to occur that would make the recovery of these assets and liabilities no longer probable, the Registrants would be required to write off or write down these regulatory assets and liabilities. For further detail on the Registrants’ regulatory assets and liabilities, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Including Identifiable Intangibles, Goodwill, and Equity Method Investments
The Registrants review the carrying value of long-lived assets, including identifiable intangibles, goodwill, equity method investments, and investments without a readily determinable fair value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable, and at least annually, goodwill is tested for impairment as required by accounting guidance for goodwill and other intangible assets. Unforeseen events, changes in market conditions, and probable regulatory disallowances, where applicable, could have a material effect on the value of long-lived assets, including intangibles, goodwill, equity method investments, and investments without a readily determinable fair value due to changes in observable or estimated market value, future cash flows, interest rate, and regulatory matters could result in an impairment charge. The Registrants recorded no impairments to long-lived assets, including intangibles, goodwill, or equity method investments during 2021 and 2019. During 2020, CenterPoint Energy recognized equity method investment impairment losses as discussed further in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements and goodwill impairment losses as discussed further in Notes 6 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
Fair value is the amount at which an asset, liability or business could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices or valuations by third parties, present value techniques based on estimates of cash flows, or multiples of earnings or revenue performance measures. The fair value could be different using different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques.
Fair value measurements require significant judgment and unobservable inputs, including (i) projected timing and amount of future cash flows, which factor in planned growth initiatives, (ii) the regulatory environment, as applicable, and (iii) discount rates reflecting risk inherent in the future market prices. Determining the discount rates for the non-rate regulated businesses requires the estimation of the appropriate company specific risk premiums for those non-rate regulated businesses based on evaluation of industry and entity-specific risks, which includes expectations about future market or economic conditions existing on the date of the impairment test. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on results of the impairment tests.
Annual goodwill impairment test
CenterPoint Energy and CERC completed their 2021 annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 2021 and determined, based on an income approach or a weighted combination of income and market approaches, that no goodwill
73
impairment charge was required for any reporting unit. The fair values of each reporting unit significantly exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit.
Although no goodwill impairment resulted from the 2021 annual test, an interim goodwill impairment test could be triggered by the following: actual earnings results that are materially lower than expected, significant adverse changes in the operating environment, an increase in the discount rate, changes in other key assumptions which require judgment and are forward looking in nature, if CenterPoint Energy’s market capitalization falls below book value for an extended period of time, or events affecting a reporting unit such as a contemplated disposal of all or part of a reporting unit.
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Generally, a long-lived asset to be sold is classified as held for sale in the period in which management, with approval from the Board of Directors, as applicable, commits to a plan to sell, and a sale is expected to be completed within one year. The Registrants record assets and liabilities held for sale, or the disposal group, at the lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value less cost to sell. If a disposal group reflects a component of a reporting unit and meets the definition of a business, the goodwill within that reporting unit is allocated to the disposal group based on the relative fair value of the components representing a business that will be retained and disposed. Goodwill is not allocated to a portion of a reporting unit that does not meet the definition of a business. A disposal group that meets the held for sale criteria and also represents a strategic shift to the Registrant is also reflected as discontinued operations on the Statements of Consolidated Income, and prior periods are recast to reflect the earnings or losses from such businesses as income from discontinued operations, net of tax.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, as described further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, certain assets and liabilities representing a business met the held for sale criteria. As a result, goodwill attributable to the natural gas reporting unit of $398 million and $144 million at CenterPoint Energy and CERC, respectively, was deemed attributable to assets held for sale as of December 31, 2021. Neither CenterPoint Energy nor CERC recognized any gains or losses upon classification of held for sale, including impairments of goodwill, during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Fair value is the amount at which an asset, liability or business could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices, present value techniques based on estimates of cash flows, or multiples of earnings or revenue performance measures. The fair value could be different if different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques were applied.
Fair value measurements require significant judgment and often unobservable inputs, including (i) projected timing and amount of future cash flows, which factor in planned growth initiatives, (ii) the regulatory environment, as applicable, and (iii) discount rates reflecting risk inherent in the future market prices. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the resulting fair value.
CenterPoint Energy and CERC used a market approach consisting of the contractual sales price adjusted for estimated working capital and other contractual purchase price adjustments to determine fair value of the businesses classified as held for sale. The fair value of the retained businesses within the natural gas reporting unit was estimated based on a weighted combination of income and market approaches, consistent with the methodology used in the 2021 and 2020 annual goodwill impairment tests. A third-party valuation specialist was utilized to determine the key assumptions used in the estimate of fair value of the retained natural gas reporting unit as of December 31, 2021. The fair value of the retained natural gas reporting unit at CenterPoint Energy and CERC significantly exceeded the carrying value of the retained businesses within that reporting unit immediately after classifying the Arkansas and Oklahoma Natural Gas businesses as held for sale.
For further information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Unbilled Revenues
Revenues related to electricity delivery and natural gas sales and services are generally recognized upon delivery to customers. However, the determination of deliveries to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month either electronically through AMS meter communications or manual readings. At the end of each month, deliveries to non-AMS customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is estimated. Information regarding deliveries to AMS customers after the last billing is obtained from actual AMS meter usage data. Unbilled electricity delivery revenue is estimated each month based on actual AMS meter data, daily supply volumes and applicable rates. Unbilled natural gas sales are estimated based on estimated
74
purchased gas volumes, estimated lost and unaccounted for gas and tariffed rates in effect. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates.
Pension and Other Retirement Plans
CenterPoint Energy sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering all employees who meet eligibility requirements. CenterPoint Energy uses several statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events in calculating the expense and liability related to its plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases as estimated by management, within certain guidelines. In addition, CenterPoint Energy’s actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension and other retirement plans expense recorded. Please read “— Other Significant Matters — Pension Plans” for further discussion.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2(u) to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements that affect the Registrants.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT MATTERS
Pension Plans (CenterPoint Energy). As discussed in Note 8(b) to the consolidated financial statements, CenterPoint Energy maintains non-contributory qualified defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees. Employer contributions for the qualified plans are based on actuarial computations that establish the minimum contribution required under ERISA and the maximum deductible contribution for income tax purposes.
Under the terms of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans, it reserves the right to change, modify or terminate the plan. CenterPoint Energy’s funding policy is to review amounts annually and contribute an amount at least equal to the minimum contribution required under ERISA.
Additionally, CenterPoint Energy maintains unfunded non-qualified benefit restoration plans that allows participants to receive the benefits to which they would have been entitled under the non-contributory qualified pension plan except for the federally mandated limits on qualified plan benefits or on the level of compensation on which qualified plan benefits may be calculated.
CenterPoint Energy’s funding requirements and employer contributions for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | (in millions) | |||||||||
| Minimum funding requirements for qualified pension plans | $ | — | $ | 76 | $ | 86 | ||||
| Employer contributions to the qualified pension plans | 53 | 76 | 86 | |||||||
| Employer contributions to the non-qualified benefit restoration plans | 8 | 10 | 23 |
Although CenterPoint Energy’s minimum contribution requirement to the qualified pension plans in 2022 is zero, it expects to make contributions aggregating up to $50 million. CenterPoint Energy expects to make contributions aggregating approximately $7 million to the non-qualified benefit restoration plans in 2022.
Changes in pension obligations and assets may not be immediately recognized as pension expense in CenterPoint Energy’s Statements of Consolidated Income, but generally are recognized in future years over the remaining average service period of plan participants. As such, significant portions of pension expense recorded in any period may not reflect the actual level of benefit payments provided to plan participants.
As the sponsor of a plan, CenterPoint Energy is required to (a) recognize on its Consolidated Balance Sheet an asset for the plan’s over-funded status or a liability for the plan’s under-funded status, (b) measure a plan’s assets and obligations as of the
75
end of the fiscal year and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of the plans in the year that changes occur through adjustments to other comprehensive income and, when related to its rate-regulated utilities with recoverability of cost, to regulatory assets.
The projected benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $2.3 billion and $2.5 billion as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
As of December 31, 2021, the projected benefit obligation exceeded the market value of plan assets of CenterPoint Energy’s pension plans by $226 million. Changes in interest rates or the market values of the securities held by the plan during 2022 could materially, positively or negatively, change the funded status and affect the level of pension expense and required contributions.
Houston Electric and CERC participate in CenterPoint Energy’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans covering substantially all employees. Pension cost by Registrant were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | CenterPoint Energy | Houston Electric | CERC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension cost | $ | 69 | $ | 34 | $ | 27 | $ | 49 | $ | 19 | $ | 20 | $ | 93 | $ | 40 | $ | 35 |
The calculation of pension cost and related liabilities requires the use of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. Two of the most critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate.
As of December 31, 2021, CenterPoint Energy’s qualified pension plans had an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 5.00% rate, which is the same rate assumed as of December 31, 2020. The expected rate of return assumption was developed using the targeted asset allocation of our plans and the expected return for each asset class. CenterPoint Energy regularly reviews its actual asset allocation and periodically rebalances plan assets to reduce volatility and better match plan assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2021, the projected benefit obligation was calculated assuming a discount rate of 2.80%, which is 0.35% higher than the 2.45% discount rate assumed as of December 31, 2020. The discount rate was determined by reviewing yields on high-quality bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency and the expected duration of pension obligations specific to the characteristics of CenterPoint Energy’s plans.
CenterPoint Energy’s actuarially determined pension and other postemployment cost for 2021 and 2020 that is greater or less than the amounts being recovered through rates in the majority of Texas jurisdictions is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. Pension cost for 2022, including the nonqualified benefit restoration plan, is estimated to be $22 million before applicable regulatory deferrals and capitalization, based on an expected return on plan assets of 5.00% and a discount rate of 2.80% as of December 31, 2021. If the expected return assumption were lowered by 0.50% from 5.00% to 4.50%, 2022 pension cost would increase by approximately $10 million.
As of December 31, 2021, the pension plans projected benefit obligation, including the unfunded nonqualified pension plans, exceeded plan assets by $226 million. If the discount rate were lowered by 0.50% from 2.80% to 2.30%, the assumption change would increase CenterPoint Energy’s projected benefit obligation by approximately $118 million and decrease its 2022 pension cost by approximately $5 million. The expected reduction in pension cost due to the decrease in discount rate is a result of the expected correlation between the reduced interest rate and appreciation of fixed income assets in pension plans with significantly more fixed income instruments than equity instruments. In addition, the assumption change would impact CenterPoint Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets by increasing the regulatory asset recorded as of December 31, 2021 by $100 million and would result in a charge to comprehensive income in 2021 of $14 million, net of tax of $4 million, due to the increase in the projected benefit obligation.
Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the pension plans will impact CenterPoint Energy’s future pension expense and liabilities. CenterPoint Energy cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
76